Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Physical and Chemical Modifications in Starch Structure and Reactivity

Written By

Haq Nawaz, Rashem Waheed, Mubashir Nawaz and Dure Shahwar

Submitted: March 31st, 2019 Reviewed: July 28th, 2019 Published: March 11th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88870

Chapter metrics overview

2,561 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Starch is a naturally occurring glucose homo-polysaccharide of nutritional, pharmaceutical, and industrial importance. The complex polymeric structure and poor solubility of native starch in water limits their importance at pharmaceutical and industrial level. The structure, reactivity, and functionality of the native starch can be modified by physical, chemical, enzymatic, and biotechnological methods. Various physical modifications techniques, including the thermal, radio-thermal, freezing and thawing, annealing, high-pressure, ultrasonic, and pulsed electric field treatment, and chemical modifications, including oxidation, etherification, esterification, cationization, cross-linking, and graft polymerization, have been found to change the surface properties, polarity and linearity of the molecular chains, the degree of substitution, the polymeric, granular, and crystalline structure, amylose to amylopectin ratio, solubility, viscosity, pasting, gelatinization, swelling, water absorption, and emulsifying properties of starch. The structural changes have resulted in the improvement of thermal and freeze-thaw stability, viscosity, solubility, water binding capacity, swelling power, gelling ability, and enzymatic digestibility of starch. The exposure of reactive functional groups after physical or chemical modification modifies the reactivity of starch toward water, oil, acids, enzymes, and other chemical species. These modification techniques have led to some revolutionary changes in reactivity, functionality, and application of starch in various fields.


  • starch structure
  • starch reactivity
  • functional properties
  • chemical modifications
  • physical modification

1. Introduction

Starch is the most important polysaccharide as well as storage polymer of plants abundantly found in leaves, stem, fruit, seed, tubers, and roots of various plants. Starch is produced in chloroplast and amyloplast of plant cells by photosynthesis, stored as a source of food and energy. It is stored in plant cell during tubers sprouting, germination of seeds and fruit maturation [1, 2]. Major sources of starch included cereals grains such as wheat, barley, rice and corn, the seeds of the legumes such as beans, garden peas, chickpeas, and pulses, the tubers such as potato, sweet potato, ginger, turmeric and groundnut and immature fruits and vegetables [3, 4, 5].

Starch has great nutritional, pharmaceutical and industrial significance due to its unique physical, chemical and functional and nutritional properties. Starch is a good source of nutrition as it is hydrolyzed into glucose on digestion by α-amylase. The metabolic oxidation of glucose provides instant energy which is utilized in various metabolic and other cellular activities [6, 7, 8]. Due to the higher concentration of amylose, starch is used as an excipient to activate drugs and act as an encapsulating agent facilitating the deliver the drug to its target organ [9, 10, 11]. As a natural polymer, starch is used to replace plastic in the coating of food materials and production edible films in the food industry. It is usually mixed with food components to protect them from mechanical damage, to extend their half-life and to improve their appearance. It is also used as a recyclable component for molds production in the food industry. It is added as a bulking agent in food and pharmaceutical formulations to enhance handling and stability as well as preservation of components texture and to enhance their viscosity [12, 13, 14]. Moreover, due to water-resistant nature of amylose, it can form excellent films due to which it has great importance at industrial level [15].

1.1 Starch structure and composition

Chemically starch is a homopolymer of α-Glucopyranose units with the chemical formula (C6H10O5)n. Starch is composed of two types of polymer chains known as amylose and amylopectin. Amylose possesses a linear structure with α1–4 glycosidic linkage while amylopectin possesses a branched structure with α1–4 as well as α1–6 glycosidic linkages (Figure 1) [16, 17]. Normally, starch consists of relatively lower amount of amylose (20–30%) than that of amylopectin (70–80%). The ratio of amylose and amylopectin affects the starch structure in terms of crystallinity, size of the granules and chemical nature and arrangement of polymers within the granule. The studies have shown that the fine structure of amylopectin plays an important role in the functionality of starch. It is the relative concentration of amylose and amylopectin which determines the physical and functional properties of starch. The starches containing low amylopectin have been found to show the quick onset of gelation as compared to low amylose starches. The starches containing relatively high amylose content have been found to form comparatively hard and rigid gels and strong films while high amylopectin starches are dispersed easily in water and form soft gels and weak films [15, 18, 19, 20, 21]. The amylose to amylopectin ratio also influences the nutritional quality of starch that is assessed by its rate of digestion and glycemic index (GI) as an indicator to check the quality of carbohydrates [22].

Figure 1.

Structure of amylose and amylopectin in starch.

1.2 Functional properties of starch

Based on its compact structure, starch possesses diverse functional properties and applications in biomedical and industrial fields. Due to polymeric and branching nature starch shows relatively less solubility in water and possesses relatively lower ability to absorb water and oil. Starch shows good iodine-binding ability. It also possesses a relatively high viscosity and good swelling power and gelatinization abilities. It also shows good pasting properties with consistency, smoothness, and clarity and can form thin films. Starch shows freeze–thaw and cold storage stabilities which make it a favorable candidate for various food and industrial formulations. Starch is resistant to moderate temperature and pressure but susceptible to acid and enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis. However, the native starches show relatively lower values of enzymatic digestibility [18, 23, 24, 25, 26]. To increase its nutritional, biomedical and industrial importance, the functional properties of starch can be improved under the influence of various physical and chemical factors.

1.3 Factors affecting the structure and properties of starch

The native starches possess a complex granular and crystalline structures which differ in size in various plants [2, 16]. Several factors have been reported which affect the structural, physical, chemical, and functional properties of starch. Starch is sensitive to very high and very low pH, high temperature, high pressure, and osmotic pressure, light, radiation, mechanical stress, and ultrasound waves. Heating treatment of starch in aqueous medium has been found to cause transition of amorphous form to crystalline starch resulting in gelatinization of starch. The treatment with microwave radiation has been found to affect the crystalline structure and functional properties of starch which is linked with the loss of birefringence and crystallinity due to deformation during modification [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. Interaction of starch with water and oil also affects the properties of starch. The absorption of water results in the breakdown of amylose-amylopectin linkages, loss of crystallinity and swelling of starch granules. The swelling of starch granules is reversible at the initial stage but irreversible after a certain period [37]. Freezing at low temperature after gelatinization results in recrystallization of starch granules and increases the resistance and hardness of starch [38].

Along with these physical factors, some chemical factors have been also reported to affect the structure and functions of starch. Various oxidizing agents, hydroxy or carboxy derivatives of hydrocarbons, some carboxylic acids, phosphates, different acid, and base cross-linkers and synthetic polymers, and some cationic molecules are the major chemical factors which have been reported to modify the structure and properties of native starches [39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46]. Starch is also susceptible to acids and enzymatic hydrolysis which results in degradation of amylose and amylopectin and alter the morphology and surface properties of granules leading to the change in functional value of starch [47, 48, 49]. These physical and chemical factors have helped improve the functional quality of starch to obtain better results while used in various food and industrial formulations.


2. Starch modification

Any changes in the structure of starch molecule caused by various environmental, operational and processing factors are termed as modifications. These modifications may exert either positive or negative effects on the structure and functionality of starch molecules. The native starches obtained from various plants are diverse in their structure and functions. To enhance the structural and functional quality of these starches and achieve better results in various formulations, the researchers suggest some modification in their structure. Several studies have been reported on the improvement of functional quality of starch by physical, chemical or mechanical modifications [23, 43, 45, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58]. However, some environmental and processing factors may reduce the functional quality of starch by various modifications during storage and processing [57]. The physical modifications are comparatively safe and preferable over chemical modifications as the later involve the changes in the chemical structure of the molecule which limit its use in most of the formulations.

2.1 Physical modification of starch

Physical modifications involve the changes in the morphology and three-dimensional structure of starch under the influence of some physical factors such as milling, moisture, temperature, pressure, pH, radiation, pulse-electric field, ultrasonic waves, etc. Physical modifications result in the variation in particle size, surface properties, solubility index and functional properties such as water absorption, swelling capacity, pasting and gelation ability of starch. These modifications directly influence the functional quality and selectivity and suitability of the modified starch for various nutritional, pharmaceutical and industrial formulations. Several studies have been reported on the physical modification of starch using different techniques. The commonly used methods of physical modification include superheating of starch, thermal inhibition treatment, UV and gamma irradiation, microwave treatment, high pressure, osmotic pressure and instantaneous controlled pressure treatment, mechanical activation by stirring ball mill, treatment by pulsed electric field, micronization in vacuum ball mill, annealing and freeze–thaw treatment [28, 29, 31, 33, 51, 53, 55, 56, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68]. The most frequently used and the most effective methods of physical modification are presented in Figure 2 and their effects on the structure and properties of various starches are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 2.

Methods of physical and chemical modifications of starch.

Modification method Treatment Change in starch structure Change in starch properties References
Thermal modification
Heating treatments
Gentle heating Heating starch at low temperature (45–65°C) It causes slight changes in starch structure and amylopectin to amylose ratio. It shows no significant effect on the physicomechanical properties of starch. [35]
Superheating Heating starch at relatively high temperature (180–220°C) It results in the formation of spreadable gel particles with a creamy texture on cooling. It improves the gelatinization and pasting properties of starch. [76]
Extrusion heating Application of mechanical force in low-temperature environment It causes the degradation of amylose and amylopectin of the starch polymer by random chain-splitting. It also causes a high degree of granule disruption with complete loss of crystallinity It lowers the swelling power and viscosity and improves the water solubility and digestibility of starch. [51, 77]
Hydrothermal treatment Heating of starch in an aqueous medium. It causes physical reorganization of starch granules It improves the granule size, mobility, and stability which make it able to be digested easily by amylase. It also improves the gelatinization properties of starch. [30, 67, 78]
Heat-moisture treatment Heat application in the presence of limited moisture levels: 22–27% and high temperature above the glass-transition temperature: 100–120°C for a specified length of time: 1–24 h It results in a change in size, shape and granular and crystalline structure of starch. It causes a partial or complete conversion of the B-type crystalline starch to A-type. It also causes disruption of helical structures within the amorphous regions of starch granules. It induces the molecular degradation of starch and increases the degree of polarization. It decreases the amylose leaching, peak viscosity, and swelling capacity and enhances the solubility, thermal stability, gelatinization temperatures, pasting temperature, pasting time, interaction properties and susceptibility of starch to chemical and enzymatic attack (α-amylase and acid hydrolysis). [28, 50, 59, 79, 80, 81, 82]
Radiation treatment
Microwave irradiation Application of microwave radiation at different ranges of moisture and temperature to influence the dielectric constant of starch. It improves the granular crystallinity and surface morphology. Microwave treatment Improves the water and oil holding capacity, emulsifying activity, swelling capacity, solubility, and gelling ability. It also increases the pasting temperature and paste viscosity. It decreases the peak viscosity and gelatinization, and the degree of relative crystallinity. [27, 31, 53, 83]
Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation Starch granules exposed to UV light. It causes free radical-induced cross-linking and depolymerization, oxidative photodegradation, and dextrinization in starch. UV treatment Influences the physical, chemical and functional properties of starch. [61, 84, 85]
Gamma irradiation Exposure of starch granules to various doses of high energy gamma radiation. Gamma irradiation causes the breakage of the amylopectin chains at the amorphous regions and decreases the amylopectin to amylose ratio. It also causes the radiolysis and radio-depolymerization of starch The exposure to gamma radiation decreases the pasting viscosity, and enthalpy change of starch and molecular weight and gyration radius of amylopectin. It increases the susceptibility of starch towards amylase. It also improved the rheological properties such as gelatinization viscosity, swelling power, and solubility. [54, 86, 87, 88]
Non-thermal modification
pH treatment Addition of some acid or base to change the pH of the medium. A high pH results in partial degradation of starch granules with a decrease in molar size and radius of gyration. A low pH results in hydrolysis of starch particularly in the amorphous region of granules and decreases the molecular weight of the starch. Increase in pH improves the solubility, swelling power, and compression properties. Low pH treatment improves the gelation properties of starch. [35, 48, 49, 89]
Moisture treatment Moisture acts as plasticizer and anti-plasticizer for starch films for different properties It causes a plasticizing effect on calorimetric glass transition temperature, linear expansion, tensile modulus, and water vapor permeability while an anti-plasticizing effect on mechanical properties i.e. tensile strength and toughness. [90]
Mechanical treatment
Simple milling/grinding It involves the grinding of starch by physical forces. It decreased the crystalline/amorphous ratio, crystallinity, content of double helix of starch. It also results in a rapid increase and then a gradual decrease in surface parameters. It reduces the viscosity and increases the susceptibility of physical and chemical factors to starch. It increases water-binding capacity, adsorptive capacity, and reactivity of starch. [91, 92]
Micronization in vacuum ball mill It damages the B-type starch granules, results in loss of the granular order and double-helix content and reductions in crystallinity. It also causes depolymerization of starch polymer molecules. Changes the rheological properties of starch. It increases the water adsorption, iodine binding capacity, granule swelling, solubility and susceptibility of starch to amylase. It decreases the viscosity, and elasticity of paste. [59, 93, 94]
Mechanical activation by stirring Application of mechanical force on starch by stirring ball mill. The treatment results in the degradation of the crystal structure to amorphous particles and formation of an agglomerate of the resulting amorphous particles. It reduces the gelatinization temperature and enthalpy, shear-thinning, and apparent viscosity of starch resulting in enhancement of cold-water solubility of the starch. [29]
Pressure treatment
High-pressure treatment Treatment of starch under pressure < 400 MPa. It exerts a pressure and time-dependent effect on the microstructure of starch. It causes melting of amylopectin crystals and loss of birefringence. The pressure treatment causes changes in rheological properties of starch. It increases the hardness and chewiness and improves the freeze–thaw stability of the starch gels. [33, 95]
Ultra-high pressure treatment Treatment pf starch under pressure > 400 MPa. It distorts in the crystalline region and transits A-type crystalline starch to B-type. It increases the swelling of starch granules and restricts the amylose leaching. It lowers the gelatinization temperature. [33, 59, 65]
Instantaneous controlled pressure treatment The treatment increases the median volume diameter in cold water. It decreases the gelatinization enthalpy and birefringence under polarized light. [30]
Osmotic pressure treatment Heating of starch in a hypertonic (saturated) solution of sodium sulfate at 100–120°C across the semipermeable membrane It causes distortion in the shapes of starch granules and changes the B-type crystalline starch to A-type. This modification increases the gelatinization temperature. [32, 80, 96]
Hydrostatic pressure treatment Application of high pressure ranging from 400 to 900 MPa. It causes the disintegration and retrogradation of starch granules. It retards the swelling of granules or reduces viscosity with preserving the taste and nutrient of starch [56]
Ultrasound treatment
Ultra-sonication Treatment of starch with ultrasonic waves. It distorts the starch granules. It increases the solubility, viscosity and swelling capacity of granules and reduces the pasting ability and digestibility of starch. It also increases the gelatinization temperature and enthalpy and decreases the solubility. [36, 53, 63]
High-pressure ultra-sonication The treatment of ultrasound waves to native starch granules. at 24KHz to 360KHz frequency It distorts in the crystalline region of the starch granules. It decreases the enthalpy of gelatinization, consistency coefficient, crystallinity and molecular weight of starch granules. [63, 97]
Annealing Modification of starch in the presence of intermediate water contents (40–50% w/w) or excess water more than 65% w/w at temperatures lower than the onset temperature of gelatinization It increases interaction between the amylose– amylopectin and amylose-amylose chains and the crystalline perfection.
It enhances the mobility of double-helical chain segments within granules, allows subsequent recrystallization, restructuring, or both of starch chains, enhances molecular order and provides more homogeneity among crystallites.
Decreases the amylose leaching and swelling of granules and increases thermal stability gelatinization temperatures, and susceptibility towards α-amylase. [59, 80]
Thermal inhibition Dehydration of starch at a high temperature until it becomes anhydrous (<1% moisture It results in a decrease in granular size. It increases the cohesive-texture and stabilizes the viscosity of starch. [52, 98]
Cold plasma Treatment of starch with low-temperature plasma or glow-discharge plasma. It causes free radical-induced cross-linking of starch and increases the amylose leaching. It reduces the relative crystallinity due to active plasma species-induced depolymerization. It influences the physical and functional properties of starch. It increases the pasting and viscosity but decreases the retrogradation tendency. [99, 100, 101]
Pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment Processing of starch-water suspension in electric field strength of 50 kV/cm. It reduces enthalpy, gelatinization temperature, enthalpy, viscosity and crystallinity of granules. The granule diameters increase with increase in the field strength. [62, 64, 102, 103]
Freezing Freezing the starch at very low temperature (sub-zero levels) Reversible structural disorder on starch granules, It causes the change in the texture and gelatinization properties and increase in retrogradation. [80]
Freeze–Thaw treatment Heating of starch at high temperature (59–79°C) flowed by freezing and defrosting. An increase in the number of Free-Thaw cycles changes the complex modulus and phase angle of the starch. Affects the rheological properties of starch. Increases the swelling power, viscosity, and thermal stability of starch. It also influences the surface properties of the starch granules. [60]
[38, 51]
Duel modification Treatment of starch with a combination of different physical factors.
Heat-moisture treatment-annealing Heat-moisture treatment followed by annealing. No significant damage of individual treatment on the structure of starch granules has been observed.
Heat-moisture-annealing treatment resulted in disruption of crystalline structure.
Increase in enthalpy. [58, 72]
Annealing-sonication and Sonication-annealing Annealing followed by sonication and vice versa. Both treatments promote a synergic behavior on crystallite collapse and result in a decrease in relative crystallinity. The later also results in irregular surface morphologies and granule disintegration. Both increase the pasting viscosity

Table 1.

Methods of physical modification of starch and changes in starch structure and properties.

2.2 Chemical modification of starch

The chemical modification involves the alteration of physiochemical properties of starch by introducing new chemical or functional groups in starch without any physical alteration in the shape and size of the molecule. Each of the glucose units in amylose and amylopectin has three reactive hydroxyl groups which are the major sites for chemical modification in starch. The chemical modification alters the physical behavior of starch including retrogradation, salting, and gelatinization that work by stabilizing the intermolecular and intramolecular bonding of starch granules. The commonly used methods of chemical modification of starch include oxidation by different oxidizing agents, etherification by addition of some hydroxyethyl, hydroxypropyl or carboxymethyl moieties on hydroxyl groups of starch, esterification by condensation of some fatty acids, other carboxylic acids and phosphates with active hydroxyl groups of starch, cationization by introducing some cationic molecules, cross-linking by addition of various cross-linkers and graft-polymerization of starch with synthetic polymers [40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72]. Cationic modifications involve the reaction of starch molecules that contain tertiary and secondary ammonium, imino, amino, sulfuric and phosphate groups which react with hydroxyl groups of starch. It improves the dielectric constant of starch granules. It has great importance in the textile industry as an additive, in paper and cosmetic industry due to low cost, rapid degradation and bioavailability [73]. Cross-linking is the mechanism of covalent interaction between starch molecules. The reagents used to form copolymer in starch are sodium trimetaphosphate, sodium tripyrophosphate, epichlorohydrin and phosphoryl chloride. It has been reported to modify the starch to form frozen products in the food industry and also used to make plastics due to resistant properties [42, 45, 46]. The mechanism of addition of anhydrous acetyl group or vinyl acetate in the presence of sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide to native starch granules is called esterification. Acetylated starch has great importance at the industrial level as a thickener, stabilizer, adherent and encapsulator [39, 74, 75]. The commonly used effective methods of chemical modification of starch are presented in Figure 2 and their effects on the structure and properties of various starches are summarized in Table 2.

Modification method Treatment Change in structure Change in properties References
Oxidation Addition of carboxyl and carbonyl group to native starch by the use of an oxidizing agent. It causes depolymerization of starch resulting in retardation in recrystallization due to the incorporation of carbonyl and carboxyl groups. It increases the stability, clarity and biding properties but reduces the dispersion viscosity of starch. [23, 44, 104]
Stabilization by addition of a polymer Copolymerization with synthetic polymers It provides the structural stability to starch and reduces the retrogradation. It improves the freeze–thaw stability and shelf life of starch-based food products. [23]
Hydroxyethylation Introduction of hydroxyethyl group to the starch. Changes in the granular structure. Improves the drug binding ability for some anticancer and other drugs. [71]
Hydroxypropylation Addition of hydroxypropyl group on the starch. It disrupts the inter- and intra-molecular hydrogen bonds and weakens the granular structure of starch. It increases the motional freedom of starch chains in amorphous regions. It increases the peak viscosity, water binding capacity, swelling power, solubility and enzymatic digestibility of starch. It also improves the paste clarity and freeze–thaw stability. However, it decreases the gelatinization parameters, enthalpy of gelatinization, and transition temperatures. It also decreases the hardness and adhesiveness of the gels. [26, 68, 105]
Carboxymethylation Carboxymethyl substitution of hydroxyl groups in starch It adds the hydrophobic groups on the starch molecule. It increases the stability of starch in aqueous media, reduces the recrystallizing ability and prevents the damage from heat and microorganisms. [51]
Acetylation Reaction of an acetyl group with the hydroxyl group of polymeric starch It retards the crystallization or retrogradation in starch granules. It inhibits the formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonds and enhances the viscosity and swelling capacity of granules. It reduces the pasting temperature and solubility. [39, 99]
Fatty acylation Reaction of fatty acids with starch It results in the formation of amylose-fatty acyl complexes. It changes the optical activity and thermal behavior of starch [106]
Phosphorylation Addition of phosphate group on hydroxyl groups of starch It results in the formation of either monophosphate or diphosphate starch. It increases the steric hindrance and prevents the linearity of molecular chains. It improves the viscosity, textural properties, paste clarity and Freeze-Thaw stability of starch. It also increases resistance to low pH, high temperature, and high shear. It decreases the temperature of gelatinization. [68]
Succinylation Treatment of starch with Octinyl succinic anhydride It results in the derivatization of starch with alkenyl succinic anhydrides. The modification increases the swelling volume, peak viscosity, hot paste viscosity, and cool paste viscosity but decreases the gelatinization temperature and gel hardness. It also increases the production of slow-digesting and resistant starch. [107]
Cationization Treatment of starch with various cationic molecules. Introduction of amino, ammonium, imino, phosphonium or sulfonium groups to give a positive ionic charge to starch. Increases the solubility, stability, dispersibility, and clarity of the starch. [43]
Dry cationization Dry heating of citric acid to anhydride. The cationic molecules are sprayed in the absence of liquid phase on dried starch during extrusion. It results in the formation of cross-linked starch citrate. It alters the granular structure of starch and improves its adsorption properties. [70, 80]
Wet cationization Homogenous and heterogenous reactions of starch with cationic molecules in the presence of a liquid medium. It also results in the formation of cross-linked starch. It increases the viscosity and decreases the paste temperature. [70]
Semi-dry cationization Mixing of starch with cationic molecules followed by a thermal reaction. Results in cationic cross-linking of starch. It produces a high degree of substitution in starch granules. [70]
Cross-linking (Formation of inter and intramolecular bridges) Etherification and esterification of granules with cross-linking polymers by reacting with a mixture (99:1) of sodium trimetaphosphate and sodium tripolyphosphate or other cross-linkers in an aqueous alkaline slurry containing sodium sulfate. It reduces the mobility of amorphous chains in the starch granule. It introduces the inter- and intra-molecular bonds with multifunctional small molecules with hydroxyl groups on starch to strengthen the granules against various factors. It increases the ordering of internal granule structure and stability. It decreases the solubility of starch in water which reduces its association with lipids, moisture, and proteins. It also causes decreases in viscosity, swelling capacity, digestibility, retrogradation rate, the peak temperature of relaxation endotherm and enthalpy of starch. It increases the gelatinization temperature, glass transition temperature, melting enthalpy, free volume of starch chains, relaxation enthalpy and stability of starch to high temperature. [23, 42, 45, 46, 109, 110]
Acid cross-linking The reaction of starch with acids It increases the gelatinization temperature and the breadth of the gelatinization endotherm. [48]
Graft copolymerization Copolymerization of starch with synthetic polymers such as poly (ethylene terephthalate), polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, and polystyrene. It changes the structure of starch from a homopolymer to heteropolymer. It results in changes in physical properties and reactivity of starch. [41]
Duel modification (Modification using the combination of different physical and chemical methods) Modification with a combination of microwave and ultrasound irradiation and esterification of carboxymethyl cold-water-soluble starch with octenyl succinic anhydride. It reduces the esterification time and produces the starch with better emulsifying and surfactant properties, good freeze–thaw stability. [42, 69]
Cross-linking in combination with hydroxypropylation or acetylation. It increases the production of slow-digesting and resistant starch. [108]

Table 2.

Methods of chemical modification and changes in the structure and properties of modified starches.


3. Effect of modification on the reactivity of starch

Both the physical and chemical modifications have been found to result in a change in the granular and molecular structure of starch which leads to the change in its reactivity and functionality. The mechanical, thermal radiolytic, and acid-catalyzed hydrolytic degradation of starch granules result in an increase in its reactivity due to the exposure of reactive functional groups after the breakdown of amylose and amylopectin chains. Oxidation, acetylation, phosphorylation, carboxymethylation, cationization, and copolymerization also introduce some new functional groups on starch resulting in a change in reactivity of starch towards the water, oil, acids, enzymes, and other chemical species. Cross-linking by the addition of cross-linker molecules also results in the formation of inter and intramolecular bridges among the components of starch which alters its reactivity and specificity for use in industrial and biomedical fields.


4. Conclusion

The physical and chemical modifications have been found to improve the functional quality of starch for its use in certain formulations while such modifications may also limit its use for other purposes. The choice of modification type and treatment method depends on what types of changes in functionality and reactivity of starch are required for a specific application. The modification of starch by various physical methods have been found to affect its structural parameters and physical and functional properties including crystallinity, surface properties, solubility, viscosity, swelling ability, pasting and gelatinization properties, and thermal and freeze–thaw stability. The modifications of starch by the chemical method have been also found to affect the molecular structure and reactivity of starch by addition of new functional groups, degradation of the polymeric structure, oxidation by free radical or cross linking of starch molecules. The change in the polarity due to exposure of reactive functional groups and the increase in the degree of substitution and intermolecular cross-linking results in a change in the reactivity of starch towards water, oil, acids, enzymes, and other chemical species. These modification techniques may lead to some revolutionary changes in reactivity, functionality starch and application of starch in the nutritional, pharmaceutical, biomedical and industrial field. However, the selection of a suitable modification method is much more important for the researchers to make the desired and targeted improvement in the functional quality of starch.


Conflict of interest

I confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1. Smith AM. The biosynthesis of starch granules. Biomacromolecules. 2001;2:335-341
  2. 2. Tester RF, Karkalas J, Qi X. Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture. Journal of Cereal Science. 2004;39:151-165
  3. 3. Santana ÁL, Meireles MAA. New starches are the trend for industry applications: a review. Food and Public Health. 2014;4:229-241
  4. 4. Srichuwong S, Sunarti TC, Mishima T, Isono N, Hisamatsu M. Starches from different botanical sources I: Contribution of amylopectin fine structure to thermal properties and enzyme digestibility. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2005;60:529-538
  5. 5. Srichuwong S, Sunarti TC, Mishima T, Isono N, Hisamatsu M. Starches from different botanical sources II: Contribution of starch structure to swelling and pasting properties. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2005;62:25-34
  6. 6. Annison G, Topping DL. Nutritional role of resistant starch: Chemical structure vs physiological function. Annual Review of Nutrition. 1994;14:297-320
  7. 7. Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1992;46:S33-S50
  8. 8. Tharanathan RN, Mahadevamma S. Grain legumes—a boon to human nutrition. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2003;14:507-518
  9. 9. Elvira C, Mano JF, San Roman J, Reis RL. Starch-based biodegradable hydrogels with potential biomedical applications as drug delivery systems. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1955-1966
  10. 10. Santander-Ortega MJ, Stauner T, Loretz B, Ortega-Vinuesa JL, Bastos-González D, Wenz G, et al. Nanoparticles made from novel starch derivatives for transdermal drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 2010;141:85-92
  11. 11. Vilivalam VD, Illum L, Iqbal K. Starch capsules: An alternative system for oral drug delivery. Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Today. 2000;3:64-69
  12. 12. Bertolini AC. Trends in Starch Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009
  13. 13. Janssen L, Moscicki L. Thermoplastic Starch. Weinheim, Germany: John Wiley & Sons; 2009
  14. 14. Song JH, Murphy RJ, Narayan R, Davies GBH. Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2009;364:2127-2139
  15. 15. Jiménez A, Fabra MJ, Talens P, Chiralt A. Edible and biodegradable starch films: a review. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2012;5:2058-2076
  16. 16. Eliasson A-C. Starch in Food: Structure, Function and Applications. CRC press; 2004
  17. 17. Vamadevan V, Bertoft E. Structure-function relationships of starch components. Starch. 2015;67:55-68
  18. 18. Case SE, Capitani T, Whaley JK, Shi YC, Trzasko P, Jeffcoat R, et al. Physical properties and gelation behavior of a low-amylopectin maize starch and other high-amylose maize starches. Journal of Cereal Science. 1998;27:301-314
  19. 19. Fredriksson H, Silverio J, Andersson R, Eliasson A-C, Åman P. The influence of amylose and amylopectin characteristics on gelatinization and retrogradation properties of different starches. Carbohydrate Polymers. 1998;35:119-134
  20. 20. Pérez S, Bertoft E. The molecular structures of starch components and their contribution to the architecture of starch granules: A comprehensive review. Starch. 2010;62:389-420
  21. 21. Svihus B, Uhlen AK, Harstad OM. Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2005;122:303-320
  22. 22. Lee B-H, Bello-Pérez LA, Lin AH-M, Kim CY, Hamaker BR. Importance of location of digestion and colonic fermentation of starch related to its quality. Cereal Chemistry. 2013;90:335-343
  23. 23. Boukhalfa F, Kadri N, Bouchemel S, Ait Cheikh S, Chebout I, Madani K, et al. Chemically modified starch and utilization in food stuffs. Mediterranean Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2018;11:37-50
  24. 24. Jane J, Shen L, Chen J, Lim S, Kasemsuwan T, Nip W. Physical and chemical studies of taro starches and flours1 2. Cereal Chemistry. 1992;69:528-535
  25. 25. Lii C-Y, Chang S-M, Young Y-L. Investigation of the physical and chemical properties of banana starches. Journal of Food Science. 1982;47:1493-1497
  26. 26. Liu H, Ramsden L, Corke H. Physical properties and enzymatic digestibility of hydroxypropylated ae, wx, and normal maize starch. Carbohydrate Polymers. 1999;40:175-182
  27. 27. Colman TAD, Demiate IM, Schnitzler E. The effect of microwave radiation on some thermal, rheological and structural properties of cassava starch. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2014;115:2245-2252
  28. 28. da Rosa ZE, Dias ARG. Impact of heat-moisture treatment and annealing in starches: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2011;83:317-328
  29. 29. Huang Z-Q, Lu J-P, Li X-H, Tong Z-F. Effect of mechanical activation on physico-chemical properties and structure of cassava starch. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2007;68:128-135
  30. 30. Loisel C, Maache-Rezzoug Z, Esneault C, Doublier J-L. Effect of hydrothermal treatment on the physical and rheological properties of maize starches. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006;73:45-54
  31. 31. Nawaz H, Shad MA, Saleem S, Khan MUA, Nishan U, Rasheed T, et al. Characteristics of starch isolated from microwave heat treated lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) seed flour. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2018;113:219-226
  32. 32. Pukkahuta C, Shobsngob S, Varavinit S. Effect of osmotic pressure on starch: New method of physical modification of starch. Starch. 2007;59:78-90
  33. 33. Shaoxiao LWGZZ, Baodong Z. The influence of ultra high pressure treatment on the physicochemical properties of areca taro starch. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association. 2013;5:80-84
  34. 34. Singh N, Singh J, Kaur L, Sodhi NS, Gill BS. Morphological, thermal and rheological properties of starches from different botanical sources. Food Chemistry. 2003;81:219-231
  35. 35. Wicaksono Y, Nuri N, Wisudyaningsih B. Effect of temperature and pH of modification process on the physical-mechanical properties of modified cassava starch. Molekul. 2016;11:248
  36. 36. Yu S, Zhang Y, Ge Y, Zhang Y, Sun T, Jiao Y, et al. Effects of ultrasound processing on the thermal and retrogradation properties of nonwaxy rice starch. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2013;36:793-802
  37. 37. Jekle M, Mühlberger K, Becker T. Starch–gluten interactions during gelatinization and its functionality in dough like model systems. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016;54:196-201
  38. 38. Szymońska J, Wodnicka K. Effect of multiple freezing and thawing on the surface and functional properties of granular potato starch. Food Hydrocolloids. 2005;19:753-760
  39. 39. Betancur AD, Chel GL, Cañizares HE. Acetylation and characterization of Canavalia ensiformis starch. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1997;45:378-382
  40. 40. Greenwood CT, Muir DD, Whitcher HW. Hydroxyethyl starch as a cryoprotective agent for human red blood cells the relation between the molecular properties and the cryoprotective effect. Starch. 1977;29:343-347
  41. 41. Hernández AR. Chemical modification of starch with synthetic. Applications of Modified Starches. 2018;2:3-22
  42. 42. Jyothi AN, Moorthy SN, Rajasekharan KN. Effect of cross-linking with epichlorohydrin on the properties of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) starch. Starch. 2006;58:292-299
  43. 43. Korma SA, Kamal-Alahmad NS, Ammar A-F, Zaaboul F, Zhang T. Chemically modified starch and utilization in food stuffs. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2016;5:264-272
  44. 44. Kuakpetoon D, Wang Y-J. Characterization of different starches oxidized by hypochlorite. Starch. 2001;53:211-218
  45. 45. Nabeshima EH, Grossmann MVE. Functional properties of pregelatinized and cross-linked cassava starch obtained by extrusion with sodium trimetaphosphate. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2001;45:347-353
  46. 46. Páramo-Calderón DE, Carrillo-Ahumada J, Juárez-Arellano EA, Bello-Pérez LA, Aparicio-Saguilán A, Alvarez-Ramirez J. Effect of cross-linking on the physicochemical, functional and digestibility properties of starch from Macho (Musa paradisiaca L.) and Roatan (Musa sapientum L.) banana varieties. Starch. 2016;68:584-592
  47. 47. Karim AA, Sufha EH, Zaidul ISM. Dual modification of starch via partial enzymatic hydrolysis in the granular state and subsequent hydroxypropylation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008;56:10901-10907
  48. 48. Singh V, Ali SZ. Acid degradation of starch. The effect of acid and starch type. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2000;41:191-195
  49. 49. Wang L, Wang Y-J. Structures and physicochemical properties of acid-thinned corn, potato and rice starches. Starch. 2001;53:570-576
  50. 50. Kulp K, Lorenz K. Heat-moisture treatment of starches. I. Physicochemical Properties. 1981;58:46-48
  51. 51. Lawal MV. Modified starches as direct compression excipients–effect of physical and chemical modifications on tablet properties: A review. Starch. 2019;71:1800040
  52. 52. Lim S-T, Han J-A, Lim HS, BeMiller JN. Modification of starch by dry heating with ionic gums. Cereal Chemistry. 2002;79:601-606
  53. 53. Nadir AS, Helmy IMF, Nahed MA, Wafaa MMA, Ramadan MT. Modification of potato starch by some different physical methods and utilization in cookies production. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2015;4:556-569
  54. 54. Nene SP, Vakil UK, Sreenivasan A. Effect of gamma radiation on physico-chemical characteristics of red gram (Cajanus cajan) starch. Journal of Food Science. 1975;40:943-947
  55. 55. Silihe K, Zingue S, Winter E, Awounfack C, Bishayee A, Desai N, et al. Starch Modification and Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18:1073
  56. 56. Stute R, Klingler RW, Boguslawski S, Eshtiaghi MN, Knorr D. Effects of high pressures treatment on starches. Starch. 1996;48:399-408
  57. 57. Villareal RM, Resurreccion AP, Suzuki LB, Juliano BO. Changes in physicochemical properties of rice during storage. Starch. 1976;28:88-94
  58. 58. Zia-ud-Din, Xiong H, Fei P. Physical and chemical modification of starches: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2017;57:2691-2705
  59. 59. BeMiller JN, Huber KC. Physical modification of food starch functionalities. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. 2015;6:19-69
  60. 60. Eliasson A-C, Kim HR. Changes in rheological properties of hydroxypropyl potato starch pastes during freeze-thaw treatments I. A rheological approach for evaluation of freeze-thaw stability. Journal of Texture Studies. 1992;23:279-295
  61. 61. Fiedorowicz M, Tomasik P, You S, Lim S-T. Molecular distribution and pasting properties of UV-irradiated corn starches. Starch. 1999;51:126-131
  62. 62. Han Z, Zeng X, Zhang B, Yu S. Effects of pulsed electric fields (PEF) treatment on the properties of corn starch. Journal of Food Engineering. 2009;93:318-323
  63. 63. Jambrak AR, Herceg Z, Šubarić D, Babić J, Brnčić M, Brnčić SR, et al. Ultrasound effect on physical properties of corn starch. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2010;79:91-100
  64. 64. Jeyamkondan S, Jayas DS, Holley RA. Pulsed electric field processing of foods: A review. Journal of Food Protection. 1999;62:1088-1096
  65. 65. Katopo H, Song Y, Jane J. Effect and mechanism of ultrahigh hydrostatic pressure on the structure and properties of starches. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2002;47:233-244
  66. 66. Raffi J, D’Urbal M, Pollin C, Saint-Lebe L, Dauberte B. Gamma radiolysis of starches derived from different foodstuffs. Starch. 1981;33(Pt. 4):301-306
  67. 67. Tester RF, Debon SJ. Annealing of starch—a review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2000;27:1-12
  68. 68. Waliszewski KN, Aparicio MA, Bello LA, Monroy JA. Changes of banana starch by chemical and physical modification. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2003;52:237-242
  69. 69. Čížová A, Sroková I, Sasinková V, Malovíková A, Ebringerová A. Carboxymethyl starch octenylsuccinate: Microwave-and ultrasound-assisted synthesis and properties. Starch. 2008;60:389-397
  70. 70. Liu J, Yang R, Yang F. Effect of the starch source on the performance of cationic starches having similar degree of substitution for papermaking using deinked pulp. BioResources. 2015;10:922-931
  71. 71. Paleos CM, Sideratou Z, Tsiourvas D. Drug delivery systems based on hydroxyethyl starch. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2017;28:1611-1624
  72. 72. Zanella Pinto V, Goncalves Deon V, Moomand K, Levien Vanier N, Pilatti-Riccio D, da Rosa ZE, et al. Characteristics of modified carioca bean starch upon single and dual annealing, heat-moisture-treatment, and sonication. Starch. 2019;71:1800173
  73. 73. Zhang L-M. A review of starches and their derivatives for oilfield applications in China. Starch. 2001;53:401-407
  74. 74. Wang Y-J, Wang L. Characterization of acetylated waxy maize starches prepared under catalysis by different alkali and alkaline-earth hydroxides. Starch. 2002;54:25-30
  75. 75. Xu Y, Ding W, Liu J, Li Y, Kennedy JF, Gu Q, et al. Preparation and characterization of organic-soluble acetylated starch nanocrystals. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2010;80:1078-1084
  76. 76. Majzoobi M, Radi M, Farahnaky A, Jamalian J, Tongdang T, Mesbahi G. Physicochemical properties of pre-gelatinized wheat starch produced by a twin drum drier. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2011;13:193-202
  77. 77. Acosta S, Chiralt A, Santamarina P, Rosello J, González-Martínez C, Cháfer M. Antifungal films based on starch-gelatin blend, containing essential oils. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016;61:233-240
  78. 78. Priya B, Gupta VK, Pathania D, Singha AS. Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of biodegradable starch/PVA composite films reinforced with cellulosic fibre. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2014;109:171-179
  79. 79. Jyothi NVN, Prasanna PM, Sakarkar SN, Prabha KS, Ramaiah PS, Srawan GY. Microencapsulation techniques, factors influencing encapsulation efficiency. Journal of Microencapsulation. 2010;27:187-197
  80. 80. Omoregie E, Okugbo O. Various techniques for the modification of starch and the applications of its derivatives. Journal of Pharmacology Bioresource. 2015;11:66
  81. 81. Vamadevan V, Bertoft E, Soldatov DV, Seetharaman K. Impact on molecular organization of amylopectin in starch granules upon annealing. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013;98:1045-1055
  82. 82. Vermeylen R, Goderis B, Delcour JA. An X-ray study of hydrothermally treated potato starch. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2006;64:364-375
  83. 83. Amini AM, Razavi SMA, Mortazavi SA. Morphological, physicochemical, and viscoelastic properties of sonicated corn starch. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2015;122:282-292
  84. 84. Bertolini AC, Mestres C, Colonna P, Raffi J. Free radical formation in UV-and gamma-irradiated cassava starch. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2001;44:269-271
  85. 85. Merlin A, Fouassier J-P. Etude de radicaux libres forméas par irradiation ultraviolette de l’amidon: Application aux réctions de photodégradation et de photogreffage. Die Makromolekulare Chemie. 1981;182:3053-3068
  86. 86. Bao J, Ao Z, Jane J. Characterization of physical properties of flour and starch obtained from gamma-irradiated white rice. Starch. 2005;57:480-487
  87. 87. Michel JP, Raffi J, Saint-Lebe L. Experimental study of the radiodepolymerization of starch. Starch. 1980;32:295-298
  88. 88. Raffi J, Agnel JP, Saint-Lebe L, Dauberte B. Gamma radiolysis of starches derived from different foodstuffs. Starch. 1981;33(Pt. 3):269-271
  89. 89. Lee JH, Han J-A, Lim S-T. Effect of pH on aqueous structure of maize starches analyzed by HPSEC-MALLS-RI system. Food Hydrocolloids. 2009;23:1935-1939
  90. 90. Chang YP, Cheah PB, Seow CC. Plasticizing—Antiplasticizing effects of water on physical properties of tapioca starch films in the glassy state. Journal of Food Science. 2000;65:445-451
  91. 91. Grant LA. Effects of starch isolation, drying, and grinding techniques on its gelatinization and retrogradation properties. Cereal Chemistry. 1998;75:590-594
  92. 92. Liu TY, Ma Y, Yu SF, Shi J, Xue S. The effect of ball milling treatment on structure and porosity of maize starch granule. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2011;12:586-593
  93. 93. Tamaki S, Hisamatsu M, Teranishi K, Yamada T. Structural change of wheat starch granule by ball-mill treatment. Journal of Applied Glycoscience. 1997;44:505-513
  94. 94. Tamaki S, Hisamatsu M, Teranishi K, Adachi T, Yamada T. Structural change of maize starch granules by ball-mill treatment. Starch. 1998;50:342-348
  95. 95. Stolt M, Oinonen S, Autio K. Effect of high pressure on the physical properties of barley starch. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2000;1:167-175
  96. 96. Pukkahuta C, Suwannawat B, Shobsngob S, Varavinit S. Comparative study of pasting and thermal transition characteristics of osmotic pressure and heat–moisture treated corn starch. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2008;72:527-536
  97. 97. Czechowska-Biskup R, Rokita B, Lotfy S, Ulanski P, Rosiak JM. Degradation of chitosan and starch by 360-kHz ultrasound. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2005;60:175-184
  98. 98. Chiu C-W, Schiermeyer E, Thomas DJ, Shah MB. Thermally inhibited starches and flours and process for their production. 1998
  99. 99. Thirumdas R, Trimukhe A, Deshmukh RR, Annapure US. Functional and rheological properties of cold plasma treated rice starch. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2017;157:1723-1731
  100. 100. Sarangapani C, Devi Y, Thirundas R, Annapure US, Deshmukh RR. Effect of low-pressure plasma on physico-chemical properties of parboiled rice. LWT- Food Science and Technology. 2015;63:452-460
  101. 101. Zou J-J, Liu C-J, Eliasson B. Modification of starch by glow discharge plasma. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2004;55:23-26
  102. 102. Han Z, Zeng XA, Fu N, Yu SJ, Chen XD, Kennedy JF. Effects of pulsed electric field treatments on some properties of tapioca starch. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012;89:1012-1017
  103. 103. Han Z, Zeng XA, Yu SJ, Zhang BS, Chen XD. Effects of pulsed electric fields (PEF) treatment on physicochemical properties of potato starch. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2009;10:481-485
  104. 104. Rutenberg MW, Solarek D. Starch derivatives: Production and uses. Starch: Chemistry and Technology. 2nd ed. 1984:311-388
  105. 105. Lee HL, Yoo B. Effect of hydroxypropylation on physical and rheological properties of sweet potato starch. LWT- Food Science and Technology. 2011;44:765-770
  106. 106. Bulpin PV, Welsh EJ, Morris ER. Physical characterization of amylose-fatty acid complexes in starch granules and in solution. Starch. 1982;34:335-339
  107. 107. Bao J, Xing J, Phillips DL, Corke H. Physical properties of octenyl succinic anhydride modified rice, wheat, and potato starches. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2003;51:2283-2287
  108. 108. Han J-A, BeMiller JN. Preparation and physical characteristics of slowly digesting modified food starches. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2007;67:366-374
  109. 109. Klein MI, DeBaz L, Agidi S, Lee H, Xie G, Lin AH-M, et al. Dynamics of Streptococcus mutans transcriptome in response to starch and sucrose during biofilm development. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13478
  110. 110. Chung H-J, Woo K-S, Lim S-T. Glass transition and enthalpy relaxation of cross-linked corn starches. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2004;55:9-15

Written By

Haq Nawaz, Rashem Waheed, Mubashir Nawaz and Dure Shahwar

Submitted: March 31st, 2019 Reviewed: July 28th, 2019 Published: March 11th, 2020