Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Introductory Chapter: Managing World’s Forests for Sustainable Development

Written By

Mohd Nazip Suratman and Zulkiflee Abd Latif

Reviewed: September 10th, 2019 Published: February 26th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89642

From the Edited Volume

Forest Degradation Around the World

Edited by Mohd Nazip Suratman, Zulkiflee Abd Latif, Gabriel De Oliveira, Nathaniel Brunsell, Yosio Shimabukuro and Carlos Antonio Costa Dos Santos

Chapter metrics overview

703 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Forests are important biological resources as they provide habitat for many of the world’s species [1]. Forests also provide timber and non-timber forest products such as bamboo and rattan and food ranging from fruits, mushrooms, honey, and a wide variety of traditional medicines that are critical for human survival [2]. Furthermore, they are key component of many species’ habitats, providing nourishment, shelter, and structural features needed for communication, surveillance, and other activities [3]. They also provide significant ecosystem services in terms of nutrients, water cycling, prevention of erosion, sequestration of carbon as well as performing of range of other physical and biological functions. Forests are the main filters in the earth since there are many pollutions from human activities such as industry and motor transportation are disposed, i.e., carbon dioxide (CO2), water (H2O), nitrogen (N), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) (National Research Council U.S., 1972). These pollutants can be filtered by plants for its life cycle, thereby reducing pollution at the atmosphere, although CO2 and H2O become main material for their photosynthesis [4]. Results from photosynthesis of plants are the main energy resources for all animal life including human. It is a substantial ecosystem service in terms of providing nutrients, water recycling, prevention of erosion, and carbon storage in the terrestrial ecosystem as well as sequestering CO2 in the atmosphere [5, 6, 7, 8].


2. Forest degradation around the world

The growth in human population has forced mankind to explore existing resources, including forest for multiple purposes [9], for instance, logging of timber for wood-based industries, agricultural activities, urban areas, road, and mining. All these practices are done at different stages of forest growth which give significant impacts on the stand structure, composition, and other components of the forest and will consequently reduce forest productivity and their ecosystem functions [10]. During early civilizations, forest occupied about half of the earth’s surface. However, it has, at the moment, reduced into less than one-third of the total earth’s surface. The significant reduction of the forest areas requires appropriate planning and management for the conservation [8], especially forest in the tropical and subtropical areas in the developing nations. Today, the degradation of the forest due to anthropogenic activities and natural disturbances is significantly reducing total forest areas in the world. Originally, tropical forest covered about 1.5–1.8 billion ha of the land surface [6, 11]. Unfortunately, one-third of these original forests have been lost because of deforestation, resulting into large degraded areas. To date, the degraded areas are common in many countries, most of which are converted into other land uses, although some of them will regenerate into secondary forests [12]. Currently, the secondary forest can be found in all areas in the world and it is estimated to reach about 64% of the total world forest [13].

The decrease of world’s forest is caused by many activities such as clearing to open land for agriculture, roads, settlement, logging for timber, and cutting for fuel. Indirectly, forest is succumbing to the effect of environmental pollution and further threat by climatic change. Together, these causes have been responsible for decimating many of the world’s forest, and they threaten to significantly degrade those that remain. Moreover, the burning of trees, shrubs, and other vegetation during land clearing and after logging further contributes to environmental deterioration [14].


3. The role of natural regeneration

Sapling regeneration is important to restore forest formation after disturbance, balancing the loss of primary forest and as a main sequester of CO2. Their radial growth characteristics are the main performer of canopy closure, and it can be used to identify the canopy formation in the secondary forest after disturbances. Moreover, the canopy closure can be used to predict the vertical structure in the future; therefore, it will explain the pressure that will be given by dominant species in the later succession.

The continuing loss of primary tropical forest has made the secondary forest to be increasingly important for maintaining the ecology across the large forested landscapes [15]. The regeneration in the tropical secondary forest is strongly influenced by disturbances that resulted from natural tree fall in primary forest [15, 16]. Regeneration is widely recognized as being a key process in determining the structure and dynamism of tropical secondary forest [17]. For instance, the logging of mature trees can reduce seed resource in the forest [9]. Nevertheless, it may increase the light intensity, which reaches the forest floor and will stimulate the seeds’ germination and growth of saplings. The ability of regeneration in the degraded areas is determined by the success of the seedlings and saplings to grow [18].

The success of forest regeneration in terms of its distribution and diversity can be used as parameters to understand the level of forest succession and to figure out the population dynamic condition in the areas that have been controlled [18]. A lot of efforts have been made to study forest regeneration to provide information on ecological condition [18, 19, 20]; however, the data which have been collected cannot solve the same problem in different areas in the world. This is because every area in the world has different conditions which make it possible to create the different microclimate after fragmentation, and then influence the recovery process. The change of microclimate because of forest fragmentation will influence the plant species survival. Therefore, only species that can adapt to the environmental change will survive as different species have different capabilities to response to the ecological pressure. Furthermore, there are crucial chemical elements in the soil that have been recognized for growth of all plants [21], and the loss one of these elements will influence the plant growth, especially macronutrient. Besides the chemical elements, forest regeneration is influenced by light intensity which reaches under the canopy. The increasing of light intensity which reaches under the canopy will stimulate the amount of photosynthesis that directly accelerates regeneration for the light demanding plant [12].


4. Carbon sequestration in forests

Rapid development of industrial technologies in the world has contributed to the increment of greenhouse gases. The increase of greenhouse gases, such as CO2 in the atmospheres, has led to global warming phenomenon. Nowadays, rise of global temperatures has constituted a challenge to the mankind. The increment of CO2 today is estimated to be 1.3–1.9 ppm year−1 [22]. According to [23], from the analysis recorded in Malaysia, the average of temperatures has increased by 1.1°C within 50 years, which is consistent with the trend on global warming.

In reality, trees have important function in the carbon sequestration process [24, 25, 26]. In this case, the conservation of plant resources in a sustainable manner is the best solution. Forests play important roles in the CO2 sequestration process. Trees in the forests are important in order to perform the canopy closure in the forest and then influence the other species. Several studies have shown that the light intensity in the understory affects the growth and crown morphology of several tree species [17, 21, 27] and soil properties at allocation of plant biomass [28, 29, 30, 31]. Additionally, the effect of soil properties and light intensity has been known to correlate with growth rate, and distribution pattern as well as species composition. In reality, each species has different capability to respond to their environmental factors.

In the tropical rainforests, nutrient cycling is probably one of the most significant ecological processes [32]. Similarly, according to Hamzah et al. [33], tropical rainforests are recognized as the richest ecosystems in the world in terms of structures, species diversity, and ability to maintain the global climate change by reducing the accumulation of greenhouse gases. According to Sands [34], tropical rainforests contain 70% of the world’s plants and animals, 70% of the world’s vascular plants, 30% of all birds, and more than 90% of all the invertebrates. There can be more than 200 tree species per hectare in tropical rainforest.


5. Tropical rainforests: Malaysia’s perspective

The tropical rainforest in Malaysia is one of the most diverse, complex, and productive terrestrial ecosystems in the world. The climate of Malaysia is typically humid tropical and is characterized by year-round high temperatures and seasonal heavy rain. As a result of these climatic conditions, the predominant natural vegetation is tropical rain forest whereby the main forest types being lowland then hill dipterocarp forest, peat swamp forest, freshwater swamp forest, and mangrove forest [35]. Malaysia has a total land area of 32.86 million ha. Of the total land area, 20.46 million ha are forest areas in which Peninsular Malaysia, Sarawak, and Sabah cover 28, 45, and 27% of the total forest areas, respectively [13]. It was estimated that Malaysia forests in Peninsular and Borneo are about 2830 and 9000–15,000 tree species, respectively [36, 37].

5.1 Species composition

Malaysian tropical rainforest is a productive forest which consists of various valuable timbers from the family of dipterocarpaceae and non-dipterocarpaceae. The name “dipterocarp” comes from the Greek for “two-winged seed.” The dipterocarp species are from the family dipterocarpaceae and are the giants of the South-East Asian forests as well as the dominant family in them. Dipterocarp trees dominate forests in Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Peninsular Malaysia, and the wet parts of Philippines. The largest genera are Shorea(196 species), Hopea(104 species), Dipterocarpus(70 species), and Vatica(65 species). Other common genera namely Dryobalanops, Neobalanocarpus, Parashorea, Cotylelobium, and Anisopteraare also important part of tree communities of tropical rainforests. It is common to find 25 or more species of Shorea, and six or more species of the other three genera in the forest of Peninsular Malaysia, Borneo, and Sumatra. Dipterocarp trees have excellent timber qualities, and they are marketed internationally as plywood and as sawn timber [38].

Non-dipterocarps consist of 427 species from 201 genera and 50 families of non-dipterocarps. Examples of important non-dipterocarp families are Leguminosae, Myristicaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Burseraceae, Sapotaceae, and Apocynaceae. Unlike dipterocarp species, generally non-dipterocarp timbers are less durable than the dipterocarp. However, according to Schulte [39], the non-dipterocarp species also play an important role within the tropical rainforest. They either form the major components of the understory layer (i.e., Annonaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lauraceae, Meliaceae, Myristicaceae, and Rubiaceae) or they have the commercial use, frequently only locally as fruit trees (i.e., Moraceae, Anacardiaceae, Bombacaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Guttiferae, Lauraceae, Mimosaceae, Polygalaceae, and Sapindaceae).

5.2 Tropical rainforest formation

The main forest types in Malaysia are formed from three types of formation, that is, climatic, edaphic, and biotic climax. Figure 1 shows five forest zones are developed from climatic climax formations are lowland dipterocarp forest (0–300 m above sea level [a.s.l.]), hill dipterocarp forest (300–800 m a.s.l.), upper hill dipterocarp forest (800–1100 m a.s.l.), oak-laurel forest (1100–1600 m a.s.l.), and montane ericaceous forest (above 1600 m a.s.l.) (Symington, 2004). These forests are characterized by species composition. The first three forest types are mostly dominated by trees from the dipterocarpaceae family; hence, they are termed as dipterocarp forests. Montane ericaceous and oak-laurel are characterized by an abundance of trees from Fagaceae–Lauraceae and Ericaceae families, respectively [41]. They can be distinguished by a number of structural characters which include the size of canopy height, canopy layer, leaves, and the presence of vascular and non-vascular epiphytes and climbers. The montane forest also differs from lowland in having fewer and smaller emergent trees, flattish canopy surfaces, gnarled limbs, and denser sub-crowns [42]. The montane ericaceous and oak-laurel forests are moist and are characterized by a thick layer of mosses and bryophytes.

Figure 1.

Altitudinal profile of forest zones developed from climatic climax formation in Malaysia (modified from Symington [40]).

There are seven forest types that were developed based on edaphic climax formations [40]. The edaphic refers to ecological climax resulting from soil factors which are commonly persisting through cycles of climatic and physiographic change. These forests include mangrove swamp, peat swamp, freshwater swamp, beach, riparian, heath, and limestone. Mangroves occur on estuarine mud below the tide mark mainly concentrated in the west of Peninsular Malaysia [24]. Main genera of mangroves include Rhizophora, Sonneratia, Avicennia, Bruguiera, Ceriops, and Lumnitzera.

Beach forests form narrow strips of woodland, sandy, or gravel beaches along the seacoast, above the level of all but the highest tides. Calophyllum inophyllum(Bintangor laut), Syzygium grande(Kelat jambu laut), and Casuarina equisetifolia(Ru pantai) are the main common trees dominated the beach forests. Dipterocarpaceae species such as Shorea siamensis(Temak batu) has been recorded to occur in the beach forests of Pulau Rebana located at off the coast of Perlis [40].

Peat swamp forest developed on un-decomposed and partly decomposed organic matter. Over time, these create thick layers of acidic peaty soils. Most of the species are different from dry land. Dipterocarps are important components in peat swamp forests such as S. albida(Meranti merah), S. uliginosa(Meranti bakau), S. teysmanniana(Meranti bunga), S. platycarpa(Meranti paya), and A. marginata(Mersawa paya). Non-dipterocarpaceae species include Tetramerista glabra(Punah), Gonystylus bancanus(Ramin melawis), and Koompassia malaccensis(Kempas).

Riparian forests are narrow strips of vegetation in adjacent to a body of water such as a river, stream, and lake [43]. The zones of riparian forest are determined by the incidence of tidal influence, width of stream, rate of flow, and altitude. The most abundant Dipterocarpaceae is D. oblongifolius(Keruing neram). The best known non-dipterocarpaceae include Saraca thaipingensis(Gapis), Pometia pinnata(Kasai daun besar), Tristaniopsis whiteana(Pelawan), and Dysoxylum angustifolium(Maris).

Freshwater swamp forests occur in flat land, which is inundated with freshwater, either permanently or seasonally. The forests contain many of the endangered species such as D. semivestitus(Keruing padi), S. hemsleyana(Cengal pasir daun besar), V. flavida(Resak padi), H. apiculata(Giam melukut), and S. macrantha(Meranti kepong hantu) as discovered at Hutan Simpan Parit, Perak [44]. Commonly found non-dipterocarps include Alstonia spatulata(Pulai basung), Fagraea crenulata(Malabera), and Lagerstroemiaspp. (Bungor).

Heath forests are moist forest in areas with acidic and sandy soils that are extremely nutrient poor. The forests developed on pale, light-textured, and acidic sandy soils. The forests are known in Borneo as Kerangas—an Iban language means land too poor for rice growing once cleared. S. glauca(Damar laut daun kecil) occurs gregariously, other dipterocarps are H. semicuneata(Sama rupa cengal) and Vatica odorata(Resak kesat).

The association of man has resulted in destruction or interference of forests that produce a type of vegetation that is in equilibrium with the prevailing biotic factors. For example, lowland dipterocarp forests were converted into very different type of forests due to cutting, firing, grazing, or intermittent cultivation. The forests mainly contain a mixture of Schima wallichiana(Medatang gatal) and Oxytenanthera nigrociliata(bamboo), which also includes forest remnants in the form of secondary forests in all stages of development from open grassland to scrub. Some common dipterocarps found this type of forests are S. roxburghii(Meranti temak nipis), Anisopteraspp. (Mersawa), and V. cinerea(Resak laut).

Ecologically, Gelam swamp forests are related to the peat swamp forests but their floristic composition is almost entirely different. Many of secondary species exist, namely, Macaranga maingayi(Mahang) and Stenochlaena palustris(Akar paku). Fire has prevented the development of peat swamp complex and promoted predominance of the fire-resistant gelam—Melaleuca cajuputi. No dipterocarps occur in gelam freshwater swamp forest.


6. The need for sustainably managed forests

Sustainable forest management is high on both political and scientific agendas of many countries and at a global level, with much recent attention being focused on the tropical rainforest. Forest is the most biologically deserved terrestrial ecosystems within which trees are central to the habitat and environmental of other plant and animal species. Knowledge of the biology of tree flora is therefore critical in providing a sound scientific basis to the management and conservation of the world’s forest resource. By its very nature, biodiversity and its conservation are complex and multi-faceted. With respect to forest, biodiversity may be viewed at the level of the forest community and constituent population of species.

The emphasis on conservation often has one dimension, traditionally focused on the establishment of national park for the protection of fauna or particular ecosystems with little regard for hierarchy of organization and the spatial and temporal dynamic of biological processes [40]. Deforestation continues to keep forest stand, and sustainable management of forest ecosystems for the future has become a global environmental imperative. Within this, effective management of forest genetic resources is a key element in the future forest conservation.


7. Biodiversity of forest

Biodiversity is referred to as the variety of plants, animals, and microorganisms that exist, the genes they contain, and the ecosystems they live in. The diversity of life that a tree can support is incredible. A single tree in the tropical rainforest can house up to 2000 different species of insects, birds, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, fungi, mosses, and epiphytic plants. Trees are an important component of biodiversity. The tropical rain forests are blessed with abundant biodiversity and are known to have more species per unit area than temperate areas and biodiversity decreases with increasing altitudes [41]. Tropical rain forests contain the mixture of species as compared with temperate forests which tend to be dominated by one species.

The status of biodiversity tropical rainforest as elsewhere has always been dynamic. Over millions of years, under natural conditions, some species have increased in variety or numbers and others have been reduced or lost. Some people wonder why we should be worried about conserving biodiversity now, in particular, when the world has gone on more or less as it is for so long. But natural habitats everywhere are being destroyed as never before and as habitats are lost, we are also losing various types of plants and animals. No one would have thought, even a few years ago, that some members from the family dipterocarpaceae in Malaysia could be endangered, but now it is. With the rapid land use and cover changes, there are concerns that anthropogenic changes to environment are leading to too many of forest species being lost and biodiversity becoming seriously depleted.

Biodiversity is important because it helps to keep the environment in a natural balance. An ecosystem which is species rich is more resilient and adaptable to external stress than the one in which the range of species is limited. In a system where species are limited, the loss or temporary reduction of any one could disrupt a complex food chain with serious effects on other species in that same system.

Biodiversity is the key issue to natural conservation, and plant diversity is one of the important components of the biological diversity [45, 46, 47]. The diversity of tree species is fundamental to total forest biodiversity. The central biodiversity in the world are tropical and subtropical forest [42]. Central and western Amazonia Tropical rain forests have been considered as the two central mega-diversity areas in the world [48, 49], and the other tropical rain forests could be found in central Africa, west Africa, Madagascar, and Indo-Malaysian area [50, 51].


8. Conclusions and recommendation

Any initiatives involved in sustainable forest management and conservation are essential to human well-being. Therefore, to ensure a successful conservation effort, an understanding on the significance roles of forests among general public is extremely important. Promoting and raising awareness to the public toward forest resource management are crucial for the general public to be aware on their importance, roles, and threats. Understanding their intrinsic values and variability within and among living organisms and the systems they inhabit is critical to the survival of the planet, species, and mankind. In order to spread the message, the use of social media can be an effective way to disseminate the information far and wide. Another way to communicate various aspects of forest (i.e., species of flora and fauna, genetic, ecosystem, and environmental diversity), a street mural can be constructed in a public space as an approach of communicating to raise awareness to a public audience. Recognizing the importance of forest management and conservation is necessary toward achieving sustainable development in terms of contribution to species conservation, provision of water supply, food security, and poverty alleviation. These can be incorporated into education curriculum beginning from the primary level. Providing capacity building to the teachers on sustainable forest management will enhance the effectiveness of teaching and learning.

Strengthening governments’ efforts at all levels for the full implementation of the National Forestry Policy, especially through increased allocations of human and technical resources and financial could contribute toward the success of sustainable forest management strategy. Coordination efforts among all agencies responsible in the development of policy, planning, and natural resources management are important to ensure the ecosystem approaches and objectives of forest conservation can be incorporated in sectors such as forest management, agriculture, transportation, and water management. These coordinate efforts can reduce the significant loss of forest resources in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Establishment of protected areas is extremely important in particular for endangered species and sensitive habitats. The current terrestrial protected areas in Peninsular Malaysia of 1.8 million ha are not sufficient for the implementation of full range conservation biodiversity efforts. More protected areas should be established to increase more habitats for rare and threatened species and sensitive habitats. In addition, Malaysia should establish uniform national protected areas system operating in the country. Currently, the protected areas are managed by different networks and governed by different laws with varying degrees of protection status. Protected areas need to be better located and effectively managed to deal with problems of such as illegal logging, human settlements, unsustainable tourism, encroachment, and challenges in climate change.

The setting up of natural history museum (government- or privately-run) can contribute to demonstrate and educate about the importance of forest management and conservation. In addition, besides raising a greater awareness, the collection of specimens can be used for research and education by the students, communities, and relevant stakeholders. The museum can be used not only as a significant repository for specimens of the threatened animal and plant populations but also serves as a primary source of information about historical aspects of biodiversity at the national, regional, and global levels.


  1. 1. Mackey B. Wildlife, Fire and Future Climate: A Forest Ecosystems Analysis. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 2002. 188p
  2. 2. Young A, Boshier D, Boyle T. Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice. Melbourne: CRISO Publishing; 2000
  3. 3. Lowet CH, Wirt EB, Rosen PC. Vegetation Structure and Diversity in Natural Communities at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1994
  4. 4. Salisbury FB, Ross CW. Plant Physiology. 4th ed. Belmont: Wadswoth Publishing Company; 1992. 682 p
  5. 5. Montagnini F, Nair PKR. Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems. 2004;61-62:281-295
  6. 6. Ahrends A, Burgess ND, Milledge SAH, Bulling MT, Fisher B, Smart JCR, et al. Predictable waves of sequential forest degradation and biodiversity loss spreading from an African city. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(33):14556-14561
  7. 7. Kenzo T, Ichie T, Hattori D, Kendawang JJ. Change in above- and belowground biomass in early successional tropical secondary forests after shifting cultivation in Sarawak, Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management. 2010;260:875-882
  8. 8. Leroux SJ, Krawchuk MG, Schmiegelow F, Cumming SG, Lisgo K, Anderson LG, et al. Global protected areas and UICN designation: Do the categories match the conditions. Biological Conservation. 2010;143:609-616
  9. 9. Gardingen PRV, Clearwater MJ, Nifinluri T, Effendi R, Rusmantoro W, Noor M, et al. Impact of logging on the regeneration of lowland dipterocarp forest in Indonesia. Commonwealth Forest Review. 1998;77:71-82
  10. 10. Hardiwinoto S, Pudyatmoko S, Sabarnurdin S. Tingkat ketahanan dan proses regenerasi vegetasi setelah letusan gunung merapi. Manusia dan Lingkungan. 1998;15:47-59
  11. 11. Appiah M. Changes in plant species composition within a planted forest in a deciduous agroecosystem in Ghana. Agroforestry Systems. 2011;85(1):57-74
  12. 12. Amlin G. Characteristics of sapling compositions and soil nutrients in logged-over forest at Krau Wildlife Reserve, Pahang [M. Sc. thesis]. Universiti Teknologi MARA; 2014. 120p (unpublished)
  13. 13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Global Forest Resources Assessment (Main Report). Rome: FAO; 2010
  14. 14. National Research Council (U.S.). Physics Survey Committee on Managing Global Genetic Resource: Agricultural Imperatives. Forest Trees. Washington DC: National Academy Science; 1991
  15. 15. Siminski A, Alfredo CF, Raymond PG, Ademir RR, Maur’icio SR. Secondary forest succession in themata atlantica, Brazil: Floristic and phytosociological trends. Ecology. 2011;2011:1-9
  16. 16. Johnston JM, Crossley JRDA. Forest ecosystem recovery in the southeast US: Soil ecology as an essential component of ecosystem management. Forest Ecology and Management. 2002;155:187-203
  17. 17. D’Oliveira MVN, Ribas LA. Forest regeneration in artificial gaps twelve years after canopy opening in acre state western Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management. 2011;261:1722-1731
  18. 18. Carter WK, Fredericksen TS. Tree seedling and sapling density and deer browsing incidence on recently logged and mature non-industrial private forestlands in Virginia, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 2007;242:671-677
  19. 19. Finzi AC, Canham CD. Sapling growth in response to light and nitrogen availability in a southern New England forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 2000;131(1):153-165
  20. 20. Duchesneau R, Lesage I, Messier C, Morin H. Effect of light and intraspecific competition and growth and crown morphology of two size classes of understory balsam fir saplings. Forest Regeneration and Management. 2001;140:215-225
  21. 21. Mengel K, Kirkby EA, Konsergaten H, Appel T. Principles of Plant Nutrition. 5th ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001
  22. 22. Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change (IPCC). Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. 2009. Available from:[Accessed November 18, 2015]
  23. 23. Natural Resources and Environment (NRE). Jumlah kes pembalakan haram yang dilaporkan sejak tahun 2006 hingga 2008 mengikut negeri. 2010. Available from:[Accessed November 14, 2011]
  24. 24. Suratman MN. Carbon sequestration potential of mangroves in Southeast Asia. In: Bravo F, Jandl R, LeMay V, von Gadow K, editors. Managing Forest Ecosystems: The Challenge of Climate Change, Berlin: Springer; 2008. pp. 297-315
  25. 25. Mohd Zaki NA, Latif ZA, Suratman MN, Zainal MZ. Modelling the carbon stocks estimation of the tropical lowland dipterocarp forest using LiDAR and remotely sensed data. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2016;III-7:187-194
  26. 26. Mohd Zaki NA, Latif ZA, Suratman MN. Modelling above-ground live trees biomass and carbon stock estimation of tropical lowland dipterocarp forest: Integration of field-based and remotely sensed estimates. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2018;39(8):2312-2340
  27. 27. Latif ZA, Blackburn GA. The effects of gap size on some microclimate variables during late summer and autumn in a temperate broadleaved deciduous forest. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2010;54(2):119-129
  28. 28. Castilho CVD, Magnusson WE, Araujo RNOD, Luizao RCC, Luizao FJ, Lima AP, et al. Variation in aboveground tree live biomass in a central Amazonia Forest. Effect of Soil and Topography. 2006;234:85-96
  29. 29. Nogueira EM, Fearnside PM, Nelson BW, Barbosa RI, Keizer EWH. Estimate of forest biomass in the Brazilian amazon: New allometric equations and adjustment to biomass from wood-volume inventories. Forest Ecology and Management. 2008;256:853-867
  30. 30. Kenzo T, Ichie T, Hattori D, Kendawang JJ. Change in above- and belowground biomass in early successional tropical secondary forests after shifting cultivation in Sarawak, Malayisa. Forest Ecology and Management. 2010;260:875-882
  31. 31. Niiyama K, Kajimoto T, Matsuura Y, Yamashita T, Matsuo N, Yashiro Y, et al. Estimation of roots biomass based on excavation of individual root systems in primary dipterocarp forest in Pasoh forest reserve, Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 2010;26:271-284
  32. 32. Latiff A, Faridah-Hanum I, Ibrahim AZ, Jaman R. Biomass and floristics of Sayap-Kinabalu Park, Sabah. ASEAN Review of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation (ARBEC). 1998. pp. 1-7. Article I
  33. 33. Hamzah MZ, Arifin A, Zaidey AK, Azirim AN, Zahari I, Hazandy AH, et al. Characterizing soil nutrient status and growth performance of planted dipterocarpand non-dipterocarp on degraded forest land in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Applied Science. 2009;9:4215-4223
  34. 34. Sands R. Forestry in a Global Context. United Kingdom: CABI Publishing; 2005. 262p
  35. 35. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Soil Map of the World. Paris: UNESCO; 1974
  36. 36. Ng FSP, Low CM, Mat Asri NS. Endemic trees of the Malay Peninsula. In: FRIM Research Pamphlet No. 106. Kepong: Forest Research Institute Malaysia; 1990
  37. 37. Wong KM. Patterns of plant endemism and rarity in Borneo and the Malay Peninsular, In: Peng CI, Lowry PP, editors. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Floras of Asia and the Pacific Rim, Monograph Series No. 16. Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica; 1998. pp. 139-169
  38. 38. Primack RB, Corlett R. Tropical Rain Forests: An Ecological and Biogeographical Comparison. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2005
  39. 39. Schulte A, Schöne D. Dipterocarp Forest Ecosystems: Towards Sustainable Management. Berlin: World Scientific Publishing Co.; 1996
  40. 40. Symington CF. Forester’s manual of Dipterocarps. In: Malayan Forest Records No. 16. Kuala Lumpur: Forest Research Institute Malaysia and Malaysian Nature Society; 2004
  41. 41. Suratman MN, Hamid ANH, Md Sabri MD, Kusin M, Yamani SAK. Changes in tree species distribution along altitudinal gradients of montane forests in Malaysia. In: Öztürk M, Hakeem KR, Farida-Hanum I, Efe R, editors. Climate Change Impacts on High-Altitude Ecosystems. Switzerland: Springer; 2015. pp. 491-522
  42. 42. Whitmore TC. Tropical Rainforest of the Far East. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1984
  43. 43. Suratman MN, Mohamad R, Abdullah Z, MAM A. Kuala Keniam: Nature’s Treasure Trove in the Heartland. UiTM Press; 2011. 134p
  44. 44. Suratman MN, Noh NAM, Nawi L. Spatial distribution and demographic structure of the critically endangered Dipterocarpaceae in fragmented habitat in Malaysia. In: Poster presented at the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO). Salt Lake City, USA; 5-11 October 2014
  45. 45. Dubois JCL. The present status of research into management of the rainforest of Amazonian Brazil. In: Mez-Pompa A, Whitmore TC, Hadley M, editors. Rain Forest Regeneration and Management. Paris: Parthenon; 1991. pp. 431-436
  46. 46. Asner GP, Keller M, Pereira R, Zweede JC, Silva JNM. Canopy damage and recovery after selective logging in Amazonia: Field and satellite studies. Ecological Applications. 2004;14:280-298
  47. 47. Ferozet SM, Yoshimura K, Hagihara A. Architectural stratification and woody species diversity of a subtropical forest grown in a limestone habitat in Okinawa Island Japan. World Academic of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2006;17:11-20
  48. 48. Gentry AH. Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environment and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 1988;75(1):1-34
  49. 49. Ter Steege HN, Pitman D, Sabatier H, Castellanos P, Van der HDC, Daly M, et al. A spatial model of tree alpha-diversity and tree density for the amazon. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2003;12:2255-2277
  50. 50. Smith RL. Ecology and Field Biology. New York: Harper and Row; 1990
  51. 51. Odum EP. Dasar-dasar ekologi. Indonesia: Gajah Mada University Press; 1993. p. 1993

Written By

Mohd Nazip Suratman and Zulkiflee Abd Latif

Reviewed: September 10th, 2019 Published: February 26th, 2020