Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Natural Radioactive Decay

Written By

Entesar H. Elaraby

Submitted: 21 October 2019 Reviewed: 26 February 2020 Published: 14 April 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91899

From the Edited Volume

Recent Techniques and Applications in Ionizing Radiation Research

Edited by Ahmed M. Maghraby and Basim Almayyahi

Chapter metrics overview

855 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This chapter is primarily concerned with natural radioactive decay. Generally speaking, there are two types of natural radioactive decays: alpha decays “which contain two neutrons and two protons” emitted from radon gas; additionally, nuclear decay by emission of photons (γ-decay). This chapter aims to describe γ and alpha loss of nuclei and demonstrates how to measure the radioactive material naturally using solid-state nuclear track detector (SSNTD) and high purity Germanium detector (HPGD). Also, methods of measuring the different characteristics of the alpha particle using the track profile technique (TPT) will be presented. Finally, results will be presented in the alpha and radon measurements. The concentration of aerosols has attracted much attention by many researchers in the past decade. Research has shown that aerosols are responsible for harmful chemical reactions that lead to the physical degradation of the stratospheric ozone layer. Moreover, aerosols increase the risk of developing cancer in humans when inhaled in large proportions. Therefore, neutron activation analysis (NAA) is a very important application to measure these concentrations.

Keywords

  • alpha particle
  • radon
  • HPGD
  • SSNTD
  • NAA
  • TPT

1. The source of natural radioactive

There are multiple sources that cause natural radiation. These sources are limited to three main types: cosmic radiation, internal or ground radiation.

1.1 Cosmic radiation

The Earth is constantly bombarded by cosmic rays that affect all living things. The charged particles in the radiation interact with the Earth’s magnetic field and result in an overflow of radiation from beta and gamma, the intensity of which and the value of the radiation dose differ according to the different nature of the place and the effect of the magnetic field in it [1].

1.2 Internal or ground radiation

Ground or internal radiation is present in everything that surrounds us, such as water, air and vegetation. Different levels of radioactive material from uranium, its daughters, thorium and its daughters, have been found in various places on Earth. The radiation levels vary depending on where they are measured and depend on the amount of uranium and thorium atoms present in the soil. Exposure to radiation occurs by inhaling radon gas, one of the sons of uranium and thorium, or ingesting radioactive atoms in food and water, where there are proportions of them that vary according to the location. Sites with high levels of radiation have higher dose levels [2]. High doses cause lung cancer and pose a major threat to human health [3]. Therefore it is important to measure the ground radiation from uranium and uranium decay, such as thorium, radium, and radon.

Advertisement

2. Radioactive decay

2.1 Alpha decay

The process of unstable (or radioactive) atoms becomes stable by emitting radiation. This event over time is called radioactive decay.

Alpha decay results in the loss of two protons and two neutrons from the nucleus.

X Z A Y Z 2 A 4 + α 2 4 + energy Q E1
Ra 88 226 Rn 86 222 + α 2 4 + energy Q E2

X is parent atom and Y is daughter atom, and Q the energy is carried away primarily by the kinetic energy of the alpha particle.

Alpha particles are often observed to be produced on their own energy, meaning that the parent nucleus is converted to the basic state of the daughter’s nucleus by emitting a particle with energy that corresponds to the value of the entire Q. But the degradation processes of the alpha particles may be associated with the emission of photons. As shown in Figure 1. This indicates the presence of energy levels and the underlying quantum structure of separate states in the nuclei as in atomic transformations. The nucleus decomposes into the excited state of the daughter’s nucleus, in which case the lowest effective Q α value. The daughter nucleus can later decay to ground state by releasing a photon. Hence a series of decay occurs

Figure 1.

Alpha particle transitions in the decay of 228Th. Source: Das and Ferbel.

X Z A Y Z 2 A 4 + α 2 4 + energy Q α E3

2.2 Gamma decay

A gamma ray γ has very high electromagnetic radiation carrying energy away from the nucleus.

X Z A X Z A + γ E4

When a nucleus disintegrates by emitting an α-particle or a β-particle, the daughter nucleus may be left in an excited state, if the excited nucleus does not break apart or emit another particle, it can de-excite to the ground state by emitting a high energy photon or gamma ( γ ) ray. As we see in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Gamma ray emitting from transitions in the decay of 12B.

B 5 12 C 6 12 + e + ν ¯ E5
C 6 12 C 6 12 + γ E6
Advertisement

3. Measurement of radioactive

3.1 Measurement of alpha particle and radon

The Solid State Nuclear Track Detector SSNTDs is a polymer used for detecting energetic charged particles such as protons and alpha–particles. SSNTDs an insulating solid naturally and manmade occurring and there are many types of this detector such as: inorganic crystals, glasses and plastics.

The CR-39 Solid State Nuclear Track Detector is known to be widely used for radon gas measurement. CR39 is sensitive also to detect proton and neutron dosimeter and cosmic ray investigations. The ability of CR-39 to record the location of a radiation source, even at extremely low concentrations is exploited in autoradiography studies with alpha particles, and for detection of alpha emitters. The interaction of the energetic particles with the polymer results in the formation of latent tracks. These latent tracks can be made by chemical etching of the polymer.

CR-39 sheets is cut into small detectors of area 1.2 cm × 1.5 cm each. The exposure time for sample is 30 days (to reach secular equilibrium) for 222Rn determination see Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The chamber used to measure the radon and alpha in soil.

After exposure the CR-39 detectors were etched in 6.25 normal NaOH at 70°C for 6 h. The different parameter of track such as the track density ρ, track diameter D and track length L are measured by using optical microscope. Figure 4 shows that the track of particle which incidence on the surface of detector [4, 5].

Figure 4.

The reading under the microscope.

To measure the Track Profile Technique (TPT) of alpha particle as Figure 5 you must irradiate the sides (the edges) of the detector by 241Am source of alpha particle with energy of five under normal incidence.

Figure 5.

The track profile of deferent energy of alpha particle at deferent bulk etch rate.

3.2 Determination of the bulk etching rate V B and range of alpha particle

The method involves a direct measurement of the track lengths in both phases of evolution; the acute-conical and the over etched phases. Accordingly, the maximum value of the track length (L max) at the saturation point and also the corresponding saturation time (t sat), which is the time required for track length to reach the maximum and constant value, to be determined in accordance with the energy of the alpha particle which in turn can be used to calculate V B according to the relation [6].

V B = R th L max t est E7

where R th is the theoretical range of alpha particle energy incident on the detector material.

Track profile was obtained as mentioned before and the range of certain particle track energy in the detector was measured using the relation

R = L eR + h R E8

where L eR is the track length just very close to the end of track L eR = V T t R, V T is the track etch rate and h is the removal thickness layer (h = V B t R), t R is the time needed to reach to the end of track.

3.2.1 The results and discussion of TPT

Table 1 show that the L max depends on the energy of the incident particle while the t R not depends only on the energy of the incident particle but also on the etching rates, particularly the bulk etch rate V B which in turn controlled by the etching conditions; the concentration, and the temperature of the etching solution. The bulk etch rate V B was varying from 1.21 to 1.28 μm h−1 with average value 1.25 ± 0.04 μm h−1. All values of V B were dependent on the etching conditions. The value of L max for the same energy is constant in the same matter. The range of the particle energy dependent on the density of medium. R = 0 R d x = T 0 d x d T dT = 0 T d T S T and S T = d x d T dT = I ¯ n ion where T is the kinetic energy of the particle, n ion is the number of electron ion pairs formed per unit path length, and I ¯ denotes the average energy needed to ionize an atom in the medium. The concentration of the solution and temperature are used to elucidate the path of the particles and have no effect along the path. The value of L max does not affect by increase in the concentration or in the temperature of the etching solution, while the time needed to reach to the end of track (t R) is change with change the condition of etching. The values of L max were 20.02, 17.60 and 12.32 μm with the energies of alpha particle 5.48, 5 and 4 MeV respectively. The result show that, the range of alpha energies 4, 5 and 5.48 MeV in CR39 were 19.88, 29.89 and 33.88 μm respectively. This value corresponds to the theoretical values shown in Table 1. After these regions, the track length starts to turn gradually into a circular path, and the track etch rate approaches the bulk etch rate (V T ≈ V B) and the track begins to change gradually to the spherical shape (Figure 5).

Energy E = 5.48 MeV E = 5 MeV E = 4 MeV
L max (μm) 20.02 17.60 12.32
R (μm) (theoretical values) 34.20 29.40 19.80
R (μm) experiment 33.88 29.89 19.88
t R (h) 11.00 9.75 6.00
V B (by L max) 1.28 1.21 1.25
Average V B 1.25 ± 0.04 μm h−1

Table 1.

The maximum track length, range, the saturation time and bulk etch rate with different energy of alpha particle in CR39 detector.

3.3 The concentration of radon and the annual effective dose

The equilibrium concentration of radon C eq determined from the track density by using the following relation

C eq = ρ K t ef E9

where t ef is the effective exposure time in hours and the calibration factor K of the SSNTDs (tracks cm−2 day−1/Bq m−3).

The surface exhalation rate (Bq m−1 · h−1) of the sample for the release of radon can be calculated by the formula exhalation rate [5, 7].

E a = C eq A E10

Where A is the cross section area of cup (m2), V is the effective volume of the cup in m3, and λ the decay constant for radon in h−1.

The mass exhalation rate (Bq kg−1 · h−1) in the samples is calculated using the following formula [4, 5, 8]:

E m = C eq M E11

Where M is the mass of sample (kg).

The annual effective dose H (μSv year−1) was calculated from the following relation.

H = C × D × F × T = 25.2 C μ Sv year 1 E12

where, C in Bq m−3 is the measured mean radon activity concentration in air, F is the indoor equilibrium factor between radon and its progeny (0.4), T is time (7000 h year−1) and D is the dose conversion factor 9 nSv h−1/Bq m−3 [3, 9].

3.4 Neutron activation analysis

Thermal neutron activation analysis is used as the primary method for determining the element in any sample. This analysis is carried out inside the reactor with a flow of 3.31 × 1012 n cm−2 or more. Long-lived radio nuclides are determined using activation with thermal neutrons. First, the samples are filled in aluminum cups. With a 2-hour irradiation time, then re-encapsulate after irradiation and then measured after 4 days of cooling and a second time after 20 days of cooling, using a high-purity Germanium Mono-Germanium Spectrometer (HPGe) ray with a precision of 2.5 kV for the 60Co 1332.5 keV line, efficiently It is about 40% relative to the 3 × 3 “NaI reagent of the same line. Then gamma spectra are analyzed and then the concentrations of different detected elements are estimated [10].

This method give the different element in air or in soil for example in Jazan region we can measure the different heavy element in air by using this technique.

3.4.1 The results and discussion of NAA

The Figures 69 are summarized the concentrations of heavy elements in Airport and Cady mall in PM10 and TSP samples which collected from Jazan city. Figures 6 and 7 were shown that the concentrations of heavy elements in Airport and Cady mall in PM10. The elements in TSP sample show in Figures 8 and 9.

Figure 6.

PM10—Airport zone: concentrations of heavy elements.

Figure 7.

PM10—Cady mall zone: concentrations of heavy elements.

Figure 8.

TSP—Mountain neighborhood zone: concentrations of heavy elements.

Figure 9.

TSP—an industrial zone: concentrations of heavy elements.

By adopting the level of concentration of elements in the atmosphere as the ranking standard, barium, calcium, iron and zinc elements were found to be the most dominant elements in the Jazan region of Saudi Arabia. It was observed that the concentration depends on the study areas, as the industrial regions had the highest concentration of barium, iron, and zinc, whereas the market areas had the lowest concentration, especially barium and calcium. Barium concluded that the main source of barium traces is car paints. It was also found that the concentration of zinc traces in the airport area and in the industrial zone samples. The main sources of zinc impacts in Jizan are tire wear, brake wear and exhaust emissions. Therefore, we can ensure that zinc emissions are due to industrial processes, especially those related with tire wear and wear. Tires and brake pads are made of vulcanized rubber in the presence of a stimulant. The vulcanization tonic currently used in industry is zinc oxide, which explains the source of zinc in tires and brake pads.

The lowest concentrated elements were bromine and chromium in the Jizan region. The effects of bromine can be attributed to vehicle emissions. The contribution of cars to bromine emissions cannot be more than 5%. Chromium TSP concentration was also found from the Jazan mountainous district. Concentration may be harmful based on the findings of the Environmental Protection Agency [11], that continuous inhalation of about 0.8 ng m−3 of chromium increases the risk of cancer by 1.0 × 10−6%.

Basically, earth elements include Ce, Eu and La, while trace elements include Sc, Th, Hf, Sb and Co. The maximum concentration of Sc and Co was noted in the Mountain neighborhood samples, while Th and Sb concentrations were found to be highest in the Airport zone. The maximum concentration of Hf was noted in the industrial zone samples, while the highest concentration of La, Ce and Eu was noted in mountain neighborhood samples.

These concentrations differ from site to site according to the geography of the place and the data provided indicate that the concentration of iron, calcium, chromium and zinc in Jazan is relatively less than in other regions. The Table 2 shows these differences.

Local Concentration (ng m−3) References
Ca Fe Zn Cr Co
Jazan city 26058.8–66998.4 7003.8–27798.7 12955.1–41069.7 61.14–91.9 6.9–12.1 Present work
North Egypt Nd 1430–22,230 50–146,930 10–500 1–20 EL-Araby et al. [10]
Upper-Egypt 42713.43−80447.75 2022.23−21,420 12327.1−25628.3 59.9–101.55 7.3–12.24 Monged [12]
Santa Cruz, Brazil 11–2.5 × 105 77.4–2.9 × 105 0.0–1.5 × 104 0.0–8678 0.8–1.6 Quiterioa et al. [13]
La Plata, Argentina Nd 747–5967 20–1049 3.5–12 Nd Bilos et al. [14]
Birmingham, UK 171–245 245–348 64–641 7.1–18 Nd Harrinson et al. [15]
East St. Louis, USA 1918 666 231 5.7 Nd Sweet et al. [16]
USA and European Cities Nd 3710 <103 10–30 Nd Lantzy and Mackenzie [17]

Table 2.

Comparison of the concentration ranges of some elements in Jazan (present work) and other places in the world.

3.5 Measurement of gamma ray

To reduce the gamma ray background the hyper pure germanium detector is inserted inside a lead shield, through a hole in the bottom. The lead shield is internally lined with cadmium and copper layers. A layer of Cd (z = 48) and Cu are used, Cd is an effective filter for Pb-X rays, while Cu attenuates the Cd-X ray and prevents personal exposure to the toxic cadmium Figure 10.

Figure 10.

High purity germanium detector.

To reduce the noise from the thermal radiation in the crystal, the HPGe detector is cooled with liquid nitrogen (77°K, −194°C) during its use. This reduces the leakage current generated by mobile carriers at room temperature and prevents voltage break down through the crystal. The HPGe Gamma-ray spectrometer consists of a detector, a pulse processing electronic unit, and an output device such as a counter, multi-channel analyzer (MCA). A diagram of a basic radiation detection system is Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Block diagram of gamma ray spectrometer.

The coarse and fine gain controls of the spectroscopy amplifier, it’s differentiating and integrating time constants and all other controls were adjusted to obtain the best energy resolution and good linearity of the spectrometer over a wide range the input voltages. After selecting the optimum set up, the resolving power (resolution) of the spectrometer was found to be 1.92 KeV for 1332 KeV gamma ray line of the 60Co.

The gamma ray spectrometer system was calibrated by applying different standard gamma emitters’ sources. These include 137Cs (661.66 keV), 60Co (1173.23, 1332.5 keV), 40K (1460.8 keV) and 226Ra which is most favorable for calibration, since its spectrum covers a wide energy range from 0.186 to 2.45 MeV.

To measure gamma ray in any sample must folded and placed container for 1 month to allow radioactive equilibrium to be reached (secular equilibrium) This step ensured that radon gas and its daughters remain in the sample.

The gamma ray spectra of sample accumulate for at least 24 hours, and then analyze to detect the gamma ray energies due to uranium, thorium and their daughters, and due to potassium, and then the counting rate for each gamma transition was determined.

The radioactive decay series of 238U and 232Th are complex and produces alpha, beta, and gamma radiation. Figures 12 and 13 show the important isotopes in the decay series, indicates whether the primary decay mode is via alpha or beta emission, and gives the half-life.

Figure 12.

The Uranium-238 decay chain.

Figure 13.

The Thorium-232 decay chain.

3.6 Conclusions

This chapter presented the methods of decay for alpha, beta, and gamma, as well as showed the best methods for measuring both alpha and gamma, which are available and simple, as they are characterized by accuracy and high sensitivity, so it can be relied upon to determine the concentration of radioactive materials and doses that determine the places of pollution. These methods contribute to preserving the environment, by identifying the places of pollution, whether by radiation or by heavy materials. Measuring heavy materials is an important technology in determining the whereabouts of uranium and its daughter. This technology also contributes to reducing environmental pollution by harmful heavy materials.

The result show that the best method to determination of bulk etch rate V B is by L max method; it is the faster and easier than weight method. The range of alpha particle is measured by track profile method (TPT). The measured range of alpha particles was very close to the theoretical values of the range. The track profile method is useful to determine the different parameters of track.

This chapter has successfully evaluated the concentration of heavy metals in the atmosphere of the Mountain Neighborhood, Airport, Cady Mall and Industrial zones and established a number of conclusions. For instance, it was found that all the sampled specimens were enriched with both zinc and calcium. However, barium was only found in the Airport, Mountain Neighborhood and Industrial zones. Ultimately, a number of conclusions based on the findings have been outlined below.

  • The analysis of the samples enabled the author to arrive at the conclusion that maximum concentration of PM10 and TSP aerosols in Jazan city occurs during March.

  • When literature values for the concentration of heavy metals were compared with other areas, it was concluded that Jazan city had relatively lower concentration with respect to North Egypt and Santa Cruz industrial district. The results also revealed that the difference in heavy metal concentrations was much pronounced when non-polluted zones were compared with polluted zones.

  • It was concluded that Jazan city PM10 and TSP aerosols are mainly rich in calcium, barium, zinc, and iron; all of which are as a result of anthropogenic activities.

  • The concentration of zinc and Barium was found to be highest in the airport area, while iron and calcium were found to be highly concentrated in Cady Mall and the Mountain neighborhood respectively.

Having covered the concentration of heavy metals in the atmosphere of four locations in Jazan city, and the dangers associated with high concentration of such metals ascertained, a number of recommendations were made as follows.

It is recommended that green belts be designed around different cities in order to reduce the level of concentration of aerosols in the atmosphere. In addition, environmental regulations should be put forward and their effectiveness be ensured through strict monitoring of air pollution levels. The use of transport and construction machinery that increase emission of aerosols should be minimized whenever possible. Finally the author suggests that a thorough evaluation should be carried out before any industrial project is implemented in order to ascertain its level of pollution as well as its compatibility within the framework of sustainable environment.

References

  1. 1. Morison I. Introduction to Astronomy and Cosmology. Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2008
  2. 2. WHO, Handbook. World Handbook on Indoor Radon. World Health Organization. 2009:94
  3. 3. ICRP. Radiological protection in medicine. ICRP Publication 105. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(5)
  4. 4. EL-Araby EH. Direct measurement of the radioactive radon gas activity in water in Saudi Arabia. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2018;1976(1):020019
  5. 5. EL-Araby EH, Soliman HA, Abo-Elmagd M. Measurement of radon levels in water and the associated health hazards in Jazan—Saudi Arabia. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Science. 2019;12(1):31-36
  6. 6. Azooz AA, AL-Nia’emi SHS, Al-Jubbori MA. Empirical parameterization of CR-39 longitudinal track depth. Radiation Measurements. 2012;47:67-72
  7. 7. Chen J, Whyte J, Ford K. An overview of radon research in Canada. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015;167:44-48
  8. 8. Singh K, Sengupta D, Prasad R. Radon exhalation rate and uranium estimation in rock samples from Bihar uranium and copper mines using the SSNTD technique. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 1999;51:107-113
  9. 9. UNSCEAR. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations Publication Annex B; 2008
  10. 10. EL-Araby EH, Abd El-wahab MM, EL-Desouky TM, Diab HM, Mohseen MM. Assessment of atmospheric heavy metal deposition in Egypt by using neutron activation analysis. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2011;69:1506-1511
  11. 11. Environmental Protection Agency EPA. Air Toxics Website. 2003. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/S
  12. 12. Monged MHE. Assessment of Ambient Gamma Radiation and Chemical Pollutants in Upper Egypt’s Atmosphere. [PhD thesis] Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University. 2009
  13. 13. Quiterioa SL, da Silvaa CRS, Arbillaa G, Escaleira V. Metals in airborne particulate matter in the industrial district of Santa Cruz, Rio de Janerio, in an annual period. AE International-Central & South America, Atmospheric Environment. 2004;38:321-331
  14. 14. Bilos C, Colombo JC, Skorupka CN, Rodrigues Presa J. Sources, distribution and variability if airborne trace metals in La Plata City area, Argentina. Environmental Pollution. 2001;111:149-158
  15. 15. Harrinson RM, Smith DJT, Luhana L. Source apportionment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from an urban location in Birmingham, UK. Environmental Science and Technology. 1996;30:825-832
  16. 16. Sweet CW, Vermette SJ, Landsberg S. Sources of toxic trace elements in in urban air in Illinois. Environmental Science and Technology. 1993;27(12):2502-2510
  17. 17. Lantzy RJ, Mackenzie FT. Atmospheric trace metals: Global cycles and assessment of man’s impact. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta. 1979;43:511-525

Written By

Entesar H. Elaraby

Submitted: 21 October 2019 Reviewed: 26 February 2020 Published: 14 April 2020