Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Use of Sustainable Materials in Self-Healing Concrete

Written By

Busari Ayobami Adebola, Kupolati Williams Kehinde, Loto Tolulope Roland, Sadiku Rotimi Emmanuel, Jacques Snyman and Ndambuki Julius

Submitted: January 14th, 2019 Reviewed: May 10th, 2019 Published: February 12th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86768

From the Edited Volume

Strength of Materials

Edited by Héctor Jaramillo S., Julian Arnaldo Avila and Can Chen

Chapter metrics overview

771 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Vulnerability to cracks is one of the major flaws of concrete infrastructure. The need to reduce the repair cost of this defect birthed the need for self-healing concrete. The incidence of cracks on concrete structures is a big threat to the stability of bridges, concrete roads, and other concrete infrastructures. This review assessed the use of self-healing technology on concrete using sustainable material as an active method of healing crack. This was done with the view of improving the stability, strength, and sustainability of infrastructure for national growth. The outcome of the review showed three prominent methods used in self-healing technology, which include autogenous healing, encapsulation of polymeric material, and microbial production of calcium-carbonate (biotechnological approaches). The review also revealed that calcium carbonate is a versatile material that can be used in crack healing for the filling of voids and improves the porosity of the concrete. The success of using the autogenous healing method depends on the diameter of the crack induced in the concrete structure. Additionally, this method can operate independently in different conditions regardless of the crack position. Correspondingly, lowering the water-cement ratio improves the autogenous healing process. The use of encapsulation of polymeric material and microbial production of calcium-carbonate methods showed that the presence of water and humidity is a critical factor to be considered. However, biotechnology using microbial action is prone to the production of ammonium ions (NH4+) through ureolytic activity, which results in nitrogen oxide emission into the atmosphere. Congruently, this may affect the durability of the concrete. Based on the uniqueness of this technology, it is recommended for the construction of sustainable infrastructure now and in the foreseeable future.


  • self-healing
  • sustainability
  • concrete
  • asphalt
  • infrastructure

1. Introduction

The concept of self-healing concrete came from the principle of the self-healing properties of the skin, a form of natural defense mechanism. Nature plays an active role in this process by the development of clots to seal the break. This is the first process of skin healing. Self-healing technology is a novel branch of engineering aimed at the protection of concrete infrastructure from developing minor and major cracks. In a bid to improve the strength and durability of concrete which, is one of the most pervasive material in the world in terms of infrastructural construction, self-healing technology was adopted. The use of concrete has been adopted in the design and construction of major infrastructure for national growth. Globally, concrete is widely used for the construction of structural and pavement elements [1]. The first usage of concrete in the world was in the Roman Empire, for the construction of the Pantheon, which is a very great structure and still in a functional state till date [2]. Concrete microstructure consists of a multiphase nanostructured material in the composite form which ages over time. The structural strength of concrete to a large extent depends on the micro- and nanoscale structural properties of the constituent element.

Despite the uniqueness of concrete infrastructures using these innovative materials, they are still prone to cracks. The research of [3] as reported in [4] revealed that concrete crack is a result of shrinkage, weather action, thermal stresses, and so on. Using self-healing technology, the strength and durability of concrete can be improved using biotechnological method by adopting the calcite precipitation principle. Self-healing technology seems to be very effective if the crack size is not more than 0.8 mm at the early age. However, the research of [4] revealed that hydro-gel encapsulation, vascular systems, and capsules are also good methods of self-healing concrete structures. Recent research focuses on the use of biotechnology and nanomaterial and the use of autogenous principle in self-healing technology which is espoused in this review.

1.1 Self-healing technology

The concept of self-healing was birthed some few decades due to the crack induced in some water retaining structures [5]. One of the major causes of concrete structural failure is the crack that can occur both in the plastic and hardened states [69]. The effect of crack may not be pronounced at the early stage, but it affects the mechanical strength at the late age which involves a lot of money for repair. The research of [7] showed that the active treatment of cracks seems to be an effective method as compared with the passive method of crack treatment.

The main concept was to make sure that this concrete structure affected by crack regained its mechanical strength by the hydration of the cement particles present in it [10, 11]. The concept of autogenic healing was used in this approach. According to [11], autogenous healing is a procedure where materials self-heal by nature. The same author avowed that this self-healing may be due to the formation of the carbonate or the hydroxide of carbon (calcium carbonate and calcium hydroxide). Additionally, the sedimentation of particles and swelling of the cement matrix in the concrete proved to be likely causative factors [12]. Asserted the problem of sedimentation and swelling can be averted and corrected using the self-healing capacity of the material composition of concrete.

Self-healing is an example of the active process of crack treatment. This method can operate independently in different conditions regardless of the crack position. The design of materials with healing properties is now gaining acceptance in concrete technology due to its numerous advantages.

1.2 Sustainable materials used in self-healing concrete

Sustainable structures provide environmentally friendly infrastructure, add long-term value to facilities, and improve the structural stability of structures. In concrete technology, different materials have been used in self-healing technology through three main strategies as shown in Table 1.

  1. Autogenous healing

  2. Encapsulation of polymeric material

  3. Microbial production of calcium-carbonate (biotechnological approaches)

1Autogenous healing[1318]
2Encapsulation of polymeric material[19]
3Biotechnological approaches[2024]

Table 1.

Self-healing methods.

S/NMaterial usedAuthors
1The use of hydrophobic solution adopting sonication technique[2931]
2Melamine-based and polyurethane (PU) capsule material[32, 33]
3Perspex cast acrylic tubes and glass tubes[34, 35]
4Glass and ceramic cylindrical capsules[36, 37]
5Spherical capsules using sodium silicate solution[32, 38]
6The use of encapsulated epoxy in polystyrene-divinylbenzene microcapsules[39]
7Isocyanate prepolymer encapsulated in hollow cylindrical glass tubes[34, 35]
8Microcapsules to hold bisphenol F epoxy resin (Cailleux and Pollet)[19]
9Microcapsules made of silica gel with oil core were used[41]

Table 2.

Materials used in encapsulation method of self-healing.

1.2.1 Autogenous healing

This process of healing occurs when the continuity of two sides of cracks is restored without any external repair [25]. The same author avowed that water passing through concrete dissolve the calcium present in the cement mortar of concrete. The passage of water oftentimes is through the presence of cracks either in the hardened or plastic state. The calcium is transported in the insoluble form in the voids which eventually seal the crack without any external approach. The cracks did not only heal, but the mechanical properties were also restored. Additionally, the healed concrete becomes impermeable to water, thereby improving the mechanical strength. The principle of sealing cracks with calcium carbonate crystals from carbon dioxide in the surrounding soil, air, or water is the autogenous healing process. This reaction with the free calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide from the hydration of tricalcium silicate of the cement helps in crack healing also. However the main product that fills the void is the calcium carbonate [25].

Furthermore, the research of [26] showed that calcium carbonate is a versatile material that can be used in crack healing for the filling of voids and improved porosity. The research of [13, 14] showed that the presence of unhydrated cement in the concrete composition can affect autogenous healing. Additionally, the presence of water and humidity are also critical factors. The improvement of this approach of crack treatment depends on the water-cement ratio used in the concrete design. The lower the water-cement ratio, the better the autogenous healing process. Moreover, the success of this approach depends on the diameter of the crack induced in the concrete structure. The research of [18] showed that only cracks ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 can be filled using this approach.

1.2.2 Encapsulation of polymeric material

This process involves coating of the hydrophobic nanoparticles with an additional polymer layer. This process involves the foaming of the healing agent in the presence of moisture. It also involves the use of fibers in concrete. Encapsulation also uses capsules that can survive in concrete matrix. The addition of this capsule must not interfere with rheology and mechanical properties of the concrete both in the plastic and hardened states [27]; this factor according to the research of [19] as stated in [28] makes this method difficult. The research of [19, 28] stated that encapsulation involves the use of liquid, gas, or fine solid particles incorporating synthetic polymer in concrete technology. The research of [19] stated that to provide protection to the constituents of the healing agent, the healing process begins when the capsule is opened to crack and the applied load breaks the capsule which invariably opens the healing agent [4]. This method can be categorized into the following:

  1. Bacterial precipitation

  2. Encapsulated chemical healing agents

The materials used in this method are as shown in Table 2.

The drawback of this approach is the tendency to repeat itself over time, and this invariably leads to repeated healing. Moreover, the moisture content required is high to make the healing process effective. Research of [4244] showed that insufficient capillary action could render the method ineffective. The cost of production is another shortcoming of adopting this method.

1.3 Biotechnological approaches

Biotechnology involves the use of biomineralization in concrete technology. It is a process of mineral formation by living organism in nature. According to the same author, the process can be accomplished by inducing biological mineralization in an open environment as a result of uncontrolled microbial metabolic activity [21]. This process occurs in an anaerobic environment or at toxic-anoxic boundary as avowed by [22]. This is as a result of photosynthesis from bicarbonate solutions which results in carbonate production [45]. Besides, the use of this method is feasible when carbon dioxide is present in the surrounding. It can be inferred from this that photosynthesis pathway can be applied when concrete infrastructure is exposed to carbon dioxide in the presence of light.

Furthermore, the heterotrophic growth of different types of bacteria such as Arthrobacter, Bacillus, and Rhodococcusleads to the production of organic salt and carbonate minerals through urea analysis [4648]. It also results in the increase in the pH consequently increasing the concentration of carbonate. This process is achieved by the conversion of carbon dioxide to carbonate [13, 49, 50]. Invariably, this aids the calcium carbonate precipitation which plays an active role in the blockage of cracks [51, 52]. Other bacteria used in self-healing technology are shown in Table 3.

Type of bacteriaCement replacementImportanceSource
1Bacillus aeriusRice huskStrength, durability[53]
2Bacillus megateriumNo replacementCompressive strength[54]
3Bacillus sphaericusNormal concreteDurability[14, 55]
4Sporosarcina pasteuriiFly ash concreteStrength, durability
5Sporosarcina pasteuriiSilica fumeImprovement in strength and durability[56]
6Bacillus sphaericusNo replacementAlternative surface treatment for concrete[52]
7ShewanellaspeciesNo replacementCompressive strength[52, 5759]
8Bacillus subtilisCompressive strength[59]

Table 3.

Bacteria used in self-healing technology.

The major drawback of this approach is the production of ammonium ions (NH4+) through ureolytic activity which results in nitrogen oxide emission into the atmosphere. It is estimated that the remediation of 1 m2 of concrete needs 10 g/L of urea which produces 4.7 g of nitrogen. This amount is about one third of the nitrogen that is produced by each person everyday [52]. Furthermore, the presence of excessive ammonium in the concrete matrix increases the risk of salt damage by converting to nitric acid. Hence, an optimization to find the required amount of urea is beneficial to avoid excessive ammonium emission.

For cement-based materials, different methods can be found in literature (Table 4); the first breakthrough involves the use of encapsulated sealant or adhesive [19]. These are stored in fibers [39, 40] or in longer tubes [60]. Filling of the voids and cracks with expansive material can propel carbonation when water percolates [61, 62]. The use of bacteria to stimulate the self-healing mechanism is also a promising alternative [6365]. Nanotechnology is a unique branch of science that uses nanomaterial in the design, construction, repair, and protection of infrastructures. It deals with the application of the physical world in a small scale by assessing the atom, molar molecule, and similar molecule of material [6668]. With the increasing development of nanotechnology, the use of tiny nanoparticles and nanomaterial also increased in modern technologies [69].

ItemSelf-healing materialsAuthors
1Encapsulated sealants and adhesive[19]
2The adhesives can be stored in short fiber[39, 40]
3The adhesives can be stored in long fiber[43, 6062]
4Expansive component in the concrete[61, 62]
5Bacteria to stimulate the self-healing mechanism[6365]

Table 4.

Self-healing materials.


2. Conclusions

This review assessed the use of self-healing technology for sustainable infrastructural development. Relevant literatures on the use of self-healing technology in concrete technology were assessed. The main concept was to make sure that concrete structure affected by crack regained its mechanical strength by the hydration of the cement particles present in it. Self-healing mechanism using the autogenous healing, encapsulation of polymeric material, and microbial production of calcium carbonate (biotechnological approaches) was studied. The review revealed that:

  1. The major shortcoming using capsulation method is its repeatability over a long time which can also lead to repeated healing over a long time.

  2. Capsulation method requires high amount of moisture to make it effective.

  3. The cost of production of capsules for large concrete structures is also a major flaw of this approach.

  4. Insufficient capillary force of the crack causes lower than expected amount of healing agent being released into the matrix using capsulation method.

  5. Heterotrophic growth of different genera of bacteria results in the production of carbonate minerals; invariably, this aids the calcium carbonate precipitation which plays an active role in the blockage of cracks.

  6. The activities of these bacteria lead to an increase in the pH of the medium, thereby increasing the carbonate concentration.

  7. Excessive production of ammonium in the concrete matrix using biotechnological approach increases the risk of salt damage by conversion to nitric acid.

  8. The effectiveness of autogenous healing of crack depends on the water-cement ratio used in the concrete design. The success of this approach depends on the diameter of the crack induced in the concrete structure.


3. Recommendations

  1. Future studies should focus on the production of some of these self-healing materials in large quantity.

  2. Future studies should also focus on the effect of this technology on corrosion considering the versatile usage of reinforced concrete for infrastructural construction.

  3. It is also recommended that the use of biotechnology in self-healing should be done with caution and the right technology should be used because of its effect on durability.



The authors are grateful to the management of Covenant University for the access to the articles used for this review.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Oloyede SA. Tackling causes of frequent building collapse in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2010;7(3):127-132
  2. 2. Delatte NJ. Lessons from roman cement and concrete. ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 2008;127(3):109-115
  3. 3. ACI (American Concrete Institute). Causes, Evaluation, and Repair of Cracks in Concrete Structures. Farmington Hills, MI; 2007
  4. 4. Souradeep G, Kua HW. Encapsulation technology and techniques in self-healing concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2016;28(12):04016165. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001687
  5. 5. Edvardsen C. Water permeability and autogenous healing of cracks in concrete. ACI Materials Journal. 1999;96(4):448-454
  6. 6. Le Métayer-Levrel G, Castanier S, Orial G, Loubière JF, Perthuisot JP. Applications of bacterial carbonatogenesis to the protection and regeneration of limestones in buildings and historic patrimony. Sedimentary Geology. 1999;126:25-34. Available from:[Accessed: 26 March 2019]
  7. 7. Warscheid T, Braams J. Biodeterioration of stone: A review. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2000;46:343-368
  8. 8. Achal V, Mukherjee A, Sudhakara Reddy M. Microbial concrete: Way to enhance the durability of building structures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2011;23:730-734
  9. 9. Achal V, Mukerjee A, Sudhakara Reddy M. Biogenic treatment improves the durability and remediates the cracks of concrete structures. Construction and Building Materials. 2013;48:1-5
  10. 10. Ter Heide N. Crack healing in hydrating concrete [MSc-thesis]. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology; 2005
  11. 11. Granger S, Loukili A, Pijaudier-Cabot G, Behloul M. Self-healing of cracks in concrete: From a model material to usual concretes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Advances in Concrete Through Science and Engineering; Quebec City, Canada; 2006
  12. 12. Schlangen E, Joseph C. Self-healing processes in concrete. In: Ghosh SK, editor. Self-Healing Materials: Fundamentals, Design Strategies and Applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2008. pp. 141-182
  13. 13. Van Tittelboom K et al. Comparison of different approaches for self-healing concrete in a large-scale lab test. Construction and Building Materials. 2016;107:125-137
  14. 14. Wang J, Dewanckele J, Cnudde V, Van Vlierberghe S, Verstraete W, De Belie N. X-ray computed tomography proof of bacterial-based self-healing in concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2014;53:289-304
  15. 15. Clear CA. Effects of Autogenous Healing upon the Leakage of Water through Cracks in Concrete. USA: Cement and Concrete Association; 1985
  16. 16. Reinhardt HW, Joos M. Permeability and self-healing of cracked concrete as a function of temperature and crack width. Cement and Concrete Research. 2003;33(7):981-985
  17. 17. Şahmaran M, Keskin SB, Ozerkan G, Yaman IO. Self-healing of mechanically-loaded self-consolidating concretes with high volumes of fly ash. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2008;30:872-887
  18. 18. Ahn TH, Kishi T. The effect of geo-materials on the autogenous healing behavior of cracked concrete. In: ICCRRR II; Cape Town, South Africa; 2009. pp. 125-126
  19. 19. Dry C. Matrix cracking repair and filling using active and passive modes for smart timed release of chemicals from fibers into cement matrices. Smart Materials and Structures. 1994;3:118-123
  20. 20. Tebo BM, Johnson HA, McCarthy JK, Templeton AS. Geomicrobiology of manganese (II) oxidation. Trends in Microbiology. 2005;13:421-428
  21. 21. Ramachandran SK, Ramakrishnan V, Bang SS. Remediation of concrete using micro-organisms. ACI Materials Journal. 2001;98:3-9
  22. 22. Hammes F, Verstraete W. Key roles of pH and calcium metabolism in microbial carbonate precipitation. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 2002;1:3-7
  23. 23. Barton LL, Northup DE. Microbial Ecology. United State: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011
  24. 24. Wu M, Johannesson B, Geiker M. A review: Self-healing in cementitious materials and engineered cementitious composite as a self-healing material. Construction and Building Materials. 2012;28:571-583
  25. 25. Neville AM, Brooks JJ. Concrete Technology. United Kingdom: Pearson; 2010
  26. 26. Hearn N. Self-sealing, autogenous healing and continued hydration: What is the difference? Materials and Structures. 1998;31:563-567
  27. 27. Seifan M, Samani AK, Berenjian A. Bioconcrete: Next generation of self-healing concrete. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2006;100(6):2591-2602. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-7316-z
  28. 28. Dragostin I, Dragostin O, Pelin A-M, Grigore C, Zamfir CL. The importance of polymers for encapsulation process and for enhanced cellular functions. Journal of Macromolecular Science. Part A. 2017;54(7):489-493
  29. 29. Kessler M, Sottos N, White S. Self-healing structural composite materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2003;34(8):743-753
  30. 30. Brown EN, White SR, Sottos NR. Retardation and repair of fatigue cracks in a microcapsule toughened epoxycomposite. Part II: In situ self-healing. Composites Science and Technology. 2005;65(15):2474-2480
  31. 31. Feng X, et al. Self-healing mechanism of a novel cementitious composite using microcapsules. In: Proceedings, International Conference on Durability of Concrete Structures; Hangzhou, China: Zhejiang University; 2008
  32. 32. Pelletier M, Brown R, Shukla A, Bose A. Self-healing concrete with a microencapsulated healing agent. Technical Report; Kingston, RI: University of Rhode Island; 2011
  33. 33. Liu H, et al. Self-healing of concrete cracks using hollow plant fibres. In: Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Self-Healing Materials; Chicago; 2009a
  34. 34. Thao TDP. Quasi-brittle self-healing materials: Numerical modelling and applications in civil engineering [Ph.D. dissertation]. Singapore: National University of Singapore; 2011
  35. 35. Thao TDP, Johnson TJS, Tong QS, Dai PS. Implementation of self-healing in concrete-proof of concept. The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering. 2009;2(2):116-125
  36. 36. Van Tittelboom K, Adesanya K, Dubruel P, Van Puyvelde P, DeBelie N. Methyl methacrylate as healing agent for self-healing cementitious materials. Smart Materials and Structures. 2011a;20(12):125016
  37. 37. Van Tittelboom K, De Belie N. Self-healing concrete: Suitability of different healing agents. International Journal of 3 R's. 2010;1(1):12-21
  38. 38. Huang H, Ye G, Leung C, Wan K. Application of sodium silicate solution as self-healing agent in cementitious materials. In: Proceedings, International RILEM Conference on Advances in Construction Materials Through Science and Engineering; Bagneux, France: RILEM Publications SARL; 2011. pp. 530-536
  39. 39. Li W, Jiang Z, Yang Z, Zhao N, Yuan W. Self-healing efficiency of cementitious materials containing microcapsules filled with healing adhesive: Mechanical restoration and healing process monitored by water absorption. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):1-8
  40. 40. Qian SZ, Zhou J, Schlangen E. Influence of curing condition and pre-cracking time on the self-healing behavior of engineered cementitious composites. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2010b;32:686-693
  41. 41. Yang Z, Hollar J, He X, Shi X. A self-healing cementitious composite using oil core/silica gel shell microcapsules. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2011;33(4):506-512
  42. 42. Dong B, Wang Y, Fang G, Han N, Xing F, Lu Y. Smart releasing behavior of a chemical self-healing microcapsule in the stimulated concrete pore solution. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2015;56:46-50
  43. 43. Joseph C, Jefferson A, Cantoni M. Issues relating to the autonomic healing of cementitious materials. In: Proceedings 1st International Conference on Self-Healing Materials; Netherlands: Springer; 2007. p. 1
  44. 44. Sun L, Yu WY, Ge Q. Experimental research on the self-healing performance of micro-cracks in concrete bridge. Advanced Materials Research. 2011;250:28-32
  45. 45. Mann S. Biomineralization: Principles and Concepts in Bioinorganic Materials Chemistry. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001
  46. 46. De Muynck W, Cox K, De Belie N, Verstraete W. Bacterial carbonate precipitation as an alternative surface treatment for concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2008;22(5):875-885
  47. 47. Jonkers HM, Thijssen A, Muyzer G, Copuroglu O, Schlangen E. Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecological Engineering. 2010;36:230-235
  48. 48. Wiktor V, Jonkers HM. Quantification of crack-healing in novel bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2011;33:763-770
  49. 49. Stocks-Fischer S, Galinat JK, Bang SS. Microbiological precipitation of CaCO3. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1999;31:1563-1571
  50. 50. Pacheco-Torgal F, Labrincha JA. Biotech cementitious materials: Some aspects of an innovative approach for concrete with enhanced durability. Construction and Building Materials. 2013;40:1136-1141
  51. 51. Dick J, De Windt W, De Graef B, Saveyn H, Van Der Meeren P, BelieN D, et al. Bio-deposition of a calcium carbonate layer on degraded limestone byBacillusspecies. Biodegradation. 2006;17:357-367
  52. 52. Muynck W, Belie N, Verstraete W. Improvement of concrete durability with the aid of bacteria. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Self Healing Materials; Noordwijk aan zee, The Netherlands; 2007
  53. 53. Siddique R, Singh K, Kunal M, Corinaldesi Singh V, Rajor A. Properties of bacterial rice husk ash concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2016;121:112-119
  54. 54. Andalib R, Majid MZA, Hussin MW, Ponraj M, Keyvanfar A, Mirza J. et al. Optimum concentration ofBacillus megateriumfor strengthening structural concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2016;118:180-193
  55. 55. Chahal N, Siddique R, Rajor A. Influence of bacteria on the compressive strength, water absorption and rapid chloride permeability of fly ash concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2012;28:351-356
  56. 56. Chahal N, Siddique R, Rajor A. Influence of bacteria on the compressive strength, water absorption and rapid chloride permeability of concrete incorporating silica fume. Construction and Building Materials. 2012;37(1):645-651
  57. 57. Siddique R, Kaur N. Effect of ureolytic bacteria on concrete properties. Construction and Building Materials. 2011;25(10):3791-3801
  58. 58. Gosh SK, editor. Self-Healing Materials; Fundamentals, Design Strategies and Applications. USA: Wiley Blackwell; 2008
  59. 59. Khaliq W, Ehsan MB. Crack healing in concrete using various bio influenced self-healing techniques. Construction and Building Materials. 2016;102:349-357
  60. 60. Nishiwaki T, Mihashi H, Jang B-K, Miura K. Development of self-healing system for concrete with selective heating around crack. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology. 2006;4(2):267-275
  61. 61. Hosoda A, Kishi T, Arita H, Takakuwa Y. Self healing of crack and water permeability of expansive concrete. In: 1st International Conference on Self-Healing Materials; Noordwijk, Holland; 2007
  62. 62. Sisomphon K, Çopuroğlu O, Fraaij ALA. Durability of blast-furnace slag mortars subjected to sodium monofluorophosphate solution curing. In: Proceedings 4th International Conference on Construction Materials: Performance, Innovations and Structural Implications; (24) (PDF) Autogenous self-healing of cement with expansive minerals-I: Impact in early age crack healing; Nagoya, Japan; 2009
  63. 63. Bang SS, Galinat JK, Ramakrishnan V. Calcite precipitation induced by polyurethane-immobilizedBacillus pasteurii. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2001;28:404-409
  64. 64. Jonkers H, Schlangen E. In: Schmets AJM, van der Zwaag S. editors, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Self Healing Materials; 18-20 April 2007; Noordwijk aan Zee, The Netherlands: Springer; 2007
  65. 65. De Muynck W, Debrouwer D, De Belie N, Verstraete W. Bacterial carbonate precipitation improves the durability of cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Research. 2008;38:1005-1014
  66. 66. Mansour NM, Zohre D. Nanotechnology’s role in optimization of energy consumption in buildings. In: 5th Conference of Fuel Consumption Optimization of the Country; 2006
  67. 67. Khandve PV. Nanotechnology for building material. International Journal of Basic and Applied Research. 2014;4:146-151
  68. 68. BASF. Nanotechnology for Simple, Successful Concrete Repair—A Specifiers’ Guide. Germany: BASF Company; 2008. pp. 1-24
  69. 69. Seaton A. Nanotechnology and the occupational physician. Occupational Medicine. 2006;56:312-316

Written By

Busari Ayobami Adebola, Kupolati Williams Kehinde, Loto Tolulope Roland, Sadiku Rotimi Emmanuel, Jacques Snyman and Ndambuki Julius

Submitted: January 14th, 2019 Reviewed: May 10th, 2019 Published: February 12th, 2020