Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Endomembrane Trafficking in Plants

Written By

Birsen Cevher-Keskin

Submitted: September 30th, 2019 Reviewed: February 6th, 2020 Published: April 9th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91642

Chapter metrics overview

767 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The functional organization of eukaryotic cells requires the exchange of proteins, lipids, and polysaccharides between membrane compartments through transport intermediates. Small GTPases largely control membrane traffic, which is essential for the survival of all eukaryotes. Transport from one compartment of this pathway to another is mediated by vesicular carriers, which are formed by the controlled assembly of coat protein complexes (COPs) on donor organelles. The activation of small GTPases is essential for vesicle formation from a donor membrane. In eukaryotic cells, small GTP-binding proteins comprise the largest family of signaling proteins. The ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (ARF1) and secretion-associated RAS superfamily 1 (SAR1) GTP-binding proteins are involved in the formation and budding of vesicles throughout plant endomembrane systems. ARF1 has been shown to play a critical role in coat protein complex I (COPI)-mediated retrograde trafficking in eukaryotic systems, whereas SAR1 GTPases are involved in intracellular coat protein complex II (COPII)-mediated protein trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus. The dysfunction of the endomembrane system can affect signal transduction, plant development, and defense. This chapter offers a summary of membrane trafficking system with an emphasis on the role of GTPases especially ARF1, SAR1, and RAB, their regulatory proteins, and interaction with endomembrane compartments. The vacuolar and endocytic trafficking are presented to enhance our understanding of plant development and immunity in plants.


  • GTPases
  • ARF1 (ADP-ribosylation factor 1)
  • SAR1 (secretion-associated RAS superfamily 1)
  • COPI (coat protein complex I)
  • COPII (coat protein complex II)
  • membrane traffic
  • clathrin

1. Introduction

Endomembrane trafficking plays a crucial role for maintaining fundamental cellular functions (signal transduction, cellular homeostasis, etc.) and in response to environmental stimuli. The membrane trafficking pathways start from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) then go through the Golgi apparatus to different destinations including vacuoles/lysosomes, endosomes, and the plasma membrane (PM) [1].

In plant cells the membrane trafficking system comprises three major trafficking pathways: the biosynthetic secretory pathway, the endocytic pathway, and the vacuolar transport pathway. (i) The biosynthetic secretory pathwaytransports newly synthesized proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane and/or the extracellular space. (ii) The endocytic pathwayfunctions in the recycling of PM-localized and extracellular factors between the PM and the endosomal compartments. (iii) The vacuolar transport pathwaydrives the transportation of newly synthesized protein to the vacuole (Figure 1) [3].

Figure 1.

The membrane trafficking pathways are grouped into three major categories: (i) the biosynthetic secretory pathway, (ii) the endocytic pathway, and (iii) the vacuolar transport pathway (modified from Inada and Ueda [2]).

Each trafficking pathway is mediated by the following steps: (i) budding of the transport vesicle from the donor membrane, which is mediated by ARF/SAR1 GTPase (and coat proteins in many cases); (ii) transport and targeting of the transport vesicle; (iii) tethering of the vesicle by tethering proteins under the regulation of RAB GTPase and fusion of the transport vesicle to the target membrane mediated by soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment protein receptors (SNARE); and (iv) recycling of the transport machinery components to the donor membrane (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

The general machinery of membrane trafficking. Each trafficking pathway is mediated by the following steps: (i) budding of the transport vesicle from the donor membrane, which is mediated by ARF/SAR1 GTPase (and coat proteins in many cases); (ii) transport and targeting of the transport vesicle; (iii) tethering of the vesicle by tethering proteins under the regulation of RAB GTPase and fusion of the transport vesicle to the target membrane mediated by SNARE proteins; and (iv) recycling of the transport machinery components to the donor membrane [2,4].

In eukaryotic cells, small GTP-binding proteins involve the largest family of signaling proteins. The activation of small GTP-binding proteins (GTPases) is essential for vesicle formation from a donor membrane. Four main subfamilies have been identified in plants: (i) ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)/secretion-associated RAS superfamily (SAR), (ii) RAB, (iii) Rho-like proteins in plants (ROP), and (iv) RAN[5, 6, 7]. Over the evolution of eukaryotic organisms, the conservation of GTPases explains their significance in cellular signaling processes [7, 8, 9]. Small GTPases serve as molecular switches that transduce signals by exchanging between the GTP- and GDP-bound conditions. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), GDP dissociation inhibitors (GDIs), and GTPase-activating proteins are regulators of small GTP-binding proteins.

GEFs activate small GTPases, which in turn interact with specific effectors to stimulate downstream pathways. GAPs trigger the intrinsic GTPase activity, thereby accelerating the inactivation of the GTPases’ regulatory activity. GEFs convert the GDP-bound inactive form of the GTPases to the GTP-bound active form by stimulating the dissociation of GDP from the GDP-bound form. In the “active” state, the GTP-bound GTPases interact with various downstream effector proteins that execute diverse cellular functions. GTPases are inactivated through either the intrinsic capability of the GTPase to hydrolyze GTP to GDP + Pi or an interaction with another protein group, the GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). These proteins catalyze the hydrolytic activity of GTPases, which then return to the inactive state GDP-bound state [6]. The improvement of fluorescent protein-labeled GTPases and cargo molecules has enhanced the assignment of subcellular locations for these proteins within the endomembrane system.

The traffic between organelles is bi-directional. (i) Starting at the ER and leading toward the destination organelles (the forward trafficking) is called anterograde transport, and (ii) the reverse pathway is called retrograde transport.


2. Membrane trafficking pathways

2.1 The biosynthetic secretory pathway

2.1.1 Anterograde transport (forward trafficking) ER-to-Golgi protein transport

The conventional trafficking pathway starts at the ER; protein synthesis and modification occurs and undergoes further modification [10]. Proteins leave the ER via COPII carriers to reach the Golgi. ER and Golgi compartments are closely associated with each other to ease the movement of cargo between them [11]. This ER-to-Golgi transport is termed “anterograde transport” and is mediated by COPII proteins, which are highly conserved in eukaryotes [12]. From the ER, synthesized proteins are exported to the cis-Golgi and are transported via Golgi stacks where protein modifications occur. Modified proteins are sorted into the extracellular space or storage and lytic organelles from the Golgi. In plants, proteins can also be sorted from the Golgi into the chloroplast [13].

The accumulation of secretory cargo, deformation of the membrane, and formation of transport vesicles are mediated by COPII. In mammalian cells and in most of the plant cell types, the ER and Golgi are in close proximity, and the COPII cycles on and off the ER with a fast turnover rate [14, 15]. COPII coat proteins are mostly distributed in the cytosol and concentrate at ERES that appear in association with motile Golgi stacks in plant cells. These proteins also accumulate in punctate structures that are not associated with the Golgi (Figure 2B).

The recruitment of COPII coat proteins involves SAR1 GTPase and its GDP/GTP exchange factor, SEC12 [16, 17]. The Arabidopsisgenome encodes five genes for SAR1, seven genes SEC23, three genes for SEC24, two genes SEC13, and two SEC31 isoforms [18].

The assembly of COPII occurs at distinct sites on ribosome-free transitional ER (tER) or ER exit sites (ERESs) [19]. The cytosolic GTPase SAR1 is activated by the ER membrane-associated GEF SEC12, and then SAR1 associates with the ER lipid bilayer membrane, and after the COPII coat composed of the SEC23-24 and SEC13-31 heterodimer complexes is recruited [20, 21, 22]. The cargo recruitment complex involving SEC23-24 and SAR1 sorts transport and ER resident proteins [23, 24]. The COPII coat includes four proteins, assembled as an internal receptor/cargo-binding dimer of SEC23 and SEC24 and an outer cage dimer of SEC31 and SEC13. SEC16 is important for ER protein export by recognizing the COPII assembly region at the ERES [25]. The cargo selection is achieved by the SEC23/SEC24-SAR1 complex (pre-budding complex) [26]. This complex recruits SEC13-SEC31, which offer the outer layer of the coat and manage membrane deformation to constitute COPII vesicles. The SEC16 and SED4 are the other additional proteins for the COPII assembly. SEC16 comprises COPII coat component domains and has an important role as a scaffold for coat assembly [27]. SEC16 is a key organizer of ERESs in yeast and mammalian cells [28, 29]. The two encoded from ArabidopsisSEC16 genes resemble the human small isoform, and it was shown that they are important for ER export and tER organization in HeLa cells [29].

COPII is also involved in the physical deformation of the ER membrane that drives the COPII carrier formation [30]. SAR1-mediated GTP hydrolysis leads to COPII carrier un-coating and follows the exposure of the carrier membrane to fusion with the Golgi membrane [31].

In the GTP-bound conformation, SAR1 protein binds directly to the lipid bilayer which it does by an N-terminal amphipathic alpha-helix [32]. In the GDP-bound conformation, SAR1 binds membranes with lower affinity [25, 31].

The SED4 is responsible for the rate of ER-to-Golgi transport as an integral membrane protein at the ER membrane [32]. The deletion of SED4 causes to reduce the transportation rate of ER-to-Golgi in S. cerevisiaewild-type cells [33]. The SED4 and SEC12 have close homology with the cytoplasmic domain, but no GEF activity has been reported in S. cerevisiae[34].

It has been reported that SAR1 reduces the mechanical rigidity of the lipid bilayer membrane to which it binds in yeast [35]. Because of the ability of SAR1, it was suggested that membrane-bound SAR1-GTP decreases the energetic cost for the other COPII coat proteins (Sec13, Sec31, etc.) to generate curvature [35].

In Arabidopsis, three SAR1 homologs have been identified (AtSARA1a, AtSARA1b, and AtSARA1c). AtSARA1A and AtSARA1B have a 93% amino acid sequence identity [36]. The AtSARA1a expression level correlated with the secretion activity level from ER membranes. The AtSARA1a mRNA upregulation has been reported to cause the blockage of ER transport to the cis-Golgi compartment [37]. The COPII protein-encoding genes are ubiquitously expressed except SAR1 (At1g09180) and a SEC31 (At1g18830) isoform by microarray analyses [18]. Tissue specificity was observed for the SEC31 isoform At1g18830, while all other genes appear to be ubiquitously expressed in all tissues and developmental stages [18].

SAR1 accumulation was observed to concentrate predominantly in crude ER fractions of Pisum sativumL. seedlings [38]. The COPII protein coat recruitment by SAR1p has been intensively studied [39]. In human development and disease, the SEC24 and SAR1 isoforms have specificity for the trafficking of selective cargo [4041]. In plant cells, specific amino acid sequences in the primary proteins affect the selective export of membrane cargo [42]. Diacidic sequence induces the accumulation of SEC24A to ERESs. The interaction occurs between the K channel KAT1, which contains the specific amino acid sequence in the cytosolic tail, and SEC24A [43, 44].

Different export signals in SEC24 proteins might lead to selective accumulation of cargo in COPII carriers in mammalian and plant cells. It was suggested that more efficient intracellular trafficking is likely achieved by cargo specialization of COPII isoforms in multicellular organisms [45]. Figure 3 shows the basic diagram of the retrograde and anterograde transport in plant cells [47].

Figure 3.

Model of membrane trafficking to the vacuole in plant cells. The vacuolar trafficking pathway involves three trafficking routes inArabidopsis(i) depending on the sequential action of RAB5 and RAB7, (ii) AP-3-dependent but RAB5- and RAB7- independent pathway, and (iii) RAB5-dependent and AP-3-independent route (modified from Ebine et al. [46]).

The COPII machinery has significant importance for ER-to-Golgi transport in the early secretory pathway in plants [48]. The retention of secretory cargo molecules or membrane proteins that cycle between the ER and Golgi apparatus leads to blockage of the ER export [14, 43, 48]. COPII machinery is involved in biotic and abiotic stress responses in plants. It has been shown that functional SEC24A is essential for systemic turnip mosaic virus movement by interaction in a signal specific manner with the N-terminal domain 6-kDa viral protein 6 K [49]. In high-temperature conditions, overexpression of SEC31A has been reported in the IRE1 mutant which leads to improvement of the male sterility phenotype in Arabidopsis[50].

2.1.2 Retrograde transport (reverse trafficking) Retrograde transport and COPI

Of the 12 ARF isoforms, ARF1 is targeted to the Golgi and post-Golgi structures in plant cells. ArabidopsisARF1 has been shown to be involved in different trafficking pathways including ER-Golgi traffic, vacuolar trafficking, and endocytosis and/or recycling [51, 52]. Arfs are divided into three classes and express six isoforms, namely, Arf1 to Arf 6 (with Arf2 being absent in human) in the mammalian system.

ARF1 manages ER-to-Golgi transport and Golgi-derived transport to the plasma membrane, depending on the COPI vesicle coat protein components [53, 54]. A large number of ARF in plants suggest the possibility for highly regulated vesicle trafficking [53]. Similar to other small GTPases, ARF GTPases cycle between an active state, when associated with GTP (membrane-bound form), and an inactive state when bound to GDP (predominantly cytosolic form).

In its GDP form, ARF1 is present in the cytosol and is recruited to the surface of Golgi membranes by a GEF. A SEC7-type GEF stimulates the binding of GTP to ARF1. This progression can be inhibited by the fungal metabolite Brefeldin A (BFA) in mammalian cells [55]. In the same system, the GDP-bound form of ARF1 interacts with p24 cytosolic tails [56]. The cytosolic ARF1 activation initiates COPI biogenesis. The GTP-bound form of ARF1 interacts with coatomer, which can also interact directly with the p24 cytosolic tails. In this manner, the p24 cytosolic tail can interact both with ARF1 and coatomer [56]. The conformational change of ARF1 occurs by the GTP/GDP exchange that may cause its dissociation from p24 cytosolic tails [56].

COPI vesicles mediate different transport steps, including ER-to-Golgi intermediate compartment transport, Golgi transport, and/or intra-Golgi transport (anterograde transport and/or retrograde transport) [57, 58]. Two types of COPI-coated vesicles form containing anterograde or retrograde cargo (KDEL receptor), and low amounts of Golgi enzymes have been reported to exist at the Golgi apparatus level [59]. COPI proteins are involved in transport along the endocytic pathway [60]. During the selective transport of vesicles, the coat proteins must distinguish between cargo and resident proteins of the donor organelle. Arabidopsishas single genes for γ-COP and δ-COP and multiple genes for the other COPI subunits [61]. COPI coatomer forms a coat around vesicles budding from the Golgi. Two different sizes of COPI (COPIa and COPIb) vesicles have been identified by multiparameter electron tomography analysis in Arabidopsis[62]. COPIa coats are retrograde transport vesicles, and COPIb vesicles are restricted to medial- and trans-cisternae and are involved for retrograde transport within the Golgi stack. The multiple copies of COPI in plants suggest the presence of different classes of COPI vesicles. The protein complex COPI coatomer is composed of seven subunits (α, β, β’, γ, δ, ε, and ζ-COP). COPI represents approximately 0.2% of soluble cytosolic protein indicating their roles as unassembled precursors of COPI vesicles [63].

In intracellular transport, cargo transmembrane protein sorting at each step depends on the specific interaction of certain signals in their cytoplasmic tails with the correct coat proteins [64]. In yeast and mammalian cells, the cytosolic dilysine motif is essential for the ER localization of type I membrane proteins [65]. The two lysine residues must be in the −3, −4 (KKXX) or − 3, −5 (KXKXX) positions relative to the carboxy (C) terminus [65]. For ER localization, the lysine residue at the −3 position is the most critical residue [66]. In mammals, lysine residue mutations within the KKXX motif lead to the expression of reporter proteins at the cell surface [65]. In contrast, the same mutation leads to vacuolar transfer in yeast [67]. The p24 proteins have been suggested to function in Golgi-to-ER retrograde transport, as they contain cargo receptors on their luminal side and coatomer and/or ARF1 receptors on their cytoplasmic side in mammalian cells [68] COPI is necessary for recycling p24 proteins to the ER from the Golgi apparatus [69].

In general p24 proteins are only found in the ER. The binding of p24 proteins to COPI is mediated by dilysine motifs at the −3 and − 4 positions of p24 [69]. Up to 11 different p24 family members proteins have been identified in Arabidopsis. The p24 proteins appear to bind COPI with higher affinity than COPII. In the cytosolic tail of the Arabidopsisp24 (Atp24), the dilysine motif is important both for binding of coatomer subunits and ARF1 [70].

ARF1 has been shown to localize to Golgi and endosomes and regulate cell proliferation, cell elongation, and fertility, whereas ARF6 is associated with plasma membrane and important for actin remodeling and receptor endocytosis in plant cells [54]. The ARF6 overexpression was shown in breast cancer cells and also involved ERK signaling during invasion. On the other hand, the use of ARF1 protein as a prognostic marker for gastric cancer has been reported [71].

Low expression level of ARF1 (Q71L) mutant in tobacco mesophyll protoplasts has been reported to lead to wtp24 accumulation in the Golgi apparatus [69]. These studies verify the COPI-recycling mechanism can efficiently function in plants. COPI-binding dilysine motif-deficient p24 mutants are transported to the PVC and vacuole [69]. It was observed that p25 may function as an anchor for the p24 proteins in retrograde transport [69]. Intra-Golgi transport

Two different models for intra-Golgi transport were suggested: (i) vesicular transport and (ii) cisternal progression/maturation.

Between two different models, the direction of COPI vesicles is a critical distinguishing factor. (i) The vesicular transport modelassumes that anterograde cargo is transported between static cisternae by coordinated budding and fusion reactions of anterograde-directed COPI vesicles [72]. Retrograde-directed COPI vesicles antagonize the continuous loss of material at the trans-Golgi. Therefore, two different COPI vesicles are involved for this model, one mediating anterograde transport and the other mediating retrograde transport. (ii) In the cisternal progression/maturation model, Golgi cisternae are stable compartments. In anterograde COPII vesicles, secretory cargoes are transported from one cisterna to the next, which finally disassemble at the trans-Golgi. Anterograde cargo would not leave the lumen, and resident Golgi proteins are maintained in the cisternae [72].

The COPI vesicles contain Golgi enzymes at a concentration that is up to 10 times higher than that found in the cisternae in animal cells [73]. The cisternal progression/maturation model does not clarify the presence of anterograde cargo within COPI vesicles or different anterograde cargo transportation rates in animal cells [74].

The “cisternal progression/maturation” model is the most widely accepted model for distinct and essential trafficking tasks in the Golgi. The stack of Golgi cisternae involves the historical record of progression from entry at the cis-face to exit at the trans-face [75]. The cargo molecules stay within a given cisternae as it passes, across a regular of seven locations within the Golgi stack on its way to the trans-face, and exit from the Golgi by transport carriers. In the cisternal progression, the newly arrived cargo in the Golgi exited with exponential kinetics rather than exhibiting a discrete lag or transit time [76]. Conserved oligomeric Golgi (COG) complex proteins accelerate the tethering of the vesicles to the target cisternae [77]. Resident Golgi proteins are assumed to recycle from older to younger cisternae. In retrograde COPI vesicles, transmembrane Golgi proteins may recycle. Peripheral Golgi proteins may recycle by dissociating from a given cisternae and then bind and combine to a younger cisternae.

2.2 Vacuolar trafficking

Plants have a complex vacuolar transport system different from that of mammalian systems by assigning evolutionarily conserved machinery to unique trafficking pathways. These pathways provide a fundamental basis for plant development at the cellular and higher-ordered levels [78]. Plants have evolved unique and complex vacuolar trafficking pathways compared with non-plant systems (Figure 3) [46].

The diverse functions of plant vacuoles are fulfilled through tight regulation of trafficking to and from the vacuoles, which involves evolutionarily conserved machinery components including Rab GTPases [79]. However, the basic framework of the Rab GTPase action is well conserved in eukaryotic cells [80]. Recent comparative genomic studies suggest that each eukaryotic lineage has acquired a unique repertoire of Rab GTPases during evolution [81] Autophagy-related and Golgi-independent transport from the ER to the vacuole is another example of such trafficking pathway [82]. This pathway also involves an exocyst subcomplex, although Rab and SNARE molecules associated with this pathway have not been identified thus far.

2.2.1 RAB GTPases

RAB GTPases constitute the largest family of small GTPases; 57 members are encoded in the Arabidopsisgenome [83]. Based on their similarity to animal RAB GTPases, RAB GTPases are grouped into eight clades, i.e., RAB1/RABD, RAB2/RABB, RAB5/RABF, RAB6/RABH, RAB7/ RABG, RAB8/RABE, RAB11/RABA, and RAB18/RABC in angiosperms [84]. Plants also harbor a unique set of Rab GTPases partly characterized by diversification of the RAB5 group acting in endosomal/vacuolar trafficking pathways [85]. RAB7 is also proposed to regulate vacuolar traffic in plants [86]. In animal cells, a sequential action of RAB5 and RAB7 mediated by the effector complex HOPS [18] and a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RAB7 consisting of SAND1/Mon1 and CCZ1 is responsible for the maturation from early to late endosomal compartments (Figure 4) [86].

Figure 4.

RAB and the other proteins in intracellular trafficking (modified from Malaria Parasite Metabolic Pathways [47]).

Future studies on the molecular mechanisms of these plant-specific vacuolar trafficking pathways will reveal how plants have used unique vacuolar trafficking routes and how plants have developed their unique vacuolar trafficking pathways during evolution. The tethering of transport vesicles to the target membranes is mediated by the interaction between RAB GTPases and specific sets of tethering factors, many of which have been shown to be RAB effectors, which bind to specific RABs at the GTP-bound active state in yeast and animal systems [80]. After the tethering of transport vesicles by the tethering factors, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment protein receptors lead to the membrane fusion [80]. Tethering factors comprise long coiled-coil proteins and protein complexes called tethering complexes. Each tethering step is mediated by a specific tethering complexes such as COG (functioning in retrograde trafficking within the Golgi), HOPS-CORVET (tethering with the lysosome/vacuole), and exocyst (functioning in the last step of the secretory pathway). In plants, homologous genes encoding these tethering complex proteins are also found, whereas some fibrous coiled-coil proteins are not conserved [84].

2.3 The endocytic pathway

Endocytosis in plant cells has an essential role for basic cellular functions and communication with the environment. Through the formation of closed membrane vesicles (60–120 nm), the uptake of extracellular molecules or the internalization of plasma membrane lipids and proteins is achieved [37]. During the life cycle of the plant, endosomes have vital importance for different processes including lateral organ differentiation, hormone signal transduction, root hair formation, embryo patterning, and plant immunity [36, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92]. Transportation of various cargo molecules involved in a broad range of physiological processes from the plasma membrane into the cytoplasm is achieved by this pathway. Figure 5 shows the general organization of the endosomal trafficking system in plants [36].

Figure 5.

The general organization of the endosomal trafficking system in plants. Current models of retromer localization and function place the retromer recycling complex in the TGN, in the MVB, or both [36].

As in animal cells, endocytosis in plant cells is mediated by (i) clathrin-mediated(CME) and (ii) clathrin-independent pathways(CIE) [93].

2.3.1 Clathrin-mediated pathway

In plants, the major endocytic mechanism depends on the coat protein clathrin. This pathway starts at the plasma membrane by clathrin-coated vesicle formation. CME is important for different physiological processes involving cell signaling, cell adhesion, nutrient uptake, developmental regulation, etc. The pathway starts by clathrin-coated vesicle formation at the plasma membrane; in the cytosolic parts of different transmembrane cargo molecules, the clathrin coat binds to specific binding sites. The recruitment of the pioneer proteins to the plasma membrane is ensured by the cargo molecules and enhanced by the initiation of an endocytic pathway. Clathrin involved in a variety of other processes such as the salt stress response, the defense response, cryptogein-induced signaling, and cytokinesis [94, 95, 96]. Many viruses act as endocytic cargoes for the entry into the cell [97]. A large number of “coat-associated clathrin adaptor proteins” and “scaffold proteins” serve as cargo adaptors by interaction with specific cargoes. Short linear sequence motifs or covalent modifications such as phosphorylation or ubiquitylation in cargo proteins are important for cargo adaptor interactions [98]. Most cargo adaptors also interact directly with lipids and with other coat proteins. These complex interactions cause the initiation of clathrin coat assembly and its further expansion [99]. Binding of the clathrin coat proteins to the cytosolic sites of different transmembrane cargo molecules is essential for the cargo recruitment to the region of the plasma membrane that will form the vesicle.

Because of the difficulty of visualizing and manipulating, studies on cargo and lipids are very difficult [100]. The most widely studied one is the maintenance of polar localization of auxin transporters, namely, the PIN proteins. Polar localization of PIN proteins involves three steps: (i) nonpolar secretion, (ii) clathrin-dependent endocytosis, and (iii) polar recycling [91]. Dynamic regulation of PIN polarity provided with this mechanism is important in response to environmental and developmental stimuli [101, 102]. Mutations in Rab5 or clathrin cause endocytosis disruption and auxin-related developmental defects [91]. Endocytosis works as a negative feedback of the signaling process. After internalization, flagellin-sensitive 2 (FLS2) is targeted for degradation by ubiquitination which then terminates the signal transduction process [103, 104]. The polarly localized Arabidopsisboron transporter 1(BOR1), the tomato ethylene-inducing xylanse receptor (LeEIX2), and the iron transporter 1 (IRT1) are the other plasma membrane cargoes in plant cells [92, 105]. For accurate development and growth regulation, the equilibrium of cargo localization in the endomembrane system and the dynamic trafficking machinery is essential during the plant life cycle.

2.3.2 Clathrin-independent pathway

Several endocytic pathways that do not use clathrin-coated vesicles are involved in a CI pathway that was mediated by caveolae. Some of these pathways are constitutive, whereas others are activated by specific signals or by pathogens [106]. Furthermore, their mechanisms and kinetics of endocytic vesicle formation, associated molecular machinery, and cargo direction are different. Some members of the ARF and Rho subfamilies of small GTPases have been suggested to have key roles in regulating different pathways of CI endocytosis [107]. CI pathways are grouped in terms of those that use a “dynamin-mediated scission mechanism” (dynamin-dependent) and those that require other processes (dynamin-independent). A second characteristic is a contribution of small GTPases in several CI pathways [108].

2.4 The endomembrane system in plant development and plant defense

The dysfunction of the endomembrane system can affect plant development and signal transduction [109, 110]. The interaction between the actin cytoskeleton and the endomembrane system involves various aspects of plant cell function and development [111, 112, 113].

The actin cytoskeleton is involved for the dynamic feature of the ER [114]. Microtubules have been reported to also influence the mobility of the ER, but to a lesser degree or at a much slower rate [115]. ARF1 plays an essential role in normal cell growth, plant development, and cell polarity and is ubiquitously expressed in all organs of Arabidopsis[116, 117]. In de-etiolated pea shoots, ARF1 was concentrated mainly in the crude Golgi fractions [38]. Antisense RNA studies show that ARF also affects cell expansion and cell size in Arabidopsis[118]. BFA-visualized exocytic trafficking defective1 (BEX1) has been reported to require for recycling of PIN transporters and auxin-mediated development in Arabidopsis[52]. BEX1 encodes ARF1A1C which localizes to the TGN/EE and Golgi apparatus. For normal venation patterning, polar auxin transport by PIN1 is required [118, 119]. Vascular network defective 4 (VAN4) is required for cellular growth and venation development [120]. VAN4 encodes a putative TRS120 subunit of the TRAPPII complex protein that functions as a Rab-GEF and/or tethering factor [121]. VAN4 is involved in polar localization and the recycling of PIN proteins. VAN3/SFC, ARF-GAP, and VAN7/GNOM ARF-GEF have been reported to regulate venation pattern by regulating the activity of the ARF GTPase [122].

Another relation with endomembrane trafficking and plant development was revealed by the continuous vascular ring mutants (COV1). Parker et al. have reported that the COV1 mutant is involved in ectopic differentiation of vascular Arabidopsiscells [123]. Afterward, COV1 has been reported as a TGN-localized membrane protein that is required for Golgi morphology and vacuolar protein trafficking and for the development of myrosin cells in leaves [124].

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is important for the cytosolic and nuclear protein degradation, whereas certain proteins are degraded by autophagic degradation. De-ubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs) are essential for endosomal trafficking by affecting the fate of endocytosed cargo [125]. Endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) components are crucial for plant growth and development. Mutations of ESCRT or ESCRT-associated proteins in plants lead to ubiquitin accumulation, embryonic and seedling lethality, and misregulation of different signaling pathways, which can be associated with endosomal sorting defects in Arabidopsis[10, 126]. ESCRT mutations in Arabidopsiscause it to die at different developmental stages [127]. Under optimal growth conditions, autophagy seems to be unessential for plant life cycle. But a lack of autophagy can be the reason of the carcinogenesis and neurodegenerative diseases in the mammalian system [128].

Plants protect themselves with the help of small RNA-dependent immune system in response to biotic stress [129]. sRNAs are short regulatory RNAs (20–30 nucleotides) that silence genes with complementary sequences [130]. Against pathogens, several groups of plant sRNAs have important roles in plant defense. Plants send sRNAs in extracellular vesicles (exosomes) to the pathogen to silence virulence genes [130, 131, 132]. Host Arabidopsiscells have been shown to secrete exosome-like extracellular vesicles to deliver sRNAs into fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. These sRNA-containing vesicles accumulate at the infection sites of plant and are occupied up by the fungal cells. Transferred host sRNAs cause silencing of virulence-related genes critical for pathogenicity. Plant extracellular vesicles, mainly exosomes, have been reported to play a crucial role in cross-kingdom sRNA trafficking between Arabidopsisand the fungal pathogen B. cinerea[129].


3. Conclusions

The functional organization of eukaryotic cells requires the exchange of proteins, lipids, and polysaccharides between membrane compartments through transport intermediates. Transport from one compartment of this pathway to another is mediated by vesicular carriers, which are formed by the controlled assembly of coat protein complexes (COPs) on donor organelles. The plant endomembrane system is mostly conserved among eukaryotes but shows complex features. The structural organization of the endomembrane system is important for correct membrane trafficking and plant physiology. The trans-Golgi network (TGN) is a unique subcellular structure, which is a sorting center that integrates upstream cargoes from secretory vesicles, the plasma membrane, and other organelles. The TGN functions as an early endosome compartment, adding to the complexity of sorting mechanisms in plant cells. Protein sorting at the ER-Golgi interface is important for the protein defects. However, the specificity and quantity of cargo sorting control mechanisms between endosome compartments are not completely clarified. More comprehensive studies on endomembrane trafficking will be necessary for the illumination of development, disease responses, hormone signaling (ABA and auxin), and plant immune system via sRNAs in exosomes in plant cells.



This work was supported by grant to B. Cevher-Keskin from ICGEB (CRP/TUR09-03) and COST Action (CA16212)-TUBITAK 217O401. I’m grateful to Prof. Dr. Mahmut TOR for valuable suggestions and Faik Keskin for the preparation of the figures.


Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Morita MT, Shimada T. The plant endomembrane system-a complex network supporting plant development and physiology. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2014;55:667-671. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcu049
  2. 2. Inada N, Ueda T. Membrane trafficking pathways and their roles in plant–microbe interactions. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2014;55(4):672-686. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcu046
  3. 3. Ebine K, Inoue T, Ito J, Ito E, Uemura T, Goh T, et al. Plant vacuolar trafficking occurs through distinctly regulated pathways. Current Biology. 2014;24(12):1375-1382. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.004
  4. 4. Inada N, Ueda T. Membrane trafficking pathways and their roles in plant–microbe Interactions. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2014;55(4):672-686. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcu046
  5. 5. Kahn RA, Der CJ, Bokoch GM. The ras superfamily of GTP-binding proteins: Guidelines on nomenclature. The FASEB Journal. 1992;6:2512-2513. DOI: 10.1016/0166-6851(96)02579-0
  6. 6. Vernoud V, Horton AC, Yang Z, Nielsen E. Analysis of the small GTPase gene superfamily of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2003;131:1191-1208. DOI: 10.1104/pp.013052
  7. 7. Inoue H, Randazzo PA. Arf GAPs and their interacting proteins. Traffic. 2007;8:1465-1475. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00624.x
  8. 8. Bourne HR, Sanders DA, McCormick F. The GTPase superfamily: A conserved switch for diverse cell functions. Nature. 1990;348:125-132
  9. 9. Jekely G. Small GTPases and the evolution of the eukaryotic cell. BioEssays. 2003;25:1129-1138. DOI: 10.1002/bies.10353
  10. 10. Wang X, Chung KP, Lin W, Jiang L. Protein secretion in plants: Conventional and unconventional pathways and new techniques. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2017;69:21-38. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx435
  11. 11. Meritxell B, Cutrona MB, Beznoussenko GV, Fusella A, Martella O, Moral P, et al. Silencing of mammalian Sar1 isoforms reveals COPII-independent protein sorting and transport. Traffic. 2013;14(6):691-708. DOI: 10.1111/tra.12060
  12. 12. Villarejo A, Burén S, Larsson S, Déjardin A, Monné M, Rudhe C, et al. Evidence for a protein transported through the secretory pathway en route to the higher plant chloroplast. Nature Cell Biology. 2005;7:1224-1231. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1330
  13. 13. Cutrona MB, Beznoussenko GV, Fusella A, Martella O, Moral P, Mironov AA. Silencing of mammalian Sar1 isoforms reveals COPII-independent protein sorting and transport. Traffic. 2013;14:691-708. DOI: 10.1111/tra.12060
  14. 14. Ward TH, Brandizzi F. Dynamics of proteins in Golgi membranes: Comparisons between mammalian and plant cells highlighted by photobleaching techniques. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2004;61:172-185. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-003-3355-6
  15. 15. Kang BH, Staehelin LA. ER-to-Golgi transport by COPII vesicles in Arabidopsis involves a ribosome-excluding scaffold that is transferred with the vesicles to the Golgi matrix. Protoplasma. 2008;234:51-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00709-008-0015-6
  16. 16. Morishige M, Hashimoto S, Ogawa E, Toda Y, Kotani H, Hirose M, et al. GEP100 links epidermal growth factor receptor signalling to Arf6 activation to induce breast cancer invasion. Nature Cell Biology. 2008;10:85-92. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1672
  17. 17. Nakano A, Muramatsu M. A novel GTP-binding protein, Sar1p, is involved in transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1989;109:2677-2691. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.2677
  18. 18. Hanton SL, Chatre L, Matheson LA, Rossi M, Held MA, Brandizzi F. Plant Sar1 isoforms with near-identical protein sequences exhibit different localisations and effects on secretion. Plant Molecular Biology. 2008;67:283-294. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-008-9317-5
  19. 19. Orci L, Stamnes M, Ravazzola M, Amherdt M, Perrelet A, Söllner TH, et al. Bidirectional transport by distinct populations of COPI-coated vesicles. Cell. 1997;90:335-349
  20. 20. Stephens DJ, Pepperkok R. Illuminating the secretory pathway: When do we need vesicles? Journal of Cell Science. 2001;114:1053-1059
  21. 21. D’Enfert C, Wuestehube LJ, Lila T, Schekman R. Sec12p-dependent membrane binding of the small GTP-binding protein Sar1p promotes formation of transport vesicles from the ER. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1991;114:663-670. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.114.4.663
  22. 22. Miller EA, Barlowe C. Regulation of coat assembly-sorting things out at the ER. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2010;22:447-453. DOI: 10.1016/
  23. 23. Miller EA, Antonny B, Hamamoto S, Schekman R. Cargo selection into COPII vesicles is driven by the Sec24p subunit. The EMBO Journal. 2002;21:6105-6113. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdf605
  24. 24. Miller EA, Beilharz TH, Malkus PN, Lee MCS, Hamamoto S, Orci L, et al. Multiple cargo binding sites on the COPII subunit Sec24p ensure capture of diverse membrane proteins into transport vesicles. Cell. 2003;114:497-509. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00609-3
  25. 25. Hughes H, Budnik A, Schmidt K, Palmer KJ, Mantell J, Noakes C, et al. Organisation of human ER-exit sites: Requirements for the localisation of Sec16 to transitional ER. Journal of Cell Science. 2009;122:2924-2934. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.044032
  26. 26. Supek F, Madden DT, Hamamoto S, Orci L, Schekman R. Sec16p potentiates the action of COPII proteins to bud transport vesicles. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2002;158:1029-1038. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200207053
  27. 27. Gimeno RE, Espenshade P, Kaiser CA. SED4 encodes a yeast endoplasmic reticulum protein that binds Sec16p and participates in vesicle formation. Journal of Cell Biology. 1995;131:325-338. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.131.2.325
  28. 28. Watson P, Townley AK, Koka P, Palmer KJ, Stephens DJ. Sec16 defines endoplasmic reticulum exit sites and is required for secretory cargo export in mammalian cells. Traffic. 2006;7:1678-1687. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00493.x
  29. 29. De Matteis MA, Luini A. Exiting the Golgi complex. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2008;9:273-284. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2378
  30. 30. Lee MCS, Orci L, Hamamoto S, Futa E, Ravazzola M, Schekman R. Sar1p N-terminal helix initiates membrane curvature and completes the fission of a COPII vesicle. Cell. 2005;122:605-617. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025
  31. 31. Settles EI, Loftus AF, McKeown AN, Parthasarathy R. The vesicle trafficking protein Sar1 lowers lipid membrane rigidity. Biophysical Journal. 2010;99:1539-1545. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.059
  32. 32. Pagant S, Wu A, Edwards S, Diehl F, Miller EA. Sec24 is a coincidence detector that simultaneously binds two signals to drive ER export. Curr. O Biologico. 2015;25:403-412. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.070
  33. 33. Saito-Nakano Y, Nakano A. Sed4p functions as a positive regulator of Sar1p probably through inhibition of the GTPase activation by Sec23p. Genes to Cells. 2000;5:1039-1048
  34. 34. Connerly PL, Esaki M, Montegna EA, Strongin DE, Levi S, Soderholm J, et al. Sec16 is a determinant of transitional ER organization. Current Biology. 2005;15:1439-1447. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.065
  35. 35. Loftus AF, Hsieh VL, Parthasarathy R. Modulation of membrane rigidity by the human vesicle trafficking proteins Sar1A and Sar1B. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2012;426:585-589. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.08.131
  36. 36. Reyes FC, Rafael B, Otegui MS. Plant endosomal trafficking pathways. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2011;14(6):666-673. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.07.009
  37. 37. Robinson DG, Herranz MC, Bubeck J, Pepperkok R, Ritzenthaler C. Membrane dynamics in the early secretory pathway. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2007;26:199-225. DOI: 10.1080/07352680701495820
  38. 38. Keskin BC, Yuca E, Ertekin O, Yüksel B, Memon AR. Expression characteristics of ARF1 and SAR1 during development and the de-etiolation process. Plant Biology. 2012;14:24-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00482.x
  39. 39. Fromme JC, Ravazzola M, Hamamoto S, Al-Balwi M, Eyaid W, Boyadjiev SA, et al. The genetic basis of a craniofacial disease provides insight into COPII coat assembly. Developmental Cell. 2007;13:623-634. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.10.005
  40. 40. Sarmah S, Barallo-Gimeno A, Melville DB, Topczewski J, Solnica-Krezel L, Knapik EW. Sec24D-dependent transport of extracellular matrix proteins is required for zebrafish skeletal morphogenesis. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10367. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010367
  41. 41. Barlowe C. Signals for COPII-dependent export from the ER: What’s the ticket out? Trends in Cell Biology. 2003;13:295-300. DOI: 10.1016/S0962-8924(03)00082-5
  42. 42. Sieben C, Mikosch M, Brandizzi F, Homann U. Interaction of the K(+)-channel KAT1 with the coat protein complex II coat component Sec24 depends on a di-acidic endoplasmic reticulum export motif. The Plant Journal. 2008;56:997-1006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03658.x
  43. 43. Bar-Peled M, Conceicao A, Frigerio L, Raikhel NV. Expression and regulation of aERD2, a gene encoding the KDEL receptor homolog in plants, and other genes encoding proteins involved in ER-Golgi vesicular trafficking. The Plant Cell. 1995;7:667-676. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.7.6.667
  44. 44. Marti L, Fornaciari S, Renna L, Stefano G, Brandizzi F. COPII-mediated traffic in plants. Trends in Plant Science. 2010;15:522-528. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.05.010
  45. 45. Jürgens G. Membrane trafficking in plants. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2004;20:481-504. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.082503.103057
  46. 46. Ebine K, Inoue T, Ito J, Ito E, Uemura T, Goh T, et al. Plant vacuolar trafficking occurs through distinctly regulated pathways. Current Biology. 2014;24:1375-1382. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.004
  47. 47. Malaria Parasite Metabolic Pathways. Available from:[Accessed: 01 March 2019]
  48. 48. DaSilva LL, Snapp EL, Denecke J, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hawes C, Brandizzi F. Endoplasmic reticulum export sites and Golgi bodies behave as single mobile secretory units in plant cells. The Plant Cell. 2004;16:1753-1771. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.022673
  49. 49. Jiang L, Patarroyo D, Cabanillas G, Zheng H, Laliberte JF. The vesicle-forming 6K2 protein of turnip mosaic virus interacts with the COPII Coatomer Sec24a for viral systemic infection. Journal of Virology. 2015;89(13):6695-6710. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00503
  50. 50. Deng Y, Srivastava R, Quilichini TD, Dong H, Bao Y, Horner HT, et al. IRE1, a component of the unfolded protein response signaling pathway, protects pollen development in Arabidopsis from heat stress. Plant Journal. 2016;88(2):193-204. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13239
  51. 51. Pimpl P, Hanton SL, Taylor JP, Pinto-daSilva LL, Denecke J. The GTPase ARF1p controls the sequence-specific vacuolar sorting route to the lytic vacuole. The Plant Cell. 2013;15:1242-1256. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.010140
  52. 52. Tanaka H, Nodzyłski T, Kitakura S, Feraru MI, Sasabe M, Ishikawa T, et al. BEX1/ARF1A1C is required for BFA-sensitive recycling of PIN auxin transporters and auxin-mediated development in arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2014;55(4):737-749. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pct196
  53. 53. Vernoud V, Horton AC, Yang Z, Nielsen E. Analysis of the small GTPase gene superfamily of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2003;131:1191-1208. DOI: 10.1104/pp.013052
  54. 54. Goldberg J. Structural and functional analysis of the ARF1-ARFGAP complex reveals a role for coatamer in GTP hydrolysis. Cell. 1999;96:893-902. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80598-X
  55. 55. Chardin P, Paris S, Antonny B, Robineau S, Béraud-Dufour S, Jackson CL, et al. A human exchange factor for ARF contains Sec7- and pleckstrin-homology domains. Nature. 1996;384:481-484
  56. 56. Zhao L, Helms JB, Brugger B, Harter C, Martoglio B, Graf R, et al. Direct and GTP-dependent interaction of ADP ribosylation factor 1 with coatomer subunit beta. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94:4418-4423. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4418
  57. 57. Ostermann J, Orci L, Tani K, Amherdt M, Ravazzola M, Elazar Z, et al. Stepwise assembly of functionally active transport vesicles. Cell. 1993;75:1015-1025. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90545-2
  58. 58. Beck R, Prinz S, Diestelkotter-Bachert P, Rohling S, Adolf F, Hoehner K, et al. Coatomer and dimeric ADP ribosylation factor 1 promote distinct steps in membrane scission. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2011;194:765-777. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201102095
  59. 59. Orci L, Amherdt M, Ravazzola M, Perrelet A, Rothman JE. Exclusion of Golgi residents from transport vesicles budding from Golgi cisternae in intact cells. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2000;150:1263-1269
  60. 60. Whitney JA, Gomez M, Sheff D, Kreis TE, Mellman I. Cytoplasmic coat proteins involved in endosome function. Cell. 1995;83:703-713
  61. 61. Sanderfoot A, Raikhel N. The secretory system of Arabidopsis. In: The Arabidopsis Book. Rockville, MD, USA: American Society of Plant Biologists; 2003
  62. 62. Donohoe BS, Kang BH, Staehelin LA. Identification and characterization of COPIa- and COPIb-type vesicle classes associated with plant and algal Golgi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:163-168. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609818104
  63. 63. Donaldson JG, Jackson CL. ARF family G proteins and their regulators: Roles in membrane transport, development and disease. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2011;12:362-375. DOI: 10.1038/nrm3117
  64. 64. Aniento F, Helms B, Memon A. How to make a vesicle: Coat protein-membrane interactions. The Golgi apparatus and the plant secretory pathway. Annual Plant Reviews. 2003;9:36-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00791.x
  65. 65. Jackson MR, Nilsson T, Peterson PA. Identification of a consensus motif for retention of transmembrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. The EMBO Journal. 1990;9:3153-3162
  66. 66. Hardt B, Bause E. Lysine can be replaced by histidine but not by arginine as the ER retrieval motif for type I membrane proteins. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2002;291:751-757. DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2002.6515
  67. 67. Gaynor EC, Heesen S, Graham TR, Aebi M, Emr SD. Signal-mediated retrieval of a membrane protein from the Golgi to the ER in yeast. Journal of Cell Biology. 1994;127:653-665. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.127.3.653
  68. 68. Nickel W, Brugger B, Wieland F. Vesicular transport: The core machinery of COPI recruitment and budding. Journal of Cell Science. 2002;115:3235-3240
  69. 69. Langhans M, Marcote MJ, Pimpl P, Virgili-López G, Robinson DG, Aniento F. In vivo trafficking and localization of p24 proteins in plant cells. Traffic. 2008;9:770-785. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00719.x
  70. 70. Contreras I, Ortiz-Zapater E, Aniento F. Sorting signals in the cytosolic tail of membrane proteins involved in the interaction with plant ARF1 and coatomer. The Plant Journal. 2004;38:685-698. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02075.x
  71. 71. Tsai MM, Lin PY, Cheng WL, Tsai CY, Chi HC, Chen CY, et al. Overexpression of ADP-ribosylation factor 1 in human gastric carcinoma and its clinicopathological. Cancer Science. 2012;103:1136-1144. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02243.x
  72. 72. Rothman JE, Wieland FT. Protein sorting by transport vesicles. Science. 1996;272:227-234. DOI: 10.1126/science.272.5259.227
  73. 73. Lanoix J, Ouwendijk J, Lin CC, Stark A, Love HD, Ostermann J, et al. GTP hydrolysis by arf-1 mediates sorting & concentration of Golgi resident enzymes into functional COP I vesicles. The EMBO Journal. 1999;18:4935-4948. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/18.18.4935
  74. 74. Pepperkok R, Whitney JA, Gomez M, Kreis TE. COPI vesicles accumulating in the presence of a GTP restricted arf1 mutant are depleted of anterograde and retrograde cargo. Journal of Cell Science. 2000;113:135-144
  75. 75. Glick BS, Elston T, Oster GA. Cisternal maturation mechanism can explain the asymmetry of the Golgi stack. FEBS Letters. 1997;414:177-181. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00984-8
  76. 76. Patterson GH, Hirschberg K, Polishchuk RS, Gerlich D, Phair RD, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Transport through the Golgi apparatus by rapid partitioning within a two-phase membrane system. Cell. 2008;133:1055-1067. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.044
  77. 77. Smith RD, Lupashin VV. Role of the conserved oligomeric Golgi (COG) complex in protein glycosylation. Carbohydrate Research. 2008;343:2024-2031. DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2008.01.034
  78. 78. Brillada C, Rojas-Pierce M. Vacuolar trafficking and biogenesis: A maturation in the field. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2017;40:77-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.08.005
  79. 79. Wickner W, Schekman R. Membrane fusion. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2008;15:658-664
  80. 80. Saito C, Ueda T. Chapter 4: Functions of RAB and SNARE proteins in plant life. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology. 2009;274:183-233. DOI: 10.1016/S1937-6448(08)02004-2
  81. 81. De Marchis F, Bellucci M, Pompa A. Unconventional pathways of secretory plant proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum to the vacuole bypassing the Golgi complex. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2013;8(8):25129. DOI: 10.4161/psb.25129
  82. 82. Kulich I, Pečenková T, Sekereš J, Smetana O, Fendrych M, Foissner I, et al. Arabidopsis exocyst subcomplex containing subunit EXO70B1 is involved in autophagy-related transport to the vacuole. Traffic. 2013;11:1155-1165. DOI: 10.1111/tra.12101
  83. 83. Hill D, Sylvester A. Diversification of theRabguanosine triphosphatase family in dicots and monocots. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2007;49:1129-1141. DOI: 10.1111/j.1672-9072.2007.00520.x
  84. 84. Fujimoto M, Ueda T. Conserved and plant-unique mechanisms regulating plant post-Golgi traffic. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2012;3:197. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00197
  85. 85. Viotti C, Kruger F, Krebs M, Neubert C, Fink F, Lupanga U, et al. The endoplasmic reticulum is the main membrane source for biogenesis of the lytic vacuole in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25:3434-3449. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.113.114827
  86. 86. Bock JB, Matern HT, Peden AA, Scheller RH. A genomic perspective on membrane compartment organization. Nature. 2001;409:839-841. DOI: 10.1038/35057024
  87. 87. Carter CJ, Bednarek SY, Raikhel NV. Membrane trafficking in plants: New discoveries and approaches. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2004;7:701-707. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.09.016
  88. 88. Voigt B, Timmers AC, Šamaj J, Hlavačka A, Ueda T, Preuss M, et al. Actin-based motility of endosomes is linked to the polar tip growth of root hairs. European Journal of Cell Biology. 2005;84:609-621. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2004.12.029
  89. 89. Robatzek S, Chinchilla D, Boller T. Ligand-induced endocytosis of the pattern recognition receptor FLS2 in Arabidopsis. Genes Development. 2006;20:537-542. DOI: 10.1101/gad.366506
  90. 90. Geldner N, Hyman DL, Wang X, Schumacher K. Chory J Endosomal signaling of plant steroid receptor kinase BRI1. Genes Development. 2007;21:1598-1602. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1561307
  91. 91. Dhonukshe P, Tanaka H, Goh T, Ebine K, Mahonen AP, Prasad K, et al. Generation of cell polarity in plants links endocytosis, auxin distribution and cell fate decisions. Nature. 2008;456:962-966. DOI: 10.1038/nature07409
  92. 92. Sharfman M, Bar M, Ehrlich M, Schuster S, Melech-Bonfil S, Ezer R, et al. Endosomal signaling of the tomato leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein LeEix2. The Plant Journal for Cell and Molecular Biology. 2011;68:413-423. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04696.x
  93. 93. Murphy AS, Bandyopadhyay A, Holstein SE, Peer WA. Endocytotic cycling of PM proteins. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2005;56:221-251. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144150
  94. 94. König S, Ischebeck T, Lerche J, Stenzel I, Heilmann I. Salt-stress induced association of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate with clathrin-coated vesicles in plants. Biochemical Journal. 2008;415:387-399. DOI: 10.1042/BJ20081306
  95. 95. Leborgne-Castel N, Lherminier J, Der C, Fromentin J, Houot V, Simon-Plas F. The plant defense elicitor cryptogein stimulates clathrin-mediated endocytosis correlated with reactive oxygen species production in bright yellow-2 tobacco cells. Plant Physiology. 2008;146:1255-1266. DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2015.09.011
  96. 96. Karahara I, Suda J, Tahara H, Yokota E, Shimmen T, Misaki K, et al. The preprophase band is a localized center of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in late prophase cells of the onion cotyledon epidermis. Plant Journal. 2009;57:819-831. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03725.x
  97. 97. Sigismund S et al. Endocytosis and signaling: Cell logistics shape the eukaryotic cell plan. Physiological Reviews. 2012;92:273-366. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00005.2011
  98. 98. Liu AP, Aguet F, Danuser G, Schmid SL. Local clustering of transferrin receptors promotes clathrin-coated pit initiation. Journal of Cell Biology. 2010;191:1381-1393. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201008117
  99. 99. Traub LM, Bonifacino JS. Cargo recognition in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2013;5:a016790
  100. 100. Liu AP, Aguet F, Danuser G, Schmid SL. Local clustering of transferrin receptors promotes clathrin-coated pit initiation. Journal of Cell Biology. 2010;191:1381-1393. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201008117
  101. 101. Kleine-Vehn J, Ding Z, Jones A, Tasaka M, Morita M, Friml J. Gravity-induced PIN transcytosis for polarization of auxin fluxes in gravity-sensing root cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;21:22344-22349. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013145107
  102. 102. Rakusová H, Gallego-Bartolome J, Vanstraelen M, Robert HS, Alabadi D, et al. Polarization of PIN3-dependent auxin transport for hypocotyl gravitropic response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Journal. 2011;67:817-826. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04636.x
  103. 103. Göhre V, Spallek T, Häweker H, Mersmann S, Mentzel T, Boller T, et al. Plant pattern-recognition receptor FLS2 is directed for degradation by the bacterial ubiquitin ligase AvrPtoB. Current Biology. 2008;18:1824-1832. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.063
  104. 104. Wada M, Ludewig U, Schaaf G, von Wiren N, Fujiwara T. The Arabidopsis major intrinsic protein NIP5;1 is essential for efficient boron uptake and plant development under boron limitation. The Plant Cell. 2006;18:1498-1509. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.106.041640
  105. 105. Barberon M, Dubeaux G, Kolb C, Isono E, Zelazny E, Vert G. Polarization of iron-regulated transporter 1 (IRT1) to the plant-soil interface plays crucial role in metal homeostasis. PNAS. 2014;111(22):8293-8298. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1402262111
  106. 106. Bitsikas V, Correa IR Jr, Nichols BJ. Clathrin-independent pathways do not contribute significantly to endocytic flux. eLife. 2014;3:e03970. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.03970
  107. 107. Mayor S, Parton RG, Donaldson JG. Clathrin-independent pathways of endocytosis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2014;6(6):a016758. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016758
  108. 108. Mayor S, Pagano RE. Pathways of clathrin-independent endocytosis. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2007;8(8):603-612. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2216
  109. 109. Ding Y, Robinson DG, Jiang L. Unconventional protein secretion (UPS) pathways in plants. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2014;29:107-115. DOI: 10.1016/
  110. 110. Boutté Y, Moreau P. Modulation of endomembranes morphodynamics in the secretory/retrograde pathways depends on lipid diversity. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2014;22:22-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.08.004
  111. 111. Sampathkumar A, Gutierrez R, Mcfarlane HE, Bringmann M, Lindeboom J, Emons AM, et al. Patterning and lifetime of plasma membrane-localized cellulose synthase is dependent on actin organization in Arabidopsis interphase cells. Plant Physiology. 2013;162:675-688. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.215277
  112. 112. Wang P, Hussey PJ. Interactions between plant endomembrane systems and the actin cytoskeleton. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6:422. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00422
  113. 113. Cevher-Keskin B. ARF1 and SAR1 GTPases in endomembrane trafficking in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013;14:18181-18199. DOI: 10.3390/ijms140918181
  114. 114. Sparkes I, Hawes C, Frigerio L. FrontiERs: Movers and shapers of the higher plant cortical endoplasmic reticulum. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2011;14:658-665. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.07.006
  115. 115. Hamada T, Ueda H, Kawase T, Hara-Nishimura I. Microtubules contribute to tubule elongation and anchoring of endoplasmic reticulum, resulting in high network complexity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2014;166:1869-1876. DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.252320
  116. 116. Kahn RA, Gilman AG. The protein cofactor necessary for ADP-ribosylation of Gs by cholera toxin is itself a GTP binding protein. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1986;261:7906-7911
  117. 117. Stearns T, Willingham MC, Botstein D, Kahn RA. ADP-ribosylation factor is functionally and physically associated with the Golgi complex. PNAS. 1990;87(3):1238-1242. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.3.1238
  118. 118. Gebbie LK, Burn JE, Hocart CH, Williamson RE. Genes encoding ADP-ribosylation factors inArabidopsis thalianaL. Heyn.; genome analysis and antisense suppression. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2005;56:1079-1091. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri099
  119. 119. Zhang J, Nodzyński T, Pěnčík A, Rolčík J, Friml J. PIN phosphorylation is sufficient to mediate PIN polarity and direct auxin transport. PNAS. 2010;107(2):918-922. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909460107
  120. 120. Naramoto S, Otegui MS, Kutsuna N, de Rycke R, Dainobu T, Karampelias M, et al. Insights into the localization and function of the membrane trafficking regulator GNOM ARF-GEF at the Golgi apparatus in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 2014;26:3062-3076. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.125880
  121. 121. Naramoto S, Nodzyński T, Dainobu T, Takatsuka H, Okada T, Friml J, et al. VAN4 encodes a putative TRS120 that is required for normal cell growth and vein development in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2014;55(4):750-763. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcu012
  122. 122. Naramoto S, Sawa S, Koizumi K, Uemura T, Ueda T, Friml J, et al. Phosphoinositide dependent regulation of VAN3 ARF-GAP localization and activity essential for vascular tissue continuity in plants. Development. 2009;136:1529-1538. DOI: 10.1242/dev.030098
  123. 123. Parker G, Schofield R, Sundberg B, Turner S. Isolation of COV1, a gene involved in the regulation of vascular patterning in the stem of Arabidopsis. Development. 2003;130:2139-2148. DOI: 10.1242/dev.00441
  124. 124. Shirakawa M, Ueda H, Koumoto Y, Fuji K, Nishiyama C, Kohchi T, et al. Continuous vascular ring (COV1) is a trans-Golgi network-localized membrane protein required for Golgi morphology and vacuolar protein sorting. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2014;55(4):764-772. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pct195
  125. 125. Kalinowska K, Isono E. All roads lead to the vacuole-autophagic transport as part of the endomembrane trafficking network in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2018;69:1313-1324. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx395
  126. 126. Nagel M-K, Kalinowska K, Vogel K, Reynolds GD, Wu Z, Anzenberger F, et al. Arabidopsis SH3P2 is an ubiquitin-binding protein that functions together with ESCRT-I and the deubiquitylating enzyme AMSH3. PNAS. 2017;114(34):7197-7204. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710866114
  127. 127. Kolb C, Nagel M-K, Kalinowska K, Hagmann J, Ichikawa M, Anzenberger F, et al. FYVE1 is essential for vacuole biogenesis and intracellular trafficking inArabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 2015;67:1361-1373. DOI: 10.1104/ pp.114.253377
  128. 128. Rusten TE, Simonsen A. ESCRT functions in autophagy and associated disease. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(9):1166-1172. DOI: 10.4161/cc.7.9.5784
  129. 129. Zhang C, Wu Z, Li Y, Wu J. Biogenesis, function, and applications of virus-derived small RNAs in plants. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;6:1237
  130. 130. Baulcombe D. RNA silencing in plants. Nature. 2004;431:356-363. DOI: 10.1038/nature02874
  131. 131. Cai Q , Qiao L, Wang M, He B, Lin F-M, Palmquist J, et al. Plants send small RNAs in extracellular vesicles to fungal pathogen to silence virulence genes. Science. 2018;360:1126-1129. DOI: 10.1126/science.aar4142
  132. 132. Rovenich H, Boshoven JC, PHJ B, Thomma BP. Filamentous pathogen effector functions: Of pathogens, hosts and microbiomes and microbiomes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2014;20:96-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.05.001

Written By

Birsen Cevher-Keskin

Submitted: September 30th, 2019 Reviewed: February 6th, 2020 Published: April 9th, 2020