Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Septic Embolism in Endocarditis: Anatomic and Pathophysiologic Considerations

Written By

Vikas Yellapu, Daniel Ackerman, Santo Longo and Stanislaw P. Stawicki

Submitted: 13 February 2018 Reviewed: 26 March 2018 Published: 12 September 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.76766

From the Edited Volume

Advanced Concepts in Endocarditis

Edited by Michael S. Firstenberg

Chapter metrics overview

1,652 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Septic embolism is a relatively common and potentially severe complication of infective endocarditis (IE). Septic emboli (SE), most often described as consisting of a combination of thrombus and infectious material—either bacterial or fungal—can be caused by hematogenous spread from virtually any anatomic site; however, it most commonly originates from cardiac valves. During the past two decades there has been a confluence of various risk factors that, both alone and in combination, led to greater incidence of both IE and SE, including increasing population age, greater use of prosthetic valves, implantation of various intracardiac devices, escalating intravenous drug use, and the high incidence of healthcare associated infections with antibiotic resistant microorganisms. From a clinical standpoint, SE can present at any time during the course of IE and may even be the initial presenting sign. SE may affect virtually any location in the human body, but some organs (e.g., liver, spleen, brain) and anatomic regions (e.g., lower extremity) tend to be more frequently involved. The most important aspect of management involves prompt recognition and proactive therapeutic approach. Given the broad spectrum of clinical presentations, symptoms and complications, SE can be challenging to diagnose and treat. Following the identification of SE, appropriate antibiotic coverage should be immediately instituted followed by supportive and/or interventional management, depending on the severity of presentation and the associated complications. In this chapter we explore the pathophysiology, anatomic origins, diagnostic tools, therapeutic measures, and new developments in SE, focusing predominantly on bacterial infections of cardiac origin.

Keywords

  • endocarditis
  • infective endocarditis
  • morbidity and mortality
  • septic embolism

1. Introduction

The collective understanding of infective endocarditis (IE) has changed significantly since its early characterization by Sir William Osler [1, 2]. In most low-and-middle income countries, rheumatic fever accounts for approximately two-thirds of all endocarditis cases [3, 4, 5], whereas in developed countries it is responsible for less than 10% of instances [6]. Over the past decade the incidence of IE has been increasing, with a recent study showing an overall increase of >30% between 2000 and 2011 [7]. The American Heart Association identified IE and associated complications as a major source of cardiovascular disability [8].

This surge in IE has been linked, in part, to recent medical advances, including increased use of implantable cardiac devices and a growing population of patients with chronic comorbidities [5, 9, 10]. Moreover, 10–35% of newly diagnosed cases of IE are thought to be healthcare associated infections, and hospital-acquired IE attributable to sources other than cardiac surgery is an emerging problem with mortality as high as 30–50% [11, 12]. The above observations can be explained, to some degree, by increases in antibiotic resistance including greater incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and higher prevalence of comorbidities in an increasingly aging population [2, 5, 12, 13].

In terms of intravenous drug use, injectable heroin has seen significant escalation [14, 15], with an associated incidence of IE growing by 58% between 2000 and 2013 [14]. In addition to the disease burden on individual patients and their families, the health-care system is further taxed with managing this difficult and expensive to treat population [14, 16]. Finally, it is important to recognize that recent years have seen IE presentations becoming more acute in nature, making diagnosis and treatment more challenging at times [5, 17, 18]. Among key complications of acute IE, the development of potentially devastating septic emboli (SE) may be seen. In this chapter, we will focus on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of SE in the context of IE, using a systematic anatomic approach and outlining some of the most recent developments in this fast-changing area of cardiovascular infectious disease.

Advertisement

2. Pathophysiology of septic emboli

When discussing the pathophysiology of emboli of cardiac origin, one must consider both non-infective (Libman-Sacks or autoimmune, Marantic or related to wasting illnesses such as cancer) and infective (e.g., bacterial or fungal) endocarditis [19, 20, 21]. As an overarching theme, any condition that results in structural “damage or alteration” of cardiac valves has the potential to trigger an inflammatory reaction leading to the formation of valvular “vegetations” and thromboembolic complications [22]. In contrast to non-infectious valvular etiologies which lead to sterile emboli, IE has the potential to produce SE which typically are composed of a conglomerate of infectious organisms, inflammatory cells, platelets and fibrin [23]. In contrast to non-infectious emboli, SE have the potential to result in both vascular compromise and hematogenous spread of infection [24, 25, 26]. Evidence shows that as many as 50–82% of patients with IE may be affected by some form of SE, including both symptomatic and sub-clinical presentations [27, 28, 29]. In terms of valvular propensity for systemic (non-pulmonary) SE development, mitral valve is the most commonly involved [10, 30].

The genesis of SE is predicated on the appearance of a thrombus in a critical cardiac (usually valvular, Figure 1) location. This is usually associated with the presence of infected pacemaker leads, prosthetic valve, or some form of anatomic (acquired or congenital) abnormality of the native valve [30]. Bacterial species that feature specific adhesion matrix molecules are particularly likely to attach onto the damaged valvular surfaces, endocardium, or exposed prosthetic material [30, 31, 32]. Simultaneous presence of inflamed tissue and microorganisms leads to further accumulation of fibrin-platelet-microorganism complexes, contributing to the growth of infectious vegetations [33, 34]. If fragments of such vegetations—in whole or in part—are released into the circulation, SE is said to have occurred [5, 31, 32]. Microorganisms most often implicated include Staphylococci, Beta-hemolytic Streptococci, Haemophilus, Actinobacteria, Caridobacterium, Eikenella, and Kingella. The latter 5 are often listed under the acronym, “HACEK”, and are less likely to cause IE than Staphylococci and Streptococci [10, 32, 35, 36]. Identifying the causative organism is critical to instituting prompt treatment with the most appropriate antibiotics. It is important to recognize that SE may affect any organ system or anatomic location, although certain patterns of involvement tend to be more common than others. This chapter will review key clinical evidence and developments regarding the diagnosis and management of SE. The authors will organize the current discussion according to regional/anatomic considerations in order to systematize and simplify the review process.

Figure 1.

An example of a large necrotic bacterial vegetation, leading to the replacement of the entire posterior mitral valve leaflet. A pustule can be seen in the immediate vicinity of the vegetation. Also note the normal-appearing leaflet, chorda tendinea, and papillary muscles of the anterior leaflet (labeled as ANT. MV).

Advertisement

3. Head and neck

3.1. Brain

It is well known that there are many different central nervous system (CNS) manifestations of SE [37]. However, proving direct cause-and-effect relationship has been more challenging. Evidence suggests that septic cerebral embolic events may complicate as many as 40% of cases of IE, with recurrence rates for SE reaching 50% [38]. Cumulatively, manifestations of SE within the cerebral circulation can be divided into cerebral infarction (purely ischemic, purely hemorrhagic, or combined), CNS infection (encephalitis, meningitis, and abscess formation); and vasculopathy (vasculitis, mycotic aneurysm formation), with widely varied clinical presentations [38]. Summary of potential CNS manifestations of IE is provided in Table 1.

CerebrovascularInfectionsSecondary complicationsRare complications
Ischemic strokeMeningoencephalitisToxic-metabolic encephalopathyMyeloradiculitis
Intracerebral hemorrhageCerebritisSeizureSpinal cord infarction
Subarachnoid hemorrhageAbscess formationHeadacheDiscitis/osteomyelitis
Mycotic aneurysm formationVentriculitisCranial neuropathies
EpendymitisMononeuritis multiplex
Myalgia

Table 1.

Central nervous system manifestations of infective endocarditis.

Adopted from Ref. [6].

Involvement of SE within the CNS can be broadly categorized into cerebrovascular and non-cerebrovascular event types. Given that approximately 20% of cardiac output is dedicated to supplying the cerebrovascular system, it is no surprise that the brain is among the most commonly involved organs in IE. In fact, it is not uncommon for a cerebrovascular event to precede the formal diagnosis of IE, and to be the trigger for subsequent cardiac work-up [39]. Consistent with the above information, the greatest risk factor for a cerebral SE is left-sided IE, especially when due to Staphylococcus aureus infection. For embolic strokes, symptomatology heavily depends on the final resting point of the embolus. In one extreme case, complete cortical blindness followed the rupture of bilateral occipital mycotic aneurysms [40]. Even among patients with a limited duration of initial clinical symptoms, the risk of recurrent brain infarction may be as high as 80% [41]. Figure 2 demonstrates septic embolism to the brain originating from mitral valve endocarditis.

Figure 2.

An example of septic embolization to the brain (circled) originating from an infected vegetation on the mitral valve (arrow) (source: Ref. [29]. Image used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license).

Among patients experiencing CNS complications due to SE, approximately 50–60% have ischemic lesions, with the middle cerebral artery distribution being most commonly affected [42, 43]. Associated symptoms may include contralateral hemiplegia, homonymous hemianopia, dysarthric or aphasic speech, neglect, and sensory loss. It is difficult to differentiate between intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic infarction based on clinical symptoms alone, and importantly, the American Stroke Association recommends against the use of intravenous Alteplase in cases of suspected ischemic stroke due to SE because of elevated potential for hemorrhagic conversion [23]. At the time of this publication there is no specific recommendation for or against intra-arterial intervention (e.g., thrombectomy) in the setting of SE causing large vessel occlusion and cerebral infarction, and cases should be evaluated on an individual basis.

Risk factors for mortality in stroke caused by SE include MRSA infection, older patient age, and larger vegetation size [44]. Patients with right-sided IE can also experience cerebral SE although it is very uncommon and occurs through the so-called “paradoxical embolus” pathway [45, 46]. Prompt evaluation for cerebral SE is critical in any patient presenting with focal neurologic symptoms, and usually starts with computed tomography (CT) of the brain to rule out bleeding, and potentially CT-Angiography to evaluate the cerebral circulation for patency. One must keep in mind that, regardless of clinical symptoms, the majority of patients with IE have some evidence of cerebral SE on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [47, 48].

Patients with cerebral SE have elevated mortality rates compared to patients presenting with stroke from other etiologies. In fact, baseline mortality of approximately 8–9% may reach nearly 40% in the presence of meningitis, hemorrhage, or brain abscess [39]. In the setting of mild cerebral ischemia, immediate antibiotic therapy combined with valve surgery within 48 h results in improved outcomes, including fewer systemic embolic events and more favorable mortality profile [49]. Recent studies also suggest that an ischemic stroke secondary to IE is unlikely to transform into a hemorrhagic stroke [50]. Primary indications for surgery in the setting of IE include the emergence of heart failure, uncontrolled infection, and embolism prevention [49]. Note that antithrombotic therapy is somewhat controversial in this setting. The American Heart Association guidelines for surgical intervention state that in the absence of severe neurological deficits, cardiac surgery should be considered urgently [50, 51]. In cases of severe ischemic stroke, it is recommended to delay surgery by at least 4 weeks, and with hemorrhagic stroke (usually a more severe complication) at least 4 weeks are recommended prior to proceeding with cardiac surgery [50].

3.2. Eyes

Septic embolization involving ocular and facial structures is extremely rare. There is, however, fragmentary case-based evidence for such occurrences. In one example, Dadu et al. [52], described SE involving the ophthalmic artery and the inferior muscular artery, resulting in diplopia due to medial rectus muscle paralysis. In that particular case, IE of the mitral valve was causative. In another rare occurrence, Cumurcu et al. [53], describe a case of a septic metastasis to the iris, resulting in iris abscess and endophthalmitis.

3.3. Thyroid

The possibility of SE to the thyroid has been proposed in 1959 by Richie while describing acute suppurative thyroiditis in a child [54]. Cabizuca et al. [55], reported an unusual case of IE leading to acute thyroiditis, presumably due to septic embolization. Although undoubtedly uncommon, the paucity of literature reports in this area is likely due to limited awareness and under-recognition of similar clinical presentations.

Advertisement

4. The thorax

Given the pathophysiologic factors discussed earlier in the chapter, SE of cardiac origin tend to follow the pattern of “cardiac output.” Consequently, a generalization can be made that the higher the blood flow to a specific organ or anatomic region, the higher the chance of SE traveling there. Within the thorax, there are two commonly described types of septic emboli—those originating on the “left side” of the heart and involving the coronary arterial circulation or thoracic aorta [56, 57], and those originating from the “right side” and involving the pulmonary arterial circuit [58, 59, 60].

4.1. Coronary circulation

First described in the 1910s and 1920s, septic coronary embolism continues to be under-recognized as a cause of acute coronary ischemia [56]. These types of emboli predominantly originate from bacterial valvular vegetations [61]. A high index of clinical suspicion is required because electrocardiographic (ECG) and laboratory changes characteristic of myocardial ischemia can easily be misinterpreted as being due to more typical coronary artery thrombosis [29]. The diagnosis is established through the performance of a comprehensive work-up, including trans-thoracic and trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE), with subsequent angiography as indicated [62, 63]. Management may include a variety of both non-interventional and interventional procedures, up to and including surgical cardiac revascularization at the time of valve replacement [29].

4.2. Thoracic aorta

Mycotic aneurysms of the aorta have been described as a consequence of septic emboli from infective endocarditis [64]. Clinical management of these lesions is challenging, partly due to the presence of active infection within the aneurysm itself, and partly due to the associated inflammatory changes and altered (e.g., diminished) structural integrity of the involved aorta [65]. Mycotic aortic aneurysms are associated with significant mortality and complications, including the potential for the development of aortoesophageal or aortotracheobronchial fistula [66, 67].

4.3. Pulmonary artery

Pulmonary artery aneurysms (PAA) of infectious etiology are among less frequently seen complications of endocarditis [68, 69]. They are similar to mycotic aneurysms, with the main difference being the location of occurrence [70]. PAAs (also referred to as Rasmussen’s aneurysms) can be seen in patients with tuberculosis. However, there have been recent cases with PAAs being associated with endocarditis [70, 71]. These aneurysms require prompt surgical treatment given published mortality rates of approximately 50% [72]. Patients with aneurysms that are symptomatic or >6 centimeters in size are candidates for surgery [73]. Data regarding surgical treatment are limited; however, recent studies have shown that steel coil embolization may be applicable in this setting [70, 74, 75, 76]. While PAAs are uncommon in endocarditis, they should be considered in patients with IE that present with pulmonary symptoms.

4.4. Pulmonary circulation

Pulmonary SE are relatively common complications of right-sided IE (RSIE). As outlined in previous sections, any areas through which large volume of blood transits will be inherently susceptible to SE. The pulmonary arterial circuit is no exception in this regard. From an anatomic standpoint, evidence suggests that septic pulmonary emboli (SPE) involve both upper and lower lobes, with bilateral upper lobes involved in >70% of patients, and peripheral or subpleural zones involved in >90% of cases [58]. Centrally located lesions were noted in only about 25% of instances [58]. SPE are distinct from other types of pulmonary emboli because of their tendency to form cavitary lesions with air-fluid levels [77]. A significant proportion of patients with RSIE are intravenous drug users [78, 79], although there is an increasing number of patients with SPE who present with IE due to implanted cardiac devices [80, 81]. SPE in intravenous drug users can manifest with empyema, and is most likely to be associated with endocarditis due to S. aureus infection [82]. Other common complications of SPE include pulmonary abscess and pulmonary nodules [77]. If patients with either empyema or a pulmonary abscess are identified, it is crucial to continue intravenous antibiotics and preform an incision and drainage prior to any required valve surgery [83]. Waiting is not recommended as a strategy in these patients, mainly because of the risk of further complications associated with therapeutic delays [83, 84]. Pulmonary and perivalvular abscess should be suspected in intravenous drug users who fail to respond to antibiotic administration [84].

As with any other type of pulmonary embolism (PE), SPE can be life threatening [85, 86, 87]. It is important to note that it may be initially difficult to differentiate between the two types of PE. Consequently, diagnosis and management requires high levels of clinical suspicion, appropriate diagnostics (e.g., TEE), and immediate treatment (antibiotics, with surgery if indicated). Most SPE patients present with constitutional symptoms, dyspnea, chest pain, and cough (including hemoptysis) [58]. CT imaging may show the presence of cavitary lesions with an associated “feeding vessel sign,” representing a pulmonary artery coursing directly into the infected area [88].

Advertisement

5. Abdomen and retroperitoneum

5.1. The spleen

Septic embolism to the spleen is well described as a complication of IE [10]. In fact, after SE to the central nervous system (>50%), spleen appears to be the second most commonly involved organ in terms of frequency (approximately 30%), with some variability across sources of reported data [18, 28, 89]. One of most common presentations of SE to the spleen is the appearance of single or multiple abscesses [90], including microscopic lesions that were difficult-to-detect until the advent of advanced CT imaging [89]. Abdominal CT and MRI are the gold standard for diagnosing splenic abscesses [8]. Infected splenic artery aneurysms attributed to embolic sequelae of IE have also been reported [91]. Clinical management involves splenectomy in about 50% of cases, with percutaneous drainage indicated for large isolated abscesses and patients who are poor surgical candidates [29]. In cases of splenic arterial aneurysm and infarction, prompt surgical intervention is recommended. Patients should undergo drainage of the abscess or splenectomy prior to any cardiac surgery. This may help prevent further propagation and/or distant spread of the systemic infectious process [8, 91]. An example of splenic SE is shown in Figure 3 [92].

Figure 3.

An example of septic embolus to the spleen. In this particular case, the embolus originated from Corynebacterium diphtheriae endocarditis (source: Ref. [92]. Image used under the terms of Creative commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivs Unported license).

5.2. The liver

Septic emboli to the liver are relatively common, occurring in >10% of cases of IE [10]. Similar to SE to the spleen, SE to the liver have the potential to evolve over time, coalescing from smaller “micro-abscesses” into larger collections [10]. Hepatic abscesses can be present in association with either right-sided or left-sided endocarditis [93, 94]; however, it may be difficult to determine whether the origin of the infection is cardiac or extra-cardiac, especially when the involved microorganism has known affinity for both locations [94]. Clinical management should follow established guidelines and practices for the treatment of IE and hepatic abscesses [29]. Similar to splenic abscess management, hepatic abscess should be drained as soon as possible in order to prevent worsening and/or further spread of the systemic infectious process [95].

5.3. The pancreas

Due to its vague clinical presentation, SE to the pancreas has the potential to go unrecognized. This is partially because SE to the pancreas often co-occurs with SE to other organs, potentially leading to “clinical masking” of organ-specific symptoms and/or signs [96]. Clinically, septic emboli to the pancreas may result in a picture resembling acute pancreatitis, and are usually characterized by leukocytosis, elevated pancreatic enzymes, peri-pancreatic “stranding” on CT scan, and acute abdominal pain [29]. Most often, pancreatic involvement in the setting of IE and SE tends to be self-limited [10]. At times, the finding of pseudoaneurysms involving adjacent arterial structures may provide a hint that the origin of the observed clinical syndrome is a result of SE [97].

5.4. The kidneys

Similar to the pancreas, SE to the kidneys is most often described in the setting of multi-visceral involvement [29]. Overall, renal SE are relatively frequent in the setting of IE, and their manifestations include infarcts in 31% of cases and glomerulonephritis in 26% [98]. Of interest, glomerulonephritis seen in association with IE has been shown not to feature immune complex deposition [98]. The co-occurrence of SE to other organs with arterial “high-flow” characteristics is exemplified by cases involving simultaneous cerebral, splenic, renal, and intestinal emboli [96]. Clinically, patients with renal SE may be found to have hematuria, glomerulonephritis, and evidence of renal failure [10]. Management focuses on preservation of renal function and is generally supportive, including antibiotic treatment, end-organ support (if required), and percutaneous or open interventions (in cases where abscess drainage is indicated) [98, 99, 100].

Etiology of renal injury in patients with IE is not always obvious, especially given the combined effect of cardiac dysfunction, sepsis, and concurrent treatment with potentially nephrotoxic antibiotics [98, 101]. Systemic infection can lead to acute tubular necrosis, while antibiotic treatment can lead to acute interstitial nephritis [102]. It is important to differentiate these conditions from the glomerulonephritis that is seen in IE, with an outline of important differentiating factors provided in Table 2.

Type of kidney injury→GlomerularInterstitialTubularVascular
Typical causesBacterial endocarditis and vasculitisAntibioticsSepsis and hypovolemiaRenal ischemia
Cast typeRed blood cell castsWhite blood cell castsGranular castsTubular epithelial cell casts
Clinical managementTreatment of underlying etiologyRemove inciting substanceHydration and treatment of underlying conditionSurgical correction of underlying pathology

Table 2.

Types of kidney injury, including their associated differentiating characteristics [102].

5.5. The intestines including mesenteric involvement

Given its large surface area and rich vasculature, the bowel receives a significant amount of cardiac output and is highly susceptible to SE originating from IE [10, 29]. Fortunately, when compared to other organs and organ systems outlined above, arterial distribution to the bowel appears to be less commonly affected (e.g., superior mesenteric artery in 3%, inferior mesenteric in <1%) [103]. This may be, at least in part, due to the presence of some degree of redundancy within the mesenteric vasculature, as opposed to a lack of such redundancy in the kidney or spleen. Occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery by SE is relatively well described in the setting of mitral valve endocarditis [104]. Mesenteric pseudoaneurysm attributable to SE has also been described [105]. In cases of acute arterial occlusion, bowel infarction may follow without prompt restoration of adequate blood flow to the involved segment(s) of bowel [106].

5.6. Reproductive organs

The involvement of reproductive organs in septic embolic complications is very uncommon. However, the authors believe that at least a brief overview of this under-recognized topic is warranted. In terms of testicular involvement, symptomatic presentation, including swelling, has been reported in conjunction with right-sided endocarditis [107]. It is thought that the this unusual clinical picture may result from SE [52, 107]. In another case, pneumococcal pulmonary valve endocarditis has been circumstantially linked to epididymo-orchitis and a scrotal abscess [108], although the directionality of causation may be difficult to prove except for the fact that Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from the epididymo-orchitis is seldom a primary cause of scrotal infection. Equally uncommon, ovarian involvement has also been reported. In an exceedingly rare case, a female patient presented with a giant pyomyoma suggestive of ovarian neoplasm [109]. The origin of this presentation, however, was traced to Streptococcus agalactiae endocarditis and deep vein thrombosis of the right external iliac and femoral veins [109].

Advertisement

6. Extremities and musculoskeletal system

In general terms, extremity involvement in association with IE represents approximately one-third of all cases of SE, with clinical manifestations involving the musculature in approximately 40% cases and bones/joints in >10% of instances [10, 110]. Other than massive embolic events involving acute occlusion of arterial flow to an extremity producing significant ischemia, symptoms tend to be more “nebulous” in terms of clinical presentation, more self-limited in nature, and easily overlooked by clinicians [10, 100]. Pathognomonic signs such as Osler nodes and Janeway lesions are rare (2.7 and 1.6% cases, respectively) but highly suggestive of endocarditis [111]. Figure 4A shows an example of an Osler node, while Figure 4B demonstrates a Janeway lesion [112, 113].

Figure 4.

(A, left) An example of an Osler node in a patient with infective endocarditis (source: Ref. [112], image used in accordance with the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License); (B, right) Janeway lesions (see arrows) in a patient with aortic valve vegetation (source: Ref. [113], image used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License).

6.1. Acute extremity ischemia

This potentially devastating presentation has been reported in the setting of more severe cases of IE, often involving valve replacement [114, 115, 116], with some patients experience multiple/recurring embolic events [114, 115]. In terms of clinical presentation, patients may exhibit a broad spectrum of complaints including pain, pallor, poikilothermia, and paresthesias with extreme cases threatening the viability of the limb itself [114]. Both surgical and thrombolytic management options have been reported [117, 118]. Prompt recognition of the cardiac source of SE is critical in preventing further embolic events.

6.2. Septic arthritis

Due to their non-specific nature and general commonality, joint-related complaints can be challenging to diagnose and easily misinterpreted. Not infrequently, multiple diagnostic tools must be utilized to successfully identify the cardiac source of the patient’s original symptoms (and thus the proximal source of infection) [119]. In one case, it was the complaint of septic arthritis which led to the ultimate diagnosis of streptococcal endocarditis [120]. Similar to other embolic phenomena associated with IE, septic arthritis tends to be a manifestation of multi-focal metastases of infectious material [119, 121].

Advertisement

7. Uncommon neurologic presentations

This section will discuss a heterogeneous group of less common manifestations of SE affecting the CNS, including extracranial involvement. The paucity of published literature in this broad topic area is likely due to limited awareness and under-recognition of such clinical presentations. Within the microcosm of SE associated with IE, approximately 30–40% of events involve neurological manifestations [10, 122]. Beyond the more commonly seen complaints (e.g., stroke, transient ischemic attack, meningitis, brain abscess) within this subset, less frequently reported clinical manifestations may include visual loss, seizures, acute mononeuropathy, and even spinal cord involvement [122, 123, 124]. Septic emboli can migrate to the spinal cord, causing segmental infarction [122, 123]. These exceedingly rare events have the potential to result in severe disability and often accompany additional, simultaneous SE to other anatomic regions [10].

Advertisement

8. Miscellaneous considerations

During the past two decades, significant increases have been noted in the number of valvular repairs, valve replacements, intracardiac devices and hemodialysis catheter placements [125, 126, 127, 128]. Collectively, these procedures inherently create a small, but significant risk of IE, especially in patients with chronic comorbid conditions such as renal insufficiency, diabetes and autoimmune diseases [129, 130, 131]. Given the potential for major morbidity and mortality associated with IE in the setting of indwelling intravascular/intracardiac devices, the primary focus should be on prevention. Within this context, efforts include more selective device implantation policies and better modulation of known post-implantation risks [132].

In terms of general diagnostic considerations, numerous guidelines and recommendations have been published to date. Although beyond the scope of the current discussion, certain aspects of these recommendations warrant a brief mention [133, 134]. One very important highlight is the emphasis on prompt echocardiography in cases of suspected IE, with TEE recommended if the initial TTE is negative and clinical suspicion remains high [8]. Echocardiographic imaging can then be repeated in 3–5 days if clinical symptoms/suspicion persist [8]. It is also suggested that patients with vegetations >10 mm in size, embolic events while on antibiotic treatment, and patients with >2 embolic events should be evaluated for surgical intervention [8]. One unique diagnostic consideration is the inability to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with certain types of intravascular devices/implants. Amraoui et al. recently described the use of positron emission tomography (PET) as an alternative method of identifying foci of SE in patients with implantable cardiac devices, with limited success [135].

Treatment options start with intravenous antibiotics, however in certain cases prompt surgical treatment is necessary. The American Heart Association developed guidelines to assist with identification of patients who require prompt surgical intervention [136]. Patients with IE who develop decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or a new aortic or mitral valve murmur require prompt surgery [50, 136, 137]. Patients with preserved LVEF that are stable and adequately managed on medical therapy do not need an immediate corrective surgery [138]. However, a recent study demonstrated that surgical intervention in the setting of CHF can reduce mortality from approximately 60–85% to 15–35% when compared to medical therapy alone [139, 140]. Patients who present with valvular vegetations >10 mm in size, or with multiple vegetations on imaging, are likely to benefit from surgery [136]. Another important indication for surgery is lack of improvement after 7 days of appropriate antibiotic therapy [136]. Any SE to end organs or associated arterial aneurysms also warrant immediate surgical evaluation and prompt intervention. As mentioned earlier in the chapter, emboli to different anatomic regions may require distinct plans and different timing in terms of surgical intervention [50]. The diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis constitutes another major indication for surgical intervention. Patients who present within 60 days of discharge following the placement of a new prosthetic valve with persistent fevers should be evaluated for the presence of IE, and if proven to harbor such infection should undergo operative management. It is important to remember that roughly 25% of prosthetic valve patients may be at risk of IE [136, 141].

Advertisement

9. Conclusions

Despite significant clinical research and advances in clinical management, septic embolism associated with infectious endocarditis continues to be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Given the increasing number of intravascular and intracardiac device implantations, as well as the greater prevalence of chronic comorbid conditions, it is not surprising that the incidence of both infectious endocarditis and septic embolism has followed suit. In this chapter, we outlined general pathophysiologic and anatomic considerations with which all physicians should be familiar. This important knowledge should serve to assist providers in maintaining a high level of clinical suspicion for potential IE and/or SE. Given the continued high rates of associated disability and mortality, more research is needed to better understand and treat these “low-frequency, high-impact” events.

References

  1. 1. Osler W. Gulstonian lectures on malignant endocarditis. The Lancet. 1885;125(3210):415-418
  2. 2. Alpert JS, Klotz SA. Infective endocarditis. In: Fuster V et al., editors. Hurst's the Heart. 14th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017
  3. 3. Carapetis JR et al. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. The Lancet Infectious Diseases;5(11):685-694
  4. 4. Marijon E et al. Prevalence of rheumatic heart disease detected by echocardiographic screening. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;357(5):470-476
  5. 5. Cahill TJ, Prendergast BD. Infective endocarditis. The Lancet. 2016;387(10021):882-893
  6. 6. Klaas JP. Neurologic complications of cardiac and aortic disease. Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology. 2017;23(3, Neurology of Systemic Disease):654-668
  7. 7. Pant S et al. Trends in infective endocarditis incidence, microbiology, and valve replacement in the United States from 2000 to 2011. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015;65(19):2070-2076
  8. 8. Baddour LM et al. Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications. A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132(15):1435-1486
  9. 9. Stawicki SP et al. Comorbidity polypharmacy score and its clinical utility: A pragmatic practitioner's perspective. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 2015;8(4):224-231
  10. 10. Wojda TR et al. Septic embolism: A potentially devastating complication of infective endocarditis. In: Contemporary Challenges in Endocarditis. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2016
  11. 11. Fernandez-Guerrero ML et al. Hospital-acquired infectious endocarditis not associated with cardiac surgery: An emerging problem. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1995;20(1):16-23
  12. 12. Benito N et al. Health care-associated native valve endocarditis: Importance of non-nosocomial acquisition. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;150(9):586-594
  13. 13. Murdoch DR et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: The international collaboration on endocarditis-prospective cohort study. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2009;169(5):463-473
  14. 14. Wurcel AG et al. Increasing infectious endocarditis admissions among young people who inject drugs. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2016;3(3):ofw157
  15. 15. Hedden SL. Behavioral Health Trends in the United States: Results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Department of Heath & Human Services; 2015
  16. 16. Chakraborty K, Basu D. Physical complications of intravenous drug abuse: A comprehensive review. Eastern Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;12(1):49
  17. 17. Cabell CH et al. Changing patient characteristics and the effect on mortality in endocarditis. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2002;162(1):90-94
  18. 18. Hoen B et al. Changing profile of infective endocarditis: Results of a 1-year survey in France. JAMA. 2002;288(1):75-81
  19. 19. Hennerici MG et al. Case Studies in Stroke: Common and Uncommon Presentations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006
  20. 20. Rooth E. Hemostatic disturbances in acute ischemic stroke. 2011. Available from: https://openarchive.ki.se/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10616/40820/Elisabeth_Rooth_Thesis.pdf?sequence=1. [Last accessed on April 24, 2018]
  21. 21. Hanna J, Furlan A. 20. Cardiac Disease and Embolic Sources. Brain Ischemia: Basic Concepts and Clinical Relevance. London, UK: Springer; 2012. p. 299
  22. 22. Katsouli A, Massad MG. Current issues in the diagnosis and management of blood culture-negative infective and non-infective endocarditis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2013;95(4):1467-1474
  23. 23. Demaerschalk B et al. On behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Scientific rationale for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [published online ahead of print December 22, 2015]. Stroke. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000086. Available from: https://professional.heart.org/professional/ScienceNews/UCM_479831_Putting-the-Patient-First-Comments-on-Scientific-Rationale-for-the-Inclusion-a.jsp
  24. 24. Kannoth S, Thomas SV. Intracranial microbial aneurysm (infectious aneurysm): Current options for diagnosis and management. Neurocritical Care. 2009;11(1):120
  25. 25. Olaison L, Pettersson G. Current best practices and guidelines: Indications for surgical intervention in infective endocarditis. Cardiology Clinics. 2003;21(2):235-251
  26. 26. Peters PJ, Harrison T, Lennox JL. A dangerous dilemma: Management of infectious intracranial aneurysms complicating endocarditis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2006;6(11):742-748
  27. 27. Snygg-Martin U et al. Cerebrovascular complications in patients with left-sided infective endocarditis are common: A prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging and neurochemical brain damage markers. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2008;47(1):23-30
  28. 28. Millaire A et al. Incidence and prognosis of embolic events and metastatic infections in infective endocarditis. European Heart Journal. 1997;18(4):677-684
  29. 29. Stawicki SP et al. Septic embolism in the intensive care unit. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2013;3(1):58
  30. 30. Anguera I et al. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infective endocarditis: Description of 10 cases and analysis of native valve, prosthetic valve, and pacemaker lead endocarditis clinical profiles. Heart. 2005;91(2):e10
  31. 31. Karchmer AW. Infective endocarditis. In: Kasper D et al., editors. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 19th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015
  32. 32. Crawford MH, Doernberg S. Infective endocarditis. In: Crawford MH, editor. Current Diagnosis and Treatment: Cardiology. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017
  33. 33. Werdan K et al. Mechanisms of infective endocarditis: Pathogen–host interaction and risk states. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2014;11(1):35
  34. 34. Kerrigan SW. Platelet bacterial interactions in the pathogenesis of infective endocarditis—Part II: The staphylococcus. In: Recent Advances in Infective Endocarditis. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2013
  35. 35. Duzenli AE, Dwyer J, Carey J. Haemophilus parainfluenzae endocarditis associated with maxillary sinusitis and complicated by cerebral emboli in a young man. Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports. 2017;5(2):2324709617704003
  36. 36. Dunn JJ, Hindiyeh IY. Clinical microbiology in pediatrics. Perspectives in Pediatric Pathology. 2011;28:80-103
  37. 37. Molinari GF. Septic cerebral embolism. Stroke. 1972;3(2):117-122
  38. 38. Ruttmann E et al. Neurological outcome of septic cardioembolic stroke after infective endocarditis. Stroke. 2006;37(8):2094-2099
  39. 39. Heiro M et al. Neurologic manifestations of infective endocarditis: A 17-year experience in a teaching hospital in Finland. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2000;160(18):2781-2787
  40. 40. Lawrence-Friedl D, Bauer KM. Bilateral cortical blindness: An unusual presentation of bacterial endocarditis. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1992;21(12):1502-1504
  41. 41. Horstkotte D et al. Emergency heart valve replacement after acute cerebral embolism during florid endocarditis. Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany: 1983). 1998;93(5):284-293
  42. 42. Derex L, Bonnefoy E, Delahaye F. Impact of stroke on therapeutic decision making in infective endocarditis. Journal of Neurology. 2010;257(3):315-321
  43. 43. Purves D, Augustine G, Fitzpatrick D. The blood supply of the brain and spinal cord. Neuroscience. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 2001
  44. 44. Leitman M et al. Vegetation size in patients with infective endocarditis. European Heart Journal-Cardiovascular Imaging. 2011;13(4):330-338
  45. 45. Sancetta SM, Zimmerman HA. Congenital heart disease with septal defects in which paradoxical brain abscess causes death: A review of the literature and report of two cases. Circulation. 1950;1(4):593-601
  46. 46. Hart RG et al. Stroke in infective endocarditis. Stroke. 1990;21(5):695-700
  47. 47. Bakshi R et al. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging findings in bacterial endocarditis: The neuroimaging spectrum of septic brain embolization demonstrated in twelve patients. Journal of Neuroimaging. 1999;9(2):78-84
  48. 48. Cooper HA et al. Subclinical brain embolization in left-sided infective endocarditis: Results from the evaluation by MRI of the brains of patients with left-sided intracardiac solid masses (EMBOLISM) pilot study. Circulation. 2009;120(7):585-591
  49. 49. Kang D-H. Timing of surgery in infective endocarditis. Heart. 2015;101(22):1786-1791
  50. 50. Yanagawa B et al. Surgical management of infective endocarditis complicated by embolic stroke: Practical recommendations for clinicians. Circulation. 2016;134(17):1280-1292
  51. 51. Baddour LM et al. Infective endocarditis in adults: Diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132(15):1435-1486
  52. 52. Dadu RT, Dadu R, Zane S. Unusual presentation of endocarditis with nutritional variant streptococci. Clujul Medical. 2013;86(2):153
  53. 53. Cumurcu T, Demirel S, Doganay S. Iris abscess as an unusual presentation of endogenous endophthalmitis after intramuscular injection. Ocular Immunology and Inflammation. 2010;18(3):190-191
  54. 54. Richie JL. Acute suppurative thyroiditis in a child. AMA Journal of Diseases of Children. 1959;97(4):493-494
  55. 55. Cabizuca C et al. Acute thyroiditis due to septic emboli derived from infective endocarditis. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2008;84(994):445-446
  56. 56. Brunson JG. Coronary embolism in bacterial endocarditis. The American Journal of Pathology. 1953;29(4):689
  57. 57. Caraballo V. Fatal myocardial infarction resulting from coronary artery septic embolism after abortion: Unusual cause and complication of endocarditis. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1997;29(1):175-177
  58. 58. Cook RJ et al. Septic pulmonary embolism: Presenting features and clinical course of 14 patients. Chest. 2005;128(1):162-166
  59. 59. Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK, Teigen C. Pulmonary septic emboli: Diagnosis with CT. Radiology. 1990;174(1):211-213
  60. 60. MacMillan J, Milstein S, Samson P. Clinical spectrum of septic pulmonary embolism and infarction. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1978;75(5):670-679
  61. 61. Whitaker J et al. Successful treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction caused by septic embolus with the use of a thrombectomy catheter in infective endocarditis. BMJ Case Reports. 2011;2011:bcr0320114002
  62. 62. Kessavane A et al. Septic coronary embolism in aortic valvular endocarditis. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 2009;18(5):572-574
  63. 63. Taniike M et al. Acute myocardial infarction caused by a septic coronary embolism diagnosed and treated with a thrombectomy catheter. Heart. 2005;91(5):e34
  64. 64. Pasic M. Mycotic aneurysm of the aorta: Evolving surgical concept. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1996;61(4):1053-1054
  65. 65. Knosalla C et al. Using aortic allograft material to treat mycotic aneurysms of the thoracic aorta. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1996;61(4):1146-1152
  66. 66. van Doorn RC et al. Aortoesophageal fistula secondary to mycotic thoracic aortic aneurysm: Endovascular repair and transhiatal esophagectomy. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 2002;9(2):212-217
  67. 67. MacIntosh EL, Parrott JC, Unruh HW. Fistulas between the aorta and traceobronchial tree. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1991;51(3):515-519
  68. 68. Ungaro R et al. Solitary peripheral pulmonary artery aneurysms. Pathogenesis and surgical treatment. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1976;71(4):566-571
  69. 69. Deterling Jr RA, Clagett OT. Aneurysm of the pulmonary artery: Review of the literature and report of a case. American Heart Journal. 34(4):471-499
  70. 70. Theodoropoulos P et al. Pulmonary artery aneurysms: Four case reports and literature review. The International Journal of Angiology: Official Publication of the International College of Angiology Inc. 2013;22(3):143-148
  71. 71. Wells I et al. Pulmonary mycotic aneurysm secondary to left-sided infective endocarditis treated with detachable coils. Clinical Radiology Extra. 2004;59(5):37-39
  72. 72. Benveniste O, Bruneel F, Bédos JP, Wolff M, Lesèche G, Leport C, Vildé JL, Vachon F, Régnier B. Ruptured mycotic pulmonary artery aneurysm: An unusual complication of right-sided endocarditis. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1998;30(6):626-628
  73. 73. Ferretti GR et al. False aneurysm of the pulmonary artery induced by a Swan-Ganz catheter: Clinical presentation and radiologic management. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1996;167(4):941-945
  74. 74. Caralps JM et al. True aneurysm of the main pulmonary artery: Surgical correction. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1978;25(6):561-563
  75. 75. Hamawy AH, Cartledge RG, Girardi LN. Graft repair of a pulmonary artery aneurysm. The Heart Surgery Forum. 2002;5(4):396-398
  76. 76. Sakuma M et al. Peripheral pulmonary artery aneurysms in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension. Internal Medicine. 2007;46(13):979-984
  77. 77. Wong K et al. Clinical and radiographic spectrum of septic pulmonary embolism. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2002;87(4):312-315
  78. 78. Rossi SE, Goodman PC, Franquet T. Nonthrombotic pulmonary emboli. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2000;174(6):1499-1508
  79. 79. Hecht SR, Berger M. Right-sided endocarditis in intravenous drug users: Prognostic features in 102 episodes. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1992;117(7):560-566
  80. 80. Graziosi M et al. Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in patients with an implanted cardiac device: A prospective study. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2014;41(8):1617-1623
  81. 81. Grammes JA et al. Percutaneous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction in 100 patients with intracardiac vegetations defined by transesophageal echocardiogram. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;55(9):886-894
  82. 82. Ye R et al. Clinical characteristics of septic pulmonary embolism in adults: A systematic review. Respiratory Medicine. 2014;108(1):1-8
  83. 83. Horstkotte D et al. Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis executive summary; the task force on infective endocarditis of the European society of cardiology. European Heart Journal. 2004;25(3):267-276
  84. 84. Olaison L, Pettersson G. Current best practices and guidelines: Indications for surgical intervention in infective endocarditis. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 2002;16(2):453-475
  85. 85. Rockoff MA, Gang DL, Vacanti JP. Fatal pulmonary embolism following removal of a central venous catheter. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 1984;19(3):307-309
  86. 86. Sheu C-C et al. Spontaneous pneumothorax as a complication of septic pulmonary embolism in an intravenous drug user: A case report. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2006;22(2):89-93
  87. 87. Goswami U et al. Associations and outcomes of septic pulmonary embolism. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal. 2014;8:28
  88. 88. Dodd JD, Souza CA, Müller NL. High-resolution MDCT of pulmonary septic embolism: Evaluation of the feeding vessel sign. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006;187(3):623-629
  89. 89. Ting W et al. Splenic septic emboli in endocarditis. Circulation. 1990;82(5 Suppl):IV105-IV109
  90. 90. Chulay JD, Lankerani MR. Splenic abscess: Report of 10 cases and review of the literature. The American Journal of Medicine. 1976;61(4):513-522
  91. 91. McCready RA et al. Infected splenic artery aneurysm with associated splenic abscess formation secondary to bacterial endocarditis: Case report and review of the literature. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2007;45(5):1066-1068
  92. 92. Patris V et al. Corynebacterium diphtheriae endocarditis with multifocal septic emboli: Can prompt diagnosis help avoid surgery? The American Journal of Case Reports. 2014;15:352
  93. 93. Yang W, Lin H-D, Wang L-M. Pyogenic liver abscess associated with septic pulmonary embolism. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2008;71(9):442-447
  94. 94. Tran MP et al. Streptococcus intermedius causing infective endocarditis and abscesses: A report of three cases and review of the literature. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2008;8(1):154
  95. 95. Rashid RM, Salah W, Parada JP. “Streptococcus milleri” aortic valve endocarditis and hepatic abscess. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2007;56(2):280-282
  96. 96. Hart RG, Kagan-Hallet K, Joerns SE. Mechanisms of intracranial hemorrhage in infective endocarditis. Stroke. 1987;18(6):1048-1056
  97. 97. Nwafor I et al. Giant pseudoaneurysm of a splanchnic artery: A case report. Journal of Vascular Medicine and Surgery. 2015;3(208):2
  98. 98. Majumdar A et al. Renal pathological findings in infective endocarditis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2000;15(11):1782-1787
  99. 99. Townell NJ et al. Community-associated methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus endocarditis “down under”: Case series and literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2012;44(7):536-540
  100. 100. Colen TW et al. Radiologic manifestations of extra-cardiac complications of infective endocarditis. European Radiology. 2008;18(11):2433
  101. 101. Gerlach AT et al. Risk factors for aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity in surgical intensive care unit patients. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2011;1(1):17
  102. 102. Cannon DC. The identification and pathogenesis of urine casts. Laboratory Medicine. 1979;10(1):8-11
  103. 103. Kirkwood ML et al. Mycotic inferior mesenteric artery aneurysm secondary to native valve endocarditis caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2014;28(5):1312.e13-1312.e15
  104. 104. Misawa S-i et al. Septic embolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery induced by mitral valve endocarditis. Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2011;17(4):415-417
  105. 105. Cassada DC et al. Mesenteric pseudoaneurysm resulting from septic embolism. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 1998;12(6):597-600
  106. 106. Edwards MS et al. Acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia: Surgical management and outcomes. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2003;17(1):72-79
  107. 107. Muthukumaran CS, Govindaraj PR, Vettukattil J. Testicular swelling with pneumonia and septicaemia: A rare presentation of right-sided endocarditis. Cardiology in the Young. 2005;15(5):532-533
  108. 108. Vrettos A et al. Pneumococcal pulmonary valve endocarditis. Echo Research and Practice. 2017;4(3):K1-K5
  109. 109. Genta PR et al. Streptococcus agalactiae endocarditis and giant pyomyoma simulating ovarian cancer. Southern Medical Journal. 2001;94(5):508-511
  110. 110. Churchill MA, Geraci JE, Hunder GG. Musculoskeletal manifestations of bacterial endocarditis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1977;87(6):754-759
  111. 111. Bachmeyer C, Dubourdieu V, Poignet B. Do not disregard diagnostic clues of endocarditis: Comment on the article by Garg et al. Arthritis Care & Research. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23526. Availabe from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acr.23526 [ahead of print]
  112. 112. Tsagaratos C, Taha FW. Recognizing infective endocarditis in the emergency department. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2012;13(1):92-93
  113. 113. Fareedy SB, Rajagopalan P, Schmidt EC. Janeway lesions: A valuable clinical sign in patients with infective endocarditis. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives. 2016;6(2):30660
  114. 114. Kitts D, Bongard FS, Klein SR. Septic embolism complicating infective endocarditis. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1991;14(4):480-487
  115. 115. Mandell GL et al. Enterococcal endocarditis: An analysis of 38 patients observed at the New York Hospital-Cornell medical Center. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1970;125(2):258-264
  116. 116. Pessinaba S et al. Vascular complications of infective endocarditis. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses. 2012;42(5):213-217
  117. 117. Lozano P et al. Acute lower limb ischemia complicating endocarditis due toCandida parapsilosis in a drug abuser. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 1994;8(6):591-594
  118. 118. Miroslav M et al. Rare forms of peripheral arterial embolism: Review of 11 cases. Vascular. 2005;13(4):222-229
  119. 119. Bonfiglioli R et al. 18 F-FDG PET/CT diagnosis of unexpected extracardiac septic embolisms in patients with suspected cardiac endocarditis. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2013;40(8):1190-1196
  120. 120. Good AE, Hague JM, Kauffman CA. Streptococcal endocarditis initially seen as septic arthritis. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1978;138:805-806
  121. 121. Bossert M et al. Septic arthritis of the acromioclavicular joint. Joint, Bone, Spine. 2010;77(5):466-469
  122. 122. Royden Jones Jr H, Siekert RG. Neurological manifestations of infective endocarditis: Review of clinical and therapeutic challenges. Brain. 1989;112(5):1295-1315
  123. 123. Sandson TA, Friedman JH. Spinal cord infarction. Report of 8 cases and review of the literature. Medicine. 1989;68(5):282-292
  124. 124. Siccoli M et al. Successful intra-arterial thrombolysis in basilar thrombosis secondary to infectious endocarditis. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2003;16(3):295-297
  125. 125. Premuzic V et al. Complications of permanent hemodialysis catheter placement; need for better pre-implantation algorithm? Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis. 2016;20(4):394-399
  126. 126. Falk V. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement indications should not be expanded to lower-risk and younger patients response to falk. Circulation. 2014;130(25):2332-2342
  127. 127. Chaker Z et al. Sex differences in the utilization and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017;6(9):e006370
  128. 128. Bradshaw PJ et al. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of cardiac pacemaker insertions in an ageing population. Open Heart. 2014;1(1):e000177
  129. 129. Salvador VBD et al. Clinical risk factors for infective endocarditis in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Texas Heart Institute Journal. 2017;44(1):10-15
  130. 130. Desai RJ et al. Risk of serious infections associated with use of immunosuppressive agents in pregnant women with autoimmune inflammatory conditions: Cohort study. BMJ. 2017;356:j895
  131. 131. Polyzos KA, Konstantelias AA, Falagas ME. Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EP Europace. 2015;17(5):767-777
  132. 132. Nielsen JC, Gerdes JC, Varma N. Infected cardiac-implantable electronic devices: Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. European Heart Journal. 2015;36(37):2484-2490
  133. 133. Habib G et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). European Heart Journal. 2015;36(44):3075-3128
  134. 134. Pappas PG et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015;62(4):e1-e50
  135. 135. Amraoui S et al. Contribution of PET imaging to the diagnosis of septic embolism in patients with pacing lead endocarditis. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2016;9(3):283-290
  136. 136. Prendergast BD, Tornos P. Surgery for infective endocarditis: Who and when? Circulation. 2010;121(9):1141-1152
  137. 137. Tornos P et al. Infective endocarditis in Europe: Lessons from the Euro heart survey. Heart. 2005;91(5):571-575
  138. 138. Hasbun R et al. Complicated left-sided native valve endocarditis in adults: Risk classification for mortality. JAMA. 2003;289(15):1933-1940
  139. 139. Croft CH et al. Analysis of surgical versus medical therapy in active complicated native valve infective endocarditis. American Journal of Cardiology. 1983;51(10):1650-1655
  140. 140. Richardson JV et al. Treatment of infective endocarditis: A 10-year comparative analysis. Circulation. 1978;58(4):589-597
  141. 141. Pansini S et al. Risk of recurrence after reoperation for prosthetic valve endocarditis. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 1997;6(1):84-87

Written By

Vikas Yellapu, Daniel Ackerman, Santo Longo and Stanislaw P. Stawicki

Submitted: 13 February 2018 Reviewed: 26 March 2018 Published: 12 September 2018