Computed parameters of conformal cylindrical array for various radii of curvatures.

## Abstract

Phase compensation techniques based on projection method and convex optimization (phase correction only) for comparing the maximum gain of a phase-compensated conformal antenna array have been discussed. In particular, these techniques are validated with conformal phased array antenna attached to a cylindrical-shaped surface with various radii of curvatures. These phase compensation techniques are used to correct the broadside radiation pattern. It is shown that the maximum broadside gain compensated is still less than the gain of a linear flat array for any surface deformation. This fundamental maximum compensated gain limitations of the phase compensation techniques can be used by a designer to predict the maximum broadside obtainable theoretical gain on a conformal antenna array for a particular deformed surface.

### Keywords

- conformal antennas
- phased arrays
- antenna radiation patterns
- convex optimization
- microstrip arrays

## 1. Introduction

Conformal antenna arrays are beneficial for applications that need an antenna to be placed on a non-flat surface, for example, on the fuselage of a UAV/airplane in the aerospace industry [1, 2, 3], implantable sensors in wearable networks [4, 5, 6, 7, 8], and satellite communications [9, 10, 11]. One of the main advantages of using conformal antenna is its structural integration ability on singly curved (e.g., a wedge/cylinder) [12, 13, 14, 15] and doubly curved (like a sphere) surfaces [16]. This can be very useful in applications where using definite flat surface may not be a practical design choice. Another exciting application of conformal antenna array is at the base station in a cellular mobile communication system. Today, mobile service providers are utilizing three separate antenna panels (dipole or monopole array) in a cell for a 120° sector coverage. What about, if one cylindrical array is used instead of three dipole arrays [17]? This can result in a much smaller transmitter requirement with 360° azimuthal coverage plus reduced base station size at a lower cost (specifically beneficial in crowded residential areas where cellular companies have to rent the space for base station installation).

On the other hand, these curved surfaces may be subjected to intentional (e.g., flexing wings of a UAV/aircraft) and/or unintentional (bending of aircraft wings due to severe weather conditions/vibrations) forces that change the shape of the surface [12]. As a result, the radiation pattern of the conformal antenna array is changed as shown in Figure 1. The results in [18] indicate that directivity of conformal antenna array can be reduced by 5–15 dB. In the literature, various methods have been proposed to compensate the reduction in directivity and to improve/correct the radiation pattern of a conformal antenna array. In [1, 2, 3, 11, 19, 20, 21], mechanical calibration techniques have been used to steer the main beam on a conformal surface in the desired direction. In [12, 13, 15, 16, 22, 23, 24, 25], projection method of [26] is used to correct the main beam direction of a deformed/flex surface. In [27, 28, 29, 30], various optimization algorithms have been used to control the radiation pattern of conformal antenna arrays. In summary, it has been shown that the radiation pattern of a conformal antenna array can be improved with different calibration techniques, signal processing algorithms, sensor circuitry, and phase and amplitude adjustments.

This chapter will focus on phase compensation of four-element conformal cylindrical antenna array using (1) projection method and (2) convex optimization method. First, a brief introduction and working principle of phase compensation is presented using projection method. Then, array factor expression will be derived to compensate the radiation pattern of conformal cylindrical array. Then, the convex optimization algorithm will be discussed to compute the array weights for pattern recovery of conformal cylindrical array. Then, compensated gain using both the methods will be compared to linear flat array to explore the gain limitations of these compensated techniques for conformal antenna arrays. Finally, conclusion and future work are presented.

## 2. Projection method for pattern recovery of conformal antenna array

The projection method in [26] and its further exploration in [12, 15, 22] are adopted here to describe the behavior of the conformal antenna array shown in Figure 2. For discussion, consider the problem where the flat antenna array is placed on the singly curved surface shaped as a cylinder with radius r as shown in Figure 2. The position of each antenna element on the cylinder is represented as

To compute this compensated phase, the antenna elements are projected on the reference plane and then the distances from antenna elements on cylindrical surface (shown as black dots) to the projected elements on the reference plane (shown as dashed circles) are calculated. Suppose

### 2.1 Computing the distance to the projected elements

The distance from the antenna elements on the cylinder to the projected elements on the reference plane can be computed using:

where

### 2.2 Computing the compensated phase

The required compensated phase to correct the broadside radiation pattern of a conformal cylindrical antenna array in Figure 2 is then given by:

where

### 2.3 Array factor expression

To analytically compute the corrected (compensated) radiation pattern and validate with simulation results, the following compensated array factor

where

where

For this work, the phase difference

## 3. Convex optimization for pattern recovery of conformal antenna array

The broadside gain maximization problem of a conformal antenna array in Figure 2 can be formulated as a linear constrained quadratic programming problem [32], i.e.,

where

Iterative optimization algorithms are normally adopted to find this minimum. Although second-order Newton method is able to find the solution in fewer steps, it requires evaluation of complex quadratic norm defined as the Hessian matrix ^{th} iteration for Gradient descent method is given as

where

## 4. Analytical and simulation results

To analytically compute the corrected (compensated) radiation pattern and validate with simulation results, the compensated array factor

### 4.1 Cylindrical surface with radius of curvature r = 8 cm

The four-element microstrip patch antenna array on a cylindrical surface with radius ** Table 1** that the broadside compensated gain

Parameter | Projection method | Convex optimization | |
---|---|---|---|

8 | [121.67,0,0,121.67] | [−89.49,146.95,146.95,-89.49] | |

6.17 | 6.17 | ||

0.8 | 0.8 | ||

10 | [101.84,0,0,101.84] | [−170.44,85.95,85.95,−170.44] | |

4 | |||

0.53 | |||

12 | [86.95,0,0,86.95] | [114.61,26.05,26.05,114.61] | |

2.74 | |||

0.4 | |||

15 | [70.95,0,0,70.95] | [9.66,−62.66,−62.66,9.66] | |

1.765 | |||

0.24 | |||

30 | [36.42,0,0,36.42] | [−102.2,−139.3,−139.3,−102.2] | |

0.5 | |||

0 |

### 4.2 Cylindrical surface with radii of curvatures r = 10 , 12 , 15 cm

When radii of curvatures of cylindrical surface array increase (less deformation), both the projection and convex optimization (phase correction only) methods recover the broadside radiation pattern with decreasing gap between corrected and uncorrected gains as shown in Figures 5** –**7 and are also tabulated in Table 1. The gain

### 4.3 Cylindrical surface with radii of curvatures r = 30 cm

In the limiting case, when the radius of curvature of conformal cylindrical array increases up to 30 cm and above (approaching flat array), the compensated gains achieved from both projection and convex optimization methods nearly reaches the linear flat array gain, which is demonstrated in Figure 8 and is shown in Table 1.

## 5. Conclusion

In this chapter, phase compensation techniques based on projection method and convex optimization (phase correction only) have been discussed for recovery of broadside radiation pattern on a conformal cylindrical-shaped antenna array. The compensated gains of both the methods have been compared with linear flat antenna array. It is shown that the maximum broadside gain recovered with both the methods is less than the linear antenna array for severe deformation cases and approaches the gain of linear antenna array for less conformal deformation surfaces. The analytical expressions and convex optimization algorithm used can be used by a designer to predict the maximum possible compensated gain of conformal antenna array.

## 6. Future work

The proposed techniques can be extended for broadside pattern correction of conformal antenna arrays on other deformed surfaces (spherical nose of plane, flexing wings of UAV, etc.). Another interesting research can be to extend these techniques for beamforming on conformal deformed surfaces (e.g., on base station/tower of cellular companies) to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and its capacity. In this work, convex optimization is used to compute the compensated phases (with uniform amplitudes constraint) for recovery of broadside radiation pattern only. In practice, the technique is robust and can be used to calculate complex weights (amplitude tapering as well as phase correction), which can be further explored for beamforming applications and side lobe level control of conformal antenna arrays.

## Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Ignite (NTF), Ministry of IT & Telecom, Government of Pakistan via project no. ICTRDF/TR&D/2015/04.

## References

- 1.
Schippers H, Knott P, Deloues T, Lacomme P, Scherbarth MR. Vibrating antennas and compensation techniques Research in NATO/RTO/SET 087/RTG 50. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference; 3-10 March 2007; Big Sky, MT. pp. 1-13 - 2.
Wincza K, Gruszczynski S. Influence of curvature radius on radiation patterns in multibeam conformal antennas. In: Proceedings of the 36th European Microwave Conference; 10-15 September 2006; Manchester. pp. 1410-1413 - 3.
Loecker C, Knott P, Sekora R, Algermissen S. Antenna design for a conformal antenna array demonstrator. In: 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP); 26-30 March 2012; Prague. pp. 151-153 - 4.
Salonen P, Rahmat-Samii Y, Schaffrath M, Kivikoski M. Effect of textile materials on wearable antenna performance: A case study of GPS antennas. In: IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation; 20-25 June 2004; Monterey. pp. 459-462 - 5.
Kennedy TF, Fink PW, Chu AW, Champagne NJ, Lin GY, Khayat MA. Body-worn E-textile antennas: The good, the low-mass, the conformal. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 2009; 57 :910-918. DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2009.2014602 - 6.
Psychoudakis D, Lee GY, Chen C-C, Volakis JL. Estimating diversity for body-worn antennas. In: 3rd European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP); 23-27 March 2009; Berlin. pp. 704-708 - 7.
Semkin V et al. Conformal antenna array for millimeter-wave communications: Performance evaluation. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies. 2017; 9 :241-247. DOI: 10.1017/S1759078715001282 - 8.
Kuang Y, Yao L, Yu SH, Tan S, Fan XJ, Qiu YP. Design and electromagnetic properties of a conformal ultra wideband antenna integrated in three-dimensional woven fabrics. Polymers. 2018; 10 :1-10. DOI: 10.3390/polym10080861 - 9.
Schippers H, Verpoorte J, Jorna P, et al. Conformal phased array with beam forming for airborne satellite communication. In: International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas (WSA 2008); 26-27 February 2008; Vienna. pp. 343-350 - 10.
Salas Natera MA et al. New antenna array architectures for satellite communications. In: Karimi M, editor. Advances in Satellite Communications. 1st ed. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2011. pp. 167-194. DOI: 10.5772/838 - 11.
Wu Y, Warnick F, Jin C. Design study of an L-band phased array feed for wide-field surveys and vibration compensation on FAST. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 2013; 61 :3026-3033. DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2013.2254438 - 12.
Braaten BD, Aziz MA, Roy S, Nariyal S, Irfanullah, Chamberlain NF, et al. A self-adapting flexible (SELFLEX) antenna array for changing conformal surface applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 2013; 61 :655-665. DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2012.2226227 - 13.
Anagnostou D, Iskander M. Adaptive flexible antenna array system for deformable wing surfaces. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference; 7-14 March 2015; Big Sky, MT. pp. 1-6 - 14.
Irfanullah, Khattak S, Braaten BD. Improvement of the broadside radiation pattern of a conformal antenna array using amplitude tapering. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal. 2017; 32 :511-516 - 15.
Braaten BD, Roy S, Irfanullah, Nariyal S, Anagnostou DE. An autonomous self-adapting conformal array for cylindrical surfaces with a changing radius. In: IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APSURSI); 6-11 July 2014; Memphis. pp. 1784-1785 - 16.
Braaten BD, Roy S, Irfanullah, Nariyal S, Anagnostou DE. Phase compensated conformal antennas for changing spherical surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 2014; 62 :1880-1887. DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2014.2298881 - 17.
Josefsson L, Persson P. Conformal Array Antenna Theory and Design. 1st ed. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: Wiley-IEEE Press; 2006. 472 p. DOI: 10.1002/047178012X - 18.
Haupt RL. Antenna Arrays, A Computational Approach. 1st ed. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: Wiley-IEEE Press; 2010. 534 p. DOI: 10.1002/9780470937464 - 19.
Seidel TJ, Rowe WST, Ghorbani K. Passive compensation of beam shift in a bending array. Progress in Electromagnetics Research C. 2012; 29 :41-53 - 20.
Ferreira DB, de Paula CB, Nascimento DC. Design techniques for conformal microstrip antennas and their arrays. In: Kishk A, editor. Advancement in Microstrip Antennas with Recent Applications. 1st ed. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2013. pp. 1-31. DOI: 10.5772/53019 - 21.
Khaleel HR, Al-Rizzo HM, Abbosh AI. Design, fabrication, and testing of flexible antennas. In: Kishk A, editor. Advancement in Microstrip Antennas with Recent Applications. 1st ed. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2013. pp. 363-382. DOI: 10.5772/50841 - 22.
Irfanullah, Nariyal S, Roy S, Masud MM, Ijaz B, Iftikhar A, et al. A note on the fundamental maximum gain limit of the projection method for conformal phased array antennas. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS); 11-16 November 2012; Maui, HI. pp. 1-4 - 23.
Rigobello F, Mansutti G, Khan MS, Capobianco AD. Pattern recovering of conformal antenna array for strongly deformed surfaces. In: 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP); 19-24 March 2017; Paris. pp. 869-871 - 24.
Mansutti G, Rigobello F, Asif S, Khan MS, Capobianco AD, Galtarossa A. Main lobe control of a beam tilting antenna array laid on a deformable surface. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation. 2018:1-6. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2521953 - 25.
Mansutti G, Khan MS, Capobianco AD, Iftikhar A, Asif S. Self-adapting conformal phased array antennas for complex changing surfaces. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters. 2017; 59 :393-399. DOI: 10.1002/mop.30301 - 26.
Chiba I, Hariu K, Sato S, Mano S. A projection method providing low sidelobe pattern in conformal array antennas. In: International Symposium Digest: Antennas and Propagation; 26-30 June 1989; San Jose. pp. 130-134 - 27.
Liang Z, Ouyang J, Yang F. A hybrid GA-PSO optimization algorithm for conformal antenna array pattern synthesis. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications. 2018; 32 :1601-1615. DOI: 10.1080/09205071.2018.1462257 - 28.
Xu Z, Li H, Liu Q-Z. Pattern synthesis of conformal antenna array by the hybrid genetic algorithm. Progress in Electromagnetics Research (PIER). 2008; 79 :75-90. DOI: 10.2528/PIER07091901 - 29.
Mandrić V, Rupčić S, Žagar D. Optimization of the spherical antenna arrays. In: Proceedings of 54th International Symposium ELMAR-2012; 12-14 September 2012; Zadar. pp. 287-292 - 30.
Haupt RL. Adaptive antenna arrays using a genetic algorithm. In: IEEE Mountain Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Systems; 24-26 July 2006; Logan, UT - 31.
Hansen RC. Phased Array Antennas. 1st ed. Logan, UT, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009. 551. p. DOI: 10.1002/9780470529188 - 32.
Boyd S, Vandenberghe L. Convex Optimization. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004. 716 p.DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511804441