Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Physical Properties of Porous Pure and Zr/Sn-Doped Nanocrystalline BaTiO3 Ceramics

Written By

Umaru Ahmadu, Alhassan Muazu and Sadiq Umar

Submitted: June 11th, 2017 Reviewed: February 15th, 2018 Published: November 5th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.75500

Chapter metrics overview

1,077 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Polycrystalline BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 ceramics (x = 0.02-0.04) were prepared by a combination of solid-state and mechanochemical process and characterized at room temperature by X-ray diffraction for phase composition. Their crystal structures were found to be of the cubic and tetragonal symmetries, respectively. The grain size and porosity which were determined using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) and densitometer, respectively showed decrease and increase of relative density respectively, with increase in doping concentration. The variations of dielectric constant and loss with frequency and temperature show a maximum dielectric constant of 1660 at room temperature for Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.03Zr0.01)O3. The remnant polarization (Pr) and coercive field (Ec) of BT were found to be 581.73 V/cm and 0.27 μC/cm2. Increase in Sn content led to an increase in Pr of 0.58, 3.07, 3.73 C/cm2, and Ec of 1766.8, 2855.7, 2661.1 V/cm, respectively and are expected to lead to a significant reduction in the thickness of the multilayer ceramic capacitors. Impedance spectroscopy of polycrystalline Ba (Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02) O3 in a wide frequency and temperature range showed Nyquist plots with presence of grain and grain boundary at 400°C and a negative temperature coefficient of resistance (NTCR) for Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3. The dielectric relaxation showed a non-Debye character.

Keywords

  • porous ceramics
  • barium titanate
  • doping
  • ferroelectrics
  • MLCC

1. Introduction

1.1. BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3

Barium titanate (BT) is one of the most basic and widely applied ferroelectric oxide materials with a perovskite-ABO3 type crystalline structure. It is chemically and mechanically remarkably stable and exhibits ferroelectric properties from room temperature to just below the transition temperature (Tc). It is easily prepared and used in polycrystalline ceramic form [1]. Due to its excellent dielectric, ferroelectric, piezoelectric, pyroelectric and optoelectric properties, it is extensively used in multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCC), positive temperature coefficient of resistance (PTCR) thermistors, piezoelectric sensors, actuators, ferroelectric random access memories (FRAM) and electro-optic devices [2, 3]. Pure BT is an electric insulator with a large energy gap of 3.05 eV at room temperature. However, when doped with small metals, it becomes semiconducting and leads to possibilities of tailoring its properties for specific technological applications. Modified BT compositions are widely used in MLCCs due to its high dielectric constant and low loss [4]. Among the doped BT compositions, Ba(Ti1-xSnx)O3 (BST) system has drawn wide attention due to its manifestation of diffuse-type phase transition [5, 6, 7] and many dielectric applications with reduction of phase transition temperature toward room temperature [8, 9]. Zirconium-doped barium titanate with general formula Ba(ZrxTi1-x)O3 (BZT) has attracted great attention for its potential applications due to its high dielectric constant, relatively low dielectric losses, large voltage tunability of the dielectric constant, as well as a good chemical stability [10, 11, 12]. Partial replacement of titanium by tin, zirconium or hafnium generally leads to a reduction in Tcand an increase in the permittivity maximum (εmax) with increase in dopant content [13]. The substitution of isovalent cations Zr+4 and Sn+4 for Ti+4 lead to the formation of barium titanate stannate zirconate compound which belongs to the class of complex perovskite structure having the general formula ABB″xB”4-xO3 (A,B, are the cation, B”xB”4-x are the isovalent cation dopants and O3 anion). These compounds have been widely studied owing to their very high and broad relative permittivity at the ferroelectric Curie point. Therefore, codoping of BT with two tetravalent ions Zr+4 and Sn+4 would be a good strategy to tailor the properties of porous BT ceramics.

There are challenges, however, one of which is in developing a dielectric layer of fewer than 10 μm with a large capacitance, a major requirement for MLCC miniaturization and electronic/microelectronic devices [14]. Reduction of the grain size of BT ceramics to the micron level leads to an increase in permittivity at room temperature. Further reduction of grain size to less than few hundred nanometers leads to a further decrease in permittivity. On the other hand, the presence of porosity can lead to dielectric permittivity that is lower than that of the solid material. It is thus one strategy to achieve lower dielectric constants for microelectronics devices. Thus, controlling porosity can yield a spectrum of dielectric constants from a single material [15]. Porosity plays a role in decreasing the Curie point for barium titanate ceramics with apparent density below 90% [16]. Manipulation of the volume ratio of porosity can lead to appropriate dielectric constant being obtained in a wide range. These advantages have been harnessed in the fabrication of materials with highly anisotropic dielectric constants with simultaneous introduction of aligned pores [17]. High material porosity is considered as an advantage only in few cases such as in materials that have resistance to temperature changes.

Various techniques have been introduced to make mesoporous and porous BaTiO3 some of which include, development of soft-chemistry routes to produce nanoparticles or specially shaped materials, such as one-dimensional nanowires; sonochemical methods to prepare size-tunable BaTiO3 crystals [18] and the introduction of biosynthesis methods to prepare BaTiO3 nanopowders [19]. Mesoporous and porous materials have important features such as the possession of large surface areas and nano size porous structures [20]. These features make the materials widely used in photo electronics, catalytic reactions and semiconductors among others [21, 22]. However, the high costs and difficulty in process control in these routes necessitated the development of alternative options for the synthesis of porous BaTiO3 nanoparticles.

Mechanochemical synthesis can be used to reduce the grain size of porous BaTiO3 and Ba (Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x) O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) powder to nanosize. This is predicated on the fact that mechanical technique is superior to both the conventional solid-state reaction and wet-chemistry-based processing routes for several reasons as it uses low-cost and widely available oxides as starting materials compared to wet chemical routes which are extremely sensitive to environmental conditions such as moisture, light and heat [23, 24].

Complex impedance spectroscopy is a nondestructive method [25] that uses to distinguish the grain boundary from the grain-electrode effects which are usually the sites for trapping oxygen vacancies and other defects. Within a wide range of ceramics, an ionic, ionic plus electronic or electronic conduction is shown in these sites. It is also useful in establishing space charge polarization and its relaxation mechanism, by appropriately attributing different values of resistance and capacitance to the grain and grain boundary effects. It allows the contributions to the overall electrical property by various components in the material to be easily separated. Other workers have used impedance spectroscopy to study other materials [26, 27] to gain insight into electrical conduction mechanisms of the materials. In this work, we report the structural and electrical properties of porous BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics prepared by solid-state and mechanochemical technique. The effect of porosity on the ceramics material will be used to evaluate the materials and serve as guide in the choice for MLCC and thermistor applications.

1.2. Mechanochemical synthesis

Mechanochemical synthesis or high-energy milling is the preparation of powder by high-energy ball milling of elemental mixtures. The most important feature of this technique is that the formation of the product compounds flows from the reactions of oxide precursors by mechanical energy activation, rather than the heat energy necessitated in the conventional solid-state reaction process.

The solid-state reactions initiated by intensive milling in high-energy ball mills could be a good choice for the ceramic powder preparation. The area of contact between the reactant powder particles increases with the intensive milling. This is the consequence of reduction in particle size and permits fresh surfaces to come into contact. This permits the reduction to continue without the requirement for diffusion through the product layer. Alternatively, the particle refinement and consequent reduction in diffusion distances (due to microstructural refinement) can at least reduce the reaction temperatures significantly, even if they do not occur at room temperature. In general, the procedure of sintering is improved by liquid-phase sintering with titanium-rich composition at the temperature above 1320°C or by mechanical activation of precursors (BaCO3 and TiO2) [28, 29, 30]. In addition, particle size of ceramic powders is reduced by mechanical treatment and produces nanostructured powders which are of primary interest in the current trend of miniaturization and integration of electronic components [31, 32].

1.3. Barium titanate (BaTiO3) perovskite structure

The perovskite, ABO3 type structure of BT is cubic (above 120°C) with Ba ion (larger A cation) located at the cube corners, Ti ion (smaller B cation) at the body center, and oxygen at the face centre, forming octahedra around each Ti ion. It is considered an FCC-derivative structure in which the larger A cation and oxygen together form an FCC lattice, while the smaller B cation occupies the octahedral interstitial sites in the FCC array. The Ba ion occupies the space formed between eight neighboring octahedra, giving the Ba, Ti and the oxygen ions coordination number of 12, 6 and 6, respectively. BaTiO3 can accept the substitution of foreign cations on two distinct sites, the A-site (Ba) and the B-site (Ti). The stability of the perovskite compounds arises mainly from the electrostatic charge of the ions when perfectly integrated.

1.4. Structural phase transitions in barium titanate

BT undergoes a series of structural phase transitions upon cooling from high temperature. In the temperature range of 1430–1620°C, barium titanate assumes a hexagonal structure. In the 130–1430°C range, BT is cubic and nonpolar (space group Pm3m),thus centrosymmetric and nonpiezoelectric. When the temperature is below the Curie temperature (130°C), the cubic structure (paraelectric) is slightly distorted to a tetragonal (P4mm)structure (ferroelectric) which is noncentrosymmetric, with an accompanying movement of Ti atoms inside the O6 octahedra. In turn, oxygen ions all shift in the opposite direction [100]. Not only does this result in distortion of oxygen octahedron, but the opposite displacement of negative and positive charges within the unit cell leads to the formation of an electric dipole moment, and hence to the appearance of spontaneous polarization and ferroelectric properties. In the tetragonal phase, the direction of the vector of spontaneous polarization Ps (i.e., polar direction) lies parallel to the direction of one of the original cubic [100] directions. When the temperature is below 5°C, the tetragonal structure transforms to an orthorhombic ferroelectric phase (C2mm)with the polar axis parallel to a face diagonally, and the direction of spontaneous polarization transfers to a pseudocubic [110]. At as low as −90°C, it further transforms to a rhombohedral structure (R3m)with the polar axis along a body diagonal and is spontaneously polarized along a [111] direction.

The Goldschmidt tolerance factor for a perovskite structure (ABO3) is given by the formula:

t=rA+rO2rB+rOE1

where rArBand rOare the A-site, B-site, and oxygen ionic radii, respectively. There are three possible values of ‘t’: (1) t ≥ 1: show ferroelectricity. (2) t < 1: This antiferroelectric perovskite. (3) t = 1: perfect cubic structure.

Advertisement

2. Experimental

2.1. Sample preparation

All samples used in this study were prepared by the conventional solid state and mechanochemical technique from fine powders of metal oxides or metal carbonates. The nominal purity of the initial powders, as well as their manufacturers are given in Table 1.

Starting materialsManufacturersPurity
BaCO3Merck, Germany99.9%
TiO2Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc.,U.S.A99.9+%
SnO2Strem, Chemicals, U.S.A.99.9%
ZrO2Strem, Chemicals, U.S.A99.9%

Table 1.

Precursors, purity level and manufacturers.

2.2. Synthesis of barium titanate (BaTiO3) and Zr- and Sn-doped barium titanate

BaTiO3and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) nanocrystalline powders were synthesized by a combination of solid-state reaction and high-energy ball milling technique. The starting materials were analytical grade high-purity (99·9%) oxide precursors, BaCO3, ZrO2, TiO2 and SnO2. Stoichiometric amounts of the oxides were weighed according to nominal composition and ball-mixed for 12 h in alcohol. The mixture was dried in an oven and calcined in an alumina crucible at 1050°C for 4 h in the air to yield BaTiO3, Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3, Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.03Zr0.01)O3, and Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.04)O3 powders. The calcined powders were ball-milled in an isopropyl alcohol as wetting medium using SPEX 8000 Mixer/Mills (60 Hz model) at room temperature for 7 h. The milling was stopped for 15 min after every 60 min of milling to cool down the system. The slurry was put in an oven and dried at 90°C for 24 h. The milled powder was compacted at 5 ton to make pellets of size 15 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm in thickness using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as a binder. After burning off the binder (PVA), the pellets were sintered in a programmable furnace at temperatures of 1190°C for 2 h in alumina crucibles.

2.3. Characterization

Phase identification of calcined and sintered powders was carried out using X-ray diffractometer with monochromatic Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) under 40 kV/30 mA—over a 2θ range from 20 to 80° at a scanning rate of 2°/min. The experimental densities of the samples were calculated using Electronic Densimeter MD-3005 ALFAMIRAGE. The morphological studies of the sintered sample were carried out using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) (JEOL 7600F) operated at 15 kV. The polarization-electric field (P–E) hysteresis characteristics of the samples were determined using a Precision LC material analyzer (Radiant, U.S.A). The dielectric and impedance measurement was carried out for the sintered sample using an Agilent 4294 A Impedance Analyzer in the frequency and temperature range of 40 Hz–1 MHz and 30–400°C, respectively.

Advertisement

3. Structural and electrical properties

3.1. Structural properties

Structural and dielectric properties were evaluated for both BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramic, while thermistor application is explored in Ba (Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3 ceramic

3.1.1. XRD analysis

Figure 1 shows the room temperature XRD patterns of BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics. It is seen that all the compositions are of single-phase perovskite structure without any trace of secondary phase and imply that Sn+4 and Zr+4 entered the unit cell and maintained the perovskite structure as a solid solution. The enlarged XRD patterns of the ceramics in the range of 2θof 44–46.5o clearly show that the crystal structure of the ceramic is cubic for BT with JCPDS file no. 96-150-7758 and space group Pm-3 m(Figure 2a). This is because the (200) and (002) peaks are not split [33] as reported by other workers [34, 35], whereas it is tetragonal for Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) (Figure 2bd) with the splitting of the (200) and (002) characteristic peaks which are in agreement with the joint committee on powder diffraction standards (JCPDS file no.98-00-2020), similar result was obtained for x = 0.04 using conventional method by other workers [36]. It can also be noticed from Figure 2ad that the positions of the diffraction peaks of the ceramics shift slightly to lower angle with increasing Sn content in the range of 2θfrom 44 to 46.5o. This is attributed to the larger ionic radius of Sn+4 (0.69 Å) and Zr+4 (0.72 Å) as compared with that of Ti+4 (0.60 Å) with results in a slight enlargement of crystal cell volumes and hence a shift of diffraction peaks toward lower angles.

Figure 1.

XRD patterns of BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 ceramics (a) BT, (b) 0.02, (c) 0.03 and (d) 0.04 sintered at 1190°C.

Figure 2.

XRD patterns of BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 ceramics in the range of2θfrom 44 to 46.5o(a) BT, (b) 0.02, (c) 0.03 and (d) 0.04 sintered at 1190°C.

3.1.2. Microstructure

Figures 36 show the FE-SEM images of porous BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramic sintered at 1190°C for 2 h. All the samples are dense and have varying microstructural features with the presence of voids. The presence of voids in the FE-SEM images indicates that the pellets have a certain amount of porosity. The grain size and grain boundary can be seen very clearly in a nonagglomerated region and the grain size decreases with increasing Sn content. The difference among these four samples is attributed to the difference in Sn and Zr content since all of them have been processed under the same conditions. Further substitution of Sn caused the grain size to become smaller with more porous regions between them compared to porous BaTiO3 sample. The average grain size of BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics determined by using linear intercept technique is shown in Table 2. The grain size decreased from 199.65 to 89.28 nm with increase in Sn and this indicates that Sn is a grain growth inhibitor.

Figure 3.

FESEM images of nanocrystalline BT sample at magnification of×200,000.

Figure 4.

FESEM images of nanocrystalline Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02) sample at magnification of ×200,000.

Figure 5.

FESEM images of nanocrystalline Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.03) sample at magnification of×200,000.

Figure 6.

FESEM images of nanocrystalline Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.04) sample at magnification of×200,000.

SampleTheoretical density (dxrd) (g/cm3)Experimental density (dexp)(g/cm3)Relative density (%)% porosityGrain size (nm)
BaTiO36.025.63993.66.3144.53
Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O36.175.38287.212.8199.65
Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.03Zr0.01)O36.195.41887.512.484.54
Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.04)O36.185.50289.010.989.28

Table 2.

Physical properties of BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02–0.04) ceramics.

3.1.3. Density

The experimental or observed density of each sample was calculated using the Archimedes principle from (Eq. (2)):

ρexp=MaρwMaMwE2

where Maand Mware the respective weights in gram of the pellet measured in air and in water. ρw isthe density of pure water in g/cm3. The theoretical density of the material was calculated using (Eq. (3)):

ρxrd=cell masscell volume=n×M×1.66×1024Vgcm3,E3

where n is the number of atoms per unit cell, M is the molecular weight of atoms constituting one unit of the chemical formula, and V is the unit cell volume.

The experimental densities of the porous BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics prepared by High Energy Mechanochemical (HEM) method and conventional sintering vary from 93.6% to 89.0%of theoretical density. The relative density of BaTiO3 is higher compared to the Sn-/Zr-doped samples. The increase of the tin content to x = 0.04 induced further densification which tends to inhibit the grain growth [37]. This increase in density is also evident in FESEM microstructures of Figures 36 which show a decreasing presence of porosity with increasing Sn content.

3.1.4. Porosity

The porosity of BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics was calculated using (Eq. (4)):

Porosity=dxrddexp×100dxrdE4

The macroporous structure of BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics exhibited a porosity of 6.3–10.9% Table 2. Porosity increased from 6.3 to 12.8% at Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3 and then decreased to 10.9% with increase in Sn concentration, respectively. The increase of the relative density and decrease of porosity with Sn concentration enhance the density of the ceramics with reduction of pores. It can be seen from the FESEM image in Figures 36 that the pores vary in sizes in all the samples. Pores are composed of macropores in the grain boundary or nanopores in the grains, but in all the samples, only macropores are visible.

3.1.5. Effect of porosity on dielectric properties

Porosity in BT ceramics can be considered as a secondary phase and indicates its degree of densification. Pores in BT ceramics are usually formed by incomplete sintering or using sacrificial pore formers and exist in between the grains. Porosity decreases strength, because pores reduce the true cross section area of a BT ceramics and also pores act as stress concentrating notches. In many cases, different densities within a ceramic are used to provide a wide continuous range of dielectric constants. The relative permittivity decreases with increasing material porosity as reported by other workers [38]. Porosity of a ceramic material is a serious defect in high-voltage insulating systems [39]. Enhanced electric field in the pores increases the probability of bond breakage on the pore walls and leads to the lowering of the overall breakdown strength [40].

3.2. Dielectric properties

3.2.1. Variation of dielectric constant and loss tangent with frequency

The real (ε′) part of relative permittivity and tan δ in the frequency range of 40 Hz–1 MHz of porous BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics at room temperature is shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. It can be seen that the value of dielectric constant is higher at lower frequencies and decreases with increase in frequency. The decrease of dielectric constant with increasing frequency means that the response of the permanent dipoles decreases as the frequency increases and the contribution of the charge carriers (ions) toward the dielectric constant decreases [41, 42].

Figure 7.

Variation of the real part of relative permittivity (ε’) of nanocrystalline BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02–0.04) at 30°C.

Figure 8.

Frequency dependence of dielectric loss (tan δ) of BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02–0.04) at 30°C.

The ε′ for BT has a value of only 1550 at room temperature which is lower than that of the sample prepared by conventional solid-state reaction route [43, 44]. The observed lower value is as a result of the smaller grain size of the ceramics [45, 46]. With the reduction of crystallite size that corresponds to the width of the domain wall, pinning would be formulated inside the grains and the domain wall motion would be inhibited. The domain wall mobility reduction leads to the decrease of the switching rate, hence lowering the dielectric constant. The presence of tin in the material also decreases the dielectric constant of Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.04)O3 [47, 48]. The observed lowering of the dielectric constant for Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.04)O3 could be considered as a combined effect of the presence of Sn and the nanocrystalline nature of the grains.

The increase of dielectric constant from 1563 to 1671 (Table 3) in porous Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3 and Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.03Zr0.01)O3, respectively, may be as a result of decrease of grain size and porosity of the sample. The frequency-independent behavior of è for Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3 and Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.04)O3 beyond 1000 Hz indicates the reduction of the contribution of the charge carriers toward the dielectric permittivity ε’ and tends to a static value at all temperatures as a result of absence of space charge effects [49]. Further, the ε’ exhibits high value which reflects the effect of space charge polarization and/or conducting ion motion. The best sample is Ba (Ti0.96Sn0.03Zr0.01) O3 because it exhibited high real dielectric relative permittivity of 1671, loss of 1.63 and low porosity of 12.4% among the doped samples. This shows that the sample Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.03Zr0.01)O3 can be used for MLCCs and energy storage application.

SamplesEc(kV/cm)Pr(μC/cm2)Ps(μC/cm2)
BT0.5920.2951.934
BTSZ11.7660.5761.411
BTSZ22.9303.1174.680
BTSZ32.8943.7265.120

Table 3.

Ferroelectric properties of the samples at room temperature.

The variation of tan δ with frequency is shown in Figure 8. Similar to the behavior of ε’ with frequency, the dielectric loss exponentially decreases with decreasing frequency to almost zero for porous BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.04)O3.but rises beyond 105 Hz for Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3 and Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.03Zr0.01)O3, respectively. In the lower frequency region, a decrease in the value of tan δ is observed which is due to the dominance of space charge polarization and interface effects at lower frequencies. However, for porous BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.04)O3 at a frequency of 104Hz, frequency-independent behavior of these parameters is observed. The values of tan δ of BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) are shown in Table 3. The decrease of tan δ in BaTiO3 from 0.8 to 0.43 and from 1.6 at x = 0.03 to 0.43 at x = 0.02 clearly indicates that loss tangent shows a decreasing tendency with increase of zirconium content in agreement with literatures [50]. The dielectric losses were a combined result of electrical conduction and orientational polarization of the matter [51].

3.2.2. Variation of dielectric constant and tangent loss with temperature

The variation of dielectric constant and tangent loss as a function of temperature for porous BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics measured from room temperature to 150°C at the frequency of 100 Hz is shown in Figures 9 and 10, respectively. From Figure 9, it is clear that the maximum dielectric constant of porous BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) is at room temperature and decreases with increase in temperature, though less than that reported in CuO-modified Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics synthesized using solid-state reaction [44] except for porous BT where the dielectric constant was observed to decrease from 30 to 70°C and then increased sharply at 90°C. Thereafter, it falls to the lowest level at 110°C, thus indicating a phase transition. For porous Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics, the phase transition seems to be shifted toward lower room temperature with increase in doping concentration as reported by other workers [52]. The shifting of transition temperature (Tc) to a lower value can be explained by the larger radius of Sn4+ (0.69 Å) and Zr+4 (0.72 Å), compared to Ti4+ (0.605 Å). Uchino et al. have suggested that with decreasing grain size, Tcwas shifted downward toward room temperature, eventually tending toward 0 K at some critical particle size [53].

Figure 9.

Temperature dependence of dielectric constant of nanocrystalline BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x) O3(x = 0.02–0.04) ceramics measured at 100 kHz.

Figure 10.

Temperature dependence of dielectric loss of nanocrystalline BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02–0.04) ceramics measured at 100 kHz.

In Figure 10, the dielectric loss of Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) beyond 70°C becomes almost independent and later merges at higher temperature, except for BaTiO3 which rapidly increases with increase in temperature beyond 90°C. This sharp increase in dielectric loss in the high temperature region in BaTiO3 may be attributed to the increased mobility of charge carriers arising from defects or vacancies in the sample [54]. In porous BaTiO3 sample, the minimum in the dielectric loss is coincident with the maximum of dielectric anomaly. Therefore, we conclude that porous BaTiO3 sample undergoes a structural phase transition. The loss tangent of porous Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics decreases with increasing Zr content due to the chemical stability of Zr4+ compared to that of Ti [55].

3.3. Ferroelectric properties

The polarization versus electric field (P-E) hysteresis loops of BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics measured at room temperature and 1 kHz with different Sn concentrations are shown in Figure 11. The results are presented in Table 3. The polarization hysteresis loop is not fully saturated which may be due to leakage current. The P-Eloops become larger and broader as the Sn content (x) increases which show the ferroelectricity of the Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04). The increase in Remnant polarization is due to the increase in the dielectric property and decrease of the porosity of the sample with an increase in Sn doping [56]. The performance parameter of BT is very close to that of the reported values (Psof 2.0 μC/cm2, Ecof 5 kV/cm) for the ceramic sample [57] and lower than the one obtained by the same synthesis route (Prof 2.0μC/cm2, and coercive field (Ec) of 1060 V/cm) [35]. The decrease of Ecfor 2.8 to 2.6 kV/cm for Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.03Zr0.01)O3 to Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.04)O3 may be attributed to the reduction in grain size and indicates that Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.04)O3 may be useful for switching applications. BaTiO3 samples have cubic phase and ferroelectric tetragonal phase (Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3, Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.03Zr0.01)O3 and Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.04)O3) as evident from XRD result. Polarization reversal of a ferroelectric domain is much easier inside a larger grain the comparison to that in a smaller grain [58]. Oxygen vacancies may affect domain wall motion by a screening of the polarization charge. A formation ion of mechanical barriers against the domain walls by oxygen vacancies, that is, domain wall pinning, might also stabilize the domain configuration.

Figure 11.

P-E hysteresis loop of nanocrystalline ceramics synthesized at 1190°C: (a) BT, (b) 0.02, (c) 0.03, and (d) 0.04.

3.4. Complex impedance

Figure 12 shows the variation of the real (Z) and imaginary (Z) part of impedance (inset) with frequency from 200 to 400°C. It is observed that the magnitude of Zdecreases with increase in frequency at different temperatures which is an indication of an increase in dc conductivity. The coincidence of Zand Zvalues at higher frequencies at all temperatures indicates a possible release of space charge [59] and a consequent lowering of the barrier properties of the material [60]. Further, at low frequencies, the Zvalues decrease with rise in temperature, that is, they show negative temperature coefficient of resistance (NTCR) behavior similar to semiconductors [61].

Figure 12.

Frequency dependences of real (Z’) and imaginary (Z”) part of impedance (inset) of nanocrystalline Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3 sample at 200–400°C.

Figure 13 shows the complex impedance plots (Z) or Cole-Cole plots, that is, plotting imaginary part Zagainst the real part Zof complex impedance Z=Z+jZof BTSZ ceramic, performed at 200, 250, 300 and 350°C over a wide frequency range (40 Hz to 1 MHz). From Figure 13, it is observed that with the increase in temperature, the slope of the lines decreases and the curve moves toward real (Z) axis indicating an increase in conductivity of the sample.

Figure 13.

Plot ofZversus Z″ (Nyquist or Cole-Cole plots) for nanocrystalline Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3 ceramic data taken over a wide frequency range of 40 Hz to 1 MHz at 200–350°C.

At temperature 400°C, two semicircles are formed (Figure 14) representing resistance for grain (Rg) and grain boundary (Rgb) effect in the material having centers lying below the real axis confirming the presence of the non-Debye type of relaxation phenomenon in the materials [62]. Hence, grain and grain boundary effects in Figure 14 could be separated at these temperatures. The high-frequency semicircle corresponds to a bulk contribution, and the low-frequency semicircle corresponds to the grain boundary effect [63]. The value of bulk resistance (Rg) in the high-frequency range and grain boundary resistance (Rgb) in the low-frequency range obtained from the intercepts of the semicircular arcs formed at 400°C on the real axis (Z) is 44.08 and 148.4 kΩ, respectively (Figure 14). The observed data were modeled on an equivalent circuit having a series combination of two parallel resistor-capacitor elements (inset of Figure 14) [64, 65]. The real (Z) and imaginary (Z) parts of total impedance of the equivalent circuit are defined as:

Z=Rg1+ωRgCg2+Rgb1+ωRgbCgb2E5
Z=RgωRgCg1+ωRgCg2+RgbωRgbCgb1+ωRgbCgb2E6

where Rgand Cg are the grain resistance and grain capacitance, Rgband Cgbare the grain boundary resistance and grain boundary capacitance at the interfacial regions, respectively, and ω is the angular frequency. The semicircles in the impedance spectrum have a characteristic peak occurring at a unique relaxation frequency (ωmax=2πfmax)which can be expressed as ωmaxRC=ωmaxτ =1, where “fmax” is the frequency at the maximum of semicircle. Therefore,

fmax=12πτ=12πRCE7

where τ is the relaxation time. The respective capacitances (Cband Cgb) due to the grain and grain boundary effects can be calculated using Eq. 7. The values of Rg, Rgb, Cgand Cgbobtained from Cole-Cole plots at 400°C are 44.17 kΩ, 148.43 kΩ, 3.23 × 10−10 Farad and 1.71 × 10−8 Farad, respectively. The corresponding relaxation times due to both the bulk and grain boundary effect (τgand τgb) have been calculated using Eq. 7 to be 1.42 × 10−5 s and 2.55 × 10−3 s, respectively.

Figure 14.

Plot ofZversus Z″ (Nyquist or Cole-Cole plots) for nanocrystalline Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3 ceramic data taken over a wide frequency range of 40 Hz to 1 MHz at 400°C.

Moreover, the results showed a higher value of Rgbas compared to Rgas a result of a lower concentration of oxygen vacancies and trapped electrons in grain boundaries. This is due to the loss of oxygen during high temperature sintering process which again greatly influenced the conduction and dielectric relaxation behavior of the material. High temperature sintering leads to the formation of oxygen vacancies as 2OoxO2g+2Vo¨+4e. Nevertheless, when the temperature is slowly cooled to room temperature in air, a reoxidation process occurs as 2Vo¨+Oox+4eO2gand leads to the formation an insulating grain boundary and highly conductive oxygen-deficient grains [66].

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

In this study, porous BaTiO3 and Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 (x = 0.02−0.04) ceramics with nanocrystalline structure were obtained by mechanochemical synthesis method. The effects of the porosity of the ceramics on their microstructural and dielectric properties were investigated. It was found that porosity of the ceramics could be tailored by varying the dopant content. With increase of Sn content, porosity decreased from 12.8 to 10.9%. X-ray analysis confirms the cubic and tetragonal structure at room temperature for pristine and Zr and Sn codoped barium titanate, respectively. FESEM images indicated that the particles possess a porous structure. The temperature dependence dielectric study revealed a normal ferroelectric behavior in the material. Room temperature dielectric constant increased with Sn and Zr content, while dielectric loss decreased. Electrical parameters such as the real part of impedance (Z), the imaginary part of impedance (Z) as a function of both frequency and temperature have been studied through impedance spectroscopy. Nyquists plots of Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3 ceramic show both bulk and grain boundary effects at 400°C which indicates the NTCR behavior of the sample. Therefore, Ba(Ti0.96Sn0.02Zr0.02)O3 ceramic is considered as a promising low-cost material for thermistor applications. The electrical relaxation process occurring in the material has been found to be temperature dependent.

References

  1. 1. Stojanovic BD, Mastelaro VR, Paiva Santos CO, Varela JA. Structure study of donor doped barium titanate prepared from citrate solutions. Science of Sintering. 2004;36:179-188
  2. 2. Haertling GH. Ferroelectric ceramics: History and technology. Journal of American Ceramic Society. 1999;82(4):797-818
  3. 3. Uchino K. Ferroelectric Devices. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2000
  4. 4. Jaffe B, Cook WR, Jaffe H. Piezoelectric Ceramics. London: Academic Press Limited; 1971
  5. 5. Shi T, Xie L, Gu L, Zhu J. Why Sn doping significantly enhances the dielectric properties of Ba(Ti1-xSnx)O3. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:8606. DOI: 10.1038/srep08606
  6. 6. Lu SG, Xu ZK, Chen H. Tunability and relaxor properties of ferroelectric barium stannate titanate ceramics. Applied Physics Letters. 2004;85(22):5319-5321
  7. 7. Wei X, Yao X. Preparation, structure and dielectric property of barium stannate titanate ceramics. Material and Science Engineering, B. 2007;137:184
  8. 8. Kumar SU, Reddy VR, Bag P, Rawat R, Gupta SM, Gupta A. Electro-caloric effect in lead-free Sn doped BaTiO3 ceramics at room temperature and low applied fields. Applied Physics Letters. 2014;105:112907. DOI: 10.1063/1.4896044
  9. 9. Xie L, Li YL, Yu R, Cheng ZY, Wei XY, Yao X, Jia CL, Urban K, Bokov AA, Ye Z-G, Zhu J. Static and dynamic polar nanoregions in relaxor ferroelectric Ba(Ti1-xSnx)O3 system at high temperature. Physical Review B. 2012;85, 014118
  10. 10. Zhi Y, Guo R, Bhalla AS. Dielectric behavior of Ba(Ti1−xZrx)O3 single crystals. Journal of Applied Physics. 2000;88(1):410. DOI: 10.1063/1.373674
  11. 11. Stojanovic BD, Foschini CR, Pavlovic VB, Pablovic VM, Pejovic V, Varela JA. Barium titanate screen-printed thick films. Ceramics International. 2002;28(3):293-298. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-8842 (01)00093-1
  12. 12. Zhao J, Li L, Wang Y, Gui Z. DC bias properties of Ba(Ti1−xZrx)O3 ceramics. Material Science and Engineering, B. 2003;99(1–2):207-210
  13. 13. Jiang JZ, Poulsen FW, Mørup S. Structure and thermal stability of nanostructured iron-doped zirconia prepared by high-energy ball milling. Journal of Materials Research. 1999;14:1343-1352
  14. 14. Martin L, Chu Y, Ramesh R. Advances in the growth and characterization of magnetic, ferroelectric, and multiferroic oxide thin films. Materials Science and Engineering R. 2010;68:89-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.mser.2010.03.001
  15. 15. Gong X, She WH, Hoppenjans EE, Wing ZN, Geyer RG, Halloran JW, Chappell WJ. Tailored and anisotropic dielectric constants through porosity in ceramic components. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 2005;53:3638-3647
  16. 16. Fang TT, Hsieh HL, Shiau F. Effects of pore morphology and grain size on the dielectric properties and tetragonal–cubic phase transition of high-purity barium titanate. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1993;76(5):1205-1211. DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03742.x
  17. 17. Wing ZN, Wang B, Halloran JW. Permittivity of Porous Titanate Dielectrics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 2006;89:3696.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15512916.2006.01323.x
  18. 18. Dang ZM, Zhou T, Yao SH, Yuan JK, Zha JW, Song HT, Li JY, Chen Q, Yang WT, Bai J. Advanced calcium copper titanate/polyimide functional hybrid films with high dielectric permittivity. Journal of Advanced Materials. 2009;21(20):2077-2082. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200803427
  19. 19. Jhaa AK, Prasad K. Ferroelectric BaTiO3 nanoparticles; biosynthesis and characterization. Colloids and Surfaces, B: Biointerfaces. 2010;75:330-334
  20. 20. Larsen G, Lotero E, Nabity M, Petkovic LM, Shobe DS. Surfactant-assisted synthesis of mesoporous zirconia powders with high surface areas. Journal of Catalysis. 1996;164:246-248. DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1996.0379
  21. 21. Corma A. From microporous to mesoporous molecular sieve materials and their use in catalysis. Chemical Reviews. 1997;97(6):2373-2420. DOI: 10.1021/cr960406n
  22. 22. Victor F, Stone J, Davis R. Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of titania and niobia mesoporous molecular sieves. Chemistry of Materials. 1998;10(5):1468-1474. DOI: 10.1021/cm980050r
  23. 23. German RM. Sintering Theory and Practice. New York: Wiley; 1996
  24. 24. Wang S, Ding J, Shi Y, Chen YJ. High coercivity in mechanically alloyed BaFe10Al2O19. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2000;219:206-212
  25. 25. Macdonald JR. Impedance Spectroscopy—Emphasizing Solid Materials and Systems. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1987
  26. 26. Ahmadu U, Tomas Ŝ, Jonah SA, Musa AO, Rabiu N. Equivalent circuit models and analysis of impedance spectra of solid electrolyte Na0.25Li0.75Zr2(PO4)3. Advanced Materials Letters. 2013;4(3):185-195
  27. 27. Jacob R, Harikrishnan Nair G, Isac J. Impedance spectroscopy and dielectric studies of nanocrystalline iron doped barium strontium titanate ceramics. Processing and Application of Ceramics. 2015;9(2):73-79
  28. 28. Gomez-Yanez C, Benitez C, Ramirez HB. Mechanical activation of the synthesis reaction of BaTiO3 from a mixture of BaCO3 and TiO2 powders. Ceramics International. 2000;26:271-277
  29. 29. Berbenni V, Marini A, Bruni G. Effect of mechanical milling on solid state formation of BaTiO3 from BaCO3-TiO2 (rutile) mixtures. Thermochimica Acta. 2001;374:151-158
  30. 30. Brzozovski E, Castro MA. Lowering the synthesis temperature of high-purity BaTiO3 powders by modifications in the processing conditions. Thermochimica Acta. 2003;398:123-129
  31. 31. Ding JS, Suzuki T, McCormic PG. Ultra fine particles prepared by mechanical/thermal processing. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1996;79:2956-2958
  32. 32. Giri AK. Nanocrystalline materials prepared through crystallization due to instability in amorphous materials after grinding. Advanced Materials. 1997;9:163-166
  33. 33. Buttner RH, Maslen EN. Structural parameters and electron difference density in BaTiO3. Acta Crystallographica Section B. 1992;B48:764-769
  34. 34. Burtr L, Jianping Z. Preparation, structure evolution and dielectric properties of barium titanate thin fim and powder by an aqueous sol-gel process. Thin Solid Films. 2001;388:107
  35. 35. Lazarevi ZZ, Vijatovi M, Doh MZ, Rom NZ, Rom MJ, Paunovi N, Stojanovi BD. The characterization of the barium titanate ceramic powders prepared by the Pechini type reaction route and mechanically assisted synthesis. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2010;30:623-628
  36. 36. Pengrong R, Zicheng L, Qian W, Biaolin P, Shanming K, Huiqing F, Gaoyang Z. Large nonlinear dielectric behavior in BaTi1−xSnxO3. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:6693. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07192-x
  37. 37. Al-Naboulsia T, Boulos M, Tenailleau C, Dufour P, Zakhour M, Sophie G-F. Elaboration and characterization of barium titanate powders obtained by the mechanical activation of barium nitrate and titanate oxide, and electrical properties of the ceramics sintered by SPS. Journal of Ceramic Processing Research. 2016;17(8):870-875. ISSN 1229-9162
  38. 38. Hou YD, Chang LM, Zhu MK, Song XM, Yan H. Effect of Li2CO3Li2CO3 addition on the dielectric and piezoelectric responses in the low-temperature sintered 0.5PZN–0.5PZT systems. Journal of Applied Physics;102:2007, 084507. DOI: 10.1063/1.2800264
  39. 39. Srikanth KS, Singh VP, Vaish R. Enhanced pyroelectric figure of merits of porous BaSn0.05Ti0.95O3 ceramics. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2017;37(13):3943-3950. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.05.015
  40. 40. Yang KY, You WJ, Krishnamurthy A. Effect of porosity on electrical stability of hydrocarbon polymeric low-k dielectric. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 2005;52(10):2333-2336
  41. 41. Graca M, Valente MA, Ferreira da Silva MG. Electrical properties of lithium niobium silicate glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2003;325(1–3):267-274
  42. 42. Bergo P, Pontuschka WM, Prison JM. Dielectric properties of P2O5-Ni2O-Li2 glasses containing WO3, CoO or Fe2O3. Solid State Communicaions. 2007;141(10):545-547
  43. 43. Shao SF, Zhang JL, Zhang Z, Zheng P, Zhao ML, Li JC, Wang CL. High piezoelectric properties and domain configuration in BaTiO3 ceramics obtained through the solid-state reaction route. Journal of Physics and Dielectric: Applied Physics. 2008;41(12):125408
  44. 44. Tan YQ, Zhang JL, Wang CL. High piezoelectric properties and good temperature stabilities of CuO-modified Ba(Ti0.96SnxZr0.04-x)O3 ceramics. Journal of Advanced Dielectrics. 2013;3(2):1350014
  45. 45. Wu K, Schulze W. Aging of the weak-field dielectric response in fine- and coarse-grain ceramic BaTiO3. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1992;75(12):3390-3395. DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04439.x
  46. 46. Frey MH, Payne DA. Grain-size effect on structure and phase transformations for barium titanate. Physics Review. 1996;B54:3158-3168
  47. 47. Isupov VA. Some p5roblems of diffuse ferroelectric phase transitions. Ferroelectrics. 1989;90(1):113-118. DOI: 10.1080/00150198908211278
  48. 48. Nath AK, Medhi N. Density variation and piezoelectric properties of Ba(Ti1-xSnx)O3 ceramics prepared from nanocrystalline powders. Bulletin of Materials Science. 2012;35(5):847-852
  49. 49. Ahmadu U, Tomas Ŝ, Musa AO, Isah KU. Electrical and dielectric characterization of Na0.5Li0.5Zr2(PO4)3. Open Journal of Physical Chemistry. 2011;1:94-103
  50. 50. Zheng P, Zhang JL, Shao SF, Tan YQ, Wang CL. Piezoelectric properties and stabilities of CuO-modified Ba(Ti,Zr)O3 ceramics. Applied Physics Letters. 2008;94:032902. DOI: 10.1063/1.3072347
  51. 51. Gattu S, Dasari KS, Kocharlakota VR. Structural and dielectric properties of Sn doped barium magnesuim zirconium titanate perovskite ceramics. World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics. 2015;5:346-352. DOI: 10.4236/wjcmp.2015.54035
  52. 52. Alkathya MS, Joseph A, Raju KCJ. Dielectric properties of Zr substituted barium strontium titanate. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2016;3:2321-2328
  53. 53. Uchino K, Sadanaga E, Hirose T. Dependence of the crystal structure on particle size in barium titanate. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1989;72(8):1555-1558. DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb07706.x
  54. 54. Ganguly P, Jha AK. Journal of Alloys and Compound. 2010;495:7-12
  55. 55. Sagar R, Hudge P, Madolappa S, Kumbharkhane AC, Raibagkar RL. Electrical properties and microwave dielectric behaviour of holmium substituted barium zirconium titanate ceramics. Journal of Alloys and Compound. 2012;537:197
  56. 56. Yadav KL, Sharma P. Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences. 2008;15:61
  57. 57. Deshpande SB, Potdar HS, Patil MM, Deshpande VV, Khollam YB. Dielectric properties of BaTiO3 ceramics prepared from powders with bimodal distribution. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2006;12(4):584-588
  58. 58. Leu CC, Chen CY, Chien CH. Domain structure study of SrBi2Ta2O9 ferroelectric thin films by scanning capacitance microscopy. Applied Physics Letters. 2003;82(20):3493-3495. DOI: 10.1063/1.1576308
  59. 59. Plocharski J, Wieczoreck W. PEO based composite solid electrolyte containing NASICON. Solid State Ionics. 1988;979:28-30
  60. 60. Kumar A, Singh BP, Choudhary RNP, Thakur AK. Characterization of electrical properties of Pb-modified BaSnO3 using impedance spectroscopy. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2006;99(1):150-159
  61. 61. Sarangi S, Badapanda T, Behera B, Anwar S. Frequency and temperature dependence dielectric behavior of barium zirconate titanate nanocrystalline powder obtained by mechanochemical synthesis. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2013;24:4033-4042. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-013-1358-0
  62. 62. Ranjan R, Kumar N, Behera B, Choudhary RNP. Investigations of Impedance and Electric Modulus Properties of Pb1-xS mx(Zr0.45Ti0.55)1x/4O3ceramics. Advanced Materials Letters. 2014;5(3):138-142
  63. 63. Ganguly P, Jha AK, Deori KL. Complex impedance studies of tungsten?bronze structured Ba5SmTi3Nb7O30 ferroelectric ceramics. Solid State Communications. 2008;146(11-12):472-477
  64. 64. Hirose N, West AR. Impedance spectroscopy of undoped BaTiO3 ceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1996;79:1633-1641. DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08775.x
  65. 65. Dutta A, Bharti C, Sinha TP. AC conductivity and dielectric relaxation in CaMg1/3Nb2/3O3. Materials Research Bulletin. 2008;43(5):1246-1254
  66. 66. Morrison FD, Sinclair DC, West AR. Characterization of lanthanum doped barium titanate ceramics using impedance spectroscopy. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 2001;84:531-538

Written By

Umaru Ahmadu, Alhassan Muazu and Sadiq Umar

Submitted: June 11th, 2017 Reviewed: February 15th, 2018 Published: November 5th, 2018