Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Cacao Agrosystems in Tabasco, México

Written By

Hortensia Brito-Vega, Edmundo Gómez-Méndez and José Manuel Salaya-Domínguez

Submitted: 27 February 2018 Reviewed: 03 May 2018 Published: 22 August 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.78302

From the Edited Volume

Sustainability of Agroecosystems

Edited by Alexandre Bosco de Oliveira

Chapter metrics overview

1,158 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The cacao agrosystems are very suitable for reforesting completely cleared areas and can become biological corridors between segments of the forest, allowing the repopulation of birds, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians, among others. Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) is one of the most important tropical crops both nationally and internationally. However, by appropriate management of cacao crops and the inclusion of aggregate values in forest, fruit, vegetables, and ornamental production, as organic cultivation, specific varieties of plants could generate significant income for small producers in the Southeast from Mexico. This cacao agrosystem is involved in erosion, soil fertility, plant nutrition, water quantity and quality, carbon sequestration, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and soil biodiversity.


  • agroforestry
  • nutrient
  • organic
  • soil chemical properties

1. Introduction

Currently, global challenges such as deforestation, indefensible cultivation practices, loss of flora and fauna, greater risk of climate alteration, as well as the intensification of food shortages, poverty and malnutrition, can be observed and investigated [1]. Proper selection of trees and crop species helps meet wood demand, increase yield, soil fertility, promote sustainability and adequate efficiency of natural resources [2]. The cultivation of cocoa interspersed with tree species and high-density short rotation can be the best option to meet the growing requirements of raw materials for food and industry through the sustainability of natural resources [3].

The agroforestry systems of cacao in Tabasco (Mexico) is an ecological agricultural alternative, economically feasible, sustainable, and conservation of natural resources in the simultaneous preservation of forests and jungles. Given that Theobroma cacao is a shade-tolerant plant, this production system manages genetic diversity of ecosystems in southern Mexico, Tabasco [4]. The objective of this review is to conduct a current investigation of the state of the art of cocoa agrosystems in the state of Tabasco, Mexico.

1.1. Theobroma cacao L

The T. cacao is a member of the Malvaceae family and is a neotropical species that originated in southern and central Mexico. It is widely grown in more than four countries in the humid tropical regions (Tabasco, Chiapas, Oaxaca, and Veracruz). Cocoa beans are used for chocolate, sweets, and drinks. The cacao pods (fruits) grow mainly on the tree trunk. Photo assimilates are translocated from source organs (leaves) to sink organs (pods) through a long-distance phloem pathway.

Based on the morphological characteristics and geographical origins, three main genetic groups have traditionally been defined within cocoa: Criollo, Forastero, and Trinitario. Trinitario has been recognized as a hybrid “Criollo × Forastero.” Recently, molecular markers and chromosome analysis have been used to classify cocoa germplasm into 10 main groups: Amelonado, Contamana, Curaray, Guayana, Iquitos, Marañón, Nanay, Purús, Criollo, and Nacional [5]. The genomes of Criollo and Amelonado have been sequenced and cover 76 and 92% of the estimated genome size, respectively [5, 6].

These genomes are important for research in genetic characterization, phylogenetics, and viability. Tabasco is a state of the Mexican Republic located in the southeastern part of the country (Mexico), with 17 municipalities of which three are the largest producers of cocoa with the agroforestry system: Comalcalco, Cunduacán, and Cárdenas (Figure 1). It has a tropical humidity climate, with temperatures ranging from a minimum of 17°C to a maximum of 42°C, with a rainfall of 2000 mm per year and a relative humidity of 90%. The topography is generally flat and low and is covered to a large extent with lakes, lagoons, and wetlands [4]. These biotic and abiotic conditions have favored the agroforestry systems in the production of cocoa of the three groups Criollo, Forastero, and Trinitario, at the same time, an increase in the fertility of the soil, micro- and macroorganisms, conservation and together with the sustainability.

Figure 1.

The cacao agroforestry systems in Tabasco (México).


2. The cacao agrosystems

Diversification, efficiency in land use, climate change, sustainability, and permanent vegetation cover are important elements of agroforestry systems, which play an important role in adapting to climate change [7, 8, 9, 10]. Agrosystem has been recognized as a process in agriculture as an innovative and promising way to reduce the concentration of atmospheric CO2 by replacing fossil fuels in the Kyoto Protocol [11].

Tabasco is the first producer of cocoa under agroforestry systems, Mexico. It is mentioned as a green and economically viable alternative with the concurrent conservation of forest remains and economic services (Table 1). In this state, two typical systems of cocoa production are managed: (1) traditional farming system, where cocoa plantations are implanted under forests or natural forests, and herbaceous, shrubby, and upper canopy individuals are eliminated to provide greater light input [13, 14, 15]; and (2) cocoa plantations are established in areas where the entire forest or native has been removed and replaced by a single forest species and the cocoa plants are shaded with banana and other crops such as cassava and corn as a provisional shade until forest species provide sufficient shade [13, 16, 17].

StateSurfaces (Ha−1)Production (T−1)Performance (T/H−1)

Table 1.

The producing states of Theobroma cacao in Mexico under agroforestry system [12].

Environmental performance in cocoa production as monoculture and agroforestry through life cycle assessment based on ISO 14040 and 14044, with adaptation for local impact indicators. The analysis considered cocoa production at the farm level, from field establishment to the limit of the cocoa crop. The results showed that agroforestry has the smallest contribution to the categories of global impact of global warming, acidification, and eutrophication, which represent carbon dioxide (3.67E+01 kg CO2), sulfur dioxide (4.31E−02 kg SO2), and phosphate (2.25E−05 kg PO4), respectively [18].

Agroforestry with cacao and monoculture of cocoa also had the highest amount of organic carbon and organic matter in the soil, conditions that favor the growth and activity of beneficial microorganisms for the soil rhizosphere (Pseudomonas sp. and Trichoderma sp.) [19]. In addition, this cocoa agroforestry system had the highest value at 1.36 tons per hectare, as compared to the monoculture of cocoa that was below 1 ton per hectare. Therefore, this agroforestry system is a wise option to promote the environmental sustainability of cocoa crops associated with plant diversity [19].

Agroforestry is increasingly considered as an important adaptation and mitigation strategy against climate change. In particular, the use of fruit trees, trees, and shrubs has been promoted as a practice that contributes to improving soil fertility through nitrogen fixation and the use of macro- and beneficial microorganisms, by increasing the supply of nutrients for the production of crops. While much of the evidence on the impact of tree diversity is based on ranch experiments and correlation analysis, there is a paucity of rigorous evidence under the real conditions of small farmers. Research on the impacts of the adoption and the change of arboreal vegetation such as Gliricidia sepium and Faidherbia albida [19].

The producers in Malawi adopted the agroforestry system with cocoa and the changes of trees or shrubs of the legume type showed the increase in value to the different crops by 35%. It also had an impact on the disaggregation through stratification by land ownership revealing that farmers with smaller farms of up to 2 acres obtain the greatest benefits. In addition, the use of legume-type shrubs along with corn also significantly increased the value of food crops. This study offers preliminary ideas that contribute to an emerging field of research on the quantitative assessment of agricultural interventions, such as agroforestry practices using new analytical approaches. We provide some policy ideas and recommend the need to design future research on development initiatives that consider small-scale variation in the social, economic, and ecological context of farmers to improve their absorption and adaptation in order to take advantage of the full potential of the agroforestry to improve soil fertility and family food security [20].

2.1. The cocoa beans

Chocolate has been attributed to attainment of optimal human health and development due to its high content of flavonoids that are crucial in reducing the risk or delaying the development of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other age-related diseases [21].

The production of chocolate had a great impact with the appearance of the diseases of “Phytophthora,” “Ceratocystis fimbriata,” “Crinipellis perniciosa,” and “Moniliophthora roreri” in the cocoa plants (Figure 2). To recover the production of cocoa, many hybrid plants resistant to diseases have been developed (Figure 3). However, some different cocoa hybrids produce cocoa beans that generate chocolate with variable quality. The fermentation of cocoa beans is a microbiological process that can be applied to the production of chocolate flavor precursors, which leads to overcome the problem of the variable quality of chocolate [22]. The beneficial microorganisms in the use of cocoa production have influence on the microbial communities present in the fermentation process of the compounds involved during the fermentation and the sensory characterization of chocolate. In the bitter or semibitter taste, the use of microorganisms such as: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Acetobacter pasteurianus is proposed as starter cultures for the fermentation of cocoa.

Figure 2.

The healthy and diseased “Moniliophthora roreri” cocoa pod present in agroforestry systems.

Figure 3.

The surface area and production of cocoa in the state of Tabasco [21].

Climate change can create serious problems for farmers by increasing the variability of rainfall, droughts, and floods. Understanding how to build the resilience of livelihoods for these purposes is a hallucinatory necessity. Agroforestry can be considered as a potential solution, although many people intuitively link agrosystems with livelihoods against floods and drought, there is little comprehensive empirical evidence. Agrosystems for small farmers can develop livelihood capacities for floods and drought: it is possible to adapt various strategies to climate change, but is crucial for small farmers, and agroecosystem can be a promising option to balance the main production of cocoa, which is mainly chocolate grains [23].


3. Soil chemical properties and nutrient

The soil of the agroforestry systems is enriched with the addition of litter in large quantities by the different plant species, which ultimately improves fertility in terms of organic carbon available from the soil to the plant and the participation of macro- and microorganisms in the soil. The processes of crushing, degrading, and transforming the available nutrients (N, P, and K) provide alternative sources of income and employment to the population of the rural areas that help in the economic systems [13, 24].

The fall of litter is an important input for the replacement of microbial substances in the soil and is one of the most essential ways to maintain soil fertility and quality of vegetable production with free of agrochemicals. The agroforestry system is a proven system of land use to vertically improve the health, quality, and microbial stability against unsuitable climatic conditions. This system contributes to increase the nutritional balance in the soil compared to the open system, that is, pH (7.9), EC (0.43 dSm−1), available nitrogen (253.48 kg/ha), potassium (219.63 kg/ha), organic carbon (1.07%), and available soil phosphorus (22.72 kg/ha) [13, 24].

The spatial integration of land use for the management of soil fertility, soil health, economic services, crop quality, and the key factors that influence the integration of land conservation based on multipurpose agrosystems such as outputs and inputs in the process of agroforestry-cocoa integration and the use of agroforestry space lands have been discussed [13, 25, 26, 27, 28].


  1. 1. Garrity DP. Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agroforestry Systems. 2004;61:5-17
  2. 2. Sharma P, Rai SC, Sharma R, Sharma E. Effects of land use change on soil microbial C, N and P in a Himalayan watershed. Pedobiologia. 2004;48:83-92
  3. 3. Sarvade S, Mishra HS, Kaushal R, Chaturvedi S, Tewari S. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and soil properties as influenced by different Agri-silviculture systems of Terai region, northern India. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 2014;5(3):350-355
  4. 4. INEGI. Instituto Nacional De Estadistica Y Geografia. 2018. Available from:
  5. 5. Li F, Wu B, Qin X, Yan L, Lai J. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of the sucrose transporter gene family from Theobroma cacao L. Gene. 2014;546(2):336-341. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.05.056
  6. 6. Rani S, Chauhan SK, Kumar R, Dhatt KK. Bioeconomic appraisal of flowering annuals for seed production under poplar (Populus deltoides) based agroforestry system. Tropical Agricultural Research. 2011;22(2):125-133
  7. 7. Chauhan SK, Brar MS, Sharma R. Performance of poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr. Ex Marsh) and its effect on wheat yield under agroforestry system in irrigated agro-ecosystem, India. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2012;10(1):53-60
  8. 8. Chauhan SK, Sharma R, Singh B, Sharma SC. Biomass production, carbon sequestration and economics of on-farm poplar plantations in Punjab, India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2015;7(1):452-458
  9. 9. Singh B, Sharma KN. Tree growth and nutrient status of soil in a poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr.) based agroforestry system in Punjab, India. Agroforestry Systems. 2007;70:125-134
  10. 10. Singh RB. Environmental consequences of agricultural development: A case study from the green revolution state of Haryana, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2000;82:97-103
  11. 11. Ajit HAK, Dhyani SK, Bhat GM, Malik AR, Dutt V, Jain A. Quantification of carbon stocks and sequestration potential through existing agroforestry systems in the hilly Kupwara district of Kashmir valley in India. Current Science. 2017;113(4):782-785. DOI: 10.18520/cs/v113/i04/782-785
  12. 12. SIAP. Agrifood and Fisheries Information Service. CACAO. 2018. Available from:
  13. 13. Brito-Vega H, Salaya-Dominguez JM, Gomez-Mendez E, Gomez-Vazquez A, Antele-Gomez JB. Physico-chemical properties of soil and pods (Theobroma cacao L.) in cocoa agroforestry systems. Journal of Agronomy. 2018;17(1):48-55
  14. 14. Fontes AG, Gama-Rodrigues AC, Gama-Rodrigues EF, Sales MVS, Costa MG, Machado RCR. Nutrient stocks in litterfall and litter in cocoa agroforests in Brazil. Plant and Soil. 2014;383:313-335
  15. 15. Monroe PHM, Gama-Rodrigues EF, Gama-Rodrigues AC, Marques JRB. Soil carbon stocks and origin under different cacao agroforestry systems in Southern Bahia, Brazil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2016;221:99-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.022
  16. 16. Bargali SS. Weight loss and nitrogen release in decomposing wood litter in an age series of eucalypt plantation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1996;28:699-702
  17. 17. Bargali SS, Singh SP, Singh RP. Pattern of weight loss and nutrient release in decomposing leaf litter in an age series of eucalypt plantations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1993;25:1731-1738
  18. 18. Oliveira PHG, Gama-Rodrigues AC, Gama-Rodrigues EF, Sales MVS. Litter and soil-related variation in functional group abundances in cacao agroforests using structural equation modeling. Ecological Indicators. 2018;84:254-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.030
  19. 19. López-Ferrer ÚC, Brito-Vega H, López-Morales D, Salaya-Domínguez JM, Gómez-Méndez E. Trichoderma role in agroforestry-cacaotal systems as an antagonal agent. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 2017;20(1):91-100 Available from:
  20. 20. Coulibaly JY, Chiputwa B, Nakelse T, Kundhlande G. Adoption of agroforestry and the impact on household food security among farmers in Malawi. Agricultural Systems. 2017:15552-15569. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.03.017
  21. 21. Arévalo-Gardini E, Arévalo-Hernández CO, Baligar VC, He ZL. Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in Peru. Science of the Total Environment. 2017;605-606:792-800. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.122
  22. 22. da Veiga Moreira IM, de Figueiredo Vilela L, da Cruz Pedroso Miguel MG, Santos C, Lima N, Freitas SR. Impact of a microbial cocktail used as a starter culture on cocoa fermentation and chocolate flavor. Molecules. 2017;22(5):1-15. DOI: 10.3390/molecules22050766
  23. 23. Quandt A, Neufeldt H, McCabe JT. The role of agroforestry in building livelihood resilience to floods and drought in semiarid Kenya. Ecology and Society. 2017;22(3):1-12. DOI: 10.5751/ES-09461-220310
  24. 24. Sirohi C, Bangarwa KS. Effect of different spacings of poplar-based agroforestry system on soil chemical properties and nutrient status in Haryana, India. Current Science (00113891). 2017;113(7):1403-1407. DOI: 10.18520/cs/v113/i07/1403-1407
  25. 25. Guteta D, Abegaz A. Factors influencing scaling up of agroforestry-based spatial land-use integration for soil fertility management in Arsamma watershed, Southwestern Ethiopian Highlands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2016;59(10):1795-1812. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2015.1090960
  26. 26. Pandey DN. Multifunctional agroforestry systems in India. Current Science. 2007;92:455-463
  27. 27. Bisht N, Sah VK, Satyawali K, Tiwari S. Comparison of wheat yield and soil properties under open and poplar based agroforestry system. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2017;9(3):1540-1543
  28. 28. Puri S, Nair PKR. Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program. Agroforestry Systems. 2004;61:437-452

Written By

Hortensia Brito-Vega, Edmundo Gómez-Méndez and José Manuel Salaya-Domínguez

Submitted: 27 February 2018 Reviewed: 03 May 2018 Published: 22 August 2018