Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Carbon-/Zeolite-Supported TiO2 for Sorption/Photocatalysis Applications in Water Treatment

Written By

Florica Manea and Corina Orha

Submitted: March 12th, 2018 Reviewed: August 8th, 2018 Published: November 5th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80803

Chapter metrics overview

973 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The role of various carbon forms, i.e., activated carbon and carbon nanotubes/nanofibers as support for TiO2 in drinking water treatment, is discussed. Also, TiO2 supported onto zeolite that acts bifunctionally as a sorbent/photocatalyst for drinking water treatment is presented. The main contaminants of natural organic matter (NOM), arsenic species, and nitrogen compounds from drinking water sources by the type of groundwater and surface water can be removed/degraded by sorption/photocatalysis using TiO2 supported onto carbon and/or zeolite. TiO2 supported on powdered activated carbon (PAC-TiO2), granular activated carbon (GAC-TiO2), and zeolite (Z-TiO2), namely, supported TiO2, was synthesized through the sol-gel method, and TiO2 and multiwall carbon nanotubes/carbon nanofibers dispersed within epoxy matrix (CNT-TiO2-Epoxy, CNF-TiO2-Epoxy), namely, TiO2 composite, were obtained through the two-roll mill method. Kinetic study results through specific mathematic models allowed to elucidate some mechanistic aspects for sorption and photocatalysis for the application in drinking water. The intercalation of the carbon- and zeolite-supported TiO2 layers into a filtering system allows to develop a self-cleaning filtering system in drinking water.


  • carbon-supported TiO2
  • zeolite-supported TiO2
  • sorption
  • photocatalysis
  • drinking water treatment

1. Introduction

Water pollution is a concern for the European population, and the quality objectives for the water protection are set through the EU Water Framework Directive. Also, one of the targets of the Clean Water and Sanitation Goal within the Millennium Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda is to achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all by 2030 [1].

The challenges in treating drinking water are dependent on the water sources, mainly consisted of surface and groundwater. Problematic substances in the drinking water sources can include organic matter and/or different inorganic contaminants, e.g., nitrite, nitrate, and ammonium.

One of the common and advanced unitary processes used in drinking water technology is sorption designed as activated carbon- or zeolite-based filtering. Due to more hydrophobic nature of the activated carbon, it has been recognized for elimination of a broad range of hazardous materials belong to the organic class from aqueous solutions. Activated carbon is less efficiently applied for removal of simple inorganic metallic ions or small-size anions [2].

Zeolite is also a known filtering material that exhibits a high sorption capacity [3] characterized by a selectivity degree in relation with the type of zeolite based on its specific properties of molecular sieve and ionic exchanger [4, 5, 6]. The main disadvantage is represented by the fouling of the filtering material surface.

Photocatalysis process is considered very promising for advanced water treatment based on the oxidation and reduction reaction for in situ generation of highly reactive transitory species (i.e., H2O2, OH, O2, O3) for mineralization of organic compounds and disinfection by-products [7, 8], through the electron-hole pair formation under UV or solar irradiation.

Among various semiconductors that have been investigated in photocatalysis application, titanium dioxide (TiO2) has attracted much attention due to its physical and chemical stability, negligible toxicity, the resistance to corrosion, redox selectivity, high photostability, and easy preparation [3, 9, 10]. By UV irradiation onto TiO2 surface, under conditions of photon energy (hv) greater than or equal to the bandgap energy of TiO2, the electron will be photoexcited from the valence band to the empty conduction band leading to an empty unfilled valence band that corresponded to the hole and thus creating the electron-hole pair. The electron-hole pair is involved within various oxidative/reductive reactions including the degradation of organics.

For the drinking water treatment, the main disadvantage of TiO2-based photocatalysis is given by the necessity of the further separation phase to remove TiO2 from water, in order to avoid the loss of catalyst particles and introduction of the new pollutant of contamination of TiO2 in the treated water [11]. A solution to avoid the introduction of a new separation phase includes catalyst fixation onto various supports, e.g., activated carbon [12] and mesoporous clays [13]. The catalyst immobilization on different supports allows getting catalyst composites, which are considered a new generation of catalyst with different properties in relation with those of solely TiO2. According to the obtaining methods, there are a large variety of composites [14], from which in this chapter will be discussed:

  • Composites with TiO2 coated (supported) on the support of activated carbon by the type of powder and granular and zeolite [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]

  • Hybrid composites, which comprise a matrix material of polymer (epoxy) in which TiO2 and the support of carbon nanotubes or nanofibers are dispersed [22, 23, 24]

Taking into account that the catalyst represents the key of the performance of the photocatalytic application, the catalyst-based composite should exhibit various effects related to the components and the obtaining methods [14], such as simple supporting effect, stabilizing the microstructure or active components, formation of new compounds which act as active components or stabilizers, having two or more functions, controlling of redox performances, and influencing the kinetics of adsorption/desorption and diffusion of molecules.

In this chapter, two types of composites obtained by two different methods and applied in the drinking water treatment are presented:

  • TiO2 supported on powdered activated carbon (PAC-TiO2), granular activated carbon (GAC-TiO2), and zeolite (Z-TiO2), namely, supported TiO2.

  • TiO2 and multiwall carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibers dispersed within epoxy matrix (CNT-TiO2-Epoxy, CNF-TiO2-Epoxy), namely, TiO2 composite. The carbon and zeolite components were selected taking into account their utility as sorbent for natural organic matter [20, 21, 22, 23, 24].


2. TiO2-based composites obtaining and morphostructural properties

The granular, powdered activated carbon and natural zeolite were functionalized with TiO2 using titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) as TiO2 precursors by sol-gel method (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of obtaining PAC-TiO2, GAC-TiO2, and Z-TiO2.

For the synthesis process of the composite materials consisting of carbon nanotubes or carbon nanofibers mixed with TiO2 particles within epoxy matrix, the two-roll mill technique was applied (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Schematic diagram of obtaining CNT-TiO2-Epoxy and CNF-TiO2-Epoxy.

The morphology of all synthesized materials was observed by a scanning electronic microscope (SEM, Inspect S PANalytical model) coupled with the energy-dispersive X-ray analysis detector (EDX). Figure 3ac presents SEM images for PAC-TiO2, GAC-TiO2, and Z-TiO2, which show the layered structure of activated carbon and a nonuniform distribution and more or less agglomeration of TiO2 nanoparticles onto the surface. It can be also seen that TiO2 only adhered to the surface of zeolite without the insight of the inside of the zeolite pores.

Figure 3.

SEM images for (a) PAC-TiO2, (b) GAC-TiO2, and (c) Z-TiO2.

The results of semiquantitative elemental analysis of the synthesized material surface were presented by EDX spectra indicating Ti and C presence for PAC-TiO2 and GAC-TiO2 and, also, the presence of Ti on the natural zeolite (Figure 4). Small amounts of Al, Si, and S were identified within the activated carbon as both powdered and granular as impurities and the presence of K and Ca within the zeolite composition were found.

Figure 4.

EDX spectra for (a) PAC-TiO2, (b) GAC-TiO2, (inset: GAC), and (c) Z-TiO2 (inset: zeolite).

For composite materials that used epoxy as matrix, it can be noticed that TiO2 nanoparticles were attached on the nanostructured carbon surface, and, also, a well dispersion of carbon and TiO2 nanoparticles within epoxy matrix is noticed (Figure 5a,b). A slight more uniform distribution of TiO2 nanoparticles seems to be for CNF in comparison with CNT [22]. The presence of TiO2 particles in composite materials was confirmed by EDX spectra (Figure 6).

Figure 5.

SEM images for (a) CNF-TiO2-Epoxy and (b) CNT-TiO2-Epoxy.

Figure 6.

EDX spectra for (a) CNF-TiO2-epoxy and (b) CNT-TiO2-epoxy.

X-ray diffraction measurements were carried out to determine the crystal phase composition using a PANalytical X’PertPRO MPD diffractometer. Figure 7 presents the XRD patterns of GAC-TiO2, PAC-TiO2, and Z-TiO2. The anatase form of TiO2 is the predominant phase, identified by diffraction lines at 2θ of 25.3, 38.6, 48, 54, and 62.97° [25]. Also, the XRD results revealed that the major component of natural zeolite used in this study is clinoptilolite (2θ ~ 10°; 12°; 22.5°; 30°) [26].

Figure 7.

XRD pattern for PAC-TiO2, GAC-TiO2, and Z-TiO2.

Figure 8 presents the XRD patterns of composite materials based on nanostructured carbon. It is obviously the presence of anatase form of TiO2 as predominant phase, with the intensity of diffraction lines higher due to the higher TiO2 loading within the composite composition in comparison with the supported TiO2.

Figure 8.

XRD pattern for CNT-TiO2 and CNF-TiO2.


3. TiO2-based composite application for sorption and photocatalysis-unitary processes in drinking water treatment

Various types of carbon and zeolite are reported as good sorbents for various types of pollutants from water [2, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24]. The easy separation of these materials from water and their good sorption capacity that is important in the first stage of the overall photocatalysis process make them very promising as support for the TiO2 immobilization.

Humic acids (HAs) represent a main component of natural organic matter that gives the organic loading of drinking water sources, which must be removed or destroyed because of water quality regulations. Also, the presence of HAs before the chlorination step as disinfection could lead to trihalomethane and other toxic by-product generation. The efficiency of supported TiO2materials for the sorption and the photocatalysis of HA from water, expressed as HA removal efficiency, is presented comparatively in Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Evolution of HA removal efficiency by sorption and photocatalysis for 50 mg·L−1 HA onto (a) GAC-TiO2, (b) Z-TiO2, and (c) PAC-TiO2.

The HA removal efficiency was calculated using the following equation:

Removal efficiency=c0ctc0×100%E1

where C0 and Ct are the concentrations of HA in aqueous solution in terms of A254 at initial time and at any time t, respectively (mg·L−1).

The sorption was assessed as the preliminary and compulsory step of the overall photocatalysis process taking into consideration also the possibility to use the supports as simple sorbents and only for self-cleaning to apply the photocatalysis. The sorption capacity for HA is better for PAC-TiO2, while the photocatalytic activity is better for GAC-TiO2. This should explain the morphological structure and the sizes of the particles. The lower particle size leads to the higher sorption capacity, while for the photocatalysis application the size of support decreased the photocatalytic activity may be due to the finer suspension should hinder the UV irradiation penetration to the TiO2 surface.The sorption and the photocatalysis capacities of TiO2 composite materialsassessed in terms of HA removal efficiency showed the superiority of CNT-TiO2-Epoxy versus CNF-TiO2-Epoxy. It can be noticed that a slight photocatalytic activity was found for both materials (Figure 10).

Figure 10.

Evolution of removal efficiency of 25 mg·L−1 HA using CNT-TiO2-epoxy by photocatalysis (a), sorption (b), CNF-TiO2-epoxy by photocatalysis (c), and sorption (d).

For HA removal, the sorption capacity of tested materials increased in order:


The evaluation of photocatalytic activity after the sorption step showed an increasing order:


These behaviors should be explained by the available sites of the carbon in the sorption process and the available sites of TiO2 in the photocatalysis process, which are in direct relations with the morphology, size, and the bonding type between TiO2, carbon, and zeolite support. Also, epoxy resin hindered the available sites, which decreased both sorption capacity and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 composite materials.

In order to determine some mechanism aspects regarding the sorption and photocatalysis processes, several kinetic models must be checked to find the optimum one. Two different kinetic models are used to fit the experimental data, i.e., pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models [27].

3.1. Pseudo-first-order kinetic model

The pseudo-first-order kinetic adsorption was suggested by Lagergren (1898) for the adsorption of solid/liquid systems. It can be expressed in integrated form as shown in Eq. (2):


where, k1 is the rate constant of adsorption (min−1) and qt is the adsorption loading of dye (mg·g−1) at time t (min).

3.2. Pseudo-second-order kinetic model

The pseudo-second-order kinetics, proposed by Ho and Mckay [28], is expressed in Eq. (3):


where, k2 is the rate constant of the pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics (g·mg−1·min−1) and qe is the equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg·g−1).

Pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order kinetic models were tested for fitting the sorption and photocatalysis experimental data (Tables 1 and 2). The linear plots of t/qtvs. tshow that the experimental data agree with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model for the HA adsorption. The calculated qevalues agree very well with the experimental data, and the correlation coefficients for the pseudo-second-order kinetic model are higher than 0.90 in almost all cases. These indicate that the adsorption of HA from water onto materials obeys the pseudo-second-order kinetic model that predicts an exponential decay of concentrations as a function of time. The pseudo-first-order kinetic model was not appropriate for fitting the sorption experimental data, while the photocatalysis experimental data were fitted well with both kinetic models with the correlation coefficient higher than 0.90. However, there is a significant difference between calculated and experimental qe using the pseudo-first-order kinetic model that limits its interpretation (Table 2), and, thus, it means that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model is most appropriate. Besides the kinetic parameter, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model informed about the significance of the sorption step within the overall photocatalysis process. It is well known that the reaction rate and kinetics are influenced by many experimental parameters, e.g., HA concentration, catalyst dose, and pH [22].

HA concentration (50 mg·L−1)
HA concentration (25 mg·L−1)

Table 1.

Pseudo-second-order kinetic parameters for HA sorption and photocatalysis.

HA concentration (50 mg·L−1)
HA concentration (25 mg·L−1)

Table 2.

Pseudo-first-order kinetic parameters for HA photocatalysis.

Based on the results presented in Table 1, it can be seen that the PAC-TiO2 exhibited higher sorption capacity and the best kinetics for HA removal and the GAC-TiO2 exhibited the best photocatalytic kinetics, which are in accordance with the efficiency results. The worse results were achieved for TiO2 compositematerials, which can be explained by the presence of epoxy matrix that reduced the active sites for the sorption and the photocatalysis. Also, the main difference was found between CNT-TiO2-Epoxy and CNF-TiO2-Epoxy due to the morphology and sizes of the nanostructured carbon component, better for CNT in comparison with CNF. For these types of material, the photocatalytic activity was better also for CNT-TiO2-Epoxy.

Arsenic is a common contaminant in drinking water supplies especially for groundwater sources. Inorganic arsenic speciation in water consists of arsenite (AsIII) and arsenate (AsV), but As(III) is more problematic because of its high toxicity and the difficulty to be removed from water [29]. The comparative results regarding As(III) removal in the presence of HA showed a good efficiency for both sorption and photocatalysis using supported TiO2material (Figure 11).

Figure 11.

Time evolution of As(III) concentration during sorption and photocatalysis using PAC-TiO2 and GAC-TiO2.

Another common problem of groundwater source used for drinking water supply is given by the presence of ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate. Nitrate could not be removed from water on these tested materials, while ammonium and nitrate were removed from Z-TiO2 (Figure 12).

Figure 12.

Time evolution of NO2 concentration during photolysis (a), photocatalysis using Z-TiO2 (b), of NH4+ concentration during photocatalysis using Z-TiO2 (c), and natural zeolite (d).

The results showed that ammonium is removed by sorption on the zeolite based on ionic exchange, which is proven by comparison with natural zeolite, while the nitrite removal is based on its oxidation process during UV irradiation, which is enhanced by the presence of the Z-TiO2 photocatalyst.

Since activated carbon is a versatile sorbent class for the retention of a wide spectrum of organic compounds and arsenic(III) and the zeolite exhibited an adsorption/ion-exchange capacity for ammonium, nitrite, and heavy metals, their common presence as mixed materials broadens the spectrum of contaminants that can be removed from the water.


4. Conclusions

In this chapter, two types of composites obtained by two different methods and applied in the drinking water treatment were studied:

  1. TiO2 supported on powdered activated carbon (PAC-TiO2), granular activated carbon (GAC-TiO2), and zeolite (Z-TiO2), namely, supported TiO2, obtained through sol-gel method.

  2. TiO2 and multiwall carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibers dispersed within epoxy matrix (CNT-TiO2-Epoxy, CNF-TiO2-Epoxy), namely, TiO2 composite, obtained through the two-roll mill method.

The sorption and photocatalysis studies showed that for HA removal, the sorption capacity of tested materials increased in order, PAC-TiO2 > Z-TiO2 > GAC-TiO2 > CNT-TiO2-Epoxy>CNF-TiO2-Epoxy, and for the photocatalytic activity, GAC-TiO2 > Z-TiO2 > PAC-TiO2 > CNT-TiO2-Epoxy> CNF-TiO2-Epoxy.

The removal of pollutants/impurities dissolved in water is based, on the one hand, on the sorption capacity of activated carbon and/or zeolite, which exhibited selectivity for certain impurities dissolved under the lamp-off conditions. On the other hand, but taking into account the sorption phase, by starting the lamp, TiO2 on the active carbon surface and the zeolite acted by photocatalytic activity generating oxidation and reduction processes that cause the degradation and mineralization of the dissolved organic compounds and the transformation of the inorganic contaminants into the compounds that can be retained on the surface material or compounds that do not affect the quality of the water. Also, the oxidation and reduction processes under irradiation conditions allow the destruction of the contaminants and, implicitly, the cleaning of the sorbent surface. A mixture of zeolite and activated carbon as support for TiO2 could exhibit bifunctionality, depending on the water features. Thus, for low loading of water with contaminants that can be adsorbed on the filter material, the lamp is not switched on during system operation but only in the washing/regeneration stage, and for a water loaded with contaminants that cannot be adsorbed on the filter material, the system works with the lamp on, ensuring water decontamination and self-cleaning during operation.



This work was supported by the Romanian National Research Programs PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2016, PED 69/2017.


  1. 1. European Commission Environment, Water Framework Directive. Available from:
  2. 2. Orha C, Lazau C, Pode R, Manea F. Simultaneous removal of humic acid and arsenic (III) from drinking water using TiO2-powdered activated carbon. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology. 2018;19:39-47
  3. 3. Nan Chong M, Jin B, Chow WK, Saint C. Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: A review. Water Research. 2010;44:2997-3027. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039
  4. 4. Wang S, Peng Y. Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2010;156:11-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.029
  5. 5. Paliulis D. Removal of formaldehyde from synthetic wastewater using natural and modified zeolites. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2016;25:251-257. DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/60727
  6. 6. Capasso S, Salvestrini S, Coppola E, Buondonno A, Colella C. Site-energy distribution analysis of humic acids adsorption by zeolitic tuff. Journal of Porous Materials. 2007;14:363-368. DOI: 10.1007/s10934-006-9074-2
  7. 7. Esplugas S, Gimenez J, Conteras S, Pascual E, Rodrıguez M. Comparison of different advanced oxidation processes for phenol degradation. Water Research. 2002;36:1034-1042. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00301-3
  8. 8. Pera-Titus M, Garcıa-Molina V, Banos MA, Gimenez J, Esplugas S. Degradation of chlorophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes: A general review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2004;47:219-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.09.010
  9. 9. Gaya UI, Abdullah AH. Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: A review of fundamentals, progress and problems. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2008;9:1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2007.12.003
  10. 10. Fujishima A, Rao TN, Tryk DA. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2000;1:1-21. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-5567(00)00002-2
  11. 11. Yang GCC, Li CJ. Electrofiltration of silica nanoparticle containing wastewater using tubular ceramic membranes. Separation and Purification Technology. 2007;58:159-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.07.019
  12. 12. Lee DK, Kim SC, Cho IC, Kim SJ, Kim SW. Photocatalytic oxidation of microcystin-LR in a fluidized bed reactor having TiO2-coated activated carbon. Separation and Purification Technology. 2004;34:59-66. DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00175-8
  13. 13. Chong MN, Vimonses V, Lei S, Jin B, Chow C, Saint C. Synthesis and characterisation of novel titania impregnated kaolinite nano-photocatalyst. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2009;117:233-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.06.039
  14. 14. Xie Z, Liu Z, Wang Y, Yang Q, Xu LDW. An overview of recent development in composite catalysts from porous materials for various reactions and processes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2010;11:2152-2187. DOI: 10.3390/ijms11052152
  15. 15. Orha C, Lazau C, Manea F, Ursu D. Effect of carbon nanofiber onto TiO2-modified powder/granular activated carbon for advanced water treatment. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Analytical and Environmental Problems; 9-10 October 2017; University of Szeged, Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry. pp. 244-248
  16. 16. Orha C, Pode R, Manea F, Lazau C, Bandas C. Titanium dioxide-modified activated carbon for advanced drinking water treatment. Process Safety and Environment Protection. 2017;108:26-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.07.013
  17. 17. Lazau C, Ratiu C, Orha C, Pode R, Manea F. Photocatalytic activity of undoped and Ag-doped TiO2-supported zeolite for humic acid degradation and mineralization. Materials Research Bulletin. 2011;46:1916-1921. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.07.026
  18. 18. Orha C, Pop A, Lazau C, Jakab A, Pode R, Manea F. Carbon-zeolite composite materials in advanced drinking water treatment. In: Borchers U, Gray J, Thompson KC, editors. Water Contamination Emergencies: Managing the Threats. 2013. pp. 346-355. DOI: 10.1039/9781849737890-00346
  19. 19. Ratiu C, Manea F, Lazau C, Orha C. Zeolite-supported TiO2 based photocatalysis-assisted electrochemical degradation of p-aminophenol from water. Chemical Papers. 2011;65:289-298. DOI: 10.2478/s11696-011-0009-2
  20. 20. Ilinoiu EC, Pode R, Manea F, Colar LA, Jakab A, Orha C, et al. Photocatalytic activity of a nitrogen doped TiO2 modified zeolite in the degradation of reactive yellow 125 azo dye. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2013;44:270-278. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2012.09.006
  21. 21. Orha C, Lazau C, Ursu D, Manea F. Effect of TiO2 loading on powder-activated carbon in advanced drinking-water treatment. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 2017;216:203-211. DOI: 10.2495/WS170191
  22. 22. Orha C, Manea F, Pop A, Bandas C, Lazau C. TiO2 nanostructured carbon composite sorbent/photocatalyst for humic acid removal from water. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57:14178-14187. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1062433
  23. 23. Orha C, Pop A, Tiponut V, Manea F. Composite material based on silver-doped zeolite and multi-wall carbon nanotubes for humic acid removal. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 2013;12:917-921
  24. 24. Jakab A, Pode R, Pop A, Schoonman J, Orha C, Manea F. TiO2-modified zeolite-carbon nanotubes composite electrode for photoelectrodegradation of pentachlorophenol from water under UV irradiation. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 2017;216:133-142. DOI: 10.2495/WS170191
  25. 25. Neren Ökte A, Sayınsöz E. Characterization and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 supported septiolite catalysts. Separation and Purification Technology. 2008;62:535-543. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.03.011
  26. 26. Ratiu C, Lazau C, Sfirloaga P, Orha C, Sonea D, Novaconi S, et al. Decontaminate effect of the functionalized materials with undoped and doped (Ag) TiO2 nanocrystals. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 2009;8:237-242
  27. 27. Lv L, He J, Wei M, Evans DG, Duan X. Uptake of chloride ions from aqueous solutions by calcined layered double hydroxides: Equilibrium and kinetic studies. Water Research. 2006;40:735-743. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.043
  28. 28. Ho YS, McKay G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochemistry. 1999;34:451-465. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5
  29. 29. Mohan D, Pittman CU Jr. Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents-a critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007;142:1-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006

Written By

Florica Manea and Corina Orha

Submitted: March 12th, 2018 Reviewed: August 8th, 2018 Published: November 5th, 2018