Mean values of selected soil properties under three different tree species.
Abstract
We examined the soil microbial community structure and soil enzyme potential within three dominant tree species at a tropical dry forest during five months. Changes within microbial community in response to sampling periods and tree species were evaluated using fatty acid methyl-ester and enzymes potential. We found that both tree species and precipitation determined microbial community structure and enzyme potential. This is the first study that provides insight into the soil microbial community at Guánica Dry Forest, a valuable contribution that will help elucidate strategies for better management and protection of the soil biota of the area.
Keywords
- dry soil
- soil enzyme activity
- microbial diversity
- EL-FAME
- phosphatases
1. Introduction
Forest ecosystems are a fundamental part of the biosphere as they govern global primary production and biogeochemical cycling [1]. The dynamics of decomposition and nutrient cycling is driven by soil microbial communities [2] and their enzymatic potential [3]. Assessments of soil microbial community composition are often coupled with the assessment of soil processes (C storage and nutrient cycling) through different enzymatic activities to better address the ecosystem function [4]. Some of the principal enzyme activities assayed in soils are involved in carbon cycling (β-glucosidase, α-galactosidase) with potential importance for C sequestration [5]. Other enzymes such as β-glucosaminidase are important in the decomposition of more complex compounds such as chitin [6, 7] Phosphorus cycling enzymes (acid and alkaline phosphatases and phosphodiesterase) are important since most soils are P deficient [8] and microbial enzyme activity (EA) plays a vital role in the availability of P in soils.
Both microbial communities and enzyme activities are sensitive to biotic and abiotic disturbances. For example, low soil moisture may result in low enzyme activity [9] and rainfall pulses may result in pulses of microbial growth which may lead to pulsed secretion of soil enzymes promoting a temporary increase of soil enzyme activity [10].
Understanding the dynamics of forest soil ecosystem depends on elucidating the contribution of individual plant species to the soil biota and the process that they regulate [11]. Determining and quantifying plant species effects under natural conditions can be difficult due to environmental noise and the interaction among species present in an area [12]. Little is known about the effects of dominant vegetation on the soil biogeochemical processes such as enzyme activities [13]. Even less is known about the plant-soil-microbial interactions that take place in extreme environments such as tropical dry forest.
Nearly 42% of tropical forests around the world are seasonally dry plant communities, where around half of the Central American and Caribbean land area is characterized by a tropical or subtropical dry forest climate. In the Coastal Plateau of the Guánica Dry Forest (GDF), an UNESCO/MAB Biosphere Reserve, dwarfed trees grow isolated from one another in the cracks of the calcareous platform, forming individual islands of fertility [14]. A lack of interspecific competition is observed, as tolerance to environmental stress and scarcity of space for establishment make it difficult for aboveground and belowground competition, also contributing to the evenness of tree species found in this area [14]. The substrate is derived from limestone made from marine deposits that vary throughout the forest from deep alluvial fans to exposed fractured limestone with shallow soil pockets [15]. This naturally occurring plant community provides the ideal conditions to determine how specific tree species affect the soil microbial community composition and enzymatic potential in a dry forest.
In order to understand how trees impact soil microbial communities, a five-month study was conducted at the GDF. We selected three dwarfed, isolated tree species (a pantropical species and two native species) that are highly distributed among the forest, hypothesizing that these trees may harbour different microbial community structure and activities. The tree species selected complied with the following requirements: (1) that trees were growing in cracks isolated from other trees by exposed rock and (2) that their litter and belowground substrate originated from their own residue decomposition [16]. Additionally, this forest experiences bimodal and pulsed precipitation patterns [17, 18] that may contribute in the alteration of the microbial dynamics and nutrient turnover of the forest. Our objectives were: (1) to determine if tree species traits had an effect on the soil microbial community structure and activities and (2) to determine the effects of sampling period on the soil microbial community structure and activities.
2. Methods
2.1 Study site
The study was located in the coastal association of the Guánica Dry Forest latitude 66°53′30″W longitude 17°58′0″N [16, 17, 18]. In this area of the forest, dwarf individual adult trees from different species are separated by exposed rocks which prevent overlap among trees forming “monospecific tree islands” ( Figure 1A and B ). These “monospecific tree islands” have little or no mineral soil ( Figure 1A ), with a highly organic substrate composed of shallow monospecific litter and humus ( Figure 1C and D ), which varies according to variations in the ground relief and season from 2 to 8 cm depth [16]. These characteristics make this forest an ideal system to study tree species effects as there are no confounding effects of overlapping roots from other species. We chose three trees from three species, previously tagged and studied, that grow from 100 m to approximately 300 m from the coast.

Figure 1.
Detailed description of study site. (A) Tree species that has established its growth in the cracks and crevices of the calcareous rock. Black arrow demonstrates a new soil pocket that is being formed as a by-product of the decomposition of the tree’s litter. (B and C)
The three tree species selected are:
2.2 Selected soil substrate analyses
Total organic matter, soil texture, pH and moisture analyses were completed. Soil total organic matter was determined by the ignition method. Soil texture was determined by the pipette method [19]. Soil pH was determined in a 1:5 (soil:water) mixture using an Orion 420A pH Meter [20]. Soil moisture was determined by weighing and drying 1 g of soil at 105°C during 24 h [20].
2.3 EL-FAME analysis
Microbial community structure was evaluated by the ester-linked (EL)-FAME method as described by [21]. A total of 3 g of field moist soil was used for each sample, and four steps were completed: (a) saponification and methylation of ester-linked fatty acids were performed by incubating the 3 g of soil in 15 ml of 0.2 M KOH in methanol at 37°C during 1 h—samples were vortexed every 10 min during the incubation period and, after the incubation period was completed, 3 ml of 1.0 acetic acid was added to neutralize the mixture’s pH; (b) partitioning of the FAMEs into an organic phase was achieved by adding 10 ml of hexane and centrifuging the preparations at 480×
2.4 Soil enzyme activity
Study of enzyme activities was performed as described in [4, 6]. The activities of enzymes relevant in C cycling (β-glucosidase), C and N cycling (β-glucosaminidase), P cycling (alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, phosphodiesterase) and in the S cycle (arylsulphatase) were assayed using 0.5 g of air-dried soil (<2 mm). Duplicate replicates and one control were used for all the soils that were tested; furthermore, the appropriate substrate was used for each assay and reactions were incubated for 1 h at 37°C at their optimal pH as described in [4]. For the controls, the substrate was added after the 1-h incubation period and subtracted from a sample control value. Enzyme activity is expressed in mg p-nitrophenol (PN) released in kg−1 soil h−1.
2.5 Statistical analysis
All data analysed with JMP software were checked for normality and transformed to log10. To determine differences in soil FAMEs, enzyme activity and selected soil properties due to tree species and sampling periods, canonical discriminate analysis (CDA) was conducted with the JMP program. The first and second canonical discriminate functions were utilized to determine the distribution of enzyme activity and FAMEs as influenced by each tree species and by sampling period. SigmaPlot 10 software was used to conduct two-way analysis of variance (2-way ANOVA). Two-way analysis of variance was used to establish the effect of plant species and sampling period on soil community structure, enzyme activities and selected soil properties.
3. Results
3.1 Selected soil and plant properties
Soil samples under all tree species were predominantly organic (65–85%). The mineral part of the soil is silty loam to silty clay loam (20–36% clay, 0.4–0.7% sand, 63–80% silt) depending on the tree location in the study area (data not shown). Soil pH was neutral to alkaline for all tree species ( Table 1 ). Two-way ANOVA did not demonstrate an interaction between tree species and sampling months ( Table 2 ). Available N varied significantly with regard to monthly sampling and not to tree species ( Table 2 ). Available Ca and P varied significantly with regard to tree species ( Table 2 ). Total N and C:N ratio varied significantly with regard to tree species.

Table 1.

Table 2.
Two-way analysis of variance for the effects of species (
3.2 Soil enzyme activities
Six enzyme activities (EAs) were assessed representing C (β-glucosidase), N (β-glucosaminidase), P (phosphodiesterase, alkaline and acid phosphatase) and S (arylsulphatase) cycling. There was a clear and significant separation in the soil enzyme activity between the tree species in this forest, while there was no distinct trend due to the sampling time (
Figure 2
). Most of the separation on the metabolic capacity of the soil according to these six EAs was observed along axis 1, which explained 87.22% of the variability.

Figure 2.
Canonical discriminate analysis of the soil enzyme activity at the Guánica Dry Forest. (A) canonical discriminate analysis of the soil enzyme activity as affected by tree species (
Two-way analysis of variance was used to establish the effect of plant species and sampling period on soil enzyme activities. The only enzymes that were significantly affected by plant species were alkaline phosphatase (F = 8.18; P < 0.001), β-glucosidase (F = 8.86; P < 0.001) and β-glucosaminidase (F = 5.97; P = 0.007) ( Table 2 ). Alkaline phosphatase was the only enzyme affected by monthly variations (F = 4.375; P = 0.007). Two-way ANOVA does not demonstrate significant interactions between tree species and monthly variations.
3.3 Microbial community structure (EL-FAME)
A total of 56 FAMEs were identified in the samples analysed and 13 FAMEs were used as indicators of different microbial groups as affected by tree species traits and sampling time (
Table 2
). According to CDA, significant differences (P < 0.0001) were detected in the FAME profiles of the soil microbial community structure as affected by tree species traits (
Figure 3A
). Canonical axis 1 explained 83% of the variation. The soil microbial communities under

Figure 3.
Canonical discriminate analysis of the soil FAMEs at the Guánica Dry Forest. (A) canonical discriminate analysis of the soil FAME profiles as affected by tree species (
In addition to the effects of tree species on FAME profiles of the microbial community structure, there were also significant monthly variations (p = 0.001) according to CDA along CA1, which explained 68.81% of the variation (
Figure 3B
). The CDA revealed that July, September and August clustered together along axis 1. August was separated from other months due to the predominance of
Two-way analysis of variance was used to establish the effect of plant species and sampling period on soil community structure. The Gram-positive EL-FAMEs that were significantly affected due to tree species were iso15:0, iso17:0, antesio17:0, 10Me16:0 and 10Me17:0. Gram-negative markers affected by tree species were 17:0 cy and 19:0 cy and fungal markers were 18:1ω9c, 16:1ω5c, 18:2 ω6c and 18:3 ω6c. The Gram-positive EL-FAMEs that were significantly affected due to monthly variations were iso15:0, antesio15:0 and 10Me16:0. None of the Gram-negative markers were affected by monthly variations. Fungal markers 16:1ω5c, 18:2 ω6c and 18:3 ω6c were significantly affected by monthly variations. Two-way ANOVA did not demonstrate significant interactions between tree species and monthly variations ( Table 2 ).
4. Discussion
4.1 Soil microbial communities in a dry forest as affected by tree species
The evaluated tree species had the ability of modifying soil microbial communities. We found that the relative abundance of 8 out of 13 markers was higher under
Species traits such as leaf nutrients, leaf toughness and specific leaf area (SLA, cm2/g) are known to contribute to the rate of decomposition of organic matter, which may drive the microbial community under each tree species [22, 23, 24]. Previous studies have determined that
Differences in the relative abundance of fungal markers at the Guánica Dry Forest could also be due to the microclimate of each tree species. The amplitude of temperature fluctuations encountered in this forest varies among plant species, a factor that has been documented to affect arthropods in this system [16]. The canopies of both
4.2 Soil microbial communities in a dry forest as affected by monthly variations
As found in our study, microbial community structure was influenced by monthly wet/dry events ( Figure 3B ). Previous studies have described significant responses of the soil microbial communities to wet/dry events [25]. Our results point towards differential responses between sporadic and continuous rainfall events. The fungal markers showed lower abundance during July and higher abundance during October and November. Saprophytic fungal marker (18:3 ω6c, 18:2 ω6c) and the mycorrhiza marker 16:1 ω5c were more susceptible to monthly rainfall variations (p < 0.0001) than any other microbial group. As a consequence of rainfall pulses, adventitious roots were observed in the soil substrate, which serves as a surface area for the establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Although arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance P absorption in root systems, we did not find any correlation between available P and mycorrhizal marker 16:1 ω5c.
Although fungal markers showed greater monthly fluctuations, the G+ bacterial marker
4.3 Soil enzymatic activity
Our results show that enzyme activity is highly dependent on the soil microbial community structure of each tree species. Tree species was a strong modulator of soil enzyme activity when compared to monthly climatic variations. Although all enzymes tested were active under each tree species, activity of certain enzymes was higher under specific tree species. For instance, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and β-glucosidase activity was higher under
Tree species idiosyncratic traits affect not only the structure of microbial communities but also their enzyme activities. Alkaline phosphatase under
Microbial phosphatase activity is crucial for the supply of inorganic phosphate in this system. Soils at the Guánica Dry Forest are P limited due to the high amount of carbonates from the underlying calcareous substrate. In this study, phosphatases were the most active enzymes, microbial communities are allocating resources to balance the P deficiency of the Guánica soils. When P deficiency is present in a system, increased phosphatase activity occurs as a response to P starvation [29]. A mechanism that compensates soil P deficiency is the inoculation of the arbuscular mycorrhizae, which are known to enhance plant P availability via the production of phosphatase enzymes [30]. We identified similar concentrations of the arbuscular mycorrhizae marker 16:1 ω5c for
5. Conclusions
Idiosyncratic effects of tree species coupled with extreme changes in water input contribute in shaping the soil microbial community structure and enzymatic activity at the Guánica Dry Forest. In this system, saprophytic fungi, arbuscular mycorrhizae and anaerobic Gram-positive sulphur-reducing bacteria seem to be more sensitive to rainfall pulses when compared to Gram-positive (including actinobacteria), Gram-negative and protozoan communities. Even though monthly variations play a significant role in microbial community structure, soil enzyme activities did not vary during the months sampled. Our findings demonstrate that, although mesoclimate is a determinant driver of ecosystems, tree species is a stronger modulator of the soil microbial dynamics at the Guánica Dry Forest. To our understanding, this is the first study that provides insight into the soil microbial community of the Guánica Dry Forest, a valuable contribution that will help elucidate strategies for better management and protection of the soil biota of the area.
Acknowledgments
The project was funded by NSF Grant HRD-0734826 and is a contribution of the Centre of Applied Tropical Ecology and Conservation of the University of Puerto Rico in collaboration with the USDA-ARS in Lubbock, Texas. We appreciate the support of Mr. Larry Diaz, laboratory coordinator, and students from the Ecosystems Processes and Function laboratory of the University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, that participated in the field collection of soil samples; Mr. Jon Cotton, laboratory technician, and students from Dr. Veronica Acosta-Martinez laboratory at the USDA-ARS Lubbock Texas, that participated in sample processing, and Mr. Dean Holder from the USDA-ARS Lubbock Texas, who offered training in the determination of soil texture. Special thanks to Dr. Francisco Calderon from the USDA-ARS Akron Colorado for kind participation in the revision of this manuscript. Thanks to Dr. Raymond Tremblay for commenting on the statistical part of the manuscript.
References
- 1.
Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G. Microbial diversity and soil functions. European Journal of Soil Science. 2017; 68 (1):12-26 - 2.
Fierer N, Leff JW, Adams BJ, Nielsen UN, Bates ST, Lauber CL, et al. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012; 109 (52):21390-21395 - 3.
Van Der Heijden MG, Bardgett RD, Van Straalen NM. The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters. 2008; 11 (3):296-310 - 4.
Acosta-Martínez V, Bell CW, Morris BE, Zak J, Allen VG. Long-term soil microbial community and enzyme activity responses to an integrated cropping-livestock system in a semi-arid region. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2010; 137 (3-4):231-240 - 5.
Acosta-Martinez V, Cruz L, Sotomayor-Ramirez D, Pérez-Alegría L. Enzyme activities as affected by soil properties and land use in a tropical watershed. Applied Soil Ecology. 2007; 35 (1):35-45 - 6.
Parham JA, Deng SP. Detection, quantification and characterization of β-glucosaminidase activity in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2000; 32 (8-9):1183-1190 - 7.
Ekenler M, Tabatabai MA. β-Glucosaminidase activity as an index of nitrogen mineralization in soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2004; 35 (7-8):1081-1094 - 8.
Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA. Phosphatases in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1977; 9 (3):167-172 - 9.
Sardans J, Peñuelas J. Drought decreases soil enzyme activity in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex L. forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2005;37 (3):455-461 - 10.
Castro-Díez P, Fierro-Brunnenmeister N, González-Muñoz N, Gallardo A. Effects of exotic and native tree leaf litter on soil properties of two contrasting sites in the Iberian Peninsula. Plant and Soil. 2012; 350 (1-2):179-191 - 11.
Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN, Setälä H, Van Der Putten WH, Wall DH. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science. 2004; 304 (5677):1629-1633 - 12.
Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2003; 18 (3):119-125 - 13.
Baldrian P, Šnajdr J, Merhautová V, Dobiášová P, Cajthaml T, Valášková V. Responses of the extracellular enzyme activities in hardwood forest to soil temperature and seasonality and the potential effects of climate change. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2013; 56 :60-68 - 14.
Medina E, Cuevas E, Molina S, Lugo AE, Ramos O. Structural variability and species diversity of a dwarf Caribbean dry forest. Caribbean Journal of Science. 2010; 46 (2-3):203-215 - 15.
Cintrón BB, Lugo AE. Litterfall in a subtropical dry forest: Guanica, Puerto Rico. Acta Científica. 1990; 4 (1-3):37-49 - 16.
Barberena-Arias MF. Single tree species effects on temperature, nutrients and arthropod diversity in litter and humus in the Guánica dry forest [Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Puerto Rico; 2008 - 17.
Medina E, Cuevas E. Propiedades fotosintéticas y eficiencia de uso de agua de plantas leñosas del bosque deciduo de Guánica: Consideraciones generales y resultados preliminares. Acta Científica. 1990; 4 :25-36 - 18.
Govender Y, Cuevas E, Sternberg LD, Jury MR. Temporal variation in stable isotopic composition of rainfall and groundwater in a tropical dry forest in the northeastern Caribbean. Earth Interactions. 2013; 17 (27):1-20 - 19.
Gee GW, Bauder JW. Particle-Size Analysis 1. Soil Science Society of America. Madison, Wl USA: American Society of Agronomy; 1986 - 20.
Anderson J, Ingram J. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility (TSBF): Handbook of Methods. Wallingford, Ox UK: CAB International; 1993 - 21.
Schutter ME, Dick RP. Comparison of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) methods for characterizing microbial communities. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2000; 64 (5):1659-1668 - 22.
Cuevas E, Medina E. Nutrient dynamics within Amazonian forests. Oecologia. 1988; 76 (2):222-235 - 23.
Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Cornelissen JH, Vendramini F, Cabido M, Castellanos A. Chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in Central Argentina. Plant and Soil. 2000; 218 (1-2):21-30 - 24.
Schneider T, Keiblinger KM, Schmid E, Sterflinger-Gleixner K, Ellersdorfer G, Roschitzki B, et al. Who is who in litter decomposition? Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biogeochemical functions. The ISME Journal. 2012; 6 (9):1749 - 25.
Tremont O, Cuevas E. Carbono orgánico, nutrientes y cambios estacionales de la biomasa microbiana en las principales especies de dos tipos de bosques tropicales. Multiciencias. 2004; 4 (2):96-103 - 26.
Dijkman NA, Boschker HT, Stal LJ, Kromkamp JC. Composition and heterogeneity of the microbial community in a coastal microbial mat as revealed by the analysis of pigments and phospholipid-derived fatty acids. Journal of Sea Research. 2010; 63 (1):62-70 - 27.
Muyzer G, Stams AJ. The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2008; 6 (6):441 - 28.
Waldrop MP, Balser TC, Firestone MK. Linking microbial community composition to function in a tropical soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2000; 32 (13):1837-1846 - 29.
Richardson AE, Simpson RJ. Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus. Plant Physiology. 2011; 156 (3):989-996 - 30.
George E, Marschner H, Jakobsen I. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in uptake of phosphorus and nitrogen from soil. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 1995; 15 (3-4):257-270 - 31.
Wu QS, Zou YN, He XH. Differences of hyphal and soil phosphatase activities in drought-stressed mycorrhizal trifoliate orange ( Poncirus trifoliata ) seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae. 2011;129 (2):294-298