Open access

Introductory Chapter: New Trends and Recent Developments for Thermal Power Plants

Written By

Paweł Madejski

Submitted: 22 December 2017 Published: 02 May 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74723

From the Edited Volume

Thermal Power Plants - New Trends and Recent Developments

Edited by Pawe? Madejski

Chapter metrics overview

1,600 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. New trends and challenges

The largest share of sources for electricity generation still belongs to fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil. Conventional thermal power plants based on the fossil fuel combustion are currently facing new challenges. The challenges and recent activities mainly result from the development of technologies that use renewable energy sources and activities aimed at reducing the emission of harmful substances into the atmosphere.

The new challenges are a decisive impulse for introducing changes in power plants and combined heat and power plants, as well as for the implementation and continuous development of new technologies allowing for the electricity and heat production in the least harmful way to the environment. In recent years, many activities have been observed to reduce pollutant emissions and optimize the performance of thermal power plants. Ensuring a continuous supply of electricity and heat is necessary and requires a continuous monitoring of all processes and conduct of maintenance and optimization works.

Based on the data provided by International Energy Agency [1], we can observe how electricity generation during almost last 50 years is changing (Figure 1). Total electricity generation was increased almost 6 times, reaches in 2015 value 24,255 TWh, with the share of fossil fuel on the level around 66% (75% in 1973). The share of renewable energy sources (Figure 1) includes mainly geothermal, solar, wind, ocean, biofuels, and waste was increased from 0.6 to 7.1% of total electricity generation sources. Despite these changes and the intensive development of technologies based on renewable energy sources, fossil fuels still dominate. The values presented in Figure 1 confirm current trends indicating the continuous use of coal (39.3% in 2015) as the main source and a large increase of natural gas utilization (22.9% in 2015).

Figure 1.

World electricity generation by fuel between 1971 and 2015 [1].

The use of various sources for the electricity generation is strongly diversified and depends on the geographical location which determines the possibility of using renewable resources, as well as on the availability of fossil fuels (coal, gas). The next very important factor is the change in the demand for electricity, which is conditioned by the development dynamics of individual regions of the world. Figure 2 presents data illustrating changes in the quantities of electricity produced in particular regions of the world. It is noticeable that in recent years, the increase in electricity generation has changed in many regions of the world with different rates. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries have the largest share all the time (44.7% in 2015), but for some time the rate of growth has decreased and this level is almost constant.

Figure 2.

World electricity generation by region between 1971 and 2015 [1].

Coal-fired power plants currently face a big challenge to reduce the level of gaseous pollutants and to adopt new flue-gases treatment methods and devices. Regulations for reducing NOx, Sox, and dust emissions become more strict [2], and the required limits of gas emission levels are different for old and for new units. In case of old units, with the fuel power above 300 MW, permitted emission levels have been changed during last year’s [2]. The upper limits of the average annual values for pulverized coal-fired boilers and for sources above 300 MWt are presented in Figure 3. In addition to these values, the future regulations can also include limits of emission levels for HCl, HF, Hg, and NH3, as well as CO indicator levels. Emission limit values are developed every few years based on the best available techniques (BATs) that exist or will be available in the future.

Figure 3.

Emission limit values (mg/Nm3) for SO2, NO2, and dust for fossil fuel-fired power plants using solid or liquid fuels with the exception of gas turbines and gas engines, and for the total nominal power delivered in fuel >300 MW.

Due to mandatory environmental regulations, coal-fired power stations in many countries need to install denitrification plants (DeNOx) for nitrogen oxide (NOx) and desulphurization plants (DeSOx) for sulfur oxide (SOx) removal from the flue gases. The most popular methods for removing sulfur oxides from exhaust gases are calcium methods. There are several types of this calcium method such as dry, semi-dry, but the Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (WFGD) method is the most common technology for SOx control. The reduction of NOx emission levels is currently possible using primary and secondary measures. Primary measures are used inside the combustion chamber including methods as proper selection of the excess air ratio and temperature, modification of combustion techniques (re-burning, exhaust gas recirculation, air staging, cooling the flame and burners re-design). The use of primary measures allows to reduce NOx emission with an efficiency about 35%, so in many cases is not enough to meet the environmental concerns. The other solution is to use secondary measures of NOx reduction, such as Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR). These techniques based on the auxiliary installations are located behind the boiler combustion zone. Secondary measures are more effective than primary methods and NOx reduction efficiency can reach about 50 and 95% for SNCR and SCR techniques, respectively. Many research activities are currently focused on the developed methodology of prediction and assessment [3, 4, 5, 6], optimization [7, 8, 9, 10], and improving the efficiency of NOx reduction using primary as well as secondary measures.

However, to avoid efficiency reduction of the production process by applying these methods, the thermal efficiency of the boiler needs to be constantly at a high level. It is necessary to perform optimization work of combustion process using dedicated and novel measurement techniques, optimization algorithms, consequently developed by many researchers and boilers manufacturers [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. Introduction of primary and secondary measures for NOx reduction can result in a higher level of carbon in fly ash. Many research activities are observed regarding the quality of fly ash [19, 20] and its potential utilization [21, 22] as well as ash monitoring and optimization of cleaning methods of ash deposits formation inside the boilers [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30].

Currently, one of the big challenges is to assess the possibilities of CO2 capture and to develop a technology that allows limiting the emission of this greenhouse gas. For this reason, many theoretical studies, as well as experimental work, have been carried out, among others in order to evaluate the possibilities of CO2 capture, and the impact of applying technology on production efficiency in both old production units and newly built [31, 32, 33, 34, 35].

The increased share of electricity produced from renewable energy sources [36] requires from coal-fired power plants more flexible operation to balance power grids and compensate the variable electricity demand [37]. Coal-fired power plants need to adopt these requirements and to operate in the flexible regime. Flexibility in the power plants operation is characterized by the necessity of frequent load changes, the need to work outside the nominal operating conditions, and the need of more frequent power units start-ups as well as shortening the time of start-up, shutdown or changing a partial load. The necessary flexibility can be achieved with acceptable impacts on component life, efficiency, and emissions but it needs continuous monitoring and controlling of basic operating parameters [38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47]. In Figure 4, the forecasted electricity generation (2012–2040) based on renewable energy sources is presented.

Figure 4.

Electricity generation by sources (20122040) [36].

In recent years, an intense increase in the use of gas-fired systems can be observed. Gas-fired plants are characterized by high efficiency and the ability to provide fast response to variable electricity demand. Production of electricity and heat using gas technology is widely used in the power industry, and from year to year more and more units start the operation [48, 49, 50]. The efficiency of the gas turbine is mainly responsible for the high efficiency of the system, as well as the ability to quickly change the load and operate under high flexible regime [51, 52]. Ensuring the optimal operating conditions together with the changing demand requires the use of proper tools for monitoring and optimizing the production process.

For several years, it has been observed a great interest in the growing possibilities of obtaining gas from the unconventional gas resources. The shale gas supply can play an important role and lead to a substitution of a coal-fired plant by gas-fired plants. In Figure 5, the technically recoverable shale gas resources are presented.

Figure 5.

Shale gas resources [36].

Shale gas deposits belong to unconventional resources (tight gas, shale gas) and are under detailed consideration as a chance for replacing fuels from conventional resources. Finding of shale formations is easier than conventional, but exploitation of hydrocarbons is more difficult [53, 54, 55, 56]. Nevertheless, on the basis of the data presented in Figure 5, it can be observed that the gas resources are located in every region of the world.

Advertisement

2. Conclusions

Nowadays, power companies need to modify their management method and models and adapt to strongly changing requirements and regulation on the electricity generation and sale market. Development of more marketable approaches focused on high-quality services needs to be prepared in a careful way. All activities need to be scheduled taking into account upcoming requirements maintaining optimal parameters and efficiency of all processes. The demand for electricity and heat production is still largely covered by conventional Thermal Power Plants which face a big challenge to meet the environmental requirements. Constant keeping high efficiency of processes, avoiding shortening of a critical component lifetime is one of the most important tasks to accomplish. Increased share of renewable energy sources enforces more flexible operation of existing Thermal Power Plants and the necessity to provide fast response to variable electricity demand. Because of these limitations, Gas Power Plants can start to play an important role, allowing for rapid change of load and to reduce the emission of harmful gas pollutants. New environmental restrictions together with the need for operation under changing load, requires constantly introducing new solutions and technologies, as well as carrying out research and development activities to create and implement new optimal solutions.

References

  1. 1. International Energy Agency. Key World Energy Statistics 2017. Paris. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2017.pdf
  2. 2. Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on Industrial Emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control, Recast). Official Journal of the European Union. 2010;334:17-119
  3. 3. Stupar G, Tucakovic D, Zivanovic T, Belosevic S. Assessing the impact of primary measures for NOx reduction on the thermal power plant steam boiler. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2015;78:397-409. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.12.074
  4. 4. Chui EH, Gao H. Estimation of NOx emissions from coal-fired utility boilers. Fuel. 2010;89:2977-2984. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.05.008
  5. 5. Backreedy RI, Jones JM, Ma L, Pourkashanian M, Williams A, Arenillas A, Arias B, Pis JJ, Rubiera F. Prediction of unburned carbon and NOx in a tangentially fired power station using single coals and blends. Fuel. 2005;84:2196-2203. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.05.022
  6. 6. Modliński N. Numerical simulation of SNCR (selective non-catalytic reduction) process in coal fired grate boiler. Energy. 2015;92:67-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.124
  7. 7. Zheng L-G, Zhou H, Cen K-F, Wang C-L. A comparative study of optimization algorithms for low NOx combustion modification at a coal-fired utility boiler. Expert Systems with Applications. 2009;36:2780-2793. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.088
  8. 8. Tan P, Ji X, Zhang C, Fang Q, Chen G. Modeling and reduction of NOx emissions for a 700 MW coal-fired boiler with the advanced machine learning method. Energy. 2016;94:672-679. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.11.020
  9. 9. Smrekar J, Potocnik P, Senegacnik A. Multi-step-ahead prediction of NOx emissions for a coal-based boiler. Applied Energy. 2013;106:89-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.056
  10. 10. Song J, Romero CE, Yao Z, He B. Improved artificial bee colony-based optimization of boiler combustion considering NOx emissions, heat rate and fly ash recycling for on-line applications. Fuel. 2016;172:20-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.065
  11. 11. Łukasz Ś, Konrad W, Konrad Ś, Tomasz J, Daniel N, Jerzy C. Optimization of combustion process in coal-fired power plant with utilization of acoustic system for in-furnace temperature measurement. Applied Thermal Engineering 2017;123:711-720. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.078
  12. 12. Alamoodi N, Daoutidis P. Nonlinear control of coal-fired steam power plants. Control Engineering Practice 2017;60:63-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.12.005
  13. 13. Campbell R. Increasing the Efficiency of Existing Coal-Fired Power Plant. Congressional Research Service Report, December 2013. R43343. Available from: www.crs.gov
  14. 14. Madejski P, Janda T, Modliński N, Nabagło D. A combustion process optimization and numerical analysis for the low emission operation of pulverized coal-fired boiler. In: Konstantinos G, Skvaril J, editors. Developments in Combustion Technology. IntechOpen; 2016
  15. 15. Żymełka P, Nabagło D, Janda T, Madejski P. Online monitoring system of air distribution in pulverized coal-fired boiler based on numerical modeling. Archives of Thermodynamics. 2017;38:109-125. DOI: 10.1515/aoter-2017-0027
  16. 16. Baldi S, Le Quang T, Holub O, Endel P. Real-time monitoring energy efficiency and performance degradation of condensing boilers. Energy Conversion and Management 2017;136:329-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.016
  17. 17. Badur J, Ziółkowski P, Sławiński D, Kornet S. An approach for estimation of water wall degradation within pulverized-coal boilers. Energy. 2015;92:142-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.061
  18. 18. Cho B, Choi G, Uruno Y, Kim H, Chung J, Kim H, Lee K. One-dimensional simulation for attemperator based on commissioning data of coal-fired steam power plant. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2017;113:508-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.069
  19. 19. Barranco R, Gong M, Thompson A, Cloke M, Hanson S, Gibb W, Lester E. The impact of fly ash resistivity and carbon content on electrostatic precipitator performance. Fuel. 2007;86:2521-2527. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.02.022
  20. 20. Hower JC, Trimble AS, Eble CF. Temporal and spatial variations in fly ash quality. Fuel Processing Technology. 2001;73:37-58. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00193-X
  21. 21. Blissett RS, Rowson NA. A review of the multi-component utilisation of coal fly ash. Fuel. 2012;97:1-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.024
  22. 22. Ahmaruzzaman M. A review on the utilization of fly ash. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2010;36:327-363. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.003
  23. 23. Shi Y, Wang J, Liu Z. On-line monitoring of ash fouling and soot-blowing optimization for convective heat exchanger in coal-fired power plant boiler. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2015;78:39-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.12.002
  24. 24. Madejski P, Taler D. Analysis of temperature and stress distribution of superheater tubes after attemperation or sootblower activation. Energy Conversion and Management. 2013;71:131-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.03.025
  25. 25. Madejski P, Janda T, Taler J, Nabagło D, Węzik R, Mazur M. Analysis of fouling degree of individual heating surfaces in a pulverized coal fired boiler. Journal of Energy Resources Technology – ASME 2018. 2018;140:1-8. DOI: 10.1115/1.4037936
  26. 26. Taler J, WeRglowski B, Taler D, Trojan M, Sobota T, Dzierwa P, Pilarczyk M, Madejski P, Nabagło D. Method of determination of thermo-flow parameters for steam boiler. Journal of Power Technologies. 2015;95(4):309-316
  27. 27. Bilirgen H. Slagging in PC boilers and developing mitigation strategies. Fuel. 2014;115:618-624. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.034
  28. 28. Pronobis M. The influence of biomass co-combustion on boiler fouling and efficiency. Fuel. 2006;85(4):474-480. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.08.015
  29. 29. Taler J, Trojan M, Taler D. Chapter 1. Monitoring of Ash Fouling and Internal Scale Deposits in Pulverized Coal Fired Boilers. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2012
  30. 30. Taler J, Taler D, Ludowski P. Measurements of local heat flux to membrane water walls of combustion chambers. Fuel. 2014;115:70-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.06.033
  31. 31. Arias B, Abanades JC, Criado YA, Moreno J, Spoerl R, Romano M, Casella F, de Lena E, Díaz L, Lorenzo M, Madejski P, Czupryński P. Improving the flexibility of coal power plants with CO2 capture by calcium looping. In: 7th IEAGHG Network Meeting and Technical Workshop on High Temperature Solid Looping Cycles. Luleå, Sweden: Kulturens Hus; Sep 4–5, 2017
  32. 32. Abanades JC, Arias B, Lyngfelt A, Mattisson T, Wiley DE, Li H, Ho MT, Mangano E, Brandani S. Emerging CO2 capture systems. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2015;40:126-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.018
  33. 33. Arias B, Diego ME, Abanades JC, Lorenzo M, Diaz L, Martínez D, Alvarez J, Sánchez-Biezma A. Demonstration of steady state CO2 capture in a 1.7 MWth calcium looping pilot. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2013;18:237-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.07.014
  34. 34. Bryngelsson M, Westermark M. CO2 capture pilot test at a pressurized coal fired CHP plant. Energy Procedia. 2009;1:1403-1410. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.184
  35. 35. Korkmaz Ö, Oeljeklaus G, Görner K. Analysis of retrofitting coal-fired power plants with carbon dioxide capture. Energy Procedia. 2009;1:1289-1295. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.169
  36. 36. Deloitte Global Services Limited. The Future of the Global Power Sector. London, Deloitte: The Creative Studio; 2015
  37. 37. Henderson C. Increasing the Flexibility of Coal-fired Power Plants. London: IEA Clean Coal Centre Park House; 2014. Available from: www.iea-coal.org
  38. 38. Alizadeh MI, Parsa Moghaddam M, Amjady N, Siano P, Sheikh-El-Eslami MK. Flexibility in future power systems with high renewable penetration: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;57:1186-1193. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.200
  39. 39. Belderbos A, Delarue E. Accounting for flexibility in power system planning with renewables. Advanced Materials Research – Switzerland. 2015;71:33-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.02.033
  40. 40. Zapata Riveros J, Donceel R, Van Engeland J, D’haeseleer W. A new approach for near real-time micro-CHP management in the context of power system imbalances – A case study. Energy Conversion and Management. 2015;89:270-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.076
  41. 41. Zhao H, Qiuwei W, Shuju H, Honghua X, Rasmussen CN. Review of energy storage system for wind power integration support. Applied Energy. 2015;137:545-553. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.103
  42. 42. Mikkola J, Lund PD. Modeling flexibility and optimal use of existing power plants with large-scale variable renewable power schemes. Energy. 2016;112:364-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.082
  43. 43. Sun L, Liu C. Reliable and flexible steam and power system design. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2015;79:184-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.11.076
  44. 44. Taler J, Węglowski B, Taler D, Sobota T, Dzierwa P, Trojan M, Madejski P, Pilarczyk M. Determination of start-up curves for a boiler with natural circulation based on the analysis of stress distribution in critical pressure components. Energy. 2015;92:153-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.086
  45. 45. Taler J, Węglowski B, Dzierwa P, Czupryński P, Madejski P, Nabagło D, Żyrkowski C. Analysis to speed up of the start-up of steam boiler OP-380. Journal of Power Technologies. 2014;94(2):1-8
  46. 46. Trojan M, Taler D. Thermal simulation of superheaters taking into account the processes occurring on the side of the steam and flue gas. Fuel. 2015;150(10):75-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.095
  47. 47. Madejski P, Taler D, Taler J. Numerical model of a steam Superheater with a complex shape of the tube cross section using control volume based finite element method. Energy Conversion and Management. 2016;118:179-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.069
  48. 48. Olumayegun O, Wanga M, Kelsall G. Closed-cycle gas turbine for power generation: A state-of-the-art review. Fuel. 2016;180:694-717. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.074
  49. 49. Sabouhi H, Abbaspour A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Dehghanian P. Reliability modeling and availability analysis of combined cycle power plants. Advanced Materials Research – Switzerland. 2016;79:108-119
  50. 50. Thamir k. Ibrahim, Mohammed Kamil Mohammed, Omar I. Awad, Rahman MM, Najafi G, Firdaus Basrawi, Ahmed N. Abd Alla, Rizalman Mamat. The optimum performance of the combined cycle power plant: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;79:459-474. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.060
  51. 51. Meherwan P. Boyce: Gas Turbine Engineering Handbook. 2nd ed. Huston, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2002
  52. 52. Cohen H, Rogers GFC, Saravanamuttoo HIH. Gas Turbine Theory. 3rd ed. UK: Longman Group Limited; 1987
  53. 53. Jarzyna JA, Bała M, Krakowska P, Puskarczyk E, Strzępowicz A, Wawrzyniak-Guz K, Więcław D, Ziętek J. Shale gas in Poland. In: Al-Megren HA, Altamimi RH, editors. Advances in Natural Gas Emerging Technologies. Rijeka: InTech; 2017. pp. 191-210. DOI: 10.5772/67301
  54. 54. Saussay A. Can the US shale revolution be duplicated in continental Europe? An economic analysis of European shale gas resources. Energy Economics. 2018;69:295-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.002
  55. 55. Bilgen S, Sarıkaya İ. New horizon in energy: Shale gas. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2016;35:637-645. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.014
  56. 56. Wang Q, Li R. Research status of shale gas: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;74:715-720. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.007

Written By

Paweł Madejski

Submitted: 22 December 2017 Published: 02 May 2018