Open access peer-reviewed chapter

A Review of European Owls as Predators of Bats

Written By

Alan Sieradzki and Heimo Mikkola

Submitted: 21 October 2019 Reviewed: 30 October 2019 Published: 15 January 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90330

From the Edited Volume


Edited by Heimo Mikkola

Chapter metrics overview

1,241 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Fossil evidence indicates that owls have been preying on bats from as far back as the Pleistocene. Overall, bats form quite small portions (i.e. trace to 0.2%) of the diets (by prey frequency) of European owls. An assessment of dietary studies and anecdotal accounts reveals that five species of European owls, the Eurasian scops owl Otus scops, Pygmy owl Glaucidium passerinum, Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus, little owl Athene noctua and Ural owl Strix uralensis, rarely feed on bats (with less than 0.1−0.4%) and a further two species, short-eared owl Asio flammeus and eagle owl Bubo bubo, may only take bats occasionally, while three species, long-eared owl Asio otus, barn owl Tyto alba and tawny owl Strix aluco, feed on bats more frequently. In this study, a total of 19,864 recorded bats have been preyed upon by these owls, with as many as 48 bat species being identified. Barn and tawny owls have captured most of this total (47.1 and 41.9%), followed by the long-eared owl (7.6%), while short-eared and eagle owls take similar amounts of bats (1.1 and 1.7%, respectively). Owl predation on bats deserves future research because it may help contribute to our knowledge on bat biodiversity and distribution and possibly identify an additional risk for small populations of endangered bats.


  • European owls
  • bats
  • predation

1. Introduction

Bats are the only mammals capable of self-powered flight yet constitute some 20% of all living mammal species, with as many as 110 separate bat species coexisting within the same ecological community, a number that far exceeds that of any other mammalian group [1, 2]. Bats diversified in the Early Eocene in response to an increase in prey diversity, and Eocene bat fossils have been found on most continents leaving the geographic origin a source of debate [1]. Despite their taxonomic and ecological diversity, modern bats (order: Chiroptera) are almost exclusively nocturnal. Rydell and Speakman [3] think that predation risk could have been a significant factor preventing early bats from becoming diurnal. The only other vertebrates that exploit niches for nocturnal flying predators are the owls and nightjars. Fossil evidence indicates that owls have been predating on bats from as far back as the Pleistocene [4, 5]. Since bats are very fast in flight, predation pressure on bat populations is likely to be a minor cause of mortality. Indeed, in the owl diets from North America (23,888 prey items) and temperate Europe, plus Iraq, reviewed by Marti [6], bats did not occur. In later reviews, Mikkola [7] found that bats accounted for 0.04% of prey items of barn Tyto alba, tawny Strix aluco and long-eared owls Asio otus in the British Isles (67,405 prey items) with the same percentage for short-eared Asio flammeus and Tengmalm’s owls Aegolius funereus (15,147 prey items) in Europe and Finland. For the Eurasian eagle owls Bubo bubo (17,615 prey items), bats accounted for 0.03% of prey taken in Fennoscandia.

In this paper, we examine the ecological relationships between owls and bats and see if the larger owl species take larger bats as they tend to do with other prey [8].


2. Methods

We conducted a literature review examining bats as prey in the diets of European owls. The literature examined was published between 1886 and 2018 and covered the ecological timeframe of the Pleistocene to current day. A total of 1680 publications were examined, and a synthesis of the findings is reported here. Utmost effort has been made to avoid duplication in the counting of the same bats mentioned in the review papers and/or multiple papers by the same author. The collection of the data was limited to Eurasia and one particular case study in North Africa (short-eared owl—Algeria). Only 8 European owl species had more than 10 bats in their diet studies, namely, barn owl, tawny owl, long-eared owl, short-eared owl, Eurasian eagle owl, Tengmalm’s owl, Ural owl Strix uralensis and little owl Athene noctua.

Bat weights are drawn from [9, 10, 11, 12, 13] as an average of values given. Species weight is the average of the species of that family. Owl weights from [14] are an average of extremes for females and males combined. Our analysis is focused on the frequency of bats in the diet of owls; we also compare the weights of the bat species to the weights of the owl species which ate them. We did not assess bats in terms of their role in the collective biomass of prey taken by the owls.


3. Results

3.1 How owls capture bats

Bats are captured by owls mainly during the periods of emergence or return from roosts, but owls are in general not well adapted for catching bats [15]. The relative benefits of capturing substandard individuals are greatest just when a predator is attacking a species of prey which is typically difficult to capture and kill [16].

Some authors have indicated that barn owls frequently capture young bats that are not yet able to fly [17] and that bats seem to be rarely captured in flight [18]. In Vickery Bat Cave, Oklahoma, barn owls were observed using a wholly unique technique to capture adult Mexican free-tailed bats Tadarida brasiliensis. Appearing at dusk when the bat flight from the cave was at its height, the owls dropped from a ledge only 3 m or so above the bats and moved swiftly along with them, often making a capture. Each owl appeared to select one bat before starting the chase, and the bats were caught with ‘unerring precision’. Looney [19] witnessed on one September evening the capture of seven bats by one or more owls within a 45-minute period.

Another technique witnessed at a different location [20] was when a barn owl flew into a column of bats head-on from above, stalled, with head up, feet down and wings spread wide, catching a bat that struck it in the chest. It was assumed that the bats were not using their echolocation apparatus while flying in such a dense mass. The owl was observed to make four successful captures using this technique.

Research of Petrželková et al. [15] indicates that barn owls most probably prefer to prey on volant inexperienced yearling bats which are easier to catch while reaching almost adult size. Yearling bats lack flying skills, they are conspicuous during the emergence, and they often concentrate near the roost during their early practice flights, making them more vulnerable to owl predation than adults.

Spitzenberger et al. [21] recorded, with an infrared camera and an automatic registration device, tawny owl attacks on bats entering an attic roost through an access window. At least 333 Myotis emarginatus bats entered the roost by flying over or past the owl which attacked 252 times but with only 31 strikes being successful. During a successful attack, the owl extended its legs, jumped upwards with raised wings and snatched and killed the entering bat with the talons of the foot, tore it apart and ate it on the spot or carried it away. The owl killed 5.3% of the maximum number of female bats roosting in the attic during 12 nights. By restricting its attacks to the period of late pregnancy, the owl took advantage of the state of highest vulnerability of the female bats in this maternity colony.

The observations of [19, 20, 21] would suggest that individual owls develop their own unique techniques for capturing bats on the wing.

Bats also seem able to avoid predation to some extent during their evening emergence and morning return to and from the roost. Güttinger [22] noted that Myotis myotis changed their emergence exit from a roost to avoid the attacks from tawny owls. Petrželková and Zukal [23] have shown with the use of a trained barn owl that Eptesicus serotinus bats are using clustering during emergence as an important anti-predation strategy although the owl presence did not induce any major changes in other measured parameters (like onset, end, rate or duration of emergence).

Boratyński [24] made an interesting observation in Poland on how a tawny owl was attempting to catch a Nyctalus noctula in the air, but the bat ‘hid in the predator’s shadow’ by flying very close behind it and waiting until the owl gave up hunting. Finally, the bat flew away safely after the owl ceased searching for the lost prey.

Forest-dwelling owls may experience difficulties in capturing any bats that are present, as bats tend to fly close to the trees, as the study by Russo et al. [25] suggests. This may explain why both the great grey owl Strix nebulosa and the hawk owl Surnia ulula have so far had no bats in their diet lists; and the extremely well studied Eurasian Pygmy owl Glaucidium passerinum has so far been recorded preying on only one Myotis daubentoni and one unidentified Vespertilionidae bat in Finland [26] and another in Russia [27]. Scherzinger [28] was wondering why Plecotus auratus is not found in the diet of the Pygmy owl as both species are known to use old Dendrocopos major holes.

3.2 Owl species and bat diversity

At least 48 bat species have been identified in the diet of eight Eurasian owl species (Table 1). A total of 19,864 bats have been preyed upon by these owls. The barn owl has captured 47.1% of all recorded bats in this review, but the tawny owl comes a close second with almost as high a percentage (41.9%), although its food samples have been studied much less than those of the barn owl (well over 5 million prey items). The long-eared owl comes far behind these two with just 7.6%. The short-eared owl and the eagle owl take similar amounts of bats (1.1 and 1.7% from this material, respectively). With only trace amounts of bats in their diets (i.e. 0.4 to 0.1%), we still list the little owl, Tengmalm’s owl and Ural owl in Table 1 but the scops owl only inTable 2.

Bat species and weight in grams T.a. S.a. S.u. A.o. A.fl. B.b. A.fu. A.n. Total
Pipistrellus pygmaeus 5.1 50 50
P. pygmaeus or P. pipistrellus 5.3 36 36
Pipistrellus pipistrellus 5.5 661 2415 5 1 10 8 3100
Myotis mystacinus 6.1 69 205 1 2 8 5 2 292
Myotis brandtii 6.5 16 151 1 168
Pipistrellus abramus 6.5 1 658 659
Murina huttoni 6.7 1 1
Rhinolophus hipposideros 6.9 69 135 1 2 207
Pipistrellus sp. 6.9 145 1 144 7 7 304
Murina hilgendorfi 7.0 4 4
Pipistrellus kuhlii 7.3 2146 21 113 12 2292
Hypsugo savii 7.5 16 3 1 20
Asellia tridens 8.0 36 13 3 52
Myotis nattereri 8.3 523 71 13 4 3 1 615
Myotis emarginatus 8.7 54 46 1 101
Myotis capaccinii 8.8 36 1 37
Plecotus auritus 9.3 375 228 5 5 3 1 618
Myotis petax 9.5 2 2
Myotis annectans 9.7 2 2
Barbastella barbastellus 9.7 50 418 8 476
Plecotus sp. 9.8 45 2 2 49
Rhinopoma microphyllum 10.0 3 7 10
Pipistrellus nathusii 10.2 133 22 2 1 158
Myotis bechsteinii 10.2 38 125 1 4 168
Plecotus austriacus 10.3 272 11 11 294
Myotis daubentonii 10.9 115 85 5 18 4 227
Nycteris thebaica 11.5 3 3
Eptesicus nilssoni 11.6 17 65 3 2 3 2 92
Miniopterus schreibersii 11.9 55 39 1 1 97
Myotis sp. 12.1 69 1 2 195 4 271
Rhinolophus blasii 12.5 3 3
Rhinolophus euryale 12.9 10 36 6 52
Myotis dasycneme 13.2 33 16 49
Rhinolophus sp. 14.6 2 1 3
Rhinolophus bocharicus 15.1 6 6
Nyctalus leisleri 16.0 24 7 31
Vespertilio murinus 16.6 119 1725 2 51 3 1900
Vespertilio sp. 16.8 1 1
Vespertilio sinensis 17.0 12 12
Rhinolophus mehelyi 17.6 2 2
Eptesicus sp. 18.5 1 1
Hesperoptenus sp. 18.8 1 1
Otonycteris hemprichii 19.0 56 16 5 77
Eptesicus bottae 20.5 19 13 1 33
Myotis blythii 21.3 199 75 1 41 1 317
Eptesicus serotinus 23.4 985 281 120 28 1 1415
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum 23.5 135 35 10 180
Taphozous nudiventris 28.0 37 2 2 3 44
Nyctalus sp. 28.1 1 1
Nyctalus noctula 28.3 425 1033 274 19 10 1761
Myotis myotis 32.8 1981 916 1 3 46 2 2949
Tadarida teniotis 38.0 9 3 1 13
Nyctalus lasiopterus 40.1 2 1 3
Cynopterus sphinx 46.0 1 1
Scotophilus heathi 50.0 1 1
Rousettus leschenaulti 60.0 1 1
Rousettus aegyptiacus 135.0 90 4 94
Chiroptera (unidentified) 191 121 1 114 11 54 3 21 515
Total 9356 8312 12 1510 220 346 22 86 19,864
Percentage of the total 47.1 41.9 0.1 7.6 1.1 1.7 0.1 0.4 100.0

Table 1.

Numerical occurrence of bat species in increasing order of weight and unidentified bats in the diet of the most studied owl species in Eurasia.

T.a. = Tyto alba: [29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58], S.a. = Strix aluco: [7, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90]; S.u. = Strix uralensis: [61, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96]; A.o. = Asio otus: [38, 42, 43, 60, 61, 81, 92, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127]; A.fl. = Asio flammeus: [46, 92, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133]; B.b. = Bubo bubo: [37, 60, 61, 92, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154]; A.fu. = Aegolius funereus: [60, 61, 86, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161]; A.n. = Athene noctua: [45, 60, 61, 74, 103, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177].

Owl Average % of bats Sample size Author(s) and area Maximum % of bats Sample size Author(s) and area
Barn owl (Tyto alba) 0.12 4,023,465 Roulin and Christe [29] Europe 26.6 2931 Sommer et al. [178] Germany
Tawny owl (Strix aluco) 0.07 19,902 Mikkola [7] Europe 30.5 13,791 Obuch [59] Slovakia
Ural owl (Strix uralensis) 0.06 1739 Jäderholm [91] Finland 0.3 1983 Rosina and Shokhrin [92] Far East, Russia
Eagle owl (Bubo bubo) 0.08 29,277 Jánossy and Schmidt [134] Eurasia 5.9 763 Rosina and Shokhrin [92] Far East, Russia
Long-eared owl (Asio otus) 0.04 793,309 Birrer [179] Eurasia 29.3 3561 Tian et al. [97] Beijing, China
Short-eared owl (Asio flammeus) 0.04 5449 Mikkola [7] Europe 39.3 516 Djilali et al. [128] El Golea, Algeria
Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus) 0.04 9698 Mikkola [7] Finland 0.2 581 Uttendörfer [60] Germany
Little owl (Athene noctua) 0.01 23,899 Schönn et al. [180] Europe 2.8 360 Barbu and Sorescu [162] Romania
Scops owl (Otus scops) 0.03 6871 Malle and Probst [181] Europe 0.1 2152 Muraoka [182] Austria

Table 2.

Average and maximum numerical percentages of bats that have been eaten by European owls.

It has been said that larger owl species take larger prey [8]. This study shows, however, that all sizes of bats are widely represented in the diet of the studied owls (Table 1). However, there is a statistically significant correlation in the weight of eaten bats and the weight of the owl (0.736, p < 0.05). The heaviest owl Bubo bubo takes bats with an average weight of 21.5 g, while the smallest owl Aegolius funereushas taken bats with the average weight of only 8.9 g (Table 3). Bat sizes range from 5.1 g, species like Pipistrellus pygmaeus, to 135 g species like Rousettus aegyptiacus (Figure 1). In the diet of owls, an average of 18.5 species of bats was found: barn owl 40, tawny owl 33, eagle owl 27, long-eared owl 18 and little owl 15 (Table 3). The remaining three species, short-eared, Tengmalm’s and Ural owls had only eaten five species, each.

Owl species Average weight of the owl Number of bats in the diet Number of bat species in the diet Total weight of bats in the diet Minimum weight of eaten bat species Maximum weight of eaten bat species Average weight of all bats eaten
Aegolius funereus 139.5 19 5 169.7 6.1 11.6 8.9
Athene noctua 166.0 65 15 897.3 5.5 32.8 13.8
Asio otus 310.3 1396 18 17,696.3 5.5 38.0 12.7
Tyto alba 332.5 9165 40 164,934.2 5.1 135.0 18.0
Asio flammeus 355.5 209 5 2525.7 5.5 28.0 12.1
Strix aluco 514.3 8191 33 125,874.7 5.5 50.0 15.4
Strix uralensis 839,5 11 5 134.7 6.1 32.8 12.3
Bubo bubo 2542.5 292 27 6267.5 5.5 135.0 21.5
Total/average 19,348 18.5 318,500.1 5.1 135.0 16.5

Table 3.

Numbers and weights of bats eaten by European owls in increasing order of weight. The correlation between owl weight and average bat prey weight is 0.736 which is significant at the level of p < 0.05. Weights shown are in g.

Figure 1.

An eagle owl has brought to its nest a female Egyptian fruit bat with a baby still sucking when figure was taken in 2008. Courtesy of Ezra Hadad, Israel.

The average and maximum percentages of bats that have been eaten by the most studied Eurasian owls are shown in Table 2. Bats comprise only a very small part of an owls’ diet; their percentage share amongst all prey is usually much less than 0.2% (Table 2). The very low percentage of bats in the food of owls suggests that bats are normally not a profitable prey item for owls, quite possibly because of the time and energy needed to capture them.

Leading the level of bat consumption is the barn owl, although the absolute value, compared to other prey, is a very modest 0.12% (Table 2). No other owl species has taken bats over 0.1% in any large study samples. But the percentage rises markedly depending on the availability of bats as owls respond to increasing overall bat abundance in the environment [183]. Small maximum value samples show that near bat caves or in otherwise bat-rich biotopes, the prey share of bats can be significantly higher, up to 25–39% (Table 2).


4. Discussion

Contrary to other mammalian orders, bats face a very low risk of predation. Nocturnality and the capacity to reach remote shelters by active flight offer little opportunities for diurnal avian and terrestrial mammalian predators [21]. It has been shown that non-predator and non-accidental mortality of bats (probably caused by a disease, parasites or starvation) measured inside the fortifications is higher during transitory periods preceding and following the period of deep hibernation, in which mortality is the lowest [184].

In the Far East, it has been noted that the eagle owl eats more bats during the autumn and close to the seashore where, most probably, it hunts these bats during their seasonal spring and autumn migrations along the coast [92].

Bats flying along line landscape elements (forest edges, shore and tree lines) or in open spaces are more exposed to predation [185].

Although the diet studies are equally numerous, in Europe the short-eared owl catches many fewer bats than the long-eared owl, likely due in part to its diurnal activity in open habitat (with fewer bats). However, in Algeria (North Africa), three short-eared owl pairs had more bats (39% by number and 9.3% by biomass) in their diet when long-eared owls in the same area preferred rodents and birds [128].

In the case of the long-eared owl, Garcia et al. [98] concluded that on a geographical scale, bat abundance does not seem to reflect bat availability for owls, maybe because hunting strategies for preferred prey such as small rodents are not well suited for the capture of flying bats. Bats occurred in many long-eared owl diets across the Mediterranean region, but their contribution remained largely irrelevant, although some bat aggregations were a locally important food source for some individual owls during certain periods.

Large barn owl diet samples show well how bats are eaten more in the south than in the north: In Britain, the frequency of bats was only 0.03% of 66,276 prey [185] and was 0.03% out of 102,588 prey in Belgium [30] but was 0.06% of 18,768 prey in the Pyrenees and 0.11% of 10,716 prey in Corsica [30].

Some cave samples for the tawny owl (30.5% bats out of 13,791 prey items) date back to the second half of the eighteenth century [61]. It is not known if the climate was more favourable to bats at that time, but they must have been more abundant. Roulin and Christe [29] have also shown that bat predation by barn owls has decreased during the last 150 years, due to historical declines in bat populations during the last century [186]. This decline could be caused by the human impacts which have affected many bat species. Lesiński [187] showed that in Poland, tawny owls ate fewer bats in the 1980s, possibly due to the intensive use of toxic pesticides during those years.


5. Conclusions

Owls prey on bats rarely and opportunistically, although bat aggregations could be a locally important food source for some species and individual owls during certain periods. Also, the decrease in the main prey (rodent) abundance can lead owls to expand their diet and include bats. It has been said that pellet studies could underestimate or even miss small bats taken by owls [185]. This study shows, however, that all sizes of bats are widely represented in the diet of the studied owls. That larger owls tend to take larger bat prey could be useful in archaeological cave studies when trying to identify the original predator of recovered bone/fossil remains [188].

We found two main obstacles in the food studies of European owls: first, several studies did not present complete lists of prey numbers or frequencies (often bats are combined with shrews, as insectivorous mammals), and second, identification skills to name the bat species showed a large variation (in this material we had 515 unidentified bats). We urge future owl diet studies to include complete prey lists to provide future reviewers with more accurate bat occurrence data.

Although the number of bats found in owl pellets can be small, such data collected may represent important faunistic and biodiversity contributions, particularly for rare species. Many bat species still have a ‘data deficient’ conservation label, and even in the most recent atlas of Bats in many European countries, the data on distribution of some bat species remains very scarce and incomplete [31].



We thank Dr. Risto Tornberg, University of Oulu, Finland, for helping with the statistics and David H. Johnson, Director of the Global Owl project, for the helpful editorial comments and input on the project. Jevgeni Shergalin kindly obtained and translated a few Russian books and papers for this study. We also thank Ezra Hadad for the kind use of his photograph.


  1. 1. Simmons NB. An Eocene big bang for bats. Science. 2005;307:527-528
  2. 2. BatLife-Europe. 2017. Available from:
  3. 3. Rydell J, Speakman JR. Evolution of nocturnality in bats: Potential competitors and predators during their early history. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1995;54:183-191
  4. 4. Williams EE. Additional notes on fossil and subfossil bats from Jamaica. Journal of Mammalogy. 1952;33(2):171-179
  5. 5. Sevilla P, Chaline J. New data on bat fossils from middle and upper Pleistocene localities in France. Geobios. 2011;44(2-3):289-297
  6. 6. Marti CD. A review of prey selection by the long-eared owl. Condor. 1976;78:331-336
  7. 7. Mikkola H. Owls of Europe. Calton: T. & A.D. Poyser; 1983a
  8. 8. Marti CD. Feeding ecology of four sympatric owls. Condor. 1974;76:45-61
  9. 9. Pérez-Barbería FJ. Influencia de la Variacíon Latitudinal en la Contribucíon de los Murciélagos (Chiroptera) a la Dieta de la Lechuza Común (Tyto alba). Ardeola. 1991a;38(1):61-68
  10. 10. Stuart C, Stuart T. Field Guide to the Mammals of Southern Africa. Cape Town: Struik Publishers; 1995
  11. 11. Van Den Brink PJ. A Field Guide to the Mammals of Britain and Europe. London: Collins; 1973
  12. 12. Lindhe Norberg UM, Norberg RÅ. Scaling of wingbeat frequency with body mass in bats and limits to maximum bat sizes. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2012;215:711-722
  13. 13. Wikipedia. 2017. Available from:
  14. 14. Mikkola H, Lamminmäki J. Moult, Ageing and Sexing of Finnish Owls. Saarijärven Offset Oy: Saarijärvi; 2014. Finnish and English
  15. 15. Petrželková KJ, Obuch J, Zukal J. Does the barn owl (Tyto alba) selectively predate individual great mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis)? Lynx. 2004;35:123-132
  16. 16. Temple SA. Do predators always capture substandard individuals disproportionally from prey population? Ecology. 1987;68:669-674
  17. 17. Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer K. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. In: Columbiformes-Piciformes. Vol. 9. Wiesbaden: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft; 1980
  18. 18. König C. Schleiereule, Tyto a. alba Scop., “schlägt” fliegende Fledermäuse. Beitr Vogelkd. 1961;7:229-233
  19. 19. Looney MW. Predation on bats by hawks and owls. Bulletin of the Oklahoma Ornithological Society. 1972;21:1-3
  20. 20. Twente JW. Predation on bats by hawks and owls. Wilson Bulletin. 1954;66(2):135-136
  21. 21. Spitzenberger F, Engelberger S, Kugelschafter K. Real time observations of Strix aluco preying upon a maternity colony of Myotis emarginatus. Vespertilio. 2014;17:185-196
  22. 22. Güttinger R. Mausohren leben gefährlich. Fledermaus-Anzeiger, Regionalbeilage für die Kantone SG/AI/AR. 1990
  23. 23. Petrželková KJ, Zukal J. Does a live barn owl (Tyto alba) affect emergency behaviour of serotine bats (Eptesicus serotinus)? Acta Chiropterologica. 2003;5(2):177-184
  24. 24. Boratyński J. Observation of the behaviour of noctule bat Nyctalus noctula during the escape from a predator – Tawny owl Strix aluco. Polish Academy of Sciences Notatki-Notes. 2011a;2010:47-48. In Polish with Abstract in English
  25. 25. Russo D, Cistrone L, Jones G. Emergence time in forest bats: The influence of canopy closure. Acta Oecologica. 2007;31:119-126
  26. 26. Kellomäki E. Food of the pygmy owl Glaucidium passerinum in the breeding season. Ornis Fennica. 1977;54:1-29
  27. 27. Shepel AI. Birds of Prey and Owls of the Kama Region near Perm. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University; 1992. Only in Russian
  28. 28. Scherzinger W. Zum Aktionssystem des Sperlingskauzes (Glaucidium passerinum, L.). Zoologica. 1970;41(118):1-120
  29. 29. Roulin A, Christe P. Geographic and temporal variation in the consumption of bats by European barn owls. Bird Study. 2013b;60(4):561-569
  30. 30. Libois RM. Etude par analyse du regime alimentaire de la Chouette Effraie Tyto alba (Scopoli). Cahiers d’Ethologie Appliquee. 1984a;4:1-120
  31. 31. Vale-Gončalves HM, Barros P, Braz L, Cabral JA. The contribution of the barn owl (Tyto alba) feeding ecology to confirm bat species occurrence in North Portugal. Barbastella. 2015a;8(1):1-5
  32. 32. Brown DJ. Seasonal variations in the prey of some barn owls in Gwynedd. Bird Study. 1981;28(2):139-146
  33. 33. Cooke D, Nagle A, Smiddy P, Fairley J, Muircheartaigh IO. The diet of the barn owl Tyto alba in county Cork in relation to land use. Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. 1996;96B(2):97-111
  34. 34. Dor M. Examining the diet of the barn owl. The Nature and the Land. 1947;7(7):337-344
  35. 35. Kubik J, Leniec H, Sitkowski W. Analysis of the mammal Fauna of the Lublin Coal Basin based on owl pellets. Acta Theriologica. 1984;29(13):167-173
  36. 36. Nader I. Animal remains in pellets of the barn owl, Tyto alba, from the vicinity of an-Najaf, Iraq. Bulletin of the Iraq Natural History Museum. 1968;4:1-7
  37. 37. Rockenbauch D. Ergänzungen zur Nahrungsbiologie einiger Eulenarten. Anzeiger der Ornithologischen Gesellschaft in Bayern. 1976;15:78-84
  38. 38. Schmidt E. Vergleich zwischen der Säugernahrung der Waldohreulen, Asio otus (L.), in der Ungarischen Tiefebene und der in Nordeuropa. Lounais-Hämeen Luonto. 1972;45:1-10
  39. 39. Schmidt E, Štollmann A. Nahrung der Sleiereule (Tyto alba guttata Brehm, 1831) in Talkessel Turčianska Kotlina (Slowakei). Zborník Slovenského Národného Múzea, Prirodné vedy, Bratislava. 1972;18(1):139-142
  40. 40. Schnurre O, Bethge E. Ernährungsbiologische Studien an Schleiereulen (Tyto alba) im Berliner Raum. Milu. 1973;3(4):476-484
  41. 41. Smal CM. The diet of the barn owl Tyto alba in southern Ireland, with reference to a recently introduced prey species–The Bank Wole Clethrionomys glareolus. Bird Study. 1987;34:113-125
  42. 42. Alivizatos H, Goutner V. Winter diet of the barn owl (Tyto alba) and long-eared owl (Asio otus) in North-Eastern Greece: A comparison. Journal of Raptor Research. 1999;33(2):160-163
  43. 43. Benda P, Andreas M, Kock D, Lučan RK, Munclinger P, Nova P, et al. Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the eastern Mediterranean. Part 4. Bat fauna of Syria: Distribution, systematics, and ecology. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae. 2006;70(1):1-329
  44. 44. Mahmood-ul-Hassan M, Beg MA, Mushtaq-ul-Hassan M, Mirza HA, Siddique M. Nesting and diet of the barn owl (Tyto alba) in Pakistan. Journal of Raptor Research. 2007;41(2):122-129
  45. 45. Manganaro A, Ranazzi L, Salvati L. Diet overlap of barn owl (Tyto alba) and little owl (Athene noctua) in a Mediterranean urban area. Buteo. 2001;12:67-70
  46. 46. Mushtaq-Ul-Hassan M, Ghazi RR, Nisa N-U. Food preference of the short-eared owl (Asio flammeus) and barn owl (Tyto alba) at Usta Muhammad, Baluchistan, Pakistan. Turkish Journal of Zoology. 2007;31(1):91-94
  47. 47. Pokines JT, Peterhans CK. Barn owl (Tyto alba) taphonomy in the Negev Desert, Israel. Israel Journal of Zoology. 1998;44:19-27
  48. 48. Sleeman DP, Kelleher KM. Barn owl Tyto alba depredating Daubenton’s bats Myotis daubentoni. Irish Birds. 2008;8:434-435
  49. 49. Tores M, Yom-Tov Y. The diet of the barn owl Tyto alba in the Negev desert. Israel Journal of Zoology. 2003;49:233-236
  50. 50. Guerra C, Garcia D, Alcover JA. Unusual foraging patterns of the barn owl, Tyto alba (Strigiformes: Tytonidae), on small islets from the Pityusic archipelago (Western Mediterranean Sea). Folia Zoologica. 2014;63(3):180-187
  51. 51. Kvartalnov PV, Poyarkov ND, Popovkina AB, Dementyev MN. Barn owl in the south-east of Azerbaijan. Ekologiya Berkut. 2011;20(1-2):111-114
  52. 52. Pande S, Dahanukar N. Reversed sexual dimorphism and differential prey delivery in barn owls (Tyto alba). Journal of Raptor Research. 2012;46(2):184-189
  53. 53. Samsoor Ali AM, Santhanakrishnan R. Diet composition of the barn owl Tyto alba (Aves: Tytonidae) and spotted owlet Athene brama (Aves: Strigidae) coexisting in an urban environment. Podoces. 2012;7(1/2):21-32
  54. 54. Santhanakrishnan R, Mohamed AH, Ali S, Anbarasan U. Diet variations of the barn owl Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) in Madurai District, Tamil Nadu, southern India. Podoces. 2010;5(2):95-103
  55. 55. Obuch J, Danko Š, Noga M. Recent and subrecent diet of the barn owl (Tyto alba) in Slovakia. Slovak Raptor Journal. 2016;10:1-50
  56. 56. Obuch J, Benda P. Food of the barn owl (Tyto alba) in the Eastern Mediterranean. Slovak Raptor Journal. 2009;3:41-50
  57. 57. Bekker D, Janssen R, Buys J. First records of predation of grey long-eared bats (Plecotus austriacus) by the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in the Netherlands. Lutra. 2014;57(1):43-47
  58. 58. Love RA, Webbon C, Glue DE, Harris S. Changes in the food of Barn Owls (Tyto alba) between 1974 and 1997. Mammal Review. 2000;30(2):107-129
  59. 59. Obuch J. The representation of bats (Chiroptera) in the diet of owls (Strigiformes) in Slovakia. Vespertilio. 1998;3:65-75. Slovak with abstract in English
  60. 60. Uttendörfer O. Neue Ergebnisse über die Ernährung der Greivögel und Eulen. Stuttgart: Eugen Elmer; 1952
  61. 61. Obuch J. Spatial and temporal diversity of the diet of the tawny owl (Strix aluco). Slovak Raptor Journal. 2011a;5:1-120
  62. 62. Gruzdev LV, Likhachec GN. Contribution to feeding habits of Strix aluco in the Tula Zaseki. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. 1960;39:624-627. Russian with Abstract in English
  63. 63. März R. “Sammler” Waldkauz. Beitr Vogelkd. 1954;1(4):7-38
  64. 64. Skuratowicz W. Investigations on the composition of the food of the tawny owl (Strix aluco L.) in the years 1946-1948. The Poznan Society of Friends of Science, Department of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Biological Section. 1950;12(4):226-236
  65. 65. Adanez VA. Alimentación del Carabo (Strix aluco L. 1758) en España. Alytes. 1983;1(1):1-14
  66. 66. Ahlbom B. Kattugglans föda. Fåglar i Sörmland. 1971;4:59-62
  67. 67. Balčiauskienė L. Analysis of tawny owl (Strix aluco) food remains as a tool for long-term monitoring of small mammals. Acta Zoologica Lituanica. 2005;15(2):85-89
  68. 68. Beven G. The food of tawny owl in London. London Bird Report. 1964;29:56-72
  69. 69. Beven G. The food of tawny owls in Surrey. Surrey Bird Report for 1966. 1966;2:32-39
  70. 70. Galeotti P, Morimando F, Violano C. Feeding ecology of the tawny owls (Strix aluco) in urban habitats (northern Italy). Bollettino di Zoologia. 2009;58(2):143-150
  71. 71. Holmberg T. Variationer i kattugglans (Strix aluco) bytesval. Fauna and Flora. 1976;71:97-107
  72. 72. Itämies J, Mikkola H. On the diet of the tawny owl (Strix aluco) in Rauma. Porin Lintutieteellinen Yhdistys Vuosikirja. 1972;1:25-26. Finnish with Summary in English
  73. 73. Julian S, Altringham JD. Bat predation by a tawny owl. Natura. 1994;119:49-56
  74. 74. Kasprzyk K, Kitowski I, Czochra K, Krawczyk R. Bats in the diet of owls from the southern part of the Lublin region (SE Poland). Myotis. 2004;41-42:75-80
  75. 75. Lesiński G, Gryz J, Kowalski M. Bat predation by tawny owls Strix aluco in differently human-transformed habitats. Italian Journal of Zoology. 2009b;76(4):415-421
  76. 76. Lesiński G, Gryz J, Romanowski J, Olszewski A, Kowalski M, Krauze-Gryz D, et al. Small mammals of Kampinos National Park and its protection zone, as revealed by analyses of the diet of tawny owls Strix aluco Linnaeus, 1758. Fragmenta Faunistica. 2013;56(1):65-81
  77. 77. Lundberg A. Why are the Ural owl Strix uralensis and the tawny owl S. aluco parapatric in Scandinavia? Ornis Scandinavica. 1980;11:116-120
  78. 78. Mikkola H. Lehtopöllöt ovat yksilöllisiä. Suomenselän Lintutieteellinen. 1968;3:4-5. Only in Finnish
  79. 79. Nores C. Comparacion del regimen alimenticio de Strix aluco y Tyto alba en la Costa oriental Asturiana. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Universidad de Oviedo, Serie Biología. 1979;20-21:189-194
  80. 80. Ruprecht AL. Bats (Chiroptera) as constituents of the food of barn owls Tyto alba in Poland. Ibis. 1979;121:489-494
  81. 81. Schmidt E, Topal G. Presence of bats in owl pellets from Hungary. Vertebrata Hungarica. 1971;12:93-102. Only in Hungarian
  82. 82. Wendland V. 14jährige Beobachtungen zur Vermehrung des Waldkauzes (Strix aluco L.). Journal of Ornithology. 1972;113(3):276-286
  83. 83. Yalden DW. Dietary separation of owls in the Peak District. Bird Study. 1985;32:122-131
  84. 84. Gryz J, Krauze-Gryz D. Mammals in the diet of tawny owl Strix aluco in western part of Skierniewice Forest district (Central Poland). Forest Research Papers. 2017;78(4):297-302
  85. 85. Idouhar-Saadi H, Moulai R, Souttou K, Baziz-Neffah F, Smai A, Zenia S, et al. Diet comparison between fledgling and adult tawny owl Strix aluco Linné, 1758 (Aves: Strigidae) in suburban area of El Harrach (Algiers, Algeria). International Journal of Zoological Research. 2014;4(4):59-66
  86. 86. Hagen Y. Rovfuglene og Viltpleien. Oslo: Byldendal Norsk Forlag; 1952
  87. 87. Kowalski M, Lesiński G. The food of the tawny owl (Strix aluco L.) from near a bat cave in Poland. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge. 1990;41:23-26
  88. 88. Schnurre O. Lebensbilder märkischer Waldkäuze (Strix aluco L.). Milu. 1961;1:83-124
  89. 89. Cais L. Badania nad skladem pokarmu kilku gatunków sów. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu im Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu (Biologia). 1963;44:1-21
  90. 90. Twietmeyer S, Angetter L-S, Böhm N. Fledermäuse in der Nahrung des Waldkauzes (Strix aluco) und weitere Nahrungsbestandteile von zwei Standorten in der Region Trier. Dendrocopos. 2011;38:12-17
  91. 91. Jäderholm K. Diets of the Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus and the Ural owl Strix uralensis in Central Finland. Ornis Fennica. 1987;64:149-153
  92. 92. Rosina VV, Shokhrin VP. Bats in the diet of owls from Russian Far East, southern Sikhote Alin. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy. 2011b;22(1):205-213
  93. 93. Ahlbom B. Slaguggla, Pärluggla och Sparvuggla–Något om deras föda i Gästrikland och Hälsingland. Fåglar i X-län. 1976;7:17-24
  94. 94. Imaizumi Y. Analysis of ural owl pellet contents. Zoological Magazine (Dobutsugaku Zasshi). 1968;77(12):402-404. Japanese with Abstract in English
  95. 95. Korpimäki E, Sulkava S. Diet and breeding performance of Ural owls Strix uralensis under fluctuating food conditions. Ornis Fennica. 1987;64:57-66
  96. 96. Obuch J, Danko Š, Mihόk J, Karaska D, Šimák L. Diet of the Ural owl (Strix uralensis) in Slovakia. Slovak Raptor Journal. 2013;7:59-71
  97. 97. Tian L, Zhou X, Shi Y, Guo Y, Bao W. Bats as the main prey of wintering long-eared owl (Asio otus) in Beijing: Integrating biodiversity protection and urban management. Integrative Zoology. 2015;10:216-226
  98. 98. Garcia AM, Cervera F, Rodrίguez A. Bat predation by long-eared owls in Mediterranean and temperate regions of southern Europe. Journal of Raptor Research. 2005a;39(4):445-453
  99. 99. Araujo J, Rey JM, Landin A, Moreno A. Contribucíon al Estudio del Búho Chico (Asio otus) en España. Ardeola. 1973;19:397-428
  100. 100. Czarnecki Z. Observations on the biology of the long-eared owl (Asio otus L.). The Poznan Society of Friends of Science, Department of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Biological Section. 1956;18(4):1-41. Polish with Abstract in English
  101. 101. Fairley JS. Food of long-eared owls in north-East Ireland. British Birds. 1967;60:130-135
  102. 102. Glue DE, Hammond GJ. Feeding ecology of the long-eared owl in Britain and Ireland. Bird Study. 1974;67(9):361-369
  103. 103. Haensel J, Walther HJ. Beitrag zur Ernährung der Eulen im Nordharz-Vorland unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Insektennahrung. Beitr Vogelkd. 1966;11(6):345-358
  104. 104. Källander H. Food of the long-eared owl Asio otus in Sweden. Ornis Fennica. 1977;54:79-84
  105. 105. Schmidt E. Über die Winternahrung der Waldohreulen in der VR Ungarn. Zoologische Abhandlungen. 1965;27(13):307-317
  106. 106. Schmidt E. Die Ernährung der Waldohreule (Asio otus) in Europa. Aquila. 1974;81(1):221-235
  107. 107. Veiga JP. Alimentación y relaciones troficas entre la lechuza común (Tyto alba) y el búho Chico (Asio otus) en la sierra de Guadarrama (España). Ardeola. 1978;18:118-142
  108. 108. Zimmermann K. Kleinsäuger in der Beute von Waldohreulen bei Berlin. Beitr Vogelkd. 1963;9:59-68
  109. 109. Plini P. Primi dati sull’alimentazione del Gufo comune Asio otus nel Lazio. Avocetta. 1986;10:41-43
  110. 110. Wendland V. Paralleler Verlauf der Fortpflanzungsrate bei Waldohreule (Asio otus) und Mäusebussard (Buteo buteo). Beitr Vogelkd. 1984;30(1):1-11
  111. 111. Wijnandts H. Ecological energetics of the long-eared owl (Asio otus). Ardea. 1984;72:1-92
  112. 112. Carrillo J, Nogales M, Delgado G, Marrero M. Preliminary data for a comparative study of the feeding habits of Asio otus canariensis on El Hierro and gran Canaria, Canary Islands. In: Meyburg B-U, Chancellor RD, editors. Raptors in the Modern World. Berlin, London, Paris: WWGBP; 1989
  113. 113. González AG, Ortί FC. Notas sobre la variaciόn estacional y geográfica de la dieta del búho Chico Asio otus. Ardeola. 2001;48(1):75-80
  114. 114. Scott D. The Long-Eared Owl. London: The Hawk and Owl Trust; 1997
  115. 115. Sharikov AV. Peculiarities of winter feeding in the long-eared owl (Asio otus) in settlements of Stavropol Krai. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. 2006;85(7):871-877. In Russian with Abstract in English
  116. 116. Simmi F, Martucci O, Manganaro A, De Giacomo U, Fanfani A. Dieta del Gufo Comune Asio otus (Linnaeus, 1758) nella riserva del Lago di Vigo (VT). Alula. 1998;5(1-2):140-144
  117. 117. Charter M, Izhaki I, Leshem I, Roulin A. Diet and breeding success of long-eared owls in a semi-arid environment. Journal of Arid Environments. 2012;85:142-144
  118. 118. Escala C, Alonso D, Mazuelas D, Mendiburu A, Vilches A, Arizaga J. Winter diet of long-eared owls Asio otus in the Ebro valley (NE Iberia). Revista Catalana d’Ornitologia. 2009;25:49-53
  119. 119. Sergio F, Marchesi L, Pedrini P. Density, diet and productivity of long-eared owls Asio otus in the Italian Alps: The importance of Microtus voles. Bird Study. 2008;55:321-328
  120. 120. Stolarz P, Lesiński G. The Bechstein’s bat Myotis bechsteinii as a prey of the long-eared owl Asio otus in western Roztocze. Kulon. 2017;22:142-145. Polish with summary in English
  121. 121. Stolarz P, Lesiński G, Liszewska E, Karpińska O. Autumn diet of the long-eared owl Asio otus in the Mazowiecka lowland. Kulon. 2017;22:107-116. Polish with abstract in English
  122. 122. Tulis F, Balaž M, Obuch J, Šotnar K. Responses of the long-eared owl Asio otus diet and the numbers of wintering individuals to changing abundance of the common vole Microtus arvalis. Biologia. 2015;70(5):667-673
  123. 123. Hills P, Fairley JS, Smal CM, Archer P. The diet of the long-eared owl in Ireland. Irish Birds. 1988;3:581-588
  124. 124. Li X-J, Bao W-D, Sun L-S. Diet of wintering long-eared owls in Beijing City. Chinese Journal of Zoology. 2007;42(2):52-55. In Chinese with Abstract in English
  125. 125. Zimmermann K. Jährliche Schwankungen in der Ernährung eines Waldohreulen-Paares zur Brutzeit. Vogelwelt. 1950;71(1):152-155
  126. 126. Corral JF, Cortés JA, Gill JM. Contribución al estudio de la alimentación de Asio otus en el sur de España. Doñana, Acta Vertebrate. 1979;6:179-190
  127. 127. Standen R. Some observations by English naturalists on the fauna of Rathlin Island and Ballycastle district. Irish Naturalist. 1987;6:173-178
  128. 128. Djilali K, Sekour M, Souttou K, Abadsa L, Guezoul O, Denys C, et al. Diet of short-eared owl asio flammeus (Pontobbidan, 1763) in desert area at Hassi El Gara (El Golea, Algeria). Zoology and Ecology. 2016b;26(3):159-165
  129. 129. Aho J. The autumn food of Asio f. flammeus Pontopp. in the vicinity of the city of Tampere, South Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici. 1964;1:375-376
  130. 130. Glue DE. Prey taken by short-eared owls at British breeding sites and winter quarters. Bird Study. 1971;17(1):39-42
  131. 131. Glue DE. Feeding ecology of the short-eared owl in Britain and Ireland. Bird Study. 1976;23:70-78
  132. 132. Calvo Macho JM. Alimentación invernal de la Lechuza Campestre Asio flammeus en una localidad del Norte de España. In: Chancellor RD, Meyburg B-U, Ferrero JJ, editors. Holarctic Birds of Prey. Berlin, London and Paris: ADENEX-WWGBP; 1998. pp. 467-474
  133. 133. Jiménez-Perez J, Gomez JA, Escobar JV, Lacomba I. Estudio de la alimentación de la Lechuza Campestre (Asio flammeus) y la Lechuza Común (Tyto alba) en l’Albufera de Valencia. Mediterranean Natural. 1989;1:81-88
  134. 134. Jánossy D, Schmidt E. Die Nahrung des Uhus (Bubo bubo) Regionale und erdzeitliche Änderungen. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge. 1970;21:25-51
  135. 135. Bocheński Z. The diet of the eagle-owl Bubo bubo (L.) in the Pieniny Mts. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia. 1960;5(8):1-23. In Polish with Abstract in English
  136. 136. März R. Der Uhu. Wittenberg Lutherstadt: A. Ziemsen Verlag; 1958
  137. 137. Wendland V. Aufzeichnungen über Brutbiologie und Verhalten der Waldohreule (Asio otus). Journal für Ornithologie. 1957;98:241-261
  138. 138. Amr ZS, Handal EN, Bibi F, Najajrah MH, Qumsiyeh MB. Change in the diet of the Eurasian eagle owl, Bubo bubo, suggests decline in biodiversity in Wadi Al Makhrour, Bethlehem governorate, Palestinian territories. Slovak Raptor Journal. 2016;10:1-5
  139. 139. Baumgart W. An Horsten des Uhus (Bubo bubo) in Bulgarien. II. Der Uhu in Nordostbulgarien (Aves, Strigidae). Zool. Abhigyan. 1975;33(18):251-275
  140. 140. Bezzel E, Obst J, Wickl K-H. Zur Ernährung und Nahrungswahl des Uhus (Bubo bubo). Journal für Ornithologie. 1976;117(2):210-238
  141. 141. Görner M, Knobloch H. Zur Ernährungssituation des Uhus (Bubo b. bubo L.) in Thüringen. Archiv für Naturschutz und Landschaftsforschung, Berlin. 1977;18(3):161-176
  142. 142. Milchev B, Spassov N. First evidence for carrion-feeding of Eurasian eagle owl (Bubo bubo) in Bulgaria. Ornis Hungarica. 2017;25(1):51-62
  143. 143. Obuch J. Spatial diversity in the diet of the Eurasian eagle owl Bubo bubo in Iran. Podoces. 2014;9(1):7-21
  144. 144. Olsson V. Studies on a population of eagle owls, Bubo bubo (L.), in Southeast Sweden. Viltrevy. 1979;11(1):1-99
  145. 145. Papageorgiou NK, Vlachos CG, Bakaloudis DE. Diet and nest site characteristics of eagle owl (Bubo bubo) breeding in two different habitats in North-Eastern Greece. Avocetta. 1993;17:49-54
  146. 146. Piechocki R, Stubbe M, Uhlenhaut K, Dawka N. Die Ernährungsökologie des Uhus Bubo bubo yenisseensis Buturlin in der Mongolischen Volksrepublik. Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung für Systematik. 1977;104:539-559
  147. 147. Ramanujam ME. A preliminary report on the prey of the Eurasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo) in and around Pondicherry. Zoos’ Print Journal. 2001;16(5):487-488
  148. 148. Rockenbauch D. Untergang und Wiederkehr des Uhus Bubo bubo in Baden-Würtemberg. Anzeiger der Ornithologischen Gesellschaft in Bayern. 1978;17(3):293-328
  149. 149. Sándor AD, Ionescu DT. Diet of the eagle owl (Bubo bubo) in Braşov, Romania. North-Western Journal of Zoology. 2009;5(1):170-178
  150. 150. Simeonov S, Milchev B, Boev Z. Study of the eagle owl (Bubo bubo (L.)) (Aves: Strigiformes) in the Strandsha Mountain (Southeast Bulgaria). II. Food spectrum and trophic specialization. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica. 1998;50(2/3):87-100
  151. 151. Stubbe M, Batsajchan O, Lindecke O, Samjaa R, Stubbe A. New data on feeding ecology of Bubo bubo and Asio otus (Aves: Strigidae) in Mongolia. Erforschung biologischer Ressourcen der Mongolei (Halle/Saale). 2016;13:301-311
  152. 152. Suchý O. A contribution to the knowledge of the eagle Owl’s (Bubo bubo) diet in Jesenίky Mountains in 1955-2000. Buteo. 2003;13:31-39
  153. 153. Wickl K-H. Der Uhu (Bubo bubo) in Bayern. Garmischer Vogelkd. Berichte. 1979;6:1-47
  154. 154. Thiollay JM. Essai sur les rapaces du midi de la France, distribution-écologie. Hibou Grand Duc, Bubo bubo bubo L. Alauda. 1969;37:15-27
  155. 155. Ahlbom B. Pärlugglans föda i S-Dalarna. Meddelande i S-Dalarna. 1977;10:16-18
  156. 156. Kellomäki E. Varpuspöllön (Glaucidium passerinum) ravintobiologiasta Etelä- ja Keski-Suomessa 1960-luvulla [M.Sc. thesis]. Finland: University of Turku; 1969. Only in Finnish
  157. 157. Klaus S, Mikkola H, Wiesner J. Aktivität und Ernährung des Rauhfußkauzes Aegolius funereus (L.) während der Fortpflanzungsperiode. Zool. Jb. Syst. 1975;102:485-507
  158. 158. Pokornẏ J. The diet of the Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus) in northbohemian mountain areas damaged by immissions. Buteo. 2000;11:107-114. Czechish with abstract in English
  159. 159. Pykal J, Kloubec B. Feeding ecology of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus in Šumava National Park, Czechoslovakia. In: Meyburg B-U, Chancellor RD, editors. Raptor Conservation Today. The Banks, Mountfield: WWGBP. The Pica Press, Helm International Ltd; 1994
  160. 160. Sulkava P, Sulkava S. Die nistzeitliche Nahrung des Rauhfusskauzes Aegolius funereus in Finland 1958-67. Ornis Fennica. 1971;48:117-124
  161. 161. Zárybnická M, Riegert J, Št’astný K. The role of Apodemus mice and Microtus voles in the diet of the Tengmalm’s owl in Central Europe. Population Ecology. 2013;55:353-361
  162. 162. Barbu P, Sorescu C. Contributions concernant la nourriture de la Chouette. Analele Universitatii Bucuresti (Biologie Animale). 1970;19:67-72
  163. 163. Alivizatos H, Goutner V, Zogaris S. Contribution to the study of the diet of four owl species (Aves, Strigiformes) from mainland and island areas of Greece. Belgian Journal of Zoology. 2005;135(2):109-118
  164. 164. Alivizatos H, Goutner V, Athanasiadis A, Poirazidis K. Comparative temporal prey use by barn owl (Tyto alba) and little owl (Athene noctua) in the Evros Delta, northeastern Greece. Journal of Biological Research. 2006;6:177-186
  165. 165. Ganya IM, Zubkov NI. The Little Owl (Athene noctua Scopoli) Food at the Middle Part of Moldavia. Kishinev: Shtiintsa Press; 1975. pp. 63-72. In Russian
  166. 166. Hibbert-Ware A. Report of the Little Owl Food Inquiry 1936-37. London: H.F. and G. Witherby Ltd.; 1938
  167. 167. Hounsome T, O’Mahony D, Delahay R. The diet of little owls Athene noctua in Gloucestershire, England. Bird Study. 2004;51:282-284
  168. 168. Juillard M. La Chouette chevȇche. 2me éd ed. Prangins: Nos Oiseaux, Sociétéromande pour l’étude et la protection des oiseaux; 1985
  169. 169. Obuch J, Krištίn A. Prey composition of the little owl Athene noctua in an arid zone (Egypt, Syria, Iran). Folia Zoologica. 2004;53(1):65-79
  170. 170. Rakhimov II, Pavov YI. Birds of Prey and Owls of Tatarstan. Kazan: Tatpoligraf Press; 1999. Only in Russian
  171. 171. Rodriguez MM. Espectro Alimenticio del Mochuelo común (Athene noctua) en España. Alytes. 1983;1(1):1-15
  172. 172. Simeonov SD. New data on the diet of the little owl (Athene noctua Scop.) in Bulgaria. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Ecology. 1983;11:53-60. In Russian with Abstract in English
  173. 173. Sosnikhina TM. Practical importance of the little owl in semidesert conditions in the south Armenian SSR. Proceedings of Academy of Sciences of the Armenian SSR, Biology and Agricultural Sciences. 1950;3(1):95-100. Only in Russian
  174. 174. Sukhinin AN, Bel’skaya GS, Zhernov IV. Little owl diet in Turkmenia. Ornitologiya. 1972;10:216-227. Only in Russian
  175. 175. Van Nieuwenhuyse D, Génot J-C, Johnson DH. The Little Owl – Conservation, Ecology and Behaviour of Athene Noctua. Cambridge: University Press; 2008
  176. 176. Charter M, Leshem Y, Izhaki I, Guershon M, Kiat Y. The diet of the little owl, Athene noctua, in Israel. Zoology in the Middle East. 2006;39(1):31-40
  177. 177. Lanszki J. A kuvik (Athene noctua) táplálek-összetétele egy Somogy megyei külvárosi élöhelyen. Natura Somogyiensis. 2006;9:315-324 (Only in Hungarian)
  178. 178. Sommer RS, Niederle M, Labes R, Zoller H. Bat predation by the barn owl Tyto alba in a hibernation site of bats. Folia Zoologica. 2009;58(1):98-103
  179. 179. Birrer S. Synthesis of 312 studies on the diet of the long-eared owl Asio otus. Ardea. 2009;97(4):615-624
  180. 180. Schönn S, Scherzinger W, Exo K-M, Ille R. Der Steinkauz Athene Noctua. Wittenberg Lutherstadt: A. Ziemsen Verlag; 1991
  181. 181. Malle G, Probst R. Die Zwergohreule (Otus scops) in Österreich. Klagenfurt am Wörthersee: Verlag des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Kärnten; 2015
  182. 182. Muraoka Y. Videonanalyse der Zwergohreule in Unterkärnten: Auswertung von Infrarotaufnahmen aus einem Nistkasten. Abt. 20, UAbt. Naturschutz. Wien: Projektbericht im Auftrag des Amtes der Kärntner Landesregierung; 2009
  183. 183. Lesiński G, Ignaczak M, Manias J. Opportunistic predation on bats by the tawny owl Strix aluco. Animal Biology. 2009a;59:283-288
  184. 184. Ruczyński I, Ruckzyńska I, Kasprzyk K. Winter mortality rates of bats inhabiting man-made shelters (northern Poland). Acta Theriologica. 2005a;50(2):161-166
  185. 185. Speakman JR. The impact of predation by birds on bat populations in the British isles. Mammal Review. 1991;21:123-142
  186. 186. Stebbings RE. Conservation of European Bats. London: Christopher Helm; 1988
  187. 187. Lesiński G. Long-term changes in abundance of bats as revealed by their frequency in tawny owls’ diet. Versita Biologia Section Zoology. 2010;65(4):749-753
  188. 188. Andrews P. Owls, Caves and Fossils. London: Natural History Museum Publications; 1990

Written By

Alan Sieradzki and Heimo Mikkola

Submitted: 21 October 2019 Reviewed: 30 October 2019 Published: 15 January 2020