Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Fungal Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Materials

Written By

Najiah Nadir, Nur Liyana Ismail and Azlan Shah Hussain

Submitted: September 27th, 2018 Reviewed: January 8th, 2019 Published: April 24th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.84239

Chapter metrics overview

1,493 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The biomass must be converted to fermentable carbohydrates through pretreatment process to break down the complex structure to its constituents prior to fermentation. For lignocellulosic materials, lignin moiety is extremely resistant to degradation because of hydrogen bond cross-linking between the cellulose and hemicellulose. Biological pretreatment using white-rot fungi are novel method and environmental-friendly as a method of biomass deconstruction as compared to other conventional means. These fungi can excrete ligninolytic enzymes to degrade lignin although the rate of deconstruction is slow. Hence, this chapter will focus on the fungal pretreatment or delignification process using white-rot fungi as it is an important step to increase the feedstock conversion.


  • biomass conversion
  • lignocellulose
  • pretreatment
  • enzyme
  • white-rot fungi

1. Introduction

The depletion of fossil fuel energy sources causes much attention on biomass as the source of renewable energy or biofuel. There are three classifications of biofuel according to the feedstock source, which are first-, second- and third-generation biofuels. First-generation biofuels employ an edible biomass as feedstock while second-generation biofuels utilize numerous non-edible feedstock, ranging from lignocellulosic biomass to municipal solid wastes. Third-generation biofuels also exploit non-edible source but different feedstock such as algal biomass and gases [1].

The lignocellulosic biomass mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. The conversion of lignocellulosic biomass requires a pretreatment process, which is one of the most important and expensive stages in bioenergy production. This process is performed to degrade and remove lignin from the biomass constituents and thus allows further manipulation of the valorizable portion of biomass, that is, increasing the yield of fermentable carbohydrates [2, 3]. Generally, the pretreatment process can be divided into four, that are physical, chemical, physicochemical, and biological methods [2, 4] as in Table 1. Subject to the pretreatment strategies, this process can reduce cellulose crystallinity, improve surface accessibility and decrease lignin content [3].

Physical Chemical Physicochemical Biological
Objective Reduce particle size, increase surface area and reduce cellulose crystallinity Hydrolyze lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose Breakdown lignin-holocellulose linkages Degrade lignin from holocellulose components
  • Milling

  • Grinding

  • Chipping

  • Freezing

  • Radiation

  • Acid

  • Alkaline

  • Ionic liquid

  • Organosolv

  • Steam explosion

  • Ammonia fiber expansion

  • CO2 explosion

  • Liquid hot water

  • Wet oxidation

  • Microbial consortium

  • Fungal

  • Enzymatic

  • Low environmental impact

  • Low dangerous chemical requirement

  • High effectiveness

  • Short process time

  • High uniformity and selectivity

  • Less dangerous process condition

  • Lack of by-products degradation

  • Less corrosiveness

  • Higher energy efficiency

  • Short process time

  • Environmental friendly

  • No chemical requirement

  • Low energy consumption

  • High energy requirement

  • High cost

  • Toxicity

  • Corrosiveness of equipment

  • Chemical recovery

  • Production of inhibitors

  • Long process time

  • Chemical recovery and recycling

  • High operation cost

  • Formation of inhibitors

  • Long process time

  • Large space requirement

  • Need continuous monitoring of microorganism growth

Table 1.

Pretreatment strategies of lignocellulosic biomass.

Biological pretreatment methods are performed by biological agents, either the microorganisms or enzymes excreted by the microorganisms. This method usually utilizes mild pressure and/or temperature and does not involve acid, alkali, or any reactive species [2, 3, 4]. Since this pretreatment is conducted under mild conditions, it requires much lower energy input and the byproduct(s) would not hamper or inhibit hydrolysis process. Apart from that, there is no need for chemical recovery because no chemicals were employed [3, 5]. Due to these reasons, the biological pretreatment is an environmentally safe process [3, 4, 5, 6]. However, the main issue is it consumes a long pretreatment time [4, 7].

This chapter discusses an overview of recent studies on fungal pretreatment using white-rot fungi and important parameters affecting the pretreatment process of lignocellulosic feedstock such as fungal strain, inoculum concentration and moisture content.


2. Fungal pretreatment

The biological pretreatment can be categorized into bacterial consortium, fungal treatments and enzymatic treatments [4, 8]. The commonly utilized microorganisms in this pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass are filamentous fungi, which can be easily found in the environment such as ground, living plants and lignocellulose wastes [9]. Wood-decay fungi are classified into three main groups, which are white-, brown- and soft-rot fungi [10]. Among them, the most effective are basidiomycetes white-rot fungi because they have the capability to degrade lignin from the holocellulose (cellulose and hemicellulose) surface [2, 7, 9, 11] and cause white-rot on wood or trees, whereas brown- and soft-rot fungi degrade only minimal lignin [6]. Lignin is a polyaromatic polymer that gives rigidity to lignocellulose [7, 11]. Previous studies on three types of rot fungi were presented in Table 2.

2.1 White-rot fungi

White-rot fungi differ significantly in the relative rates at which they attack lignin and carbohydrates in woody or lignocellulosic tissues [6, 17]. They can be differentiated by their delignification mode, named as selective and non-selective delignification as can be seen in Figure 1. In selective delignification, mostly lignin and hemicellulose are degraded, while consuming a small amount of cellulose. However, for non-selective delignifiers, all three lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose are degraded almost equally [6, 18]. Even the number of non-selective white-rot fungi is greater than selective white-rot fungi [11], more than 1500 fungi species are selective delignifiers [6]. These fungi are favored for fungal pretreatment in recent researches to ensure a lignin-free and cellulose-rich biomass for next hydrolysis step [3, 7, 17] and enhance the biomass digestibility [3, 18]. Some of the white-rot fungi species were shown in Figure 2.

Figure 1.

Mechanism of fungal pretreatment using white-rot fungi on lignocellulosic materials.

Figure 2.

White-rot fungi of species (a) Abortiporus biennis, (b) Ceriporiopsis subvermispora, (c) Coriolopsis trogii, (d) Ganoderma applanatum, (e) Irpex lacteus and (f) Trametes versicolor [19].

2.2 Enzymatic systems of white-rot fungi

The white-rot fungi play a major role in degrading woods in forest ecosystems [9]. These fungi have the ability to degrade lignocellulosic biomass during their growth in nature owing to the production of two enzymatic systems, which are hydrolytic system and oxidative ligninolytic system [7, 17]. In hydrolytic system, cellulases and hemicellulases are utilized to degrade holocellulose [17]. Non-selective white-rot fungi cause substantial cellulose loss because of their high cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic activity. Conversely, selective white-rot fungi excrete hemicellulolytic enzymes and employ hemicellulose-derived sugars as the main carbon sources [7].

The main enzymes in ligninolytic system to degrade lignin and open the phenyl rings are lignin peroxidase (LiP), manganese peroxidase (MnP) and laccase [5, 7, 17, 20]. Nevertheless, not all of these enzymes are secreted by fungal cultures [7]. Lignin peroxidase (EC, also known as ligninase, is a heme-protein involves in oxidizing and/or cleaving of non-phenolic aromatic lignin moieties and similar molecules. Manganese peroxidase (EC is a heme-containing glycoprotein, aids delignification by catalyzing reaction that oxidizes phenolic compounds in the presence of Mn2+. Laccases (EC are copper-containing oxidase enzymes that act on phenols and similar molecules by executing one-electron oxidations [5, 6, 7]. Versatile peroxidase (VP) is regarded as the third peroxidase, a LiP-MnP hybrid as it is capable of degrading both phenolic and non-phenolic lignin compounds and Mn2+ [6, 7].

2.3 Pretreatment of lignocelluloses with white-rot fungi

The sugarcane bagasse was subjected to fungal pretreatment by P. ostreatus and C. subvermispora for a period of 60 days [18]. At the end of pretreatment, P. ostreatus homogeneously degraded all the lignocellulose components of lignin, xylan and glucan up to 11.1, 15.7 and 8.4%, respectively. C. subvermispora yielded obvious lignin and xylan removal while consuming minimal glucan at 48, 47 and 13.6%, correspondingly. With sugarcane bagasse as the biomass, P. ostreatus behaves non-selectively due to the fact that the digestibility is not enhanced even when it degrades both lignin and polysaccharides. In contrast, C. subvermispora shows selective behavior as it removes lignin and xylan while sustaining glucan, which further improved the digestibility.

The biodegradability of wheat straw and oak wood chips treated with the white-rot fungi C. subvermispora and L. edodes was observed for 56 days [21]. Using wheat straw as the feedstock, C. subvermispora reached higher lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose degradation of 83.3, 80.5 and 20.2% than L. edodes with the values of 71.7, 69.3 and 12.2%, respectively. Different observation was found when choosing oak wood chips as the biomass. C. subvermispora achieved lower lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose removal of 53.5, 50.6 and 17.4% than L. edodes with the values of 60.6, 56.3 and 37.3%, correspondingly. Both fungi selectively degraded lignin in wheat straw and wood chips but with different strategy. C. subvermispora colonizes the biomass predominantly during the first 7 days and breaks lignin and hemicelluloses without growing, whereas L. edodes constantly grows and removes lignin during the growth. The relative lower lignin removal of wood chips compared to wheat straw indicates that the fungi had more difficulty to penetrate the wood chips due to its dense structure.

In a research done on pretreatment of willow sawdust via the white-rot fungi A. biennis and Leiotrametes menziesii, it was revealed that A. biennis was more preferable for fungal pretreatment even though it has lower delignification than L. menziesii, because it consumed a very low amount of cellulose [22]. After 30 days of treatment, the lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose loss attained by A. biennis were 17.1, 19.3 and 7.4%, respectively. On the other hand, higher lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose removal was achieved by L. menziesii, with the corresponding values of 30.5, 42.4 and 26.6%.

Xu et al. [23] reported that within 12 days of pretreatment, the highest lignin loss achieved by medicinal mushroom, Inonotus obliquus, using wheat straw as substrate is at 72%, with cellulose loss of 55%. However, lower delignification was observed for corn stover and rice straw of 47 and 39% with cellulose reduction of 55 and 45%. The hemicellulose content of wheat straw, corn stover and rice straw were decreased to 46, 39 and 44%, respectively. From these results, I. obliquus shows its potential as a delignifier of agricultural biomass as it can produce high-activity-level ligninolytic and hydrolytic enzymes.

T. versicolor and S. hirsutum showed selective delignification characteristics during the pretreatment of radiata pine wood chips [14]. Both fungi have the largest selectivity value on 21 days of treatment, with T. versicolor exhibited better selectivity than S. hirsutum. Both of T. versicolor and S. hirsutum delignified the chips by 16%. The hemicellulose and cellulose was reduced at 5% each for T. versicolor whereas 9% each for S. hirsutum. As the treatment period was increased, the selectivity values of both fungi decreases because cellulose was degraded together with lignin.

The delignification properties of two white-rot fungi, rainbow fungus (T. versicolor) and edible oyster fungus (P. ostreatus), on solid oriental beech wood (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) was studied for 120 days [10]. For both fungi, there is no substantial difference observed on lignin and cellulose degradation, with lignin degradation was more effective in the first 30 days of exposure. After 120 days of incubation, T. versicolor and P. ostreatus decayed lignin by 57.4 and 56.5%, and cellulose by 16.7 and 13.9%, respectively. Meanwhile, the decrease in total carbohydrate content was significantly higher for the first 30 days using T. versicolor as compared to P. ostreatus. At the end of the exposure period, the total carbohydrate content was almost the same, 7.3 and 6.7%, correspondingly. Both fungi are selective delignification, since the degradation of cellulose starts only after 60 days of incubation.

Four agricultural residues (wheat straw, corn stover, barley straw, and corncob) were pretreated for 21 days using the white-rot fungus Irpex lacteus [24]. The highest lignin removal was detected using corn stover (45.8%) as the feedstock, followed by wheat straw (42.3%), barley straw (31.0%) and corncob (17.1%). For glucan digestibility, the increment was significant for corn stover (up to 59.2%), wheat straw (up to 54.8%) and barley straw (up to 53.9%), except for corncob (reduced to 30.3%). The increase in xylan digestibility was observed in corn stover (up to 82.1%), wheat straw (up to 78.0%) and barley straw (up to 58.2%), but not for corncob (decreased to 22.4). Generally, all residues showed a reduction in lignin content. In the case of glucan and xylan digestibility, only corncob yielded lower digestibility after treatment. However, to be specific, I. lacteus behaves differently when subjected to different types of raw materials.

The lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose biodegradation of oil palm empty fruit bunches was investigated by exploiting two white-rot fungi, P. ostreatus and P. chrysosporium [25]. The lignin degradation was higher with P. ostreatus (51.9%) than with P. chrysosporium (42.1%) after treating for 21 days. In contrast, lower hemicellulose and cellulose degradation rates were noted for P. ostreatus (13.8 and 7.6%) compared to P. chrysosporium (27.7 and 28.2%). Since only a small amount of cellulose was degraded, fungal pretreatment using P. ostreatus is acceptable for palm residues. The fungus P. ostreatus can be considered as a selective delignifier because the cellulose degradation happens only after the 21 days of treatment, whereas P. chrysosporium is a non-selective delignifier as it concurrently breaks down lignin and structural carbohydrates.

Ishola et al. [26] found that fungal pretreatment improved the digestibility of oil palm empty fruit bunches by 4.5 times. The digestibility of untreated bunches was only 3.4%. This value was raised to 15.4% after the bunches were pretreated by Pleurotus floridanus fungus. After the pretreatment, the percentage of total lignin removal was very low, which is reduced by 0.03%. The hemicellulose content was increased by 4.4%, whereas the cellulose was decreased by 5.0% due to fungal attack on the linkage between lignin and carbohydrate.

Enhancement of hemicellulose accessibility was reported when fresh poplar wood (Populus tomentosa) was treated for 56 days with a common white-rot fungus on angiosperm wood, Trametes velutina [27]. Comparison between untreated and fungi-pretreated material revealed that lignin degradation can positively impact hemicellulose conversion. This was proven with the reduction in lignin content by 7.2% has resulted to an increase in both hemicellulose and cellulose content by 1.0 and 6.4%, consecutively. These findings suggested that lignin degradation rendered xylan more susceptible to xylanase and that in turn rendered cellulose more susceptible to cellulase.

For woody materials and agricultural residues feedstock, the ligninolytic systems and the appropriate fungal strains for the delignification may be different as they have different structure and chemical composition. Hence, it is important to discover the most significant white-rot fungal strain by assessing the strains for the highest degradation ability with the lowest holocellulose utilization as fungal selection subjects to the lignocellulosic biomass chosen for processing [11, 18]. Moreover, one fungus yields a very large difference of the decayed lignin-hemicellulose-cellulose ratio from another fungus, even when using different strains of the same species [6]. Some of recent researches on fungal pretreatment were tabulated in Table 3.

Substrate Fungi species Effect References
Wheat straw Ganoderma lobatum (white-rot)
  • Lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose degradation of 50.3, 18.1 and 21.4%

  • Sugar recovery increased by approximately 27.6%

Gloeophyllum trabeum (brown-rot)
  • 37.6 and 13.3% of hemicellulose and cellulose removal

  • Sugar recovery decreased by 10.9%

Moso bamboo Phanerochaete chrysosporium (white-rot)
  • Higher degradability

  • On lignin over hemicellulose and cellulose

G. trabeum (brown-rot)
  • Preferential degradability on hemicellulose than lignin and cellulose

Radiata pine Trametes versicolor (white-rot)
  • Loss of lignin at 16%, while both hemicellulose and cellulose at 5% each

Stereum hirsutum (white-rot)
  • Lignin degradation of 16%, whereas hemicellulose and cellulose of 9% individually

G. trabeum (brown-rot)
  • Hemicellulose and glucans content reduced approximately to 5 and 3%

  • Mass loss ranged between 6 and 8% during the first month of biodegradation

Scots pine Daldinia concentrica (soft-rot)
  • 2.5% of weight loss after decayed for 2 months

Xylaria acuta (soft-rot)
  • Weight reduction of 12.4% after 2 months of incubation

Table 2.

Previous studies on fungal pretreatment using three different types of rot fungi.

Substrate Fungi species Inoculum conc. Moisture content (%) T (°C) pH Time (days) Nutrient Effect References
Sugarcane bagasse P. ostreatus 0.05 w/w% N.S 27 N.S 60 +
  • Lignin, xylan and glucan degradation up to 11.1, 15.7 and 8.4%

  • Glucan and xylan digestibility reached 35 and 19%

C. subvermispora
  • Lignin, xylan and glucan removal at 48, 47 and 13.6%

  • Glucan and xylan digestibility increased up to 55 and 27%

Wheat straw C. subvermispora 10 w/w% 70% 24 N.S 56 N.S
  • Decrease in lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose were 83.3, 80.5 and 20.2%

L. edodes
  • Lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose biodegradation of 71.7, 69.3 and 12.2%

Oak wood chips C. subvermispora 10 w/w% 70% 24 N.S 56 N.S
  • Reduction of lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose content at 53.5, 50.6 and 17.4%

L. edodes
  • Lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose removal increased to 60.6, 56.3 and 37.3%

Willow sawdust A. biennis 0.32 w/w% 80% 27 N.S 30
  • Degradation of lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose reached 17.1, 19.3 and 7.4%

L. menziesii 0.48 w/w%
  • Lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose loss of 30.5, 42.4 and 26.6%

Wheat straw I. obliquus 8% N.S 28 6 12 +
  • Decrease in lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose up to 72, 46 and 55%

Corn stover
  • Lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose reduction reached 47, 39 and 55%

Rice straw
  • Removal of lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose increased up to 39, 44 and 45%

Radiata pine T. versicolor N.S 70% 25 N.S 21 N.S
  • Loss of lignin at 16%, while both hemicellulose and cellulose at 5% each

S. hirsutum
  • Lignin degradation of 16%, whereas hemicellulose and cellulose of 9% individually

Beech wood T. versicolor N.S 65% 22 N.S 120 N.S
  • Reduction of lignin and cellulose up to 57.4 and 16.7%

P. ostreatus
  • Lignin and cellulose biodegradation of 56.5 and 13.9%

Corn stover I. lacteus 50 v/w% 7.3–8.5% 30 N.S 21 N.S
  • Removal of lignin reached 45.8%

  • Glucan and xylan digestibility increased up to 59.2 and 82.1%

Wheat straw
  • Lignin loss was 42.3%

  • Digestibility of glucan and xylan reached 54.8 and 78.0%

Barley straw
  • Lignin removal up to 31.0%

  • Digestibility of glucan and xylan enhanced to 53.9 and 58.2%

  • Degradation of lignin at 17.1%

  • Glucan and xylan digestibility reduced to 30.3 and 22.4%

Oil palm empty fruit bunches P. ostreatus N.S 67% 30 N.S 21 N.S
  • Lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose degradation at 51.9, 13.8 and 7.6%

P. chrysosporium
  • Reduction of lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose were 42.1, 27.7 and 28.2%

Oil palm empty fruit bunches P. floridanus N.S 59.40% 31 N.S 28 +
  • Lignin and cellulose were reduced by 0.03 and 5.0%, while hemicellulose was increased by 4.4%

  • Digestibility was improved by 4.5 times

Poplar wood T. velutina 100 v/w% N.S 28 N.S 56 N.S
  • Delignification by 7.2%, whereas both hemicellulose and cellulose were increased by 1.0 and 6.4%


Table 3.

Summary of recent publications on fungal pretreatment.

N.S, not specified.


3. Parameters affecting pretreatment process

High lignin degradation can be achieved by having high activities of white-rot fungi and production of ligninolytic enzymes. This is influenced by several pretreatment parameters such as fungal strain, inoculum concentration, moisture content, aeration, pH, temperature, supplements and incubation time [28, 29, 30]. Moreno et al. [29] reviewed that for solid state fermentations (SSF), depending on the strain used, the usual conditions that have been used are at moisture content 45–85%, pH 4–5, with an inoculum level of 1–10 mg/g substrate (dry weight), at temperatures ranging from 15 to 40°C and over 1–12 weeks. The optimization of these parameters is important to increase the efficiency of the pretreatment by reducing the carbohydrate loss and pretreatment time [31]. However, for most of these factors, the optimal conditions are depended on the substrate and fungal strain [28]. Temperature and pH are reported to affect fungal metabolism, spore germination and growth. Low moisture content can reduce nutrients availability and growth, while higher moisture content can boost contamination, reduce heat and oxygen transmission, and affect enzyme production [32]. Adekunle et al. [33] reported that the pH and temperature of the SSF play a vital role in the production of laccase by T. versicolor.

3.1 Fungal strain

In order for the white-rot fungi to be used in the pretreatment process, screening of a large number of fungal isolates is important in order to have the right isolates for the process. Screening step allows the selection of isolates with the highest ligninolytic enzymes production and activity as well as high lignin degradation on the specific substrates. In order to limit matter losses, selective delignification is crucial and high fermentable sugar losses must be avoided. White-rot fungi strains should therefore be carefully selected based on these important parameters. Table 4 summarizes some of white-rot fungi species that have been studied for several lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment.

Fungi species Substrate(s) Enzymes References
Ceriporiopsis subvermispora Hazel branches Laccase and MnP [34]
Albizia chips [35]
Miscanthus sinensis [36]
Echinodontium taxodii Bamboo Laccase and MnP [37]
Trametes versicolor Pine wood chips Laccase [14]
Corn stalk [33]
Corn silage [38]
Tricholoma giganteum Wheat straw Laccase [39]
Schizophyllum commune Banana stalk
Corn cobs
Sugarcane bagasse
Wheat straw
Laccase, LiP and MnP [40, 41]
Pseudolagarobasidium acaciicola Parthenium biomass Laccase [42]
Dichomitus squalens Chestnut shell Laccase [43]
Daedalea flavida Cotton stalks Laccase and LiP [44]
Tremetes villosa Coconut shell
Sugarcane bagasse
Sisal fiber
MnP [45]
Stereum ostrea Wheat bran MnP [46]
Pleurotus ostreatus Rice straw N.S [47]
Polyporus brumalis Wheat straw N.S [48]

Table 4.

Lignocellulosic biomass pretreatments with different white-rot fungi species and their isolated enzymes.

N.S,not specified.

3.2 Inoculum concentration

Inoculum concentration is an important factor in biological pretreatment. Sufficient amounts of inoculum must be defined to ensure good fungal growth and substrate colonization. The time required for the colonization of the substrate is affected by the type and amount of inoculums [31]. Higher concentration of inoculum will lead to shorter time of colonization of the substrate [49].

3.3 Moisture content

Moisture content of the solid state fermentation is a critical aspect for fungal growth and activities. Lignin degradation is significantly influenced by this factor as it affects the growth and activities of the fungal. Increasing the moisture content enhances the nutrient transfer but reduces the porosity of the substrate and limits oxygen transfer [28]. However, insufficient water content in the substrates may cause deactivation of the fungi. Optimum moisture content depends upon the organism and the substrate used for SSF [30]. The range of moisture content of substrate for SSF using white-rot fungi is usually between 45 and 85% [29]. A study on the effect of moisture content for delignification of cotton stalks by Daedalea flavida MTCC 145 (DF-2) in SSF found that the highest ligninolytic enzyme activities, optimal lignin degradation 29.88 ± 0.97% (w/w) with cellulose loss 11.70 ± 1.30% (w/w) were observed at 75% moisture content [44]. It was reported that the lignin degradation increased with increase in moisture content. Cellulose and hemicellulose degradation were found to be increased at higher moisture content and small particle size. The selectivity value, SV also influenced by the moisture content. Increase in moisture content decreased the SV, and this may be due to the decreasing of lignin degradation compared to cellulose loss caused by oxygen diffusion declining and ligninolytic enzymes inhibition. Similar condition was also reported for SSF of steam-exploded cornstalk by T. versicolor where the highest laccase activity achieved in this study was 2765.81 Ug−1 at 75% moisture content [33]. A study on laccase production by a novel white-rot fungus Pseudolagarobasidium acaciicola LA 1 through SSF of Parthenium biomass reported that the highest laccase activities, 16,388 Ug−1 of substrate was found at liquid to solid ratio of 5 with an incubation period of 7 days [42].

3.4 Temperature

Temperature is another very critical factor in the pretreatment using white-rot fungi. However, different genus has different tolerant to temperature. Fungal physiology, fungal strain and types of substrate also resulted in different optimal temperature for biological pretreatment [30]. This statement is in agreement with several studies which showed the production of ligninolytic enzyme using white-rot fungi has various optimal temperature [33, 50]. White-rot basidiomycetes grow optimally at temperature between 25 and 30°C while most of white-rot ascomycetes fungi grow optimally at 39°C [5]. The metabolism of these fungi produces heat and develops temperature gradients in SSF media. The accumulated heat can lead to adverse effect on the fungal growth and their metabolic activity which leading to the denaturation of the key enzymes. From the studies on pretreatment of rice straw, ligninolytic activities by S. commune was found to be peaked at 30 and 35°C [40, 41]. Meanwhile the highest ligninases production by T. versicolor was reported at 40°C [51]. Adekunle et al. [33] reported in their study on the SSF of steam-exploded cornstalk with T. versicolor that there was a direct correlation between the temperature and laccase production, with the highest laccase activity of 2677.16 U g−1 was produced at 28°C. The maximum production of laccase by T. giganteum AGHP (1.53 × 105 Ug−1 of dry substrate) was obtained at 30°C [39]. This study also showed that lower temperature of 10 and 20°C are not suitable for the growth of fungi due to lower enzyme production. Similar result was obtained from the study on laccase production by Pseudolagarobasidium acaciicola LA 1, the optimum production (19,944 Ug−1 dry substrate), was found at 30°C [42].

3.5 pH

pH is one of the prominent parameters in the cultivation of fungi and it is very problematic to control in SSF [52]. The initial pH of the medium influences the microbial growth and the production of ligninolytic enzyme. White-rot fungi grow well at pH 4–5, while substrate acidity decreases their growth. A study conducted on the isolation of laccase from a novel white-rot fungus Pseudolagarobasidium acaciicola LA 1 through SSF of Parthenium biomass showed that the isolated laccase was found to perform optimally at pH 4.5 and highly stable within the range of pH 4–7 for 24 h [42]. The effect of pH is important in the case of laccase production, and a small change in intracellular pH will result in a decrease of macromolecules synthesis. Patel and Gupte [39] reported that the maximal laccase production (1.27 × 105 Ug−1 of dry substrate) by Tricholoma giganteum AGHP was achieved at pH 5.0. No increment in the production of enzyme was found at higher pH. This may be attributed to the poor mycelial growth at an elevated pH which may restrict the laccase production. It was reported that the maximum ligninolytic activities by T. versicolor were found at pH 4.0 and 5.0 [33]. Asgher et al. [40] showed that the optimum enzymes production by S. commune IBL-06 was found to be at pH 5 while pH 4.43 and 4.46 for S. commune NI-07 [41]. Change in pH will affect the three dimensional structure of laccase which in turn leads to the decrease in laccase activity [5].

3.6 Aeration

Production and activity of ligninolytic enzymes are also influenced by aeration. There are several purposes of aeration such as to supply oxygen into the media, for the removal of CO2, heat dissipation, distribution of water vapor to regulate humidity, and circulation of volatile compounds produced during metabolism. Thus, this factor should be optimized to improve rate of delignification [49].

3.7 Supplements

Other factor such as various supplements (Cu2+, Mn2+, ferulic acid, xylidine, veratric acid, vanillic acid, cinnamic acid, guaiacol, etc.) for the SSF media have previously been reported in studying their effect on production of ligninolytic enzymes [44, 53]. Many studies reported that the copper at various concentrations influences laccase production in S. ostrea, T. pubescens, P. eryngii, and P. ostreatus [46, 54]. This is related to the role of Cu2+ that controls the transcription of laccase gene and also enhances the stability of this enzyme. Meanwhile, the concentration on Mn2+ influenced both MnP and laccase production by different Pleurotus species [55].


4. Conclusion

Pretreatment is very crucial in the conversion of lignocellulosic materials to other value-added products as lignin acts as the barrier for enzyme penetration. Comparing various pretreatment strategies, fungal pretreatment is more favorable because it is an environmental-friendly process. White-rot fungi with high selectivity of delignification than cellulose removal are more desirable compared to other microorganisms as cellulose is the feedstock for the subsequent hydrolysis process. Fungal strain, inoculum concentration, moisture content, temperature, pH, aeration and supplements are crucial parameters for fungal growth and metabolism to achieve good pretreatment outcome.


  1. 1. Lee RA, Lavoie JM. From first- to third-generation biofuels: Challenges of producing a commodity from a biomass of increasing complexity. Animal Frontiers. 2013;3(2):6-11. DOI: 10.2527/af.2013-0010
  2. 2. Haghighi Mood S, Hossein Golfeshan A, Tabatabaei M, Salehi Jouzani G, Najafi GH, Gholami M, et al. Lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol, a comprehensive review with a focus on pretreatment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013;27:77-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.033
  3. 3. Zheng Y, Zhao J, Xu F, Li Y. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2014;42:35-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2014.01.001
  4. 4. Ravindran R, Jaiswal AK. A comprehensive review on pre-treatment strategy for lignocellulosic food industry waste: Challenges and opportunities. Bioresource Technology. 2016;199:92-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.106
  5. 5. Sindhu R, Binod P, Pandey A. Biological pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass—An overview. Bioresource Technology. 2016;199:76-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.030
  6. 6. Narayanaswamy N, Dheeran P, Verma S, Kumar S. Biological pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic saccharification. In: Fang Z, editor. Pretreatment Techniques for Biofuels and Biorefineries. Green Energy. Berlin: Springer; 2013. pp. 3-34. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32735-3_1
  7. 7. Wan C, Li Y. Fungal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnology Advances. 2012;30(6):1447-1457. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.03.003
  8. 8. Taha M, Shahsavari E, Al-Hothaly K, Mouradov A, Smith AT, Ball AS, et al. Enhanced biological straw saccharification through coculturing of lignocellulose-degrading microorganisms. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2015;175(8):3709-3728. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-015-1539-9
  9. 9. Chaturvedi V, Verma P. An overview of key pretreatment processes employed for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels and value added products. 3 Biotech. 2013;3(5):415-431. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-013-0167-8
  10. 10. Bari E, Taghiyari HR, Naji HR, Schmidt O, Ohno KM, Clausen CA, et al. Assessing the destructive behaviors of two white-rot fungi on beech wood. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2016;114:129-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.06.010
  11. 11. Saha BC, Qureshi N, Kennedy GJ, Cotta MA. Biological pretreatment of corn Stover with white-rot fungus for improved enzymatic hydrolysis. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2016;109:29-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.12.020
  12. 12. Hermosilla E, Rubilar O, Schalchli H, da Silva AS, Ferreira-Leitao V, Diez MC. Sequential white-rot and brown-rot fungal pretreatment of wheat straw as a promising alternative for complementary mild treatments. Waste Management. 2018;79:240-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.044
  13. 13. Xu G, Wang L, Liu J, Wu J. FTIR and XPS analysis of the changes in bamboo chemical structure decayed by white-rot and brown-rot fungi. Applied Surface Science. 2013;280:799-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.05.065
  14. 14. Shirkavand E, Baroutian S, Gapes DJ, Young BR. Pretreatment of radiata pine using two white rot fungal strains Stereum hirsutum and Trametes versicolor. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017;142:13-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.021
  15. 15. Monrroy M, Ibañez J, Melin V, Baeza J, Mendonça RT, Contreras D, et al. Bioorganosolv pretreatments of P. radiata by a brown rot fungus (Gloephyllum trabeum) and ethanolysis. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2010;47(1–2):11-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.01.009
  16. 16. Nilsson T, Daniel G. Chemistry and microscopy of wood decay by some higher ascomycetes. Holzforschung. 1989;43(1):11-18. DOI: 10.1515/hfsg.1989.43.1.11
  17. 17. Castoldi R, Bracht A, de Morais GR, Baesso ML, Correa RCG, Peralta RA, et al. Biological pretreatment of Eucalyptus grandis sawdust with white-rot fungi: Study of degradation patterns and saccharification kinetics. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2014;258:240-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.090
  18. 18. da Silva Machado A, Ferraz A. Biological pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse with basidiomycetes producing varied patterns of biodegradation. Bioresource Technology. 2017;225:17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.053
  19. 19. Ginns JH. Polypores of British Columbia (Fungi: Basidiomycota) [Internet]. Tech Rep 1. Vol. 104. Victoria, BC: Province of British Columbia; 2017. 1-260 p. Available from: [Accessed: 2018-12-28]
  20. 20. Wang FQ, Xie H, Chen W, Wang ET, Du FG, Song AD. Biological pretreatment of corn Stover with ligninolytic enzyme for high efficient enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresource Technology. 2013;144:572-578. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.012
  21. 21. van Kuijk SJA, Sonnenberg ASM, Baars JJP, Hendriks WH, del Río JC, Rencoret J, et al. Chemical changes and increased degradability of wheat straw and oak wood chips treated with the white rot fungi Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Lentinula edodes. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2017;105:381-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.07.003
  22. 22. Alexandropoulou M, Antonopoulou G, Fragkou E, Ntaikou I, Lyberatos G. Fungal pretreatment of willow sawdust and its combination with alkaline treatment for enhancing biogas production. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017;203:704-713. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.006
  23. 23. Xu X, Xu Z, Shi S, Lin M. Lignocellulose degradation patterns, structural changes, and enzyme secretion by Inonotus obliquus on straw biomass under submerged fermentation. Bioresource Technology. 2017;241:415-423. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.087
  24. 24. García-Torreiro M, López-Abelairas M, Lu-Chau TA, Lema JM. Fungal pretreatment of agricultural residues for bioethanol production. Industrial Crops and Products. 2016;89:486-492. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.05.036
  25. 25. Piñeros-Castro Y, Velásquez-Lozano M. Biodegradation kinetics of oil palm empty fruit bunches by white rot fungi. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2014;91:24-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.03.009
  26. 26. Ishola MM, Isroi TMJ. Effect of fungal and phosphoric acid pretreatment on ethanol production from oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB). Bioresource Technology. 2014;165:9-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.053
  27. 27. Wang W, Yuan T, Cui B, Dai Y. Investigating lignin and hemicellulose in white rot fungus-pretreated wood that affect enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresource Technology. 2013;134:381-385. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.042
  28. 28. Rouches E, Herpoël-Gimbert I, Steyer JP, Carrere H. Improvement of anaerobic degradation by white-rot fungi pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;59:179-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.317
  29. 29. Moreno AD, Ibarra D, Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M. A review of biological delignification and detoxification methods for lignocellulosic bioethanol production. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2015;35(3):342-354. DOI: 10.3109/07388551.2013.878896
  30. 30. Isroi MR, Syamsiah S, Niklasson C, Cahyanto MN, Ludquist K, et al. Biological pretreatment of lignocelluloses with white-rot fungi and its applications: A review. BioResources. 2011;6(4):5224-5259. DOI: 10.15376/biores.6.4.5224-5259
  31. 31. van Kuijk SJA, Sonnenberg ASM, Baars JJP, Hendriks WH, Cone JW. Fungal treated lignocellulosic biomass as ruminant feed ingredient: A review. Biotechnology Advances. 2015;33(1):191-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.014
  32. 32. Chen H. Biotechnology principles of solid state fermentation. In: Modern Solid State Fermentation. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. pp. 23-74. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6043-1_2
  33. 33. Adekunle AE, Zhang C, Guo C, Liu CZ. Laccase production from Trametes versicolor in solid-state fermentation of steam-exploded pretreated cornstalk. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2017;8(1):153-159. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-016-9562-9
  34. 34. Liu X, Hiligsmann S, Gourdon R, Bayard R. Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomasses pretreated with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017;193:154-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.075
  35. 35. Ge X, Matsumoto T, Keith L, Li Y. Fungal pretreatment of albizia chips for enhanced biogas production by solid-state anaerobic digestion. Energy & Fuels. 2015;29(1):200-204. DOI: 10.1021/ef501922t
  36. 36. Vasco-Correa J, Li Y. Solid-state anaerobic digestion of fungal pretreated Miscanthus sinensis harvested in two different seasons. Bioresource Technology. 2015;185:211-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.099
  37. 37. Kong W, Chen H, Lyu S, Ma F, Yu H, Zhang X. Characterization of a novel manganese peroxidase from white-rot fungus Echinodontium taxodii 2538, and its use for the degradation of lignin-related compounds. Process Biochemistry. 2016;51(11):1776-1783. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.01.007
  38. 38. Tišma M, Planinić M, Bucić-Kojić A, Panjičko M, Zupančič GD, Zelić B. Corn silage fungal-based solid-state pretreatment for enhanced biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion with cow manure. Bioresource Technology. 2018;253:220-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.037
  39. 39. Patel H, Gupte A. Optimization of different culture conditions for enhanced laccase production and its purification from Tricholoma giganteum AGHP. Bioresources and Bioprocessing. 2016;3(1):11-20. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-016-0088-6
  40. 40. Asgher M, Wahab A, Bilal M, Nasir Iqbal HM. Lignocellulose degradation and production of lignin modifying enzymes by Schizophyllum commune IBL-06 in solid-state fermentation. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2016;6:195-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2016.04.003
  41. 41. Kumar VP, Naik C, Sridhar M. Production, purification and characterization of novel laccase produced by Schizophyllum commune NI-07 with potential for delignification of crop residues. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology. 2015;51(4):432-441. DOI: 10.1134/S0003683815040080
  42. 42. Adak A, Tiwari R, Singh S, Sharma S, Nain L. Laccase production by a novel white-rot fungus Pseudolagarobasidium acaciicola LA 1 through solid-state fermentation of Parthenium biomass and its application in dyes decolorization. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2016;7(6):1427-1435. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-016-9550-0
  43. 43. Zhang X, Yu H, Huang H, Liu Y. Evaluation of biological pretreatment with white rot fungi for the enzymatic hydrolysis of bamboo culms. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2007;60(3):159-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.02.003
  44. 44. Meehnian H, Jana AK, Jana MM. Effect of particle size, moisture content, and supplements on selective pretreatment of cotton stalks by Daedalea flavida and enzymatic saccharification. 3 Biotech. 2016;6(2):235. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0548-x
  45. 45. Silva MLC, de Souza VB, da Silva Santos V, Kamida HM, de Vasconcellos-Neto JRT, Góes-Neto A, et al. Production of manganese peroxidase by Trametes villosa on unexpensive substrate and its application in the removal of lignin from agricultural wastes. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology. 2014;5:1067-1077. DOI: 10.4236/abb.2014.514122
  46. 46. Usha KY, Praveen K, Reddy BR. Enhanced production of ligninolytic enzymes by a mushroom Stereum ostrea. Biotechnology Research International. 2014;2014:1-9. DOI: 10.1155/2014/815495
  47. 47. Mustafa AM, Poulsen TG, Sheng K. Fungal pretreatment of rice straw with Pleurotus ostreatus and Trichoderma reesei to enhance methane production under solid-state anaerobic digestion. Applied Energy. 2016;180:661-671. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.135
  48. 48. Rouches E, Zhou S, Sergent M, Raouche S, Carrere H. Influence of white-rot fungus Polyporus brumalis BRFM 985 culture conditions on the pretreatment efficiency for anaerobic digestion of wheat straw. Biomass & Bioenergy. 2018;110:75-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.01.018
  49. 49. Madadi M, Abbas A. Lignin degradation by fungal pretreatment: A review. Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology. 2017;8(2):1-6. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7471.1000398
  50. 50. Tian X, Fang Z, Guo F. Impact and prospective of fungal pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 2012;6(3):335-350. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.346
  51. 51. Asgher M, Iqbal HMN, Asad MJ. Kinetic characterization of purified laccase produced from Trametes versicolor IBL-04 in solid state bio-processing of corncobs. BioResources. 2012;7(1):1171-1188. DOI: 10.15376/biores.7.1.1171-1188
  52. 52. Hölker U, Höfer M, Lenz J. Biotechnological advantages of laboratory-scale solid-state fermentation with fungi. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2004;64(2):175-186. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-003-1504-3
  53. 53. Liu Y, Juan L, Luo Z, Rao S, Su Y, Yang Y. Effect of supplements Mn2+, Cu2+, and aromatic compounds and Penicillium decumbens on lignocellulosic enzyme activity and productivity of Catathelasma ventricosum. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2013;23:565-571. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1211.11007
  54. 54. Galhaup C, Goller S, Peterbauer CK, Strauss J, Haltrich D. Characterization of the major laccase isoenzyme from Trametes pubescens and regulation of its synthesis by metal ions. Microbiology. 2002;148(7):2159-2169. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-148-7-2159
  55. 55. Stajić M, Persky L, Hadar Y, Friesem D, Duletić-Laušević S, Wasser SP, et al. Effect of copper and manganese ions on activities of laccase and peroxidases in three Pleurotus species grown on agricultural wastes. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2006;128(1):87-96. DOI: 10.1385/ABAB:128:1:087

Written By

Najiah Nadir, Nur Liyana Ismail and Azlan Shah Hussain

Submitted: September 27th, 2018 Reviewed: January 8th, 2019 Published: April 24th, 2019