Abstract
Nanofibrous scaffolds belong to the most suitable materials for tissue engineering, because they mimic the fibrous component of the natural extracellular matrix. This chapter is focused on the application of nanofibers in skin tissue engineering and wound healing, because the skin is the largest and vitally important organ in the human body. Nanofibrous meshes can serve as substrates for adhesion, growth and differentiation of skin and stem cells, and also as an antimicrobial and moisture-retaining barrier. These meshes have been prepared from a wide range of synthetic and nature-derived polymers. This chapter is focused on the use of nature-derived polymers. These polymers have good or limited degradability in the human tissues, which depends on their origin and on the presence of appropriate enzymes in the human tissues. Non-degradable and less-degradable polymers are usually produced in bacteria, fungi, algae, plants or insects, and include, for example, cellulose, dextran, pullulan, alginate, pectin and silk fibroin. Well-degradable polymers are usually components of the extracellular matrix in the human body or at least in other vertebrates, and include collagen, elastin, keratin and hyaluronic acid, although some polymers produced by non-vertebrate organisms, such as chitosan or poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), are also degradable in the human body.
Keywords
- skin replacements
- wound dressings
- nanofibers
- electrospinning
- epidermis
- dermis
- keratinocytes
- fibroblasts
- stem cells
- vascularization
- cell delivery
- drug delivery
- regenerative medicine
1. Introduction
Nanofibrous scaffolds are one of the most promising materials for skin tissue engineering and wound dressing, because they resemble nanoarchitecture of the native extracellular matrix (for a review, see [1]). Therefore, they can serve as suitable carriers of cells for tissue engineering and also as suitable wound dressings, which are able to protect the wound from external harmful effects, mainly microbial infection, and at the same time, they can keep appropriate moisture and gas exchange at the wound site.
Nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering have been fabricated from a wide range of synthetic and nature-derived polymers, which can be either biostable or degradable within the human body. Biostable synthetic polymers used in nanofiber-based skin regenerative therapies include, for example, polyurethane [2], polydimethylsiloxane [3], polyethylene terephthalate [4], polyethersulfone [5], and also hydrogels such as poly(acrylic acid) (PAA, [6]), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA, [7]), and poly[di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate] (PDEGMA, [8]). Degradable synthetic polymers typically include poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL, [9]) and its copolymers with polylactides (PLCL, [10]), polylactides (PLA, [11]) and their copolymers with polyglycolides (PLGA, [12]), and also so-called auxiliary polymers, such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO, [13]) or poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA, [14]), which facilitated the electrospinning process and improved the mechanical properties and wettability of the chief polymer. However, the synthetic polymers, although they are well-chemically defined and tailorable, are often bioinert, hydrophobic and thus not promoting cell adhesion, and also not well-adhering to the wound site. Therefore, they need to be combined with other bioactive substances, particularly nature-derived polymers.
This chapter is focused on nature-derived polymers used for fabrication of nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering and wound healing. The advantages of most of these polymers are their better bioactivity, flexibility, wettability, and adhesion to the wound site. Similarly as synthetic polymers, also nature-derived polymers can be divided into polymers with none or limited degradability, when implanted into human tissues, and polymers well-degradable in human tissues. The first group includes glucans, such as cellulose, schizophyllan, dextran, starch, and other polysaccharides and proteins, such as pullulan, xylan, alginate, pectin, gum tragacanth, gum arabic, silk fibroin, and sericin. The second group of polymers degradable in human tissues includes collagen and its derivative gelatin, elastin, keratin, glycosaminoglycans such as hyaluronic acid, heparin and chondroitin sulfate, and also polymers not produced in the human body, namely chitosan, gellan gum, zein, and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-
Some of the polymers degradable in human tissues, such as collagen, gelatin, elastin, keratin, and glycosaminoglycans, contain specific cell-binding motifs in their molecules, for example, specific amino acid sequences in proteins and oligosaccharide domains in glycosaminoglycans, which are recognized by cell adhesion receptors of integrin and non-integrin families (for a review, see [15, 16]). These molecules are often used in allogeneic or xenogeneic form, thus they can be associated with pathogen transmission or immune reaction. However, some synthetic polymers, for example PLA and PCL, have been reported to induce a more pronounced inflammatory reaction than gelatin [17].
This review chapter summarizes earlier and recent knowledge on skin tissue engineering and wound dressing applications, based on nanofibrous scaffolds made of nature-derived polymers, including our results.
2. Nature-derived nanofibers with none or limited degradability in the human tissues
Nature-derived nondegradable polymers or polymers with limited degradability in human tissues include polymers not occurring in the human body and synthesized by other organisms, such as plants, algae, fungi, insects, and bacteria.
Nanofibrous cellulose can be prepared in three basic forms: bacterial cellulose, which contains cellulose nanofibrils, synthesized by bacteria, nanofibrillar cellulose prepared from plants, particularly from wood, by hydrolysis, oxidation, and mechanical disintegration, and cellulose nanofibers created by electrospinning (for a review, see [19]). For electrospinning, cellulose should be solved. Well-known solvent of cellulose is N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO). Another possibility is N-alkylinidazolium-derivate ionic liquid and N,N-dimethylacetamide containing 8 wt% of LiCl. However, any of them did not prove to be a good solvent for needleless electrospinning. The most favorable solvent of cellulose was found to be trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). However, TFA causes severe skin burns and is toxic for aquatic organisms even in low concentrations [20]. These problems, which limit the use of cellulose for creation of electrospun scaffolds for biomedical applications, can be solved by substituting the natural cellulose by its derivatives. The mostly used derivative of cellulose is cellulose acetate (CA), mainly due to its easier solubility and biocompatibility. CA can be dissolved in several solvents, however the best ones for electrospinning proved to be acetic acid (AA), and mixtures of acetone and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC). Some results of successfully spun fibers by needleless electrospinning in our experiments can be found in Figure 1 , demonstrating differences in the fiber morphology. The 95% aqueous mixture of AA showed the best results in comparison with acetone/DMAC mixtures due to production of smoother fibers and lower cytotoxicity.

Figure 1.
Scanning electron microscopy of nanofibrous layers produced by wire needleless electrospinning using different solvents, namely 12 wt% of CA in acetone/DMAC (9:1) (left) or 14 wt% of CA in 95% AA (right).
All the mentioned forms of cellulose have been widely applied as wound dressings releasing various bioactive agents into wounds (antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidative agents, cytokines, and growth and angiogenic factors), as transparent wound dressings for direct optical monitoring of wounds, for systemic transdermal drug delivery (analgesics, antiphlogistics, corticoids, and antihypertensives) and for construction of epidermal electronics for monitoring wound healing or physiological status of the organism. Non-degradable nanocellulose has also been used as a temporary carrier for delivery of keratinocytes, dermal fibroblasts, and mesenchymal stem cells into wounds (for a review, see [19]).
However, for use as direct scaffolds for skin tissue engineering, cellulose should be rendered degradable in human tissues. Cellulose is degradable by cellulase enzymes (exoglucanases and endoglucanases), which hydrolyze 1,4-beta-D-glycosidic linkages. These enzymes are not synthesized in human tissues, but they can be incorporated into cellulose scaffolds in order to degrade them gradually [21, 22]. These enzymes are believed to be non-toxic for mammalian cells [23, 24]. Moreover, the final product of cellulose degradation by these enzymes is glucose, which is a natural nutrient for the cells, by contrast with the acidic by-products of the standard currently used biodegradable PLA or PLGA scaffolds [25]. Another possibility how to use cellulase enzymes in skin tissue engineering (and in tissue engineering in general) is cell sheet technology. First, cells can be grown on the top of non-degradable cellulose substrates. After reaching the cell confluence, self-standing cell sheets can be released by exposure of the cellulose substrates to cellulases. Unlike the proteolytic enzymes conventionally used for detaching cells from their growth supports, cellulases do not disintegrate the extracellular matrix (ECM) formed by cells and do not cleave extracellular parts of cell adhesion receptors binding the ECM [26]. The cell sheets can be then replanted in the wound bed.
Another interesting approach how to render the cellulose degradable was metabolic engineering of
Other approaches how to render the cellulose degradable, at least partially, is its oxidation and other chemical modifications of cellulose, such as its conversion into regenerated cellulose or 2,3-dialdehydecellulose. In addition, cellulose of animal origin, that is, from tunicates, degraded more quickly than plant cellulose. For example, when cellulose films from
Other glucans used for fabrication of nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering and wound healing include dextran, starch and pullulan. According to the type of their glycosidic bonds, these polysaccharides belong to α-glucans.
Dextran was also used as component of a bilayer scaffold for skin tissue engineering. The upper part of the scaffolds was made of electrospun blend of poly(ε-caprolactone-
Dextran is degradable by dextranases, enzymes hydrolyzing (1 → 6)-alpha-D-glycosidic linkages. This enzyme is produced mainly by bacterial and fungi, but it was also detected in animal and human tissues, namely liver and spleen. Therefore, dextran is often chosen for biomedical applications, particularly drug delivery, because it is slowly degradable in human organism. Dextran molecules with Mw higher than 40 kDa are sequestered in the liver and spleen, and then hydrolyzed by endo- and exodextranases. Dextran molecules with Mw lower than 40 kDa can be eliminated through renal clearance [32]. However, dextran hydrogels implanted subcutaneously or intramuscularly into rats did not show signs of degradation 6 weeks post-implantation and were surrounded by a thin fibrous capsule and some macrophages and giant cells, which is a response typical for a number of non-degradable materials [32].
The degradability of alginate in human organism is limited. Alginate is naturally degraded by alginate lyases or alginate depolymerases, which have been isolated from marine algae, marine animals, bacteria, fungi, viruses, and other microorganisms, but are not present in the human organism. Degradability of alginate can be increased by its oxidation and at low pH. Also the hydrophilicity and water uptake capacity of alginate can help in its removal from the wound site (for a review, see [48]).
Other polysaccharides explored for creation of nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering and wound healing are gum tragacanth and gum arabic, both polysaccharides of plant origin, degradable by bacteria and fungi, for example, in soil [57, 58].
In biomaterial science, silk fibroin is considered to be degradable, but in mammalian organism, this degradation is long-lasting and can take more than 1 year. As a kind of biomaterial approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for medical use, silk is defined by United States Pharmacopeia as non-degradable for its negligible tensile strength loss
The degradation behavior of fibroin scaffolds depends on the preparation method and structural characteristics, such as processing condition, pore size, and silk fibroin concentration (for a review, see [65]). For example, three-dimensional porous scaffolds prepared from silk fibroin using all-aqueous process degraded within 2–6 months after implantation into muscle pouches of rats, while the scaffolds prepared using an organic solvent, hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP), persisted beyond 1 year. It was probably due to a lower original silk fibroin concentration, larger pore size, and a higher and more homogeneous cellular infiltration of aqueous-derived scaffolds than in HFIP-derived scaffolds [66].
For skin tissue engineering and wound healing, silk fibroin has been combined with various synthetic and natural polymers and other bioactive substances. The polymers included, for example, PCL, [67], poly(L-lactic acid)-
3. Nature-derived nanofibers degradable in the human tissues
Nature-derived polymers degradable in human tissues include, in particular, polymers that are synthesized in the human body and usually act as components of ECM. These polymers are proteins (collagen and its derivative gelatin, elastin, fibrinogen and fibrin, keratin) or polysaccharides in non-sulfated form (hyaluronic acid) and sulfated form (heparin-like glycosaminoglycans). In addition, some natural polymers synthesized by other organisms, such as bacteria, fungi, insects, crustaceans or plants, are degradable in human tissues, because they are susceptible to enzymes present in human tissues, such as lysozyme and esterases. These polymers include chitosan, gellan gum, zein, and PHBV.
Collagen is one of the most widely used natural proteins for creation of nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering and wound healing. However, these scaffolds are usually mechanically weak, and therefore they need crosslinking or blending with synthetic polymers. Collagen crosslinking with conventionally used agents, particularly glutaraldehyde, is associated with the risk of the scaffold cytotoxicity. More benign crosslinkers used recently include, for example, citric acid [95] or quaternary ammonium organosilane, a multifunctional crosslinking agent, which improved the electrospinnability of collagen by reducing its surface tension, endowed the collagen nanofibers with potent antimicrobial activity and promoted the adhesion and metabolic activity of primary human dermal fibroblasts without any cytotoxicity, at least in a lower concentration of 0.1% w/w [97].
Synthetic polymers used for combination with collagen in nanofibrous scaffolds included PLA [98], PLGA [99, 100], and particularly PCL, which was either blended with collagen [101, 102, 103, 104] or served as substrate for subsequent deposition of collagen [105]. Collagen has also been combined with natural polymers, such as silk fibroin [73] or chitosan in a form of blends [106] or in a form of bilayered scaffolds, where collagen was electrospun onto the chitosan scaffolds [107]. Collagen was also grafted on the surface of composite electrospun PVA/gelatin/alginate nanofibers [41]. Collagen-based or collagen-containing nanofibers have been loaded with a wide range of bioactive substances, such as vitamin C, vitamin D3, hydrocortisone, insulin, triiodothyronine, and epidermal growth factor [100], transforming growth factor-β1 [102], plant extracts such as
Similarly as collagen, also gelatin is the most promising for skin tissue engineering and wound healing applications in combination with various synthetic and natural polymers. For example, gelatin was combined with polyurethane [109], PLA [11, 17], and particularly with PCL, where it was incorporated into core-shell PCL/gelatin nanofibers as the core polymer [110] or electrospun independently of PCL using a double-nozzle technique, which resulted in creation of two types of nanofibers in the scaffolds, either mixed [111] or arranged in separate gelatin and PCL layers [112]. Gelatin was also combined with a copolymer of lactic acid and caprolactone P(LLA-CL) in the form of blends [113] or in the form of coaxial nanofibers with P(LLA-CL)/gelatin shell and albumin core containing epidermal growth factor, insulin, hydrocortisone, and retinoic acid [114]. Natural proteins combined with gelatin included dextran [31], pullulan [38], alginate [41], silk fibroin [74], and hyaluronan with chondroitin sulfate [86].
For combination with synthetic and natural polymers, for example, with PCL [115], and chitosan and keratin [116], gelatin was also used in the form of photocrosslinkable gelatin methacrylate hydrogel (GelMA). On PCL nanofibers, GelMA showed a higher decoration level in comparison with native gelatin [116]. Self-standing nanofibrous matrices electrospun from GelMA enabled tuning of their water retention capacity, stiffness, strength, elasticity, and degradation by changing the exposure time to UV light [117].

Figure 2.
Developing a bilayer construct of keratinocytes and fibroblasts on a PLLA nanofibrous membrane with fibrin and collagen hydrogel. Left: schematic design; right: real construct.
Also fibrinogen was used for modification of synthetic polymeric nanofibers in order to enhance the cell adhesion and growth. Nanofibrous scaffolds electrospun from blends of PCL and fibrinogen improved the adhesion, proliferation, and epidermal differentiation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) in comparison with pure PCL scaffolds. Composite PCL/fibrinogen scaffolds seeded with ADSCs also markedly improved healing of full-thickness excisional wounds created in rats in comparison with acellular dermal matrix or acellular dermal matrix with ADSCs [124].
In most studies dealing with keratin-containing nanofibers, keratin was combined with other natural or synthetic polymers in order to improve the spinnability of keratin, or to improve the bioactivity of the co-electrospun polymer. For example, in a study by Cruz-Maya
Hyaluronic acid stimulated infiltration of nanofibrous scaffold composed of hyaluronan, silk fibroin and PCL [75], and can help to promote cell proliferation [129]. Electrospinning of pure hyaluronic acid is not simple because of solubility characteristics of this polymer. Hyaluronic acid is well-soluble in water but less-soluble in most organic solvents, which can be solved by mixtures of solvents as water/ethanol or water/dimethylformamide [130]. Increasing of evaporation and decreasing of solution surface tension by the solvent mixing helps to electrospinning process. Another possibility is electrospinning of hyaluronic acid together with a suitable water-soluble polymer such as PVA [131] or PEO. The solution of pure hyaluronic acid [132] or with relatively small amount of carrier PEO was successfully spun into nanofibrous material by air-assisted electrospinning technology, that is, electroblowing [133]. For creation of nanofibrous scaffolds, hyaluronic acid was also used in combination with PCL [134], PLA [135] or gelatin, chondroitin sulfate and sericin [86].
However, electrospinning of chitosan is difficult due to its polycationic characters. Due to the presence of amine groups in the chitosan molecule, acidic aqueous solutions are the best solvents for this polymer. The best candidates for solvent system seem to be mixture of acetic acid (AA) and formic acid (FA) or trifluoroacetic acid (TFA); however, TFA is highly toxic. Electrospinning of pure chitosan has very low productivity because it requires very concentrated polymeric solutions [141]. Therefore, for creation of nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering, chitosan has been mixed with other natural or synthetic polymers, such as collagen [142], gelatin [143], keratin [116], cellulose [144], pectin [54, 55], silk fibroin [69], PHBV [145], PCL [142], PLA [146], PLGA [147], PEO, [148], and also with PVA, which was used in our studies ( Figure 3 ). Chitosan has also been mixed with various nanoparticles, such as halloysite nanotubes [149], graphene oxide [150] or nanodiamonds [144]. The reason of all these mixtures was to improve the stability, spinnability, wettability, mechanical properties, and biofunctionality of chitosan-containing scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. Combination of chitosan with various polymers also enabled creation of bilayer scaffolds for reconstruction of two main skin layers, that is, epidermis containing keratinocytes and dermis containing fibroblasts [116, 142]. In order to enhance the antimicrobial and wound healing activity of chitosan, this polymer was electrospun together with extract from Henna leaves [151]. In addition, chitosan nanoparticles have been incorporated in nanofibrous scaffolds as carriers for controlled drug delivery, for example, delivery of growth factors, cytokines and angiogenic factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor [152], granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [153] or angiogenin [147]. Nanofibrous scaffolds promising for skin tissue engineering and wound healing were also prepared directly from chitin, which was electrospun either alone with further modifications with fibronectin, laminin and particularly with type I collagen [154], or in combination with silk fibroin [70].

Figure 3.
Scanning electron microscopy of nanofibrous layers produced by needle electrospinning from PVA/chitosan solution.
4. Conclusions
Nanofibrous scaffolds made of nature-derived polymers hold a great promise for skin tissue engineering and wound healing. These scaffolds are created from biological matrices, and from this point of view, they resemble the extracellular matrix more closely than synthetic polymers. Some of these polymers, such as collagen, gelatin, elastin, keratin, nonsulfated and sulfated glycosaminoglycans, and also nonmulberry silk fibroin, contain motifs that are recognized and bound by cell adhesion receptors. Therefore, nature-derived polymers can increase the bioactivity of synthetic polymers, when combined with them in nanofibrous scaffolds. Conversely, synthetic polymers can improve the electrospinnability and mechanical properties of the natural polymers. Similarly as synthetic polymers, nature-derived polymers can be more or less degradable in human tissues. Degradable polymers include collagen, gelatin, elastin, keratin, glycosaminoglycans, but also chitosan, gellan gum and PHBV, that is, polymers produced by other than mammalian organisms. Polymers produced by other organisms, such as bacteria, fungi, algae, plants or insects, are usually nondegradable in human tissues, or their degradability is limited due to lack of appropriate enzymes. These polymers include glucans, such as cellulose or dextran, and other polysaccharides and proteins, such as pullulan, alginate, pectin, and silk fibroin. Well-degradable polymers are recommended as direct scaffolds for tissue engineering, while less-degradable polymers are suitable for “intelligent” wound dressing for drug delivery and cell delivery.
Acknowledgments
This review article was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (grants No. 17-02448S and 17-00885S).
References
- 1.
Bacakova L, Bacakova M, Pajorova J, Kudlackova R, Stankova L, Musilkova J, et al. Nanofibrous scaffolds as promising cell carriers for tissue engineering, chapter 3. In: Rahman MM, Asiri AM, editors, ISBN 978-953-51-2529-7, Print ISBN 978-953-51-2528-0, Nanofiber Research - Reaching New Heights. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen; 2016. pp. 29-54 - 2.
Kim JI, Pant HR, Sim HJ, Lee KM, Kim CS. Electrospun propolis/polyurethane composite nanofibers for biomedical applications. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2014; 44 :52-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.062 - 3.
Drupitha MP, Bankoti K, Pal P, Das B, Parameswar R, Dhara S, et al. Morphology-induced physico-mechanical and biological characteristics of TPU-PDMS blend scaffolds for skin tissue engineering applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials. 2019; 107 (5):1634-1644. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34256 - 4.
Arslan A, Simşek M, Aldemir SD, Kazaroğlu NM, Gümüşderelioğlu M.Honey-based PET or PET/chitosan fibrous wound dressings: Effect of honey on electrospinning process. Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition. 2014; 25 (10):999-1012. DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2014.918455 - 5.
Babaeijandaghi F, Shabani I, Seyedjafari E, Naraghi ZS, Vasei M, Haddadi-Asl V, et al. Accelerated epidermal regeneration and improved dermal reconstruction achieved by polyethersulfone nanofibers. Tissue Engineering. Part A. 2010; 16 (11):3527-3536. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0829 - 6.
Altinbasak I, Jijie R, Barras A, Golba B, Sanyal R, Bouckaert J, et al. Reduced graphene-oxide-embedded polymeric nanofiber mats: An “on-demand” photothermally triggered antibiotic release platform. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2018; 10 (48):41098-41106. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b14784 - 7.
Zupančič Š, Sinha-Ray S, Sinha-Ray S, Kristl J, Yarin AL. Controlled release of ciprofloxacin from core-shell nanofibers with monolithic or blended core. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2016; 13 (4):1393-1404. DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00039 - 8.
Li H, Williams GR, Wu J, Lv Y, Sun X, Wu H, et al. Thermosensitive nanofibers loaded with ciprofloxacin as antibacterial wound dressing materials. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2017; 517 (1-2):135-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.12.008 - 9.
Hejazian LB, Esmaeilzade B, Moghanni Ghoroghi F, Moradi F, Hejazian MB, Aslani A, et al. The role of biodegradable engineered nanofiber scaffolds seeded with hair follicle stem cells for tissue engineering. Iranian Biomedical Journal. 2012; 16 (4):193-201. DOI: 10.6091/ibj.1074.2012 - 10.
Mikes P, Horakova J, Saman A, Vejsadova L, Topham P, Punyodom W, et al. Comparison and characterization of different polyester nano/micro fibres for use in tissue engineering applications. Journal of Industrial Textiles. 2019. In press. DOI: 10.1177/1528083719848155 - 11.
Hoveizi E, Nabiuni M, Parivar K, Rajabi-Zeleti S, Tavakol S. Functionalisation and surface modification of electrospun polylactic acid scaffold for tissue engineering. Cell Biology International. 2014; 38 (1):41-49. DOI: 10.1002/cbin.10178 - 12.
Shtrichman R, Zeevi-Levin N, Zaid R, Barak E, Fishman B, Ziskind A, et al. The generation of hybrid electrospun nanofiber layer with extracellular matrix derived from human pluripotent stem cells, for regenerative medicine applications. Tissue Engineering. Part A. 2014; 20 (19-20):2756-2767. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0705 - 13.
Poormasjedi-Meibod MS, Salimi Elizei S, Leung V, Baradar Jalili R, Ko F, Ghahary A. Kynurenine modulates MMP-1 and type-I collagen expression via aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation in dermal fibroblasts. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2016; 231 (12):2749-2760. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.25383 - 14.
Gaaz TS, Sulong AB, Akhtar MN, Kadhum AA, Mohamad AB, Al-Amiery AA. Properties and applications of polyvinyl alcohol, halloysite nanotubes and their nanocomposites. Molecules. 2015; 20 (12):22833-22847. DOI: 10.3390/molecules201219884 - 15.
Bacakova L, Svorcik V. Cell colonization control by physical and chemical modification of materials. In: Kimura D, editor. Cell Growth Processes: New Research. Hauppauge, New York, USA: Nova Science Publishers, Inc; 2008. pp. 5-56. ISBN 978-1-60456-123-6 - 16.
Bacakova L, Filova E, Parizek M, Ruml T, Svorcik V. Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants. Biotechnology Advances. 2011; 29 (6):739-767. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.004 - 17.
Blackstone BN, Hahn JM, McFarland KL, DeBruler DM, Supp DM, Powell HM. Inflammatory response and biomechanical properties of coaxial scaffolds for engineered skin in vitro and post-grafting. Acta Biomaterialia. 2018; 80 :247-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.014 - 18.
Bačáková L, Novotná K, Sopuch T, Havelka P. Cell interaction with cellulose-based scaffolds for tissue engineering – A review. In: Mondal IH, editor. Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives: Synthesis, Modification, Nanostructure and Applications. Hauppauge, New York, USA: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2015. pp. 341-375. ISBN 978-1-63483-571-8 - 19.
Bacakova L, Pajorova J, Bacakova M, Skogberg A, Kallio P, Kolarova K, et al. Versatile application of nanocellulose: From industry to skin tissue engineering and wound healing. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9 (2). pii: E164. DOI: 10.3390/nano9020164 - 20.
Ohnkawa K. Nanofibers of cellulose and its derivatives fabricated using direct electrospinning. Molecules. 2015; 20 :9139-9154. DOI: 10.3390/molecules20059139 - 21.
Hu Y, Catchmark JM. Integration of cellulases into bacterial cellulose: Toward bioabsorbable cellulose composites. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials. 2011; 97 (1):114-123. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31792 - 22.
Hu Y, Catchmark JM. In vitro biodegradability and mechanical properties of bioabsorbable bacterial cellulose incorporating cellulases. Acta Biomaterialia. 2011; 7 (7):2835-2845. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.028 - 23.
Ko IK, Iwata H. An approach to constructing three-dimensional tissue. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2001; 944 :443-455. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03854.x - 24.
Ko IK, Kato K, Iwata H. A thin carboxymethyl cellulose culture substrate for the cellulase-induced harvesting of an endothelial cell sheet. Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition. 2005; 16 (10):1277-1291. DOI: 10.1163/156856205774269511 - 25.
Entcheva E, Bien H, Yin L, Chung CY, Farrell M, Kostov Y. Functional cardiac cell constructs on cellulose-based scaffolding. Biomaterials. 2004; 25 (26):5753-5762. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.024 - 26.
Torres-Rendon JG, Köpf M, Gehlen D, Blaeser A, Fischer H, De Laporte L, et al. Cellulose nanofibril hydrogel tubes as sacrificial templates for freestanding tubular cell constructs. Biomacromolecules. 2016; 17 (3):905-913. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01593 - 27.
Yadav V, Paniliatis BJ, Shi H, Lee K, Cebe P, Kaplan DL. Novel in vivo-degradable cellulose-chitin copolymer from metabolically engineered Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2010; 76 (18):6257-6265. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00698-10 - 28.
Yadav V, Sun L, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL. In vitro chondrogenesis with lysozyme susceptible bacterial cellulose as a scaffold. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2015; 9 (12):E276-E288. DOI: 10.1002/term.1644 - 29.
Safaee-Ardakani MR, Hatamian-Zarmi A, Sadat SM, Mokhtari-Hosseini ZB, Ebrahimi-Hosseinzadeh B, Rashidiani J, et al. Electrospun schizophyllan/polyvinyl alcohol blend nanofibrous scaffold as potential wound healing. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019; 127 :27-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.256 - 30.
Unnithan AR, Sasikala AR, Murugesan P, Gurusamy M, Wu D, Park CH, et al. Electrospun polyurethane-dextran nanofiber mats loaded with estradiol for post-menopausal wound dressing. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2015; 77 :1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.02.044 - 31.
Pan JF, Liu NH, Sun H, Xu F. Preparation and characterization of electrospun PLCL/Poloxamer nanofibers and dextran/gelatin hydrogels for skin tissue engineering. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (11):e112885. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112885 - 32.
Maia J, Evangelista MB, Gil H, Ferreira L. 2. Dextran-based materials for biomedical applications. In: Gil MH, editor. Carbohydrates Applications in Medicine. Kerala, India: Research Signpost; 2014. pp. 31-53. ISBN: 978-81-308-0523-8 - 33.
Bačáková L, Novotná K, Pařízek M. Polysaccharides as cell carriers for tissue engineering: The use of cellulose in vascular wall reconstruction. Physiological Research. 2014; 63 (Suppl 1):S29-S47 - 34.
Waghmare VS, Wadke PR, Dyawanapelly S, Deshpande A, Jain R, Dandekar P. Starch based nanofibrous scaffolds for wound healing applications. Bioact Mater. 2017; 3 (3):255-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.006 - 35.
Byman E, Schultz N, Netherlands Brain Bank, Fex M, Wennström M. Brain alpha-amylase: A novel energy regulator important in Alzheimer disease? Brain Pathology. 2018; 28 (6):920-932. DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12597 - 36.
Abed A, Assoul N, Ba M, Derkaoui SM, Portes P, Louedec L, et al. Influence of polysaccharide composition on the biocompatibility of pullulan/dextran-based hydrogels. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A. 2011; 96 (3):535-542. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33007 - 37.
Xu F, Weng B, Gilkerson R, Materon LA, Lozano K. Development of tannic acid/chitosan/pullulan composite nanofibers from aqueous solution for potential applications as wound dressing. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2015; 115 :16-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.081 - 38.
Shi L, Le Visage C, Chew SY. Long-term stabilization of polysaccharide electrospun fibres by in situ cross-linking. Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition. 2011; 22 (11):1459-1472. DOI: 10.1163/092050610X512108 - 39.
Krishnan R, Rajeswari R, Venugopal J, Sundarrajan S, Sridhar R, Shayanti M, et al. Polysaccharide nanofibrous scaffolds as a model for in vitro skin tissue regeneration. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine. 2012; 23 (6):1511-1519. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-012-4630-6 - 40.
Liu X, Chang M, He B, Meng L, Wang X, Sun R, et al. A one-pot strategy for preparation of high-strength carboxymethyl xylan-g-poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels with shape memory property. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2019; 538 :507-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.023 - 41.
Sobhanian P, Khorram M, Hashemi SS, Mohammadi A. Development of nanofibrous collagen-grafted poly (vinyl alcohol)/gelatin/alginate scaffolds as potential skin substitute. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019; 130 :977-987. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.045 - 42.
Coşkun G, Karaca E, Ozyurtlu M, Ozbek S, Yermezler A, Cavuşoğlu I. Histological evaluation of wound healing performance of electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol)/sodium alginate as wound dressing in vivo. Bio-medical Materials and Engineering. 2014; 24 (2):1527-1536. DOI: 10.3233/BME-130956 - 43.
Jeong SI, Krebs MD, Bonino CA, Khan SA, Alsberg E. Electrospun alginate nanofibers with controlled cell adhesion for tissue engineering. Macromolecular Bioscience. 2010; 10 (8):934-943. DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201000046 - 44.
Tort S, Acartürk F, Beşikci A. Evaluation of three-layered doxycycline-collagen loaded nanofiber wound dressing. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2017; 529 (1-2):642-653. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.027 - 45.
Byeon SY, Cho MK, Shim KH, Kim HJ, Song HG, Shin HS. Development of a Spirulina extract/alginate-imbedded PCL nanofibrous cosmetic patch. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2017; 27 (9):1657-1663. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1701.01025 - 46.
Hoseinpour Najar M, Minaiyan M. Taheri A. Preparation and in vivo evaluation of a novel gel-based wound dressing using arginine-alginate surface-modified chitosan nanofibers. Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 2018; 32 (6):689-701. DOI: 10.1177/0885328217739562 - 47.
Hu WP, Zhang B, Zhang J, Luo WL, Guo Y, Chen SJ, et al. Ag/alginate nanofiber membrane for flexible electronic skin. Nanotechnology. 2017; 28 (44):445502. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa8746 - 48.
Guarino V, Caputo T, Altobelli R, Ambrosio L. Degradation properties and metabolic activity of alginate and chitosan polyelectrolytes for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. AIMS Materials Science. 2015; 2 (4):497-502. DOI: 10.3934/matersci.2015.4.497 - 49.
Voragen AGJ, Coenen G-J, Verhoef RP, Schols HA. Pectin, a versatile polysaccharide present in plant cell walls. Structural Chemistry. 2009; 20 :263-275. DOI: 10.1007/s11224-009-9442-z - 50.
Archana D, Dutta J, Dutta PK. Evaluation of chitosan nano dressing for wound healing: Characterization, in vitro and in vivo studies. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2013; 57 :193-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.03.002 - 51.
Tayi L, Maku RV, Patel HK, Sonti RV. Identification of pectin degrading enzymes secreted by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and determination of their role in virulence on rice. PLoS One. 2016; 11 (12):e0166396. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166396 - 52.
Martos MA, Zubreski ER, Garro OA, Hours RA. Production of pectinolytic enzymes by the yeast Wickerhanomyces anomalus isolated from citrus fruits peels. Biotechnology Research International. 2013; 2013 :435154. DOI: 10.1155/2013/435154 - 53.
Huber DJ, Karakurt Y, Jeong J, et al. Pectin degradation in ripening and wounded fruits. The Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal (Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology). 2001; 13 (2):224-241. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-31312001000200009 - 54.
Lin HY, Chen HH, Chang SH, Ni TS. Pectin-chitosan-PVA nanofibrous scaffold made by electrospinning and its potential use as a skin tissue scaffold. Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition. 2013; 24 (4):470-484. DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2012.693047 - 55.
Lin HY, Chen SH, Chang SH, Huang ST. Tri-layered chitosan scaffold as a potential skin substitute. Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition. 2015; 26 (13):855-867. DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2015.1061350 - 56.
Chen S, Cui S, Zhang H, Pei X, Hu J, Zhou Y, et al. Cross-linked pectin nanofibers with enhanced cell adhesion. Biomacromolecules. 2018; 19 (2):490-498. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01605 - 57.
Saruchi, Kaith BS, Jindal R, Kumar V. Biodegradation of gum tragacanth acrylic acid based hydrogel and its impact on soil fertility. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2015; 115 :24-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab. 2015.02.009 - 58.
Hindi SSZ, Albureikan MO, Al-Ghamdi AA, Alhummiany H, Ansari MS. Synthesis, characterization and biodegradation of gum arabic-based bioplastic membranes. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Research. 2017; 4 (2):32-42. DOI: 10.12691/nnr-4-2-1 - 59.
Zarekhalili Z, Bahrami SH, Ranjbar-Mohammadi M, Milan PB. Fabrication and characterization of PVA/gum tragacanth/PCL hybrid nanofibrous scaffolds for skin substitutes. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2017; 94 (Pt A):679-690. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.10.042 - 60.
Ranjbar-Mohammadi M, Rabbani S, Bahrami SH, Joghataei MT, Moayer F. Antibacterial performance and in vivo diabetic wound healing of curcumin loaded gum tragacanth/poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun nanofibers. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2016; 69 :1183-1191. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.032 - 61.
Pedram Rad Z, Mokhtari J, Abbasi M. Calendula officinalis extract/PCL/Zein/gum arabic nanofibrous bio-composite scaffolds via suspension, two-nozzle and multilayer electrospinning for skin tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019; 135 :530-543. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.204 - 62.
Srivastava CM, Purwar R. Fabrication of robust Antheraea assama fibroin nanofibrous mat using ionic liquid for skin tissue engineering. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2016; 68 :276-290. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.020 - 63.
Srivastava CM, Purwar R, Gupta AP. Enhanced potential of biomimetic, silver nanoparticles functionalized Antheraea mylitta (tasar) silk fibroin nanofibrous mats for skin tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019; 130 :437-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.255 - 64.
Chouhan D, Chakraborty B, Nandi SK, Mandal BB. Role of non-mulberry silk fibroin in deposition and regulation of extracellular matrix towards accelerated wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia. 2017; 48 :157-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.019 - 65.
Cao Y, Wang B. Biodegradation of silk biomaterials. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2009; 10 (4):1514-1524. DOI: 10.3390/ijms10041514 - 66.
Wang Y, Rudym DD, Walsh A, Abrahamsen L, Kim HJ, Kim HS, et al. In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2008; 29 (24-25):3415-3428. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.002 - 67.
Lee JM, Chae T, Sheikh FA, Ju HW, Moon BM, Park HJ, et al. Three dimensional poly(ε-caprolactone) and silk fibroin nanocomposite fibrous matrix for artificial dermis. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2016; 68 :758-767. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.019 - 68.
Sridhar S, Venugopal JR, Ramakrishna S. Improved regeneration potential of fibroblasts using ascorbic acid-blended nanofibrous scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A. 2015; 103 (11):3431-3440. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35486 - 69.
Zhou Y, Yang H, Liu X, Mao J, Gu S, Xu W. Electrospinning of carboxyethyl chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol)/silk fibroin nanoparticles for wound dressings. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2013; 53 :88-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.11.013 - 70.
Yoo CR, Yeo IS, Park KE, Park JH, Lee SJ, Park WH, et al. Effect of chitin/silk fibroin nanofibrous bicomponent structures on interaction with human epidermal keratinocytes. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2008; 42 (4):324-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2007.12.004 - 71.
Shefa AA, Amirian J, Kang HJ, Bae SH, Jung HI, Choi HJ, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of effectiveness of a novel TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber-silk fibroin scaffold in wound healing. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2017; 177 :284-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.130 - 72.
Xin S, Li X, Wang Q , Huang R, Xu X, Lei Z, et al. Novel layer-by-layer structured nanofibrous mats coated by protein films for dermal regeneration. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. 2014; 10 (5):803-810. DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2014.1748 - 73.
Yeo IS, Oh JE, Jeong L, Lee TS, Lee SJ, Park WH, et al. Collagen-based biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds: Preparation and characterization of collagen/silk fibroin bicomponent nanofibrous structures. Biomacromolecules. 2008; 9 (4):1106-1116. DOI: 10.1021/bm700875a - 74.
Shan YH, Peng LH, Liu X, Chen X, Xiong J, Gao JQ. Silk fibroin/gelatin electrospun nanofibrous dressing functionalized with astragaloside IV induces healing and anti-scar effects on burn wound. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2015; 479 (2):291-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.12.067 - 75.
Li L, Qian Y, Jiang C, Lv Y, Liu W, Zhong L, et al. The use of hyaluronan to regulate protein adsorption and cell infiltration in nanofibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2012; 33 (12):3428-3445. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.038 - 76.
Sheng X, Fan L, He C, Zhang K, Mo X, Wang H. Vitamin E-loaded silk fibroin nanofibrous mats fabricated by green process for skin care application. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2013; 56 :49-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.01.029 - 77.
Fan L, Cai Z, Zhang K, Han F, Li J, He C, et al. Green electrospun pantothenic acid/silk fibroin composite nanofibers: Fabrication, characterization and biological activity. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces. 2014; 117 :14-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.12.030 - 78.
Lin S, Chen M, Jiang H, Fan L, Sun B, Yu F, et al. Green electrospun grape seed extract-loaded silk fibroin nanofibrous mats with excellent cytocompatibility and antioxidant effect. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces. 2016; 139 :156-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.001 - 79.
Kandhasamy S, Arthi N, Arun RP, Verma RS. Synthesis and fabrication of novel quinone-based chromenopyrazole antioxidant-laden silk fibroin nanofibers scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2019; 102 :773-787. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.076 - 80.
Suganya S, Venugopal J, Ramakrishna S, Lakshmi BS, Dev VR. Naturally derived biofunctional nanofibrous scaffold for skin tissue regeneration. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2014; 68 :135-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.031 - 81.
Lee OJ, Ju HW, Kim JH, Lee JM, Ki CS, Kim JH, et al. Development of artificial dermis using 3D electrospun silk fibroin nanofiber matrix. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. 2014; 10 (7):1294-1303 - 82.
Park YR, Ju HW, Lee JM, Kim DK, Lee OJ, Moon BM, et al. Three-dimensional electrospun silk-fibroin nanofiber for skin tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2016; 93 (Pt B):1567-1574. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.047 - 83.
Gholipourmalekabadi M, Samadikuchaksaraei A, Seifalian AM, Urbanska AM, Ghanbarian H, Hardy JG, et al. Silk fibroin/amniotic membrane 3D bi-layered artificial skin. Biomedical Materials. 2018; 13 (3):035003. DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa999b - 84.
Xie SY, Peng LH, Shan YH, Niu J, Xiong J, Gao JQ. Adult stem cells seeded on electrospinning silk fibroin nanofiberous scaffold enhance wound repair and regeneration. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2016; 16 (6):5498-5505. DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2016.11730 - 85.
Sapru S, Das S, Mandal M, Ghosh AK, Kundu SC. Prospects of nonmulberry silk protein sericin-based nanofibrous matrices for wound healing - In vitro and in vivo investigations. Acta Biomaterialia. 2018; 78 :137-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.047 - 86.
Bhowmick S, Scharnweber D, Koul V. Co-cultivation of keratinocyte-human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) on sericin loaded electrospun nanofibrous composite scaffold (cationic gelatin/hyaluronan/chondroitin sulfate) stimulates epithelial differentiation in hMSCs: In vitro study. Biomaterials. 2016; 88 :83-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.034 - 87.
Gilotra S, Chouhan D, Bhardwaj N, Nandi SK, Mandal BB. Potential of silk sericin based nanofibrous mats for wound dressing applications. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2018; 90 :420-432. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.077 - 88.
Zhao R, Li X, Sun B, Zhang Y, Zhang D, Tang Z, et al. Electrospun chitosan/sericin composite nanofibers with antibacterial property as potential wound dressings. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2014; 68 :92-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.029 - 89.
Law JX, Liau LL, Saim A, Yang Y, Idrus R. Electrospun collagen nanofibers and their applications in skin tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017; 14 (6):699-718. DOI: 10.1007/s13770-017-0075-9 - 90.
Wang Y, Zhang CL, Zhang Q , Li P. Composite electrospun nanomembranes of fish scale collagen peptides/chito-oligosaccharides: Antibacterial properties and potential for wound dressing. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2011; 6 :667-676. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S17547 - 91.
Zhou T, Wang N, Xue Y, Ding T, Liu X, Mo X, et al. Electrospun tilapia collagen nanofibers accelerating wound healing via inducing keratinocytes proliferation and differentiation. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces. 2016; 143 :415-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.052 - 92.
Le Corre-Bordes D, Hofman K, Hall B. Guide to electrospinning denatured whole chain collagen from hoki fish using benign solvents. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2018; 112 :1289-1299. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.088 - 93.
Zhou T, Sui B, Mo X, Sun J. Multifunctional and biomimetic fish collagen/bioactive glass nanofibers: Fabrication, antibacterial activity and inducing skin regeneration in vitro and in vivo. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2017; 12 :3495-3507. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S132459 - 94.
Chen J, Gao K, Liu S, Wang S, Elango J, Bao B, et al. Fish collagen surgical compress repairing characteristics on wound healing process In vivo. Marine Drugs. 2019; 17 . pii: E33. DOI: 10.3390/md17010033 - 95.
Cumming MH, Leonard AR, LeCorre-Bordes DS, Hofman K. Intra-fibrillar citric acid crosslinking of marine collagen electrospun nanofibres. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2018; 114 :874-881. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.180 - 96.
Ramanathan G, Muthukumar T, Sivagnanam T. In vivo efficiency of the collagen coated nanofibrous scaffold and their effect on growth factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines in wound healing. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2017; 814 :45-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.08.003 - 97.
Dhand C, Balakrishnan Y, Ong ST, Dwivedi N, Venugopal JR, Harini S, et al. Antimicrobial quaternary ammonium organosilane cross-linked nanofibrous collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2018; 13 :4473-4492. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S159770 - 98.
Ravichandran R, Venugopal JR, Sundarrajan S, Mukherjee S, Sridhar R, Ramakrishna S. Composite poly-L-lactic acid/poly-(α,β)-DL-aspartic acid/collagen nanofibrous scaffolds for dermal tissue regeneration. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2012; 32 (6):1443-1451. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.04.024 - 99.
Alamein MA, Stephens S, Liu Q , Skabo S, Warnke PH. Mass production of nanofibrous extracellular matrix with controlled 3D morphology for large-scale soft tissue regeneration. Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods. 2013; 19 (6):458-472. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2012.0417 - 100.
Peh P, Lim NS, Blocki A, Chee SM, Park HC, Liao S, et al. Simultaneous delivery of highly diverse bioactive compounds from blend electrospun fibers for skin wound healing. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2015; 26 (7):1348-1358. DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00123 - 101.
Gümüşderelioğlu M, Dalkıranoğlu S, Aydın RS, Cakmak S. A novel dermal substitute based on biofunctionalized electrospun PCL nanofibrous matrix. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A. 2011; 98 (3):461-472. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33143 - 102.
Albright V, Xu M, Palanisamy A, Cheng J, Stack M, Zhang B, et al. Micelle-coated, hierarchically structured nanofibers with dual-release capability for accelerated wound healing and infection control. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2018; 7 (11):e1800132. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201800132 - 103.
Abdul Khodir WKW, Abdul Razak AH, Ng MH, Guarino V, Susanti D. Encapsulation and characterization of gentamicin sulfate in the collagen added electrospun nanofibers for skin regeneration. J Funct Biomater. 2018; 9 (2):E36. DOI: 10.3390/jfb9020036 - 104.
Wang C, Wang Q , Gao W, Zhang Z, Lou Y, Jin H, et al. Highly efficient local delivery of endothelial progenitor cells significantly potentiates angiogenesis and full-thickness wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia. 2018; 69 :156-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.019 - 105.
Ghosal K, Manakhov A, Zajíčková L, Thomas S. Structural and surface compatibility study of modified electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) composites for skin tissue engineering. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017; 18 (1):72-81. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-016-0500-8 - 106.
Xie X, Li D, Su C, Cong W, Mo X, Hou G, et al. Functionalized biomimetic composite nanfibrous scaffolds with antibacterial and hemostatic efficacy for facilitating wound healing. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. 2019; 15 (6):1267-1279. DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2019.2756 - 107.
Yao CH, Chen KY, Chen YS, Li SJ, Huang CH. Lithospermi radix extract-containing bilayer nanofiber scaffold for promoting wound healing in a rat model. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2019; 96 :850-858. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.053 - 108.
Aldana AA, Abraham GA. Current advances in electrospun gelatin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2017; 523 (2):441-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.044 - 109.
Yao CH, Lee CY, Huang CH, Chen YS, Chen KY. Novel bilayer wound dressing based on electrospun gelatin/keratin nanofibrous mats for skin wound repair. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2017; 79 :533-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.076 - 110.
Adeli-Sardou M, Yaghoobi MM, Torkzadeh-Mahani M, Dodel M. Controlled release of lawsone from polycaprolactone/gelatin electrospun nano fibers for skin tissue regeneration. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019; 124 :478-491. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.237 - 111.
Baghersad S, Hajir Bahrami S, Mohammadi MR, Mojtahedi MRM, Milan PB. Development of biodegradable electrospun gelatin/aloe-vera/poly(ε-caprolactone) hybrid nanofibrous scaffold for application as skin substitutes. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2018; 93 :367-379. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.020 - 112.
Dias JR, Baptista-Silva S, Sousa A, Oliveira AL, Bártolo PJ, Granja PL. Biomechanical performance of hybrid electrospun structures for skin regeneration. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2018; 93 :816-827. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.050 - 113.
Chandrasekaran AR, Venugopal J, Sundarrajan S, Ramakrishna S. Fabrication of a nanofibrous scaffold with improved bioactivity for culture of human dermal fibroblasts for skin regeneration. Biomedical Materials. 2011; 6 (1):015001. DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/6/1/015001 - 114.
Jin G, Prabhakaran MP, Kai D, Ramakrishna S. Controlled release of multiple epidermal induction factors through core-shell nanofibers for skin regeneration. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2013; 85 (3 Pt A):689-698. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.06.002 - 115.
Mao W, Kang MK, Shin JU, Son YJ, Kim HS, Yoo HS. Coaxial hydro-nanofibrils for self-assembly of cell sheets producing skin bilayers. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2018; 10 (50):43503-43511. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b17740 - 116.
Kim JW, Kim MJ, Ki CS, Kim HJ, Park YH. Fabrication of bi-layer scaffold of keratin nanofiber and gelatin-methacrylate hydrogel: Implications for skin graft. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2017; 105 (Pt 1):541-548. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.07.067 - 117.
Zhao X, Sun X, Yildirimer L, Lang Q , Lin ZYW, Zheng R, et al. Cell infiltrative hydrogel fibrous scaffolds for accelerated wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia. 2017; 49 :66-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.017 - 118.
DeFrates KG, Moore R, Borgesi J, Lin G, Mulderig T, Beachley V, et al. Protein-based fiber materials in medicine: A review. Nanomaterials. 2018; 8 (7). pii: E457. DOI: 10.3390/nano8070457 - 119.
Khalili S, Khorasani SN, Razavi SM, Hashemibeni B, Tamayol A. Nanofibrous scaffolds with biomimetic composition for skin regeneration. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2019; 187 (4):1193-1203. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-018-2871-7 - 120.
Riedel T, Brynda E, Dyr JE, Houska M. Controlled preparation of thin fibrin films immobilized at solid surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A. 2009; 88 (2):437-447. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31755 - 121.
Law JX, Musa F, Ruszymah BH, El Haj AJ, Yang Y. A comparative study of skin cell activities in collagen and fibrin constructs. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2016; 38 (9):854-861. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.05.017 - 122.
Pajorova J, Bacakova M, Musilkova J, Broz A, Hadraba D, Lopot F, et al. Morphology of a fibrin nanocoating influences dermal fibroblast behavior. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2018; 13 :3367-3380. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S162644 - 123.
Bacakova M, Pajorova J, Broz A, Hadraba D, Lopot F, Zavadakova A, et al. A two-layer skin construct consisting of a collagen hydrogel reinforced by a fibrin-coated polylactide nanofibrous membrane. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2019; 14 :5033-5050. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S200782 - 124.
Mirzaei-Parsa MJ, Ghanbari H, Alipoor B, Tavakoli A, Najafabadi MRH, Faridi-Majidi R. Nanofiber-acellular dermal matrix as a bilayer scaffold containing mesenchymal stem cell for healing of full-thickness skin wounds. Cell and Tissue Research. 2019; 375 (3):709-721. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-018-2927-6 - 125.
Wang J, Hao S, Luo T, Zhou T, Yang X, Wang B. Keratose/poly (vinyl alcohol) blended nanofibers: Fabrication and biocompatibility assessment. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2017; 72 :212-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.071 - 126.
Giuri D, Barbalinardo M, Sotgiu G, Zamboni R, Nocchetti M, Donnadio A, et al. Nano-hybrid electrospun non-woven mats made of wool keratin and hydrotalcites as potential bio-active wound dressings. Nanoscale. 2019; 11 (13):6422-6430. DOI: 10.1039/c8nr10114k - 127.
Cruz-Maya I, Guarino V, Almaguer-Flores A, Alvarez-Perez MA, Varesano A, Vineis C. Highly polydisperse keratin rich nanofibers: Scaffold design and in vitro characterization. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A. 2019; 107 (8):1803-1813. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36699 - 128.
Zahedi E, Esmaeili A, Eslahi N, Shokrgozar MA, Simchi A. Fabrication and characterization of core-shell electrospun fibrous mats containing medicinal herbs for wound healing and skin tissue engineering. Marine Drugs. 2019; 17 (1). pii: E27. DOI: 10.3390/md17010027 - 129.
Yan S, Zhang Q , Wang J, Liu Y, Lu S, Li M, et al. Silk fibroin/chondroitin sulfate/hyaluronic acid ternary scaffolds for dermal tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomaterialia. 2013; 9 (6):6771-6782. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.016 - 130.
Li J, He A, Han CC, Fang D, Hsiao BS, Chu B. Electrospinning of hyaluronic acid (HA) and HA/gelatin blends. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 2006; 27 :114-120. DOI: 10.1002/marc.200500726 - 131.
Séon-Lutz M, Couffin A-C, Vignoud S, Schlatter G, Hébraud A. Electrospinning in water and in situ crosslinking of hyaluronic acid / cyclodextrin nanofibers: Towards wound dressing with controlled drug release. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2019; 207 :276-287. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.085 - 132.
Um IC, Fang D, Hsiao BS, Okamoto A, Chu B. Electro-spinning and electro-blowing of hyaluronic acid. Biomacromolecules. 2004; 5 (4):1428-1436. DOI: 10.1021/bm034539b - 133.
Pokorny M, Rassushin V, Wolfova L, Velebny V. Increased production of nanofibrous materials by electroblowing from blends of hyaluronic acid and polyethylene oxide. Polymer Engineering and Science. 2016; 56 :932-938. DOI: 10.1002/pen.24322 - 134.
Qian Y, Li L, Jiang C, Xu W, Lv Y, Zhong L, et al. The effect of hyaluronan on the motility of skin dermal fibroblasts in nanofibrous scaffolds. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2015; 79 :133-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.04.059 - 135.
Stodolak-Zych E, Rozmus K, Dzierzkowska E, Zych Ł, Rapacz-Kmita A, Gargas M, et al. The membrane with polylactide and hyaluronic fibers for skin substitute. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 2018; 20 (4):91-99. DOI: 10.5277/ABB-01199-2018-02 - 136.
Kurpinski KT, Stephenson JT, Janairo RR, Lee H, Li S. The effect of fiber alignment and heparin coating on cell infiltration into nanofibrous PLLA scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2010; 31 (13):3536-3542. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.062 - 137.
Yergoz F, Hastar N, Cimenci CE, Ozkan AD, Tekinay T, Guler MO, et al. Heparin mimetic peptide nanofiber gel promotes regeneration of full thickness burn injury. Biomaterials. 2017; 134 :117-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.040 - 138.
Sadeghi A, Zandi M, Pezeshki-Modaress M, Rajabi S. Tough, hybrid chondroitin sulfate nanofibers as a promising scaffold for skin tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019; 132 :63-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.208. 27 - 139.
Pezeshki-Modaress M, Mirzadeh H, Zandi M, Rajabi-Zeleti S, Sodeifi N, Aghdami N, et al. Gelatin/chondroitin sulfate nanofibrous scaffolds for stimulation of wound healing: In-vitro and in-vivo study. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A. 2017; 105 (7):2020-2034. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35890 - 140.
Azuma K, Ifuku S, Osaki T, Okamoto Y, Minami S. Preparation and biomedical applications of chitin and chitosan nanofibers. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. 2014; 10 (10):2891-2920. DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2014.1882 - 141.
Kai D, Liow SS, Loh XJ. Biodegradable polymers for electrospinning: towards biomedical applications. Materials Science and Engineering C: Materials for Biological Applications. 2014; 45 :659-670. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.051 - 142.
Pal P, Dadhich P, Srivas PK, Das B, Maulik D, Dhara S. Bilayered nanofibrous 3D hierarchy as skin rudiment by emulsion electrospinning for burn wound management. Biomaterials Science. 2017; 5 (9):1786-1799. DOI: 10.1039/c7bm00174f - 143.
Gomes S, Rodrigues G, Martins G, Henriques C, Silva JC. Evaluation of nanofibrous scaffolds obtained from blends of chitosan, gelatin and polycaprolactone for skin tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2017; 102 :1174-1185. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.004 - 144.
Mahdavi M, Mahmoudi N, Rezaie Anaran F, Simchi A. Electrospinning of nanodiamond-modified polysaccharide nanofibers with physico-mechanical properties close to natural skins. Marine Drugs. 2016; 14 (7). pii: E128. DOI: 10.3390/md14070128 - 145.
Veleirinho B, Coelho DS, Dias PF, Maraschin M, Ribeiro-do-Valle RM, Lopes-da-Silva JA. Nanofibrous poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/chitosan scaffolds for skin regeneration. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2012; 51 (4):343-350. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.05.023 - 146.
Shalumon KT, Sathish D, Nair SV, Chennazhi KP, Tamura H, Jayakumar R. Fabrication of aligned poly(lactic acid)-chitosan nanofibers by novel parallel blade collector method for skin tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. 2012; 8 (3):405-416. DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2012.1395 - 147.
Mo Y, Guo R, Zhang Y, Xue W, Cheng B, Zhang Y. Controlled dual delivery of angiogenin and curcumin by electrospun nanofibers for skin regeneration. Tissue Engineering. Part A. 2017; 23 (13-14):597-608. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0268 - 148.
Mengistu Lemma S, Bossard F, Rinaudo M. Preparation of pure and stable chitosan nanofibers by electrospinning in the presence of poly(ethylene oxide). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17 (11):E1790. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17111790 - 149.
Koosha M, Raoufi M, Moravvej H. One-pot reactive electrospinning of chitosan/PVA hydrogel nanofibers reinforced by halloysite nanotubes with enhanced fibroblast cell attachment for skin tissue regeneration. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces. 2019; 179 :270-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.03.054 - 150.
Mahmoudi N, Eslahi N, Mehdipour A, Mohammadi M, Akbari M, Samadikuchaksaraei A, et al. Temporary skin grafts based on hybrid graphene oxide-natural biopolymer nanofibers as effective wound healing substitutes: Pre-clinical and pathological studies in animal models. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine. 2017; 28 (5):73. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-017-5874-y - 151.
Yousefi I, Pakravan M, Rahimi H, Bahador A, Farshadzadeh Z, Haririan I. An investigation of electrospun henna leaves extract-loaded chitosan based nanofibrous mats for skin tissue engineering. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2017; 75 :433-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.076 - 152.
Piran M, Vakilian S, Piran M, Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A, Hosseinzadeh S, Ardeshirylajimi A. In vitro fibroblast migration by sustained release of PDGF-BB loaded in chitosan nanoparticles incorporated in electrospun nanofibers for wound dressing applications. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018; 46 (supp 1):511-520. DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1430698 - 153.
Tanha S, Rafiee-Tehrani M, Abdollahi M, Vakilian S, Esmaili Z, Naraghi ZS, et al. G-CSF loaded nanofiber/nanoparticle composite coated with collagen promotes wound healing in vivo. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A. 2017; 105 (10):2830-2842. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36135 - 154.
Noh HK, Lee SW, Kim JM, Oh JE, Kim KH, Chung CP, et al. Electrospinning of chitin nanofibers: Degradation behavior and cellular response to normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 2006; 27 (21):3934-3944. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.016 - 155.
Vashisth P, Pruthi V. Synthesis and characterization of crosslinked gellan/PVA nanofibers for tissue engineering application. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2016; 67 :304-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.049 - 156.
Vashisth P, Nikhil K, Roy P, Pruthi PA, Singh RP, Pruthi V. A novel gellan-PVA nanofibrous scaffold for skin tissue regeneration: Fabrication and characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016; 136 :851-859. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.113 - 157.
Vashisth P, Srivastava AK, Nagar H, Raghuwanshi N, Sharan S, Nikhil K, et al. Drug functionalized microbial polysaccharide based nanofibers as transdermal substitute. Nanomedicine. 2016; 12 (5):1375-1385. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.01.019 - 158.
Bonifacio MA, Cometa S, Cochis A, Gentile P, Ferreira AM, Azzimonti B, et al. Data on Manuka Honey/Gellan gum composite hydrogels for cartilage repair. Data in Brief. 2018; 20 :831-839. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.155 - 159.
Yu I, Kaonis S, Roland CR. A study on degradation behavior of 3D printed gellan gum scaffolds. Procedia CIRP. 2017; 65 :78-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.020 - 160.
Lin T, Lu C, Zhu L, Lu T. The biodegradation of zein in vitro and in vivo and its application in implants. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011; 12 (1):172-176. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-010-9565-y - 161.
Maharjan B, Joshi MK, Tiwari AP, Park CH, Kim CS. In-situ synthesis of AgNPs in the natural/synthetic hybrid nanofibrous scaffolds: Fabrication, characterization and antimicrobial activities. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2017; 65 :66-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.034 - 162.
Zhang M, Li X, Li S, Liu Y, Hao L. Electrospun poly(l-lactide)/zein nanofiber mats loaded with Rana chensinensis skin peptides for wound dressing. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine. 2016; 27 (9):136. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-016-5749-7 - 163.
Figueira DR, Miguel SP, de Sá KD, Correia IJ. Production and characterization of polycaprolactone- hyaluronic acid/chitosan- zein electrospun bilayer nanofibrous membrane for tissue regeneration. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2016; 93 (Pt A):1100-1110. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.080 - 164.
Babitha S, Korrapati PS. Biodegradable zein-polydopamine polymeric scaffold impregnated with TiO2 nanoparticles for skin tissue engineering. Biomedical Materials. 2017; 12 (5):055008. DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa7d5a - 165.
Sultana N, Khan TH. In vitro degradation of PHBV scaffolds and nHA/PHBV composite scaffolds containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2012; 2012 :190950. DOI: 10.1155/2012/190950 - 166.
Sundaramurthi D, Krishnan UM, Sethuraman S. Epidermal differentiation of stem cells on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) nanofibers. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2014; 42 (12):2589-2599. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1124-3 - 167.
Keshel SH, Biazar E, Rezaei Tavirani M, Rahmati Roodsari M, Ronaghi A, Ebrahimi M, et al. The healing effect of unrestricted somatic stem cells loaded in collagen-modified nanofibrous PHBV scaffold on full-thickness skin defects. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2014; 42 (3):210-216. DOI: 10.3109/21691401.2013.800080 - 168.
Zine R, Sinha M. Nanofibrous poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/collagen/graphene oxide scaffolds for wound coverage. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2017; 80 :129-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.138 - 169.
Yuan J, Geng J, Xing Z, Shim KJ, Han I, Kim J, et al. Novel wound dressing based on nanofibrous PHBV-keratin mats. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2015; 9 (9):1027-1035. DOI: 10.1002/term.1653