Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Alentejano Pig

Written By

Rui Charneca, José Martins, Amadeu Freitas, José Neves, José Nunes, Hugo Paixim, Pedro Bento and Nina Batorek-Lukač

Reviewed: 21 December 2018 Published: 06 February 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.83757

From the Monograph

European Local Pig Breeds - Diversity and Performance. A study of project TREASURE

Edited by Marjeta Candek-Potokar and Rosa M. Nieto Linan

Chapter metrics overview

1,480 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The present chapter presents the history and current status of Alentejano pig breed, a Portuguese autochthonous swine breed. A review of literature regarding reproductive and productive traits was carried out. Reproductive performance includes sow age at first parturition and at culling, litters per sow and per year, piglets born alive per litter, percentage of stillborn per litter, piglets birth weight, mortality rate until weaning, piglet weaned per litter, duration of lactation and farrowing interval. Growth performance includes average daily gain and average daily feed intake during lactation, early, middle and late growing stages and fattening stage. Carcass traits were evaluated using age and weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, carcass yield, lean meat content, back fat thickness at withers and at the level of the last rib, muscle thickness at the cranial edge of gluteus medius muscle and loin eye area. Meat and fat quality traits of longissimus muscle were evaluated by means of pH at 45 min and 24 hours after slaughter, objective colour (CIE L*, a* and b*), intramuscular fat content and fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat. However, a considerable number of studies on Alentejano pig, data on reproductive performance and some parameters of meat quality are still scarce.

Keywords

  • traditional European breed
  • TREASURE
  • productive traits
  • phenotype
  • Portugal

1. History and the current status of the breed (census)

The Alentejano pig belongs to the Mediterranean group [1] and derives, as the Iberian breed pig, from the primitive Sus scrofa mediterraneus. Alentejano pig belongs to the Iberian type breeds, characterized by low prolificacy [2] and low growth rate (except under “montanheira” regime). It is also quite adipogenic [3]. Its meat and fat are considered as excellent for both fresh meat market and to process high-grade sausage and dry cured products. Alentejano pigs are well adapted to the environment and to the use of natural resources as feed. Already in the first century AD, Roman documents stressed out the importance of acorns from holm oak forests and in the outdoor rearing of these pigs from Lusitanos [4]. Before change and domination of indoors pig production system, Alentejano was the main pig breed in Portugal, representing over 45% of the total national pig population [5]. This breed was predominantly distributed by the regions south of the Tagus river. Due to several factors, this breed declined in numbers and importance, mainly since the second half of the twentieth century, and was on the edge of extinction in the 1980s. Gradually, from the end of 1980s onward, a slight but consistent recovery of this breed and its traditional production system occurred, fostered by grants of several agents for conservational purposes [6, 7]. Nowadays, the Alentejano pig recovered and represent an economic, ecological and social add value to Alentejo region. Census of Alentejano pig breed is presented in Figure 1. By the end of 2017, 6464 breeding sows and 510 boars were registered in the breed herdbook, distributed by 137 herds. Each farm had, on average, 47 sows [8].

Figure 1.

Census of Alentejano pig breed from 1994 to 2017 [8].

Advertisement

2. Exterior phenotypic characteristics

The information on the morphology of the Alentejano pig is summarized in Table 1. Alentejano is a medium-sized pig with a light bone structure, black coat colour and scarce black, blonde or reddish thin hair (Figures 2 and 3). It has a long, thin head with a pronounced frontonasal angle, and relatively small, thin, forward-facing ears, triangular in shape and slightly tipped out. The body is not too wide and deep; the back is of medium length and width, slightly arched; the shoulders and hams are regularly developed and medium in width; the extremities are short and slim, ending with small feet with uniform black pigmented hooves. Their temperament is considered energetic [4, 9]. Nowadays, the classifications used by the technicians from the breeders’ association vary between placid and friendly to moderately tractable (ANCPA, personal communication), considering the differences found between farms.

Measurement (average)Adult maleAdult female
Body weight (kg)160120
Body length2,3 (cm)126
Ear lengthSmall to mediumSmall to medium
Chest girth3 (cm)122
Number of teats10

Table 1.

Summary of morphology information on Alentejano pig breed1.

Data provided by ANCPA (personal communication).


Measured from the tip of the nose to the starting point of the tail.


Entire males at 120 kg live weight [10].


Figure 2.

Alentejano sows with piglets.

Figure 3.

Alentejano boar.

Advertisement

3. Geographical location and production system

This breed’s origin and present location is the southwest of the Iberian Peninsula. It is reared under extensive conditions, perfectly adapted to the environment and the use of natural feedstuff resources [7]. It participates into a well-defined agro-sylvo-pastoral system known as “Montado”. As a strategic step of this production system, the intensive fattening of animals occurs in Quercus forests from late October to late February (“montanheira”) [5].

Traditionally, the herds were divided into three categories: breeding sows, growing pigs and fattening pigs [11]. Breeding sows and growing pigs were fed with natural pastures and, when necessary (e.g., during summer) supplemented with cereal grains (barley, oats or corn), legumes (chickling vetch, faba bean or black chickpea), and local agricultural by-products, which conditioned the growth and duration of the production cycle. Pigs fattened with acorns and grass present very high average daily gains [7, 12]. Conversely, nowadays, there is no uniform production system. Breeding season, feeding management, weight and age at slaughter vary among farms, depending on the tradition and the production objectives [7]. However, most production systems usually use two farrowing seasons (spring-summer and fall-winter). Piglets born between April and September go to montanheira the following year. Piglets born between December and March supply the roast piglets’ market, the fresh meat market with pigs weighing on average less than 120 kg, and are used for herd replacement when purebred [7, 13]. In some cases, alike the observed in Spain with the Iberian pig, in this last farrowing season, a terminal cross with Duroc breed is used to obtain crossbred pigs with better growth performances, higher yields and leaner carcasses (ANCPA, personal communication). The extensive and semi-extensive systems are the most common, and the presence of a free-range feeding period is obligatory for production of PDO and PGI products. However, Alentejano pigs are increasingly reared in semi-extensive systems where, to improve and standardize performance and productivity, most sows and growing pigs receive concentrated balanced feeds. Breeding farms are also abandoning the traditional concrete facilities (“malhadas”) and in most cases, farrowing occurs outdoor, in a “camping” environment with huts and/or collective shelters [14].

Advertisement

4. Organisations for breeding, monitoring and conservation

The Alentejano pig is listed among the endangered Portuguese breeds of farm animals. In 2015, the national legislation (https://dre.pt/web/guest/pesquisa/-/search/66619894/details/maximized) categorized the Alentejano pig breed as in moderate risk of extinction. The names and contacts of the main organizations of the breed are presented in Table 2. The breeding program is run by ACEPA, A.C.E. (Alentejano Pig Complementary Consortium of Companies, A.C.E.), created in 2011, which also holds the Alentejano pig Herdbook. Besides ACEPA, two breeders’ associations—the Association of the Alentejano Pig Breeders (ACPA), covering mainly the south of the Alentejo region, and the National Association of the Alentejano Pig Breeders (ANCPA), covering mostly the centre and north of the region—collect data that are stored and processed by the database GenPro (Ruralbit Lda.). More recently (in 2014 and 2017), each association created a Group of Producers (ALPORC SA and PACOOP, CRL) for commercial issues.

Name of organisationAddressE-mail address
ACEPA—Agrupamento Complementar de Empresas do Porco Alentejano, A.C.E.Rua Diana de Liz, Apartado 123, 7006-802 Évoraaceporcoalentejano@gmail.com
ANCPA—Associação Nacional dos Criadores do Porco AlentejanoRua Diana de Liz, Apartado 71 7002-501 Évoraporcoalentejano@gmail.com
ACPA—Associação de Criadores de Porco AlentejanoRua Armação de Pêra, 2 7670-259 Ouriqueacpaourique@gmail.com

Table 2.

Contact details of the breeding organisations for Alentejano pig breed.

Advertisement

5. Productive performance

5.1 Reproductive traits

Despite the availability of commercial artificial insemination doses, in most cases females are naturally mated. At farm level, the ratio of boar:sow varies from 1:5 up to 1:15 (ANCPA, personal communication). Table 3 summarizes the basic data available on the reproductive traits. The mean age of sows at first parturition ranges from 10.6 to 16.6 months, but the gilts management (especially feeding) in each farm can greatly influence this trait, justifying individual variations from 9 up to 24 months of age, at farm level (ANCPA, personal communication). Gestation is shorter than in other breeds or genotypes (111 days [2]). Regarding the litter characteristics, sows of Alentejano breed have a number of live born piglets ranging from 6.7 to 9.4 ([2, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19], Charneca R, personal communication), weighing between 1.0 and 1.3 kg at birth [2, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21]. The reported stillbirth rate varies between 1.2 and 11.3% [2, 15, 16]. The high rate on stillbirth in one of the studies [15] may be related to the high total prolificacy also observed in that trial. The reported values for stillbirth rate are lower than the reported in modern genotypes [22]. The mortality rate at weaning mentioned in two studies [2, 16] ranged from 18.8 to 27.5%. Both are relatively high values but in line with reported values for other Iberian pigs [23]. The average value for weaned piglets per cycle is 5.7 (ANCPA, personal communication), based on a sample of 2636 records from 20 farms, which is in accordance with the reported values for the prolificacy and mortality rate observed in other scientific studies [2, 15, 16, 17]. Due to the relatively low growth rate of sucking piglets [2, 15, 16, 18] and usual poor post-weaning conditions, the lactations are usually longer than the practiced in the modern intensive systems, ranging from 35 to 60 days ([15, 16, 17, 20, 21], Charneca R, personal communication). These long lactations increase the farrowing interval and reduce the breed productivity. Regarding the reproductive performance of the Alentejano breed, the information available only covers some data (e.g., number of litters per sow and per year, life production of sow and farrowing interval), representing data collected by the breeders’ associations. In the authors’ opinion, these data should be used for a clearer monitoring in this breed, after validation. The information available for the Alentejano suggests that this pig breed has a moderate reproductive efficiency.

ReferencesAge at first parturition (mth)Litters per sow per yearNo. of piglets alive per litterPiglet live weight (kg)Stillborn per litter (%)Mortality at weaning (%)Piglet weaning weight (kg)Duration of lactation (d)Farrowing interval (d)Age at culling (mth)
[2]8.01.11.727.0
[15]9.41.111.36.335
[16]7.31.21.218.811.050
[17]7.01.311.053
[18]10.66.7
[19]7.9
[20]1.09.056
[21]1.212.060
Charneca R16.335
Charneca R26.9
Charneca R37.0
ANCPA416.6 (2247)1.8 (1991)206 (1991)45 (2636)

Table 3.

Main reproductive traits in Alentejano pig breed.

Charneca R, unpublished data, University of Évora, 2016.


Charneca R, unpublished data from Experimental Centre of Ministry of Agriculture (CEBA), data from 2017.


Charneca R, unpublished data from University of Évora experimental farm (Mitra), data from 2012 to 2015.


ANCPA, 2018. Breed database values representing data collected from 20 farms computed specifically for this chapter. The number of animals considered for each trait is provided within brackets.


No.—number; mth—month; d—days.

5.2 Growth performance

Basic data available on growth performance of Alentejano pig are presented in Tables 4 and 5. Due to the big differences reported between studies regarding the live weight range covered, the stages for growth performance were defined as lactation (regardless of how long it was), early, middle and late growing stages (from weaning to approximately 30 kg, between 30 and 60, and between 60 and 100 kg live weight, respectively) and fattening stage (above 100 kg live weight). In some sources [17, 24, 25, 26], only the overall growth rate for the whole studied period (defined as overall) was provided. It should also be noted that only a small number of studies actually aimed at evaluating the breed potential for growth. In the studies mentioned in Table 4, the average daily gain in the lactation period ranged from 133 to 191 g/day. The lactation periods considered varied from 35 to 56 days, and in most cases, piglets were supplemented 15–21 days after birth. Still, all the values are lower than the ones observed in modern breeds [2]. Average daily gain in the early growing stage (192 g/day; [18]) is also considerably lower than those observed in modern breeds [38, 39], denoting lesser intensity of rearing and/or growth potential. Also, the middle and late growing stages, the fattening stage, and the overall stage are generally characterized by relatively slow growth and high heterogeneity (251–489, 187–805, 336–1000, and 187–805 g/day in middle and late growing stage, fattening stage, and overall stage [17, 18, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]). These differences may be explained by the fact that studies covered distinct situations, where different rearing systems and/or environmental conditions (e.g., season) and also feeding levels were practiced. In the context of the evaluation of growth performance, it is also of interest to observe the extreme values, because it can be assumed that the maximum figures exhibit the growth potential of Alentejano pigs in ad libitum conditions of feeding (≈1000 g/day in the fattening stage [18]).

ReferencesFeeding regime and production systemNo. of animalsADG lactation1ADG growing2ADG fattening3Overall ADG4
EarlyMiddleLate
[2]Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor261163
[15]Ad Lib60149
[16]Ad Lib5974191
[17]Semi; intensive15556
[18]Ad Lib; extensive38191
Ad Lib; extensive481927151000715
[20]Ad Lib1203142
[24]Rest; intensive; indoor14481
[25]Semi; intensive; indoor24471
[26]Rest; intensive; indoor15494
[27]Rest; intensive; indoor18450450
Rest; extensive; outdoor12533533
[28]Ad Lib; intensive; indoor20805805
[29]Ad Lib; intensive; indoor30801801
[30]Rest; intensive; indoor30346439393
[31]Rest; intensive; indoor24489446
[32]Rest; intensive; indoor51251251
Ad Lib; intensive; indoor36617617
[33]Semi; intensive; indoor48505
12557
12336453
Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor12568568
[34]Rest; intensive; indoor24187187
Ad Lib; intensive; indoor12442442
Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor36627447627
[35]Rest; outdoor15671671
[36]Rest; intensive; indoor30277363502432
[37]Ad Lib70275491383
Rest22331331
Ad Lib39421461838441
Rest26240240
Ad Lib40339339
20339339

Table 4.

Growth performance in Alentejano pig breed according to different studies.

ADG in period of lactation regardless of how long it was.


ADG in growing period estimated from weaning to approximately 30 kg, between approximately 30 and 60 kg and between approximately 60 and 100 kg live body weight, respectively.


ADG in a period of fattening is reported for above 100 kg live body weight.


When the source provides only the overall growth rate for the whole studied period, this growth rate is defined as overall ADG.


No, number; ADG, average daily gain in g; w, weaning; Ad Lib, ad libitum feeding regime; Semi, semi ad libitum feeding regime; Rest, restrictive feeding regime.

ReferencesFeeding regime and production systemME content of feed (MJ/kg)CP content of feed (%)No. of animalsADFI growing1ADFI fattening2Overall ADFI3
middlelate
[17]Semi; intensive13.8152.1
[24]Rest; intensive; indoor16.0142.2
[25]Semi; intensive; indoor12.8242.2
[27]Rest; intensive; indoor12.6182.3
Rest; extensive; outdoor12.6122.4
[29]Ad Lib; intensive; indoor13.514.6303.2
[30]Rest; intensive; indoor15.0301.62.62.5
[31]Rest; intensive; indoor15.0242.2
[32]Rest; intensive; indoor13.2511.6
[33]Semi; intensive; indoor17.4482.5
17.4122.5
17.4122.72.6
Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor17.4122.4
[34]Rest; intensive; indoor14.7241.4
Ad Lib; intensive; indoor14.7122.5
[35]Rest; outdoor15.0152.9
[36]Rest; intensive; indoor15.01561.72.4
[37]Ad Lib17.5392.02.8
Rest17.5261.9
Ad Lib14.0401.5
Ad Lib14.0201.5

Table 5.

Average daily feed intake (in kg/day) in Alentejano pig breed in different studies.

ADFI in growing period estimated between approximately 30 and 60 kg (middle) and between approximately 60 and 100 kg live body weight (late), respectively.


ADFI in a period of fattening is reported for above 100 kg live body weight.


When the source provides only the overall average feed intake for the whole studied period, this feed intake is defined as overall ADFI.


No., number; ADFI, average daily feed intake in kg/day; Ad Lib, ad libitum feeding regime; Semi, semi ad libitum feeding regime; Rest, restrictive feeding regime; ME, metabolisable energy; CP, crude protein.

The information on the feed intake and feed nutritional value (Table 5) is scarce, which limits the evaluation of the breed´ growth potential. Nevertheless, as expected, average daily feed intake (ADFI) increased with body weight. In restricted animals, ADFI ranged from 1.6 to 1.7 kg in middle growing stage (from ∼30 to 60 kg live weight), from 1.9 to 2.9 kg in late growing stage (from 60 to 100 kg live weight) and from 2.5 to 2.7 kg in the fattening stage (>100 kg live weight). The same tendency was observed in ad libitum fed animals even tough values are only available for middle (from 1.5 to 2.0 kg ADFI) and late growing stage (from 2.4 to 3.2 kg ADFI).

5.3 Body composition and carcass traits

In Portugal, in most common commercial conditions, Alentejano pigs are slaughtered at weaning for roasted piglet market, at 90–100 kg live weight for the fresh meat market, at 120–140 kg for the production of dry-cured sausages, and at 150–170 kg for the ham industry in Portugal or in Spain [7]. Table 6 summarizes the available information on the most commonly encountered carcass traits obtained from research and field studies. Alentejano breed pigs involved in these studies were slaughtered at ages ranging from 120 to 360 d, and between 39 and 160 kg live weight. Dressing yields and lean meat contents were calculated based on commercial cuts obtained according to the Portuguese norm NP-2931. The backfat thickness at withers ranged from 45 to 78 mm, while at the level of the last rib it varied from 12 to 63 mm. Similarly, muscularity measured as lean meat content varied from 35.9 to 51.7%, the loin eye area from 15 to 32 cm2, whereas the muscle thickness measured above Gluteus medius muscle varied from 36 to 43 mm, which indicates lower muscular development compared to modern breeds [39, 47, 48]. This variation in backfat and muscle thickness is a consequence of the wide range of final live weights of pigs and different feeding regimes applied in the considered studies.

ReferencesFeeding regime and production systemNo. of animalsFinal age (d)Final BW (kg)Hot CW (kg)Dressing yield (%)Lean meat content (%)Backfat thickness (mm)M1 (mm)Loin eye area (cm2)
At withersAt last rib
[17]Semi; intensive698.075.076.5
[18]Ad Lib; extensive1293.034.627.9
[24]Rest; intensive; indoor14100.221.7
[25]Semi; intensive; indoor2498.078.480.0
[26]Rest; intensive; indoor15299100.280.380.141.522.0
[27]Rest; intensive; indoor1899.337.5
Rest; extensive; outdoor1299.441.1
[28]Ad Lib; intensive; indoor2022093.028.9
[29]Ad Lib; intensive; indoor3093.072.678.1
[30]2Rest; intensive; indoor518040.031.177.851.715.5
525670.055.979.845.017.9
527580.065.281.545.618.5
529790.074.182.342.920.0
5324100.080.980.941.520.1
5360110.088.180.142.620.4
[31]Rest; intensive; indoor2499.782.783.042.122.1
[32]Rest; intensive; indoor1571.855.377.145.9
Ad Lib; intensive; indoor15113.587.176.735.9
[33]Semi; intensive; indoor1298.174.375.7
Semi; intensive; indoor12120.493.978.0
Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor4108.687.478.1
Semi; intensive; indoor1298.174.375.7
Semi; intensive; indoor12120.493.978.0
Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor8108.684.878.1
Rest; intensive; indoor1298.175.677.138.322.9
Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor1292.176.483.041.824.8
Semi; intensive; indoor12120.696.780.244.330.4
[34]Rest; intensive; indoor2470.412.336.4
Ad Lib; intensive; indoor1291.218.740.3
Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor36108.923.242.6
[35]Rest; outdoor15240105.026.0
[36]2Rest; intensive; indoor1012042.231.073.417.0
1018070.955.678.420.1
1024080.263.779.520.4
[37]Ad Lib438.529.576.516.4
Ad Lib492.871.777.321.5
Rest879.661.677.321.0
Ad Lib4115.792.379.866.557.021.5
Rest8115.392.179.921.0
Ad Lib4130.1103.679.671.561.821.8
Rest8132.2104.679.175.960.222.6
Ad Lib4115.488.977.161.345.721.3
Rest8114.889.477.963.647.121.4
Ad Lib4132.5105.579.673.344.924.8
Rest8129.7101.278.167.746.122.4
Ad Lib493.874.279.152.837.421.6
Rest878.561.878.745.028.420.0
Ad Lib12131.4105.780.477.763.221.2
[40]Rest; intensive; indoor570.034.117.3
580.034.317.7
590.033.017.6
5100.031.719.4
5110.036.321.5
[41, 42]Ad Lib; intensive; indoor24100.041.4
[43]Rest; extensive; outdoor589.170.378.9
5100.580.379.9
5109.889.481.4
[44]2Rest; intensive; indoor542.229.369.413.015.3
570.952.273.630.018.1
580.259.974.741.019.0
589.666.774.451.020.3
5100.575.675.256.021.1
5110.082.575.056.021.3
[45]Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor29160.0130.481.531.7
[46]Semi696.075.778.918.9

Table 6.

Body composition and carcass traits in Alentejano pig breed.

M muscle thickness measured according to ZP method (at the cranial edge of Gluteus medius muscle (mm).


Groups differ in weight at slaughter; to see more details on study design, address to the corresponding source.


No., number; BW, body weight; CW, carcass weight; Ad Lib, ad libitum feeding regime; Semi, semi ad libitum feeding regime; Rest, restrictive feeding regime.

5.4 Meat and fat quality

Table 7 summarizes the most commonly encountered meat and fat quality traits of Alentejano´ carcasses, as measured in Longissimus muscle. In the studies reporting meat quality in Alentejano pigs, pH measured in Longissimus muscle at 45 min post-mortem ranged from 5.89 to 6.45, while at 24 h post mortem it varied between 5.39 and 5.79. These pH 24 values reported in the carcasses of Alentejano pigs are slightly higher than those from modern breeds [52, 53], suggesting the existence of lower glycogen stores before slaughter and more oxidative muscle metabolism. These high pH 24 values are also associated with lower drip loss [54], which corroborates with higher intramuscular fat content (ranging from 3.1 and 7.5%) and darker colour (high Minolta L* value; L* varying from 43 to 51). As previously observed, lower pH values are related with higher water losses by drip due to a reduction in the repulsive electrostatic forces between the myofilaments, partial denaturation of the myosin head (address to [55, 56] for review). On the other hand, higher values of intramuscular fat are generally associated to a decrease in the moisture diffusivity coefficient [57]. Intramuscular fat content is highly variable among studies (3.1 and 7.5%; [24, 27, 29, 40, 41, 42, 46, 49, 50, 51]), mainly due to study conditions (feeding regime, intensity of rearing, age and body weight at slaughter) but generally increases with body weight at slaughter within specific study (e.g., from 6.2% at 70 kg to 7.5% in 110 kg [40]) and is higher when a restrictive feeding regime is applied. The extreme values obtained for SFA, MUFA and PUFA content of intramuscular fat in Longissimus muscle were 35.0–43.7, 47.7–57.5, and 4.1–10.9% [27, 29, 33, 49, 50, 51]. Due to big differences between studies with regard to the feeding regime, feed composition, final body weight/age, and fatness, which are all important factors influencing the fatty acid composition of meat, the results of the fatty acid composition should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that the results reported in the considered studies indicate higher proportions of SFA and particularly of MUFA, in contrast to lower PUFA content, in comparison to the modern meaty type of pigs [27, 49, 58, 59]. This can be attributed to a higher synthesis of MUFA (which increases with age [60]) and SFA, caused by higher fat deposition, as shown by the results of body composition (backfat thickness at the level of the last rib = 40 mm on average, Table 6).

ReferencesFeeding regime and production systemNo. of animalsFinal BW (kg)pHCIE1IMF content (%)Fatty acid composition2 (%)
45 min24 hL*a*b*SFAMUFAPUFAn − 6/n − 3
[24]Rest; intensive; indoor141005.514313.86.53.1
[27]Rest; intensive; indoor18995.938.757.24.116.2
Rest; extensive; outdoor12993.138.457.54.113.4
[29]Ad Lib; intensive; indoor30936.455.73509.74.64.841.547.710.925.2
[33]Rest; intensive; indoor129841.8
Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor129235.0
Semi; intensive; indoor1212137.8
[40]3Rest; intensive; indoor5706.2
5806.4
5907.2
51007.2
51107.5
[41, 42]Ad Lib; intensive; indoor241005.794310.63.94.8
[46]Semi6965.895.39514.1
[49]Ad Lib; extensive; outdoor84.941.152.16.8
[50]Rest Ad; extensive; outdoor101055.714712.05.26.9
[51]Ad Lib; intensive; indoor16965.764814.08.84.843.751.84.8
Rest; intensive; indoor32815.624711.97.13.743.351.94.8

Table 7.

Summary of collected literature data on meat quality traits measured in Longissimus muscle from pigs of Alentejano pig breed.

CIE, objective colour defined by the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage; L*, greater value indicates a lighter colour; a*, greater value indicates a redder colour; b*, greater value indicates a more yellow colour.


For fatty acid composition, only pigs on control diet were considered. Control diets differ among studies, to see diet composition address to the corresponding source.


Groups differ in weight at slaughter; to see more details on study design, address to the corresponding source.


No., number; Ad Lib, ad libitum feeding regime; Semi, semi ad libitum feeding regime; Rest, restrictive feeding regime; pH 45, pH measured approximately 45 min post mortem; pH 24, pH measured approximately 24 h post mortem; IMF, intramuscular fat; SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Advertisement

6. Use of the breed and main products

The Alentejano pig is bred for the production of high-quality meat, sausages and dry-cured products. This slow growing-fat local pig breed is mostly reared in extensive finishing conditions, using the different agro-forest resources at their disposal. The high slaughter ages and weights grants great maturity and better flavour to the meat and meat products obtained, as already recognized in ancient Roman documents [4]. Meat from the Alentejano pig has high contents of oleic acid-rich intramuscular fat, micronutrients and antioxidants [27, 61]. It must be produced according to the conditions established in the Portuguese legislation (Decreto-Lei no. 95/2014, 24th of June—MAM, 2014) to be certified under the Protected Designation of Origin (“Carne de Porco Alentejano DOP”). Meat, fat and offal from Alentejano pigs are also used for the production of high-quality products (Table 8). There are currently five PDO and 23 PGI certified products [62].

Product name1Type of the productStatus of the product
Carne de Porco AlentejanoRaw meatPDO
Presunto de BarrancosDry cured hamPDO
Paleta de BarrancosDry cured shoulderPDO
Presunto do AlentejoDry cured hamPDO
Paleta do AlentejoDry cured shoulderPDO
Presunto de Campo Maior e ElvasDry cured hamPGI
Paleta de Campo Maior e ElvasDry cured shoulderPGI
Presunto de Santana da SerraDry cured hamPGI
Paleta de Santana da SerraDry cured shoulderPGI
Cacholeira branca de PortalegreSausagePGI
Chouriço de Carne de Estremoz e BorbaSmoked sausagePGI
Chouriço de PortalegreSmoked sausagePGI
Chouriço Grosso de Estremoz e BorbaSmoked sausagePGI
Chouriço Mouro de PortalegreSmoked sausagePGI
Farinheira de Estremoz e BorbaSmoked sausagePGI
Farinheira de PortalegreSmoked sausagePGI
Linguiça de PortalegreSmoked sausagePGI
Linguiça do Baixo AlentejoSmoked sausagePGI
Lombo Branco de PortalegreDry-cured sausagePGI
Lombo Enguitado de PortalegreSmoked sausagePGI
Morcela de Assar de PortalegreSmoked sausagePGI
Morcela de Cozer de PortalegreSausagePGI
Morcela de Estremoz e BorbaSmoked sausagePGI
Paia de Estremoz e BorbaSmoked sausagePGI
Paia de Lombo de Estremoz e BorbaSmoked sausagePGI
Paia de Toucinho de Estremoz e BorbaSmoked sausagePGI
Painho de PortalegreSmoked sausagePGI
Paio de BejaSmoked sausagePGI

Table 8.

List of certified products from Alentejano pig breed.

All related legislation and additional information about these products can be found at https://tradicional.dgadr.gov.pt/en/.


Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 634476 for project TREASURE. The content of this paper reflects only the authors’ view, and the European Union Agency is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

References

  1. 1. Porter V. Spain and Portugal. In: Porter V, Mountfield TJ, editors. Pigs: A Handbook to the Breeds of the World. Ithaca, United States: Cornell University Press; 1993. pp. 137-140
  2. 2. Charneca R, Nunes J, Le Dividich J. Reproductive and productive traits of sows from Alentejano compared to sows Large-White × Landrace genotype. Revista Portuguesa de Zootecnia (electronic edition). 2012;Ano 1(1). Available from: https://www.apez.pt/documentos/RPZ/Charneca_2012_1_1.pdf [Accessed: September 24, 2018]
  3. 3. Neves JA, Sabio E, Freitas A, Almeida JAA. Déposition des lipides intramusculaires dans le porc Alentejano. L’effet du niveau nutritif pendant la croissance et du régime alimentaire pendant l’engraissement. Produzione Animale. 1996;9:93-97
  4. 4. Póvoas Janeiro J. A Suinicultura em Portugal: Subsídios biométricos para o estudo do gado suíno nacional. Boletim Pecuário. 1944;XII:3-192
  5. 5. Carvalho JO. Contribuição para o Estudo Económico da Montanheira. Lisboa: Junta Nacional dos Produtos Pecuários; 1964. 56 p
  6. 6. Devish N. Perspectivas Económicas da Pecuária Europeia: Objectivos e Estratégias dos Criadores. Alimentação Animal. 1995;V:4-12
  7. 7. Freitas AB. A raça suína Alentejana: Passado, presente e futuro. In: Silva Filha OL, editor. Las razas porcinas Iberoamericanas: Un enfoque etnozootécnico. Salvador, Brasil: Instituto Federal Baiano; 2014. pp. 55-80. 416 p
  8. 8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Domestic Animal Diversity Information System [Internet]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/dad-is/browse-by-country-and-species/en/ [Accessed: September 24, 2018]
  9. 9. Reis J. Livro Genealógico. In: Acerca do porco. Lisboa, Portugal: Federação Portuguesa de Associações de Suinicultores; 1995. 120 p
  10. 10. Freitas AB, Charneca R, Mourão T, Nunes JT. Parâmetros Produtivos e Zoométricos de Varrascos de Raça Alentejana. In: Livro de Comunicações do XV Congresso de Zootecnia; 2–5/11/2005. Vila Real, Portugal: UTAD; 2005. pp. 315-319
  11. 11. Pereira JG. Relatório da Intendência de Pecuária de Elvas—Arrolamento Geral de Gados e Animais de Capoeira de 1940. Boletim Pecuário. 1945;XII:101-143
  12. 12. Frazão TL. O porco Alentejano. Boletim Pecuário. 1965;XXXIII:5-30
  13. 13. Santos Silva J, Tirapicos Nunes JL. Inventory and characterization of traditional Mediterranean pig production systems. Advantages and constraints towards its development. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica. 2013;(Suppl. 4):61-67
  14. 14. Charneca R, Freitas A, Martins J, Neves J, Elias M, Laranjo M, et al. Alentejano and Bísaro pigs: Tradition and innovation – The TREASURE Project. In: Petrović MM, editor. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium - Modern Trends in Livestock Production. Belgrade, Serbia: Institute for Animal Husbandry; 2017. pp. 148-155
  15. 15. Charneca R. Estudo Comparativo da Composição Química do Colostro e do Leite de Porcas de Raça Alentejana e Porcas Large-White X Landrace (Efeitos sobre a sobrevivência neo-natal, o crescimento e a composição corporal dos leitões) [MSc thesis]. Lisbon, Portugal: Technical University of Lisbon, Agronomy Superior Institute and Faculty of Veterinary Medicine; 2001. p. 88
  16. 16. Marques PNG. Características produtivas e reprodutivas do Porco Alentejano. Influências genéticas e ambientais [PhD thesis]. Évora, Portugal: University of Évora; 2001. p. 223
  17. 17. PROJECTO AGRO 254. Produção de suínos ao ar livre – unidade de demonstração [Internet]. 2007. [Updated: 26/10/2017]. Available from: http://bit.ly/2OUhStU [Accessed: September 24, 2018]
  18. 18. Nunes J. Contributo para a reintegração do porco Alentejano no montado [PhD thesis]. Évora, Portugal: University of Évora; 1993. p. 276
  19. 19. Monteiro MH. Aspectos reprodutivos de fêmeas da raça suína Alentejana [MSc thesis]. Lisbon, Portugal: Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa; 1999. p. 97
  20. 20. Póvoas Janeiro J. Ritmo de crescimento, em peso, dos leitões Alentejanos, até às 8 Semanas. Revista de Medicina Veterinaria. 1951;XLVI:495-502
  21. 21. Freitas AB, Neves J, Nunes J, Martins JM. Performances de engorda e características da carcaça de porcos Alentejanos engordados em sistema silvo-pastoril e em sistema intensivo. In: Lamela López L, Suárez Hemández J, Armengol López N, Ojeda González A, editors. Proceedings of the IV Congreso Latinoamericano de Agroforesteria para la Produccion Pecuaria Sostenible; 24–28 October 2006; La Habana, Cuba. Varadero, Cuba: Instituto de Ciencia Animal; 2006. p. 5
  22. 22. Canario L, Père MC, Tribout T, Thomas F, David C, Gogué J, et al. Estimation of genetic trends from 1977 to 1998 of body composition and physiological state of Large-White Pigs at birth. Animal. 2007;1(10):1409-1413
  23. 23. González F, Vargas JD, Robledo J, Prieto L, Andrada JA, Aparício MA. Influence of environmental conditions in Iberian pig rearing systems. In: Nanni Costa L, Zambonelli P, Russo V, editors. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig; 11–13/10/2007; Messina-Capo d’Orlando (ME), Italy. Bologna, Itália: AlmaDL; 2008. pp. 153-160. DOI: 10.6092/unibo/amsacta/2513
  24. 24. Martins JM, Neves JA, Freitas A, Tirapicos JL. Effect of long-term betaine supplementation on chemical and physical characteristics of three muscles from the Alentejano pig. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2012;92:2122-2127. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5595
  25. 25. Tirapicos Nunes J, Paiva JC, Gomes C, Freitas AB, Almeida JA. Effects of diets during growth and their repercussion on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of carcass. Options Méditerranéennes. Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens. 2000;41:159-163
  26. 26. Freitas AB, Neves JA, Bento P, Charneca R, Nunes J. Peso óptimo de abate do porco Alentejano destinado à produção de carne para consumo em fresco. In: Proceedings of the XIII Congresso de Zootecnia–Produzir Qualidade Em Segurança–Évora; 1–4 October 2003; Evora, Portugal. Evora, Portugal; 2003. p. 4
  27. 27. Martins JM, Neves JA, Freitas A, Tirapicos JL. Rearing system and oleic acid supplementation effect on carcass and lipid characteristics of two muscles from an obese pig breed. Animal. 2015;9:1721-1730
  28. 28. Lopes PA, Costa ASH, Costa P, Pires VMR, Madeira MS, Achega F, et al. Contrasting cellularity on fat deposition in the subcutaneous adipose tissue and longissimus lumborum muscle from lean and fat pigs under dietary protein reduction. Animal. 2014;8:629-637. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114000160
  29. 29. Madeira MS, Costa P, Alfaia CM, Lopes PA, Bessa RJB, Lemos JPC, et al. The increased intramuscular fat promoted by dietary lysine restriction in lean but not in fatty pig genotypes improves pork sensory attributes. Journal of Animal Science. 2013;91:3177-3187. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5424
  30. 30. Freitas AB, Neves J, Charneca R, Nunes JLT, Martins JM. Influence of slaughter weight on growth and carcass characteristics of Alentejano pigs. Options Méditerranéennes. Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens. 2007;76:109-113
  31. 31. Freitas AB, Neves JA, Lança M, Charneca R, Tirapicos Nunes J. Influence of the feeding level on growth and carcass characteristics of Alentejano pigs. Options Méditerranéennes. Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens. 2007;76:105-108
  32. 32. Freitas AB, Cancela d’ Abreu M, Kletschke MC, Simòes F, Almeida JA. Influence de l’alimentation avec triticale et foin de luzerne pendant la période de préfinition de porcs Alentejanos sur la composition tissulaire des carcasses au début et à la fin de la finition en “Montanheira”. Options Méditerranéennes. Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens. 2000;41:155-158
  33. 33. Pires da CJ, Oliveira OER. Optimisation de la production du porc Alentejano destiné à la transformation en produits secs traditionnels de haute qualité–Evaluation des performances productives dans des conditions expérimentales. Options Méditerranéennes. Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens. 2000;41:137-146
  34. 34. Freitas AB, Vaz I, Almeida JAA, Nunes JLT. Utilização de uma “dieta de exploração” na alimentação de pre-acabamento do porco Alentejano. Revista Portuguesa de Zootecnia. 1995;2:87-94
  35. 35. Freitas AB, Charneca R, Maceira P and Nunes JT. Avaliação de parâmetros produtivos e biométricos em varrasquetes de raça Alentejana. In: Proceedings of the XIII Congresso de Zootecnia–Produzir Qualidade em Segurança–Évora; 1–4 October 2003; Evora, Portugal. Evora, Portugal; 2003. p. 3
  36. 36. Freitas AB, Neves J, Silva H, Charneca R, Nunes JT. Avaliação do crescimento do porco Alentejano entre os 40 e 80 kg do peso vivo. In: Proceedings of the XII Congresso de Zootecnia; Vila Real, Portugal. Vila Real, Portugal; 2002
  37. 37. Freitas A. Influência do nível e regime alimentar em pré-acabamento sobre o crescimento e desenvolvimento do porco Alentejano e suas repercussões sobre o acabamento em montanheira e com alimento comercial [PhD thesis]. Evora, Portugal: Universidade de Évora; 1998. p. 305
  38. 38. Affentranger P, Gerwig C, Seewer GJF, Schwörer D, Künzi N. Growth and carcass characteristics as well as meat and fat quality of three types of pigs under different feeding regimens. Livestock Production Science. 1996;45:187-196
  39. 39. McCann MEE, Beattie VE, Watt D, Moss BW. The effect of boar breed type on reproduction, production performance and carcass and meat quality in pigs. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research. 2008;47:171-185
  40. 40. Neves JA, Freitas A, Martins JM, Nunes JLT. Physical measures of the carcass and the chemical composition of Longissimus dorsi muscle of Alentejano pigs between 70 and 110 kg LW. Options Méditerranéennes. Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens. 2012;101:475-478
  41. 41. Santos R, Ribeiro M da G, Farinha N, Barradas A, Neves JA, Bento P. Estudo da influência de diferentes alimentos sobre características quantitativas e qualitativas da gordura em porcos de raça alentejana. Revista de Ciências Agrárias. 2008;31:5-16
  42. 42. Ribeiro GP, Farinha N, Santos R, Neves J. Efeito de três alimentos diferentes sobre as características físico-químicas do músculo Longissimus dorsi do porco de raça Alentejana. Revista de Ciências Agrárias. 2007;30:375-384
  43. 43. Neves J, Freitas AB, Bento P, Charneca R, Nunes JL. Características da carcaça de suínos de raça Alentejana. In: Proceedings of the XIII Congresso de Zootecnia–Produzir Qualidade em Segurança–Évora; 1–4 October 2003; Evora, Portugal. Evora, Portugal; 2003. p. 4
  44. 44. Neves J, Freitas A, Charneca R, Nunes J. Effect of slaughter weight on carcass quality traits of Alentejano pig breed. In: Proceedings of the 49th International Congress of Meat science and Technology; Sao Paulo, Brazil. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Universidade Estadual de Campinas/ICoMST; 2003. pp. 343-344
  45. 45. Grave MMF. Características da carcaça em suínos de raça Alentejana e cruzados Large White x Landrace terminados em montanheira [MSc thesis]. Lisbon, Portugal: University of Lisbon; 2015. p. 84
  46. 46. Santos e Silva J, Ferreira-Cardoso J, Bernardo A, da Costa JSP. Conservation and development of the Bisaro pig. Characterisation and zootechnical evaluation of the breed for production and genetic management. In: Wenk C, Fernandez JA, Dupuis M, editors. Quality of Meat and Fat in Pigs Affected by Genetics and Nutrition. Proceedings of the Joint Session of the EAAP Commissions on Pig Production, Animal Genetics and Animal Nutrition; 1999; Zurich, Switzerland: Wageningen Press; 2000. pp. 85-92
  47. 47. Frazão TL. O porco Alentejano melhorado. Boletim Pecuário. 1984;L:13-75
  48. 48. Freitas A, Neves J, Nunes JT, Charneca R, Martins JM. Desenvolvimento do tecido adiposo e muscular em suínos de raça Alentejana. Revista de Ciências Agrárias. 2007;30:317-322
  49. 49. Teixeira A, Rodrigues S. Pork meat quality of Preto Alentejano and commercial Largewhite Landrace cross. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2013;12:1961-1971
  50. 50. Neves JA, Martins JM, Freitas AB. Effect of betaine intake on muscle and backfat characteristics of pigs. In: Proceedings of the 55th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology; Copenhagen, Denmark. Copenhagen, Denmark; 2009. PE1.43
  51. 51. Neves JAFM. Influência da engorda em montanheira sobre as características bioquímicas e tecnológicas da matéria prima e do presunto curado de porco alentejano [PhD thesis]. Evora, Portugal: Universidade de Évora; 1998. p. 213
  52. 52. Serra X, Gil F, Pérez-Enciso M, Oliver MA, Vázquez JM, Gispert M, et al. A comparison of carcass, meat quality and histochemical characteristics of Iberian (Guadyerbas line) and Landrace pigs. Livestock Production Science. 1998;56:215-223
  53. 53. Monin G. Influence des facteurs de production sur les qualités technologiques et sensorielles des viandes de porc. Options Méditerranéennes. Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens. 2000;41:167-179
  54. 54. Huff-Lonergan E, Baas TJ, Malek M, Dekkers JCM, Prusa K, Rothschild MF. Correlations among selected pork quality traits. Journal of Animal Science. 2002;80:617-627
  55. 55. Honikel KO. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science. 1998;49:447-457
  56. 56. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Science. 2005;71:194-204
  57. 57. Muriel E, Ruiz J, Ventanas J, Petrón MJ, Antequera T. Meat quality characteristics in different lines of Iberian pigs. Meat Science. 2004;67:299-307
  58. 58. Alonso V, Campo MM, Español S, Roncalés P, Beltrán JA. Effect of crossbreeding and gender on meat quality and fatty acid composition in pork. Meat Science. 2009;81:209-217
  59. 59. Pugliese C, Sirtori F. Quality of meat and meat products produced from southern European pig breeds. Meat Science. 2012;90:511-518
  60. 60. Girard JP, Denoyer C, Desmoulin B, Gandemer G. Facteurs de variation de la composition en acides gras des tissus adipeux (bardière) et musculaires (long dorsal) de porc. Revue Française des Corps Gras. 1983;30:73-79
  61. 61. Neves J, Freitas A, Martins JM, Nunes J. Alpha-tocopherol content on the semimembranosus muscle of Alentejano pigs reared in intensive and extensive conditions. In: Costa LN, Zambonelli P, Russo V, editors. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig; 11–13 October 2007; Messina, Capo d’Orlando (ME), Italy. Bologna, Italy: AlmaDL; 2008. pp. 165-167
  62. 62. DGADR. Portuguese Traditional Products [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://tradicional.dgadr.gov.pt/en/ [Accessed: April 3, 2018]

Written By

Rui Charneca, José Martins, Amadeu Freitas, José Neves, José Nunes, Hugo Paixim, Pedro Bento and Nina Batorek-Lukač

Reviewed: 21 December 2018 Published: 06 February 2019