Open access

Introductory Chapter: Sources, Health Impact, and Environment Effect of Hydrocarbons

Written By

Muharrem Ince and Olcay Kaplan Ince

Published: 04 December 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89039

From the Edited Volume

Hydrocarbon Pollution and its Effect on the Environment

Edited by Muharrem Ince and Olcay Kaplan Ince

Chapter metrics overview

1,686 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Pollution control and environmental protection have become a worldwide issue of concern. The aliphatic hydrocarbons (AHs), aromatic hydrocarbons (ArHs) such as benzene and toluene, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), including benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[ghi]pyrilene, and benzo[a]pyrene, are persistent organic pollutants (POPs) for ecosystem. These hazardous pollutants are risky because of mutagenic, carcinogenic, immunotoxic, and teratogenic effects. These components threaten all life forms ranging from microorganisms to humans when they are released into the environment especially via human activities. The aim of this study is to provide up-to-date information on the various hydrocarbons present in the environment, routes of exposure, and their adverse impact on environment and human health. There are two major categories that contain hydrocarbons; these are aliphatic and aromatic compounds (Figure 1). While aromatic hydrocarbons contain at least one benzene ring, the other group called as nonaromatic or aliphatic does not contain it. The basic structure that forms aromatic hydrocarbons is the benzene ring. On the other hand, petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) comprised of carbon and hydrogen atoms which are organic compounds. They have varying structural configurations with physical and chemical characteristics. They can be broadly classified as gasoline range organics (GROs) and diesel range organics (DROs). The first group that is called GROs comprises monoaromatic hydrocarbons including toluene, benzene, and ethylbenzene. This category has short-chain alkanes ranging from 6 to 10 C. The second group that is called DROs has longer C-chain alkanes from 10 to 40 C, and this category contains hydrophobic chemicals including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [1, 2]. These compounds, in contaminated ecosystem, are considered to be one of the most stable hydrocarbon forms. The PAH molecular weight is the main factor to determine their origin’s level in earth. There are two PAH sources: natural and anthropogenic. Both sources are important and remarkable. Because of natural and anthropogenic activities, these pollutants are irregularly distributed throughout various levels and locations to all over the world. Various studies have revealed that PAHs have carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic effect on human health [3, 4]. The main skeleton of these compounds, classified as organic pollutants, consists of two or more benzene rings. The extensive nonpolar contaminants are detected in petrochemical products including coal, oil, and tar. Another significant source of hydrocarbons is also incomplete combustion [5, 6, 7, 8]. According to researchers, because of ecotoxicological risks and potential sources, 26 AHs and 16 PAHs causing concerns for ecosystem are categorized as carcinogen or mutagen by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). These ecotoxicological compounds include benzo[a]pyrene, benz[a]anthracene, etc. The USEPA mentioned that there are 126 major pollutants in the environment, 25 of them were threatening and 5 were extremely dangerous for the environment. For example, some health institutions including the USEPA and International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) mentioned that benzo[a]pyrene that is a member of PAHs is carcinogenic for animals and humans [7, 9, 10, 11].

Figure 1.

Hydrocarbon classification [42].


2. Sources of hydrocarbons

The major hydrocarbon sources are petroleum and petroleum combustion; however, their emission sources can be classified as phytogenic (natural), petrogenic, and pyrogenic. To recognize pollutant type and migration, circumstances play a key role for their origin [12]. Hydrocarbons can enter to the environment via dispersion, evaporation, dissolution, adsorption, and other processes including petroleum and petroleum combustion [13, 14]. Petrogenic sources generally pollute groundwater and threaten the environment because petrogenic source products including lubricants and fuels leak from the tanks and release into the environment [15]. The USEPA specified 16 priority PAHs in a petroleum source, namely, alkylated naphthalene, dibenzothiophene, fluorene, phenanthrene, and chrysene series [16]. The pyrogenic PAHs are produced during the fuel combustion because there are suitable conditions that are high temperature and absence of oxygen. Also, pyrolysis of fat and incomplete combustion besides power plants are the most prominent hydrocarbon sources [17]. Hydrocarbons and their derivatives are a significant environmental concern due to their extensive use and toxic mechanism action, and these products are highly available in aquatic medium [18, 19]. Industrial activities and chemical plants produce PAHs, and they are considered as petrogenic and natural PAH sources [20]. During fat pyrolysis and incomplete combustion processes, anthropogenic emissions of PAHs are released into the environment [7, 8]. On the other hand, PAH sources were classified as natural, industrial, domestic, agricultural, and mobile by Ravindra et al. [21]. Hydrocarbons are usually generated by various sources including wildfires, oil seepages, volcanic activities, and other sources. Moreover, these natural hydrocarbons are mainly produced during organic material chemical conversions in microorganisms, fungi, plants, sediments, etc. [16, 22, 23, 24].


3. Health threat and environmental impact assessment

Recent studies have recognized the effects of toxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity of hydrocarbons. Increasing contamination level of these pollutants in environment especially in aquatic media is a significant environmental concern because they are used frequently and show environmental toxic effects [25, 26, 27, 28]. The USEPA and World Health Organization (WHO) classified PAHs and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) as POP groups in marine and coastal environment [29, 30]. The most of PAHs have been banned by health authorities due to their long half-life, wide distribution, and high bioaccumulation in the food chain, as well as their potential for toxicity to humans, because these compounds are highly lipid soluble and these toxic chemicals can bioaccumulate from environment to the gastrointestinal tract of mammals [25, 31]. When animals and humans are exposed to hydrocarbons, it is probable that they have various health problems because they are vulnerable and endangered against these components. Research on some hydrocarbons including benzo[a]pyrene, pyrene, and benzo[a]anthracene have revealed that these compounds have carcinogenic and mutagenic effect [7, 8, 11, 32, 33]. During certain time frameworks and under given conditions, assessment of environmental impact is a very important systematic process. To measure the actual or potential impacts including psychosocial, physical, microbiological, and chemical hazard on the health case of humans or environment has a vital role [34, 35, 36]. After the obtained series of critical data from monitoring studies, quantitative environmental impact assessment (EIA) can be made. To provide better view for evaluating POP exposure and their adverse health effect on environment and human requires critical data obtained from the environment [37, 38, 39]. The EIA has several key stages, and it covers the risk level of all types of ecosystems. These stages are summarized in Figure 2. The EIA includes all activities which attempt to analyze and evaluate the effects of human stresses on natural and anthropogenic environments [36, 40, 41, 42, 43].

Figure 2.

Environmental impact assessment stages.


4. Conclusion and future perspectives

The main aim of this study is to provide contemporary information on a variety of hydrocarbons present in the environment, exposure routes, and their adverse effects on ecosystem. Hydrocarbon sources, human health impact, and effect on the environment have been thoroughly investigated and presented. In light of this information, generated by natural or anthropogenic sources, hydrocarbons’ mutagenic, teratogenic, and carcinogenic characteristics have caused serious concerns in today’s environment; thus, various remediation techniques are needed to remove these hazardous chemicals from the environment. Therefore, some suggestions were presented as:

  • All health authorities should develop standard methods for analysis of hydrocarbons and share it for all researchers.

  • Researchers should develop more various remediation techniques available for hydrocarbons, and they should be applicable on every aspect of the environment such as soil, water, and air.

  • After the treatment process, developed remediation techniques should not leave behind any second pollutant.

  • Ecological risk assessment should be evaluated using the risk quotient.

  • Techniques for removing hydrocarbons from the environment should be developed, but it is important that preventive measures can be taken to prevent these pollutants from entering the food chain and environment.


  1. 1. Kamath R, Rentz JA, Schnoor JL, Alvarez PJJ. Phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils: Principles and applications. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. 2004;151:447-478
  2. 2. Gkorezis P, Daghio M, Franzetti A, Van Hamme JD, Sillen W, Vangronsveld J. The interaction between plants and bacteria in the remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: An environmental perspective. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:1836
  3. 3. Gan S, Lau EV, Ng HK. Remediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009;172(2-3):532-549
  4. 4. Gitipour S, Ghasemi S, Shasemzade R. Methods for treatment of PAH contaminated soils; review and comparison. In: 4th International Conference on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development. Jamshoro, Pakistan; 2016
  5. 5. Connell DW. Basic Concepts of Environmental Chemistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2005
  6. 6. Ince M, Yaman M. High performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for determination of benzo[a]pyrene in grilled meat foods. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 2012;24(8):3391-3395
  7. 7. Ince M, Kaplan Ince O, Yaman M. Optimization of an analytical method for determination of pyrene in smoked meat products. Food Analytical Methods. 2017;10:2060-2067
  8. 8. Kaplan Ince O, Ince M. Using box–Behnken design approach to investigate benzo[a]anthracene formation in smoked cattle meat samples and its’ risk assessment. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2019;56:1287-1294
  9. 9. Jin D, Jiang X, Jing X, Ou Z. Effects of concentration, head group, and structure of surfactants on the degradation of phenanthrene. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007;144(1-2):215-221
  10. 10. Bansal V, Kim KH. Review of PAH contamination in food products and their health hazards. Environment International. 2015;84:26-38
  11. 11. Ince M, Kaplan OI. An overview the toxicology of benzo(a)pyrene as biomarker for human health: A mini-review. Novel Techniques in Nutrition and Food Science. 2019;4(2):NTNF.000580.2019
  12. 12. Douglas GA, Emsbo Mattingly S, Stout SA, Uhler AD, McCarthy KJ. Chemical finger printing methods. In: Murphy BL, Morrison RD, editors. Introduction to Environmental Forensics. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Academic; 2007. pp. 311-454
  13. 13. Kim D, Kumfer BM, Anastasio C, Kennedy IM, Young TM. Environmental aging of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on soot and its effect on source identification. Chemosphere. 2009;76(8):1075-1081
  14. 14. Wang Z, Fingas M, Lambert P, Zeng G, Yang C, Hollebone B. Characterization and identification of the Detroit River mystery oil spill (2002). Journal of Chromatography. A. 2004;1038(1-2):201-214
  15. 15. Zakaria MP, Takada H, Tsutsumi S, Ohno K, Yamada J, Kouno E, et al. Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in rivers and estuaries in Malaysia: A widespread input of petrogenic PAHs. Environmental Science and Technology. 2002;36(9):1907-1918
  16. 16. Stogiannidis E, Laane R. Source characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by using their molecular indices: An overview of possibilities. In: Whitacre D, editor. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (Continuation of Residue Reviews). Vol. 234. Springer, Cham; 2015
  17. 17. Saber D, Mauro D, Sirivedhin T. Environmental forensics investigation in sediments near a former manufactured gas plant site. Environmental Forensics. 2006;7(1):65-75
  18. 18. Hailwood M, King D, Leoz E, Maynard R, Menichini E, Moorcroft S, Pacyna J et al. Ambient Air Pollution by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PAH. Position Paper Annexes. 2001
  19. 19. Wickramasinghe AP, Karunaratne DGGP, Sivakanesan R. PM10-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Concentrations, source characterization and estimating their risk in urban, suburban and rural areas in Kandy, Sri Lanka. Atmospheric Environment. 2011;45(16):2642-2650
  20. 20. Osman KT. Soils, Principles, Properties and Management. Netherlands: Springer; 2013
  21. 21. Ravindra K, Mittal AK, Grieken R. Health risk assessment of urban suspended particulate matter with special reference to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A review. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2001;16(3):169-190
  22. 22. Boll ES, Christensen JH, Holm PE. Quantification and source identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediment, soil, and water spinach from Hanoi, Vietnam. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2008;10(2):261-269
  23. 23. Bakhtiari AR, Zakaria MP, Yaziz MI, Lajis MNH, Bi X, Rahim MCA. Vertical distribution and source identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in anoxic sediment cores of Chini Lake, Malaysia: Perylene as indicator of land plant-derived hydrocarbons. Applied Geochemistry. 2009;24(9):1777-1787
  24. 24. Tobiszewski M, Namieśnik J. PAH diagnostic ratios for the identification of pollution emission sources. Environmental Pollution. 2012;162:110-119
  25. 25. Haffner D, Schecter A. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs): A primer for practicing clinicians. Current Environmental Health Reports. 2014;1:123-131
  26. 26. Long M, Bonefeld- Jørgensen EC. Dioxin-like activity in environmental and human samples from Greenland and Denmark. Chemosphere. 2012;89:919-928
  27. 27. Tavakoly Sany SB, Hashim R, Rezayi M, Salleh A, Rahman MA, Safari O, et al. Human health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from consumption of blood cockle and exposure to contaminated sediments and water along the Klang Strait, Malaysia. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2014;84:268-279
  28. 28. U.S.EPA. EPA’s Reanalysis of Key Issues Related to Dioxin Toxicity and Response to NAS Comments. Vol. 1. Washington, DC; 2012
  29. 29. Tavakoly Sany SB, Hashim R, Salleh A, Rezayi M, Mehdinia A, Safari O. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in coastal sediment of Klang Strait, Malaysia: Distribution pattern, risk assessment and sources. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94907
  30. 30. WHO State of the science of endocrine disrupting chemicals 2012. United Nations Environment Programme and the World Health Organization. Geneva; 2013
  31. 31. Ahmadzadeh S, Kassim A, Rezayi M, Rounaghi GH. Thermodynamic study of the complexation of p-isopropylcalix [6] arene with Cs+ cation in dimethylsulfoxide-acetonitrile binary media. Molecules. 2011;16:8130-8142
  32. 32. Liu K, Han W, Pan WP, Riley JT. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emissions from a coal-fired pilot FBC system. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2001;84(2-3):175-188
  33. 33. Samanta SK, Singh OV, Jain RK. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Environmental pollution and bioremediation. Trends in Biotechnology. 2002;20(6):243-248
  34. 34. Rezayi M, Heng LY, Abdi MM, Noran NM, Esmaeili C. A thermodynamic study on the complex formation between tris (2-pyridyl) methylamine (tpm) with Fe+2, Fe+3, Cu+2 and Cr+3 cations in water, acetonitrile binary solutions using the conductometric method. International Journal of Electrochemical Science. 2013;8:6922-6932
  35. 35. Saadati N, Abdullah MP, Zakaria Z, Tavakoly Sany SB, Rezayi M, Hassonizadeh H. Limit of detection and limit of quantification development procedures for organochlorine pesticides analysis in water and sediment matrices. Chemistry Central Journal. 2013;7:1-10
  36. 36. Tavakoly Sany SB, Hashim R, Rezayi M, Salleh A, Safari O. A review of strategies to monitor water and sediment quality for a sustainability assessment of marine environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2014;21:813-821
  37. 37. Law RJ, Bersuder P, Barry J, Deaville R, Reid RJ, Jepson PD. Chlorobiphenyls in the blubber of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from the UK: Levels and trends 1991-2005. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2010;60:470-473
  38. 38. Rezayi M, Karazhian R, Abdollahi Y, Narimani L, Sany SBT, Ahmadzadeh S, et al. Titanium (III) cation selective electrode based on synthesized tris(2pyridyl) methylamine ionophore and its application in water samples. Scientific Reports. 2014;4:4664
  39. 39. Tavakoly Sany SB, Salleh A, Sulaiman AH, Sasekumar A, Tehrani G, Rezayi M. Distribution characteristics and ecological risk of heavy metals in surface sediments of West Port, Malaysia. Environmental Protection Engineering. 2012;38:139-155
  40. 40. Jazani RK, Tehrani GM, Hashim R. TPH-PAH contamination and benthic health in the surface sediments of Bandar-E-imam Khomeini-Northwest of the Persian Gulf. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering and Technology. 2013;2:213-225
  41. 41. Tehrani GM, Sany SBT, Hashim R, Salleh A. Predictive environmental impact assessment of total petroleum hydrocarbons in petrochemical wastewater effluent and surface sediment. Environment and Earth Science. 2016;75:177
  42. 42. Gitipour S, Sorial GA, Ghasemi S, Bazyari M. Treatment technologies for PAH-contaminated sites: A critical review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2018;190:546
  43. 43. EHSC Environmental risk assessment. Environment, Health and Safety Committee [EHSC] of the Royal Society of Chemistry. 2008

Written By

Muharrem Ince and Olcay Kaplan Ince

Published: 04 December 2019