Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Nanopharmaceuticals: A Boon to the Brain-Targeted Drug Delivery

Written By

Mahira Zeeshan, Mahwash Mukhtar, Qurat Ul Ain, Salman Khan and Hussain Ali

Submitted: September 3rd, 2018 Reviewed: December 5th, 2018 Published: June 4th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.83040

Chapter metrics overview

1,753 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Brain is well known for its multifarious nature and complicated diseases. Brain consists of natural barriers that pose difficulty for the therapeutic agents to reach the brain tissues. Blood-brain barrier is the major barrier while blood-brain tumor barrier, blood-cerebrospinal (CSF) barrier and efflux pump impart additional hindrance. Therapeutic goal is to achieve a considerable drug concentration in the brain tissues in order to obtain desired therapeutic outcomes. To overcome the barriers, nanotechnology was employed in the field of drug delivery and brain targeting. Nanopharmaceuticals are rapidly emerging sub-branch that deals with the drug-loaded nanocarriers or nanomaterials that have unique physicochemical properties and minute size range for penetrating the CNS. Additionally, nanopharmaceuticals can be tailored with functional modalities to achieve active targeting to the brain tissues. The magic behind their therapeutic success is the reduced amount of dose and lesser toxicity, whereby localizing the therapeutic agent to the specific site. Different types of nanopharmaceuticals like polymeric, lipidic and amphiphilic nanocarriers were administered into the living organisms by exploiting different routes for improved targeted therapy. Therefore, it is essential to throw light on the properties, mechanism and delivery route of the major nanopharmaceuticals that are employed for the brain-specific drug delivery.

Keywords

  • nanocarriers
  • nanoparticles
  • nanopharmaceuticals
  • ligand
  • brain diseases
  • targeted drug delivery
  • nanomedicine
  • route of administration

1. Introduction

Brain besides being a fascinating organ is also known for its complexity. From outside, this delicate organ is protected by a bony structure called skull while internally it is sheltered from noxious substances via some complex barrier systems. These protective barriers impede the treatment strategies adopted for therapeutic purposes [1]. The management of CNS disorders such as dementia, epilepsy, panic disorders, meningitis, and brain tumors greatly depends on the means of attaining higher drug levels at the targeted sites. Physico-chemical properties of the drug molecule mainly dictate its ability to penetrate these barriers and achieve a therapeutic outcome. Thus the ultimate pharmacological response obtained by the potential drug depends on multiple factors like its effectiveness, its uptake or penetration through protective barriers or its ability to bind with specific carrier proteins for efficient transport across the membrane [2]. Among these barriers, blood-brain barrier (BBB) presents one of the types that hinder the transport of the medicinal compounds for treating brain ailments. BBB serves as both physical and transport barrier and is present at the interface of blood and brain. It is a tight junction made of microvascular endothelial cells, astrocytes, and pericytes [3]. Therefore, the development of newer therapeutic strategies is the need of the hour to overcome these transport hurdles.

1.1 Barriers in delivering drug to brain

1.1.1 The blood-brain barrier (BBB)

It is a tight physical junction present at the interface of CNS and blood circulation. It consists of endothelial cells that do not have fenestrations and thus restrict the influx of ions and other solutes into the brain from surrounding blood capillaries. Astrocytes and pericytes surround endothelial cells and thus make it almost an impermeable barrier. BBB allows paracellular transport of small lipophilic compounds (<400 Da) via passive diffusion. This barrier also offers active transport of some hydrophilic compounds by the means of transport proteins (e.g., P-glycoprotein) present at the junction. The transcellular pathway that is used by some compounds to enter the brain includes different mechanisms such as passive diffusion, specific transporters, and transcytosis [4].

1.1.2 Other barriers

Among the primary brain tumors, gliomas are considered the most common. These tumors make a barrier at their early stage termed as blood-brain tumor barrier (BBTB). Although BBTB is permeable at the core of glioblastomas, however, it closely resembles BBB at the peripheral regions. This combination of BBB and BBTB leads to an additional hindrance for drug delivery to reach the glioblastoma cells and thus requires newer drug development strategies to aid drug delivery to the tumor site [5].

Efflux pumps also serve as additional barriers in drug delivery to the brain that are present in endothelial cells lining. These efflux pumps are made up of protein complexes called adherens junctions primarily regulate the permeability of the endothelial barrier [6].

Blood-cerebrospinal fluid also acts as a barrier that limits the free movement of molecules and drug compounds across the brain by strictly regulating the transfer of solutes between the blood and CSF [7].

Advertisement

2. Drug delivery to brain: potential hurdles to overcome

Mainly lipophilic drugs are used to treat CNS ailments and possess a molecular weight below 400 Da and log P between −0.5 and 6.0 [8, 9]. For drugs that are ionized at physiologic pH, it is their unionized fraction that determines the concentration gradient across the BBB for passive diffusion [2]. By considering these facts, a drug should be designed in such a manner that it has optimal lipid solubility so that it penetrates BBB and maintains a therapeutic concentration in the brain. But this is not that simple because only increasing the lipophilicity of the drug molecule via certain chemical modifications may not attain the desired pharmacokinetic effects as it may lead to decreased systemic solubility and bioavailability. It may also have increased protein binding and higher uptake by liver and reticuloendothelial system which ultimately leads to increased metabolism thus leading to diminished active drug concentration at the target site [2]. There are certain drug molecules that penetrate the BBB besides what their lipid solubility suggest. This penetration is attributed to the carrier-mediated transport of these polar compounds present at the tight junctions [10].

Advertisement

3. Nanopharmaceuticals: an approach to achieve brain targeting

Brain targeting is potentially difficult because of multiple barriers. Recent advances in nanotechnology present opportunities to overcome such limitations and to deliver the drug to the brain targets. Nanopharmaceuticals are the relatively newer field that employed “therapeutic containing nanomaterial” with unique physicochemical properties due to their small size (one to several 100 nm), high surface to volume ratio and flexibility to alter their properties [11]. An alternate definition can be pharmaceuticals engineered on the nanoscale for the therapeutic purpose [12]. Nanopharmaceuticals comprised of different nanomaterial like polymers, lipids, amphiphilic material, metals, inorganic elements, carbon nanotubes, dendrimers, etc., to constitute nanocarriers which can be fabricated in different sizes, shapes, morphology, surface charges and surface groups for the brain-specific targeted delivery of the drug across barriers. Nanopharmaceuticals mediated drug delivery system has the power to penetrate drug moieties across CNS, either passively or actively, and improve bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy of the drug even at a lower concentration. Currently, available marketed nanopharmaceuticals for the brain are mentioned in Table 1.

RouteBrandNanocarrierIndicationManufacturer
SCCopaxoneGlatiramer acetateMultiple sclerosisTEVA
IVDepoCyt®Cytarabine encapsulated in multivesicular liposomes (20 μm)Lymphomatous malignant meningitisLeadiant Biosciences
Epidural space injectionDepoDur®Morphine sulfate encapsulated in multivesicular liposomes (17–23 μm)Chronic painPacira Pharmaceuticals
IVOpaxio®Paclitaxel covalently linked to SLNGlioblastomaCell Therapeutics
Intratumoral InjectionNanoTherm®Aminosilane-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide (15 nm) nanoparticlesLocal ablation in glioblastoma, prostate, and pancreatic cancerMagforce
OralAvinza®Morphine sulfate nanocrystalsPsychostimulantPfizer/King Pharma
OralFocalin
XR®
Dexmethylphenidate HCl nanocrystalsADHDNovartis
OralRitalin
LA®
Methylphenidate HCl nanocrystalsADHDNovartis
SC injectionPlegridy®Polymer-protein conjugate (PEGylated IFN Beta-1a)Multiple sclerosisBiogen
IM injectionInvega Sustenna®PaliperidoneSchizophreniaJanssen Pharms
IVAmBisome®Amphotericin B liposomeCryptococcal meningitisGilead Sciences, Inc.
IVAbelcet®Amphotericin B liposomeCryptococcal meningitisEnzon Pharma
IVDaunoXome®Daunorubicin liposomePediatric brain tumorsUnder Phase I trial
IVDoxil®/Caelyx®Doxorubicin HSPC, cholesterol, and DSPE-PEG2,000Glioblastoma and Pediatric brain tumorsPhase II
Phase II
IVMyocet®Doxorubicin EPC and cholesterolGlioblastomaPhase II
IVSGT-53 (SynerGene Therapeutics)Cationic liposome with anti-transferrin antibodyGlioblastomaPhase II
Cornell DotsSilica nanoparticles with a fluorophore, PEG-coatedMalignant brain tumors imagingPhase I

Table 1.

Marketed nanopharmaceuticals for brain disorders.

SC, subcutaneous; IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous; AHDH, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; IFN, interferon; DSPE, distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine; EPC, egg phosphatidylcholine; PEG, polyethylene glycol.

Advertisement

4. Nanopharmaceuticals: brain targeting mechanisms

Nanopharmaceuticals could able to breach blood-brain barriers through various mechanisms. On the simple edge, their smaller size leads to passive delivery of the drugs through transcellular route across brain’s epithelial cells or choroid plexus. Criteria for the simple passive diffusion across the barriers are molecular size less than 400 Da, low hydrogen bonding capacity and lipophilicity [13, 14]. Therefore, lipophilic and tailored nanocarriers could deliver the drug through this mechanism.

While extremely hydrophobic molecules like nutrients (glucose and amino acids) pass through active diffusion mechanism with the aid of special transporter proteins. On the other hand, hydrophilic and larger molecules like transferrin and insulin pass through receptor-mediated transport across the membrane [15]. BBB majorly comprised of the endothelial layer which possessed tight junctions; the presence of proteins, namely occludins, claudins and adhesion molecules in the tight junction, make it a tougher barrier [16].

Nanopharmaceuticals are custom-made to surpass the brain barriers through these mechanisms:

  • Lipophilic nanocarriers (liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles SLN) fuse with the endothelial cells and transport the drug through the transcellular pathway or endocytosis. Moreover, nanoparticles provide a sustained drug release pattern in the bloodstream, enabling higher drug concentration to cross BBB [17].

  • Furthermore, nanoparticles are functionalized with ligands or specific surfaces to trigger receptor-mediated transcytosis or carrier-mediated transport across BBB. Attachment of ligands like lactoferrin, transferrin, insulin facilitated receptor-mediated transport. Cationized ligands and peptides like albumin cross through receptor-mediated absorptive transport. Nanoparticles surface can be modified to utilize active transport system comprising P-glycoproteins, L-transporters, nucleoside transporter, ionic transporter, multidrug-resistant proteins that transfer the molecules into the brain by consuming adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [17]

Liposomes have been extensively studied and even FDA approved nanocarrier for brain disorders. Surface modulation of liposomes with functional proteins, peptides and polyethers aided targeted drug delivery for brain diseases [18]. PEGylated liposomes and glutathione-PEGylated liposomes evade body’s reticuloendothelial system and facilitate enhanced drug uptake across BBB [19]. Moreover, transferrin-modified liposomes [20], TAT peptide-conjugated liposomes [21], glucose-modified liposomes [22], and transferrin-folate bound liposome effectively deliver the drug across the barrier to treat multiple sclerosis [23]. Similarly, transferrin bound SLN and thiamine coated SLN were found to be efficacious in the treatment of cerebral malaria and increased drug uptake in the brain [24]. Mechanisms of transport across BBB are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Different pathways for nanopharmaceuticals mediated transport across the blood-brain barrier (Under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) [96].

Polymeric nanoparticles accumulate in the brain tissue by both passive and active mechanisms. Chitosan-poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles showed enhanced delivery of coenzyme Q to the brain of transgenic mice through absorption mediated endocytosis [25]. In another study, PLGA was coupled with Tet-1 peptide to achieve neuronal targeting of curcumin in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Retrograde transportation of curcumin across the barriers destroyed amyloid aggregates and scavenges oxidative radicals in the brain [26]. Similarly, ligand attached polymeric-lipidic nanoparticles like nerve growth factor (NGF) loaded poly butyl cyanoacrylate (PBCA) liposomes considerably deliver the drug across the BBB cholinergic system in the amnesic rodent model [27]. Likewise, inorganic nanocarriers show promising outcomes in terms of brain targeting. Amine functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes adopted transcytosis mechanism to pass BBB [28]. A natural substance wheat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxide (WGA-hrp) was conjugated to gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and administered in the IM injection into the mice. Results were remarkable in terms of drug penetration across BBB [29].

Dendrimers are the excellent drug carriers; their surface functionalization with folic acid, peptides, aptamers, amino acids, biotin, antibodies facilitated more site-specific targeting. To penetrate CNS barriers, dendrimers were conjugated with transferrin, lactoferrin, D-glucosamine, and leptin for more effective brain drug delivery [30].

Some other nanoparticulate systems like nanoemulsion and nanogel can be functionalized with targeting moieties (transferrin, insulin, peptides) for CNS drug delivery. Nanogels made up of PEG-polyethylenimine (PEI) and N-vinylpyrrolidone/isopropyl acrylamide have been tested to ensure CNS drug delivery potential [30].

Advertisement

5. Nanopharmaceuticals classification on the basis of routes of administration

BBB mediated drug uptake restrictions prompt scientists to investigate drug delivery potential of the nanopharmaceuticals to the brain through various routes. The ultimate objective was to enhance drug penetration across BBB and to reduce disease index. Up till now, the most commonly employed route was systemic administration through Intravenous (IV) injection. Other natural routes like oral, intranasal (IN), intrathecal (IT), intraperitoneal (IP) have been used as well. Some novel strategies like cerebral devices, implants, Ultrasound-guided nanoparticle delivery, osmotic delivery gain much attention in the recent era. Different nanopharmaceuticals are illustrated in Figure 2. List of all nanopharmaceuticals delivered through different routes have been mentioned in Table 2.

Figure 2.

Nanopharmaceuticals classification on the basis of route and nanocarriers.

RouteDrugParticle sizeNano componentActive ligandIndicationReferences
OralDalargin~100 nmpoly (butylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticleTween 80-PEG 20000Analgesic effect[33]
OralIndomethacin~320 nmLipidic corepoly (ε-caprolactone) coatGlioblastoma treatment[31]
OralSaquinavir100–200 nmpolyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), Lipoid-80 and deoxycholic acidIncrease oral bioavailability and brain distribution[32]
OralEstradiol138.8 ± 4.3 nmpolylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) nanoparticlesTween 80 coatedAlzheimer’s disease treatment[34]
Intraperitoneal (IP)None220 ± 35 nmIron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticlescoated with a carbon shell derived from glucoseBrain cells localization[36]
Intranasal (IN)Bromocriptine161.3 ± 4.7 nmChitosan nanoparticleParkinson’s disesase[48]
INClonazepam15 ± 10 nmMicroemulsionIncrease brain/blood uptake ratio[52]
INNimodipine30.3 ± 5.3 nmMicroemulsionHigh brain uptake[53]
INRisperidone15.5 nm-nanoemulsion; 16.7 nm-mucoadhesive nanoemulsionNanoemulsion; mucoadhesive nanoemulsionSchizophrenia treatment[54]
INDiadanosine-dideoxyinosine (dd)269–382 nmChitosan nanoparticlesIncrease brain/plasm, CSF/plasma ratio[12]
INRivastigmine143.1 to 3300 nmChitosan nanoparticleAlzheimer’s disease[50]
INVenlafaxine167 ± 6.5 nmChitosan nanoparticlesMajor depressive disorders and anxiety disorder[51]
INDuloxetine137.2 ± 2.88 nmNanostructured lipid carriersBehaviorial improvement in major depressive disorder[55]
INCoumarin100 to 600 nmmethoxy-PEG-polycaprlactoneEnhanced brain penetration[58]
INVasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)90–100 nmPEG-PLA nanoparticles (NP)Protein translocation across BBB[79]
INSumatriptan23.1 ± 0.4 nmMiceller nanocarrierMigraine therapy[56]
INZolmitriptan23 nmMiceller nanocarrierMigraine therapy[57]
INFITC labeled5 nmAuNPFITCBrain specific delivery[80]
Intravenous (IV)AzidothymidineTransferrin anchored PEG nanoparticlesViral infection[81]
IVValproic acidNanoparticlesEpilepsy[82]
IVTacrine35.58 ± 4.64 nmPBCA NPsAlzheimer’s disease[83]
IVCabazitaxel24–68 nmPEG modified Cellulose (Cellax) NPsGlioblastoma[84]
IV and intratumoralDocetaxel/SiRNA110–150 nmPeptide modified Cationic liposomesGlioma[85]
IV/IntranasalCatalase9.5 nmExosomesParkinsonism[86]
IVHCFU50 nmNanogelsGlioma[87]
IV (MRI)Curcumin<100 nmMagnetic NPsDetection of amyloid plexus in Alzheimer’s[88]
IVSunitinib/anti-miR-21 oligonucleotide<190 nmNPsGlioblastoma[89]
IVMonocolonal antibody (OX26)300–600 nmPEG-chitosan NPsCerebral ischemia[90]
Focused ultrasound+IVFE3O4/SPAnHNanoparticlesMalignant glioma[91]
Convection-enhanced deliveryCPT-1196–101 nmLiposomesIntracranial tumor[92]
IntrathecalFasudil100 nmLiposomesSubarachnoid hemorrhage[93]
IntracranialPaclitaxel3 mmNanoscale PLGA implantsIntracranial glioblastoma[94]
Neural probesDexamethasone400–600 nmPLGA nanoparticles in alginate hydrogelGlial inflammation[95]

Table 2.

Nanopharmaceuticals administration through various routes.

PEG, polyethylene glycol; PLA, polylactic acid; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; SPAnH, poly[aniline-c-sodium N-(1-one-butyric acid)] aniline; PBCA, poly(n-butyl cyanoacrylate); HCFU, N-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil.

5.1 Oral administration

The oral route is the most convenient, non-invasive and compliant mode of administration. However, brain targeting through the oral route was not investigated largely mainly due to indirect systemic entry through absorption from the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Harsh GIT environment, slow onset of action, shorter half-life, first pass elimination and reduced systemic absorption hampered drug therapeutic efficacy and bioavailability. Thus, oral drug delivery failed to deliver the therapeutic moiety to the brain efficiently. In this regard, nanopharmaceuticals must possess the properties to bear harsh enzymatic environment, overcome first pass metabolism and efficiently permeate through the intestinal epithelial barrier to reach the systemic circulation.

Scientists developed lipid nanocore surrounded by poly (e-caprolactone) and orally administered to the mice. The concentration of the loaded drug, indomethacin, was successively increased in the brain and efficiently treat glioblastoma in the mice model without causing BBB vessel alteration. This could serve as a basis for safe and effective brain targeting via oral route [31].

Similarly, orally administered saquinavir-loaded nanoemulsion significantly delivers the drug across BBB. Nanoemulsion was stabilized by deoxycholic acid which overpasses first-pass elimination of the drug. The oily phase, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) facilitates rapid transport to the brain. It laid the foundation for effective brain targeting through oral route [32].

Researchers formulated poly (butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles, double coated with Tween 80 and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-2000 for the oral delivery of the dalargin to the brain. Dalargin is a hexapeptide, anti-nociceptive agent which could not cross BBB. However, its nanoformulation showed promising analgesic effects in the mice model, which demonstrated the potential of the nanoformulation for brain targeting via oral route [33].

Orally administered Tween 80 coated PLGA deliver estradiol successfully to the brain. The therapeutic efficacy in elevating Alzheimer’s disease was parallel to the nanoformulation administered intramuscularly [34]. In short, oral delivery of drug-loaded nanopharmaceuticals achieved preliminary success but still need to be further explored in the near future.

5.2 Intraperitoneal administration (IP)

Intraperitoneal administration involved peritoneal cavity of the abdomen. The route is still under investigation. It has an advantage of delivering a larger amount of the drug and it is employed when a vein for the IV injection is not easily located. In addition, it can be employed when animals are not ready for oral administration. However, the route is currently limited to pre-clinical research in small animals and need to be scaled up [35].

Iron oxide nanoparticles were fabricated with the aim to target subcellular compartment of the brain cells. For this purpose, iron oxide nanoparticles with different shapes (round, biconcave, spindle, nanotube) were synthesized and coated with glucose derived fluorescent carbon layer. In-vivo administration through IP route indicated biconcave nanoparticles localized in the nuclei and nanotube-shaped nanoparticles located in the cytoplasm of the brain cells. While the carbon coated surface on iron oxide nanoparticles facilitated attachment of several therapeutic moieties on the nanoparticles for their delivery inside the brain cells [36]. Therefore, the IP route could serve as a major route to deliver the drug across the brain barriers.

5.3 Intravenous administration (IV)

Systemic route including IV drug delivery to the brain involves the receptor-mediated and adsorptive mediated transcytosis. It is the most exploited route of administration for the nanoparticles because of the immediate action systemically and locally by targeted delivery. Polybutyl cyanoacrylate (PBCA) was first used for the synthesis of the NPs intended for the brain. Analgesic dalargin was incorporated in the PBCA NPs with Polysorbate 80 coating and a marked level of analgesia was seen in the animal studies after IV administration of the NPs [37]. PBCA NPs with doxorubicin coated with Polysorbate 80 were studied for their brain delivery in the rats and showed the promising result in 2–4 hours as compared to the uncoated NPs after IV drug delivery [38]. In a similar study, Polysorbate 80 coated PBCA NPs with a size of 280 nm were evaluated for the delivery of Loperamide across BBB following IV injection. Results were quite promising in the in-vivo nociceptive studies on mice [39]. Musumeci et al. prepared the docetaxel loaded nanospheres using PLGA and observed the biphasic release of drug following IV administration. An in vitro study using a biomembrane model made of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) was conducted and confirmed the significant release of the drug across the membrane, making it a potent drug delivery approach for crossing BBB [40]. An in vitro study was conducted on brain endothelial cell lines and glioma cells using nanocarrier system made with PLGA/PLA and a detailed sketch of cellular uptake, cytotoxicity and therapeutic efficiency were obtained. Furthermore, the animal studies confirmed the uptake of NPs in the brain following IV administration [41]. In one study, male Sprague Dawley rats were used for establishing the efficacy of curcumin as an anticancer drug with neuroprotective properties. The study group demonstrated that how the nanoparticles can increase the circulation time of curcumin in the body and penetration across the BBB, especially the distribution of NPs in the hippocampus. Half-life and mean residence time of curcumin increased after IV administration of NPs across the BBB [42]. Liu et al. demonstrated the effect of breviscapine loaded PLA NPs in rats after IV administration. NPs with an average particle size of 319 nm were distributed in the liver, spleen and brain. The prepared NPs had longer circulation life because they evaded the RES and crossed BBB [43]. Poly (alkyl cyanoacrylate) NPs can deliver several drugs like loperamide, doxorubicin, tubocurarine, etc., across the brain based on the principle of LDL receptor mediate endocytosis after injection of these NPs into the blood by IV administration. Prior to in vivo studies, these NPs were coated with surfactants like Poloxamers and Tween for the enhanced drug uptake by brain blood capillaries [44]. Some of the latest techniques of treating brain disorders include delivery of neurogenic genes, mRNA and siRNA. One such study was reported by Son et al. for the delivery of rabies virus glycoprotein (RVG) labeled disulfide containing polyethyleneimine (PEI) nanomaterial to the brain. In vivo studies revealed promising data after the infusion of RVG peptide linked nanomaterial in 6 weeks old male BALB/c mice. [45] MRI-driven targeting of the brain using iron oxide NPs of around 100 nm was reported by the group of researchers. Mice were injected with the NPs suspension and were kept in the magnetic field for 30 minutes. There was 5-folds increase in the accumulation of NPs in the glioma cells in the presence of a magnetic field as compared to undirected NPs following IV administration. This approach can be used as a non-invasive therapeutic and diagnostic tool in the various dimensions of health [46]. However, the associated issues like rapid body clearance through the reticuloendothelial system and unintended organ distribution must be overcome for appropriate brain-specific drug delivery.

5.4 Intranasal administration (IN)

Recently, intranasal (IN) route for the drug delivery to the brain proved to be a reliable and non-invasive mode to cross BBB while possessing the ability to deliver a wide range of drug moieties like smaller molecules, larger macromolecules, growth factors, viral vectors and even stem cells to the brain. The transport involves either olfactory or trigeminal nerve which has a direct link from the brain and terminated in the nasal cavity at respiratory epithelium or olfactory neuroepithelium [47]. The nasal mucosa is the target tissue for the drug administration and possessed features like a larger surface area, porous endothelial membrane, huge blood flow, the absence of first-pass elimination and readily accessible. Olfactory region of nasal mucosa provide nose to brain targeting feature and could able to treat various CNS disorders like depression, pain, Alzheimer’s disease, glioblastoma, multiple sclerosis etc. Several dosage forms, sprays, suspensions, nebulizers, aerosols, gel, solutions can be utilized for IN drug delivery [47]. On the other hand, barriers like mucociliary clearance from nasal mucosa, enzymatic degradation and low degree of permeability across nasal epithelium hinder the drug targeting efficiency to the brain. As a solution, nanopharmaceuticals were used which overcome the clearance and other nasal problems due to their unique nature.

One of the studies demonstrated IN administration of chitosan nanoparticle to deliver bromocriptine, a dopaminergic agonist, to minimize motor function disorder associated with prolonged levodopa usage in the Parkinson’s disease. Results were promising in terms of motor function [48]. Didanosine-dideoxyinosine (ddI) is an antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and available in oral dosage forms, however, faced extensive degradation and elimination in GIT which decreases its bioavailability. To overcome the issues, dd loaded chitosan nanoparticles were administered through IN route. Results indicated higher brain to plasma, CSF to plasma and olfactory blood to plasma ratios in the case of IN delivered dd nanoparticles. It shows that nanoformulation can be directly delivered to the brain compartment through IN route [49].

Another research group fabricated rivastigmine loaded chitosan nanoparticle for inhibiting acetylcholinesterase in the brain through IN administration. The free drug had severe bioavailability issues and distributed to the non-targeted site with severe side effects when administered through oral or IV route. Here, chitosan nanocarrier and administration through nasal route enhanced brain uptake with higher brain/blood ratio. It further highlighted the role of nanocarrier and route in brain targeting [50]. Similarly, Venlafaxine (VLF) chitosan nanoparticles were administered to the brain through the nasal route for the treatment of major depressive disorders and anxiety disorder with improved brain uptake and enhanced bioavailability [51].

Another study showed microemulsion and mucoadhesive delivering clonazepam, an anxiolytic, sedative, hypnotic, anticonvulsant drug to the brain. The brain/blood uptake ratio of the intranasal microemulsion and mucoadhesive microemulsion were significantly higher than the IV administered microemulsion, indicating the effectiveness of IN route for brain-specific drug delivery [52]. Similarly, the microemulsion was used for the IN delivery of nimodipine to the brain cells. The microemulsion leads to 3-fold more drug uptake by the olfactory bulb than the IV route. AUC ratio of brain to plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to plasma were higher after IN administration in comparison to IV injection. Thus, it could be a promising approach to treat neurodegenerative disorders [53]. Risperidone nanoemulsion and mucoadhesive nanoemulsion were administered through IN route for the treatment of schizophrenia. The composition of nanoemulsion included glyceryl monocaprylate as an oily phase, tween 80 as a surfactant and mixture of propylene glycol and transcutol as a co-surfactant. While mucoadhesive microemulsion had chitosan polymer which induces mucoadhesive properties. The nanoemulsion and mucoadhesive nanoemulsion improved risperidone bioavailability, prevent first pass metabolism and bypass BBB to achieve desired drug concentration at the targeted site. The brain/blood uptake ratio and drug transport efficiency were found to be significantly higher through nasal administration in comparison to the IV injection [54].

Furthermore, nanostructured lipid carriers comprising duloxetine was prepared and delivered to the brain via IN route for the treatment of the major depressive disorder. The results revealed prolonged drug release and therapeutic effect as demonstrated from improved behavior analysis after 24 hours [55].

Furthermore, micellar nanocarrier (amphiphilic nanocarriers) of sumatriptan was developed to treat an acute migraine to improve cerebral blood flow. Limitations of the drug associated with oral dosage forms and subcutaneous administration like poor bioavailability, shorter plasma half-life, and hepatic elimination have been resolved to much extent through incorporation in micellar nanocarrier. And increased brain concentration of the drug and site-retention can be achieved via nose to brain drug delivery [56]. Similarly, zolmitriptan-loaded micellar nanocarriers were prepared to target brain serotonin receptors and inhibit cranial vessel inflammation. Micellar nanocarriers were administered through nasal route with enhanced characteristics like lower particle size, higher permeation across nasal mucosa, appropriate flow rate, ability to load hydrophilic as well as hydrophobic drugs, enhanced site-retention and ultimately enhanced drug therapeutic activity [57].

Another polymer methoxy-PEG-polycaprolactone was used to encapsulate coumarin with promising brain penetration and myelin binding properties, while administered through nasal route [58]. Bioadhesive nanocarriers reported in the above studies overcome many hurdles associated with a nasal route like protection of drug against enzymatic degradation, enhanced permeability, and avoidance of mucociliary clearance. However, IN delivery of nanopharmaceuticals should be further improved with targeting moieties and incorporation of cost-effective approach.

Advertisement

6. Alternate routes and strategies

6.1 Conventional enhanced delivery (CED)

Potential brain barriers can be by-passed by injecting the drug directly into the tissues using catheter. Such a direct delivery of therapeutic agent to the target site is termed as conventional enhanced delivery (CED). Many pre-clinical studies adapted CED to infuse nano-formulations directly into the brain [59]. C57BL/6 J mice were used to infuse a 10 μL solution of lipid nanocapsules (LNCs) having an average size of 70 nm into their skull at an infusion rate of 0.5 μL/min [60]. An alternate method for direct infusion was also reported in which drug-loaded micelles were injected by making small incisions on the skull. A foremost shortcoming CED technique is its invasiveness which requires high anesthetic doses prior to incisions, which resulted in the death of the experimental rats [61]. This technique also requires the optimization of certain factors like pH and osmolarity to surpass any brain damage [62].

6.2 Intracarotid delivery

Administering the drug into the carotid artery provides an alternative solution to direct delivery. This direct systemic delivery requires a catheter to directly inject drugs into the bloodstream. In a study, the efficacy of direct systemic delivery was reported almost twice to that of CED in terms of brain damage [63]. IV route is also used to deliver the drug directly into systemic circulation. Ferrociphenol-loaded lipid nanoparticles were infused to manage glioma via the IV route. The outcomes showed that mean survival of the rats was 28 days while mean survival rate recorded foe CED was of 24 days [62, 64].

6.3 Intratumor delivery

Polylactic acid (PLA) and poly-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (PDMAEMA) were used to synthesize amphiphilic star-branched co-polymeric nanoparticles for intratumor delivery of the drugs for treating brain tumors. In a study, this system was used to deliver combined DOX and miR-21 inhibitor (miR-21i) into LN229 glioma cells directly. These micelles protected miR-21i from lysosome degradation and the release of DOX to the nucleus, which ultimately decreased the miR-21 expression. This combined DOX and miR-21i delivery surprisingly displayed an anti-proliferative efficiency compared with separate treatment of DOX or the miR-21. The outcomes revealed that this co-polymeric system was a better option for delivering genes and hydrophobic therapeutic agents [65].

6.4 Other parenteral routes

Delivering the drug directly into the brain is another way of treating brain disorders. This local drug delivery has been approved by the US FDA [66]. Intrathecal administration of nanopharmaceuticals delivers the nano-drugs in the CSF. However, this route of administration is most commonly used for anesthetics and neurotic pain [67]. This route is under experimental phases in humans. It includes two different ways of delivering the therapeutic moiety, either by infusion in the intralumbar region or intraventricularly using an Ommaya reservoir placed subcutaneously and connected to the brain with a catheter [68]. Thioflavin-T was delivered by intrahippocampal injection for targeting the β amyloid in the brain using the nanoparticles. The data reported localization of thioflavin-T in the intracellular and extracellular spaces of the brain, which prevented the formation of β-amyloid aggregates in the Alzheimer’s disease. This same method can be adapted to deliver the anticancerous drugs as well as other analgesic peptides [69]. In an in situ perfusion study conducted on mice, Polysorbate 80 coated PBCA NPs loaded with the tubocurarine were able to cross the BBB after intraventricular drug administration. There was a marked effect on the EEG epileptiform spikes [70]. Intraarterial drug delivery has an advantage over the other conventional systems of drug delivery because of the increased dose delivery at the desired site of the brain. This route can also be exploited for the immun0-targeting. However, this route has some limitations like a dilution of the drug because of cerebral blood flow [71].

6.5 Ultrasound guided drug delivery

Ultrasound facilitated drug penetration through brain barriers is yet another option for safe and reversible targeted drug delivery [72]. In this technique, ultrasound radiations are employed to generate shear stress on the vascular endothelium for a transient and reversible perforation in the BBB which facilitates the nanoscaled drug delivery to the targeted site. It appeared in a research outcome that docosahexaenoic acid binding with low-density lipoprotein NPs can penetrate the BBB by the application of ultrasound sonication. A near IR fluorescent dye examination revealed about 60 times greater accumulation of sonication facilitated drug delivery to the targeted site. The main advantage reported was lack of cytotoxicity or neuronal damage due to pointed ultrasound irradiation [73]. PEGylated PLA nanoparticles delivery to the brain was facilitated via ultrasound-induced perforation. β-specific antibody 6E10 was conjugated on PEG-PLA along with the coumarin 6 and DiR as fluorescent probes to assess the target site accumulation. Ultrasonication facilitated NPs penetration was about 2.5-fold more than the complementary non-sonicating therapy [74]. Ultrasound techniques can be used to aid the enhanced delivery of PEG-b-poly(l-Lysine) coupled with siRNA into glioma cells by 10-fold in conjunction with a newer gas-cored nanobubble [75].

Advertisement

7. Future prospects for nanopharmaceuticals delivery

Another targeted approach to the brain for delivering drugs is through the ocular route. The ocular route has so many advantages like reduced peripheral toxicity and direct delivery of therapeutic moiety in the target site [76]. Ocular and intranasal drug delivery for the brain was compared by a group, in which nerve growth factor (NGF) was used for treating Alzheimer’s disease. However, it was found out that intranasal drug administration was more effective and potent for brain disorders and ocular route did not perform well. However, many scientists are working for making the ocular route a success because of it being the compliant and non-invasive route [77]. There has been a huge room for the administration of nanocarrier through ocular route to the brain. Nanocarrier can facilitate drug delivery to the brain because of their size, site-retention properties and enhanced adhesion to the lacrimal fluid. The route can be exploited for the delivery of drugs and genes to CNS by avoiding systemic exposure via nanopharmaceuticals [78].

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

Brain-targeted drug delivery is a difficult matter due to anatomic and pathophysiological brain barriers. The current advances in nanotechnology provide a solution in the form of nanopharmaceuticals, drug containing nanocarriers, to cross the CNS barriers and to target the brain tissue in various disorders. Nanopharmaceuticals’ mode of administration into the body is an important aspect, which ultimately effects drug concentration in the brain and drug therapeutic effect. Current chapter highlighted the routes of administration through which nanopharmaceuticals can be delivered to reach the brain. Every route has pros and cons, nanopharmaceuticals overcome the route associated limitations in the delivery of drug to the brain due to their peculiar physicochemical properties and surface modulation. Translation this research area into the clinic still require investigations, as safety is the foremost concern and distribution to other body organs must be eradicated. Moreover, there is a need to control the drug delivery rate when nanopharmaceuticals reach the brain for safer action.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Dong X. Current strategies for brain drug delivery. Theranostics. 2018;8:1481
  2. 2. Begley DJ. Delivery of therapeutic agents to the central nervous system: The problems and the possibilities. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2004;104:29-45
  3. 3. Sharma U, Badyal PN, Gupta S. Polymeric nanoparticles drug delivery to brain: A review. International Journal of Pharmacology. 2015;2:60-69
  4. 4. Pehlivan SB. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for targeting, imaging and diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmaceutical Research. 2013;30:2499-2511
  5. 5. Van Tellingen O et al. Overcoming the blood–brain tumor barrier for effective glioblastoma treatment. Drug Resistance Updates. 2015;19:1-12
  6. 6. Komarova YA et al. Protein interactions at endothelial junctions and signaling mechanisms regulating endothelial permeability. Circulation Research. 2017;120:179-206
  7. 7. Bhaskar S et al. Multifunctional nanocarriers for diagnostics, drug delivery and targeted treatment across blood-brain barrier: Perspectives on tracking and neuroimaging. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2010;7:3
  8. 8. Bodor N, Buchwald P. Brain-targeted drug delivery. American Journal of Drug Delivery. 2003;1:13-26
  9. 9. Levin VA. Relationship of octanol/water partition coefficient and molecular weight to rat brain capillary permeability. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1980;23:682-684
  10. 10. Begley DJ, Brightman MW. Structural and functional aspects of the blood-brain barrier. In: Prokai L, Prokai-Tatrai K, editors. Peptide Transport and Delivery into the Central Nervous System. Basel: Birkhäuser, Progress in Drug Research. 2003;61:39-48
  11. 11. Bawa R. Nanopharmaceuticals: Nanopharmaceuticals. European Journal of Nanomedicine. 2010;3:34-40
  12. 12. Weissig V, Pettinger TK, Murdock N. Nanopharmaceuticals (part 1): Products on the market. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2014;9:4357
  13. 13. Lipinski CA et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 1997;23:3-25
  14. 14. Lu C-T et al. Current approaches to enhance CNS delivery of drugs across the brain barriers. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2014;9:2241
  15. 15. Jain KK. Nanobiotechnology-based strategies for crossing the blood-brain barrier. Nanomedicine. 2012;7:1225-1233
  16. 16. Wolburg H, Lippoldt A. Tight junctions of the blood-brain barrier: Development, composition and regulation. Vascular Pharmacology. 2002;38:323-337
  17. 17. Saraiva C et al. Nanoparticle-mediated brain drug delivery: Overcoming blood–brain barrier to treat neurodegenerative diseases. Journal of Controlled Release. 2016;235:34-47
  18. 18. Micheli M-R et al. Lipid-based nanocarriers for CNS-targeted drug delivery. Recent Patents on CNS Drug Discovery. 2012;7:71-86
  19. 19. Rip J et al. Glutathione PEGylated liposomes: Pharmacokinetics and delivery of cargo across the blood–brain barrier in rats. Journal of Drug Targeting. 2014;22:460-467
  20. 20. Koshkaryev A, Piroyan A, Torchilin VP. Increased apoptosis in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo by ceramides in transferrin-modified liposomes. Cancer Biology & Therapy. 2012;13:50-60
  21. 21. Wang Y et al. Preparation and evaluation of lidocaine hydrochloride-loaded TAT-conjugated polymeric liposomes for transdermal delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2013;441:748-756
  22. 22. Xie F et al. Investigation of glucose-modified liposomes using polyethylene glycols with different chain lengths as the linkers for brain targeting. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2012;7:163
  23. 23. Niu R et al. Preparation, characterization, and antitumor activity of paclitaxel-loaded folic acid modified and TAT peptide conjugated PEGylated polymeric liposomes. Journal of Drug Targeting. 2011;19:373-381
  24. 24. Gupta Y, Jain A, Jain SK. Transferrin-conjugated solid lipid nanoparticles for enhanced delivery of quinine dihydrochloride to the brain. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2007;59:935-940
  25. 25. Wang ZH et al. Trimethylated chitosan-conjugated PLGA nanoparticles for the delivery of drugs to the brain. Biomaterials. 2010;31:908-915
  26. 26. Mathew A et al. Curcumin loaded-PLGA nanoparticles conjugated with Tet-1 peptide for potential use in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32616
  27. 27. Kurakhmaeva KB et al. Brain targeting of nerve growth factor using poly (butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. Journal of Drug Targeting. 2009;17:564-574
  28. 28. Kafa H et al. The interaction of carbon nanotubes with an in vitro blood-brain barrier model and mouse brain in vivo. Biomaterials. 2015;53:437-452
  29. 29. Zhang Y et al. Transporter protein and drug-conjugated gold nanoparticles capable of bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:25794
  30. 30. Ghalamfarsa G et al. Application of nanomedicine for crossing the blood–brain barrier: Theranostic opportunities in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Immunotoxicology. 2016;13:603-619
  31. 31. Rodrigues SF et al. Lipid-core nanocapsules act as a drug shuttle through the blood brain barrier and reduce glioblastoma after intravenous or oral administration. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. 2016;12:986-1000
  32. 32. Vyas TK, Shahiwala A, Amiji MM. Improved oral bioavailability and brain transport of Saquinavir upon administration in novel nanoemulsion formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2008;347:93-101
  33. 33. Das D, Lin S. Double-coated poly (butylcynanoacrylate) nanoparticulate delivery systems for brain targeting of dalargin via oral administration. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2005;94:1343-1353
  34. 34. Mittal G et al. Development and evaluation of polymer nanoparticles for oral delivery of estradiol to rat brain in a model of Alzheimer’s pathology. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011;150:220-228
  35. 35. Mujokoro B et al. Nano-structures mediated co-delivery of therapeutic agents for glioblastoma treatment: A review. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2016;69:1092-1102
  36. 36. Chaturbedy P et al. Shape-directed compartmentalized delivery of a nanoparticle-conjugated small-molecule activator of an epigenetic enzyme in the brain. Journal of Controlled Release. 2015;217:151-159
  37. 37. Kreuter J et al. Passage of peptides through the blood-brain barrier with colloidal polymer particles (nanoparticles). Brain Research. 1995;674:171-174
  38. 38. Gulyaev AE et al. Significant transport of doxorubicin into the brain with polysorbate 80-coated nanoparticles. Pharmaceutical Research. 1999;16:1564-1569
  39. 39. Alyautdin RN et al. Delivery of loperamide across the blood-brain barrier with polysorbate 80-coated polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles. Pharmaceutical Research. 1997;14:325-328
  40. 40. Musumeci T et al. PLA/PLGA nanoparticles for sustained release of docetaxel. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2006;325:172-179
  41. 41. Li J, Sabliov C. PLA/PLGA nanoparticles for delivery of drugs across the blood-brain barrier. Nanotechnology Reviews. 2013;2:241-257
  42. 42. Tsai Y-M et al. Curcumin and its nano-formulation: The kinetics of tissue distribution and blood-brain barrier penetration. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2011;416:331-338
  43. 43. Liu M et al. Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of surface modification polymeric nanoparticles. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2008;31:547-554
  44. 44. Kreuter J. Influence of the surface properties on nanoparticle-mediated transport of drugs to the brain. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2004;4:484-488
  45. 45. Son S et al. A brain-targeted rabies virus glycoprotein-disulfide linked PEI nanocarrier for delivery of neurogenic microRNA. Biomaterials. 2011;32:4968-4975
  46. 46. Chertok B et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles as a drug delivery vehicle for MRI monitored magnetic targeting of brain tumors. Biomaterials. 2008;29:487-496
  47. 47. Mittal D et al. Insights into direct nose to brain delivery: Current status and future perspective. Drug Delivery. 2014;21:75-86
  48. 48. Md S et al. Bromocriptine loaded chitosan nanoparticles intended for direct nose to brain delivery: Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and scintigraphy study in mice model. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013;48:393-405
  49. 49. Al-Ghananeem AM et al. Intranasal drug delivery of didanosine-loaded chitosan nanoparticles for brain targeting; an attractive route against infections caused by AIDS viruses. Journal of Drug Targeting. 2010;18:381-388
  50. 50. Fazil M et al. Development and evaluation of rivastigmine loaded chitosan nanoparticles for brain targeting. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2012;47:6-15
  51. 51. Haque S et al. Venlafaxine loaded chitosan NPs for brain targeting: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012;89:72-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.051
  52. 52. Vyas TK et al. Preliminary brain-targeting studies on intranasal mucoadhesive microemulsions of sumatriptan. AAPS PharmSci Tech Journal. 2006;7:E49-E57. DOI: 10.1208/pt070108
  53. 53. Zhang Q et al. Preparation of nimodipine-loaded microemulsion for intranasal delivery and evaluation on the targeting efficiency to the brain. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2004;275:85-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.01.039
  54. 54. Kumar M et al. Intranasal nanoemulsion based brain targeting drug delivery system of risperidone. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2008;358:285-291. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.03.029
  55. 55. Alam MI et al. Intranasal administration of nanostructured lipid carriers containing CNS acting drug: Pharmacodynamic studies and estimation in blood and brain. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2012;46:1133-1138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.05.014
  56. 56. Jain R et al. Formulation and evaluation of novel micellar nanocarrier for nasal delivery of sumatriptan. Nanomedicine. 2010;5:575-587. DOI: 10.2217/nnm.10.28
  57. 57. Jain R et al. Micellar Nanocarriers: Potential nose-to-brain delivery of zolmitriptan as novel migraine therapy. Pharmaceutical Research. 2010;27:655-664. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-009-0041-x
  58. 58. Kanazawa T. Brain delivery of small interfering ribonucleic acid and drugs through intranasal administration with nano-sized polymer micelles. Medical Devices (Auckland, NZ). 2015;8:57-64. DOI: 10.2147/mder.s70856
  59. 59. Allard E et al. Local delivery of ferrociphenol lipid nanocapsules followed by external radiotherapy as a synergistic treatment against intracranial 9L glioma xenograft. Pharmaceutical Research. 2010;27:56
  60. 60. Lollo G et al. Development of multifunctional lipid nanocapsules for the co-delivery of paclitaxel and CpG-ODN in the treatment of glioblastoma. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2015;495:972-980
  61. 61. Corem-Salkmon E et al. Convection-enhanced delivery of methotrexate-loaded maghemite nanoparticles. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2011;6:1595
  62. 62. Huynh NT et al. Administration-dependent efficacy of ferrociphenol lipid nanocapsules for the treatment of intracranial 9L rat gliosarcoma. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2012;423:55-62
  63. 63. Laine A-L et al. Brain tumour targeting strategies via coated ferrociphenol lipid nanocapsules. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2012;81:690-693
  64. 64. Huynh NT et al. Treatment of 9L gliosarcoma in rats by ferrociphenol-loaded lipid nanocapsules based on a passive targeting strategy via the EPR effect. Pharmaceutical Research. 2011;28:3189-3198
  65. 65. Qian X et al. Star-branched amphiphilic PLA-b-PDMAEMA copolymers for co-delivery of miR-21 inhibitor and doxorubicin to treat glioma. Biomaterials. 2014;35:2322-2335
  66. 66. Guerin C et al. Recent advances in brain tumor therapy: Local intracerebral drug delivery by polymers. Investigational New Drugs. 2004;22:27-37
  67. 67. Hwang SR, Kim K. Nano-enabled delivery systems across the blood-brain barrier. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2014;37:24-30
  68. 68. Bleyer WA et al. The Ommaya reservoir. Newly recognized complications and recommendations for insertion and use. Cancer. 1978;41:2431-2437
  69. 69. Härtig W et al. Electron microscopic analysis of nanoparticles delivering thioflavin-T after intrahippocampal injection in mouse: Implications for targeting β-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience Letters. 2003;338:174-176
  70. 70. Alyautdin R et al. Significant entry of tubocurarine into the brain of rats by adsorption to polysorbate 80-coated polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles: An in situ brain perfusion study. Journal of Microencapsulation. 1998;15:67-74
  71. 71. Joshi S, Emala CW, Pile-Spellman J. Intra-arterial drug delivery: A concise review. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 2007;19:111-119
  72. 72. Yang HW et al. Non-invasive synergistic treatment of brain tumors by targeted chemotherapeutic delivery and amplified focused ultrasound-hyperthermia using magnetic nanographene oxide. Advanced Materials. 2013;25:3605-3611
  73. 73. Mulik RS et al. Localized delivery of low-density lipoprotein docosahexaenoic acid nanoparticles to the rat brain using focused ultrasound. Biomaterials. 2016;83:257-268
  74. 74. Yao L et al. Facilitated brain delivery of poly (ethylene glycol)-poly (lactic acid) nanoparticles by microbubble-enhanced unfocused ultrasound. Biomaterials. 2014;35:3384-3395
  75. 75. Yin T et al. Ultrasound-sensitive siRNA-loaded nanobubbles formed by hetero-assembly of polymeric micelles and liposomes and their therapeutic effect in gliomas. Biomaterials. 2013;34:4532-4543
  76. 76. Thakur S, Sharma P, Malviya R. Review: Recent strategies involved in brain targeting through ocular route-patents and application. Annals of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutics. 2017;2(8):1043
  77. 77. Capsoni S et al. Delivery of NGF to the brain: Intranasal versus ocular administration in anti-NGF transgenic mice. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2009;16:371-388
  78. 78. Abdulrazik M. Method for central nervous system targeting through the ocular route of drug delivery. Google Patents. 2003
  79. 79. Gao X et al. Brain delivery of vasoactive intestinal peptide enhanced with the nanoparticles conjugated with wheat germ agglutinin following intranasal administration. Journal of Controlled Release. 2007;121:156-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.05.026
  80. 80. Raliya R et al. Non-invasive aerosol delivery and transport of gold nanoparticles to the brain. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:44718. DOI: 10.1038/srep44718 Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep44718#supplementary-information
  81. 81. Mishra V et al. Targeted brain delivery of AZT via transferrin anchored pegylated albumin nanoparticles. Journal of Drug Targeting. 2006;14:45-53
  82. 82. Darius J et al. Influence of nanoparticles on the brain-to-serum distribution and the metabolism of valproic acid in mice. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2000;52:1043-1047
  83. 83. Wilson B et al. Targeted delivery of tacrine into the brain with polysorbate 80-coated poly (n-butylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2008;70:75-84
  84. 84. Bteich J et al. A novel nanoparticle formulation derived from carboxymethyl-cellulose, polyethylene glycol and cabazitaxel for chemotherapy delivery to the brain. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2018;29(6):2009-2020
  85. 85. Yang Z-Z et al. Tumor-targeting dual peptides-modified cationic liposomes for delivery of siRNA and docetaxel to gliomas. Biomaterials. 2014;35:5226-5239
  86. 86. Haney MJ et al. Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for Parkinson’s disease therapy. Journal of Controlled Release. 2015;207:18-30
  87. 87. Soni S et al. Delivery of hydrophobised 5-fluorouracil derivative to brain tissue through intravenous route using surface modified nanogels. Journal of Drug Targeting. 2006;14:87-95
  88. 88. Cheng KK et al. Curcumin-conjugated magnetic nanoparticles for detecting amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease mice using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Biomaterials. 2015;44:155-172
  89. 89. Costa PM et al. MiRNA-21 silencing mediated by tumor-targeted nanoparticles combined with sunitinib: A new multimodal gene therapy approach for glioblastoma. Journal of Controlled Release. 2015;207:31-39
  90. 90. Aktaş Y et al. Development and brain delivery of chitosan-PEG nanoparticles functionalized with the monoclonal antibody OX26. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2005;16:1503-1511
  91. 91. Chen P-Y et al. Novel magnetic/ultrasound focusing system enhances nanoparticle drug delivery for glioma treatment. Neuro-Oncology. 2010;12:1050-1060
  92. 92. Noble CO et al. Novel nanoliposomal CPT-11 infused by convection-enhanced delivery in intracranial tumors: Pharmacology and efficacy. Cancer Research. 2006;66:2801-2806
  93. 93. Ishida T, Takanashi Y, Kiwada H. Safe and efficient drug delivery system with liposomes for intrathecal application of an antivasospastic drug, fasudil. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2006;29:397-402
  94. 94. Ranganath SH et al. The use of submicron/nanoscale PLGA implants to deliver paclitaxel with enhanced pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in intracranial glioblastoma in mice. Biomaterials. 2010;31:5199-5207
  95. 95. Kim D-H, Martin DC. Sustained release of dexamethasone from hydrophilic matrices using PLGA nanoparticles for neural drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3031-3037
  96. 96. Karthivashan G et al. Therapeutic strategies and nano-drug delivery applications in management of ageing Alzheimer’s disease. Drug Delivery. 2018;25:307-320

Written By

Mahira Zeeshan, Mahwash Mukhtar, Qurat Ul Ain, Salman Khan and Hussain Ali

Submitted: September 3rd, 2018 Reviewed: December 5th, 2018 Published: June 4th, 2019