Open access peer-reviewed chapter

TADF Technology for Efficient Blue OLEDs: Status and Challenges from an Industrial Point of View

Written By

Alhama Arjona-Esteban, Barbara Szafranowska and Julian Ochsmann

Submitted: January 22nd, 2019 Reviewed: April 25th, 2019 Published: July 13th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86534

Chapter metrics overview

1,548 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The rise of OLED technology for display applications over the past decade was impressive. Today, OLED displays can be found everywhere, for example, in smartphones, TVs, smartwatches, monitors, cars, or digital cameras. However, as technology advances, the need for better OLED materials which help to improve energy efficiency and resolution of OLED displays is growing. While for the red and green pixels, phosphorescent materials have allowed for a boost in performance, the use of fluorescent materials for the blue pixel still limits the efficiency of OLED displays. Academic research has demonstrated many improvements regarding the efficiency of blue OLEDs using phosphorescent or TADF materials. However, studies on the limitations of device lifetime are rare. In the present chapter, the development of blue OLEDs based on TADF emitters is discussed from an industrial point of view. First, the material design principles for TADF molecules as well as the requirements for efficient blue TADF emitters are discussed. Moreover, a short literature overview on the latest improvements in blue TADF materials in academia and industry is presented. Finally, an outlook on this technology, its industrial possibilities, and alternatives is given.


  • TADF
  • triplet up-conversion
  • industry
  • deep blue
  • high efficiency blue

1. Introduction

After their first development in the late 1980s [1], organic-light-emitting diodes slowly made their entry into the market of displays for televisions and mobile phones. Compared to other display technologies, OLED displays offer advantages such as wide viewing angles and very high contrast ratio while maintaining low energy consumption. In addition, OLED displays are thin and lightweight and can even be fabricated on flexible substrates, which allows for new and exciting applications. OLEDs can be produced using small molecules or polymers by vacuum thermal evaporation or by inkjet printing.

The basic pixels used to generate the primary colors, red, green, and blue, in an OLED display should have similar performance in order to guarantee a balanced efficiency and power consumption, which is beneficial for display technology, for example, in terms of increasing resolution and decreasing backplane technology complexity. However, as of today, the red and green pixels outperform the blue ones by far, which lies in the different technologies used for the different colors: There are three main photophysical mechanisms, which are relevant for light generation in OLEDs: fluorescence, phosphorescence, and thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF). Fluorescent materials were the first to be used in OLEDs [2]. However, the efficiency of a simple OLED device based on fluorescent materials is limited. These materials can only convert 25% of the excitons formed under electronic excitation into light because quantum mechanics dictates that under electronic excitation, singlet and triplet excitons are formed in a ratio of 1:3 (see Figure 1). Thus, with the discovery of phosphorescent materials, which can make use of all the excited states including triplets, the efficiency of green and red OLEDs increased drastically [3, 4]. However, as of today, no deep blue phosphorescent materials have been found to be stable enough for industrial applications. In this regard, the third generation of OLED materials comes into play. TADF technology allows, like phosphorescent materials, for the conversion of all excitons into light, but holds the promise of longer device lifetime [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11].

Figure 1.

Schematic energy diagrams of fluorescent, phosphorescent, and TADF molecules and their corresponding excitation and de-excitation pathways, when used in OLEDs. Fluorescence often relates to the first emitter material generation. Phosphorescence is the second material generation. TADF marks the latest conceptual development. Figure courtesy of CYNORA.

In this chapter, we will focus on TADF technology as a potential alternative to fluorescent materials in deep blue OLEDs. We will discuss the advantages of this technology and the challenges connected to entering the industrial production of displays.


2. Requirements for TADF behavior and key performance indicators of TADF emitters

In this section, we will focus on the main design principles for TADF molecules and discuss the parameters that make TADF emission possible and how to tune them.

In simple terms, thermally activated delayed fluorescence, as depicted in Figure 1, is a fluorescence mechanism based on the repopulation of the singlet state by reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) from the triplet state, triggered by thermal energy. Thus, the theoretical internal quantum yield (IQE) of an OLED based on TADF is 100%, comparable to that of phosphorescent emitters and much higher than the 25% achieved by fluorescent materials, neglecting any additional contributions from triplet-triplet annihilation (TTA).

For the TADF process to be possible, the energy difference between the triplet and the singlet states (∆EST) has to be smaller than 0.2 eV [12]. From the molecular design point of view, this small ∆EST is mostly addressed by spatially separating the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the molecule. The use of electron-donating (donor) and electron-withdrawing (acceptor) building blocks generates a charge-transfer structure with localized HOMO and LUMO orbitals. This localization can be favored by increasing the twist angle between the donor and acceptor moiety. However, a minimal overlap of the orbitals is necessary for RISC to take place, so a trade-off between small ∆EST and overlap has to be found.

Besides having a small ∆EST, an efficient TADF emitter has to fulfill other requirements: High photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY) together with short excited state lifetimes ensure efficient RISC and radiative decay from the singlet state. Furthermore, a narrow spectrum at the desired color coordinate is necessary to provide the requested color purity. In addition, and especially for industrial applications, a long-lived device has to be delivered in order to satisfy the customers.

2.1 Color tuning: how to achieve blue

The use of strong donor and acceptor units is very widespread when aiming for small ∆EST and short excited state lifetime. However, in order to achieve blue emission, the electron-donor and acceptor units have to be carefully matched.

Since the frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) in TADF emitters are highly localized on the donor and acceptor moieties, it can be assumed that the FMOs of the emitters will be very similar to the FMOs of the isolated donor and acceptor building blocks. Hence, the HOMO of the TADF emitter is determined by the donor moiety and the LUMO by the acceptor moiety (see Figure 2).

Figure 2.

The calculated FMO levels of the TADF emitter depicted on the left can be attributed to the respective HOMO (donor) and LUMO (acceptor) of the building blocks depicted on the right.

We can get an estimate on the donor and acceptor strength of different building blocks by performing density functional theory (DFT) calculations and comparing their HOMO and LUMO values. A higher HOMO level (less negative) corresponds to a stronger donor, while a strong acceptor has a lower LUMO level (more negative) (see Figure 3). A detailed list of the calculated HOMO and LUMO levels of many donor and acceptor building blocks has been published elsewhere [10].

Figure 3.

Correlation of calculated HOMO and LUMO values of donor and acceptor building blocks with the expected emission color of the resulting TADF emitter. Figure courtesy of CYNORA.

Finally, from the difference between the calculated HOMO and LUMO levels, we can get a rough estimate of the optical bandgap, which corresponds to the combination of these donor and acceptor moieties. Carefully choosing the donor and acceptor units based on the calculations will allow us to reach the desired color range, in this case, deep blue with peak emission between 450 and 470 nm.

2.2 Narrow emission

Typically, TADF emitters display broad emission spectra. The reason is that the intramolecular charge-transfer (CT) state, where the emission originates, can undergo geometric relaxation, leading to many molecular configurations emitting at different energies. While for lighting applications, this intrinsic property of TADF emitters can be seen as an advantage, for display applications, the broad emission should be avoided. The display industry requires high color purity with CIEy values around 0.1 for the blue pixel, which can, with current host materials, only be achieved with a narrow spectrum. Moreover, when the spectrum is narrow, the emission onset can be shifted to lower energies, improving the blue color. Shifting the emission onset to lower energies is beneficial in matching the emitter with available host materials and getting a higher stability of the whole system (see Section 4: Requirements for host materials).

The host material can also influence the width and position of the spectrum of the TADF emitter. Polar hosts, for instance, often lead to broader and red-shifted spectra [13]. However, this effect is small in comparison to the intrinsic variations of the different emitter families [14]. Therefore, it is worth aiming to produce molecular structures that have an intrinsically smaller full width at half maximum (FWHM). In the literature, this is mainly addressed by rigidification of the donor-acceptor scaffold in order to minimize the rotational and bending modes and thereby suppressing the geometric relaxation of the CT state [10]. The rigidity can be obtained by fusing the donor and acceptor units or introducing steric hindrances, as demonstrated in Ref. [15] by interlocking the donor units.

2.3 Tuning the excited state dynamics of TADF emitters

The main parameters which describe the excited state dynamics of TADF emitters are the fluorescence radiative decay rate kF, the rate of delayed fluorescence kDF, the rates of intersystem crossing kISC, and reverse intersystem crossing kRISC, as well as the energy difference ΔEST between the first excited singlet S1 and the first excited triplet T1 states (see Figure 4). In order to obtain the best performing TADF emitters, all of these parameters have to be taken into account and careful molecular design must go hand in hand with in-depth photophysical analysis of these emitter systems.

Figure 4.

Schematic energy diagram showing the main parameters which determine the excited state dynamics of TADF emitters.

The light-emitting performance of TADF materials depends on efficient radiative decay processes (kF and kDF) from S1 to the electronic ground state S0 and is also closely related to ΔEST, which governs the up-conversion of excitons from T1 to S1. A small ΔEST is crucial to obtain high values of kRISC, improving the triplet harvesting through the thermally activated reverse intersystem crossing mechanism.

Decreasing the singlet-triplet energy gap ΔEST and increasing the radiative decay rate kF is a useful way to get efficient TADF emission. Unfortunately, as mentioned at the beginning of Section 2, there is a trade-off between getting a small ΔEST and getting a high kF, which is related to the electronic coupling between the ground state and the singlet excited state. A good separation of the HOMO and LUMO orbitals leads to a small ΔEST, but it also reduces kF [16]. On the contrary, compounds with overlapping HOMO and LUMO orbitals are expected to exhibit high values for kF, but yielding relatively large ΔEST, and thus showing less TADF contribution [17].

One of the approaches to increase the radiative decay rate, while maintaining a small ΔEST in TADF emitters, is the concept of using an aromatic bridge or spacer between the donor and acceptor moieties in the molecular design. In such a system, the delocalization of molecular orbitals is given, while there is in addition a weak overlap of HOMO and LUMO orbitals at the spacer, which induces a larger oscillator strength, enhancing the rate of radiative decay. This concept was successfully demonstrated in many TADF emitters containing phenyl linkers between donor and acceptor units in one TADF molecule [17, 18, 19, 20]. Initially, the aromatic bridge negatively influenced ΔEST—making it larger—because of an increased S1 energy level, whereas the T1 level was reduced by the extended π-conjugation. But in such cases, the singlet-triplet energy gap could still be reduced by using stronger donors and acceptors and thereby strengthening the charge-transfer character [21, 22, 23]. In addition, the π-conjugation can be interrupted by twisting the donor and acceptor units, so that they are nearly orthogonal to each other. This design strategy is also very beneficial in decreasing ΔEST and hence increasing kRISC.

Other approaches reported in the literature to get highly efficient TADF materials are to delocalize the HOMO by increasing the number of donors [10, 18, 20] or to design a dual emitting core [24, 25]. In the second case, light absorption and emission is intensified by introducing multiple TADF chromophores fused into one molecule, yielding high PLQY.

The rate of reverse intersystem crossing kRISC is directly linked to the easily observable excited state lifetime of delayed fluorescence τDF, which is usually in the order of a few microseconds for efficient TADF molecules. The higher the kRISC, the shorter is τDF. τDF is a measure for how long on average the triplet excited state of the TADF emitter is populated. Long-lived triplet excitons are believed to be destructive for OLED devices, because they enable potentially detrimental processes such as triplet-triplet or triplet-polaron annihilation [26, 27, 28, 29]. Therefore, triplet excited state lifetimes of TADF emitters should be as short as possible to enhance device stability by reducing detrimental quenching processes. Again, the reduction of the ΔEST gap results in speeding up the triplet harvesting mechanism. Several new molecular design methods have been proposed to reach an excited state lifetime of only a few microseconds, including physical separation of donor and acceptor units, dual emitting cores, breaking conjugation by twisted structures, multi-donor approach, introduction of strong donors and acceptors, and others described above [30, 31].


3. Blue TADF emitters in the literature

The general approach followed in the literature for the design of TADF emitters consists in combining donor and acceptor moieties into one molecule to separate the HOMO and LUMO orbitals and ensure a small ΔEST value. In this section, the latest developments reported in the literature since 2017 are collected and classified by the acceptor unit. We have focused on efficient devices (EQE > 10%) with deep-blue color (CIEy < 0.15). The references are collected in Table 1 and Figure 5. For earlier results, we recommend other review articles [9, 10, 11, 32]. Most of the collected articles put their main focus on achieving deep blue color by combining donor units based on carbazole or acridine motifs and acceptors such as sulfones, triazines, or pyrimidines. While high EQE values can be achieved [33], these data have to be taken with care, since often they are given at low luminance (10–100 cd/m2) and the devices suffer from high roll-off. Unfortunately, very few data are provided on device stability.

Sf-3CzFan, Liao and coworkers [36]15% EQE at 100 cd/m2
CIE (0.16, 0.14)
G2Xu and coworkers [35](no EQE)
CIE (0.15, 0.12)
3DpYM-pDTCCheng and coworkers [37]20% EQE at 500 cd/m2
CIE (0.14, 0.18)
TXAZKim, Kim and coworkers [38]16% EQE max (DPEPO)
CIE (0.15, 0.13)
FATAKaji and coworkers [34]11% EQE max
CIE (0.15, 0.13)
Ac3MHPMKido and coworkers [39]10% EQE at 100 cd/m2
CIE (0.16, 0.15)
CNICtCzLee and coworkers [40]10% EQE at 100 cd/m2
CIE(0.14, 0.13)
DCzBN3Adachi and coworkers [41]10% EQE at 100 cd/m2
CIE (0.15, 0.06)
TN4T-PCZZheng, Meng and coworkers [33]20% EQE max
CIE (0.16, 0.03)

Table 1.

Status of deep-blue TADF technology as published in the literature.

Figure 5.

Selected structures of published deep-blue TADF emitters.

Interestingly, many approaches aim for solution-processed OLEDs either using small molecules bearing solubilizing chains [34] or dendrimer structures [35]. Currently, the vast majority of OLED products issued from the display industry are based on the evaporation of small molecules under vacuum. Printing and coating techniques are however receiving increasing attention due to the evident advantages of cost-effectivity and low material consumption.


4. Requirements for host materials

It is commonly known that the performance of TADF emitters is often very poor in neat emitter films, because of concentration quenching, aggregation, and other effects. Therefore, diluting the emitter molecules with host molecules at relatively low emitter concentrations (10–30%) improves not only their photophysical characteristics but also boosts the efficiency in devices [42]. One of the basic requirements for a host material is a sufficiently high triplet state energy. In fact, the T1-state of the host is ideally higher than the energy of the T1-state of the TADF emitter in order to prevent Dexter energy transfer of triplet excited states from the TADF emitter to the host material, which represents a major loss channel in TADF-based OLEDs.

Moreover, the HOMO- and LUMO-energy level differences between the host and emitter material need to be well adjusted. Large energy level differences between the host and emitter may cause direct charge trapping on the emitter or unwanted exciplex formation. The energy levels of the materials have to be carefully aligned in order to achieve the desired energy and/or charge carrier transfer between those two species, which helps in improving light-emitting performance.

Besides these two important points described above, a host for TADF should also have the following features [28, 43, 44]:

  • Thermal and morphological stability: defined by the high glass transition temperature (Tg) for stabilizing the film morphology and inhibiting crystallization.

  • High material stability: judged mainly by the bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of the single bonds of a molecule under three different conditions (cationic, anionic and neutral state).

  • Low polarity: to reduce the emitter-host local dipole interactions that tend to shift the emission peak to longer wavelengths (bathochromic shift).

Furthermore, the triplet energy T1 is sensitive towards the following [43, 45, 46, 47, 48]:

  • Extended π-conjugation: triplet energy decreases considerably in the line of benzene, biphenyl, and p-terphenyl. Also, fused ring systems lower the triplet energy (naphthalene less than biphenyl).

  • Connection pattern and torsion angles: highly twisted molecular structures reduce the conjugation, increasing the triplet level; meta-linkage leads to a lower degree of conjugation and is more beneficial to get high triplet levels than para-linkage.

  • Aggregation: bulky substituents weaken intermolecular reactions of π-conjugated host molecules, thus reducing the red-shift of phosphorescence spectra (T1 increase). Hence, depending on the strength of interactions, T1 measured in solution can be higher compared to those from neat films [49].

Stable hosts for blue TADF emitters are still very rare, because they require triplet energies above 3.0 eV to guarantee an efficient exciton confinement. Versatile building blocks like carbazole, thiophene, or benzofuran are often used for host and emitter materials targeted for deep blue, because of their high intrinsic triplet energies of 2.8–3.0 eV.

One of the most popular hosts for blue TADF is DPEPO, benefiting from the high triplet energy of 3.00 eV [50]. Unfortunately, OLED devices with DPEPO generally suffer from serious efficiency roll-off due to its poor stability [51]. Other conventional host examples classified by their potential charge transport characteristics are shown below [43, 52, 53] (Figure 6):

Figure 6.

Different host materials reported in the literature classified by their potential charge transport characteristics. (a) p-type hosts (hole transport character). (b) n-type hosts (electron transport character). (c) Ambipolar hosts (hole and electron transport character).


5. Next generation OLED: hyper-fluorescence

In the last few years, TADF emitters have become very popular for application in OLEDs, because of their triplet up-conversion property, which allows for high external quantum efficiency. In fact, TADF emitters can deliver device efficiencies, which can be up to three times higher than for OLEDs based on fluorescent dopants. However, many highly efficient TADF materials suffer from relatively strong degradation (e.g., due to long exciton lifetimes) and from broad emission spectra (characteristic for the intramolecular charge transfer states). One recently reported strategy to overcome those hurdles is the hyper-fluorescence approach (which is sometimes also referred to as TADF assisted fluorescence), first demonstrated by Adachi in 2014 [54].

In this approach, the outstanding properties of TADF molecules are utilized in combination with the narrow emission of fluorescent molecules: the TADF emitter serves as the triplet up-conversion material, which is responsible for high efficiency. After the up-conversion of triplet excited states to the singlet state of the TADF molecule, these singlet excited states can be transferred via Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to the S1 state of the fluorescent emitter. Ideally, light emission occurs exclusively from the fluorescent dopant, which delivers a well-defined color point (Figure 7). If both, the rates of RISC and FRET are high, the overall excited state lifetime in this system is decreased, and hence the operational lifetime of the whole system is expected to be increased.

Figure 7.

(a) A simplified hyper-fluorescent diagram of a three-component system. The excitons are generated on the TADF material. The triplets are up-converted to singlets, which are further transferred via Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to the fluorescent dopant. The radiative decay to the ground state takes place on the fluorescent dopant. The host is omitted for clarity. (b) The FWHM of the emitting system based on TADF is significantly reduced when doped with a fluorescent material. Figure courtesy of CYNORA.

Hyper-fluorescence with all of its potential benefits is a very promising technology, which is not easy to engineer, because many criteria have to be met [54, 55, 56, 57, 58]. The two main criteria, which have to be fulfilled in order to achieve efficient hyper-fluorescence are an optimal spectral overlap of the TADF molecule’s emission spectrum with the absorption spectrum of the fluorescent molecule and a high PLQY of both molecules. Achieving a great spectral overlap while maintaining a high device efficiency is especially challenging for hyper-fluorescence in the deep blue color range, where fluorescent materials with absorption peaks in the range of 400–450 nm and small Stokes shifts have to be combined with blue TADF emitters [57]. In addition, the TADF component should exhibit very fast reverse intersystem crossing from the triplet to the singlet excited state [57].

Moreover, the unwanted short-range Dexter energy transfer from the triplet state of the TADF emitter to the non-emitting triplet state of the fluorescent emitter should be avoided. Since Dexter transfer is highly dependent on the distance between the involved species, one way to minimize it is to physically separate the fluorescent and TADF emitting cores. This can be done by reducing the concentration of the fluorescent material in the system (typically ~1 wt.%) or by shielding the fluorescent dopant via the introduction of bulky side groups [55, 59]. This kind of molecular shielding is also beneficial to prevent self-quenching when using higher doping concentrations of the fluorescent material [60].

Finally, it is also important to align the HOMO and LUMO levels of all components within the emission layer (EML) in order to reduce charge trapping by the fluorescent material.

Besides using a conventional fluorescent molecule in such a “hyper-approach”, where two emitters are combined, one can also use DABNA molecules, which were first introduced by Hatakeyama in 2016 [61]. DABNA derivatives are very interesting emitters for display applications in a hyper-approach, since they have even narrower emission and smaller Stokes shifts than most conventional fluorescent dopants.

Summarizing, hyper-fluorescence is a very complex approach where three or four materials are mixed within the EML and whose mechanisms are not yet fully understood. However, and despite the difficult and limited material selection, especially for the deep blue region, this technology is considered a promising alternative for TADF and phosphorescence technologies, and holds the promise of high efficiency and stability as required by the display industry.


6. Industry status: Kyulux and CYNORA

Table 2 summarizes some of the device performances, which were published by CYNORA and one result announced by Kyulux. While the efficiency is usually reported at a similar brightness (1000 cd/m2), comparing the results for color and device lifetime is not as easy, since color cannot be accurately defined by peak emission wavelength alone and device lifetime is often measured under different conditions depending on the preference of the company. A peak emission wavelength of ~460 nm is required for deep-blue OLED pixels, but this requirement is not sufficient to define the color. Additional parameters that also include the shape of the emission spectrum are the CIE 1931 coordinates CIEx and CIEy, which define a point in color space. For the deep blue region, it is usually sufficient to only look at the CIEy coordinate, which needs to be ≤0.15.

EQE at 1000 cd/m2 (%)CIEyPeak emission (nm)LT95 at 750 cd/m2 (h)Date
Deep-blue color requirement≤0.15~460
CYNORA150.28<470~190May, 2017
240.15460~30Dec, 2017
200.13464~15August, 2018
Kyulux22470~100July, 2018 [62]

Table 2.

Status of Kyulux and CYNORA.

Device lifetimes are determined by measuring the decrease of luminance over time until a certain loss of the initial luminance is reached. If the luminance decay of a device was measured starting at a luminance of 750 cd/m2 until the time were the luminance decreased by 5%, this lifetime value would be given as LT95 at 750 cd/m2. Lifetimes measured under different conditions can be converted into other lifetime values. However, there is always an error connected to such a calculation. In general, it will always be the case that the lifetime is reduced for increasing brightness, and the lifetime is increased when a larger decrease in luminance is measured (LT90 is always longer than LT95).

In May 2017, CYNORA announced the result of a sky blue OLED with 15% EQE, a CIEy of 0.28, a peak emission of around 470 nm, and a LT95 at 750 cd/m2 of around 190 hours. This was an important milestone on the way to an efficient deep blue TADF emitter. Before this result, TADF lifetimes LT95 for sky blue and deep blue had usually been in the minutes.

In December of the same year, CYNORA could build highly efficient OLED devices having 24% EQE with a deep blue TADF emitter at a CIEy of 0.15 and a peak emission of 460 nm. However, the device lifetime in this system was also reduced by roughly one order of magnitude to 30 hours. These two results impressively show the difficulty of reaching deep blue emission color together with high efficiency, and maintaining or improving device lifetime at the same time. These three factors, efficiency, color and lifetime, are clearly very closely linked, which means that device performance can only be compared between devices with the same color. Later in 2018, CYNORA also introduced results based on the hyper-approach. Even a lower CIEy of .013 at an emission wavelength of 464 nm together with a high EQE of 20% and a - for this color point- decent device lifetime of 15 hours LT95 at 750 cd/m2 were achieved.

Also, in 2018 (July), Kyulux announced a first sky blue OLED device result based on a hyper-approach with an emission maximum at 470 nm, an EQE of 22% and an LT95 at 750 cd/m2 of 100 hours.

Clearly, the results in the field of TADF of both companies, Kyulux and CYNORA, are impressive. Within just a few years, the companies showed that the TADF technology could be advanced from an interesting R&D topic to a serious contender for the next generation of high-efficiency emitters. The challenge for CYNORA is now to improve the stability of the TADF-based blue OLED pixel to a level that makes mass production with this technology feasible. A highly efficient and stable blue emitter will solve many technical issues for the display makers and pave the way for displays with lower power consumption and for higher display resolution.


7. Conclusion: what needs to be solved to get TADF ready?

From the latest improvements in academia and industry, it is clear that TADF technology is capable of achieving the desired blue color point necessary to succeed in the display field. Many TADF-based systems with deep blue color and high efficiency have been reported [9, 10, 11, 32]. However, challenges when going to deeper blue color remain the availability of suitable host materials with sufficiently high triplet levels and device stability. A way to circumvent the issue in the deep blue color region of having an emission onset at low wavelengths, that is, high energies, is to combine TADF emitters with narrow-emitting fluorescent dopants in the hyper-approach, where the excitons formed on the TADF material transfer their energy via FRET to the fluorescent emitter. Again, while this approach holds the promise of very narrow and efficient emission, engineering a three-component emissive layer requires the matching of several materials in terms of absorption and emission spectra as well as frontier molecular orbital alignment.

Finally, the most pressing issue and the one receiving the least attention in the literature remains the intrinsic stability of the materials, including the host, which is the material used at the highest concentration in the emissive layer, the TADF emitter, which determines the final efficiency of the device, and all stack materials which can potentially affect the device stability. From a molecular design point of view, chemically stable bonds are preferred. Moreover, in the device stack, the energy levels of all compounds need to be optimized in order to prevent too much stress on a particular material, which might lead to decomposition. This challenge is the focus of research-driven companies like CYNORA. After the fast development of the last years, we are confident that this advancement is achievable in a short period of time and that TADF technology will be ready for application soon.


  1. 1. Tang CW, Van Slyke SA. Organic electroluminescent diodes. Applied Physics Letters. 1987;51:913. DOI: 10.1063/1.98799
  2. 2. Van Slyke SA, Chen CH, Tang CW. Organic electroluminescent devices with improved stability. Applied Physics Letters. 1996;69:2160. DOI: 10.1063/1.117151
  3. 3. Baldo MA, O’Brien DF, You Y, Shoustikov A, Sibley S, Thompson ME, et al. Highly efficient phosphorescent emission from organic electroluminescent devices. Nature. 1998;395:151-154. DOI: 10.1038/25954
  4. 4. Baldo MA, Lamansky S, Burrows PE, Thompson ME, Forrest SR. Very high-efficiency green organic light-emitting devices based on electrophosphorescence. Applied Physics Letters. 1999;75:4-6. DOI: 10.1063/1.124258
  5. 5. Endo A, Sato K, Yoshimura K, Kai T, Kawada A, Miyazaki H, et al. Efficient up-conversion of triplet excitons into a singlet state and its application for organic light emitting diodes. Applied Physics Letters. 2011;98:083302. DOI: 10.1063/1.3558906
  6. 6. Bergmann L, Zink DM, Bräse S, Baumann T, Volz D. Metal-organic and organic TADF-materials: Status, challenges and characterization. Topics in Current Chemistry. 2016;374:22. DOI: 10.1007/s41061-016-0022-6
  7. 7. Adachi C. Third-generation organic electroluminescence materials. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2014;53:060101. DOI: 10.7567/JJAP.53.060101
  8. 8. Volz D. Review of organic light-emitting diodes with thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters for energy-efficient sustainable light sources and displays. Journal of Photonics for Energy. 2016;6:020901. DOI: 10.1117/1.JPE.6.020901
  9. 9. Cai X, Su S-JJ. Marching toward highly efficient, pure-blue, and stable thermally activated delayed fluorescent organic light-emitting diodes. Advanced Functional Materials. 2018;1802558:1-33. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201802558
  10. 10. Im Y, Kim M, Cho YJ, Seo JA, Yook KS, Lee JY. Molecular design strategy of organic thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters. Chemistry of Materials. 2017;29:1946-1963. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05324
  11. 11. Bui T-T, Goubard F, Ibrahim-Ouali M, Gigmes D, Dumur F. Thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters for deep blue organic light emitting diodes: A review of recent advances. Applied Sciences. 2018;8:494. DOI: 10.3390/app8040494
  12. 12. Dias FB. Kinetics of thermal-assisted delayed fluorescence in blue organic emitters with large singlet-triplet energy gap. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2015;373:20140447-20140447. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0447
  13. 13. Santos PL, Ward JS, Data P, Batsanov AS, Bryce MR, Dias FB, et al. Engineering the singlet-triplet energy splitting in a TADF molecule. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2016;4:3815-3824. DOI: 10.1039/C5TC03849A
  14. 14. Noriega R, Barnard ES, Ursprung B, Cotts BL, Penwell SB, Schuck PJ, et al. Uncovering single-molecule photophysical heterogeneity of bright, thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters dispersed in glassy hosts. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2016;138:13551-13560. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b05488
  15. 15. Cho YJ, Jeon SK, Lee SS, Yu E, Lee JY. Donor interlocked molecular design for fluorescence-like narrow emission in deep blue thermally activated delayed fluorescent emitters. Chemistry of Materials. 2016;28:5400-5405. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01484
  16. 16. Berberan-Santos MN, Garcia JMM. Unusually strong delayed fluorescence of C70. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1996;118:9391-9394. DOI: 10.1021/ja961782s
  17. 17. Hirata S, Sakai Y, Masui K, Tanaka H, Lee SY, Nomura H, et al. Highly efficient blue electroluminescence based on thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Nature Materials. 2015;14:330-336. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4154
  18. 18. Uoyama H, Goushi K, Shizu K, Nomura H, Adachi C. Highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes from delayed fluorescence. Nature. 2012;492:234-238. DOI: 10.1038/nature11687
  19. 19. Lee DR, Kim BS, Lee CW, Im Y, Yook KS, Hwang SH, et al. Above 30% external quantum efficiency in green delayed fluorescent organic light-emitting diodes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015;7:9625-9629. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b01220
  20. 20. Lee DR, Kim M, Jeon SK, Hwang SH, Lee CW, Lee JY. Design strategy for 25% external quantum efficiency in green and blue thermally activated delayed fluorescent devices. Advanced Materials. 2015;27:5861-5867. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201502053
  21. 21. Zhang Q , Li B, Huang S, Nomura H, Tanaka H, Adachi C. Efficient blue organic light-emitting diodes employing thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Nature Photonics. 2014;8:326-332. DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.12
  22. 22. Baek JY, Lee J-H, Kwon S-K, Moon C-K, Kim K-H, Sun JW, et al. Thermally activated delayed fluorescence from azasiline based intramolecular charge-transfer emitter (DTPDDA) and a highly efficient blue light emitting diode. Chemistry of Materials. 2015;27:6675-6681. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02515
  23. 23. Shizu K, Tanaka H, Uejima M, Sato T, Tanaka K, Kaji H, et al. Strategy for designing electron donors for thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2015;119:1291-1297. DOI: 10.1021/jp511061t
  24. 24. Cho YJ, Jeon SK, Chin BD, Yu E, Lee JY. The design of dual emitting cores for green thermally activated delayed fluorescent materials. Angewandte Chemie. 2015;127:5290-5293. DOI: 10.1002/ange.201412107
  25. 25. Kim M, Jeon SK, Hwang S, Lee S, Yu E, Lee JY. Highly efficient and color tunable thermally activated delayed fluorescent emitters using a “twin emitter” molecular design. Chemical Communications. 2015;52:339-342. DOI: 10.1039/C5CC07999C
  26. 26. Giebink NC, D’Andrade BW, Weaver MS, Brown JJ, Forrest SR. Direct evidence for degradation of polaron excited states in organic light emitting diodes. Journal of Applied Physics. 2009;105:124514. DOI: 10.1063/1.3151689
  27. 27. Sandanayaka ASD, Matsushima T, Adachi C. Degradation mechanisms of organic light-emitting diodes based on thermally activated delayed fluorescence molecules. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2015;119:23845-23851. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07084
  28. 28. Song W, Lee JY. Degradation mechanism and lifetime improvement strategy for blue phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes. Advanced Optical Materials. 2017;5:1600901. DOI: 10.1002/adom.201600901
  29. 29. Wang Q , Aziz H. Degradation of organic/organic interfaces in organic light-emitting devices due to polaron-exciton interactions. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2013;5:8733-8739. DOI: 10.1021/am402537j
  30. 30. Lee J, Shizu K, Tanaka H, Nakanotani H, Yasuda T, Kaji H, et al. Controlled emission colors and singlet-triplet energy gaps of dihydrophenazine-based thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2015;3:2175-2181. DOI: 10.1039/c4tc02530j
  31. 31. Yang Z, Mao Z, Xie Z, Zhang Y, Liu S, Zhao J, et al. Recent advances in organic thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials. Chemical Society Reviews. 2017;46:915-1016. DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00368K
  32. 32. Arjona-Esteban A, Volz D. Status and next steps of TADF technology: An industrial perspective. In: Highly Efficient OLEDs. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2018. pp. 543-572. DOI: 10.1002/9783527691722.ch15
  33. 33. Liang X, Han HB, Yan ZP, Liu L, Zheng YX, Meng H, et al. Versatile functionalization of trifluoromethyl based deep blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials for organic light emitting diodes. New Journal of Chemistry. 2018;42:4317-4323. DOI: 10.1039/c7nj04482h
  34. 34. Wada Y, Kubo S, Kaji H. Adamantyl substitution strategy for realizing solution-processable thermally stable deep-blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials. Advanced Materials. 2018;30:1705641. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201705641
  35. 35. Li J, Liao X, Xu H, Li L, Zhang J, Wang H, et al. Deep-blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence dendrimers with reduced singlet-triplet energy gap for low roll-off non-doped solution-processed organic light-emitting diodes. Dyes and Pigments. 2017;140:79-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.01.036
  36. 36. Zhang W, Zhang Y-X, Zhang X-Q , Liu X-Y, Fan J, Liao L-S. Blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials based on bi/tri-carbazole derivatives. Organic Electronics. 2018;58:238-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.04.022
  37. 37. Rajamalli P, Senthilkumar N, Huang P-Y, Ren-Wu C-C, Lin H-W, Cheng C-H. New molecular design concurrently providing superior pure blue, thermally activated delayed fluorescence and optical out-coupling efficiencies. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2017;139:10948-10951. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b03848
  38. 38. Woo S-J, Kim Y, Kwon S-K, Kim Y-H, Kim J-J. Phenazasiline/spiroacridine donor combined with methyl-substituted linkers for efficient deep blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2019;11:7199-7207. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b20009
  39. 39. Komatsu R, Ohsawa T, Sasabe H, Nakao K, Hayasaka Y, Kido J. Manipulating the electronic excited state energies of pyrimidine-based thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters to realize efficient deep-blue emission. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017;9:4742-4749. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b13482
  40. 40. Im Y, Han SH, Lee JY. Deep blue thermally activated delayed fluorescent emitters using CN-modified indolocarbazole as an acceptor and carbazole-derived donors. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2018;6:5012-5017. DOI: 10.1039/c8tc00546j
  41. 41. Chan CY, Cui LS, Kim JU, Nakanotani H, Adachi C. Rational molecular design for deep-blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters. Advanced Functional Materials. 2018;28:1-7. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201706023
  42. 42. Méhes G, Goushi K, Potscavage WJ, Adachi C. Influence of host matrix on thermally-activated delayed fluorescence: Effects on emission lifetime, photoluminescence quantum yield, and device performance. Organic Electronics. 2014;15:2027-2037. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.05.027.
  43. 43. Tao Y, Yang C, Qin J. Organic host materials for phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes. Chemical Society Reviews. 2011;40:2943-2970. DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00160k
  44. 44. Zhang D, Cai M, Bin Z, Zhang Y, Zhang D, Duan L. Highly efficient blue thermally activated delayed fluorescent OLEDs with record-low driving voltages utilizing high triplet energy hosts with small singlet-triplet splittings. Chemical Science. 2016;7:3355-3363. DOI: 10.1039/C5SC04755B
  45. 45. Bagnich SA, Rudnick A, Schroegel P, Strohriegl P, Köhler A. Triplet energies and excimer formation in meta- and para-linked carbazolebiphenyl matrix materials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2015;373:20140446. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0446
  46. 46. Strohriegl P, Wagner D, Schrögel P, Hoffmann ST, Köhler A, Heinemeyer U, et al. Novel host materials for blue phosphorescent OLEDs. In: So F, Adachi C, editors. 2013. p. 882906. DOI: 10.1117/12.2023305
  47. 47. Oshiyama T, Yasukawa N, Kita H, Matsui T, Sumita M, Morihashi K. A theoretical guideline for designing effective host materials based on 4,4′-bis(9-carbazolyl)-1,1′-biphenyl derivatives for blue phosphorescent devices. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan. 2017;90:195-204. DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.20160345
  48. 48. Varathan E, Vijay D, Kumar PSV, Subramanian V. Computational design of high triplet energy host materials for phosphorescent blue emitters. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2013;1:4261-4274. DOI: 10.1039/c3tc30473f
  49. 49. Woon KL, Hasan ZA, Ong BK, Ariffin A, Griniene R, Grigalevicius S, et al. Triplet states and energy back transfer of carbazole derivatives. RSC Advances. 2015;5:59960-59969. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA09340F
  50. 50. Han C, Zhao Y, Xu H, Chen J, Deng Z, Ma D, et al. A simple phosphine-oxide host with a multi-insulating structure: High triplet energy level for efficient blue electrophosphorescence. Chemistry: A European Journal. 2011;17:5800-5803. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201100254
  51. 51. Ihn S-G, Lee N, Jeon SO, Sim M, Kang H, Jung Y, et al. An alternative host material for long-lifespan blue organic light-emitting diodes using thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Advanced Science. 2017;4:1600502. DOI: 10.1002/advs.201600502
  52. 52. Wong MY, Zysman-Colman E. Purely organic thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials for organic light-emitting diodes. Advanced Materials. 2017;29:1605444. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201605444
  53. 53. Chen D, Su SJ, Cao Y. Nitrogen heterocycle-containing materials for highly efficient phosphorescent OLEDs with low operating voltage. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2014;2:9565-9578. DOI: 10.1039/c4tc01941e
  54. 54. Nakanotani H, Higuchi T, Furukawa T, Masui K, Morimoto K, Numata M, et al. High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters. Nature Communications. 2014;5:4016. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5016
  55. 55. Zhang D, Song X, Cai M, Duan L. Blocking energy-loss pathways for ideal fluorescent organic light-emitting diodes with thermally activated delayed fluorescent sensitizers. Advanced Materials. 2018;30:1-10. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201705250
  56. 56. Furukawa T, Nakanotani H, Inoue M, Adachi C. Dual enhancement of electroluminescence efficiency and operational stability by rapid upconversion of triplet excitons in OLEDs. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:8429. DOI: 10.1038/srep08429
  57. 57. Ahn DH, Jeong JH, Song J, Lee JY, Kwon JH. Highly efficient deep blue fluorescent organic light-emitting diodes boosted by thermally activated delayed fluorescence sensitization. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2018;10(12):10246-10253. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b19030.
  58. 58. Byeon SY, Lee DR, Yook KS, Lee JY. Recent progress of singlet-exciton-harvesting fluorescent organic light-emitting diodes by energy transfer processes. Advanced Materials. 2019:1803714. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201803714
  59. 59. Jang JS, Han SH, Choi HW, Yook KS, Lee JY. Molecular design of sensitizer to suppress efficiency loss mechanism in hyper-fluorescent organic light-emitting diodes. Organic Electronics. 2018;59:236-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.015.
  60. 60. Kim HS, Park SR, Suh MC. Concentration quenching behavior of thermally activated delayed fluorescence in a solid film. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2017;121:13986-13997. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02369
  61. 61. Hatakeyama T, Shiren K, Nakajima K, Nomura S, Nakatsuka S, Kinoshita K, et al. Ultrapure blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence molecules: Efficient HOMO-LUMO separation by the multiple resonance effect. Advanced Materials. 2016;28:2777-2781. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201505491
  62. 62. Kyulux Dramatically Improves the Performance of Its Blue Hyperfluorescence OLED Emitters. 2018. Available from:

Written By

Alhama Arjona-Esteban, Barbara Szafranowska and Julian Ochsmann

Submitted: January 22nd, 2019 Reviewed: April 25th, 2019 Published: July 13th, 2019