Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Leadership Styles in Nursing

Written By

Serpil Çelik Durmuş and Kamile Kırca

Submitted: April 11th, 2019 Reviewed: September 11th, 2019 Published: November 4th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89679

Chapter metrics overview

2,967 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Recent developments in the field of management-organization and organizational behavior and new concepts have also led to the emergence of new leadership styles in leadership. Leadership in health services is important for following innovations and adapting to current situations. Nurses working together with other health personnel in hospitals providing health services constitute an important group in leadership. Nursing, which is a key force for patient safety and safe care, is a human-centered profession, and therefore leadership is a key skill for nurses at all levels. The leadership styles of nurse managers are believed to be an important determinant of job satisfaction and persistence of nurses. The need for nurses with leadership skills and the need for nurses to develop their leadership skills are increasing day by day. There are several leadership styles defined in nursing literature. These leadership styles are examined under the titles of relational leadership style, transformational leadership, resonant leadership, emotional intelligence leadership, and participatory leadership. The task-focused leadership style is explored under the headings of transactional and autocratic leadership, laissez-faire leadership, and instrumental leadership.

Keywords

  • nursing
  • leadership
  • leadership styles
  • patient safety
  • quality of care

1. Introduction

“Leadership is not only about individuals, but also about teams” [1].

Nowadays, leadership in health services is an important issue that aims to protect and improve human health. Rapid changes and developments in the health sector increase the importance of developing managership and leadership skills for health managers [2]. Regional and national health systems tend to redesign their functions and priorities by making structural changes in social and economic terms to cope with the increasing health problems [3]. The inclusion of complex technology and intense human relations in hospital services, which constitute a significant part of health care services, leads to the emergence of important managerial problems [4]. The existence of effective, creative, visionary, motivated, knowledgeable, principled leaders for the development of the institution is important to eliminate various problems in health services. To be able to do this, it is necessary to determine the qualifications that can contribute to the effective leadership of corporate managers [2, 5].

Leadership in health services is of great importance in terms of following innovations and adapting to existing situations [6]. Leadership can be defined as a multidimensional process, which means that a person motivates others to direct their activities and develop their skills under certain circumstances [3, 7]. The leader is the person who sets the goals of his group and who influences and directs the members of the group in line with these goals [8]. In addition, a good leader must be dynamic, passionate, have a motivational effect on other people, be solution oriented, and try to inspire others. Nurses, who work together with other health personnel in hospitals, constitute an important group in leadership. Nursing, which is a key force for patient safety and safe care, is a human-centered profession, and therefore leadership is a key skill for nurses at all levels. The leadership styles of nurse managers are believed to be an important determinant of job satisfaction and job commitment of nurses. Nurses who are mobilized and empowered to perform specific personal or group goals by a good leader nurse are willing to implement evidence-based practices and are highly motivated, well informed, and committed to organizational goals. Therefore, they perform patient care in a more effective and planned process. It has become imperative to examine the role of leadership styles of nurse managers on staff outcomes after miscarriage of health workforce, which is a global nursing problem, increasing health care costs and workload [9, 10].

There is a limited number of articles in the literature about the leadership styles of nurses. In these studies, the importance of leadership styles and practices on patient outcomes and patient safety, health service power and corporate culture were determined [3]. However, Cummings [10] stated that most styles can be grouped under relational leadership or task-focused leadership. Relational leadership styles focus on people and relationships. It includes transformational, emotional intelligence, resonance, and participatory leadership. These styles are positively associated with staff satisfaction, organizational commitment, improved staff health welfare, stress reduction, job satisfaction, productivity increase, effective study, and positive patient outcomes. However, task-focused leadership is focused on completion of works, deadlines, and directives. Task-focused leadership styles include operational, autocratic, and laissez-faire leadership [10].

Advertisement

2. Leadership styles in nursing

2.1 Relational leadership

Relational leadership styles focus on people and relationships and include transformational, emotional intelligence, resonance, and participatory leadership [11]. These leadership styles are associated with increased employee satisfaction, organizational commitment, improved staff health and well-being, stress reduction, job satisfaction, increased productivity, effective work, and positive patient outcomes [10].

2.1.1 Transformational leadership

Transformational leadership is considered the gold standard of leadership [11]. Transformational leadership is at the center of nursing because it has an impact on patient outcomes, employee satisfaction, and safety culture. Transformational nurse leaders first perform nursing, communicate effectively with their audiences, and become effective role models [12]. Such leaders are motivated and empowering, encouraging and following their audience for organizational goals and individual goals [13, 20]. In addition, it is explained how the transformational leaders have four characteristics that affect their audience. These characteristics are charisma, inspirational, intellectual thinking, and individual attention [42].

It is thought that the transformational leaders fascinate their audience with the charisma feature. This fascination is sometimes associated with the physical characteristics of the leader as well as communication skills and vision. The inspiring character of transformational leaders supports and motivates their followers with encouraging speeches in case of hard work and crises [14].

Transformational leaders, with their intellectual characteristics, encourage their followers to think innovatively and to think about how we can do it better. At the same time, these leaders do not prefer their followers to accept their thoughts as they are [14]. Finally, the transformational leaders, who are interested in their followers individually, advise them in line with their individual needs. In addition, leaders appreciate their followers within the team.

When considered with a general assessment, transformational leaders think that their followers should be evaluated individually and the needs and characteristics of the followers may change with the influence of the leader. Therefore, with the mentoring of the leader, the development of the followers increases at the same rate.

2.1.2 Resonance leadership

Resonance leadership is based on emotional intelligence and awareness, including being open and sensitive to judgment [15]. Resonance leaders have emotional intelligence features. These are self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management [16]. According to these characteristics, resonance leaders are effective in managing and solving conflict, democratic, collaborative, and can find solutions to problems.

2.1.3 Emotional intelligence

Emotional intelligence was first described as a feature of transformational and resonant leadership in the 1980s. Leaders with emotional intelligence have four important structures: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and social skills. Emotionally intelligent leaders are sensitive to the well-being, emotions, and emotional health of themselves and their followers, and develop effective personal relationships while directing followers to common business goals. Emotionally intelligent leaders manage and reflect their emotions, making rational decisions to ensure teamwork and collaboration. Emotionally intelligent leaders are also effective in conflict resolution because they have the ability to see the situation from others’ perspective and manage work stress [11].

2.1.4 Participatory leadership

In participatory leadership, the views of individuals and groups are taken into consideration. Knowledge, experience, skills, and innovation are of great importance in the decision-making process, with a wide range of expertise and participation in engagement. In 2016, WHO called for participatory leadership to replace hierarchical leadership models of health leadership, suggesting that inclusiveness and the involvement of various stakeholders would strengthen health services [17].

2.2 Task-focused leadership

The task-focused leadership style involves planning business activities, clarifying roles within a team or a group of people, as well as a set of objectives, and continuous monitoring of processes and performance. Task-focused leaders focus on completion of jobs, deadlines, and directives [10]. Task-focused leadership is significantly associated with high-level patient satisfaction [18].

2.2.1 Transactional and autocratic leadership

“Do it now!”

This concept, which is referred to as “transactional leadership” in English literature, is used as “interactionist,” “operational,” or “transactional” leadership in different sources. Transactional leadership is a leadership style that provides short-term goals and motivates viewers through the fulfillment of individual needs in exchange for high performance toward organizational goals [19]. Leaders in transactional leadership act as exchanges managers by exchanging followers who lead to improvement in production, and are interested in processes rather than shared values with forward-thinking ideas [18, 20].

Transactional leadership style emerges in two basic forms as “management with exceptions” and “conditional rewarding” [21, 22]. The form management with exceptions is divided into two as active and passive. The active leader monitors the performance of the team followers and intervenes to correct these errors when he/she detects errors. The passive leader expects the followers’ mistakes to draw their attention before giving negative feedback or any warning [23]. In conditional rewarding, transactional leaders clearly explain to their followers what their duties are, how they will be made, and how they will be rewarded if the desired tasks are fulfilled satisfactorily [21, 24].

Transactional leaders are cultural carriers who maintain the existing order and act in line with traditions and past [25]. In crises where an explicit orientation is required, the transactional leadership approach is an effective style. Transactional leadership can be the best leadership style for the direction of critical events [18, 26]. This leadership style can be effective in emergency situations such as cardiac arrest, by enabling nurses to focus on the task as a whole on the patient [27].

In the literature, transactional leadership and transformational leadership are explained together and comparisons are made. Besides, unlike the transformational leadership, leaders who adopt an interactive approach want to maintain the same things instead of changing the future, and they are less concerned with the creative and innovative aspects and focus on concepts such as efficiency and quality [28]. Bass emphasizes the use of interactive leadership as a conditionally rewarding performance, especially among followers and leaders [29]. While transformational leadership results in a performance beyond expected, interactive leadership focuses on the expected results [30]. According to the transactional leadership, leadership is seen as a simple mutual exchange between leaders and followers based on economic or political reasons, while transformational leadership states that leaders and followers influence each other in order to achieve higher levels of motivation and morale [31].

Another type of transactional leadership is autocratic leadership. Autocratic leaders are defined as directives, controlling, power-oriented, and closed-minded. The leader describes the “what, when, why, and how” of the task. He/she emphasizes obedience, loyalty, and strict adherence to the rules. Followers do what the autocratic leader says [32]. The autocratic leadership style can be considered ideal in emergencies because he or she takes all decisions himself/herself, regardless of the views of the leading staff [3]. Because information is seen as power, critical information can be hidden from the team. Mistakes are not tolerated and individuals are accused rather than erroneous operations. Rewards are given for compliance, but disobedience is punished [18, 32]. In addition, autocratic leaders can create fear among staff and often make decisions without consulting the team [32]. These leaders motivate their subordinates by using their “legal powers,” “rewarding powers,” and “coercive forces.” Autocratic leaders may not be welcome by their team, but this can be transformed into appreciation and devotion when the positive results of their leadership emerge. Although staff do not like autocratic leaders, they often work well on their orders [18, 32]. This leadership approach can be useful at the moment when it is necessary to make quick decisions or to mobilize uneducated and less-motivated followers in the short term by pressure and fear [6, 33, 34]. The positive aspect of this style is that it works perfectly in emergencies or chaotic situations with little time for discussion.

Schoel et al. found that very popular leaders were perceived as ineffective, while unpopular leaders could be perceived as effective [35]. According to the results of Uysal et al., the perception of the behavior of hospital managers as autocratic by followers decreases the productivity of the work [6], because autocratic leadership is perceived negatively by the followers; the reason is that the authoritarian attitude does not give the employee the right to speak, and that the awards and punishments are precise and clear.

2.2.2 Laissez-faire leadership

The style of leadership recognizing full freedom is also referred to as “laissez-faire” in the literature and is expressed as “let them do it.” This kind of a leader advises the process by not participating in the process, encourages followers to generate ideas, offers suggestions when asked by followers, and declares opinions. [31]. Leadership that recognizes full freedom is a style in which the leader provides little or no orientation or control, and prefers a practical approach. Fully free leadership style includes a leader who does not decide, and acts without staffing or supervision [3]. The main task of the leader is to provide resources. Such leaders dissipate responsibilities and retreat and refrain from taking decisions [31]. The leader only gives his/her opinion when asked about his/her opinion on any subject, but this view is not binding on his/her followers [36].

Leadership that recognizes full freedom is an authoritative, task-focused leadership style, because it involves the regulation of tasks in times of crisis, so it shows reactive leadership. This style of leadership is often used by inexperienced leaders or those who are about to vacate their leadership positions, who prefer to give up their followers or others to change their positions, such as those who would like to give up their job [18]. The leader leaves the followers on their own. Followers do what they think is the best. Followers are trained to find the best solution to their problems. Whenever he/she sees it necessary, a person can form a group with whom he/she wants to solve problems, try new ideas, and make the decisions that he/she thinks are most appropriate for him/her [37, 38].

There are positive and negative aspects of the leadership style that gives full freedom. The first positive aspect of this leadership style is the determination and implementation of the goals, plans, and policies of employees or members of the organization, and it mobilizes the creativity of each member or employee [39]. The second positive aspect is that employees are motivated to train themselves and find the most appropriate solution to the problems. When the individual deems it necessary, he/she creates a group with the people he/she wants, solves the problems, tries new ideas, and reaches the most appropriate decisions [40]. The negative aspects of leadership, which gives full freedom, are the emergence of turmoil within the organization and the fact that everyone leads to the targets he/she wants and even toward opposing targets. Another disadvantage is the significant decrease in organizational success, independent of personal achievements.

Skogstad et al. state that the type of leadership recognizing full liberty reinforces the role conflict and role ambiguity experienced by the individual, and increases the conflicts with colleagues [40]. Hinkin et al. also state that leadership behaviors that recognize full liberty harm the punitive and rewarding roles of the leader and decrease leaders’ effectiveness [41]. Chaudhry and Javed state that fully free leadership has no effect on the motivation of the followers compared to other types of leadership [42]. Şentürk et al. reveals that fully free leadership does not have a reinforcing effect on innovative behaviors but rather reduces it [31]. According to the results of Uysal et al., the perception of the behavior of hospital managers as autocratic by followers decreases the productivity of the work [6]. Because autocratic leadership is perceived negatively by the followers. The reason is that the authoritarian attitude does not give the employee the right to speak, and that the awards and punishments are precise and clear.

2.2.3 Instrumental leadership

Instrumental leadership focuses on choosing an appropriate strategy along with appropriate resources to achieve business goals, and it is vital for sustainable corporate performance [43, 44]. This leadership style is part of the spectrum of transformational and interactive leadership styles. Instrumental leaders can be effective managers because they ensure efficiency protection. Thus, jobs are completed in line with the resources, strategic vision, and time constraints of the health facility [45]. In current leadership approaches, the strategy and task-focused developmental functions of the leaders are not taken into account; however, strategy and task-focused functions, which are instrumental forms of leadership, are essential for organizations and followers to ensure sustainable performance. Instrumental leadership is based on neither ideals nor swap relationships. Instrumental leadership includes ensuring harmony between the organization and the environment, developing strategies, preparing task and strategy tables, using resources effectively, and providing performance feedback [44]. The most prominent feature of the instrumental leadership type is the determination of the subordinates’ path by the leader [34]. The instrumental leader is mainly concerned with the timely completion of the work related to the desired goal; it focuses on functions such as setting goals, organizing group members, setting up the communication system, and determining work-related times [46]. Akyurt et al. found that instrumental and interactive leadership have a statistically significant and positive effect on job satisfaction and organizational commitment [21]. Tengilimoglu and Yigit, in their study on 355 state hospital workers in order to determine the effect of leadership behavior in hospitals on job satisfaction of the employees, found that the leadership style with the highest job satisfaction were participatory, instrumental, success-oriented, and supporting leadership, respectively [34].

Advertisement

3. Effective leadership

As the health sector is in a process of change, new leadership approaches need to be implemented to effectively manage this new structure [46]. Developments in the field of management-organization and organizational behavior and new concepts have also led to the emergence of new leadership styles in leadership [4]. Leadership is important for every organization as well as for health organizations, because the success of an organization is a good leader [47]. For effective leadership, it is important to focus on the dynamic relationships between guidance, leadership values, culture, talent, and organizational context [48]. Effective leaders in health care services consider safe, qualified, and friendly care as the top priority. Effective leadership is critical to facilitate quality care, patient safety, and positive staff development. Leaders make the voice of patients continuous; they continuously monitor their patient experiences, concerns, needs, and feedback [49]. Nurses, the largest workforce in a health institution and a dynamic profession, play an important role in health leadership and policy-making, while maintaining their traditional care skills [50]. The leadership style of executive nurses plays an important role in the provision of job satisfaction and motivation of nurses, development of institutional commitment, and effective management of conflicts [51, 52, 53]. In addition, effective leadership styles can increase the quality of health care outcomes. In addition, leadership in health facilities is considered as an important factor in ensuring quality health services, patient satisfaction, and financial performance.

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

Nurses are responsible for guiding the community because of their responsibilities in health care. Patient care and education, effective communication, and clinical management are the most important tasks. These tasks are closely related to leadership behavior. Nurses who exhibit leadership behavior will be pioneers in bringing the profession to a professional level. The goal of future health care institutions should be to influence the quality of patient care through a good nursing leadership. Future research should focus on the development, applicability, and implementation of robust leadership style models in different health environments. These studies should include multidisciplinary professional teams; strengthen the role of nurses and other health professionals; and address organizational parameters and individual wishes, preferences, and expectations for quality of life and health care.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

We thank everyone who provided scientific guidance.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Darzi, A. High Quality Care For All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. [Internet]. 2008. Available from:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-quality-care-for-all-nhs-next-stage-review-final-report
  2. 2. Keklik B. Determination of leadership types adopted in health services: A special hospital case. Afyon Kocatepe university. FEAS Journal. 2012;14(1):73-93
  3. 3. Sfantou DF, Laliotis A, Patelarou AE, Pistollo DS, Matalliotakis M, Patelarou E. Importance of leadership style towards quality of care measures in healthcare settings: A systematic review. Healthcare. 2017;5(73):2-17
  4. 4. Eryeşil K, İraz RA. Field study on the relationship between leadership styles and organizational commitment. Journal of Selçuk University Vocational School of Social Sciences. 2017;20(2):129-139
  5. 5. Karahan A. Investigation of the relationship between leadership and organizational commitment in hospitals. Journal of Social Sciences. 2008;10(1):145-162
  6. 6. Uysal ŞA, Keklik B, Erdem R, Çelik R. Investigation of the relationships between hospital Managers’ leadership traits and work productivity levels of employees. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration. 2012;15(1):25-56
  7. 7. Koçel T. Business Management: Management and Organization, Behavior in Organizations, Classical, Modern, Contemporary and Contemporaneus Approaches. 10th ed. Istanbul: Beta Edition Publishing; 2005
  8. 8. Sabuncuoglu Z, Tüz M. Organizational Psychology. Alfa Actual Distribution: Bursa; 2008
  9. 9. Asamani JA, Naab F, Ofei AMA. Leadership styles in nursing management: Implications for staff outcomes. Journal of Health Science. 2016;6(1):23-36. DOI: 10.17532/jhsci.2016.266
  10. 10. Cummings G. Editorial: Your leadership style – How are you working to achieve a preferred future? Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2012;21(23-24):3325-3327
  11. 11. Cope V, Murray M. Leadership styles in nursing. Nursing Standard. 2017;31(43):61-70. DOI: 10.7748/ns.2017.e10836
  12. 12. Anonson J, Walker ME, Arries E, Maposa S, Telford P, Berry L. Qualities of exemplary nurse leaders: Perspectives of frontline nurses. Journal of Nursing Management. 2014;22(1):127-136
  13. 13. Brewer C, Kovner C, Djukic M, Fatehi F, Greene W, Chacko TP, et al. Impact of transformational leadership on nurse work outcomes. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2016;72(11):2879-2893
  14. 14. Intestines AS, Peace VK. The effects of transformational and Interactionist leadership relationships on nursing and health services. ACU Health Information Journal. 2018;9(2):97-104
  15. 15. Brendel W, Bennett C. Learning to embody leadership through mindfulness and somatics practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2016;18(3):409-425
  16. 16. Laschinger HK, Wong CA, Cummings GG, Grau AL. Resonant leadership and workplace empowerment: The value of positive organisational cultures in reducing workplace incivility. Nursing Economics. 2014;32(1):5-15
  17. 17. World Health Organisation (WHO). Open Mındsets: Partıcıpatory Leadershıp For Health. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. Available from:http://www.who.int, France, 2016, 1-30
  18. 18. Giltinane CL. Leadership styles and theories. Nursing Standard. 2013;27(41):35-39
  19. 19. Dilek H. Leadership Styles and Perception of Justice; a Research on Effects of Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Gebze: Gebze Institute of Technology; 2005
  20. 20. Marquis BL, Huston CJ. Leadership and Management Tools for the New Nurse: A Case Study Approach. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012
  21. 21. Akyurt N, Alpaslan M, Oktar ÖF. Leadership styles in health workers-job satisfaction-organizational commitment model. Süleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal. 2015;6(13):50-61
  22. 22. Zhu W, Sosik JJ, Riggio RE, Yang B. Relationships between transformational and active transactional leadership and followers’ organizational identification: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management. 2012;13(3):186-212
  23. 23. Bass BM, Steidlmeier P. Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly. 1999;10(2):181-217
  24. 24. Sosik JJ, Jung DD. Full Range Leadership Development: Pathways for People, Profit and Planet. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2011
  25. 25. Kılıç R, Keklik B, Yildiz H. A study aimed at determining the effect of transformative and fully free leadership styles on organizational silence. Management and Economics. 2014;21(2):249-268
  26. 26. Bish M. Leadership and management frameworks and theories. In: Day GE, Leggat SG, editors. Leading and Managing Health Services: An Australasian Perspective. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; 2015. pp. 16-28
  27. 27. Bach S, Ellis P. Leadership, Management and Team Working in Nursing Transforming Nursing Practice Series. Exeter, UK: Learning Matters; 2011
  28. 28. Barlı Ö. Behavioral Sciences and Behavior in Organizations. 3rd ed. Istanbul: Aktif Publishing House; 2008
  29. 29. Bass BM. Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and National Boundaries? American Psychologist. 1997;52(2):130-139
  30. 30. Northouse PG. Leadership, Theory and Practices. 6th ed. Istanbul: Surat Univercity Publishing, Trans. Cengiz Simsek; 2014
  31. 31. Şentürk FK, Durak M, Yılmaz E, Kaban T, Kök N, Baş AA. Study on determining the effects of transformational and Interactionist leadership styles on individual innovation. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Social Science Institute. 2016;8(17):173-198
  32. 32. Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Jung DI, Berson Y. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88(2):207-218. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
  33. 33. Tengilimoglu D. A field study to determine the characteristics of leadership behavior in public and private sector organizations. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences. 2005;4(14):1-16
  34. 34. Tengilimoglu D, Yigit A. A field study on the effect of leadership behaviors on personnel job satisfaction in hospitals. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration. 2005;8(3):374-400
  35. 35. Schoel C, Bluemke M, Mueller P, Stahlberg D. When autocratic leaders become an option--uncertainty and self-esteem predict implicit leadership preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;101(3):521-540. DOI: 10.1037/a0023393
  36. 36. Arun K. Leadership Styles and Sharing Knowledge Relationship. Erzurum: Ataturk University, Institute of Social Sciences; 2008
  37. 37. Minister I, Büyükbese T. Leadership types and current-future situation comparison of power sources: A field research based on the perceptions of the administrators of educational institutions. Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Journal of Social and Economic Research. 2010;12(19):73-84
  38. 38. Telli E, Unsar SA, Oguzhan A. The effects of leadership behavioral styles on Employees’ organizational burnout and displacement tendencies: A case study. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges. 2012;2(2):135-150
  39. 39. Çetin T. The Effect of Fully Free Leadership Understanding on Innovation Trends of Mid-Term Managers: An Application in Furniture Enterprises in the Aegean Region. Unpublished Master Thesis, Dumlupınar University Institute of Social Sciences, Kütahya, 2009
  40. 40. Skogstad A, Einarsen S, Torsheim T, Aasland MS, Hetland H. The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2007;12(1):80-92
  41. 41. Hinkin TR, Schriesheim CA. An examination of nonleadership: From Laissezfaire leadership to leader reward omission and punishment omission. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008;93(6):1234-1248
  42. 42. Chaudhry AQ , Javed H. Impact of transactional and laissez faire leadership style on motivation. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2012;3(7):258-264
  43. 43. Antonakis J, House R. On İnstrumental Leadership: Beyond Transactions and Transformations. Omaha: UNL Gallup Leadership Institute Summit; 2004
  44. 44. Hooijberg R, Antonakis J. Instrumental Leadership: The Nuts and Bolts of Leadership. [Internet]. 2014. Available from:www.imd.org/globalassets/publications/insightsimd/docs/38---instrumental-leadership.pdf[Accessed: 31-05-2017]
  45. 45. Kılınç T. Developments in situational leadership: Developments in leadership approach. Istanbul University Journal of Faculty of Business Administration. 1995;24(1):59-76
  46. 46. Dodson D. What’s the Best Leadership Style for Healthcare? Leadership and Workforce Development. [İnternet]. 2017. Available from:https://nchica.org/whats-the-best-leadership-style-for-healthcare
  47. 47. Ballow C. Leaders and Systems. The Governance Institute White Paper. Winter 2009. 1-2
  48. 48. Al-Sawai A. Leadership of healthcare professionals: Where do we stand? Oman Medical Journal. 2013;28(4):285-287
  49. 49. Gün İ, Aslan Ö. Leadership theories and leadership in health business. Journal of Health and Nursing Management. 2018;5(3):217-226
  50. 50. Cherian S, Karkada S. Review on leadership in nursing. International Journal of Nursing Research and Practice. 2017;4(1):57-66
  51. 51. Kurt SD. The Effect of Leadership Behaviors of Clinical Responsible Nurses on Nurses’ Job Satisfaction. (Thesis). Halic University, Institute of Health Sciences. İstanbul. 2009
  52. 52. Bucak B. The Perceptions of Leadership Approaches and Conflict Management Strategies of Nurses Who Work in Two Different Hospitals in Ankara. (Thesis). Gazi University Institute of Health Sciences. Ankara. 2010
  53. 53. Gülkaya G. Transformative Leadership Behaviors of Nurses in Service and Motivation Status of Nurses Working Together. (Thesis). Hacettepe University, Institute of Health Sciences. Ankara. 2012

Written By

Serpil Çelik Durmuş and Kamile Kırca

Submitted: April 11th, 2019 Reviewed: September 11th, 2019 Published: November 4th, 2019