Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Dental Biofilm as Etiological Agent of Canine Periodontal Disease

Written By

Jana Kačírová, Marián Maďar, Gabriela Štrkolcová, Aladár Maďari and Radomíra Nemcová

Submitted: 02 April 2019 Reviewed: 30 June 2019 Published: 30 July 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88305

From the Edited Volume

Bacterial Biofilms

Edited by Sadik Dincer, Melis Sümengen Özdenefe and Afet Arkut

Chapter metrics overview

1,161 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Periodontal disease is one of the most common health problem affecting dogs. The disease is more prevalent in small breeds and brachycephalic breeds compared to large breeds, and incidence increases with advancing age. In first stage it affects only the gingival tissue and causes gingivitis. It later develops into periodontitis which involves changes in other periodontium tissues. Main etiological agents of periodontal disease are pathogenic bacteria of dental biofilm, and products of their metabolism. In human, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola and Tannerella forsythia play a key role in the etiology of periodontal disease. Also, there are many other candidates as human periodontal pathogens, including Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella nigrescens, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Parvimonas micra, Eikenella corrodens, Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Eubacterium nodatum and Campylobacter rectus. Since periodontal diseases in dogs are similar to human diseases in terms of disease progression and clinical manifestation, we can assume their common etiology. This chapter is focused on review about canine dental biofilm and about members of biofilm as potential causative agent of canine periodontal disease.


  • dental plaque
  • biofilm
  • dog
  • periodontal disease
  • gingivitis
  • periodontitis

1. Introduction

Periodontal disease is a significant veterinary health problem of companion dogs [1]. Periodontal disease refers to a group of inflammatory diseases. In both humans and dogs the initial stages of periodontal disease are observed clinically as red and inflamed gingivae, defined as gingivitis. Without treatment to remove, and disrupt the dental plaque, gingivitis may progress to periodontitis [2]. Periodontitis, the later, irreversible stage of the disease, is an inflammatory disease of supporting teeth tissues [3]. The primary etiological factor in the initiation and progression of periodontal disease is dental plaque [4]. Dental plaque is the community of microorganisms found on a tooth surface as a biofilm, embedded in a matrix of polymers of host and bacterial origin [5]. It is believed that enzymes secreted by dental biofilm bacteria as well as bacterial antigens activate the host inflammatory response initiating disease [6]. Dental calculus that represents mineralized bacterial dental biofilm is considered as secondary etiological factor in periodontal disease [7]. Dental calculus itself is relatively non-pathogenic and, despite its rough surface, is not the direct cause of inflammatory processes, but mainly has an irritant effect. In addition, the presence of dental calculus leads to greater biofilm accumulation by creating a rough surface [8]. Dental calculus is always covered with a layer of dental biofilm, so it plays an important role as retention factor in the colonization of microorganisms [9].


2. Canine dental biofilm

The oral cavity is a host for a variety of microorganisms including bacteria, viruses, fungi and protozoa that colonize teeth, tongue, oral mucosa, hard palate, caries lesions, periodontal pocket and similarly. The distribution of microorganisms in the oral cavity is not random; most species prefer certain places to others due to the specific local conditions that these sites provide, for example, the anaerobic environment of the gingival sulcus [10, 11]. However, the oral cavity environment is also hostile to microbial life, so only a certain groups of microorganisms entering it are able to colonize it, and survive in this environment. Microorganisms must attach to the surface and form biofilms to remain in oral cavity [12].

Dog oral cavity hides a rich and diverse bacterial community and exceeds the estimates of culture-based studies. Of the cultivable oral microbiota, genera Actinomyces, Streptococcus and Granulicatella are most commonly isolated from saliva. Genera Porphyromonas, Actinomyces and Neisseria are most commonly isolated from plaque [13]. Genera Porphyromonas, Fusobacterium, Capnocytophaga, Derxia, Moraxella, Bergeyella, non-cultivable Lachnospiraceae, Enhydrobacter, non-classified Peptostreptococcaceae, Xylanibacter, Parabacteroides, Tannerella, Neisseria, Treponema and Bacteroides were identified by the pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene [14]. In another oral microbiota study also by pyrosequencing the 16S rRNA gene, the bacterial genera Actinomyces, Porphyromonas, Fusobacterium, Neisseria, Pasteurella, Lampropedia, Capnocytophaga, Frigovirgula, Filifactor, Conchiformibius, Eubacterium, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Derxia have been identified with an abundance >1% [15]. Based on the sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene the presence of other genera in the oral cavity of dogs such as Abiotrophia, Aerococcus, Campylobacter, Cardiobacterium, Clostridium, Curtobacterium, Dialister, Dietzia, Dysgonomo-nas, Eikenella, Enterococcus, Eubacterium, Gemella, Globicatella, Granulicatella, Haemophilus, Lactobacillus, Leptotrichia, Leucobacter, Micrococcus, Micromonas, Peptostreptococcus, Prevotella, Propionibacterium, Propionivibrio, Rothia, Selenomo-nas, Schwartzia, Sporocytophaga, Wolinella, Xanthomonas and Xenophilus was confirmed [16]. Many of them are part of the biofilm formed on teeth surface. In dogs, also in humans, a subgingival biofilm includes colonies of anaerobic, Gram-negative (Bacteroides spp., Capnocytophaga spp., Fusobacterium spp., Porphyromonas spp., Prevotella spp., Tannerella spp. and Treponema spp.) as well as Gram-positive bacteria (Actinomyces spp., Corynebacterium spp., Eubacterium spp., Peptostreptococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp.) [17].

The formation of dental biofilm in the oral cavity is a multi-stage process [18]. It can be divided into four main stages: pellicle formation, initial bacterial adhesion, plaque maturation and finally bacterial dispersion [11]. Initially, a semipermeable layer called pellicle is formed on the tooth surface, which mediates the interaction between tooth, oral fluids and microorganisms [19]. Primary colonizers form biofilm autoaggregation (aggregation between the same species) and coaggregation (aggregation between different species) [20]. In addition, they facilitate the arrival of additional bacteria by providing multiple diverse adhesive sites. They also begin to build a matrix that holds the biofilm together. Some species are incapable of adhering to the surface, but are often able to anchor to a matrix or directly to earlier colonizers [21]. Representatives of the genera Neisseria, Corynebacteriumand Stenotrophomonas are involved as primary colonizers in the formation of canine dental biofilm. The most common species of the genus Neisseria are N. zoodegmatis, N. animaloris and N. weaveri. Representatives of the genera Actinomyces, Porphyromonas, Moraxella, Leucobacter, and the families Peptostreptococcaceae and Pasteurellaceae probably play the roles of secondary colonizers. Species Actinomyces canis and Porphyromonas gingivicanis show high levels of biofilm incorporation. The species which featured most frequently in the role of third community member are Peptostreptococcaceae spp., Porphyromonas gingivicanis and Leucobacter spp. [22]. Bacteria from dental biofilm can either be protective, and provide an essential barrier through interactions with the host immune system, or be pathogenic, and cause diseases, such as periodontitis [15]. Oral microbiota varies greatly in healthy dogs and in dogs with disease of oral cavity, and also contains a high proportion of non-cultivable or unexplored species [23]. In healthy dogs, more common species are Moraxella spp., Bergeyella zoohelcum, Neisseria shayeganii, Pasteurellaceae spp., Capnocytophaga spp. and Stenotrophomonas spp. In dogs with periodontitis, species Peptostreptococcaceae spp., Lachnospiraceae spp. and Clostridiales spp. are significantly more prevalent [24].


3. Periodontal disease

Periodontal disease occurs naturally in a wide range of species from rodents to humans [25]. Periodontal disease is one of the most common diseases of adult dogs, with up to 80% of animals affected [23]. All canine breeds are at risk of developing periodontal disease [26]. In general, the disease is more prevalent in small breeds compared to large breeds, and incidence increases with advancing age. In addition, brachycephalic breeds and dogs with teeth overcrowding have been reported to be especially vulnerable to developing the advanced stages of the disease [27]. There are four stages of periodontal disease, each of which is based on the severity of clinical lesions as follows: Stage 1—gingivitis, Stage 2—early periodontitis, Stage 3—moderate periodontitis, Stage 4—advanced periodontitis [28].

Gingivitis is completely reversible, and is recognized by the classic signs of halitosis, bleeding, inflammation, redness and swelling of the gingivae. Periodontitis is irreversible, and attacks the deeper structures that support the teeth, permanently damaging the surrounding bone and periodontal ligament [23]. The breakdown of the collagen fibers of the periodontal ligament results in a periodontal pocket between the gingiva and the tooth. Periodontal pocket deepen due to further destruction of periodontal ligament fibers and alveolar bone resorption. Advanced periodontitis is characterized by gingival erythema and edema, gingival bleeding, gingival recession, tooth mobility, suppuration of periodontal pocket and loss of teeth [29]. We know two main categories of periodontal disease in which loss of supporting structures around the tooth occurs: chronic periodontitis and aggressive periodontitis [30]. Chronic periodontitis is chronic inflammation results in, mostly irreversible, loss of epithelial tissue, bone and ligament. Aggressive periodontitis is characterized by rapid rate of disease progression. It can be present in localized or generalized form; both are early-onset forms of chronic periodontal inflammatory disease. No disease-specific biomarkers exist that differentiate chronic periodontitis from aggressive periodontitis. Although current knowledge suggests that both have similar etiology and histopathology and might indeed be different ends of the same disease spectrum [31].

Periodontal disease is caused by the accumulation of bacterial dental biofilm on the teeth and gingivae, toxic products of the metabolism of these microorganisms, and the host immune response against the infection that triggers the inflammatory process [32]. In case of chronic periodontitis usually have abundance of plaque and calculus, which match with the amount of periodontal destruction. On the other hand, in case of aggressive periodontitis, there is usually a mismatch between the amount of local factors and the periodontal destruction [33]. Periodontal disease affects more frequently and more severely regions of premolars and molars than regions of maxillary and mandibular incisors. Missing of teeth is observed at a high and increasing incidence with age. The tooth most commonly lost is the first premolar, followed by the other premolars and molars, where severe periodontitis is frequently found [34]. Periodontitis is a serious infection that can have medical consequences such as anorexia and weight loss, chronic pain, swollen gums, dental caries, breakage or loss of teeth and breakage of the maxillary or mandibular bone [35]. Unfortunately, the damage from periodontal disease is not confined to just loss of teeth. Oral infection, especially periodontitis, may affect the course and pathogenesis of a number of systemic diseases, such as chronic bronchitis, pulmonary fibrosis, endocarditis, interstitial nephritis, glomerulonephritis and hepatitis [1].


4. Periodontal pathogens

Although there is sufficient evidence that biofilm accumulation and maturation is essential for initiation and progression of periodontal disease, studies show that bacterial species colonizing periodontal pocket have different roles in the pathogenesis of this disease [36]. Microbial density is considered to be critical for the development of gingivitis, and some types of chronic periodontitis, while the species of the microorganisms may be of greater importance in the initiation of aggressive periodontitis [35]. Subgingival microbiota in periodontitis may contain hundreds of bacterial species, but only a small number is associated with disease progression, and is considered to be of importance etiologically [37]. The presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is an indication of tuberculosis, and Treponema pallidum a positive diagnosis of syphilis, but there is no single microorganism, which is attributable to chronic periodontitis [38].

As with any other infection, identification of the microbial pathogens associated with the etiology of periodontitis is the first step towards the development of effective therapeutic approaches. The establishment of a microorganism as a true pathogen should be based on two main levels of evidence: (1) the organism should be present in higher prevalence and/or levels in disease than in health, and (2) its suppression or elimination should reduce or stop disease progression [39]. In human, the presence of three species of Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria within subgingival biofilm, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola and Tannerella forsythia, described by Socransky et al. as the “red complex,” show a strong association to periodontitis, and some studies have indicated their involvement also in dogs [40]. There are many others candidates as human periodontal pathogens, including Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella nigrescens, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Parvimonas micra, Eikenella corrodens, Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Treponema socranskii, Eubacterium nodatum and Campylobacter rectus [41]. Some of them are also associated with canine periodontal disease. Tannerella forsythia, Campylobacter rectus and Porphyromonas gulae were detected in almost all dogs with periodontitis. Prevotella intermedia and Eikenella corrodens were detected only in few dogs with periodontitis, Treponema denticola, Capnocytophaga ochracea and Porphyromonas gingivalis were detected in only one specimen. In addition, Prevotella nigrescens and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans were not detected in any of the specimens [42]. Actinomyces canis and Corynebacterium canis are significantly more prevalent in dogs with periodontitis than in healthy dogs [23, 24]. Species of the genera Actinomyces and Corynebacterium can play the same role in periodontitis in dogs that P. gingivalis plays in periodontitis in humans. This assumption is based on the finding that the ratio of these genera that have trypsin-like activity is increased in areas with periodontitis compared to their ratio in non-periodontal areas and may partly explain the absence of P. gingivalis [43]. Protist organisms, such as Entamoeba gingivalis and Trichomonas tenax, are also present in canine dental biofilm, and correlate with periodontal disease. These findings provide the evidence for the presence of oral protozoa in canine dental biofilm, and suggest a possible role for protozoa in the periodontal disease process [44].

4.1 Genus Porphyromonas

The genus Porphyromonas is phylogenetically classified in the family Porphyromonadaceae, order Bacteroidales, class Bacteroides and phylum Bacteroidetes. Representatives of this genus are Gram-negative, obligate anaerobic, non-motile and non-spore-forming rods. Several species of Porphyromonas, including P. endodontalis, P. circumdentaria and P. gingivalis were isolated from the biofilm of adult dogs, but not from any oral sites of puppies and adolescent dogs [45]. Also, several new Porphyromonas species (P. gulae, P. macacae, P. cangingivalis, P. cansulci, P. creviocanis, P. gingivacanis, P. canoris, P. denticanis) associated with periodontal disease have been described [23]. In humans, the major periodontal pathogen is P. gingivalis [46]. There are several differences between isolates Porphyromonas from humans and from dogs. For example, P. gingivalis isolates of canine origin are catalase positive, but isolates of human origin are catalase negative. These catalase positive organisms like P. gingivalis may represent the species P. gulae [47].

P. gulae is rarely found in humans and healthy animals, usually is isolated from animals, including dogs, with active periodontitis [48]. From dogs with periodontal disease are most frequently isolated three Porphyromonas species: P. gulae, P. salivosa (current name, P. macacae) and P. denticanis [49]. Of these only, P. gulae exhibits virulence characteristics similar to those of the human periodontal pathogen P. gingivalis such as lysyl- and arginyl-specific proteolytic activity of the gingipains. This finding suggested that P. gulae may play a key role in the development of periodontitis in dogs [50]. In addition, fimbrial protein with the same size and antigenicity similar the 41-kDa fimbrial subunit protein (fimbrillin, FimA) of P. gingivalis was identified in P. gulae [51]. The fimbria is an important cell structure involved in the adherence and invasion of host’s cells, and stimulates the production of inflammatory cytokines by macrophages and fibroblasts. This adhesive ability is considered to be a major pathogenic characteristic of Porphyromonas that causes periodontal tissue destruction [52].

P. cangingivalis is the most prevalent canine oral bacterial species in both plaque from healthy gingiva and plaque from dogs with early periodontitis. The ability of P. cangingivalis to predominate in both health and disease environments suggests that it is both metabolically flexible enough to colonize in health and also able to compete against other Porphyromonas spp. in a disease environment [24]. P. cangingivalis has a complete protoporphyrin IX synthesis pathway potentially allowing it to synthesize its own heme unlike pathogenic Porphyromonads such as P. gingivalis that acquire heme predominantly from blood. The ability to synthesize siroheme and vitamin B12 point to enhanced metabolic flexibility for P. cangingivalis, which may underlie its prevalence in the canine oral cavity [53].

4.2 Genus Tannerella

The genus Tannerella is phylogenetically classified in the family Porphyromonadaceae, order Bacteroidales, class Bacteroides and phylum Bacteroidetes. Representatives of this genus are Gram-negative, anaerobic, non-motile rods. The primary periodontal pathogen is Tannerella forsythia originally described as Bacteroides forsythus, and reclassified to Tannerella forsythia based on 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis [54]. T. forsythia should be regarded as common member of oral microbiota in dogs [42], but dogs with gingivitis or periodontitis are more likely to be infected with T. forsythia than healthy animals [26]. T. forsythia has several virulence factors, including surface antigen BspA, cell surface proteolytic enzymes, hemagglutinin, cell envelope lipoproteins, glycosidases and cell surface (S)-layer, which contribute to pathogenic potential. The surface protein BspA can bind extracellular matrix components as well as other oral bacteria, and is partly responsible for alveolar bone resorption [55].

4.3 Genus Campylobacter

The genus Campylobacter is phylogenetically classified in the family Campylobacteraceae, order Campylobacterales, class Epsilonproteobacteria and phylum Proteobacteria. Species Campylobacter rectus (formerly Wolinella recta), Gram-negative, microaerophilic and motile bacterium, is regarded as common member of oral microbiota in dogs. C. rectus, Tannerella forsythia and Porphyromonas gulae are three major species present in dogs with periodontitis base on study using molecular biological approaches [42]. Several possible factors of virulence have been described for C. rectus, such as flagellum, surface layer proteins (S-layer), RTX-type toxins, GroELlike proteins and lipopolysaccharide [56]. C. rectus may be an important indicator of periodontal disease. Together with other oral anaerobic bacteria, C. rectus is associated with the initiation and progression of periodontal disease [57].

4.4 Genus Treponema

The genus Treponema is phylogenetically classified in the family Spirochaetaceae, order Spirochaetales, class Spirochaetesa and phylum Spirochaetes. Treponemes are Gram-negative, obligate anaerobic, motile spirochetes. Treponemes are involved in the development of chronic domestic animal diseases, including periodontal diseases in dogs [58]. Dogs harbor several different Treponema spp. in their oral cavity, and they can be common in both healthy and periodontitis affected dogs, indicating they are part of the normal oral microbiota [40]. Canine dental biofilm include species T. denticola, T. socranskii, T. vincentii, T. maltophilum, T. medium and T. pectinovorum [59]. Prevalence T. denticola and T. socranskii is significantly higher in dogs with periodontitis than in dogs without periodontitis. In addition, Treponema spp. are not only in the microbial biofilm but also within the gingival tissue [60].

Treponemes, including T. denticola, are found on the surface of dense subgingival bacterial biofilms, particularly at the interface of biofilms and gingival epithelium. T. denticola has been shown to adhere to fibroblasts and epithelial cells as well as extracellular components of the matrix present in periodontal tissues, and produces several harmful factors that can contribute to virulence of bacteria [61]. The main virulence factors of T. denticola in chronic periodontitis include motility and chemotaxis, the ability to interact synergistically with other periodontal pathogens, the ability to produce cytotoxic metabolites, the ability to form biofilms and a variety of cell surface proteins. Motility and chemotaxis allow the bacterium to rapidly colonize new sites, penetrate deep periodontal pocket and penetrate into epithelial layers. Cell surface proteins cause dysregulation of host defense, thereby helping to protect the subgingival biofilm and causing host tissue destruction [58].

4.5 Genus Fusobacterium

The genus Fusobacterium is phylogenetically classified in the family Fusobacteriaceae, order Fusobacteriales, class Fusobacteriia and phylum Fusobacteria. Species Fusobacterium nucleatum and Fusobacterium canifelinum were identified in subgingival plaque from dogs with and without periodontitis [62]. Based on phenotypic and genotypic differences, F. nucleatum is divided into five subspecies, namely F. nucleatum subspp. nucleatum, F. nucleatum subspp. polymorphum, F. nucleatum subspp. fusiforme, F. nucleatum subspp. vincentii and F. nucleatum subspp. animalis, whose prevalence varies with disease [63]. At present, the mechanisms of pathogenicity of F. nucleatum are unclear. Butyrate production is considered a virulence factor. The association of F. nucleatum with periodontal disease is probably through its role as a transient colonizer between Gram-positive and Gram-negative species, mainly in humans. Consequently, F. nucleatum can serve as a bridge between species that can colonize exposed tooth surfaces (early colonizers), and species that require interactions with other species (late colonizers). Since late colonizers tend to be species associated with periodontal destruction, bridging with F. nucleatum could play an important role in determining the pathogenicity of a mature oral biofilm community [64, 65]. Of the large number of periodontal pathogens, F. nucleatum is most frequently involved in infections outside the oral cavity, including pneumonia, pyogenic liver abscess, sepsis, infectious endocarditis, brain abscesses and caecal inflammation [66].

4.6 Genus Parvimonas

The genus Parvimonas is phylogenetically classified in the family Peptoniphilaceae, order Tissierelliales, class Tissierellia and phylum Firmicutes. The species Parvimonas micra originally classified as Peptostreptococcus micros was first reclassified in 1999 to Mircomonas micros, and the second time reclassified in 2006 to Parvimonas micra [67]. P. micra is anaerobic, asaccharolytic Gram-positive coccus found in dogs with periodontitis but not in the healthy dogs [68]. The virulence factors produced by P. micra, which may play a role in the pathogenesis of periodontitis, are poorly characterized. P. micra may modulate the inflammatory response in the host and contribute to the destruction of periodontal tissue. In addition, P. micra is capable of adhering to epithelial cells, also to other periodontal pathogens [69], and is able to form biofilms in conjunction with Frederiksenia canicola and P. gulae. P. micra might provide a catalyst for progressive tissue destruction, inflammation and alveolar bone loss in canine periodontal disease, in keeping with the keystone-pathogen hypothesis [68].

4.7 Genus Prevotella

The genus Prevotella is phylogenetically classified in the family Prevotellaceae, order Bacteroidales, class Bacteroidia and phylum Bacteroidetes. Representatives of this genus are Gram-negative, anaerobic, non-motile rods. The primary periodontal pathogen is species Prevotella intermedia. Within the P. intermedia strains, heterogeneity was found in terms of serology and DNA homology. In 1992, based on complex DNA-DNA hybridization, it was suggested that P. intermedia be reclassified into two species, P. intermedia and P. nigrescens [70]. P. intermedia and P. nigrescens, members of the “orange complex” described by Socransky et al., are among the most common species in subgingival plaque in humans. P. intermedia may under certain conditions increase the activity of degradation enzymes and promote the progression of periodontitis [71]. P. intermedia is also present in canine dental plaque. In dogs, the counts of P. intermedia correlated with the amount of plaque and the degree of gingivitis [72]. Prevotella dentalis is also associated with periodontitis. P. dentalis (formerly Mitsuokella dentalis) was originally named after Japanese bacteriologist Mitsuok, who described this organism for the first time [38]. Mitsuoka isolates a large number of P. dentalis strains from humans, dogs and pigs that seem to be closely related to the Bacteroides genus [73].

4.8 Oral protozoa

For several decades, research in periodontology is focused on the characterization of bacterial communities thought to be involved in canine periodontal diseases. However, other microorganisms are known to inhabit the oral cavity and could also influence the process of periodontal disease. There were identified two oral protozoa, Entamoeba gingivalis and Trichomonas tenax, which can inhabit the canine oral periodontium. Both were statistically associated to animals with periodontal disease [74].

The species Entamoeba gingivalis is phylogenetically classified in the genus Entamoeba, class Archamoebae and phylum Amoebozoa. The protozoan E. gingivalis resides in the oral cavity and is frequently observed in the periodontal pockets of humans and pets. The parasite E. gingivalis is more prevalent and more abundant in periodontal pockets, suggesting that this ecological niche is either propitious for its survival, or that the parasite induces changes leading to this environment [75]. E. gingivalis is an opportunistic pathogen, which, together with synergistic symbiotic bacteria, can cause periodontal diseases in hosts with low immunity [76]. Pathogenicity of protozoa E. gingivalis in the oral cavity is not completely understood [77].

The species Trichomonas tenax is phylogenetically classified in the genus Trichomonas, family Trichomonadidae and order Trichomonadida. T. tenax inhabits the oral cavities of various mammals, including humans, dogs, cats and horses [78]. T. tenax, an anaerobic motile-flagellated protozoan, is 12–20 μm long and 5–6 μm wide organism. It is either ellipsoidal or ovoid in shape and has four anterior flagella of unequal lengths [79]. T. tenax can ingest bacteria and various particles by phagocytosis necessary for their development. T. tenax, detected in periodontal cases, is likely to be related to the onset and evolution of periodontal disease [80]. This parasite has been reported to be involved in a number of cases of pulmonary trichomoniasis. Besides bronchopulmonary exudates the trichomonads have also been found in pleural fluid, submaxillary gland and infra-auricular lymph node [81]. Several mechanisms may explain the deleterious effects of the T. tenax parasite towards periodontal tissues. Recent studies have emphasized the ability of parasites to induce changes in some features of microbial communities. T. tenax can escape the host immune response via a complex strategy caused by an imbalance of the oral cavity microbiocenosis. Pathogenic bacteria involved in periodontal host colonization and immune subversion use complement and toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathways. Like bacteria, parasites are recognized by TLR. T. tenax also produce fibronectin-like proteins, responsible for tissue adhesion. Given this pathogenic property, host-tissue disruption and lysis may be induced by T. tenax secretion of peptidases such as cathepsin B-like proteinases for matricial type 1 collagen and gelatin hydrolyses or haemolysins for erythrolysis [79].


5. The possibility of transferring bacteria from the oral microbiome of dogs to human

Except for to the impact on animal health, bacteria from the oral cavity of animals may also have harmful effects on human health in the case of microbial transmissibility, for example, through dog bites. Dog bite wounds are polymicrobial, with a broad combination of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. The microbiology of infected bite wounds from dogs is similar to that of the organisms that colonize the dog’s oral cavity. Less frequently, isolates may also come from the environment and patients’ skin [82]. On average, a dog bite wound contains two to five different species of bacteria [83]. Pasteurella species are the most frequent isolates of dog bites (50%), especially Pasteurella canis is the most common isolate of dog bites [84]. Other common aerobic organisms include P. multocida, P. dagmatis, Staphylococcus spp. (including MRSA), Streptococcus spp. (including S. pyogenes), Neisseria spp., Capnocytophaga canimorsus, Corynebacterium spp., Moraxella spp., Enterococcus spp. and Bacillus spp. [82, 83]. The most common anaerobic organism isolated from infected dog bite wounds is Fusobacterium nucleatum [82]. Fusobacterium canifelinum was also isolated from wounds in humans after dog bites [85]. Other common anaerobes include Prevotella spp., Bacteroides spp., Porphyromonas spp., Propionibacterium spp. and Peptostreptococcus spp. [82, 83]. Several Porphyromonas species (P. macacae, P. canoris, P. circumdentaria, P. cangingivalis, and P. cansulci) [84] and other periodontal pathogens (Tannerella forsythia, Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella dentalis) were also isolated from infected dog bite wounds [82]. In addition, some pathogens such as Leptospira, Rabies virus, Clostridium tetani or Francisella tularensis, which can cause systemic infection after bites by dogs, were isolated from wounds in humans [83].

As transmission of oral bacteria during normal contacts between dogs and humans is also feasible one might expect correlations between the oral microbiota of dogs and humans [17]. Oral-to-oral transfer of Neisseria shayeganii, Porphyromonas canigingivalis, Tannerella forsythia and Streptococcus minor from dogs to humans is suspected. The finding of potentially zoonotic and periodontopathic bacteria in the canine oral microbiome may be a public health concern [15].


6. Conclusion

Review of literature showed that some bacterial species like Tannerella forsythia, Campylobacter rectus, Treponema denticola, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Parvimonas micra and Prevotella intermedia are the important pathogens for periodontitis in both humans and dogs. On the other hand, Porphyromonas gulae is specifically associated with canine periodontal disease. In addition, it is assumed, that oral protozoa such as Entamoeba gingivalis and Trichomonas tenax play role in canine periodontal disease. In summary, periodontal disease is polymicrobial disease and further analyses of the associated species of periodontitis and their virulence factors in dogs are needed.



This publication was supported by the project of the Ministry of education science Research and sport of the Slovak Republic VEGA 1/0788/19 and VEGA 1/0081/17.


  1. 1. Stella JL, Bauer AE, Croney CC. A cross-sectional study to estimate prevalence of periodontal disease in a population of dogs (Canis familiaris) in commercial breeding facilities in Indiana and Illinois. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0191395. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191395
  2. 2. Davis IJ et al. Longitudinal quantification of the gingival crevicular fluid proteome during progression from gingivitis to periodontitis in a canine model. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2016;43(7):584-594. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12548
  3. 3. Saini R et al. Periodontitis, a true infection. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases. 2009;1(2):149-150. DOI: 10.4103/0974-777X.56251
  4. 4. Lovegrove JM. Dental plaque revisited: Bacteria associated with periodontal disease. Journal of the New Zealand Society of Periodontology. 2004;87:7-21. ISSN: 0111-1485
  5. 5. Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community: Implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health. 2006;6(Suppl 1):S14. DOI: 1472-6831-6-S1-S14
  6. 6. Wallis C et al. A longitudinal assessment of periodontal health status in 53 Labrador retrievers. The Journal of Small Animal Practice. 2018;59(9):560-569. DOI: 10.1111/jsap.12870
  7. 7. Niklaus PL, Lindhe J, editors. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. Danvers: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. p. 1480. ISBN: 978-0-470-67248-8
  8. 8. Niemiec BA. Veterinary Periodontology. Danvers: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 372. DOI: 10.1002/9781118705018
  9. 9. Hellwig E, Klimek J, Attin T. Záchovná stomatologie a parodontologie. Praha: Grada Publishing; 2003. p. 332. ISBN: 80-247-0311-4
  10. 10. Wade WG. New aspects and new concepts of maintaining “microbiological” health. Journal of Dentistry. 2010;38(Suppl 1):S21-S25. DOI: S0300-5712(10)70007-5
  11. 11. Huang R, Li M, Gregory RL. Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm. Virulence. 2011;2(5):435-444. DOI: 10.4161/viru.2.5.16140
  12. 12. Marsh PD. Dental plaque: Biological significance of a biofilm and community life-style. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2005;32(Suppl 6):7-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00790.x
  13. 13. Elliott DR et al. Cultivable oral microbiota of domestic dogs. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005;43(11):5470-5476. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5470-5476.2005
  14. 14. Sturgeon A et al. Metagenomic analysis of the canine oral cavity as revealed by high-throughput pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Veterinary Microbiology. 2012;162(2-4):891-898. DOI: S0378-1135(12)00638-4
  15. 15. Oh C et al. Comparison of the oral microbiomes of canines and their owners using next-generation sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0131468. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131468
  16. 16. Dewhirst FE et al. The canine oral microbiome. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e36067. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036067
  17. 17. Golynska M et al. Molecular-level evaluation of selected periodontal pathogens from subgingival regions in canines and humans with periodontal disease. Journal of Veterinary Science. 2016;18(1):51-58. DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2017.18.1.51
  18. 18. Dhir S. Biofilm and dental implant: The microbial link. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2013;17(1):5-11. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.107466
  19. 19. Hannig C, Hannig M. The oral cavity: A key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2009;13(2):123-139. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-008-0243-3
  20. 20. Chandki R, Banthia P, Banthia R. Biofilms: A microbial home. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2011;15(2):111-114. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.84377
  21. 21. Sauer K et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. Journal of Bacteriology. 2002;184(4):1140-1154. ISSN: 0021-9193
  22. 22. Holcombe LJ et al. Early canine plaque biofilms: Characterization of key bacterial interactions involved in initial colonization of enamel. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e113744. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113744
  23. 23. Riggio MP et al. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with canine periodontal disease. Veterinary Microbiology. 2011;150(3-4):394-400. DOI: S0378-1135(11)00139-8
  24. 24. Davis IJ et al. A cross-sectional survey of bacterial species in plaque from client owned dogs with healthy gingiva, gingivitis or mild periodontitis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e83158. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083158
  25. 25. Hennet PR, Harvey CE. Natural development of periodontal disease in the dog: A review of clinical, anatomical and histological features. Journal of Veterinary Dentistry. 1992;9(3):13-19. ISSN: 0898-7564
  26. 26. Di Bello A et al. Periodontal disease associated with red complex bacteria in dogs. The Journal of Small Animal Practice. 2014;55(3):160-163. DOI: 10.1111/jsap.12179
  27. 27. Marshall MD et al. A longitudinal assessment of periodontal disease in 52 Miniature Schnauzers. BMC Veterinary Research. 2014;10:166. DOI: 1746-6148-10-166
  28. 28. Carvalho CM et al. Mandibulectomy for treatment of fractures associated with severe periodontal disease. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 2015;56(3):292-294. ISSN: 0008-5286
  29. 29. Preshaw PM et al. Periodontitis and diabetes: A two-way relationship. Diabetologia. 2011;55(1):21-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-011-2342-y
  30. 30. Armitage GC. Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Annals of Periodontology. 1999;4(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1902/annals.1999.4.1.1
  31. 31. Kinane DF, Stathopoulou PG, Papapanou PN. Periodontal diseases. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers. 2017;3:17038. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.38
  32. 32. Albuquerque C et al. Canine periodontitis: The dog as an important model for periodontal studies. Veterinary Journal. 2011;191(3):299-305. DOI: S1090-0233(11)00299-1
  33. 33. Ramachandra SS et al. Differential diagnosis between chronic versus aggressive periodontitis and staging of aggressive periodontitis: A cross-sectional study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2018;8(4):594-603. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_623_17
  34. 34. Isogai H et al. Epidemiological study on periodontal diseases and some other dental disorders in dogs. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1989;51(6):1151-1162. ISSN: 0021-5295
  35. 35. Stephan B et al. Activity of pradofloxacin against Porphyromonas and Prevotella spp. implicated in periodontal disease in dogs: Susceptibility test data from a European multicenter study. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2008;52(6):2149-2155. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00019-08
  36. 36. Wolff L, Dahlen G, Aeppli D. Bacteria as risk markers for periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. 1994;65(5 Suppl):498-510. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.5s.498
  37. 37. AlJehani YA. Risk factors of periodontal disease: Review of the literature. International Journal of Dentistry. 2014;2014:182513. DOI: 10.1155/2014/182513
  38. 38. Arora N, Mishra A, Chugh S. Microbial role in periodontitis: Have we reached the top? Some unsung bacteria other than red complex. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2014;18(1):9-13. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.128192
  39. 39. Perez-Chaparro PJ et al. Newly identified pathogens associated with periodontitis: A systematic review. Journal of Dental Research. 2014;93(9):846-858. DOI: 0022034514542468
  40. 40. Nises J et al. The occurrence of Treponema spp. in gingival plaque from dogs with varying degree of periodontal disease. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0201888. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201888
  41. 41. Teles R et al. Lessons learned and unlearned in periodontal microbiology. Periodontology 2000. 2013;62(1):95-162. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12010
  42. 42. Kato Y et al. Molecular detection of human periodontal pathogens in oral swab specimens from dogs in Japan. Journal of Veterinary Dentistry. 2011;28(2):84-89. DOI: 10.1177/089875641102800204
  43. 43. Takada K, Hirasawa M. Expression of trypsin-like activity by the genera Corynebacterium and Actinomyces in canine periodontitis. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2000;49(7):621-625. DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-49-7-621
  44. 44. Patel N et al. The prevalence of canine oral Protozoa and their association with periodontal disease. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2016;64(3):286-292. DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12359
  45. 45. Isogai H et al. Ecology of genus Porphyromonas in canine periodontal disease. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin. Reihe B. 1999;46(7):467-473. ISSN: 0514-7166
  46. 46. Mysak J et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis: Major periodontopathic pathogen overview. Journal of Immunology Research. 2014;2014:476068. DOI: 10.1155/2014/476068
  47. 47. Harvey CE, Thornsberry C, Miller BR. Subgingival bacteria: Comparison of culture results in dogs and cats with gingivitis. Journal of Veterinary Dentistry. 1995;12(4):147-150. ISSN: 0898-7564
  48. 48. Fournier D et al. Porphyromonas gulae sp. nov., an anaerobic, gram-negative coccobacillus from the gingival sulcus of various animal hosts. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2001;51(Pt 3):1179-1189. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-51-3-1179
  49. 49. Holden JA et al. Porphyromonas gulae activates unprimed and gamma interferon-primed macrophages via the pattern recognition receptors toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), TLR4, and NOD2. Infection and Immunity. 2017;85(9):1-15. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00282-17
  50. 50. Lenzo JC et al. Porphyromonas gulae has virulence and immunological characteristics similar to those of the human periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infection and Immunity. 2016;84(9):2575-2585. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01500-15
  51. 51. Hamada N et al. Molecular and antigenic similarities of the fimbrial major components between Porphyromonas gulae and P. gingivalis. Veterinary Microbiology. 2008;128(1-2):108-117. DOI: S0378-1135(07)00472-5
  52. 52. do Nascimento Silva A et al. Pathogenicity and genetic profile of oral Porphyromonas species from canine periodontitis. Archives of Oral Biology. 2017;83:20-24. DOI: S0003-9969(17)30213-3
  53. 53. O’Flynn C et al. Comparative genomics of the genus Porphyromonas identifies adaptations for heme synthesis within the prevalent canine oral species Porphyromonas cangingivalis. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2015;7(12):3397-3413. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evv220
  54. 54. Sharma A. Virulence mechanisms of Tannerella forsythia. Periodontology 2000. 2010;54(1):106-116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2009.00332.x
  55. 55. Chukkapalli SS et al. Chronic oral infection with major periodontal bacteria Tannerella forsythia modulates systemic atherosclerosis risk factors and inflammatory markers. Pathogens and Disease. 2015;73(3):1-12. DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftv009
  56. 56. Arce RM et al. Characterization of the invasive and inflammatory traits of oral Campylobacter rectus in a murine model of fetoplacental growth restriction and in trophoblast cultures. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2010;84(2):145-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2009.11.003
  57. 57. Ihara H et al. Detection of Campylobacter rectus in periodontitis sites by monoclonal antibodies. Journal of Periodontal Research. 2003;38(1):64-72. DOI: 1o627
  58. 58. Dashper SG et al. Virulence factors of the oral spirochete Treponema denticola. Journal of Dental Research. 2010;90(6):691-703. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510385242
  59. 59. Valdez M et al. Isolation of oral spirochetes from dogs and cats and provisional identification using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis specific for human plaque Treponema spp. Journal of Veterinary Dentistry. 2000;17(1):23-26. ISSN: 0898-7564
  60. 60. Nordhoff M et al. Association of Treponema spp. with canine periodontitis. Veterinary Microbiology. 2008;127(3-4):334-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.09.011
  61. 61. Sela MN. Role of Treponema denticola in periodontal diseases. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine. 2001;12(5):399-413. ISSN: 1045-4411
  62. 62. Senhorinho GN et al. Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Porphyromonas spp. and Fusobacterium spp. in dogs with and without periodontitis. Anaerobe. 2012;18(4):381-385. DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.04.008
  63. 63. Han YW. Fusobacterium nucleatum: A commensal-turned pathogen. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2015;23:141-147. DOI: S1369-5274(14)00180-5
  64. 64. Merritt J et al. Autoaggregation response of Fusobacterium nucleatum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75(24):7725-7733. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00916-09
  65. 65. Signat B et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum in periodontal health and disease. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2011;13(2):25-36. DOI: v13/25
  66. 66. Henne K et al. Sex-specific differences in the occurrence of Fusobacterium nucleatum subspecies and Fusobacterium periodonticum in the oral cavity. Oncotarget. 2018;9(29):20631-20639. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25042
  67. 67. Uemura H et al. Parvimonas micra as a causative organism of spondylodiscitis: A report of two cases and a literature review. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2014;23:53-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.02.007
  68. 68. Sanguansermsri P et al. Interspecies dynamics among bacteria associated with canine periodontal disease. Molecular Oral Microbiology. 2017;33(1):59-67. DOI: 10.1111/omi.12199
  69. 69. Tanabe S, Bodet C, Grenier D. Peptostreptococcus micros cell wall elicits a pro-inflammatory response in human macrophages. Journal of Endotoxin Research. 2007;13(4):219-226. DOI: 10.1177/0968051907081869
  70. 70. Fukui K et al. Incidence of Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens carriage among family members with subclinical periodontal disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1999;37(10):3141-3145. ISSN: 0095-1137
  71. 71. Zhang Y et al. Population-genomic insights into variation in Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens isolates and its association with periodontal disease. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2017;7:409. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00409
  72. 72. Allaker RP et al. Prevalence of Porphyromonas and Prevotella species in the dental plaque of dogs. The Veterinary Record. 1997;140(6):147-148. ISSN: 0042-4900
  73. 73. Hiranmayi KV et al. Novel pathogens in periodontal microbiology. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences. 2017;9(3):155-163. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_288_16
  74. 74. Patel N, Holcombe L, Andrew P. Oral protists: Importance to canine periodontal disease. Protistology. 2016;10:57-58. ISSN: 1680-0826
  75. 75. Bonner M et al. Reassessing the role of Entamoeba gingivalis in periodontitis. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2018;8:379. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00379
  76. 76. Liu GY et al. Experimental study on the pathogenesis of Entamoeba gingivalis. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi. 2001;19(4):229-232. ISSN: 1000-7423
  77. 77. Mielnik-Blaszczak M et al. Entamoeba gingivalis: Prevalence and correlation with dental caries in children from rural and urban regions of Lublin Province, Eastern Poland. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 2018;25(4):656-658. DOI: 10.26444/aaem/80403
  78. 78. Dybicz M et al. Molecular identification of Trichomonas tenax in the oral environment of domesticated animals in Poland: Potential effects of host diversity for human health. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 2018;25(3):464-468. DOI: 10.26444/aaem/92309
  79. 79. Marty M et al. Trichomonas tenax and periodontal diseases: A concise review. Parasitology. 2017;144(11):1417-1425. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182017000701
  80. 80. Benabdelkader S et al. Specific clones of Trichomonas tenax are associated with periodontitis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0213338. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213338
  81. 81. Kutisova K et al. Tetratrichomonads from the oral cavity and respiratory tract of humans. Parasitology. 2005;131(Pt 3):309-319. ISSN: 0031-1820
  82. 82. Abrahamian FM, Goldstein EJ. Microbiology of animal bite wound infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2011;24(2):231-246. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00041-10
  83. 83. Rothe K, Tsokos M, Handrick W. Animal and human bite wounds. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2015;112(25):433-442; quiz 443. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0433
  84. 84. Talan DA et al. Bacteriologic analysis of infected dog and cat bites. Emergency medicine animal bite infection study group. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340(2):85-92. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400202
  85. 85. Conrads G et al. Fusobacterium canifelinum sp. nov., from the oral cavity of cats and dogs. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 2004;27(4):407-413. DOI: 10.1078/0723202041438509

Written By

Jana Kačírová, Marián Maďar, Gabriela Štrkolcová, Aladár Maďari and Radomíra Nemcová

Submitted: 02 April 2019 Reviewed: 30 June 2019 Published: 30 July 2019