Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Application of Radiation and Genetic Engineering Techniques to Improve Biocontrol Agent Performance: A Short Review

Written By

Seyed Mahyar Mirmajlessi, Hossein Ahari Mostafavi, Evelin Loit, Neda Najdabbasi and Marika Mänd

Submitted: 27 August 2018 Reviewed: 11 October 2018 Published: 27 November 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.81964

From the Edited Volume

Use of Gamma Radiation Techniques in Peaceful Applications

Edited by Basim A. Almayah

Chapter metrics overview

1,362 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Biological control is a potential nonchemical method to manage plant pathogens by beneficial microorganisms. To improve antagonistic potential of biocontrol agents, mutation by radiations, chemicals, and genetic manipulations has been used. Genetic techniques and ionizing radiation containing direct or indirect emissions play the greatest role for selection of useful microorganisms to enhance the efficiency of biological systems. Indeed, genetic engineering has a main role in increasing antimicrobial metabolites, host colonization ability, and endurance in micro-ecosystem. Genetic improvement can be achieved by protoplast fusion, genetic modification (GM), and chemical (genotoxic agents) and physical mutations. However, ultraviolet light and ionizing radiations can induce modifications in the genome of an organism. Irradiation, particularly gamma rays, is also applied for controlling postharvest diseases. Indeed, irradiation cannot completely eliminate pathogens, but it might result in cell injury and directly damage the chromosomal DNA of a living cell. This technology has been used for many reasons including disinfestation of foods, reducing foodborne pathogens, and extending shelf life many fruits, vegetables, and nuts. In the current review, we discuss advances in the radiation and molecular genetic techniques with the aim to improve antagonistic potential of microorganisms as it is applied to the suppression of plant pathogens.


  • biocontrol agents
  • genetic engineering
  • ionizing radiations

1. Introduction

The risks associated with chemical residues on the leaves and fruits have highlighted the need for more useful and safer alternative control treatments. Biological control is a potential nonchemical mean to manage plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, nematodes, or weeds by beneficial microorganisms such as fungi, yeast, or bacteria [1]. The virulence of pathogens probably changes if genetic mutations occur in the genes related to pathogenicity of microorganisms upon mutagenic treatments [2]. It is quite obvious that the application of ionizing radiations such as gamma rays and X-rays and genetic methods plays the greatest role in the development of techniques for the selection of useful microorganisms [3]. Indeed, irradiation is the process of exposing an amount of energy in the form of speed particles or rays for improving food safety and reducing microorganisms that destroy agricultural crops. For instance, studies on transcriptional changes of Salmonella typhimurium using gamma irradiation showed that the expression of the virulence genes in irradiated mutants was reduced in comparison with non-irradiated controls [4]. It has been also shown that gamma irradiation alone or in combination with other methods can improve the microbiological safety [5]. Likewise, the wholesomeness (lack of teratogenicity, mutagenicity, and toxicity) of irradiated products has been studied extensively, in which food irradiation has not provided any evidence of increased threat of mycotoxin formation in irradiated food [6]. There is an increasing interest in commercial application of genetically modified microorganisms with improved biocontrol properties toward plant pathogens [7]. To that end, this chapter is an advanced survey reviewing the radiation and molecular genetic techniques with the aim to improve antagonistic potential of microorganisms as it is applied to the suppression of plant diseases.

2. Genetic improvement of microorganisms

The biological and molecular characterizations of biocontrol agents and bioactive compound producers are very important for the modern agriculture [8]. Since environmental conditions are subject to change, the biocontrol agent requires genetic improvement for effective performance [9]. To improve the efficiency and productivity of biological systems, genetic engineering has a main role in increasing antifungal and antibacterial metabolites, host colonization ability, and endurance in micro-ecosystem. Genetic improvement can be achieved by chemical and physical mutations, protoplast fusion, and transformation [10].

2.1 Use of protoplast fusion

Protoplast fusion is an important technique for gene manipulation. It breaks down the barriers to genetic exchange and is a relatively new flexible technique to induce or promote genetic recombination in a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells [11]. By protoplast fusion ( Figure 1 ), interspecific or even intergeneric hybrids can be produced, and it is feasible to transfer useful genes, for attributes (such as disease resistance, enzyme and phytotoxin production, rapid growth rate, nitrogen fixation, protein quality, and drought resistance), from one species to another [12].

Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of haploid cell construction by protoplast fusion.

To breed new strains with improved production of the spore and phytotoxin, protoplast fusion between the Helminthosporium gramineum subsp. echinochloa and Curvularia lunata was carried out [10]. Prabhavathi et al. [13] showed that the isolated protoplast from Trichoderma reesei strain PTr2 significantly increased enzyme activities in two fusants SFTr2 and SFTr3 as compared to the parental strain PTr2. Bakhtiari et al. [14] produced a new recombinant of Tolypocladium inflatum with cyclosporine 2.8 times more than parental strain by protoplast fusion between different strains.

2.2 Genetic transformation

Nowadays, some wild-type fungal and bacterial species are used as biocontrol agents. But, there are limitations that restrict their efficacies. Poor survival of the inoculant in particular soils and low production of required metabolites are the most important limitations [15]. The technology of genetic modification (GM) has the capacity to create new strains in which these problems are overcome [16]. Genetic manipulation requires the development of vector-mediated transformation systems that include, first, infusion of exogenous DNA into receiver cells; second, expression of genes present on the incoming DNA; and, finally, stable preservation and replication of the inserted DNA, leading to the expression of the desired phenotypic trait ( Figure 2 ).

Figure 2.

Schematic illustration of plasmid-mediated transformation system.

The development of an effective strain that can tolerate the environmental adversities and securing of the essential regulatory approval are primary obligations for the successful use of a GM inoculant as biocontrol agents [17]. Resca et al. [18] genetically modified the strains of P. fluorescens F113Rif (pCU8.3) and P. fluorescens F113Rif (pCUP9) to increase phenazine1 carboxylate (Phl) production for biocontrol efficacy against Polymyxa betae on sugar beet. An endochitinase-encoding gene was cloned from the T. viride. This gene was introduced into Chaetomium globosum CG10 after ligating it with the promoter and terminator of Trp synthetase from Aspergillus nidulans. Endochitinase activity significantly increased in 30% of the transformants for improvement of the biocontrol activity of Chaetomium globosum [19].

2.3 Improvement of the bioagents via mutagenesis

Breeding of antagonists is directed to achieve effective strains for biocontrol of plant pathogens under a wide range of environmental conditions. Mutation techniques have been used to improve antagonistic potential of biocontrol agents to manage phytopathogens. Physical and chemical mutagens have been applied by many researchers to generate new biotypes [3]. Ultraviolet light (UV), ionizing radiation, and chemicals (as genotoxic agents) can randomly induce modifications in organism’s genome. About 25 years ago, X-ray, as an active mutagen, was used to produce the first mutant strain of Penicillium chrysogenum. The next mutagenic technique used was the application of ultraviolet light on P. chrysogenum. The produced mutant displayed three times more activity (with respect to penicillin contains) than the original strain induced by X-irradiation.

Later on, fast neutrons and gamma irradiation were used successfully. The effectiveness of gamma rays significantly surpassed that of UV and X-rays. Also, mutagenic effects of chemicals in combination with UV light on P. chrysogenum were investigated. The mutant strains were about 1500 times as productive as the wild type [19]. Mess et al. [20] demonstrated that gamma irradiation at 130 Gy using 137Cs generated an avirulent mutant (avr-mutant) of F. oxysporumf. sp. lycopersici. One mutant showed the expected loss of fusarium root rot on tomato plants. Some successful studies have been made to improve the biocontrol potential of Trichoderma and Gliocladium species by exposing them to physical mutagens such as gamma ray. Mutagenesis of Trichoderma atroviride by gamma irradiation greatly improved their capabilities to produce antibiotics [21]. Rugthaworn et al. [22] investigated the improvement of Actinomycete strains by gamma irradiation for biocontrol of Fusarium sporotrichioides, Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotium rolfsii. The induced mutants were detected by observing the ability of chitinase production and showed higher inhibitory effect on three phytopathogenic fungi than the wild type. Mohamed and Haggag [23] showed that gamma irradiation generated a T. harzianum mutant against F. oxysporum through increasing of antifungal metabolites (hydrolytic enzymes, antibiotics, and total phenols) under salt stress conditions.

Irradiation of T. harzianum produced salt-tolerant mutants that greatly were improved in sporulation, growth rate, and biocontrol ability against Fusarium oxysporum, the causal agent of tomato wilt disease. Ahari-mostafavi et al. [24] showed the possibility of biological control of bean root rot disease, using of avirulent mutants of Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli isolate produced by gamma irradiation. Furthermore, stable gamma-irradiated mutants of G. virens have immense potentiality as biocontrol agents [25]. Haggag [26] improved the production of P. fluorescens antibiotics (including phenazine, pyrrolnitrin, and phloroglucinol) and siderophore against damping-off pathogens (F. solani, F. oxysporum, and R. solani) by UV light. Papavizas et al. [27] developed mutant isolates of G. virens by means of irradiation and a chemical mutagen. They showed evidence that it is feasible to induce benomyl-tolerant mutants of G. virens by long and repeated exposure to UV irradiation combined with ethyl methanesulfonate. Mohamed et al. [7] applied the UV mutagenesis technique to enhance three hydrolytic enzymes effective in the biocontrol ability of T. viride against two of the important plant fungal pathogens, Sclerotia rolfesii and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. In biological control experiments against root rot and white rot diseases caused by S. rolfesii and S. sclerotiorum, respectively, in bean plants under artificial and natural infested soil, complete control of the disease was achieved. Treatment of the bean seeds with T. viride mutants resulted in reducing colonization of S. rolfesii and S. sclerotiorum in bean rhizosphere compared with treatment with their parental wild type and increased plant yield.

Moreover, Balasubramanian et al. [28] tested biocontrol efficacy of the UV mutants and wild strain of T. harzianum against phytopathogens such as F. oxysporum, Bipolaris oryzae, R. solani, and Alternaria sp. A mutant strain showed maximum inhibition of the above pathogens through more extracellular chitinase and protein production, when compared to the wild strain. Also, UV mutagenesis increased 2.29-fold in phytase activity of T. lanuginosus over that of their parental strain [29]. Chitinase production was improved by sixfold in Ophiostoma floccosum using UV mutagenesis [30]. Furthermore, the ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutant with an enzyme activity of 25.56 U ml−1 was obtained by further exposure to UV radiation and yielded an activity of 34.12 U ml−1 [31].

2.3.1 Mechanism of ionizing radiation effects on bioagents

Irradiation can have direct or indirect effects on organisms. In the case of a direct hit, electromagnetic radiance and high-energy particles break chemical bonds or reactive oxygen-centered (•OH) radicals originated from the radiolysis of water. Hydroxyl radicals are very reactive and are known to interfere with the bonds between nucleic acids within a single strand or between opposite strands. An indirect effect occurs on organisms when radiation ionizes a neighboring molecule, which in turn reacts with the genetic material [32]. Ionizing radiation effects (on microorganisms) are primarily the result of disruption of the DNA or RNA ( Figure 3 ).

Figure 3.

Schematic illustration of DNA mutation by ionizing mutations drawn by anonymous.

Since the DNA is much larger than other molecular structures in a cell, the induced biological and chemical changes by either primary ionizing or through secondary free radical attack can prevent replication and destroy cells [33] or generate some genetic traits of microorganisms to have higher antagonistic potential [2]. Therefore, the induced biological and chemical changes are related to the absorbed radiation dose [33]. The pathogenicity of infectious organisms is diminished by irradiation. Lim et al. [4] showed that the expression of the virulence genes in S. typhimurium gamma-irradiated mutants was reduced and expression of toxin genes of Vibrio spp.-irradiated mutants did not increase, compared with non-irradiated wild types.

2.3.2 Irradiation sources

Ionizing radiation is mainly known to high-energy photons of radio nuclides (gamma rays) and X-rays from machine sources with energies up to 5 MeV and accelerated electrons with energies up to 10 MeV generated by electron accelerating machines [34]. Gamma ray occurs in the short wavelength, with high-energy region of the spectrum, and has the greatest penetrating power. Gamma rays come from spontaneous breakdown of radionuclides including the radionuclide’s cobalt-60 (60Co) with a half-life of 5.3 years or cesium-137 (137Cs) with a half-life of 30 years [35]. X-ray is similar to gamma radiation based on radioactive isotopic sources. Although their effects on materials are generally similar, these kinds of radiations differ in their energy spectra, angular distributions, and absorbed dose rates [36, 37]. Electrons can be produced from machines capable of accelerating electrons as light speed by means of a linear accelerator. In comparison with gamma ray and X-rays, electrons cannot penetrate very far into materials and do not have deep penetrating power. So, electrons as beta particles are usually chosen to treat the surface of materials [32, 34]. Generally, the strength of the source and the length of time a material is exposed to the ionizing energy determine the irradiation dose, measured in grays (Gy) or kilo grays (1 kGy = 1000 Gy). One gray is equal with one joule of energy absorbed in a mass of one kilogram [38]. Based on available evidence, the safety of the irradiation technology in food industry was considered and judged acceptable. This has developed in international bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the and Codex Alimentarius Commission [35, 39].


3. Conclusion

Plant pathogens are a worldwide problem. A variety of approaches may be applied to control plant diseases. Beyond suitable agronomic performances, farmers frequently rely on chemicals. Environmental pollution and carcinogenic effects of pesticides are limiting factors in the success of their application. Nowadays, there are severe regulations and political pressure to remove the most dangerous chemicals from the market. So, biological control could be the best alternative against plant pathogens, and development of mutants is an important technique in strain improvement toward plant pathogen suppression, which yields reliable strains for biocontrol. Since strains bred by mutagenesis can get registration (from environmental protection agencies) more easily than strains produced by protoplast fusion and transformation or via gene cloning for field use, more attention should be paid to the mutagenic methods. In an agricultural environment, mutants are interacting and competing with various communities of microorganisms that can have intense effects on the survival and performance of the introduced mutants. Hence, before commercial application of such inoculants in an open environment, their behaviors and potential impact on ecosystems should be investigated as part of the risk assessment. Additionally, integrated treatment of irradiation and biocontrol agent has the potential as an alternative means for postharvest disease control. In fact, there is a limited dose rate for its application on postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Thus, the combination of irradiation and biocontrol agent increases applied range of irradiation for postharvest control by decreasing of dose rate to which the product has been exposed. From our point of view, considering different aspects of irradiation may provide useful information for managing harmful microorganisms on crops, so that in the near future, this technique will be used as one of the most important research tools for biotechnologists, plant pathologists, and molecular biologists.



Authors want to thank Prof. Vahe Minassian from Tarbiat Modares University for critical reading of the manuscript.


  1. 1. Agrios GN. Plant Pathology. New York: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005. 952 p
  2. 2. Barkai-Golan R. Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables: Development and Control. Hardbound. Academic Press; 2001. 442 p
  3. 3. Rey M, Delgado JJ, Rincon AM, Limon CM, Benitez T, Perez EA, et al. Improvement of Trichoderma strains for biocontrol. Micologia Industrial Y Micopatotogia. 2000;17:531-536
  4. 4. Lim S, Jung J, Kim D. The effect of gamma radiation on the expression of the virulence genes of Salmonella typhimurium and Vibrio spp. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2007;76(11):1763-1766
  5. 5. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). Irradiation to Ensure the Safety and Quality of Prepared Meals, Vienna, Austria; 2009. p. 375
  6. 6. Kottapalli B, Wolf-Hall CE, Schwarz P. Effect of electron-beam irradiation on the safety and quality of Fusarium-infected malting barley. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2006;110(3):224-231
  7. 7. Mohamed HAA, Haggag WM, Attallah AG. Genetic enhancement of Trichoderma viride to overproduce different hydrolytic enzymes and their biocontrol potentiality against root rot and white mold diseases in bean plants. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. 2010;1(3):273-284
  8. 8. Spadaro D, Gullino ML. Improving the efficacy of biocontrol agents against soilborne pathogens. Crop Protection. 2005;24:601-613
  9. 9. Hornok L. Genetically modified microorganisms in biological control. Novenyvedelem. 2000;36:229-237
  10. 10. Zhang ZB, Burgos NR, Zhang JP, Yu LO. Biological control agent for rice weeds from protoplast fusion between Curvularia lunata and Helminthosporium gramineum. Weed Science. 2007;55:599-605
  11. 11. Bhojwani SS, Powar JB, Cocking EL. Isolation, culture and division of protoplast. Plant Science Letters. 1977;8:85-89
  12. 12. Murlidhar RV, Panda T. Fungal protoplast fusion: A revisit. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering. 2000;22:429-431
  13. 13. Prabhavathi VR, Mathivanan N, Sagadevan E, Murugesan K, Lalithakumari D. Intra-strain protoplast fusion enhances carboxymethylcellulase activity in Trichoderma reesei. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2006;38:719-723
  14. 14. Bakhtiari MR, Fallahpour M, Foruzanfakhr P, Moazami N. Protoplast fusion technique in Tolypocladium inflatum for increasing cyclosporine production. Journal of Biotechnology. 2007;131(2):135-136
  15. 15. Van-veen JA, Van-overbeek LS, Van-elsas JD. Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 1997;61:121-135
  16. 16. Morrissey JP, Walsh UF, O’Donnell A, Moënne-Loccoz Y, O’Gara F. Exploitation of genetically modified inoculants for industrial ecology applications. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002;81(4):599-606
  17. 17. Ye X, Al-Babili S, Kloti A, Zhang J, Lucca P, Beyer P, et al. Engineering the provitamin A (beta-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Science. 2000;287:303-305
  18. 18. Resca R, Basaglia M, Poggiolini S, Vian P, Bardin S, Walsh UF, et al. An integrated approach for the evaluation of biological control of the complex Polymyxa betae/Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus, by means of seed inoculants. Plant and Soil. 2001;12:215-226
  19. 19. Haggag WM, Mohamed HA. Enhancement of antifungal metabolites production from gamma-ray induced mutants of some Trichoderma species for control onion white rot disease. Plant Pathology Bulletin. 2002;11:45-56
  20. 20. Mess J, Wit R, Christa ST, Francis DG, Michel AH, Ben JC. Loss of avirulence and reduced pathogenecity of a gamma-irradiated mutant of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici. Phytopathology. 1999;89:1131-1137
  21. 21. Brunner K, Susanne Z, Woo L, Lorito M, Christian P, Kubicek P, et al. Improvement of the fungal biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride to enhance both antagonism and induction of plant systemic disease resistance. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71(7):3959-3965
  22. 22. Rugthaworn P, Dilokkunanant U, Sangchote S, Piadang N, Kitpreechavanich V. A search and improvement of actinomycete strains for biological control of plant pathogens. Kasetsart Journal: Natural Science. 2007;41:248-254
  23. 23. Mohamed HAA, Haggag WM. Biocontrol potential of salinity tolerant mutants of Trichoderma harzianum against Fusarium oxysporum causing tomato wilt disease. Arab Journal of Biotechnology. 2005;8(1):35-48
  24. 24. Ahari-Mostafavi H, Safaie N, Naserian B, Fathollahi H, Dorri H, Lak M, et al. Possibility of biological control of bean root rot disease, using of avirulent mutants of Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli isolate. Journal of Plant Protection. 2009;16(3):123-134
  25. 25. Jash S, Khalko S, Bose S, Roy M, Pan S. Morphological and physiological characterization of some mutant isolates of Gliocladium virens, a potential mycoparasite of sclerotial plant pathogens. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2006;40(2):114-118
  26. 26. Haggag WM. Enhancement of suppressive metabolites from Pseudomonas fluorescence against tomato damping-off pathogens. Arab Journal of Biotechnology. 1999;2:1-14
  27. 27. Papavizas GC, Roberts DP, Kim KM. Development of mutants of Gliocladium virens tolerant to benomyl. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 1990;36:484-489
  28. 28. Balasubramanian N, Thamil-Priya V, Gomathinayagam S, Shanmugaiah V, Jashnie J, Lalithakumari D. Effect of chitin adapted and ultra violet induced mutant of Trichoderma harzianum enhancing biocontrol and chitinase activity. Australian Journal of Basic Applied Science. 2010;4(10):4701-4709
  29. 29. Gulati HK, Chadha BS, Saini HS. Production, purification and characterization of thermostable phytase from thermophilic fungus Thermomyces lanuginosus TL-7. Acta Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica. 2007;54(2):121-138
  30. 30. Wu C, Teo VS, Farrell RL, Bergquist PL, Nevalainen KM. Improvement of the secretion of extracellular proteins and isolation and characterization of the amylase I (amy1) gene from Ophiostoma floccosum. Gene. 2006;384:96-103
  31. 31. Ul-Haq I, Ali S, Aslam A, Qadeer MA. Characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant with enhanced production of beta-D fructofuranosidase. Bioresource Technology. 2008;99(1):7-12
  32. 32. Ahari-Mostafavi H, Mirmajlessi SM, Fathollahi H. The potential of food irradiation: Benefits and limitations. In: Trends in Vital Food and Control Engineering. Croatia, Rijeka: Intech Open Access Publisher; 2012. pp. 43-68
  33. 33. Scott-smith J, Suresh P. Irradiation and food safety. Food Technology. 2004;58(11):48-55
  34. 34. Hvizdzak AL, Beamer S, Jaczynski J, Matak KE. Use of electron beam radiation for the reduction of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Tennessee in peanut butter. Journal of Food Protection. 2010;73:353-357
  35. 35. Ahari-Mostafavi H, Fathollahi H, Motamedi F, Mirmajlessi SM. Food irradiation: Applications, public acceptance and global trade. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2010;9(20):2826-2833
  36. 36. Johnson M, Estes-Reynolds A. Consumer acceptance of electron-beam irradiated ready-to-eat poultry meats. Journal of Food Process Preservation. 2004;28:302-319
  37. 37. Suresh P, Leslie A, Braby L. Electron Beam Technology for Food Irradiation, The International Review of Food Science and Technology (Winter 2004/2005). An Official Publication of the International Union of Food Science and Technology (IUFoST); 2005
  38. 38. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Statement summarizing the conclusions and recommendations from the opinions on the safety of irradiation of food adopted by the BIOHAZ and CEF panels. The EFSA Journal. 2011;9(4):2107
  39. 39. Landgraf M, Gaularte L, Martins C, Cestari A, Nunes T, Aragon L, Destro M, Behrens J, Vizeu D, Hutzler B. Use of Irradiation to Improve the Microbiological Safety of Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables. The IAEA Technical Documents (IAEA-TECDOC) 1530; 2006. pp. 41-59

Written By

Seyed Mahyar Mirmajlessi, Hossein Ahari Mostafavi, Evelin Loit, Neda Najdabbasi and Marika Mänd

Submitted: 27 August 2018 Reviewed: 11 October 2018 Published: 27 November 2018