Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Molecular Cloning of Genic Male-Sterility Genes and Their Applications for Plant Heterosis via Biotechnology-based Male-sterility Systems

Written By

Xiangyuan Wan and Suowei Wu

Submitted: March 20th, 2019 Reviewed: May 21st, 2019 Published: June 14th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86976

From the Edited Volume

Synthetic Biology

Edited by Madan L. Nagpal, Oana-Maria Boldura, Cornel Baltă and Shymaa Enany

Chapter metrics overview

1,054 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

In this chapter, we summarize the strategies about molecular cloning and functional confirmation of plant genic male-sterility (GMS) genes and their applications for hybrid breeding and seed production via biotechnology-based male-sterility (BMS) systems in crop plants. The main content includes four sections: (1) GMS gene cloning strategies, including forward genetic approaches (e.g., map-based cloning, T-DNA or transposon tagging, and MutMap method) and reverse genetic approaches (e.g., homology-based cloning, anther-specific expression gene screening, and other reverse genetic methods); (2) functional confirmation methods of GMS genes, including transgenic complementation, targeted mutagenesis, allelic mutant test and sequencing, anther spatiotemporal expression analysis, and cytological observation; (3) application value assessment of GMS genes and mutants, such as genetic stability analysis of male sterility controlled by GMS genes under different genetic backgrounds and multiple environments, and genetic effects driven by GMS genes on plant heterosis and analysis of potential linkage with bad traits; (4) development and application of BMS systems based on GMS genes and/or their mutants, including transgenic construct-driven non-transgenic seed systems (e.g., seed production technology (SPT) and multi-control sterility (MCS)), and transgenic male-sterility systems (e.g., roundup hybridization systems (RHS1 and RHS2) and Barnase/Barstar system). Finally, we summarize and provide our perspectives on the studies of GMS genes and development of cost-effective and environment-friendly BMS systems in crop plants.

Keywords

  • gene cloning
  • genic male sterility (GMS)
  • biotechnology-based male sterility (BMS)
  • heterosis application
  • genetically modified plants

1. Introduction

The demand for food supply is increasing exponentially with the human population continuously growing. According to a report, the world population is predicted to increase by 34% by 2050 [1], whereas the area of land for agriculture practices is decreasing consistently over the last few decades because of urbanization and land degradation. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the food production per unit area as cultivated lands are limited [2].

Hybrid vigor (or heterosis) is the superior performance of the heterozygous hybrid progeny over both homozygous parents. Most crops show hybrid vigor, such as maize, rice, wheat, sorghum, rapeseed, and sunflower, but commercial production of hybrids is only feasible if a reliable and cost-effective pollination control system is available. In cereal crops, maize is a monoecious and diclinous species, which makes it very successful in heterosis utilization with relatively feasible emasculation. The emasculation, namely, the physical removal of the male floral structure, usually includes manual and mechanical detasseling. However, emasculation is not only time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive but also detrimental to plant growth, thus reducing the yield of hybrid seed. At the same time, it is unfeasible for the crops that have small, bisexual flowers, such as rice, wheat, and barley. Therefore, it is an ideal alternative to use male-sterile line for pollination control in these cereal crops [3, 4].

Male sterility (MS) refers to cases in which viable male gametes (i.e., pollen) are not produced, while female gametes are fully fertile. Male sterility can be generated by either cytoplasmic or nuclear genes. Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) is caused by mitochondrial genes together with nuclear genes and has been used in commercial hybrid production in crops (such as maize, rice, and oilseed rape), but this method suffers from the poor genetic diversity, increased disease susceptibility, and unreliable restoration of CMS lines [5]. Genic male sterility (GMS) is caused by nuclear genes alone, and the use of GMS can overcome these drawbacks, but it is difficult to obtain a pure and large-scale increase of male-sterile female lines through self-pollination. Fortunately, with the rapid development of GMS gene isolation methods, plant-transformation techniques, and other new biotechnologies, many efforts have been made to identify and utilize GMS genes and ultimately develop more efficient biotechnology-based male sterility (BMS) systems in crop plants [3, 4, 6].

In this chapter, we systemically described the molecular cloning methods, functional confirmation approaches, application value assessment of GMS genes, as well as the strategies and comprehensive evaluation of BMS systems based on elite GMS genes in cereal crops (Figures 1 and 2). This will provide a guideline and shed light on GMS gene cloning and application in hybrid seed breeding and production via BMS systems in major cereal crops.

Figure 1.

The technology workflow of cloning methods and application strategies of GMS genes in crop plants.

Figure 2.

A typical example of maizeZmMs30gene: from map-based cloning and functional confirmation to application value assessment (adapted from Ref. [18]). (A) Map-based cloning ofZmMs30gene; (B) gene structure and mutation site comparison between WT andms30-6028mutant; (C) predictive protein sequence comparison of ZmMs30 between WT andms30-6028mutant; (D) transgenic complementation and CRISPR-Ca9-targeted mutagenesis confirmation of ZmMs30 gene in maize; (E and F) cytological observation of anther and pollen development in WT andms30-6028mutant at stage 11 (S11) by using transverse section light microscopy, SEM (E) and TEM (F); (G) heterosis comparison of WT andms30-6028mutant by using two representative hybrid combinations with male lines Chang 7-2 and Dedan5M in two locations, respectively.

Advertisement

2. Molecular cloning strategies of GMS genes in crop plants

There are basically two ways to clone GMS genes in crops: forward and reverse genetics. Forward genetic approaches require the cloning of sequences underlying the male-sterile phenotype, such as map-based cloning, T-DNA or transposon tagging, and MutMap method (Figure 3), whereas reverse genetic strategies seek to identify and select mutations in a known sequence, such as homology-based cloning, anther-specific expression gene screening, and other reverse genetic cloning strategies.

Figure 3.

The forward genetic approaches of GMS gene cloning in crop plants.

2.1 Forward genetic approaches

2.1.1 Map-based cloning

Map-based cloning or positional cloning is a classical forward genetic strategy of GMS gene cloning. Map-based cloning strategy relies on linkage disequilibrium between markers and the gene of interest, that is, as distances between the gene of interest and the analyzed markers decrease, so does the frequency of recombination. In general, the procedure of map-based cloning method includes the following steps (Figure 3A). First is the construction of segregating population of F2 or BC1F1 by crossing male-sterile mutant with a distant male-fertile line followed by self-pollination or backcrossing with the male-sterility mutant line. Second is primary mapping of GMS gene based on bulked segregant analysis (BSA) and molecular marker (such as SSR, SNP, and INDELs) linkage analysis using the F2 or BC1F1 segregating populations which have high levels of linkage disequilibrium. Third is fine mapping of GMS gene by developing more polymorphic markers and enlarging the segregating population. Finally, the GMS gene will be narrowed down to a small interval on the targeted chromosome. Under the help of bioinformatic analysis, the putative GMS gene will be identified.

So far, there are at least 38 GMS genes in major cereal crops that have been cloned via map-based cloning strategy, including 20, 15, and 3 GMS genes reported in rice, maize, and wheat, respectively (Table 1). As the genome sequence information of more crop plants is available, there will be more GMS genes isolated by map-based cloning strategy in crop plants.

No.Cloning strategyGMS genesCropsFunctional confirmation methods*Application value evaluationReferences
1Map-based cloningZmMs7Maize1, 3, 4, 5MCS system[9]
ZmMs8Maize4No data[10]
ZmMs9Maize3, 4No data[11]
ZmMs10/APV1Maize3, 4No data[12]
ZmMs22/MSCA1Maize1, 3, 4, 5No data[13, 14]
ZmMs23Maize3, 4, 5No data[15]
ZmMs26Maize1, 2, 3, 4SPT system[16, 17]
ZmMs30Maize1, 2, 3, 4MCS, sterility stability, and heterosis analysis[18]
ZmMs32Maize3, 4, 5No data[19]
ZmMs33Maize1, 2, 3, 4, 5MCS, MAS[20, 21]
Zmms44Maize4Maize SPT-like[22]
ZmMs6021Maize1, 3, 4, 5No data[23]
IG1Maize3, 4No data[24]
MAC1Maize2, 3, 4No data[25]
IPE1/ZmMs20Maize3, 4No data[26, 27]
MIL1Rice1, 4No data[28]
MIL2Rice3, 4No data[29]
TIP2/bHLH142Rice1, 4, 5No data[30, 31]
TIP3Rice1, 2, 3, 4No data[32]
CYP704B2Rice1, 4, 5No data[33]
CYP703A3Rice4, 5No data[34]
PTC1Rice1, 4, 5No data[35]
TDRRice1, 4, 5No data[36]
OsNP1Rice1, 4, 5No data[37]
OsGPAT3Rice1, 3, 4, 5No data[38]
DPWRice1, 4, 5No data[39]
DPW2Rice1, 3, 4No data[40]
OsDEX1Rice1, 3, 4, 5No data[41]
CSARice1, 4No data[42]
OsABCG26Rice1, 2, 4, 5No data[43]
OsPKS2Rice1, 4, 5No data[44]
EAT1Rice1, 3, 4, 5No data[45]
PDA1/OsABCG15Rice3, 4, 5No data[46]
MTR1Rice1, 4No data[47]
OsERS1Rice1, 4No data[48]
TaMs1Wheat1, 2, 3, 4Wheat SPT-like[49]
TaMs2Wheat1, 2, 3, 4No data[50, 51]
TaMs5Wheat1, 2, 3, 4No data[52]
2T-DNA taggingbHLH142Rice1, 4, 5No data[31]
OsAPI5Rice1, 3, 4No data[53]
OsGT1Rice3, 4No data[54]
UDT1Rice3, 4, 5No data[7]
RIP1Rice2, 3, 4No data[55]
WDA1Rice2, 3, 4, 5No data[56]
OsCP1Rice4,No data[57]
GSL5Rice2, 3, 4, 5No data[58]
DTM1Rice3, 4No data[59]
DTC1Rice3, 4No data[60]
3Transposon taggingZmMs45Maize1, 2, 3STP system[8, 61, 62]
OCL4Maize2, 3, 4No data[63]
OsGAMYBRice1, 3, 4, 5No data[64]
MSP1Rice1, 4, 5No data[65]
CAP1Rice1, 4, 5No data[66]
4MutMap cloningOsLAP6/OsPKS1Rice2, 3, 4, 5No data[67]
OsABCG26Rice1, 2, 4, 5No data[68]
OsNP1Rice1, 2, 3, 4, 5Rice SPT-like[69]
TaMs1Wheat1, 2, 3, 4No data[70]
5Homology-based cloningOsTDF1Rice1, 2, 4, 5, 6No data[71]
OsACOS12Rice1, 3, 4, 5, 6No data[72]
OsIG1Rice2, 3, 4, 5, 6No data[24, 73]
OsCER1Rice2, 3, 4, 5, 6No data[74]
OsRAFTINRice2, 4, 5, 6No data[75]
TaMs45Wheat1, 2, 3, 4, 5No data[76]
TaMs26Wheat1, 2, 4, 5, 6No data[77]
6Anther-specific expression gene screeningOsC6Rice2, 4, 5, 6No data[78]
OsG1Rice2, 4, 6No data[79]
OsADFRice2, 4, 6No data[80]
OsUAM3Rice2, 4, 6No data[81]
TaRAFTINWheat2, 4, 5, 6No data[75]
7Other reverse genetic cloningOsSTRL2Rice2, 4, 5, 6No data[82]
OsFTIP7Rice2, 3, 4No data[83]
OsTGA10Rice2, 3, 4, 5, 6No data[84]
OsAGO2Rice2, 3, 4, 6No data[85]

Table 1.

Cloning, functional confirmation, and application value evaluation of GMS genes in crops.

Notes: (1) functional complementation, (2) knockout by using CRISPR-Cas9 or knockdown by using RNAi, (3) allelism test and allelic mutant sequencing, (4) anther-specific expression analysis, (5) phylogenetic analysis and orthologous analysis with known GMS gene, (6) cytological observation


2.1.2 T-DNA or transposon tagging

T-DNA or transposon tagging are efficient and straightforward approaches for GMS gene cloning based on the T-DNA or transposon insertion male-sterile mutants (Figure 3B), PCR, and bioinformatic analysis. If the male-sterile mutant comes from a T-DNA or transposon insertion, rapid identification of the GMS gene is at least theoretically possible by locating the sequence tag and analyzing its neighboring sequences by using thermal asymmetric interlaced (TAIL) PCR, inverse PCR, and genomic PCR methods. There are at least 10 GMS genes cloned by using T-DNA tagging in rice, such as API5, bHLH142, OsGT1, UDT1, RIP1, WDA1, OsCP1, GSL5, DTM1, and DTC1(Table 1). For instance, rice UDT1(Undeveloped Tapetum1) gene was isolated from a T-DNA insertional rice male-sterile mutant by using T-DNA tagging method [7]. The flanking region of the inserted T-DNA in mutant line was amplified by TAIL–PCR. Sequence analysis of that region revealed that T-DNA was inserted into a gene located on chromosome 7. BLAST analysis indicated that the most similar proteins are the Brassica napusbHLH transcription factor CAD54298 and the ArabidopsisbHLH protein AMS (At2g16910), each of which shares 32% overall identity with the rice protein. These results indicated that UDT1encodes a putative bHLH transcription factor in rice [7].

In addition, there are at least two and three GMS genes cloned via transposon tagging in maize (Ms45and OCL4) and rice (OsGAMYB, MSP1, and CAP1), respectively (Table 1). For example, maize Ms45gene is isolated by an activator transposon tagging, the tassel-specific transcription of Ms45gene is shown by RNA hybridization analysis, and genetic transformation of ms45mutant with a copy of Ms45gene can restore the fertility phenotype in maize [8].

2.1.3 MutMap method

MutMap method is based on whole-genome sequencing of pooled DNA from a segregating population of plants that show a useful phenotype [86], for example, male sterility resulted from ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis (Figure 3C). In classic MutMap method, a GMS mutant is crossed directly to the original wild-type line; the resulting F1 is self-pollinated to obtain F2 progeny segregating for the GMS mutant and wild-type phenotypes. DNA of F2 displaying the mutant phenotype is bulked and subjected to whole-genome sequencing followed by alignment to the reference sequence. SNPs with sequence reads composed only of mutant sequences (SNP index of 1; SNP index is defined as the ratio between the number of reads of a mutant SNP and the total number of reads corresponding to the SNP) are closely linked to the causal SNP for the mutant phenotype [86]. The MutMap method was used for rice GMS gene cloning, e.g., OsLAP6/OsPKS1[67]. Recently, a modified MutMap method was developed in rice male-sterility gene (OsMs55/MER3) cloning [87]. Different from the original MutMap method that aligns the mutant pool DNA sequence with the assembled WT genome, the modified MutMap method was to align the re-sequencing data of the mutant pool DNA and WT DNA with the Nipponbare reference genome. The resulting SNPs of mutant/Nipponbare and WT/Nipponbare were further compared to determine the candidate mutant gene. This modified method does not need an assembled WT genome as reference and thus is more cost-effective and widely applicable. The modified MutMap method was used for GMS gene cloning in rice and wheat, such as OsABCG26[68], OsNP1[69], and TaMs1[70] (Table 1). As the next-generation sequencing technology advances and cost of sequencing decreases rapidly, the MutMap method will be applicable for more crop plants except for rice and wheat.

2.2 Reverse genetic approaches

Reverse genetic approach means from gene to phenotype and relies upon sequence information as retrieved from genome, cDNA library, and/or expressed sequence tag (EST) sequencing. The scientist starts with the selection of a specific sequence and tries to gain insight into the underlying function by selecting for mutations that disrupt the sequence and thereby its function. The reverse genetic approaches for GMS gene cloning include homology-based cloning, anther-specific expression gene screening, and other methods.

2.2.1 Homology-based cloning

Homology-based cloning is a simple and straightforward method of GMS gene cloning, and it relies on the conservation in sequence and function of the reference GMS gene among different species, mainly through the sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of the related GMS genes. As a lot of GMS genes have been cloned in model plants and the genome sequencing information become available for most important crops [88], there are several GMS genes that have been identified through homology-based cloning approach, such as OsTDF1, OsACOS12, OsCER1, OsIG1, OsRAFTIN, TaMs26, and TaMs45(Table 1). In Arabidopsisand rice, the molecular, genetic, and biochemical pathways regulating anther and pollen development have been extensively studied [89, 90], revealing the same number of developmental stages (14) and relatively conserved regulatory pathways in both species [91, 92]. The information about GMS obtained in Arabidopsisand rice provides opportunities to identify and utilize male sterility in economically important crops such as maize, barley, and wheat where GMS systems are not as well characterized [88, 93]. Based on this gene cloning strategy, about 62 putative maize GMS genes have been predicted and analyzed recently [3], and this will greatly enlarge the GMS gene number after functional confirmation via multiple methods (refer to Section 3).

2.2.2 Anther-specific expression gene screening

Given that most of GMS genes show anther-specific expression pattern, some putative GMS genes can be isolated by differential screening of the anther cDNA library, such as the GMS genes OsC6, OsG1, OsADF, and OsUAM3in rice and TaRAFTINin wheat (Table 1). OsC6, encoding a lipid transfer protein, was reported to be abundantly expressed in tapetal cells of the anther and played a crucial role in the development of lipidic orbicules and pollen exine during another development in rice [78, 94]. OsG1was originally cloned from a rice anther cDNA library, encoding a β-1,3-glucanase and belonging to the defense-related subfamily A. OsG1was essential for callose degradation in tetrad dissolution, and its silencing results in male sterility [79]. OsADF, encoding an anther development F-box protein, was obtained from a rice panicle cDNA clone and played a critical role in rice tapetum cell development and pollen formation [80]. OsUAM3(UDP-arabinopyranose mutase 3) was identified by screening the expression patterns of the OsUAMgenes in various vegetative and reproductive tissues and found to be a unique gene required for pollen wall morphogenesis in reproductive development [81]. TaRAFTINwas identified from an anther cDNA library of hexaploid wheat and cloned by using the RACE-PCR method, encoding a sporophytically produced structural protein that is essential for pollen development [75].

2.2.3 Other reverse genetic approaches

Once a GMS gene is cloned and characterized, its interaction protein or targeted gene may be involved in male-sterility regulation, too. Therefore, some of the GMS genes could be isolated by other reverse genetic approaches, such as chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq), genome-wide expression analysis of a specific gene family, targeted mutagenesis of candidate GMS genes, etc. For example, OsTGA10encoding a bZIP transcription factor was identified as a target of the MADS box protein OsMADS8 by using the ChIP-seq technique, and mutation of OsTGA10 resulted in male sterility [84]. OsSTRL2was identified based on the genome-wide expression analysis of rice STR-like (OsSTRL) gene family and its anther-specific expression pattern [82]. OsFTIP7was identified as GMS gene through targeted mutagenesis of the rice genes encoding multiple C2 domain and transmembrane region proteins (MCTPs) using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)—CRISPR-associated nuclease 9 (Cas9) technology and targeted mutation of OsFTIP7lead to complete male-sterility phenotype in rice [83].

Advertisement

3. Functional confirmation methods of GMS genes in crop plants

As described above, once the putative GMS gene has been cloned, it should be tested by using a series of experiments, including transgenic complementation, targeted mutagenesis, allelism test and allelic mutant sequencing, anther-specific expression analysis, phylogenetic analysis, and cytological observation (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

The functional confirmation approaches of GMS genes in crop plants.

3.1 Transgenic complementation

Transgenic complementation is an essential tool and an effective way to confirm the function of a putative GMS gene. Based on the difference of transformation receptors, it includes two ways. The first one is transformation of the male-sterile mutants from which the GMS gene has been cloned, and then observation of the male-fertility phenotype in transgenic plant. For example, maize ZmMs7gene was confirmed by the transformation of proZmMs7-ZmMs7construct into maize HiII hybrid line. The transgenic plants were then crossed with the ms7-6007mutant, and transgenic plant in the ms7-6007homozygous mutant background can rescue the male-sterility defect of ms7-6007mutant and recovered the fertility phenotype (Table 1) [9]. The second one is transformation of the corresponding heterozygous male-sterility mutants with the orthologous GMS gene in model plants (such as Arabidopsis) and segregation analysis of complementation by the transgene. The putative GMS ortholog needs to be fused to a promoter to drive its expression in the Arabidopsismutant, either by a constitutive, overexpression promoter, or via the Arabidopsisnative gene-specific promoter. Although the first option is usually quicker, the results are not always satisfactory, due to the temporal and cell-specific regulation observed in some genes. For instance, anther and pollen transcription factors such as AtMs1orthologs in rice (PTC1) and barley (HvMs1) did not recover Arabidopsis ms1mutant fertility when driven by the CaMV35S overexpression promoter. However, once the rice and barley ortholog genes were fused to the Arabidopsis AtMs1native promoter, fertility was restored in the ms1homozygous mutant [35, 93].

3.2 Targeted mutagenesis

Targeted mutagenesis of the putative GMS gene includes two ways: knockdown and knockout approaches. Knockdown strategy, such as RNA interference (RNAi) silencing, is very helpful to those genes in which null mutant is lethal. RNAi silencing is a useful technique to characterize gene function; however, this approach may not generate clear phenotypes due to the threshold level needed for effective silencing [61]. RNAi target genes generally have reduced expression rather than being fully silenced; thus enough transcript may remain to maintain wild-type function. This partial reduction in gene expression was seen in several GMS gene RNAi silencing [63, 73, 80, 81, 93], where pollen development was affected by the silencing and showed a partial male-sterility phenotype. In addition, RNAi silencing has been shown to be unreliable after successive generations [95].

Knockout strategies, such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), customized homing endonucleases (meganucleases), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and CRISPR-Cas9 technology, have been shown to significantly increase the frequency and precision of genome editing. Especially, CRISPR-Cas9 has quickly become the technology of choice for genome editing and functional confirmation of GMS gene due to its simplicity, efficiency, and versatility [96]. For instance, rice OsLAP6/OsPKS1, maize ZmMs30, ZmMs33, and wheat TaMs45gene are confirmed as GMS genes by using the CRISPR-Cas9 technology, respectively. Targeted mutagenesis of these genes leads to complete male-sterility phenotype [18, 20, 67, 76].

3.3 Allelism test and allelic mutant sequencing

Allelism test (complementation test for functional allelism) is a test to determine whether two mutants are caused by the same gene. If there is more than one mutant of a specific GMS gene, allelism test should be carried out. A male-sterile (ms) homozygote is pollinated by a fertile heterozygote (+/ms) from the putative allelic line. If the progeny exhibits a fertile/ sterile segregation ratio of 1:1, the two mutants are allelic with each other. If all the progenies display male fertile, suggest that the two mutations complement each other and they are not allelic. Furthermore, the allelic mutant gene can be confirmed based on sequencing and alignment with each other. If different msmutants come from the mutation of the same GMS gene, the GMS gene function in male-sterility will be confirmed. For instance, the function of maize ZmMs33has been confirmed by allelism test and sequencing of several ms33allelic mutants, such as ms33-6019, ms33-6029, ms33-6024, ms33-6038, and ms33-6052[20, 97]. Most of the cloned GMS genes have allelic mutants and are confirmed by allelic mutant sequencing (Table 1), so it is a usefully functional confirmation strategy besides the genetic complementation and targeted mutagenesis.

3.4 Anther-specific expression analysis

The anther-specific expression analysis is another important method for functional confirmation of putative GMS gene. In general, the expression pattern of GMS gene could be analyzed by using the following approaches: semiquantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), northern blotting, promoter-GUS or GMS-GFP transgenic plant analysis, RNA in situ hybridization, and immunoblotting (or western blotting). For instance, the spatiotemporal expression pattern of Ms6021was analyzed by qRT-PCR, RNA in situ hybridization, and western blotting, and the results indicated that Ms6021is mainly expressed in the tapetum and microspore in maize [23]. The anther- and tapetum-specific expression pattern of rice PTC1was analyzed by using RT-PCR, qRT-PCR, and PTC1pro-GUStransgenic rice anther staining [35]. Spatiotemporal expression pattern of TaMs2was analyzed by using RT-PCR, RNA in situ hybridization, and TaMs2:GFP transgenic anther microscopy, indicating that TaMs2is an anther-specific expression and dominant GMS gene [50].

3.5 Phylogenetic analysis

In order to get more functional information of the putative GMS gene, phylogenetic analysis should be carried out for expounding the evolutionary relationship with other putative orthologs. The detailed method is as follows: protein sequences of the putative orthologs of the targeted GMS can be obtained from Gramene (http://www.gramene.org) or NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and aligned using ClustalX program [98]. A phylogenetic tree can be generated using molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA6) program based on a Poisson model with the maximum likelihood method [99]. Support values are estimated by 1000 times of bootstrap replicates. For instance, by using phylogenetic analysis, maize Ms23 and its paralog bHLH122 fall in the same clade with two rice GMS proteins, TIP2 and EAT1. TIP2 is the rice ortholog of Ms23, whereas maize bHLH122 is the ortholog of rice EAT1. Maize bHLH51, rice TDR, and ArabidopsisAMS fall in the same clade, while maize Ms32, rice UDT1, and ArabidopsisDYT1 fall in the same clade [15]. These results not only confirm the function of Ms23 and Ms32 in regulating male sterility but also predict that their paralogs bHLH122 and bHLH51 may be involved in male sterility, and this needs to be confirmed by targeted mutagenesis analysis and/or other strategies.

3.6 Cytological observation

As to the forward genetic cloning of the GMS gene, cytological observation is one of the phenotypic analyses of the male-sterile mutant. When the candidate GMS gene is cloned by reverse genetic approaches, cytological observation is one of the most important strategies for functional confirmation of the putative GMS gene. Cytological observation methods include light microscopy of transverse sections, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of anther and pollen development. For instance, the functions of rice OsTGA10and OsAGO2in male sterility were confirmed by targeted mutagenesis of these genes with antisense and CRISPR-Cas9 systems and cytological characterization of mutants by transverse section observation and TEM analysis of anthers at different stages [84, 85]. The functions of wheat TaMs26in anther and pollen wall development in bread wheat were tested by targeted mutagenesis of all the three homologs and cytological analysis using SEM method [77]. Cytological observation is helpful to confirm the function mechanism of the putative GMS genes in the cellular level.

Advertisement

4. Application value evaluation of GMS genes and mutants in crop plants

Compared to CMS and environment-sensitive genic male sterility (EGMS), GMS has many advantages such as the high germplasm utilization efficiency, higher male-sterility stability under various environments, and lower linkage rate with adverse traits. As more and more GMS genes have been cloned in crops, the BMS systems by using GMS gene have been developed in several crop plants and come into commercial utilization, such as SPT and MCS systems [3]. However, before utilization in the BMS systems, many characteristics of GMS gene and its mutant should be assessed systemically, such as genetic stability analysis of male-sterility, heterosis comparison, and analysis of potential linkage with bad traits.

4.1 Genetic stability analysis of male-sterility

Firstly, the genetic stability of the male-sterile mutant should be appraised in different genetic backgrounds and various environments. The general procedure is as follows (Figure 5A; the recessive msmutant is taken as an example): a homozygous msmutant is used as female parent and crossed with hundreds of inbred lines with broad genetic backgrounds to get the heterozygous F1 hybrids. Then one of the F1 hybrids is self-pollinated to produce F2 seeds. Thereafter 50–100 of the F2 seeds from each cross are grown in various environments. The fertility segregation ratios of the F2 populations are investigated, and anthers of three sterile individuals in each F2 population are collected and stained with 1% I2-KI solution to examine male-sterility status of pollen grains. If the segregation ratio of fertility to sterility in all crosses shows 3:1 as expected, we can say that the male sterility is genetically stable in different genetic backgrounds and various environments. Otherwise, if the ratio is not always 3:1 and confirmed by the molecular marker-assisted selection results, we can say that the male sterility is unstable in different genetic backgrounds and/or various environments. For instance, the male-sterility stability of maize ms30-6028mutant was analyzed by crossing with 329 maize inbred lines and observation of the segregation ratio of fertility to sterility in F2 populations, suggesting that ms30-6028is a stable male-sterility mutant under diverse genetic backgrounds [18].

Figure 5.

The application value evaluation of GMS genes and mutants in crop plants.

4.2 Heterosis comparison between msmutant and wild type

Secondly, the effects of msmutant on heterosis should be analyzed by comparing the yield and related agronomy traits between F1 hybrid plants produced by using msmutant and wild type (WT) as female parents and crossing with the same inbred line (Figure 5B). For instance, to test whether ms30-6028gene affects maize heterosis and grain yield, ms30-6028mutant and its homozygous WT line were used as female parents and crossed with 30 maize inbred lines, respectively. The harvested F1 hybrids and their corresponding parental lines were grown according to the planting model of maize field production in two different locations. Eighteen agronomic traits such as plot yield, whole growth period, plant height, ear height, and hundred-kernel weight were investigated to compare the differences of heterosis and field production performance of 30 pairs of hybrid combinations using ZmMs30and ms30-6028homozygous plants as female parents, respectively. The results indicated that ms30-6028mutation has no obvious negative effects on maize heterosis and field production, suggesting that ZmMs30gene and its mutant ms30-6028are applicable for hybrid maize breeding and hybrid seed production [18].

4.3 Analysis of potential linkage with disadvantage genes and traits

Furthermore, other than the male-sterility stability analysis and heterosis comparison described above, the potential linkage with bad traits of mslocus should be analyzed. There are at least two ways to get this target: one is phenotypic observation of the hybrid plants that come from the homozygous msmutant used as female parent, while those of the fertile sibling used as control. If the field production performances of the hybrid plants between msmutant and WT are similar with each other, we can say that the msmutation is not linked with disadvantage traits and thus can be applicable in hybrid seed breeding and production. For instance, maize Ms44hybrids showed no yield penalty in any of the tested environments, indicating that it is desirable for commercially viable products [22]. The other is sequencing of the putative genes near the mslocus and screening for the potential disadvantage genes based on bioinformatic analysis.

Advertisement

5. Application potential analyses of BMS systems by using GMS genes in crop plants

As described above, cloning and characterization of plant GMS genes have contributed significantly to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of anther and pollen development in crop plants and have provided an important basis for developing BMS lines. Several attempts have been made to utilize GMS genes in combination with new technologies to achieve more feasible BMS systems in crop plants [3, 4, 6, 100]. Here, we introduce briefly the strategies, assessment, and applications of some typical BMS systems in crop plants (Table 2).

StrategyBMS systemCropApplication assessmentApplication statusRef.
Transgenic construct-driven non-transgenic product systemsMCSMaize1. Genetic stability and heterosis of msline
2. Genetic stability analysis of MCS maintainer lines
Product test[9, 18, 21]
SPTMaize1. Genetic stability of SPT maintainer lines
2. SPT transgene transmission rate through pollen
Commercial application in maize[62]
SPT-like (based on dominant ms44gene)Maize1. Ms44plants increase kernel number
2. Ms44hybrids showed no yield penalty
Product test[22]
SPT-like (based on OsNP1gene)RiceThe osnp1line was crossed with ∼1200 rice germplasms, ∼10% out-yielded the best local cultivarsProduct test[69]
SPT-like (based on TaMs1gene)WheatNo dataNo data[49]
Transgenic male-sterility systemsRHS1: glyphosate-mediated male sterilityMaize1. The consistency in performance across inbreds
2. The RHS inbreds showed no yield penalty
Commercial application in maize[101]
RHS2Maize1. The endogenous mts-siRNAs are present widely
2. The elite event was introgressed into 15 maize germplasms
Product test[102]
Barnase/Barstar systemOilseed rape1. It is feasible in some crop plants
2. Double female parent seeds needed
Commercial application in canola[103, 104]

Table 2.

Strategy and application assessment of BMS systems in crop plants.

5.1 Development strategies of the BMS systems

The development strategies of BMS systems based on GMS genes and other new technologies have been reviewed thoroughly and systemically in our laboratory [3]. In general, there are two kinds of strategies to develop BMS systems that have an application potential in hybrid seed production: transgenic construct-driven non-transgenic seed systems and transgenic male-sterility systems. The former includes the SPT and MCS systems in maize, SPT-like systems in maize, rice, and wheat, while the latter includes the RHS1 and RHS2 systems in maize and Barnase/Barstar system in oilseed rape (Table 2).

5.1.1 SPT- and SPT-like systems in crops

The SPT system is one of the representatives of transgenic construct-driven non-transgenic seed systems initially developed in maize by using a transgenic maintainer strategy [62]. The SPT transgenic maintainer line is created by transforming the plant of interest with an SPT construct consisting of three components: (i) a wild-type male-fertility gene (e.g., Ms45) to restore fertility, (ii) a pollen lethality gene (e.g., ZmAA) to disrupt normal pollen development, and (iii) a fluorescent seed color marker gene (e.g., DsRed2) for seed sorting. Of the pollen grains produced by the SPT maintainer line, all have the ms45genotype, 50% are non-transgenic, and 50% have the SPT transgenic elements. The latter grains are unable to germinate due to expression of the ZmAAgene. Thus, self-pollination of the SPT maintainer line produces both seeds with the same genotype of the SPT maintainer line (ms45/ms45 + SPT-T-DNA) and seeds with the male-sterile genotype (ms45/ms45). The two types of seeds can be efficiently separated by mechanical color sorting, since the 50% of seeds contain the SPT elements showing a red color under green excitation light. When the male-sterile line (ms45/ms45) is pollinated with the SPT maintainer line, almost 100% of the resulting seeds have the ms45/ms45genotype and can be used as male-sterile female lines for crossbreeding and hybrid seed production.

Since the maize SPT system was developed and applied successfully [62], several SPT-like systems have been developed in maize, rice, and wheat based on ZmMs44, OsNP1, and TaMs1genes, respectively [22, 49, 69]. Although there are potentially many advantages of the SPT system, the rate of transgene transmission through pollen was found to vary with the highest rate being 0.518% [62]. Therefore, there is an increased risk of transgenic pollen flow during the male-sterile line propagation phase, thus resulting in greatly limited application in the countries and regions with strict biotechnology regulatory oversight.

5.1.2 MCS System

To decrease the rate of transgene transmission through the pollen of SPT maintainer lines, our laboratory developed a MCS system by transforming a single MCS construct into the maize ms7, ms30,or ms33mutant [9, 105, 106]. The MCS construct contains five functional modules: (i) a male-fertility gene (e.g., ZmMs7, ZmMs30or ZmMs33) to restore fertility, (ii) two pollen disruption genes (e.g., ZmAAand Dam) to disrupt the production of transgenic pollen, (iii) a fluorescent color marker gene (e.g., DsRed2or mCherry) for seed color sorting, and (iv) an herbicide-resistant gene (e.g., Bar) to prevent sophistication of seeds because it is beneficial for the propagation of high-purity MCS transgenic maintainer line seeds through herbicide spraying during specific stages of production. As the MCS construct harbors two pollen disruption modules, both of which can inhibit transgenic pollen formation or function, the transgene transmission rate through pollen is greatly decreased. Furthermore, the Bargene in the MCS construct is helpful for propagating highly pure seeds of the transgenic maintainer line. Compared with the SPT construct, the MCS construct, which harbors two additional functional modules, the Barand Damgenes, can produce maintainer and male-sterile lines with higher purity and greatly decrease the transgene transmission rate as well as the risk of transgene flow in commercial maize hybrid seed production. To promote commercial application, a field test of the MCS system in China is currently underway.

As described above, although the final product of transgenic construct-driven male-sterility systems is non-transgenic, the use of these systems is often limited by the lack of GMS mutants and male-fertile genes in many crops. Consequently, many biotechnology strategies have been developed in the past 30 years to produce artificially dominant male-sterile plants independent of GMS mutants and male-fertility genes, such as the RHS systems in maize and Barnase/Barstar system in oilseed rape.

5.1.3 RHS system

The RHS system, which is based on glyphosate-mediated male sterility, is deployed for hybrid seed production by Monsanto [101]. The RHS system consists of RHS and RR transgene constructs. The RHS transgene cassette contains the CP4-EPSPS gene (encoding 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate 3-phosphate synthase, which is insensitive or resistant to glyphosate) driven by the enhanced 35S promoter, which has been shown to be poorly expressed in tapetum cells and microspores, and thus the resulting RHS plant demonstrates male sterility following glyphosate application with little/no injury to the rest of the plant. The RR transgene construct comprises a double expression cassette providing high constitutive expression of CP4-EPSPS resulting in robust resistance to glyphosate. In hybrid seed production fields, rows of an RHS female line are interplanted with rows of an RR male line, and over-the-top sprays of glyphosate induce male sterility in RHS female plants, which are subsequently pollinated by RR male plants. By withholding glyphosate, the RHS plants remain fully fertile and are capable of self-pollination for propagation of female line without the need for a maintainer line.

The RHS system replaces mechanical detasseling with glyphosate spray and greatly simplifies the process of hybrid seed corn production. Recently, this system has been improved as RHS2 by using endogenous maize male tissue-specific small interfering RNAs to trigger cleavage of the CP4-EPSPS mRNA specifically in tassels, resulting in glyphosate-sensitive male cells [102].

5.1.4 Barnase/Barstar system

The Barnase/Barstar system was the first dominant BMS system developed in rapeseed and tobacco [103, 104] and then has been tested and tried in wheat and rice [107, 108]. The barnaseand barstargenes are fused with the tapetum-specific TA29 promoter and then transformed individually into plants. The TA29-barnasetransformed plants are completely male-sterile and are crossed with TA29-barstar-expressing fertile plants, which results in the co-expression of barnaseand barstargenes in the anther tapetal cell layer. The inactivation of barnaseby barstarleads to the restoration of fertility in the hybrid F1 plants [109].

5.2 Application assessment of the BMS systems

Although serval BMS systems had been developed during the past decades, only three of them were thoroughly assessed and applied in commercial hybrid seed production in some crops, such as SPT, RHS, and Barnase/Barstar systems.

In SPT system, the stability of transgenes in prospective SPT maintainer lines were examined based on Southern blot analyses of genomic DNA from T0 to T4 plants to assess the integration and structural fidelity of the transgenes. No changes in hybridization patterns with three different restriction enzyme digestions of the SPT transgenes indicated that the transgenes are stable over multiple generations. More importantly, the transgene transmission through pollen was tested by using the pollen of transgenic SPT maintainer to pollinate non-transgenic plants. Then ears were harvested from the non-transgenic female parent plants and examined under visible light for the presence of pink seeds expressing the DsRed2 protein. The transgene transmission rate through pollen varied from 0% to 0.518% with different constructs and transformants. As the transformant DP-32138-1 showed the lowest transgene transmission rate that was maintained across generations and in different inbred backgrounds, it was selected as the SPT maintainer line for use in maize male-sterile parent seed increase [62].

The RHS system was developed by minimizing the CP4-EPSPS expression in the tassel and maximizing glyphosate delivery to the tassel resulting in consistent male sterility for hybrid seed corn production [101]. Therefore, the glyphosate spray timing, dose, target, and mode should be examined firstly in different maize varieties. Subsequently, the consistency in performance of the RHS technology across a broad range of inbred varieties is essential and has been examined in field trials. The performance standard for RHS is 0.5% anther extrusion or >99.5% tassel sterility to insure high purity in hybrid seeds. The field data show that RHS has consistently surpassed the performance standard since 2007 when examined across an increasing number of inbred varieties. In fact, in 2011 and 2012, 100% sterility or zero anther extrusion was observed across 46 and 47 inbred varieties, respectively. The RHS inbreds have shown comparable yield to mechanical detasseling; furthermore, the F1 hybrid seeds produced by crossing RHS with RR showed full resistance to glyphosate and comparable performance to hybrid seeds produced by mechanical detasseling [101].

The Barnase/Barstar system was the first BMS system developed in tobacco and oilseed rape plants based on tapetal cell-specific expression of TA29-barnaseand TA29-barstargenes [103, 104]. TA29-barnasetransgene leads to dominant male sterility due to selective destruction of anther tapetal cells, while TA29-barstartransgene can suppress the expression of TA29-barnasetransgene and restore the male fertility. The feasibility of this system was confirmed in many crop plants, such as oilseed rape, tobacco, lettuce, chicory, cauliflower, tomato, cotton, and maize. However, the dominant male-sterility line must maintained in heterozygous plants by crossing with a wild-type line in the same (isogenic) genetic background. The elimination of the fertile segregants by herbicide spray doubles the amount of female parent seed needed for hybrid seed production, which could limit the applicability of the system in crops with low multiplication factor and relatively low plant density [4].

5.3 Commercial application of the BMS systems

As shown in Table 2, there are only three BMS systems that have been applied in commercial hybrid seed production, including SPT, RHS, and Barnase/Barstar systems. The SPT system has been deregulated by USDA APHIS in 2011 and is thus available for commercial hybrid seed production in maize [110]. Unlike other BMS systems, the maize inbred parent lines produced using the SPT system do not inherit SPT transgene from the SPT maintainer line and thus are non-transgenic. Furthermore, both the commercial maize hybrid seed produced from the SPT system and the resulting commodity maize grain harvested from these hybrid plants are non-transgenic. Subsequently, acknowledgement of the non-transgenic status of progeny produced by the SPT system is also supported by regulatory agencies in Australia and Japan [111, 112]. Therefore, hybrid maize and commodity grain produced from the SPT system are non-genetically modified (non-GM) and subject only to those regulations applicable to conventional non-GM maize. The performance of RHS system has been evaluated by Monsanto manufacturing group which produces the hybrid seeds that are sold in the marketplace. A few modifications have been implemented to make the RHS system more practical and manageable in the field [101]. Most recently, the second-generation RHS (RHS2) technology combines the relative simplicity and convenience of a systemic herbicide spray methodology with targeted protein expression to create an inducible male sterility system for industrial production of maize hybrid seeds in an environmentally independent manner [102]. The Barnase/Barstar system has been used successfully for the commercial production of canola hybrids (Brassica napus) in Canada [4]. However, most of the BMS systems have not been used in commercial hybrid seed production, maybe because of lacking the cost-effective and environment-friendly BMS systems and/or the regulatory acceptance of using BMS systems among different countries.

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

In this chapter, we focus on the molecular cloning, functional confirmation, and application value assessment of GMS genes as well as their application in hybrid seed production via several BMS systems in cereal crops, such as rice, maize, and wheat. With the rapid development of the next-generation sequencing technology, more genome information of cereal crops are available, leading to plenty GMS genes cloned and characterized in crop plants. As shown in Table 1, there are more than 70 GMS genes cloned in cereal crops, and most of them (57/73) are identified by using forward genetic approach, including 38 genes isolated by map-based cloning, 15 genes identified by T-DNA/Transposon tagging and 4 genes isolated by MutMap method. Whereas the rest of GMS genes are identified viareverse genetic approach, including 7 genes isolated through homology-based cloning, 5 genes identified by anther-specific expression gene screening and 4 genes cloned by other reverse genetic methods. Among them, there are 49 GMS genes cloned in rice, 17 GMS genes in maize, 6 GMS genes in wheat, and 1 GMS gene in barley. From these data, we conclude that the forward genetic approaches, especially map-based cloning, are the most popular method for GMS gene cloning in crops; most GMS genes have been cloned in rice and maize, whereas only a few GMS genes are cloned in wheat and barley. Consider that the conserved role of GMS genes in different species and the sequence information of GMS genes in rice and maize can be used for cloning of the orthologs in wheat and barley through reverse genetic approaches. For example, the functions of TaMs26and TaMs45, the wheat homologs of maize Ms26and Ms45, were confirmed via a custom-designed homing endonuclease and CRISPR-Cas9-targeted mutagenesis in wheat, respectively [76, 77], while the role of HvMs1, the barley homolog of Arabidopsis Ms1and rice PTC1, was analyzed by using RNAi silencing in barley [93].

Although there are a lot of GMS genes identified in cereal crops up to now, less than 10 GMS genes are assessed for the value in heterosis utilization and hybrid seed production (Table 1). For example, ZmMs7, ZmMs30, and ZmMs33are tested in maize MCS system [9, 18, 21]; ZmMs26, Zmms44, and ZmMs45are tested in maize SPT (or SPT-like) system [16, 22, 62]; OsNP1is tested in rice SPT-like system [69]; and TaMs1is tested in wheat SPT-like system [49]. All these BMS systems belong to transgenic construct-driven non-transgenic product strategies, leading to potential application of these systems in commercial hybrid seed production, especially in the countries and/or regions with strict regulatory policy. These systems have many advantages, such as non-transgenic final products, environment-friendly without application of herbicide in hybrid seed production fields, and deregulated by the regulatory authority in some countries, whereas they are limited by using transgenic maintainer line based on completely male-sterile mutants and the male-fertility genes and requirement of fluorescent seed color-sorting machine. Therefore, the transgenic male-sterility systems, such as RHS system based on glyphosate-mediated male sterility, have also been developed and used in commercial hybrid seed production in maize [101, 102]. This system is independent of male-sterility mutants and male-fertility genes, no need for transgenic maintainer line and seed color sorting, and the herbicide-resistant male-sterility lines are helpful to highly efficient and mechanized hybrid seed production. However, this transgenic male-sterility system is limited by the “zero tolerance” regulatory policy preventing transgenic planting in many countries, need for application of herbicide in hybrid seed production fields, and potential risk of gene flow. In summary, both SPT and RHS systems have advantages and disadvantages compared with each other.

With the advance of molecular cloning methods including both forward and reverse genetic approaches, especially the next-generation sequencing technology and genome-editing technology (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9), more GMS genes in cereal crops with large and complex genome (e.g., wheat and barley) will be identified and characterized by using multiple strategies as described in this chapter. At the same time, the application value of the putative GMS genes should be assessed systemically in genetic stability of male sterility, effects on heterosis performance, and potential linkage with detrimental traits. This will not only boost our understanding in the molecular mechanism of anther and pollen development but also give great opportunity to develop novel BMS systems for commercial hybrid seed production in cereal crops.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The research in our lab was supported by the National Transgenic Major Program of China (2018ZX0800922B, 2018ZX0801006B), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771875, 31871702), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0100806, 2017YFD0102001, 2017YFD0101201), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (06500060), and the “Ten Thousand Plan”—National High-Level Talents Special Support Plan (For Xiangyuan Wan).

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Advertisement

Abbreviations

BMSbiotechnology-based male sterility
BSAbulked segregant analysis
CMScytoplasmic male sterility
CRISPRclustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats
EGMSenvironment-sensitive genic male sterility
EMSmethanesulfonate
ESTexpressed sequence tag
GMgenetically modified
GMSgenic male sterility
MCSmulti-control sterility
MSmale sterility
MEGAmolecular evolutionary genetics analysis
qRT-PCRquantitative real-time PCR
RHSroundup hybridization systems
RTreverse transcription
SEMscanning electron microscopy
SPTseed production technology
TAIL-PCRthermal asymmetric interlaced-polymerase chain reaction
TEMtransmission electron microscopy
WTwild type

References

  1. 1. FAO U. How to Feed the World in 2050. Rome: Highlevel Expert Forum; 2009
  2. 2. Miller JK, Herman EM, Jahn M, Bradford KJ. Strategic research, education and policy goals for seed science and crop improvement. Plant Science. 2010;179:645-652. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.006
  3. 3. Wan X, Wu S, Li Z, Dong Z, An X, Ma B, et al. Maize genic male-sterility genes and their applications in hybrid breeding: Progress and perspectives. Molecular Plant. 2019;12:321-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.01.014
  4. 4. Perez-Prat E, van Lookeren Campagne MM. Hybrid seed production and the challenge of propagating male-sterile plants. Trends in Plant Science. 2002;7:199-203
  5. 5. Williams ME. Genetic engineering for pollination control. Trends in Biotechnology. 1995;13:344-349
  6. 6. Whitford R, Fleury D, Reif JC, Garcia M, Okada T, Korzun V, et al. Hybrid breeding in wheat: Technologies to improve hybrid wheat seed production. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2013;64:5411-5428. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert333
  7. 7. Jung KH, Han MJ, Lee YS, Kim YW, Hwang I, Kim MJ, et al. Rice undeveloped Tapetum1 is a major regulator of early tapetum development. The Plant Cell. 2005;17:2705-2722. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.105.034090
  8. 8. Cigan AM, Unger E, Xu RJ, Kendall T, Fox TW. Phenotypic complementation ofms45maize requires tapetal expression of MS45. Sexual Plant Reproduction. 2001;14:135-142
  9. 9. Zhang D, Wu S, An X, Xie K, Dong Z, Zhou Y, et al. Construction of a multicontrol sterility system for a maize male-sterile line and hybrid seed production based on the ZmMs7 gene encoding a PHD-finger transcription factor. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2018;16:459-471. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12786
  10. 10. Wang DX, Skibbe DS, Walbot V. MaizeMale sterile 8 (Ms8), a putative β-1,3-galactosyltransferase, modulates cell division, expansion, and differentiation during early maize anther development. Plant Reproduction. 2013;26:329-338. DOI: 10.1007/s00497-013-0230-y
  11. 11. Albertsen M, Fox T, Leonard A, Li B, Loveland B, Trimnell M. Cloning and use of thems9gene from maize. US patent US20160024520A1; 2016
  12. 12. Somaratne Y, Tian Y, Zhang H, Wang M, Huo Y, Cao F, et al. ABNORMAL POLLEN VACUOLATION1 (APV1) is required for male fertility by contributing to anther cuticle and pollen exine formation in maize. The Plant Journal. 2017;90:96-110. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13476
  13. 13. Albertsen M, Fox T, Trimnell M, Wu Y, Lowe L, Li B, et al.Msca1nucleotide sequences impacting plant male fertility and method of using same. US patent US20090038027A1; 2009
  14. 14. Chaubal R, Anderson JR, Trimnell MR, Fox TW, Albertsen MC, Bedinger P. The transformation of anthers in the msca1 mutant of maize. Planta. 2003;216:778-788. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-002-0929-8
  15. 15. Nan GL, Zhai J, Arikit S, Morrow D, Fernandes J, Mai L, et al. MS23, a master basic helix-loop-helix factor, regulates the specification and development of the tapetum in maize. Development. 2017;144:163-172. DOI: 10.1242/dev.140673
  16. 16. Wu Y, Hershey H. Nucleotide sequences mediating plant male fertility and method of using same. USA patent US20110173725; 2011
  17. 17. Djukanovic V, Smith J, Lowe K, Yang M, Gao H, Jones S, et al. Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designed I-CreI homing endonuclease. The Plant Journal. 2013;76:888-899. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12335
  18. 18. An X, Dong Z, Tian Y, Xie K, Wu S, Zhu T, et al. ZmMs30 encoding a novel GDSL lipase is essential for male fertility and valuable for hybrid breeding in maize. Molecular Plant. 2019;12:343-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.01.011
  19. 19. Moon J, Skibbe D, Timofejeva L, Wang CJ, Kelliher T, Kremling K, et al. Regulation of cell divisions and differentiation by MALE STERILITY32 is required for anther development in maize. The Plant Journal. 2013;76:592-602. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12318
  20. 20. Xie K, Wu S, Li Z, Zhou Y, Zhang D, Dong Z, et al. Map-based cloning and characterization of Zea mays male sterility33 (ZmMs33) gene, encoding a glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2018;131:1363-1378. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-018-3083-9
  21. 21. Zhu T, Wu S, Zhang D, Li Z, Xie K, An X, et al. Genome-wide analysis of maize GPAT gene family and cytological characterization and breeding application of ZmMs33/ZmGPAT6 gene. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 23 Apr 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-019-03343-y. [Published online ahead of print]
  22. 22. Fox T, DeBruin J, Haug Collet K, Trimnell M, Clapp J, Leonard A, et al. A single point mutation in Ms44 results in dominant male sterility and improves nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2017;15:942-952. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12689
  23. 23. Tian Y, Xiao S, Liu J, Somaratne Y, Zhang H, Wang M, et al. MALE STERILE6021 (MS6021) is required for the development of anther cuticle and pollen exine in maize. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:16736. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16930-0
  24. 24. Evans MM. The indeterminate gametophyte1 gene of maize encodes a LOB domain protein required for embryo Sac and leaf development. The Plant Cell. 2007;19:46-62. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.106.047506
  25. 25. Wang CJ, Nan GL, Kelliher T, Timofejeva L, Vernoud V, Golubovskaya IN, et al. Maize multiple archesporial cells 1 (mac1), an ortholog of rice TDL1A, modulates cell proliferation and identity in early anther development. Development. 2012;139:2594-2603. DOI: 10.1242/dev.077891
  26. 26. Chen X, Zhang H, Sun H, Luo H, Zhao L, Dong Z, et al. IRREGULAR POLLEN EXINE1 is a novel factor in anther cuticle and pollen exine formation. Plant Physiology. 2017;173:307-325. DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00629
  27. 27. Wang Y, Liu D, Tian Y, Wu S, An X, Dong Z, et al. Map-based cloning, phylogenetic, and microsynteny analyses of ZmMs20 gene regulating male fertility in maize. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20:1411. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20061411
  28. 28. Hong L, Tang D, Zhu K, Wang K, Li M, Cheng Z. Somatic and reproductive cell development in rice anther is regulated by a putative glutaredoxin. The Plant Cell. 2012;24:577-588. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.093740
  29. 29. Hong L, Tang D, Shen Y, Hu Q, Wang K, Li M, et al. MIL2 (MICROSPORELESS2) regulates early cell differentiation in the rice anther. The New Phytologist. 2012;196:402-413. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04270.x
  30. 30. Fu Z, Yu J, Cheng X, Zong X, Xu J, Chen M, et al. The rice basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor TDR INTERACTING PROTEIN2 is a central switch in early anther development. The Plant Cell. 2014;26:1512-1524. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.123745
  31. 31. Ko SS, Li MJ, Sun-Ben Ku M, Ho YC, Lin YJ, Chuang MH, et al. The bHLH142 transcription factor coordinates with TDR1 to modulate the expression of EAT1 and regulate pollen development in rice. The Plant Cell. 2014;26:2486-2504. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.126292
  32. 32. Yang Z, Sun L, Zhang P, Zhang Y, Yu P, Liu L, et al. TDR INTERACTING PROTEIN 3 encoding a PHD-finger transcription factor regulates Ubisch bodies and pollen wall formation in rice. The Plant Journal. 25 Apr 2019. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14365. [Published online ahead of print]
  33. 33. Li H, Pinot F, Sauveplane V, Werck-Reichhart D, Diehl P, Schreiber L, et al. Cytochrome P450 family member CYP704B2 catalyzes the {omega}-hydroxylation of fatty acids and is required for anther cutin biosynthesis and pollen exine formation in rice. The Plant Cell. 2010;22:173-190. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.070326
  34. 34. Yang X, Wu D, Shi J, He Y, Pinot F, Grausem B, et al. Rice CYP703A3, a cytochrome P450 hydroxylase, is essential for development of anther cuticle and pollen exine. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2014;56:979-994. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12212
  35. 35. Li H, Yuan Z, Vizcay-Barrena G, Yang C, Liang W, Zong J, et al. PERSISTENT TAPETAL CELL1 encodes a PHD-finger protein that is required for tapetal cell death and pollen development in rice. Plant Physiology. 2011;156:615-630. DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.175760
  36. 36. Li N, Zhang DS, Liu HS, Yin CS, Li XX, Liang WQ, et al. The rice tapetum degeneration retardation gene is required for tapetum degradation and anther development. The Plant Cell. 2006;18:2999-3014. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.106.044107
  37. 37. Liu Z, Lin S, Shi J, Yu J, Zhu L, Yang X, et al. Rice No Pollen 1 (NP1) is required for anther cuticle formation and pollen exine patterning. The Plant Journal. 2017;91:263-277. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13561
  38. 38. Men X, Shi J, Liang W, Zhang Q, Lian G, Quan S, et al. Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 3 (OsGPAT3) is required for anther development and male fertility in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2017;68:513-526. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw445
  39. 39. Shi J, Tan H, Yu XH, Liu Y, Liang W, Ranathunge K, et al. Defective pollen wall is required for anther and microspore development in rice and encodes a fatty acyl carrier protein reductase. The Plant Cell. 2011;23:2225-2246. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.087528
  40. 40. Xu D, Shi J, Rautengarten C, Yang L, Qian X, Uzair M, et al. Defective Pollen Wall 2 (DPW2) encodes an acyl transferase required for rice pollen development. Plant Physiology. 2017;173:240-255. DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00095
  41. 41. Yu J, Meng Z, Liang W, Behera S, Kudla J, Tucker MR, et al. A rice Ca2+ binding protein is required for tapetum function and pollen formation. Plant Physiology. 2016;172:1772-1786. DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.01261
  42. 42. Zhang H, Liang W, Yang X, Luo X, Jiang N, Ma H, et al. Carbon starved anther encodes a MYB domain protein that regulates sugar partitioning required for rice pollen development. The Plant Cell. 2010;22:672-689. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.073668
  43. 43. Zhao G, Shi J, Liang W, Xue F, Luo Q, Zhu L, et al. Two ATP binding cassette G transporters, rice ATP binding cassette G26 and ATP binding cassette G15, collaboratively regulate rice male reproduction. Plant Physiology. 2015;169:2064-2079. DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.00262
  44. 44. Zhu X, Yu J, Shi J, Tohge T, Fernie AR, Meir S, et al. The polyketide synthase OsPKS2 is essential for pollen exine and Ubisch body patterning in rice. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2017;59:612-628. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12574
  45. 45. Niu N, Liang W, Yang X, Jin W, Wilson ZA, Hu J, et al. EAT1 promotes tapetal cell death by regulating aspartic proteases during male reproductive development in rice. Nature Communications. 2013;4:1445. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2396
  46. 46. Zhu L, Shi J, Zhao G, Zhang D, Liang W. Post-meiotic deficient anther1 (PDA1) encodes an ABC transporter required for the development of anther cuticle and pollen exine in rice. Journal of Plant Biology. 2013;56:59-68. DOI: 10.1007/s12374-013-0902-z
  47. 47. Tan H, Liang W, Hu J, Zhang D. MTR1 encodes a secretory fasciclin glycoprotein required for male reproductive development in rice. Developmental Cell. 2012;22:1127-1137. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.04.011
  48. 48. Yang X, Li G, Tian Y, Song Y, Liang W, Zhang D. A rice glutamyl-tRNA synthetase modulates early anther cell division and patterning. Plant Physiology. 2018;177:728-744. DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00110
  49. 49. Tucker EJ, Baumann U, Kouidri A, Suchecki R, Baes M, Garcia M, et al. Molecular identification of the wheat male fertility gene Ms1 and its prospects for hybrid breeding. Nature Communications. 2017;8:869. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00945-2
  50. 50. Ni F, Qi J, Hao Q, Lyu B, Luo MC, Wang Y, et al. Wheat Ms2 encodes for an orphan protein that confers male sterility in grass species. Nature Communications. 2017;8:15121. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15121
  51. 51. Xia C, Zhang L, Zou C, Gu Y, Duan J, Zhao G, et al. A TRIM insertion in the promoter of Ms2 causes male sterility in wheat. Nature Communications. 2017;8:15407. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15407
  52. 52. Pallotta MA, Warner P, Kouidri A, Tucker EJ, Baes M, Suchecki R, et al. Wheat ms5 male-sterility is induced by recessive homoeologous A and D genome non-specific Lipid Transfer Proteins. The Plant Journal. 22 Apr 2019. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14350. [Published online ahead of print]
  53. 53. Li X, Gao X, Wei Y, Deng L, Ouyang Y, Chen G, et al. Rice APOPTOSIS INHIBITOR5 coupled with two DEAD-box adenosine 5′-triphosphate-dependent RNA helicases regulates tapetum degeneration. The Plant Cell. 2011;23:1416-1434. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.110.082636
  54. 54. Moon S, Kim SR, Zhao G, Yi J, Yoo Y, Jin P, et al. Rice glycosyltransferase1 encodes a glycosyltransferase essential for pollen wall formation. Plant Physiology. 2013;161:663-675. DOI: 10.1104/pp.112.210948
  55. 55. Han MJ, Jung KH, Yi G, Lee DY, An G. Rice Immature Pollen 1 (RIP1) is a regulator of late pollen development. Plant & Cell Physiology. 2006;47:1457-1472. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcl013
  56. 56. Jung KH, Han MJ, Lee DY, Lee YS, Schreiber L, Franke R, et al. Wax-deficient anther1 is involved in cuticle and wax production in rice anther walls and is required for pollen development. The Plant Cell. 2006;18:3015-3032. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.106.042044
  57. 57. Lee S, Jung KH, An G, Chung YY. Isolation and characterization of a rice cysteine protease gene, OsCP1, using T-DNA gene-trap system. Plant Molecular Biology. 2004;54:755-765. DOI: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000040904.15329.29
  58. 58. Shi X, Sun X, Zhang Z, Feng D, Zhang Q, Han L, et al. GLUCAN SYNTHASE-LIKE 5 (GSL5) plays an essential role in male fertility by regulating callose metabolism during microsporogenesis in rice. Plant & Cell Physiology. 2015;56:497-509. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcu193
  59. 59. Yi J, Kim SR, Lee DY, Moon S, Lee YS, Jung KH, et al. The rice gene DEFECTIVE TAPETUM AND MEIOCYTES 1 (DTM1) is required for early tapetum development and meiosis. The Plant Journal. 2012;70:256-270. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04864.x
  60. 60. Yi J, Moon S, Lee YS, Zhu L, Liang W, Zhang D, et al. Defective tapetum cell death 1 (DTC1) regulates ROS levels by binding to metallothionein during tapetum degeneration. Plant Physiology. 2016;170:1611-1623. DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.01561
  61. 61. Cigan AM, Unger-Wallace E, Haug-Collet K. Transcriptional gene silencing as a tool for uncovering gene function in maize. The Plant Journal. 2005;43:929-940. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02492.x
  62. 62. Wu Y, Fox TW, Trimnell MR, Wang L, Xu RJ, Cigan AM, et al. Development of a novel recessive genetic male sterility system for hybrid seed production in maize and other cross-pollinating crops. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2016;14:1046-1054. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12477
  63. 63. Vernoud V, Laigle G, Rozier F, Meeley RB, Perez P, Rogowsky PM. The HD-ZIP IV transcription factor OCL4 is necessary for trichome patterning and anther development in maize. The Plant Journal. 2009;59:883-894. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03916.x
  64. 64. Kaneko M, Inukai Y, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Itoh H, Izawa T, Kobayashi Y, et al. Loss-of-function mutations of the rice GAMYB gene impair alpha-amylase expression in aleurone and flower development. The Plant Cell. 2004;16:33-44. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.017327
  65. 65. Nonomura KI, Miyoshi K, Eiguchi M, Suzuki T, Miyao A, Hirochika H, et al. The MSP1 gene is necessary to restrict the number of cells entering into male and female sporogenesis and to initiate anther wall formation in rice. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1728-1739. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.012401
  66. 66. Ueda K, Yoshimura F, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Nonomura K, Wabiko H. Collapsed abnormal pollen1 gene encoding the Arabinokinase-like protein is involved in pollen development in rice. Plant Physiology. 2013;162:858-871. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.216523
  67. 67. Zou T, Xiao Q, Li W, Luo T, Yuan G, He Z, et al. OsLAP6/OsPKS1, an orthologue of Arabidopsis PKSA/LAP6, is critical for proper pollen exine formation. Rice (N Y). 2017;10:53. DOI: 10.1186/s12284-017-0191-0
  68. 68. Chang Z, Chen Z, Yan W, Xie G, Lu J, Wang N, et al. An ABC transporter, OsABCG26, is required for anther cuticle and pollen exine formation and pollen-pistil interactions in rice. Plant Science. 2016;253:21-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.09.006
  69. 69. Chang Z, Chen Z, Wang N, Xie G, Lu J, Yan W, et al. Construction of a male sterility system for hybrid rice breeding and seed production using a nuclear male sterility gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113:14145-14150. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613792113
  70. 70. Wang Z, Li J, Chen S, Heng Y, Chen Z, Yang J, et al. Poaceae-specific MS1 encodes a phospholipid-binding protein for male fertility in bread wheat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017;114:12614-12619. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715570114
  71. 71. Cai C-F, Zhu J, Lou Y, Guo Z-L, Xiong S-X, Wang K, et al. The functional analysis of OsTDF1 reveals a conserved genetic pathway for tapetal development between rice and Arabidopsis. Science Bulletin. 2015;60:1073-1082. DOI: 10.1007/s11434-015-0810-3
  72. 72. Li Y, Li D, Guo Z, Shi Q, Xiong S, Zhang C, et al. OsACOS12, an orthologue of Arabidopsis acyl-CoA synthetase5, plays an important role in pollen exine formation and anther development in rice. BMC Plant Biology. 2016;16:256. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-016-0943-9
  73. 73. Zhang J, Tang W, Huang Y, Niu X, Zhao Y, Han Y, et al. Down-regulation of a LBD-like gene, OsIG1, leads to occurrence of unusual double ovules and developmental abnormalities of various floral organs and megagametophyte in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66:99-112. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru396
  74. 74. Ni E, Zhou L, Li J, Jiang D, Wang Z, Zheng S, et al. OsCER1 plays a pivotal role in very-long-chain alkane biosynthesis and affects plastid development and programmed cell death of tapetum in rice (Oryza sativaL.). Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9:1217. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01217
  75. 75. Wang A, Xia Q, Xie W, Datla R, Selvaraj G. The classical Ubisch bodies carry a sporophytically produced structural protein (RAFTIN) that is essential for pollen development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:14487-14492. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2231254100
  76. 76. Singh M, Kumar M, Albertsen MC, Young JK, Cigan AM. Concurrent modifications in the three homeologs of Ms45 gene with CRISPR-Cas9 lead to rapid generation of male sterile bread wheat (Triticum aestivumL.). Plant Molecular Biology. 2018;97:371-383. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-018-0749-2
  77. 77. Singh M, Kumar M, Thilges K, Cho M-J, Cigan AM. MS26/CYP704B is required for anther and pollen wall development in bread wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) and combining mutations in all three homeologs causes male sterility. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0177632. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177632
  78. 78. Zhang D, Liang W, Yin C, Zong J, Gu F, Zhang D. OsC6, encoding a lipid transfer protein, is required for postmeiotic anther development in rice. Plant Physiology. 2010;154:149-162. DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.158865
  79. 79. Wan L, Zha W, Cheng X, Liu C, Lv L, Liu C, et al. A rice beta-1,3-glucanase gene Osg1 is required for callose degradation in pollen development. Planta. 2011;233:309-323. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-010-1301-z
  80. 80. Li L, Li Y, Song S, Deng H, Li N, Fu X, et al. An anther development F-box (ADF) protein regulated by tapetum degeneration retardation (TDR) controls rice anther development. Planta. 2015;241:157-166. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-014-2160-9
  81. 81. Sumiyoshi M, Inamura T, Nakamura A, Aohara T, Ishii T, Satoh S, et al. UDP-arabinopyranose mutase 3 is required for pollen wall morphogenesis in rice (Oryza sativa). Plant & Cell Physiology. 2015;56:232-241. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcu132
  82. 82. Zou T, Li S, Liu M, Wang T, Xiao Q, Chen D, et al. An atypical strictosidine synthase, OsSTRL2, plays key roles in anther development and pollen wall formation in rice. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:6863. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07064-4
  83. 83. Song S, Chen Y, Liu L, See YHB, Mao C, Gan Y, et al. OsFTIP7 determines auxin-mediated anther dehiscence in rice. Nature Plants. 2018;4:495-504. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-018-0175-0
  84. 84. Chen ZS, Liu XF, Wang DH, Chen R, Zhang XL, Xu ZH, et al. Transcription factor OsTGA10 is a target of the MADS protein OsMADS8 and is required for tapetum development. Plant Physiology. 2018;176:819-835. DOI: 10.1104/pp.17.01419
  85. 85. Zheng S, Li J, Ma L, Wang H, Zhou H, Ni E, et al. OsAGO2 controls ROS production and the initiation of tapetal PCD by epigenetically regulating OsHXK1 expression in rice anthers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019;116:7549-7558. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1817675116
  86. 86. Abe A, Kosugi S, Yoshida K, Natsume S, Takagi H, Kanzaki H, et al. Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nature Biotechnology. 2012;30:174-178. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2095
  87. 87. Chen Z, Yan W, Wang N, Zhang W, Xie G, Lu J, et al. Cloning of a rice male sterility gene by a modified MutMap method. Hereditas (Beijing). 2014;36:85-93
  88. 88. Gomez JF, Talle B, Wilson ZA. Anther and pollen development: A conserved developmental pathway. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2015;57:876-891. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12425
  89. 89. Ma H. Molecular genetic analyses of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in flowering plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2005;56:393-434. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141717
  90. 90. Shi J, Cui M, Yang L, Kim YJ, Zhang D. Genetic and biochemical mechanisms of pollen wall development. Trends in Plant Science. 2015;20:741-753. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.07.010
  91. 91. Wilson ZA, Zhang DB. From Arabidopsis to rice: Pathways in pollen development. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009;60:1479-1492. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp095
  92. 92. Zhang D, Luo X, Zhu L. Cytological analysis and genetic control of rice anther development. Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 2011;38:379-390. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2011.08.001
  93. 93. Fernández Gómez J, Wilson ZA. A barley PHD finger transcription factor that confers male sterility by affecting tapetal development. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2014;12:765-777. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12181
  94. 94. Tsuchiya T, Toriyama K, Nasrallah ME, Ejiri S. Isolation of genes abundantly expressed in rice anthers at the microspore stage. Plant Molecular Biology. 1992;20:1189-1193
  95. 95. Baulcombe D. RNA silencing in plants. Nature. 2004;431:356-363. DOI: 10.1038/nature02874
  96. 96. Svitashev S, Schwartz C, Lenderts B, Young JK, Mark Cigan A. Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nature Communications. 2016;7:13274. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13274
  97. 97. Zhang L, Luo H, Zhao Y, Chen X, Huang Y, Yan S, et al. Maize male sterile 33 encodes a putative glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase that mediates anther cuticle formation and microspore development. BMC Plant Biology. 2018;18:318. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1543-7
  98. 98. Higgins DG, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ. Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. Methods in Enzymology. 1996;266:383-402
  99. 99. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30:2725-2729. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst197
  100. 100. Kim YJ, Zhang D. Molecular control of male fertility for crop hybrid breeding. Trends in Plant Science. 2018;23:53-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.10.001
  101. 101. Feng PC, Qi Y, Chiu T, Stoecker MA, Schuster CL, Johnson SC, et al. Improving hybrid seed production in corn with glyphosate-mediated male sterility. Pest Management Science. 2014;70:212-218. DOI: 10.1002/ps.3526
  102. 102. Yang H, Qi Y, Goley ME, Huang J, Ivashuta S, Zhang Y, et al. Endogenous tassel-specific small RNAs-mediated RNA interference enables a novel glyphosate-inducible male sterility system for commercial production of hybrid seed inZea maysL. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0202921. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202921
  103. 103. Mariani C, De Beuckeleer M, Truettner J, Leemans J, Goldberg RB. Induction of male sterility in plants by a chimaeric ribonuclease gene. Nature. 1990;347:737-741
  104. 104. Mariani C, Gossele V, Beuckeleer MD, Block MD, Goldberg RB, Greef WD, et al. A chimaeric ribonuclease-inhibitor gene restores fertility to male sterile plants. Nature. 1992;357:384-387
  105. 105. Wan X, Xie K, Wu S, An X, Li J, Zhang D, et al. A strategy of maintaining and propagating male-sterile line based on Ms30 gene in maize. China Patent 201510300778.9; 2015
  106. 106. Wan X, Xie K, Wu S, Li J, An X, Zhang D, et al. A method of maintaining and propagating male-sterile line by using a multi-control sterility construct based on Ms7 gene in maize. China Patent 201510301333.2; 2015
  107. 107. De Block M, Debrouwer D, Moens T. The development of a nuclear male sterility system in wheat. Expression of the barnase gene under the control of tapetum specific promoters. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1997;95:125-131
  108. 108. Abe K, Oshima M, Akasaka M, Konagaya KI, Nanasato Y, Okuzaki A, et al. Development and characterization of transgenic dominant male sterile rice toward an outcross-based breeding system. Breeding Science. 2018;68:248-257. DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.17090
  109. 109. Shukla P, Singh NK, Gautam R, Ahmed I, Yadav D, Sharma A, et al. Molecular approaches for manipulating male sterility and strategies for fertility restoration in plants. Molecular Biotechnology. 2017;59:445-457. DOI: 10.1007/s12033-017-0027-6
  110. 110. USDA-APHIS. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Seed Production Technology (SPT) Process OECD Unique Identifier: DP-32138-1 Corn: Final Environmental Assessment. Riverdale, MD: United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service [Internet]. 2011. Available from:http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/08_33801p_fea.pdf
  111. 111. FSANZ. New Plant Breeding Techniques. Report of a Workshop hosted by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) [Internet]. 2012. Available from:http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/publications/Documents/New%20Plant%20Breeding%20Techniques%20Workshop%20Report.pdf
  112. 112. MHLW J. The outcome of the discussion on F1 hybrid seeds produced with the DuPont's Seed Production Technology (SPT) using DP-32138-1. Japan Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare [Internet]. 2013. Available from:http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/2r9852000002tccm-att/2r9852000002tck7.pdf

Written By

Xiangyuan Wan and Suowei Wu

Submitted: March 20th, 2019 Reviewed: May 21st, 2019 Published: June 14th, 2019