Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Primary Brain Tumors in Childhood

Written By

Romana Richterová and Branislav Kolarovszki

Submitted: October 13th, 2017 Reviewed: January 26th, 2018 Published: August 22nd, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74510

From the Edited Volume

Brain Tumors

Edited by Amit Agrawal, Luis Rafael Moscote-Salazar

Chapter metrics overview

1,334 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


This chapter offers literary review of most frequently observed brain tumors in childhood. It offers basics of epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnostics of most often occurring types of tumors according to new WHO classification of brain tumors from 2016 and emphasizes molecular biological characteristics and role of altered genes and genetic pathways in brain tumor etiology, classification and treatment. This review not only concentrates on gliomas, medulloblastomas and ependymomas, but also offers characterization of other less frequently observed lesions. Each tumor characteristics also contains basics of therapeutical possibilities of these lesions with focus on targeted and individually designed therapy according to molecular and genetic alterations found in tumor tissue sample.


  • brain tumors
  • childhood
  • glioma

1. Introduction

Brain tumors are the second most common group of tumors (following hematological malignancies) as well as the most frequent solid tumors in childhood [1] in age category up to 1 year and between 5 and 19 years of age, even the most common childhood malignancy [2], as well as the most frequent death cause from all oncological diagnoses [3]. Despite the significant progress in imaging and neurosurgical techniques, molecular genetic diagnostics and therapeutic protocols as well as the introduction of concomitant chemoradiotherapy, cure and survival rates of these children did not significantly change – except for medulloblastoma [4].


2. Epidemiology of brain tumors in children

The incidence of pediatric CNS tumors varies worldwide with an average of 4 cases per 100,000 children with the highest occurrence is in the United States [3]. By age groups, the highest incidence is in adolescents (15–19 years, 6.38/100,000), followed by a group of children under 1 year (6.2/100,000). Subsequently, it is slightly declining, with 5.5/100,000 children aged between 1 and 4 years; in 5–14 years, the incidence is 5.1/100,000 [2, 5]. About 25–30% are in supratentorial localization, followed by the cerebellum (15–20%), the brain stem (10–12%), the pituitary and suprasellar region (10–15%), cranial nerves (6–7%), brain ventricles (5–6.4%), spinal cord (4.3–4.6%) and 2.6–2.9% are tumors of meninges [2, 6], as shown in Figure 1. Also a typical localization and histological type occur in certain age group. By 1 year of age, tumors most often occur at multiple locations in the brain and in ventricles. At the age of 1–4 years, the most common site is the cerebellum, cerebral hemispheres and brain stem. In the age range from 5 to 9 years, tumors occur frequently in the cerebellum, brain stem and cerebral hemispheres. At the age from birth to 9 years, the most common tumors are gliomas and embryonal tumors (up to 1 year is the most common embryonic atypical teratoma/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT), in the older children it is medulloblastoma (MB)). In 10–14 year age group, the most typical site is cerebral hemisphere and most frequently occurring are gliomas, tumors of the pituitary region and embryonal tumors. Adolescents (aged 15–19 years) most often have pituitary tumors, then astrocytomas and neoplastic tumors, but the incidence of meningiomas also increases. Typical localizations in this age group are the pituitary and suprasellar regions, followed by cerebral hemispheres and cerebellum. In general, brain tumors are more common in boys [2, 5].

Figure 1.

Localization of CNS tumors in pediatric population [5].

There are many risk factors for brain tumor development, but to date only some hereditary syndromes (type 1 and 2 neurofibromatosis, tuberous sclerosis, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Gorlin syndrome, Turcot syndrome, Cowden syndrome, Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and hereditary retinoblastoma) and ionizing radiation have been verified. Other possible risk factors include: a personal history of previous cancer treatment, a family history of the CNS tumor, the parent age at the time of conception, the later contact of the child with common childhood infectious diseases [7], congenital anomalies [8], higher birth weight and larger head circumference [9]. Interestingly, the results of studies suggest lower incidence of CNS tumors in children with allergies and asthma [10, 11].


3. Classification of brain tumors in children

The new WHO classification of CNS tumors from 2016 for the first time uses molecular genetic characteristics for tumor classification in some cases. In this new edition, some new tumor entities appeared, some have been merged while others were excluded. Changes involving childhood tumors include: inclusion of epithelial glioblastoma, removal of the term brain gliomatosis, reclassification of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma to diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27–mutant, inclusion of the ependymoma, RELA fusion–positive as a separate unit and inclusion of the diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor. The change also affected the classification of medulloblastomas, where genetically defined classification was added. The term primitive neuroectodermal tumors (CNS PNET) was eliminated while an embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes, C19MC–altered was included [12].

Childhood brain tumors are also classified according to their localization into: infratentorial, supratentorial tumors and tumors of parasellar region. Most frequently observed histological types of pediatric CNS tumors are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Most frequent histological types of CNS tumors in children [5].

Infratentorial localization is typical for cerebellar astrocytoma (pilocytic astrocytoma – PA, but also diffuse less frequently anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma), medulloblastomas, ependymomas, brain stem gliomas (most commonly diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27–mutant, PA), AT/RT and choroid plexus tumors.

Supratentorial localization are common: low-grade glioma—LGG (PA, diffuse astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, mixed oligoastrocytoma, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma—SEGA, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma—PXA), high-grade glioma—HGG (anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma and glioblastoma), neuronal and mixed neuronal-glial tumors (ganglioglioma—GG, desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma—DIA, ganglioglioma—DIGG, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor—DNET and papillary glioneuronal tumor), embryonal tumors (embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered—ETMR, medulloepithelioma, CNS neuroblastoma, CNS ganglioneuroblastoma, CNS embryonal tumor and CNS embryonal tumor with rhabdoid features), AT/RT, ependymomas, meningiomas, choroid plexus tumors, pineal tumors (pineocytomas, pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation and papillary tumors of the pineal region) and rarely metastases of extra-neural malignant tumors.

Tumors occurring in parasellar region usually are: craniopharyngiomas, adenomas, LGG astrocytomas (tumors of central regions, chiasma, hypothalamus, thalamus, PA or diffuse astrocytomas) as well as germ cell tumors.


4. Brain tumors symptoms in children

Symptoms of brain tumors can develop gradually and worsen over time, or they may manifest suddenly and dramatically. Symptoms may be general or specific, resulting from tumor localization. General symptoms are manifestation of intracranial hypertension that is caused either by tumor growth, brain swelling or onset of hydrocephalus or a combination of these factors. Symptoms of intracranial hypertension include: headache (especially in the morning after awakening), nausea or vomiting, diplopia and strabismus, disturbances of balance, personality changes, epileptic seizures or loss of consciousness. Infants may experience irritability, loss of appetite, delay or regression of psychomotor development. There is also bulging of the fontanelle and the disproportionate enlargement of the head circumference. Children of school age may suffer from increased fatigue, psychological changes, impairment of school performance, disturbances of memory and impaired concentration. Regarding the localization of the tumor, other locally specific neurological symptoms may also occur: visual disturbances, narrowing and outages of visual field, abnormal bulb movements, nystagmus, hearing or speech disorders, paresis or hemiparesis, muscle weakness, loss of sensitivity or coordination, ataxia, posture disorder, walking instability, tingling of body parts, cranial nerves palsy as well as hormonal disorders.


5. Brain tumors diagnostics

Diagnosis of brain tumor is based on a patient history and complete neurological examination. Imaging examination is performed when a brain tumor is suspected. Basic imaging examination is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is the most spectacular imaging for intracranial structures that is currently available in medicine. In brain tumor diagnostics the use of contrast media—gadolinium—is essential. MR-angiography displays brain vessels alongside with pathological tumor vasculature, what is important for planning of the surgical treatment. MR-spectroscopy is a metabolic examination of the brain. The perfusion MRI monitors blood flow in the investigated area. Tumors are metabolically active and require greater blood supply. Functional MRI and MR-tractography are used for planning of surgical approach. Preoperatively, the navigational MRI is performed for the needs of intraoperative navigation. Among the disadvantages of MRI is relatively longer duration, which in smaller children requires general anesthesia. However, a huge advantage is the absence of radiation [13].

Computer tomography (CT) is mostly used for the display of bones and their lesions, which do not appear in detail in MRI. Another indication may be CT-angiography. Due to the high dose of radiation; however, CT is reserved for cases of sudden changes in the neurological condition when rapid imaging is necessary.

Positron emission tomography (PET) uses radioactive fluorodeoxyglucose for visualization of tumor tissue that is metabolically more active. The radioactive load is very low and is excluded in 1 day. It can be used preoperatively for diagnostics as well as for postoperative distinguishing between residues, recurrences and postoperative changes in unclear cases [14].

Angiography (mostly DSA) uses vessel imaging after contrast agent administration to assess tumor vascular supply. It is also associated with radiation and though is currently replaced by MR- or CT-angiography. However, it remains reserved for preoperative embolization of the tumor, which is carried out by DSA [13].

Specimen of CSF obtained from lumbar puncture is used for cytological examination to detect the presence of tumor cells that occur in CSF in tumor dissemination or in leukemia tumors. It is also used to detect the presence of tumor markers, in particular bHCG and AFP in germ cell tumors. It also serves to verify the presence of infection, especially in the postoperative period [13].

Biopsy of brain tumor is essential for definitive diagnosis. In most cases, tissue sample is obtained during surgery. However, there are also cases of inoperable tumors according to their localization or extent. If a tumor resection cannot be performed, a stereotactic biopsy can be useful. In some cases, however, the biopsy is too risky, and therefore the diagnosis is determined only by MRI (e.g., diffuse pontine gliomas).

Also other examinations could be useful, such as: EEG, evoked potentials, evaluation of neurocognitive functions, ophthalmological examination (papilledema of optic nerve and perimeter), evaluation of hearing disorder and hormone levels and function [13].


6. Treatment of brain tumors

Treatment consists of surgical intervention, followed by oncological and symptomatic treatment and requires multidisciplinary approach.

Surgical treatment is the basis of treatment and, in some tumors, it is the only sufficient form of therapy. Also histologically, benign tumors can be a surgical challenge by their localization. An essential part of brain tumor surgery is the use of microscope and micro instruments. Nowadays, it belongs to the usual equipment of surgical department, as well as ultrasonic aspirator, navigation systems, intraoperative sonography and possibility of realization of electrophysiological monitoring. Electrophysiological monitoring requires appropriate instrumentation and personnel equipment that enhances the safety of the operation to the full possible extent in the eloquent areas of the CNS. Use of 5-aminolevulic acid is very helpful in operations of HGG. Patient ingests this acid prior to surgery, and then during surgery, with use of fluorescence on the microscope, high-grade glial cells begin to gleam, which also contributes to performance of accurate resection and representative tumor sampling for histological examination. Awake operations with the possibility of intraoperative stimulation, in which the patient is conscious either during the entire procedure or in a certain part of it, are used in adult patients, especially in tumors in motor, sensory and speech areas. In children, it is significantly limited by age and ability to cooperate. They are mainly performed in older age groups of children [15].

According to extent of resection, we divide surgical treatment into: total resection, near-total resection, partial resection and biopsy. In most tumors (except well-defined benign tumors or well-defined metastases), total resection is only a radiological rather than a biological term. The surgical approach can serve (though not as a standard treatment method) for the targeted administration of radiotherapy in the form of intraoperative radiotherapy with a single irradiation of the tumor bed directly after resection of the tumor [16] or chemotherapy—for example, intraoperative administration of biodegradable carmustine [17]. In addition to craniotomy, other techniques—for example, endonasal trans-sphenoidal approach—can also be used, including endoscopy for pituitary tumor tumors. Another option for biopsy or tumor removal (often when located in brain ventricles) is endoscopic surgery. From other surgical methods, shunts in hydrocephalus can be used, most commonly ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Another option is implantation of Ommaya reservoir, which is useful for repeated sampling of CSF for laboratory examinations, for therapeutic evacuation puncture of CSF, as well as for the local administration of chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy is part of adjuvant oncological treatment after surgical resection alone or along with radiotherapy. It can be administered systemically (intravenously or orally), locally during surgery, or postoperatively into an implanted reservoir. Most serious side effects of chemotherapy are: bone marrow depression, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and temporary hair loss. Generally, children better tolerate high doses of chemotherapy compared to adults, which may increase the aggressiveness of treatment if necessary.

Targeted biological therapy is directed against the specific protein and gene targets of the tumor, or against the environment that affects its growth and survival. But even all tumors of the same histological type do not have the same alterations and the treatment goals. Therefore, it is essential to examine each tumor sample for the presence of altered genes and proteins in order to determine targeted individualized treatment. One of the best known drugs is bevacizumab with an antiangiogenic effect, which stops the nutrient intake into the tumor by blocking of angiogenesis. This treatment is used for HGG. However, the effect of this treatment is lower than expected. Therefore, it is reserved as supportive treatment in relapsing non-responding tumors. Also used is everolimus, the mTOR pathway blocker in the treatment of subependemal giant astrocytoma, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in particular EGFR (erlotinib and gefitinib) in the treatment of ependymomas [18]. Patients with HGG with a proven BRAF V600E mutation also receive BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib and dabrafenib) with partial effects [19].

Radiotherapy is also often used in treatment of pediatric brain tumors, either alone or as part of concomitant therapy. It uses high energy RTG beams to damage tumor cell DNA. It can take various forms, using external radiotherapy as well as local forms. External radiotherapy is mostly accomplished with a linear accelerator by various techniques, such as conventional radiotherapy, 3D conformal radiotherapy, modulated beam intensities, stereotactic radiotherapy using stereotactic frames or radio-surgical methods (single irradiation) that use a linear accelerator, gamma knife or cyber knife as the source of radiation. Local forms of radiotherapy require an invasive approach. This group includes intraoperative radiotherapy, which is applied during surgery and interstitial brachytherapy requiring surgical delivery of emitters close to the tumor. Subsequently, radiotherapy is applied in the postoperative period. Local forms have, of course, a minor incidence of undesirable radiotherapy effects, of which the most common are: fatigue, hair loss, radiation dermatitis, brain edema and presence of post radiation necrosis and encephalopathy. Proton therapy is becoming increasingly popular.

The novelty in the treatment of HGG is the use of an alternating electric field. It appears to be the most effective in connection to concomitant chemoradiotherapy. It is recommended for treatment of recurrent tumors [20].

Very necessary is also supportive medical treatment, in particular corticosteroids which suppress perifocal and postoperative edema, anticonvulsants (in the presence of epileptic seizures), analgesics, antiemetic drugs, nutritional support and oncological rehabilitation [21].


7. Most common brain tumor types occurring in childhood

The most common CNS tumors in children are: gliomas, ependymomas, neuroglial tumors, embryonal tumors, choroid plexus tumors, craniopharyngiomas and germ cell tumors.

7.1. Gliomas

Glial tumors account for 55% of pediatric CNS tumors [3]. It is a heterogeneous group of tumors that varies from a well-defined, potentially curable low-grade pilocytic astrocytoma and diffusely growing astrocytomas (grade II) to high-grade, aggressive and incurable tumors, such as diffuse glioma of midline structures. They arise from CNS glial precursor cells: astrocytomas originate in astrocytes, oligodendrogliomas in oligodendrocytes, mixed gliomas are derived from astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and ependymal cells. The histologically most common glioma in children is astrocytoma.

7.1.1. Low-grade gliomas in children

The most common LGG in children are: pilocytic astrocytoma—PA (grade I), diffuse astrocytoma (grade II), oligodendroglioma (grade II), subependemal giant astrocytoma (SEGA) and pleomorphic xanthastrocytoma (PXA). The prognosis of LGG in children is relatively good, especially in well-defined grade I lesions with the possibility of total resection. Dissemination within the CNS is rare, but may be multifocal, especially in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 syndrome [22]. Unfavorable prognostic factors include: low age, impossibility of total resection, diffuse growth (especially IDH mutated), diencephalic syndrome, presence of symptoms of intracranial hypertension and metastasis [23]. Pilocytic astrocytoma WHO grade I

This tumor is the most frequent LGG in children (up to 85%). Typical localizations are: cerebellum, diencephalon, optic tract, basal ganglia or brain stem [3]. Various localizations of this tumor also have their typical genetic characteristics. Its autosomal dominant forms are part of NF type 1 syndrome and tuberous sclerosis with typical localization over the course of the optical pathway, less often in hypothalamus. However, sporadic forms are more frequent. It may contain a BRAF-KIAA fusion that is connected to better prognosis. Conversely, the higher MIB-1 proliferation index is associated with shortened survival [24]. Therapy consists of surgical treatment. Despite the limited growth and the benign nature, the possibility of its removal is sometimes limited by its localization.

Its subtype is a pilomyxoid astrocytoma with a typical angiocentric array of myxoid matrix. It is most common in infants and children of pre-school age with a typical hypothalamus and chiasm localization. Due to its localization, total resection is less probable and thus has a slightly worse prognosis compared to pilocytic astrocytoma [25]. Diffuse gliomas WHO grade II

Diffuse low-grade gliomas account for 10% of all LGG in children [3]. Histologically, most common types are: astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma and mixed oligoastrocytoma. The most frequent group is the diffuse astrocytoma (DA), which is mainly located in hemispheres (especially in the frontal and temporal lobe), brain stem, optic pathway, hypothalamus and thalamus. Although they may appear to be similar to diffuse gliomas of adulthood, they have different genetic characteristics and typical biological behavior. Unlike DA of adulthood, for which the presence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations is typical, these are very rare in children. MAPK pathway and BRAF gene alterations are more common [26]. Unlike diffuse adult LGG, DA of pediatric type usually do not undergo malignant transformation into higher grade glioma, so their prognosis is more favorable. Especially in older children it is important to provide genetic diagnostics of the tumor type and differentiation between the more favorable type of LGG (DA without IDH mutation or diffuse oligodendroglioma without IDH mutation and 1p/19q co-deletion) and adult LGG type that may occur in older children and adolescents [27]. Up to 75% of adult LGG types in childhood are subject of malignant transformation. Treatment consists of surgical removal of the tumor and subsequent observation, but their infiltrative growth pattern generally does not allow their total resection. In case of relapse and progress in tumor growth, chemotherapy with carboplatin (with or without vincristine) may be used. Alternatively, the TPCV regimen (thioguanine, procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine) may be used, rarely in the second line with vinblastine and temozolomide. In relapsing non-responding tumors, bevacizumab is given in combination with irinotecan [28] and in some cases accompanied with radiotherapy. For early and late side effects of radiation, chemotherapy is preferred in children (in opposite to adult treatment). In pediatric patients, tumor localization and age at diagnosis are stronger factors for choosing therapy modality than the histological characteristics of the tumor itself [29, 30]. Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma WHO grade I

This tumor type is most frequently diagnosed in patients with tuberous sclerosis and mutations in TSC1 and TSC2 genes. Its typical location is a lateral ventricle, mostly growing subependymal near the foramen Monroi [6]. Growth pattern is slow without infiltration of surrounding tissues. Surgical resection, if possible, is a modality of choice in treatment of this tumor. SEGA is one of few tumors with proven efficacy of targeted treatment with mTOR inhibitors, everolimus or sirolimus, which may also eliminate the necessity of surgical treatment [31]. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma WHO grade II

PXA is relatively rare tumor, which accounts for 0.5–1% of all CNS tumors in childhood [3], typically occurring supratentorially, especially in the temporal lobe. It grows in the cortex, sometimes infiltrating meninges [6]. The most common symptoms are epileptic seizures. Frequently, V600E mutation of the BRAF gene occurs, especially in temporal lobe localization [32]. This tumor may undergo malignant transformation into an anaplastic form, which is classified as a separate type of tumor in the new WHO classification, has grade III and belongs to the HGG. Like grade II pleomorphic xanthastrocytoma, it often shows a V600E mutation of the BRAF gene [33].

7.1.2. High-grade gliomas in children

High-grade gliomas account for 15–20% of all pediatric CNS tumors [3]. HGG in children include anaplastic astrocytoma (grade III), glioblastoma and its variants (grade IV) and diffuse gliomas of midline structures (including diffuse pontine glioma). They are characterized by very high mitotic activity and in grade IV also with presence of microvascular proliferation and necrosis as it is in adult HGG. Despite these common histological features, children’s HGG differ from adult tumors by their typical localization, genetic alterations and clinical behaviors. Pediatric HGG almost always grow as primary malignancies and their malignant transformation from LGG is extremely rare [34]. Besides localization in cerebral hemispheres, which is also typical for adult forms of HGG, pediatric HGG occur more often in midline structures, such as thalamus, cerebellum or pons. Pontine HGG are typical for pediatric age group (account for 50% of all HGG in children) and have even worse prognosis than hemispheric tumors [35]. Children’s HGGs (especially tumors in children under 3 years of age) have significantly less genetic alterations than adult forms [36]. On the basis of a recurring combination of genetic and epigenetic features and characteristic biological and clinical behavior, 6 subtypes of HGG were determined (Table 1).

AgeYoung childAdolescentAdolescentAllAdolescentYoung child
Typical locationCerebellum, pons, spinal cord, thalamusBrain hemispheresBrain hemispheresBrain hemispheresBrain hemispheresBrain hemispheres
Typical alterationH3.3 or H3.1
mut. K27, TP53, ATRX, ACVR1 (pons), FGFR1 (thalamus), ampl. PDGFRA
H3.3, mut. G34, TP53, ATRXmut. IDH1, IDH2, ATRX, TP53ampl. PDGFRA, EGFR, mut. TP53, del. CDKN2A/CDKN2Bmut. NF1, TP53, ampl. PDGFRA, EGFR, del. CDKN2A/CDKN2Bmut. BRAF V600E, del. CDKN2A
Gene expressionProneuralMixedProneuralProneuralMesenchymalUnknown
Median survival6 months1 year>2 years1 year1 year>4 years

Table 1.

Characterization of pediatric HGG subtypes.

Mut., mutation; ampl., amplification, del., deletion [38].

The K27 subtype is characteristically found in pons, thalamus and cerebellum in younger children. Its typical alterations are: mutation of K27, TP53 and ATRX genes, PDGFRA amplification, ACVR1 mutation (typical for localization in pons) and mutation of FGFR1 which is typical for thalamic site of tumor. Among all subtypes it has the shortest survival—from 6 to 9 months [37, 38].

The G34 subtype is more frequent in adolescents and young adults and typically grows in cerebral hemispheres. It most commonly contains mutations of the G34, TP53 and ATRX genes. The survival time is about 1 year after the diagnosis is determined [37].

The IDH subtype with typical IDH1, IDH2, TP53 and ATRX mutations, grows usually in the hemisphere. Tumors with IDH mutations account for less than 10% of children’s HGG, they occur more commonly in adults. This type can also arise from malignant transformation of LGG, what is generally rare in children. According to prognosis, this type belongs to more favorable subtypes with a survival period of more than 2 years [34, 38].

The RTK-I (receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) subtype grows in cerebral hemispheres and occurs throughout the pediatric age spectrum. Typically, it includes: amplification of PDGFRA and EGFR, TP53 mutation and CDKN2A/CDKN2B deletion. Patients with this tumor subtype have a worse prognosis of survival, generally within 1 year [36, 38].

Mesenchymal subtype is most common among adolescents and young adults. It also occurs in cerebral hemispheres and contains mutations of NF1 and TP53, amplification of PDGFRA and EGFR and deletion of CDKN2A/CDKN2B. It also belongs to worse types according to prognosis, with a survival of up to 1 year [36, 38, 39].

The last subtype is epithelioid glioblastoma which is similar to pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma. It grows in cerebral hemispheres, in younger children and typically displays BRAF V600E mutation and CDKN2A deletion. It belongs to most favorable subtypes with a survival of more than 4 years [6, 12].

The presence of oncogene amplification, such as MYCN, PDGFR and EGFR, is associated with a worse prognosis in all types [40]. The most important prognostic factor is histological tumor grading and the extent of surgical resection. Radiotherapy is used in subsequent oncological treatment. Its combination with chemotherapy with temozolomide is therapeutically less successful than in adults [35]. Lomustine, vincristine and prednisone may also be used in chemotherapy. In case of recurrent HGG, repeated resection is considered individually, depending on the histological nature of the original tumor, the recurrence localization or the length of the progression free period. Reoperation could be also necessary for obtaining of fresh tissue samples for targeted treatment or for local administration of chemotherapy. In patients whose initial treatment failed, high-dose chemotherapy with total bone marrow suppression and subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [41] or clinical trial of new treatment modalities may be attempted. Molecular targets are very limited. Patients with BRAF V600E mutation are tested for BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib and dabrafenib) with partial effect [19]. Diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27 M-mutant

The previous WHO classification is also called diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). The new edition classifies this tumor as diffuse midline glioma because it also appears in thalamus, cerebellum and spinal cord. It is predominantly considered childhood tumor, although it may also occur in adults. It contains a typical K27 M mutation of the histone H3 gene H3F3A (less frequently the HIST1H3B gene) and grows typically diffusely and infiltrates surrounding tissues [37]. It is classified as WHO grade IV, regardless of the presence or absence of anaplastic features [12]. A tumor growing in the ventral pontine region is a highly aggressive, destructive neoplasm that accounts for up to 80% of all glioma in the brain stem of children. The mean age at diagnosis is 6–7 years and median survival is 9 months [42]. Cranial nerve lesions, long-tract lesion symptoms, ataxia and behavioral disorders appear as leading clinical symptoms. The first symptom is often the abducens nerve palsy, which is also a negative prognostic factor. Also facial nerve palsy may occur. Obstruction of CSF pathways could lead to hydrocephalus [43]. Typically, on MR image tumor occupies more than half of the axial diameter of the pons. It has no exact boarders and does not enhance after gadolinium administration. Due to the typical MRI image and its localization, biopsy is rarely indicated, but in some cases stereotactic biopsy could be beneficial [44]. This tumor is known to spread to the distal parts of the brain stem and along the white matter tract to both the cerebellum and the thalamus in over half of the patients. Supratentorial spreading and leptomeningeal dissemination are uncommon [39]. Total resection due to its localization and growth pattern is not possible, so the most common treatment is radiotherapy, which helps to control symptoms and generally prolongs patient’s survival. Because of the known CNS spread, irradiation of the entire head or the entire neural axis is sometimes chosen [39]. Systemic administration of chemotherapeutic agents has been shown to be ineffective for insufficient passage through the hematoencephalic barrier to pons [45]. The administration of chemotherapy (especially topotecan) is also attempted locally, directly to the tumor, using a stereotactic catheter. However, the results are not yet clear [46]. Children under age of 3 have a slightly better prognosis, probably due to different molecular genetic characteristics [47].

7.1.3. Ependymomas

Ependymomas are tumors originating from ependymal cells, which form a lining of CSF pathways and produce cerebrospinal fluid. They form the second most common group of children’s CNS malignancies. They occur supratentorially, in the posterior fossa and in the spinal cord, mostly in children under 10 years of age [48]. Clinical signs depend on localization. In the most frequent, infratentorial localization, they present with the development of obstructive hydrocephalus, ataxia, cervical spinal pain and symptoms of cranial nerve lesion can also be present. Supratentorial localization often causes headaches, epileptic seizures and depending on localization, the development of focal neurological deficit. In case of suspicion on ependymoma, it is necessary to realize the MRI of whole craniospinal axis even before surgery. If possible, lumbar puncture with CSF sampling is recommended.

Ependymomas could be histologically: subependymoma (grade I), myxopapillary ependymoma (grade I), ependymoma (grade II), ependymoma, RELA fusion-positive (grade II—III) and anaplastic ependymoma (grade III). Subependymoma and myxopapillary ependymoma appear almost exclusively in adults. The existence of several molecular subtypes of ependymomas, which differ in their localization, molecular genetic characteristics, typical age group of patients and prognosis, are known.

Two genetically distinct subgroups are distinguished in ependymomas of posterior fossa localization [49]. Group A occurs more frequently (up to half the ependymomas of all localizations) affecting predominantly younger children (3 years of age) and has a worse prognosis. In these tumors, fewer gene alterations occur and the VEGF, PDGFR, integrin and MAPK signaling pathways are most commonly affected [50]. Epigenetic suppression of differentiation genes is often present in this group of tumors [51]. Duplication of 1q occurs in 25% of group A ependymomas and it is a common negative prognostic feature [52]. Less frequently occurring group B affects predominantly adolescents and young adults. It contains frequent chromosome changes and its prognosis is more favorable than in group A. In both groups, the mutation rate is relatively low and gene mutations occur sporadically [50].

Up to 70% of supratentorially localized ependymomas harbor fusion of C11orf95-RELA on chromosome 11q [50]. This change never occurs when locating in the posterior fossa. The discovery of the presence of this fusion was so significant that in the new WHO classification of brain tumors from 2016 the ependymoma with the RELA fusion was classified as a separate entity [12]. Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A with or without the presence of duplication of 1q is a negative prognostic factor [53]. The most frequent occurrence is in children with an average age of 8 years. The fusion of YAP1 (with MAMLD1 or FAM118B) occurs in supratentorially localized ependymomas without RELA fusion. These tumors are more common in younger children with an average age of 1.4 years. From all ependymomas, the worst prognosis has supratentorial RELA positive tumors and group A ependymomas in the posterior fossa. At the same time, they are the most common forms (together make up two-thirds of all ependymomas) that occur predominantly in children [53].

Therapeutic modality is extensive surgical removal followed by radiotherapy, which can only be used in the treatment of children aged more than 1 year. Currently, the use of chemotherapy (especially vincristine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and etoposide) is in clinical trials [38]. The choice of the treatment scheme determines the age of the child, the histological type of tumor, the extent of the resection performed and the presence of dissemination in the CSF pathways.

7.2. Neuronal and mixed neuronal-glial tumors

It is a heterogeneous group of tumors with neuronal or mixed neuroglial morphology. They are mostly grade I, but their anaplastic forms can also occur. Following tumors are most frequently present in children.

7.2.1. Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma (DIA) and ganglioglioma (DIGG)

These grade I tumors account for 0.5% of CNS childhood tumors [3]. They occur almost exclusively in children under 2 years of age. MRI verifies a large cystic tumor, especially in the frontal or parietal lobe. They are histologically and genetically almost identical, the only difference between them is the neoplastic neuronal component. Approximately 40% of these tumors display MET amplification and about 10% also BRAF V600E mutation [54].

7.2.2. Ganglioglioma (GG)

These tumors are characterized by a combination of neoplastic ganglion cells with a glial component similar to PA or diffuse glioma (especially astrocytoma). They occur mainly supratentorially. Seizures are usually leading symptom [33]. GG often harbor BRAF V600E mutation. The glial component of GG can undergo malignant transformation to anaplastic form that has higher mitotic activity, endothelial proliferation and necrosis in 3–5%. Up to half of the anaplastic GG is characterized by the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation, a minor part of the TP53 mutation [6].

7.2.3. Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNET)

It is a low-grade tumor (grade I), which occurs mainly supratentorially in the temporal lobe. It often manifests as drug-resistant epilepsy. There are several histological subtypes, which do not differ in typical age of origin, the nature of epileptic seizures or prognosis. Most of these tumors show alterations of FGFR1 and BRAF V600E mutation [27].

7.3. Embryonal tumors

This group of tumors originates from embryonal cells that remain present in the CNS after birth. They are the most common childhood malignant CNS tumors (15–20%) in children under the age of 14 [12]. In adults, they are extremely rare. Most frequently occurring embryonal tumors are: meduloblastoma, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor and CNS embryonal tumors (better known under the older name CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumors—PNETs). All tumors of this group tend to spread along the CFS pathways. Therefore, it is recommended to perform MR of whole craniospinal axis prior to surgery. CSF sampling is also indicated, as the finding of circulating tumor cells can appear earlier than dissemination in MRI. The prognosis of embryonic tumors depends on the age of the patient, dissemination of the tumor within CNS at the time of diagnosis, the size of the postoperative residue and on the histopathological and molecular biological properties of the tumor.

7.3.1. Medulloblastoma (MB)

It is the most common malignant brain tumor type in children. MB is a group of lesions that differ significantly by their genetic alterations, histological features and prognosis. In all cases, however, they are grade IV and fast-growing. Characteristic localization is infratentorial and leptomeningeal spread is typical. MB often manifests by symptoms of intracranial hypertension and blockage of CSF pathways as well as other symptoms, such as ataxia and nystagmus. Medulloblastoma may also occur as part of hereditary syndromes: Turcot, Rubinstein-Taybi, Gorlin, Li-Fraumeni syndrome and Fanconi anemia. There are four histological variants (classic type, desmoplastic nodular type, medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity and large cell and anaplastic type) and four subtypes depending on the signal pathway involved or genes altered: WNT (10%), SHH (30%), group 3 (15%) and group 4 (45%). WHO classification of brain tumors from 2016 classifies genetically defined MB into: WNT-activated, SHH-activated and TP53-mutant, SHH-activated and TP53-wildtype and non-WNT/non-SHH medulloblastoma, which is divided into MB group3 and MB group 4 [12].

The WNT medulloblastoma is the less frequent group (10%), which is typically found in the brain stem area in children aged 10. Often displays classic histology. The incidence of CNS metastases is very low. Activation of the WNT signaling pathway is characteristic [55]. About 90% of these tumors present with CTNNB1 mutation. Mutations of DDX3X, chromatin remodeling genes and TP53 are also common. TP53 mutation in this type of tumor is not associated with a worse prognosis as it is in TP53 mutated SHH MB. In general, WNT-activated MB has a very good prognosis.

The SHH group of medulloblastomas accounts for 30% of all MB and is the most heterogeneous. All histological types could occur. Dominant localization is in cerebral hemispheres. The most commonly affected age group is up to 4 years of age and then adolescents over 17 years of age. In children up to 4 years of age, it is most commonly present MB with extensive nodularity and in group 4–17 years of age, it is classic and large cell anaplastic type. Desmoplastic nodular type is typical for patients over 17 years of age [56]. Genetic alterations also vary by age category. Mutation of SUFU gene is commonly present in age group up to 4 years, whereas SMO mutation occurs mainly in patients over 17 years of age. Between 4 and 17 years of age, amplification of MYCN and GLI2 occurs. PTCH1 alterations and TERT promoter mutation occur in all age categories [57]. While MBs of children under 4 years with extensive nodularity generally have a better prognosis, MBs with large cell anaplastic characteristics, presence of MYCN amplification or TP53 mutation are very aggressive. They tend to metastasize within the CNS, and therefore are associated with a very poor prognosis [55, 56]. SHH-activated MBs with TP53 mutation are classified separately. In children with TP53 mutation, it is often a germline mutation that is part of the Li-Fraumeni syndrome [58].

Non-WNT/non-SHH MB is divided into group 3 and group 4. While group 3 forms 15%, group 4 45% of all MBs. Although genetically different, some characteristics and genetic alterations are common. There is a higher occurrence in boys in both groups, structural anomalies are common—especially the formation of isochromosome 17q. A structural alteration that aberrantly induces the activity of GFI1 or GF1B proto-oncogenes is common in both groups, particularly in group 3 [59]. The worst prognosis of all types has group 3 (particularly in boys), with large cell anaplastic morphology and with proven MYC over-expression and amplification. Group 4 is the most common molecular type with a pronounced predominance in boys. Nearly all tumors in this group have classic morphology. The prognosis of patient survival is moderate—except those with proven MYC amplification, which have worse prognosis [55]. Patients with metastasis present at diagnosis have a high risk of relapse, with the exception of patients with isochromosome 17, who make up a subgroup with more favorable prognosis [60].

The diagnosis is based on preoperative MRI examination of the craniospinal axis. Over the past 30 years, the most fundamental shift has been made in treatment of MB among all CNS childhood tumors and has changed from a fatal disease to a tumor with a 70% curability. The basis is surgical treatment with the maximal possible extent of resection. In the postoperative period, MRI is again indicated to evaluate the postoperative residue and the examination of cerebrospinal fluid is also beneficial. Medulloblastoma has as one of the few CNS tumors staging system that has 5 degrees (M0 = not disseminated, M1 = positive cytology of CSF without MR image of dissemination, M2 = nodular proliferation in cerebellar and cerebral subarachnoid spaces and in ventricles, M3 = nodular proliferation in spinal subarachnoid spaces, M4 = extra-neural propagation). Surgery is followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy with whole CNS irradiation for frequent dissemination of medulloblastoma within the CNS. The chemotherapy regimens use either a combination of cisplatin, lomustine and vincristine or a combination of cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and vincristine [61]. Radiotherapy is administered at a dose of 54 Gy targeted to the tumor bed, followed by irradiation of the craniospinal axis at a dose of 24–36 Gy. The introduction of chemotherapy into the treatment scheme reduced the dose necessary to irradiate the craniospinal axis, thereby reducing the incidence of side effects of radiation [62]. However, radiotherapy in children under 3 years of age is not used for serious adverse effects on brain development. To potentiate the effects of standard chemotherapy, methotrexate is concomitantly administered to children under 3 years, either systemically or locally [63].

7.3.2. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT)

This high-grade neoplasm (grade IV) accounts for 1–2% of pediatric CNS tumors. Typically, it occurs in the age category up to 5 years, and in children under 1 year of age, it is the most common malignant CNS tumor. As it grows very quickly, clinical manifestations occur early. AT/RT is often localized supratentorialy and also in the posterior fossa [3, 64]. About 20% of patients have already dissemination of the tumor at the time of diagnosis, usually along leptomeninges. Rare coincidence with renal tumors may occur [65]. Genetically, it is characterized by deletion on the 22nd chromosome and loss of INI1/SMARCB1/BAF47 expression due to germline or somatic mutations. Evaluation of SMARCB1 expression is necessary to distinguish AT/RT from other embryonic tumors [66]. This tumor was the first primary CNS tumor in which the major tumor suppressor gene was identified, namely SMARCB1. The presence of SMARCB1 germline mutation is the basis for identifying the syndrome predisposing to the rhabdoid tumor, which is common in patients with coincidence of AT/RT with rhabdoid tumor of the kidney. The greatest risk of developing tumors in this syndrome is during the first year of age, which requires monitoring and active screening in children from these families. Immunohistochemical evidence of cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen, glial fibrillary acidic protein, synaptophysin, desmin and vimentin is also necessary. The MIB-1 proliferation index is high, 50–100% [67]. MRI of the entire craniospinal axis as well as examination of CSF for the presence of tumor cells is useful in diagnosis. There is no standard treatment regime for AT/RT. Treatment is based on surgical resection. The localization of the tumor and the extent of its spread is crucial for the choice of treatment modalities. Prolongation of survival requires a combination of postoperative systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy (methotrexate, cytarabine and hydrocortisone) with radiotherapy. Negative prognostic factors include: the presence of SMARCB1 germline mutations, postoperative residues, dissemination at the time of diagnosis and the age under 2 years [64].

7.3.3. Embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered (ETMR)

This tumor typically occurs in children under 3 years of age. It has a poor prognosis, most patients die within 1–2 years after diagnosis [68]. Characteristic is the 19q13.42 locus amplification, which contains a cluster of microRNA (C19MC) and a fusion between TTYH1 and C19MC [69]. Treatment begins with a surgical resection, followed by adjuvant oncology treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In children under 3 years, radiotherapy is not indicated.

7.3.4. Neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma CNS

These two neoplasms belong to embryonal tumors but show neuronal differentiation, in the case of ganglioneuroblastoma also the presence of ganglionic cells. They most often occur in early childhood. In general, neuroblastomas are a frequent diagnosis, but especially in the chest and abdominal cavity (in the brain they are rare). Some of these include gene alterations leading to increased expression of the transcription factor FOXR2 [70]. The treatment scheme is the same as for other embryonal tumors – surgery followed by chemotherapy in children less than 3 years of age and addition of radiotherapy in older children.

7.4. Pineoblastoma

In the past, this tumor was classified as embryonal, but in the new WHO classification it was reclassified to a group of pineal tumors. Its histological and molecular biological properties are similar to embryonal tumors. Because of its location, obstructive hydrocephalus is predominantly caused by blockage of CSF passages at the level of the third ventricle, and symptoms of the pressure on tectum—especially oculomotor disorder, poor reaction of pupils to light with present reaction to accommodation, later hemiparesis and ataxia. Often occur germline mutations of the RB1 and DICER1 genes [71]. Pineoblastoma is often found in children with congenital retinoblastoma. It can rarely disseminate along CSF pathways. A staging system similar to embryonal tumors is used. The primary therapeutic step is surgical resection. However, due to localization, total resection is unlikely, with only partial resection or biopsy performed in the majority of patients. This is followed by oncological treatment that combines chemotherapy and radiotherapy with a dose of 54 Gy on tumor bed and 24–36 Gy for craniospinal axis. A different therapy management is used in children under 3 years of age who undergo biopsy, followed by chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy with bone marrow ablation followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

7.5. Germ cell tumors

Intracranial germ cell tumors are a heterogeneous group that accounts for 3–4% of brain tumors with the exception of Japan where the incidence is higher, up to 15% [72]. Based on histopathological characteristics, they are divided into germinomas and nongerminomas (embryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, mature or immature teratoma, teratoma with malignant transformation, yolk sac tumor and mixed germ cell tumor). In some countries, dividing into secretory and non-secretory tumors is also used—depending on the presence and absence, respectively, of elevation of serum and CSF tumor markers [12].

The most common localization is the pineal and suprasellar area, where they form either solitary or multiple lesions. The pineal region is much more frequent, but up to 10% of patients have both sites at the time of diagnosis, which is typical for pure germinomas [73]. Rare localities include basal ganglia, brain ventricles, cerebral hemispheres and thalamus. Tumor in the suprasellar region is often presented by hormonal expression. Often occur diabetes insipidus, enuresis, anorexia and also psychological changes [74]. Pineal localization has usually earlier manifestation, with hydrocephalus and diplopia developing from pressure to the tectal and aqueductal region. The most common germ cell tumor is germinoma. Mutations of the KIT, KRAS and NRAS genes are common [75]. Half of germinoma cases harbor deregulation of the KIT/RAS and AKT/mTOR pathways. The germline variations of JMJD1C occur more frequently in Japanese, which is probably related to the higher incidence of germinomas in this country. This gene is important for maintaining male germ cells [76].

In the diagnosis, apart from MRI, cytological examination of CSF and evaluation of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and beta human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG) concentrations in both serum and in CSF is used [77]. In addition, hormonal examination of hypothalamic and pituitary function and examination of the visual field in suprasellar and hypothalamic tumors are necessary. The essentials of the treatment are chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but biopsy is required for reliable diagnosis. Only in tumors with unambiguous MRI image and positive tumor markers in CSF can be treated without biopsy.

7.6. Choroid plexus tumors

These rare intraventricular tumors account for 1% of all brain tumors and 2–4% of pediatric tumors. They arise from neuroectoderm and consist of differentiated epithelial plexus cells that produce CSF. They most often occur in the age group under 2 years of age. The most common site are lateral ventricles (less often the 3rd and 4th ventricle), but could also occur in the cerebellopontine angle and in the cerebral parenchyma. They mostly manifest by symptoms of intracranial hypertension from hydrocephalus, both from overproduction of the CSF as well as from obstruction of the CSF pathways. Sometimes, however, they can also manifest suddenly, in case of bleeding into the tumor [78]. This group of tumors consists of: choroid plexus papilloma (grade I), atypical choroid plexus papilloma (grade II) and choroid plexus carcinoma (grade III). There are no genetic differences between papilloma and atypical papilloma. In both, immunoreactivity to cytokeratin, vimentin, S100 protein and synaptophysin is present. On the other hand, carcinoma is genetically different. The germline mutations of TP53 as part of the Li-Fraumeni syndrome predispose to the formation of plexus carcinoma. Somatic TP53 mutations are present in up to 60% of the plexus carcinomas and the more copy of the mutated TP53 is present, the worse is the prognosis [79]. Chromosome alterations are rarely detected.

MRI showing relatively well-defined extra-axial mass that does not invade the brain tissue with gadolinium enhancement and containing calcification and microhemorrhages is essential. Surgical treatment is the method of choice. Due to the rich vascular supply, preoperative tumor embolization is preferred in some cases. Hydrocephalus treatment is also necessary—sometimes requires external ventricular drainage. In some patients hydrocephalus is permanent, and therefore ventriculoperitoneal shunt or the endoscopic ventriculostomy of the 3rd ventricle are required [80]. There is no need for further treatment in the papilloma, radiotherapy, radiosurgery or chemotherapy with bevacizumab may be used in atypical or recurrent forms. Chemotherapy has been proven in choroid plexus carcinoma, which can spread along CSF pathways [81].

7.7. Craniopharyngioma

Craniopharyngiomas are rare tumors, accounting for 3–5% of pediatric brain tumors. They occur in two subtypes: adamantinomatous and papillary [12]. The adamantinomatous variant for which the CTNNB1 mutation is typical, is often found in children [6]. Their congenital origin is assumed to be from the ectodermal residues of the Rathke capsule or from another embryonal epithelium. They most commonly occur in the suprasellar area with intrasellar propagation. Symptoms include: endocrine disorders, visual disturbances, hydrocephalus symptoms and very rarely when growing in the posterior fossa—headache, diplopia, ataxia and hearing loss [82]. The diagnosis is made by MRI that displays a tumor with a solid and cystic component and with intratumoral calcifications. Evaluation of hormonal function and visual field is also necessary. The therapy of newly diagnosed craniopharyngiomas is a combination of surgical treatment, radiotherapy and a drainage of the cyst. The prognosis is good, 90% of patients survive more than 10 years [83]. Total resection may have serious complications, including: need for hormone replacement therapy, severe obesity, behavioral disorders, blindness, epileptic seizures, postoperative CSF leak, pseudoaneurysms, oculomotor disorders, severe postoperative bleeding and hypothalamic injury [84]. While recurrent craniopharyngiomas are treated by resection, radiotherapy or radiosurgery, tumors with unresponsive cystic component can be treated by administration of P32, bleomycin or interferon alpha directly into the tumor bed. It can be supplemented by systemic administration of interferon [85].

7.8. Other pediatric CNS tumors

Schwannomas are in children rare, mostly benign neoplasms originating from Schwann cells of cranial or other nerves. Some of these tumors are present as a part of the NF2 type genetic syndrome, especially at bilateral occurrence. From cranial nerves, this tumor mostly affects VIII cranial nerve and is called vestibular schwannoma or acoustic neurinoma [86]. Vestibular schwannomas can cause loss of hearing and tinnitus. Diagnosis is mainly based on MRI. The method of choice is resection of the tumor, further treatment is usually not necessary. In rare cases, radiotherapy can be used in the presence of postoperative residues [87].

Meningiomas that grow from meninges are much rarer in children than in adults—they account for about 2.6–2.9% of CNS childhood tumors [2]. It occurs most often between 6 and 12 years of age. Children have a higher incidence of tumors growing from the skull base and a higher incidence of atypical (grade II) and anaplastic (grade III) meningiomas compared to adults. Chromosome 22 abnormalities are often present, also as a part of the NF2 type syndrome. Tumors connected with NF2 occur at younger age (about 2 years) and may also be the first symptom of this disease. In benign tumors, surgical treatment is largely sufficient, but in the case of incomplete resection and in tumors of higher grade, is usually combined with radiotherapy. Favorable prognostic factors include: age up to 10 years, superficial localization, total extirpation and absence of NF2 syndrome, where localization and resection extent are stronger predictive factors than histological grade [88].

Primary CNS lymphomas (PCNSL) are rare in children. Patients with immunodeficiency have an increased risk of developing CNS lymphomas [89]. They occur mainly in children around 14 years of age with moderate predominance in boys [90]. They are mostly localized in brain hemispheres. Clinical symptoms include symptoms of increased intracranial pressure, ataxia, hemiparesis, epileptic seizures and cranial nerve palsy. MRI and CSF sampling is used in diagnostics. MRI verifies solid lesion (even with a possible cystic component). Histologically, mature aggressive B cell lymphoma (B-NHL), as well as anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) or peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) are most often present. Pediatric B-NHL has a low to moderate proliferation index, a lower Bc12 protein expression and a higher frequency of the Bc16 + GC fetal center phenotype, indicating a better prognosis [91]. While the prognosis of PCNSL in adults is very poor, in children is better. Interestingly, localization of PCNSL in deep brain structures does not affect the prognosis [90]. In chemotherapy, methotrexate or cytarabine at high doses are mostly used, usually providing satisfactory remission without need for use of radiotherapy (often used in ALCL form). It has been found that the exclusive use of chemotherapy is more effective than combined chemoradiotherapy. Explanation could be the use of lower doses of chemotherapy in combined therapy. High-dose therapy of methotrexate, which appears to be the most effective, is better tolerated by children compared to adults. Radiotherapy is therefore reserved for recurrent forms [89].


8. Conclusion

Pediatric CNS tumors are diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. A lot of specialists are involved in their management: pediatricians, neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiologists, radiation and clinical oncologists, endocrinologists and others. Due to the development of MRI and its techniques, use of invasive examinations is minimalized. Over the past decades, there has been a significant refinement of operational technologies, enabling the most extensive and yet safe resection of the tumor. Children CNS tumors are frequent, often with unfavorable prognosis. While in most malignant tumors the prognosis has not improved as hoped, in case of medulloblastoma there has been a significant survival prolongation during last decades. Undoubtedly, this is due to extensive research of the molecular genetic characteristics of tumors, which identified genetically defined subgroups of medulloblastoma with different treatment strategies. This change was also reflected in the new WHO classification, which also classifies medulloblastomas based on genetic alterations. Intense research also takes place in other tumor entities, where the discovery is yet about to come. Identifying molecular and genetic targets is the only possible way to target individualized therapy that appears both in treatment and in further prognosis improving in this age group as a key point.


  1. 1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2013;63(1):11-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21166
  2. 2. Ostrom QT, de Blank PM, Kruchko C et al. Alex’s lemonade stand foundation infant and childhood primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. Neuro-Oncology 2015;16(10):1-36. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou327
  3. 3. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. Neuro-Oncology. 2014;16(4):1-63. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou223
  4. 4. Pui CH, Gajjar AJ, Kane JR, et al. Challenging issues in pediatric oncology. Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology. 2011;8:540-549. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.95
  5. 5. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, de Blank PM et al. American Brain Tumor Association adolescent and young adult primary brain and central nervous system Tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro-Oncology 2016;18(1):1-50. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov297
  6. 6. Chiang JC, Ellison DW. Molecular pathology of paediatric central nervous system tumours. The Journal of Pathology. 2017;241(2):159-172. DOI: 10.1002/path.4813
  7. 7. Andersen TV, Schmidt LS, Poulsen AH, et al. Patterns of exposure to infectious diseases and social contacts in early life and risk of brain tumours in children and adolescents: An international case-control study (CEFALO). British Journal of Cancer. 2013;108:2346-2353. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.201
  8. 8. Partap S, MacLean J, Von Behren J, et al. Birth anomalies and obstetric history as risks for childhood tumors of the central nervous system. Pediatrics. 2011;128:652-657. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3637
  9. 9. Bjorge T, Sorensen HT, Grotmol T, et al. Fetal growth and childhood cancer: A population-based study. Pediatrics. 2013;132:1265-1275. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-1317
  10. 10. Roncarolo F, Infante-Rivard C. Asthma and risk of brain cancer in children. Cancer Causes & Control. 2012;23:617-623. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-9928-7
  11. 11. Shu X, Prochazka M, Lannering B, et al. Atopic conditions and brain tumor risk in children and adolescents--an international case-control study (CEFALO). Annals of Oncology. 2014;25(4):902-908. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu048
  12. 12. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathologica. 2016;131(6):803-820. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
  13. 13. Pollack IF. Multidisciplinary management of childhood brain tumors: A review of outcomes, recent advances, and challenges. Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics. 2011;8(2):135-148. DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.PEDS1178
  14. 14. Wells EM, Packer RJ. Pediatric brain tumors. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015;21(2):373-396. DOI: 10.1212/01.CON.0000464176.96311.d1
  15. 15. Balogun JA, Khan OH, Taylor M, et al. Pediatric awake craniotomy and intra-operative stimulation mapping. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2014;21(11):1891-1844. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.07.013
  16. 16. Seddighi A, Esmaeil Akbari M, Seddighi AS, et al. First experience of intraoperative radiation therapy in cerebral high grade Glioma in Iran: A report of three cases and literature review. Iranian Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2015;8(5):e3795. DOI: 10.17795/ijcp-3795
  17. 17. Xing W, Shao C, Qi Z, et al. The role of Gliadel wafers in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM: A meta-analysis. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2015;9:3341-3348. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S85943
  18. 18. Karajannis M, Allen JC, Newcomb EW. Treatment of Pediatric brain Tumors. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2008;217(3):584-589. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21544
  19. 19. Kieran MW, Hargrave DR, Cohen KJ, et al. Phase 1 study of dabrafenib in pediatric patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory BRAF V600E high- and low-grade gliomas (HGG, LGG), Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), and other solid tumors (OST). Journal of Clincal Oncology. 2015;33(15):A-10004. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.10004
  20. 20. Green A, Foreman N, Levy JM, et al. HG-120case series of three pediatric brain tumor patients treated with tumor-treating fields. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18:75-76. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now073.116
  21. 21. Grob ST, Levy JMM. Improving diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes in Pediatric brain Tumors. Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s40291-017-0299-3
  22. 22. Bandopadhayay P, Bergthold G, London WB, et al. Long-term outcome of 4,040 children diagnosed with pediatric low-grade gliomas: An analysis of the surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2014;61(7):1173-1179. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24958
  23. 23. Stokland T, Liu JF, Ironside JW, et al. A multivariate analysis of factors determining tumor progression in childhood low-grade glioma: A population-based cohort study (CCLG CNS9702). Neuro-Oncology. 2010;12(12):1257-1268. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noq092
  24. 24. Hawkins C, Walker E, Mohamed N, et al. BRAF-KIAA1549 fusion predicts better clinical outcome in pediatric low-grade astrocytoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 2011;17(14):4790-4798. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0034
  25. 25. Colin C, Padovani L, Chappe C, et al. Outcome analysis of childhood pilocytic astrocytomas: A retrospective study of 148 cases at a single institution. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 2013;39:693-705. DOI: 10.1111/nan.12013
  26. 26. Forshew T, Tatevossian RG, Lawson AR, et al. Activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway: A signature genetic defect in posterior fossa pilocytic astrocytomas. The Journal of Pathology. 2009;218(2):172-181. DOI: 10.1002/path.2558
  27. 27. Qaddoumi I, Orisme W, Wen J, et al. Genetic alterations in uncommon low-grade neuroepithelial tumors: BRAF, FGFR1, and MYB mutations occur at high frequency and align with morphology. Acta Neuropathologica. 2016;131:833-845. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-016-1539-z
  28. 28. Avery RA, Hwang EI, Jakacki RI, et al. Marked recovery of vision in children with optic pathway gliomas treated with bevacizumab. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2014;132(1):111-114. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5819
  29. 29. Wisoff JH, Sanford RA, Heier LA, et al. Primary neurosurgery for pediatric low-grade gliomas: A prospective multi-institutional study from the Children’s oncology group. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:1548-1554. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318214a66e
  30. 30. Müller K, Gnekow A, Falkenstein F, et al. Radiotherapy in pediatric pilocytic astrocytomas: A subgroup analysis within the prospective multicenter study HIT-LGG 1996 by the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH). Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. 2013;189:647-655. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0357-7
  31. 31. Weidman DR, Pole JD, Bouffet E, et al. Dose-level response rates of mTor inhibition in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) related subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA). Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2015;62(10):1754-1760. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25573
  32. 32. Ida CM, Rodriguez FJ, Burger PC, et al. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma: Natural history and long-term follow-up. Brain Pathology. 2015;25:575-586. DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12217
  33. 33. Schindler G, Capper D, Meyer J, et al. Analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in 1,320 nervous system tumors reveals high mutation frequencies in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, ganglioglioma and extra-cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma. Acta Neuropathologica. 2011;121:397-405. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-011-0802-6
  34. 34. Sturm D, Witt H, Hovestadt V, et al. Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:425-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.08.024
  35. 35. Cohen KJ, Heideman RL, Zhou T, et al. Temozolomide in the treatment of children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: A report from the Children’sOncology group. Neuro-Oncology. 2011;13:410-416. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noq191
  36. 36. Wu G, Diaz AK, Paugh BS, et al. The genomic landscape of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and pediatric non-brainstem high-grade glioma. Nature Genetics. 2014;46:444-450. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2938
  37. 37. Wu G, Broniscer A, McEachron TA, et al. Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nature Genetics. 2012;44:251-253. DOI: 10.1038/ng.1102
  38. 38. Gajjar A, Bowers DC, Karajannis MA, et al. Pediatric brain Tumors: Innovative genomic information is transforming the diagnostic and clinical landscape. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015;33(27):2986-2998. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.9217
  39. 39. Buczkowicz P, Bartels U, Bouffet E, et al. Histopathological spectrum of paediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Acta Neuropathologica. 2014;128(4):573-581. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1319-6
  40. 40. Korshunov A, Ryzhova M, Hovestadt V, et al. Integrated analysis of pediatric glioblastoma reveals a subset of biologically favorable tumors with associated molecular prognostic markers. Acta Neuropathologica. 2015;129:669-678. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-015-1405-4
  41. 41. Finlay JL, Dhall G, Boyett JM, et al. Myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow rescue in children and adolescents with recurrent malignant astrocytoma: Outcome compared with conventional chemotherapy: A report from the Children’s oncology group. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2008;51(6):806-811. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21732
  42. 42. Johung TB, Monje M. Diffuse intrinsic Pontine Glioma: New pathophysiological insights and emerging therapeutic targets. Current Neuropharmacology. 2017;15(1):88-97. DOI: 10.2174/1570159X14666160509123229
  43. 43. Schroeder KM, Hoeman CM, Becher OJ. Children are not just little adults: Recent advances in understanding of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma biology. Pediatric Research. 2014;75(1-2):205-209. DOI: 10.1038/pr.2013.194
  44. 44. Roujeau T, Machado G, Garnett MR, et al. Stereotactic biopsy of diffuse pontine lesions in children. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2007;107(1):1-4. DOI: 10.3171/PED-07/07/001
  45. 45. Jansen MH, van Vuurden DG, Vandertop WP, et al. Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: A systematic update on clinical trials and biology. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2012;38:27-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.06.007
  46. 46. Anderson RC, Kennedy B, Yanes CL, et al. Convection-enhanced delivery of topotecan into diffuse intrinsic brainstem tumors in children. Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics. 2013;11(3):289-295. DOI: 10.3171/2012.10.PEDS12142
  47. 47. Broniscer A, Laningham FH, Sanders RP, et al. Young age may predict a better outcome for children with diffuse pontine glioma. Cancer. 2008;113(3):566-572. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23584
  48. 48. McGuire CS, Sainani KL, Fisher PG. Incidence patterns for ependymoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2009;110:725-729. DOI: 10.3171/2008.9.JNS08117
  49. 49. Hoffman LM, Donson AM, Nakachi I, et al. Molecular sub-group-specific immunophenotypic changes are associated with outcome in recurrent posterior fossa ependymoma. Acta Neuropathologica. 2014;127:731-745. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-013-1212-8
  50. 50. Archer TC, Pomeroy SL. Defining the molecular landscape of ependymomas. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:613-615. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.015
  51. 51. Mack SC, Witt H, Piro RM, et al. Epigenomic alterations define lethal CIMP-positive ependymomas of infancy. Nature. 2014;506:445-450. DOI: 10.1038/nature13108
  52. 52. Korshunov A, Witt H, Hielscher T, et al. Molecular staging of intracranial ependymoma in children and adults. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(19):3182-3190. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3359
  53. 53. Pajtler KW, Witt H, Sill M, et al. Molecular classification of ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and age groups. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:728-743. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.002
  54. 54. Gessi M, Zur Muhlen A, Hammes J, et al. Genome-wide DNA copy number analysis of desmoplastic infantile astrocytomas and desmoplastic infantile gangliogliomas. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. 2013;72:807-815. DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182a033a0
  55. 55. Kool M, Korshunov A, Remke M, et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: An international meta-analysis of transcriptome, genetic aberrations, and clinical data of WNT, SHH, group 3, and group 4 medulloblastomas. Acta Neuropathologica. 2012;123:473-484. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-012-0958-8
  56. 56. Ellison DW, Dalton J, Kocak M, et al. Medulloblastoma: Clinicopathological correlates of SHH, WNT, and non-SHH/WNT molecular subgroups. Acta Neuropathologica. 2011;121:381-396. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-011-0800-8
  57. 57. Remke M, Ramaswamy V, Peacock J, et al. TERTpromoter mutations are highly recurrent in SHH subgroup medulloblastoma. Acta Neuropathologica. 2013;126:917-929. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-013-1198-2
  58. 58. Kool M, Jones DT, Jäger N, et al. Genome sequencing of SHH medulloblastoma predicts genotype-related response to smoothened inhibition. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:393-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.004
  59. 59. Northcott PA, Lee C, Zichner T, et al. Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Nature. 2014;511:428-434. DOI: 10.1038/nature13379
  60. 60. Shih DJ, Northcott PA, Remke M, et al. Cytogenetic prognostication within medulloblastoma subgroups. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32:886-896. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9539
  61. 61. Nageswara Rao AA, Wallace DJ, Billups C, et al. Cumulative cisplatin dose is not associated with event-free or overall survival in children with newly diagnosed average-risk medulloblastoma treated with cisplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy: Report from the Children’s oncology group. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2014;61(1):102-106. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24670
  62. 62. Mizumoto M, Murayama S, Akimoto T, et al. Proton beam therapy for pediatric malignancies: A retrospective observational multicenter study in Japan. Cancer Medicine. 2016;5(7):1519-1525. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.743
  63. 63. Lafay-Cousin L, Smith A, Chi SN, et al. Clinical, pathological, and molecular characterization of infant Medulloblastomas treated with sequential high-dose chemotherapy. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2016;63(9):1527-1534. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26042
  64. 64. Lafay-Cousin L, Hawkins C, Carret AS, et al. Central nervous system atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours: The Canadian paediatric brain tumour consortium experience. European Journal of Cancer. 2012;48:353-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.005
  65. 65. Biegel JA, Fogelgren B, Wainwright LM, et al. Germline INI1 mutation in a patient with a central nervous system atypical teratoid tumor and renal rhabdoid tumor. Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer. 2000;28(1):31-37. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(200005)28
  66. 66. Slavc I, Chocholous M, Leiss U, et al. Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor: Improved long-term survival with an intensive multimodal therapy and delayed radiotherapy—The Medical University of Vienna experience, 1992 to 2012. Cancer Medicine. 2014;3:91-100. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.161
  67. 67. McLendon RE, Adekunle A, Rajaram V, et al. Embryonal central nervous system neoplasms arising in infants and young children: A pediatric brain tumor consortium study. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2011;135(8):984-993. DOI: 10.5858/2010-0515-OAR1
  68. 68. Spence T, Sin-Chan P, Picard D, et al. CNS-PNETs with C19MC amplification and/or LIN28 expression comprise a distinct histogenetic diagnostic and therapeutic entity. Acta Neuropathologica. 2014;128:91-103. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1291-1
  69. 69. Kleinman CL, Gerges N, Papillon-Cavanagh S, et al. Fusion of TTYH1with the C19MC microRNA cluster drives expression of a brain-specific DNMT3Bisoform in the embryonal brain tumor ETMR. Nature Genetics. 2014;46:39-44. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2849
  70. 70. Sturm D, Orr BA, Toprak UH, et al. New brain tumor entities emerge from molecular classification of CNS-PNETs. Cell. 2016;164:1060-1072. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.015
  71. 71. De Kock L, Sabbaghian N, Druker H, et al. Germ-line and somatic DICER1 mutations in pineoblastoma. Acta Neuropathologica. 2014;128(4):583-595. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1318-7
  72. 72. Millard NE, Dunkel IJ. Advances in the management of central nervous system germ cell tumors. Current Oncology Reports. 2014;16:393. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-014-0393-1
  73. 73. Weksberg DC, Shibamoto Y, Paulino AC. Bifocal intracranial germinoma: A retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes in 20 patients and review of the literature. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2012;82(4):1341-1351. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.033
  74. 74. Afzal S, Wherrett D, Bartels U, et al. Challenges in management of patients with intracranial germ cell tumor and diabetes insipidus treated with cisplatin and/or ifosfamide based chemotherapy. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 2010;97(3):393-399. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-009-0033-z
  75. 75. Wang L, Yamaguchi S, Burstein MD, et al. Novel somatic and germline mutations in intracranial germ cell tumours. Nature. 2014;511:241-245. DOI: 10.1038/nature13296
  76. 76. Kuroki S, Akiyoshi M, Tokura M, et al. JMJD1C, a JmjC domain-containing protein, is required for long-term maintenance of male germ cells in mice. Biology of Reproduction. 2013;89:93. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.108597
  77. 77. Allen J, Chacko J, Donahue B, et al. Diagnostic sensitivity of serum and lumbar CSF bHCG in newly diagnosed CNS germinoma. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2012;59(7):1180-1182. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24097
  78. 78. Pandey S, Sharma V, Singh K, et al. Uncommon presentation of choroid plexus papilloma in an infant. Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences. 2016;11(1):61-63. DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.181254
  79. 79. Merino DM, Shlien A, Villani A, et al. Molecular characterization of choroid plexus tumors reveals novel clinically relevant subgroups. Clinical Cancer Research. 2015;21:184-192. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1324
  80. 80. Ogiwara H, Dipatri AJ Jr, Alden TD, et al. Choroid plexus tumors in pediatric patients. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2012;26(1):32-37. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2011.601820
  81. 81. Gopal P, Parker JR, Debski R, et al. Choroid Plexus Carcinoma. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2008;132:1350-1354. DOI: 10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[1350:CPC]2.0.CO;2
  82. 82. Zhou L, Luo L, Xu J, et al. Craniopharyngiomas in the posterior fossa: A rare subgroup, diagnosis, management and outcomes. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2009;80(10):1150-1154. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.149088
  83. 83. Zacharia BE, Bruce SS, Goldstein H, et al. Incidence, treatment and survival of patients with craniopharyngioma in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. Neuro-Oncology. 2012;14(8):1070-1078. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos142
  84. 84. Clark AJ, Cage TA, Aranda D, et al. Treatment-related morbidity and the management of pediatric craniopharyngioma: A systematic review. Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics. 2012;10(4):293-301. DOI: 10.3171/2012.7.PEDS11436
  85. 85. Maarouf M, El Majdoub F, Fuetsch M, et al. Stereotactic intracavitary brachytherapy with P-32 for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. 2016;192(3):157-165. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0910-7
  86. 86. Gaikwad N, Sathe NU, Wadkar G, et al. Schwannoma of the cervical Vagus nerve in a child: A case report. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2013;65:188-191. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-011-0475-4
  87. 87. Vadivelu S, Prasad P, Adesina AM, et al. Giant invasive spinal schwannoma in children: A case report and review of the literature. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2013;7:289. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-289
  88. 88. Menon G, Nair S, Sudhir J, et al. Childhood and adolescent meningiomas: A report of 38 cases and review of literature. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2009;151(3):239-244. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-009-0206-8
  89. 89. Thorer H, Zimmermann M, Makarova O, et al. Primary central nervous system lymphoma in children and adolescents: Low relapse rate after treatment according to non-Hodgkin-lymphoma berlin-Frankfurt-Münster protocols for systemic lymphoma. Haematologica. 2014;99(11):238-241. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.109553
  90. 90. Abla O, Weitzman S, Blay JY, et al. Primary CNS lymphoma in children and adolescents: A descriptive analysis from the international primary CNS lymphoma collaborative group (IPCG). Clinical Cancer Research. 2011;17(2):346-352. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1161
  91. 91. Miles R, Raphael M, McCarthy K, et al. Pediatric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma demonstrates a high proliferation index, frequent c-Myc protein expression, and a high incidence of germinal Center subtype: Report of the French-American-British (FAB) international study group. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2008;51:369-374. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21619

Written By

Romana Richterová and Branislav Kolarovszki

Submitted: October 13th, 2017 Reviewed: January 26th, 2018 Published: August 22nd, 2018