Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Cellulose Nanocrystals: From Classical Hydrolysis to the Use of Deep Eutectic Solvents

Written By

Manon Le Gars, Loreleï Douard, Naceur Belgacem and Julien Bras

Submitted: August 20th, 2019 Reviewed: September 23rd, 2019 Published: November 27th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89878

Chapter metrics overview

1,415 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


During the last two decades, interest in cellulosic nanomaterials has greatly increased. Among these nanocelluloses, cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) exhibit outstanding properties. Indeed, besides their high crystallinity, cellulose nanocrystals are interesting in terms of morphology with high aspect ratio (length 100–1000 nm, width 2–15 nm), high specific area, and high mechanical properties. Moreover, they can be used as rheological modifier, emulsifier, or for barrier properties, and their surface chemistry opens the door to numerous feasible chemical modifications, leading to a large panel of applications in medical, electronic, composites, or packaging, for example. Traditionally, their extraction is performed via monitored sulfuric acid hydrolysis, leading to well-dispersed aqueous CNC suspensions; these last bearing negative charges (half-sulfate ester groups) at their surface. More recently, natural chemicals called deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have been used for the production of CNC in a way of green chemistry, and characterization of recovered CNC is encouraging.


  • cellulose
  • sulfuric acid hydrolysis
  • cellulose nanocrystals
  • bio-based nanomaterials
  • deep eutectic solvents

1. Introduction

As renewable and biodegradable nanomaterials, nanocelluloses have raised a huge interest for several decades. Indeed, their natural available and abundant source—the biomass—as well their interesting properties makes them materials of choice for new nanomaterial science in a large panel of applications. Two types of nanocelluloses exist: cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) differing from each other in their properties as well in their isolation process. As presented in Figure 1, the exponential evolution of the number of publications and patents dealing with cellulose nanocrystals confirms the large interest generated by these nanomaterials.

Figure 1.

Noncumulative evolution of the number of publications and patents dealing with CNC (source: SciFinder, April 2019—Descriptors, cellulose nanocrystal, cellulose nanorod, rodlike cellulose, cellulose nanowire, cellulose crystallite, cellulose nanoparticle, cellulose whiskers, nanocrystalline cellulose—Language, English).

This chapter aims to describe CNC isolation from cellulose using classical or more recent methods, as well as their properties and applications.


2. Cellulose nanocrystals from classical acid hydrolysis

2.1 From cellulose to cellulose nanocrystals

2.1.1 Structure of cellulose

Cellulose can be extracted from a large variety of sources, kike wood (the main source), seed fibers (cotton), bast fibers (flax, jute, ramie), some animal species (tunicates), fungi, and fruits, with different cellulose contents [1]. With more than 1011 tons of cellulose produced each year [2], with less than 5% is extracted for applications, cellulose is the most abundant polymer on our planet [3]. Historically, cellulose was discovered after being extracted with nitric acid from several plants by the French researcher Anselme Payen in 1838, who characterized the residual compound with chemical formula C6H10O5 [3, 4]. In 1939, the name “cellulose” was for the first time introduced in the scientific community. After almost 200 years of cellulose extraction, modification, and industrial use, this sustainable and biodegradable polymer is currently used for several applications, from paper and cardboard to biomedical, building, textile, cosmetics, pharmacy, and composites [5, 6]. Indeed, intrinsic properties of cellulose fibers—abundancy, renewability, and availability—as well its fibrillary structure or mechanical properties (strength, flexibility) make them materials of choice for such applications. Indeed, in their natural form, cellulose fibers are included in hemicellulose- and lignin-based matrix like a natural composite and acts as the primary compound of plant cell walls by providing high mechanical properties and maintaining their structure.

Looking more precisely at cellulose structure, it is a linear homopolymer of β-D-glucopyranose (C6H12O6) units. These anhydro-D-glucose units (AGU) are linked by β-(1–4)-glycosidic linkage, a covalent bonding between equatorial OH group in C4 and C1 carbon atom of the next unit. Every unit is twisted at 180°C with respect to its surrounding environment and is in chair conformation, with the three hydroxyl groups in equatorial position. Cellobiose (C12H22O11)—the combination of two anhydroglucose units (AGU)—is the repeating unit of cellulose [2, 3]. Cellulose general formula is represented in Figure 2(a).

Figure 2.

(a) Chemical structure of cellulose chain and (b) representation of some hydrogen bonds between two cellulose chains.

End groups of cellulose polymer are chemically different: one nonreducing end and one reducing bearing aldehyde group. Note that cellulose degree of polymerization (DP) is expressed as a function of the AGU unit number and depends on the cellulose source and isolation process (e.g., DP between 300 and 1700 for wood pulp and 800–1000 for cotton) [3]. The numerous hydroxyl groups—three per AGU—induce possible functionalization of cellulose as well as intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds in and between cellulose chains. These interactions form stabilized and flexible cellulose filaments: the cellulose microfibrils (see Figure 3(a)).

Figure 3.

Schematization of a simplified (a) composition of cellulose fiber (extracted and adapted from [7]) and (b) arrangements of crystalline and amorphous domains in cellulose chains (extracted from [8]).

Moreover, cellulosic chains are rearranged into different regions: the ordered crystalline and the disordered amorphous ones. Indeed, a cellulose chain can be represented as a crystalline wire connected by amorphous areas (see Figure 3(b)). It explains the aggregation of cellulose chains and thus their arrangement into microfibrils. The latter are assembled in bundles, themselves assembled in cellulose fibers, with a semi-crystalline structure. Cellulose crystals present four polymorphs: cellulose I, II, III, and IV. Cellulose I is the most abundant form in nature and is present under cellulose Iα and Iβ forms whose ratio depends on the source and affect cellulose properties [3, 4]. Crystallinity of cellulose varies according to the source and is in the large range of 40–80% [3], leading to highly cohesive fibers. Looking more precisely at the level of the microfibrils, they are composed of elementary fibrils, with a diameter around 5 nm. This general structure provides visualization of the different scales inside the cellulose fiber. In addition to being environmentally relevant, cellulose fibers present interesting mechanical properties, ability for further surface modification, low toxicity, low cost, and other properties making them outstanding materials for a lot of traditional as well as innovative applications.

2.1.2 Cellulose nanocrystals from cellulose

Hierarchical structure of cellulose fibers is at the origin of cellulosic nanomaterials, the nanocelluloses, having at least one dimension of nanometric scale as their name suggests. Indeed, from elementary fibrils, two types of nanocellulose can be obtained differing by their isolation procedure, as well by their properties and applications. Figure 4 shows their different morphologies. Briefly, cellulose nanofibrils are obtained by applying high shear mechanical treatment to a cellulose suspension, and recovered nanofibrils have a length between 500 nm and 10 μm and a width between 5 and 50 nm, according to their preparation method, their source, and potential chemical treatment.

Figure 4.

TEM images of (a) microfibrillated cellulose (MFC), (b) TEMPO-oxidized nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), and (c) wood cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) (extracted from [8]).

First investigation on cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) was reported by Ranby et al. in 1950 [9, 10]: after carrying out a sulfuric acid hydrolysis to wood cellulose fibers, he observed rodlike particles with two nanoscale dimensions. Indeed, by hydrolyzing cellulose fibers, most of the amorphous parts of the cellulose are disintegrated, and final nanomaterials are highly crystalline. Cellulose nanocrystals have a length between 100 and 500 nm and a width between 2 and 15 nm depending on the cellulose source and the chemical treatment applied. Indeed, even if the use of sulfuric acid for hydrolysis is the most common process, other research groups have investigated the use of other acids, leading to CNC with different properties. In any case, washing steps are essential to remove any chemicals and to well-disperse the CNC. Concerning their industrialization, around 10 CNC producers can be recorded, with annual production up to 400 tons/year. These productions are significantly lower than those of CNF, but requirement of more chemicals and difficult industrial production steps (washing, dialysis, and sonication) can easily explain this difference. Table 1 shows the non-exhaustive list of CNC producers and their annual production capacity. Note that the leader and pioneer CelluForce© has recently announced new strategy of efficient industrialization [11].

CompanyCountryAnnual production capacity (tons)
CelluForce Inc.USA400
America Process Inc. (GranBio)USA200
Alberta Pacific Forest Industries Inc.Canada180 (expected in 2021)
Anomera Inc.Canada11
Forest Products Laboratory (FPL)USA5
University of MaineUSA4
Blue Goose Biorefineries Inc.Canada4
Cellulose LabCanada4
Advanced Cellulosic Material Inc.Canada1
InnoTech AlbertaCanada0.3
Embrapa/National Nanotechnology Laboratory for AgricultureBrazilPilot

Table 1.

Main CNC producers and their location and annual production capacity (data extracted from Refs. [12, 13]).

2.2 Cellulose nanocrystals: nanomaterials with interesting properties

2.2.1 Isolation of cellulose nanocrystals

Cellulose nanocrystals are obtained by applying a chemical treatment to cellulose fibers: mild acid hydrolysis. Typically employing strong sulfuric acid H2SO4 is going to penetrate into accessible amorphous domains of cellulosic chains and dissolve them to release crystalline parts. Amorphous domains are randomly oriented and arranged inducing a lower density of these domains which are thus more vulnerable to acid hydrolysis [14] and especially to the infiltration of hydronium ions H3O+ leading to hydrolytic cleavage of glycosidic bonds. In this sense, Ranby et al. were the first to prove the preparation and the presence of CNCs, the smallest cellulosic building blocks. Figure 5 synthesizes the different steps of CNC isolation using sulfuric acid hydrolysis.

Figure 5.

Schematic representation of sulfuric hydrolysis of cellulose fibers (This scheme was extracted from an unpublished work (PhD manuscript of E. Gicquel, 2017)).

As previously mentioned, cellulose fibrils are exposed to a sulfuric acid hydrolysis, with defined concentration, temperature, and reaction time. Once amorphous domains are dissolved, a sonication step allows the separation between intact crystalline domains, leading to isolated CNC bearing half-sulfate ester groups on their surface. These charges come from the reaction between sulfuric acid and surface hydroxyl groups of cellulose and induce repulsive forces between negatively charged CNC leading to colloidal stability and dispersion in water [15]. While sulfuric acid is the most common acid used for cellulose fibers hydrolysis, other researches have focused on the use of other organic or mineral acids, like phosphoric acid, hydrobromic acid, or hydrochloric acid [16, 17, 18, 19], generally leading to less stable suspension due to the lack of charges at the surface of the CNC. Moreover, the use of deep eutectic solvents is the subject of the next part of this chapter. When cellulosic source is not totally pure, previous steps are required. Indeed, alkali treatment (generally NaOH) and bleaching steps (generally acetic acid, aqueous chlorite) are essential to remove impurities, especially lignin and hemicelluloses when starting directly from biomass or even biowaste. Cellulose content of raw material is thus drastically increased. Note that a lot of studies have investigated the production of CNC from less conventional sources like rice, soy, and others in order to valorize food and organic waste [20, 21]. Final yield and morphology of CNC are really dependent on the cellulosic source and on the hydrolysis conditions. Indeed, optimization and control of the acid hydrolysis have been the subject of several publications. If common parameters are the hydrolysis with 64 wt% sulfuric acid at 40–45°C during about 30 min, it has been proved that variation of one of the parameters can largely influence the reaction yield as well as CNC properties. For example, by increasing of 10 min the time of hydrolysis, it has been shown by Flauzino Neto et al. that crystalline parts are destructed inducing a significant decrease in length [20]. Beck et al. [22] have confirmed this point, admitting that too long times of reaction induce degradation of cellulose but that too short times induce only large and non-dispersible fibers and large aggregates. Only specific reaction times yield to a well-dispersed colloidal suspension of CNC. Chen et al. [17] have confirmed that best yield and CNC properties are obtained with previously mentioned standard conditions. Moreover, the importance of acid concentration relative to cellulose fibers is highlighted too, since a too high concentration could be too drastic and a too low concentration insufficient for the hydrolysis efficiency. At the end of the reaction, mixture media are first diluted with distilled water to quench the reaction, then submitting to several separation steps with centrifugation cycles and filtrations and washed by dialysis against distilled water for several days, in order to remove unreacted compounds and chemicals. In some cases, they use also NaOH to neutralize pH which can modify the crystallinity and the surface ions. After dialysis, a final centrifugation cycle or another filtration process aims to remove aggregates. CNC suspension is finally sonicated in order to well disperse the nanocrystal and obtain colloidal suspension thanks to dimensions and sulfate half ester groups bearing by CNC.

2.2.2 Properties of cellulose nanocrystals

In addition to their nanometric size, CNC are unique biodegradable and renewable nanomaterials. Moreover, they result from a previously described optimized acid hydrolysis applied on abundant sources of cellulose and exhibit many other interesting properties. Figure 6 summarizes the main CNC properties as well as their applications. Regarding the surface properties of CNC, they generally exhibit half-sulfate ester groups (▬SO3) on their surface after being treated with sulfuric acid. Even if the amount of ▬SO3 is pretty low (about 50–200 μmol g−1), these negative charges are sufficient to induce repulsive forces between nanomaterials and thus colloidal stability in aqueous media. Moreover, as presented in Figure 6, due to isolation process, other charged groups can be present on CNC surface, like carboxyl groups (▬COO), aldehyde groups (▬CHO), and others [23], leading to different charge properties inducing different CNC properties. Moreover, numerous hydroxyl groups (three groups in each AGU units) are at reactive surface sites for the introduction of new functional groups via hydroxyl groups’ functionalization. Regarding the physical properties of CNC, they have a low density (1.606 g cm−3), a high aspect ratio length/width (e.g., varying between 10 and 30 for CNC extracted from cotton and around 70 for those extracted from tunicate [15]), and a high surface area (between 150 and 800 m2 g−1). Note that all their morphological and surface properties are highly dependent on their source as well as their isolation process and conditions [8, 22]. Moreover, CNC exhibit highly interesting mechanical properties. Indeed, in addition to their high crystallinity (between 54 and 88% according to the source [24]), their high elastic modulus (≈150 ± 50 GPa) and tensile strength (≈7.5 ± 0.5 GPa) [25] make them interesting materials as mechanical reinforcement in polymer matrices, for example. For comparison, their mechanical properties are similar to Kevlar® fibers [26] widely used in composite field.

Figure 6.

Main surface and physical properties of cellulose nanocrystals and inherent main applications.

At low solid content (<3 wt%), due to hydrogen bonds between cellulose chains and thus between each nanocrystals, CNC water suspension is in the form of a translucent gel. Rheological properties of CNC are outstanding and concentration dependent. Indeed, at low concentration (<3 wt%), CNC suspension presents shear thinning behavior at high shear rate, and at higher concentration (>3 wt%), the suspension presents shear thinning behavior explained by the nanocrystals alignment in the flow direction at a critical shear rate [27]. Source and isolation of CNC influence these rheological properties too. Besides all these properties, CNC self-organize in ordered structure, especially to form a nematic phase. Revol et al. [28] described in the 1990s this self-organization of CNC in water suspension into stable chiral nematic phases. These last exhibit liquid crystalline properties, which when added to intrinsic birefringence of CNC induce interesting optical properties. Moreover, when ordered CNC suspension is solvent evaporated and thus solidified in a self-standing film, conserved chiral nematic structure (helicoidal structures) and iridescent behavior of films are observed and monitored by CNC concentration and surface charge as well as suspension sonication [27, 28]. Figure 7 shows explicit pictures of these rheological and liquid crystalline properties.

Figure 7.

(a) Translucent gel-like CNC suspension at 15 wt% in water (extracted from 57), (b) birefringence with shear-inducing observed for an aqueous CNC suspension at 0.6 wt% in cross-polarized light (extracted from [57]), (c) solvent-casted CNC film in diffuse light, normal to the surface (on the left part) and oblique to the surface (on the right part) (extracted from [29]), and (d) schematic representation of CNC orientation in isotropic and anisotropic phases (This scheme was extracted from an unpublished work (PhD manuscript of R. Bardet, 2014)).

All these outstanding surface and physical properties of CNC confirm their high and increasing interest in research and industrial field during the last decades. Although their isolation and characterization are currently well-advanced and optimized, application fields are at the center of ongoing researches, as described in the following part.

2.2.3 Various applications of cellulose nanocrystals and their industrialization

As exposed in Figure 6, CNC found applications in various fields. Indeed, thanks to their outstanding morphological, mechanical, and rheological properties as well as their colloidal stability and high surface reactivity. All these properties added to their biodegradability and renewability make them highly interesting and innovative materials with many potential applications. Table 2 summarizes CNC applications and corresponding exploited properties, as well as some literature references.

MarketApplicationsExploited CNC propertiesReferences
Flexible packaging
Optical films
High mechanical properties
Filmogenic properties
[30, 31]
Coatings/paints/adhesivesCoatings for flexible packagingMorphology
Rheological properties
[32, 33]
Electronics/sensorsFlexible electronics
Piezoelectric sensors
Electrical insulating
Piezoelectric properties
Surface area
[34, 35, 36]
FiltrationMesoporous films and membranesHigh specific surface area
High mechanical properties
BiomedicalBiocomposites for bone/tooth replacement
Drug delivery
Protein immobilization
Wound dressings
Low toxicity
Colloidal stability
High mechanical properties
Surface reactivity
[38, 39]
Flexible batteries
Large surface area
CosmeticsHydrogels and foamsColloidal stability
Emulsion interfacial stabilization
[41, 42]
SecuritySecurity papers and inksIridescent properties

Table 2.

Main market applications of CNC and corresponding properties and literature references.

Nanocomposite field is an emerging research area which finds applications in several domains like food packaging, medical devices, and building. Renewable aspect of CNC is particularly interesting since it correlates with the development of bio-based and biodegradable polymers as mentioned in the first part of this chapter. Moreover, these same properties are just as interesting in other application fields, from coatings, electronics, filtration, and biomedical devices to energy, cosmetics, and security. Note that for applications that may enter in contact with food or human body and for any industrialization, toxicity of CNC is a key challenge to investigate. Indeed, even if cellulose is known to be a nontoxic polymer, CNC are nanomaterials—and the “nano” prefix can be frightened for media and population—with specific morphology and surface properties. A recent review of Roman et al. [44] explored CNC toxicity. Results of this study correlate with previous results of Lin et al. [39] and Kovacs et al. [45], demonstrating that CNC are not toxic by ingestion or dermal contact and for aquatic organisms. However, pulmonary and cytotoxicity are less ideal since their toxicity depends on CNC properties and form (especially if they are in powder form, since they are more volatile). In any case, toxicity of CNC is low, especially when they are in wet-state or in composites, films, or coatings, for example, not constraining development of new CNC-based products.


3. Deep eutectic solvent for cellulose nanocrystals preparation

As described in the first part of this chapter, the traditional methods used to obtain cellulose nanocrystal consist of strong acid hydrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis, or oxidation reactions. These treatments allow to hydrolyzing the amorphous regions in cellulose chains, and they are often followed by mechanical or ultrasonic treatment to homogenize the suspension. However, these methods use toxic chemicals and are difficult to industrialize.

Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) are a new class of green organic solvents; they are in the continuity of molten salt and ionic liquid solvent, but they are less toxic and easier to use. A deep eutectic solvent is composed of at least two compounds, a Lewis or Brönsted acid and a base. According to its constituents, a DES can be classed in one of the four existing categories listed in Table 3.

TypeComponent 1Component 2
IQuaternary ammonium saltMetal chloride
IIQuaternary ammonium saltMetal chloride hydrate
IIIQuaternary ammonium saltHydrogen bond donor
IVMetal chloride hydrateHydrogen bond donor

Table 3.

The four DES families.

The association of these compounds with a specific ratio forms an eutectic mixture with a melting temperature far below than of its constituents.

In the case of type III, it is accepted that the self-association occurs via hydrogen bonding interactions between the hydrogen bond donor and the hydrogen bond acceptor. The strong hydrogen bonds between the different compounds prevent the crystallization of each product and decrease the melting point of the mixture below room temperature [46]. Type III DESs are easy to obtain by simply mixing the compounds with the right ratio at a temperature higher than the melting point during 1 h. The mixture obtained is homogenous and transparent and has a low vapor pressure. However, the main drawback of deep eutectic solvents is their price. Nevertheless, some studies show that it is possible to recycle them between three and five times depending on the DES components and the usage [47]. Moreover, a subclass of DESs, named natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES), is formulated using bio-based compounds; these solvents are environmentally friendly and their price can be lower.

DESs and NADES can be helpful in organic chemistry; indeed they can replace some toxic organic solvents; Zdanowicz summarized all their possible application domains for polysaccharide processing [48]. Among all these applications, one of them consists of the use of type III DESs as an acidic hydrolytic solvent for cellulose nanocrystal obtention.

This principle has been studied for the first time by Sirviö et al. [49]; they manage to extract individual nanocrystals using a choline chloride: oxalic acid dihydrate treatment from dissolving pulp. Different DESs had been prepared in different ratios and studied to hydrolyze the amorphous part of cellulose fibers from different sources: an overview of these treatments is summarized in Table 4.

Cellulose sourcePretreatment (DES, etc.)Molar ratioTimeTemp. (°C)Yield (%)Dimension (nm)References
Dissolving pulpChCl:OAD1:12 h10068l = 390 ± 25
d = 13.6 ± 1.1
1:12 h12073l = 353 ± 16
d = 13.8 ± 0.7
ChCl:p–t1:12 h6070
ChCl:levulinic acid1:22 h10088
Dissolving pulpChCl:OAD1:130 min100l = 50–350
d = 3–8
Cotton fiberChCl:OAD1:11 h10079.8l = 194.1
d = 9.6 ± 2.9
ChCl:OAD1:21 h10080.0l = 152.7
d = 6.1 ± 1.2
ChCl:OAD1:31 h10081.6l = 122.4
d = 4.7 ± 2.2
Cotton fiberChCl:OAD
800 W
3 min8074.2l = 100–350
d = 3–25
800 W
3 min9062.4
800 W
3 min10057.8l ≈ 150
d < 17
Bleached eucalyptus kraft pulpChCl:OAD + catalysis,
FeCl3.6H2O (mmol/gDES)
7 h8086l = 5152 ± 3328[53]
6 h8073l = 270 ± 92
6 h8071l = 258 ± 54
6 h8088l = 5726 ± 3856
Bleached birch Kraft pulpAH:glycerol1:210 min70d = 5.7 ± 1.3[54]
Empty fruit bunchChCl:citric acid1:26 h85l = 25–37[55]
Dissolving pulpGH:APA1:224 hRoom T80d = 5.6 ± 1.4[56]

Table 4.

Overview of the different DES pretreatments tested for cellulose nanocrystals obtention.

ChCl, choline chloride; OAD, oxalic acid dihydrate; t, toluenesulfonic; AH, aminoguanidine hydrochloride; GH, guanidine hydrochloride; APA, anhydrous phosphoric acid.

In 2016, Sirviö tried three different DESs with choline chloride as hydrogen bond acceptor and oxalic acid (anhydrous or dihydrate), p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate, and levulinic acid as hydrogen bond donors [49]. Only DESs composed of choline chloride/oxalic acid dihydrate (ChCl:OAD) with a 1:1 molar ratio are allowed to obtain, after mechanical disintegration and CNC suspension. Different batches were prepared using different times and temperatures (Figure 8(a–d)). Cellulose nanocrystals obtained after 2 h of treatment at 120°C had the highest aspect ratio with a mean length of 353 ± 16 nm and diameter of 9.9 ± 0.7 nm (Figure 8d). The study showed that the final width of CNCs depends on the pretreatment temperature [57].

Figure 8.

Transmission electron micrographs of CNCs using DES pretreatment: (a) ChCl:OAD 1:1, 2 h−100°C [49]; (b) ChCl:OAD 1:1, 4 h−100°C [49]; (c) ChCl:OAD 1:1, 6 h−100°C [49]; (d) ChCl:OAD 1:1, 2 h−120°C [49]; (e) ChCl:OAD 1:1, 1 h−100°C [51]; (f) ChCl:OAD 1:2, 1 h−100°C [51]; (g) ChCl:OAD 1:3, 1 h−100°C [51]; (h) ChCl:OAD 1:4 + cat:FeCl3.6H2O (0.15 mmol/gDES), 6 h–80°C [53]; (i) ChCl:OAD 1:4 + cat:FeCl3.6H2O (0.3 mmol/gDES), 6 h−80°C [53]; (j) ChCl:OAD 1:1, 30 min−100°C [50]; (k) microwave-assisted ChCl:OAD 1:1, 3 min−80°C [52]; (l) microwave-assisted ChCl:OAD 1:1, 3 min−90°C [52]; (m) microwave-assisted ChCl:OAD 1:1, 3 min−100°C [52]; (n) guanidine hydrochloride:anhydrous phosphoric acid 1:2, 24 h room temperature [56]; (o) aminoguanidine hydrochloride:glycerol 1:2, 10 min−70°C [54]; (p) aminoguanidine hydrochloride:glycerol 1:2, 10 min −70°C [54].

Ling et al. studied the effect of ChCl:OAD treatment on cellulose nanocrystal structure [51]; three molar ratios were chosen 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3, under two temperatures 80 and 100°C. Cellulose nanocrystals suspensions were obtained in every case (Figure 8(e–g)). Lower crystallinity and lamellar structures were observed for CNCs with lower acid content, and hydrogen bonds were more broken with higher acid ratio (ChCl:OAD = 1:3) during the DES treatment. Moreover, these CNCs obtained were better dispersed and had a higher aspect ratio.

In order to decrease the treatment temperature and increase the CNC yield, Yang et al. proposed to add a catalyst (FeCl3) during the DES treatment [53]. They found out that the optimum conditions for the treatment were 80°C and 6 h using a deep eutectic solvent composed of choline chloride, oxalic acid dihydrate, and FeCl3·6H2O with a molar ratio of 1:4.43:0.1. Cellulose nanocrystals with a length between 50 and 300 nm and a diameter range of 5–20 nm were isolated from eucalyptus kraft pulp with a yield of 90% (Figure 8(h–i)).

Using ChCl:OAD (1:1) DES, Laitinen et al., in 2017, were able to obtain a CNC suspension after 30 min of pretreatment at 100°C and a microfluidizer treatment. The cellulose nanocrystals obtained had a low charged content and could be used as effective oil–water Pickering stabilizers (Figure 8(j)) [50].

In 2017, interesting work was published by Liu et al. [52]. They reported an ultrafast fabrication of CNCs using the DES ChCl:OAD (1:1) assisted by microwave pretreatment. In only 3 min, the CNCs obtained had diameters between 100 and 25 nm and lengths between 100 and 350 nm (Figure 8(k–m)). The yield was 74.2%, and the nanocrystals’ crystallinity was higher than 82%.

Another DES composed of choline chloride and citric acid with a molar ratio of 2:1 allowed Ibrahim et al., in 2018, to hydrolyze lignocellulosic materials and to obtain cellulose nanocrystals [55].

Some deep eutectic solvents can dissolve cellulose; it is the case for the DESs composed of guanidine hydrochloride and anhydrous phosphoric acid (1:2). This solvent was studied by Sirviö to treat dissolving pulp during 24 h and then regenerate it into cellulose nanoparticles [56] (Figure 8n)).

In addition to the hydrolyzation of cellulose amorphous part, some DESs can simultaneously chemically modify the CNC surface. For example, Li et al. obtained cationic nanocrystals using aminoguanidine hydrochloride and glycerol mixture with a molar ratio of 1:2 (Figure 8(o–p)) [54].


4. Conclusion

The aim of this chapter was to provide an overview of cellulose nanocrystals and their production by various hydrolysis procedure.

Traditionally extracted from multiple cellulose sources via sulfuric acid hydrolysis, these cellulosic nanomaterials are pioneering for a wide range of applications, briefly introduced in this chapter. Such hydrolysis process has allowed the industrialization of this cellulose nanocrystals since 2011. However, in current context, the development of green chemistry is crucial in this research field, and new alternative process are expected.

In order to support this sustainable strategy, the use of natural deep eutectic solvents for the production of cellulose nanocrystals in mild condition has been very recently developed with interesting and encouraging results.



LGP2 is part of the LabEx Tec 21 (Investissements d’Avenir—grant agreement n°ANR-11-LABX-0030) and of PolyNat Carnot Institute (Investissements d’Avenir—grant agreement n° ANR-16-CARN-0025-01).


Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Varshney VK, Naithani S. Chemical functionalization of cellulose derived from nonconventional sources. In: Kalia S, Kaith BS, Kaur I, éditeurs. Cellulose Fibers: Bio- and Nano-Polymer Composites: Green Chemistry and Technology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2011. p. 43–60. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17370-7_2
  2. 2. Suhas GVK, Carrott PJM, Singh R, Chaudhary M, Kushwaha S. Cellulose: A review as natural, modified and activated carbon adsorbent. Bioresource Technology. 2016;216:1066-1076
  3. 3. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H-P, Bohn A. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2005;44(22):3358-3393
  4. 4. O’Sullivan AC. Cellulose: The structure slowly unravels. Cellulose. 1996;4:173-207
  5. 5. Habibi Y. Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chemical Society Reviews. 2014;43(5):1519-1542
  6. 6. Dufresne A. Nanocellulose: From Nature to High Performance Tailored Materials. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2012. 460 p
  7. 7. Capron I, Rojas OJ, Bordes R. Behavior of nanocelluloses at interfaces. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science. 2017;29:83-95
  8. 8. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chemical Society Reviews. 2011;40(7):3941-3994
  9. 9. Ranby BG. Fibrous macromolecular systems. Cellulose and muscle. The colloidal properties of cellulose micelles. Discussions of the Faraday Society. 1951;11:158-164
  10. 10. Ranby BG, Ribi E. Über den feinbau der zellulose. Experientia. 1950;6:12-14
  11. 11. CelluForce [Internet]. CelluForce. 2016. Available at:
  12. 12. ISO/TC 6/TG 1-Cellulose Nanomaterials. Summary of International Activities on Cellulose Nanomaterials. 2017
  13. 13. Cranston E. Overview of Canada. Chiba, Japan: TAPPI Nano Division; 2019
  14. 14. Lima MM de S, Borsali R. Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: Structure, properties, and applications. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 2004;25(7):771-787
  15. 15. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ. Cellulose nanocrystals: Chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chemical Reviews. 2010;110(6):3479-3500
  16. 16. Camarero Espinosa S, Kuhnt T, Foster EJ, Weder C. Isolation of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(4):1223-1230
  17. 17. Chen L, Wang Q, Hirth K, Baez C, Agarwal UP, Zhu JY. Tailoring the yield and characteristics of wood cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) using concentrated acid hydrolysis. Cellulose. 2015;22(3):1753-1762
  18. 18. Viet D, Beck-Candanedo S, Gray DG. Dispersion of cellulose nanocrystals in polar organic solvents. Cellulose. 2007;14:109-113
  19. 19. Yu H, Qin Z, Liang B, Liu N, Zhou Z, Chen L. Facile extraction of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals with a high yield of 93% through hydrochloric acid hydrolysis under hydrothermal conditions. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2013;1(12):3938-3944
  20. 20. Flauzino Neto WP, Silvério HA, Dantas NO, Pasquini D. Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from agro-industrial residue—Soy hulls. Industrial Crops and Products. 2013;42:480-488
  21. 21. Johar N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A. Extraction, preparation and characterization of cellulose fibres and nanocrystals from rice husk. Industrial Crops and Products. 2012;37(1):93-99
  22. 22. Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG. Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(2):1048-1054
  23. 23. Tang J, Sisler J, Grishkewich N, Tam KC. Functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals for advanced applications. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2017;494:397-409
  24. 24. Lin N, Huang J, Dufresne A. Preparation, properties and applications of polysaccharide nanocrystals in advanced functional nanomaterials: A review. Nanoscale. 2012;4(11):3274-3294
  25. 25. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, et al. Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2011;50(24):5438-5466
  26. 26. Cheng M, Chen W, Weerasooriya T. Mechanical properties of Kevlar® KM2 single fiber. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology. 2005;127(2):197
  27. 27. George J, Sabapathi S. Cellulose nanocrystals: Synthesis, functional properties, and applications. Nanotechnology, Science and Applications. 2015;8:45-54
  28. 28. Revol J-F, Bradford H, Giasson J, Marchessault RH, Gray DG. Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 1992;14(3):170-172
  29. 29. Beck S, Bouchard J, Chauve G, Berry R. Controlled production of patterns in iridescent solid films of cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose. 2013;20(3):1401-1411
  30. 30. Mariano M, Kissi NE, Dufresne A. Cellulose nanocrystals and related nanocomposites: Review of some properties and challenges. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics. 2014;52(12):791-806
  31. 31. Hubbe MA, Ferrer A, Tyagi P, Yin Y, Salas C, Pal L, et al. Nanocellulose in thin films, coatings, and plies for packaging applications: A review. BioResources. 2017;12(1):2143-2233
  32. 32. Kaboorani A, Riedl B, Blanchet P, Fellin M, Hosseinaei O, Wang S. Nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC): A renewable nano-material for polyvinyl acetate (PVA) adhesive. European Polymer Journal. 2012;48(11):1829-1837
  33. 33. Mascheroni E, Rampazzo R, Ortenzi MA, Piva G, Bonetti S, Piergiovanni L. Comparison of cellulose nanocrystals obtained by sulfuric acid hydrolysis and ammonium persulfate, to be used as coating on flexible food-packaging materials. Cellulose. 2016;23(1):779-793
  34. 34. Hoeng F, Denneulin A, Bras J. Use of nanocellulose in printed electronics: A review. Nanoscale. 2016;8(27):13131-13154
  35. 35. Csoka L, Hoeger IC, Rojas OJ, Peszlen I, Pawlak JJ, Peralta PN. Piezoelectric effect of cellulose nanocrystals thin films. ACS Macro Letters. 2012;1(7):867-870
  36. 36. Gaspar D, Fernandes SN, De Oliveira AG, Fernandes JG, Grey P, Pontes RV, et al. Nanocrystalline cellulose applied simultaneously as the gate dielectric and the substrate in flexible field effect transistors. Nanotechnology. 2014;25(9):094008
  37. 37. Karim Z, Mathew AP, Grahn M, Mouzon J, Oksman K. Nanoporous membranes with cellulose nanocrystals as functional entity in chitosan: Removal of dyes from water. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2014;112:668-676
  38. 38. Domingues RMA, Gomes ME, Reis RL. The potential of cellulose nanocrystals in tissue engineering strategies. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(7):2327-2346
  39. 39. Lin N, Dufresne A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. European Polymer Journal. 2014;59:302-325
  40. 40. Yang X, Shi K, Zhitomirsky I, Cranston ED. Cellulose nanocrystal aerogels as universal 3D lightweight substrates for supercapacitor materials. Advanced Materials. 2015;27(40):6104-6109
  41. 41. Kalashnikova I, Bizot H, Bertoncini P, Cathala B, Capron I. Cellulosic nanorods of various aspect ratios for oil in water Pickering emulsions. Soft Matter. 2013;9(3):952-959
  42. 42. Tasset S, Cathala B, Bizot H, Capron I. Versatile cellular foams derived from CNC-stabilized Pickering emulsions. RSC Advances. 2014;4(2):893-898
  43. 43. Zhang YP. Nanocrystalline cellulose for covert optical encryption. Journal of Nanophotonics. 2012;6(1):063516
  44. 44. Roman M. Toxicity of cellulose nanocrystals: A review. Industrial Biotechnology. 2015;11(1):25-33
  45. 45. Kovacs T, Naish V, O’Connor B, Blaise C, Gagné F, Hall L, et al. An ecotoxicological characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). Nanotoxicology. 2010;4(3):255-270
  46. 46. Francisco M, van den Bruinhorst A, Kroon MC. Low-transition-temperature mixtures (LTTMs): A new generation of designer solvents. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2013;52(11):3074-3085
  47. 47. Satlewal A, Agrawal R, Bhagia S, Sangoro J, Ragauskas AJ. Natural deep eutectic solvents for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment: Recent developments, challenges and novel opportunities. Biotechnology Advances. 2018;36(8):2032-2050
  48. 48. Zdanowicz M, Wilpiszewska K, Spychaj T. Deep eutectic solvents for polysaccharides processing. A review. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2018;200:361-380
  49. 49. Sirviö JA, Visanko M, Liimatainen H. Acidic deep eutectic solvents as hydrolytic media for cellulose nanocrystal production. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17(9):3025-3032
  50. 50. Laitinen O, Ojala J, Sirviö JA, Liimatainen H. Sustainable stabilization of oil in water emulsions by cellulose nanocrystals synthesized from deep eutectic solvents. Cellulose. 2017;24(4):1679-1689
  51. 51. Ling Z, Edwards JV, Guo Z, Prevost NT, Nam S, Wu Q, et al. Structural variations of cotton cellulose nanocrystals from deep eutectic solvent treatment: Micro and nano scale. Cellulose. 2019;26(2):861-876
  52. 52. Liu Y, Guo B, Xia Q, Meng J, Chen W, Liu S, et al. Efficient cleavage of strong hydrogen bonds in cotton by deep eutectic solvents and facile fabrication of cellulose nanocrystals in high yields. ACS Sustainable Chemical Engineering. 2017;5(9):7623-7631
  53. 53. Yang X, Xie H, Du H, Zhang X, Zou Z, Zou Y, et al. Facile extraction of thermally stable and dispersible cellulose nanocrystals with high yield via a green and recyclable FeCl3-catalyzed deep eutectic solvent system. ACS Sustainable Chemical Engineering. 2019;7(7):7200-7208
  54. 54. Li P, Sirviö JA, Asante B, Liimatainen H. Recyclable deep eutectic solvent for the production of cationic nanocelluloses. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2018;199:219-227
  55. 55. Ibrahim A, Abdullah MF, Sam ST. Hydrolysis empty fruit bunch (EFB) using green solvent. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018;429:012059
  56. 56. Sirviö JA. Fabrication of regenerated cellulose nanoparticles by mechanical disintegration of cellulose after dissolution and regeneration from a deep eutectic solvent. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2019;7(2):755-763
  57. 57. Foster EJ et al. Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chemical Society Reviews. 2018;47:2609-2679

Written By

Manon Le Gars, Loreleï Douard, Naceur Belgacem and Julien Bras

Submitted: August 20th, 2019 Reviewed: September 23rd, 2019 Published: November 27th, 2019