Abstract
Tumor angiogenesis and tumor progression to late oral squamous cell carcinoma are closely related. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a heparin-binding growth factor with mitogenic activity specific for vascular endothelial cells, regulates key events of the pathological angiogenesis involved in the metabolic functions of malignant tissues. The level of high-affinity tyrosine kinase receptor for VEGF, flt, in tumor endothelial cells in vivo is seen upregulated, supporting the role of VEGF as a potential signaling tumor angiogenesis axis in vivo and sustaining the notion that paracrine mechanisms are responsible for the regulation of tumor angiogenesis. The expression of VEGFs is increased in the processes of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) progression and proliferation. Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C)/VEGF3 expression induced by chemokine CCL4 is connected to lymph node metastasis in OSCC. This chapter was aimed to summarize and analyze the findings on the role of vascular endothelial growth factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma and briefly discuss the potential of vascular endothelial growth factor that targets this pathway as treatment for OSCC.
Keywords
- angiogenesis
- vascular endothelial growth factor
- oral cancer
- overexpression
- VEGF polymorphism
1. Introduction
The angiogenesis process involves approximately twenty factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor, placenta growth factor (PIGF-1), epidermal growth factor (EP), as platelet-derived GF (PDGF), and the most important angiogenic factor: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Studies of restricted expression patterns and functional roles have implicated VEGFs in the generation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vasculature complex genetic pathways. VEGF has since been documented as being a potent stimulator of endothelial cells proliferation and migration and to induce the expression of interstitial collagenases. Specifically, VEGFs regulate physiological angiogenesis, including the vessel and the organ development, the lymphogenesis, and the differentiation during embryogenesis, as well the pathogenesis of a multiplicity of disorders. The hypothesis that VEGF action is required for tumor angiogenesis has been first provided by the findings of the vascular development of tumor xenografts in mice. These results were confirmed through in situ hybridization studies, showing a correlation between the degree of defective angiogenesis and VEGF mRNA upregulation. These studies uniformly concur that VEGF expression enhances tumor growth. In this chapter, we provide a brief historical overview of the discovery of VEGF, structural characterization of the other members of VEGF family and their receptor, and to summarize the main features of the role of vascular endothelial growth factor in angiogenesis of oral cancer development.
2. Discovery of VEGF
VEGF was first described in 1983 as a factor secreted by hepatocarcinoma cell lines [1] that increased microvascular permeability to plasma proteins in the skin of guinea-pigs. It was highly purified to homogeneity from pituitary folliculostellate cells and characterized in 1989 [2]. Other authors supported evidence that this protein potently stimulated endothelial cell migration [3, 4, 5]. It was named “vascular permeability factor” or VPF, potent inducers of vascular hyperpermeability (especially venular endothelium) to fibrinogen and other plasma proteins [6], which upon secretion by tumor cells, promotes vascular leakage [7]. More years later, it was demonstrated that VPF has potent mitogenic activity in a diversity of cell types, and also versus endothelial cells [8]. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are predominantly produced by endothelial, hematopoietic, and stromal cells in response to hypoxia and upon stimulation by growth factors such as transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), interleukins, or platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs). VEGFs specifically interact with one or several receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), VEGF receptor −1, −2, and −3 (VEGFR-1, −2, −3), and with distinct coreceptors such as neuropilins or heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans. VEGF receptors are classified as type V RTKs whose extracellular domains consist of seven immunoglobulin-like (Ig-like) domains [9, 10]. The intracellular domain consists of seven immunoglobulin-like domains (I–VII), a single transmembrane (TM) region, and a tyrosine kinase consensus sequence (TK) interrupted by a cytoplasmatic kinase domain [11, 12].
3. The VEGF gene and isoforms
The VEGFs term identifies a large and heterogeneous family of secreted polypeptides, named VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-E and placenta growth factor (PGF), characterized by a highly conserved receptor-binding cystine-knot structure similar to that of the platelet-derived growth factors [13, 14]. Of those six members, VEGF-A plays a key role in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis [15]. PGF is mainly expressed in placenta, heart and lungs; it is a ligand for VEGFR-2 and it is involved in angiogenesis regulation. VEGF-B binds VEGFR-1 and neuropilin-1, mostly expressed in the extracellular matrix and abundantly expressed in brown fat, in the myocardium and skeletal muscle; it is implicated in high cellular energy metabolism. VEGF-C is produced as a precursor protein [16, 17]. VEGF-C promotes mitogenesis, migration and survival of ECs [18], and regulates the lymphatic vessel growth by binding to VEGF-receptor-3 (VEGFR-3, Flt-4) [19, 20]. VEGF-D, binds and activates VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3, because is mitogenic for EC, angiogenic, and lymphangiogenic. Its expression was demonstrated mainly in the lung and skin during embryogenesis. VEGF-E expression, binding the VEGFR-2, promotes the release of tissue factors, proliferation, chemotaxis and sprouting of cultured vascular ECs in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo [6, 21]. The major function of VEGF-C consist in regulation VEGF exerts its effect on tissues at several levels; mechanisms range from a plethora of physiological processes which regulate blood vessel growth, such as during pregnancy and in tissue repair to pathological conditions, including chronic inflammation, would healing process, and cancer [6, 22]. It has been proven that VEGF causes a pronounced angiogenic response in a variety of in vivo models, including the chick chorioallantoic membrane [23, 24]. Native VEGF is a basic, heparin-binding, homodimeric glycoprotein of 45,000 daltons. Interestingly, the VEGF gene has been mapped to chromosome 6 at position p21.3 [25] and consists of eight exons and seven introns in the coding sequence, which covers a region of 14 kilobases. Among these, there is evidence that the −634G/C, −1154G/A, and −2578C/A
3.1 Biological effects of VEGF expression
The VEGF and the “fibroblastic growth factor” (bFGF) demonstrate a powerful synergism in the promotion of angiogenesis in vitro, as shown by models using microvascular endothelial cells invading the
4. Role of VEGF in oral squamous cell carcinoma
4.1 The role of VEGF in invasion
Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, is not only a normal physiological process, but it is closely linked to both tumor growth and metastasis, providing the principal pathway through tumor cells exit the primary tumor site and enter the circulation. A multiplicity of molecular determinants is involved in these different mechanisms of vascular growth, and VEGFs play a significant role in pathological angiogenesis. In particular, the role of VEGF-A in tumor angiogenesis are clarified by several studies [23, 55], but the results concerning VEGF-expression in normal and dysplastic oral epithelium, as well as about the potential role of VEGF in oral squamous cell carcinoma progression shown contradictions. VEGF-A overexpression has been reported in most types of cancer, including oral squamous cell carcinoma, and it is thought to be a prognostic factor for survival. Some studies revealed no altered VEGF expression in the normal and mildly dysplastic oral epithelium, or the expression was significantly lower than neoplastic epithelium [16, 17, 18]. A considerable upregulation of VEGF expression during the transition from normal oral epithelium through dysplasia to OSCC, but no correlation was found between VEGF expression and the grade of dysplasia. Many researchers demonstrated an upregulation of VEGF expression in cancerous tissues in comparison to the normal oral mucosa. These results suggest that VEGF could be implicated in tumor progression by expanding the vascularity during the process of transition from the normal oral mucosa to invasive carcinoma [18, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56]. Immunohistochemical study of VEGF expression in oral squamous cell carcinomas clarify the relationship between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and clinicopathological factors in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), showing that serum VEGF levels were significantly higher in oral cancer patients as compared to normal controls that further showed an increasing trend with clinical stage and lymph node involvement, suggesting that VEGF level may be a reliable biomarker and may be a potential target for development of chemotherapeutic strategies for patients with oral carcinoma.
4.2 The role of VEGF in metastasis
Lymphangiogenesis plays a vital role in tumor growth and systemic dissemination of different carcinomas [2]. Although vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) is well known to be associated with lymph node metastasis in patients with OSCC, inducing the production of urokinase by cancer and playing a crucial role in the extracellular matrix remodeling and tumor cell invasion, the specific mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis in OSCC are largely unknown. Further, it has been implicated in inducing the growth of both blood and lymphatic vessels and in regulation of proliferation, differentiation and migration of lymphatic endothelial cells in many physiological and pathological conditions [19, 20]. Overexpression of VEGF-C has been detected in various malignancies and is frequently associated with lymphatic invasion, nodal and distant metastasis and consequently poor survival [23, 33]. VEGF-C signaling is involved in the progression of several malignancies that put forward VEGF-C as a potential target for the development of new anticancer therapies to prevent local invasion and metastatic spread of disease. The progression of several malignancies involves VEGF-C signaling. The immunohistochemical analysis and real-time quantitative RT-PCR studies showed a significant correlation between the levels of VEGF-C mRNA expression in a human OSCC cell line, through the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt pathway. The angiogenic action of this growth factor is achievable by binding to two receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (KDR, Flk-1) [17, 22]. VEGFR-2 is the major mediator of the mitogenic, angiogenic and permeability-enhancing effects of VEGF-A, while the role of VEGFR-1 in the regulation of angiogenesis is controversial. It is implicated in a paracrine release of growth factors, but the central role of this receptor is to prevent the interaction of VEGF with VEGFR-2. Also, it may promote angiogenesis by recruitment in tumor vasculature of monocytes and other bone marrow-derived cells [48, 52, 57]. Moreover, VEGFR-1 is involved in the induction of matrix metalloproteinases [49] that retrovirus-mediated expression of a dominant negative VEGFR-2, because of inhibition of signal transduction through wild-type VEGFR-2, suppression of the growth of glioblastoma multiforme and other tumor cell lines in vivo. Correlation of VEGF expression with clinical stage of OSCC is controversial. Clinicopathologic findings suggest that evaluation of VEGF expression is of prognostic value in patients with OSCC. VEGF expression was found to increase significantly with advancing stage of the tumor. Elevated expression of VEGF was associated with aggressive phenotype and advanced stage of the tumor [58], as well as demonstrated by Yu Hong Li et al. which found a higher VEGF expression in stage 3 and 4 tumors as compared to stage 1 and 2 [59]. An explanation could be attributed to the correlation with the intensity of VEGF expression and the degree of differentiation or invasiveness of carcinoma. The results support the findings of previous
4.3 The role of VEGF in prognosis
Interestingly, some studies have focused on the potential prognostic importance of
4.4 Vascular endothelial growth factor and advances in developing novel therapeutic strategies for oral squamous cell carcinoma
There is a great need for therapies to prevent and/or slow the progression of OSCC. Recent studies focused on potential of drugs that target VEGF or its receptors-signaling system because their angiogenesis-promoting activity at the level of endothelial cells. Therefore, modulation of these factors to inhibit tumor angiogenesis, currently, is a major focus in developing OSCC therapies. The development of angiogenesis inhibitors as anticancer agents have been developed with data showing promising efficacy at reducing OSCC in in vitro models [13, 14]. Recent studies found that administration of angiogenesis inhibitors agents in association with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can improve the efficacy of these treatments. For example, Teicher et al. observed that coadministration of the TNR-470, angiogenesis inhibitor agent, induces a substantial cyclophosphamide-induced tumor cell-killing. Jain’s study confirmed these findings suggesting that it was a consequent normalization of the tumor vasculature, as a result of endothelial cell death. Different therapeutic strategies to induce the inhibition of VEGF or its receptor signaling system are being emerging for treatment of OSCC, as VEGFR-1 ribozymes, VEGF toxin conjugates, and soluble VEGF receptors.
5. Conclusions
Angiogenesis is
References
- 1.
Senger DR, Galli SJ, Dvorak AM, Perruzzi CA, Harvey VS, Dvorak HF. Tumor cells secrete a vascular permeability factor that promotes accumulation of ascites fluid. Science. 1983; 219 (4587):983-985 - 2.
Hamilton WJ, Boyd JD, Mossman HW. Human Embryology. Baltimore: William & Wilkins; 1962 - 3.
Gilbert SF. Developmental Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer; 1988 - 4.
Folkman J, Klagsbrun M. Angiogenic factors. Science. 1987; 235 :442-447 - 5.
Ferrara N, Henzel WJ. Pituitary follicular cells secrete a novel heparin-binding growth factor specific for vascular endothelial cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1989; 161 (2):851-858 - 6.
Davis S, Aldrich TH, Jones PF, Acheson A, Compton DL, Jain V, et al. Isolation of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, by secretion-trap expression cloning. Cell. 1996; 87 :1161-1169 - 7.
Thurston G, Daly C. The complex role of angiopoietin-2 in the angiopoietin-tie signaling pathway. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2012; 2 :a006550 - 8.
Favard C, Moukadiri H, Dorey C, Praloran V, Plouët J. Purification and biological properties of vasculotropin, a new angiogenic cytokine. Biology of the Cell. 1991; 73 (1):1-6 - 9.
Criscuolo GR, Merrill MJ, Oldfield EH. Further characterization of malignant glioma-derived vascular permeability factor. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1988; 69 (2):254-262 - 10.
Keck PJ, Hauser SD, Krivi G, Sanzo K, Warren T, Feder J, et al. Vascular permeability factor, an endothelial cell mitogen related to PDGF. Science. 1989; 246 (4935):1309-1312 - 11.
Robinson CJ, Stringer SE. The splice variants of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and their receptors. Journal of Cell Science. 2001; 114 (Pt 5):853-865 - 12.
Bates DO, Cui TG, Doughty JM, Winkler M, Sugiono M, Shields JD, et al. VEGF165b, an inhibitory splice variant of vascular endothelial growth factor, is down-regulated in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Research. 2002; 62 :4123-4131. The discovery of a novel inhibitory VEGF-A165 variant resulting from analternative exon 8 - 13.
Robinson CJ, Stringer SE. The splice variants of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and their receptors. Journal of Cell Science. 2001; 114 :853-865. A review of the splice variants of VEGF-A and their functions - 14.
Gluzman-Poltorak Z, Cohen T, Herzog Y, Neufeld G. Neuropilin-2 and neuropilin-1 are receptors for the 165-amino acid form of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and of placenta growth factor-2, but only neuropilin-2 functions as a receptor for the 145-amino acid form of VEGF. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000; 275 :18040-18045. This study shows that the VEGF-A145 isoform selectively recognizes NRP2. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M909259199 - 15.
Ferrara N, Gerber HP, Lecouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nature Medicine. 2003; 9 (6):669-676 - 16.
Fong GH, Zhang L, Bryce DM, Peng J. Increased hemangioblast commitment, not vascular disorganization, is the primary defect in flt-1 knock-out mice. Development. 1999; 126 (13):3015-3025 - 17.
Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang W-J, Goeddel DV, Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science. 1989; 246 :1306-1309 - 18.
Keck PJ, Hauser SD, Krivi G, Sanzo K, Warren T, Feder J, et al. Vascular permeability factor, an endothelial cell mitogen related to platelet derived growth factor. Science. 1989; 246 :1309-1312 - 19.
Tischer E, Mitchell R, Hartman T, Silva M, Gospodarwicz D, Fiddes JC, et al. The human gene for vascular endothelial growth factor. Multiple protein forms are encoded through alternative exon splicing. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1991; 266 :11947-11954 - 20.
Turley H, Scott PAE, Watts VM, Bicknell B, Harris AL, Gatter KG. Expression of VEGF in routinely fixed material using a new monoclonal antibody VG1. The Journal of Pathology. 1998; 186 :313-318 - 21.
Zhang H, Craft P, Scott PAE, Ziche M, Weich HA, Harris AL, et al. Enhancement of tumor growth and vascular density by transfection of vascular endothelial cell growth factor into MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1995; 87 :213-219 - 22.
Park JE, Keller GA, Ferrara N. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) isoforms: Differential deposition into the subepithelial extracellular matrix and bioactivity of extracellular matrix-bound VEGF. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 1993; 4 :1317-1326 - 23.
Meyer M, Clauss M, Lepple-Wienhues A, Waltenberger J, Augustin HG, Ziche M, et al. A novel vascular endothelial growth factor encoded by Orf virus, VEGF-E, mediates angiogenesis via signalling through VEGFR-2 (KDR) but not VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) receptor tyrosine kinases. The EMBO Journal. 1999; 18 (2):363-374 - 24.
Gille H, Kowalky J, LI B, Lecouter J, Moffat B, Zioncheck TF, et al. Analysis of biological effects and signaling properties of Flt-1 (VEGFR-1) and KDR (VEGFR-2). A reassessment using novel receptor-specific vascular endothelial growth factor mutants. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001; 276 (5):3222-3230 - 25.
Wise LM, Veikkola T, Mercer AA, Savory LJ, Fleming SB, Caesar C, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-like protein from orf virus NZ2 binds to VEGFR2 and neuropilin-1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999; 96 (6):3071-3076 - 26.
Partanet TA, Alitalo K, Miettinen M. Lack of lymphatic vascular specificity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in 185 vascular tumors. Cancer. 1999; 86 (11):2406-2412 - 27.
Cross MJ, Claesson-Welsh L. FGF and VEGF function in angiogenesis: Signalling pathways, biological responses and therapeutic inhibition. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2001; 22 (4):201-207 - 28.
Matsumoto T, Claesson-Welsh L. VEGF receptor signal transduction. Science's STKE. 2001; 2001 (112):re21 - 29.
Alitalo K, Carmeliet P. Molecular mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis in health and disease. Cancer Cell. 2002; 1 (3):219-227 - 30.
Yuan F, Chen Y, Dellian M, Safabakhsh N, Ferrara N, Jain RK. Time-dependent vascular regression and permeability changes in established human tumor xenografts induced by an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor antibody. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. USA. 1996; 93 :14765-14770 - 31.
Carmeliet P, Ng Y-S, Nuyens D, Theilmeier G, Brusselmans K, Cornelissen I, et al. Impaired myocardial angiogenesis and ischemic cardiomyopathy in mice lacking the vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms VEGF164 and VEGF188. Nature Medicine. 1999; 5 :495-502 - 32.
Cheung N, Wong MP, Yuen ST, Leung SY, Chung LP. Tissue-specific expression pattern of vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms in the malignant transformation of lung and colon. Human Pathology. 1998; 29 :911-914 - 33.
Coltrini D, Gualandris A, Nelli EE. Growth advantage and vascularisation induced by basic fibrolblast growth factor overexpression in endometrial HEC-1-B cells: An export -dependent mechanism of action. Cancer Research. 1995; 55 :4729-4738 - 34.
Gitay-Goren H, Cohen T, Tessler S, Soker S, Gengrinovitch S, Rockwell P, et al. Selective binding of VEGF121 to one of the three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors of vascular endothelial cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996; 271 :5519-5523 - 35.
Relf M, LeJeune S, Scott PAE, Fox S, Smith K, Leek R, et al. Expression of the angiogenic factors vascular endothelial cell growth factor, acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth factor β-1, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, placenta growth factor and pleiotrophin in human primary breast cancer and its relation to angiogenesis. Cancer Research. 1997; 57 :963-969 - 36.
Plate K. From angiogenesis to lymphangiogenesis. Nature Medicine. 2001; 7 (2):151-152 - 37.
Shibuya M, Claesson-Welsh L. Signal transduction by VEGF receptors in regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Experimental Cell Research. 2006; 312 (5):549-560 - 38.
Skobe M, Hawighorst T, Jackson DG, Prevo R, Janes L, Velasco P, et al. Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer metastasis. Nature Medicine. 2001; 7 (2):192-198 - 39.
Taipale J, Makinen T, Arighi E, Kukk E, Karkkainen M, Alitalo K. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 1999; 237 :85-96 - 40.
Partanen TA, Arola J, Saaristo A, Jussila L, Ora A, Miettinen M, et al. VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression in neuroendocrine cells and their receptor, VEGFR-3, in fenestrated blood vessels in human tissues. The FASEB Journal. 2000; 14 (13):2087-2096 - 41.
Klagsbrun M, Folkman J. Angiogenesis. In: Sporn MB, Roberts AB, editors. Peptide Growth Factors and their Receptors. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1991. pp. 549-586 - 42.
Soker S, Takashima S, Miao HQ , Neufeld G, Klagsbrun M. Neuropilin-1 is expressed by endothelial and tumor cells as an isoform-specific receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. Cell. 1998; 92 (6):735-745 - 43.
Yuan L, Moyon D, Pardanaud L, Bréant C, Karkkainen MJ, Alitalo K, et al. Abnormal lymphatic vessel development in neuropilin 2 mutant mice. Development. 2002; 129 (20):4797-4806 - 44.
Safran M, Kaelin WG. HIF hydroxylation and the mammalian oxygen-sensing pathway. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2003; 111 (6):779-783 - 45.
Rak J, Mitsuhashi Y, Bayko L, Filmus J, Shirasawa S, Sasazuki T, et al. Mutant ras oncogenes upregulate VEGF/VPF expression: Implications for induction and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Research. 1995; 55 (20):4575-4580 - 46.
Coultas L, Chawengsaksophak K, Rossant J. Endothelial cells and VEGF in vascular development. Nature. 2005; 438 (7070):937-945 - 47.
Chen JC, Chang YW, Hong CC, Yu YH, Su JL. The role of the VEGF-C/VEGFRs axis in tumor progression and therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013; 14 (1):88-107 - 48.
Abdul-Aziz MA, Amin AK, El-Rouby DH, Shaker OG. Lymphangiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Correlation with VEGF-C expression and lymph node metastasis. International Journal of Dentistry. 2017:10. Article ID: 7285656 - 49.
Bryne M. Is the invasive front of an oral carcinoma the most important area for prognostication? Oral Diseases. 1998; 4 (2):70-77 - 50.
Abdo MM, Gaballah ET, Fikry HE, Mosbah MM. Expression of VEGF-C in oral precancerous lesions and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mansoura Journal of Dentistry. 2014; 1 (3):105-108 - 51.
Wang Z, Chen Y, Li X, Li X, Ma W, et al. Expression of VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 in human laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas and its significance for lymphatic metastasis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2012; 13 (1):27-31 - 52.
Khaleel ME, Raza A, Ehsan A, Masood R, Javed M. Clinicopathological spectrum of oral squamous cell carcinoma at a public sector health facility. Biomédica. 2015; 31 (1):21-26 - 53.
Krishna A, Singh RK, Singh S, Verma P, Pal US, et al. Demographic risk factors, affected anatomical sites and Clinicopathological profile for oral squamous cell carcinoma in a north Indian population. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2014; 15 (16):6755-6760 - 54.
Benke EM, Ji Y, Patel V, Wang H, Miyazaki H, et al. VEGF-C contributes to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma growth and motility. Oral Oncology. 2010; 46 (4):e19-e24 - 55.
Ding MX, Lin XQ , Fu XY, Zhang N, Li JC. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and angiogenesis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006; 12 (28):4582-4585 - 56.
Vairaktaris E, Serefoglou Z, Avgoustidis D, Yapijakis C, Critselis E, Vylliotis A, et al. Gene polymorphisms related to angiogenesis, inflammation and thrombosis that influence risk for oral cancer. Oral Oncology. 2009; 45 :247-253 - 57.
Cheng CY, Chang CS, Liu CJ, Kao SY. Vascular endothelial growth factor 936 C/T polymorphism is associated with vascular invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics. 2008; 106 :79-84 - 58.
Faratzis G, Tsiambas E, Rapdis AD, et al. VEGF and KI 67 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of tongue–An immunohistochemical and computerized image analysis study. Oral Oncology. 2009; 45 (7):584-588 - 59.
Li YH, Hu CF, Shao Q , et al. Elevated expression of survival and VEGF protein are strong independent predictors of survival in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2008; 6 :1 - 60.
Ferrara N, Davis-Smyth T. The biology of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocrine Reviews. 1997; 18 :4-25 - 61.
Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor as a target for anticancer therapy. The Oncologist. 2004; 9 (Suppl 1):2-10 - 62.
Kim SK, Park SG, Kim KW. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2015; 41 (1):11-18. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2015.41.1.11 - 63.
Shang ZJ, Li JR. Expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and vascular endothelial growth factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma its correlation with angiogenesis and disease progression. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. 2005; 34 (3):134-139 - 64.
Nasr HB, Chahed K, Bouaouina N, Chouchane L. Functional vascular endothelial growth factor −2578 C/A polymorphism in relation to nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk and tumor progression. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2008; 395 :124-129 - 65.
Unal ZN, Unal M, Bagdatoglu OT, Polat G, Atik U. Genetic polymorphism of VEGF-1154 (A/G) in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Archives of Medical Research. 2008; 39 :209-211 - 66.
Ku KT, Wan L, Peng HC, Tsai MH, Tsai CH, Tsai FJ. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene-460 C/T polymorphism. Acta Haematol. 2010; 123 :91-95 - 67.
Shintani S, Li C, Ishikawa T, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A, B, C and D in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncology. 2004; 40 (1):13-20