Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Chromatographic Analysis of Selenium Species

Written By

Aleksandra Sentkowska

Submitted: 21 March 2019 Reviewed: 24 May 2019 Published: 12 July 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.87053

From the Edited Volume

Importance of Selenium in the Environment and Human Health

Edited by Mohammed Muzibur Rahman, Abdullah Mohamed Asiri, Anish Khan and Inamuddin

Chapter metrics overview

1,020 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Selenium is an important element in environmental and living organisms that is being essential in very narrow concentration range, while deficiency or toxicity occurs outside this range. However, its toxicity depends not only on its dose but also on its chemical form. In environmental samples, selenium can exist in inorganic forms (as elemental selenium, metal selenides, selenite, or selenate anions) and as organic species with direct C-Se bonds (methylated compounds, selenoaminoacids, and selenoproteins). Thus, the development of reliable techniques to study the speciation of selenium in environmental samples is necessary. The main purpose of this chapter is to provide an update on the recent literature concerning the strategies for selenium speciation in environmental samples. Liquid chromatography coupled with sensitive detector is a commonly used technique for selenium separation. Gas chromatography can also be applied for such purpose; however derivatization step is usually required before analysis. Direct determination of selenium species at the concentration levels present in natural samples is very often difficult or even impossible. For this, several preconcentration/separation procedures for selenium have been proposed, including coprecipitation, extraction into an organic solvent, or application of solid sorbents.


  • selenium
  • speciation
  • chromatography
  • gas chromatography
  • liquid chromatography

1. Introduction

Selenium and its several species have been demonstrated to be essential for living organisms [1, 2]. It plays a key role in many important metabolic pathways such as thyroid hormone metabolism and antioxidant defense systems [3]. For these reasons, it should be present in human diet. The range between the deficiency and toxicity of selenium is very narrow. The nutritionally required daily uptake of selenium is 55 μg; however some studies suggest that it should be 100 μg [4]. It is estimated that the diets of 1 billion people might lack sufficiency for their well-being [5, 6]. The toxic dose of selenium is very much dependent on its chemical form, with different toxicity for organic and inorganic forms [7]. Selenoaminoacids are principal dietary forms of selenium, and selenomethionine (SeMet) is derived from plants, while selenocysteine (SeCys) from animals [8, 9].

Selenium naturally exists in many different inorganic (elemental selenium, selenide, selenite, and selenate ions) and organic forms (methylated compounds, selenoaminoacids, and selenoproteins). Inorganic selenium, present in water and soil, can be easily transformed into volatile compounds by plants and fungi. Organic species of selenium form covalent C-Se bonds. SeCys is included into selenoproteins and participates in redox reactions. The metabolic pathway of selenium in the human body is complicated [10]. In general it can be divided into three groups including reduction of inorganic species by glutathione (GHS) to selenide, cleavage reaction of organic species by β-lyase; utilization according to the UGA codon leading the synthesis of selenoproteins; and finally excretion after being metabolized to methylated species.

Apart from the importance of the selenium in living organisms, this element is also spread throughout the environment. Sulfur-containing minerals are natural sources of selenium, but it is also produced by combustion of fossil fuels. It should be noticed that selenium is used in electronic industries and agriculture as a component of fertilizers.

Several analytical procedures for determination of selenium at low concentration levels in environmental samples have been proposed and recently reviewed [11, 12]. For selenium speciation analysis, the coupling of chromatographic techniques such as gas chromatography (GC) or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a highly sensitive and selective detector is very useful [13]. Even though GC exhibits high efficiency and simplicity, HPLC has the ability of dealing with nonvolatile compounds, extending the range of application and avoiding a derivatization step. This chapter will focus on the recent progress in the application of HPLC in different modes for selenium speciation analysis in water, soil, and plants. Sample pretreatment procedures will be also considered. The principal selenium species present in environmental samples are summarized in Table 1.

IUPAC nameAbbreviationChemical formula
Soil and waterSeleniteSe(IV)SeO32−

Table 1.

Principal selenium species present in environmental samples.


2. Sample preparation

Sample preparation step is crucial in every analysis where analytes are present at very low concentration levels. In the speciation analysis, there is also another difficulty that should be overcome. An important requirement for reliable speciation is to retain the concentration and structure of the original chemical forms in the sample. In general, aquatic samples such as rain, ground- or surface water, tap and drinking water, seawater, and soil solutions do not require any pretreatment procedures other than filtration through 0.45 μm filter.

Extraction of selenium species from the solid samples with the highest recovery is quite challenging. According to Peachey et al. [14], selection of the extraction method, which provides high extraction efficiency while preventing the integrity of selenium species, is essential for the accurate measurement of its species. The most used method can be divided into three main groups:

  • Extraction using aqueous solution (water, water-methanol, and buffers).

  • Acid or alkali hydrolysis (hydrochloric acid and methanesulfonic acid).

  • Enzymatic hydrolysis (proteinase, protease, and mixture of enzymes).

Since selenoaminoacids are water-soluble, extraction with hot water is extensively used [14, 15, 16, 17]. However, the efficiency of water extraction from yeast was only 10% [17]. To release bounded selenoaminoacids, enzymatic or acidic hydrolysis was necessary [18, 19, 20]. The addition of methanesulfonic acid was used for selenomethionine extraction from yeast when heated under reflux [21]. Casiot et al. [22] reported that extraction of selenium species from yeast with water and ethanol led only to 10–20% recoveries of selenium and not allowed to extract selenomethionine. The addition of pectinolytic enzymes released additional 20% of selenomethionine, while the addition of dodecyl sulfate solution allowed solubilization of a selenoprotein that accounted for 30% of total selenium. On the other hand, using tetramethylammonium hydroxide solubilized the sample completely, but the extracted selenium species were entirely degraded to selenomethionine and inorganic selenium [22]. It should be noticed that this type of extraction strictly depends on the choice of an enzyme, pH of the extraction solution, as well as temperature and time of the extraction. The most commonly used enzymes for this purpose are proteinase K or proteolytic enzymes (protease XIV), which were used for water-insoluble selenium fraction in many complicated matrices [23]. To reduce the extraction time, also ultrasonic hydrolysis can be used as the breakdown of Se-containing proteins (peptide bonds) into selenoaminoacids occurs [24]. The in vitro digestion with gastric juice was also used for selenium extraction from fish samples [25]. This procedure allowed SeMet determination, but the whole process takes few hours.

The sequential procedure developed by Chassaigne et al. [26] consisted of three steps: first, Tris-HCl buffer was used for extraction of water-soluble fractions, then also Tris-HCl with the addition of SDS for solubilization of protein fraction, and, finally, concentrated HNO3 was used for dissolving of the remaining solid residue. A similar three-step procedure was used for extraction of selenium from mushrooms with 89% extraction efficiency [27]. It should be noticed that sequential treatment was also applied for dietary supplements [28, 29].

Cuderman et al. [30] examined different extraction media to identify selenium species in buckwheat. The optimal extraction efficiencies were obtained by hydrolysis with HCl, followed by breaking the cells with liquid nitrogen and then enzymatic hydrolysis with protease XIV. Ammonium acetate [31], sodium hydroxide [32], and enzymatic hydrolysis with pronase E [33] have been proposed for extraction of selenium species from green onion leaves.


3. Total selenium determination

Determination of the total selenium content is still the first step of its analysis. This procedure requires that organic forms must be transferred into inorganic selenium that is usually achieved with digestion using strong mineral acids or UV irradiation after addition of hydrogen peroxide [12, 34]. For this purpose, fluorometry, electrochemical detectors, atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS), mass spectrometry (MS), and neutron activation analysis have been used (Table 2).

TechniqueMatrixDetection limitRef.
UV-VisWater, soil0.012 mg L−1[34]
FluorometryWater0.35 ng[35]
X-ray fluorescenceWater0.032 ng mL−1[36]
HGAASWater2 ng L−1[37]
ETAASSeafood0.16 μg g−1[38]
ICP-MSSoil3–29 ng L−1[39]
Adsorptive stripping voltammetryWater0.06 ng mL−1[40]
Differential-pulse cathodic stripping voltammetryFood supplements0.2 ng mL−1[41]
Differential-pulse anodic stripping voltammetry0.06 ng mL−1[42]
Instrumental neutron activation analysisLibyan food26–90 μg L−1[43]

Table 2.

Analytical methods for the determination of total selenium.

Hydride generation coupled to AAS or AFS detectors is specific for Se(IV) determination, where these species are selectively reduced to volatile SeH2, usually by sodium tetrahydroborate in hydrochloric medium. This technique can be applied for the determination of total inorganic selenium (e.g., sum of selenite and selenate) after quantitative reduction. The content of Se(VI) is then obtained by the difference between two determinations. This technique can be fully automatic by connection with flow injection analysis system. The advantage of such system is minimum sample and reagent consumption as well as short time of single run.

Stripeikis et al. [44] determined selenite and selenate in drinking water using fully automatic online separation/pre-concentration system coupled to electrochemical atomic spectrometry. Preconcentration of both selenium forms was carried out onto a microcolumn packed with an anionic resin (Dowex 1X8) that was placed in the robotic arm of the autosampling device. Selenite and selenate were then sequentially eluted with HCl at concentration of 0.1 and 4 mol L−1, respectively. The interference of large amounts of chloride ions during selenium atomization was prevented by using iridium as a permanent chemical modifier.

Kocot et al. [36] proposed a dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction with graphene as a solid adsorbent and ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate as a chelating agent for Se(IV) in analysis of inorganic selenium by the energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry; the concentration of Se(VI) was calculated as the difference between the concentration of selenite after and before reduction of selenate.

Due to the high selectivity and sensitivity, wide linear range, as well as multielement and multi-isotope detection, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is a great tool for selenium analysis. However, some difficulties can be found when conventional ICP-MS is used for this purpose. To avoid the spectra interferences with 80Se isotope (the largest natural abundance of 49.6%), 82Se and 77Se are often monitored. The use of collision/reaction cell, operating with hydrogen gas, lowers argon dimer interferences. This technique was applied by Reyes et al. to determine the selenium in biological reference materials and serum samples [45] and yeast [46].


4. Separation techniques in selenium speciation analysis

The occurrence of selenium at very low concentration levels as well as the dependence of its toxicity on the form in which it occurs resulted in the need for reliable analytical procedures for identification and quantification of its species. The coupling of separation of selenium species with sensitive detection has become a powerful technique for Se speciation. Liquid chromatography operating in different modes is the most used analytical technique for this purpose; however electrophoresis and gas chromatography also were used in selenium analysis. That is why these two methods will be also described in this chapter, which will mainly focus on liquid chromatography.

4.1 Gas chromatography

Selenium species can be divided into volatile and nonvolatile compounds. The first group of compounds can be directly analyzed using gas chromatography, for example, dimethylselenide was determined in human breath after ingestion of Se-enriched selenite [47]. For other nonvolatile compounds, derivatization is required.

In the literature many derivatization procedures can be found. Pelaez et al. [48] tested two methods of derivatization of selenomethionine and selenomethionine in selenium supplements. The first method consisted of esterification of the carboxylic acid group using propan-2-ol and then acylation of amino group. The second described procedure used ethanol-ethyl chloroformated for one step derivatization. Then detection using ICP-MS was performed.

In general, many types of detectors were coupled with GC for speciation analysis of selenium. Yang et al. [49] successfully used ICP detection for the determination of selenium in yeast. Organoselenium species in plants were determined using GC-MIP-AES detection [50]. Because of the requirement of the derivatization, GC is not so widely used in selenium speciation analysis in comparison to liquid chromatography.

4.2 Capillary electrophoresis

Due to the high resolving power, capillary electrophoresis (CE) has a potential to be used in speciation analysis as an alternative or complementary technique to HPLC. CE coupled with ICP-MS was used in the analysis of selenium in yeast extract after SEC separation [51]. The obtained limit of detection for organic and inorganic species was in range 7–18 μg L−1. The main difficulty in such separation can be big sizes of selenopolypeptides resulting in their slow migration. In such case, the predigestion of selenoprotein fraction is recommended.

It should be highlighted that gel electrophoresis offers better resolution than liquid chromatography in the analysis of high molecular weight selenoproteins, which was used in such analysis by Chassaigne et al. [26], and in Se-enriched yeast analysis as well by Chery et al. in blood sample analysis [52].

4.3 High-performance liquid chromatography

4.3.1 Size-exclusion chromatography

Separation in size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) strictly depends on the size of separated analytes. That is why this technique is widely used as a preliminary step to sample purification or to separate selenoproteins from the matrix. Ayouni [53] observed high molecular weight selenium compounds in the extract of dietary supplements after separation by SEC. Conjunction of SEC with ICP-MS was used for analysis of the products of enzymatic digestion of selenoproteins fraction [54, 55]. Size-exclusion chromatography was also used in selenium analysis in human plasma [56] and extracts from rats’ internal organs [57].

4.3.2 Ion-exchange chromatography

Anion-exchange chromatography has been mainly employed in selenium speciation analysis [58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63]. Mobile phases used in this mode usually contain small content of organic modifier (e.g., 2–5% methanol) and buffered salt solution (e.g., acetate, phosphate, and citrate). During the separation process, the equilibria between the charged solute ion and the oppositely charged surface of the stationary phase are established. The separation is achieved based on the differences of the strength of such interaction between analytes. Anion-exchange chromatography was used in the selenium speciation analysis in garlic, sunflowers, and radish sprouts [64]. In addition to well-known compounds like SeMet or MeSeCys, several unidentified signals were obtained. The application of high-resolution mass spectrometry enabled identification of additional selenocompounds as inorganic metabolites, such as deamino-hydroxy-seleno-homolanthionine, N-acetylcysteine-selenomethionine, methylseleno-pentose-hexose, methylselenoglutathione, 2,3-dihydroxy-propionyl selenocysteine-cysteine, methyltio-selenoglutathione, 2,3-dihydroxy propionyl-seleno-lanthionine, and two Se-containing compounds with proposed molecular formula C10H18N2O6Se and C10H13N5O3Se.

Cation-exchange chromatography was used to analyze selenium-enriched yeast in a human adsorption study [65]. As a mobile phase, pyridinium formate buffer with 3% of methanol was used. This method was suitable for separation of organic selenium species, however not suitable to separate selenite and selenate.

4.3.3 Reversed-phase chromatography

Both, simple reversed-phase [66, 67, 68] and ion-pair (IP) reversed-phase chromatography [15, 28, 69], are widely used for analysis of ionic and neutral selenium species. The mobile phases are aqueous with small amount of polar organic solvent (usually methanol or acetonitrile). Because of their hydrophilicity, selenoaminoacids are not retained onto typical reversed-phase columns. The use of ion-pairing reagents as mobile phase additives allows their separation. The ion-pairing reagent is usually an alkyl sulfonate, an alkyl sulfate, or an alkylammonium salt. Its nonpolar chain interacts with hydrophobic stationary phase (e.g., C8 or C18), while ionizable group is neutralized by oppositely charged analyte. Hexanesulfonic acid has been used as anion-pairing reagent in the speciation analysis of selenium in Brazil nuts, using C8 column for separation [70]. Obtaining separation was satisfied for organic compounds but poor for selenite and selenate. For separation of organic and inorganic forms of selenium, tetrabutylammonium acetate was proposed [71]. Also mixed ion-pairing reagents (butanesulfonic and tetramethylammonium hydroxide) were also used to simultaneously separate inorganic and organic species with satisfactory separation efficiencies [72].

New mobile phase additives are still developed, for example, room temperature ionic liquids [73]. Their mechanism of action is based on bilayer formulation onto stationary phase. It gives the possibility of additional interactions between the analyte and the bed, which significantly affects the retention and shape of the recorded signals. The effects of several imidazolium chlorides on the separation of selenium species mixture was described in details [74]. In all cases, SeMeCys was the first species eluted indicating its weak retention in the column, while the retention time of Se(VI) was increasing with the increase of alkyl chain.

4.3.4 Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography

Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) is a complementary technique to reversed-phase mode. The separation mechanism is mainly based on the partition of the analyte between the thin water layer adsorbed onto the stationary surface and the eluent, which contain high content of organic solvent usually acetonitrile. It is known that also other interactions such as hydrogen bonding dipole-dipole interactions and electrostatic forces may play an important role in the retention mechanism in HILIC [75]. The governed retention mechanism strictly depends on the type of used stationary phase and the buffer conditions (content of organic solvent, concentration of salt, and pH). TSKgel Amide-80 stationary phase with covalently bound carbamoyl groups is frequently used in the analysis of selenium in HILIC mode [76, 77]. According to the characterization of amide stationary phase, the achieved separation is not pH dependent [78]. Also zwitterionic and silica stationary phases have been also used in HILIC separation of selenium [79, 80]. It should be highlighted that in selenium separation in HILIC mode methanol is recommended instead of acetonitrile as a main component of mobile phase [79] which is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The chromatogram of selenium compounds obtained on silica column using (A) MeOH and (B) ACN in the mobile phase [79]. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.

The use of methanol enhances peak intensity, improve the separation of SeMet and SeMeSeCys, and shorten time of the single run. The best separation conditions have been obtained for silica column and mobile phase consisted of 85% of methanol and 8 mM of ammonium acetate. Using the zwitterionic column (ZIC-HILIC) instead of silica stationary phase resulted in recording of very asymmetric peaks.

The potential of two orthogonal chromatographic modes—RP and HILIC—was examined in the analysis of onion leaf extracts [79]. Higher separation efficiency (mainly for inorganic selenium species) and shorter retention times were obtained when HILIC mode was used (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

The chromatographic separation of selenium species present in onion leaf extracts in (A) HILIC mode and (B) RP mode. (A) Atlantis HILIC (silica) column, mobile phase: 85% MeOH and 8 mM CH3COONH4, pH 7. (B) Luna C8 column, mobile phase: 99.5% HCOOH and 0.5% ACN [79]. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.


5. Conclusions

The determination of selenium is of great importance from the point of view of understanding its metabolism and its potential benefits for human health. Due to the variety of selenium species and low concentrations in which it occurs in environmental samples, liquid chromatography coupled to ICP-MS is the most powerful method for speciation analysis of selenium. However, other techniques, for example, HILIC-MS/MS, have also been successfully applied in the speciation analysis of selenium. It should be highlighted that for such analysis all the analytical steps like selection of separation and detection method and the optimization of separation parameters (eluent type and composition, mobile phase additives) should be optimized to avoid the coelution of selenium species.

The recent application of liquid chromatography for selenium separation in plants (vegetables samples) is shown in Table 3. For sure new chromatographic strategies will be described in the literature in the nearest future.

Sample (determined selenium species)Mobile phaseStationary phaseDetectionRef.
Reversed-phase chromatography
Green leafy vegetables (SeCys2, SeMet)50% MeOH + 1.5% HCOOHC18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm)ICP-MS[69]
Ion-pair reversed-phase chromatography
Garlic (MeSeCys, SeMet, Se(IV), Se(VI))Gradient phosphate buffer pH 6.0, 5% MeOH, 0.1% [C6mim]ClAgilent Zorbax SB-C8 (150 × 4.6 mm)HG-AFS[58]
Anion-exchange chromatography
Onion (MeSeCys, SeMet, Se(IV), g-glu-MeSeCys, Se(VI))Gradient acetate buffer, pH 4.7Hamilton PRP-X100 (250 × 4.1 mm, 10 mm)ICP-MS[69]
Cation-exchange chromatography
Carrot (inorganic Se, SeMet, g-glu-MeSeCys)Gradient: ammonium formate, pH 3.0, 5% MeOHChrompack IonoSpher 5C (150 × 2.0 mm, 5 mm)ICP-MS[75]
Hydrophilic liquid chromatography
Onion leaves (Se(IV), Se(VI), MeSeCys, SeMet)Gradient: MeOH and ammonium acetate, pH 7Atlantis HILIC (silica) (100 × 2.1 mm, 3.0 mm)MS/MS[81]

Table 3.

Examples of the recent HPLC application for selenium speciation in plant materials.


Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.


Appendices and nomenclature

AASatomic absorption spectrometry
AFSatomic fluorescence spectrometry
C8octylsilane column
CEcapillary electrophoresis
CH3COONH4ammonium acetate
ETAASelectrothermal atomic absorption
GCgas chromatography
HCOOHformic acid
HClhydrochloric acid
HGAAShydride generation atomic absorption spectrometric
HILIChydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography
HNO3nitric acid
HPLChigh-performance liquid chromatography
ICP-MSinductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry
ILsionic liquids
IPion pair
RPreverse phase
SECsize-exclusion chromatography


  1. 1. Tan LC, Nancharaiach YV, van Hullebusch ED, Lens PNL. Selenium: Environmental significance, pollution and biological treatment technologies. Biotechnology Advances. 2016;34:886-907. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.05.005
  2. 2. Weekeley CM, Harris HH. Which form is that? The importance of selenium speciation and metabolism in the prevention and treatment of disease. Chemical Society Reviews. 2013;42:8870-8894. DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60272a
  3. 3. Zimmerm MT, Bayse CA, Ramoutar RR, Brumaghim JL. Sulfur and selenium antioxidants: Challenging radicals scavenging mechanism and developing structure-activity relationship based on metal binding. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2015;145:30-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2014.12.020
  4. 4. Clark LC, Combs GF, Turnbull BW, Slate EH, Chalker DK, Chow J, et al. Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin. A randomized controlled trial. Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Study Group. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996;276:1957-1963
  5. 5. Joy EJM, Ander EL, Young SD, Black CR, Watts MJ, Chilimba ADC, et al. Dietary mineral supplies in Africa. Physiologia Plantarum. 2014;31:208-229. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12144
  6. 6. Stoffaneller R, Morse NL. A review of dietary selenium intake and selenium status in Europe and the Middle East. Nutrients. 2015;7:1494-1537. DOI: 10.3390/nu7031494
  7. 7. Forchhammer K, Bock A. Biologie und biochemie des elements selen. Naturwissenschaften. 1991;78:497-504. DOI: 10.1007/BF01131397
  8. 8. Olsen OE, Novacek EJ, Whitehead EI, Palmer IS. Investigation of selenium in wheat. Phytochemistry. 1970;9:1181-1188. DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)85306-6
  9. 9. Hawkens WC, Wilhelmes EC, Tapper AL. Abundance and tissue distribution of selenocysteine-containing proteins in the rat. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 1985;23:77-92. DOI: 10.1016/0162-0134(85)83011-7
  10. 10. Wastney ME, Combs GF, Canfield WK, Taylor PR, Patterson KY, Hill DA, et al. A human model of selenium that integrates metabolism from selenite and selenomethionine. Japanese Journal of Nutrition. 2011;141:708-717. DOI: 10.3945/jn.110.129049
  11. 11. Kumkrong P, LeBlanc K, Mercier PHJ, Mester Z. Selenium analysis in waters. Part 1: Regulation and standard methods. Science of the Total Environment. 2018;640-641:1611-1634. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.392
  12. 12. LeBlanc K, Kumkrong P, Mercier PHJ, Mester Z. Selenium analysis in waters. Part 2: Speciation methods. Science of the Total Environment. 2018;640-641:1635-1651. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.394
  13. 13. Marcinkowska M, Barałkiewicz D. Multielemental speciation analysis by advanced hyphenated technique—HPLC/ICP-MS: A review. Talanta. 2016;161:1777-1204. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.08.034
  14. 14. Peachey P, McCarthy N, Goenaga-Infante H. Acceleration of enzymatic hydrolysis of protein-bound selenium by focused microwave energy. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2008;23:487-492. DOI: 10.1039/B717854A
  15. 15. Kubacha KM, Hanley T, Mantha M, Wiklson RA, Falconer TM, Kassa Z, et al. Evaluation of selenium in dietary supplements using elemental speciacion. Food Chemistry. 2017;218:313-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.086
  16. 16. Tsai Y, Lin C, Hsu I, Sun Y. Sequential photocatalyst-assisted digestion and vapor generation device coupled with anion exchange chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for speciation analysis of selenium species in biological samples. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2014;806:165-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.11.008
  17. 17. Kotrebai M, Bird SM, Tyson JF, Block E, Uden PC. Characterization of selenium species in biological extracts by enhanced ion-pair liquid chromatography with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and by referenced electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Spectrochimica Acta B. 1999;54:1573-1591. DOI: 10.1016/S0584-8547(99)00086-5
  18. 18. Kotrebai M, Birringer M, Tyson JF, Block E, Uden PC. Selenium speciation in enriched and natural samples by HPLC-ICP-MS and HPLC-ESI-MS with perfluorinated carboxylic acid ion-pairing agents. Analyst. 2000;125:71-78. DOI: 10.1039/A906320J
  19. 19. Kotrebai M, Tyson JF, Block E, Uden PC. High-performance liquid chromatography of selenium compounds utilizing perfluorinated carboxylic acid ion-pairing agents and inductively coupled plasma and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric detection. Journal of Chromatography. A. 2000;866:51-63. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(99)01060-2
  20. 20. McSheehy S, Yang W, Pannier F, Szpunar J, Łobiński R, Auder J, et al. Speciation analysis of selenium in garlic by two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography with parallel inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric and electrospray tandem mass spectrometric detection. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2000;421:147-153. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01039-4
  21. 21. Wróbel K, Wróbel K, Caruso JA. Selenium speciation in low molecular weight fraction of Se-enriched yeast by HPLC-ICP-MS: Detection of selenoadenosylmethionine. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2002;17:1048-1054. DOI: 10.1039/B200920J
  22. 22. Casiot C, Szpunar J, Łobiński R, Potin-Gautier M. Sample preparation and HPLC separation approaches to speciation analysis of selenium in yeast by ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 1999;14:645-650
  23. 23. Huerta VD, Sanchez MLF, Sanz-Medel A. Quantitative selenium speciation in cod muscle by isotope dilution ICP-MS with reaction cell: Comparison of different reported extraction procedures. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2004;19:644-648. DOI: 10.1039/b313826g
  24. 24. Capelo JL, Fernandez C, Pedras B, Santos P, Gonzales P, Vaz C. Trends in selenium determination/speciation by hyphenated techniques based on AAS or AFS. Talanta. 2006;68:1442-1447. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.08.027
  25. 25. Cabanero AI, Madrid Y, Camara C. Selenium and mercury bioaccessibility in fish samples: An in vitro digestion method. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004;526:51-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.09.039
  26. 26. Chassaigne H, Chery CC, Bordin G, Ropdriguez AR. Development of new analytical methods for selenium speciation in selenium-enriched yeast material. Journal of Chromatography. A. 2001;976:409-422. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00945-7
  27. 27. Dernovics M, Stefanka Z, Fodor P. Improving selenium extraction by sequential enzymatic processes for Se-speciation of selenium-enriched Agaricus bisporus. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2002;372:473-480. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-001-1215-5
  28. 28. Hsieh Y, Jiang S. Determination of selenium compounds in food supplements using reversed-phase liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Microchemical Journal. 2013;110:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2013.01.009
  29. 29. Wang W, Chen Z. Extraction of selenium species in pharmaceutical tablets using enzymatic and chemical methods. Microchimica Acta. 2009;165:167-172. DOI: 10,1007/s00604-008-0115-1
  30. 30. Cuderman P, Ozbolt L, Krefl I, Stibilij V. Extraction of Se species in buckwheat sprouts grown from seeds soaked in various Se solutions. Food Chemistry. 2010;123:941-948. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.04.063
  31. 31. Tie M, Li B, Sun T, Guan W, Liang Y, Li H. HPLC-ICP-MS speciation of selenium in Se-cultivated Flammulina velutipes. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2017 (in press). DOI: 10.1061/j.arabje.2017.05.012
  32. 32. Kapolna E, Fodor P. Speciation analysis of selenium enriched green onions (Allium fistulosum) by HPLC-ICP-MS. Microchemical Journal. 2006;84:52-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2006.04.014
  33. 33. Kapolna E, Shah M, Caruso JA, Fodor P. Selenium speciation studies in Se-enriched chives (Allium schoenoprasum) by HPLC-ICP-MS. Food Chemistry. 2007;101:1398-1406. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.03.048
  34. 34. Ramachandran Kumar GS. Modified spectrophotometric method for the determination of selenium in environmental and mineral mixtures using 2,3-diaminonaphthalene. Talanta. 1996;43:1711-1714. DOI: 10.1016/0039-9140(96)01947-9
  35. 35. Wang D, Alfthan G, Aro A. Determination of total selenium and dissolved selenium species in natural waters by fluorometry. Environmental Science and Technology. 1994;28:383-387. DOI: 10.1021/es00052a007
  36. 36. Kocot K, Leardi R, Walczak B, Sitko R. Determination and speciation of trace and ultratrace selenium ions by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry using graphene as solid adsorbent in dispersive micro-solid phase extraction. Talanta. 2015;134:360-365. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.11.036
  37. 37. Örnemark U, Pettersson J, Olin A. Determination of total selenium in water by atomic-absorption spectrometry after hydride generation and preconcentration in a cold trap system. Talanta. 1992;39:1089-1096. DOI: 10.1016/0039-9140(92)80206-S
  38. 38. Méndez H, Alava F, Lavilla I, Bendicho C. Ultrasonic extraction combined with fast furnace analysis as an improved methodology for total selenium determination in seafood by electrothermal-atomic absorption spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2002;452:217-222. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01475-1
  39. 39. Tolu J, Hecho IL, Bueno M, Thiry Y, Potin-Gautier M. Selenium speciation analysis at trace level in solis. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2011;684:126-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.10.044
  40. 40. Ashournia M, Aliakbar A. Determination of Se(IV) in natural waters by adsorptive stripping voltammetry of 5-nitropiazselenol. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010;174:788-794. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.121
  41. 41. Holak W, Specchio JJ. Determination of selenium in food supplements by differential-pulse cathodic stripping voltammetry in the presence of added copper. Analyst. 1994;119:2179-2182. DOI: 10.1039/AN9941902179
  42. 42. Ramadan AA, Mandil H, Shikh-Debes A. Differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetric determination of selenium (IV) at a gold electrode modified with 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine. 4HCl-Nafion. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2014;6:148-153. DOI: 10.24297/jac.v15i2.7818
  43. 43. Elghawi U, Al-Sadeq AA, Bejey MM, Alamin MB. Determination of selenium in Libyan food items using pseudocyclic instrumental neutron activation analysis. Biological Trace Element Research. 2005;107:61-72. DOI: 10.1385/BTER:107:1:061
  44. 44. Stripeikis J, Pedro J, Bonivardi A, Tudino M. Determination of selenite and selenite in drinking water: A fully automatic on-line separation/pre-concentration system coupled to electrochemical atomic spectrometry with permanent chemical modifiers. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004;502:99-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2003.09.022
  45. 45. Reyes LH, Gayon JMM, Alonso JIG, Sanz-Medel A. Determination of selenium in biological materials by isotope dilution analysis with an octopole reaction system ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2003;18:11-16. DOI: 10.1039/B209213A
  46. 46. Reyes LH, Marchante-Gayon JM, Alonso JIG, Sanz-Medel A. Application of isotope dilution analysis for evaluation of extraction conditions in the determination of total selenium and selenomethionine in yeast-based nutritional supplements. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2006;54:1557-1563. DOI: 10.1021/jf0523768
  47. 47. Kremer D, Ilgen G, Feldman J. GC-ICP-MS determination of dimethylselenide in human breath after ingestion of 77 Se-enriched selenite: Monitoring of in-vivo methylation of selenium. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2005;383:509-515. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-005-0001-1
  48. 48. Pelaez MV, Bayon MM, Alonso JIG, Sanz-Medel A. A comparison of different derivatisation approaches for the determination of selenomethionine by GC-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2000;15:1217-1222. DOI: 10.1039/B000505N
  49. 49. Yang L, Mester Z, Stugeon RE. Determination of methionine and selenomethionine in yeast by specie-specific isotope dilution GC/MS. Analytical Chemistry. 2004;75:5149-5156. DOI: 10.1021/ac049475p
  50. 50. Kahakachchi C, Boakye HT, Uden PC, Tyson JF. Chromatographic speciation of anionic and neutral selenium compounds in Se-accumulating Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) and selenized yeast. Journal of Chromatography. A. 2004;1054:303-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.07.083
  51. 51. Mounicou S, McSheehy S, Szpunar J, Potin-Gautier M, Łobiński R. Analysis of selenium yeast for selenium speciation by size-exclusion chromatography and capillary zone electrophoresis with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric detection (SEC-CZE-ICP-MS). Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2002;17:15-20. DOI: 10.1039/B107943N
  52. 52. Chery CC, Gunther D, Cornelis R, Vanhaecke F, Moens L. Detection of metals in proteins by means of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: Application to selenium. Electrophoresis. 2003;24:3305-3313. DOI: 10.1002/elps.200305590
  53. 53. Ayouni L. Speciation of selenium in a commercial dietary supplement by liquid chromatography coupled with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A. 2007;70:735-741. DOI: 10.1080/15287390701236314
  54. 54. Moreno P, Quijano MA, Gutierrez AM, Perez-Conde MC, Camara C. Study of selenium species distribution in biological tissues by size exclusion and ion exchange chromatography inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004;524:315-327. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.02.029
  55. 55. Siwek M, Galunsky B, Niemeyer B. Isolation of selenium organic species from arctic krill after enzymatic hydrolysis. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2005;281:737-741. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-004-2936-z
  56. 56. Koyama H, Omura K, Ejima A, Kasanuma Y, Watanabe C, Satoh H. Separation of selenium-containing proteins in human and mouse plasma using tandem high-performance liquid chromatography columns coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Analytical Biochemistry. 1999;267:84-91. DOI: 10.1006/abio.1998.2949
  57. 57. Kobayasi Y, Orga Y, Suzuki KT. Speciation and metabolism of selenium injected with 82Se-enriched selenite and selenite in rats. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 2001;760:73-81. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00252-3
  58. 58. Duncan EG, Maher WA, Jagtap R, Krikowa F, Roper MM, O’Sullivan CA. Selenium speciation in wheat grain varies in the presence of nitrogen and sulphur fertilizers. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2017;39:955-966. DOI: 10.1007/s10653-016-9857-6
  59. 59. Lavu RVS, Laing GD, Van De Wiele T, Pratti VL, Willekens K, Vandecasteele B, et al. Fertilizing soil with selenium fertilizers: Impact on concentration, speciation, and bioaccessibility of selenium in leek (Allium ampeloprasum). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2012;60:10930-10935. DOI: 10.1021/jf302931z
  60. 60. Garousi F, Domokos-Szabolesy F, Jánószky M, Kovács AB, Veres S, Soós A, et al. Selenoamino acid-enriched green pea as a value-added plant protein source for humans and livestock. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2017;73:168-175. DOI: 10.1007/s11130-017-0606-5
  61. 61. Ni Z, Liu Y, Qu M. Determination of 5 natural selenium species in selenium-enriched bamboo shoots using LC-ICP-MS. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2014;23:1049-1053. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-014-0143-z
  62. 62. Gomes da Silva E, Mataveli LRV, Arruda MAZ. Speciation analysis of selenium in plankton, Brazil nut and human urine samples by HPLC-ICP-MS. Talanta. 2013;110:53-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.02.014
  63. 63. Michalska-Kacymirow M, Kurek E, Smolis A, Wierzbicka M, Bulska E. Biological and chemical investigation of Allium cepa L. response to selenium inorganic compounds. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2014;406:3717-3722. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-7742-7
  64. 64. Ruszczyńska A, Konopka A, Kurek E, Elguera JCT, Bulska E. Investigation of biotransformation of selenium in plants using spectrometric methods. Spectrochimica Acta Part B. 2017;130:7-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2017.02.004
  65. 65. Larsen EH, Sloth J, Hansen M, Moesgaard S. Selenium speciation and isotope composition in 77Se enriched yeast using gradient elution HPLC separation and ICP-dynamic reaction cell-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2003;18:310-316. DOI: 10.1039/B209586F
  66. 66. Khanam Am Platel K. Bioaccessibility of selenium, selenomethionine and selenocysteine from foods and influence of heat processing on the same. Food Chemistry. 2016;184:1293-1299. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.005
  67. 67. Zhang HJ, Gao PF, Guo XF, Wang H. Simultaneous determination of selenium containing amino acids and their sulfur-analogues in green tea and gynostemma pentaphyllum infusion with high performance liquid chromatography based on fluorescence labeling. Microchemical Journal. 2013;110:192-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2013.03.016
  68. 68. Tie M, Li B, Zhuang X, Han J, Liu L, Hu Y, et al. Selenium speciation in soybean by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS). Microchemical Journal. 2015;123:70-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2015.05.017
  69. 69. Maneetong S, Chookhampaeng S, Chantiratikul A, Chinrasri O, Thosaikham W, Sittipout R, et al. Hydroponic cultivation of selenium-enriched kale (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra L.) seedling and speciation of selenium with HPLC-ICP-MS. Microchemical Journal. 2013;108:87-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2013.01.003
  70. 70. Vonderheide AP, Wrobel K, Kannamkumarath SS, B’Hymer C, Montes-Bayon M, de Leon CP, et al. Characterization of selenium species in Brazil nuts by HPLC-ICP-MS and ES-MS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50:5722-5728. DOI: 10.1021/jf0256541
  71. 71. Marchante-Gayon JM, Thomas C, Feldmann I, Jakubowski N. Comparison of different nebulizers and chromatographic techniques for the separation of selenium in nutritional commercial supplements by hexapole collision and reaction cell ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2000;15:1093-1102. DOI: 10.1039/B002372H
  72. 72. Zheng J, Kosmus W. Retention study of inorganic and organic selenium compounds on a silica-based reversed phase column with ion-pairing reagents. Chromatographia. 2000;51:338-344. DOI: 10.1007/BF02490613
  73. 73. Garcia-Alvarez-Coque MC, Ruiz-Angel MJ, Berthod A, Carda-Broch S. On the use of ionic liquids as mobile phase additives in high-performance liquid chromatography. Review Analytica Chimica Acta. 2015;883:1-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.03.042
  74. 74. Grijalba AC, Fiorentini EF, Wuilloud RG. Ionic liquid-assisted separation and determination of selenium species in food and beverage samples by liquid chromatography coupled to hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography. A. 2017;1491:227-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.02.045
  75. 75. McCalley DV. Understanding and manipulating the separation in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography—A review. Journal of Chromatography. A. 2017;1523:49-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.06.026
  76. 76. Far J, Preud’homme H, Lobinski R. Detection and identification of hydrophilic selenium compounds in selenium-rich yeast by size exclusion-microbore normal-phase HPLC with the on-line ICP-MS and electrospray Q-TOF-MS detection. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2010;657:175-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.040
  77. 77. Dernovics M, Far J, Lobinski R. Identification of anionic selenium species in Se-rich yeast by electrospray QTOF MS/MS and hybrid linear ion trap/orbitrap MSn. Metallomics. 2009;1:317-329. DOI: 10.1039/b901184f
  78. 78. Greco G, Letzel T. Main interactions and influences of the chromatographic parameters in HILIC separation. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 2013;51:684-693. DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmt015
  79. 79. Sentkowska A, Pyrzynska K. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography in the speciation analysis of selenium. Journal of Chromatography B. 2018;1074-1075:8-15. DOI: 10.1016/jchromb.2018.01.006
  80. 80. Arnaudguilhem C, Bierla K, Ouerdane L, Preud’homme H, Yiannikouris Y, Lobinski R. Selenium metabolomics in yeast using complementary reversed-phase/hydrophilic ion interaction (HILIC) liquid chromatography-electrospray hybrid quadrupole trap/orbitrap mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2012;757:26-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.10.029
  81. 81. Bierła K, Godin S, Lobiński R, Szpunar J. Advances in electrospray mass spectrometry for the selenium speciation: Focus on Se-rich yeast. TRAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2018;104:87-94

Written By

Aleksandra Sentkowska

Submitted: 21 March 2019 Reviewed: 24 May 2019 Published: 12 July 2019