Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Consequences of Herbicide Use in Rural Environments and Their Effect on Agricultural Workers

Written By

Ana Paola Balderrama-Carmona, Norma Patricia Silva-Beltrán, Luis Alberto Zamora Alvarez, Norma Patricia Adan Bante and Edgar Felipe Moran Palacio

Submitted: 29 June 2019 Reviewed: 18 November 2019 Published: 14 March 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90546

From the Edited Volume

Sustainability Concept In Developing Countries

Edited by Surendra N. Kulshreshtha

Chapter metrics overview

1,118 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The herbicides are used frequently to fight the proliferation of weeds. The use of herbicides correlates with an improvement in agricultural yield, but the harm to the health of human populations is well established and has been demonstrated in numerous scientific studies. In many developing countries, farmers build their own homes, and this, along with the application of herbicides in their fields, increases their exposure, through both contact with skin and respiration. It is scientifically proven that herbicides cause infertility, kidney problems, endocrine disruption, apoptosis, cytotoxicity, and neurotoxic effects. Such diseases impact the quality of those affected, and naturally the contaminated environment negatively affects human health. This chapter focuses on revising the most relevant studies regarding the health effects on agricultural workers living in rural environments due to herbicide contamination and how to sustain the herbicide use.


  • occupational health
  • herbicide pollution
  • quality of life
  • economic vulnerability
  • agriculture sustainability

1. Introduction

Agriculture has enormous global environmental repercussion and still is an important sector responsible for the greater part of the rural communities’ income in developing countries [1]. Agricultural land occupies a third of the ice-free global land area, and it is expected that this percentage will rise due to increased demand for agricultural products to support the continued growth in the human population [2].

Agricultural practices can be harmful to human and surrounding ecosystems. The environmental/occupational exposure to agrochemicals (pesticide or fertilizers) has become a concern for human health [3]. Sixty percent of agrochemicals are used in the soil, and the others drain into the ground polluting the water supply; these chemicals are toxic for living organisms as they are absorbed by plants and successively accumulate in human tissue through biomagnifications of the food chain, causing human health and environment concerns [4]. Chemical pollutants are a serious and growing global problem. Pollution has become one of the greatest threats to humankind and is caused by their prevalence in water, on land, and in air. At least 7 million people die as a result of air pollution, 842,000 from water pollution, and 420,000 from consuming contaminated food. In 2015, 9 million people died (16% of deaths worldwide) due to poor waste management, generating more deaths than AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis together [5]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 1000 pesticides [6], among them the herbicides, fungicides, bactericides, and insecticides, are used agriculturally today; however, as many as 140,000 pesticides have been synthesized since 1950.

One global concern is that genetically modified seeds permit farmers to spray herbicides even during the growing season. This leaves their crops unharmed—primarily soybeans and corn—but also leaves them with carcinogenic levels of the systemic herbicide glyphosate [7], according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [8]. Actually, 90% of the soybean and corn seeds are herbicide resistant [7]. A huge list of commercial food products containing soy, corn, and honey maintains traces of herbicides; glyphosate has also been reported in oat products [9].

In addition to the trace exposure of herbicides in various foods, the greatest levels are in the agricultural fields. The herbicides can be classified according to their chemical structure as organophosphates, organochlorines, carbamates, and pyrethroids, comprising a large portion of herbicides in the overall market. In developing countries, the most common herbicides based on their popularity are glyphosate, paraquat, atrazine, and 2,4-D. The use of these chemicals is well adapted for rural workers because they are of low cost, replace manual weeding, and improve yields [10]. However, accidental exposure to herbicides can be highly dangerous to human beings and other living organisms, and training programs by the sellers of herbicides that inform workers of the risk of exposure due to direct contact with the chemicals do not exist [11]. FAO reported that 800 million individuals in the world are undernourished, of which 780 million live in developing regions. Therefore, the possible health effects from the use of herbicides, in these regions, are considered by locals as less significant compared to the importance of eradicating famine [1, 12]. Because of this, it is important to balance the use of herbicides and their possible effect on the environment and health and reach sustainability. This review aims to present the key problems that can occur due to the mismanagement of herbicides in developing countries and how these chemicals can affect the health of farmworkers.


2. Methodology

A literature search was conducted to describe the health effects on agricultural workers in rural environments due to herbicide exposure and contamination. The following data sources were used: Medline, EMBASE, Science Direct, PubMed, and Redalyc, with published studies not older than 10 years. The key terms of the search were about farmer’s health and herbicide contamination, although the search was not restricted. After deleting duplicate records, all remaining retrieved references to the bibliographic search were selected using only the title and summary. Research with irrelevant topics was eliminated to focus on the articles of interest in our study. The results were organized according to the type of health disorder due to occupational exposure. Studies focused on how to support the use of herbicides were also considered. Two hundred and one articles were selected for review of their abstracts, and 101 were classified for full analysis. After the revision of these full texts, only 61 studies were finally cited in this paper.

This review analyzes the impact of the excessive use of herbicides on specific health disorders in exposed agricultural workers and the environment damage. Many studies expose the health effects caused by herbicides; however, those in developing countries are rare. It is necessary to emphasize agriculture-related poor practices, the almost inexistent farmer training, and the health risk that this entails.


3. Environmental impact of bad practices on agriculture

The unpromising future of agriculture in developing countries faces many challenges as a result of social pressure, increased migration, labor shortages, climate change, and food insecurity and is now an accelerating phenomenon that has resulted in the use of inadequate herbicides and depletion of natural resources, in particular the soil [12].

These events have led to the erosion of natural resources due to overexploitation of soils, to meet the growing demand for food [13], resulting in the excessive use of herbicides. It is well known that a significant portion of the chemicals applied has proven to be excessive, expensive, and sometimes unnecessary. In several countries such as in Europe and Japan, the use has been reduced; however, in the rest of the world, it has even increased [1].

Globally, in environmental government instances of some countries, are established permissible limits of herbicides in water and soil, however, in developing countries herbicides are not monitored, or simply this standards do not exist; nevertheless, several studies have shown that herbicides and their derivative compounds contaminate natural resources such as water and soil, for example, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), a secondary compound of glyphosate, can persist for several years in the soil [14]. The relationship between herbicide environmental pollution and the risk of harm to health is caused by failure to apply the adequate quantity, frequency of the products and the resistance of pests to herbicides, which causes them to tend to be accumulated in soil and water, depending on their physicochemical nature and their dynamics of interaction with the environment [15].

Table 1 shows residual soil and water values from the most commonly used herbicides worldwide. The concentrations found exceed the maximum permissible levels by international laws [22]. The reported values are evidence of progressive accumulation, which represents a risk factor for human health.

[15]2,4-D (dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)*609 μg/kgBrazil, 2013
[16]Terbuthylazine*37.6 μg/kgArable, 2015
[17]Phenolic herbicide*0.4 mg/kgBosnia, 2016
[18]AMPA*342.75 mg/kgMexico, 2018
[19]Glyphosate+27.8 μg/LUSA, 2013
[20]Atrazine+15.66 μg/LUSA, 2008
[21]Glyphosate+1.42 μg/LMexico, 2015
≤5 μg/L
36.8 μg/L
Mexico, 2018

Table 1.

Occurrence of herbicides in soil and water samples.

The compounds with an asterisk (*) are found in soil samples, and those with a plus sign (+) are herbicides reported in water.


4. Health effects on agricultural workers

Occupational health hazards usually refer to the materials and processes that have the potential to cause injury, sickness, and impaired health and affect the well-being and efficiency among workers. Occupational diseases may occur long after being exposed to occupational hazards, such as air contaminants and chemical, biological, physical, and ergonomic hazards, including psychosocial factors as well [5]. In agricultural trade, workers are exposed to numerous agricultural environment aerosols, including herbicides.

People who have been exposed to herbicides occupationally, or by eating foods or liquids containing herbicide residue, or for that matter inhaled herbicide-contaminated air, have experience a broad range of chronic health effects, including impaired neurobehavioral function (e.g., cognitive and behavioral disorders), Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, hormone disruption, asthma, allergies, hypersensitivity, obesity, diabetes, hepatic lesions, kidney failure, multiple sclerosis, and cancer [3, 23, 24, 25].

4.1 Neurobehavioral problems

Many studies related to the occupational herbicide exposure of agricultural workers exist. Neurobehavioral symptoms among participants appear to be associated with cumulative exposure [26]. Pesticide poisoning and suicides are very high in developing countries and rural environments. Suicides influenced by pesticides have been largely reported among agricultural workers; evidence exists that indicates that pesticides induce such behavior [25, 27]. Some organophosphates, for example, paraquat and glyphosate, inhibit the cholinesterase activity in the nervous system, whereby this irreversible inhibition can produce cerebral damage such that cholinergic neurons are injured and can be responsible for neuropsychiatric and neurobehavioral disorders, including memory, cognitive, mental, emotional, motor, and sensory deficits [28].

It has long been established that Alzheimer’s development is exacerbated from occupational exposure to organophosphates. Chin-Chan [29] determined that the risk of Alzheimer’s is higher in those who have had occupational contact. The herbicides induce oxidative stress which in turn produces the activation of calpains and then caspases, a known link to Parkinson’s disease [30].

4.2 Hormone disruption

The inhibition of acetylcholinesterase in the hypothalamus after organophosphate exposure alters the secretion rate of gonadotropin-releasing hormone by affecting the secretion of pituitary hormones that stimulate the gonads (gonadotrophic hormones), including folio-stimulating and luteinizing hormones. The relationship between exposure to pesticides and anomalies in the functional structure of the seminal cells was checked [31].

A relationship between hypothyroidism and the use of organochlorine insecticides, fungicides, and herbicides has been found [32]. The organophosphates, by themselves, are capable of interfering with endocrine function by inhibiting the binding of thyroid hormones to their corresponding receptors.

4.3 Respiratory and immune diseases

Occupational exposure to pesticides can represent a serious risk to the respiratory system. Spirometry was performed in workers occupationally exposed to pesticides in various developing countries and revealed a significant decrease in the lung function parameters [33]. Another study evaluated the association between allergic and non-allergic wheeze and pesticides and found significant differences than implicate organophosphates and pyrethroids that are commonly used in agricultural and residential settings with adverse respiratory effects [34].

The organophosphates can affect the immune response, including the production of antibodies and of interleukin 2, T-cell proliferation, decrease of CD5 cells, increase of CD26 and autoantibodies, alteration of Th1/Th2 cytokines, inhibition of NK cells and the lymphocyte-activated killer cells, and the cytotoxic activity of the T lymphocytes. The oxidative stress can be produced by a wide range of factors among which the pesticides are found [35]. In this sense, Simoniello [36] showed that agricultural workers of the Pampas region in Argentina exposed to pesticide mixtures presented modifications in the oxidative equilibrium and enzymatic alterations.

4.4 Metabolic complications

It has been shown that there is an association between exposure to pesticides and a high incidence of metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and diabetes. The pesticides affect the cellular metabolism of carbohydrates and lipids and can lead to insulin resistance and alterations in glucose homeostasis [37]. Organochloride compounds are persistent and remain in the body for a long period. The presence of multiple chlorine atoms in its structure increases its lipophilicity and results in accumulation in adipose tissue. Several studies have explored the possible relationship between the concentration of organochlorides and obesity [38].

Organochlorides are associated with peripheral arterial disease, particularly in people suffering from obesity, the idea being that dioxins are supported after binding to AhR and induce inflammation, hypertension, and arteriosclerosis [39].


5. Implications of herbicides on health problems in people who live in agricultural rural areas

The use of herbicides is uncontrolled in many developing countries. Herbicides can cause toxic effects on agricultural workers’ health, both by their direct and indirect action (inhalation, dermal or oral exposure) [10]. Long-term and acute occupational exposure to herbicide among agricultural workers produces a charge or a cost to the countries [40]; the study of Buendía [41] reports that the average cost per patient intoxicated by paraquat exceeds that of various chronic diseases prevalent in Colombia. The social and economic impact on health could contribute significantly to the global public health problem. The increased morbidity includes lower quality of life and functional status.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) offers “the Index for a Better Life” which measures people’s quality of life and compares it among countries, based on the personalized management of the priorities of each individual [42]. In developing countries increase the poverty of the population, due to the low remuneration, for example, in the research of Cely-Andrade [43] reports that in mining zones exist the worst quality of life-related to health than agricultural areas, however the mining works are better paid, although economic growth does not accurately represent human well-being, the economic dimension is a key dimension of rural prosperity and farmers consider that economic resources increase the chances of improving their quality of life.

The monitoring of human groups exposed to chemical agents with the potential to cause damage to the organism is aimed at preserving health and quality of life especially of those populations that are at high risk. Many studies of the exposure of herbicides in agricultural workers exist; one of the most common, biomonitoring, is searching the chemicals in the urine of the people living in agricultural areas. In Table 2 the most recent studies about the concentrations of herbicides in people from rural areas are shown.

ReferenceMethodParticipants and precedenceReported concentrations in urine
[38]ELISAAgricultural workers in Costa Rica6.3 μg/24 h of paraquat
[44]HPLC–MS/MSStudents in Thailand2,4-D
[45]ELISAChildren in Nicaragua0.9 μg/g Cr 2,4-D
[46]LC–MS/MSAgricultural workers in Croatia0.3 to 8.0 μg/g Cr atrazine
[47]HPLC-ESI-MSFarmer family in France9.5 μg/L glyphosate
[48]LC–MS/MSAgricultural workers in a rural area from Italy2.94 μg/L TBA
[21]ELISAFarmers from Mexico0.47 μg/L glyphosate
[49]MSPregnant women from Ghana0.46 μg/L 2,4-D
[50]MSPregnant women in rural zones of the USA3.40 ng/mL glyphosate
[51]HPLC–MS/MSAmenity horticulturists in Ireland7.4 μg L−1 glyphosate
[52]ELISAFarmers in Sri Lanka0–2.1 mg/g Cr paraquat
48–353 mg/g Cr Glyphosate
[53]LC-MS/MSFarmers in the USA4.04 ppb
[54]MS/MSChildren and teenagers in Mexico2.63 μg/mL glyphosate

Table 2.

Analysis studies of herbicides in urine from people living in rural areas.

Herbicide exposure is a current problem in public health, especially in developing countries mainly for the following reasons: the main cause of work accidents in agriculture is neglect of safety requirements (28.9%) [55]; workers do not have training for use herbicides and do not use the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for the preparation, application, transportation, and storage [56]. On the other hand, herbicide regulations are less strict or inexistent in developing countries [57], and these chemicals are used by tons because they replace the manual tasks, increasing productive capacity and significantly lowering production costs [10].


6. Damaged environment: How to rehabilitate it?

The use of pesticides to produce food, both to feed local populations and for exportation, should comply with good agricultural practices regardless of the economic status of a country. Farmers should limit the amount of pesticide used to the minimum necessary to protect their crops [5]. One approach is the large-scale implementation of precision agriculture that utilizes remote sensing and responds in real time to crop resource requirements and to weather and climatic conditions. Also, with the cost being such an important factor in consumer choices, policymakers can seek a market-based solution for modifying consumption patterns by better incorporating the true environmental costs to produce a food item [2].

The sustainable rise includes improving agricultural yields while at the same time abating environmental impacts. Relative to scenarios, less-extreme changes toward reducing meat consumption, waste, and the demand for nonfood agricultural products could greatly reduce the environmental impacts of the food system [58]. A few years ago, the agri-environmental scheme (AES) options were rising; these were established as effective strategies to evading contamination peaks when weed burden is high, whereas more demanding AES options guarantee an overall reduction in herbicide use, even during relatively easy farming years in which less weed pressure is experienced [59].

There are several strategies for controlling weeds; one of the practices is the manual weeding that depends on the workforce and is one of the main causes of the loss of organic matter in the soil, due to the excess of weeding and constant plows, making the soil lose its fertility. Therefore, low-income farmers require using herbicides; however, they do so in an uncontrolled manner. These types of practices are not sustainable options for the protection of the environment and occupational health. Moss [60] in his analysis points out that there are approximately 16 reasons why farmers prefer the use of herbicides and within them are economic factors due to the reduction of labor and rapidity of results, in addition to the lack of training and technology among other points.

Numerous studies have provided substantial knowledge to obtain these objectives, noting that one of the strategies is the minimum tillage; however, it is critical and requires effective management, since changes and resistance can be induced in the same herbs, in addition to greater involvement of economists, social scientists, and marketing professionals [12, 60].

In this sense, it is necessary to promote solutions that improve biodiversity and its environment, in addition to maintaining agricultural production; Figure 1 shows the relationship between the diverse strategies necessary for the sustainable control of weeds.

Figure 1.

The main factors that must be involved to achieve sustainable control of the herbs do not benefit the crops.

Farmers are always looking for immediate changes to eliminate weeds; herbicides offer these options, compared to nonchemical strategies that take more time. Some strategies to convince the farmers are to promote crop rotations and field demonstrations, among others, but the most important is to change the farmer mentality which could be achieved by encouraging financial support that could bring about short-term changes [61]; however, attitudinal changes are long-term results that lead to better results.

As was mentioned in Section 3, the global food demand promotes that farmers cannot leave aside the use of herbicides [24]. Consequently, the natural recovery of the soil is not carried out, causing an accumulation of herbicides. This phenomenon is the main factor associated with the development of diseases produced by the chronic exposure of people who work and live in rural areas.


7. Conclusions

The literature analysis indicates that the health problems of agricultural workers are directly related to environmental pollution due to the unsustainable use of herbicides.

Health problems due to the exposure of agricultural workers to herbicides are a major concern, mainly in developing countries. This concern is due to the fact that the use of herbicides in these regions is indiscriminate and the workers have no prior training for their use, so there are no personal protective equipment regulations, and in developing countries there are few or no regulations to address accumulated concentrations in the environment, and there are no regulated biomonitoring in workers.

In rural areas mainly from developing countries, where there are no exists specific standards for their regulations, there is disturbing environmental contamination by herbicides; in these places are reported numerous diseases related to herbicide exposure, which leads to demand in public health services and hence decrease in the workforce, the worker’s quality of life, and the growth of the country. That is why herbicide distribution companies should commit to indicate to the users/workers the correct management of the herbicides, including application quantities, as well as, the rigorous use of personal protective equipment.

This research showed that exposure to herbicides by agricultural workers and the environmental contamination with these chemicals are problems that can be solved by enforcing establish regulations in rural zones principally from developing countries.



This study was supported by “Programa para el Desarrollo Profesional Docente (PRODEP),” authorization number 511-6/18-8537.


Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Ramankutty N, Mehrabi Z, Waha K, Jarvis L, Kremen C, Herrero M, et al. Trends in global agricultural land use: Implications for environmental health and food security. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2018;69:789-815. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040256
  2. 2. Davis KF, Gephart JA, Emery KA, Leach AM, Galloway JN, D’Odorico P. Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources. Global Environmental Change. 2016;39:12-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.004
  3. 3. Kim KH, Kabir E, Jahan SA. Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects. The Science of the Total Environment. 2017;575:525-535. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.009
  4. 4. Sankhla MS, Kumari M, Sharma K, Kushwah RS, Kumar R. Water contamination through pesticide & their toxic effect on human health. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology. 2018;6:867-970
  5. 5. Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR, Adeyi O, Arnold R, Basu N, et al. The lancet commission on pollution and health. The Lancet. 2017;391:462-512. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0
  6. 6. WHO Pesticide residues in food [Internet]. 2018. Available from:
  7. 7. Landrigan PJ, Benbrook C. GMOs, herbicides, and public health. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373:693-695. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp150566
  8. 8. Tarone RE. On the international agency for research on cancer classification of glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2018;27(1):82-87. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000289
  9. 9. Rubio F, Guo E, Kamp L. Survey of glyphosate residues in honey, corn and soy products. Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology. 2014;5:1. DOI: 10.4172/2161-0525.1000249
  10. 10. Haggblade S, Minten B, Pray C, Reardon T, Zilberman D. The herbicide revolution in developing countries: Patterns, causes, and implications. The European Journal of Development Research. 2017;29:533-559. DOI: 10.1057/s41287-017-0090-7
  11. 11. Kesavachandran C, Pathak MK, Fareed M, Bihari V, Mathur N, Srivastava AK. Health risks of employees working in pesticide retail shops: An exploratory study. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environment Medicine. 2009;13(3):121-126. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5278.58914
  12. 12. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The State of Food and Agriculture: Leveraging Food Systems for Inclusive Rural Transformation. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2017, ISBN 978-92-5-109873-8. Available from: [Accessed: July 2019]
  13. 13. Sims S, Corsi S, Gbehounou G, Kienzle J, Taguchi M, Friedrich T. Sustainable weed management for conservation agriculture: Options for smallholder farmers. Agriculture. 2018;8:118. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture8080000
  14. 14. Sidoli P, Baran N, Angulo-Jaramillo R. Glyphosate and AMPA adsorption in soils: Laboratory experiments and pedotransfer rules. Environmental Science and Pollutution Research. 2016;23:5733-5742
  15. 15. Baumgartner D, Godoy de Souza E, Renata Machado SC, Furlan MM. Correlation between 2,4-D herbicide residues and soil attributes in southern of Brazil. Revista Ciência Agronômica. 2017;48:428-437
  16. 16. Scherr KE, Bielsk L, Kosubov P, Dinisov P, Hvezdov M, Hofman ZJ. Occurrence of chlorotriazine herbicides and their transformation products in arable soils. Environmental Pollution. 2017;222:283-293
  17. 17. Sapcanin A, Cakal M, Imamovic B, Salihovic M, Pehlic E, Jacimovic Z, et al. Herbicide and pesticide occurrence in the soils of children’s playgrounds in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2016;188:450. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5463-4
  18. 18. Leyva-soto LA, Balderrama-Carmona AP, Moran-Palacio EF, Díaz-Tenorio LM, Gortares-Moroyoqui P. Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in population of agricultural fields: Health risk assessment overview. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2018;16(4):5127-5140. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1604_51275140
  19. 19. Mahler BJ, Van Metre PC, Burley TE, Loftin KA, Meyer MT, Nowell LH. Similarities and differences in occurrence and temporal fluctuations in glyphosate and atrazine in small Midwestern streams (USA) during the 2013 growing season. The Science of the Total Environment. 2017;579:149-158
  20. 20. Almberg KS, Turyk ME, Jones RM, Rankin K, Freels S, Stayner LS. Atrazine contamination of drinking water and adverse birth outcomes in community water systems with elevated atrazine in Ohio, 2006-2008. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15:1889. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15091889
  21. 21. Rendón-von Osten J, Dzul-Caamal R. Glyphosate residues in groundwater, drinking water and urine of subsistence farmers from intensive agriculture localities: A survey in Hopelchén, Campeche, Mexico. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14:595. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14060595
  22. 22. Li Z, Jennings A. Worldwide regulations of standard values of pesticides for human health risk control: A review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14:826. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14070826
  23. 23. Khare S. Pesticide contamination in India and its health effects. International Journal of Scientific and Technical Research in Engineering. 2018;3:8-14. Available from:
  24. 24. Fuhrimann S, Winkler MS, Staudacher P, Weiss FT, Stamm C, Eggen RI, et al. Exposure to pesticides and health effects on farm owners and workers from conventional and organic agricultural farms in Costa Rica: Protocol for a cross-sectional study. JMIR Research Protocols. 2019;8(1):e10914. DOI: 10.2196/10914
  25. 25. Kori RK, Sing MK, Jain AK, Yadav RS. Neurochemical and behavioral dysfunctions in pesticide exposed farm workers: A clinical outcome. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry. 2018;33:372-381. DOI: 10.1007/s12291-018-0791-5
  26. 26. Negatu B, Vermeulen R, Mekonnen Y, Kromhout H. Neurobehavioural symptoms and acute pesticide poisoning: A cross-sectional study among male pesticide applicators selected from three commercial farming systems in Ethiopia. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2018;75:283-289. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104538
  27. 27. Klingelschmidt J, Milner A, Khireddine-Medouni I, Witt K, Alexopoulos EC, Toivanen S, et al. Suicide among agricultural, forestry, and fishery workers: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2018;44(1):3-15. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3682
  28. 28. Androutsopoulos VP, Hernandez AF, Liesivuori J, Tsatsakis AM. A mechanistic overview of health associated effects of low levels of organochlorine and organophosphorous pesticides. Toxicology. 2013;307:89-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.09.011
  29. 29. Chin-Chan M, Navarro-Yepes J, Quintanilla-Vega B. Environmental pollutants as risk factors for neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. Environmental pollutants as risk factors for neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. Frontiers of Cellular Neuroscience. 2015;9:124. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00124
  30. 30. Bastías-Candia S, Zolezzi JM, Inestrosa NC. Revisiting the paraquat-induced sporadic Parkinson’s disease-like model. Molecular Neurobiology. 2019;56:1044-1055. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-018-1148-z
  31. 31. Martenies SE, Perry MJ. Environmental and occupational pesticide exposure and human sperm parameters: A systematic review. Toxicology. 2013;3017:66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.02.005
  32. 32. Pellegriti G, Frasca F, Regalbuto C, Squatrito S, Vigneri R. Worldwide increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: Update on epidemiology and risk factors. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology. 2013;2013:965212. DOI: 10.1155/2013/965212
  33. 33. Buralli RJ, Ribeiro H, Mauad T, Amato-Lourenço LF, Salge JM, Diaz-Quijano FA, et al. Respiratory condition of family farmers exposed to pesticides in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15:1203. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15061203
  34. 34. Hoppin JA, Umbach DM, Long S, London SJ, Henneberger PK, Blair A, et al. Pesticides are associated with allergic and non-allergic wheeze among male farmers. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2017;125:535-543. DOI: 10.1289/EHP315
  35. 35. Halliwell B. Oxygen and nitrogen are pro-carcinogens. Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen, chlorine and nitrogen species: Measurement, mechanism and the effects of nutrition. Mutation Research, Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 1999;443:37-52. DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5742(99)00009-5
  36. 36. Simoniello MF, Kleinsorge EC, Scagnetti JA, Mastandrea C, Grigolato RA, Paonessa AM, et al. Biomarkers of cellular reaction to pesticide exposure in a rural population. Biomarkers. 2010;15(1):5260. DOI: 10.3109/13547500903276378
  37. 37. Casals-Casas C, Desvergne B. Endocrine disruptors: From endocrine to metabolic disruption. Annual Review of Physiology. 2011;73:135-162. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142200
  38. 38. Lee K, Park EK, Stoecklin-Marois M. Occupational paraquat exposure of agricultural workers in large costa Rican farms. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2009;82:455. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-008-0356-7
  39. 39. Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS, et al. EDC-2: The endocrine society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocrine Reviews. 2015;36:E1-E150. DOI: 10.1210/er.2015-1010
  40. 40. Ramírez-Santana M, Iglesias-Guerrero J, Castillo-Riquelme M, Scheepers PTJ. Assessment of health care and economic costs due to episodes of acute pesticide intoxication in workers of rural areas of the Coquimbo region, Chile. Value in Health Regional Issues. 2014;5:35-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2014.07.006
  41. 41. Buendía JA, Restrepo-Chavarriaga GJ. Costo de la intoxicación por paraquat en Colombia. Value in Health Regional Issues. 2019;20:110-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.02.006
  42. 42. OECD. How’s life? [Internet]. 2017. Available from:
  43. 43. Cely-Andrade JL, Garcia-Ubaque JC, Manrique-Abril F. Quality of life related to health in the mining population of Boyacá. Revista de Salud Pública. 2017;19(3):362-367. DOI: 10.15446/rsap. v19n3.56163
  44. 44. Panuwet P, Prapamontol T, Chantara S, Barr DB. Urinary pesticide metabolites in school students from northern Thailand. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2009;212:288-297. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.07.002
  45. 45. Rodríguez T, van Wendel de Joode B, Lindh CH, et al. Assessment of long-term and recent pesticide exposure among rural school children in Nicaragua. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2012;69:119-125. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2010.062539
  46. 46. Mendaš G, Vuletić M, Galić N, Drevenkar V. Urinary metabolites as biomarkers of human exposure to atrazine: Atrazine mercapturate in agricultural workers. Toxicology Letters. 2012;210:174-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.11.023
  47. 47. Mesnage R, Moesch C, Le Grand R, Lauthier G, de Vendomois JS, Gress S, et al. Glyphosate exposure in a farmer’s family. BioMed Research International. 2014;1:1-8. DOI: 10.1155/2014/179691
  48. 48. Mercadante R, Polledri E, Bertazzi PA, Fustinoni S. Biomonitoring short- and long-term exposure to the herbicide terbuthylazine in agriculture workers and in the general population using urine and hair specimens. Environment International. 2013;60:42-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.07.016
  49. 49. Wylie BJ, Ae-Ngibise KA, Boamah EA, Mujtaba M, Messerlian C, Hauser R, et al. Urinary concentrations of insecticide and herbicide metabolites among pregnant women in rural Ghana: A pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14(4):354. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14040354
  50. 50. Parvez S, Gerona RR, Proctor C, Friesen M, Ashby JL, Reiter JL, et al. Glyphosate exposure in pregnancy and shortened gestational length: A prospective Indiana birth cohort study. Environmental Health. 2018;17:23. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-018-0367-0
  51. 51. Connolly A, Jones K, Basinas I, Galea KS, Kenny L, McGowan P, et al. Exploring the half-life of glyphosate in human urine samples. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2019;222:205-210. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.09.004
  52. 52. De Silva PMC, Abdul K, Jayasinghe S, Chandana S, Jayasumana C, Siribaddana S. Occupational herbicide exposure and declining kidney functions among sugarcane farmers In rural Sri Lanka. Kidney International Reports. 2019;4:S102-S103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.05.265
  53. 53. Perry MJ, Mandrioli D, Belpoggi F, Manservisi F, Panzacchi S, Irwin C. Historical evidence of glyphosate exposure from a US agricultural cohort. Environmental Health. 2019;18:42. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-019-0474-6
  54. 54. Sierra-Diaz E, Celis-de la Rosa AJ, Lozano-Kasten F, Trasande L, Peregrina-Lucano AA, Sandoval-Pinto E, et al. Urinary pesticide levels in children and adolescents residing in two agricultural communities in Mexico. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(4):562. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16040562
  55. 55. Enn A, Merisalu E. Causes and consequences of work accidents in Estonian agriculture. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2019;76:P.3.10. DOI: 10.1136/OEM-2019-EPI.271
  56. 56. Andrade-Rivas F, Rothe HA. Chemical exposure reduction: Factors impacting on south African herbicide sprayers’ personal protective equipment compliance and highrisk work practices. Environmental Research. 2015;142:34-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.05.028
  57. 57. Zomorrodi A, Zhou X. Role of EKC and PHH in determining environment quality and their relation to economic growth of a country. Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research. 2016;3(2):139-144. DOI: 10.20448/journal.501/2016.3.2/501.2.139.144
  58. 58. Poore J, Nemecek T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science. 2019;360:987-992. DOI: 10.1126/science. aaw9908
  59. 59. Brethour C, Weersink A. An economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticide reduction. Agricultural Economics. 2001;25:219-226. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862. 2001.tb00202.x
  60. 60. Moss S. Integrated weed management (IWM): Why are farmers reluctant to adopt non-chemical alternatives to herbicides. Pest Management Science. 2019;75:1205-1211. DOI: 10.1002/ps.5267
  61. 61. Jussaume RA, Ervin D. Understanding weed resistance as a wicked problem to improve weed management decisions. Weed Science. 2016;64:559-569. DOI: 10.1614/WS-D-15-00131.1

Written By

Ana Paola Balderrama-Carmona, Norma Patricia Silva-Beltrán, Luis Alberto Zamora Alvarez, Norma Patricia Adan Bante and Edgar Felipe Moran Palacio

Submitted: 29 June 2019 Reviewed: 18 November 2019 Published: 14 March 2020