Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Introductory Chapter: Identification and Isolation of Trichoderma spp. - Their Significance in Agriculture, Human Health, Industrial and Environmental Application

Written By

Mohammad Manjur Shah and Hamisu Afiya

Reviewed: December 13th, 2018Published: January 30th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.83528

From the Edited Volume


Edited by Mohammad Manjur Shah, Umar Sharif and Tijjani Rufai Buhari

Chapter metrics overview

2,897 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

The genus Trichodermais a diverse group of free-living fungi in the family Hypocreaceae, commonly present in all soils [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. These ascomycetes fungi are opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts inhabiting root ecosystems [3, 7] and parasites on other groups of fungi [2]. They reproduce by chlamydospores and ascospores and proliferate better at mesophilic temperatures (25–35°C) and wide range of pH. Several findings supported this such as [8] who observed no visible growth of conidia at 15°C, but retain growth at 25°C and best results at 30°C [9], evaluated the growth of Trichodermaisolates at different temperatures and pH ranges, and reported the highest mycelial growth of T. hamatum T612, T. harzianum T447, T. harzianum T969, and T. hamatum T614at 25°C and T. virens T523and Trichodermasp. at 30°C. For pH requirement, mycelial growth of T. hamatum T612, T. harzianum T447, and T. virens T523grew best at pH 5 and T. harzianum T969and Trichodermasp. at pH 7, while T. hamatum T614has best mycelial growth at pH 8. A recent study by [10] reported 25–35°C. Similarly, a pH range of 5.5–8.5 was congenial for T. harzianumand T. hamatum.

Trichodermacolonizes several ecological niches where they play a vital role; they have been earlier recognized as effective biocontrol agents of plant-pathogenic fungi, producers of secondary metabolites of medical importance [3, 11, 12], and agents of bioremediation. Similarly, their ability to degrade lignocellulosic biomass to produce second-generation biofuels and other value-added products has been widely accepted [3, 12].


2. Identification of Trichodermaisolates

Conventional methods for identification of Trichodermaspp. using morphological and cultural approach have earlier been used. These include arrangement of conidiophores, phialides, and conidia, while cultural features include linear growth, colony color, growth pattern, and pigmentation of hyphae. The fungus has revealed different morphologies on various cultivation media due to genetic factors and environmental and nutritional factors. Green colony pigmentation after incubation for 7 days at 28°C on potato dextrose agar (PDA) was observed in Trichodermacultures isolated from soil samples in Kliran [5]. Rhizospheric isolates revealed pale or yellowish color of reverse colonies at 25 and 30°C with rapid growth, loosely arranged conidia, and effused conidiation [13]. An ellipsoidal, obovoid, and bowling pin phialides were observed in Trichodermaspp. [14]; 10 isolates from groundnut rhizosphere revealed different morphological and microscopic features as shown in Table 1.

S/NIsolateColony colorColony reverse colorConidiophore characterPhialide characterConidia shapeChlamydospore formation
1GRT-1Dark greenAmberLong infrequently branching and verticillateFrequently paired, lageniform, and divergentGlobose to ellipsoidalInfrequent, terminal, and intercalary
2GRT-2Dull green to bluish greenColorlessBroad, verticillate, and frequently branchingLageniform, divergent, terminal philaid more elongatedSub cylindrical to narrow ellipsoidalFrequent, intercalary, and terminal
3GRT-3WhiteWhiteNo conidiaAbundant, terminal, and intercalary
4GRT-4Scattered in minute tufts and pale yellow greenPale yellowishRarely branched and verticillateCylindrical or slightly inflated and divergentEllipsoidalFrequently intercalary and terminal
5GRT-5Dell green to bluish greenPale yellowishBroad frequently branching and verticillateAmpulliform and divergentSub cylindricalInfrequent, intercalary, and terminal
6GRT-6Dark bluish greenUncoloredInfrequently branching and verticillateLageniform and convergentGlobose to ellipsoidalFrequently intercalary and terminal
7GRT-7Dark green producing tufts or pustules fringed by sterile myceliumDull yellowishFrequently branching and verticillateAmpulliform and convergentSub globose to obovoidInfrequent, internally and terminally
8GRT-8Dull green to bluish greenPale yellowishNarrow verticillate and frequently branchingAmpulliform and divergentSub cylindrical to narrow ellipsoidalInfrequent, intercalary, and terminal
9GRT-9Dark bluish greenUncoloredInfrequently branching and verticillateLageniform and convergentGlobose to ellipsoidalInfrequent, intercalary, and terminally
10GRT-10Compute dull, green tufts or pustulesDiscoloredFrequently branching and pyramidal structureLageniform and divergentObovoidFrequently, intercalary, and terminal

Table 1.

Morphological characteristics of some Trichodermaisolates.

Source: [15].

Isolates GRT-1, GRT-6, and GRT-9 were confirmed as Trichoderma viride; GRT-2, GRT-5, and GRT-8 as Trichoderma koningii; GRT-4as Trichoderma reesei; GRT-7 as Trichoderma harizanum; and GRT-10 as Trichoderma aureoviride, while GRT-3 could not be identified up to species level (Figure 1) [15]. However, conventional methods for the identification of Trichodermaspp. using morphological and cultural methods are prone to error and poor documentation of isolates at the culture collection since isolates are not “adequately differentiated” [16]. The use of molecular phylogenetic features coupled with the conventional methods is a better approach for verification of isolates and identification of novel strains [8] than morphological features alone, as anamorph and teleomorph used for defining species have reached their limits [17]. Several literatures have reported various techniques of molecular characterization to confirm Trichodermaisolates, such as “amplifying and analyzing the sequences of internal transcribed spacer gene (ITS) 1 and 2 and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1) encoding gene” and BLAST interface in TrichOKEY and TrichoBLAST [16]; “restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and DNA sequencing” [18, 19, 20]; random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPD) and rDNA sequencing [1421]; sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) marker [7]; etc.

Figure 1.

Trichodermaisolates after 5 days incubation period [15]. (a) Colony color. (b) Colony reverse color.


3. Isolation media for Trichoderma

The growth of Trichodermahas been screened on different culture media for various studies using available, relatively cheaper supporting media such as corn meal agar, oat meal agar, potato dextrose agar, Czapek’s Dox agar, special nutrient media, carrot agar, rose Bengal agar, selective media, etc. However, selective media favor growth of Trichodermastrains over other fungi and hence preferred for easy identification of Trichodermaisolates over rapidly growing fungi that may overlap it [22].

3.1. Trichodermaselective media (TSM)

Trichodermaselective medium (TSM) is recognized for quantitative isolation of Trichodermaspp. from soil. It is composed of low glucose level for rapid growth and sporulation of the fungus. Chloramphenicol is used to inhibit the growth of bacteria, while pentachloronitrobenzene, p-dimethylaminobenzenediazo sodium sulfonate, and rose bengal are used as selective fungal inhibitors [22].

3.1.1. TSM recipe

  1. 0.2 g of MgSO4∙7H2O.

  2. 0.9 g of K2HPO4.

  3. 0.15 g of KCl.

  4. 1.0 g of NH4NO3.

  5. 3.0 g of glucose.

  6. 0.15 g of rose bengal.

  7. 20 g of agar.

  8. 0.25 g of chloramphenicol.

  9. 0.3 g of p-dimethylaminobenzenediazo sodium sulfonate.

  10. 0.2 g of pentachloronitrobenzene.

Recipe is dissolved in 1000 ml distilled water and autoclaved at 121°C, 1.4 kg cm−1 for 15 min. Then add 0.25 g chloramphenicol and 0.2 g pentachloronitrobenzene into the solution. Keep/store media at 45°C to prevent solidification.

3.2. Trichoderma harzianumselective medium (THSM)

Selection of THSM enables comparison between aggressive and non-aggressive Trichodermagroups. The antimicrobials chloramphenicol, streptomycin, quintozene, and propamocarb are added to the medium to highly select T. harzianumin compact colonies without visible contamination [23].

3.2.1. Recipe for THSM

  1. 0.2 g of MgSO4∙7H2O.

  2. 0.9 g of K2HPO4.

  3. 1.0 g of NH4NO3.

  4. 0.15 g of KCl.

  5. 0.15 g of rose bengal.

  6. 3 g of glucose.

  7. 20 g of agar.

  8. 950 mL of distilled water.

Media is autoclaved at 121°C, 1.4 kg cm−1, for 15 min, and 0.25 g of chloramphenicol, 9.0 mL of streptomycin, 1.2 mL of propamocarb, and 0.2 g of quintozene are added.

3.3. Rose Bengal agar (RBA)

RBA is a nonselective medium for isolation of Trichodermawhich is developed by Jarvis in 1973, for enumeration of molds and yeasts from food. The medium is suitable with protein foods and tolerates high temperatures. Chloramphenicol or chlortetracycline is added to suppress the growth of bacteria [24].

3.3.1. Recipe for rose Bengal agar (RBA)

  1. Mycological peptone 5.0 g

  2. Rose bengal 0.05 g

  3. Glucose 10.0 g

  4. Chloramphenicol 0.1 g

  5. Dipotassium phosphate 1.0 g

  6. Agar 15.0 g

  7. MgSO4.7 H20 0.5 g

  8. Distilled 1000 mL

Add the ingredients to the distilled water and boil to dissolve completely. Add 10 mL of chloramphenicol or chlortetracycline; shake and autoclave at 121°C for 15 min. Store in the dark at 4°C for further use.


4. Method for isolation of Trichoderma

Several methods are available for the isolation of Trichoderma; however, one of the commonest methods reported in literature is the serial dilution of samples [22, 25, 26, 27, 28]. This technique is simple, cost-effective, and appropriate to handle large samples.

Soil samples are collected, air dried, and ground into powder. Stock solution of sample is prepared by dissolving 10 g of powdered soil sample into 90 mL of distilled water. Next, serial dilution of samples were prepared as 10−1, 10−2…10−5. One milliliter of each of the prepared dilution is spread evenly on a suitable medium on a petri dish at 28 ± 1°C for 7 days.


5. Agricultural significance of Trichodermaspp.

Continuous use of chemical pesticides to manage fungal pathogens (which are known to cause major diseases in agriculture) has led to destruction of soil structure, soil infertility, and accumulation of toxic compounds on crops. Moreover, “chemical fungicides have less influence on pathogens due to their diversity, adaptability and increasing resistance” [4]. Various microbial biocontrol agents serve a solution for management of the aforementioned to attain a sustainable agriculture for future generations [29].

Knowledge about biocontrol potential of the fungus Trichodermaspp. has been recognized as early as 1920 [30, 31], although it received researcher’s interest with advances in genetic engineering [12]. This technology has made it easy to isolate, characterize, clone, sequence, and express the roles of specific genes in the biocontrol mechanism. The genes encoding the enzymes play vital roles in biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, growth of hyphae, degradation of cell wall, and antagonistic activity against plant pathogens [29]. Trichoderma harzianum(Th. Azad) and Trichoderma viride(01PP) are used as biopesticides and biofertilizers [32, 33], growth promoters, and inducers of disease resistance in plants [12, 33]. The former is the main antagonist utilized in management of plant diseases in agriculture [34, 35] due to its cost-effectiveness and minimal effects on the ecological balance [34].

Trichodermais efficient in improving vegetative growth of plants and nutrient content of soil through decomposition and biodegradation [33]. Active substance such as fungal spores is applied as foliar sprays and pre- and post-planting treatments, during watering and transplanting. Trichoderma-based products are marketed worldwide and applied in fields, nurseries, and horticulture for management of fungal soil-borne pathogens such as Pythiumand Rhizoctonia[33, 35]. It is a safe and environmentally friendly method to reduce the detrimental effects of chemical pesticides [36].

Various articles reported on the role of Trichodermaspp. as antagonist to plant pathogens such as T. harzianum, T. asperellum, and T. virensagainst Phytophthora capsiciin red pepper [16]; Trichodermaisolates against Sclerotium rolfsii, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, C. capsici[37], S. minorand S. sclerotiorumin the in vitro experiments [38]; T. atroviride SY3Aand T. harzianum SYNwere effective biological control agents of R. solanidamping-off of cucumber [39]; Trichodermaisolates were antagonist to soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi (Fusarium graminearum, Rhizoctonia solani, Macrophomina phaseoli, and Phytophtora cactorum) [9]; Trichodermaspecies was antagonist to anthracnose of strawberry [5]; Trichodermaisolates inhibit and control the growth of Fusarium oxysporumwith Trichoderma harzianumbeing the most effective [40]; T. viride, T. polysporum, and T. harzianuminhibit more than 60% growth of C. paradoxa[19]; T. hamatum LU593and T. virens LU556delayed aphids manifestation on cabbage [41]; Trichodermaisolates against Sclerotium rolfsii[6]; Trichodermaisolates against Fusarium sambucinum[42]; and Trichodermaspp. and Bacillusspp. in seed treatment against root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica[43].


6. Mechanism of biological control

Several researches have revealed the mechanism of biocontrol in Trichodermavia mycoparasitism (by coiling around the host, formation of appressoria and breakdown of the host cell wall), antibiosis, and competition for resources (space and nutrients). A peptaibol from Trichodermamay induce apoptosis in plant-pathogenic fungi through complex mechanisms. Trichokonins, a type of peptaibol from Trichoderma pseudokoningii SMF2, produced a molecular biocontrol mechanism which efficiently induces apoptosis in fungal cells. Apoptotic hallmarks such as the deposition of cytoplasmic vacuoles, presence of reactive oxygen species, breakage of DNA molecule, and exposure of phosphatidylserine were observed in Fusarium oxysporumcells treated with Trichokonins [44]. Mycoparasitism has been reported in Trichodermaspecies antagonist to Anthracnose disease of strawberry. Microscopic examination revealed that the hyphae of Trichoderma“grew alongside and coiled compactly around the hyphae of the fungal pathogen isolates” [5].

Recent development has further shown the significance of Trichodermato induce systemic/localized resistance in plant by colonizing the root epidermis and subsequent release of bioactive metabolites, to transform the transcriptome and proteome of resultant plants [11, 30]. It further revealed that metabolites/enzymes produced in Trichodermasuch as chitinase and β-1,3 glucanase as recorded in T. virideand T. harzianum, respectively [37]; cellulases and hemicellulases in Trichodermaspp. [12, 45]; and proteases and lipases [46] are responsible for breaking down the component of the fungal cell wall to reduce the integrity of the pathogen cell. Relevant biocontrol processes such as production of hydrolytic enzymes and antifungal metabolites and the formation of infection structures are controlled by heterotrimeric G proteins and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases. Similarly, induction of plant systemic resistance in Trichoderma virensand hyperosmotic stress response in Trichoderma harzianumare related to MAPK signaling [47], while biocontrol associated with coiling and chitinase production in Trichodermais regulated by internal cAMP level.


7. Trichodermain human health

Trichodermaspecies are possible source of important antimicrobial agents against gram negative, positive, fungi and yeast” [48]. Earlier in 1995, isolated peptides from Trichodermastrains showed antibacterial activity against S. aureus[49]; T. harzianumproduced 44.06 μg/mL of the well-known antifungal drug, cyclosporine [50]. Similarly, ‘Trichodermanins C–E (1–3), new diterpenes with a rare fused 6-5-6-6ring system, have been isolated from a fungus Trichoderma harzianum” detached from a marine sponge H. okadai. Cytotoxicity assay using three cancer cell lines showed significant activity in 1 [51]. Broth extracts of Trichodermaspecies (Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma longibrachiatum, and T. koningii) showed antifungal and antibacterial activity against Paecilomyces variotii, Penicillium notatum, Nematospora coryli, Mucor miehei, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus subtilis, Enterobacter dissolvens, and Sarcina luteausing agar disk diffusion method [48].


8. Industrial and environmental applications of Trichodermaspp.

Trichodermaare utilized in the production of low-cost enzymes for applications in food, pulp, and paper and textile industries to generate biofuel. The biotechnological workhorse of Trichodermais the production of cellulases [52], in addition to the extracellular laccase [53]. Together with cellulases, endoglucanases (EG1, EG2, EG3, and EG5), and β-glucosidase, these enzymes catalyze the breakdown of ligninolytic biomass to produce an important industrial enzyme for the production of second-generation biofuels and other value-added products such as fermentable sugars, organic acids, solvents, drink softeners, etc. [54]. The production of proteins such as heterogenous proteins from cellobiohydrolase I (cbhI), a strong and inducible promoter of the gene encoding the major cellulose [55], and hydrophobins HFBI and HFBII [56, 57, 58] for industrial applications has been reported. Research efforts have focused on increasing enzyme yield and other valuable products from Trichodermaspp. through genome sequencing [45]. The highest yield of 1.4 g hydrophobins HFBI and 0.24 g hydrophobins HFBII per liter was obtained from the fungus through genetic manipulation on glucose-containing culture medium [59]; up to 40 mg/l of chymosin was produced from a transformed strain [55]; newly constructed Trichodermastrains designed for specific industrial applications such as biofinishing and biostoning of cotton increased the cellulose CBHI by 1.5-fold and CBHII by fourfold as to the main strain. These were further increased to 1.6-fold CBHI and 3.4-fold CBHII by transformation as compared to the host strain. In addition, CBHII proteins were produced by the gene promoter (Trichodermacellulases).


9. Conclusion

Trichodermaspp. is one of the frequently isolated fungal genera from soil and plant roots that have been extensively studied for their vast metabolites with various applications (agricultural, industrial, health, etc.).

In the field of agriculture, Trichodermaare suitable antimicrobial agents against pathogenic bacteria, fungi, and yeast. Similarly, they play a vital role in improving the vegetative growth of plants and nutrient content of soil through decomposition and biodegradation. It is a safe, cost-effective, and environmentally benign technology to attain a sustainable agriculture.

In the field of medicine, different metabolites of medical importance have been reported from Trichoderma. Earlier in 1995, isolated peptides from Trichodermastrains showed antibacterial activity against S. aureus[49]. T. harzianumproduced 44.06 μg/mL of the well-known antifungal drug, cyclosporine [50].

Cellulases, an important industrial enzyme from Trichoderma, are essential in the breakdown of biomass to produce second-generation biofuels and other value-added products such as fermentable sugars, organic acids, solvents, drink softeners, [54] etc., in addition to the laccase production for textile industries. With advances in genetic engineering, efforts are focused on designing new strains of Trichodermaspp. through genome sequencing for production of novel metabolites of various applications.


  1. 1.Samuels GJ.Trichoderma: A review of biology and systematics of the genus. Mycological Research. 1996;100(8):923-935. DOI: 10.1016/S0953-7562(96)80043-8
  2. 2.Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M.Trichodermaspp.—Opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2004;2(1):43-56
  3. 3.Schuster A, Schmoll M. Computer-assisted corneal topography. High-resolution graphic presentation and analysis of keratoscopy. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2010;87:787-799
  4. 4.Matei S, Matei G-M, Cornea P, Popa G. Characterization of soilTrichodermaisolates for potential biocontrol of plant pathogens. Factori şi procese pedogenetice din zona temperată. 2011;10:29-37
  5. 5.Mutia D, Prilya F. Exploration ofTrichodermaspp. and fungal pathogen that causes a strawberry anthracnose and examination of in vitro antagonistic activity. Biotika. 2017;5(18):58-68
  6. 6.Mohan PN. Studies on antagonistic potential ofTrichodermaspp. from saline soils [Internet]. Agricultural University; 2017. Available from:
  7. 7.Digamber PS. Geographical diversity analysis ofTrichodermaspp. isolates based on sequence related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) marker. Latur: College of Agricultural Biotechnology; 2017
  8. 8.Soesanto L, Sri-Utami D, Rahayuniati RF. Morphological characteristics of fourTrichodermaisolates and two endophyticFusariumisolates. Canadian Journal on Scientific and Industrial Research. 2011;2(8):294-306
  9. 9.Hajieghrari B, Torabi-giglou M, Mohammadi MR, Davari M. Biological potential of some IranianTrichodermaisolates in the control of soil borne plant pathogenic fungi. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2008;7(8):967-972
  10. 10.Shravan kashid V. Studies on Compatibility ofTrichodermaspp. with Agrochemicals. Parbhani: Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth; 2017
  11. 11.Mukherjee PK, Horwitz BA, Herrera-Estrella A, Schmoll M, Kenerley CM.Trichodermaresearch in the genome era. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2013;51(1):105-129. Available from:
  12. 12.Błaszczyk L, Siwulski M, Sobieralski K, Lisiecka J, Jędryczka M.Trichodermaspp.—Application and prospects for use in organic farming and industry. Journal of Plant Protection Research. 2014;54(4):309-317
  13. 13.Sharma KK, Singh US. Cultural and morphological characterization of rhizospheric isolates of fungal antagonistTrichoderma. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2014;6(2):451-456
  14. 14.Choi I-Y, Hong S-B, Yadav MC. Molecular and morphological characterization of green mold,Trichodermaspp. isolated from oyster mushrooms. Mycobiology. 2003;31(2):74-80. Available from:
  15. 15.Sekhar YC, Ahammed SK, Prasad TNVKV. Identification ofTrichodermaspecies based on morphological characters isolated from rhizosphere of groundnut (Arachis hypogaeaL). International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology. 2017;6(3):2056-2063
  16. 16.Savitha MJ, Sriram S. Morphological and molecular identification ofTrichodermaisolates with biocontrol potential againstPhytophthora blightin red pepper. Pest Management In Horticultural Ecosystems. 2015;21(2):194-202
  17. 17.Samuels GJ.Trichoderma: Systematics, the sexual state, and ecology. The Nature and Application of Biocontrol Microbes II: Trichoderma spp. 2006;96(2):1-12
  18. 18.Bourguignon E. Ecology and diversity of indigenousTrichodermaspecies in vegetable cropping systems. Lincoln University; 2008
  19. 19.Kannangara S, Dharmarathna R, Jayarathna DL. Isolation, identification and characterization ofTrichodermaspecies as a potential biocontrol agent againstCeratocystis paradoxa. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2016;12(1):51-62. Available from:
  20. 20.Hatvani L. Mushroom pathogenicTrichodermaspecies: Occurrence, biodiversity, diagnosis and extracellular enzyme production. University of Szeged; 2008
  21. 21.Narayan K, Kotasthane A. Genetic relatedness amongTrichodermaisolates inhibiting a pathogenic fungiRhizoctonia solani. Journal of Biotechnology. 2006;5:580-584
  22. 22.Elad Y, Chet I, Henis Y. A selective medium for improving quantitative isolation ofTrichodermaspp. from soil. Phytoparasitica. 1981;9(1):59-67
  23. 23.Williams J, Clarkson JM, Mills PR, Cooper RM. A selective medium for quantitative reisolation ofTrichoderma harzianumfromAgaricus bisporuscompost. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003;69(7):4190-4191
  24. 24.Rose bengal chloramphenicol (RBC) agar. International Journal of Food Microbiology. Elsevier; 1987;5(3):261-262
  25. 25.Mustafa A, Khan AM, Inam-ul-Haq M, Pervez AM, Umar U-D. Usefulness of different culture media for in-vitro evaluation ofTrichodermaspp. against seed-borne fungi of economic importance. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology. 2009;21(1):83-88
  26. 26.Khandelwal M, Datta S, Mehta J, Naruka R, Makhijani K, Sharma G, et al. Isolation, characterization & biomass production ofTrichoderma virideusing various agro products—A biocontrol agent. Advances in Applied Science Research. 2012;3(6):3950-3955
  27. 27.Roy MK, Hembram S, Debnath A. Effect of different media and pH on growth and sporulation of different nativeTrichodermaspp. An International Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences. 2015;10(4):1833-1837
  28. 28.Iqbal S, Ashfaq M, Malik AH, Khan KS, Mathew P. Isolation, preservation and revival ofTrichoderma viridein culture media. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2017;5(3):1640-1646
  29. 29.Sharma P, Vignesh KP, Ramesh R, Saravanan K, Deep S, Sharma M, et al. Biocontrol genes fromTrichodermaspp.: A review. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10(86):19898-19907
  30. 30.Harman G. Overview of mechanisms and uses ofTrichodermaspp. In: The Nature and Application of Biocontrol Microbes II:Trichodermaspp. Overview. Phytopathology. 2006;96(2):190-194
  31. 31.Harman GE. Overview of mechanisms and uses ofTrichodermaspp. Phytopathology. 2006;96(2):190-194. Available from:
  32. 32.Kumar V, Shahid M, Srivastava M, Sonika P, Singh A, Sharma A. Role of secondary metabolites produced by commercialTrichodermaspp. and their effect against soil borne pathogens. Biosensors. 2014;03(01):1-5. Available from:
  33. 33.Woo SL, Ruocco M, Vinale F, Nigro M, Marra R, Lombardi N, et al.Trichoderma-based products and their widespread use in agriculture. The Open Mycology Journal. 2014;8(1):71-126. Available from:
  34. 34.Monte EL.Trichodermain organic agriculture. In: Proceedings V World Avocado Congress. 2003. pp. 725-733
  35. 35.Kumar S, Thakur M, Rani A.Trichoderma: Mass production, formulation, quality control, delivery and its scope in commercialization in India for the management of plant diseases. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014;9(53):3838-3852. Available from:
  36. 36.Hermosa R, Botella L, Montero-Barrientos M, Alonso-Ramírez A, Arbona V, Gómez-Cadenas A, et al. Biotechnological applications of the gene transfer from the beneficial fungusTrichoderma harzianumto plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2011;6(8):1235-1236
  37. 37.Kumar K, Amaresan N, Bhagat S, Madhuri K, Srivastava RC. Isolation and characterization ofTrichodermaspp. for antagonistic activity against root rot and foliar pathogens. Indian Journal of Microbiology. 2012;52(2):137-144
  38. 38.Elias LM, Domingues MVPF, De Moura KE, Harakava R, Patricio RA. Selection ofTrichodermaisolates for biological control ofSclerotinia minorandS. sclerotiorumin lettuce. Summa Phytopathologica. 2016;42(23):216-221
  39. 39.Yobo KS. Biological control and plant growth promotion by selectedTrichodermaandBacillusspecies. KwaZulu-Natal University; 2005
  40. 40.Shankar GK. Induction of Systemic Resistance in Tomato by usingTrichoderma. India: PhD Thesis submitted to PhD Thesis submitted to Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth; 2015. 219 pp. Available from:
  41. 41.Pus W. Plant-Mediated Effects ofTrichodermaspp. andBeauveria bassianaIsolates on Insect and Pathogen Resistance. New Zealand: Lincoln University; 2017
  42. 42.Ru Z, Di W.Trichodermaspp. from rhizosphere soil and their antagonism againstFusarium sambucinum. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2012;11(18):4180-4186. Available from: and Di.htm
  43. 43.Chinheya CC. Use ofTrichodermaandBacillusisolates as seed treatments against the root knot nematodeMeloidogyne Javanica(Chitwood). University of KwaZulu-Natal; 2015
  44. 44.Shi M, Chen L, Wang X, Zhang T, Zhao P, Song X, et al. Antimicrobial peptaibols fromTrichoderma pseudokoningiiinduce programmed cell death in plant fungal pathogens. Microbiology. 2012;158:166-175
  45. 45.Seidl V, Seiboth B.Trichoderma reesei: Genetic approaches to improving strain efficiency. Biofuels. 2010;1(2):343-354
  46. 46.Jorge L.Trichodermastrains as biocontrol agents. Advancements in Genetic Engineering. 2014;03(01):4172. Available from:
  47. 47.Zeilinger S, Omann M.Trichodermabiocontrol: Signal transduction pathways involved in host sensing and mycoparasitism. Gene Regulation and Systems Biology. 2007;1:227-234
  48. 48.Tarus PK, Chhabra SC, Langat-Thoruwa C, Wanyonyi AW. Fermentation and antimicrobial activities of extracts from different spp. ofTrichoderma. African Journal of Health Sciences. 2004;11:33-42
  49. 49.Goulard C, Hlimi S, Rebuffat S, Bodo B. Trichorzins HA and MA, antibiotic peptides fromTrichoderma harzianumI. Fermentation, isolation and biological properties. Journal of Antibiotics (Tokyo). 1995;48(11):1248-1253
  50. 50.Azam A, Anjum T, Irun W.Trichoderma harzianum: A new fungal source for the production of cyclosporin A. Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology. 2012;7:33-35
  51. 51.Yamada T, Suzue M, Arai T, Kikuchi T, Tanaka R. Trichodermanins C–E, new diterpenes with a fused 6-5-6-6 ring system produced by a marine sponge-derived fungus. Marine Drugs. 2017;15:169
  52. 52.Schuster A, Schmoll M. Biology and biotechnology ofTrichoderma. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2010;87:787-799
  53. 53.Cázares-García S, Vázquez-Garcidueñas M, Vázquez-Marrufo G. Structural and phylogenetic analysis of laccases fromTrichoderma: A bioinformatic approach. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55295
  54. 54.Kumar R, Singh S, Singh O. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: Biochemical and molecular perspectives. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology. 2008;35(5):377-391
  55. 55.Uusitalo AH, Penttila BM, Knowles J, Novel Fungal A. Expression system: Secretion of active calf chymosin from the filamentous fungusTrichoderma reesei. Biotechnology. 1989;7:596-603
  56. 56.Linder M, Selber K, Nakari-Setälä T, Qiao M, Kula MR, Penttilä M. The hydrophobins HFBI and HFBII fromTrichoderma reeseishowing efficient interactions with nonionic surfactants in aqueous two-phase systems. Biomacromolecules. 2001;2(2):511-517
  57. 57.Askolin S, Nakari-Setälä T, Tenkanen M. Overproduction, purification, and characterization of theTrichoderma reeseihydrophobin HFBI. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2001;57(1-2):124-130
  58. 58.Mustalahti E, Saloheimo M, Joensuu JJ. Intracellular protein production inTrichoderma reesei (Hypocrea jecorina)with hydrophobin fusion technology. New Biotechnology. 2013;30(2):262-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2011.09.006
  59. 59.Askolin S. Characterization of theTrichoderma reeseihydrophobins HFBI and HFBII. VTT Publications. Helsinki University of Technology; 2006

Written By

Mohammad Manjur Shah and Hamisu Afiya

Reviewed: December 13th, 2018Published: January 30th, 2019