Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Ibérico (Iberian) Pig

Written By

Rosa Nieto, Juan García-Casco, Luis Lara, Patricia Palma-Granados, Mercedes Izquierdo, Francisco Hernandez, Elena Dieguez, Juan Luis Duarte and Nina Batorek-Lukač

Reviewed: 21 December 2018 Published: 06 February 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.83765

From the Monograph

European Local Pig Breeds - Diversity and Performance. A study of project TREASURE

Edited by Marjeta Candek-Potokar and Rosa M. Nieto Linan

Chapter metrics overview

1,868 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The main characteristics of the Iberian breed, an autochthonous pig breed of the Iberian Peninsula, are presented in this chapter along with the results of a literature review on productive traits. Reproductive performance was estimated by sow age at first parturition, litters per sow and year, piglets alive per litter, piglet weight at birth and at weaning, percentage of stillborn per litter, mortality at weaning, lactation length and farrowing interval. For growth performance, average daily gain and daily feed intake during lactation and in different growing phases are provided. Carcass traits were evaluated by age and weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, carcass yield, backfat thickness measurements, muscle thickness and loin eye area. Meat quality traits of longissimus muscle (pH, objective colour measurements and intramuscular fat) were also assessed. The main part of the studies considered simulated practical production conditions in Iberian pig rearing although others evaluated a defined growing period, sometimes quite far from the usual commercial slaughter weight of this breed. Therefore, some figures should be interpreted with caution. Although a considerable number of studies on Iberian pig were included in the current review, scientific papers on reproductive performance and some meat quality parameters are still rather scarce.

Keywords

  • traditional European breed
  • TREASURE
  • productive traits
  • phenotype
  • Spain

1. History and current status of the breed (census)

The Iberian pig is an autochthonous porcine breed derived from ancestral domestic pig populations of the Iberian Peninsula. For centuries, it was widely spread all over this territory. Nowadays, it can be found in the Southwest of the Peninsula: West Andalusia, Extremadura and Salamanca province. In the Portuguese Alentejo, this porcine breed, with some minor differences, is known as Porco Alentejano.

Until the middle of the XX century, the Iberian pig was the main porcine breed reared in Spain. In the first decades of the last century, the census of reproductive sows could have surpassed 500,000 animals that widely extended all over the country. Since then, a series of sanitary challenges, changes in social and feeding habits, as well as the transformation of the dehesa territory into field crops, lead to a dramatic decline in the Iberian pig population [1] that did not stop until the middle 1980s. The most critical moments of the Iberian pig population crisis took place during the 1960s, in which the breed was at serious risk of extinction.

In the late 1980s, a new period started with the beginning of Iberian pig breeding recovery and the revalorisation of its products. To this recovery contributed not only the increasing demand for traditional food products of high organoleptic quality—a key issue for the definitive recuperation of the Iberian pig population—but also the social awareness for preservation of the genetic heritage and the natural habitat associated to this breed.

There is no official historical census of the Iberian population as the classification was based on the production system (extensive vs. intensive) and not on genetic discrimination. However, taking into account part of these data, along with own data of the Iberian pig breeders association, we can see the approximate evolution of the Iberian pig population during the last years in Figure 1. At present, with a reliable system of pig population registration, we know that there are 4370 registered Iberian pig farms, with 375,500 breeding sows and 4780 boars in the latest available status (November 2017). The total number of pigs slaughtered during 2017 were 3,240,000, which represent a 35% increment with respect to 2014 when the sector was suffering the effects of the global economic crisis and a specific crisis due to a production excess that led to a decrease in the census.

Figure 1.

Census of Iberian pig breed, presenting number of sows (No. sows) and boars (No. boars) per year, starting with the year of heard book establishment.

Advertisement

2. Exterior phenotypic characteristics

The racial characteristics that identify the Iberian pig are recorded in the racial standard of the genealogical book (order APA/3376/2007). Nevertheless, even today there is a great morphological heterogeneity resulting from the historical genetic isolation of this breed that gave rise to multiple local varieties, many of them already lost or subsumed into the Retinto variety, which is the predominant nowadays. The Iberian breed general morphology information is summarised in Table 1. In general, it is a medium-sized animal with pigmented skin which colour could vary from intense black to blond or reddish. The hair is weak and rather scarce (in entrepelado varieties) or absent (in hairless or lampiño varieties). The legs are thin and resistant, and the hooves are dark and uniformly coloured (Figures 2 and 3), except for the variety Torbiscal which can present depigmented or whitish-striped legs.

Measurement (average)Adult maleAdult female
Body weight (kg)140.5128.0
Body length1 (cm)84.184.6
Head length (cm)32.131.1
Ear length (cm)18.418.7
Chest girth (cm)24.722.7
Height at withers (cm)79.877.3
Number of teats10–1210–12

Table 1.

Summary of morphology information on Iberian pig breed.

Measured from the tip of the nose to the starting point of the tail.


Figure 2.

Iberian sow with piglets.

Figure 3.

Iberian boar.

Advertisement

3. Geographical location and production system

One of the characteristics of the Iberian pig production is its high diversity, both from the genetic point of view as well as for its feeding and management.

The genuine traditional production system, carried out in the wide dehesas found in southwestern Spain, is based on the rearing of pure Iberian pigs, which have extensive or semi-extensive management up to 95–105 kg of body weight, and a finishing period or montanera in which pigs graze acorns and pastures up to 155–165 kg body weight and reach between 14 and 18 months of age. However, since several years ago, the majority of fattened pigs are produced under intensive conditions using Iberian × Duroc crossed pigs. These pigs are slaughtered with only 10 months, and their production has extended to geographical areas non-traditionally related to the Iberian pig (Murcia, Catalonia). Between these two extreme situations, several combined systems can be found. From the genetic point of view, pigs can be purebred or 50 or 75% Iberian, always obtained by crossing Iberian pure sows with Duroc boars. From the feeding and management perspective, they can be either reared intensively and fed concentrates—based on cereals and legumes—during its whole life or in mixed outdoor systems in which pigs are fed concentrates plus the natural resources available (mainly pastures). On the other extreme, we found the traditional completely extensive system (montanera) in which pigs graze acorns and the pasture available. As an example of the numerical relevance of the different rearing systems, in 2017 the total Iberian pigs produced in montanera were 635,000, from which 297,000 where purebred and 338,000 crossed with Duroc. On the other hand, 664,000 were fattened in extensive or semi-extensive systems with no-acorn feeding, most of them cross-breed; finally, 1,941,000 were fattened in intensive systems, all of them cross-breed. These figures point out that only 20% of the pigs are fattened under the traditional montanera system and that only 10% of total slaughtered pigs are pure Iberian [2].

The Duroc crossing provides increased precocity, higher lean deposition rates and increased prolificacy and reproductive performance. However, purebred Iberian pigs have particular qualities and distribution of lipids in tissues which are responsible for the characteristic texture, aroma and juiciness of their products. The extensive management allows pigs to reach a higher age at slaughter along with continuous exercise, both contributing to higher meat quality. The traditional production system is highly linked to the valorisation of the dehesa, and their rural environment play an essential role in the preservation of this ecosystem.

Advertisement

4. Organisations for breeding, monitoring, and conservation

The Spanish Association of Iberian Pig Breeders (AECERIBER)1 was born in 1985 in Zafra (Badajoz, Extremadura) during a critical period when the breed was at serious risk of extinction. According to non-official records, during these years the population of Iberian breeding sows could had been as low as 5000. Therefore, this was a moment that required an organisation that would join all traditional farmers to work together in the conservation and expansion of the breed. In 1987, the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture granted AECERIBER the management and development of the genealogical book, since 1992 the genetic selection programme and, more recently, the Conservation programme for several varieties in danger of extinction. Nowadays, more than 2000 breeders in Spain take part in the association.

Advertisement

5. Productive performance

5.1 Reproductive traits

An overview of data registered on reproductive traits is presented in Table 2. The recorded age of sows at first parturition is 10.0–16.5 months [7, 12, 22]. On average, sows of Iberian pig breed have 2.2 litters per year [15, 21] with around 7.5 piglets (from 6.0 to 8.3; [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21]). Mean body weight of piglets at birth varies from 1.1 to 1.4 kg [9, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23]. Stillborn percentage of piglets and mortality rates until weaning in the considered studies are satisfactory and range from 1.7 to 20.6 [4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20, 21] and 2.5 to 22.9% [14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21], respectively. Although there are few studies with data available for this period of Iberian pig rearing, the average duration of lactation registered in the collected studies is prolonged in comparison to modern intensive systems (up to 60 days [23], but in average to 39 days [6, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23]), which leads to a longer farrowing interval (approximately 173 days [14, 15, 21]) and higher weaning weight (6.9–20.8 kg [9, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23]). However, recent analysis shows that the trends in the last years are to reduce the duration of lactation to 25–26 days, close to the lactation periods found in conventional sows [24].

ReferenceSow age at first parturition (mth)Litters per sow per yearNo. of piglets alive per litterPiglet live weight (kg)Stillborn per litter (%)Mortality at weaning (%)Piglet weaning weight (kg)Duration of lactation (d)Farrowing interval (d)
[3]8.0
[4]7.34.6
[5]7.14.5
[6]7.78.156
[7]10.07.7
[8]
[9]8.11.33.610.0
[10]7.64.7
[11]7.54.2
[12]16.5
[13]7.89.956
[14]8.315.322.921177
7.720.620.831172
8.215.122.041179
[15]2.26.96.2166
[16]6.31.74.3
[17]1.47.835
[18]6.01.47.134
[19]7.31.46.52.96.935
[20]7.61.16.42.58.035
[21]2.17.85.610.627173
[22]10.0
[23]1.420.860

Table 2.

Summary of collected literature data on reproduction traits in Iberian pig breed.

No.—number; mth—month; and d—days.

5.2 Growth performance

The basic data on growth performance obtained in this review are presented in Tables 3 and 4. Due to differences among studies concerning the live weight ranges covered and for comparative purposes, we defined the stages for growth performance as lactation (regardless of its length), growing stage (from weaning to approximately 30 kg live body weight) and early, middle and late fattening stages, estimated between approximately 30 and 60 kg, 60 and 100 kg and above 100 kg live body weight, respectively. Sometimes the source provided only the overall growth rate for the whole fattening stage (defined in this case as overall). The recorded data in Table 3 shows heterogeneity. A big part of the collected studies simulated practical conditions of the production systems used in Iberian pig rearing so that they can be considered as field studies. On the other hand, a reduced group of the recorded papers aimed at evaluating the actual growth potential of Iberian pigs in a defined growing period. For this reason, the average growth rates were not calculated. The average daily gain in the early stage that corresponds to the lactation period (approximately 257 g/day, range from 168 to 371 g/day [9, 18, 23, 27, 28, 60, 61, 64, 67]) could be considered in the range of those described for modern sows [71, 72], although the average lactation period in the present studies (approximately 39 days; Table 2) is considerably greater than in sows of conventional breeds (21–28 days). The collected data show that daily gain is characterized by high heterogeneity in the growing (185–524 g/day, [28, 43, 44, 49, 50, 54, 57, 58, 60, 63]), early (228–566 g/day, [26, 49, 53, 54, 57, 68]), middle (181–800 g/day, [9, 26, 38, 42, 48, 51, 52, 57, 68]), late (387–1018 g/day, [4, 9, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 55, 59, 60, 62, 65, 66, 68]) and overall (181–800 g/day, [9, 25, 26, 29, 32, 33, 38, 42, 43, 44, 48, 49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 68, 69, 70]) fattening stages, which is related to the fact that this review comprises studies of a variety of production systems and, probably more important, feeding levels. In the context of the evaluation of growth performance, it is of interest to point out the extreme values recorded as it can be assumed that the maximum figures obtained for each growing phase correspond to Iberian pig’s growth potential determined in ad libitum or close to ad libitum feeding conditions (i.e. 524 g/day in growing stage [50], 800 g/day in overall fattening stage [51, 52] and 1018 g/day from 128 kg onwards [65]).

ReferenceFeedingNo. of animalsADG lactation1ADG growing2ADG fattening3ADG birth to slaughter
EarlyMiddleLateOverall
[4]Ad lib579566
[9]Rest78445445
Ad lib78207515
[18]Ad lib32168
[23]Ad lib1704346
[25]Rest58473
Ad lib58720
[26]Rest365228228
Ad lib365651651651
[27]Ad lib26,913267
[28]Ad lib2633320320
[29]Rest182241
Ad lib182845
Rest231250
Ad lib231595
Rest226307
Ad lib226714
[30, 31]Rest22277
Ad lib22545
[32]Ad lib701608
[33]Rest16389
Ad lib16471
[34]Ad lib43577
[35]Ad lib32559
[36]Semi32387
[37]Semi16396
[38]Rest24299299
Rest16694
Ad lib8800
[39]Ad lib16650
[40, 41]Ad lib8532
Ad lib16522
[42]Rest16181181
Ad lib16472
[43, 44]Semi78185
Semi60500
Semi60807
[45]Ad lib20880
Ad lib20880
[46]Ad lib151701
[47]Ad lib122755
[48]Rest1159338338
Ad lib1159586
[49]Rest48349349349
Ad lib24506506506
[50]Semi18524
[51, 52]Ad lib24800800
Rest48576576
[53]Ad lib20566566
[54]Rest12415415415
Ad lib12499499499
Semi25485
[55]Ad lib6917
Rest6679
[56]400581
[57]Semi16501501501
Semi12671671
[58]Ad lib26391
Rest27251
[59]Ad lib161775
[60]8816193
8047377
1666662
[61]Ad lib120190
[62]Rest16423
[63]Ad lib60444
[64]Ad lib38371
[65]Ad lib241018
[66]Ad lib25893
Ad lib100893
[67]14247
[68]Ad lib60465465
Ad lib60622622
Ad lib60619
[69]Ad lib12450
[70]27735

Table 3.

Summary of collected literature data on growth performance in Iberian pig breed.

ADG in period of lactation regardless of how long it was.


ADG in growing period estimated from weaning to approximately 30 kg live body weight.


ADG in a period of fattening is reported for early, middle and late fattening stages estimated between approximately 30 and 60 kg, 60 and 100 kg and above 100 kg live body weight, respectively. Sometimes the source provided only the overall growth rate for the whole studied period (in that case defined as overall).


No.—number; ADG—average daily gain in g; Ad lib—ad libitum feeding regime; Semi—semi ad libitum feeding regime; Rest—restrictive feeding regime.

ReferenceFeedingME content of feed (MJ/kg)CP content of feed (%)No. of animalsADFI growing1ADFI fattening2
EarlyMiddleLateOverall
[25]Rest13581.82
Ad lib583.28
[30, 31]Rest12.616221.62
[33]Rest12.514162.15
[38]Rest12.514.3241.72
Rest13.813.2163.65
Ad lib13.813.284.00
[39]Ad lib3.5165.60
[40, 41]Ad lib13.383.38
[42]Rest16161.40
[43, 44]Semi12.617.8780.91
Semi11.915.8602.06
Semi13.113.5603.24
[49]Rest13.114.4481.341.34
Ad lib13.114.4241.811.81
Semi13.6181.52
[51, 52]Ad lib12.69.5243.52
Rest12.69.5482.63
[53]Ad lib11.6201.67
[54]Rest121.43
Ad lib121.60
Semi251.39
[55]Ad lib13.08.464.74
Rest13.08.463.65
[57]Semi12.014.6161.771.77
Semi12.014.6123.09
[58]Ad lib13.014.8260.80
Rest13.014.8270.59
[62]Rest11.85.4163.36
[68]Ad lib602.05
Ad lib603.12
Ad lib603.41

Table 4.

Summary of collected literature data on average daily feed intake (in kg/day) in Iberian pig breed.

ADFI in growing period estimated from weaning to approximately 30 kg live body weight.


ADFI in a period of fattening is reported for early, middle and late fattening stages estimated between approximately 30 and 60 kg, 60 and 100 kg and above 100 kg live body weight, respectively. Sometimes the source provided only the overall daily feed intake for the whole studied period (in that case defined as overall).


No.—number; ADFI—average daily feed intake in kg/day; Ad lib—ad libitum feeding regime; Semi—semi ad libitum feeding regime; Rest—restrictive feeding regime; ME—metabolisable energy; and CP—crude protein.

Information on feed intake and feed nutritional composition was mentioned only in few of the considered studies, which limits the evaluation of maximum growth potential as this parameter is directly related to pig nutrition and management (Table 4). Average daily feed intake increased as pigs increased body weight from approximately 1.4 kg/day (0.80–1.81 kg/day [43, 44, 49, 57, 58]) in the growing stage, to approximately 4.1 kg/day (3.41–4.74 kg/day [55, 68]) in the late fattening stage in ad libitum-fed pigs. The maximum value recorded, 5.6 kg/day (determined in individually allocated animals), corresponds to pigs fed ad libitum on acorns in the late fattening stage (from approximately 90 to 140 kg body weight [39]) and shows high intake capacity in Iberian pigs. In comparative studies, the higher intake capacity of Iberian pigs compared to conventional pigs has been confirmed in similar experimental conditions and body weight range [73]. In this respect, according to van Lunen and Cole [74], voluntary feed intake has declined in the development of modern high-selected pigs compared to non-selected animals.

5.3 Body composition and carcass traits

The basic data obtained in this review with some of the most common carcass traits are presented in Table 5. As mentioned before, attention should be given to high heterogeneity of the recorded data, because slaughter body weights in the included studies ranged from 1 to 191 kg. A big part of the studies—some of them including high number of pigs—simulated practical conditions of the production systems used in Iberian pig rearing, whereas a reduced group of papers aimed at evaluating different performance and carcass composition parameters in a defined growing period [28, 49, 53, 58, 63, 64, 75, 86], in some cases quite far from the usual commercial slaughter weight of this breed (140–160 kg). In studies where final body weight was above 100 kg, pigs were slaughtered at approximate age of 407 days [25, 29, 33, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 64, 65, 68, 82, 85, 86] and reached around 152 kg live body weight [9, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 51, 52, 55, 56, 62, 64, 65, 69, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86]. In agreement with high slaughter weight, dressing yield in these studies was around 81%. The back fat thickness values measured in all considered studies spanned from 35 to 90 mm on the withers (in average 85 mm in studies with final body weight above 100 kg [55, 62, 85]), from 10 to 90 mm at the level of the last rib (in average 58 mm in studies with final LW above 100 kg [25, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 51, 52, 55, 64, 65, 68, 69, 76, 77, 82, 85, 86]) and from 48 to 65 mm when measured above gluteus medius muscle (in average 56 mm in studies final body weight above 100 kg [68, 76]). Similarly, muscularity measured as loin eye area span from 13 to 29 cm2 (in average 23 cm2 in studies with final LW above 100 kg [30, 31, 34, 35, 65, 76, 82]) and muscle thickness measured at the cranial edge of gluteus medius muscle from 11 to 60 mm (in average 40 mm in studies with final body weight above 100 kg [68, 76]). Percentage of lean meat content is not reported in the literature as this is not commonly estimated on Iberian pig carcass composition studies, which are focused mainly in the premium cuts obtained from these animals (hams, shoulders and loins). The variation in back fat and muscle thickness of the values recorded is also a consequence of the wide range of final live weights and different feeding regimes applied in the reported studies. Despite the body weight range considered, these parameters point out the strong tendency of Iberian pigs for depositing high rates of fat and low rates of lean tissue when compared to conventional types of pigs.

ReferenceNo. of animalsFinal age (d)Final BW (kg)Hot CW (kg)Dressing yield (%)Back fat thickness (mm)M1 (mm)Loin eye area (cm2)
S2At withersAt last rib
[9]7815512580.8
[25]5831
5830313611282.26228
[28]26334011
[29]18247516013282.376
23148114911778.767
22647616914082.977
[30, 31]2215212078.86425
[32]70116213180.7
[33]847715912679.1
835514511680.5
[34]4315612177.55529
[35]3215512580.55221
[36]3214411580.2
[37]1614711679.448
[38]1641215112079.146
841215912578.349
[39]1613810978.845
[40, 41]848117314081.344
1648117113780.346
[42]1628116313079.650
[43, 44]6033615812176.862
[45]2015913182.2
2015913182.2
[46]42713664
[48]115916413783.4
[49, 75]48503774.824
24503673.324
[51, 52]5210078.151
2610079.052
[53]20513467.4352318
[55]615011677.39064
615111777.88671
[56]15111979.1
[58]2585251666.712.
27106251668.114.
[62]1613211184.177
[63]42812512
[64]18122362877.916
2033615812478.263
[65]2448419115982.47629
[68]6031114511781.26580
[69]121189378.648
[41]848115012180.649
848114111380.147
[76]8347315612680.548546013
[77]47034016090
[78]2862561088881.2
27036213811281.7
[79]2553490131
[80]31935315912779.9
[81]616650816313079.7
[82]24145815813384.06725
[83]12516113986.8
[84]2213511685.8
8215012583.5
17716113483.2
1917414683.6
[85]904581508871
[86]811183.1
85814961.810
8234563460.022
8352805670.436
8395836072.038
8424977476.442
848215312480.971

Table 5.

Summary of collected literature data on body composition and carcass traits in Iberian pig breed.

M is the muscle thickness measured according to ZP method (at the cranial edge of gluteus medius muscle (mm)).


S is the back fat thickness measured according to ZP method (above gluteus medius muscle (mm)).


No.—number; BW—body weight; and CW—carcass weight.

5.4 Meat quality

The basic data obtained in this review concerning some of the most common meat and fat quality traits measured in longissimus muscle and back fat tissue are presented in Table 6. In the studies reporting meat quality, pH measured in longissimus muscle at 45 min and 24 hours postmortem varied from 6.29 to 6.62 [69, 76, 96] and from 5.61 to 5.75 [69, 76, 88, 89, 93, 96], respectively. Intramuscular fat content was very variable and ranged from 3.0 to 19.7% (6.9% in average) [29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 37, 38, 39, 42, 62, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 76, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 94]. Colour measured in CIE L, a, b colour space varied from 34 to 54, 7.5 to 14.8 and 1.7 to 13.6 for L, a* and b*, respectively [68, 69, 76, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 95, 96]. Total SFA, MUFA and PUFA content of intramuscular fat in longissimus muscle, reported for the control groups of animals in the considered studies, were approximately 38, 56 and 7%, with n6–n3 ratio varying from 2 to 20% [30, 31, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 42, 64, 66, 67, 77, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 97]. On the other hand, total SFA, MUFA and PUFA content of back fat tissue, reported for control animals in the mentioned studies, were close to 33, 56 and 11%, with n6–n3 ratio varying from 5.6 to 20% [30, 31, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 41, 42, 62, 68, 69, 77, 91, 97]. Due to wide differences between studies regarding parameters as feeding management, feed composition, final body weight or age and fatness, which are all important factors influencing the fatty acid composition of meat and fat tissue, the results of average fatty acid composition should be interpreted with caution. When comparative studies in which Iberian pigs have been contrasted either with its crosses with Duroc pigs [68] or with pigs from conventional breeds [69, 92], the pigs from Iberian genotype show redder (higher values of a*) and darker (lesser values of L) muscles and higher level of intramuscular fat in longissimus muscle than the other pigs types. The red tone is related to greater myoglobin content [91, 92] and is generally associated with higher intramuscular fat levels and more oxidative muscle metabolism.

ReferenceNo. of animalspH 45pH 24CIE1IMF (%)FA composition of IMF2 (%)FA composition of BFT3 (%)
L*a*b*SFAMUFAPUFAn6/n3SFAMUFAPUFAn6/n3
[29]1825.9
2315.3
2266.9
[30, 31]226.235.559.35.22.128.260.811.014.8
[32]7019.5
[33]86.036.857.95.32.427.859.812.46.2
84.636.958.15.02.628.361.010.78.0
[35]835.559.05.52.129.459.111.511.8
[36]836.958.15.02.628.361.010.78.0
[37]168.537.556.75.88.833.343.623.16.7
[38]165.438.557.43.65.432.356.411.25.7
85.037.558.54.05.632.256.910.95.6
[39]165.238.757.34.05.530.358.910.85.7
[42]169.837.858.14.128.359.612.2
[62]1619.738.654.76.820.0
[64]1639.650.010.410.0
2038.058.43.610.0
[65]244.6
[66]259.737.858.14.06.3
1008.438.857.93.23.3
[67]146.133.247.819.0
[68]604011.313.68.838.752.58.7
[69]126.495.75547.53.934.851.713.5
[41]828.157.714.2
[76]836.625.743413.21.78.3
[77]4708.239.853.27.037.051.511.5
[79]14899.8
[80]3197.5
[81]30839.5
[82]2414.8
[83]1255.2
[87]3197.5
[88, 89]905.724313.16.76.436.057.26.815.6
[90]244712.47.34.635.855.48.712.3
[91]104614.84.74.839.948.211.934.749.415.9
[92]214510.54.33.040.949.110.013.8
[93]155.613411.03.9
[94]124.0
124.2
[95]214510.5
[96]276.295.61429.64.8
[97]1339.557.43.120.036.655.08.49.9

Table 6.

Summary of collected literature data on meat quality traits in Iberian pig breed.

CIE—objective colour defined by the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage; L* greater value indicates a lighter colour; a* greater value indicates a redder colour; b* greater value indicates a more yellow colour.


For fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat tissue in longissimus muscle, only pigs on control diet were considered, and when fatty acid composition was reported separately for neutral and polar lipids, values reported for neutral lipids were considered. Control diets differed among studies, to see diet composition address to the corresponding source.


For fatty acid composition of back fat tissue, only pigs on control diet were considered and when fatty acid composition was reported separately for outer and inner layers, values reported for outer layer of back fat tissue were considered. Control diets differed among studies, to see diet composition address to the corresponding source.


No.—number; pH 45—pH measured approximately 45 min postmortem; pH 24—pH measured approximately 24 hours postmortem; FA—fatty acid; IMF—intramuscular fat; BFT—back fat tissue; SFA—saturated fatty acids; MUFA—monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA—polyunsaturated fatty acids; and n6/n3—the proportion between n6 and n3 polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Advertisement

6. Use of breed and main products

The Iberian pig production is mainly focussed on the elaboration of cured products, with hams, shoulders and loins being those more important, although other charcuterie pieces of lower economic relevance are also produced (chorizo, salchichón, morcón, etc.). More recently, fresh meat either for domestic consumption or for the HORECA sector has gained increasing importance being highly appreciated for its peculiarities in aroma, texture and juiciness, competing in the market with the conventional pig meat and also with specific meat pieces of lamb and beef. Nevertheless, the cured products from the Iberian pig fattened in the traditional montanera system are the commercially strategic products for the whole sector since their high-quality standards provide a prestige that, in a way, favours the rest of productions. All the hams, shoulders and loins produced from Iberian pig in Spain are currently under an official regulation [98] that classify the cured products detailed according to their genetic origin (pure or cross-breed and at what percentage) and system of production (intensive, semi-extensive or montanera), with the aim of offering the consumer a precise information of product origin which is directly related with their market prices. There are currently four protected designations of origin (DPO) for Iberian cured products (Guijuelo, Dehesa de Extremadura, Jabugo and Los Pedroches) that endorse and protect Iberian hams and shoulders. The most typical and well-known product that represents the breed is the bellota cured ham that reaches high prices in the market and acts as a flagship of the increasing export market (EU, Japan and the USA).

The quality of the Iberian products from the sensorial and organoleptic, technological, dietetic, biosecurity, commercial and healthy point of view, is due to various meat properties that determine their essence. All of them together are responsible for their commercial success and consumer appreciation. Its sensory characteristics, such as appearance, smell, colour and above all the flavour, justify the conservation of this breed and its ecosystem and the maintenance of its ancient forms of production and processing.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The research was conducted within the project TREASURE, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 634476. The content of this paper reflects only the author’s view, and the European Union Agency is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

References

  1. 1. Vargas-Giraldo JD, Aparicio-Tovar MA. Análisis de la evolución de los censos y sistemas de producción del cerdo ibérico. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros. 2001;193:87-118
  2. 2. Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. RIBER (Registro informativo de organismos independientes de control del ibérico) [Internet]. 2018. Available from: http://www.mapama.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/calidad-agroalimentaria/calidad-comercial/mesa-del-iberico/riber-publico/ [Accessed: 7 May 2018]
  3. 3. Fernández A, Rodrigáñez J, Zuzúarregui J, Rodríguez MC, Silió L. Genetic parameters for litter size and weight at different parities in Iberian pigs. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2008;6:98-106
  4. 4. García-Casco JM, Fernández A, Rodríguez MC, Silió L. Heterosis for litter size and growth in crosses of four strains of Iberian pig. Livestock Science. 2012;147:1-8
  5. 5. Saura M, Fernández A, Varona L, Fernández AI, De Cara MÁR, Barragán C, et al. Detecting inbreeding depression for reproductive traits in Iberian pigs using genome-wide data. Genetics Selection Evolution. 2015;47:1
  6. 6. Benito-Hernández J, Vázquez Cisneros C, García Casco J, Moreno M, Ferrera Claramunt C, Luis J. El cerdo Ibérico. Revista Computadorizada de Producción Porcina. 1997;4:14
  7. 7. Benito J, Albarrán A, García Casco J. Extensive Iberian pig production grazing systems. Grassland Science in Europe. 2006;11:635-645
  8. 8. Dobao MT, Rodrigañez J, Silió L. Seasonal influence on fecundity and litter performance characteristics in Iberian pigs. Livestock Science. 1983;10:601-610
  9. 9. Dobao MT, Rodrigañez J, Silio L, Toro MA, De Pedro E. Genetica de la prolificidad en el cerdo ibérico: Revisión de metodologias y resultados. Investigación Agraria: Producción y Sanidad Animales. 1988;3:109-133
  10. 10. Perez-Enciso M, Gianola D. Estimates of genetic parameters for litter size in six strains of Iberian pigs. Livestock Science. 1992;32:283-293
  11. 11. Rodriguez C, Béjar F, Rodrigañez J, Silió L. Componentes de varianza, heterosis y depresión consanguinea en el tamaño de camada de cerdos ibéricos. Investigación Agraria: Producción y Sanidad Animales. 1993;8:45-53
  12. 12. Rodriguez C, Rodriganez J, Silio L. Genetic analysis of maternal ability in Iberian pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 1994;111:220-227
  13. 13. Vázquez C, Menaya C, Benito J, Ferrera JL, Garcia-Casco JM. Influencia de la edad de la cerda y de la estacion de parto en caracteres de prolificidad y aptitud materna en cerdos ibéricos. Investigación Agraria: Producción y Sanidad Animales. 1995;10:29-39
  14. 14. Izquierdo M, Bazán J, Ayuso D, Paniagua M. Evaluación del crecimiento y del consumo de pienso de lechones ibéricos criados en unas condiciones de intensivo y destetados a diferentes edades. Tierras. 2009;159:37-45
  15. 15. Leenhouwers JI, Merks JWM. Suitability of traditional and conventional pig breeds in organic and low-input production systems in Europe: Survey results and a review of literature. Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales. 2013;53:169-184. DOI: 10.1017/S2078633612000446
  16. 16. Suarez MV, Barba C, Forero J, Sereno JRB, Dieguez E, Delgado JV. Reproductive characterisation of various pig breed from Iberian origin. I. Descriptive analysis. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2002;51:245-248
  17. 17. Gómez-Carballar F, Aguinaga MA, Nieto R, Aguilera JF. Effects of intermittent suckling on the performance and digestive efficiency of Iberian piglets weaned at 35 days of age. Livestock Science. 2009;124:41-47
  18. 18. Aguinaga MA, Gomez-Carballar F, Nieto R, Aguilera JF. Production and composition of Iberian sow’s milk and use of milk nutrients by the suckling Iberian piglet. Animal. 2011;5:1390-1397
  19. 19. Gómez-Carballar F, Lara L, Nieto R, Aguilera JF. Response of the Iberian sow to protein supply and feeding level during late gestation. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2013;181:72-79
  20. 20. Gómez-Carballar F, Lara L, Nieto R, Aguilera JF. Effect of increasing lysine supply during last third of gestation on reproductive performance of Iberian sows. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013;11:798-807
  21. 21. Piñeiro C, Aparicio M, De Andrés MA, Rainho N, Rodríguez-Estévez V. Reproducti on performance parameters in Iberian pig farms. In: De Pedro EJ, Cabezas AB, editors. Options Méditerranéennes: Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens, n. 101; 14-16 October 2010; Córdoba, Spain. Zaragoza, Spain: CIHEAM; 2012. pp. 193-195
  22. 22. FAO. The Domestic Animal Diversity Information System [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://dad.fao.org/ [Accessed: 19 July 2017]
  23. 23. Barba C, Delgado JV, Sereno F, Diéguez E, Cañuelo P. Caracterización productiva de las variedades del cerdo ibérico. II: Estudio preliminar del peso al nacimiento y pesos a las primeras edades. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2000;49:186
  24. 24. López-Romero P, Calabroni T, Alòs-Saiz N. Evolución de los principales índices técnicos en las explotaciones porcinas Ibéricas españolas. Solo Cerdo Ibérico. 2016;36:38-41
  25. 25. Dobao MT, Rodriganez J, Silio L, Toro MA, De Pedro E, Garcia de Siles JL. Crecimiento y características de canal en cerdos ibéricos, duroc-jersey x ibérico y jiaxing x ibérico. Investigación Agraria: Producción y Sanidad Animales. 1987;2:9-23
  26. 26. Garcia Casco JM, Silio L. Heterosis on growth traits in Iberian pigs. Información Tecnica Economica Agraria. 1991;87A:218-226
  27. 27. Garcia-Casco JM, Béjar F. Estimas de componentes de (Co) varianza en caracteres de crecimiento en cerdos ibéricos mediante metodologia REML.(estimation of (co) variance components for growth traits in Iberian pigs using REML methodology). Investigación Agraria: Producción y Sanidad Animales. 1993;8:25-32
  28. 28. Silio L, Toro M, Rodriguez C, Rodrigañez J. Inferencias sobre cambios geneticos en una linea de cerdos ibéricos seleccionada para crecimiento magro. Investigación Agraria: Producción y Sanidad Animales. 1997;12:65-77
  29. 29. Benito J, Vázquez C, Menaya C, Ferrera JL, García Casco JM, Silió L, et al. Evaluation of the productive parameters in different strains of Iberian. In: Alfonso L, Tirapicos JL, editors. Options Méditerranéennes: Série A. No. 41; 26-28 November 1998; Evora, Portugal. Zaragoza, Spain: CIHEAM; 2000. pp. 113-121
  30. 30. Daza A, Mateos A, Rey AI, Lopez-Bote CJ. Feeding level in the period previous to the late fattening phase influences fat composition at slaughter in free-ranged Iberian pigs. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 2005;59:227-236
  31. 31. Daza A, Mateos A, Rey AI, Bote CL. Effect of feeding level during the period previous to free-range fattening on growth and carcass characteristics in Iberian pigs. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2005;3:387-395
  32. 32. Óvilo C, Fernández AI, De Pedro E, García Casco J, Rodríguez C, Silió L. Asociación de una mutación no sinónima del gen MC4R con el crecimiento y rendimiento de piezas nobles en cerdos ibéricos. Información Tecnica Economica Agraria. 2006;102:79-85
  33. 33. Daza A, López-Bote C, Rey A, Olivares Á. Effect of age at the beginning of the free-range fattening period on growth and carcass and fat quality in Iberian pigs. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 2006;60:317-324
  34. 34. Daza A, Mateos A, Carrasco CL, Rey A, Ovejero I, López-Bote CJ. Effect of feeding system on the growth and carcass characteristics of Iberian pigs, and the use of ultrasound to estimate yields of joints. Meat Science. 2006;72:1-8
  35. 35. Rey AI, Daza A, López-Carrasco C, López-Bote CJ. Feeding Iberian pigs with acorns and grass in either free-range or confinement affects the carcass characteristics and fatty acids and tocopherols accumulation in Longissimus muscle and backfat. Meat Science. 2006;73:66-74
  36. 36. Daza A, Mateos A, Rey AI, Ovejero I, Lopez-Bote CJ. Effect of duration of feeding under free-range conditions on production results and carcass and fat quality in Iberian pigs. Meat Science. 2007;76:411-416
  37. 37. Daza A, López-Bote CJ, Barberán FT, Espin JC, Carrasco CL, Olivares A, et al. Effect of Mediterranean forest parasite with Curculio sp. on nutritional value of acorn for Iberian pig feeding and fat characteristics. Meat Science. 2007;76:316-320
  38. 38. Dunker A, Rey AI, López-Bote CJ, Daza A. Effect of the feeding level during the fattening phase on the productive parameters, carcass characteristics and quality of fat in heavy pigs. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 2007;16:624
  39. 39. Daza A, Rey AI, Carrasco CL, Bote CL. Influence of acorn size on growth performance, carcass quality and fatty acid composition of subcutaneous and intramuscular fat from Iberian pigs fattened in confinement. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2008;6:230-235
  40. 40. López-Bote CJ, Toldrá F, Daza A, Ferrer JM, Menoyo D, Silió L, et al. Effect of exercise on skeletal muscle proteolytic enzyme activity and meat quality characteristics in Iberian pigs. Meat Science. 2008;79:71-76
  41. 41. Daza A, Rey AI, Olivares A, Cordero G, Toldrá F, López-Bote CJ. Physical activity-induced alterations on tissue lipid composition and lipid metabolism in fattening pigs. Meat Science. 2009;81:641-646
  42. 42. Daza A, Lopez-Bote CJ, Olivares A, Menoyo D, Ruiz J. Influence of a severe reduction of the feeding level during the period immediately prior to free-range fattening on performance and fat quality in Iberian pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2008;88:449-454
  43. 43. Ayuso M, Óvilo C, Fernández A, Nuñez Y, Isabel B, Daza A, et al. Effects of dietary vitamin A supplementation or restriction and its timing on retinol and α-tocopherol accumulation and gene expression in heavy pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2015;202:62-74
  44. 44. Ayuso M, Fernández A, Isabel B, Rey A, Benítez R, Daza A, et al. Long term vitamin A restriction improves meat quality parameters and modifies gene expression in Iberian pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2015;93:2730-2744
  45. 45. Benito Hernández J, Vázquez Cisneros C, Ferrera Claramount JL, Meneya Moreno C, Garcia Casco JM. Comportamiento en montanera del cerdo ibérico. Su influencia en las características de los jamones en fresco. Agricultura. 1995:671-674
  46. 46. Aparicio Macarro JB. Ceba de cerdo ibérico. (VII) Ganancia en peso vivo en régimen de pastoreo (montanera) suplementado con harina de soja. Control del depósito de grasa dorsal. Archivos de Zootecnia. 1977;26:97
  47. 47. Aparicio Macarro JB, Pena Blanco F, Herrera Garcia M. Fattening Iberian pigs, 9: Live weight gain and thick fat tissue on acorn pasture with barley+ Lysina+ methionine. Archivos de Zootecnia. 1986;35:267
  48. 48. Barba C, Delgado JV, Sereno RBS, Diéguez E, Cañuelo P. Productive characterisation in Iberian pig varieties. I: Preliminary study of growth and weight in the premontanera and montanera periods. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2000;49:179-187
  49. 49. Nieto R, Miranda A, García MA, Aguilera JF. The effect of dietary protein content and feeding level on the rate of protein deposition and energy utilization in growing Iberian pigs from 15 to 50 kg body weight. The British Journal of Nutrition. 2002;88:39-49
  50. 50. Rivera-Ferre MG, Aguilera JF, Nieto R. Differences in whole-body protein turnover between Iberian and landrace pigs fed adequate or lysine-deficient diets. Journal of Animal Science. 2006;84:3346-3355
  51. 51. Barea R, Nieto R, Aguilera JF. Effects of the dietary protein content and the feeding level on protein and energy metabolism in Iberian pigs growing from 50 to 100 kg body weight. Animal. 2007;1:357-365
  52. 52. Barea R, Nieto R, Lara L, García MA, Vílchez MA, Aguilera JF. Effects of dietary protein content and feeding level on carcass characteristics and organ weights of Iberian pigs growing between 50 and 100 kg live weight. Animal Science. 2006;82:405-413
  53. 53. Fernández-Fígares I, Conde-Aguilera JA, Nieto R, Lachica M, Aguilera JF. Synergistic effects of betaine and conjugated linoleic acid on the growth and carcass composition of growing Iberian pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2008;1(2):86-102
  54. 54. Nieto R, Seiquer I, Aguilera JF. The effect of dietary protein content on calcium and phosphorus retention in the growing Iberian pig. Livestock Science. 2008;116:275-288
  55. 55. García-Valverde R, Barea R, Lara L, Nieto R, Aguilera JF. The effects of feeding level upon protein and fat deposition in Iberian heavy pigs. Livestock Science. 2008;114:263-273
  56. 56. Clemente I, Membrillo A, Azor Ortiz PJ, Polvillo O, Juárez M, Santos E, et al. Caracterización de la diversidad genética intrarracial del cerdo ibérico. Información Tecnica Economica Agraria. 2008;104:314-322
  57. 57. Barea R, Nieto R, Vitari F, Domeneghini C, Aguilera JF. Effects of pig genotype (Iberian v. landrace$\times$ large white) on nutrient digestibility, relative organ weight and small intestine structure at two stages of growth. Animal. 2011;5:547-557
  58. 58. Conde-Aguilera JA, Aguinaga MA, Aguilera JF, Nieto R. Nutrient and energy retention in weaned Iberian piglets fed diets with different protein concentrations. Journal of Animal Science. 2011;89:754-763
  59. 59. Rodríguez-Estévez V, Sánchez-Rodríguez M, García AR, Gómez-Castro AG. Average daily weight gain of Iberian fattening pigs when grazing natural resources. Livestock Science. 2011;137:292-295
  60. 60. Sánchez-Esquiliche F, Rodríguez-Estévez V. Meta-análisis de los resultados productivos de las fases de crecimiento y cebo del cerdo Ibérico [thesis]. Cordoba, Spain: Universidad de Córdoba; 2011
  61. 61. Castellano R, Aguinaga MA, Nieto R, Aguilera JF, Haro A, Seiquer I. Effects of intermittent suckling on body composition of Iberian piglets weaned at 35 days of age. Animal. 2014;8:714-720
  62. 62. Nieto R, Martínez-Pérez M, Haro A, Lara L, Aguilera JF. Effects of protein intake on rate of growth, protein deposition, and carcass traits of heavy Iberian pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2015;93:3471-3482
  63. 63. Nieto R, Barea R, Lara L, Palma-Granados P, Aguilera JF. Lysine requirement relative to total dietary protein for optimum performance and carcass protein deposition of Iberian piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2015;206:48-56
  64. 64. Ayuso M, Óvilo C, Rodríguez-Bertos A, Rey AI, Daza A, Fenández A, et al. Dietary vitamin A restriction affects adipocyte differentiation and fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat in Iberian pigs. Meat Science. 2015;108:9-16
  65. 65. Ayuso D, Gonzalez Martinez A, Peña Blanco F, Izquierdo Cebrian M. Changes in adipose cells of longissimus muscle in Iberian pigs raised under extensive conditions. Anais Academia Brasileira da Ciencias. 2018;90:247-253
  66. 66. Rey AI, Lopez-Bote CJ. Effect of dietary copper and vitamin E supplementation, and extensive feeding with acorn and grass on longissimus muscle composition and susceptibility to oxidation in Iberian pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2001;85:281-292
  67. 67. Ovilo C, Benítez R, Fernández A, Núñez Y, Ayuso M, Fernández AI, et al. Longissimus transcriptome analysis of purebred and crossbred Iberian pigs differing in muscle characteristics. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:2-24
  68. 68. Serrano MP, Valencia DG, Nieto M, Lázaro R, Mateos GG. Influence of sex and terminal sire line on performance and carcass and meat quality of Iberian pigs reared under intensive production systems. Meat Science. 2008;78:420-428
  69. 69. Serra X, Gil F, Pérez-Enciso M, Oliver MA, Vázquez JM, Gispert M, et al. A comparison of carcass, meat quality and histochemical characteristics of Iberian (Guadyerbas line) and landrace pigs. Livestock Production Science. 1998;56:215-223
  70. 70. Seiquer I, Palma-Granados P, Lachica M, Lara L, Fernández-Fígares I, Haro A, et al. Performance and carcass characteristics of immunocastrated and surgically castrated Iberian pigs fed diets of different protein concentration. In: Charneca R, Triapicos Nunes J, Loures L, Rato Nunes J, editors. Book of Abstracts of the 9th International Symposium on Mediterranean Pig; 3-5 November 2016; Portalegre, Portugal: Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre; 2016. p. 54
  71. 71. van Nieuwamerongen SE, Bolhuis JE, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Soede NM. A review of sow and piglet behaviour and performance in group housing systems for lactating sows. Animal. 2014;8:448-460
  72. 72. Velayudhan DE, Nyachoti CM. Effect of increasing dietary canola meal inclusion on lactation performance, milk composition, and nutrient digestibility of lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science. 2017;95:3129-3135
  73. 73. Morales J, Pérez JF, Baucells MD, Mourot J, Gasa J. Comparative digestibility and lipogenicactivity in landrace and Iberian finishing pigs fed ad libitum corn and corn-sorghum-acorn based diets. Livestock Production Science. 2002;77:195-205
  74. 74. van Lunen TA, Cole DJA. Energy-amino acid interactions in modern pig genotypes. In: Garnsworthy PC, Wiseman J, Haresign W, editors. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Nottinghan, UK: Nottinghan Univ. Press; 1996. pp. 233-261
  75. 75. Nieto R, Lara L, García MA, Vílchez MA, Aguilera JF. Effects of dietary protein content and food intake on carcass characteristics and organ weights of growing Iberian pigs. Animal Science. 2003;77(1):47-56. DOI: 10.1017/S1357729800053637
  76. 76. Martinez-Macipe M, Rodriguez P, Izquierdo M, Gispert M, Manteca X, Mainau E, et al. Comparison of meat quality parameters in surgical castrated versus vaccinated against gonadotrophin-releasing factor male and female Iberian pigs reared in free-ranging conditions. Meat Science. 2016;111:116-121
  77. 77. Ibáñez-Escriche N, Magallón E, Gonzalez E, Tejeda JF, Noguera JL. Genetic parameters and crossbreeding effects of fat deposition and fatty acid profiles in Iberian pig lines. Journal of Animal Science. 2016;94:28-37
  78. 78. Dobao MT, Poza ML, Rodriganez J, Silio L. Diferencias en la composition de canal de tres estirpes de cerdo ibérico. Anales del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias. Serie Ganadera. 1985;22:99-112
  79. 79. Fernandez A, De Pedro E, Nunez N, Silió L, Garcı́a Casco J, Rodrı́guez C. Genetic parameters for meat and fat quality and carcass composition traits in Iberian pigs. Meat Science. 2003;64:405-410
  80. 80. Fernández AI, Alves E, Fernández A, De Pedro E, López-García MA, Ovilo C, et al. Mitochondrial genome polymorphisms associated with longissimus muscle composition in Iberian pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2008;86:1283-1290
  81. 81. Casco JMG, Muñoz MM, López LS, Valdovinos CR. Genotype by environment interaction for carcass traits and intramuscular fat content in heavy Iberian pigs fattened in two different free-range systems. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014;12:388-395
  82. 82. Ayuso D, González A, Hernández F, Corral JM, Izquierdo M. Prediction of carcass composition, ham and foreleg weights, and lean meat yields of Iberian pigs using ultrasound measurements in live animals. Journal of Animal Science. 2013;91:1884-1892
  83. 83. Ayuso D, González A, Hernández F, Peña F, Izquierdo M. Effect of sex and final fattening on ultrasound and carcass traits in Iberian pigs. Meat Science. 2014;96:562-567
  84. 84. Garcia-Gudino J, Izquierdo M, Ayuso D, del Rosario AI, Duarte JL, Perez MA, et al. Effect of pre-slaughter weight and sex on commercial meat cut yields of Iberian pigs. In: Dovč P, Čandek-Potokar M, editors. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, supp. 4; 10-12 October 2013; Ljubljana, Slovenia: University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty; 2013. pp. 101-104
  85. 85. Tejerina D, Garcia-Torres S. Effect of production system and sex on different carcass traits of Iberian pigs. In: De Pedro EJ, Cabezas AB, editors. Options Méditerranéennes, A no. 101; 14-16 October 2010; Cordoba, Spain. Zaragoza, Spain: CIHEAM; 2012. pp. 401-404
  86. 86. Mayoral AI, Dorado M, Guillén MT, Robina A, Vivo JM, Vázquez C, et al. Development of meat and carcass quality characteristics in Iberian pigs reared outdoors. Meat Science. 1999;52:315-324
  87. 87. Alves E, Fernandez A, Ovilo C, De Pedro E, Rodrigańez C, Silió L. Influencia de genes mitocondri ales sobre el contenido de grasa intramuscular en cerdos Ibéricos. Información Tecnica Economica Agraria. 2005;26(I):9-11
  88. 88. Tejerina D, García-Torres S, Cava R. Water-holding capacity and instrumental texture properties of m. longissimus and m. Serratus ventralis from Iberian pigs as affected by the production system. Livestock Science. 2012;148:46-51
  89. 89. Tejerina D, García-Torres S, de Vaca MC, Vázquez FM, Cava R. Effect of production system on physical–chemical, antioxidant and fatty acids composition of longissimus and serratus ventralis muscles from Iberian pig. Food Chemistry. 2012;133:293-299
  90. 90. Muriel E, Ruiz J, Ventanas J, Petrón MJ, Antequera T. Meat quality characteristics in different lines of Iberian pigs. Meat Science. 2004;67:299-307
  91. 91. Cava R, Estévez M, Ruiz J, Morcuende D. Physicochemical characteristics of three muscles from free-range reared Iberian pigs slaughtered at 90 kg live weight. Meat Science. 2003;63:533-541
  92. 92. Estévez M, Morcuende D, López RC. Physico-chemical characteristics of M. longissimus from three lines of free-range reared Iberian pigs slaughtered at 90 kg live-weight and commercial pigs: A comparative study. Meat Science. 2003;64:499-506
  93. 93. Prior E, Garcia-Torres S, López-Gajardo A, Cabeza de Vaca M, Tejerina D. Effect of high-oxygen modified atmosphere packaging on some quality traits of meat from Iberian pigs reared under “Montanera” system. In: Dovč P, Čandek-Potokar M, editors. Acta Agric Slov Supplement 4; 10-12 October 2013; Ljubljana, Slovenia. Ljubljana, Slovenia: University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty; 2013. pp. 163-166
  94. 94. Ventanas S, Estevez M, Tejeda JF, Ruiz J. Protein and lipid oxidation in longissimus and dry cured loin from Iberian pigs as affected by crossbreeding and diet. Meat Science. 2006;72:647-655
  95. 95. Estévez M, Morcuende D, Cava R. Oxidative and colour changes in meat from three lines of free-range reared Iberian pigs slaughtered at 90 kg live weight and from industrial pig during refrigerated storage. Meat Science. 2003;65:1139-1146
  96. 96. Nieto R. TREASURE Survey WP 2.1, Personal Communication; 2017
  97. 97. Óvilo C, Benítez R, Fernández A, Isabel B, Núñez Y, Fernández AI, et al. Dietary energy source largely affects tissue fatty acid composition but has minor influence on gene transcription in Iberian pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2014;92(3):939-954
  98. 98. BOE. Real Decreto 4/2014, de 10 de enero, por el que se aprueba la norma de calidad para la carne, el jamón, la paleta y la caña de lomo ibérico. Boletín Oficial del Estado; 2014. pp. 1569-1585

Notes

  • AECERIBER—Spanish Association of Iberian Pig Breeders; C/San Francisco, 51, 1°D, Zafra, Badajoz, Spain, 06300, E-mail address: zafra@aeceriber.es.

Written By

Rosa Nieto, Juan García-Casco, Luis Lara, Patricia Palma-Granados, Mercedes Izquierdo, Francisco Hernandez, Elena Dieguez, Juan Luis Duarte and Nina Batorek-Lukač

Reviewed: 21 December 2018 Published: 06 February 2019