Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: Key Features and the Role of the NXF1 (Nuclear Export Factor) Protein

Written By

Elena Golubkova, Anna Atsapkina, Anna K’ergaard and Ludmila Mamon

Submitted: October 8th, 2019 Reviewed: December 19th, 2019 Published: January 28th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90917

Chapter metrics overview

825 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Now there is interest in finding factors that, once in the ovum, can affect the development of offspring. The sbr (Dm nxf1) gene in D. melanogaster belongs to the evolutionarily conserved family of nxf (nuclear export factor). It is involved in controlling of male fertility and forming the factor that affects the segregation of maternal and paternal chromosomes after fertilization. The Dm NXF1 (SBR) protein seems to play a role in forming this mysterious factor during the meiotic period of spermatogenesis. Male germ cells develop as a syncytium, and success of spermatid individualization depends, to a great degree, on gene expression in primary spermatocytes. Most transcripts formed in primary spermatocytes are long-lived. The presence of the Dm NXF1 protein in the nucleus as well as in the cytoplasm suggests that it plays a role in the biogenesis of long-lived RNA and in cytoskeletal reorganization.

Keywords

  • spermatogenesis
  • meiosis
  • Drosophila
  • NXF
  • cytokinesis
  • RNA-binding protein

1. Introduction

Spermatogenesis is an evolutionary conservative process. In testes, the developing germline cells divide synchronously and with incomplete cytokinesis remaining interconnected by cytoplasmic bridges. Therefore, the germline cells develop as a syncytium and only become separated from each other at the end of spermatogenesis during spermatid individualization. In Drosophila melanogaster, the stem cell daughter, the gonialblast, undergoes four rounds of synchronous mitotic divisions to produce 16 precursor cells, called spermatogonia [1, 2, 3]. The spermatogonia then become spermatocytes and grow 25 times in size [1, 4]. During the growth phase, the majority of the transcripts for sperm differentiation are expressed and potentially stored until their protein activity is required [5, 6, 7]. Many of the transcribed genes are important for meiosis and post meiotic stages [6] or as are suggested to be reserved up to sperm maturing and delivered into the egg at fertilization [8, 9]. After the growth phase, the spermatocytes divide twice by meiosis and then differentiate into 64 haploid spermatid interconnected in a syncytium. At sperm individualization, most unneeded products are pushed to the end of the spermatozoon and an actin structure, termed the investment cone, forms a new membrane [10, 11]. Each cell becomes independent and turns into a mobile spermatozoon. Development of a mature spermatozoon with the change of histones on protamines in nucleus, the building of an acrosome and a tail, the forming of cellular membrane, occurs without transcription owing to translation of the long-lived mRNAs. Such mRNAs are keeping as a part of the RNP-complexes localized in the different cellular compartments. The testis-specific isoform of the Dm NXF1 (SBR) protein can be an important component of these RNP-complexes.

Advertisement

2. Long-lived transcripts and interacting proteins: role in the sperm maturation during spermiogenesis

Most transcripts formed in primary spermatocytes are not translated immediately after exiting from the nucleus. These RNAs are reserved in the ribonucleoprotein protein (RNP) complexes for a long time up to the elongation stage during spermatid individualization [6]. In D. melanogaster, 529 of the 553 mRNAs detected in spermatid were transcribed in primary spermatocytes [12].

The existence of the NXF (Nuclear eXport Factor) specialized transport receptors, which are the products of paralogous genes of the NXF family and are expressed predominantly in the testes or the brain of humans and mice, has been associated with the presence of long-lived, temporary non-translatable transcripts [13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. The most evolutionary conservative member of this family (NXF1) provides transport of the majority of the mRNAs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [18, 19, 20, 21]. The paralogous members of the NXF family differ from the NXF1 protein by divergent sequences enabling interaction with nucleoporins—proteins of nuclear pore complexes and the domain of LRR (leucine-rich repeats). These sequences are responsible for interaction with the partner proteins forming RNP complexes at different steps of mRNA biogenesis [13, 14, 15]. The primary localization of testis-specific NXFs in the cytoplasm suggests their participation in the biogenesis of long-lived mRNAs, which are temporarily untranslated [16, 17].

In D. melanogaster, the testis-specific Nxfparalogous genes are unknown. Unlike its orthologous in humans and mice, the Dm nxf1(sbr) gene does have testis-specific products [22, 23]. The short testis-specific sbrtranscripts use the alternative promoters in intron 3 and do not include exons 1–3. As a result, the testis-specific truncated SBR protein excludes nuclear localization signals (NLS) present in the canonical SBR protein and in the part of the RNA binding domain (RBD) (Figure 1) [24]. Such truncated SBR form can have other functions in addition to the nuclear RNA export, which are important for spermatogenesis.

Figure 1.

The testis-specificsbrmRNAs are detected by 5′ and 3′ RACE-PCR. Boxes indicate exons included in the sbr mRNAs. Exon numbers are signed under each box. RBD – RNA-binding domain; LRR – leucine-rich domain; NTF2L – nuclear transport factor 2 like; UBA – ubiquitin associated domain; NLS – nuclear localization signal. In testes, allsbrmRNAs have the shortened 3′ UTR. In all transcripts, length of the 3′ UTR varies from 44 to 124 nucleotides. TwosbrmRNAs, using the alternative promoters in intron 3, give rise the shortened protein isoform without NLS and the part of RBD, which are present in the canonical full-length SBR (published in Mamon et al. [24]).

During transcriptional activities—the prophase of meiosis and the round spermatid phase—the SBR protein is primarily found in the nucleus (Figures 2,3). This is coordinated with the known universal function of NXF1 proteins in various organisms [18, 19, 20, 21]. Unfortunately, antibodies to C-terminal part of the SBR protein cannot contradistinguish full-sized and truncated SBR isoforms.

Figure 2.

Adult testis immunofluorescence using anti-SBR (Alexa 546 goat anti-mouse). In the prophase of meiosis (arrowhead) and at the round spermatid stage (arrow)—The SBR proteins are primarily localized in the nucleus. Asterisk denotes the stem cells zone. Scale bar, 75 μm.

Figure 3.

Prepupal testis immunofluorescence using anti-SBR (Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse – A, B) and DAPI (A′, B′). A. Most part of the future gonad is represented of growing spermatocytes, primary spermatocytes, and meiocytes. Initially, the shape of the nucleus is round (A, thin arrow); then the shape becomes irregular (A, short arrow). B. Cyst of 16 meiocytes with the cytoplasmic localization of the SBR protein. Bivalents partially condensed (arrows). Asterisk denotes the stem cells zone. Scale bar, 75 μm.

Nuclei of spermatids in onion stage are brightly painted fluorochromes conjugated with anti-SBR (Figure 2). Nebenkern is near each of nucleus and is free from SBR. Only 24 genes are transcribed in Drosophilaspermatids [12], but spermatid nuclei show the brightest coloring by anti-SBR. Why at onion stage such high concentration of transport receptors for mRNA is necessary. It is possible that spermatid nuclei may be one of the docking place for some long-lived mRNAs because the most dramatic events depending from translation of these mRNAs are related to nucleus and/or structures connected with nucleus during the sperm maturation. In elongated spermatids, the SBR protein is localized on a nuclear surface asymmetrically, only along one of its sides (Figure 4). Spermatid elongation is period of intensive nuclear morphogenesis [1]. The nuclear envelope becomes asymmetrical, with nuclear pores being disposed along one side of elongated nucleus. In this region, the dense body consisting from a microtubule (MT) and actin-rich structure is formed and also localized along one side of the nucleus [25]. Nucleoporin binding domains (NTF2L and UBA) in the SBR proteins (Figure 1) allow them to participate in the storing of the RNP complexes with the long-lived RNAs connected with the nucleoporins on the nuclear envelope. After the RNP complexes dissociate, the translation of their mRNAs begins close to the nucleus, where there is a need for appropriate proteins. Then the components of the RNP complexes, including the SBR proteins, relocate in a spermatozoon tail as the granules and are degradate (Figure 4) [26, 27]. Proteasome degradation of the proteins is necessary for the formation of mature sperm [28]. SBR (Dm NXF1) protein has UBA-like domain (Figure 1), which are involved in a variety of cellular functions and many are connected to the ubiquitin proteasome system, an essential pathway for protein degradation in eukaryotic cells [29, 30]. Proteasome degradation is important for cell cycle progression [31]. Testis-specific proteasome degradation in D. melanogasterprobably provides effective elimination of SBR during spermatid individualization (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Spermatids at the elongation or individualization stages inD. melanogastermales (Alexa Fluor 546). Spermatids at the elongation stage: the SBR protein moves onto one side of the spermatid nuclear. The SBR protein leaves the condensed nuclei and is translocated in large granules into the formed spermatozoon tails at the final stage of spermatid elongation before individualization. 63× magnification.

It is important that mRNAs encoded by all of the post-meiotically transcribed genes are localized to the extreme distal ends of elongated spermatids. These mRNAs are subdivided into two classes named by comet and cup transcripts [12]. There is not a concentration of SBR to the distal ends of elongated spermatids.

A feature of spermatogenesis is that many genes produce shortened transcripts that encode shortened proteins. These proteins cannot function as the full-sized proteins encoded by the same genes [32]. This is due to the presence of testis-specific promoters or alternative splicing variants [33]. In addition, testis-specific transcripts often use an alternative polyadenylation site located upstream, compared to those in the transcripts of the same gene in other organs [33, 34]. This may be important for the regulation of translation and degradation of transcripts during spermatogenesis. All the transcripts of the Dm nxf1(sbr) gene have the shortened 3′UTR in testes [22, 23].

Advertisement

3. Allele-specific effects of the sbrgene including the male infertility

Mutations of the house-keeping genes are characterized by a broad range of pleiotropic effects. It is no surprise that mutations of the Dm nxf1gene lead to both male and female sterility and increase the frequency of the development malformations (FlyBase [35]). That may be the result of disruption of the NXF1 general functions. Allele-specific effects of mutations in the Dm nxf1gene suggest that its products may have specialized functions. The organ-specific products of sbrcan provide such specialization [22, 23, 24]. In addition, the source of specialized functions may be the presence of functionally significant sequences in the SBR protein, responsible for interaction with the certain partners. As a result, SBR may be involved in other processes than the nuclear-cytoplasmic export of mRNAs [36, 37]. A mutant product that disrupts the system of macromolecular interactions can have a dominant negative effect, in this case heterozygosity at the null allele will be better than the presence of a mutant protein along with the normal product [38]. Among the mutant alleles of the sbr (Dm nxf1)gene with the dominant effects are the formation of three-pole spindles during the first meiotic division in sbr5/+females [36] and sterility of sbr12/Dp (1;Y)y + v + males. Dp (1;Y)y + v + is the duplication of the segment of the X chromosome with the sbr+, y + and v + alleles, translocated on the Y chromosome. The duplication compensates a lethal effect of the different alleles of the sbrgene localized on X-chromosome [39]. sbr10is the thermosensitive allele with a block of the heat shock protein synthesis under heat shock (HS) [40]. It is a recessive feature of the sbr10allele [38]. Adult males carrying the sbr10allele are thermosensitive and die from 37°C, 1 h [8]. HS increased the number of abnormalities, of not only paternal but also maternal sex chromosome sets, in the offspring of the sbr10males. Meiocytes were the thermosensitive stage for this unexpected effect [8].

It was interesting to know what feature is characterized the SBR protein distribution in the future gonads of D. melanogastermales on the pupal stage. On a pre-pupa stage of development, the future gonad in D. melanogastermales is spherical with two poles with dividing cells (Figure 3). One pole produces germ-line cells and another—somatic cells of a future gonad. Both poles are quite poor SBR protein. It is as a rule characteristic for SBR in a zone of dividing cells in different tissues. Most part of a future gonad is represented by cysts with 16 spermatocytes. Cysts from 16 meiocytes are outstanding by the highest content of the cytoplasmic SBR protein (Figure 3B).

As the growing spermatocytes are characterized by the high level of transcriptional activity, the long-lived RNAs seem to be the most appropriate candidate for the role of factors that, along with the spermatozoon, enter an ovum during fertilization and can participate in chromosome disjunction. Due to the process of translation, a small number of these molecules are sufficient for the regulation of chromosome segregation. This is particularly important during the first hours of embryonal development of D. melanogaster, as it takes place in the absence of transcriptional activity of the zygotic genome [41]. It has been demonstrated that along with the spermatozoon, paternal RNAs that may also play a role in fertilization, as well as zygotic and embryonic development, also enter the oocyte [42, 43]. High level of the SBR protein in cytoplasm shows that this protein may play a crucial role in biogenesis of the long-lived RNAs in D. melanogaster. The significance of SBR in forming the meiotic spindle in female D. melanogaster[36] and for the mitotic divisions in early embryos [44] leave unknown the molecular partners of the SBR protein involved in these processes.

One more target of sbr12mutant alleles is the sperm flagellum [26, 45, 46]. The sperm axoneme as a main component of a flagellum defining mobility of a spermatozoon enters the ovum during fertilization [47, 48]. Axoneme is a derivative of a spermatid centroiole, which becomes the basis for the paternal centrosome formation, providing fusion of pronuclei and division of embryonic nuclei [49].

Advertisement

4. The centrosome for male meiosis and building of the axoneme

The centrosome plays a special role in spermatogenesis. It determines the polarity of the stem cells, maintaining contact with the hub and enabling the asymmetric division of stem cells [50]. Male spermatocytes of the wild type contain two centrosomes each. Each centrosome has two orthogonal centrioles that are 10 times larger than those in other cells [51]. Thus, during meiosis I, each of two centrosomes contains a pair of duplicated centrioles.

No centriole duplication occurs before meiosis II. Before chromatid segregation in secondary spermatocytes, each pair of centrioles divides into two single centrioles. Prior to chromatid segregation during meiosis II, one of the centrioles migrates to the opposite pole of a cell. As a result, each spermatozoon inherits only one centriole, which becomes the basal body forming the axoneme [1, 52]. Paternal centrosome participates in the formation of astral microtubules for moving male and female pronuclei toward each other [49]. The role of centrosome RNAs in the asymmetry distribution of cytoplasmic determinants among daughter cells [53] makes plausible the hypothesis that centrosome may be a carrier of the paternal factors, affecting the embryo development.

The axoneme growth during sperm maturation needs translation of the long-lived mRNAs coding the components of axonemal complex. Morphological defects of axoneme are a characteristic dominant manifestation of sbr12mutant allele (Figure 5) [26, 27].

Figure 5.

Electron microscopy images of a cross section of 64 cell cysts. (A) Control (males ofOregon R). (B) Morphological defects at the spermatid elongation stage inD. melanogaster sbr12/Dp (1; Y) y + v + males. Spermatids are often not subdivided into individual cells, and there are anomalies in axoneme structure (long arrow) and in mitochondrial derivatives (short arrow) (published in Mamon et al. [27]). Scale bar, 200 nm.

Translational control is crucial for morphogenical events that take place in the absence of transcription during spermiogenesis [26, 54]. The transcripts encoding proteins required for post-meiotic processes including spermiogenesis are almost all abundantly transcribed in spermatocytes [5]. In D. melanogaster, elongation of the flagellar axoneme does not require the ubiquitous process of intraflagellar transport [55, 56]. The axoneme growth and spermatid elongation can be carried out at the expense of translation of mRNAs encoding tubulin subunits and other axonemal proteins within the ciliary pocket [25]. The genetic analysis of male fertility has identified numerous genes involved in spermiogenesis control [25, 57]. Spermatid individualization process depends on genes involved in RNAs metabolism [58].

In sbr12/Dp (1;Y)y + v + males, the morphology of mitochondrial derivatives and cytokinesis are defective in the elongated spermatids (Figure 5). Mitochondria morphogenesis depends on translation efficiency [54], also as a creation of new cellular membrane.

Advertisement

5. Incomplete cytokinesis providing a cellular communication as a feature of male generative cells

Syncytial development during the formation of male generative cells is conservative and is characteristic for different animals [59, 60]. It is assumed that the link between the cells in the syncytium is important primarily for synchronizing differentiation processes [59]. The cytoskeleton and the molecules providing a cellular communication are the main components supporting of equality of each cell in the syncytium.

The cytokinesis of spermatogenic cells is characterized by the formation of ring canals linking the cells that have undergone meiosis or mitosis [61]. During cell division, a contractile ring, made of actin and myosin II filaments, assembles as a result of the interaction between the plus ends of the microtubules and the cell cortex [62]. The contractile ring is double-sided. The microtubules whose minus ends directed toward centrosome on one pole of the dividing cell bind to one side of the contractile ring by their plus ends. The microtubules that have their minus ends turned toward centrosome on the other pole of the dividing cell bind to the opposite side of the contractile ring. Thus, the ring attached equatorially to the membrane of the dividing cell forms an actin-myosin cleavage furrow [60]. The ingression of the cleavage furrow is accompanied by the growth of the daughter cell membranes.

+TIPs—complexes linked to the plus-ends of the microtubules—play a special role in the interaction of the plus-ends of the microtubules with the cell cortex [63]. +TIPs also play an important role in finding and capturing microtubule targets—the cortex and the chromosomes [64, 65]. Localized mRNAs are anchored at the plus ends of microtubules especially in polarized cells [66]. SBR also may be one of the factors that interact with the plus-ends of microtubules.

It is worth noting that the Hs NXF1 (TAP) factor in humans was initially identified notas a protein enabling transport of mRNA from the nucleus into the cytoplasm, but as a factor important for cellular adhesion and involved in cell signaling [67]. For this reason, the protein Hs NXF1 was called TAP—Tip-associated protein, where Tip stands for tyrosine kinase-interacting protein.

Tyrosine phosphorylation is important for regulating the assembly and disassembly of the actin cytoskeleton at cell-cell junctions. In many cases, tyrosine phosphorylation in proteins of the junction complex—plakoglobin and β-catenin in adherens junctions—disrupts interactions between cytoskeleton and membrane [68]. It is believed [61] that tyrosine phosphorylation in targets leads to the disassociation of phosphorylated actin from the contractile ring that forms during the cytokinesis of the cells comprising the syncytium during spermatogenesis. This stabilizes the interaction between the walls of the ring and the cell membrane, ends cell division, and forms the ring canal [61]. Building a new cell wall at the cleavage site during cytokinesis requires the involvement of components of the cell membrane and the signaling molecules [69]. A system of transport molecules ensures the delivery of the necessary elements to the region where the cell membrane is being formed [70].

Interactions of NXF1 with cytoskeleton [27] and the cellular membrane [67] may help finding partners of NXF1 in the cytoplasm. Not surprisingly, the closest evolutionary relative of NXF1 is dynein. Dynein plays a significant role in cytokinesis, chromosome segregation, and in enabling the movement of the flagellum of the sperm [70, 71].

Advertisement

6. Homology of proteins of the NXF family and axonemal dyneins as a source of evolutionary relationship

Searching for related proteins and aligning sequences using the multiple sequence alignment tool base has demonstrated that among the proteins that are homologous to the factor NXF1, axonemal dynein of various organisms—especially its light chain—is most frequent. Aligning sequences that exhibit homology demonstrates that the N-terminus of the Dm NXF1 protein, which includes RBD domains and the LRR (leucine-rich repeats), corresponds to the axonemal light chain of dynein in vertebrates (Figure 6). At the LRR site, there is a sequence that exhibits a high degree of homology (marked by bold typeface in Figure 6), both when comparing different NXF factors (orthologous and paralogous), and comparing the SBR protein with sequences of light chains of dynein (Figure 6). The functions of this sequence are yet to be determined.

Figure 6.

Results of the alignment of the amino acid sequences of LRR domains of different NXF factors, including SBR, and dynein light chain fragment ofD. melanogaster(DNAL1 Dm) (A). The alignment of the amino acid sequences of dynein light chain fragments (DNAL1) of different organisms (Danio rerio– DANRE;Xenopus laevis– XENLA) and the LRR domain of SBR (NXF1 DROME) (B). Red letters denote identical amino acids; blue – identical amino acids in the dynein light chain and in the SBR. The bold type notes most often meeting amino acids in corresponding position in protein. Gray color notes interchangeable amino acids. Green color notes sequence of the LRR (leucine rich repeats) domain in SBR protein (http://www.uniprot.org/align/201202072EGVYDYGWG).

The dynein complex is a multicomponent system consisting of light, light intermediate, intermediate, and heavy chains of dynein [72]. Interacting with a multitude of protein and ribonucleic partners, the LC8 and TcTex1 light chains of dynein enable a link between different forms of the transported cargo and heavy chains of dynein that function as molecular motors [73, 74]. By interacting with its partner dynacin complex, the dynein complex enables cytoplasmic transport of macromolecular complexes, vesicles, and organelles [75], including particles containing RNAs [74, 76].

In the fruit fly, the null mutants of the genes that encode the light or heavy chain of dynein have anomalies of wings and bristles, exhibit male and female sterility, and are characterized by disrupted sensory axon trajectories [71], thus demonstrating a similarity to the mutants of the sbrgene.

During spermatid individualization, the dynein light chains 1 (DLC1) participate in the assembly of the F-actin [77]. Dynein is necessary for centrosome separation, for forming the division spindle, and for aligning chromosomes equatorially during metaphase [78, 79]. During the interaction with the surface of microtubules, dynein also interacts with MAP proteins [80]. During prometaphase, the DYNLT3 light chain can be observed in kinetochores. During metaphase, dynein moves toward the spindle pole [81, 82]. The dynein complex leaves the kinetochores along with checkpoint proteins. This could be related to the transport of checkpoint proteins (for example, Bub3) from kinetochores to spindle poles [83]. If we recall the homology of the proteins Bub3 and Rae1 [84] and the fact that the protein Rae1, found in RNP complexes that are important for forming the spindle, is capable of direct interaction with NXF1 [85], it is possible to consider these factors as polyfunctional. They are taking part both in nuclear-cytoplasmic transport of macromolecules and in the formation of the mitotic apparatus of the cell.

Because it is the light chain of dynein in the dynein complex that is responsible for interaction with the cargo [72], this resemblance to the N-terminus of the SBR protein suggests that SBR may have the same partners as a dynein complex (that these proteins can have the general partners or the general functions, and they are evolutionary conservative).

Advertisement

7. Conclusion

In D. melanogaster, the evolutionarily conservative sbr (Dm nxf1)gene is characterized by the testis-specific gene products. The cytoplasmic localization of the SBR protein in meiotic cysts is quite impressive. Some sbrmutant alleles cause male sterility and the specific morphological defects of the spermatids at the individualization stage. Transcriptional activity during pre-meiotic and meiotic stages of spermatogenesis is crucial for the sperm motility in D. melanogaster. During these stages, the factors are formed that are able to affect the frequency of aneuploidy arising in the offspring after fertilization. The sbrgene is an attractive model for investigation of male sterility and the paternal effect on the embryonic development due to the RNA-binding protein SBR involvement in formation and fate of the long-lived RNAs.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staff of KHROMAS (the Center of study of ultrastructure and molecular composition of biological objects at Biological Faculty of St. Petersburg State University) and to its head Elena R. Gaginskaya for their most important assistance in performance of this work.

Advertisement

Funding

The Russian Foundation for Basic Research supported the work (project 19-04-01255).

Advertisement

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this review.

References

  1. 1. Fuller MT. Spermatogenesis. In: Bate M, Martinez-Arias A, editors. The Development ofDrosophila melanogaster. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993. pp. 71-147. 1564 p
  2. 2. Fuller MT, Spradling AC. Male and femaleDrosophilagermline stem cells: Two versions of immortality. Science. 2007;316:402-404
  3. 3. Riparbelli MG, Colozza G, Callaini G. Procentriole elongation and recruitment of pericenriolar material and downregulated in cyst cells as they enter quiescence. Journal of Cell Science. 2009;122:3613-3618
  4. 4. Cenci G, Bonaccorsi S, Pisano C, Verni F, Gatti M. Chromatin and microtubule organization during premeiotic, meiotic and early postmeiotic stages ofDrosophila melanogasterspermatogenesis. Journal of Cell Science. 1994;107:3521-3534
  5. 5. Schäfer M, Nayernia K, Engel W, Schäfer U. Translational control in spermatogenesis. Developmental Biology. 1995;172:344-352
  6. 6. White-Cooper H. Molecular mechanisms of gene regulation duringDrosophilastermatogenesis. Reproduction. 2010;139:11-21
  7. 7. White-Cooper H, Davidson I. Unique aspects of transcription regulation in male germ cells. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2011;3(7):a002626
  8. 8. K’ergaard AV, Mamon LA. Hyperthermia of maleDrosophila melanogastermeiocytes induces abnormalities in both paternal and maternal sex chromosome sets of the offspring. Russian Journal of Genetics. 2007;43:1153-1160
  9. 9. Vibranovski MD, Chalopin DS, Lopes HF, Long M, Karr TL. Direct evidence for postmeiotic transcription duringDrosophila melanogasterspermatogenesis. Genetics. 2010;186:431-433
  10. 10. Fabrizio JJ, Hime G, Lemmon SK, Bazinet C. Genetic dissection of sperm individualization inDrosophila melanogaster. Development. 1998;125:1833-1843
  11. 11. Noguchi T, Miller KG. A role for actin dynamics in individualization during spermatogenesis inDrosophila melanogaster. Development. 2003;130:1805-1816
  12. 12. Barreau C, Benson E, Gudmannsdottir E, Newton F, White-Cooper H. Post-meiotic transcription inDrosophilatestes. Development. 2008;135:1897-1902
  13. 13. Herold A, Klymenko T, Izaurralde E. NXF1/p15 heterodimers are essential for mRNA nuclear export inDrosophila. RNA. 2001;7:1768-1780
  14. 14. Yang J, Bogerd HP, Wang PJ, Page DC, Cullen BR. Two closely related human nuclear export factors utilize entirely distinct export pathways. Molecular Cell. 2001;8:397-406
  15. 15. Sasaki M, Takeda E, Takano K, Yomogida K, Katahira J, Yoneda Y. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of mouseNxffamily gene products. Genomics. 2005;85:641-653
  16. 16. Zhang M, Wang Q , Huang Y. Fragile X mental retardation protein FMRP and the RNA export factor NXF2 associate with and destabilizeNxf1mRNA in neuronal cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:10057-10062
  17. 17. Pan J, Eckardt S, Leu NA, Buffone MG, Zhou J, Gerton GL, et al. Inactivation ofNxf2causes defects in male meiosis and age-dependent depletion of spermatogonia. Developmental Biology. 2009;330:167-174
  18. 18. Katahira J, Strasser K, Podtelejnikov A, Mann M, Jung JU, Hurt E. The Mex67 pmediated nuclear mRNA export pathway is conserved from yeast to human. The EMBO Journal. 1999;18:2593-2609
  19. 19. Bachi A, Braun IC, Rodrigues JP, Pante N, Ribbeck K, von Kobbe C. The C-terminal domain of TAP interacts with the nuclear pore complex and promotes export of specific CTE-bearing RNA substrates. RNA. 2000;6:136-158
  20. 20. Herold A, Suyama M, Rodrigues JP, Braun IC, Kutay U, Carmo-Fonseca M, et al. TAP (NXF1) belongs to a multigene family of putative RNA export factors with a conserved modular architecture. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2000;20:8996-9008
  21. 21. Braun IC, Herold A, Rode M, Conti E, Izaurralde E. Overexpression of TAP/p15 heterodimers by passes nuclear retention and stimulates nuclear mRNA export. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276:20536-20543
  22. 22. Ivankova N, Tretyakova I, Lyozin G, Avanesyan E, Zolotukhin A, Zatsepina OG, et al. Alternative transcripts expressed bysmall bristles,theDrosophila melanogaster nxf1gene. Gene. 2010;458:11-19
  23. 23. Ginanova V, Golubkova E, Kliver S, Bychkova E, Markoska K, Ivankova N, et al. Testis-specific products of theDrosophila melanogaster sbrgene, encoding nuclear export factor 1, are necessary for male fertility. Gene. 2016;577:153-160
  24. 24. Mamon L, Ginanova V, Kliver S, Toropko M, Golubkova E. Organ-specific transcripts as a source of gene multifunctionality: Lessons learned from theDrosophila melanogaster sbr(Dm nxf1) gene. Biomedical Communications. 2019;62(2):146-157
  25. 25. Fabian L, Brill JA.Drosophilaspermatogenesis big things come from little packages. Spermatogenesis. 2012;2(3):197-212
  26. 26. Atsapkina AA, Golubkova EV, Kasatkina VV, Avanesyan EO, Ivankova NA, Mamon LA. Peculiarities of spermatogenesis inDrosophila melanogaster: Role of main transport receptor of mRNA (Dm NXF1). Cell and Tissue Biology. 2010;4(5):429-435
  27. 27. Mamon LA, Ginanova VR, Kliver SF, Yakimova AO, Atsapkina AA, Golubkova EV. RNA-binding proteins of the NXF (nuclear export factor) family and their connection with the cytoskeleton. Cytoskeleton. 2017;74:161-169
  28. 28. Zhong L, Belote JM. The testis-specific proteasome subunit Prosα6T ofD. melanogasteris required for individualization and nuclear maturation during spermatogenesis. Development. 2007;134:3517-3525
  29. 29. Suyama M, Doerks T, Braun IC, Sattler M, Izaurralde E, Bork P. Prediction of structural domains of TAP reveals details of its interaction with p15 and nucleoporins. EMBO Reports. 2000;1(1):53-58
  30. 30. Madsen L, Schulze A, Seeger M, Hartmann-Petersen R. Ubiquitin domain proteins in disease. BMC Biochemistry. 2007;8:S1
  31. 31. Jesenberger V, Jentsch S. Deadly encounter: Ubiquitin meets apoptosis. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2002;3:112-121
  32. 32. Kleene KC. Sexual selection, genetic conflict, selfish genes and the atypical patterns of gene expression in spermatogenic cells. Developmental Biology. 2005;277:16-26
  33. 33. Kleene KC. A possible meiotic function of the peculiar patterns of gene expression in mammalian spermatogenic cells. Mechanisms of Development. 2001;106:3-23
  34. 34. Steger K. Transcriptional and translational regulation of gene expression in haploid spermatids. Anatomy and Embryology. 1999;199:471-487
  35. 35. FlyBase. 2019. Available from:https://flybase.org/reports/FBgn0003321
  36. 36. Golubkova EV, Markova EG, Markov AV, Avanesyan EO, Nokkala S, Mamon LA.Dm nxf1/sbrgene affects the formation of meiotic spindle in femaleDrosophila melanogaster. Chromosome Research. 2009;17:833-845
  37. 37. Kopytova D, Popova V, Kurshakova M, Shidlovskii Y, Nabirochkina E, Brechalov A, et al. ORC interacts with THSC/TREX-2 and its subunits promote Nxf1 association with mRNP and mRNA export inDrosophila. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;44:4920-4933
  38. 38. Nikitina EA, Komarova AV, Golubkova EV, Tretyakova IV, Mamon LA. Dominant effects ofl(1)ts403(sbr10) mutation at the disjunction of sex chromosomes in meiosis ofDrosophila melanogasterfemales after heat shock. Russian Journal of Genetics. 2003;39:269-275
  39. 39. Zhimulev IF, Belyaeva ES, Pokholkova GV, Kotchneva GV, Fomina OV, Bgatov AV, et al. Report of new mutants. Drosophila Information Service. 1982;58:210-214
  40. 40. Evgen’ev M, Levin A, Lozovskaya E. The analysis of a temperature-sensitive (ts) mutation influencing the expression of heat shock-inducible genes inDrosophila melanogaster. Molecular & General Genetics. 1979;176(2):275-280
  41. 41. Edgar ВA, Schubiger G. Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during earlyDrosophiladevelopment. Cell. 1986;44:871-877
  42. 42. Ostermeier GC, Miller D, Huntriss JD, Diamond MP, Krawetz SA. Delivering spermatozoan RNA to the oocyte. Nature. 2004;429:154
  43. 43. Miller D. Sperm RNA as a mediator of genomic plasticity. Advances in Biology. 2014;2014:179701
  44. 44. Golubkova EV, Nokkala S, Mamon LA. The nuclear export factor genesmall bristlesis involved in the control of early embryonic mitoses inDrosophila melanogaster. Drosophila Information Service. 2006;89:31-39
  45. 45. Geer BW, Lischwe TD, Murphy KG. Male fertility inDrosophila melanogaster: Genetics of the vermilion region. The Journal of Experimental Zoology. 1983;225:107-118
  46. 46. Dybas LK, Harden KK, Machnicki JL, Geer BW. Male fertility inDrosophila melanogaster: Lesions of spermatogenesis associated with male sterile mutations of the vermilion region. The Journal of Experimental Zoology. 1983;226:293-302
  47. 47. Karr T. Intracellular sperm/egg interactions inDrosophila: A three-dimensional structural analysis of a paternal product in the developing egg. Mechanisms of Development. 1991;34(2-3):101-111
  48. 48. Loppin B, Dubruille R, Horard B. The intimate genetics ofDrosophilafertilization. Open Biology. 2015;5:150076
  49. 49. Callaini G, Riparbelli MG. Fertilization inDrosophila melanogastercentrosome inheritance and organization of the first mitotic spindle. Developmental Biology. 1996;176:199-208
  50. 50. Yamashita YM, Mahowald AP, Perlin JR, Fuller MT. Asymmetric inheritance of mother versus daughter centrosome in stem cell division. Science. 2007;315:518-521
  51. 51. Gonzalez C, Tavosanis G, Mollinari C. Centrosomes and microtubule organization duringDrosophiladevelopment. Journal of Cell Science. 1998;111:2697-2706
  52. 52. Baker JD, Adhikarakunnathu S, Kernan MJ. Mechanosensory-defective, male sterileuncmutants identify a novel basal body protein required for cillogenesis inDrosophila. Development. 2004;131:3411-3422
  53. 53. Lambert JD, Nagy LM. Asymmetric inheritance of centrosomally localized mRNA during embryonic cleavages. Nature. 2002;420:682-686
  54. 54. Baker CC, Fuller MT. Translational control of meiotic cell cycle progression and spermatid differentiation in male germ cells by a novel eIF4G homolog. Development. 2007;134(15):2863-2869
  55. 55. Han YG, Kwok BH, Kernan MJ. Intraflagellar transport is required inDrosophilato differentiate sensory cilia but not sperm. Current Biology. 2003;13(19):1679-1686
  56. 56. Sarpal R, Todi SV, Sivan-Loukianova E, Shirolikar S, Subra-manian N, Raff EC, et al.DrosophilaKAP interacts with the kinesin II motor subunit KLP64D to assemble chordotonal sensory cilia, but not sperm tails. Current Biology. 2003;13(19):1687-1696
  57. 57. Wakimoto BT, Lindsley DL, Herrera C. Toward a comprehensive genetic analysis of male fertility inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2004;167(1):207-216
  58. 58. Sanders C, Smith DP. LUMP is a putative double-stranded RNA binding protein required for male fertility inDrosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e24151
  59. 59. Fawcett DW. Intercellular bridges. Experimental Cell Research. Supplement. 1961;8:174-187
  60. 60. Giansanti MG, Bonnaccorsi S, Bucciarelli E, Gatti M.Drosophilamale meiosis as a model system for the study of cytokinesis in animal cells. Cell Structure and Function. 2001;26:609-617
  61. 61. Hime GR, Brill JA, Fuller MT. Assembly of ring canals in the male germ line from structural components of contractile ring. Journal of Cell Science. 1996;109:2779-2788
  62. 62. D’Avino PP, Savoian MS, Glover DM. Cleavage furrow formation and ingression during animal cytokinesis: A microtubule legacy. Journal of Cell Science. 2005;118:1549-1558
  63. 63. Howard J, Hyman AA. Dynamics and mechanics of the microtubule plus end. Nature. 2003;422:753-758
  64. 64. Schuyler SC, Pellman D. Microtubule “plus-end-tracking proteins”: The end is just the beginning. Cell. 2001;105:421-424
  65. 65. Mimori-Kiyosue Y, Tsukita S. “Search-and-capture” of microtubules through plus-endbinding proteins (+TIPs). Journal of Biochemistry. 2003;134:321-326
  66. 66. Mili S, Macara IG. RNA localization and polarity: From a(PC) to Z(BP). Trends in Cell Biology. 2009;19(4):156-164
  67. 67. Yoon DW, Lee H, Seol W, DeMaria M, Rosenzweig M, Jung JU. Tap: A novel cellular protein that interacts with tip of herpesvirus saimiri and induces lymphocyte aggregation. Immunity. 1997;6:571-582
  68. 68. Cowin P, Burke B. Cytoskeleton-membrane interactions. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 1996;8:56-65
  69. 69. Campbell KS, Cooper S, Dessing M, Yates S, Buder A. Interaction ofp59fynkinase with dynein light chain, Tctex-1, and colocalization during cytokinesis. Journal of Immunology. 1998;161:1728-1737
  70. 70. Ai E, Skop AR. Endosomal recycling regulation during cytokinesis. Communicative & Integrative Biology. 2009;2:444-447
  71. 71. Gepner J, Li M-G, Ludmann S, Kortas C, Boylan K, Iyadurai SJP, et al. Cytoplasmic dynein function is essential inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996;142:865-878
  72. 72. Vallee RB, Williams JC, Varma D, Barnhart LE. Dynein: An ancient motor protein involved in multiple modes of transport. Journal of Neurobiology. 2004;58:189-200
  73. 73. Tai AW, Chuang JZ, Sung CH. Cytoplasmic dynein regulation by subunit heterogeneity and its role in apical transport. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2001;153:1499-1509
  74. 74. Williams JC, Roulhac PL, Roy AG, Vallee RB, Fitzgerald MC, Hendrickson WA. Structural and thermodynamic characterization of a cytoplasmic dynein light chain – Intermediate chain complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:10028-10033
  75. 75. Puls I, Jonnakuty C, LaMonte BH, Holzbaur EL, Tokito M, Mann E, et al. Mutant dynactin in motor neuron disease. Nature Genetics. 2003;33:455-456
  76. 76. Carson JH, Cui H, Barbarese E. The balance of power in RNA trafficking. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2001;11:558-563
  77. 77. Ghosh-Roy A, Desai BS, Ray K. Dynein light chain 1 regulates Dynamin mediated Factin assembly during sperm individualization inDrosophila. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2005;16:3107-3116
  78. 78. Echeverri CJ, Paschal BM, Vaughan KT, Vallee RB. Molecular characterization of the 50-kD subunit of dynactin reveals function for the complex in chromosome alignment and spindle organization during mitosis. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1996;132:617-633
  79. 79. Robinson JT, Wojcik EJ, Sanders MA, McGrail M, Hays TS. Cytoplasmic dynein is required for the nuclear attachment and migration of centrosomes during mitosis inDrosophila. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1999;146:597-608
  80. 80. Dixit R, Ross JL, Goldman YE, Holzbaur ELF. Differential regulation of dynein and kinesin motor proteins by tau. Science. 2008;319:1086-1089
  81. 81. Steuer ER, Wordeman L, Schroer TA, Sheetz MP. Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores. Nature. 1990;345:266-268
  82. 82. Pfarr CM, Coue M, Grissom PM, Hays TS, Porter ME, McIntosh JR. Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis. Nature. 1990;345:263-265
  83. 83. Lo KW-H, Kogoy JM, Pfister KK. The DYNLT3 light chain directly links cytoplasmic dynein to a spindle checkpoint protein, Bub3. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282:11205-11212
  84. 84. Babu JR, Jeganathan KB, Baker DJ, Wu X, Kang-Decker N, van Deursen JM. Rae1 is an essential mitotic checkpoint regulator that cooperates with Bub3 to prevent chromosome missegregation. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2003;160:341-353
  85. 85. Blevins MB, Smith AM, Phillips EM, Powers MA. Complex formation among the RNA export proteins Nup98, Rae1/Gle2, and TAP. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278:20979-20988

Written By

Elena Golubkova, Anna Atsapkina, Anna K’ergaard and Ludmila Mamon

Submitted: October 8th, 2019 Reviewed: December 19th, 2019 Published: January 28th, 2020