Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) and Its Treatment with Plant Extracts

Written By

Ishrat Younus, Sidra Maqbool, Sarah Jameel Khan, Humera Sarwar, Shagufta Nesar, Rida Fatima, Sidra Siddique and Moona Baig

Submitted: January 4th, 2019 Reviewed: February 4th, 2019 Published: June 12th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.84938

From the Edited Volume

Veterinary Medicine and Pharmaceuticals

Edited by Samuel Oppong Bekoe, Mani Saravanan, Reimmel Kwame Adosraku and P K Ramkumar

Chapter metrics overview

1,073 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a contagious viral infection which is caused by foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). The disease appears in cloven-footed animals. Symptoms of the disease are abrupt manifestation of sores on the mouth, nose, feet, etc. Nowadays the control and treatment of FMDVare becoming a worldwide economic problem and challenge for the society. Currently, there is no particular treatment available for FMDV, as well as the limitations and disadvantages in the use of vaccines divert the focus of researchers toward natural sources like plant extracts which possess potential antiviral activity. Various researches documented in the literature demonstrated various plant extracts with antiviral potency against FMDV. In the current chapter, we discussed about FMDV and its possible treatment with plant extracts.

Keywords

  • FMDV
  • treatment
  • plant extracts

1. Introduction

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a contagious viral infection [1] which is caused by foot-and-mouth disease virus(FMDV). The disease appears in cloven-footed animals. Symptoms of the disease are abrupt manifestation of sores on the mouth, nose, feet, etc. [2]. These symptoms can appear within 2–3 days postexposure and can take up to 7–10 days. FMDVbelongs to genus Aphthovirusand family Picornaviridaeand has seven species. In the year 2001, about 57 zones were previously influenced by dangerous FMD at the detection of FMDVfor the first time in Britain. Later on about 43 animals were encountered with FMD just in a day. So estimate regarding the onset of FMD among animals may be biased [3].

For the prevention and elimination of FMDV, two methods could be adopted, that is, massacre and immunization [4]. The virus can last for an extended period of time especially in cool environment and neutral pH.

The foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) belongs to genus Aphthovirusand family Picornaviridae[5]. FMDVhas seven diverse serotypes O, A, C, SAT-1, SAT-2, SAT-3, and Asia-1. Serotype O is the most familiar in the world among all the serotypes. More than 60 strains are found among these serotypes. These serotypes differ with each other in different topographic areas. Serotype O was accountable for that Asian epidemic which occurred in the year 1990 and influenced all over the world [1]. FMDVis a single-stranded RNA virus. It contains a protein coat comprising of four capsid proteins designated as VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4 [4].

Foot and mouth disease (FMD) affects cloven-footed animals. The disease is very fast-growing and transmissible which usually affects pigs, cattle, goats, and sheep. The symptoms include vesicles/blisters on the hoofs, mouth, nose, feet, teats, etc. Ultimately these blisters result in skin erosions. Animals become unable to take food and thus become weak. Other symptoms include salivation, decrease in milk production, and weight loss. This viral problem occurs around the whole globe. FMDVepidemic occurred in different countries of the world like Europe, the United States, and Canada. In the year 1967, FMDVepidemic resulted in mortality of 400,000 pigs in the United Kingdom. Epidemic of FMDVin the United Kingdom causes death of about 70,000 pigs, cattle, and sheep in 70 areas [2].

Foot and mouth disease is a very dangerous communicable disease. It has affected different domestic animals in different areas with very lethal symptoms. Its breakthrough is especially notable in the United Kingdom. In the year 2001, about 57 zones were previously influenced by dangerous FMD at the detection of FMDVfor the first time in Britain. Later on about 43 animals were encountered by this FMD just in a day. So estimate regarding the onset of foot and mouth disease among animals may be biased [3].

Advertisement

2. Plants for treatment of FMDV

Different plants were evaluated to prevent or eradicate FMDV. An experiment evaluated two parts of ginseng plant, stem and leaves, regarding susceptibility of mice to immunization to vaccine against serotype Asia-1 of FMDV. Ginseng along with its oil was also used to assess collective outcome regarding immunization against FMDV. This research showed that considerable high titer of various antibodies resulted when ginseng along with oil is given in combination. Important antibodies which were evaluated included IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3.

In a study forty two plants were used to prepare 47 ethanolic extracts which were evaluated for their antiviral potential against KPS/005/2545 strain of type “O” FMDV. BHK-21 cell line was used in the experimental study. The virus was used at the rate of 106.37 TCID50. Transgenic plant (Arabidopsis thaliana) was used to synthesize VP1 with 135–160 amino acid residues. These antigens were found to provide immunization against viral disease [6]. Some plants showed significant antiviral activity against FMDVwhich included Morinda ellipticaand Morinda citrifolia.Other plants failed to exhibit antiviral activity against FMDV[7]. This indicates that plants have antiviral potential and they can be used as antiviral agents against FMDV.

In another reported study, it was mentioned that FMD is a transmissible ailment of animals. Effective control of this disease needs sensitive, specific, and quick diagnostic tools at each tier of control strategy. Various pen-side tests, namely, lateral flow, RT-LAMP, immunostrip tests, and so forth, were also developed for the detection of the virus in field condition [8].

FMDVis transmissible, and to maintain protection against this virus, a study was conducted on guinea pigs and rabbits. The study suggested that immunization of animals with synthetic peptide 141–160 produces neutralizing antibodies that provide protection against FMDV[9]. Similarly, different synthetic peptide residues 141–158 and 200–213 of VP1 were synthesized from 01 Kaufbeuren strain of FMDV. These peptides were proved to provide protection against FMDVvia acting on VP1 carboxyl terminal [10].

In the 1930s, the first vaccine was developed against FMDV. The vaccine was developed from live FMDVwith formalin in combination with aluminum hydroxide gel. Treatment of animals with this vaccine reduced the outbreak of viral disease [11]. Later on, vaccines have been developed based on the virus capsid structure. These vaccines were synthesized from purified or recombinant DNA techniques, derived or chemically synthesized VP1 peptides, inoculation with DNA expressing VP1 epitopes or interleukin, and plant expressing VP1 [12]. Moreover, a vaccine was developed by deleting RGD receptor site on VP1, which resisted virus binding to the cell [13]. Similarly, a live attenuated vaccine was prepared that lack the L-coding in A-type A12 virus. The vaccine resulted in replication of cells but decreased the virulent factor of disease in cattle [14]. On the other hand, a swine inoculated with wild-type A12 in combination with oil led to neutralization of FMDV [15].

Different studies have been reported on targeted immunogens that lack infectious nucleic acid. In a reported study, mice were inoculated with active virus 3Cpro in empty capsules. This vaccine produced neutralizing response by producing antibodies [16]. Another study showed improved FMDV antibody response after coadministration of viral capsid along with porcine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [17].

Meanwhile some studies illustrated the recombinant and replication of vaccinia virus containing capsid-coding region of FMDV C1Oberbayern or C3Argentina85 [18]. To prevent the outbreak, Ad5-vectored vaccine was prepared that reduced viral growth. Furthermore, porcine interferon omegas 7 and 8 have also been reported to reduce FMDVin vitro production in swine kidney cells [19, 20].

Nowadays the control and treatment of FMDV have become a worldwide economic problem and a challenge for the society. It not only affects the animals, but humans who eat these animals are also affected. Currently, there is no any particular treatment existing regarding the cure of FMDV. The conventional method involved the use of antibiotics, flunixin, meglumine, and mild disinfectants for treating infected animals. Traditionally for washing the lesions of infected animals, natural soda ash solution, honey, and finger millet flour are used [21].

Vaccination of animals is the first-line treatment for the control of the virus. However, vaccines take several days to elicit its response, and sometimes, a booster dose is required with repeated vaccination. There is no vaccine available which meets the ideal conditions like broad antigenic spectrum, high efficacy, low risk of FMDV release, and low production cost. Inactivated (traditional) and live attenuated (conventional) vaccines are used normally. Inactivated vaccines contain one or more cell culture-derived inactivated virus mixed with the suitable excipients. Inactivated vaccines may be categorized into standard or higher potency vaccines. Standard vaccines provide broad-spectrum coverage against the virus strains, while high-potency vaccine has rapid onset of action and wider range of protection. Live attenuated vaccines are not recommended for use as it reverts the chance of infection and also prevents the recognition of infection in vaccinated animals [22].

Azadirachta indica(AI), known commonly as neem, belongs to family Meliaceae and has possessed antiviral activity against different viruses [23, 24]. There is a study that reported the use of different concentrations (200, 100, 50, 25, 12, 6, and 1 μg/ml) of aqueous and ethanolic leaves extract of Azadirachta indicafor evaluating antiviral activity against FMDVin farming animals on BHK-21 (baby hamster kidney) cell culture. Aqueous extract of the said plant showed considerable anti-FMDVactivity between the concentration ranges of 12.5–50 and 50–100 μg/ml, whereas ethanolic leaves extract demonstrated strong antiviral activity at concentrations between 6 and 25 μg/ml. Antiviral activity was evaluated by examining cytopathic effects and determining cell survival percentages [25].

Moringa oleifera, local name is Sonjna, belongs to family Moringaceae and is an effective antiviral agent used against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), HIV/AIDS, and hepatitis B virus [26]. The anti-FMDVactivity of ethanolic leaves extract of Moringa oleiferawas evaluated at different concentrations, respectively (200, 100, 50, 25, 12, 6, and 1 μg/ml), on BHK-21 cell culture. Ethanolic leaf extracts of plant showed potent anti-FMDVactivity between the concentration ranges of 12–100 and 50–300 μg/ml. However, in another study ethanol leaf extracts of plant showed significant antiviral activity at the concentration ranges from 1 up to 100 μg/ml with 50% cell survival rate [27].

Alhagi maurorumis a member of family Fabaceae, known by local name camel thorn and camelthorn-bush. The successful in vitro anti-FMDVactivity of ethanolic, methanolic, and aqueous-acetic acid extracts of A. maurorumwas reported at different stages of viral replication cycle, with the main compound found to be 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, diisooctyl ester. Reduction in cytopathic effects (CPEs) and tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) values help in the evaluation of antiviral activity of FMDVon Razi bovine kidney (RBK) cells [28].

The Withania somnifera(WS), or Ashwagandha locally known as “Indian winter cherry” or “Indian ginseng,” belongs to the family Solanaceae. Ashwagandha is a well-known South African herb used in the treatment of herpes simplex virus [29] and infectious bursal disease [30]. In literature in vitro activity of aqueous extract of Ashwagandha roots and leaves was reported against FMDVof livestock on BHK-21 cell line. Ashwagandha roots and leaves demonstrated effective anti-FMDVactivity. The antiviral activity of the plant was confirmed by observing reduction in cytopathic effects when treated with Ashwagandha root and leaf extracts [31].

In literature in vivo anti-FMDVactivity of Chinese herbal kombucha is reported against FMDVof swine on baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells. Chinese herbal kombucha is a combination of different herbal plants, i.e., Radix Glycyrrhizae, Momordica grosvenorii, Dendranthema morifolium, and Camellia sinensis.Study showed that Chinese herbal kombucha inhibited the replication of FMDVanalyzed by using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (Q-RT-PCR) technique [32].

The ethanolic extract of Spirulina platensisdemonstrated the presence of antiviral activity against different isolates of FMDV in baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell culture and in baby mice. The results of this study showed that at 50 μg/ml, S. platensisextract revealed 28.5, 31, and 35.7% reductions in FMDVtiters type A, SAT-2, and O, respectively. At the same dose, 50% inhibition in FMDVwas observed in infected baby mice [33].

Glycyrrhiza uralensisor Chinese liquorice is used to treat enterovirus 71 (EV71) and Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) of FMD. The essential antiviral component in plant is found to be glycyrrhizic acid, as the antiviral activity is directly dependent on the concentration of glycyrrhizic acid. At 1000 μg/ml concentration of plant extract, 1.0 log reduction in EV71 replication and 1.5 log reduction in CVA16 replication were observed. However, at concentration of 200 μg/ml, 1.7 and 2.2 log inhibition in EV71 and CVA16 replication is examined, respectively. Cytopathic effects were observed for determining antiviral activity [34].

Ocimum tenuiflorum(tulsi) of family Lamiaceae and Curcuma longa(turmeric) of family Zingiberaceae also possess potential antiviral activity for FMD. Aqueous extracts of both plants showed effective in vitro antiviral activity against FMDVof livestock on BHK-21 cell line at 1:2 and 1:1 dilutions [31].

Various plant crude extracts were studied for their in vitro antiviral activity against bovine FMDVon BHK-21. The immature fruit extract of Morinda ellipticaL. showed FMDVinhibition at concentration of 0.39 μg/μl with TCID50 value of 1 × 103.65. The Morinda citrifoliaL. extract also showed FMDVinhibition at 0.19 μg/μl, and TCID50 value was reported to be 1 × 103.35. Extract from leaves and stem of Amaranthus viridisL. has lowest FMDV inhibition at 0.024 μg/μl concentration (1 × 102.44 TCID50). Extracts obtained from the rhizomes of Boesenbergia rotundaL., flowers of Carthamus tinctorius, and fruits of Citrus reticulataand Elaeocarpus hygrophilusshowed inhibition of FMDVat concentration of 0.012 μg/μl of all extracts with 1 × 102.14 TCID50 [7].

Advertisement

3. Conclusion

Recently there is no particular treatment available for the treatment of FMDV, and the limitations and disadvantages in the use of vaccines divert the focus of researchers toward natural sources like plant extracts which possess potential antiviral activity. The various research works documented in the literature demonstrated various plant extracts with antiviral potency against FMDV.

Advertisement

4. Future prospects

The successful in vivo and in vitro anti-FMDVactivities of plant extracts showed that they have the potential to be used to control the virus growth inside the body and also help in managing the lesions associated with these infections. In plant extracts, different chemical constituents are present which could be further isolated and effectively used in the development of powerful and potent antiviral drug against FMDV.

References

  1. 1. Aftosa F. Foot and Mouth Disease. Ames, Iowa: College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University; 2007
  2. 2. Kirk JH. Review of Clinical Signs of Foreign Animal Diseases Which a Mixed Veterinary Practitioner Might Encounter on a Dairy. Veterinary Medicine Extension University of California. CA: Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching and Research Center Tulare; 1992
  3. 3. Gibbens JC, Wilesmith JW. Temporal and geographical distribution of cases of foot and mouth diseases during the early weeks of the 2001 epidemic in great Britian. The Veterinary Record. 2002;2002:151-212
  4. 4. Davies G. Foot and mouth disease.Research in Veterinary Science. 2002;73(3):195-199
  5. 5. ICTV. The Seventh Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Academic Press; 2000
  6. 6. Carrillo C, Wigdorovitz A, Oliveros JC, Zamorano PI, Sadir AM, Gomez N, et al. Protective immune response to foot-and-mouth disease virus with VP1 expressed in transgenic plants. Journal of Virology. 1998;72(2):1688-1690
  7. 7. Chungsamarnyart N, Sirinarumitr T, Chumsing W, Wajjawalku W. In vitro study of antiviral activity of plant crude-extracts against the foot and mouth disease virus. Kasetsart Journal. 2007;41:97-103
  8. 8. Longjam N, Deb R, Sarmah AK, Tayo T, Awachat VB, Saxena VK. A brief review on diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease of livestock: Conventional to molecular tools. Veterinary Medicine International. 2011
  9. 9. Bittle JL, Houghten RA, Alexander H, Shinnick TM, Sutcliffe JG, Lerner RA, et al. Protection against foot-and-mouth disease by immunization with a chemically synthesized peptide predicted from the viral nucleotide sequence. Nature. 1982;298(5869):30-33
  10. 10. DiMarchi R, Brooke G, Gale C, Cracknell V, Doel T, Mowat N. Protection of cattle against foot-and-mouth disease by a synthetic peptide. Science. 1986;232(4750):639-641
  11. 11. Brooksby JB. Portraits of viruses: Foot-and-mouth disease virus. Intervirology. 1982;18(1-2):1-23
  12. 12. Francis MJ, Hastings GZ, Brown F, McDermed J, Lu YA, Tam JP. Immunological evaluation of the multiple antigen peptide (MAP) system using the major immunogenic site of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Immunology. 1991;73(3):249
  13. 13. McKenna TS, Lubroth J, Rieder E, Baxt B, Mason PW. Receptor binding site-deleted foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus protects cattle from FMD. Journal of Virology. 1995;69(9):5787-5790
  14. 14. Piccone ME, Rieder E, Mason PW, Grubman MJ. The foot-and-mouth disease virus leader proteinase gene is not required for viral replication. Journal of Virology. 1995;69(9):5376-5382
  15. 15. Chinsangaram J, Mason PW, Grubman MJ. Protection of swine by live and inactivated vaccines prepared from a leader proteinase-deficient serotype A12 foot-and-mouth disease virus. Vaccine. 1998b;16(16):1516-1522
  16. 16. Chinsangaram J, Beard C, Mason PW, Zellner MK, Ward G, Grubman MJ. Antibody response in mice inoculated with DNA expressing foot-and-mouth disease virus capsid proteins. Journal of Virology. 1998a;72(5):4454-4457
  17. 17. Cedillo-Barrón L, Foster-Cuevas M, Belsham GJ, Lefèvre F, Parkhouse RME. Induction of a protective response in swine vaccinated with DNA encoding foot-and-mouth disease virus empty capsid proteins and the 3D RNA polymerase. Journal of General Virology. 2001;82(7):1713-1724
  18. 18. Berinstein A, Tami C, Taboga O, Smitsaart E, Carrillo E. Protective immunity against foot-and-mouth disease virus induced by a recombinant vaccinia virus. Vaccine. 2000;18(21):2231-2238
  19. 19. Li SF, Shao JJ, Zhao FR, Gong MJ, Xie YL, Chang HY, et al. Antiviral activity of porcine interferon delta 8 against foot-and-mouth disease virus in vitro. International Immunopharmacology. 2018;59:47-52
  20. 20. Li SF, Zhao FR, Gong MJ, Shao JJ, Xie YL, Chang HY, et al. Antiviral activity of porcine interferon omega 7 against foot-and-mouth disease virus in vitro. Journal of Medical Virology. 2019;91(2):208-214
  21. 21. Gakuya DW, Mulei CM, Wekesa SB. Use of ethnoveterinary remedies in the management of foot and mouth disease lesions in a dairy herd. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines. 2011;8(2)
  22. 22. Paton DJ, Sumption KJ, Charleston B. Options for control of foot-and-mouth disease: Knowledge, capability and policy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364(1530):2657-2667
  23. 23. Faccin-Galhardi LC, Yamamoto KA, Ray S, Ray B, Carvalho Linhares RE, Nozawa C. The in vitro antiviral property ofAzadirachta indicapolysaccharides for poliovirus. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2012;142:86-90
  24. 24. Parida M, Dash P, Upadhyay C, Saxena P, Jana A. Serological & virological investigation of an outbreak of dengue fever in Gwalior, India. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2002;116:248-254
  25. 25. Younus I, Ashraf M, Fatima A, Altaf I, Javeed A. Evaluation of cytotoxic and antiviral activities of aqueous leaves extracts of different plants against foot and mouth disease virus infection in farming animals. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017;(6):30
  26. 26. Wang L, Chen X, Wu A. Mini review on antimicrobial activity and bioactive compounds ofMoringa oleifera. Medicinal Chemistry. 2016;6:578-582
  27. 27. Younus I, Siddiq A, Assad T, Baddar S, Jameel S, Ashraf M. Screening antiviral activity ofMoringa oleiferaL. leaves against foot and mouth disease virus. Global Veterinaria. 2015;15(4):409-413
  28. 28. Shakiba Y, Rezatofighi SE, Seyyednejad SM, RoayaeiArdakani M. Inhibition of foot-and-mouth disease virus replication by hydro-alcoholic and aqueous-acetic acid extracts ofAlhagi maurorum. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2018;14(1):85-96
  29. 29. Kambizi L, Goosen BM, Taylor MB, Afolayan AJ. Anti-viral effects of aqueous extracts ofAloe feroxandWithania somniferaon herpes simplex virus type 1 in cell culture. South African Journal of Science. 2007;103:359-360
  30. 30. Pant M, Ambwani T, Umapathi V. Antiviral activity of Ashwagandha extract on infectious bursal disease virus replication. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2012;5(5):2750-2751
  31. 31. Deshpande TM, Chaphalkar SR. Antiviral activity of plant extracts against FMDV in vitro a preliminary report. International Journal of Institutional Pharmacy and Life Sciences. 2013;3(4):1-18
  32. 32. Fu N, Wu J, Lv L, He J, Jiang S. Anti-foot-and-mouth disease virus effects of Chinese herbal kombucha in vivo. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2015;46(4):1245-1255
  33. 33. Daoud HM, Soliman EM. Evaluation ofSpirulina platensisextract as natural antivirus against foot and mouth disease virus strains (A, O, SAT2). Veterinary World. 2015;8(10):1260
  34. 34. Wang J, Chen X, Wang W, Zhang Y, Yang Z, Jin Y, et al. Glycyrrhizic acid as the antiviral component ofGlycyrrhiza uralensisFisch. against coxsackie virus A16 and enterovirus 71 of hand foot and mouth disease. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2013;147(1):114-121

Written By

Ishrat Younus, Sidra Maqbool, Sarah Jameel Khan, Humera Sarwar, Shagufta Nesar, Rida Fatima, Sidra Siddique and Moona Baig

Submitted: January 4th, 2019 Reviewed: February 4th, 2019 Published: June 12th, 2019