Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Management of Educational Needs of Employees in the Electronics Industry Using English e-Learning Website Programs

Written By

Paul Juinn Bing Tan and Ming-Hung Hsu

Submitted: 24 April 2017 Reviewed: 08 June 2018 Published: 05 November 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.79391

From the Edited Volume

Management of Information Systems

Edited by Maria Pomffyova

Chapter metrics overview

1,414 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


This chapter explores whether customer satisfaction is achieved by English e-learning websites by investigating the views of the employees of Taiwanese electronics corporations who have taken English e-learning training courses. The service quality model of Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry and the technology acceptance model (TAM) were adopted to examine their satisfaction levels. First, in order to provide indicators for perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU) in the TAM, five elements of intangible service quality were utilized, namely reliability, assurance, tangibles, empathy, and responsiveness, indicated in the SERVQUAL model. Second, in order to measure PEOU, PU, and behavioral intention to use under the TAM, a survey was distributed among electronics industry workers at Taiwan’s Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park. The survey data yielded the following key findings: the users’ PU was significantly influenced by PEOU, tangibles, and responsiveness; their PEOU was significantly impacted by assurance, tangibles, and reliability; their PU and behavioral intention to use were significantly influenced by PEOU; their system usage and behavioral intention to use were significantly influenced by PU; and their system usage was significantly impacted by their behavioral intention to use. Overall, the study proposed 13 hypotheses, of which 10 were supported.


  • on-the-job training
  • curriculum for mechanical engineer
  • need analysis
  • English for science and technology
  • satisfaction

1. Introduction

English has become the common language of the world due to trade and politics, which have also promoted the popularity of English usage. The broad usage of English enables a true single market regarding knowledge and ideas [1].

Because Internet technology has become increasingly developed in the twenty-first century, the Internet plays an essential role in our lives. Using the Internet to learn languages is more common than ever before. As Internet technology advances, learning English is not limited to classrooms, and it is more popular to use the Internet to learn English. Through use of the Internet, people can learn English from any location. Instructors can teach English through the Internet instead of traditional teaching methods. E-teaching not only has many advantages and benefits for teaching and learning environments but also provides new directions and new modes of thinking.

1.1. E-learning of English learners in Taiwan

Training is often divided into preservice training and on-the-job training. Most training currently uses the Internet to achieve learning objectives and focuses on language in one of the involved courses. Over the last decade, online learning or e-learning has become an important part of the education agenda around the world. E-learning is becoming an important factor in higher education [2]. Advances in computing and information technology have changed the modes of learning. The development of information technology has influenced the learning flow and reduced the life cycle of learning material as well as learning activities [3]. Information technology is also dramatically affecting the means by which people teach and learn. IT helps people meet, talk, and work together outside of traditional meeting and office spaces. E-learning is the product of digital technology and turns traditional courses into virtual courses. The concept of an online course is the use of virtual environments to replace a part of physical classrooms [4]. E-learning has enabled universities to expand their current geographical reach, to capitalize on new prospective students and to establish themselves as global educational providers [5].

1.2. Motivation of research

  1. To understand the differences between e-service marketing and language educational e-training.

  2. To understand the differences between on-the-job training and preservice training.

1.3. Purposes of the study

This study aimed to address the need for up-to-date knowledge by focusing on the following objectives:

  1. To apply the theory of reasoned action (TRA) and the technology acceptance model (TAM) to investigate their online learning satisfaction.

  2. To understand their online English learning satisfaction.

  3. To examine the Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry (PZB) and TAM models.

  4. To understand electronics corporation employees’ basic criteria and demands for excellent English e-learning websites.

  5. To understand Taiwanese electronics corporation employees’ basic demands for English e-learning website programs.

Broadly, there are two e-learning modes:

  1. Computer-assisted instruction

  2. Distance learning.

E-learning represents a new generation of electronic teaching methods. By connecting to the network, teachers and learners can experience interactive learning on the Internet. In addition to being a new instruction media, e-learning is a new tool and a completely new learning environment; it also overcomes the limitations of traditional teaching environments.

Table 1 lists the benefits and drawbacks of traditional classroom learning and e-learning.

Traditional classroom learningE-learning
Benefits*Instantaneous feedback
*Well-known by both students and teachers
*Provides students with motivation
*Cultivates a community of learners
*Student-centered and student-paced
*Flexible regarding location and time
*More affordable for learners
*Potentially accessible to a worldwide audience
*Provides knowledge without limitations
*Capacity for archiving allows reuse and sharing of knowledge
*Location and time limitations
*More costly to provide
*Lacks instantaneous feedback for asynchronous e-learning
*Requires greater preparation time of instructor
*Causes discomfort in some learners
*Can cause greater confusion, frustration, and anxiety

Table 1.

Traditional classroom learning versus e-learning [6].

Researchers have identified many benefits of e-learning:

Web-based learning has been deemed equivalent to traditional methods regarding learners’ knowledge achievements. Of the two studies evaluating learning efficiency, only one provided evidence that more efficient learning occurred through web-based instruction [7].

E-learning is highly accessible, which refers to a user’s ability to find what is needed immediately.

Internet technologies facilitate the widespread distribution of digital content to many users simultaneously, anytime and anywhere.

Learners have control over the content, learning sequence, pace of learning, time, and media, enabling them to tailor their experience to meet personal learning objectives. E-learning provides a challenging learning environment and individual support to motivate learners and stimulate their curiosity [8].

E-learning provides a challenging learning environment and individual support to motivate learners and stimulate their curiosity [8].

Updating electronic content is easier than updating printed material, and e-learning technologies allow educators to revise their content easily and efficiently. Improved access to educational materials is crucial because learning is often an unplanned experience.

The experience of learning is a personal one, such that an e-learning system that has been effectively designed can inspire learners to engage with the learning content in a more active manner [9].

1.4. Motivation to learn

According to a study by Gardner and Lambert [10], the success in learning a second language depends on both the motivation and aptitude of the learner. In a later study [11], the same scholars suggested that the motivation to engage in language learning can be subdivided into intrinsic-extrinsic motivation and integrative-instrumental motivation. Relatedly, it should be noted that e-learning has been found to assist in enhancing learner motivation, such that accumulating evidence clearly demonstrates that the value of online communication goes beyond that of merely being a useful teaching tool.

1.5. Self-directed learning and its relationship with learning attitudes

Learner-centered methods of learning must be psychologically adapted to by those learners who are more used to teacher-centered approaches. In the view of Holec [13], it is counterproductive to teach learners how to implement self-directed learning because that learning itself would then not actually be self-directed. As such, learners must, according to Holec, teach themselves how to learn in a self-directed manner. In other words, while they may receive some support from their teachers or fellow learners, any training of learner should itself be founded on the method of self-directed learning. In this respect, self-direction can be seen as the cornerstone of both learning how to learn languages and the actual learning of languages itself.

In the most basic terms, self-directed learning consists of learning in which the learners themselves determine the specific goals, progress, and means of evaluating the learning. The related concept of self-access learning has come to be viewed as synonymous with technology-based learning, and autonomy has come to be seen as particularly critical in the context of computer-assisted language learning.

Self-access resource centers and the notion of learner training are among the key innovations in the field of self-directed language learning. For example, scholars from the Centre de Recherches et d’Applications Pédagogiques en Langue in France have asserted that skills related to self-assessment, self-management, and self-monitoring must be developed by adult learners if they are to effectively engage in self-directed learning. In that view, learner training is seen as something akin to self-access, with such training initiated as a means of supporting self-directed learning [12, 13]. Relatedly, learners who receive computer-based instruction have been found to learn in a more efficient manner and to exhibit higher knowledge retention.

1.6. Research model background

1.6.1. The theory of reasoned action

The TRA, which was first proposed by Fishbein and Ajzen [14], is an extensively studied model of intention that has been shown to be effective in explaining and predicting behaviors across a variety of domains. More specifically, as explained by Davis et al. [15, 16], the TRA is a social psychology model that focuses on the factors that determine all consciously intended behaviors [17, 14]. Because the model is a general one, it does not seek to specify whatever beliefs underlie a given behavior. However, in order to apply the TRA model effectively, it is necessary to identify those beliefs that are seen as relevant by the individuals undertaking the behaviors under investigation. In this connection, the method of conducting free response interviews with individuals who represent the population of interest in order to identify five to nine of their relevant beliefs has been suggested by Fishbein and Ajzen [14, 17] and [15, 16]. At the fundamental level, the conceptual framework of the TRA relies upon understanding the various distinctions among attitudes, intentions, beliefs, and behaviors (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Theory of reasoned action (TRA) [17].

1.6.2. Technology acceptance model

The TAM, which was developed and introduced by Davis et al. [15, 16], is essentially an extension of the TRA that has come to be highly influential. Fundamentally, this model addresses the question of how a technology becomes accepted and used by its users. According to the TAM, when a new or unfamiliar technology is introduced to users, they are effectively presented with two specific variables, namely perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU), that are in turn hypothesized to be the key factors in determining whether the technology is accepted by the users [15, 16]. The TRA is used by the TAM as the theoretical basis by which causal associations between these two key factors of PU and PEOU and users’ intentions, attitudes, and actual computer adoption behaviors are specified (Figure 2). Relatedly, the TAM has a much more discrete focus than the TRA because, in spite of the shared use of the term “technology” in their names, the TAM was actually designed to be applied to computer usage behaviors only [15, 16]. That said, it can, in fact, be applied to various types of technology in general.

Figure 2.

Technology acceptance model (TAM) [15, 16].

How PU affects acceptance:

  1. According to the TAM, PU can be defined as the extent to which using a particular technology is seen by a given person as a means of enhancing that person’s job performance [15, 16]. In other words, it refers to the user’s perception of how valuable the technology will be in to performing various job duties, whether by decreasing the time required to complete a given task or enhancing the user’s accuracy.

  2. The degree to which people use a given application is dependent on the degree to which they think it will enhance their job performance [15, 16].

  3. According to Phillips et al. [18], PU can be defined as “the prospective adopter’s subjective probability that applying the new technology from foreign sources will be beneficial to his personal and/or the adopting company’s well-being.”

  4. A number of diverse lines of research have demonstrated the theoretical importance of PU and PEOU as factors determining user behaviors [15, 16].

  5. Davis et al. [15, 16] ascertained that, overall, the correlation of PU with system usage is significantly stronger than that of PEOU, with subsequent regression analysis indicating that PEOU may, in fact, be an antecedent of PU as opposed to being a direct determinant of system usage. In other words, PEOU only affects technology acceptance in an indirect manner via its effects on PU [19].

  6. The TAM hypothesizes that the acceptance of information technology is predicted by PEOU and PU [19].

  7. The TAM was specifically designed to show the acceptance of information technology among users. The model’s primary aim is to provide, by discerning the effects of external variables on internal attitudes, beliefs, and intentions, an explanation of the factors determining computer acceptance [15, 16, 18].

  8. The TAM constitutes a useful means of predicting technology-related usage, attitudes, and satisfaction on the basis of user beliefs and external variables [20].

How PEOU affects acceptance:

  1. According to the TAM, PEOU can be defined as to the extent to which using a particular technology is seen by a given person as effortless or effortful [15, 16].

  2. It is possible for users to see a given application as both useful and excessively difficult to use, such that the benefits of using it are overwhelmed by the exertion necessary to use it [15, 16].

  3. According to Phillips et al. [18], PEOU can be defined as “the degree to which the prospective adopter expects the new technology adopted from a foreign company to be free of effort regarding its transfer and utilization.”

1.6.3. Service quality gap model

The so-called quality revolution that occurred in the 1980s was not limited exclusively to manufacturing; rather, it also influenced various services, organizations, and governmental agencies. The relative importance with which quality management has been viewed since then can thus be easily deduced [21].

The PZB model, which is also known as the service quality gap model, was first proposed by Parasuraman et al. [22]. According to this model, the highest priority of companies with respect to their service outcomes is quality, with quality being directly related to the high expectations of their clients. In this view, the service expectations set by clients are founded upon a company’s behavioral decisions or performance [23]. Relatedly, Parasuraman et al. [22] identified 10 criteria that can be used to undertake an evaluation of a service’s initial quality, with said quality being defined, essentially, as the difference between the service a customer expected to receive and the service the customer actually received. Those 10 evaluation criteria are (1) understanding (2) reliability (3) responsiveness (4) tangibles (5) courtesy (6) communication (7) competence (8) access (9) credibility, and (10) security. It is noteworthy that these criteria incorporate the five key elements for anticipating, delivering, and measuring the services of a company, namely assurance, empathy, reliability, responsiveness, and tangibility. Relatedly, the SERVQUAL model was developed by applying these criteria and the PZB model, allowing the SERVQUAL model, which is commonly referenced in literature on marketing, to measure the discrepancies between expected and perceived service quality [24]. In fact, usage of both the SERVQUAL and PZB models is currently still widespread in the industry.

The PZB model has five gaps, which are illustrated in Figure 3; Bronn [21] also described all five gaps. Notably, respondents with different demographics may have different PU and PEOU due to the five gaps.

Figure 3.

Service quality gap model (PZB model) [22].

In the current study, five factors relating to intangible service quality from the SERVQUAL and PZB models (namely assurance, empathy, reliability, responsiveness, and tangibles) were utilized to establish indicators for PEOU and PU in the TAM. Thereafter, people employed in the electronics industry by companies located at the Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park in Taiwan received a questionnaire designed to measure their PEOU, PU, and behavioral intention to use within the TAM.


2. Method

2.1. Hypotheses

The specific focus of this study was on investigating the satisfaction and motivation of the aforementioned Taiwanese electronics company employees with respect to their use of English e-learning websites. As part of the study, a literature review was performed, and the TAM and PZB models were used to expand upon the five elements of assurance, empathy, reliability, responsiveness, and tangibles. Relatedly, a five-part survey was administered in order to determine the kind of user interfaces preferred by the respondents, to measure the reliability of the English e-learning website services used by the respondents, to determine the specific types of services on the English e-learning websites that were used by the respondents, to investigate the security of said websites, and to measure how satisfied the respondents were with the sites.

Table 2 and Figures 3, 4, 5 present the specific research model and hypotheses that were used in this study.

H1The PU of e-users is positively affected by tangibles.
H2The PU of e-users is positively affected by reliability.
H3The PU of e-users is positively affected by responsiveness.
H4The PU of e-users is positively affected by assurance.
H5The PEOU of e-users is positively affected by tangibles.
H6The PEOU of e-users is positively affected by reliability.
H7The PEOU of e-users is positively affected by responsiveness.
H8The PEOU of e-users is positively affected by assurance.
H9The PU of e-users is positively affected by PEOU.
H10The learning attitude of e-users is positively affected by PEOU.
H11The learning attitude of e-users is positively affected by PU.
H12The learning satisfaction of e-users is positively affected by PU.
H13The learning satisfaction of e-users is positively affected by learning attitude.

Table 2.


Note: PU = perceived usefulness; PEOU = perceived ease of use.

Figure 4.

Research model. Note: PU = perceived usefulness; PEOU = perceived ease of use.

Figure 5.

The research model.

2.2. Participants

Through the combination of a literature review and a questionnaire survey, this study gathered data from 350 respondents working at 10 different companies. The primary aim in doing so was to investigate those Taiwanese electronics corporation employees’ perceptions regarding English e-learning educational courses taken during the course of their employment.


3. Results

This study investigated employees’ satisfaction with their use of English e-learning websites in Taiwanese electronics corporations. We conducted a literature review and described the five main themes of service quality (tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy) to produce a 20-question survey. Specifically, we used the SPSS to examine whether a significant difference exists between employee satisfaction and the age, gender, education, company location, years of work, and work experience of employees.

3.1. Questionnaire results

In total, 500 questionnaires were distributed to the employees, and 357 (71.4%) were returned. Seven of these completed questionnaires were invalid; hence, we only examined 350 of them. Several analysis methods were adopted, including frequency and descriptive one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), to understand the responses to the questionnaires. The results were divided into three parts and are discussed in the following sections.

3.2. Basic information

Frequency and descriptive analyses were used to obtain statistics regarding the background of the employees. The age, gender, education, company location, years of work, and work experience of the employees are described as follows (Table 3).

Table 3.

Respondent demographics.

Male and female respondents accounted for 72 and 28% of the sample, respectively. The respondents were aged between 20 and 70 years; in total, 46.9% of them were 20–30 years old, 35.7% were 31–40 years old, 12.6% were 41–50 years old, 4% were 51–60 years old, and 0.9% were 61–70 years old. Hence, employees aged 20–30 and 31–40 years made up the majority of the companies that we investigated. The studied companies are located in Northern Taiwan (19.7%), Central Taiwan (45.7%), Southern Taiwan (32.9%), and Eastern Taiwan (1.7%). The respondents also had a range of education levels: 7.7% completed senior high school, 8.6% completed junior college, 44.6% had received a Bachelor’s degree, 38% had received a Master’s degree, and 1.1% had received a PhD. In addition, 18.9% of respondents had worked for less than 1 year, 35.1% had worked for 1–3 years, 22% had worked for 4–6 years, 11.7% had worked for 7–9 years, and 12.3% had worked for 10 or more years.

3.3. Reliability and content (expert) validity

Content validity is a subjective test method developed by C. H. Lawshe [25] and is generally used to review items that comprise questionnaires. Specifically, agreement among raters or judges regarding the need to include a particular item in a survey is gaged. Lawshe [25] suggested that the expert subject matter raters on a panel of judges should each reply to the following question with regard to each individual questionnaire item: “Is the skill or knowledge measured by this item ‘essential’, ‘useful but not essential’, or ‘not necessary’ to the performance of the construct?” A given item would then be considered to have at least a degree of content validity if over half of the raters respond that the item is essential (Table 4) [25].

Relationship pathsStandardized coefficients (β)Sig.Coefficient of determination
H12 PU → System usage0.415***0.376
H13 Behavioral intention to use → System usage0.285***
H11 PU → Behavioral intention to use0.341***0.328
H10 PEOU → Behavioral intention to use0.304***
H1 Tangibles → PU0.142**0.429
H2 Reliability → PU0.133
H3 Responsiveness → PU0.051
H4 Assurance → PU0.153*
H9 PEOU → PU0.310***
H5 Tangibles → PEOU0.170**0.347
H6 Reliability → PEOU0.200**
H7 Responsiveness → PEOU0.091
H8 Assurance → PEOU0.251***

Table 4.

Relationship paths.

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Note: PU = perceived usefulness; PEOU = perceived ease of use.

In the present study, four relevant experts were consulted and provided advice regarding the selection of the survey content in light of the study’s research objectives. These experts’ opinions regarding the validity of the measured items were also requested to make certain that the study questionnaire possessed expert validity.

Alpha coefficients exceeding 0.70 indicate that the measured items have an appropriate internal consistency (Table 5) [26].

ItemCronbach’s alphaNumber of item

Table 5.

Reliability statistics.

The analysis results show that PU and behavioral intention for system use have a variation of 37.6%; PU and PEOU for behavioral intention to use have a variation of 32.8%; tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and PEOU for PU have a variation of 42.9%; and tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, and assurance for PEOU have a variation of 34.7%.

3.4. One-way ANOVA

We used a one-way ANOVA to determine the relationship between the questionnaire items and the demographic characteristics of the employees. The questionnaire comprised 24 questions regarding tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and satisfaction, and each item had 4 questions. The results of our analysis are detailed in Tables 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.

Sum of squaresdfMean squareFSig.
The English e-learning website is neat and appealing.Between group6.29541.574
Within group195.659345
The services on a remarkable website are presented in a way that is visually appealing.Between group12.11243.0285.599.000
Within group186.563345.541
The English e-learning website has an up-to-date information technology service.Between group11.39342.8484.834.001
Within group203.295345.589
The appearance of the physical services on the English e-learning website is consistent with the types of services provided to clients.Between group15.31243.8286.526.000
Within group202.357345.587

Table 6.

Relationship between age and tangibles.

Sum of squaresdfMean squareFSig.
The English e-learning website provides services at the promised time.Between group11.80242.9504.896.001
Within group207.912345.603
The English e-learning website performs the service correctly the first time.Between group26.07046.5189.994.000
Within group224.984345.652
When you have a problem, the English e-learning website shows a sincere interest in solving it.Between group30.51847.62911.014.000
Within group238.980345.693
The English e-learning website uses specific English e-content and error-free hardware.Between group13.64343.411
Within group257.811345

Table 7.

Relationship between age and reliability.

Sum of squaresdfMean squareFSig.
The English e-learning website serves clients precisely when English programs are performed.Between group4.51641.1291.455.216
Within group267.738345.776
The English e-learning website provides rapid service.Between group11.89642.9744.800.001
Within group213.764345.620
The English e-learning website is never too busy to respond to requests and provides 24-h service.Between group20.99545.2498.198.000
Within group220.880345.640
The English e-learning website is always willing to help.Between group18.77144.6937.546.000
Within group214.546345.622

Table 8.

Relationship between age and responsiveness.

Sum of squaresdfMean squareFSig.
The English e-learning website has specific knowledge to answer employees’ questions.Between group8.50542.126
Within group239.852345
The English e-learning website is consistently courteous.Between group12.07243.0184.744.001
Within group219.496345.636
The behavior of the English e-learning website instills confidence in employees.(functioning)Between group12.08343.0214.157.003
Within group250.685345.727
Employees feel safe when interacting with a remarkable English e-learning website.Between group11.38242.8464.023.003
Within group244.046345.707

Table 9.

Relationship between age and assurance.

Sum of squaresdfMean squareFSig.
The English e-learning website gives clients individual attention.Between group7.20341.8012.866.023
Within group216.765345.628
The English e-learning website is focused on your best interests.Between group13.53243.3835.077.001
Within group229.885345.666
The English e-learning website understands your specific needs.Between group17.26744.3176.699.000
Within group222.322345.644
The English e-learning website motivates your interest.Between group13.23043.3084.567.001
Within group249.867345.724

Table 10.

Relationship between age and empathy.

3.5. Conclusion

The following key findings were indicated by the data collected:

  • Hypothesis 2 was not supported.

  • Hypothesis 3 was not supported.

  • Consistent with results previously reported by Tan [27], Hypothesis 7 was also not supported.

  • Most of the respondents in the study consisted of men aged 20 to 40 years old.

In this study, research hypotheses were derived and tested by examining past studies and results from the statistical analysis of empirical data. The primary focus of the study is the learning satisfaction of students in digital technical English courses, and the antecedent variable in this case is service quality. The study examined English e-learning educational training courses to determine whether English e-learning websites provide customer satisfaction. In contrast to most tangible learning approaches, learners who participate in digital learning come from a more diverse range of backgrounds. The employees of a technology company can receive training via professional digital courses and achieve customer satisfaction through digitized learning.

This study verified the relevance of the technology acceptance and PZB models to digital learning research. When digital learners perceived that the digital learning system did not require time and effort to understand, and was also easy to master and use, they started to feel that the use of the system could help them to gain the knowledge that they were seeking and to believe that the system was useful. When users perceived that the digital learning system was useful, they started to adopt a positive attitude toward the system, which led to a willingness among users to continue using the system. When digital learners perceived that the digital learning system was easy to use, they started to adopt a more positive attitude toward the system, which led to a willingness among learners to continue using the system. Overall, the attitude of users with respect to the use of the digital learning system was influenced by their subjective perceptions of the system. This study did not uncover any significant relationship between reliability and perceived usefulness, or between responsiveness and perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. The study proposes the prioritization of a simple and clear design during the planning stage of the digital learning system [28]. This should cover the design of the interface and the provision of clear instructions to users in order to increase the system’s ease of use. As discussed above, company employees who participate in digital learning have to develop solutions that take into account the customer’s point of view. These employees need to respond to the demands of customers enthusiastically. Through the digital learning interface, employees can interact with customers and guide them on the use of the interface, thus making it easier for these customers to familiarize themselves with the interface. Through these two approaches, the implementation of professional English education and training courses can be further improved [29].


4. Suggestions

4.1. Suggestions for web designers

Web designers should develop websites that are easy to use and that provide service information immediately as it is updated [27]. Clients are also interested in personal security and privacy, which should be protected. Many adults do not understand how to use a computer; however, because these people are also target customers, a teaching plan for using a company’s website should be provided to them. Moreover, an optimal website must be well-designed [27, 29].

4.2. Suggestions for future researchers

English e-learning websites have become important tools for companies across the globe. However, the English e-learning quality must be improved for users. Current learning strategies not only utilize traditional education methods but also use English e-learning websites. The following suggestions are for future researchers:

(1) Thoroughly research clients’ satisfaction with the crucial factors of English e-learning websites.

(2) Seek to understand employees of electronics corporations regarding their use of English e-learning websites and provide solutions when problems are encountered.

(3) Investigate whether English e-learning websites are effective and satisfactory for learners.


  1. 1. British Council. The English Effect; 2013.
  2. 2. Frommann U, Phan TT. On the didactical potential of E-learning courseware. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS working group VI/1-VI/2. ‘Tools and Techniques for E-Learning’, 1-3 June 2005, Potsdam, Germany
  3. 3. Rosenberg MJ. E- Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001
  4. 4. Huei MC. Simulation-based investigation of multi-agent process in e-learning system. Master thesis. Department of Information Management, Tatung University; 2003
  5. 5. Singh G, O'Donoghue J, Worton H. A study into the effects of E-learning on higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 2004;2(1):14-15
  6. 6. Zhang D, Zhao JL, Zhou L, Nunamaker JF. Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM. 2004;47(5):75-79
  7. 7. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine. 2006;81(3):207-212
  8. 8. Littig P. New media-supported learning today and tomorrow: Recommendations for the next generation of education and training concepts supported by new learning media. Industrial and Commercial Training. 2006;38:86-92
  9. 9. Tan PJB, Hsu M. Designing a system for English evaluation and teaching devices: A PZB and TAM model analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2018;14(6):2107-2119. DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/86467
  10. 10. Gardner RC, Lambert WE. Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1959;13:266-272
  11. 11. Gardner RC, Lambert WE. Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers; 1972
  12. 12. Dickinson L, Carver D. Learning how to learn: Steps towards self-direction in foreign language learning in schools. English Language Teaching Journal. 1980;35:1-7
  13. 13. Holec H. Learner training: Meeting needs in self-directed learning. In: Altman HB, James CV, editors. Foreign Language Learning: Meeting Individual Needs. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1980. pp. 30-45
  14. 14. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975
  15. 15. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 1989;35(8):982-1003
  16. 16. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 1989;13:319-340
  17. 17. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980
  18. 18. Phillips LA, Calantone R, Lee MT. International technology adoption: Behavior structure, demand certainty and culture. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 1994;9:16-28
  19. 19. Ma Q, Liu L. The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. 2004;16(1):59-72
  20. 20. Al-Gahtani SS, King M. Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behaviour and Information Technology. 1999;18(4):277-297
  21. 21. Bronn PS. Adapting the PZB service quality model to reputation risk analysis and the implications for CSR communication. Journal of Communication Management. 2012;16:77-94
  22. 22. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing. 1985;49:41-50
  23. 23. Niranjan TT, Metri BA. Client-vendor-end user triad: A service quality model for IS/ITES outsourcing. Journal of Services Research. 2008;8:123-138
  24. 24. Kang GD, James J. Service quality dimensions: An examination of Gronroos’s service quality model. Managing Service Quality. 2004;14(4):266-277
  25. 25. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975;28:563-575
  26. 26. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18(1):39-50
  27. 27. Tan PJB. English e-learning in the virtual classroom and the factors that influence ESL (English as a second language): Taiwanese citizens’ acceptance and use of the modular object-oriented dynamic learning environment. Social Science Information. 2015;54(2):1-18
  28. 28. Tan PJ, Hsu MH. Developing a system for English evaluation and teaching devices. In: 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), 13 May 2017, Sapporo, Japan. pp. 938-941. DOI: 10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988596
  29. 29. Tan PJ, Hsu MH. Understanding the needs and criteria of employees in the electronics industry for English e-learning website programmes. In: 12th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA 2017), 18-20 June 2017, Siem Reap, Cambodia

Written By

Paul Juinn Bing Tan and Ming-Hung Hsu

Submitted: 24 April 2017 Reviewed: 08 June 2018 Published: 05 November 2018