Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Role of Glucose and Fatty Acid Metabolism in the Development of Insulin Resistance in Skeletal Muscle

Written By

Sithandiwe Eunice Mazibuko-Mbeje, Phiwayinkosi V. Dludla, Bongani B. Nkambule, Nnini Obonye and Johan Louw

Submitted: 20 October 2017 Reviewed: 23 February 2018 Published: 05 November 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.75904

From the Edited Volume

Muscle Cell and Tissue - Current Status of Research Field

Edited by Kunihiro Sakuma

Chapter metrics overview

1,493 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The rapid rise in the prevalence of obesity and diabetes has significantly contributed to the increasing global burden of noncommunicable diseases. Insulin resistance is a major underpinning etiology of both obesity and type 2 diabetes. Insulin resistance is characterized by a reduced response of skeletal, liver, and fat tissues to the actions of insulin hormone. Although detailed mechanisms implicated in the development of insulin resistance remain plausible, skeletal muscles have been identified to play an integral role in the improvement of insulin sensitivity in the diseased state. The effective modulation of glucose and fatty acid metabolism in the skeletal muscle through exercise or by certain therapeutics has been associated with reversal of insulin resistance and amelioration of diabetes associated complications such as inflammation and oxidative stress. This chapter will briefly discuss the role of glucose and fatty acid metabolism in the development of insulin resistance in the skeletal muscle.

Keywords

  • skeletal muscle
  • insulin resistance
  • glucose and fatty acid metabolism

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) contributes to approximately 90% of all diabetes mellitus cases and is amongst the top 10 leading causes of death worldwide [1]. Symptoms such as enhanced thirst, polyuria, fatigue, and impaired wound healing are identified in those with T2D. The recent International Diabetes Federation (IDF) report projects an astonishing increase in cases of diabetes [2]. An estimated 425 million people are currently living with diabetes, with a projected 1.5 fold increase in the prevalence of diabetes, while a total of 629 million adults are expected to be diabetic by the year 2045 [2]. In Africa, the prevalence of diabetes is estimated at 16 million and is expected to rise to 41 million by 2045 [2]. Diabetes is characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from an inadequate production of insulin and insulin utilization in a T2D state. An unhealthy lifestyle such as lack of physical activity and a diet containing excessive fat content, including refined carbohydrates has been associated with an increased risk for developing insulin resistance (IR) [2, 3]. Carbohydrate-rich diets with a high glycemic index may contribute to obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, and hyperinsulinemia. This consequence can impair glucose and lipid metabolism, and accelerate the progression of IR. During a state of IR, insulin levels are elevated due to the rising glucose levels, but over time, a state of relative inadequate production of insulin can develop [2]. IR is regarded as one of the early phenotypes associated with development of obesity, and it is normally present in high-risk individual’s years before development of T2D. Although maintenance of healthy lifestyle, as well as the use of hypolipidemic and hypoglycemic drugs, remains effective at attenuating insulin-resistant complications, the escalating incidence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) warrants further exploration into pathological mechanisms implicated in the development of IR. Accumulative evidence suggests that effective modulation of energy substrates such as glucose and free fatty acids (FFAs) remains crucial in the amelioration of lifestyle diseases, including T2D [4, 5, 6]. This chapter will discuss the role of glucose and lipid metabolism in the development of IR.

Advertisement

2. Skeletal muscle and its role in modulating insulin resistance

Skeletal muscles are comprised of an intricate tissue, with diverse network of fibers, which have different mechanical and metabolic functions. Skeletal muscles contribute to approximately 40% of the total body weight and contain 50–75% of all body proteins [7]. Skeletal muscles account for more than 80% of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake [8], and using combined oral and intravenous glucose tolerance testing, Himsworth and Kerr were able to demonstrate that tissue-specific insulin sensitivity was lower in T2D individuals [9]. Therefore, IR in skeletal muscle has a major impact on whole-body metabolic homeostasis and it is the main element for the development of T2D. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Several mechanisms that play a role in the development of IR in skeletal muscle have been proposed, and these include accumulation of intracellular lipid derivatives (diacylglycerol and ceramides) as a result of elevated plasma FFAs, oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory signals, and impaired gene transcription [8, 10]. Moreover, mitochondrial dysfunction has associated with IR [11]. The following section will focus on glucose regulation and fatty acid metabolism, in relation to the development of IR in skeletal muscle.

Advertisement

3. Glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle

Glucose is a monosaccharide used as a biological fuel during aerobic and anaerobic respiration or fermentation. Aerobic respiration is the most efficient means of glucose utilization, yielding 32 molecules of ATP during the processes of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. Glycolysis is the metabolic whereby glucose is metabolized into pyruvate or to lactate; this process yields higher capacity for ATP generation [12]. During glycolysis, glucose 6-phosphate is converted to fructose-6-phosphate by phosphohexose, and then to fructose-1,6-biphosphate by phosphofructokinase. This reaction is irreversible and is a major point of regulation during glycolysis. Energy utilization by adult skeletal muscle is tightly controlled, with muscle fibers having the ability to switch between different substrates for ATP production. This is highly dependent on the availability of energy substrates and the energy requirements [13, 14]. Skeletal muscles are able to utilize both glucose and FFAs as a source of ATP production. However, utilization of glucose and FFAs as a primary source of ATP production depends on the metabolic state of an individual, i.e., whether the individual is at a fed or fasting state [15]. During the fasting state, glucose uptake in skeletal muscle is reduced while plasma FFA levels are increased due to lipolysis in adipose tissue. This subsequently leads to the utilization of FFAs as the predominant source of ATP production [16]; whereas, during a fed state, plasma glucose levels are elevated, which stimulates insulin secretion and enhances glucose uptake by skeletal muscle. This also leads to reduced lipolysis in adipose tissue and a reduction in plasma FFAs. The ability of switching between substrates in the fasted and fed state is crucial in promoting skeletal muscle glucose oxidation. Consequently, it has been reported that muscle of insulin-resistant or diabetic subjects fails to switch between the substrates, showing metabolic inflexibility [8]. This metabolic inflexibility can result in impaired glucose and fatty acid metabolism, leading to the development of IR.

Several mechanisms, which include glucose transportation, are implicated in the regulation of skeletal muscle glucose metabolism and have been a therapeutic target for the reversal IR and improvement of skeletal muscle function. Briefly, postprandial glucose is transported actively across the plasma membrane by specific carrier proteins, which belong to the glucose transporter (GLUT) family. There are several types of glucose transporters located in the plasma membrane of myocytes. Each glucose transporter isoform plays a specific role in glucose transportation that is determined by its tissue distribution, substrate specificity, and transport kinetics [17]. Glucose transporter isoform 1 (GLUT1) is present in all cells and is largely responsible for regulating basal glucose and ensuring a steady influx of glucose into cells. The glucose transporter isoform 2 (GLUT2) is a high-Km glucose transporter expressed in hepatocytes, pancreatic beta cells, and the basolateral membranes of intestinal and renal epithelial cells. In contrast to other transporters, GLUT2 facilitates bidirectional glucose transport into and out of the cell [17]. GLUT3 is a low-capacity glucose transporter that is responsible for glucose uptake in neurons, while glucose transporter protein isoform 4 (GLUT4) is expressed exclusively in muscle and fat cells, and is responsible for increased glucose uptake into these tissues postprandially, thereby maintaining normoglycemia [17].

In skeletal muscle, insulin stimulation induces translocation of GLUT4 from intracellular vesicles within the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane and thereby increases glucose uptake [18, 19]. When insulin levels decrease in the blood and insulin receptors are no longer occupied, the glucose transporters are recycled back into the cytoplasm. Failure of GLUT4 to translocate to the plasma membrane results in IR [20]. The crucial step for effective modulation of GLUT4 translocation has been the binding of insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) to its receptor or IGF1 receptor, leading to the activation of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) pathway. Activation of this pathway has been subject to ongoing research for its role in skeletal muscle tissue growth, and most importantly, in the regulation of insulin signaling [21]. This has been verified on various models showing that knockout of insulin receptor, PI3K and AKT genes, especially in skeletal muscle, is associated with growth retardation as well as with impairment of insulin action [22, 23]. Therefore, effective modulation of glucose transportation and activation of PI3K/AKT pathway remains important to improve glucose tolerance and also skeletal muscle function.

Advertisement

4. Fatty acid metabolism in skeletal muscle

FFAs are elongated hydrocarbon chains with a terminal carboxylate group. Apart from being one of the major sources of fuel in the body, FFAs can perform a number of other functions, including serving as building blocks for phospholipids and also acting as hormones as well as intracellular messengers [24]. FFAs can exist in unsaturated or saturated form, depending on the number of bonds the hydrocarbon chain contains. While unsaturated fats such as oleic acid, mostly available in vegetable oils, are considered beneficial to the body [25], saturated fats, namely palmitic acid, are associated with the development of IR [26]. For the latter, it is widely used in experimental models to induce IR [19, 27]. Exposure of cultured skeletal muscle cells to high palmitate concentrations has been linked with the activation of protein kinase C (PKC), one of the main enzymes involved in impaired insulin signaling [26, 28]. Briefly, by phosphorylating insulin receptor substrate 1, PKC can alter the whole downstream effect of insulin response, ultimately leading to impaired GLUT4 translocation and reduced glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. Evidence shows that PKC activation by 12-deoxyphorbol 13-phenylacetate 20-acetate is associated with a reduction in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, whereas PKC inhibition with GF 109203X results in enhanced insulin action in cultured human skeletal muscle [29]. An abnormal reduction of glucose uptake in skeletal muscle, mainly due to an impaired switch in substrate preference, as explained by Randle [6], remains an important contributing factor to the development of IR and subsequent metabolic complications. Thus, it is a viable option to target glucose uptake improvement, concomitant to reducing glycogen stores to reverse IR in skeletal muscle.

Beta oxidation, the main catabolic process by which fats are broken down in the body, is another system crucial for the control of substrate switch within many cells, including skeletal muscle (Figure 1). Generally, during periods of fasting, a substrate switch occurs where FFAs become a predominant source for ATP production via beta oxidation [30]. Although FFAs are hydrophobic in nature and can passively diffuse across the lipophilic cell membrane, transporters such as plasma membrane fatty acid-binding protein (FABP), fatty acid transport protein 1 (FATP1), and cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) are widely expressed in rodent and human skeletal muscle [31, 32]. By controlling entry of long chain fatty acids across the barrier of the inner mitochondrial membrane for subsequent beta oxidation, the carnitine shuttle system can influence skeletal muscle substrate switch. Some of the well-investigated components of the system include the malonyl-CoA sensitive carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT1) that resides on the mitochondrial outer membrane (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Glucose and free fatty acids (FFAs) are the predominant substrates that are oxidized to generate acetyl-CoA, which is then utilized by the electron transport chain to generate adenosine triphosphate (ATP). An insulin-resistant state is characterized by an impaired substrate utilization, a process termed metabolic inflexibility. Modulation of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) and 5′ AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling mechanisms are increasingly targeted by various pharmacological compounds to reverse insulin resistance and improve skeletal muscle function. Abbreviations: CD36: cluster of differentiation 36, CPT1: carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1, DAG: diacyl glycerol, FAO: fatty acid oxidation, FATP: fatty acid transport protein 1, GLUT4: glucose transporter isoform 4, GO: glucose oxidation, IR: insulin receptor, and PKC: protein kinase C.

Some polyphenols, including those from grape extracts, can influence muscle lipid metabolism by reducing CD36 and regulating CPT1 expression in high fat diet (HFD) fed rats, leading to upregulated GLUT4 protein expression and improved insulin signaling [33]. Similarly, metformin, a commonly used antidiabetic drug, has demonstrated increased capacity to reverse IR and improve skeletal muscle function through the modulation of CPT1 and 5′ AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) [34, 35]. Like PI3K/AKT, AMPK is also a target of ongoing research for its role in preventing metabolic disease through modulation of substrate metabolism in various tissues [36, 37]. Intracellular energy fluctuations, represented by changing AMP/ATP ratio, such as those identified in an IR state, remain monumental for the activation or deactivation of AMPK activity [38]. A number of natural products [39, 40, 41], including metformin, are known to activate AMPK, leading to the phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase and to effective modulation of beta oxidation. However, the activity of AMPK is tissue specific and is tightly controlled in a T2D state, with its activation demonstrated to be important in reversing IR and improving signaling in skeletal muscle [19, 36].

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

Skeletal muscle forms the largest insulin-sensitive tissue in the body and remains the key site for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Glucose and FFAs are the prominent substrates responsible for ATP production in the skeletal muscle. However, in an insulin-resistant state, the utilization of both glucose and FFAs is impaired, leading to abnormally enhanced intramuscular substrate storage. Modulation of the PI3K/AKT and AMPK signaling appears to be the driving mechanism responsible for the regulation of substrate metabolism, as well as associated downstream effects such as generation of oxidative stress. Interestingly, some pharmacological compounds such as metformin are known to exert their therapeutic effects through the modulation of these pathways, leading to improved control of energy substrates. Therefore, it is imperative that more research be directed at exploring signaling mechanisms implicated in the control of energy substrates, especially in the skeletal muscle, since it is known to be the major “hub” for energy metabolism.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Biomedical Research and Innovation Platform of the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) baseline funding and the South African National Research Foundation (NRF: grant number 87836 to SE Mazibuko-Mbeje). The grant holders acknowledge that opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in any publication generated by the SAMRC or NRF supported research are those of the authors, and that the SAMRC and NRF accept no liability whatsoever in this regard. PVD was partially supported as a postdoctoral fellow by funding from the SAMRC.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest. All authors are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Advertisement

Abbreviations

AKTprotein kinase B
AMPK5′ AMP-activated protein kinase
ATPadenosine triphosphate
CD36cluster of differentiation 36
CPT1carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1
FABPfatty acid binding protein
FATP1fatty acid transport protein 1
FFAsfree fatty acids
GLUTglucose transporter
HFDhigh fat diet
IDFInternational Diabetes Federation
IGF-1insulin-like growth factor 1
IRinsulin resistance
MetSmetabolic syndrome
PI3Kphosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase
PKCprotein kinase C
T2Dtype 2 diabetes mellitus
UCPuncoupling protein

References

  1. 1. World Health Organizatio. The Top 10 Causes of Death. 2017. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/ [Accessed: 31 January 2018]
  2. 2. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas Eighth Edition. Available from: http://www.diabetesatlas.org/resources/2017-atlas.html [Accessed: 30 January 2018]
  3. 3. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/148114/1/9789241564854_eng.pdf?ua=1 [Accessed: 30 January 2018]
  4. 4. Dludla PV et al. Phenylpyruvic acid-2-O-beta-D-glucoside attenuates high glucose-induced apoptosis in H9c2 cardiomyocytes. Planta Medica. 2016;82(17):1468-1474
  5. 5. Delarue J, Magnan C. Free fatty acids and insulin resistance. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care. 2007;10(2):142-148
  6. 6. Randle PJ et al. The glucose fatty-acid cycle. Its role in insulin sensitivity and the metabolic disturbances of diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1963;1(7285):785-789
  7. 7. Frontera WR, Ochala J. Skeletal muscle: A brief review of structure and function. Calcified Tissue International. 2015;96(3):183-195
  8. 8. DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D. Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is the primary defect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 2):S157-S163
  9. 9. Himsworth HP, Kerr RB. Insulin-sensitive and insulin-insensitive types of diabetes mellitus. Clinical Science. 1939;4:119-152
  10. 10. Wu H, Ballantyne CM. Skeletal muscle inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2017;127(1):43-54
  11. 11. Montgomery MK, Turner N. Mitochondrial dysfunction and insulin resistance: An update. Endocrine Connections. 2015;4(1):R1-R15
  12. 12. Enzo E et al. Aerobic glycolysis tunes YAP/TAZ transcriptional activity. The EMBO Journal. 2015;34(10):1349-1370
  13. 13. Bangsbo J et al. ATP production and efficiency of human skeletal muscle during intense exercise: Effect of previous exercise. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2001;280(6):E956-E964
  14. 14. Baker JS, McCormick MC, Robergs RA. Interaction among skeletal muscle metabolic energy systems during intense exercise. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2010;2010:905612
  15. 15. Colberg SR et al. Skeletal muscle utilization of free fatty acids in women with visceral obesity. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1995;95(4):1846-1853
  16. 16. Cahova M, Vavrinkova H, Kazdova L. Glucose-fatty acid interaction in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue in insulin resistance. Physiological Research. 2007;56(1):1-15
  17. 17. Thorens B, Mueckler M. Glucose transporters in the 21st century. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2010;298(2):E141-E145
  18. 18. Wang J et al. Anti-diabetic activity of stigmasterol from soybean oil by targeting the GLUT4 glucose transporter. Food & Nutrition Research. 2017;61(1):1364117
  19. 19. Mazibuko SE et al. Amelioration of palmitate-induced insulin resistance in C2C12 muscle cells by rooibos (Aspalathus linearis). Phytomedicine. 2013;20(10):813-819
  20. 20. Funaki M, Randhawa P, Janmey PA. Separation of insulin signaling into distinct GLUT4 translocation and activation steps. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2004;24(17):7567-7577
  21. 21. Boucher J, Kleinridders A, Kahn CR. Insulin receptor signaling in normal and insulin-resistant states. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2014;6:a009191
  22. 22. Schiaffino S, Mammucari C. Regulation of skeletal muscle growth by the IGF1-Akt/PKB pathway: Insights from genetic models. Skeletal Muscle. 2011;1(1):4
  23. 23. Nadler ST et al. Normal Akt/PKB with reduced PI3K activation in insulin-resistant mice. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2001;281(6):E1249-E1254
  24. 24. Nagy K, Tiuca ID. Importance of Fatty Acids in Physiopathology of Human Body [Intechopen]. 2017. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/fatty-acids/importance-of-fatty-acids-in-physiopathology-of-human-body [Accessed: 01 February 2018]
  25. 25. Ahn YM et al. Oleanolic acid modulates the renin-angiotensin system and cardiac natriuretic hormone concomitantly with volume and pressure balance in rats. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2017;809:231-241
  26. 26. Benoit SC et al. Palmitic acid mediates hypothalamic insulin resistance by altering PKC-theta subcellular localization in rodents. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2009;119(9):2577-2589
  27. 27. Mazibuko SE et al. Aspalathin improves glucose and lipid metabolism in 3T3-L1 adipocytes exposed to palmitate. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2015;59(11):2199-2208
  28. 28. Kelly KR et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent insulin regulation of long-chain fatty acid (LCFA) metabolism in L6 muscle cells: Involvement of atypical protein kinase C-zeta in LCFA uptake but not oxidation. The Journal of Endocrinology. 2008;198(2):375-384
  29. 29. Cortright RN et al. Protein kinase C modulates insulin action in human skeletal muscle. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2000;278(3):E553-E562
  30. 30. Fillmore N, Mori J, Lopaschuk GD. Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation alterations in heart failure, ischaemic heart disease and diabetic cardiomyopathy. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2014;171(8):2080-2090
  31. 31. Dutta-Roy AK. Cellular uptake of long-chain fatty acids: Role of membrane-associated fatty-acid-binding/transport proteins. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2000;57(10):1360-1372
  32. 32. Bonen A, Dyck DJ, Luiken JJ. Skeletal muscle fatty acid transport and transporters. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 1998;441:193-205
  33. 33. Aoun M et al. A grape polyphenol extract modulates muscle membrane fatty acid composition and lipid metabolism in high-fat–high-sucrose diet-fed rats. The British Journal of Nutrition. 2011;106(4):491-501
  34. 34. Hu R et al. Modulation of glucose metabolism by a natural compound from Chloranthus japonicus via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):778
  35. 35. Collier CA et al. Metformin counters the insulin-induced suppression of fatty acid oxidation and stimulation of triacylglycerol storage in rodent skeletal muscle. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2006;291(1):E182-E189
  36. 36. Mihaylova MM, Shaw RJ. The AMPK signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. Nature Cell Biology. 2011;13(9):1016-1023
  37. 37. Heidrich F et al. AMPK—Activated protein kinase and its role in energy metabolism of the heart. Current Cardiology Reviews. 2010;6(4):337-342
  38. 38. Zungu M et al. Regulation of AMPK by the ubiquitin proteasome system. The American Journal of Pathology. 2011;178(1):4-11
  39. 39. Ahn J et al. The anti-obesity effect of quercetin is mediated by the AMPK and MAPK signaling pathways. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2008;373(4):545-549
  40. 40. Dugdale HF, et al. The role of resveratrol on skeletal muscle cell differentiation and myo- tube hypertrophy during glucose restriction. 2017;444(1-2):109-123
  41. 41. Johnson R et al. Aspalathin, a dihydrochalcone C-glucoside, protects H9c2 cardiomyocytes against high glucose induced shifts in substrate preference and apoptosis. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2016;60(4):922-934

Written By

Sithandiwe Eunice Mazibuko-Mbeje, Phiwayinkosi V. Dludla, Bongani B. Nkambule, Nnini Obonye and Johan Louw

Submitted: 20 October 2017 Reviewed: 23 February 2018 Published: 05 November 2018