Estimated production (mean ± standard deviation) of males of
Abstract
Cryphiops caementarius shrimp inhabits the rivers of the western slope of the Andes of Peru and Chile. But the greatest population densities found in the rivers of Arequipa (Peru) have social, economic, commercial, and gastronomic importance. Researches on this species of shrimp date from 1950. The males of C. caementarius are aggressive by having one of the most developed chelipeds, causing greater interaction and cannibalism. To reduce the interaction of the species, it has been used two culture systems. For postlarvae, using brackish water can maintain high survival (>85%), but only in initial culture which lasts for 50 days. For the fattening of adult males, culturing in separate containers conditioned in various levels improves the survival (87–100%) and yield (1.0 kg m−2), and with this system, the culture is also performed with tilapia. It is still required to demonstrate the technical and economic feasibility of fattening male shrimp in individual containers within seminatural ponds.
Keywords
- freshwater shrimp
- cannibalism
- interaction
- culture systems
1. Introduction
The Palaemonid shrimps that inhabit the rivers of the western slope of the Andes are represented by 12 species, three of which correspond to the genus
Other species of
Researches related to shrimp
The purpose of this chapter was to review progress in research with that of the freshwater shrimp
2. Interaction
In decapod crustaceans, there are those who are very aggressive as portunids crabs (
In the territorialist decapod crustaceans, the second pair of pereopods (chelipeds) is long and thick and also those are used for attack and defense, for agonistic interaction and for courtship and mating [11]. Males of
The interaction of male
3. Cannibalism
All decapod crustaceans use chelipeds for interaction, access to food, shelter, and mating, resulting in energy expenditure during the fight and can reach the autotomy of appendages and even cannibalism. Cannibalism, defined as intraspecific predation, is a behavior established in a wide variety of animals [18] and is considered as the process of killing and eating an individual of the same species [19], whether it consumes all or part of it. In
The molting fluid accumulated between the old cuticle and epidermis is the product of degradation of the old cuticle [20], which is released with ecdysis and acts as a chemical stimulant [21]. In the Hermit crabs,
In
4. Cultivation of postlarvae in brackish water
The crustacean’s cultivation comprises producing postlarvae in hatchery, the postlarvae growth until reaching juvenile stage or condition of preadult and the fattening until reaching commercial weight (>20 g). Postlarvae adapt to environmental conditions during the initial culture, and those who survive are resistant, and have higher growth rate. However, as mentioned, the problem is the interaction and cannibalism that happens throughout the animal’s life. Similar advantages are reported during the nursery phase of
To reduce cannibalism of postlarvae during communal cultivation and obtain juveniles with greater weight (200 mg) for stocking in ponds, growing in brackish water should be performed. Recent postlarvae of
Furthermore, the culture of postlarvae
5. Adult shrimp culturing in individual containers
The main problems of the communal culturing of adult crustaceans are the interaction and cannibalism per molt, which are accentuated as the animals grow and affect the growth and survival, respectively. In the communal culturing of
Cultivation in individual containers was first used in lobster
The first cultivation system in individual containers was performed with adult females
Individual containers are conditioned in various levels, both aquariums and tanks or seminatural ponds, thus increasing the planting density. In aquariums (0.186 m2 and effective volume of 55 L), the containers are installed in three levels, but in two columns, making a total of six containers per aquarium equivalent to 32 shrimps m−2 (Figure 2). In fiberglass tanks (with a bottom area of 0.159 m2 and an effective volume of 100 L), the containers are installed in five levels, but in three columns, making a total of 15 containers per tank equivalent to 94 shrimps m−2 (Figure 3). In both cases, the increased production is achieved in large containers (284 cm2), although no significant differences with those of smaller areas (Table 1) are seen. In
Container | Effective density (shrimp m−2) | Final weight (g) | Estimated performance (kg m−2) | Estimated production* (t ha−1 period−1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area (cm2) | Diameter (cm) | ||||
133 | 13 | 94.34 ± 0.00 | 8.09 ± 1.37ª | 0.763 ± 0.129ª | 7.64 ± 1.29ª |
201 | 16 | 94.34 ± 0.00 | 9.99 ± 0.62ªb | 0.941 ± 0.058ª | 9.42 ± 0.59ª |
284 | 19 | 81.76 ± 10.89 | 13.20 ± 1.99b | 1.049 ± 0.059ª | 10.49 ± 0.59ª |
The effective density is the number of surviving organisms at the end of the culture period according to the area of the container. In
However, the cultivation of
In the culture of
In studies with male shrimps
6. Co-culture of shrimp/tilapia
The co-culturing is done out with two species share a common aquatic environment (aquarium, tank, or pond), but whose construction does not allow physical interaction between organisms because they remain separate, and therefore, both species are a major management factor. Instead, in the polyculture, two or three species within the aquatic environment interact constantly competing for space and food, and therefore only one species is the main one.
Combinations of species in a co-culturing allow maximizing the performance of those who are territorial and aggressive. The co-culture of
7. Transportation of adult shrimp
The communal transport of male adult shrimps
The transport of adult
On the other hand, the conventional transport of
8. Conclusions
The male shrimps
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the Department of Biology, Microbiology, and Biotechnology of the Faculty of Sciences of the National University of Santa, for allowing the use of laboratories and instruments and equipment for conducting various investigations.
References
- 1.
Méndez M. Claves de identificación y distribución de los langostinos y camarones (Crustacea: Decapoda) del mar y ríos de la costa del Perú. Boletín Instituto del Mar del Perú. 1981; 5 :1-170 - 2.
Zacarías S, Yépez V. Camarón de río Cryphiops caementarius (Molina, 1782) en la costa centro-sur del Perú, 2007. Informe Instituto del Mar del Perú. 2015;42 (3):398-415 - 3.
Produce (Ministerio de Producción). Anuario estadístico pesquero y acuícola 2016. Perú: Ministerio de la Producción; 2017. p. 42 - 4.
Carrillo AA, Pacora A, Risco RA, Zerpa R. Plan estratégico para el camarón de río [tesis]. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2012 - 5.
Moscoso V. Catálogo de crustáceos decápodos y estomatópodos del Perú. Boletín Instituto del Mar del Perú. 2012; 27 :1-209 - 6.
Bahamonde N, Carvacho A, Jara C, López M, Ponce F, Retamal MA, et al. Categorías de conservación de decápodos nativos de aguas continentales de Chile. Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural del Paraguay. 1998; 47 :91-100 - 7.
Hobbs HH. Biogeography of subterranean decapods in north and central America and the Caribbean region (Caridea, Astacidea, Brachyura). Hydrobiologia. 1994; 287 :95-104 - 8.
Villalobos JL, Nates JC, Díaz AC. Revisión de los géneros Cryphiops Dana, 1852 yBithynops holthuis, 1973, de la familia Palaemonidae (Crustacea, Decapoda), y descripción de una especie nueva para el estado de Chiapas, México. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Serie Zoología. 1989;60 (2):159-184 - 9.
Gomes MM. Descrição de uma espécie nova do género Cryphiops (Decapoda, Natantia, Palaemonidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 1973;33 (2):169-173 - 10.
Romano N, Zeng C. Cannibalism of decapod crustaceans and implications for their aquaculture: A review of its prevalence, influencing factors, and mitigating methods. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. 2017; 25 (1):42-69. DOI: 10.1080/23308249.2016.1221379 - 11.
Mariappan P, Balasundaram C, Schmithz B. Decapod crustacean chelipeds: An overview. Journal of Biosciences. 2000; 25 (3):301-313 - 12.
Reyes W. Engorde del camarón nativo de los ríos costeros del Perú. Un estudio en sistema de recipientes individuales y con recirculación de agua. Alemania: Publicia; 2016. 89 p - 13.
Rodríguez A. Hábitos alimentarios de las jaibas Callinectes bellicosus STIMPSON yC. arcuatus ORDWAY (Brachiura: Portunidae) en Bahía Magdalena, Baja California Sur México [tesis]. La Paz, Baja California Sur, México: Instituto Politécnico Nacional Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas; 2014 - 14.
Zúñiga O, Ramos R. Balance energético en juveniles de Cryphiops caementarius (Crustacea, Palaemonidae). Biota. 1987;3 :33-43 - 15.
Barki A, Harpaz S, Karplus I. Contradictory asymmetries in body and weapon size, and assessment in fighting male prawns, Macrobrachium rosenbergii . Aggresive Behavior. 1997;23 :81-91 - 16.
Barki A, Karplus I, Goren M. Effects of size and morphotype on dominance hierarchies and resource competition in the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii . Animal Behaviour. 1992;44 (3):547-555 - 17.
Santos DB, Pontes CS. Behavioral repertoire of the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man, 1879) in laboratory. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology. 2016;4 (4):109-115 - 18.
Fox LR. Cannibalism in natural population. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1975; 6 :87-106 - 19.
Polis GA. The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 1981; 12 :225-251 - 20.
Dennell R. Integument and exoekeleton. In: Waterman TH, editor. The Physiology of Crustacea. Metabolismo and Growth. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Academic Press; 1960. pp. 447-472 - 21.
Adams JA, Moore PA. Discrimination of conspecific male molt odor signals by male crayfish Orconectes rusticus . Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2003;23 (1):7-14 - 22.
Tran MV. The scent of cannibalism: The olfactory basis of cannibalism in hermit crabs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2014; 457 :8-14 - 23.
Ponce JE. Importancia del flujo de agua en los estanques-criaderos de camarón. Actas del Simposio sobre Acuicultura en América Latina, Montevideo, Uruguay, 26 de noviembre a 2 de diciembre de 1974. Documentos de Investigación. FAO, Informes de Pesca. 1977; 1 (159):240-248 - 24.
Reyes WE. Efecto de dos probióticos bioencapsulados en nauplios de Artemia franciscana en el desarrollo larval del camarón de ríoCryphiops caementarius , en laboratorio [tesis]. Perú: Universidad Nacional de Trujillo; 2008 - 25.
Shivananda H, Kumarswamy R, Palaksha KJ, Sujatha HR, Shankar R. Effect of different types of shelters on survival and growth of giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii . Journal of Marine Science and Technology. 2012;20 (2):153-157 - 26.
Santos DB, Pontes CS, Campos PMO, Arruda MF. Behavioral profile of Macrobrachium rosenbergii in mixed and monosex culture submitted to shelters of different colors. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences. 2015;37 (3):273-279 - 27.
Mamun MAA, Hossain MA, Hossain MS, Ali ML. Effects of different types of artificial substrates on nursery production of freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man) in recirculatory system. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University. 2010;8 (2):333-340 - 28.
Tuly DM, Islam MS, Hasnahena M, Hasan MR, Hasan MT. Use of artificial substrate in pond culture of freshwater prawn ( Macrobrachium rosenbergii ): A new approach regarding growth performance and economic return. Journal of Fisheries. 2014;2 (1):53-58 - 29.
Laranja JLQ , Quinitio ET, Catacutan MR, Coloso RM. Effects of dietary L-tryptophan on the agonistic behavior, growth and survival of juvenile mud crab Scylla serrata . Aquaculture. 2010;310 :84-90 - 30.
Coyle SD, Alston DE, Sampaio CMS. Nursery systems and management. In: New MB, Valenti WC, Tidwell JH, D’Abramo LR, Kutty MN, editors. Freshwater Prawn. Biology and Farming. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 108-126 - 31.
Reyes WE, Bacilio S, Villavicencio M, Mendoza R. Efecto de la salinidad en el crecimiento y supervivencia de postlarvas del camarón de río Cryphiops caementarius Molina, 1782 (Crustacea, Palaemonidae), en laboratorio. Comunicación Científica. In: IV Congreso Iberoamericano Virtual de Acuicultura CIVA 2006; Zaragoza, España. 2006. pp. 341-346 - 32.
Cano F, Carrión S, Reyes W. Efecto de altas densidades de siembra en el crecimiento y supervivencia de postlarvas de Cryphiops caementarius (Crustacea: Palaemonidae) en agua salobre. Revista Citecsa. 2014;5 (8):62-78 - 33.
Vega-Villasante F, Galavíz-Parada JD, Guzmán-Arroyo M, Flores CA, Espinosa-Chaurand LD. Efecto de diferentes salinidades sobre el crecimiento y supervivencia de juveniles del langostino de río Macrobrachium tenellum (Smith, 1871). Zootecnia Tropical. 2011;29 (4):467-473 - 34.
Chand BK, Trivedi RK, Dubey SK, Rout SK, Beg MM, Das UK. Effect of salinity on survival and growth of giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man). Aquaculture Reports. 2015;2 :26-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2015.05.002 - 35.
Ponce JE, Eguren MC. Evaluación del crecimiento del camarón de río Cryphiops caementarius (Molina) en una poza piloto en Camaná. Véritas. 2005;9 (1):95-101 - 36.
Shleser RA. The effects of feeding frequency and space on the growth of the American lobster, Homarus americanus . Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. 1974;5 (1-4):149-155 - 37.
Van Olst JC, Carlberg JM. The effects on container size and transparency on growth and survival of lobster cultured individually. Proceeding of the Annual Meeting–World Mariculture Society. 1978; 9 (1-4):469-479 - 38.
Jussila J. Physiological responses of astacid and parastacid crayfishes (Crustacea: Decapoda) to conditions of intensive culture [tesis]. Australia: University of Kuopio; 1977 - 39.
Manor R, Segev R, Pimenta M, Aflalo ED, Sagi A. Intensification of redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus culture II. Growout in a separate cell system. Aquaculture Engineering. 2002;26 :263-276 - 40.
Ford RF, Van Olst JC, Calberg JM, Dorband WR, Johnson RL. Beneficial use thermal effluent in lobster culture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. 1975; 6 (1-4):509-519 - 41.
Kristiansen TS, Drengstig A, Bergheim A, Drengstin T, Svensen R, Kollsgård I, et al. Development of methods for intensive farming of European lobster in recirculated seawater. Results from experiments conducted at Kvitsay lobster hatchery from 2000 to 2004. Fisken og havet. 2004; 6 :1-52 - 42.
Daniels CL, Wills B, Ruiz-Perez M, Miles E, Wilson RW, Boothroyd D. Development of sea based container culture for rearing European lobster ( Homarus gammarus ) around south west England. Aquaculture. 2015;448 :186-195 - 43.
Reyes WE. Crecimiento, reproducción y supervivencia de hembras del camarón de río Cryphiops caementarius criados en recipientes individuales. Sciéndo. 2011;14 (1-2):75-86 - 44.
Geddes MC, Mills BJ, Walker KF. Growth in the Australian freshwater crayfish Cherax destructor c lark, under laboratory conditions. Australian Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research. 1988;39 :555-568 - 45.
New MB. Farming freshwater prawn. A manual for the culture of the giant river prawn ( Macrobrachium rosenbergii ). FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. 2002;428 :1-212 - 46.
Fuentes AS, Quezada LJ. Efecto de diferentes concentraciones de harina de Calendula officinalis “marigold” en la pigmentación de camarones machos adultos deCryphiops caementarius [tesis]. Perú: Universidad Nacional del Santa; 2015 - 47.
Meyers SP. Papel del carotenoide astaxantina en nutrición de especies acuáticas. In: Civera-Cerecedo R, Pérez-Estrada CJ, Ricque-Marie D, Cruz-Suárez LE, editors. Avances en Nutrición Acuícola IV. Memorias del IV Simposium Internacional de Nutrición Acuícola; 1998; La Paz, B.C.S., México. 2000. pp. 473-491 - 48.
Wickins JF, Jones E, Beard TW, Edwards DB. Food distribution equipament for individually-housed juvenile lobster ( Homarus spp.). Aquaculture Engineering. 1987;6 :277-288 - 49.
Drengstig A, Bergheim A. Commercial land-based farming of European lobster ( Homarus gammarus L.) in recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) using a single cage approach. Aquacultural Engineering. 2013;53 :14-18 - 50.
Shelley C, Lovatelli A. Mude crab aquaculture. A practical manual. In: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. Vol. 567. 2011. pp. 1-78 - 51.
Pérez RA, Tinoco KL. Cocultivo de machos del camarón de río Cryphiops caementarius con ablación del pedúnculo ocular criados en recipientes individuales dentro de tanques con machos de tilapiaOreochromis niloticus y su efecto en el crecimiento de las especies [tesis]. Perú: Universidad Nacional del Santa; 2013 - 52.
Graciano FP, Vásquez JF. Efecto de diferentes niveles de dureza del agua en la muda, crecimiento y supervivencia de adultos del camarón ede río Cryphiops caementarius en condiciones de laboratorio [tesis], Perú. Universidad Nacional del Santa; 2015 - 53.
Cornejo J, Pérez L, Reyes W. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast in the diet of male shrimpCryphiops caementarius (Crustacea, Palaemonidae) on total and differential hemocytes count. Revista Bio Ciencias. 2015;3 (3):173-186 - 54.
Ramirez M, Cántaro R, Reyes W. Growth and survival of males of Cryphiops caementarius (Palaemonidae) with diets supplemented with common salt. Latin American Journal Aquatic Research. 2018;46 (2):469-474. DOI: 10.3856/vol46-issue2-fulltext-22 - 55.
Terrones S, Reyes W. Efecto de dietas con ensilado biológico de residuos de molusco en el crecimiento del camarón Cryphiops caementarius y tilapiaOreochromis niloticus en co-cultivo intensivo. Scientia Agropecuaria, 2018;9 (2):167-176. DOI: 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2018.02.01 - 56.
Acosta A, Quiñones D, Reyes W. Efecto de dietas con lecitina de soya en el crecimiento, muda y supervivencia de machos del camarón de río Cryphiops caementarius (Crustacea: Palaemonidae). Scientia Agropecuaria. 2018;9 (1):143-151. DOI: 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2018.01.15 - 57.
Danaher J, Tidwell J, Coyle S, Dasgupta D. Effects of two densities of caged monosex nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus , on water quality, phytoplankton populations, and production when polyculture withMacrobrachium rosenbergii in temperate pond. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. 2007;38 (3):367-382 - 58.
Mogollón AV. Cocultivo de machos del camarón de río Cryphiops caementarius en recipientes individuales dentro de acuario con machos deOreochromis niloticus a diferentes densidades de siembra y sus efectos en el crecimiento y supervivencia de las especies [tesis]. Perú. Universidad Nacional del Santa; 2013 - 59.
Coyle SD, Tidwell JH, Yasharian DK, Caporelli A, Skudlarek NA. The effect of biomass density, temperature, and substrate on transport survival of market-size freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii . Journal of Applied Aquaculture. 2005;17 (4):61-71. DOI: 10.1300/J028v17n04_04 - 60.
Escobar C, Pachamoro MA, Reyes W. Supervivencia y crecimiento de machos adultos del camarón de río Cryphiops caementarius Molina 1782 (Crustacea, Palaemonidae) expuestos a salinidades. Ecología Aplicada. 2017;16 (2):75-82. DOI: 10.21704/rea.v16i2.1010 - 61.
Ahmed N. Freshwater prawn hatcheries in Bangladesh: Concern of broodstock. Aquaculture Asia Magazine, July-September, 2008. pp. 22-26 - 62.
Yang G, Frinsko M, Chen X, Wang J, Hu G, Gao Q. Current status of the giant freshwater prawn ( Macrobrachium rosenbergii ) industry in China, with special reference to live transportation. Aquaculture Research. 2012;43 :1049-1055. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03009.x - 63.
Fotedar S, Evans L. Health management during handling and live transport of crustaceans: A review. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2011; 106 :143-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2010.09.011