Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Carbon Nanocomposites: Preparation and Its Application in Catalytic Organic Transformations

Written By

Mayakrishnan Gopiraman and Ick Soo Kim

Submitted: February 23rd, 2018 Reviewed: August 23rd, 2018 Published: November 12th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.81109

Chapter metrics overview

1,560 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Carbon nanocomposites have gained huge interest in catalysis due to their small size and shape-dependent physicochemical properties. Particularly, metal nanostructures/carbon materials (mainly graphene and carbon nanotubes) based nanocomposites demonstrated extraordinary catalytic activity in organic reactions. The catalytic products prepared by using carbon nanocomposites are found to be highly valuable in various fields including pharmaceutical, biomedical, agricultural, and material sciences. Hence, the demand of carbon nanocomposites has been increasing rapidly, and the development of novel preparation methods also deserve a special concern. In this chapter, we discuss the main advances in the field over the last few years and explore the novel preparation methods of carbon nanocomposites (metal nanostructures/carbon materials) and their applications in various catalytic organic transformations.


  • carbon nanomaterials
  • metal nanostructures
  • nanocomposite
  • catalysis

1. Introduction

Carbon nanomaterials, including carbon nanotubes [both single-walled (SWCNTs) and multi-walled (MWCNTs)], graphene (G) or graphene oxide (GO), and carbon nanoparticles (CNPs), have attracted increasing attention owing to their unique structural regularity, high surface area, electrical conductivity, chemical inertness, biocompatibility, mechanical, and thermal stability [1, 2]. Graphene is a 2D single-atom-thick sheet of sp2-hybridized carbon, and it can be stacked to form 3D graphite and rolled to form 1D carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The long-range π-conjugation in graphene possesses astonishing thermal, mechanical, and electrical properties [3, 4]. Because of their outstanding physicochemical properties, researchers turned straight away into the exploration and modification of graphene and CNTs. To date, the potential applications of graphene and CNTs are diverse, which include catalyst carrier, energy storage, absorbents, biomedical, textiles, and sensors and support in many areas. As a catalyst carrier, the role of graphene and CNTs is just outstanding [5]. Particularly, in heterogeneous catalysts, the carbon materials often employed as a support to disperse the metal nanoparticles [3, 6]. In fact, the metal nanoparticles can easily agglomerate to form big nanoparticles due to their high surface energy, and it can be avoided by using support materials. Generally, the activity of the heterogeneous catalyst is mainly due to the structure of the catalyst, size of the metal nanoparticles, nature of the support, metal-support interaction, and fine dispersion of catalyst in reaction medium [7, 8]. To date, there are several metal nanoparticles supported graphene or CNT catalysts developed and reported for various organic transformations. The catalytic products are highly valuable in various fields including pharmaceutical, biomedical, agricultural, and material sciences [9]. In recent days, the interest on carbon nanocomposites in organic reaction has been increased significantly due to their unexpected positive outcomes. In this chapter, we discuss the main advances in the field over the last few years and explore the novel preparation methods of carbon nanocomposites (metal nanostructures/carbon materials) and their applications in various catalytic organic transformations.


2. Preparation and characterization of carbon nanocomposites

2.1. Noncovalent functionalization

In general, the carbon nanomaterials are chemically inert and highly hydrophobic in nature [10]. Therefore, the dispersion/anchoring of metal nanoparticles on the surface of carbon materials is very challenging task [11]. The noncovalent functionalization is one of the very common methods for the preparation of metal nanoparticles supported carbon nanocomposites. The noncovalent functionalization is mainly referred as a physical absorption, which involves weak interactions (п-interactions) [12]. In general, the noncovalent functionalization method causes no change on the basal plane structure and the electronic properties of carbon materials. However, prior to metal dispersion, in most of the cases, the surface of carbon materials has been modified to improve the hydrophobic nature and better “metal-carbon interactions.” There are two main methods for the preparation of metal nanoparticles supported carbon nanocomposites by using the noncovalent functionalization: (1) wet synthesis and (2) dry synthesis.

2.1.1. Wet synthesis

The wet synthesis method has been widely adopted for the preparation of metal nanoparticles supported carbon nanocomposites. The wet synthesis is quite simple and low time-consuming processing steps. Moreover, the uniform nucleation and the high possibility of the control of size and morphology of the metal nanoparticles are the key factors, which can be easily achieved through wet synthesis. So far, the researchers have developed numerous highly unique and efficient carbon nanocomposites. Particularly, in recent years, the numbers have been gradually increased due to the high demand of these useful materials in various fields such as catalysis, energy, sensors, biomedical, and textiles.

Noble metals such as silver (Ag), gold (Au), ruthenium (Ru), and palladium (Pd) nanoparticles have been widely employed as promoters and catalysts in various organic transformations. The carbon-based supports such as CNTs and graphene/graphene oxide (G/GO) are often used as support for the immobilization of Ag, Ru, Pd, and Au nanoparticles. It was found that the preparation method has huge influences on the structure and surface morphology of the carbon nanocomposites. Recently, Salam et al. [13] obtained a highly efficient silver-graphene nanocomposite (Ag-G) through a simple wet chemical route. They used silica-coated Ag nanoparticle solution as Ag sources. In a typical wet synthesis, the silica-coated Ag nanoparticle solution was added with aqueous GO solution under stirring for 15 min followed by the addition of hydrazine solution. The solution was heated at 80°C for 15–20 min, and the resultant precipitate (Ag-G) was filtered and dried. The Ag-G has been characterized by XRD, TEM, and Raman spectroscopy. The results confirmed the uniform dispersion of Ag nanoparticles with good attachment with GO. Well known that the NaBH4 is a strong reducing agent and often used for the preparation of carbon nanocomposites. The Ag/graphene nanocomposites were prepared using NaBH4 as a reducing agent [14]. In a typical procedure, GO was mixed with CH3COOAg solution and stirred at 100°C, followed by the addition of aqueous NaBH4 solution and stirred at 100°C. Finally, the Ag/G nanocomposites were obtained by centrifugation, washing, and freeze-drying. The SEM and TEM results confirmed that the Ag nanoparticles (ranging from 5 to 25 nm) were orderly decorated and closely attached on the graphene nanosheets.

Bozkurt [15] obtained Ag/graphene nanocomposite by the sonochemical method in situ reducing reaction of silver ions and GO with sodium citrate as a green reducing agent. At first, GO was well dispersed in distilled water, and an aqueous solution of AgNO3 was gradually added to the above suspension under vigorous stirring condition. Finally, sodium citrate was added to the above mixture and sonicated for 1 h. The resultant black solid product (Ag/graphene nanocomposite) was centrifuged and dried in a vacuum. The authors have proposed mechanism for the formation of Ag nanoparticles on GO. Briefly, at first, silver nitrate precursor deposits on the surface of the GO nanosheets. Subsequently, the applied ultrasonic irradiation assists the deposited silver nitrate precursor to homogeneously disperse on the GO surface. The functional groups such as epoxy groups, hydroxyl groups (–OH), carbonyl groups (C = O), and carboxylic acid (–COOH) groups on the surface of GO would also act as the active sites for the metal cations. In general, the oxygen functional groups interact with the metal cations through electrostatic interactions. In the final step, the addition of sodium citrate reduces the GOAg+ to Ag nanoparticles on the GO surface. In comparison with other methods, this ultrasonic irradiation method has advantages such as simplicity and high efficiency. The characterization results confirmed the merit of the ultrasonic irradiation method. TEM results showed the most of Ag nanoparticles deposited on the GO, which are spherical in shape with good attachment over GO surface.

A one-pot strategy was designed for forming the Au-SiO2-GO composite by Peng and coworkers [16]. To prepare Au-SiO2-GO composite, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and HAuCl4 were dissolved in TX-100 aqueous solution dispersed with GO, followed by the addition of compressed carbon dioxide (CO2). Here the aim of utilizing compressed CO2 is to form carbonic acid by reacting CO2 with water. The carbonic acid can act as a catalyst for TEOS hydrolysis. Certainly, the compressed CO2 can also promote the deposition of nanoparticles on a solid support. The solution mixture was stirred at room temperature for 7 hours. Finally, the CO2 was released, and the product Au-SiO2-GO composite was obtained. The TEM observation confirmed the uniform dispersion of Au nanoparticles on the GO with a narrow size distribution of 1.4–2.0 nm. The BET surface area and the total pore volume are 429 and 1.01 cm3 g1, respectively.

Binary Au-Ag catalyst has been widely demonstrated to be one of the highly efficient catalysts for organic reactions. Babu et al. [17] prepared Au-Ag/SLG nanocatalyst from HAuCl4 × H2O, Ag/DNA, and single-layer graphene (SLG). Negatively charged Salmon milt DNA was employed as Ag sources. In a typical wet synthesis, mixture of HAuCl4 × H2O and colloidal Ag/DNA was sonicated for 1 h at room temperature. Then, acid-treated single-layer graphene (f-SLG) was added to the above mixture and sonicated. Finally, the mixture was centrifuged to separate the Au-Ag/SLG and calcinated at 700°C for 3 h under inert atmosphere. Similarly, Pt-Ni bimetallic nanoparticles supported on CNTs nanocomposites (xPtNi/CNTs) with different compositions of Pt were synthesized [18]. Chemically modified CNTs were used for the decoration of nanocomposites. The solution phase reduction methods were adopted to prepare the nanocomposites in which ethylene glycol as a reducing agent in the polyol method or using poly (amidoamine) dendrimer as a platform and NaBH4 as a reducing agent were used to deposit the Pt and Ni nanoparticles on the surface of modified CNTs. Recently, Yuan and coworkers [19] found that the bimetallic Pd-Ag nanoparticles supported MWCNTs (Pd-Ag/MWCNTs) are highly active catalyst for the electro-oxidation of ethanol, n-propanol, and iso-propanol. The Pd-Ag/MWCNTs was prepared by using the NaBH4 reduction method in a mixed solvent of ethylene glycol and water. In a typical method, MWCNTs were first treated with conc. H2SO4 and conc. HNO3 to create oxygen functional groups on the surface of MWCNTs. Subsequently, the acid-treated MWCNTs were added to a mixture of PdCl2, AgNO3, and ethylene glycol/water, and then the mixture was stirred for 30 min. Finally, NaBH4 dissolved ethylene glycol was slowly added to the above mixture under vigorous stirring for 4 h. The Pd-Ag/MWCNT nanocomposite was characterized and applied for the electro-oxidation of ethanol, n-propanol, and iso-propanol.

Ru was found to be an excellent catalyst for organic reactions due to its wide chemical states (II to +VIII) and tunable properties [20]. Particularly, the Ru catalyst has shown an excellent activity in oxidation reactions because of its redox properties. Interconnected RuO2 nanoparticles anchored GO nanocatalyst (RuO2/GO) with very good BET surface area (285 m2/g) were obtained by Yuan and coworkers [21]. Very simple method was adopted for the preparation of RuO2/GO. Briefly, Ru(acac)3 and GO were dispersed in methanol and sonicated for several hours followed by heating at 65°C to evaporate the methanol. The obtained slurry was grinded well with mortar and pestle until the homogeneous mixture was obtained, and then, it was calcinated in the muffle furnace under N2 atmosphere at 600°C (heating rate of 5°C/min) for 3 h. The RuO2/GO was completely characterized by various spectroscopic and microscopic techniques.

Wang et al. [22] obtained Pd nanoparticles immobilized GO nanocomposite by a very simple wet chemical method. PdCl2 and hydrazine hydrate were used as Pd sources and reducing agent, respectively. Initially, an aqueous suspension of GO was prepared, and then, PdCl2 was added under the assistant of mild ultrasound. The hydrazine hydrate was then added to the above mixture and the solution heated at 100°C for 1 h. The black solid of Pd/GO was isolated by filtration and washed copiously with water and methanol. TEM image of the Pd/graphene composite showed that the Pd nanoparticles were supported on the surface of the GO sheets without any agglomeration of the Pd nanoparticles. The Pd nanoparticles are composed of spherical particles. The size of the Pd particles calculated to be 2–6 nm. The metal surface area of Pd/graphene measured to be 161 m2/g.

Recently, a facile and green method was developed to synthesize a new type of catalyst by coating Pd nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide (rGO)-CNT nanocomposite [23]. At first, the three-dimensional microstructure of an rGO-CNT nanocomposite was obtained by hydrothermal treatment. The homogeneous mixture of GO and CNTs was prepared under sonication conditions, and the mixture was subsequently sealed in a 50-ml Teflon-lined autoclave and maintained at 180°C for 12 h. A black gel-like 3D cylinder of rGO-CNT composite was obtained. The resultant rGO-CNT composite was dispersed in aqueous solution, and subsequently, K2PdCl4 was added. The mixture was vigorously stirred for 30 min in an ice bath. Then, the reaction mixture was washed well with pure water to obtain Pd-rGO-CNT nanocomposite.

Similarly, CuO nanoparticles were decorated on the surface of GO to obtain CuO/GO catalyst [24]. In a typical procedure, GO was dispersed in methanol and sonicated for 1 h. Then, the Cu(acac)2 added to the above mixture was refluxed for 5 h (Step 1), and the MeOH was slowly evaporated. The resultant slurry was mixed well by a mortar and pestle, and obtained homogeneous mixture of GO and Cu(acac)2 was calcinated under inert atmosphere at 350°C for 3 h. Figure 1(a) shows a schematic illustration for the preparation of CuO/GNS. The CuO/GNS was completed characterized by TEM, SEM-EDS, XPS, Raman, and XRD (Figure 1). The TEM images showed the strong attachment of CuO nanoparticles on the GNS with particle size distribution of 12–35 nm. Raman and XPS results indicated the strong attachment of CuO on GNS through covalent bonding (Cu▬C). The Cu 2p XPS spectrum of CuO/GNS showed shakeup satellite peaks of the Cu 2p3/2 at 942.4 eV and Cu 2p1/2 at 962.6 eV, which confirmed the presence of Cu(II) species (CuO).

Figure 1.

(a) Schematic illustration of the procedure for the preparation of CuO/GNS, (b–d) TEM images, (e) SEM-EDS, (f) XPS, (g) Raman, and (h) XRD patterns of CuO/GNS (from Gopiraman et al. [24]).

2.1.2. Dry synthesis

The dry synthesis is found to be highly efficient and suitable method for the synthesis of carbon nanocomposite. The main advantages of this method are its simplicity, better adhesion, and advantages of least parameters to be controlled [25]. It was found that the dry synthesis is the method, which is highly suitable for the decoration of metal nanoparticles on carbon nanomaterials when compared with wet synthesis method. In fact, several drawbacks of the wet synthesis method have been resolved by the dry synthesis method. Moreover, the carbon materials are highly hydrophobic, and it needs surface modification (with oxygen functional groups (C▬OH, C▬O▬C, C〓O, and COOH or amine groups) prior to the decoration of metal nanoparticles [26]. The oxygen functional groups could play a bridging role between the metal nanoparticles and the carbon materials. However, the creation of the oxygen functional groups is very difficult in case of activated carbon, carbon nanofibers, and carbon black. Interestingly, carbon materials without any surface functional groups could also be utilized successfully for the preparation of carbon nanocomposites. However, the large-scale production of the carbon nanocomposites through dry synthesis is limited.

A rapid and solventless dry synthesis method was described for the preparation of carbon nanocomposites by Lin and coworkers [27]. This straightforward two-step process involves the dry mixing of a precursor metal salt with carbon materials (CNTs or GO) followed by heating in an inert atmosphere. They found that the dry synthesis procedure is scalable and applicable to various other carbon substrates (e.g., CNFs, expanded graphite, CNTs, activated carbon, and carbon black) and many metal salts (e.g., Ag, Au, Co, Ni, and Pd acetates). The Ag nanoparticles decorated CNTs have been reported as a model system, and the composites were prepared under various mixing techniques, metal loading levels, thermal treatment temperatures, and nanotube oxidative acid treatments. The TEM and SEM observation confirmed the uniform and strong attachment of Ag nanoparticles on the surface of the CNTs. However, in a wet synthesis, many factors such as solvent, concentration of metal precursor, reducing agent, deposition time, and temperature need to be controlled very carefully. Similarly, Ag nanoparticles of small average diameter (<5 nm) were decorated on the surface of MWCNTs by a simple mechanochemical process [28]. In a typical preparation, the silver acetate and MWCNTs were placed in a zirconia vial. Then, two zirconia balls were placed in a vial, and the set-up was secured in a SPEX CertiPrep 8000D high energy shaker mill and subjected to mechanical shaking for a desired period of time to yield the Ag/MWCNTs nanocomposite. The mechanochemical process requires no solvent, no additional reducing agents, or no applied electrical current. They demonstrated that the mechanochemical process was found to be readily applicable to not only CNTs, but also other carbon materials that are thermally conductive such as graphene, GO, and activated carbon (Figure 2). Moreover, different organic metal salts (e.g., Au and Pd acetates and Pt acetylacetonate) were also successfully applied in similar procedures to obtain the corresponding carbon nanocomposites. The mechanochemical process is found to be rapid, versatile, and potentially scalable, making it useful for further exploitation in various applications. Scheme 1 shows the general procedure for the preparation of carbon nanocomposites by mechanochemical process.

Figure 2.

General procedure for preparation of carbon nanocomposites by mechanochemical synthesis (from Lin et al. [28]).

Scheme 1.

Suzuki reaction of iodobenzene with phenylboronic acid catalyzed by Pd-graphene nanocomposites (from Li et al. [39]).

Later, Kim’s group [29, 30, 31, 32, 33] developed various carbon nanocomposites by using the dry synthesis method also called “mix-and-heat” method. The prepared carbon nanocomposites were utilized as heterogeneous catalysts in various organic reactions. The metallic Ru nanoparticles were decorated on graphene nanosheets (GNSs) by “mix-and-heat” method [29]. Initially, the bi- and few-layered graphene nanosheets (GNSs) were obtained from graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) by a solution-phase exfoliation method. The obtained GNSs were chemically treated with concentrated H2SO4 and HNO3 to create oxygen functional groups (▬COOH, ▬C〓O, ▬C▬O▬C▬, and ▬OH) on the surface of GNSs. The resultant f-GNSs were used for the decoration of Ru nanoparticles. In a typical preparation, Ru(acac)3 was added into f-GNS and mixed well by a mortar and pestle under ambient conditions. Then, the homogeneous mixture of f-GNS and Ru(acac)3 was calcinated at 300°C for 3 h under an argon atmosphere. The morphology of the resultant nanocomposite (GNS-RuNPs) was found to be excellent. Ultrafine Ru nanoparticles were homogeneously dispersed on the surface of GNSs. Interestingly, the size of these attached Ru nanoparticles was found to be below 3.0 nm. Similarly, GNPs-RuO2NPs was prepared by a simple “mix-and-heat” method. Figure 3 shows the schematic illustration for the preparation of GNPs-RuO2NPs, TEM images, RuO2 particle distribution, XPS, XRD patterns, and Raman of GNPs-RuO2NPs. Later, CuO/MWCNTs [30], RuO2/MWCNTs [31], and GNPs-RuO2NPs [32] were synthesized by the dry synthesis method. It was demonstrated that the SWCNTs were also utilized to successfully decorate the RuO2 via dry synthesis method [33]. Astonishingly, the mean diameter of the RuO2 nanoparticles attached to SWCNTs was found to be about 0.9 nm. The BET surface area of RuO2/SWCNT was found to be 416 m2 g−1. Moreover, Raman and XPS results confirmed that the RuO2 nanoparticles were strongly attached on the surface of SWCNTs.

Figure 3.

(a) Schematic illustration for the preparation of GNPs-RuO2NPs, (b and c) TEM images, (d) RuO2 particle distribution, (e and f) XPS, (g) XRD patterns, and (h) Raman spectra of GNPs-RuO2NPs (from Gopiraman et al. [32]).


3. Carbon nanocomposites catalyzed organic reactions

Recently, carbon nanocomposites have been widely used as heterogeneous catalysts in various organic transformations. Less than 10% of the chemical processes in chemical industries are still conducted without the addition of catalyst [34]. The catalytic products such as organic building blocks, pharmaceuticals, natural products, and agricultural derivatives are very valuable in chemical industries [35]. Numerous metal catalysts (supported and unsupported) are reported for the industrially important organic transformations. Carbon nanocomposites, particularly structural carbon (graphene and CNTs) based materials, are recently being used as heterogeneous catalysts in organic transformations. In fact, the high surface area, fine dispersion, stability, reusability, and easy recovery are the key factors. Moreover, the immobilization of metal nanoparticles onto the carbon support has revealed more versatility in carrying out the highly selective catalytic processes [36]. In comparison with CNTs, graphene or GO has been preferred due to its low cost, large-scale preparation, and less health risk.

3.1. Noble metals supported carbon catalysts

Pd nanoparticles supported carbon materials have been widely used as heterogeneous or semi-heterogeneous catalysts for C▬C coupling reactions, such as Mizoroki-Heck, Suzuki-Miyaura, and Sonogashira reactions [37]. These cross-coupling reactions are the most efficient methods for the construction of C▬C bonds. The Pd as a catalyst can assemble C▬C bonds between various functionalized substrates allowed researcher to achieve the reactions that were previously impossible (or possible with multiple steps) [38]. Hence, these methodologies have found extensive use in organic synthesis and material science. Moreover, these cross-coupling reactions found to play an important role in pharmaceutical, fine chemical, and agrochemical industries.

Li et al. [39] demonstrated Pd-graphene nanocomposites as an efficient nanocatalyst for Suzuki reaction. The Pd-graphene nanocomposites showed an efficient catalytic activity toward Suzuki reaction in water under aerobic condition for a short time. Scheme 1 shows the Suzuki reaction of iodobenzene with phenylboronic acid catalyzed by Pd-graphene nanocomposites. The catalyst is not only efficient but also easily recovered and reused several times for the low-cost and environmentally friendly synthesis of biaryls. Using 1.1 mol% of Pd-graphene nanocomposite with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 100°C, the catalytic system affords 100% of yield with 95.5% selectivity. Interestingly, the catalyst can be reused at least for 10 times (at 10th cycle, the yield was 78.6%).

The complete recovery and excellent reusability are the major advantages of using heterogeneous catalysts [40]. However, in most of the heterogeneous catalytic systems, the isolation of catalysts from the reaction mixture by conventional filtration methods is inefficient and time consuming. Therefore, magnetically recoverable carbon nanocomposites have gained much attention due to it easily and complete recovery of the catalyst from reaction mixture. Fe3O4 and Pd nanoparticles were decorated on sulfonated graphene (s-G) by a facile chemical approach [41]. The prepared carbon nanocomposite Pd/Fe3O4/s-G was used as an excellent semi-heterogeneous catalyst for the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction in an environmentally friendly solvent (water/ethanol (1:1)) under ligand-free ambient conditions (Scheme 2). It was found that even a low amount of catalyst Pd/Fe3O4/s-G (0.15 mol% Pd) is also enough to achieve 97% of the product after 30 min of the reaction time. The small size and homogeneous distribution of Pd nanoparticles on the Fe3O4/s-G matrix are the main reason for the excellent catalytic activity. The activity of Pd/Fe3O4/s-G did not deteriorate even after 10th cycle, which may be due to the easy and efficient magnetic separation of the catalyst and the high dispersion and stability of the catalyst in an aqueous solution. At 10th cycle, the Pd/Fe3O4/s-G catalyst gave 84% of the product. Similarly, magnetically recoverable Pd/Fe3O4 nanoparticles supported graphene nanosheets (Pd/Fe3O4/G) were prepared for Suzuki and Heck coupling reactions (Figure 4) [42]. The Pd/Fe3O4/G system gave excellent yields over a broad range of highly functionalized substrates in both Suzuki and Heck coupling reactions. With 7.6 wt% of Pd, the Pd/Fe3O4/G worked well in Suzuki cross-coupling reaction with a high turnover number (TON) of 9250 and turnover frequency (TOF) of 111,000 h−1. Due to the good magnetic property of the Pd/Fe3O4/G, it was easily recovered using a simple magnet and reused for 10 times (Figure 4).

Scheme 2.

Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction catalyzed by Pd/Fe3O4/s-G catalyst (from Elazab et al. [41]).

Figure 4.

Pd/Fe3O4/G catalyzed (a) Suzuki cross coupling, (b) Heck coupling reactions, (c) the reaction mixture with Pd/Fe3O4/G, and (d) separation of spent catalyst from reaction mixture using a simple magnet (from Hu et al. [42]).

Similarly, various Pd nanoparticles supported graphene nanocomposites were prepared and used as an excellent nanocatalyst for the cross-coupling reaction. Pd nanoparticles supported graphitic carbon nitride (Pd/g-C3N4) was prepared through a one-step photodeposition strategy, and it was used for Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions by Sun and coworkers [43]. They found that the Pd/g-C3N4 was worked well at room temperature without any phase transfer agents, toxic solvents, and inert atmosphere. Under the optimized conditions, the Pd/g-C3N4 achieved a complete conversion (100%) of the reactant and a high yield of 97% for biphenyl. Unlike other supports, the g-C3N4 with plenty of nitrogen-containing anchor sites was a suitable platform for Pd atoms, which could favor fine dispersion and stabilization of the ultrafine Pd nanoparticles on g-C3N4. Siamak et al. [44] used single- or multi-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs and MWCNTs) as a support for the decoration of Pd nanoparticles. Both the supported catalysts (Pd/MWCNT)M and (Pd/SWCNT)M) were successfully employed in Suzuki cross-coupling reactions with a wide variety of functionalized substrates. Interestingly, they noticed that the MWCNTs supported Pd nanoparticles catalyst (Pd/MWCNT)M) showed slightly better yield when compared with SWCNTs supported Pd catalyst (Pd/SWCNT)M). They concluded that the superior catalytic activity and excellent reusability of (Pd/MWCNT)M mainly due to the larger diameter of the MWCNTs (20–150 nm) offer stronger surface interactions and provide large number of anchoring sites for the Pd nanoparticles, thus facilitating the deposition of the greater number of Pd nanoparticles on the surface of MWCNTs with strong attachment.

In organic synthesis, multi-component reactions (MCRs) are very important and essential for the synthesis of diverse complex molecules through a combination of three or more starting materials in a one-pot reaction [45]. For instance, synthesis of propargylamine through coupling reaction of aldehydes, amines, and alkynes (A3 coupling) is one of the important MCRs. The propargylamines are highly valuable in the synthesis of various biologically active compounds and natural products [46]. To synthesis the propargylamines, graphene-based composite with silver nanoparticles (Ag-G) was prepared througha simple chemical route by Salam and coworkers [13]. After being optimized the reaction conditions, the scope of the catalytic was extended. The catalytic system worked well for a wide range of substrates including aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes, including those bearing functional groups such as ▬OH, ▬Cl, and ▬Br additions. The Ag-G is air-stable, heterogeneous, cost-effective, easily recoverable, and reusable without loss in activity and selectivity. Scheme 3(a) shows three-component (A3) coupling reaction catalyzed by the Ag-G. Moreover, the Ag-G catalyst is also suitable for the synthesis of triazoles from anilines by one-pot two-step click reaction in water medium at room temperature (Scheme 3(b)). The excellent catalytic activity is due to the synergistic effect of GO. In fact, GO has high adsorption nature toward reactants through p-p stacking interactions. Hence, the GO could help the reactant to go closer to the Ag nanoparticles on GO, leading to good contact between the reactant and Ag on GO. In addition, electron transfer from the GO to Ag nanoparticles increases the local electron concentration, facilitating the uptake of electrons by reactant molecules [13].

Scheme 3.

Ag-G catalyzed (a) three-component (A3) coupling reaction and (b) synthesis of triazoles from anilines (from Salam et al. [13]).

The catalytic conversion of nitrophenols to valuable aminophenols in water by using NaBH4 is one of the important organic conversions [47]. In general, the nitrophenols are the major organic pollutants, which can be found in industrial and agricultural wastewaters. They are highly water soluble and stable in the soil and thus cause harmful effects to human beings, animals, and agricultural plants [48]. Very recently, a simple and efficient method for the reduction of nitrophenols to aminophenols was developed by using carbon nanocomposites as a catalyst. The catalytic products (aminophenols) can be used as anticorrosion-lubricant, corrosion inhibitor, photographic developer, and analgesic and antipyretic drugs [49]. Ag nanoparticles supported carbon nanofiber composites (CNFs/AgNPs) were fabricated for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol with NaBH4 in water [50]. The TEM images confirmed that very fine Ag nanoparticles were homogenously dispersed on the CNFs (Figure 5). The results showed an excellent catalytic activity of CNFs/AgNPs in the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. The reason for the superior catalytic activity of CNFs/AgNPs is mainly due to the high surface areas and synergistic effect on delivery of electrons between CNFs and Ag nanoparticles. Notably, the CNFs catalyst could be easily recycled at least for three times without loss in its activity. Possible catalytic mechanism is elucidated schematically in Figure 5(e). Similarly, Wang et al. [51] found that Au nanoparticles supported functionalized CNTs [with cyclotriphosphazene-containing polyphosphazenes (PZS)] (Au@PZS@CNTs nanohybrids) are highly suitable catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol.

Figure 5.

(a and b) TEM images of CNFs/AgNPs, (c) UV-vis absorption spectra during the catalytic reduction of 4-NP over CNFs/AgNPs, (d) reusability test, and (e) postulate mechanism of the catalytic reduction of 4-NP with the CNFs/AgNPs (from Zhang et al. [50]).

Among noble metals, Ru has shown the ability to catalyze a remarkable range of organic transformations because of its wide range of oxidation states (−2 to +8) and tunable properties [52]. The Ru metal is well known for oxidation-reduction and cross-coupling reactions. The catalytic products are high-functional components in the perfume industry and pharmaceuticals. So far, several Ru nanoparticles supported CNTs or GO catalyst are developed for the organic transformations [53, 54]. Kim’s group prepared various Ru or RuO2 nanoparticles supported carbon nanocomposites and used as heterogeneous catalysts in organic transformation [29, 31, 32, 33]. For example, 0.5–3 nm size of metallic Ru nanoparticles decorated graphene nanosheets (GNSs) was used for the oxidation of alcohols [29]. Results revealed that various alcohols (aliphatic, aromatic, alicyclic, benzylic, allylic, amino, and heterocyclic alcohols) can be oxidized into their corresponding carbonyl compounds in good to excellent yields with high selectivity (Scheme 4). Very interestingly, a 0.036 mol% Ru (5 mg) of catalyst (GNS-RuNPs) was more than enough for complete oxidation of alcohols (the lowest amount of catalyst so far reported), which shows the merit of the GNS support. The formation of active Ru-oxo species during the reaction was confirmed. The GNS-RuNPs was found to be highly efficient, chemoselective, heterogeneous, stable, and reusable. The GNS-RuNPs catalyst was reused for four times without significant loss in its catalytic activity. After 4th cycle, the used GNS-RuNPs were calcinated at high temperature and used for transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds. It was concluded that the excellent catalytic activity of GNS-RuNPs is due to the smaller size of the Ru nanoparticles, higher surface area, strong interaction between Ru nanoparticles and GNSs, and an effective dispersion of the catalyst in the reaction medium. Similarly, RuO2NPs/MWCNTs [31] and RuO2NRs/GNPs [55] were prepared and used for both aerial oxidation of alcohols and transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds. Aliphatic and aromatic tert-amine oxides (amine N-oxides) are essential and key components in the formulation of several cosmetic products as well as in biomedical applications. The GNPs-RuO2NPs demonstrated excellent catalytic activity toward oxidation of tertiary amines to their corresponding N-oxides in good to excellent yields [32]. The results showed that the scope of the reaction can be extended to various aliphatic, alicyclic, and aromatic tertiary amines.

Scheme 4.

Ru-graphene catalyzed (a) oxidation of alcohols, (b) transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds, and (c) chemoselectivity oxidation of alcohols (from Gopiraman et al. [29]).

Imines are very important moieties for the formation of fine chemicals, biologically active compounds, and their intermediates [56]. Interconnected ruthenium dioxide nanoparticles (RuO2NPs) anchored graphite oxide nanocatalyst (RuO2/GO) with good BET surface area (285 m2/g) were prepared and used as a catalyst for the synthesis of imines (Scheme 5) [21]. Generally, the graphene-based nanocomposites are often suffered from the lower BET surface area due to the face-to-face aggregation of graphene sheets. However, in case of RuO2/GO, the interconnected RuO2 network strongly prevented the further aggregation of GO, leading to the high-specific surface area of RuO2/GO. It was noticed that a broad range of amines including less reactive aliphatic amines can be transformed by the RuO2/GO to obtain the corresponding imines in good yields (98–58%) with an excellent selectivity (100%). In addition, an indirect two-step protocol was adopted for the coupling of alcohols and amines to obtain imines, and the results were found to be excellent. The reusability, stability, and heterogeneity of RuO2/GO were also investigated. The authors claimed that this is the most efficient RuO2-based nanocatalyst for the synthesis of imines among those reported to date. Similarly, ultrafine RuO2 nanoparticles (RuO2NPs) with 0.9 nm in size were immobilized on SWCNTs by a straightforward “dry synthesis” method and used it for Heck olefination of aryl halides (Scheme 6) [33]. Although Ru has showed good catalytic activity toward Heck reaction, the bromo- and chloroarenes are less reactive. Interestingly, the SWCNTs supported RuO2 catalyst worked well for the olefination of less reactive chloro- and bromoarenes. In case of supported heterogeneous catalysts, the activity is dependent on the nature of the support, metal-support interaction, and the particle size. It was believed that the inert SWCNTs might be transformed to a very active catalyst through the strong interactions between RuO2 and carbon vacancies.

Scheme 5.

RuO2/GO catalyzed (a) self-coupling of amines, (b) cross coupling of aniline with substituted primary amines, and (c) oxidative coupling of benzyl alcohol and substituted primary amines (from Yuan et al. [21]).

Scheme 6.

RuO2/SWCNT catalyzed Heck type olefination of aryl halides (from Gopiraman et al. [33]).

3.2. Non-noble metal supported carbon nanocomposites

Due to less cost, high activity, and less toxic nature, non-noble (Ni, Cu, Fe, Al, V, Ce, and Mn) nanoparticles are extensively employed studied as efficient catalysts for the organic transformations [57]. Particularly, Ni, Cu, and Fe nanoparticles have been widely studied for the organic conversion. Formamides are valuable intermediates in the synthesis of pharmaceutically important compounds [58]. Fakhri et al. [59] prepared Cu nanoparticles supported GO catalyst (rGO/CuNPs), and it was used for the synthesis of formamides and primary amines (Scheme 7). It was demonstrated that the rGO/CuNPs are highly efficient and reusable. Similarly, highly sustainable and versatile carbon nanocomposite CuO/GNS was prepared and used as catalysts for base-free coupling reactions (Scheme 8) [24]. Under very mild reaction conditions (CuO/GNS 0.7 mol%, acetonitrile 5 mL, air atmosphere, 3.5–12 h, 82°C), the CuO/GNS demonstrated outstanding catalytic activity in terms of yield (52–98%) and TON/TOF under base-free reaction conditions. A wide range of aromatic aldehydes, amines, and alkynes were employed to extend the scope of the catalytic system. In addition to the heterogeneous, stable, and reusable nature, the versatility of CuO/GNS was realized from the higher yield in aza-Michael reaction (Scheme 7(b)). After use, the GNS and CuO NPs (as CuCl2) were successfully recovered from the u-CuO/GNS (Figure 6). The recovered GNS and CuCl2 can be used for other applications. Recently, a highly efficient and cost-effective CuO/carbon-nanoparticle catalyst (CuO/CNP) was prepared by a simple “mix-and-heat” method and used for the self-coupling of amines [24]. The CuO/CNP demonstrated excellent catalytic activity toward the synthesis of imines under optimal reaction conditions involving 12 h of reaction time, 25 mg of catalyst, air atmosphere, and 110°C. A wide range of amines (aromatic, aliphatic, alicyclic, and heterocyclic amines) were efficiently catalyzed by CuO/GNS. Heterogeneity, stability, and reusability of CuO/CNP were found to be excellent.

Scheme 7.

rGO/Cu NPs catalyzed (a) formylation of different arylboronic acids and (b) amination of different arylboronic acids (from Fakhri et al. [59]).

Scheme 8.

CuO/GNS catalyzed (a) three-component coupling of aldehyde, amine, and alkynea and (b) aza-Michael reaction of amines with acrylonitrile (from Gopiraman et al. [24]).

Figure 6.

(a) Reusability and heterogeneity tests of CuO/GNS, (b) TEM images of used CuO/GNS, (c) photographic image showing the recovery of GNS and CuCl2 from used CuO/GNS, and (d) TEM images of recovered GNS (from Gopiraman et al. [24]).

Nitrogen-containing heterocycles including imidazole and its derivatives are prevalent structural motifs in various fields such as biological, pharmaceutical, and material sciences [60]. They are highly efficient antibacterial, antimalarial, antiviral, antimycobacterial, and antifungal compounds. Gopiraman and coworkers [30] have prepared highly efficient and reusable CuO/MWCNT catalyst for N-arylation of imidazole (Scheme 9). It was found that a 0.98 mol% (5 mg) of the CuO/MWCNT was sufficient for the efficient N-arylation of imidazole. The results showed that this is the smallest amount of catalyst used for N-arylation of imidazole reported to date. Chemical and physical stability, heterogeneity, and reusability of CuO/MWCNT were found to be excellent. After 4th cycle, MWCNTs were successfully separated from the used CuO/MWCNT, and it was confirmed. Based on the results obtained, it was concluded that the good catalytic activity of CuO/MWCNT is due to high surface area and effective dispersion of the CuO/MWCNT in the reaction medium.

Scheme 9.

CuO/MWCNT catalyzed N-arylation of imidazole with various aryl halides (from Gopiraman et al. [30]).

Formic acid is often produced from biomass cellulose as well as from fats and oils. This simple acid can be used for storage of hydrogen for different applications [61]. Several metal catalysts including Pt and Cu were employed to decompose formic acid [62]. However, the stability and reusability of the catalysts are limited because the sintering of Cu leads to deactivation in catalytic reactions. Bulushev et al. [63] Cu nanoparticles supported N-doped expanded graphite oxide for the decomposition of formic acid. They showed that the problem of sintering of Cu leaching could be resolved by N-doping of the carbon support. The N-doping leads to a strong interaction of the Cu species with the support by pyridinic nitrogen atoms present in the carbon support. The results showed that the N-doped Cu catalyst has good stability in the formic acid decomposition even at 478 K for at least 7 h on-stream and a significantly higher catalytic activity.

Kamal et al. [64] prepared GO-based nanocomposite (CuO@GO), and it was utilized for ligand-free and solvent-free C▬N and C▬S cross-coupling reactions with weak bases such as tri-ethylamine (Scheme 10). They found that the CuO@GO is a simple and efficient catalyst for solvent- and ligand-free C▬S cross-coupling reactions in the presence of weak bases and relatively mild reaction conditions by using the CuO@GO catalytic system. In addition, the CuO@GO was readily separated by centrifugation and could be reused six times under the solvent-free conditions with only a marginal loss of catalytic activity. Catalytic conversion of biomass-derived acids to valuable products is an important process in various chemical industries. Similarly, Ni nanoparticles supported reduced graphene oxide (Ni/RGO) was prepared and used as a heterogeneous catalyst for the C▬S cross-coupling reaction between aryl halides and thiols (Scheme 11) [65]. They found that the catalytic performance is mainly dependent on the sizes of the Ni nanoparticles. Moreover, the electron-rich planar surface of RGO helps in stabilizing the nanoparticles and prevents agglomeration.

Scheme 10.

CuO@GO catalyzed (a) S-arylation of various thiols with different aryl halides, (b) S-arylation of various thiols with different aryl chlorides, (c) reactions of various iodobenzenes with thiourea, and (d) cascade C▬S and C▬N cross coupling of aryl ortho-dihalides and ortho-aminobenzenethiols (from Kamal et al. [64]).

Scheme 11.

Ni/RGO-40 catalyzed C▬S cross coupling between aryl halide and thiol (from Sengupta et al. [65]).

Very recently, carbon black (CB) supported Ni catalyst (Ni/CB) has been prepared by a facile method using NiCl2 as the nickel source and hydrazine hydrate as the reducing agent [66]. The Ni/CB catalyst showed excellent activity toward hydrogenation of nitrophenols in water at room temperature. Results showed that the synergistic effect of nano-Ni and carbon black, the presence of oxygen functional groups on carbon black for anchoring Ni atoms, strong adsorption ability for organic molecules, and good conductivity for electron transfer from the carbon black to Ni nanoparticles are the main reason of the superior catalytic activity of the Ni/CB. Moreover, the Ni/CB catalyst is not only cheap but also magnetically separable, and therefore, this approach facilitates achieving the cost-effective reduction of nitrophenols to aminophenols. Similarly, Saravanamoorthy et al. [67] prepared highly efficient and cost-effective NiO-based carbon nanocomposite (NiO/CNP) by a simple “mix-and-heat” method. The NiO/CNP exhibited that high-rate constant (kapp) values of 4.2 × 10−2 s−1 and 3.06 × 10−2 s−1 were calculated for the reduction of 4- and 2-nitrophenols. Interestingly, the catalyst worked well for the transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds under mild reaction conditions (5 mg of NiO/CNP, 9 h of reaction time, 2 mmol of NaOH, air atmosphere, and room temperature). It was found that the NiO/CNP composite is chemoselectivity and heterogeneous in nature, stable, and reusable.

Nitrogen-doped carbon materials are found to be highly efficient support for metal nanoparticles [68]. In fact, the N-dopants in the carbon matrix act as efficient anchoring sites or defects for enhancing the nanoparticle nucleation and reducing the nanoparticle size [69]. Interestingly, the N-dopants can modify the electronic structure of the carbon matrix and tune the activity of the sp2 carbon and metal nanoparticles, thus promoting the higher catalytic activity. In addition, the hydrophilicity and basicity of carbon supports can be improved by N-doping; therefore, the N-doped carbon materials could be effectively used to prepare catalysts in the aqueous phase. However, the recent studies on the N-doped carbon supports are mainly focused on noble metals. Very recently, Nie et al. [70] prepared porous N-doped carbon black supported Ni catalyst (Ni/NCB) by a simple chemical method. The prepared Ni/NCB catalyst showed high performance in the hydrogenation of vanillin (4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde) to 2-methoxy-4-methylphenol under mild conditions at low hydrogen pressure (0.5 MPa) and mild temperature (<150°C), which is significantly superior to other frequently used Ni catalysts. The nanostructure of Ni/NCB, intimate interaction between the Ni nanoparticles and the N species, and lower oxidation state are the main reason for higher catalytic activity of Ni/NCB. Moreover, the Ni/NCB catalyst is cost-effective and easily separable.

The Fe3O4 nanoparticles have played a crucial role as a heterogeneous catalyst due to its environmentally benign, high catalytic activity, good magnetic separation performance, and high chemical stability [71]. Huo et al. [72] prepared graphene-Fe3O4 nanocomposite for the A3 coupling of aldehydes, alkynes, and amines (Scheme 12). The catalytic system produced a diverse range of propargylamines in a moderate to high yield under mild conditions. Interestingly, this catalyst could be reused up to eight times with essentially no loss of activity. Moreover, the separation and reuse of graphene-Fe3O4 were very simple, effective, and economical. Similarly, Stein and coworkers [58] prepared Fe nanoparticles supported GO for the preparation of hydrogenation of different olefins and alkynes with H2.

Scheme 12.

Graphene-Fe3O4 nanocomposite catalyzed A3 coupling of aldehydes, alkynes, and amines (from Huo et al. [72]).

3.3. Bimetallic carbon nanocomposites

Bimetallic alloy nanoparticles show an enhancement in the catalytic properties owing to the synergistic effects between the two or more distinct metals [73]. In particular, carbon materials supported bi- or multi-metallic nanocomposites are often show dramatic change in the catalytic activity when compared with the mono metallic carbon supported catalysts. Babu et al. [17] prepared bimetallic Au-Ag nanoparticles supported single-layer graphene (SLG) nanocomposites (Au-Ag/SLG) for the hydroarylation, C-arylation, and hydrophenoxylation reactions under mild and ligand-free conditions (Scheme 13). They found that the catalytic activity of the Au-Ag/SLG found to be better than the mixture of monometallic nanocatalysts (Au/SLG and Ag/SLG). Interestingly, more than twofold synergy was obtained by this bimetallic nanocatalyst (Au-Ag/SLG). Usage of meager amount of precious metals (0.09 mol% of Au and 0.22 mol% of Ag) and very good reusability made this catalytic system economically feasible. Similarly, Lv and coworkers [74] prepared porous Pt-Au nanodendrites supported on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets (Pt-Au pNDs/RGOs) for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. They found that the Pt-Au pNDs/RGOs exhibited significantly enhanced catalytic performance toward the reduction of 4-nitrophenol, as compared to commercial Pt black and home-made Au nanocrystals. The reason for the enhancement in the catalytic activity of the Pt-Au pNDs/RGOs is due to its unique interconnected nanostructures of Pt-Au pNDs, which provide more available active sites and the improved mass transport by using RGOs as a support, along with the synergistic effects between Pt and Au.

Scheme 13.

Au-Ag/SLG catalyzed (a) hydroarylation of alkynes with arenes, (b) direct arylation of 1,1-diphenylethylenes with iodobenzene, and (c) hydrophenoxylation of alkynes with substituted phenols (from Babu et al. [17]).

Aryl-substituted alkynes are versatile intermediates in the formation of various agrochemicals, medicines, and functional organic molecules [75]. Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction of terminal alkynes with aryl halides is one of the most efficient routes for the construction of substituted aryl alkynes. Supported Pd-Cu catalyst has been found to be highly efficient for the Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction in good yield. Diyarbakir et al. [76] prepared Cu-Pd alloy nanoparticles immobilized GO catalyst (rGO-CuPd) for the Sonogashira cross-coupling reactions of various aryl halides with phenylacetylene (Scheme 14). The rGO-CuPd catalyst worked well for both electron-rich and electron deficient aryl iodides and aryl bromides, affording the targeted biaryl products in high yields. They concluded that the rGO-CuPd catalytic system has obvious advantages such as recyclable, easy to operate, and environmentally friendly over the conventional Sonogashira couplings. Goksu et al. [77] developed bimetallic Ni-Pd nanoparticles supported GO catalytic system for the tandem dehydrogenation of ammonia borane and hydrogenation of nitro/nitrile compounds (Scheme 15). They found that the G-NiPd catalyst is highly active and reusable. Moreover, the reaction can be performed in an environmentally friendly process with short-reaction times and high yields.

Scheme 14.

rGO-CuPd catalyzed Sonogashira couplings of various aryl halides and phenyl acetylene (from Diyarbakir et al. [76]).

Scheme 15.

G-NiPd catalyzed tandem reaction of (a) various R-NO2 compounds and (b) nitrile and/or nitro compounds (from Goksu et al. [77]).


4. Conclusion

In recent days, the metal nanoparticles supported carbon nanocomposites are found to play a significant role in a wide range of potential applications. Due to unique properties including high surface area, the carbon nanocomposites are often used as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for industrially important organic reactions. In order to achieve carbon nanocomposites with excellent physicochemical properties, several methods have been developed so far. In this chapter, we have summarized the recent progress in the research on the preparation methods of carbon nanocomposites (mainly, graphene or graphene oxide and CNTs) and its uses in organic reactions.


  1. 1. Allen MJ, Tung VC, Kaner RB. Honeycomb carbon: A review of graphene. Chemical Reviews. 2010;110:132-145. DOI: 10.1021/cr900070d
  2. 2. Vairavapandian D, Vichchulada P, Lay MD. Preparation and modification of carbon nanotubes: Review of recent advances and applications in catalysis and sensing. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2008;626:119-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.07.052
  3. 3. Bohua W, Yinjie K, Xiaohua Z, Jinhua C. Noble metal nanoparticles/carbon nanotubes nanohybrids: Synthesis and applications. Nanotoday. 2011;6:75-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.12.008
  4. 4. Zhen-Bo W, Peng-Jian Z, Guang-Jin W, Chun-Yu D, Ge-Ping Y. Effect of Ni on PtRu/C catalyst performance for ethanol electrooxidation in acidic medium. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2008;112:6582-6587. DOI: 10.1021/jp800249q
  5. 5. Julkapli NM, Bagheri S. Graphene supported heterogeneous catalysts: An overview. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40:948-979
  6. 6. Qin YL, Wang J, Meng FZ, Wang LM, Zhang XB. Efficient PdNi and PdNi@ Pd-catalyzed hydrogen generation via formic acid decomposition at room temperature. Chemical Communications. 2013;49:10028-10030. DOI: 10.1039/C3CC46248J
  7. 7. Joo SH, Park JY, Renzas JR, Butcher DR, Huang WY, Somorjai GA. Size effect of ruthenium nanoparticles in catalytic carbon monoxide oxidation. Nano Letters. 2010;10:2709-2713.DOI: 10.1021/nl101700j
  8. 8. Krasheninnikov AV, Lehtinen PO, Foster AS, Pyykko P, Nieminen RM. Embedding transition-metal atoms in graphene: Structure, bonding, and magnetism. Physical Review Letters. 2009;102:126807. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.126807
  9. 9. Beletskaya IP, Cheprakov AV. The Heck reaction as a sharpening stone of palladium catalysis. Chemical Reviews. 2000;100:3009-3066. DOI: 10.1021/cr9903048
  10. 10. Deng D, Xiao L, Chung IM, Kim IS, Gopiraman M. Industrial-quality graphene oxide switched highly efficient metal- and solvent-free synthesis of β-ketoenamines under feasible conditions. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2017;5:1253-1259. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02766
  11. 11. Sanjib B, Lawrence TD. A novel approach to create a highly ordered monolayer film of graphene nanosheets at the liquid−liquid interface. Nano Letters. 2009;9:167-172. DOI: 10.1021/nl802724f
  12. 12. Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB, Chandra V, Kim N, Kemp KC, et al. Functionalization of graphene: Covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chemical Reviews. 2012;112:6156-6214. DOI: 10.1021/cr3000412
  13. 13. Salam N, Sinha A, Roy AS, Mondal P, Jana NR, Manirul Islam SK. Synthesis of silver–graphene nanocomposite and its catalytic application for the one-pot three-component coupling reaction and one-pot synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles in water. RSC Adv. 2014;4:10001-10012. DOI: 10.1039/C3RA47466F
  14. 14. Meng Y, Yan X, Wang Y. A simple preparation of Ag@graphene nanocomposites for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of fluorescent anticancer drug. Chemical Physics Letters. 2016;651:84-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2016.03.023
  15. 15. Bozkurt PA. Sonochemical green synthesis of Ag/graphene nanocomposite. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2017;35:397-404. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.10.018
  16. 16. Peng L, Zhang J, Yang S, Han B, Sang X, Liu C, et al. Ultra-small gold nanoparticles immobilized on mesoporous silica/graphene oxide as highly active and stable heterogeneous catalysts. Chemical Communications. 2015;51:4398-4401. DOI: 10.1039/C4CC09131K
  17. 17. Babu SG, Gopiraman M, Deng D, Wei K, Karvembu R, Kim IS. Robust Au–Ag/graphene bimetallic nanocatalyst for multifunctional activity with high synergism. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016;300:146-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.101
  18. 18. Daoush WM, Imae T. Fabrication of PtNi bimetallic nanoparticles supported on multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Experimental Nanoscience. 2015;10:392-406. DOI: 10.1080/17458080.2013.838703
  19. 19. Zhang YY, QF YI, Chu H, Nie HD. Catalytic activity of Pd-Ag nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes for the electro-oxidation of ethanol and propanol. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology. 2017;45(17):475, 30026-483, 30029. DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5813
  20. 20. Naota T, Takaya H, Murahashi SI. Ruthenium-catalyzed reactions for organic synthesis. Chemical Reviews. 1998;98:2599-2660. DOI: 10.1021/cr9403695
  21. 21. Yuan G, Gopiraman M, Cha HJ, Soo HD, Chung IM, Kim IS. Interconnected ruthenium dioxide nanoparticles anchored on graphite oxide: Highly efficient candidate for solvent-free oxidative synthesis of imines. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2017;46:279-288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.10.040
  22. 22. Wang P, Zhang G, Jiao H, Liu L, Deng X, Chen Y, et al. Pd/graphene nanocomposite as highly active catalyst for the Heck reactions. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2015;489:188-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.10.044
  23. 23. Sun T, Zhang Z, Xiao J, Chen C, Xiao F, Wang S, et al. Facile and green synthesis of palladium nanoparticles-graphene-carbon nanotube material with high catalytic activity. Scientific Reports. 2013;3:2527. DOI: 10.1038/srep02527
  24. 24. Gopiraman M, Deng D, Babu SG, Hayashi T, Karvembu R, Kim IS. Sustainable and versatile CuO/GNS nanocatalyst for highly efficient base free coupling reactions. ACS Sustainable Chemical Engineering. 2015;3:2478-2488. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00542
  25. 25. Tien HW, Huang YL, Yang SY, Wang JY, Ma CCM. The production of graphene nanosheets decorated with silver nanoparticles for use in transparent, conductive films. Carbon. 2011;49:1550-1560. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.12.022
  26. 26. Akhavan O. The effect of heat treatment on formation of graphene thin films from graphene oxide nanosheets. Carbon. 2010;48:509-519. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.09.069
  27. 27. Lin Y, Watson KA, Fallbach MJ, Ghose S, Smith JG, Delozier MD, et al. Rapid, solventless, bulk preparation of metal nanoparticle-decorated carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano. 2009;3:871-884. DOI: 10.1021/nn8009097
  28. 28. Lin Y, Watson KA, Ghose S, Smith JG, Williams TV, Crooks RE, et al. Direct mechanochemical formation of metal nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2009;113:14858-14862. DOI: 10.1021/jp905076u
  29. 29. Gopiraman M, Babu SG, Khatri Z, Kai W, Kim YA, Endo M, et al. Dry synthesis of easily tunable nano ruthenium supported on graphene: Novel nanocatalysts for aerial oxidation of alcohols and transfer hydrogenation of ketones. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2013;117:23582-23596. DOI: 10.1021/jp402978q
  30. 30. Gopiraman M, Babu SG, Khatri Z, Kai W, Kim YA, Endo M, et al. An efficient, reusable copper-oxide/carbon-nanotube catalyst for N-arylation of imidazole. Carbon. 2013;62:135-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.005
  31. 31. Gopiraman M, Babu SG, Karvembu R, Kim IS. Nanostructured RuO2 on MWCNTs: Efficient catalyst for transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds and aerial oxidation of alcohols. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2014;484:84-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.06.032
  32. 32. Gopiraman M, Bang H, Babu SG, Wei K, Karvembu R, Kim IS. Catalytic N-oxidation of tertiary amines on RuO2 NPs anchored graphene nanoplatelets. Catalytic Science & Technology. 2014;4:2099-2106. DOI: 10.1039/C3CY00963G
  33. 33. Gopiraman M, Karvembu R, Kim IS. Highly active, selective, and reusable RuO2/SWCNT catalyst for Heck olefination of aryl halides. ACS Catalysis. 2014;4:2118-2129. DOI: 10.1021/cs500460m
  34. 34. Clark JH. Solid acids for green chemistry. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2002;35:791-797. DOI: 10.1021/ar010072a
  35. 35. Baur JA, Sinclair DA. Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: The in vivo evidence. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2006;5:493-506. DOI: 10.1038/nrd2060
  36. 36. Machadoa BF, Serp P. Graphene-based materials for catalysis. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2012;2:54-75. DOI: 10.1039/C1CY00361E
  37. 37. Blaser HU, Indolese A, Schnyder A, Steiner H, Studer M. Supported palladium catalysts for fine chemicals synthesis. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2001;173:3-18. DOI: 10.1016/S1381-1169(01)00143-1
  38. 38. Kantam ML, Roy M, Roy S, Sreedhar B, Madhavendra SS, Choudary BM, et al. Polyaniline supported palladium catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling of bromo-and chloroarenes in water. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:8002-8009. DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.05.064
  39. 39. Li Y, Fan X, Qi J, Ji J, Wang S, Zhang G, et al. Palladium nanoparticle-graphene hybrids as active catalysts for the Suzuki reaction. Nano Research. 2010;3:429-437. DOI: 10.1007/s12274-010-0002-z
  40. 40. Deng D, Xiao L, Chung IM, Kim IS, Gopiraman M. Industrial-quality graphene oxide switched highly efficient metal-and solvent-free synthesis of β-ketoenamines under feasible conditions. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2017;5:1253-1259. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02766
  41. 41. Elazab HA, Siamaki AR, Moussa S, Gupton BF, El-Shall MS. Highly efficient and magnetically recyclable graphene-supported Pd/Fe3O4 nanoparticle catalysts for Suzuki and Heck cross-coupling reactions. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2015;491:58-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.11.033
  42. 42. Hu J, Wang Y, Han M, Zhou Y, Jiang X, Sun P. A facile preparation of palladium nanoparticles supported on magnetite/s-graphene and their catalytic application in Suzuki–Miyaura reaction. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2012;2:2332-2340. DOI: 10.1039/C2CY20263H
  43. 43. Sun J, Fu Y, He G, Sun X, Wang X. Green Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction catalyzed by palladium nanoparticles supported on graphitic carbon nitride. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2015;165:661-667. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.072
  44. 44. Siamaki AR, Lin Y, Woodberry K, Connell JW, Gupton BF. Palladium nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes from solventless preparations: versatile catalysts for ligand-free Suzuki cross coupling reactions. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2013;1:12909-12918. DOI: 10.1039/C3TA12512B
  45. 45. Mandel S, Weinreb O, Amit T, Youdim MBH. Brain Research Reviews. 2005;48:379-387. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.12.027
  46. 46. Binda C, Hubalek F, Li M, Herzig Y, Sterling J, Edmondson DE, et al. Crystal structures of monoamine oxidase B in complex with four inhibitors of the N-propargylaminoindan class. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2004;47:1767-1774. DOI: 10.1021/jm031087c
  47. 47. Zhao PX, Feng XW, Huang DS, Yang GY, Astruc D. Basic concepts and recent advances in nitrophenol reduction by gold-and other transition metal nanoparticles. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2015;287:114-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.01.002
  48. 48. Narayanan KB, Sakthivel N. Heterogeneous catalytic reduction of anthropogenic pollutant, 4-nitrophenol by silver-bionanocomposite using Cylindrocladium floridanum. Bioresource Technology. 2011;102:10737-10740. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.103
  49. 49. Chang YC, Chen DH. Catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol by magnetically recoverable Au nanocatalyst. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009;165:664-669. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.034
  50. 50. Zhang P, Shao C, Zhang Z, Zhang M, Mu J, Guo Z, et al. In situ assembly of well-dispersed Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs) on electrospun carbon nanofibers (CNFs) for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Nanoscale. 2011;3:3357-3363. DOI: 10.1039/C1NR10405E
  51. 51. Wang X, Fu J, Wang M, Wang Y, Chen Z, Zhang J, et al. Facile synthesis of Au nanoparticles supported on polyphosphazene functionalized carbon nanotubes for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Journal of Materials Science. 2014;49:5056-5065. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-014-8212-5
  52. 52. Sarmah PP, Dutta DK. Chemoselective reduction of a nitro group through transfer hydrogenation catalysed by Ru 0-nanoparticles stabilized on modified Montmorillonite clay. Green Chemistry. 2012;14:1086-1093. DOI: 10.1039/C2GC16441H
  53. 53. Iqbal S, Kondrat SA, Jones DR, Schoenmakers DC, Edwards JK, Lu L, et al. Ruthenium nanoparticles supported on carbon: An active catalyst for the hydrogenation of lactic acid to 1, 2-propanediol. ACS Catalysis. 2015;5:5047-5059. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b00625
  54. 54. Guerrero-Ruiz A, Bachiller-Baeza B, Rodrıiguez-Ramos I. Catalytic properties of carbon-supported ruthenium catalysts for n-hexane conversion. Applied Catalysis A: General. 1998;173:231-238. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00181-1
  55. 55. Gopiraman M, Babu SG, Khatri Z, Kai W, Kim YA, Endo M, et al. Facile and homogeneous decoration of RuO2 nanorods on graphene nanoplatelets for transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2013;3:1485-1489. DOI: 10.1039/C3CY20735H
  56. 56. Monopoli A, Cotugno P, Iannone F, Ciminale F, Dell-Anna MM, Mastrorilli P, et al. Ionic-liquid-assisted metal-free oxidative coupling of amines to give imines. European Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2014;27. DOI: 5925. DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201402530
  57. 57. Jiang L, Yao M, Liu B, Li Q, Liu R, Lv H, et al. Controlled synthesis of CeO2/graphene nanocomposites with highly enhanced optical and catalytic properties. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2012;116:11741-11745. DOI: 10.1021/jp3015113
  58. 58. Stein M, Wieland J, Steurer P, Tclle F, Mlhaupt R, Breit B. Iron nanoparticles supported on chemically-derived graphene: Catalytic hydrogenation with magnetic catalyst separation. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis. 2011;353:523-527. DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201000877
  59. 59. Fakhri P, Jaleh B, Nasrollahzadeh M. Synthesis and characterization of copper nanoparticles supported on reduced graphene oxide as a highly active and recyclable catalyst for the synthesis of formamides and primary amines. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2014;383-384:17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2013.10.027
  60. 60. Catarzi D, Colotta V, Varano F, Calabri FR, Filacchioni G, Galli A, et al. Synthesis and Biological evaluation of analogues of 7-Chloro-4,5-dihydro-4- oxo-8-(1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline-2-carboxylic Acid (TQX-173) as novel selective AMPA receptor antagonists. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2004;47:262-272. DOI: 10.1021/jm030906q
  61. 61. Zacharska M, Bulusheva LG, Lisitsyn AS, Beloshapkin S, Guo Y, Chuvilin AL, et al. Factors influencing the performance of Pd/C catalysts in the green production of hydrogen from formic acid. ChemSusChem. 2017;10:720-730. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201601637
  62. 62. Grasemann M, Laurenczy G. Formic acid as a hydrogen source – recent developments and future trends. Energy & Environmental Science. 2012;5:8171-8181. DOI: 10.1039/C2EE21928J
  63. 63. Bulushev DA, Chuvilin AL, Sobolev VI, Stolyarov SG, Shubin YV, Asanov IP, et al. Copper on carbon materials: Stabilization by nitrogen doping. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2017;5:10574-10583. DOI: 10.1039/C7TA02282D
  64. 64. Kamal A, Srinivasulu V, Murty JNSRC, Shankaraiah N, Nagesh N, Reddy TS, et al. Copper oxide nanoparticles supported on graphene oxide-catalyzed S-arylation: An efficient and ligand-free synthesis of aryl sulfides. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis. 2013;355:2297-2307. DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201300416
  65. 65. Sengupta D, Bhowmik K, De G, Basu B. Ni nanoparticles on RGO as reusable heterogeneous catalyst: Effect of Ni particle size and intermediate composite structures in C–S cross-coupling reaction. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2017;13:1796-1806. DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.13.174
  66. 66. Xia J, He G, Zhang L, Sun X, Wang X. Hydrogenation of nitrophenols catalyzed by carbon black-supported nickel nanoparticles under mild conditions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2016;180:408-415. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.043
  67. 67. Saravanamoorthy S, Chung IM, Ramkumar V, Ramaganth B, Gopiraman M. Highly active and reducing agent-free preparation of cost-effective NiO-based carbon nanocomposite and its application in reduction reactions under mild conditions. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2018;60:91-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.10.006
  68. 68. Deng Y, Xie Y, Zou K, Ji X. Review on recent advances in nitrogen-doped carbons: preparations and applications in supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2016;4:1144-1173. DOI: 10.1039/C5TA08620E
  69. 69. Wang H, Maiyalagan T, Wang X. Review on recent progress in nitrogen-doped graphene: synthesis, characterization, and its potential applications. ACS Catalysis. 2012;2:781-794. DOI: 10.1021/cs200652y
  70. 70. Nie R, Yang H, Zhang H, Yu X, Lu X, Zhou D, et al. Mild-temperature hydrodeoxygenation of vanillin over porous nitrogen-doped carbon black supported nickel nanoparticles. Green Chemistry. 2017;19:3126-3134. DOI: 10.1039/C7GC00531H
  71. 71. Cho A, Byun S, Kim BM. AuPd−Fe3O4 Nanoparticle catalysts for highly selective, one-pot cascade nitro-reduction and reductive amination. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis. 2018;360:1253-1261. DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201701462
  72. 72. Huo X, Liu J, Wang B, Zhang H, Yang Z, She X, et al. A one-step method to produce graphene–Fe3O4 composites and their excellent catalytic activities for three-component coupling of aldehyde, alkyne and amine. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2013;1:651-656. DOI: 10.1039/C2TA00485B
  73. 73. Zhang S, Shao Y, Liao HG, Liu J, Aksay IA, Yin G, et al. Graphene decorated with PtAu alloy nanoparticles: facile synthesis and promising application for formic acid oxidation. Chemistry Materials. 2011;23:1079-1081. DOI: 10.1021/cm101568z
  74. 74. Lv JJ, Wang AJ, Ma X, Xiang RY, Chen JR, Feng JJ. One-pot synthesis of porous Pt–Au nanodendrites supported on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets toward catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2015;3:290-296. DOI: 10.1039/C4TA05034G
  75. 75. Sonogashira K. Development of Pd–Cu catalyzed cross-coupling of terminal acetylenes with sp2-carbon halides. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 2002;653:46-49. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-328X(02)01158-0
  76. 76. Diyarbakir S, Can H, Metin O. Reduced graphene oxide-supported CuPd alloy nanoparticles as efficient catalysts for the sonogashira cross-coupling reactions. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015;7:3199-3206. DOI: 10.1021/am507764u
  77. 77. Goksu H, Ho SF, Metin O, Korkmaz K, Garcia AM, Gultekin MS, et al. Tandem dehydrogenation of ammonia borane and hydrogenation of nitro/nitrile compounds catalyzed by graphene-supported NiPd alloy nanoparticles. ACS Catalysis. 2014;4:1777-1782. DOI: 10.1021/cs500167k

Written By

Mayakrishnan Gopiraman and Ick Soo Kim

Submitted: February 23rd, 2018 Reviewed: August 23rd, 2018 Published: November 12th, 2018