Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Use of Ceramic Waste Powder (CWP) in Making Eco-Friendly Concretes

Written By

Amr S. El-Dieb, Mahmoud R. Taha and Samir I. Abu-Eishah

Submitted: 03 July 2018 Reviewed: 03 October 2018 Published: 05 November 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.81842

From the Edited Volume

Ceramic Materials - Synthesis, Characterization, Applications and Recycling

Edited by Dolores Eliche Quesada, Luis Perez Villarejo and Pedro Sánchez Soto

Chapter metrics overview

2,533 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The global production of ceramic waste powder (CWP), which is produced during the final polishing process of ceramic tiles, exceeds 22 billion tons. The disposal of CWP in landfills will cause significant environmental problems (i.e., soil, air, and groundwater pollution). CWP is characterized by its chemical composition that is mainly composed of silica (SiO2) and alumina (Al2O3). Both minerals represent more than 80% of the CWP composition. CWP has potentials to be used as an ingredient to partially or entirely replacing Portland cement to make eco-friendly concretes. This chapter summarizes the effect of using CWP in making eco-friendly concretes, with a particular focus on using CWP as a partial cement replacement in conventional-vibrated concrete (CVC) and self-compacting concrete (SCC), and the production of zero-cement alkali-activated concrete (AAC).


  • ceramic waste powder
  • cement replacement
  • eco-friendly concrete
  • durability
  • microstructure

1. Introduction

In a rapidly growing world population and toward meeting consumers’ needs, solid waste landfills will continue receiving huge volumes of waste. Therefore, waste management is becoming increasingly mandatory for the promotion of environmental sustainability. Numerous regulations have been imposed worldwide by governments and environmental organizations in order to reduce the negative environmental impact resulting from large numbers of solid waste landfills. The transformation of a large amount of solid waste into an alternative resource will preserve the reducing nonrenewable resources of materials; maintain the required energy and also will help solve environmental and exhausted landfill problems. Until today, researchers are investigating new solid waste materials and the potentials of recycling either in other industries or new products.

Being the world’s most consumed human-made material, concrete attracted considerable interest as a possible way to recycle solid waste products especially those that can replace cement which is a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions. An equal amount of CO2 is generated for the production of Portland cement [1]. The cement industry produces around 5–8% of the annual global greenhouse gas emissions released into the atmosphere [2]. Several by-products such as fly ash, slag, and silica fume are effectively being used in the daily production of concrete as partial cement replacement (i.e., supplementary cementitious materials (SCM)) to reduce CO2 emission [3, 4].

Global production of ceramic tiles is more than 12 Billion m2 [5]. The manufacture of ceramic tiles generates ceramic waste powder (CWP) during the final polishing process at a rate of 19 kg/m2 [6]. Therefore, the global generation of CWP exceeds 22 Billion tons. The CWP represents a significant challenge to get rid of concerning its environmental impact. It can cause, soil, water, and air pollution. On the other hand, it could represent an excellent opportunity to be used as an alternative concrete ingredient if it could be utilized in making concrete.

The effect of using ceramic wastes (i.e., roof tiles, blocks, bricks, electrical insulators, etc.) as aggregates or SCM in conventional-vibrated concrete (CVC) and mortar was reported in several studies. It is noted that limited studies were conducted on using CWP as a cement replacement in self-compacting concrete (SCC) and alkali-activated concrete (AAC) (i.e., geopolymer concrete). Some studies investigated the use of ceramic waste as coarse aggregates in CVC and mortar [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. It was concluded that ceramic waste could be used as partial replacement of natural coarse aggregate. The ceramic waste aggregate should be pre-saturated by water to offset its high absorption. The compressive strength decreased if the ceramic waste replaced natural coarse aggregate beyond 25% by weight. The use of ceramic waste as fine aggregate in CVC and mortar was assessed by various researchers [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. It was noted that using a high content of ceramic waste as fine aggregate had a negative impact on the workability of the fresh concrete, and workability admixtures were needed to avoid any adverse effect on concrete workability. It was concluded that the use of 50% by weight replacement of fine natural aggregate by ceramic waste could produce concrete without affecting the performance of hardened concrete.

The use of CWP as partial replacement of cement attracted the attention of several researchers [6, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. The main conclusion from the studies was that CWP showed slow pozzolanic activity which was evidenced at late ages. The early compressive strength was reduced by the inclusion of CWP. The development of compressive strength needed time. On the other hand, durability was improved by the incorporation of CWP in the mixtures. It was noticed that the investigations on using CWP as partial replacement of cement did not address the fresh concrete properties as affected by the inclusion of CWP as well as the microstructure characteristics. Also, no guidelines were provided for using CWP to partially replace cement. The CWP replacement level will depend on personal knowledge and experience. Furthermore, the replacement of cement by large quantities of CWP needs further evaluation.

The use of CWP in self-compacting concrete (SCC) mixtures received limited attention. In 2017, Subaşi et al. [36] investigated the use of CWP as a partial cement replacement in SCC mixtures. It was concluded that CWP could replace 15% by weight of the cement without adversely affecting the properties of the produced SCC. In 2018, Jerônimo et al. [37] replaced cement by ground clay brick waste (GCBW) in SCC mixtures. It was concluded that 20–30% by weight of the cement could be replaced by GCBW, and the compressive strength improved at 90 days of age. It was observed that the detailed evaluation of the SCC fresh properties as affected by the inclusion of CWP was not addressed. Also, the effect of using high-volume CWP in SCC still needs further assessment.

Concerning using CWP in alkali-activated concrete (AAC) (i.e., geopolymer concrete), it was noted that very limited investigations were conducted [38, 39, 40]. The main conclusion that CWP could be used in making AAC but needs detailed investigation and assessment.

An in-depth investigation to study the utilization of CWP in the production of different types of concrete is needed. This chapter summarizes the findings of collective studies conducted by the authors investigating the use of CWP in making eco-friendly concrete [41, 42, 43, 44, 45], with a particular focus on using CWP as a partial cement replacement in CVC and SCC, and the production of AAC. This will establish better understanding on how to incorporate an existing solid waste as a new construction ingredient in making echo-friendly concretes in order to optimize solid waste management, and help protect the environment by reducing the use of cement and efficiently getting rid of a solid waste material.


2. Characteristics of CWP

The produced ceramic waste material was a wet material due to the use of water during the polishing process. The average moisture content was 36% by mass. The average specific surface area (SSA) measured by air-permeability (i.e., Blain air permeability test apparatus) was 555 m2/kg. More than 50% by volume of the CWP particles had a size ranging between 5 and 10 μm. Figure 1 shows the particles’ size distribution of the CWP.

Figure 1.

Particle size distribution of CWP [43]. Reproduced with permission from the publisher.

The CWP consisted of irregular and angular particles which are similar to cement particles in shape as shown in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows the energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) of the main oxides of the CWP. The EDS analysis indicated that CWP is mainly composed of SiO2 and Al2O3.

Figure 2.

SEM images of CWP.

Figure 3.

EDS analysis of CWP [43]. Reproduced with permission from the publisher.

Table 1 gives the chemical analysis of the CWP as determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). CWP is mainly composed of silica (SiO2) and alumina (Al2O3). Both oxides are around 85% of the total material mass. Other compounds (i.e., CaO, MgO, and SO3) exist in small quantities. The mass fractions of (SiO2 + Al2O3 + Fe2O3) satisfies the requirement of the ASTM C618 [46] for natural pozzolana (i.e., >70%). Also, the SO3 and the loss on ignition (L.O.I.) conformed to the ASTM C618 requirements.


Table 1.

Chemical composition of CWP using XRF (modified from [43]).

Note: Values in parentheses are the standard deviation.

Figure 4 displays the X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the CWP. The XRD indicates that the main peaks were noticed between 2-theta values of 20 and 30o which indicates the presence of (SiO2). The observed hump between 20 and 30o indicates the occurrence of an amorphous phase. Moreover, the unleveled graph trend between the 2-theta values 0 and 40o indicates the existence of an amorphous phase in the CWP sample.

Figure 4.

XRD pattern of CWP [43]. Reproduced with permission from the publisher.

Characterizing industrial waste materials and their potentials is one of the challenging issues in the field of cement and concrete. The compressive strength was given prominence as an initial means for evaluating the pozzolanic activity. The compressive strength development of cement mortar including CWP is assessed according to ASTM C311 [47] to measure the strength activity index (SAI).

Four mortar mixtures are prepared in which cement is partially replaced by CWP. The replacement levels are 10, 20, 30 and 40% by weight. Strength activity index (SAI) is calculated as the strength percentage as compared to the control mortar mixture. Table 2 gives the 28 days compressive strength, standard deviation SAI. Results showed that all CWP specimens satisfied the ASTM C618 requirement of SAI (i.e., >75%). In an investigation by Steiner et al. [25], a similar trend in the activity index for mortar mixtures with ceramic tiles polishing residues was reported. The SAI decreased after the inclusion of 40% CWP by cement mass; this could be attributed to the dilution effect. Also, it might be due to the high silica available in the mixture as a result of the high CWP. This large quantity could not find sufficient calcium hydroxide (CH) in order to react with. Therefore, most of the silica components were left without getting involved in the chemical reaction [48]. Also, Frattini test [49] is performed to identify the pozzolanic activity of CWP following BS EN 196-5:2011 [50]. Test samples with 0, 20 and 40% CWP as cement replacement by weight are tested. The Frattini test showed that concrete with 20 and 40% CWP replacement of Portland cement exhibited pozzolanic activity at 8 and 28 days age of concrete as shown in Figure 5.

CWP replacement level (mass %)
Average 28 days strength (MPa)39.946.048.837.5
Standard deviation (MPa)
Strength activity index (SAI) in (%)91.0105.0110.585.5

Table 2.

Strength activity index (SAI) results for CWP [43].

Reproduced with permission from the publisher.

Figure 5.

Frattini test at 8 and 28 days of CP with CWP replacement [45]. Reproduced with permission from the publisher.

In conclusion, CWP is silica and alumina rich material with some amorphous phases. The CWP has some pozzolanic activity, especially at a late age, as confirmed by strength activity index and Frattini tests. Therefore, CWP possesses the potentials to be used as a partial cement replacement in CVC and SCC mixtures, and as a main binder source to make AAC mixtures.


3. Conventional-vibrated concrete (CVC)

CWP is used to partially replace cement (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40% by weight) in different CVC mixtures. Two concrete grades with different cement contents are studied (25 and 50 MPa). The mixtures are chosen to cover several applications and different cement contents. All mixtures are designed to have a slump value from 60 to 100 mm. Table 3 gives the mixtures’ proportions of the mixtures. Initial slump values (i.e., ASTM C 143 [51]) is used to judge the mixtures’ workability. The time to reach zero slump is used to assess the workability retention of the concrete mixtures. The development of compressive strength with age (i.e., 7, 28 and 90 days) and drying shrinkage (i.e., 120 days) are measured. Rapid chloride ion penetration test (RCPT) (i.e., ASTM C 1202 [52]) and bulk electrical resistivity test (i.e., ASTM C 1760 [53]) are conducted at 28 and 90 days of age to evaluate the durability of the concrete mixtures. Triplicate samples are used for the compressive strength, drying shrinkage, RCPT, bulk electrical resistivity and permeable pores tests and the average results are used. The development of the microstructure is assessed by measuring permeable pores (i.e., ASTM C642 [54]) and the pore system (i.e., total porosity and median pore diameter) is measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Both are measured at 90 days of age. Main microstructure characteristics are identified using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Concrete mixtures are prepared using ordinary Portland cement (OPC) as the primary binder. The specific surface area of cement is 380 m2/kg. Natural crushed stone of maximum size 19.0 mm is used as coarse aggregate. The specific gravity is 2.65 while the absorption was 1%. Natural sand with fineness modulus between 2.5 and 2.7 is used as fine aggregate. The specific gravity is 2.63.

3.1 Workability and workability retention of fresh concrete

Initial slump values are given in Table 3. As CWP inclusion level increases, the initial slump value decreases as a result of its high specific surface area (SSA) compared to that of the cement (i.e., the SSA of CWP is 1.5 times that of the cement). Workability retention defines the time available for easy handling the mixture. Figure 6 shows the time to zero slump of the concrete mixtures including CWP. It is noted that the workability retention time increases due to the inclusion of CWP. This could a result of CWP has no hydraulic reaction, and its pozzolanic reaction is slow. The use of 10% CWP in the 25 MPa mixtures has the highest workability retention. While for the 50 MPa mixtures, the use of 20% CWP shows the best retention time.

Figure 6.

Time to zero slump.

3.2 Compressive strength

The compressive strength development at different ages is shown in Figure 7. The coefficient of variation (COV) ranged from 0.4 to 4.8%. The compressive strength values at 7 and 28 days of age are lower than the target strength for both mixtures (i.e., 25 and 50 MPa). The reduction in strength is proportional to the CWP content. This could be attributed to the fact that CWP has no hydraulic reaction. Also, its contribution to early strength depended mainly on its microfilling ability (i.e., CWP particles’ size ranged from 5 to 10 μm). This behavior agrees with that of most pozzolanic materials with slow strength development at early ages [55]. Also, slowed strength development at early ages is reported for CWP [28, 29, 30, 32].

Figure 7.

Compressive strength development with age.

At a late age (i.e., 90 days) all the 25 MPa mixtures including CWP achieve compressive strength values higher than the target strength. The mixture with 10% CWP shows the highest compressive strength. The strength gain at 90 days of age might be due to the pozzolanic characteristics of the CWP material. For the 50 MPa mixtures, all CWP mixtures the target strength is achieved. The increase in strength values could be justified by the delayed pozzolanic reaction of the CWP. The CWP particles could have worked as nucleation sites for cement grains and hydration products which led to a denser microstructure.

3.3 Drying shrinkage

Table 4 shows the 120 days drying shrinkage strain values. The COV ranged from 20 to 26%. It is observed that the drying shrinkage strain decreases with increasing the CWP replacement level. The pores’ structure and connectivity of pores are changed due to the fine CWP particles and its pozzolanic action. This change results in restricting water movement through the concrete. The drying shrinkage values for mixtures including 10 and 20% CWP do not differ significantly from that of the control mixtures. For the 25 MPa mixtures, CWP with replacement levels of more than 20% reduces the drying shrinkage strain between 29 and 60% compared to the control mixture. While for the 50 MPa mixtures a decrease in the drying shrinkage strain values between 28 and 53% for CWP replacement levels above 20% are observed.

Mixture I.D.CementCWPFine aggregateCoarse aggregateWater contentInitial slump (mm)

Table 3.

Mixtures’ proportions (kg/m3) and initial slump values (mm) (modified from [43]).

MixtureShrinkage strain (microstrain)MixtureShrinkage strain (microstrain)

Table 4.

Drying shrinkage strain values at 120 days (microstrain) (modified from [43]).

3.4 Chloride ion penetration test (RCPT)

The concrete durability concerning its resistance to chloride ion penetration and chloride induced corrosion can be judged by the RCPT. The inclusion of CWP as partial cement replacement has a significant effect on the chloride ion penetration of the 25 and 50 MPa concrete mixtures. Figure 8 demonstrates a significant reduction in the 28 and 90 days’ test results of all CWP concrete mixtures. The COV ranged from 3 to 15%.

Figure 8.

Chloride ion penetration.

At 28 days of age, the use of 20, 30 and 40% CWP reduces the total passed charge by 2–8 times lower than that of the control mixture. Mixtures with 30 and 40% are rated as “Very Low” for chloride ion penetration as per the classification of the ASTM C1202 [52]. At 90 days of age, the chloride ion penetration classification of all the 25 MPa mixtures including CWP is “Very low.” The reduction in the total passed charge for the mixtures incorporating CWP compared to its corresponding 28 days values ranged from 56 to 84%.

While for the 50 MPa mixtures, the 28 days chloride ion penetration decreases with the inclusion of CWP. The reduction is proportional to the CWP content. The reduction with respect to the control mixture is 38% for the use of 10% CWP and 90% for the use of 40% CWP. The ASTM classification of mixtures including high levels of CWP (i.e., ≥20) is shifted from “High” to “Low” and even “Very Low.” At the 90 days of age, chloride ion penetration for all 50 MPa CWP mixtures is classified as “Very Low.” This significant reduction could be due to the microstructure densification and refinement of the pore structure provided by the fine particles of CWP in addition to its pozzolanic effect. Also, the reduction with age indicates the development of a dense microstructure, especially with discontinuous pore system. Similar findings were reported in other studies [6, 30, 34, 56].

3.5 Bulk electrical resistivity test

The corrosion protection of the concrete to the embedded reinforcement can be assessed by its electrical resistivity [57]. Figure 9 displays the bulk electrical resistivity at 28 and 90 days of age. The COV ranged from 4 to 10%. It should be noted that electrical resistivity is mainly affected by the porosity and the pore size distribution [58]. Therefore, the development of the microstructure could be judged by measuring the electrical resistivity. Ionic mobility is reduced by the discontinuity of pores, and hence concrete resistivity and corrosion protection will increase. The resistivity results of all concrete mixtures including CWP are higher than those of the control mixtures. Microfilling effect and pozzolanic activity of the CWP which could lead to a denser microstructure could be the main reasons for the increase in the resistivity of the mixtures including CWP. It was reported that the use of ceramic polishing residues was reported to reduce water permeability of cement mortar samples [6, 34].

Figure 9.

Bulk electrical resistivity.

At 28 days of age, 25 MPa mixtures including 20, 30 and 40% CWP have a resistivity higher than 10 kΩ.cm. This is classified as “High” to “Very High” corrosion protection levels according to ACI 222R-01 [57]. The increase in resistivity is proportional to the CWP replacement level. At 90 days of age, using CWP demonstrates a significant increase in the electrical resistivity values with respect to the control mixture. The 50 MPa concrete mixtures with CWP had similar performance to the 25 MPa mixtures at both ages. Including 10% CWP results in a “High” corrosion protection level. When CWP is included with 20% or more the corrosion protection level is “Very High” at both ages.

Both RCPT and resistivity results confirm the performance of the concrete mixtures including CWP with regards to chloride ion attack, chloride-induced corrosion, and corrosion protection.

3.6 Permeable pores

The permeable pores of the concrete mixtures can assess the development of the pore system and judge the microstructure development. Figure 10 shows the permeable pores measured at 90 days of age. The COV ranged from 2 to 8%. In general, the permeable pores are decreased by the inclusion of CWP compared to the control mixture.

Figure 10.

Ninety days permeable pores.

In the case of the 25 MPa mixtures, the permeable pores are reduced by 17% up to 36% due to the inclusion of CWP as a partial cement replacement. Similar performance is observed for the 50 MPa mixtures. The reduction in pores volume ranged from 2 to 24% compared to the control mixture. The inclusion of the fine CWP particles with high SSA could physically have a microfilling effect and improves the particles’ packing in the mixtures. Also, to the CWP pozzolanic activity, the mixtures microstructure is densified. Therefore, the pore structure is refined resulting in lower pore volume. The reduction in permeable pores reduces the mobility of water from inside the concrete which is reflected in reducing the reduction in the drying shrinkage strain. Also, reduction in chloride ion penetration and immobility of ions are direct effects of the pores’ size refinement. This is reflected in the reduction of the chloride ions penetration and the improvement of the electrical resistivity with age.

3.7 Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP)

MIP is a widely used test to characterize the pore structure of cement-based materials. The test is capable of providing information about the total porosity, and the median pore diameter based on intruded volume. The concrete pore system indicates its microstructural development that can be related to its performance.

Table 5 gives the results of the MIP test regarding total porosity percentage and the median pore diameter based on intruded volume at 90 days of age. The inclusion of CWP reduces the total porosity at 90 days of age. The use of 40% CWP as partial replacement of the cement reduces the porosity by 9 and 19% for the 25 and 50 MPa mixtures respectively compared to the same mixtures without CWP. The median pore diameter is reduced due to the inclusion of CWP. It is noted that the reduction was proportional to the CWP content. The reduction in the total porosity and the median pore diameter confirms the densification of the microstructure due to the inclusion of CWP as a partial cement replacement.

MixturePorosity (%)Median pore diameter* (μm)

Table 5.

MIP results at 90 days of age.

Based on the intruded volume.

The reduction in the total porosity and especially the reduction in the pore size confirm the superior durability performance of the mixture observed at the late age. The microstructure development could be related to the durability performance. The median pore diameter was correlated to the 90 days RCPT and electrical resistivity values as shown in Figure 11. The median pore diameter correlates well with the durability test results. The correlation coefficient (R2) is 0.9517 and 0.7977 for the median pore diameter relationship with the RCPT and the electrical resistivity respectively.

Figure 11.

Relation between median pore diameter and 90 days RCPT and electrical resistivity.

3.8 Microstructure characteristics

To better understand the performance of CVC mixtures including CWP, the main microstructural characteristics are inspected by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Microstructure examination is conducted at 90 days of age. The examination is conducted on the control mixture for both concrete grades (i.e., M25-0 and M50-0), and the mixtures including the highest CWP content (i.e., M25-40 and M50-40).

Figure 12 shows the SEM images of the general characteristics for M25-0 and M25-40. For the M25-0 mixture, crystalline hydration products are observed in addition to several pores. For M25-40, fewer pores with smaller size are noticed which indicates the densification of the microstructure that confirms the superior durability performance. Few crystalline hydration products are observed. Figure 13 displays the aggregate matrix interfacial transition zone (ITZ) for M25-0 and M25-40 mixtures. Crystalline hydration products are noticed in both mixtures in the ITZ region with smaller crystal size in M25-40 mixture. The matrix around the aggregate in the M25-40 mixture includes lesser pores compared to M25-0, this is similar to the observations of the general matrix microstructure.

Figure 12.

SEM image of general microstructure for M25-0 and M25-40 mixtures.

Figure 13.

SEM image of ITZ region for M25-0 and M25-40 mixtures.

The general microstructure for M50-0 and M50-40 is shown in Figure 14. Generally, the 50 MPa mixtures have a denser microstructure compared to the 25 MPa mixtures. For the M50-0 mixture, few pores are noticed, and the crystalline hydration products are smaller in size. The inclusion of CWP densified the microstructure by refining the pore structure as depicted in the SEM image. The ITZ region microstructure is presented in Figure 15. The incorporation of CWP improves the densification of the ITZ region microstructure. The crystalline hydration products and pores’ size are reduced due to the inclusion of CWP.

Figure 14.

SEM image of general microstructure for M50-0 and M50-40 mixtures.

Figure 15.

SEM image of ITZ region for M50-0 and M50-40 mixtures.


4. Self-compacting concrete (SCC)

Self-compacting concrete (SCC) has received wide attention and used in the construction industry worldwide since its development [59]. SCC is featured with high fluidity, and at the same time, high resistance to segregation and is placed purely under its weight without the need for vibration [60, 61, 62]. SCC properties are the result of modifying the composition of CVC by incorporating high powder content that has been mainly cement. However, the use of high cement content is not desirable as it will increase the cost and has other negative environmental effects. Replacing cement in SCC mixtures with waste powder is a trend gaining a great deal of attention with the growing awareness toward environmental protection and sustainable construction [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70]. CWP is used to partially replace cement to produce eco-friendly SCC. The cement content in the control mixture is 500 kg/m3 based on the preliminary mix design. The powder content of the control mixture meets the recommended value by EFNARC specifications [71]. The cement is partially replaced by the CWP in 20, 40 and 60% by weight. The concrete mixture is expected to yield compressive strength in the range of 80 MPa. The details of the mixtures’ proportions are given in Table 6.

Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is used as the main binder. The specific surface area of cement is 380 m2/kg. Natural crushed stone of maximum size 9.5 mm is used as coarse aggregate. The specific gravity is 2.65 while the absorption was 0.7%. Natural sand with fineness modulus between 2.5 and 2.7 is used as fine aggregate. The specific gravity is 2.63.

Several tests are conducted to investigate the effect of replacing cement with CWP on the fresh properties of the produced concrete. Unconfined flowability of the produced SCC mixture is assessed by the slump flow test in accordance to ASTM C1611 [72]. Passing ability is evaluated through two tests namely the J-ring (i.e., ASTM C1621 [73]), and L-box. The segregation resistance is measured through conducting the GTM segregation column test conforming to ASTM C1610 [74]. Finally, the viscosity is measured by following the V-funnel test procedure described in the EFNARC specification [71]. On the other hand, compressive strength is performed at two test ages (i.e., 7 and 28 days) in order to evaluate the strength development. The durability characteristic is evaluated by conducting the bulk electrical resistivity as per ASTM C1760 [53] at 28 and 90 days of age. Triplicate samples are used to conduct the compressive strength and the bulk electrical resistivity tests and the average results are used. Figure 16 shows the different tests conducted. The microstructure development is judged by measuring the permeable pore volume at 28 and 90 days of age. Also, the pore system (i.e., total porosity and median pore diameter) is assessed using mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). The MIP is conducted at 90 days of age.

Figure 16.

Different tests conducted on SCC.

4.1 Slump flow results

Slump flow test evaluated the unconfined flowability of the produced SCC mixtures. Figure 17 displays the test results together with the EFNARC specifications [71].

Figure 17.

Slump flow results.

It is noticed that the slump flow decreases as the amount of CWP in the mixture increases. Even with the reduction in the slump flow values, none of the CWP mixtures dropped to the slump flow class one (SF1) which is critical in the presence of highly congested reinforced concrete structures.

Chopra and Siddique [48] reported a similar trend when using rice husk ash (RHA) as cement replacement. The relatively higher specific surface area (SSA) of the CWP compared with cement would increase the water demand and accordingly resulted in lower slump flow values. Similarly, Sfikas et al. [75] reported a reduction in the slump flow of SCC when they used metakaolin, which is characterized by a high SSA, to replace cement.

The time taken for concrete to reach the 500 mm diameter circle on the steel base plate of the slump flow test is measured (T50). The T50 value can judge the viscosity of the SCC mixtures. High T50 values indicate mixtures with higher viscosity. The T50 results are given in Table 7.

Mixture ingredientsMixture designation
Fine aggregate871871871871
Coarse aggregate871871871871
Super plasticizer8.338.728.338.80

Table 6.

Mixtures’ proportions for SCC (kg/m3).

VMA = viscosity-modifying admixture.

w/cm = water/(cement + slag or CWP).

Property measuredControlR-20R-40R-60
T50 (seconds)2.682.473.244.04
V-Funnel (seconds)10.410.011112.82
L-box ratio (H2/H1)0.9630.9660.9770.967

Table 7.

Fresh test results (modified from [42]).

4.2 J-ring results

The passing ability of SCC is evaluated by the J-ring test. This test evaluates how the SCC mixtures can perform in the presence of reinforcing bars in form works. The difference between the unrestricted slump flow diameter and the J-ring flow diameter is shown in Figure 18. The inclusion of CWP improves the passing ability of the SCC mixtures. As the CWP content increases the mixtures’ passing ability is improved and shows a great capacity for flowing through congested spaces. Therefore, mixtures containing high CWP perform better than the control mixture with regards to the passing ability.

Figure 18.

J-ring results.

4.3 L-box results

The passing ability of SCC through congested reinforcement can also be assessed by using the L-box test. The L-box results are given in Table 7. Comparable blocking ratios are observed for all tested mixtures. The variation is less than 1.5%. SCC mixtures including CWP mixtures show no signs of blocking. Generally, EFNARC [71] suggests blocking risk is likely if the blocking ratio is below 0.8. The viscosity of the mixtures is too high if the blocking ratio is less than 0.8. This can cause blocking around highly congested sections. Based on the results, all mixtures with CWP can be used in applications where flow through congested reinforcement is needed.

4.4 V-funnel results

In this test, the viscosity and filling ability of the fresh concrete is judged by the V-funnel test where the concrete is forced to flow through small cross sections and confined spaces. The flow rate (i.e., V-funnel time) of the SCC through the small cross-section is directly related to the mixture’s viscosity.

The V-funnel test results are given in Table 7. The V-funnel results show an increasing trend, indicating a higher viscosity of the mixtures. All the measured V-funnel time values correspond to the second viscosity class according to EFNARC specification [71]. The increase in the viscosity indicates an improvement in the segregation resistance. The viscosity-modifying admixture (VMA) is typically used to adjust mixtures’ viscosity and enhance segregation resistance. Since the mixtures’ viscosity values are significantly enhanced by the incorporation of CWP the VMA could be eliminated from the mixture or its dosage could be reduced. This would result in more economical and low-cost mixtures.

4.5 GTM segregation column results

The ability of concrete to remain homogeneous in the composition in its fresh state is defined as its segregation resistance. The GTM segregation column test is used to evaluate the mixtures’ segregation resistance.

Segregation percentage is shown in Figure 19. The segregation percentage decreases as the CWP content increases in the mixtures. The CWP significantly improves the segregation resistance of the SCC mixtures. The incorporation of CWP in SCC enhances the cohesiveness characteristics of the mixtures. The segregation percentages are below 15%, which shows that the SCC mixtures were superior regarding segregation resistance. Segregation resistance is related to viscosity. The improvement in segregation resistance is confirmed by the V-funnel test results. As the amount of CWP increases in the mixtures from 0 to 60%, the segregation resistance is enhanced by 72.5%. The substantial enhancement in the segregation resistance can be explained by the fact that the water adsorption of the CWP particles may induce suction forces possibly leading to cluster formation. This will lead to an increase in the inter-particle bonds as in the clustering theory enhancing the segregation resistance similar to RHA mixtures studied by Le and Ludwig [76].

Figure 19.

Segregation resistance results.

4.6 Compressive strength results

Strength is measured at different test ages (7, 28, and 90 days) to evaluate the strength development as affected by the inclusion of CWP as partial cement replacement. The strength development due to the inclusion of any cement replacing material is mainly affected by the cement hydration and pozzolanic reaction the used material, and the effect on the concrete microstructure especially the densification of the microstructure with a particular focus on the aggregate-paste interfacial zone [77].

Figure 20 shows the compressive strength development with age. The COV ranged from 0.4 to 3.0%. At the 7 days of age, it is noticed that the inclusion of CWP decreases the strength and the reduction is proportional to the CWP content. This could be a direct result of replacing cement by CWP which has no hydraulic reaction. At the 28 days of age, the mixture including 20% by weight CWP showed higher strength compared to the control mixture. Nevertheless, the mixture of 60% by weight CWP shows the least developed strength. Since CWP is characterized by the slow pozzolanic reaction, it is expected not to see much effect until late ages. At the 90 days of age, the improvement in strength is noticeable. At the 90 days of age, mixtures with 20 and 40% by weight CWP achieve the highest compressive strength compared to the control mixture. This implies that 20–40% by weight CWP is the optimum cement replacement to obtain high compressive strength.

Figure 20.

Compressive strength development with age.

The increase in the strength can also be explained through the nucleation sites (i.e., nucleation of CH around the CWP particles). The CWP improves the packing of the concrete mixture due to its high SSA and its pozzolanic reaction, and the cement hydration acceleration similar to the effect of rice husk ash (RHA) observed in another investigation [76]. On the other hand, the use of 60% by weight CWP shows marginal improvement in strength; this can be due to the high amount of silica from the CWP, and the insufficient amount of calcium hydroxide (CH) from the cement hydration. Hence, some silica is left without chemical reaction. Similar behavior was observed by using RHA (i.e., characterized by high SSA and high silica content) as cement replacement [48].

4.7 Bulk electrical resistivity results

The electrical resistivity of concrete is affected by several factors such as porosity, pore size distribution, connectivity, concrete’s moisture content, and ionic mobility in pore solution. Electrical resistivity assesses the concrete protection of reinforcing steel against corrosion. According to ACI 222R-01 [57], the corrosion protection level is improved as the resistivity value increases.

The resistivity values are presented in Figure 21 at 28 and 90 days of age. The COV ranged from 6.4 to 13.2%. The resistivity increases with age. The inclusion of CWP significantly increases the mixtures’ resistivity. The significant increase in the resistivity due to the inclusion of CWP suggests that CWP tended to reduce the interconnected pore network contributing to the reduction of the concrete’s conductivity. With age, CWP pozzolanic activity contributes to the refinement of concrete pores and microstructure, thus further reduces the ionic mobility and hence the concrete’s conductivity. The improved resistivity indicated that the durability of the CWP concrete mixtures to protect reinforcing steel against the corrosive environment is much better than that of the control mixture without CWP.

Figure 21.

Electrical resistivity of SCC.

4.8 Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP)

The MIP test provides information about the pore system (i.e., pore volume and median pore diameter). The MIP results can help understand the development of the concrete microstructure and can also explain the other obtained results. Table 8 shows the MIP test results at 90 days of age. Test results show that high CWP content has a significant reduction of the pore volume and the pores’ size. The reduction in the pore volume and the pores’ size indicates densification of the microstructure. Also, the MIP results confirm the improvement observed in the resistivity results and compressive strength.

MixturePorosity (%)Median pore diameter* (μm)

Table 8.

MIP results at 90 days of age (modified from [42]).

Based on the intruded volume.


5. Zero-cement alkali activated concrete (AAC)

Zero-cement alkali-activated concrete (AAC) emerged as an alternative to cement-based concrete [78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84]. Sometimes, AAC is referred to as inorganic-polymer or geopolymer concrete. In AAC, cement is completely replaced. AAC utilizes and silica and alumina rich materials to be alkali-activated to form a three-dimensional CaO-free alumino-silicate binder. AAC offers a significant opportunity for the reuse of several industrial by-products and wastes such as fly ash, metakaolin, and blast-furnace slag. Geopolymerization technology is based on the reaction of alkaline solutions such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH), potassium hydroxide (KOH) and sodium silicate solution. The CWP is characterized by its high silica and alumina content which makes it a good candidate to be used in making ACC. The limited studies on suing CWP in AAC [38, 39, 40] concluded that the optimum curing temperature ranges from 60 to 80°C, the curing period ranges between 24 and 48 hours, and the molarity of the alkali solution is 12 M.

The use of CWP in the making AAC still needs further investigations to develop a better understanding of its performance. CWP is used to make AAC using different alkali solutions, mainly NaOH and KOH. Several parameters are investigated which include alkaline solutions with 12 M concentration (i.e., NaOH alone, KOH alone and combination), CWP to aggregate ratio (i.e., 1:1.5–1:2.0–1:2.5), admixture dosage (i.e., 1.5 and 4.0%), curing time (i.e., 60°C for 24 and 48 hours), the inclusion of slag in addition to CWP (i.e., slag content 10, 20 and 40%). Several tests are used to evaluate the performance of the mixtures which include flowability (i.e., ASTM C1437 [85]), cube compressive strength, permeable pores (i.e., ASTM C642 [54]), initial rate of water absorption (i.e., ASTM C1585 [86]), and electrical resistivity (i.e., ASTM C1760 [53]). The COV ranged from 0.3 to 2.8%.

The sodium hydroxide flakes and potassium hydroxide are dissolved in distilled water to make a solution with the desired concentration (i.e., 12 M) at least 1 day before its use. Table 9 shows the alkali solutions used and the combination of NaOH and KOH solutions. The dry ingredients are first mixed for about 1 minute. The sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide solutions are added to the dry materials based on the order of mixing in Table 9 and mixed for 3 minutes.

5.1 Effect of aggregate content

The effect of aggregate content was evaluated by the flowability and 7 days compressive strength. Mixtures are cured at 60°C for 24 hours. Figure 22 shows the flowability and 7 days compressive strength as affected by the CWP to aggregate ratio. It is noticed that the flowability decreases as the aggregate content increases. This is similar to the behavior cement concrete as the CWP content acts as a lubricant between aggregate particles. Oppositely the 7 days compressive strength improved by the increase of the aggregate content. The mixing regime of the solution affects the flowability and strength. The mixing regime (A) shows the best flowability performance while the other mixing regimes show similar flowability values. The mixing regimes (D) and (E) produce the highest compressive.

Figure 22.

Flowability and 7 days compressive strength as affected by CWP to aggregate ratio.

5.2 Effect of admixture content

Superplasticizer (i.e., polycarboxylic ether based) is added with a dosage of 1.5 and 4.0% of the CWP weight. The AAC mixture with CWP to the aggregate ratio (1:2.5) and 24 hours curing at 60°C is used to examine the effect of admixture dosage. Flowability and the 7 days compressive strength results are presented in Table 10. The use of 1.5% by weight superplasticizer, shows variable improvement in the flowability and marginal improvement in the strength. By increasing the admixture dosage to 4.0%, the flowability and strength are improved. For both admixture dosages, the mixing regimes (D) and (E) show the best flowability improvement and highest compressive strength.

I.D.Alkali solutions %Mixing regime of the solutions with the CWP
C2080NaOH solution is added first and mixed with solids for 1 minute, then KOH is added and mixing continues for an additional 2 minutes
D4060NaOH and KOH solutions are mixed then added to solids and mixed for 3 minutes
E6040KOH solution is added first and mixed with solids for 1 minute, then NaOH is added and mixing continues for an additional 2 minutes

Table 9.

Mixtures’ I.D., alkali solutions used and mixing regime of solutions.

Mixing regimeFlowability (mm)7 Days compressive strength (MPa)

Table 10.

Effect of admixture on flowability and 7 days compressive strength.

Superplasticizer admixture dosage by weight of the CWP.

5.3 Effect of curing time

The AAC mixture with CWP to aggregate ratio (1:2.5) and 4% admixture is used to examine the effect of curing time (i.e., 24 and 48 hours) at 60°C. Figure 23 shows the effect of curing time on the 7 days compressive strength. The compressive strength increases as the curing time increases. A similar trend is reported for metakaolin-based AAC [87]. Although increasing the curing time improves the compressive strength, the application of shorter curing time is considered from the point of reducing the energy consumption.

Figure 23.

Seven days compressive strength for the AAC mixture with CWP to aggregate ratio 1:2.5 as affected by curing time at 60°C.

5.4 Effect of slag content and curing regime

Several studies investigated the use of slag in making AAC [88, 89, 90, 91, 92]. Slag proved to be a suitable material in making AAC. Slag is characterized by having some hydraulic reaction due to the existence of calcium oxide (CaO) beside the existence of silica and alumina for the alkali activation. Therefore, slag is used to replace part of the CWP. This will help improve the flowability of the AAC mixture and improve the strength development without the need to increase curing time. The AAC mixture with CWP to aggregate ration 1:2.5 and 4% admixture is used to assess the effect of including slag as a binder material in addition to the CWP. The slag replaced the CWP with 10, 20 and 40% by weight. The AAC mixtures including slag are subjected to three curing regimes; air curing, 24 hours at 60°C followed by air curing, and 24 hours at 60°C followed by water curing for 6 days. Figure 24 shows the flowability of AAC mixtures including slag and CWP. The inclusion of slag improves the mixtures’ flowability. The improvement is proportional to the slag content with the highest improvement at 40% slag.

Figure 24.

Flowability of AAC including CWP and slag.

The effect of including slag with CWP on the 7 days strength is displayed in Figure 25. The air cured mixtures showed the lowest strength development. It is observed that the (oven + air) and (oven + water) results are comparable for both the 20 and 40% slag replacements. The strength values are found to increase with the increase in slag % replacing the CWP, with the highest at 40% slag.

Figure 25.

Seven days compressive strength of AAC including CWP and slag.

The inclusion of slag is beneficial in producing AAC using CWP with a level of replacement of 40%. Based on the flowability and the 7 days compressive strength, the following are the optimum mixture’s parameter to make AAC using CWP:

  1. the CWP to the aggregate ratio is 2.5,

  2. the alkali solutions mixing regime (D) (i.e., NaOH 60% and KOH 40% mixed) produces suitable flowability and strength;

  3. the use of 4% of superplasticizer to improve flowability;

  4. the application of 24 hours at 60°C followed by air curing; and

  5. the use of 40% by weight slag to replace CWP.

The performance of an AAC mixture following the above parameters is assessed. Table 11 summarizes the obtained results. Results show that CWP in combination with 40% slag can produce AAC with strength suitable for different structural applications. The electrical resistivity and initial rate of absorption indicate that the produced AAC is characterized by high durability. The change in the test results values with age indicates that most of the reactions are finished at 7 days of age. Hence there is no need for waiting to evaluate the performance at 28 days of age similar to Portland cement concrete.

Test age (days)
Compressive strength (MPa)39.340.7
Permeable pores %8.898.32
Electrical bulk resistivity (kΩ.cm)17.918.2
Initial rate of absorption (mm/min1/2) sorptivity0.150.12

Table 11.

Seven and twenty-eight days results for optimum AAC mixture.


6. Conclusions

The CWP contains high silica and alumina content (i.e., >80%). Also, it is characterized by having some amorphous content which shows pozzolanic activity especially at late ages. Therefore, CWP has strong potentials to be used as an ingredient in making eco-friendly concretes.

Using CWP as an ingredient in making CVC is viable. High-performance concrete can be produced by including CWP as partial cement replacement. CWP improves the workability retention of the CVC mixtures. The inclusion of CWP will reduce the early-age strength and slowed the strength development. Significant improvement of CVC durability can be achieved by including high content of CWP. The CVC performance varies according to the CWP content. CWP can be used in the range of 10–20% to improve workability retention and late strength development. A CWP content ranging from 30 to 40% is needed to improve durability. If the performance of mixture requires the combination of workability retention, strength and durability, a CWP content ranging from 20 to 30% can be used to optimize all required characteristics.

CWP can be used as a partial cement replacement to produce SCC that meets international requirements. All fresh concrete properties, except for slump flow, are significantly improved by the incorporation of CWP. The improvement is proportional to the CWP content. Similar to CVC, the inclusion of CWP affected the strength development and enhanced the durability. SCC with improved fresh performance and optimized strength can be produced using 40% CWP as partial cement replacement.

The use of CWP in making AAC showed promising potentials. The production of AAC using CWP should consider the aggregate content of the mixture, the use of superplasticizer admixtures and the use of an alkali solution composed of NaOH and KOH. The combination of slag with CWP improves the workability and strength development without the need for long curing time to conserve energy. The combination of CWP with fly ash can also be an alternative to enhance the performance of the produced AAC.

Finally, CWP has encouraging potentials to be used as an ingredient to make eco-friendly conventional-vibrated concrete (CVC), self-compacting concrete (SCC) and zero-cement alkali-activated concrete (AAC). The concrete industry can and will play a vital role in the sustainable development through the utilization of industrial waste materials.



This work was financially supported by the UAEU-UPAR2 Research Grant # 31 N2018. Also, the donation of the ceramic waste powder for the study by PORCELLAN (ICAD II MUSSAFAH—ABU DHABI, UAE) is much valued. The help of master students Dima M. Kanaan and Sama T. Aly is highly appreciated. Support to the second author by Southern Plains Transportation Centre (SPTC) to University of New Mexico is much appreciated.


  1. 1. Chindaprasirt P, Chareerat T, Sirivivatnanon V. Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2007;29(3):224-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.002
  2. 2. Oacheco-Torgal F, Abdollahnejad Z, Camões AF, Jamshidi M, Ding Y. Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue? Construction and Building Materials. 2012;30:400-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.017
  3. 3. Van Deventer JSJ, Provis J, Duxson P. Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement. Minerals Engineering. 2012;29:89-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.009
  4. 4. Batayneh M, Marie I, Asi I. Use of selected waste materials in concrete mixes. Waste Management. 2007;27(12):1870-1876. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.026
  5. 5. ACIMAC/MECS. World Production and Consumption of Ceramic Tiles [Internet]. 4th ed 2016. Available from: [Accessed: Oct 29, 2017]
  6. 6. Cheng YH, Huang F, Liu R, Hou JL, Li GL. Test research on effects of waste ceramic polishing powder on the permeability resistance of concrete. Materials and Structures. 2016;49(3):729-738. DOI: 10.1617/s11527-015-0533-6
  7. 7. De Brito J, Pereira AS, Correia JR. Mechanical behavior of non-structural concrete made with recycled ceramic aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2005;27(4):429-433. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.07.005
  8. 8. Senthamarai RM, Manoharan PD. Concrete with ceramic waste aggregate. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2005;27(9):910-913. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.04.003
  9. 9. Correia JR, De Brito J, Pereira AS. Effects on concrete durability of using recycled ceramic aggregates. Materials and Structures. 2006;39(2):169-177. DOI: 10.1617/s11527-005-9014-7
  10. 10. Guerra I, Vivar I, Llamas B, Juan A, Moran J. Eco-efficient concretes: The effects of using recycled ceramic material from sanitary installations on the mechanical properties of concrete. Waste Management. 2009;29(2):643-646. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.018
  11. 11. Senthamarai RM, Manoharan PD, Gobinath D. Concrete made from ceramic industry waste: Durability properties. Construction and Building Materials. 2011;25(5):2413-2419. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.049
  12. 12. Medina C, de Rojas MIS, Frías M. Reuse of sanitary ceramic wastes as coarse aggregate in eco-efficient concretes. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2012;34(1):48-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.08.015
  13. 13. Medina C, Frías M, de Rojas MIS. Microstructure and properties of recycled concretes using ceramic sanitary ware industry waste as coarse aggregate. Construction and Building Materials. 2012;31:112-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.075
  14. 14. Medina C, Frías M, de Rojas MIS, Thomas C, Polanco JA. Gas permeability in concrete containing recycled ceramic sanitary ware aggregate. Construction and Building Materials. 2012;37:597-605. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.023
  15. 15. Medina C, de Rojas MIS, Frías M. Properties of recycled ceramic aggregate concretes: Water resistance. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2013;40:21-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.04.005
  16. 16. Halicka A, Ogrodnik P, Zegardlo B. Using ceramic sanitary ware waste as concrete aggregate. Construction and Building Materials. 2013;48:295-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.063
  17. 17. Lopez V, Llamas B, Juan A, Moran JM, Guerra I. Eco-efficient concretes: Impact of the use of white ceramic powder on the mechanical properties of concrete. Biosystems Engineering. 2007;96(4):559-564. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.01.004
  18. 18. Higashiyama H, Sappakittipakorn M, Sano M, Yagishita F. Chloride ion penetration into mortar containing ceramic waste aggregate. Construction and Building Materials. 2012;33:48-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.01.018
  19. 19. Higashiyama H, Yagishita F, Sano M, Takahashi O. Compressive strength and resistance to chloride penetration of mortars using ceramic waste as fine aggregate. Construction and Building Materials. 2012;26(1):96-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.05.008
  20. 20. Higashiyama H, Yamauchi K, Sappakittipakorn M, Sano M, Takahashi O. A visual investigation on chloride ingress into ceramic waste aggregate mortars having different water to cement ratios. Construction and Building Materials. 2013;40:1021-1028. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.078
  21. 21. Bahoria BV, Parbat DK, Naganaik PB. Replacement of natural sand in concrete by waste products: A state of art. Journal of Environmental Research and Development. 2013;7(4A):1651-1656
  22. 22. Jiménez JR, Ayuso J, López M, Fernández JM, de Brito J. Use of fine recycled aggregates from ceramic waste in masonry mortar manufacturing. Construction and Building Materials. 2013;40:679-690. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.036
  23. 23. Vejmelková E, Keppert M, Rovnaníková P, Ondráček M, Keršner Z, Černý R. Properties of high performance concrete containing fine-ground ceramics as supplementary cementitious material. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2012;34(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.09.018
  24. 24. Rahhal V, Irassar E, Castellano C, Pavslík Z, Černý R. Utilization of ceramic wastes as replacement of Portland cements. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction Materials and Structures (ICCMATS-1); 24-26 November 2014; South Africa. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2014. pp. 208-213
  25. 25. Steiner LR, Bernardin AM, Pelisser F. Effectiveness of ceramic tile polishing residues as supplementary cementitious materials for cement mortars. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. 2015;4:30-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2015.05.001
  26. 26. Irassar E, Rahhal V, Tironi A, Trezza M, Pavlík Z, Pavlíková M, et al. Utilization of ceramic wastes as pozzolanic materials. In: Technical Proceedings of the 2014 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Expo. Vol. 1-3. 15-18 June 2014. Washington DC: CRC Press; 2014. pp. 316-319
  27. 27. Pokorný J, Fořt J, Pavlíková M, Studnika J, Pavlík Z. Application of mixed ceramic powder in cement based composites. Advanced Materials Research. 2014;1054:177-181. DOI: 10.4028/
  28. 28. Vejmelková E, Koáková D, Kulovaná T, Hubáek A, Erný R. Mechanical and thermal properties of moderate-strength concrete with ceramic powder used as supplementary cementitious material. Advanced Materials Research. 2014;1054:194-198. DOI: 10.4028/
  29. 29. Heidari A, Tavakoli D. A study of the mechanical properties of ground ceramic powder concrete incorporating nano-SiO2 particles. Construction and Building Materials. 2013;38:255-264. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.110
  30. 30. Pacheco-Torgal F, Jalali S. Compressive strength and durability properties of ceramic wastes based concrete. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions. 2011;44:155-167. DOI: 10.1617/s11527-010-9616-6
  31. 31. Reiterman P, Holcapek O, Cachova M, Vogel F, Jogl M, Konvalinka P. Basic and hygric properties of concrete containing fine ceramic powder. Advanced Materials Research. 2014;897:188-191. DOI: 10.4028/
  32. 32. Mishra N, Vasugi V. Experimental assessment of properties of ternary blended concrete using GGBS and ceramic powder. Indian Concrete Journal. 2015;89:74-80
  33. 33. Cheng Y, Huang F, Li G-L, Xu L, Hou J-L. Test research on effects of ceramic polishing powder on carbonation and sulphate-corrosion resistance of concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2014;55:440-446. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.023
  34. 34. Bignozzi MC, Bonduá S. Alternative blended cement with ceramic residues: Corrosion resistance investigation on reinforced mortar. Cement and Concrete Research. 2011;41(9):647-654. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.05.001
  35. 35. Fatima E, Jhamb A, Kumar R. Ceramic dust as construction material in rigid pavement. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2013;1(5):112-116. DOI: 10.12691/ajcea-1-5-5
  36. 36. Subaşi S, Öztürk H, Emiroğlu M. Utilizing of waste ceramic powders as filler material in self-consolidating concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2017;149:567-574. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.180
  37. 37. Jerônimo VL, Meira GR, LCPd-S F. Performance of self-compacting concretes with wastes from heavy ceramic industry against corrosion by chlorides. Construction and Building Materials. 2018;169:900-910. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.034
  38. 38. Sun Z, Cui H, An H, Tao D, Xu Y, Zhai J, et al. Synthesis and thermal behavior of geopolymer-type material from waste ceramic. Construction and Building Materials. 2013;49:281-287. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.063
  39. 39. El-Dieb AS, Shehab IE. Cementless concrete using ceramic waste powder. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction Materials and Structures (ICCMATS-1); 24-26 November 2014; South Africa. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2014. pp. 487-494
  40. 40. Aly ST, Kanaan DM, El-Dieb AS, Abu-Eishah SI. Properties of ceramic waste powder based geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on Polymers in Concrete (ICPIC 2018); 29 April–1 May 2018. Washington DC: Springer; 2018. pp. 429-436
  41. 41. Aly ST, El-Dieb AS, Reda Taha MM. Self-compacting concrete with large ceramic waste powder content as a partial replacement of cement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2018 (accepted for publication in ASCE)
  42. 42. Aly ST, El-Dieb AS, Reda Taha MM. Ceramic waste powder for eco-friendly self-compacting concrete. ASTM Advances in Civil Engineering Materials. 2018;7(1):426-445. DOI: 10.1520/ACEM20180043
  43. 43. El-Dieb AS, Kanaan DM. Ceramic waste powder an alternative cement replacement—Characterization and evaluation. Journal of Sustainable Materials and Technology. 2018;17:e00063. DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2018.e00063
  44. 44. El-Dieb AS, Reda Taha MM, Kanaan DM, Aly ST. Ceramic waste powder from landfill to sustainable concretes. ICE Construction Materials. 2018;171(3):109-116. DOI: 10.1680/jcoma.17.00019
  45. 45. Kannan DM, Aboubakr SH, El-Dieb AS, Reda Taha MM. High performance concrete incorporating ceramic waste powder as large partial replacement of Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials. 2017;144:35-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.115
  46. 46. ASTM C618-12a. Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  47. 47. ASTM C311/C311M-13. Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete, ASTM International. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  48. 48. Chopra D, Siddique R. Strength, permeability and microstructure of self-compacting concrete containing rice husk ash. Biosystems Engineering. 2015;130:72-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.12.005
  49. 49. Donatello S, Tyrer M, Cheeseman CR. Comparison of test methods to assess pozzolanic activity. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2010;32(2):121-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.008
  50. 50. BS EN 196-5:2011. Methods of Testing Cement—Part 5: Pozzolanicity Test for Pozzolanic Cement. London, UK: British Standards Institution; 2011
  51. 51. ASTM C143/C143M-15a. Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  52. 52. ASTM C1202-17. Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  53. 53. ASTM C1760-12. Standard Test Method for Bulk Electrical Conductivity of Hardened Concrete. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  54. 54. ASTM C642-13. Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  55. 55. Mehta PK. Concrete Structure, Properties and Materials. New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1986. p. 450
  56. 56. Bektas F. Use of ground clay brick as a supplementary cementitious material in concrete-hydration characteristics, mechanical properties, and ASR durability [dissertation]. Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA; 2007
  57. 57. ACI 222R-01. Protection of Metals in Concrete against Corrosion. Farmington Hills, USA: American Concrete Institute; 2009
  58. 58. Shahroodi A. Development of test methods for assessment of concrete durability for use in performance-based specifications [dissertation]. Department of Civil Engineering: University of Toronto; Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada; 2010
  59. 59. Zhao H, Sun W, Wu X, Gao B. The properties of the self-compacting concrete with fly ash and ground blast furnace slag mineral admixtures. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;95:66-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.050
  60. 60. ACI 237R-07. Self-Consolidating Concrete. Fragminton Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute; 2009
  61. 61. Sideris KK, Manita P. Mechanical characteristics and durability of self-consolidating concretes produced with no additional fine materials. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials. 2014;3(3-4):234-244. DOI: 10.1080/21650373.2014.924040
  62. 62. García-Taengua E, Sonebi M, Crossett P, Taylor S, Deegan P, Ferrara L, et al. Performance of sustainable SCC mixes with mineral additions for use in precast concrete industry. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials. 2016;5(3):157-175. DOI: 10.1080/21650373.2015.1024297
  63. 63. Zhu W, Gibbs JC. Use of different limestone and chalk powders in self-compacting concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 2005;35(8):1457-1462. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.001
  64. 64. Gesoğlu M, Güneyisi E, Erdoğan Ö. Properties of self-compacting concrete made with binary, ternary, and quaternary cementitious blends of fly ash, blast furnace slag, and silica fume. Construction and Building Materials. 2009;23(5):1847-1854. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.015
  65. 65. Topcu IB, Bilir B, Uygunoğlu T. Effect of waste marble dust content as filler on properties of self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2009;23(5):1947-1953. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.007
  66. 66. Liu M. Self-compacting concrete with different levels of pulverized fuel ash. Construction and Building Materials. 2010;24(7):1245-1252. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.012
  67. 67. Liu M. Incorporating ground glass in self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2011;25(2):919-925. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.092
  68. 68. Uysal M, Sumer M. Performance of self-compacting concrete containing different mineral admixtures. Construction and Building Materials. 2011;25(11):4112-4120. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.032
  69. 69. Mandanoust R, Mousavi S. Fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete containing metakaolin. Construction and Building Materials. 2012;35:752-760. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.109
  70. 70. Beycioğlu A, Aruntaş HY. Workability and mechanical properties of self-compacting concretes containing LLFA, GBFS and MC. Construction and Building Materials. 2014;73:626-635. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.071
  71. 71. EFNARC. The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete: Specification, Production and Use [Internet]. 2005. Available from: [Accessed: Oct 1, 2017]
  72. 72. ASTM C1611/C1611M-14. Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  73. 73. ASTM C1621/C1621M-17. Standard Test Method for Passing Ability of Self-Consolidating Concrete by J-Ring. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  74. 74. ASTM C1610/C1610M-17. Standard Test Method for Static Segregation of Self-Consolidating Concrete Using Column Technique. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  75. 75. Sfikas IP, Badogiannis EG, Trezos KG. Rheology and mechanical characteristics of self-compacting concrete mixtures containing metakaolin. Construction and Building Materials. 2014;64:121-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.048
  76. 76. Le HT, Ludwig H-M. Effect of rice husk ash and other mineral admixtures on properties of self-compacting high performance concrete. Materials & Design. 2016;89:156-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.120
  77. 77. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill; 2006. p. 659
  78. 78. Shehab HK, Eisa AS, Wahba AM. Mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete with full and partial cement replacement. Construction and Building Materials. 2016;126:560-565. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.059
  79. 79. Mehta A, Siddique R. Properties of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating OPC as partial replacement of fly ash. Construction and Building Materials. 2017;150:792-807. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.067
  80. 80. Pacheco-Torgal F, Castro-Gomes J, Jalali S. Alkali-activated binders: A review. Part 1. Historical background, terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products. Construction and Building Materials. 2008;22:1305-1314. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.015
  81. 81. Pacheco-Torgal F, Castro-Gomes J, Jalali S. Alkali-activated binders: A review. Part 2. About materials and binders manufacture. Construction and Building Materials. 2008;22:1315-1322. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.019
  82. 82. Shi C, Jiménez AF, Palomo A. New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research. 2011;41:750-761. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016
  83. 83. Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Van Deventer JSJ. The role of inorganic technology in the development of ‘Green Concrete’. Cement and Concrete Research. 2007;37(12):590-1597. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018
  84. 84. Komnitsas KA. Potential of geopolymer technology towards green buildings and sustainable cities. Procedia Engineering. 2011;21:1023-1032. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2108
  85. 85. ASTM C1437-15. Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  86. 86. ASTM C1585-13. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2017
  87. 87. Ronaník P. Effect of curing temperature on the development of hard structure of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials. 2010;24(7):1176-1183. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.023
  88. 88. Nath P, Sarker PK. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Construction and Building Materials. 2014;66:163-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080
  89. 89. Puertas F, Fernandez-Jimenez A. Mineralogical and microstructural characterization of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2003;25(3):287-292. DOI: 10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00059-8
  90. 90. Puertas F, Martı́nez-Ramı́rez S, Alonso S, Vázquez T. Alkali-activated fly ash/slag cement strength behavior and hydration products. Cement and Concrete Research. 2000;30(10):1625-1632. DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00298-2
  91. 91. Akçaözoğlu S, Atiş CD. Effect of granulated blast furnace slag and fly ash addition on the strength properties of lightweight mortars containing waste PET aggregates. Construction and Building Materials. 2011;25(10):4052-4058. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.042
  92. 92. Wang SD, Scrivener KL. 29Si and 27Al NMR study of alkali-activated slag. Cement and Concrete Research. 2003;33(5):769-774. DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01044-X

Written By

Amr S. El-Dieb, Mahmoud R. Taha and Samir I. Abu-Eishah

Submitted: 03 July 2018 Reviewed: 03 October 2018 Published: 05 November 2018