Characterization of pediatric HGG subtypes.
Abstract
This chapter offers literary review of most frequently observed brain tumors in childhood. It offers basics of epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnostics of most often occurring types of tumors according to new WHO classification of brain tumors from 2016 and emphasizes molecular biological characteristics and role of altered genes and genetic pathways in brain tumor etiology, classification and treatment. This review not only concentrates on gliomas, medulloblastomas and ependymomas, but also offers characterization of other less frequently observed lesions. Each tumor characteristics also contains basics of therapeutical possibilities of these lesions with focus on targeted and individually designed therapy according to molecular and genetic alterations found in tumor tissue sample.
Keywords
- brain tumors
- childhood
- glioma
1. Introduction
Brain tumors are the second most common group of tumors (following hematological malignancies) as well as the most frequent solid tumors in childhood [1] in age category up to 1 year and between 5 and 19 years of age, even the most common childhood malignancy [2], as well as the most frequent death cause from all oncological diagnoses [3]. Despite the significant progress in imaging and neurosurgical techniques, molecular genetic diagnostics and therapeutic protocols as well as the introduction of concomitant chemoradiotherapy, cure and survival rates of these children did not significantly change – except for medulloblastoma [4].
2. Epidemiology of brain tumors in children
The incidence of pediatric CNS tumors varies worldwide with an average of 4 cases per 100,000 children with the highest occurrence is in the United States [3]. By age groups, the highest incidence is in adolescents (15–19 years, 6.38/100,000), followed by a group of children under 1 year (6.2/100,000). Subsequently, it is slightly declining, with 5.5/100,000 children aged between 1 and 4 years; in 5–14 years, the incidence is 5.1/100,000 [2, 5]. About 25–30% are in supratentorial localization, followed by the cerebellum (15–20%), the brain stem (10–12%), the pituitary and suprasellar region (10–15%), cranial nerves (6–7%), brain ventricles (5–6.4%), spinal cord (4.3–4.6%) and 2.6–2.9% are tumors of meninges [2, 6], as shown in Figure 1. Also a typical localization and histological type occur in certain age group. By 1 year of age, tumors most often occur at multiple locations in the brain and in ventricles. At the age of 1–4 years, the most common site is the cerebellum, cerebral hemispheres and brain stem. In the age range from 5 to 9 years, tumors occur frequently in the cerebellum, brain stem and cerebral hemispheres. At the age from birth to 9 years, the most common tumors are gliomas and embryonal tumors (up to 1 year is the most common embryonic atypical teratoma/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT), in the older children it is medulloblastoma (MB)). In 10–14 year age group, the most typical site is cerebral hemisphere and most frequently occurring are gliomas, tumors of the pituitary region and embryonal tumors. Adolescents (aged 15–19 years) most often have pituitary tumors, then astrocytomas and neoplastic tumors, but the incidence of meningiomas also increases. Typical localizations in this age group are the pituitary and suprasellar regions, followed by cerebral hemispheres and cerebellum. In general, brain tumors are more common in boys [2, 5].
There are many risk factors for brain tumor development, but to date only some hereditary syndromes (type 1 and 2 neurofibromatosis, tuberous sclerosis, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Gorlin syndrome, Turcot syndrome, Cowden syndrome, Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and hereditary retinoblastoma) and ionizing radiation have been verified. Other possible risk factors include: a personal history of previous cancer treatment, a family history of the CNS tumor, the parent age at the time of conception, the later contact of the child with common childhood infectious diseases [7], congenital anomalies [8], higher birth weight and larger head circumference [9]. Interestingly, the results of studies suggest lower incidence of CNS tumors in children with allergies and asthma [10, 11].
3. Classification of brain tumors in children
The new WHO classification of CNS tumors from 2016 for the first time uses molecular genetic characteristics for tumor classification in some cases. In this new edition, some new tumor entities appeared, some have been merged while others were excluded. Changes involving childhood tumors include: inclusion of epithelial glioblastoma, removal of the term brain gliomatosis, reclassification of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma to diffuse midline glioma,
Childhood brain tumors are also classified according to their localization into: infratentorial, supratentorial tumors and tumors of parasellar region. Most frequently observed histological types of pediatric CNS tumors are shown in Figure 2.
Tumors occurring in
4. Brain tumors symptoms in children
Symptoms of brain tumors can develop gradually and worsen over time, or they may manifest suddenly and dramatically. Symptoms may be general or specific, resulting from tumor localization.
5. Brain tumors diagnostics
Diagnosis of brain tumor is based on a patient history and complete neurological examination. Imaging examination is performed when a brain tumor is suspected. Basic imaging examination is
Specimen of CSF obtained from
Also
6. Treatment of brain tumors
Treatment consists of surgical intervention, followed by oncological and symptomatic treatment and requires multidisciplinary approach.
According to extent of resection, we divide surgical treatment into:
The novelty in the treatment of HGG is the use of an
Very necessary is also
7. Most common brain tumor types occurring in childhood
The most common CNS tumors in children are: gliomas, ependymomas, neuroglial tumors, embryonal tumors, choroid plexus tumors, craniopharyngiomas and germ cell tumors.
7.1. Gliomas
Glial tumors account for 55% of pediatric CNS tumors [3]. It is a heterogeneous group of tumors that varies from a well-defined, potentially curable low-grade pilocytic astrocytoma and diffusely growing astrocytomas (grade II) to high-grade, aggressive and incurable tumors, such as diffuse glioma of midline structures. They arise from CNS glial precursor cells: astrocytomas originate in astrocytes, oligodendrogliomas in oligodendrocytes, mixed gliomas are derived from astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and ependymal cells. The histologically most common glioma in children is astrocytoma.
7.1.1. Low-grade gliomas in children
The most common LGG in children are: pilocytic astrocytoma—PA (grade I), diffuse astrocytoma (grade II), oligodendroglioma (grade II), subependemal giant astrocytoma (SEGA) and pleomorphic xanthastrocytoma (PXA). The prognosis of LGG in children is relatively good, especially in well-defined grade I lesions with the possibility of total resection. Dissemination within the CNS is rare, but may be multifocal, especially in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 syndrome [22]. Unfavorable prognostic factors include: low age, impossibility of total resection, diffuse growth (especially
7.1.1.1. Pilocytic astrocytoma WHO grade I
This tumor is the most frequent LGG in children (up to 85%). Typical localizations are: cerebellum, diencephalon, optic tract, basal ganglia or brain stem [3]. Various localizations of this tumor also have their typical genetic characteristics. Its autosomal dominant forms are part of NF type 1 syndrome and tuberous sclerosis with typical localization over the course of the optical pathway, less often in hypothalamus. However, sporadic forms are more frequent. It may contain a
Its subtype is a
7.1.1.2. Diffuse gliomas WHO grade II
Diffuse low-grade gliomas account for 10% of all LGG in children [3]. Histologically, most common types are:
7.1.1.3. Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma WHO grade I
This tumor type is most frequently diagnosed in patients with tuberous sclerosis and mutations in
7.1.1.4. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma WHO grade II
PXA is relatively rare tumor, which accounts for 0.5–1% of all CNS tumors in childhood [3], typically occurring supratentorially, especially in the temporal lobe. It grows in the cortex, sometimes infiltrating meninges [6]. The most common symptoms are epileptic seizures. Frequently,
7.1.2. High-grade gliomas in children
High-grade gliomas account for 15–20% of all pediatric CNS tumors [3]. HGG in children include
Type | K27 | G34 | IDH | RTK-I | Mesenchymal | Epitheloid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Young child | Adolescent | Adolescent | All | Adolescent | Young child |
Typical location | Cerebellum, pons, spinal cord, thalamus | Brain hemispheres | Brain hemispheres | Brain hemispheres | Brain hemispheres | Brain hemispheres |
Typical alteration | mut. | mut. | ampl. | mut. | mut. | |
Gene expression | Proneural | Mixed | Proneural | Proneural | Mesenchymal | Unknown |
Median survival | 6 months | 1 year | >2 years | 1 year | 1 year | >4 years |
The last subtype is
The presence of oncogene amplification, such as
7.1.2.1. Diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27 M-mutant
The previous WHO classification is also called diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). The new edition classifies this tumor as diffuse midline glioma because it also appears in thalamus, cerebellum and spinal cord. It is predominantly considered childhood tumor, although it may also occur in adults. It contains a typical
7.1.3. Ependymomas
Ependymomas are tumors originating from ependymal cells, which form a lining of CSF pathways and produce cerebrospinal fluid. They form the second most common group of children’s CNS malignancies. They occur supratentorially, in the posterior fossa and in the spinal cord, mostly in children under 10 years of age [48]. Clinical signs depend on localization. In the most frequent, infratentorial localization, they present with the development of obstructive hydrocephalus, ataxia, cervical spinal pain and symptoms of cranial nerve lesion can also be present. Supratentorial localization often causes headaches, epileptic seizures and depending on localization, the development of focal neurological deficit. In case of suspicion on ependymoma, it is necessary to realize the MRI of whole craniospinal axis even before surgery. If possible, lumbar puncture with CSF sampling is recommended.
Ependymomas could be histologically:
Two genetically distinct subgroups are distinguished in
Up to 70% of
Therapeutic modality is extensive surgical removal followed by radiotherapy, which can only be used in the treatment of children aged more than 1 year. Currently, the use of chemotherapy (especially vincristine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and etoposide) is in clinical trials [38]. The choice of the treatment scheme determines the age of the child, the histological type of tumor, the extent of the resection performed and the presence of dissemination in the CSF pathways.
7.2. Neuronal and mixed neuronal-glial tumors
It is a heterogeneous group of tumors with neuronal or mixed neuroglial morphology. They are mostly grade I, but their anaplastic forms can also occur. Following tumors are most frequently present in children.
7.2.1. Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma (DIA) and ganglioglioma (DIGG)
These grade I tumors account for 0.5% of CNS childhood tumors [3]. They occur almost exclusively in children under 2 years of age. MRI verifies a large cystic tumor, especially in the frontal or parietal lobe. They are histologically and genetically almost identical, the only difference between them is the neoplastic neuronal component. Approximately 40% of these tumors display
7.2.2. Ganglioglioma (GG)
These tumors are characterized by a combination of neoplastic ganglion cells with a glial component similar to PA or diffuse glioma (especially astrocytoma). They occur mainly supratentorially. Seizures are usually leading symptom [33]. GG often harbor
7.2.3. Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNET)
It is a low-grade tumor (grade I), which occurs mainly supratentorially in the temporal lobe. It often manifests as drug-resistant epilepsy. There are several histological subtypes, which do not differ in typical age of origin, the nature of epileptic seizures or prognosis. Most of these tumors show alterations of
7.3. Embryonal tumors
This group of tumors originates from embryonal cells that remain present in the CNS after birth. They are the most common childhood malignant CNS tumors (15–20%) in children under the age of 14 [12]. In adults, they are extremely rare. Most frequently occurring embryonal tumors are: meduloblastoma, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor and CNS embryonal tumors (better known under the older name CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumors—PNETs). All tumors of this group tend to spread along the CFS pathways. Therefore, it is recommended to perform MR of whole craniospinal axis prior to surgery. CSF sampling is also indicated, as the finding of circulating tumor cells can appear earlier than dissemination in MRI. The prognosis of embryonic tumors depends on the age of the patient, dissemination of the tumor within CNS at the time of diagnosis, the size of the postoperative residue and on the histopathological and molecular biological properties of the tumor.
7.3.1. Medulloblastoma (MB)
It is the most common malignant brain tumor type in children. MB is a group of lesions that differ significantly by their genetic alterations, histological features and prognosis. In all cases, however, they are grade IV and fast-growing. Characteristic localization is infratentorial and leptomeningeal spread is typical. MB often manifests by symptoms of intracranial hypertension and blockage of CSF pathways as well as other symptoms, such as ataxia and nystagmus. Medulloblastoma may also occur as part of hereditary syndromes: Turcot, Rubinstein-Taybi, Gorlin, Li-Fraumeni syndrome and Fanconi anemia. There are four
Non-
The diagnosis is based on preoperative MRI examination of the craniospinal axis. Over the past 30 years, the most fundamental shift has been made in treatment of MB among all CNS childhood tumors and has changed from a fatal disease to a tumor with a 70% curability. The basis is surgical treatment with the maximal possible extent of resection. In the postoperative period, MRI is again indicated to evaluate the postoperative residue and the examination of cerebrospinal fluid is also beneficial. Medulloblastoma has as one of the few CNS tumors
7.3.2. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT)
This high-grade neoplasm (grade IV) accounts for 1–2% of pediatric CNS tumors. Typically, it occurs in the age category up to 5 years, and in children under 1 year of age, it is the most common malignant CNS tumor. As it grows very quickly, clinical manifestations occur early. AT/RT is often localized supratentorialy and also in the posterior fossa [3, 64]. About 20% of patients have already dissemination of the tumor at the time of diagnosis, usually along leptomeninges. Rare coincidence with renal tumors may occur [65]. Genetically, it is characterized by deletion on the 22nd chromosome and loss of
7.3.3. Embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered (ETMR)
This tumor typically occurs in children under 3 years of age. It has a poor prognosis, most patients die within 1–2 years after diagnosis [68]. Characteristic is the 19q13.42 locus amplification, which contains a cluster of microRNA (C19MC) and a fusion between
7.3.4. Neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma CNS
These two neoplasms belong to embryonal tumors but show neuronal differentiation, in the case of ganglioneuroblastoma also the presence of ganglionic cells. They most often occur in early childhood. In general, neuroblastomas are a frequent diagnosis, but especially in the chest and abdominal cavity (in the brain they are rare). Some of these include gene alterations leading to increased expression of the transcription factor
7.4. Pineoblastoma
In the past, this tumor was classified as embryonal, but in the new WHO classification it was reclassified to a group of pineal tumors. Its histological and molecular biological properties are similar to embryonal tumors. Because of its location, obstructive hydrocephalus is predominantly caused by blockage of CSF passages at the level of the third ventricle, and symptoms of the pressure on tectum—especially oculomotor disorder, poor reaction of pupils to light with present reaction to accommodation, later hemiparesis and ataxia. Often occur germline mutations of the
7.5. Germ cell tumors
Intracranial germ cell tumors are a heterogeneous group that accounts for 3–4% of brain tumors with the exception of Japan where the incidence is higher, up to 15% [72]. Based on histopathological characteristics, they are divided into
The most common localization is the pineal and suprasellar area, where they form either solitary or multiple lesions. The pineal region is much more frequent, but up to 10% of patients have both sites at the time of diagnosis, which is typical for pure germinomas [73]. Rare localities include basal ganglia, brain ventricles, cerebral hemispheres and thalamus. Tumor in the suprasellar region is often presented by hormonal expression. Often occur diabetes insipidus, enuresis, anorexia and also psychological changes [74]. Pineal localization has usually earlier manifestation, with hydrocephalus and diplopia developing from pressure to the tectal and aqueductal region. The most common germ cell tumor is germinoma. Mutations of the
In the diagnosis, apart from MRI, cytological examination of CSF and evaluation of
7.6. Choroid plexus tumors
These rare intraventricular tumors account for 1% of all brain tumors and 2–4% of pediatric tumors. They arise from neuroectoderm and consist of differentiated epithelial plexus cells that produce CSF. They most often occur in the age group under 2 years of age. The most common site are lateral ventricles (less often the 3rd and 4th ventricle), but could also occur in the cerebellopontine angle and in the cerebral parenchyma. They mostly manifest by symptoms of intracranial hypertension from hydrocephalus, both from overproduction of the CSF as well as from obstruction of the CSF pathways. Sometimes, however, they can also manifest suddenly, in case of bleeding into the tumor [78]. This group of tumors consists of:
MRI showing relatively well-defined extra-axial mass that does not invade the brain tissue with gadolinium enhancement and containing calcification and microhemorrhages is essential. Surgical treatment is the method of choice. Due to the rich vascular supply, preoperative tumor embolization is preferred in some cases. Hydrocephalus treatment is also necessary—sometimes requires external ventricular drainage. In some patients hydrocephalus is permanent, and therefore ventriculoperitoneal shunt or the endoscopic ventriculostomy of the 3rd ventricle are required [80]. There is no need for further treatment in the papilloma, radiotherapy, radiosurgery or chemotherapy with bevacizumab may be used in atypical or recurrent forms. Chemotherapy has been proven in choroid plexus carcinoma, which can spread along CSF pathways [81].
7.7. Craniopharyngioma
Craniopharyngiomas are rare tumors, accounting for 3–5% of pediatric brain tumors. They occur in two subtypes: adamantinomatous and papillary [12]. The
7.8. Other pediatric CNS tumors
8. Conclusion
Pediatric CNS tumors are diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. A lot of specialists are involved in their management: pediatricians, neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiologists, radiation and clinical oncologists, endocrinologists and others. Due to the development of MRI and its techniques, use of invasive examinations is minimalized. Over the past decades, there has been a significant refinement of operational technologies, enabling the most extensive and yet safe resection of the tumor. Children CNS tumors are frequent, often with unfavorable prognosis. While in most malignant tumors the prognosis has not improved as hoped, in case of medulloblastoma there has been a significant survival prolongation during last decades. Undoubtedly, this is due to extensive research of the molecular genetic characteristics of tumors, which identified genetically defined subgroups of medulloblastoma with different treatment strategies. This change was also reflected in the new WHO classification, which also classifies medulloblastomas based on genetic alterations. Intense research also takes place in other tumor entities, where the discovery is yet about to come. Identifying molecular and genetic targets is the only possible way to target individualized therapy that appears both in treatment and in further prognosis improving in this age group as a key point.
References
- 1.
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2013; 63 (1):11-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21166 - 2.
Ostrom QT, de Blank PM, Kruchko C et al. Alex’s lemonade stand foundation infant and childhood primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. Neuro-Oncology 2015; 16 (10):1-36. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou327 - 3.
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. Neuro-Oncology. 2014; 16 (4):1-63. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou223 - 4.
Pui CH, Gajjar AJ, Kane JR, et al. Challenging issues in pediatric oncology. Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology. 2011; 8 :540-549. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.95 - 5.
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, de Blank PM et al. American Brain Tumor Association adolescent and young adult primary brain and central nervous system Tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro-Oncology 2016; 18 (1):1-50. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov297 - 6.
Chiang JC, Ellison DW. Molecular pathology of paediatric central nervous system tumours. The Journal of Pathology. 2017; 241 (2):159-172. DOI: 10.1002/path.4813 - 7.
Andersen TV, Schmidt LS, Poulsen AH, et al. Patterns of exposure to infectious diseases and social contacts in early life and risk of brain tumours in children and adolescents: An international case-control study (CEFALO). British Journal of Cancer. 2013; 108 :2346-2353. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.201 - 8.
Partap S, MacLean J, Von Behren J, et al. Birth anomalies and obstetric history as risks for childhood tumors of the central nervous system. Pediatrics. 2011; 128 :652-657. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3637 - 9.
Bjorge T, Sorensen HT, Grotmol T, et al. Fetal growth and childhood cancer: A population-based study. Pediatrics. 2013; 132 :1265-1275. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-1317 - 10.
Roncarolo F, Infante-Rivard C. Asthma and risk of brain cancer in children. Cancer Causes & Control. 2012; 23 :617-623. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-9928-7 - 11.
Shu X, Prochazka M, Lannering B, et al. Atopic conditions and brain tumor risk in children and adolescents--an international case-control study (CEFALO). Annals of Oncology. 2014; 25 (4):902-908. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu048 - 12.
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathologica. 2016; 131 (6):803-820. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 - 13.
Pollack IF. Multidisciplinary management of childhood brain tumors: A review of outcomes, recent advances, and challenges. Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics. 2011; 8 (2):135-148. DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.PEDS1178 - 14.
Wells EM, Packer RJ. Pediatric brain tumors. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015; 21 (2):373-396. DOI: 10.1212/01.CON.0000464176.96311.d1 - 15.
Balogun JA, Khan OH, Taylor M, et al. Pediatric awake craniotomy and intra-operative stimulation mapping. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2014; 21 (11):1891-1844. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.07.013 - 16.
Seddighi A, Esmaeil Akbari M, Seddighi AS, et al. First experience of intraoperative radiation therapy in cerebral high grade Glioma in Iran: A report of three cases and literature review. Iranian Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2015; 8 (5):e3795. DOI: 10.17795/ijcp-3795 - 17.
Xing W, Shao C, Qi Z, et al. The role of Gliadel wafers in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM: A meta-analysis. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2015; 9 :3341-3348. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S85943 - 18.
Karajannis M, Allen JC, Newcomb EW. Treatment of Pediatric brain Tumors. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2008; 217 (3):584-589. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21544 - 19.
Kieran MW, Hargrave DR, Cohen KJ, et al. Phase 1 study of dabrafenib in pediatric patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory BRAF V600E high- and low-grade gliomas (HGG, LGG), Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), and other solid tumors (OST). Journal of Clincal Oncology. 2015; 33 (15):A-10004. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.10004 - 20.
Green A, Foreman N, Levy JM, et al. HG-120case series of three pediatric brain tumor patients treated with tumor-treating fields. Neuro-Oncology. 2016; 18 :75-76. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now073.116 - 21.
Grob ST, Levy JMM. Improving diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes in Pediatric brain Tumors. Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s40291-017-0299-3 - 22.
Bandopadhayay P, Bergthold G, London WB, et al. Long-term outcome of 4,040 children diagnosed with pediatric low-grade gliomas: An analysis of the surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2014; 61 (7):1173-1179. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24958 - 23.
Stokland T, Liu JF, Ironside JW, et al. A multivariate analysis of factors determining tumor progression in childhood low-grade glioma: A population-based cohort study (CCLG CNS9702). Neuro-Oncology. 2010; 12 (12):1257-1268. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noq092 - 24.
Hawkins C, Walker E, Mohamed N, et al. BRAF-KIAA1549 fusion predicts better clinical outcome in pediatric low-grade astrocytoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 2011; 17 (14):4790-4798. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0034 - 25.
Colin C, Padovani L, Chappe C, et al. Outcome analysis of childhood pilocytic astrocytomas: A retrospective study of 148 cases at a single institution. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 2013; 39 :693-705. DOI: 10.1111/nan.12013 - 26.
Forshew T, Tatevossian RG, Lawson AR, et al. Activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway: A signature genetic defect in posterior fossa pilocytic astrocytomas. The Journal of Pathology. 2009; 218 (2):172-181. DOI: 10.1002/path.2558 - 27.
Qaddoumi I, Orisme W, Wen J, et al. Genetic alterations in uncommon low-grade neuroepithelial tumors: BRAF, FGFR1, and MYB mutations occur at high frequency and align with morphology. Acta Neuropathologica. 2016; 131 :833-845. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-016-1539-z - 28.
Avery RA, Hwang EI, Jakacki RI, et al. Marked recovery of vision in children with optic pathway gliomas treated with bevacizumab. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2014; 132 (1):111-114. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5819 - 29.
Wisoff JH, Sanford RA, Heier LA, et al. Primary neurosurgery for pediatric low-grade gliomas: A prospective multi-institutional study from the Children’s oncology group. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68 :1548-1554. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318214a66e - 30.
Müller K, Gnekow A, Falkenstein F, et al. Radiotherapy in pediatric pilocytic astrocytomas: A subgroup analysis within the prospective multicenter study HIT-LGG 1996 by the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH). Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. 2013; 189 :647-655. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0357-7 - 31.
Weidman DR, Pole JD, Bouffet E, et al. Dose-level response rates of mTor inhibition in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) related subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA). Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2015; 62 (10):1754-1760. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25573 - 32.
Ida CM, Rodriguez FJ, Burger PC, et al. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma: Natural history and long-term follow-up. Brain Pathology. 2015; 25 :575-586. DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12217 - 33.
Schindler G, Capper D, Meyer J, et al. Analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in 1,320 nervous system tumors reveals high mutation frequencies in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, ganglioglioma and extra-cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma. Acta Neuropathologica. 2011; 121 :397-405. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-011-0802-6 - 34.
Sturm D, Witt H, Hovestadt V, et al. Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2012; 22 :425-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.08.024 - 35.
Cohen KJ, Heideman RL, Zhou T, et al. Temozolomide in the treatment of children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: A report from the Children’sOncology group. Neuro-Oncology. 2011; 13 :410-416. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noq191 - 36.
Wu G, Diaz AK, Paugh BS, et al. The genomic landscape of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and pediatric non-brainstem high-grade glioma. Nature Genetics. 2014; 46 :444-450. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2938 - 37.
Wu G, Broniscer A, McEachron TA, et al. Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nature Genetics. 2012; 44 :251-253. DOI: 10.1038/ng.1102 - 38.
Gajjar A, Bowers DC, Karajannis MA, et al. Pediatric brain Tumors: Innovative genomic information is transforming the diagnostic and clinical landscape. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015; 33 (27):2986-2998. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.9217 - 39.
Buczkowicz P, Bartels U, Bouffet E, et al. Histopathological spectrum of paediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Acta Neuropathologica. 2014; 128 (4):573-581. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1319-6 - 40.
Korshunov A, Ryzhova M, Hovestadt V, et al. Integrated analysis of pediatric glioblastoma reveals a subset of biologically favorable tumors with associated molecular prognostic markers. Acta Neuropathologica. 2015; 129 :669-678. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-015-1405-4 - 41.
Finlay JL, Dhall G, Boyett JM, et al. Myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow rescue in children and adolescents with recurrent malignant astrocytoma: Outcome compared with conventional chemotherapy: A report from the Children’s oncology group. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2008; 51 (6):806-811. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21732 - 42.
Johung TB, Monje M. Diffuse intrinsic Pontine Glioma: New pathophysiological insights and emerging therapeutic targets. Current Neuropharmacology. 2017; 15 (1):88-97. DOI: 10.2174/1570159X14666160509123229 - 43.
Schroeder KM, Hoeman CM, Becher OJ. Children are not just little adults: Recent advances in understanding of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma biology. Pediatric Research. 2014; 75 (1-2):205-209. DOI: 10.1038/pr.2013.194 - 44.
Roujeau T, Machado G, Garnett MR, et al. Stereotactic biopsy of diffuse pontine lesions in children. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2007; 107 (1):1-4. DOI: 10.3171/PED-07/07/001 - 45.
Jansen MH, van Vuurden DG, Vandertop WP, et al. Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: A systematic update on clinical trials and biology. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2012; 38 :27-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.06.007 - 46.
Anderson RC, Kennedy B, Yanes CL, et al. Convection-enhanced delivery of topotecan into diffuse intrinsic brainstem tumors in children. Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics. 2013; 11 (3):289-295. DOI: 10.3171/2012.10.PEDS12142 - 47.
Broniscer A, Laningham FH, Sanders RP, et al. Young age may predict a better outcome for children with diffuse pontine glioma. Cancer. 2008; 113 (3):566-572. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23584 - 48.
McGuire CS, Sainani KL, Fisher PG. Incidence patterns for ependymoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2009; 110 :725-729. DOI: 10.3171/2008.9.JNS08117 - 49.
Hoffman LM, Donson AM, Nakachi I, et al. Molecular sub-group-specific immunophenotypic changes are associated with outcome in recurrent posterior fossa ependymoma. Acta Neuropathologica. 2014; 127 :731-745. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-013-1212-8 - 50.
Archer TC, Pomeroy SL. Defining the molecular landscape of ependymomas. Cancer Cell. 2015; 27 :613-615. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.015 - 51.
Mack SC, Witt H, Piro RM, et al. Epigenomic alterations define lethal CIMP-positive ependymomas of infancy. Nature. 2014; 506 :445-450. DOI: 10.1038/nature13108 - 52.
Korshunov A, Witt H, Hielscher T, et al. Molecular staging of intracranial ependymoma in children and adults. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2010; 28 (19):3182-3190. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3359 - 53.
Pajtler KW, Witt H, Sill M, et al. Molecular classification of ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and age groups. Cancer Cell. 2015; 27 :728-743. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.002 - 54.
Gessi M, Zur Muhlen A, Hammes J, et al. Genome-wide DNA copy number analysis of desmoplastic infantile astrocytomas and desmoplastic infantile gangliogliomas. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. 2013; 72 :807-815. DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182a033a0 - 55.
Kool M, Korshunov A, Remke M, et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: An international meta-analysis of transcriptome, genetic aberrations, and clinical data of WNT, SHH, group 3, and group 4 medulloblastomas. Acta Neuropathologica. 2012; 123 :473-484. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-012-0958-8 - 56.
Ellison DW, Dalton J, Kocak M, et al. Medulloblastoma: Clinicopathological correlates of SHH, WNT, and non-SHH/WNT molecular subgroups. Acta Neuropathologica. 2011; 121 :381-396. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-011-0800-8 - 57.
Remke M, Ramaswamy V, Peacock J, et al. TERTpromoter mutations are highly recurrent in SHH subgroup medulloblastoma. Acta Neuropathologica. 2013; 126 :917-929. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-013-1198-2 - 58.
Kool M, Jones DT, Jäger N, et al. Genome sequencing of SHH medulloblastoma predicts genotype-related response to smoothened inhibition. Cancer Cell. 2014; 25 :393-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.004 - 59.
Northcott PA, Lee C, Zichner T, et al. Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Nature. 2014; 511 :428-434. DOI: 10.1038/nature13379 - 60.
Shih DJ, Northcott PA, Remke M, et al. Cytogenetic prognostication within medulloblastoma subgroups. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014; 32 :886-896. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9539 - 61.
Nageswara Rao AA, Wallace DJ, Billups C, et al. Cumulative cisplatin dose is not associated with event-free or overall survival in children with newly diagnosed average-risk medulloblastoma treated with cisplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy: Report from the Children’s oncology group. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2014; 61 (1):102-106. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24670 - 62.
Mizumoto M, Murayama S, Akimoto T, et al. Proton beam therapy for pediatric malignancies: A retrospective observational multicenter study in Japan. Cancer Medicine. 2016; 5 (7):1519-1525. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.743 - 63.
Lafay-Cousin L, Smith A, Chi SN, et al. Clinical, pathological, and molecular characterization of infant Medulloblastomas treated with sequential high-dose chemotherapy. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2016; 63 (9):1527-1534. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26042 - 64.
Lafay-Cousin L, Hawkins C, Carret AS, et al. Central nervous system atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours: The Canadian paediatric brain tumour consortium experience. European Journal of Cancer. 2012; 48 :353-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.005 - 65.
Biegel JA, Fogelgren B, Wainwright LM, et al. Germline INI1 mutation in a patient with a central nervous system atypical teratoid tumor and renal rhabdoid tumor. Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer. 2000; 28 (1):31-37. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(200005)28 - 66.
Slavc I, Chocholous M, Leiss U, et al. Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor: Improved long-term survival with an intensive multimodal therapy and delayed radiotherapy—The Medical University of Vienna experience, 1992 to 2012. Cancer Medicine. 2014; 3 :91-100. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.161 - 67.
McLendon RE, Adekunle A, Rajaram V, et al. Embryonal central nervous system neoplasms arising in infants and young children: A pediatric brain tumor consortium study. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2011; 135 (8):984-993. DOI: 10.5858/2010-0515-OAR1 - 68.
Spence T, Sin-Chan P, Picard D, et al. CNS-PNETs with C19MC amplification and/or LIN28 expression comprise a distinct histogenetic diagnostic and therapeutic entity. Acta Neuropathologica. 2014; 128 :91-103. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1291-1 - 69.
Kleinman CL, Gerges N, Papillon-Cavanagh S, et al. Fusion of TTYH1with the C19MC microRNA cluster drives expression of a brain-specific DNMT3Bisoform in the embryonal brain tumor ETMR. Nature Genetics. 2014; 46 :39-44. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2849 - 70.
Sturm D, Orr BA, Toprak UH, et al. New brain tumor entities emerge from molecular classification of CNS-PNETs. Cell. 2016; 164 :1060-1072. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.015 - 71.
De Kock L, Sabbaghian N, Druker H, et al. Germ-line and somatic DICER1 mutations in pineoblastoma. Acta Neuropathologica. 2014; 128 (4):583-595. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1318-7 - 72.
Millard NE, Dunkel IJ. Advances in the management of central nervous system germ cell tumors. Current Oncology Reports. 2014; 16 :393. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-014-0393-1 - 73.
Weksberg DC, Shibamoto Y, Paulino AC. Bifocal intracranial germinoma: A retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes in 20 patients and review of the literature. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2012; 82 (4):1341-1351. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.033 - 74.
Afzal S, Wherrett D, Bartels U, et al. Challenges in management of patients with intracranial germ cell tumor and diabetes insipidus treated with cisplatin and/or ifosfamide based chemotherapy. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 2010; 97 (3):393-399. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-009-0033-z - 75.
Wang L, Yamaguchi S, Burstein MD, et al. Novel somatic and germline mutations in intracranial germ cell tumours. Nature. 2014; 511 :241-245. DOI: 10.1038/nature13296 - 76.
Kuroki S, Akiyoshi M, Tokura M, et al. JMJD1C, a JmjC domain-containing protein, is required for long-term maintenance of male germ cells in mice. Biology of Reproduction. 2013; 89 :93. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.108597 - 77.
Allen J, Chacko J, Donahue B, et al. Diagnostic sensitivity of serum and lumbar CSF bHCG in newly diagnosed CNS germinoma. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2012; 59 (7):1180-1182. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24097 - 78.
Pandey S, Sharma V, Singh K, et al. Uncommon presentation of choroid plexus papilloma in an infant. Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences. 2016; 11 (1):61-63. DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.181254 - 79.
Merino DM, Shlien A, Villani A, et al. Molecular characterization of choroid plexus tumors reveals novel clinically relevant subgroups. Clinical Cancer Research. 2015; 21 :184-192. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1324 - 80.
Ogiwara H, Dipatri AJ Jr, Alden TD, et al. Choroid plexus tumors in pediatric patients. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2012; 26 (1):32-37. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2011.601820 - 81.
Gopal P, Parker JR, Debski R, et al. Choroid Plexus Carcinoma. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2008; 132 :1350-1354. DOI: 10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[1350:CPC]2.0.CO;2 - 82.
Zhou L, Luo L, Xu J, et al. Craniopharyngiomas in the posterior fossa: A rare subgroup, diagnosis, management and outcomes. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2009; 80 (10):1150-1154. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.149088 - 83.
Zacharia BE, Bruce SS, Goldstein H, et al. Incidence, treatment and survival of patients with craniopharyngioma in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. Neuro-Oncology. 2012; 14 (8):1070-1078. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos142 - 84.
Clark AJ, Cage TA, Aranda D, et al. Treatment-related morbidity and the management of pediatric craniopharyngioma: A systematic review. Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics. 2012; 10 (4):293-301. DOI: 10.3171/2012.7.PEDS11436 - 85.
Maarouf M, El Majdoub F, Fuetsch M, et al. Stereotactic intracavitary brachytherapy with P-32 for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. 2016; 192 (3):157-165. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0910-7 - 86.
Gaikwad N, Sathe NU, Wadkar G, et al. Schwannoma of the cervical Vagus nerve in a child: A case report. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2013; 65 :188-191. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-011-0475-4 - 87.
Vadivelu S, Prasad P, Adesina AM, et al. Giant invasive spinal schwannoma in children: A case report and review of the literature. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2013; 7 :289. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-289 - 88.
Menon G, Nair S, Sudhir J, et al. Childhood and adolescent meningiomas: A report of 38 cases and review of literature. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2009; 151 (3):239-244. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-009-0206-8 - 89.
Thorer H, Zimmermann M, Makarova O, et al. Primary central nervous system lymphoma in children and adolescents: Low relapse rate after treatment according to non-Hodgkin-lymphoma berlin-Frankfurt-Münster protocols for systemic lymphoma. Haematologica. 2014; 99 (11):238-241. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.109553 - 90.
Abla O, Weitzman S, Blay JY, et al. Primary CNS lymphoma in children and adolescents: A descriptive analysis from the international primary CNS lymphoma collaborative group (IPCG). Clinical Cancer Research. 2011; 17 (2):346-352. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1161 - 91.
Miles R, Raphael M, McCarthy K, et al. Pediatric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma demonstrates a high proliferation index, frequent c-Myc protein expression, and a high incidence of germinal Center subtype: Report of the French-American-British (FAB) international study group. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2008; 51 :369-374. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21619