Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Perovskite-Based Formulations as Rival Platinum Catalysts for NOx Removal in Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment

Written By

Jon Ander Onrubia-Calvo, Beñat Pereda-Ayo, Unai De-La-Torre and Juan Ramón González-Velasco

Submitted: February 6th, 2019 Reviewed: September 4th, 2019 Published: October 17th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89532

Chapter metrics overview

664 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


NOx removal is still a technological challenge in diesel engines. NOx storage and reduction (NSR), selective catalytic reduction (SCR), and combined NSR-SCR systems are the efficient approaches for diesel exhaust aftertreatment control. However, NSR and combined NSR-SCR technologies require high noble metal loadings, with low thermal stability and high cost. Recently, perovskites have gained special attention as an efficient alternative to substituting noble metals in heterogeneous catalysis. Up to date, few studies analyzed the application of perovskites in automobile catalytic converters. This chapter overviews recent research on development of novel perovskite-based catalysts as a component of single-NSR and hybrid NSR-SCR systems for NOx removal from diesel engine exhaust gases. Results in our laboratory are compared with similar work reported in the literature by other authors. Under realistic conditions, 0.5% Pd–30% La0.5Ba0.5CoO3/Al2O3 catalyst achieves NOx-to-N2 conversion higher than 92% when is coupled with an SCR catalyst placed downstream. The results show promise for a considerably higher thermal stability and lower cost diesel exhaust treatment system.


  • perovskite
  • Pt-free catalyst
  • NOx removal
  • lean-burn engine
  • NSR

1. Introduction

Diesel and lean-burn engines operate with high air-to-fuel (A/F) ratios in the range of 20–65 depending on the design of the engine and the type of fuel being combusted. This environment leads to a better fuel economy, with lower CO2, CO, and HC emissions than stoichiometric gasoline engines (A/F~14.6). As a result, diesel and lean-burn engines gained popularity during the last decades, especially in Europe. However, operation under such net oxidizing environment makes three-way catalysts (TWC) not efficient enough to meet Euro VI standards regarding NOx emissions in those engines (Table 1). Furthermore, the production of particulate matter, also known as soot, is still unavoidable [1, 2]. As a result, diesel and lean-burn engines require the implementation of aftertreatment systems to control pollutant emissions, especially those related to NOx and soot emission.

Type of vehicleEuro level*NOx emission limitYear of implementationAftertreatment system composition
Heavy-duty engines1–3/I–IIIDOC
3/III5a2000DOC + DPF
4/IV3.5a2005DOC + DPF
5/V2a2008DOC + DPF + DeNOx
6/VI0.4/0.46a2014DOC + DPF + DeNOx + ASC
Passengers vehicles3/III0.5b2001DOC + DPF
4/IV0.25b2006DOC + DPF
5/V0.18b2011DOC + DPF + DeNOx
6/VI0.08b2015DOC + DPF + DeNOx + ASC

Table 1.

Evolution of Euro regulations for heavy-duty engines and passenger vehicles.

Type approval test for HDVs is conducted on an engine dynamometer, and limits defined as mass emitted per unit of mechanical work done (g kW h−1).

Type approval test for LDVs is conducted on an engine dynamometer, and limits defined as mass emitted per unit of distance driven (g km−1).

European Union heavy-duty engine emission standards are denoted by Roman numerals, while light-duty vehicle standards are denoted by Arabic numbers.

Current diesel engine exhaust treatment system can contain: (i) diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC); (ii) diesel particulate filter (DPF); (iii) NOx reduction catalyst; and (iv) ammonia slip catalyst (ASC) [3]. NOx storage and reduction (NSR) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technologies are the most promising approaches to control NOx emission [4]. NSR system, also known as lean NOx trap (LNT), operates cyclically under lean-rich periods with 1.5% Pt–15% BaO/Al2O3 as model catalyst. On the other hand, NH3-SCR systems are based on the selectively catalyzed reduction of NOx-to-N2 with externally added NH3 (produced by hydrolysis of urea) in an oxygen-rich environment. Cu or Fe/zeolite catalysts are the model NH3-SCR formulations [5]. Current status of these technologies has some drawbacks that are limiting their extended implementation.

During the last years, a reasonable interest in linking NSR and NH3-SCR systems is growing [6, 7, 8, 9], because NSR systems generate NH3 as byproduct during the short-rich period, whereas this compound is the usual selective reducing agent in the SCR technology. As a result, NOx removal efficiency of the hybrid system increases notably with a simultaneous decrease in the NH3 slip. Hence, the combined NSR-SCR system is considered as a potential solution to overcome main limitations of the stand-alone NSR and stand-alone SCR technologies. The hybrid NSR-SCR technology consists of two catalysts (NSR and SCR) arranged in series or in a single brick, which runs cyclically similarly to single-NSR systems. Up to now, the behavior of hybrid LNT-SCR systems has been mainly verified with the model 1.5% Pt–15% BaO/Al2O3 NSR catalyst. As already mentioned, the presence of platinum makes this formulation costly and limits hydrothermal stability.

Libby [10] and Voorhoeve et al. [11] proposed firstly in early 1970s a perovskite-based catalyst for automotive applications. From then, several studies were carried out related to the utilization of perovskite-based catalysts in diesel exhaust control. The perovskite formulation corresponds to oxides with ABO3 and/or A2BO4 structure, where A is the larger cation located in the center edge of the structure and B is a smaller cation located in the center of the octahedron [12]. Specifically, A can be a lanthanide, alkaline, or alkaline-earth cation, and B cation can be any metallic element from 3, 4, or 5d configuration. One of the main advantages of the perovskite structure is the possibility to adopt a wide range of different compositions, changing either the A or the B cation or partially substituting each of them by other cations with same or different valences without destroying the perovskite structure. This leads to the formation of oxygen vacancies or changes in the oxidation state of A and B cations, allowing modulation of catalytic properties of the sample to better adapt to automotive applications [13].

All above in mind, the objective of this chapter is to provide a general outlook on utilization of perovskite-based formulations as stand-alone NSR catalysts as well as combined with a zeolite SCR catalyst to conform an efficient hybrid NSR-SCR system. First, a general overview of the application of perovskite-based formulations to control nitrogen oxide emissions from diesel engines is addressed. Then, the applicability of the perovskite-based formulation to single-NSR and combined NSR-SCR technologies will be emphasized. Special attention is paid to the promise and viability of this type of materials as alternative to Pt-based NSR model catalysts.


2. General overview on application of perovskite-based catalysts for NOx emission control

Perovskite oxides exhibit a range of stoichiometry and crystal structures. In fact, they could accommodate around 90% of the metallic natural elements of the periodic table. The A and Ba cations can be partially replaced inside the structure, allowing tailoring their catalytic properties to better adapt to their application. Furthermore, physicochemical properties can be controlled by the modification of preparation method. As a result, these materials have been widely implemented in heterogeneous catalysis. Moreover, their high-hydrothermal stability enables their application in catalytic processes carried out at high temperatures [12, 13].

Many works suggest the application of perovskite oxides as alternative formulations to those based on platinum-group metals (PGMs) in automotive exhaust catalytic converters [10, 11, 14, 15]. This type of material has shown excellent activity in oxidation reaction working as diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23]. Perovskite oxides demonstrated to be efficient for the simultaneous removal of NOx and soot combustion in diesel engines allowing their implementation in diesel particulate-NOx reduction filter (DPNR) [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. Furthermore, NOx decomposition in the form of nitrous oxide or nitric oxide has been proposed as a one their potential applications [32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38]. Finally, these formulations have been widely implemented for NOx reduction in both stoichiometric gasoline engines (three-way catalyst, TWC) [24, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45] and diesel or lean-burn gasoline engines. Indeed, their implementation in the control of NOx emission from diesel engines has gained special attention during the last decades, both in the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and in the NOx storage and reduction (NSR) systems.

2.1 Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

SCR technology consists in the selective reduction of NOx by different reducing agents (NH3, H2, or HC) in a net oxidizing environment. The NH3-SCR alternative became as the most promising avenue for NOx control in diesel engines. This technology was initially implemented in stationary emission sources. However, their characteristics permit to adopt it for automobile applications. SCR technology runs under steady-state operation conditions with continuous admission of NH3 to stoichiometrically reduce NOx in an oxygen-rich environment. A urea tank is usually required for NH3 supply (by hydrolysis of urea) to achieve the SCR reactions. Due to the requirement of large space to house the urea tank, the implementation of this alternative is limited to heavy-duty vehicles. Another disadvantage is the need of a NH3-slip catalyst to avoid NH3 emission. Furthermore, the ammonia decomposition occurs above 180°C, which limits the NOx removal efficiency at low temperatures.

It is widely accepted [46, 47, 48] that the following three main reactions occur during NOx reduction through NH3-SCR: (i) standard SCR (4NH3 + 4NO + O2 → 4H2 + 6H2O); (ii) fast SCR (2NH3 + NO + NO2 → 2 N2 + 3H2O), and (iii) slow NO2 SCR (4NH3 + 3NO2 → 3.5 N2 + 6H2O). The extent of these reactions depends on the NO/NO2 ratio, which in turn is related to the oxidation capacity of the catalyst. NOx removal efficiency is favored with NO/NO2 ratio around 1 as promoting the fast SCR reaction [49] and occurring reaction at lower temperature. Nevertheless, side reactions such as NH3 oxidation, NO oxidation, or N2O formation from ammonium nitrate decomposition can also occur.

NH3-SCR formulations have evolved from vanadia-based catalysts, first adopted in stationary sources, to the current Cu or Fe supported over new nano-pore zeolites with chabazite-type structure, such as SSZ-13 or SAPO-34. These formulations have already been implemented for NOx emission control in heavy-duty vehicles and some recently in some passenger’s cars in Europe, mainly due to high NOx removal efficiency in a wide temperature window discovered with this small pore zeolite structure.

Figure 1 shows the NH3-SCR behavior of a 4% Cu/SAPO-34 prepared in our laboratory by the solid state ion exchange method [50]. Experiments were carried out with a feed stream composed of 660 ppm NO, 660 ppm NH3, 6% O2, and Ar to balance. NO conversion increased with temperature as the NH3-SCR reactions are promoted, reaching almost full conversion in an extended range from 200 to 350°C and decreasing afterward as the oxidation of ammonia with O2 is favored at higher temperatures [51]. NH3 conversion also increases with temperature, but 100% conversion was maintained above certain temperature where the NH3-O2 reaction prevails. Regarding selectivity toward N2 is around 95–100% below 350°C, whereas above this temperature, it starts to decrease due to the NH3 partial oxidation, which partially limits NOx NH3-SCR reactions. The excellent DeNOx activity of this formulation is attributed to the preferential presence of copper as isolated Cu2+ ions in the double six member rings (d6r)2; however, the presence of CuO aggregates also plays an important role in the NO-to-NO2 conversion oxidation.

Figure 1.

Evolution of NO conversion (a), ammonia conversion (b), and selectivity toward nitrogen, nitrogen dioxide, and nitrous oxide with reaction temperature, achieved with 4% Cu/SAPO-34 catalyst. Feed: 660 ppm NO, 660 ppm NH3, 6% O2, Ar to balance;W/FA0 = 222 (g cat.) h Mol−1.

Alternative compounds have been investigated for NH3-SCR technology, such as supported metal oxides (MnOx/Al2O3 and V2O5/activated carbon) [52, 53, 54], mixed oxides derived from hydrotalcite compounds such as Cu-Mg-Al [55], and perovskites oxides. Most of the catalytic studies related to the utilization of perovskite-type compositions in DeNOx technologies are based on La as A cation. However, few of them are related to NH3-SCR technology, being focused most of them on a great majority on H2-SCR and HC-SCR alternatives [3]. The NOx removal efficiency of LaMnO3, LaMn0.95V0.05O3, and BiMnO3 perovskites was analyzed [56, 57, 58]. Among them, BiMnO3 perovskite achieved higher NH3-SCR activity at lower temperatures. LaMnO3/attapulguite [59] and Fe-containing perovskites [57, 60] (LaMn0.95Fe0.05O3, LaCo0.3Fe0.7O3, or La0.8Sr0.2Fe1−xRhxO3) were also analyzed. However, these formulations showed limited NOx conversion (70–90%) or selectivity toward N2. Taking into account the results observed in Figure 1, these formulations still not represent a real alternative to current Cu/chabazite NH3-SCR catalysts.

2.2 NOx storage and reduction (NSR)

The NSR concept, also known as lean NOx trap (LNT), was pioneered by Toyota in the middle 1990s [61]. In this technology, the engine works predominantly feeding a fuel-lean mixture with periodical short-rich excursions. During the lean period, the NO is oxidized to NO2 and then adsorbed over the catalyst in the form of nitrites and specially nitrates up to its saturation. Then, the stored NOx should be released and reduced by a reductant, such as CO, H2, or HC, during the short-rich period. The operational principle addressed the choice of NSR catalyst composition, which usually contains platinum group metals (e.g. Pt, Pd, and Rh) to activate NO oxidation and NOx reduction and an alkaline or alkaline earth metal (e.g. K, Ba, Ca, and Sr) to promote NOx adsorption during lean conditions. Both metals are well distributed over high-surface area materials as alumina, ceria, zirconia, or mixed oxides. A composition consisting of (1–2%) Pt/(10–15%) BaO/Al2O3 is widely accepted as the model NSR formulation [62, 63, 64, 65]. Figure 2 shows the typical NOx storage and reduction operational principle on the NSR model catalyst [66].

Figure 2.

NOx storage and reduction: mechanism (upper figure), NOx outlet concentration during three consecutive lean-rich cycles (bottom figure).

LNT system shows some drawbacks derived from the operation principle and model formulation composition. On the one hand, LNT system shows NOx leak due to the dynamic operation conditions under lean-rich conditions, and large amounts of N2O and NH3 can be also formed during rich period [67]. Furthermore, the catalyst requires high Pt loading to promote NO-to-NO2 oxidation, which increases the cost and decreases thermal stability. Finally, the resistance to sulfur poisoning is also limited. Thus, the application of NSR technology is limited to light-duty vehicles with lean-burn engines using low-sulfur containing fuels [3].

During the last decades, modifications in composition of NSR model catalyst and new formulations such as perovskite-based materials have been explored with enhanced catalytic properties, strong deactivation resistance, and lower cost.

The application of perovskites to NSR application is mainly based on high capacity of this material to adsorb NOx during the lean period. NO-to-NO2 oxidation is considered a primary step for NOx adsorption via nitrates in the model NSR catalyst, on which NO2 adsorbs much faster than NO. With model NSR catalyst, this requires high Pt loads, which drastically increases the cost and limits the thermal stability [68, 69]. Many authors focused on development of perovskite-based formulations with high NO oxidation capacity as promising materials for use in automobile applications. In this sense, perovskite structures (ABO3) such as LaCoO3 and LaMnO3 showed excellent performance on oxidation reactions [70, 71]. Choi et al. [72] reported that the catalytic oxidation activity is intimately connected to molecular and atomic interactions of oxygen with the oxide surface. Catalytic oxidation over metal oxides (M) is often rationalized in terms of a Mars-van Krevelen mechanism [73, 74], in which vacancies (□) in the oxide lattice facilitate the adsorption and dissociation of O2.


Subsequent reaction with a reductant (R) reforms the vacancies to complete the catalytic cycle.


As a result, perovskite activity for oxidation reactions seems to be related to a change in the oxidation state of B cation, active oxygen mobility, and ion vacancy defect [70]. The enhancement of oxidation activity of perovskite-based catalysts is usually attributed to a promotion of oxygen vacancy density [75, 76, 77, 78, 79]. In this sense, lanthanum partial substitution by other cations modifies the composition and alters the physico-chemical properties of perovskite, such as crystallinity, specific surface area, average crystal size, abundance of oxygen vacancies, and oxidation state of B cation. Among different cations, Sr 2+ seems to be the most promising cation for this approach.

Figure 3 shows the evolution of α oxygen species concentration and NO-to-NO2 conversion at 300°C with degree of lanthanum substitution by Sr, for (a) La1−xSrxCoO3 and (Figure 3a) La1−xSrxMnO3 perovskites (Figure 3b). Note that α-oxygen was assigned to the oxygen release from vacancies located very near to or on the surface [16].

Figure 3.

Evolution of α desorbed oxygen species and NO-to-NO2 conversion at 300°C with lanthanum substitution degree for (a) La1−xSrxCoO3 and (b) La1−xSrxMnO3 perovskites (reprinted from Ref. [16] with permission of Elsevier).

As a general trend, Sr promotes in a higher degree the formation of α oxygen species and NO-to-NO2 oxidation capacity for Co-based perovskites than for Mn ones. The evolution of NO-to-NO2 conversion with lanthanum substitution degree confirms that the amount of oxygen vacancies is the key factor for this enhancement. As a result, Co-based perovskites show higher NO oxidation capacity, even above than Pt-based catalyst does [16]. These results confirm that perovskites can be considered as an excellent alternative for promotion NO oxidation reactions in automotive catalysis.

Nonetheless, La0.7Sr0.3CoO3 tends to agglomerate under high temperatures required during the calcination step (Figure 4). Thus, low specific surface areas (around 20 m2 g−1) and an insufficient number of NOx storage sites [80, 81] arise as main drawbacks of bulk perovskites. Two approaches have been proposed to overcome this limitation: synthesizing mesostructured perovskites via nanocasting and/or distribution of perovskite over high-surface area materials [12]. Mesoporous supports were tried in the past. In this sense, overlaying ZrTiO4 with LaCoO3 perovskite was found to reduce sintering of perovskite, which improves NOx storage capacity [82]. More recently, You et al. [83, 84] found that ceria-supported and Ce0.75Zr0.25O2-supported LaCoO3 perovskite achieved high NOx storage and reduction capacity even with low-specific surface area (below 50 m2 g−1). We analyzed the effect of incorporating increasing loadings of La0.7Sr0.3CoO3 perovskite over a conventional alumina support [85], which inhibited crystal growth of bulk perovskites (Figure 4). Hence, diffusion of intermediate compounds from oxidation to adsorption sites was facilitated. Among all prepared catalysts, 30% La0.7Sr0.3CoO3/Al2O3 sample achieved the most efficient use of perovskite phase due to the best balance between well-developed perovskite phase and NO oxidation and NO adsorption site distribution such as oxygen vacancies, structural La and Sr at the surface, and segregated SrCO3 [86, 87].

Figure 4.

TEM images of: (a) La0.7Sr0.3CoO3 and (b) 30% La0.7Sr0.3CoO3/Al2O3 samples (reprinted from Ref. [85] with permission of Elsevier).

However, NOx reduction capacity of supported formulations is still limited (Figure 5). The incorporation of Pd is analyzed as a promising avenue to improve the NOx reduction capacity of the 30% La0.7Sr0.3CoO3/Al2O3 catalyst. Two approaches can be used for the incorporation of palladium in the perovskite-based formulations via impregnation [88, 89, 90] and/or by doping the perovskite structure [86, 91, 92]. The former promotes palladium accessibility; meanwhile, the latter seems to prevent the metal from agglomeration during reduction steps [93, 94]. However, contradictory conclusions have been extracted about which of them is the optimum alternative [95, 96]. In a recent study, Zhao et al. [97] compared both Pd incorporation methods for La0.7Sr0.3CoO3 perovskite. In their study, NOx adsorption during lean conditions and NOx reduction to N2 during rich period is significantly promoted after the incorporation of Pd, especially by impregnation method. The enhancement of the catalytic performance is related to a higher NOx adsorption site regeneration and to a promotion of NOx reduction rate by the palladium incorporation, respectively. In our previous work, we prepared several catalysts with increasing palladium contents (0.75, 1.5, and 3.0%) incorporated doping perovskite structure or by wetness impregnation over alumina-supported perovskite. They concluded that the 1.5% Pd–30% La0.7Sr0.3CoO3/Al2O3 sample shows the best balance between NOx removal efficiency and minimum palladium content. The NOx removal efficiency and nitrogen production are as high as 86.2 and 69.5%, respectively (Figure 5). DeNOx activity of this formulation is similar or even higher than that achieved with the reference catalyst (1.5% Pt–15% BaO/Al2O3). Thus, the developed formulation revealed as a promising alternative to the NSR model catalyst for NOx removal in the automotive application.

Figure 5.

NO-to-NO2 conversion (XNO-to-NO2, first column), NOx storage capacity (NSC, second column), global NOx conversion (XNOx, third column), and nitrogen production (YN2, fourth column) at 400°C for perovskite-based formulations and NSR model catalyst. Feed: 500 ppm NO, 6% O2 (lean)/3% H2 (rich), Ar to balance;W/FA0 = 200 (g cat.) h Mol−1.

It is worth noting that proposed alternative showed a high NO2 outlet concentration under oxidizing conditions [66]. This suggests that on these materials more amount of NO2 is formed than the catalyst can adsorb during the lean period. Furthermore, the amount of NOx released during the rich period denotes low stability of adsorbed species, which induces fast NOx release when the reductant is injected. Thus, NOx reduction, and as a consequence N2 production, could be further promoted. The increase of the concentration and strength of NOx adsorption sites by controlling an adequate balance between NO oxidation capacity and NOx adsorption site concentration and strength at the surface [80, 81] could be an alternative to overcome observed limitations. Two alternatives have been explored: (i) incorporation of additional NOx adsorption sites [82, 83, 84, 98, 99] and (ii) modification of perovskite composition to alter the nature and surface concentration of NOx adsorption sites [86, 100, 101]. The reported results show that the increase in NOx adsorption site concentration promotes NOx storage capacity confirming that the gas/solid equilibrium between NO2 and the available NOx adsorption sites is a key factor to maximize NSC; meanwhile, the higher strength of adsorber species favors NOx reduction efficiencies during short-rich period. Thus, both alternatives improved the catalytic behavior of the corresponding perovskite-based formulation. In our case, the selected approach was the modification of the perovskite composition by Ba doping instead of Sr doping. The developed formulation 0.5% Pd–30% La0.5Ba0.5CoO3/Al2O3 adsorbs NOx in the form of nitrites/nitrates over surface basic sites, such as La or Ba-terminated perovskite surface, segregated BaCO3, or alumina support during lean conditions. Then, adsorbed NOx is released and reduced over Pd and in lower extent perovskite sites to form nitrogen containing products, such as N2O, NH3, or N2. Furthermore, a slower reaction of the NH3 formed with the stored nitrates leading to the selective formation of N2 also takes place [66].

A critical aspect of NSR model catalyst (1.5% Pt–15% BaO/Al2O3) is the low sulfur resistance due to the formation of stable barium sulfate, which limits NOxadsorption during lean conditions. Hodjati et al. [102] analyzed NOx storage performance of ABO3 perovskite-type catalysts (with A = Ca, Sr, or Ba; and B = Sn, Zr, or Ti). Regarding A-site cations, the NOx storage capacity (NSC) followed the order Ba > Sr > Ca, whereas in the case of B cation, the order was Sn > Zr > Ti. Nevertheless, the BaSnO3 formulation exhibited limited sulfur resistance. In this sense, a BaFeO3 catalyst developed latter by Xian et al. [87, 103, 104] showed a lower decrease of NSCafter sulfating (about 11–12%). The incorporation of Ti improves sulfur resistance in a higher extent; activity decreased only 5.1% after SO2-pretreatment of a BaFe1−xTixO3 catalyst (x = 0.1 or 0.2).

In the case of La-based perovskites, LaCo0.92Pt0.08O3 maintained a high NOx removal efficiency after regeneration of a pre-sulfated sample [105]. La0.7Sr0.3Co0.8Fe0.2O3 perovskite suffers from a drop in NOx removal efficiency after SO2-pretreatment of 6.4% [106]. Wang et al. [107] and Wen et al. [99] compared the sulfur and hydrothermal aging resistance of LaCo0,92Pt0,08O3 and 0.3% Pt/(Al2O3 + LaCoO3) catalysts, with respect to those shown by 1% Pt–16% Ba/Al2O3 model formulation. These alternatives achieved NOx-to-N2 reduction, sulfur resistance, regeneration, and durability similar or even higher than the model catalyst.

In summary, perovskite-based formulations achieve notable NO oxidation and NOx adsorption during oxidizing conditions. Furthermore, despite the fact that only a few works analyzed NOx removal during the short reducing period, our results summarized in this chapter remark the potential of perovskite-based materials for application in NOx storage and reduction (NSR) technology for NOx control in diesel and lean-burn engines. In fact, the excellent sulfur tolerance and hydrothermal resistance reported in previous work make these formulations even more promising alternative to Pt-based NSR model catalyst.

2.3 NSR-SCR combined system

As previously observed, stand-alone SCR and NSR systems have some disadvantages that hinder their extended application in both light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles. In the case of the NSR system the high cost, poor thermal stability due to the use of precious metals and nondesired byproduct generation is the main disadvantages, whereas SCR systems require an urea system to provide NH3 and additional device to avoid ammonia slip under transient vehicle operation. The coupling of NSR and SCR catalysts has been rapidly accepted as a potential solution, since its discovery by the Ford Motor company [9, 108]. Different catalytic formulations, system architectures, and operation control have been explored [7, 8, 50, 109, 110]. The systems based on model NSR formulation and Cu/chabazite-type zeolites emerge as the most efficient combination [111]. This hybrid technology has been demonstrated more efficient by maximizing NOx-to-N2 reduction and minimizing NH3 slip with respect to the alone-NSR catalyst. Nevertheless, the most studied NSR formulation used in the combined NSR-SCR system has usually been the conventional Pt-based model catalyst (1.5% Pt-15% BaO/Al2O3), which transfers its high cost and limited hydrothermal stability to the hybrid configuration. Based on the results demonstrated by perovskite-based formulations in the single-NSR technology, their application in combined NSR-SCR systems is considered as an evolution of the current NSR-SCR architecture.

Figure 6 shows the NOx (NO+NO2), N2O, and NH3 concentration profiles determined by FTIR for the single-NSR and double NSR-SCR configurations at 300°C. The N2 signal determined by mass spectroscopy is also included. NSR and SCR formulations correspond to 0.5% Pd–30% La0.5Ba0.5CoO3/Al2O3 and 4% Cu/SAPO-34 catalysts, respectively.

Figure 6.

NOx (NO + NO2) and NH3 outlet concentrations, and MS signal of N2 for the single NSR and NSR-SCR configurations at 300°C. Feed: 500 ppm NO, 6% O2/3% H2, and Ar to balance; W/FA0 = 200 (g h Mol−1).

The single-NSR system (Figure 6a) shows the typical NOx outlet concentration profile [112]. At the beginning of the lean period, practically all NOx fed are stored, and therefore, concentration of NOx at the reactor outlet is almost null. Then, as the length of the lean period increases, NOx adsorption sites become progressively saturated and NOx outlet concentration increases. In the subsequent rich period, H2 injected releases the stored NOx release and reduces it to a mixture of N2, NH3 and N2O [113]. During this period, the NH3 outlet concentration peaks to almost 1000 ppm (Figure 6b). NOx outlet concentration (Figure 6a) decreases drastically when the system operates under the NSR-SCR double configuration. As can be observed in Figure 6b, most NH3 formed during regeneration of the NSR catalyst is adsorbed on acidic sites of SAPO-34, since concentration of NH3 detected at the outlet of the combined NSR-SCR system is almost zero. Then, in the subsequent lean period, NOx slipping the NSR catalyst reacts with NH3 previously adsorbed on the SCR, leading to further NOx reduction [114].

The evolution of N2 signal also confirms the existence of SCR reaction over the Cu/SAPO-34 catalyst (Figure 6c). When the operation is performed with alone-NSR catalyst, formation of N2 was only detected during the rich period, the signal being constant and negligible throughout the storage period. By contrast, when the reaction was carried out with the combined NSR-SCR system, N2 formation was also detected during the storage period. At the beginning of this period, practically all NOx fed are trapped in the NSR catalyst, and therefore, there is no available NOx at the outlet gas stream to carry out the SCR reaction downstream. As a result, the N2 signals at the exit of the NSR catalyst and at the outlet of the NSR-SCR are coincident. As the storage period proceeds, the NSR catalyst becomes saturated, and the gradual increase of NOx concentration at intermediate stream that feeds the SCR catalyst activates its reduction with the NH3 previously stored over the Cu/SAPO-34 catalyst to form the effluent N2 [66].

Thus, the beneficial effect of placing an SCR catalyst downstream of the NSR is demonstrated. Hence, the catalytic behavior of different perovskite-based formulations was compared in a wider range of temperature using a H2 concentration of 3% during the rich period. Figure 7 quantifies the evolution of NO conversion and N2, NO2, and NH3 productions at 200, 300, and 400°C, for single-NSR and combined NSR-SCR systems. The NSR formulation was varied between 1.5% Pt–15% BaO/Al2O3 (model catalyst) and 0.5% Pd–30% La0.5Ba0.5CoO3/Al2O3 (perovskite-based catalyst here formulated).

Figure 7.

Global conversion of NO (XNO) and product distribution at 200, 300, and 400°C for single-NSR and combined NSR-SCR systems, based on 0.5% Pd–30% La0.5Ba0.5CoO3/Al2O3 (perovs.) and 1.5% Pt–15% BaO/Al2O3 (model) as NSR catalysts.

As a general trend, NO conversion improves with the NSR-SCR configuration irrespective of the NSR catalyst composition used. The implementation of the SCR catalyst in the hybrid configuration also improves production of N2, by consumption of NH3 and NO2 produced in the NSR catalyst. The improvement of NOx removal efficiency up to 300°C is due to higher NH3 production when the SCR catalyst is highly efficiency (200–300°C). In good agreement with this, NH3 production at the outlet decreases significantly for the combined NSR-SCR systems [66]. However, above 300°C, the NH3 production in the NSR catalyst decreases significantly due to the reaction of the NH3 with the stored nitrate downstream (3Ba(NO3)2 + 10NH3 → 3BaO + 8 N2 + 15H2O) of the NSR catalyst [65, 115]. Furthermore, NH3 can be partially oxidized [113, 116], and thus, NH3 generated is insufficient to reduce NOx slipping the upstream NSR system. This explains the moderate improvement of NOx-to-N2 reduction for the NSR-SCR double configuration with respect to the single-NSR system at high temperature.

Both configurations show high NO conversion and nitrogen production in the whole temperature range. Specifically, perovskite-based system shows a maximum NO conversion of 99% and a nitrogen production of 92% at 300°C. Indeed, perovskite-based combined NSR-SCR system shows similar or even higher NOx-to-N2 reduction efficiencies to that shown by the double configuration when the 1.5% Pt–15% BaO/Al2O3 model NSR catalyst is used.

In summary, the positive impact of placing an SCR catalyst downstream the NSR catalyst is verified on NOx removal efficiency, with notable increase in N2 production. In this sense, the mixed NSR-SCR system based on the 0.5% Pd–30% La0.5Ba0.5CoO3/Al2O3 catalyst emerges as a promising alternative, only emitting 7% NH3 at 200°C (slip of NH3), which disappears at higher temperatures achieving NH3 total elimination. This can be considered as a promising starting point for the implementation of these types of oxides in coupled NSR-SCR configurations.

2.4 Outlook and concluding remarks

NOx emission removal from lean-burn and diesel engine exhaust gases remains as a technological challenge. To overcome this environmental pollution issue, two main alternatives have been explored during the last decades: NOx storage and reduction (NSR) and selective catalytic reduction with NH3 (NH3-SCR). These alternatives show some limitations that limit their extensive application. In the case of NSR system, some NO can slip without being totally converted, and also, NH3 generated during the rich period can slip as byproduct in the effluent. Furthermore, the catalyst requires high Pt loadings, which limit the cost and thermal stability. On the other hand, NH3-SCR system requires the urea feeding system, which increases the cost and requires an extra volume of the system. Moreover, the latter shows lower NO conversion at low temperatures and allows NH3 slip. As a result, combined NSR-SCR configurations have been explored as an evolution of previous stand-alone technologies. In fact, this hybrid alternative increases the temperature operational window, promotes NO conversion, and avoids the need of urea feeding system. However, up to now, only a conventional Pt-based NSR formulation has been explored in coupled NSR-SCR configurations.

In recent years, efforts have been focused on designing a new generation of NSR catalysts with improved oxidation, adsorption, and reduction capacities. Furthermore, these new materials should be low cost and achieve long hydrothermal stability and high sulfur resistance. Perovskites have gained attention during the recent years as a potential solution. La-based formulations (i.e., LaCoO3 and LaMnO3) have shown excellent NO oxidation conversion, a primary step in the NOx adsorption during lean conditions. In fact, Sr doping further promotes the NO oxidation activity of these formulations, which is closely related to the generation of oxygen vacancies favoring oxygen mobility. However, NOx storage and reduction efficiencies are limited for bulk perovskites due to a low exposed surface area derived from the drastic calcination protocols required during the synthesis process. Supporting perovskite over high surface area materials, e.g., alumina (30% La0.7Sr0.3CoO3/Al2O3), is demonstrated to overcome this limitation. Nonetheless, NOx reduction at low and intermediate temperatures is still limited. The incorporation of low Pd contents over supported perovskite by wetness impregnation emerges as an efficient solution. In fact, 1.5% Pd–30% La0.7Sr0.3CoO3/Al2O3 shows similar or even higher NOx removal efficiencies than the conventional NSR model catalyst (1.5% Pt–15% BaO/Al2O3). The activity enhancement showed by perovskite-based formulations motivates their implementation in combined NSR-SCR systems, which as an alternative to further improve the NOx removal efficiency of the stand-alone NSR and stand-alone SCR systems. The preliminary results are very promising since NOx-to-N2 reduction above 90% has been achieved with significant lower noble metal content than platinum in the model catalyst.

Improving the exhaust aftertreatment systems is considered as a critical point in the current vehicle development. In upcoming years, research should be focus on better understanding the mechanism over perovskite-based formulation, especially during regeneration period. Moreover, the NOx trapping efficiency and NOx reduction of the adsorbed NOx can be further promoted. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no studies have been published related to the application of this type of materials to the combined NSR-SCR system. Thus, the room improvement is huge for this application, such as exploring different catalyst architectures (i.e., segmented zones or dual layer monoliths), optimizing precious metal loading, and dispersion. The construction of detailed kinetic model and modeling a full-scale operation will allow to develop a suitable aftertreatment system for automobile application.



Support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competiveness (Project CTQ2015-67597-C2-1-R), the Basque Government (IT657-13 and IT1297-19), and the University of the Basque Country acknowledged. One of the authors (JAOC) was supported by a PhD research fellowship provided by the Basque Government (PRE_2014_1_396).


  1. 1. González-Velasco JR, Pereda-Ayo B, De-La-Torre U, Urrutxua M, López-Fonseca R. Coupled NSR-SCR systems for NOx removal in light-duty vehicles. ChemCatChem. 2018;10:2928. DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201800392
  2. 2. Granger P, Parvulescu VI. Catalytic NOx abatement systems for mobile sources: From three-way to lean burn after-treatment technologies. Chemical Reviews. 2011;111(5):3155-3207. DOI: 10.1021/cr100168g
  3. 3. Jabłońska M, Palkovits R. Perovskite-based catalysts for the control of nitrogen oxide emissions from diesel engines. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2019;9(9):2057-2077. DOI: 10.1039/C8CY02458H
  4. 4. Granger P. Challenges and breakthrough in post-combustion catalysis: How to match future stringent regulations? Catalysis Science & Technology. 2017;7:5195-5211. DOI: 10.1039/C7CY00983F
  5. 5. De-La-Torre U, Pereda-Ayo B, Onrubia JA, González-Velasco JR. Effect of the presence of ceria in the NSR catalyst on the hydrothermal resistance and global DeNOx performance of coupled LNT-SCR systems. Topics in Catalysis. 2018;61(18):1993-2006. DOI: 10.1007/s11244-018-1016-0
  6. 6. Gandhi HS, Cavatalo JV, Hammerle RH, Chen Y. Catalyst system for NOx and NH3 emission. US Patent 7332135 (19-02-2008)
  7. 7. Gandhi HS, Cavatalo JV, Hammerle RH, Chen Y. Catalyst system for NOx and NH3 emission. US Patent Appl. 2004/0076565 A1 (22-04-2004)
  8. 8. Guenther J, Konrad B, Krutzsch B, Nolte A, Voigtlaender D, Weibel M, et al. Exhaust gas purification process and apparatus with internal generation of ammonia for reducing nitrogen oxide. US Patent 6338244 B1 (15-01-2002)
  9. 9. Kinugasa Y, Igarashi K, Itou T, Suzuki N, Yaegashi T, Takeuchi K. Method adsprobed and device for purifying exhaust gas from engine. US Patent 6047542 (11-04-2000)
  10. 10. Libby WF. Promising catalyst for auto exhaust. Science. 1971;171(3970):499. DOI: 10.1126/science.171.3970.499
  11. 11. Voorhoeve RJH, Remeika JP, Freeland PE, Matthias BT. Rare-earth oxides of manganese and cobalt rival platinum for the treatment of carbon monoxide in auto exhaust. Science. 1972;177(4046):353. DOI: 10.1126/science.177.4046.353
  12. 12. Zhu J, Li H, Zhong L, Xiao P, Xu X, Yang X, et al. Perovskite oxides: Preparation, characterizations, and applications in heterogeneous catalysis. ACS Catalysis. 2014;4(9):2917-2940. DOI: 10.1021/cs500606g
  13. 13. Royer S, Duprez D, Can F, Courtois X, Batiot-Dupeyrat C, Laassiri S, et al. Perovskites as substitutes of noble metals for heterogeneous catalysis: Dream or reality. Chemical Reviews. 2014;114(20):10292-10368. DOI: 10.1021/cr500032a
  14. 14. Gallagher PK, Johnson DW, Schrey F. Studies of some supported perovskite oxidation catalysts. Materials Research Bulletin. 1974;9(10):1345-1352. DOI: 10.1016/0025-5408(74)90057-9
  15. 15. Kim CH, Qi G, Dahlberg K, Li W. Strontium-doped perovskites rival platinum catalysts for treating NOx in simulated diesel exhaust. Science. 2010;327(5973):1624-1627. DOI: 10.1126/science.1184087
  16. 16. Onrubia JA, Pereda-Ayo B, De-La-Torre U, González-Velasco JR. Key factors in Sr-doped LaBO3 (B=Co or Mn) perovskites for NO oxidation in efficient diesel exhaust purification. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2017;213:198-210. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.068
  17. 17. Zhou C, Feng Z, Zhang Y, Hu L, Chen R, Shan B, et al. Enhanced catalytic activity for NO oxidation over Ba doped LaCoO3 catalyst. RSC Advances. 2015;5(36):28054-28059. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA02344K
  18. 18. Wen Y, Zhang C, He H, Yu Y, Teraoka Y. Catalytic oxidation of nitrogen monoxide over La1−xCexCoO3 perovskites. Catalysis Today. 2007;126(3):400-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.06.032
  19. 19. Wang J, Su Y, Wang X, Chen J, Zhao Z, Shen M. The effect of partial substitution of Co in LaMnO3 synthesized by sol–gel methods for NO oxidation. Catalysis Communications. 2012;25:106-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2012.04.001
  20. 20. Zhou C, Liu X, Wu C, Wen Y, Xue Y, Chen R, et al. NO oxidation catalysis on copper doped hexagonal phase LaCoO3: A combined experimental and theoretical study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2014;16(11):5106-5112. DOI: 10.1039/C3CP54963A
  21. 21. Zhong S, Sun Y, Xin H, Yang C, Chen L, Li X. NO oxidation over Ni-Co perovskite catalysts. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2015;275:351-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.046
  22. 22. Hong Z, Wang Z, Li X. Catalytic oxidation of nitric oxide (NO) over different catalysts: An overview. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2017;7(16):3440-3452. DOI: 10.1039/C7CY00760D
  23. 23. Zhu J, Thomas A. ChemInform abstract: Perovskite-type mixed oxides as catalytic material for NO removal. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2010;41:225-233. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.08.008
  24. 24. Hong S, Lee G. Simultaneous removal of NO and carbon particulates over lanthanoid perovskite-type catalysts. Catalysis Today. 2000;63(2):397-404. DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00484-3
  25. 25. Liu J, Xu J, Zhao Z, Duan A, Jiang G, Jing Y. A novel four-way combining catalysts for simultaneous removal of exhaust pollutants from diesel engine. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2010;22(7):1104-1109. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60224-2
  26. 26. Li Z, Meng M, Li Q , Xie Y, Hu T, Zhang J. Fe-substituted nanometric La0.9K0.1Co1−xFexO3−δ perovskite catalysts used for soot combustion, NOx storage and simultaneous catalytic removal of soot and NOx. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2010;164(1):98-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.036
  27. 27. Mescia D, Caroca JC, Russo N, Labhsetwar N, Fino D, Saracco G, et al. Towards a single brick solution for the abatement of NOx and soot from diesel engine exhausts. Catalysis Today. 2008;137(2):300-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.11.010
  28. 28. Teraoka Y, Kanada K, Kagawa S. Synthesis of La1-xKxMnO perovskite-type oxides and their catalytic property for simultaneous removal of NOx and diesel soot particulates. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2001;34(1):73-78. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-3373(01)00202-8
  29. 29. Yao W, Wang R, Yang X. LaCo1-xPdxO3 perovskite-type oxides: Synthesis, characterization and simultaneous removal of NOx and diesel soot. Catalysis Letters. 2009;130(3):613-621. DOI: 10.1007/s10562-009-9905-2
  30. 30. Wang K, Qian L, Zhang L, Liu H, Yan Z. Simultaneous removal of NOx and soot particulates over La0.7Ag0.3MnO3 perovskite oxide catalysts. Catalysis Today. 2010;158(3):423-426. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.06.001
  31. 31. Dhal GC, Dey S, Mohan D, Prasad R. Study of Fe, Co, and Mn-based perovskite-type catalysts for the simultaneous control of soot and NOX from diesel engine exhaust. Materials Discovery. 2017;10:37-42. DOI: 10.1016/
  32. 32. Sun K, Xia H, Hensen E, van Santen R, Li C. Chemistry of N2O decomposition on active sites with different nature: Effect of high-temperature treatment of Fe/ZSM-5. Journal of Catalysis. 2006;238(1):186-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.12.013
  33. 33. Ivanov DV, Sadovskaya EM, Pinaeva LG, Isupova LA. Influence of oxygen mobility on catalytic activity of La–Sr–Mn–O composites in the reaction of high temperature N2O decomposition. Journal of Catalysis. 2009;267(1):5-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2009.07.005
  34. 34. Ivanov DV, Pinaeva LG, Isupova LA, Sadovskaya EM, Prosvirin IP, Gerasimov EY, et al. Effect of surface decoration with LaSrFeO4 on oxygen mobility and catalytic activity of La0.4Sr0.6FeO3−δ in high-temperature N2O decomposition, methane combustion and ammonia oxidation. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2013;457:42-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.03.007
  35. 35. Wu Y, Dujardin C, Lancelot C, Dacquin JP, Parvulescu VI, Cabié M, et al. Catalytic abatement of NO and N2O from nitric acid plants: A novel approach using noble metal-modified perovskites. Journal of Catalysis. 2015;328:236-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.02.001
  36. 36. Gunasekaran N, Rajadurai S, Carberry JJ. Catalytic decomposition of nitrous oxide over perovskite type solid oxide solutions and supported noble metal catalysts. Catalysis Letters. 1995;35(3):373-382. DOI: 10.1007/BF00807194
  37. 37. Pan KL, Yu SJ, Yan SY, Chang MB. Direct N2O decomposition over La2NiO4-based perovskite-type oxides. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 2014;64(11):1260-1269. DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2014.941513
  38. 38. Alini S, Basile F, Blasioli S, Rinaldi C, Vaccari A. Development of new catalysts for N2O-decomposition from adipic acid plant. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2007;70(1):323-329. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.12.031
  39. 39. Belessi VC, Trikalitis PN, Ladavos AK, Bakas TV, Pomonis PJ. Structure and catalytic activity of La1−xFeO3 system (x=0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.35) for the NO+CO reaction. Applied Catalysis A: General. 1999;177. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-860X (98)00256-7
  40. 40. Belessi VC, Bakas TV, Costa CN, Efstathiou AM, Pomonis PJ. Synergistic effects of crystal phases and mixed valences in La–Sr–Ce–Fe–O mixed oxidic/perovskitic solids on their catalytic activity for the NO+CO reaction. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2000;28(1):13-28. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-3373(00)00159-4
  41. 41. Leontiou AA, Ladavos AK, Pomonis PJ. Catalytic NO reduction with CO on La1−xSrx(Fe3+/Fe4+)O3±δ perovskite-type mixed oxides (x = 0.00, 0.15, 0.30, 0.40, 0.60, 0.70, 0.80, and 0.90). Applied Catalysis A: General. 2003;241(1):133-141. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00457-X
  42. 42. Wang Y, Cui X, Li Y, Shu Z, Chen H, Shi J. A simple co-nanocasting method to synthesize high surface area mesoporous LaCoO3 oxides for CO and NO oxidations. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2013;176:8-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.03.033
  43. 43. Peter SD, Garbowski E, Perrichon V, Primet M. NO reduction by CO over aluminate-supported perovskites. Catalysis Letters. 2000;70(1):27-33. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019027619209
  44. 44. Shen S, Weng H. Comparative study of catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with carbon monoxide over the La1-xSrxBO3 (B = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) catalysts. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 1998;37(7):2654-2661. DOI: 10.1021/ie970691g
  45. 45. Varma S, Wani BN, Gupta NM. Redox behavior and catalytic activity of La–Fe–V–O mixed oxides. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2003;241(1):341-348. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00492-1
  46. 46. De-La-Torre U, Pereda-Ayo B, Gutiérrez-Ortiz MA, González-Marcos JA, González-Velasco JR. Steady-state NH3-SCR global model and kinetic parameter estimation for NOx removal in diesel engine exhaust aftertreatment with Cu/chabazite. Catalysis Today. 2017;296:95-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.04.011
  47. 47. Cavataio G, Girard J, Eli Patterson J, Montreuil C, Cheng Y, Lambert C. Laboratory testing of urea-SCR formulations to meet tier 2 bin 5 emissions, SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1575. 2007. DOI: 10.4271/2007-01-1575
  48. 48. Koebel M, Elsener M, Marti T. NOx-reduction in diesel exhaust gas with urea and selective catalytic reduction. Combustion Science and Technology. 1996;121(1-6):85-102. DOI: 10.1080/00102209608935588
  49. 49. Nova I, Tronconi E, editors. Urea-SCR Technology for DeNOx After Treatment of Diesel Exhausts. Berlin: Springer; 2014. 715p. DOI: 10.1080/00102209608935588
  50. 50. Urrutxua M, Pereda-Ayo B, Trandafilovic LV, Olsson L, González-Velasco JR. Influence of H2, CO, C3H6, and C7H8 as reductants on DeNOx behavior of dual monoliths for NOx storage/reduction coupled with selective catalytic reduction. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2019;58(17):7001-7013. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00149
  51. 51. De La Torre U, Pereda-Ayo B, González-Velasco JR. Cu-zeolite NH3-SCR catalysts for NOx removal in the combined NSR–SCR technology. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2012;207-208:10-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.092
  52. 52. Zhu Z, Liu Z, Niu H, Liu S. Promoting effect of SO2 on activated carbon-supported vanadia catalyst for NO reduction by NH3 at low temperatures. Journal of Catalysis. 1999;187(1):245-248. DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1999.2605
  53. 53. Tang X, Hao J, Xu W, Li J. Low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over amorphous MnOx catalysts prepared by three methods. Catalysis Communications. 2007;8(3):329-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2006.06.025
  54. 54. Singoredjo L, Korver R, Kapteijn F, Moulijn J. Alumina supported manganese oxides for the low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 1992;1(4):297-316. DOI: 10.1016/0926-3373(92)80055-5
  55. 55. Chmielarz L, Jabłońska M, Strumiński A, Piwowarska Z, Węgrzyn A, Witkowski S, et al. Selective catalytic oxidation of ammonia to nitrogen over Mg-Al, Cu-Mg-Al and Fe-Mg-Al mixed metal oxides doped with noble metals. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2013;130-131:152-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.11.004
  56. 56. Zhang R, Luo N, Yang W, Liu N, Chen B. Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 using perovskite-type oxides as the novel catalysts. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2013;371:86-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2013.01.018
  57. 57. Zhang R, Yang W, Luo N, Li P, Lei Z, Chen B. Low-temperature NH3-SCR of NO by lanthanum manganite perovskites: Effect of A-/B-site substitution and TiO2/CeO2 support. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2014;146:94-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.047
  58. 58. Zhang Y, Wang D, Wang J, Chen Q , Zhang Z, Pan X, et al. BiMnO3 perovskite catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperature. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. 2012;33(9):1448-1454. DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(11)60439-7
  59. 59. Shi H, Li X, Xia J, Lu X, Zuo S, Luo S, et al. Sol-gel synthesis of LaBO3/attapulgite (B=Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) nanocomposite for NH3-SCR of NO at low temperature. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers. 2017;27(1):166-172. DOI: 10.1007/s10904-017-0683-9
  60. 60. Wallin M, Cruise N, Klement U, Palmqvist A, Skoglundh M. Preparation of Mn, Fe and Co based perovskite catalysts using microemulsions. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2004;238(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.02.019
  61. 61. Takahashi N, Shinjoh H, Iijima T, Suzuki T, Yamazaki K, Yokota K, et al. The new concept 3-way catalyst for automotive lean-burn engine: NOx storage and reduction catalyst. Catalysis Today. 1996;27(1):63-69. DOI: 10.1016/0920-5861(95)00173-5
  62. 62. Nova I, Castoldi L, Lietti L, Tronconi E, Forzatti P. On the dynamic behavior of NOx storage/reduction Pt–Ba/Al2O3 catalyst. Catalysis Today. 2002;75(1):431-437. DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00093-7
  63. 63. Nova I, Castoldi L, Lietti L, Tronconi E, Forzatti P, Prinetto F, Ghiotti G. NOx adsorption study over Pt–Ba/alumina catalysts: FT-IR and pulse experiments. Journal of Catalysis. 2004;222(2):377-388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2003.11.013
  64. 64. Lietti L, Forzatti P, Nova I, Tronconi E. NOx storage reduction over Pt-Ba/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Journal of Catalysis. 2001;204(1):175-191. DOI: 10.1006/jcat.2001.3370
  65. 65. Lietti L, Nova I, Forzatti P. Role of ammonia in the reduction by hydrogen of NOx stored over Pt–Ba/Al2O3 lean NOx trap catalysts. Journal of Catalysis. 2008;257(2):270-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.05.005
  66. 66. Onrubia-Calvo JA. Perovskites as alternative for NOx storage and reduction systems: formulations, mechanism and optimal control [thesis]. Leioa: Universidad del País Vasco; 2019
  67. 67. You R, Meng M, Zhang J, Zheng L, Hu T, Li X. A noble-metal-free SCR-LNT coupled catalytic system used for high-concentration NOx reduction under lean-burn condition. Catalysis Today. 2019;327:347-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.03.022
  68. 68. Epling WS, Campbell LE, Yezerets A, Currier NW, Parks JE. Overview of the fundamental reactions and degradation mechanisms of NOx storage/reduction catalysts. Catalysis Reviews. 2004;46(2):163-245. DOI: 10.1081/CR-200031932
  69. 69. Pereda-Ayo B, De La Torre U, González-Marcos MP, González-Velasco JR. Influence of ceria loading on the NOx storage and reduction performance of model Pt–Ba/Al2O3 NSR catalyst. Catalysis Today. 2015;241:133-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.03.044
  70. 70. Chen J, Shen M, Wang X, Qi G, Wang J, Li W. The influence of nonstoichiometry on LaMnO3 perovskite for catalytic NO oxidation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2013;134-135:251-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.01.027
  71. 71. Chen J, Shen M, Wang X, Wang J, Su Y, Zhao Z. Catalytic performance of NO oxidation over LaMeO3 (Me=Mn, Fe, Co) perovskite prepared by the sol–gel method. Catalysis Communications. 2013;37:105-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2013.03.039
  72. 72. Choi SO, Penninger M, Kim CH, Schneider WF, Thompson LT. Experimental and computational investigation of effect of Sr on NO oxidation and oxygen exchange for La1-xSrxCoO3 perovskite catalysts. ACS Catalysis. 2013;3(12):2719-2728. DOI: 10.1021/cs400522r
  73. 73. Mars P, van Krevelen DW. Oxidations carried out by means of vanadium oxide catalysts. Chemical Engineering Science. 1954;3:41-59. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(54)80005-4
  74. 74. Idriss H, Barteau MA. Active sites on oxides: From single crystals to catalysts. Advances in Catalysis. 2000;45:261-331. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-0564(02)45016-X
  75. 75. Białobok B, Trawczyński J, Miśta W, Zawadzki M. Ethanol combustion over strontium- and cerium-doped LaCoO3 catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2007;72(3-4):395-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.12.006
  76. 76. Dow W, Huang T. Yttria-stabilized zirconia supported copper oxide catalyst: II. Effect of oxygen vacancy of support on catalytic activity for CO oxidation. Journal of Catalysis. 1996;160(2):171-182. DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1996.0136
  77. 77. Islam MS, Cherry M, Winch LJ. Defect chemistry of LaBO3 (B = Al, Mn or Co) perovskite-type oxides. Relevance to catalytic and transport behaviour. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions. 1996;92(3):479-482. DOI: 10.1039/FT9969200479
  78. 78. Chien C, Shi J, Huang T. Effect of oxygen vacancy on CO-NO-O2 reaction over yttria-stabilized zirconia-supported copper oxide catalyst. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 1997;36(5):1544-1551. DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1996.0136
  79. 79. Over H. Surface chemistry of ruthenium dioxide in heterogeneous catalysis and electrocatalysis: From fundamental to applied research. Chemical Reviews. 2012;112(6):3356-3426. DOI: 10.1021/cr200247n
  80. 80. Constantinou C, Li W, Qi G, Epling WS. NOX storage and reduction over a perovskite-based lean NOX trap catalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2013;134-135:66-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.12.034
  81. 81. Qi G, Li W. Pt-free, LaMnO3 based lean NOx trap catalysts. Catalysis Today. 2012;184(1):72-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.11.012
  82. 82. He X, Meng M, He J, Zou Z, Li X, Li Z, et al. A potential substitution of noble metal Pt by perovskite LaCoO3 in ZrTiO4 supported lean-burn NOx trap catalysts. Catalysis Communications. 2010;12(3):165-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2010.09.016
  83. 83. You R, Zhang Y, Liu D, Meng M, Jiang Z, Zhang S, et al. A series of ceria supported lean-burn NOx trap catalysts LaCoO3/K2CO3/CeO2 using perovskite as active component. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2015;260:357-367. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.016
  84. 84. You R, Zhang Y, Liu D, Meng M, Zheng L, Zhang J, et al. YCeZrO ternary oxide solid solution supported nonplatinic lean-burn NOx trap catalysts using LaCoO3 perovskite as active phase. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2014;118(44):25403-25420. DOI: 10.1021/jp505601x
  85. 85. Onrubia-Calvo JA, Pereda-Ayo B, De-La-Torre U, González-Velasco JR. Strontium doping and impregnation onto alumina improve the NOx storage and reduction capacity of LaCoO3 perovskites. Catalysis Today. 2019;333:208-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.12.031
  86. 86. Li XG, Dong YH, Xian H, Hernández WY, Meng M, Zou HH, et al. De-NOx in alternative lean/rich atmospheres on La1-xSrxCoO3 perovskites. Energy & Environmental Science. 2011;4(9):3351-3354. DOI: 10.1039/C1EE01726H
  87. 87. Xian H, Zhang X, Li X, Li L, Zou H, Meng M, et al. BaFeO3-x perovskite: An efficient NOx absorber with a high sulfur tolerance. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010;114(27):11844-11852. DOI: 10.1021/jp100197c
  88. 88. Dacquin JP, Lancelot C, Dujardin C, Da Costa P, Djega-Mariadassou G, Beaunier P, et al. Influence of preparation methods of LaCoO3 on the catalytic performances in the decomposition of N2O. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2009;91(3-4):596-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.06.032
  89. 89. Giraudon JM, Elhachimi A, Wyrwalski F, Siffert S, Aboukaïs A, Lamonier JF, et al. Studies of the activation process over Pd perovskite-type oxides used for catalytic oxidation of toluene. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2007;75(3):157-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.005
  90. 90. Say Z, Dogac M, Vovk EI, Kalay YE, Kim CH, Li W, et al. Palladium doped perovskite-based NO oxidation catalysts: The role of Pd and B-sites for NOx adsorption behavior via in-situ spectroscopy. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2014;154-155:51-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.01.038
  91. 91. Zhang R, Alamdari H, Kaliaguine S. Fe-based perovskites substituted by copper and palladium for NO+CO reaction. Journal of Catalysis. 2006;242(2):241-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.05.033
  92. 92. Yoon DY, Kim YJ, Lim JH, Cho BK, Hong SB, Nam I, et al. Thermal stability of Pd-containing LaAlO3 perovskite as a modern TWC. Journal of Catalysis. 2015;330:71-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.07.013
  93. 93. Li C, Wang C, Lin Y. Pd-integrated lanthanum-transition metal perovskites for methanol partial oxidation. Catalysis Today. 2011;174(1):135-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.01.038
  94. 94. Nishihata Y, Mizuki J, Akao T, Tanaka H, Uenishi M, Kimura M, et al. Self-regeneration of a Pd-perovskite catalyst for automotive emissions control. Nature. 2002;418:164. DOI: 10.1038/nature00893
  95. 95. Zhou K, Chen H, Tian Q , Hao Z, Shen D. Xu X. Pd-containing perovskite-type oxides used for three-way catalysts. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2002;189(2):225-232. DOI: 10.1016/S1381-1169(02)00177-2
  96. 96. Rodríguez GCM, Kelm K, Heikens S, Grünert W, Saruhan B. Pd-integrated perovskites for TWC applications: Synthesis, microstructure and N2O-sele. Catalysis Today. 2012;184(1):184-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.12.026
  97. 97. Zhao D, Gao Z, Xian H, Xing L, Yang Y, Tian Y, et al. Addition of Pd on La0.7Sr0.3CoO3 perovskite to enhance catalytic removal of NOx. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2018;57(2):521-531. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04399
  98. 98. Ye J, Yu Y, Meng M, Jiang Z, Ding T, Zhang S, et al. Highly efficient NOx purification in alternating lean/rich atmospheres over non-platinic mesoporous perovskite-based catalyst K/LaCoO3. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2013;3(8):1915-1918. DOI: 10.1039/C3CY00155E
  99. 99. Wen W, Wang X, Jin S, Wang R. LaCoO3 perovskite in Pt/LaCoO3/K/Al2O3 for the improvement of NOx storage and reduction performances. RSC Advances. 2016;6(78):74046-74052. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA18273A
  100. 100. Ueda A, Yamada Y, Katsuki M, Kiyobayashi T, Xu Q , Kuriyama N. Perovskite catalyst (La, Ba)(Fe, Nb, Pd)O3 applicable to NOx storage and reduction system. Catalysis Communications. 2009;11(1):34-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2009.08.008
  101. 101. Hodjati S, Petit C, Pitchon V, Kiennemann A. Absorption/desorption of NOx process on perovskites: Impact of SO2 on the storage capacity of BaSnO3 and strategy to develop thioresistance. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2001;30(3):247-257. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-3373(00)00249-6
  102. 102. Hodjati S, Vaezzadeh K, Petit C, Pitchon V, Kiennemann A. Absorption/desorption of NOx process on perovskites: Performances to remove NOx from a lean exhaust gas. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2000;26(1):5-16. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-3373(99)00143-5
  103. 103. Xian H, Zhang X, Li X, Zou H, Meng M, Zou Z, et al. Effect of the calcination conditions on the NOx storage behavior of the perovskite BaFeO3−x catalysts. Catalysis Today. 2010;158(3):215-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.03.026
  104. 104. Xian H, Li F, Li X, Zhang X, Meng M, Zhang T, et al. Influence of preparation conditions to structure property, NOx and SO2 sorption behavior of the BaFeO3−x perovskite catalyst. Fuel Processing Technology. 2011;92(9):1718-1724. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.04.021
  105. 105. Li X, Chen C, Liu C, Xian H, Guo L, Lv J, et al. Pd-doped perovskite: An effective catalyst for removal of NOx from lean-burn exhausts with high sulfur resistance. ACS Catalysis. 2013;3(6):1071-1075. DOI: 10.1021/cs400136t
  106. 106. Ma A, Wang S, Liu C, Xian H, Ding Q , Guo L, et al. Effects of Fe dopants and residual carbonates on the catalytic activities of the perovskite-type La0.7Sr0.3Co1−xFexO3 NOx storage catalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2014;146:24-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.06.005
  107. 107. Wang X, Qi X, Chen Z, Jiang L, Wang R, Wei K. Studies on SO2 tolerance and regeneration over perovskite-type LaCo1-xPtxO3 in NOx storage and reduction. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2014;118(25):13743-13751. DOI: 10.1021/jp5044255
  108. 108. Minami, Toshitake (Kanagawa, JP) 2009. Device for purifying exhaust gas of a diesel engine United States 20090250041
  109. 109. Sakurai K. Exhaust purifying system for internal combustion engine. US Patent Appl. 2011/0138783 A1 (16-06-2011)
  110. 110. De La Torre U, Urrutxua M, Pereda-Ayo B, González-Velasco JR. On the Cu species in Cu/beta catalysts related to DeNOx performance of coupled NSR-SCR technology using sequential monoliths and dual-layer monolithic catalysts. Catalysis Today. 2016;273:72-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.02.054
  111. 111. De-La-Torre U, Pereda-Ayo B, Moliner M, González-Velasco JR, Corma A. Cu-zeolite catalysts for NOx removal by selective catalytic reduction with NH3 and coupled to NO storage/reduction monolith in diesel engine exhaust after treatment systems. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2016;187:419-427
  112. 112. Pereda-Ayo B, Duraiswami D, Delgado JJ, López-Fonseca R, Calvino JJ, Bernal S, et al. Tuning operational conditions for efficient NOx storage and reduction over a Pt–Ba/Al2O3 monolith catalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2010;96(3-4):329-337
  113. 113. Pereda-Ayo B, Duraiswami D, González-Marcos JA, González-Velasco JR. Performance of NOx storage-reduction catalyst in the temperature-reductant concentration domain by response surface methodology. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2011;169(1-3):58-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.052
  114. 114. Pereda-Ayo B, Duraiswami D, González-Velasco JR. Control of NOx storage and reduction in NSR bed for designing combined NSR–SCR systems. Catalysis Today. 2011;172(1):66-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.01.043
  115. 115. Cumaranatunge L, Mulla SS, Yezerets A, Currier NW, Delgass WN, Ribeiro FH. Ammonia is a hydrogen carrier in the regeneration of Pt/BaO/Al2O3 NOx traps with H2. Journal of Catalysis. 2007;246(1):29-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.11.008
  116. 116. Pereda-Ayo B, González-Velasco JR, Burch R, Hardacre C, Chansai S. Regeneration mechanism of a lean NOx trap (LNT) catalyst in the presence of NO investigated using isotope labelling techniques. Journal of Catalysis. 2012;285(1):177-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2011.09.028

Written By

Jon Ander Onrubia-Calvo, Beñat Pereda-Ayo, Unai De-La-Torre and Juan Ramón González-Velasco

Submitted: February 6th, 2019 Reviewed: September 4th, 2019 Published: October 17th, 2019