Since last couple of decades, environmental issues have been increasing and traveling faster than forest fire, country to region, region to world level territory, which is a serious cause of climate change and global warming. In addition, scarcity of natural resources and air and water pollution badly affect the fauna and flora, human life with different diseases they cause definitely, such like ischaemic heart disease, lung cancer, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease, stroke, Dracunculiasis, Cholera, Hepatitis, Typhoid fever, and Norovirus . While, the green supply chain concept occurs to mitigate environmental degradations and control air, water and waste pollution through the adoption of green practices in business operations. Undeniably, the basic ideology behind green concept is to enhanced environmental sustainability, but firms adopt green concept as “kill two enemies with one bullet”. Because green supply chain can reduce the environmental pollution and production costs and it also can spur economic growth, create competitive advantage in terms of greater customer satisfaction, positive image and reputation and provide better opportunity to export their products in pro-environmental countries . The definition of green idea is expanding with new innovations and techniques to protect environmental sustainability, which can be recognized by corporate social responsibility, green manufacturing, waste reduction, recycling and remanufacturing sustainable/environmental friendly supply chain, green supply chain, etc.
The term sustainable or green supply chain refers to the idea of integrating sustainable environmental processes into the traditional supply chain. This can include processes such as supplier selection and purchasing material, product design, product manufacturing and assembling, distribution and end-of-life management. Instead of mitigating harmful impact of business and supply chain operations, green supply chain involves value addition and/or value creation through the operations of whole chain. Undeniably, reducing air, water and waste pollution is the main goal of green supply chain, while green operations also enhance firms’ performance in terms of less waste manufacturing, reuse and recycling of products, reduction in manufacturing costs, greater efficiency of assets, positive image building, and greater customer satisfaction. Figure 1 displays a green supply chain of child’s crib manufacturer as an example.
Green supply chain makes the applications of the key sustainable development strategy outstand. It emphasizes how green practices can be adopted in firms to mitigate the environmental degradations and increase the economic and operational performance of firms, while Figure 2 illustrates a simple model of green supply chain. Khan et al.  have explained the concepts of sustainable and green supply chain management:
In the World, as the environmental awareness is increasing, firms are facing heavy pressure from different stakeholders including government and customers to mitigate their harmful effect on the environment . Indeed, corporate sector needs to consider integrating their business practices in service and manufacturing industry with sustainability and reducing end-to-end supply chain costs to achieve competitive advantage [1, 9]. Since last couple of decades, growing impacts of global warming, climate change, waste and air pollution issues have involved increasing world-wide attention of experts to think more ecofriendly and find optimum possible solution towards “Green” [10, 11]. Rath  identified GSCM (green supply chain management) plays a part in motivating organizational sustainability. With the environmental concerns rising continuously, GSCM deserves a persistent community concern in developed nations. Further, it has recently woken up the developing nations to the green movement .
2. The role of critical success factors in GSCM
There is no doubt that green supply chain is a relatively new idea, which is gaining popularity so as to improve environmental performance in the whole chain [5, 14]. We have identified the following six key critical success factors for putting green supply chain management into practice to attain better environmental sustainability
Ethical leadership/internal management
2.1 Ethical leadership/internal management
Internal environment management contains support and encouragement from senior managers. Internal management is a key critical success factor for enterprises to adopt green practices. Pressure employees bring about, encouragement and support from environmental-protection motivate senior management. Meanwhile, the perception of environmental risks involved could bring positive change in adoption of green practices [8, 15, 16].
2.2 Customer management
In green supply chains, customers play an important and effective part . Indeed, developing nations’ firms are facing heavy pressure to adopt green practices in their business operations of supply chain to meet their customers’ demand so that they can be competitive in the market . Cooperation with customers becomes very useful to attain fruitful advantages from green supply chain management [7, 18].
2.3 Supplier management
Green supply chain practices are unable to be adopted without active participation of customers and suppliers [19, 20]. Strong collaboration with suppliers enhances incentive systems, boosts the adoption and development of innovative ecofriendly ideas. Technologies, green partnership agreements and openness in implementation of innovative green practices may generate enhancement in operational and environmental performance so as to achieve economic goals of firms .
A number of published researches showed that competence and relevant elements could play a part in green practices implementation in their supply chain [22, 23]. Competitiveness has been perceived as a significant factor to implement green practices rather than organizations’ wish to protect environmental sustainability. Implementing green practices in firms’ business operations may also be dated back to additional voluntary for competitive factors .
A number of researchers found the significance of societal factors for attaining environmental friendly practices objectives [15, 22, 24]. With growing attention of regulatory bodies and awareness of customers on environment, firms have to exchange end-to-end information regarding their supply chain operations’ effect on local community and people lives . In addition, NGOs (nongovernment organizations), electronic and social media are more effective in exerting pressure on firms to adopt green practices.
Increasing prominence of environmental concerns has forced regulatory authorities to strict their environmental laws and policies [8, 26]. Governmental bodies have been farming strict environmental laws to control climate change, global warming and pollution; and firms are required to reduce their supply chain’s negative effect on environmental sustainability . Hence, it becomes more and more important for firms in supply chain to have conformity with regulations so as to conducting ecofriendly strategies.
3. Green practices in supply chain management
With numerous green practices adopted, companies in their business and supply chain operations improve their productivity with better environmental growth. While, some well-known green practices are as follows;
3.1 Green material sourcing
Green sourcing means sourcing or purchasing materials and components which have such enviable ecofriendly characteristics as reusability, recyclability and nonuse of hazardous/dangerous chemicals . With more and more concerns on environmental protection, procurement professionals have been motivated to reconsider their existing sourcing, purchasing strategy and their impact on environmental sustainability [29, 30]. The role of ecofriendly purchasing is the involvement of recycling and remanufacturing. Min and Galle  further emphasized green sourcing supporting waste reduction enhances recycling and remanufacturing and other activities in supply chain. Carter and Rogers  did a research to explore the impact of green sourcing on firms’ environmental and financial performance. They concluded that owing to the successful adoption of green purchasing strategy, products’ cost is reduced and environmental performance and financial performance of firms is increased with positive reputation obtained in the market. Zailani et al.  highlighted that ecofriendly purchasing has positive relationship with firms’ operational and environmental performance. Yang et al.  green purchasing was categorized into five main facets: design operation management, supply chain management, environmental authentication, ecological, and external environmental management. They confirmed that green purchasing improved to the overall firms’ performance . The adoption of green purchasing in supply chain and business operations is a reliable tool in mitigating waste, air and water pollution.
3.2 Green marketing
The actions directed to all incorporates and consumers comprise green marketing, a broad range of marketing activities (e.g., planning, production,, process, price, promotion and after-sale service) designed to illustrate the goal of organization to mitigate the harmful effects of their products . Green marketing practice promotes the products with environmental friendly properties [8, 37]. It contains the activities that can satisfy human desires of minimum negative effects on the environmental beauty. In addition, green marketing enhances firms’ competitiveness and financial and environmental performance with positive corporate reputation and image [35, 38].
3.3 Green management
Green management practices (GMP) provide a firm with supplementary sources of information that can enhance their business and environmental objectives . Adoption of green management practices help with improved firm image, increased efficiency, environmental compliance improvement, cost savings, achievement of societal commitment and reduction of carbon emissions etc. [40, 41].
3.4 Green distribution and warehousing
Green distribution and warehousing can reduce the waste and play an important role in energy reduction and value addition of green products in warehousing significantly improve overall performance of organization with better corporate image . Green distribution helps enterprises to obtain superior financial and environmental performance [42, 43].
3.5 Green manufacturing
Green manufacturing practices are to implement socially and environmentally accountable practices to mitigate harmful effects of manufacturing and increased profitability of firms [8, 29]. Green practices in production improve efficiency of processes . This practice involves the application of the green resources, which may lead towards competitive advantage through reduction in products’ cost and improvement in products’ quality. Lean and green manufacturing industry both are working for eliminating waste and improving the efficiency of manufacturing processes . Baines et al.  highlighted the benefits of green manufacturing: green practices in production processes mitigate the bad effects of manufacturing processes on environmental sustainability, while green manufacturing improve operational, environmental and financial performance of firms.
3.6 Ecological design
Luthra et al.  highlighted that 80% impacts on environment from product and process related could be controlled with the adoption of ecological design in supply chain management. Ecological design incorporates many ideas such like using cleaner technology processes, green raw material and components [28, 44]. Green design of products reduces ecological impacts of products during their life [8, 45]. In addition, green design of products also supports reusing, recycling and remanufacturing of products, which not only helps firms to improve their environmental performance but also provide opportunity to reduce their costs .
3.7 Green transportation and reverse logistics
Green transportation and reverser logistics practices provide opportunity to organizations, to improve their image and reduce their costs . Logistics overheads can be saved through promoting transportation system’s efficiency and enhancement of customer association also can be obtained to create more profitability . The logistics activities integrated with rehabilitation comprise the practice of reverse logistics (reusing, recycling, and remanufacturing), which can produce the products that can be used again for customers . Green logistics practice helps firms to reduce their environmental impacts with improved quality and cost reductions .
3.8 Renewable energy and biofuels
Undeniably, global logistical and supply chain operations mainly depend on energy as well as fossil fuel, which are the main cause of climate change, global warming and pollution with greater carbon and greenhouse gas emissions . Renewable energy and biofuels are required in supply chain operations so as to obtain sustainable environmental and economic growth . Anable et al.  highlight that logistics related activities consume greater energy to accomplish their task. Renewable energy and biofuels improve economic performance of firms and also reduce carbon emissions. In addition, fossil fuel is more expensive than biofuels and green energy sources . The strict governmental policies together with customer awareness build pressure on corporate sector to use biofuels and environmental friendly energy in their supply chain operations. The bioenergy mitigates the carbon emissions and also improves profitability of enterprises with better image and reputation building [7, 46].
The cost minimization is considered as the most important factor for firms to implement green practices in their supply chain operations. The implementation of green supply chain initiatives would help to cut down the costs of packaging, components and materials due to use of reused, recycled and remanufactured products. Khan et al. [2, 46] highlighted that green practices provide opportunity to capture new markets and export to pro-environmental countries, while polluted firms are unable to export their products in pro-environmental countries such as USA, Germany, UK and Poland. Undeniably, green supply chain management practices have been a tool for firms to decrease their products’ cost, enhance profitability and increase market share . On the other hand, to improve social performance, firms also adopt green practices in their business activities. Social performance indicates improvement of people’s quality life standard without compromising on environmental beauty. In addition, social performance includes the enhancement of firm image and the improvement of environmental sustainability, as well as reduction in environmental risks .
By adopting GSCM practices, firms may enhance their operational performance through improving products quality and improving delivery service . Green supply chain management initiatives also help organizations to improve their environmental performance such as reduction in carbon emissions, elimination of waste from end-to-end supply chain, effective and strong collaboration with suppliers would decrease their communication costs and easily promote reuse, recycling and remanufacturing . Environment management system (EMS) integrated into firms’ manufacturing strategy will assist the firms to enhance its ecological performance .
Khan SAR, Dong Q. Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms’ performance: An empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017; 24:16829-16844. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9172-5
SAR K, Dong Q, Wei SB, Khalid Z, Yu Z. Environmental logistics performance indicators affecting per capita income and sectoral growth: Evidence from a panel of selected global ranked logistics countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017; 24(2):1518-1531. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7916-2
Handfield R, Walton S, Seegers L, Melnyk S. Green’ value chain practices in the furniture industry. Journal of Operations Management. 1997; 15(4):293-315
Srivastava S. Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2007; 9(1):53-80
Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai K. An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics. 2011; 130(1):1-15
Andic E, Yurt O, Baltacioglu T. Green supply chains: Efforts and potential applications for the Turkish market. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2012; 58:50-68
Khan SAR, Dong QL, Yu Z. Research on the measuring performance of green supply chain management: In the perspective of China. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa. 2016; 27:167-178. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.27.167
Luthra S, Garg D, Haleem A. The impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management towards sustainability: An empirical investigation of Indian automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016; 121:142-158
Gunasekaran A, Spalanzani A. Sustainability of manufacturing and services: Investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics. 2012; 140(1):35-47
Rostamzadeh R, Govindan K, Esmaeili A, Sabaghi M. Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices. Ecological Indicators. 2015; 49:188-203
Mangla S, Madaan J, Chan FT. Analysis of flexible decision strategies for sustainability-focused green product recovery system. International Journal of Production Research. 2013; 51(11):3428-3442
Rath RC. An impact of green marketing on practices of supply chain management in Asia: Emerging economic opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2013; 2(1):78-86
Kumar A, Jain V, Kumar S. A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega. 2014; 42(1):109-123
Madaan J, Mangla S. Decision modeling approach for eco-driven flexible green supply chain. In: Systemic Flexibility and Business Agility. India: Springer; 2015. pp. 343-364
Yusuf YY, Gunasekaran A, Musa A, EI-Berishy NM, Abubakar T, Ambursa HM. The UK oil and gas supply chains: An empirical analysis of adoption of sustainable measures and performance outcomes. International Journal of Production Economics. 2013; 146(2):501-514
Holt D, Ghobadian A. An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 2009; 20(7):933-956
Omkareshwar M. Green marketing initiatives by corporate world: A study. Advances in Management. 2013; 6(3):20-26
Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai KH. Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2007; 15(11):1041-1052
Awasthi A, Kannan G. Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOPR under fuzzy environment. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 2016; 91:100-108
Hu AH, Hsu CW. Critical factors for implementing green supply chain management practice: An empirical study of electrical and electronics industries in Taiwan. Management Research and Review. 2010; 33(6):586-608
Kaushik A, Kumar S, Luthra S, Haleem A. Technology transfer: Enablers and barriers—A review. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management. 2014; 14(2):133-159
Wang Z, Sarkis J. Investigating the relationship of sustainable supply chain management with corporate financial performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2013; 62(8):871-888
Kim J, Rhee J. An empirical study on the impact of critical success factors on the balanced scorecard performance in Korean green supply chain management enterprises. International Journal of Production Research. 2012; 50(9):2465-2483
Gunasekaran A, Irani Z, Papadopoulos T. Modelling and analysis of sustainable operations management: Certain investigations for research and applications. The Journal of the Operational Research Society. 2013; 65(2):806-823
Shen L, Govindan K, Shankar M. Evaluation of barriers of corporate social responsibility using an analytical hierarchy process under a fuzzy environment—A textile case. Sustainability. 2015; 7(3):3493-3514
Jayaram J, Avittathur B. Green supply chains: A perspective from an amerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics. 2015; 164:234-244 [Accessed: 16 March 2018]
Mangla SK, Kumar P, Barua MK. Flexible decision approach for analyzing performance of sustainable supply chains under risks/uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 2014; 15(2):113-130
Eltayeb TK, Zailani S, Ramayah T. Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2011; 55(5):495-506
Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Vafadarnikjoo A. Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications. 2015; 42(20):7207-7220
Handfield R, Walton SV, Sroufe R, Melnyk SA. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 2002; 141(1):70-87
Min H, Galle WP. Green purchasing practices of US firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2001; 21(9):1222-1238
Carter CR, Rogers DS. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. 2008; 38(5):360-387
Zailani S, Govindan K, Iranmanesh M, Shaharudin MR, Chong YS. Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: The Malaysian case. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015; 108:1115-1122
Yang CL, Lin SP, Chan YH, Sheu C. Mediated effect of environmental management on manufacturing competitiveness: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics. 2010; 123(1):210-220
Chen CC, Shih HS, Shyur HJ, Wu KS. A business strategy selection of green supply chain management via an analytic network process. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 2012; 64(8):2544-2557
Groening C, Sarkis J, Zhu Q. Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017:1-19
Polonsky MJ. An introduction to green marketing. Electronic Green Journal. 1994; 1(2):1-10
Ko E, Hwang YK, Kim EY. Green marketing functions in building corporate image in the retail setting. Journal of Business Research. 2013; 66(10):1709-1715
Pane Haden SS, Oyler JD, Humphreys JH. Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management: An exploratory analysis. Management Decision. 2009; 47(7):1041-1055
Luthra S, Garg D, Haleem A. Empirical analysis of green supply chain management practices in Indian automobile industry. Journal of Institution of Engineers (India): Series C. 2014; 95(2):119-126
Kang Y, Ryu MH, Kim S. Exploring sustainability management for telecommunications services: A case study of two Korean companies. Journal of World Business. 2010; 45(4):415-421
Baines T, Brown S, Benedettini O, Ball P. Examining green production and its role within the competitive strategy of manufacturers. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 2012; 5(1):53-87
Prajogo D, Chowdhury M, Yeung AC, Cheng TCE. The relationship between supplier management and firm’s operational performance: A multi-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Production Economics. 2012; 136(1):123-130
Gungor A, Gupta SM. Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: A survey. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 1999; 36(4):811-853
Sarkis J. Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices. European Journal of Operational Research. 1998; 107(1):159-174
Khan SAR, Zhang Y, Anees M, Golpîra H, Lahmar A, Dong Q. Green supply chain management, economic growth and environment: A GMM based evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 185:588-599
Mousazadeh M, Torabi SA, Pishvaee MS. Green and reverse logistics management under fuzziness. In: Supply Chain Management under Fuzziness. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; 2014. pp. 607-637
Wu C, Barnes D. Partner selection in green supply chains using PSO—A practical approach. Production Planning and Control. 2016; 27(13):1041-1061. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2016.1177233
Anable J, Brand C, Tran M, Eyre N. Modelling transport energy demand: A socio-technical approach. Energy Policy. 2012; 41:125-138
Gold S, Seuring S. Supply chain and logistics issues of bio-energy production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2011; 19(1):32-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.009
De Giovanni P, Vinzi VE. Covariance versus component-based estimations of performance in green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics. 2012; 135(2):907-916
Kleindorfer PR, Singhal K, Wassenhove LN. Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management. 2005; 14(4):482-492
Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai KH. Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its relationship to organizational improvement: An ecological modernization perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2012; 29(1):168-185