Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Zebrafish Photoreceptor Degeneration and Regeneration Research to Understand Hereditary Human Blindness

Written By

Maria Iribarne

Submitted: April 3rd, 2019 Reviewed: July 22nd, 2019 Published: August 20th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88758

Chapter metrics overview

693 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Humans with mutations in photoreceptor-related genes develop forms of retinal degeneration, such as retinitis pigmentosa, cone dystrophy, or Leber congenital amaurosis. Similarly, numerous photoreceptor mutant animal models present phenotypes that resemble retinal degeneration. Zebrafish retina manifests anatomical organization and development remarkably conserved in humans, making these fish a good model to study photoreceptor development and disease. Zebrafish are ideal for forward genetic screens to isolate mutants with visual defects. More recently, CRISPR/Cas system-mediated genome editing has enabled establishment of specific zebrafish photoreceptor mutants. Here, I review zebrafish models of inherited retinal diseases, focusing on rod versus cone photoreceptor mutants. Because zebrafish possess robust regeneration capacity to replace the lost photoreceptors, here I review the current understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying this response.


  • photoreceptor
  • degeneration
  • genetic mutant
  • regeneration
  • Müller glia
  • genome editing
  • CRISPR/Cas9 system
  • zebrafish

1. Introduction

Photoreceptor degeneration includes a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by death of photoreceptors and progressive loss of vision. Photoreceptor degeneration is a major cause of blindness in developed countries, for which there is currently no effective treatment [1]. Zebrafish are a good model to study photoreceptor development and disease, because the anatomical organization and development of the retina are remarkably conserved among vertebrates. In contrast to the mammalian retina, which is rod-rich, zebrafish have cone- and rod-rich retinas, facilitating the study of cones. Cone visual acuity can be evaluated by simple optokinetic response (OKR), even at very early stages of development. In this review, I discuss why the zebrafish model is useful to unravel mechanisms of photoreceptor loss. In addition, unlike mammals, zebrafish have the capacity to fully regenerate dead photoreceptors, raising the hope of future treatments for this disorder. Here I summarize our current understanding of this regeneration response.

1.1 Photoreceptors in the zebrafish retina

Zebrafish neural retina, like those of other vertebrates, comprises three nuclear layers, separated by two synaptic layers ( Figure 1 ). The outer nuclear layer (ONL) comprises rod and cone photoreceptors, the light-sensing neurons. The inner nuclear layer (INL) consists of bipolar, horizontal, and amacrine neurons, the second-order neurons. The ganglion cell layer is formed by ganglion cells, axons of which exit the retina, forming the optic nerve, which connects with the tectum. These neurons interconnect by synapses in the plexiform layers. The neural retina is located adjacent to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), which supports general homeostasis of photoreceptors, such as recycling 11-cis retinal for visual pigment regeneration [2, 3].

Figure 1.

Zebrafish retinal organization. (A) Semi-thin section of a zebrafish retina at 7 days post-fertilization (dpf). The neural retina is organized into 3 layers. The ONL is formed of cone and rod photoreceptors. (B) Schematic representation of all components of the retina. ONL: outer nuclear layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; GCL: ganglion cell layer; RPE: retinal pigmentary epithelium; h: horizontal; b: bipolar; a: amacrine; g: ganglion neuron.

Photoreceptors are polarized neurons with characteristic morphology. They display very specialized cell regions, including outer segments (OSs), connecting cilia, cell bodies, and terminal synapses. OS structure is important for phototransduction. The cell bodies possess the machinery to support all cell functions, and their synaptic termini transduce signals to bipolar neurons. OSs are formed by hundreds of cell membrane discs stacked horizontally and associated with a high concentration of proteins for phototransduction. These proteins are synthetized in cell bodies, and then are transported to the OS through connecting cilia.

Photoreceptors are sensory neurons that produce electrical responses when stimulated by light. In the OS, photons are captured by photopigment molecules to initiate phototransduction cascades [4]. Phototransduction is a complex signaling process that results in closing of voltage-gated ion channels, producing a change in membrane potential. Then, this electrical signal is amplified by other cell types in the inner retina and conducted to the brain. Although this signaling pathway is common to both rods and cones, signaling proteins are mostly encoded by distinct sets of rod- and cone-specific genes. Cone and rod photoreceptors have different sensitivity to light. Rods are extremely sensitive to low-intensity light, while cones function at higher light intensity, and enable color discrimination. In zebrafish, four different subtypes of cones are organized in a precise mosaic pattern. Cones are abundant throughout the zebrafish retina, unlike that of humans, in which cones are at high density in the fovea. Like humans, zebrafish are diurnal.

1.2 Zebrafish as a model to study hereditary eye diseases in humans

Hereditary diseases of the retina involve heterogeneous mutations that result in progressive photoreceptor death, leading to blindness. Mutations in over 200 genes are currently known to be associated with retinal disorders [Retinal Information Network (RetNet):]. Retinal degeneration includes multifactorial diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), cone-rod dystrophy, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In many cases, these diseases are similar in morphological pathogenicity, whereas their genetic origins may be due to mutations affecting different proteins, such as opsins, proteins of the transduction cascade, ciliary protein, or metabolic proteins.

Retinal degeneration can affect rods, cones, or both. Retinitis pigmentosa is a remarkable disease, caused by a mutation in rod photoreceptors that progresses to affect wild-type cone photoreceptors. It is characterized by progression from night blindness due to rod photoreceptor death, to dysfunction and degeneration of cones concentrated in the fovea at the center of the retina [5]. Retinitis pigmentosa is the most common inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD), affecting approximately 1 in 4000 people [6]. AMD is a multi-factorial disease that affects RPE, and leads to the loss of central vision, sustained by cone photoreceptors. AMD is the leading cause of blindness in industrialized countries [7]. Age and a positive family history of AMD are the two strongest risk factors for AMD. This disease is characterized by pigmentation changes at the level of the RPE and deposition of extracellular deposits called drusen, between the basal surface of the RPE and Bruch’s membrane in the macula [8].

Leber congenital amaurosis is a group of monogenic, inherited, retinal degenerative disorders that typically show early onset and severe visual dysfunction, with progressive degeneration [9]. At least 25 genes involved in the retinoid cycle and phototransduction, photoreceptor morphogenesis, and protein trafficking in the connecting cilia are associated with LCA. Cone and cone-rod dystrophies are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of inherited retinal diseases, involving as many as 30 genes. Initially cone photoreceptors degenerate, followed by rod photoreceptor loss. These disorders typically present progressive loss of central vision, color vision disturbances, and photophobia [10].

Why use zebrafish to research inherited retinal dystrophy? Zebrafish are small tropical fish that are easy to maintain, and that produce many eggs. They have transparent embryos that develop very rapidly, with a 3–4-month generation time. Zebrafish are also easy to modify genetically [11]. The visual system is highly conserved. It is already functional just 5 days post-fertilization (dpf), and it can be assessed by OKR [12]. The fish retina is cone-rich. Because several genes have extra paralogs caused by gene duplication in teleost fish, several genes are cone and rod-specific, making them suitable to study both types of photoreceptors independently [13]. The pioneering work of Streisinger, which produced mutants using UV-irradiated sperm, hydrostatic pressure, heat shock, or gamma irradiation, proved that genetics could be studied using the zebrafish [14, 15]. Soon after that, wide-ranging mutant collections that develop retinal degeneration were isolated, propelling zebrafish into ophthalmologic research.

1.2.1 Forward genetic screens to isolate mutants with visual defects

A special issue of Developmentin 1996 published 37 papers coming mainly from Nüsslein-Volhard’s lab in Tübingen and Wolfgang Driever’s lab in Boston. These groups performed large-scale mutagenesis screens from founder fish chemically mutagenized with N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) [16, 17, 18] to provide researchers with thousands of mutants ( Figure 2 ). This special issue described roughly 1500 mutations in more than 400 genes involved in processes that govern development and organogenesis [19]. These initial screens were based on evaluations of phenotype by stereomicroscope, without staining or complex microscopy. Additionally, behavioral screens to isolate visual mutants were carried out [12, 20, 21, 22, 23]. In these cases, OKR and optomotor responses (OMR) of mutagenized larvae were measured during a three-generation screen for recessive mutations ( Figure 2 ). Other screening used F1 generation fish (8–10 months old) derived by ENU mutagenesis, and evaluated their escape responses to a threatening object in order to isolate dominant mutants [24, 25].

Figure 2.

Genetic strategies to isolate zebrafish visual mutants. (A) Three-generation forward screening. Male zebrafish are treated with the mutagenic drug, ENU, followed by 3 generations of crossing to isolate homozygous recessive mutants. Larvae are usually screened using visual behavior tests. (B) Reverse genetic screening based on Crispr/Cas9 technology. 1–4 cell eggs are microinjected with gRNA and Cas9 mix to target a specific gene of interest. Founders need to be screened in the next generation according to the inheritance of the mutation. Homozygous recessive mutants are evaluated to find abnormal phenotypes.

The zebrafish genome has been sequenced, providing targets for reverse genetics through use of morpholinos [26]. The use mutants identified from screening in combination with morpholino knock-down has been a widely employed strategy to understand mechanisms underlying many biological processes, including vision. Morpholinos are antisense oligonucleotides designed to temporarily downregulate gene function by blocking translation or splicing [27]. However, morpholinos limit embryonic development. Usually 1 to 4-cell embryos are injected and effects can be studied up to 4–5 dpf. Mutagenic screening of zebrafish revealed conserved functions of numerous genes across vertebrate lineages and identified zebrafish orthologs for 82% of known human retinal disease genes.

1.2.2 Discerning specific signaling pathways between cone or rod photoreceptors

Genetic screens in zebrafish have shed light on the molecular bases of photoreceptor functions by isolation of visual mutants. Photoreceptor mutants have been isolated, characterized, and mapped. Cone function can be evaluated by OKR and OMR under normal light in 5–7-dpf larvae. A breakthrough discovery in retinal dystrophy was the identification of mutants of phosphodiesterase 6c (pde6c), a novel cone-specific phototransduction gene [12, 28]. Pde6c−/−was identified as a blind zebrafish mutant with rapid degeneration of cone photoreceptors having secondary, but transitory degeneration of rod photoreceptors. These two achromatopsia zebrafish mutants were the first visual disorders linked to cone-specific degeneration, and helped to identify human PDE6c mutations in patients [29, 30]. These findings indicated that like zebrafish pde6c mutants, cone-specific degeneration also occurs in humans.

The maturation and functional integrity of PDE6 depends on aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein-like 1 (AIPL1) [31]. We reported an aipl1mutant that was blind and developed cone photoreceptor degeneration accompanied by rod degeneration only at an early stage of development [32]. Retinal phenotypes of aipl1mutants are very similar to those of zebrafish hypomorphic pde6cmutants. Such results were not surprising, given the role of aipl1 in supporting pde6c functions. We confirm the absence of pd6c protein in the aipl1mutant. Unexpectedly, the level of guanylate cyclase-3 (gc-3), another important cone-specific phototransduction molecule, was also affected. At the moment, the molecular mechanism underlying the coupling of Pde6 and Gc3 maintenance in photoreceptors remains unknown. gc3mutants have been isolated by OKR and OMR screening and they present abnormal visual behavior, although their retinal morphology is normal during larval stages [22]. It would be interesting to study gc3mutants to elucidate the relationship between pde6c and gc3.

Though mutants isolated through OKR or OMR behavioral screening evaluate cone function, several mutants exhibited rod degeneration as well. Since rod and cone photoreceptor OSs are continually phagocytosed by the covering RPE, they need to be renewed actively by transport of molecules from the cell body to the OS through connecting cilia. This is called Intraflagellar Transport (IFT) [33]. Several genes have been identified as components of the IFT, such as ift52, ift57, ift80, ift88, and ift172 [23, 34]. In ift88zebrafish mutants, cilia are generated, but not maintained, causing an absence of photoreceptor OSs [35]. ift57mutant zebrafish had short OSs whereas ift172mutants lack OSs completely at 5 dpf [23, 36]. Degeneration of mutant photoreceptors is partly caused by ectopic accumulation of opsins. These results illustrate the unique mechanism of IFT, which is very different from cytosolic transport, and is important for OS formation and maintenance.

Intracellular vesicular transport is important for cytosolic distribution and recycling of molecules. β-SNAPcooperates with N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) to recycle the SNAP receptor (SNARE) by disassembling the cis-SNARE complex generated during the vesicular fusion process. β-SNAP−/−presents photoreceptors degeneration, in which photoreceptors undergo apoptosis in a BH3- only, protein BNip1-dependent mechanism due to failure to disassemble the SNARE. β-SNAPmutant was the first zebrafish mutant to link photoreceptor degeneration to vesicular transport defects [37].

Unlike photopic cone-mediated vision mutants, which can easily be isolated by behavioral tests from genetic screens, rod mutant screens are much more laborious and time consuming. Scotopic vision needs to be evaluated under dim light, and rod maturation takes up to 3 weeks post-fertilization (wpf). The escape response has been used to screen adult male F1-generation zebrafish treated with ENU, looking for dominant inherited retinal mutants [24, 25, 38, 39]. When a fish is swimming in a circular container and is threatened, it reacts by turning away from the threat. Individuals that failed to show the escape response under dim light illumination were isolated, and named night blindness a-g. A spectrum of retinal phenotypes was observed, from photoreceptor degeneration in a patchy array (nba+/; nbe+/−), thinner OSs or degenerated OSs (nbc+/−; nbd+/; nbg+/), to absence of photoreceptor degeneration (nbb+/). Homozygous mutant embryos of the F3 generation in most cases died after several days of development, indicating that these mutations are not photoreceptor-specific.

1.2.3 CRISPR/Cas editing genome technology to produce photoreceptor mutants

Forward genetic screens have proven very powerful for isolating mutants. However, they do not allow specific genes or pathways to be investigated. Programmable nucleases have revolutionized genetics by allowing precise targeted genome modifications to produce mutants. There are several types of tools for genome editing, such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) systems. These tools have facilitated widespread DNA editing in various organisms, including zebrafish. High specificity and efficiency, flexible design and simple methodology are the most relevant features. CRISPR/Cas enzyme stands out for its extremely utility based on RNA–DNA interaction, while ZFNs and TALENs recognize specific DNA sequences through protein–DNA interactions. Any researcher with basic skill in molecular biology can easily implement CRISPR technology. CRISPR/Cas can target virtually any gene of interest with a customizable short RNA guide to produce knock-out of individual genes [40, 41]. CRISPR requires two key components, a nuclease, most commonly Cas9, and sgRNA (single-guide RNA) which targets the nuclease to a specific DNA location ( Figure 2 ) [42]. By simply designing the sgRNA, CRISPR can be targeted to different genome locations. By expressing several sgRNAs, the system also enables multiplex genome editing with high efficiency [43].

1.2.4 Zebrafish photoreceptor-specific genes edited to model human retinal pathologies

Genome editing technologies have been employed in zebrafish for retinal studies. While it is quite easy to produce knock-outs, creating knock-in zebrafish remains challenging. Several photoreceptor knock-out mutants have been recovered in zebrafish that showed the involvement of several genes in photoreceptor development and survival. Mutations in over 50 genes, such as RP2, have been identified as causes of retinitis pigmentosa. RP2 is a GTPase activator protein for ARL3 and participates in trafficking of ciliary proteins. Fei Liu et al. generated an RP2knock-out zebrafish line using TALEN technology to understand the RP2 degeneration mechanism [44]. RP2knock-out zebrafish display progressive retinal degeneration, with a degeneration of rod OSs, followed by degeneration of cone OSs. RP2 knock-down by morpholinos resulted in abnormal retinal localization of GRK1 and rod transducin subunits, GNAT1 and GNB1. Furthermore, distribution of farnesylated proteins in zebrafish retina was also affected by RP2 ablation. The same lab also produced cerklknock-out zebrafish, a model for a rod-cone dystrophy [45]. Progressive degeneration of rods and cones, with an accumulation of shed OSs in the interphotoreceptor matrix was observed, suggesting that cerkl may regulate phagocytosis of OSs by the RPE. In addition, the phagocytosis-associated protein, MERTK, was significantly reduced in cerklmutants. Despite a number of genes that have been implicated in retinitis pigmentosa pathogenesis, the mechanism of the disease remains unknown. Zebrafish have proven useful for modeling these ocular diseases.

Photoreceptor genesis requires precise regulation of progenitor cell competence, cell cycle exit, and differentiation. Several transcription factors that control photoreceptor-specific gene expression have been identified. The basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor NeuroD governs photoreceptor genesis, but the signaling pathway through which it functions is unknown. NeuroD was knocked-down with morpholinos, and knocked-out with CRISPR/Cas9 [46]. NeuroD induces cell cycle exit and photoreceptor maturation through cell–cell signaling. NeuroD knock-down resulted in failure to exit the cell cycle, but did not affect expression of photoreceptor lineage markers, Nr2e3 and Crx. NeuroD increased Notch gene expression. Notch inhibition rescued the cell cycle exit, but not photoreceptor maturation. The nuclear receptor transcription factor, Nr2e3, is expressed in photoreceptors. It forms a complex with Crx, which enhances expression of rod-specific genes and represses expression of cone-specific genes in rods [47]. CRISPR-edited Nr2e3knock-out animals displayed rod precursors undergoing terminal mitoses, but failed to differentiate into rods. They did not express rod-specific genes and the OS fails to develop. Cone differentiation was normal; however, later, progressive degeneration of OS of double cones began, with a reduction of phototransduction proteins. Nr2e3 acts synergistically with Crx and Nrl to enhance rhodopsin gene expression, without affecting cone opsin expression [47].

A large number of genetic defects can disrupt OS morphology to impair photoreceptor function and viability. Kinesin family members and IFT motors are important for trafficking proteins to photoreceptor OSs [33]. Edited-knock-out osm-3/kif17and cos2/kif7mutants have comparable OS developmental delays, although via different mechanisms [48]. Cos2/kif7mutant dysfunction depends on Hedgehog signaling, which leads to generalized, non-photoreceptor-specific delay of retinal neurogenesis, while osm-3/kif17OS morphogenesis delays are associated with initial disc morphogenesis of photoreceptors. The ciliary protein C2orf71a/pcare1 is almost exclusively expressed in photoreceptors, and modulates the ciliary membrane through recruitment of an actin assembly module. Embryos and adult retinas of C2orf71a/pcare1−/−zebrafish display disorganization of photoreceptor OSs [49]. This mutant shows visual impairment assessed by OKR and OMR in larvae. Lack of pcare1in zebrafish causes similar retinal phenotype to that in humans and indicates that the function of the pcare gene is conserved across species. When mutated, Eye shut homolog (EYS), another ciliary protein, causes retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy. Since eys is absent from several rodent genomes, including mice, zebrafish hold promise as a model for EYS-deficient patients. Several groups established an eysknock-out zebrafish model using CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN technology [50, 51, 52]. Embryos and adult retinas showed disorganization of photoreceptor OSs. eys−/−zebrafish presented mislocalization of several OS proteins, such as rhodopsin, opn1lw, opn1sw1, GNB3 and PRPH2, and disruption of actin filaments in photoreceptors [50, 51, 52]. All these new zebrafish mutants present phenotypes that mimic clinical manifestations of patients, suggesting the utility of these animal models for studying the etiology of these retinopathies.

Gene target editing technologies enable production of rod-specific photoreceptor mutants, which were challenging to isolate using behavioral screening. Mutations in rhodopsin are the most common cause of retinitis pigmentosa in humans [53]. The human rhodopsin mutation Q344X was expressed in zebrafish to study photoreceptor degeneration. Early mislocalization of hRho Q334X led to rod apoptosis, without affecting cone survival. Activation of phototransduction signaling through transduction and adenylyl cyclase increased photoreceptor loss [54]. Recently, CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations were used to target the major zebrafish Rho locus, rh1–1, and several mutants were recovered [55]. These mutants were characterized by rapid degeneration of rod photoreceptors, but not of cones. These novel lines will provide badly needed in vivomodels to study pathology of retinitis pigmentosa.

All these examples of mutants recovered by reverse genetic approaches have been used to identify key molecular pathways required for photoreceptor development and function. Nonetheless, they are generally limited in terms of the number of targets that can be evaluated. Reverse genetic screening techniques have been used with invertebrate animal models and cell culture systems to identify genes and pathways involved in various biological processes; however, their use with in vivovertebrate model systems has been challenging [56]. Recently, several zebrafish labs have shown the feasibility of CRISPR/Cas-based mutagenesis assays to isolate high numbers of mutants focused on synapsis [56], thyroid morphogenesis and function [57], and the Fanconi Anemia pathway, which is involved in genomic instability syndrome, resulting in aplastic anemia [58]. One study screened 54 ciliary genes and isolated 8 mutants that were required for retinal development [59].

In summary, these descriptions of zebrafish phenotypic models isolated from forward mutagenesis screens and reverse genetic approaches targeting genes important in retinal biology have shown how it is possible to advance studies of retinal degeneration through zebrafish research. There still remain several unknown genes associated with retinal degeneration. Their eventual exploration will provide a deeper understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying photoreceptor degeneration and death.

1.3 Therapeutic treatments for retinal degeneration in humans

Several photoreceptor diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis, and macular degeneration produce photoreceptor cell death which leads to blindness. Current treatments of such diseases are ineffective; thus, several different strategies to treat them are being pursued. Neuroprotective approaches with drugs have been evaluated with different degrees of success. These include cGMP analogue treatment [60], calcium-channel blockers [61], and rod-derived cone viability factor [62]. These strategies aim to treat patients during early stages of retinal degeneration, since the disease cannot be reversed. On the other hand, neuroprotective strategies do not depend on any specific mutation and may provide a longer time window for other treatments [63]. Gene therapy has been applied to improve vision in patients with LCA caused by mutations in RPE65. In 2008, three groups reported success in delivering a healthy RPE65 gene using an AAV2 vector to the retina of three LCA patients [64, 65, 66], but the improvement may not persist [67]. External devices have been used to electrically stimulate neurons in the inner part of the retina. High visual acuity cannot be achieved, but face and object recognition, and orientation in unknown environments are possible [63].

The most promising therapies are cell transplantation and regeneration based on Müller cells. Using induced-pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) it is possible to produce eyecup-like structures [68]. These eyecups present a layered structure similar to a retina, with photoreceptor-like cells that contain outer segments, express phototransduction proteins, and some light response [69]. When photoreceptors are transplanted, they need to integrate into and establish synaptic connections with the remaining retina. Animal experiments showed that few photoreceptors integrate to produce functional recovery of vision [70, 71]. Unexpectedly, recently research demonstrated that the improvement in vision is due to exchange of cytoplasmic material (RNA and/or proteins) between donor cells and the host retina, and not to integration of transplanted photoreceptors [70, 72, 73], making it unclear through which mechanism restoration of vision is achieved. The goal of regeneration is to replace photoreceptors through induction of endogenous progenitor cells. Unfortunately, neurons in the mammalian central nervous systems cannot be replaced. In contrast, lower vertebrates such as reptiles, amphibians, and fish, have the capacity to regenerate lost neurons in brain, spinal cord, and sensory organs, such as the retina and ear [74]. Defining mechanisms of zebrafish retinal repair may offer a key to regenerative medicine.

1.3.1 Müller cell response to retinal injury

In response to injury, mammalian Müller cells exhibit signs of reactive gliotic, featuring cell hypertrophy and upregulation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) [75, 76]. Initially this reactive gliosis is neuroprotective, but eventually leads to loss of retinal neurons and causes scarring. Unlike mammals, zebrafish retina responds to neuronal damage by proliferation of Müller glia, which can replace all neuron types, including photoreceptors. Müller glia are the major glial cell type in the retina and contribute to retinal structure and homeostasis [77]. Nuclei are located in the inner nuclear layer, and these cells present apical and basal projections that extend all through the retina ( Figure 1 ). Apical feet form the outer limiting membrane. Müller glia are located so that they can monitor the entire retina and contribute to retinal structure and function.

When loss of neurons occurs, Müller glia respond by dedifferentiating, re-entering the cell cycle and producing neuronal progenitor cells ( Figure 3 ). These progenitors amplify their numbers, and then migrate to the injured region. Then neuronal progenitor cells exit the cell cycle and differentiate into replacement neurons. All types of retinal neurons can be produced and replaced in injured zebrafish retina to achieve morphological and functional recovery of the retina [78, 79, 80, 81]. Identifying molecular signals and pathways that drive this regeneration response is the focus of regenerative medicine.

Figure 3.

Photoreceptor degeneration induces a regenerative response based on Müller cell activity. (A) Photoreceptor loss and/or other cells produce stress signals such as TNFα, growth factors, etc. to induce cell Müller activation. (B) Müller cells dedifferentiate to stem cells, and divide asymmetrically to produce one NPC and one Müller glial cell. Müller cells express Ascl1 and Stat3. (C) NPCs proliferate to increase the number of progenitor cells. (D) NPCs exit the cell cycle and differentiate into photoreceptor lineage cells to reverse loss of these neurons. NPC: neuronal proliferative cells.

1.3.2 Positive and negative signaling to modulate Müller cell proliferation in the regenerative response

Understanding mechanisms by which zebrafish can regenerate injured retina may provide strategies for stimulating retinal regeneration in mammals. Given the similarity of anatomy, cell types, and gene conservation between teleost fish and mammals, the regenerative approach offers hope for clinical treatment. Both species present Müller cells that are the primary cell type responsible for regeneration.

Acute injury models have been useful for dissecting many signaling pathways, and great progress has been achieved. Several secreted signaling molecules that participate in Müller glia dedifferentiation and proliferation have been identified. These include TNFα [82], HB-EFG [83], Wnt [84], TFGb [85], insulin, and Fgf2 [86] ( Figure 3 ). In addition, Müller cells activate different transcription factors, and initiate signaling essential to differentiation and/or proliferation, such as Ascl1b [87], Stat3 [88, 89], Pax6 [90, 91], PCNA [90], Lin-28 [87]. Interestingly, it still has not been confirmed that these transcription factors and signaling molecules are also expressed and activated in genetic mutants with slow degeneration.

When a regeneration response occurs, around 50% of Müller cells dedifferentiate and proliferate in the injured region, while the other Müller cells remain as differentiated glia. Let-7, Notch and Insm1a [87, 92, 93] are involved in this quiescent Müller cell population. It may be important that some Müller cells remain quiescent to avoid an excessive neurogenesis and remodeling of the retina, as well to maintain homeostasis of healthy neurons.

Important results have come from uninjured retinas in relation to the external delivery of activation signals or transcription factors that are able to generate a regenerative response. For example, Tnfα intravitreal injection into adult fish induced a moderate proliferative response [82]. Tnfα combined with repressing Notch (γ-secretase inhibitor) via intravitreal injection produced a much stronger proliferative response [92]. These results suggest that identifying key molecules for the regenerative response, and modulating them can induce a proliferative response by Müller cells.

Recently, some exciting results came from studies in adult mice [94]. NMDA-damaged retinas, with injury to the inner part of the retina, were treated with a histone deacetylase inhibitor and overexpressed Ascl1. Under these conditions, Müller glia were induced to produce functional neurons via a trans differentiation mechanism. Gnat1rd17Gnat2cpfl3double mutant mice, a model of congenital blindness, were treated by gene transfer of β-catenin, and subsequent gene transfer of transcription factors essential for rod cell fate specification and determination. Müller glia-derived rods restored visual responses [95].

1.3.3 Genetic mutant models to investigate regeneration mechanisms

Most current studies use acute approaches to injure adult retinas, like light damage [79, 96], retinal puncture [80], chemical injection [81], or loss of specific cell populations due to activation of a toxic transgene (nitroreductase: NTR) [97, 98]. Light damage and toxic transgene NTR induce photoreceptor death, while retinal puncture kills specific neurons. These animal models use powerful, rapid damage that resembles traumatic injury in human patients. To model inherited photoreceptor degeneration diseases, better models need to be used.

Only a few studies have employed zebrafish photoreceptor genetic mutants [32]. Iribarne et al. used cone- or rod-specific mutants with a very rapid loss of photoreceptors, and observed that regeneration started as early as 1 wpf. Cone-specific mutant regeneration relied on Müller cell proliferation, while rod photoreceptor-specific mutant regeneration was based on rod progenitor proliferation [99]. Another cone mutant, Aipl1−/−,which developed a slower and progressive degeneration, surprisingly did not show an increase in Müller cell or rod progenitor proliferation, even though cell death was detected [32]. Both studies used larval animals (1 and 2 wpf) and lacked the information of later stages and the adult regenerative response. Further investigation during development and adulthood should be performed to gain a better understanding of the response of Müller cells to damage.

Interestingly, all these injury models elicited a Müller cell response that was similar overall. However, some molecules revealed injury-dependent induction. Hbegf was necessary for retinal regeneration following a mechanical injury, but it was not necessary for regeneration following photoreceptor damage by light [82, 83]. These adult acute models have proven to be powerful in revealing many of the molecular signals that drive the regenerative response. However, for modeling human photoreceptor genetic diseases, which usually proceed from embryogenesis or childhood to adulthood to completely degenerate, a more specific model needs to be used.

1.3.4 CRISPR/Cas system screening to isolate defective regenerative retinal processes

The high efficiency and multiplexing capabilities of CRISPR enable high-throughput, forward screening of “genotype to phenotype” functions in various model systems [43]. So far, several zebrafish labs have utilized CRISPR/Cas system screening (check Section 2.2.4 in this chapter). However, few screening studies have focused on regeneration. A screening method for hair cell regeneration identified 7 genes involved in this response [100]. To evaluate genes important for retinal regeneration, large-scale, reverse genetic screening has been established by applying a multiplexed gene disruption strategy [101]. This screening used an automated reporter quantification-based assay to identify cellular regeneration-deficient phenotypes in transgenic fish. Over 300 regeneration genes were targeted, and so far, data have been obtained from 120 targeted genomic sites. This screening is ongoing, and regeneration-defective mutants still have not been published. It will be interesting to see what types of new genes are associated with the regeneration response.


2. Conclusions

Inherited retinal degenerative diseases are characterized by photoreceptor death that leads to blindness. The underlying genetic causes of these disorders are numerous and diverse, and most involve photoreceptor-specific genes. Zebrafish are amenable to large-scale genetic manipulation and genome editing technology, which as I have illustrated, can generate a great mutant collection. These mutants are helping to uncover molecular mechanisms underlying retinal degeneration disorders. Currently, there are no effective treatments for these diseases in humans to reduce or impede the progression of degeneration; thus, different approaches have been investigated to develop medical interventions for the patients. Zebrafish exhibit extraordinary neuronal regeneration, including retinal photoreceptors, making them an excellent model to develop regenerative therapies to treat photoreceptor degeneration.



I thank Steven D. Aird for editing this chapter.


Conflict of interest

The author has no competing interests.


  1. 1. Angueyra JM, Kindt KS. Leveraging zebrafish to study retinal degenerations. Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology. 2018;6:110
  2. 2. Fan J, Rohrer B, Frederick JM, Baehr W, Crouch RK. Rpe65−/− and Lrat−/− mice: Comparable models of leber congenital amaurosis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2008;49(6):2384-2389
  3. 3. Iribarne M, Canto-Soler MV, Torbidoni V, Suburo AM. Controlling retinal pigment epithelium injury after experimental detachment of the retina. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2007;48(3):1348-1354
  4. 4. Iribarne M, Masai I. Do cGMP levels drive the speed of photoreceptor degeneration? Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2018;1074:327-333
  5. 5. Narayan DS, Wood JP, Chidlow G, Casson RJ. A review of the mechanisms of cone degeneration in retinitis pigmentosa. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2016;94(8):748-754
  6. 6. Verbakel SK, van Huet RAC, Boon CJF, den Hollander AI, Collin RWJ, Klaver CCW, et al. Non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2018;66:157-186
  7. 7. Jonasson F, Arnarsson A, Eiriksdottir G, Harris TB, Launer LJ, Meuer SM, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in old persons: Age, gene/environment susceptibility Reykjavik study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(5):825-830
  8. 8. Lynch AM, Mandava N, Patnaik JL, Frazer-Abel AA, Wagner BD, Palestine AG, et al. Systemic activation of the complement system in patients with advanced age-related macular degeneration. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1120672119857896
  9. 9. Cideciyan AV, Jacobson SG. Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA): Potential for improvement of vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2019;60(5):1680-1695
  10. 10. Gill JS, Georgiou M, Kalitzeos A, Moore AT, Michaelides M. Progressive cone and cone-rod dystrophies: Clinical features, molecular genetics and prospects for therapy. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019;103(5):711
  11. 11. Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio). M. Westerfield: Eugene, OR; 1993
  12. 12. Nishiwaki Y, Komori A, Sagara H, Suzuki E, Manabe T, Hosoya T, et al. Mutation of cGMP phosphodiesterase 6alpha'-subunit gene causes progressive degeneration of cone photoreceptors in zebrafish. Mechanisms of Development. 2008;125(11-12):932-946
  13. 13. Iribarne M, Masai I. Neurotoxicity of cGMP in the vertebrate retina: From the initial research on rd mutant mice to zebrafish genetic approaches. Journal of Neurogenetics. Sep 2017;31(3):59-60
  14. 14. Streisinger G, Walker C, Dower N, Knauber D, Singer F. Production of clones of homozygous diploid zebra fish (Brachydanio rerio). Nature. 1981;291(5813):293-296
  15. 15. Walker C, Streisinger G. Induction of mutations by gamma-rays in pregonial germ cells of zebrafish embryos. Genetics. 1983;103(1):125-136
  16. 16. Solnica-Krezel L, Schier AF, Driever W. Efficient recovery of ENU-induced mutations from the zebrafish germline. Genetics. 1994;136(4):1401-1420
  17. 17. Mullins MC, Hammerschmidt M, Haffter P, Nusslein-Volhard C. Large-scale mutagenesis in the zebrafish: In search of genes controlling development in a vertebrate. Current Biology. 1994;4(3):189-202
  18. 18. Haffter P, Granato M, Brand M, Mullins MC, Hammerschmidt M, Kane DA, et al. The identification of genes with unique and essential functions in the development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development. 1996;123:1-36
  19. 19. Nusslein-Volhard C. The zebrafish issue of development. Development. 2012;139(22):4099-4103
  20. 20. Brockerhoff SE, Hurley JB, Janssen-Bienhold U, Neuhauss SC, Driever W, Dowling JE. A behavioral screen for isolating zebrafish mutants with visual system defects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92(23):10545-10549
  21. 21. Neuhauss SC, Biehlmaier O, Seeliger MW, Das T, Kohler K, Harris WA, et al. Genetic disorders of vision revealed by a behavioral screen of 400 essential loci in zebrafish. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1999;19(19):8603-8615
  22. 22. Muto A, Orger MB, Wehman AM, Smear MC, Kay JN, Page-McCaw PS, et al. Forward genetic analysis of visual behavior in zebrafish. PLoS Genetics. 2005;1(5):e66
  23. 23. Gross JM, Perkins BD, Amsterdam A, Egana A, Darland T, Matsui JI, et al. Identification of zebrafish insertional mutants with defects in visual system development and function. Genetics. 2005;170(1):245-261
  24. 24. Li L, Dowling JE. A dominant form of inherited retinal degeneration caused by a non-photoreceptor cell-specific mutation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94(21):11645-11650
  25. 25. Maaswinkel H, Riesbeck LE, Riley ME, Carr AL, Mullin JP, Nakamoto AT, et al. Behavioral screening for nightblindness mutants in zebrafish reveals three new loci that cause dominant photoreceptor cell degeneration. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2005;126(10):1079-1089
  26. 26. Phillips JB, Westerfield M. Zebrafish models in translational research: Tipping the scales toward advancements in human health. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2014;7(7):739-743
  27. 27. Nasevicius A, Ekker SC. Effective targeted gene 'knockdown' in zebrafish. Nature Genetics. 2000;26(2):216-220
  28. 28. Stearns G, Evangelista M, Fadool JM, Brockerhoff SE. A mutation in the cone-specific pde6 gene causes rapid cone photoreceptor degeneration in zebrafish. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27(50):13866-13874
  29. 29. Chang B, Grau T, Dangel S, Hurd R, Jurklies B, Sener EC, et al. A homologous genetic basis of the murine cpfl1 mutant and human achromatopsia linked to mutations in the PDE6C gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(46):19581-19586
  30. 30. Thiadens AA, den Hollander AI, Roosing S, Nabuurs SB, Zekveld-Vroon RC, Collin RW, et al. Homozygosity mapping reveals PDE6C mutations in patients with early-onset cone photoreceptor disorders. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2009;85(2):240-247
  31. 31. Christiansen JR, Kolandaivelu S, Bergo MO, Ramamurthy V. RAS-converting enzyme 1-mediated endoproteolysis is required for trafficking of rod phosphodiesterase 6 to photoreceptor outer segments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(21):8862-8866
  32. 32. Iribarne M, Nishiwaki Y, Nakamura S, Araragi M, Oguri E, Masai I. Aipl1 is required for cone photoreceptor function and survival through the stability of Pde6c and Gc3 in zebrafish. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:45962
  33. 33. Malicki J, Besharse JC. Kinesin-2 family motors in the unusual photoreceptor cilium. Vision Research. 2012;75:33-36
  34. 34. Malicki J, Avidor-Reiss T. From the cytoplasm into the cilium: Bon voyage. Organogenesis. 2014;10(1):138-157
  35. 35. Tsujikawa M, Malicki J. Intraflagellar transport genes are essential for differentiation and survival of vertebrate sensory neurons. Neuron. 2004;42(5):703-716
  36. 36. Sukumaran S, Perkins BD. Early defects in photoreceptor outer segment morphogenesis in zebrafish ift57, ift88 and ift172 intraflagellar transport mutants. Vision Research. 2009;49(4):479-489
  37. 37. Nishiwaki Y, Yoshizawa A, Kojima Y, Oguri E, Nakamura S, Suzuki S, et al. The BH3-only SNARE BNip1 mediates photoreceptor apoptosis in response to vesicular fusion defects. Developmental Cell. 2013;25(4):374-387
  38. 38. Li L, Dowling JE. Disruption of the olfactoretinal centrifugal pathway may relate to the visual system defect in night blindness b mutant zebrafish. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2000;20(5):1883-1892
  39. 39. Maaswinkel H, Ren JQ , Li L. Slow-progressing photoreceptor cell degeneration in night blindness c mutant zebrafish. Journal of Neurocytology. 2003;32(9):1107-1116
  40. 40. Campbell LJ, Hyde DR. Opportunities for CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in retinal regeneration research. Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology. 2017;5:99
  41. 41. Jao LE, Wente SR, Chen W. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110(34):13904-13909
  42. 42. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337(6096):816-821
  43. 43. Varshney GK, Carrington B, Pei W, Bishop K, Chen Z, Fan C, et al. A high-throughput functional genomics workflow based on CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in zebrafish. Nature Protocols. 2016;11(12):2357-2375
  44. 44. Liu F, Chen J, Yu S, Raghupathy RK, Liu X, Qin Y, et al. Knockout of RP2 decreases GRK1 and rod transducin subunits and leads to photoreceptor degeneration in zebrafish. Human Molecular Genetics. 2015;24(16):4648-4659
  45. 45. Yu S, Li C, Biswas L, Hu X, Liu F, Reilly J, et al. CERKL gene knockout disturbs photoreceptor outer segment phagocytosis and causes rod-cone dystrophy in zebrafish. Human Molecular Genetics. 2017;26(12):2335-2345
  46. 46. Taylor SM, Alvarez-Delfin K, Saade CJ, Thomas JL, Thummel R, Fadool JM, et al. The bHLH transcription factor neurod governs photoreceptor genesis and regeneration through delta-notch signaling. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2015;56(12):7496-7515
  47. 47. Xie S, Han S, Qu Z, Liu F, Li J, Yu S, et al. Knockout of Nr2e3 prevents rod photoreceptor differentiation and leads to selective L−/M-cone photoreceptor degeneration in zebrafish. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease. 2019;1865(6):1273-1283
  48. 48. Lewis TR, Kundinger SR, Pavlovich AL, Bostrom JR, Link BA, Besharse JC. Cos2/Kif7 and Osm-3/Kif17 regulate onset of outer segment development in zebrafish photoreceptors through distinct mechanisms. Developmental Biology. 2017;425(2):176-190
  49. 49. Corral-Serrano JC, Messchaert M, Dona M, Peters TA, Kamminga LM, van Wijk E, et al. C2orf71a/pcare1 is important for photoreceptor outer segment morphogenesis and visual function in zebrafish. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):9675
  50. 50. Lu Z, Hu X, Liu F, Soares DC, Liu X, Yu S, et al. Ablation of EYS in zebrafish causes mislocalisation of outer segment proteins, F-actin disruption and cone-rod dystrophy. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:46098
  51. 51. Yu M, Liu Y, Li J, Natale BN, Cao S, Wang D, et al. Eyes shut homolog is required for maintaining the ciliary pocket and survival of photoreceptors in zebrafish. Biology Open. 2016;5(11):1662-1673
  52. 52. Messchaert M, Dona M, Broekman S, Peters TA, Corral-Serrano JC, Slijkerman RWN, et al. Eyes shut homolog is important for the maintenance of photoreceptor morphology and visual function in zebrafish. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200789
  53. 53. al-Maghtheh M, Gregory C, Inglehearn C, Hardcastle A, Bhattacharya S. Rhodopsin mutations in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Human Mutation. 1993;2(4):249-255
  54. 54. Nakao T, Tsujikawa M, Notomi S, Ikeda Y, Nishida K. The role of mislocalized phototransduction in photoreceptor cell death of retinitis pigmentosa. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e32472
  55. 55. Zelinka CP, Sotolongo-Lopez M, Fadool JM. Targeted disruption of the endogenous zebrafish rhodopsin locus as models of rapid rod photoreceptor degeneration. Molecular Vision. 2018;24:587-602
  56. 56. Shah AN, Davey CF, Whitebirch AC, Miller AC, Moens CB. Rapid reverse genetic screening using CRISPR in zebrafish. Nature Methods. 2015;12(6):535-540
  57. 57. Trubiroha A, Gillotay P, Giusti N, Gacquer D, Libert F, Lefort A, et al. A rapid CRISPR/Cas-based mutagenesis assay in zebrafish for identification of genes involved in thyroid morphogenesis and function. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):5647
  58. 58. Ramanagoudr-Bhojappa R, Carrington B, Ramaswami M, Bishop K, Robbins GM, Jones M, et al. Multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of 19 Fanconi anemia pathway genes in zebrafish revealed their roles in growth, sexual development and fertility. PLoS Genetics. 2018;14(12):e1007821
  59. 59. Hu R, Huang W, Liu J, Jin M, Wu Y, Li J, et al. Mutagenesis of putative ciliary genes with the CRISPR/Cas9 system in zebrafish identifies genes required for retinal development. FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2019;33(4):5248-5256
  60. 60. Vighi E, Trifunovic D, Veiga-Crespo P, Rentsch A, Hoffmann D, Sahaboglu A, et al. Combination of cGMP analogue and drug delivery system provides functional protection in hereditary retinal degeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018;15(13):E2997-E3006
  61. 61. Frasson M, Sahel JA, Fabre M, Simonutti M, Dreyfus H, Picaud S. Retinitis pigmentosa: Rod photoreceptor rescue by a calcium-channel blocker in the rd mouse. Nature Medicine. 1999;5(10):1183-1187
  62. 62. Ait-Ali N, Fridlich R, Millet-Puel G, Clerin E, Delalande F, Jaillard C, et al. Rod-derived cone viability factor promotes cone survival by stimulating aerobic glycolysis. Cell. 2015;161(4):817-832
  63. 63. Scholl HP, Strauss RW, Singh MS, Dalkara D, Roska B, Picaud S, et al. Emerging therapies for inherited retinal degeneration. Science Translational Medicine. 2016;8(368):368rv6
  64. 64. Bainbridge JW, Smith AJ, Barker SS, Robbie S, Henderson R, Balaggan K, et al. Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;358(21):2231-2239
  65. 65. Cideciyan AV, Aleman TS, Boye SL, Schwartz SB, Kaushal S, Roman AJ, et al. Human gene therapy for RPE65 isomerase deficiency activates the retinoid cycle of vision but with slow rod kinetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(39):15112-15117
  66. 66. Maguire AM, Simonelli F, Pierce EA, Pugh EN Jr, Mingozzi F, Bennicelli J, et al. Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber's congenital amaurosis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;358(21):2240-2248
  67. 67. Jacobson SG, Cideciyan AV, Roman AJ, Sumaroka A, Schwartz SB, Heon E, et al. Improvement and decline in vision with gene therapy in childhood blindness. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;372(20):1920-1926
  68. 68. Eiraku M, Takata N, Ishibashi H, Kawada M, Sakakura E, Okuda S, et al. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature. 2011;472(7341):51-56
  69. 69. Zhong X, Gutierrez C, Xue T, Hampton C, Vergara MN, Cao LH, et al. Generation of three-dimensional retinal tissue with functional photoreceptors from human iPSCs. Nature Communications. 2014;5:4047
  70. 70. Pearson RA, Gonzalez-Cordero A, West EL, Ribeiro JR, Aghaizu N, Goh D, et al. Donor and host photoreceptors engage in material transfer following transplantation of post-mitotic photoreceptor precursors. Nature Communications. 2016;7:13029
  71. 71. Leveillard T, Klipfel L. Mechanisms underlying the visual benefit of cell transplantation for the treatment of retinal degenerations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(3):E557
  72. 72. Santos-Ferreira T, Llonch S, Borsch O, Postel K, Haas J, Ader M. Retinal transplantation of photoreceptors results in donor-host cytoplasmic exchange. Nature Communications. 2016;7:13028
  73. 73. Singh MS, Balmer J, Barnard AR, Aslam SA, Moralli D, Green CM, et al. Transplanted photoreceptor precursors transfer proteins to host photoreceptors by a mechanism of cytoplasmic fusion. Nature Communications. 2016;7:13537
  74. 74. Lahne M, Hyde DR. Live-cell imaging: New avenues to investigate retinal regeneration. Neural Regeneration Research. 2017;12(8):1210-1219
  75. 75. Bringmann A, Wiedemann P. Muller glial cells in retinal disease. Ophthalmologica. 2012;227(1):1-19
  76. 76. Iribarne M, Ogawa L, Torbidoni V, Dodds CM, Dodds RA, Suburo AM. Blockade of endothelinergic receptors prevents development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy in mice. The American Journal of Pathology. 2008;172(4):1030-1042
  77. 77. Reichenbach A, Bringmann A. New functions of Muller cells. Glia. 2013;61(5):651-678
  78. 78. Yurco P, Cameron DA. Responses of Muller glia to retinal injury in adult zebrafish. Vision Research. 2005;45(8):991-1002
  79. 79. Bernardos RL, Barthel LK, Meyers JR, Raymond PA. Late-stage neuronal progenitors in the retina are radial Muller glia that function as retinal stem cells. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27(26):7028-7040
  80. 80. Fausett BV, Goldman D. A role for alpha1 tubulin-expressing Muller glia in regeneration of the injured zebrafish retina. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26(23):6303-6313
  81. 81. Fimbel SM, Montgomery JE, Burket CT, Hyde DR. Regeneration of inner retinal neurons after intravitreal injection of ouabain in zebrafish. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27(7):1712-1724
  82. 82. Nelson CM, Ackerman KM, O'Hayer P, Bailey TJ, Gorsuch RA, Hyde DR. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha is produced by dying retinal neurons and is required for Muller glia proliferation during zebrafish retinal regeneration. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2013;33(15):6524-6539
  83. 83. Wan J, Ramachandran R, Goldman D. HB-EGF is necessary and sufficient for Muller glia dedifferentiation and retina regeneration. Developmental Cell. 2012;22(2):334-347
  84. 84. Ramachandran R, Zhao XF, Goldman D. Ascl1a/Dkk/beta-catenin signaling pathway is necessary and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta inhibition is sufficient for zebrafish retina regeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(38):15858-15863
  85. 85. Lenkowski JR, Qin Z, Sifuentes CJ, Thummel R, Soto CM, Moens CB, et al. Retinal regeneration in adult zebrafish requires regulation of TGFbeta signaling. Glia. 2013;61(10):1687-1697
  86. 86. Wan J, Zhao XF, Vojtek A, Goldman D. Retinal injury, growth factors, and cytokines converge on beta-catenin and pStat3 signaling to stimulate retina regeneration. Cell Reports. 2014;9(1):285-297
  87. 87. Ramachandran R, Fausett BV, Goldman D. Ascl1a regulates Muller glia dedifferentiation and retinal regeneration through a Lin-28-dependent, let-7 microRNA signalling pathway. Nature Cell Biology. 2010;12(11):1101-1107
  88. 88. Kassen SC, Ramanan V, Montgomery JE. C TB, Liu CG, Vihtelic TS, et al. Time course analysis of gene expression during light-induced photoreceptor cell death and regeneration in albino zebrafish. Developmental Neurobiology. 2007;67(8):1009-1031
  89. 89. Nelson CM, Gorsuch RA, Bailey TJ, Ackerman KM, Kassen SC, Hyde DR. Stat3 defines three populations of Muller glia and is required for initiating maximal muller glia proliferation in the regenerating zebrafish retina. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2012;520(18):4294-4311
  90. 90. Raymond PA, Barthel LK, Bernardos RL, Perkowski JJ. Molecular characterization of retinal stem cells and their niches in adult zebrafish. BMC Developmental Biology. 2006;6:36
  91. 91. Thummel R, Enright JM, Kassen SC, Montgomery JE, Bailey TJ, Hyde DR. Pax6a and Pax6b are required at different points in neuronal progenitor cell proliferation during zebrafish photoreceptor regeneration. Experimental Eye Research. 2010;90(5):572-582
  92. 92. Conner C, Ackerman KM, Lahne M, Hobgood JS, Hyde DR. Repressing notch signaling and expressing TNFalpha are sufficient to mimic retinal regeneration by inducing Muller glial proliferation to generate committed progenitor cells. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34(43):14403-14419
  93. 93. Ramachandran R, Zhao XF, Goldman D. Insm1a-mediated gene repression is essential for the formation and differentiation of Muller glia-derived progenitors in the injured retina. Nature Cell Biology. 2012;14(10):1013-1023
  94. 94. Jorstad NL, Wilken MS, Grimes WN, Wohl SG, VandenBosch LS, Yoshimatsu T, et al. Stimulation of functional neuronal regeneration from Muller glia in adult mice. Nature. 2017;548(7665):103-107
  95. 95. Yao K, Qiu S, Wang YV, Park SJH, Mohns EJ, Mehta B, et al. Restoration of vision after de novo genesis of rod photoreceptors in mammalian retinas. Nature. 2018;560(7719):484-488
  96. 96. Vihtelic TS, Hyde DR. Light-induced rod and cone cell death and regeneration in the adult albino zebrafish (Danio rerio) retina. Journal of Neurobiology. 2000;44(3):289-307
  97. 97. Montgomery JE, Parsons MJ, Hyde DR. A novel model of retinal ablation demonstrates that the extent of rod cell death regulates the origin of the regenerated zebrafish rod photoreceptors. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2010;518(6):800-814
  98. 98. Hagerman GF, Noel NC, Cao SY, DuVal MG, Oel AP, Allison WT. Rapid recovery of visual function associated with blue cone ablation in zebrafish. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166932
  99. 99. Morris AC, Scholz TL, Brockerhoff SE, Fadool JM. Genetic dissection reveals two separate pathways for rod and cone regeneration in the teleost retina. Developmental Neurobiology. 2008;68(5):605-619
  100. 100. Pei W, Xu L, Huang SC, Pettie K, Idol J, Rissone A, et al. Guided genetic screen to identify genes essential in the regeneration of hair cells and other tissues. NPJ Regenerative Medicine. 2018;3:11
  101. 101. Unal Eroglu A, Mulligan TS, Zhang L, White DT, Sengupta S, Nie C, et al. Multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 targeting of genes implicated in retinal regeneration and degeneration. Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology. 2018;6:88

Written By

Maria Iribarne

Submitted: April 3rd, 2019 Reviewed: July 22nd, 2019 Published: August 20th, 2019