Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Machining of Stainless Steels and Alloys Using Non-Traditional Machining Processes

Written By

Ramesh Rudrapati

Submitted: 18 April 2018 Reviewed: 20 September 2018 Published: 21 November 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.81611

From the Edited Volume

Stainless Steels and Alloys

Edited by Zoia Duriagina

Chapter metrics overview

1,601 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Stainless steels and alloys are characterized primarily by their corrosion resistance, high strength, ductility, etc. used for various advanced applications like automotive and aerospace, sugar refineries, construction materials, etc. Many advanced high-speed machineries /systems need fine quality of parts to provide good performance in its working conditions. The machining of stainless steel and its alloys is of interest, because, of its excellent mechanical properties. Stainless steels and alloys are machined generally by traditional machining processes. But complex shapes and features on products are difficult task with the use of traditional metal cutting techniques. To machine the advanced materials to produce high dimensional accuracy and generation of intricate shapes in difficult-to-machine materials like stainless steels and alloys, nontraditional machining (NTM) techniques are now attractive the viable choices. To attain improved machining performance of the NTM processes, it is always necessary to find the optimal combinations of various process input parameters of those processes. In the present chapter, some aspects of machining of stainless steel and alloys using NTM processes such as electric discharge machining (EDM) and wire EDM, are discussed and some concluding remarks have been drawn from the study.

Keywords

  • stainless steels and alloys
  • nontraditional machining
  • EDM
  • wire EDM

1. Introduction

With the increased industrial and technological growth, materials exhibiting excellent strength, hardness, stiffness to strength ratio, good corrosion resistance properties have found wide applications particularly in aerospace, nuclear engineering, navel, marine, space technology, tool industries [1], etc. The advanced materials include stainless steel, refractory materials and its alloys, carbides, ceramic alloys, glass and fiber-based composites, etc. Stainless steel and its alloys got immense importance for variety of advanced applications. Most of stainless steels and its alloys (SS&A) treated as difficult to machine materials. Machining of SS&A using traditional methods like turning, milling, drilling, grinding, etc., cannot preferable, because of low cutting speeds and material removal rates. And it’s difficult to find cutting tools to cut these type materials. Machining of stainless steels and its alloys is an important research area for industrialists.

Stainless steel materials gained much important materials for industries at the beginning of twentieth century. Stainless steels are defined as steel alloys described mainly by its corrosion resistance, high strength, high ductility and high chromium content present.

  • Steel is one of the most attractive and widely used products in the world for various applications.

  • Currently, the steel industry is plays vital role for process of change.

  • Because of continuing procedural, technical and economic growth, the manufacture and use of steel is becoming increasing

  • The use of steel continuously gaining its share of world-wide over the last three decades

French scientist Berthier was found the iron-chromium alloys which resist to certain acids in early eighteenth century. Then after Brustline another French scientist identified the importance of carbon (C) percentage levels and chromium (Cr) levels. In 1904, Leon Guilet [2] had invented the martensitic and ferritic SS-alloys series (i.e. 410, 442, 446, and 440 C) and Fe-Ni-Cr austenitic alloy series (300 series of SS). Various researchers conducted research investigations to improve the mechanical properties of stainless steels and its alloys with addition of different supplements like Cr, Ni, C, Mo, manganese, silicon, titanium, molybdenum, aluminum, sulfur, phosphorous, nitrogen, etc., to iron (Fe). Monnart and Eduard Maurer invented the stainless steel and austenitic stainless steel in the year of 1911 and 1912 respectively [3], with improved corrosion resistance property. The free machining stainless steels with addition of 15% sulfur was introduced to the world in the year of 1928. Stainless steels with 15% sulfur were called as martensitic 416 stainless. Then after sulfur and phosphorous were both added to make the austenitic stainless grades of 303 [4]. Maurer and Brearly described the advantages of stainless steel for industrial applications [5].

These alloys are milled into coils, sheets, plates, bars, wire, tubing, etc., to be used extensively in cookware, cutlery, surgical appliances, industrial equipment (e.g., in sugar refineries), automotive and aerospace operational alloys, as a construction material, etc. stainless steels and alloys are widely used in storage tanks for transporting of various liquid based materials like orange juice, apple juice and other oil-based products, due to its corrosion resistance and antibacterial properties. These materials are also used in commercial kitchens, food processing plants etc.

The applications of stainless steels and its alloys have been increased enormously over last 30 years in various engineering related fields because of their excellent materials properties such as high strength, high temperature strength, high corrosion resistance, oxidation resistance, etc. These materials are treated as difficulty to machine materials because of low thermal conductivity, high coefficient of thermal expansion, high ductility, and high work-hardening rate, etc. Low thermal conductivity nature in these materials increases in tool temperature during machining, which leads to reduced tool life and tolerances of work-piece. Chip formation is severely affected due to high work-hardening rate and low thermal conductivity. High ductility nature has creates built-up edge on cutting tool edge and propagates vibration and chatter finally it have detrimental effects on quality of machined surface.

It is difficult to find adequate cutting tool materials to machine the advanced materials like stainless steel and its alloys using traditional machining processes. The new cutting tools along with advanced machining methodology called non-traditional machining (NTM) have been developed to machine the newly developed materials like stainless steels, ceramics, high strength polymers, composites and other alloy materials. These processes can capable of machine a wide spectrum of difficult-to-cut materials irrespective of their hardness. The important NTM processes are electric discharge machining (EDM), wire EDM, electron beam machining (EBM), ion beam machining (IBM), etc. It is necessary to conduct the NTM processes in optimum manner to enhance machining performance.

In the present paper reviews the research work carried out from the spin-off from the NTM processes to the development of NTM processes related to thermal energy-based techniques like EDM and WEDM. It reports on the research work involving the optimization of process parameters which expected to influencing the machining performance and productivity. The paper also highlights the important process parameters for performing the above said processes when machining of stainless steels and its alloys.

Advertisement

2. Machining of stainless steel and alloys by NTM processes

Machining or metal cutting is one of the important manufacturing processes in which excess or unwanted material is removed by cutting tool / electrode tool with or without physical contact with the work-piece. The classification of the machining processes is shown in Figure 1. From Figure 1, one notified that machining process is categorized into two types: traditional machining (TM) processes and non-traditional or non-conventional machining (NTM) processes. In traditional machining processes, material removal has carried out by using sharp edge cutting tool with physical contact with the work material. Tool material wear, generation of vibrations, difficulty of machining hard materials, impossible or uneconomical to produce complex shapes on parts, minimized tool life, decreased production rate and increased production costs are some of the limitations associated in TM processes because of physical contact with the work-piece. To overcome the limitations of TM techniques, NTM are developed. NTM methods applied successfully where work-piece surface is too hard, strong, flexible to resist cutting forces, difficult to clamp, to create complex shapes with both internal and external profiles, to produce fine surface finish and tolerances, residual stresses are unacceptable for materials.

Figure 1.

Classification of machining processes [2].

In NTM processes, physical tool may not present, no chip formation may take place, cutting tool need not to be harder than work material and it do not necessarily apply mechanical energy. NTM methods are classified according to usage of energy for machining are chemical energy, electrical energy, mechanical energy, electrical energy, thermal energy, etc. Thermal energy-based processes are plays important role in metal cutting industries. In thermal energy-based techniques, material removal processes based on thermal energy are characterized by very high local temperatures—hot enough to remove excess material by fusion or vaporization method. Because of the high temperature generation during metal removal process, these processes cause physical and metallurgical damage to the newly generated surface of the work material. The two main processes in this category are (1) electric discharge machining and (2) wire electric discharge machining. These processes can be used only on electrically conducting work materials.

2.1. Electric discharge machining (EDM)

Electric discharge machining (EDM) is one of the nontraditional processes most widely used in mold, die, aerospace, automotive industry and surgical components for generating intricately shaped, and mold cavities on difficult-to-cut electrically conductive materials like high strength, temperature resistant (HSTR) alloys [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. In EDM, mechanical stresses, chatter and vibration during machining can be eliminated because electrode tool does not make any direct contact with the work-piece [9].

An EDM setup is illustrated in Figure 2. The shape of the finished work-piece surface is replica of formed electrode tool. The EDM process conducted in the presence of a dielectric fluid, which makes a path for passing each discharge current to the fluid. So, fluid becomes ionized in the gap. The discharges are generated by a pulsating direct current and power supply connected to the work and the tool. The sparks occur across a small gap between electrode tool and work-piece surface. There are hundreds of electrical discharges generated during machining process and every discharge energy may form a specific surface integrity on the part which results in creation of surface texture by overlapping craters [11].

Figure 2.

EDM process [20].

The mechanism behind the material removal in EDM is complex and difficult to understand and thus it is difficult task to formulate the relationships between the input and output parameters and to predict the better EDM performance [9, 12, 13]. The inappropriate selection of control parameters in EDM process may result in poor machining performance, short-circuiting between the electrodes or even work-piece surface may damage thereby reducing the productivity and affecting the quality. Due to high capital and manufacturing costs, these processes need to be operate economically and predictably to obtain machining economics. Identifying optimal set of parametric conditions is necessary to optimize production rate, machining time, lower material waste and costs, [8, 14] etc. Analyzing, modeling and optimizing EDM process may useful to improve the performance characteristics of EDMed parts.

Literature survey has been done to review and study the machining of stainless steels and its alloys in EDM process. The details of the literature survey are given as follows:

The maraging steel is a high strength material which exhibits resistance to corrosion oxidation in its working. Machining of maraging steels by using traditional machining process is difficult, because, of its high hardness. Ruma et al. [1] had experimented the EDM of maraging steel material to investigate the influences of EDM parameters on output responses. Researchers optimized the multi-performance characteristics using teaching learning-based optimization (TLBO) and genetic algorithm (GA). Authors mentioned that selection of optimum parametric conditions essential for conduction of EDM process effectively and economically. The 17-4 PH steels widely used for aerospace and die manufacturing, Chandramouli and Eswaraiah [6] had experimented EDM of 17-4 precipitation hardening stainless steel material to evaluate the influences of input parameters: peak current, pulse on time (TONN), pulse off time (TOFF) and tool lift time on output response: material removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness. Researchers had studied, analyzed and optimized the EDM process to fine quality parameter (Ra) and qualitative factor, MRR when machining of 17-4 PH steels. Die steel materials are most widely used for industrial purposes and machining of these materials are important area of research. Banh et al. [14] presented a research work related to optimize the quality characteristics of die steel materials such as SKD61, SKD11 and SKT4, in titanium powder mixed EDM process. Researchers had been considered workpiece material, tool material, polarity, TONN, current, TOFF, and powder concentration as input parameters and MRR, tool wear rate, surface roughness, and microhardness surface, as quality responses. They stated that input parameter selection is very crucial for obtaining better performance characteristics. Electric discharge machining with powder mixed has improved its performance significantly. Priyaranjan et al. [15] had made an experimental analysis to evaluate the relationship between process parameters like pulse current, pulse duration, TOFF and dielectric pressure, and performance characteristics of MRR, electrode wear rate and taper angle of the hole of AISI 329 stainless steel in EDM process. The stainless-steel grade of 329 which commonly found for several industrial applications like heat exchangers, chemical tanks, pressure vessels, etc. Investigators had been effectively optimized output responses by controlling input parameters. They stated from their work that properties of electrode and work-piece material influences much for EDM when machining of AISI 329 stainless steel.

Pradhan and Das [7] had made experimental analysis and developed predictive models for optimizing MRR by considering discharge current, pulse duration, duty cycle, and voltage as input machining parameters in EDM of AISI D2 tool steel. They identified from their study that MRR of D2 tool steel in EDM is highly effected by input parameters. The MRR is increase with increase of discharge current, duty cycle, and voltage whereas pulse duration is most significant for MRR. Janmanee and Muttamara [16] have performed the experiment on EDM to improve the drilling performance of stainless steel AISI 431 using brass tube electrode. They determined that MRR increases with increase of servo rate, while the taper of the hole increases with increase of electrical current and servo rate. Panda and Bhoi [10] worked on analyzing, modeling and optimization of MRR for die steel in EDM process using ANN. They considered pulse current, pulse voltage and duty factor as input parameters. Researchers had been developed relationships between input parameters and MRR effectively. AISI P20 steel is using as a tool for injection molding, Amorim and Weingaertner [17] had made an experimental research work based on the EDM of AISI P20 tool steel. They analyzed the significances of control parameters on MRR, volumetric relative wear (VRW) and surface roughness of P20 tool steel material. Kumagai et al. [18] had explored the effects of electrode material on narrow deep holes in drilling of steel blocks. Jain [19] carried out the experimental analysis to identify the effects of pulse time, diameter of tool and depth of penetration on output responses of EDM of high-speed steel (HSS). He mentioned from his study that EDM is very efficient to make blind holes in HSS material. Some more publications related to the EDM of stainless steels and alloys are given in Table 1.

S. NoReferenceWork materialProcess parametersOutput responsesImpact
1Ubaid et al. [21]Stainless steel 304Current, TOFF, TONMRR, EWR, VEWCurrent and TOFF are most significant
2Majumder [22]AISI 316 LN stainless steelCurrent, TOFF, TONMRR, EWRAll parameters are significant
3Priyaranjan et al. [15]AISI 329 stainless steelCurrent, TOFF, pulse duration, dielectric pressureMRR, EWR, taper angle of holeCurrent and pulse duration are significant for brass electrode; TOFF is significant for copper electrode
4Dastagiri and Kumar [23]Stainless steel and En41b steelCurrent, V, TON and duty factorMRR, Ra and hardnessAll the parameters are significant for both the materials
5Shashikant et al. [24]EN41 steelTON, TOFF, V and discharge currentRa, Rq, Rsk, Rku and RsmCurrent is significant for surface roughness
6Shashikant et al. [25]EN19 and EN41TOFF, TON, V and discharge currentMRRCurrent is significant for MRR of both the materials
7Rajmohan et al. [26]Stainless steel 304Current and voltage, TOFF, TONMRRCurrent and TOFF are significant for MRR
8Faisal and Kumar [27]EN 31 steelCurrent, TON, TOFF, gap voltageMRR and RaCurrent is significant for both the responses
9Behera et al. [28]AISI 304 stainless steelCurrent, TON, flushing pressureMRRCurrent is significant for MRR
10Kumar et al. [29]AISI H13 die steelSparking voltage, discharge current, TOFF, TON, dielectric fluid, workpiece material H13 hot die steel: hardened and temperedMicro-hardness, RaAll parameters have considerable effects on responses

Table 1.

Literature survey related to machining of stainless steels and alloys in EDM.

TOFF = pulse off time; TON = pulse on time; EWR = electrode wear rate; VEW = volumetric electrode wear; MRR = material removal rate; Ra = surface roughness.

2.2. WEDM

Wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) is a non-traditional machining process that is widely used to machine high strength materials. It is one form of EDM as mentioned earlier. WEDM is very complex machining process which used to create high complicated shapes such as tapers, involutes, parabolas and ellipses [30] on hard materials like stainless steel, nitronic austenitic stainless, beryllium copper and titanium, ceramics, metal matrix composites [31], etc. The WEDM process involves a material erosion mechanism by pulsing of direct current between the wire electrode and work piece [32]. WEDM uses electro- thermal based energy to cut electrically conductive material(s). WEDM uses a thin continuously moving electrode in the form of wire in the range of 0.050–0.35 mm [33]. In WEDM, unwanted material is removed using series of discrete discharge currents between the wire electrode and the work material in the presence of a dielectric fluid [34]. Each discharge passed to the dielectric fluid and it becomes ionized in the gap resulted in generation of extremely high temperatures, therefore work-piece surface is melted and removed. The machined surface is cleaned by dielectric fluid by taking removed chip along with it. The schematic diagram of WEDM is shown in Figure 3. The melting point temperature of the work material is very important factor for WEDM process rather than its strength and hardness of the material [35].

Figure 3.

WEDM process [33].

WEDM is special from of EDM which enables to create very complex shapes very easily by using thin wire as electrode as mentioned above. Here, literature survey has been made to review and investigate the parts produced by WEDM of stainless steels and alloys, those details are given as follows:

DC53 is cold die steel improved from familiar cold die steel SKD1, made from daido steel. Machining of DC53 die steel is an important task. Kanlayasiri and Boonmung [35] presented an investigation of the effects of machining variables: pulse-peak current, TONN, TOFF, and wire tension on the surface roughness of DC53 die steel material in wire-EDM process. Shahali et al. [36] made an experimental analysis to identify the optimum input parameters in WEDM of DIN 1.4542 hardening stainless-steel alloy. They considered power, TOFF, voltage and servo and number of finish passes, as input parameters and surface roughness and maximum thickness of white layer as output responses. Hassan et al. [30] presented the experimental work to study the effects of process parameters: pulsed current and pulse-on duration on surface texture of AISI 4140 steel in WEDM process. They found from their study that pulse-on duration is most influential factor than pulsed current to defining the WEDM surface texture.

The P91 steel is extensively used for energy-based industries such as reactor components due to its excellent mechanical properties like high creep strength and thermal conductivity, low thermal expansion, good corrosion resistance, [37, 38] etc. Bhattacharya et al. [32] studied the corrosion behavior of P91 steel material in WEDM process. They stated that WEDMed surfaces have fine passivation than the diamond polished surface.

AISI D3 die-steel possess high resistance to wear and exhibits resistance to heavy pressure which extensively used for applications like blanking, stamping and cold forming dies and punches for long runs and lamination dies [39]. Muthukumar et al. [39] conducted experiments to study the influences of input factors such as TON, TOFF, gap voltage, wire feed on MRR, Ra and kerf width in WEDM of AISI D3 die-steel. They found improved quality responses through systematic analysis of WEDMed die steels.

SKD11 steel is a high-carbon, high-chromium alloy tool steel which used to make dies, precision gauges, spindle, jigs and fixtures, [40] etc. Zhang et al. [40] had made research analysis to seek optimal output responses: MRR and 3D surface quality (Sq) by controlling the input parameters in WEDM of SKD11 steel. Investigators had been improved the performance of WEDM process by systematic analysis and optimization.

One can found more reported articles on machining of stainless steels and alloys in WEDM from the literature. Here, some of the published papers have been presented in Table 2.

S. NoReferenceWork materialProcess parametersOutput responsesImpact
1Majumder et al. [41]Indian reduced activation ferritic martensitic (RAFM) steelpulse current, TOFF, TON, wire tensionCutting speed and RaAll parameters have significant effect on both the responses
2Giduturi and kumar [42]H-13 tool steelWire tension, wire feed, TOFF, TON, servo voltage, peak currentMRR and RaAll parameters have significant effect on both the responses
3Pamnani et al. [43]DMR249A steelCurrent, torch speed, arc gapDepth of penetrationCurrent and torch speed have significant effect on depth of penetration
4Choudhuri et al. [44]AISI stainless steel-316Servo gap set voltage, TOFF, TON and wire feed rateMRR, Ra and lower wire consumptionServo gap set voltage is significant for all the responses
5Sudhakara and Prasanthi [45]Powder metallurgical cold worked tool steelTON, TOFF, Peak current, spark gap set voltage, wire tension, water pressureRaTON parameters has the significant effect on Ra
6Reddy et al. [46]P20 die-tool steelBed speed, TON, TOFF and currentRa and volumetric material removal rateAll parameters have significant effect on both the responses
7Manjaiah et al. [47]D2 steelServo voltage, wire feed, TON, TOFF,MRR and RaTON and servo voltage have significant effect for both the responses
8Tosun et al. [48]AISI 4140 steelpulse duration, open circuit voltage, wire speed dielectric flushing pressureRaopen circuit voltage and pulse duration have significant effect on Ra
9Ugrasen et al. [49]Modified AISI 420 steelTON, TOFF, current, bed speedRa, VMRR, accuracy and EWRAll factors significantly affecting the all responses
10Sudhakara and Prasanthi [50]VANADIS 4E (powder metallurgical cold worked tool steel)TON, TOFF, peak current, spark gap set voltage, wire tension, water pressureDimensional deviationTON, TOFF, peak current, water pressure have significant effect on dimensional deviation

Table 2.

Literature survey related to machining of stainless steels and alloys in WEDM.

VMRR = volumetric material removal rate; TOFF = pulse off time; TON = pulse on time; EWR = electrode wear rate; VEW = volumetric electrode wear; MRR = material removal rate; Ra = surface roughness.

Advertisement

3. Conclusions

Followings are the conclusions drawn from the present study of machining of stainless steel and its alloys using EDM and WEDM:

  1. A historical review of steel and its alloys have been discussed.

  2. Stainless steels and alloys are the widely used industrial material for various advanced applications like aerospace, automobile, surgical, mold, tool and die industries

  3. The importance of machining of stainless steels and alloys have been discussed

  4. NTM processes are extensively used for producing complicated shapes or features on these materials

  5. EDM and WEDM are the important NTM methods which highly used by metal cutting

  6. Selection of input process parameters is very important for both EDM and WEDM techniques

  7. The effects of input parameters on output performance characteristics of EDMed or WEDMed parts needs to be understand properly

  8. Systematic analysis and proper understanding of these methods are important to make effective use of EDM and WEDM processes

  9. More extensive research needs to be conducted on stainless steel and alloys in EDM and WEDM methods to enhance the performance of machining

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The author giving thanks to Dr. Eng. Fisiha Getachew, Vice President for Academic Affairs, Hawasaa University (HU), Dr. Migbar Assefa, Assistant Professor & Dean, Faculty of Manufacturing, HU and Mr. Lijalem Mulugeta, Lecturer & HOD, Mechanical Engineering Department, HU - Institute of Technology (IOT) for encouraging me to write this chapter.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The author declaring no conflict of interest.

Advertisement

Notes/thanks/other declarations

The author giving thanks to Editor of this book for giving opportunity to write this chapter.

References

  1. 1. Ruma S, Bikash C, Barma JD, Prasun C. Optimization of wire EDM parameters using teaching learning-based algorithm during machining of maraging steel 300. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2018;5:7541-7551
  2. 2. Helmi AY. Machining of Stainless Steels and Super Alloys Traditional and Nontraditional Techniques. UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2016
  3. 3. John CT. Stainless Steel in the Brewery. MBAA TQ. 2001:67-82
  4. 4. Palmer FR. Ferrous alloys. US Patent: 1961.777
  5. 5. Paar JG, Hansen A. Introduction to Stainless Steel. USA: American Society for Metals; 1965
  6. 6. Chandramouli S, Eswaraiah K. Optimization of EDM process parameters in machining of 17-4 PH steel using Taguchi method. Materials Today Proceedings. 2017;4(2):2040-2047
  7. 7. Pradhan MK, Das R. Recurrent neural network estimation of material removal rate in electrical discharge machining of AISI D2 tool steel. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2011;225:414-421
  8. 8. Mandal D, Pal SK, Saha P. Modelling of electrical discharge machining process using back propagation neural network and multi-objective optimization using non-dominating sorting genetic algorithm-II. Journal of Material Processing Technology. 2007;186(13):154-162
  9. 9. Ho KH, Newman ST. State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM). International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture. 2003;43:1287-1300
  10. 10. Panda DK, Bhoi RK. Artificial neural network prediction of material removal rate in electro discharge machining. Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 2005;20:645-672
  11. 11. Świercz R, Świercz DO. Experimental investigation of surface layer properties of high thermal conductivity tool steel after electrical discharge machining. Metals. 2017;7(12):550. DOI: 10.3390/met7120550
  12. 12. Gostimirovic M, Kovac P, Sekulic M, Skoric B. Influence of discharge energy on machining characteristics in EDM. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2012;26:173-179
  13. 13. Świercz R, Dorota O, Świercz. Influence of electrical discharge pulse energy on the surface integrity of tool steel 1.2713. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials; Brno, Czech Republic; 24-26 May 2017. 2017
  14. 14. Banh T-L, Nguyen H-P, Ngo C, Nguyen D-T. Characteristics optimization of powder mixed electric discharge machining using titanium powder for die steel materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2018;232(3):281-298
  15. 15. Priyaranjan S, Sujit S, Dhananjay RM. Electrical discharge machining of AISI 329 stainless steel using copper and brass rotary tubular electrode. Procedia Materials Science. 2014;5:1771-1780
  16. 16. Janmanee P, Muttamara A. A Study of Hole Drilling on stainless steel AISI 431 by EDM using brass tube electrode. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Science & Technologies. 2011;2:471-481
  17. 17. Amorim FL, Weingaertner WL. The influence of generator actuation mode and process parameters on the performance of finish EDM of a tool steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2005;166:411-416
  18. 18. Kumagai S, Misawa N, Takeda K, Abdukarimov ET. Plasma-applied machining of a narrow and deep hole in a metal using a dielectric-encased wire electrode. Thin Solid Films. 2004;457:180-185
  19. 19. Jain VK. Analysis of electrical discharge drilling of a precision blind hole in HSS using bit type of tool. Microtecnic. l989;2:34-40
  20. 20. Lin YC, Cheng CH, Su BL, Hwang LR. Machining characteristics and optimization of machining parameters of SKH 57 high-speed steel using electrical discharge machining based on Taguchi method. Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 2006;21(8):922-929
  21. 21. Ubaid MA, Fikri TD, Shukry HA, Laith Al-Juboori A. Optimization of electro discharge machining process parameters with fuzzy logic for stainless steel 304 (ASTM A240). Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2017;140:1-13
  22. 22. Majumder A. Process parameter optimization during EDM of AISI 316 LN stainless steel by using fuzzy based multiobjective PSO. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2013;27:2143-2151
  23. 23. Dastagiri M, Kumar AH. Experimental investigation of EDM parameters on stainless steel & En41b. Procedia Engineering. 2014;97:1551-1564
  24. 24. Shashikant V, Roy AK, Kumar K. Effect and optimization of various machine process parameters on the surface roughness in EDM for an EN41 material using grey-Taguchi. Procedia Material Science. 2014;5:1702-1709
  25. 25. Shashikant V, Roy AK, Kaushik K. Effect and optimization of machine process parameters on MRR for EN19 & EN41 materials using Taguchi. Procedia Technology. 2014;14:204-210
  26. 26. Rajmohan T, Prabhu R, Rao GS, Palanikumar K. Optimization of machining parameters in electrical discharge machining (EDM) of 304 stainless steel. Procedia Engineering. 2012;38:1030-1036
  27. 27. Faisal N, Kumar K. Optimization of machine process parameters in EDM for EN 31 using evolutionary optimization technique. Technologies. 2018;6(2):54. DOI: 10.3390/technologies6020054
  28. 28. Behera A, Debashrita P, Mayank B. Optimization of process parameters in electro discharge machining of AISI 304 stainless steel. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018;390:1-6
  29. 29. Kumar S, Singh R, Singh TP, Sethi BL. Comparison of material transfer in electrical discharge machining of AISI H13 die steel. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 2009;223:1733-1740
  30. 30. Hassan MA, Mehat NS, Sharif S, Daud R, Tomadi SH, Reza MS. IAENG. Study of the surface integrity of AISI 4140 steel in wire electrical discharge machining. In: Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists; Hong Kong. 2009
  31. 31. Ho KH, Newman ST, Rahimifard S, Allen RD. State of the art in wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM). International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture. 2004;44:1247-1259
  32. 32. Bhattacharya S, Geogy JA, Abhishek M, Vivekanand K, Dey GK. Corrosion behavior of wire electrical discharge machined surfaces of P91 steel. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2018;27:4561-4570
  33. 33. Kapoor J, Singh S, Jaimal SK. High-performance wire electrodes for wire electrical-discharge machining—A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2012;226:1757-1773
  34. 34. Benedict GF. Nontraditional Machining Processes. New York & Basel: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1987. pp. 231-232
  35. 35. Kanlayasiri K, Boonmung S. Effects of wire-EDM machining variables on surface roughness of newly developed DC 53 die steel: Design of experiments and regression model. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2004;192-193:459-464
  36. 36. Shahali H, Yazdi MRS, Aminollah M, Ehsan I. Optimization of surface roughness and thickness of white layer in wire electrical discharge machining of DIN 1.4542 stainless steel using micro-genetic algorithm and signal to noise ratio techniques. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2012;226:803-812
  37. 37. Tavassoli AAF, Diegele E, Lindau R, Luzginova N, Tanigawa H. Current status and recent research achievements in ferritic/martensitic steels. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2014;455:269-276
  38. 38. Shamardin V, Golovanov V, Bulanova T, Povstianko A, Fedoseev AE, Goncharenko YA, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructure of advanced ferritic-martensitic steels used under high dose neutron irradiation. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 1999;271-272:155-161
  39. 39. Muthukumar V, Suresh Babu A, Venkatasamy R, Senthil KN. An accelerated particle swarm optimization algorithm on parametric optimization of WEDM of die-steel. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C. 2015;96:49-56
  40. 40. Zhang G, Zhang Z, Ming W, Guo J, Yu H, Xinyu S. The multi-objective optimization of medium-speed WEDM process parameters for machining SKD11 steel by the hybrid method of RSM and NSGA-II. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2014;70:2097-2109
  41. 41. Majumder A, Das A, Das PK. A standard deviation-based firefly algorithm for multi-objective optimization of WEDM process during machining of Indian RAFM steel. Neural Computing and Applications. 2018;29:665-677
  42. 42. Giduturi S, Kuma A. Parameter optimization of wire EDM for H-13 tool steel. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology. 2018;8:120-127
  43. 43. Pamnani R, Vasudevan M, Vasantharaja P, Jayakumar T. Optimization of A-GTAW welding parameters for naval steel (DMR 249A) by design of experiments approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 2017;231:320-331
  44. 44. Choudhuri B, Sen R, Ghosh SK, Saha SC. Modelling and multi-response optimization of wire electric discharge machining parameters using response surface methodology and grey–fuzzy algorithm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2017;231:1760-1774
  45. 45. Sudhakara D, Prasanthi G. Parametric optimization of wire electrical discharge machining of powder metallurgical cold worked tool steel using Taguchi method. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series C. 2017;98:119-129
  46. 46. Reddy CB, Reddy CE, Reddy DR. Experimental investigation of surface finish and material removal rate of P20 die-tool steel in wire-EDM using multiple regression analysis. GSTF Journal of Engineering Technology (JET). 2017;1
  47. 47. Manjaiah M, Rudolph FL, Kumar A, Basavarajappa S. Parametric optimization of MRR and surface roughness in wire electro discharge machining (WEDM) of D2 steel using Taguchi-based utility approach. International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. 2016;11:7. DOI: 10.1186/s40712-016-0060-4
  48. 48. Tosun N, Cogun C, Inan A. The effect of cutting parameters on workpiece surface roughness in wire EDM. Machining Science and Technology. 2003;7:209-219
  49. 49. Ugrasen G, Ravindra HV, Prakash GVN, Keshavamurthy R. Comparison of machining performances using multiple regression analysis and group method data handling technique in wire EDM of Stavax material. Procedia Materials Science. 2014;5:2215-2223
  50. 50. Sudhakara D, Prasanthi G. Optimization of dimensional deviation: wire cut EDM of vanadis-4e (powder metallurgical coldworked tool steel) by Taguchi method. In: Proceedings of 5th International and 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR-2014); 12-14 Dec 2014; IIT Guwahati: Assam. 2014

Written By

Ramesh Rudrapati

Submitted: 18 April 2018 Reviewed: 20 September 2018 Published: 21 November 2018