Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Ultralight Paper-Based Electrodes for Energy Applications

Written By

Chuan-Pei Lee

Submitted: 07 November 2016 Reviewed: 16 January 2018 Published: 09 February 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74098

From the Edited Volume

Novel Nanomaterials - Synthesis and Applications

Edited by George Z. Kyzas and Athanasios C. Mitropoulos

Chapter metrics overview

1,066 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


In this chapter, we briefly introduce our recent work related to the topic of ultralight paper-based electrodes for energy applications. Herein, the ultralight paper-based counter electrodes containing commercial poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) and homemade graphene dots (GDs) are synthesized for preparing flexible dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Because the GDs/PEDOT:PSS composite can well fill the porosity of paper substrate, the flexible DSSC with GDs/PEDOT:PSS-coated paper electrode exhibits much higher cell efficiency than that of DSSC using paper electrode with Pt. The features of lightweight, low-cost, space-saving (high flexibility), high machinability (easy-cutting) and environmental friendly would make the GDs/PEDOT:PSS-coated paper electrodes highly potential in portable/wearable electronic applications.


  • conducting polymer
  • flexible electronic
  • graphene dot
  • paper electrode

1. Introduction

Flexible and lightweight electronics have attracted much attention because of their high potential to be integrated into wearable commercial products [1]. Among all the flexible substrates, the printed paper substrate, composed of cellulose fibers, has been considered as the most promising one due to the following features: environmental friendly, low-cost, lightweight and easy for roll-to-roll processing [2]. Currently, the printed paper has been widely used as a substrate for transistors [3], displays [4], sensors [5], memories [6], batteries [7] and supercapacitors [8], etc. Furthermore, Professor Wang’s group reported a paper-based triboelectric nanogenerator having origami configurations for harvesting mechanical energy [9]. Professor Hu’s group developed highly flexible organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) on biodegradable and transparent paper substrates [10]. They also demonstrated a range of electronic devices on transparent paper substrate, including organic solar cell [11], touch screen [12] and thin film transistor [13].

For the applications in electrochemical devices, the main challenges of using printed paper as electrode substrates are how to make it to become conductive and electrochemical active via nonsintering processes, as well as to make a conductive layer on it uniformly and continuously because paper-based substrates are nonconductive, porous and rough due to its fibrous nature [14]. Up to now, the printed paper has not been used as the electrode substrates for the third-generation solar cell, namely dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC). DSSCs have been extensively studied and widely developed in the last two decade since they do not rely on expensive fabrication processes and can be possibly prepared by using roll-to-roll methods [15]. Whereas, flexible DSSCs are handy, convenient for transportation and suitable for setting up at complex environments, which endow them high competitiveness in solar cell markets [16].

As shown in Figure 1, a traditional DSSC is consisted of a counter electrode (CE) with Pt catalyst, an I/I3-based electrolyte and a dye-sensitized TiO2 photoanode. Briefly, the basic sequence of the working principle of a DSSC is shown below:

Figure 1.

Schematic sketch of a DSSC.



Electron injection


Electron reception


Interception reaction


Under light illumination, a photo-excited electron is injected from the excited state of the dye (dye*) into the conduction band of the TiO2. The injected electron percolates through the TiO2 film by a driving chemical diffusion gradient, and is collected at a conductive glass substrate. After passing through an external circuit, the electron is reintroduced into the DSSC at the Pt CE, where I3 is reduced to I. Immediately, I regenerates the oxidized dye (dye+) to complete the circle of a DSSC and to refresh the DSSC without other chemical side reactions.

However, the most used electrocatalyst on the CE of DSSCs is Pt, which is an expensive noble metal and is rare on earth. To further reduce the cost of fabrication of DSSCs on industrial scale, it is better to develop metal-free electrocatalytic materials for the CEs of DSSCs. Accordingly, conducting polymers (e.g., poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) (PEDOT) [17], poly(3,3-diethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-thieno-[3,4-b][1,4]-dioxepine) (PProDOT-Et2) [18], polypyrrole (PPy) [19], and polyaniline (PANI) [20]) and carbonaceous materials (such as carbon black (CB) [21], graphite [22], carbon nanotube (CNT) [23] and graphene [24]) have become the most promising electrocatalysts for the CE of DSSCs since they are metal element-free, have low material cost and possess good electrocatalytic activity. A water-dispersible conducting polymer, poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene):poly(4-styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), has attracted much attention as the catalytic CEs of DSSCs mainly due to its exceptional advantage of aqueous solution processibility [25]. Nevertheless, pristine PEDOT:PSS films are plagued by low conductivity (i.e., <1 S cm−1) and poor electrocatalytic activity for the reduction of I3 due to the nonconductive counter anion, PSS, disturbing the conduction path of PEDOT inside the film as well as the poor catalytic surface area of its flat film [26]. Inert solvents [27] or carbon materials [28] have been employed to improve conductivity and catalytic surface areas of PEDOT:PSS films. For example, by introducing CB into the PEDOT:PSS-based CEs for their DSSCs, η can achieve to 7.01% [28]. Multiwall CNT-PEDOT:PSS composite CE for DSSCs exhibits η of 6.50% [29]. A catalytic film composited of graphene and PEDOT:PSS for the use of CE in a DSSC had reached 4.50% efficiency [30]; however, a perfect graphene sheet usually possesses limited active sites for electrocatalytic reaction in spite of its extraordinarily high electrical conductivity [31]. Several strategies are employed to increase the electrocatalytic active sites on graphene sheets, such as chemical functionalization [32], heteroatom doping (e.g., nitrogen-doped graphene) [33] and nanosized graphene pieces (e.g., graphene dots (GDs) [34]). Among these graphene nanostructures, GDs have attracted great attention and been widely applied in bioimaging [35], LEDs [36] and photovoltaics [37] due to their unique properties of quantum confinement and edge effects [38, 39]. Moreover, nanometer size and rich oxygen-containing group of GDs facilitate them to be well dispersed in most solvents [40], which benefits for various solution-processable applications. Therefore, the incorporation of GDs in PEDOT:PSS enable us to fabricate an efficient electrocatalytic film by using a simple solution-coating method under low temperature (<100°C).

In this chapter, an all-metal-free CE-containing GDs-PEDOT:PSS and printed paper is developed for flexible DSSCs, and it exhibits higher performance and bending stability than those of a paper electrode with sputtered Pt. The concurrent advantage in low material cost, simple fabrication processes, highly bending durability, lightweight, space-saving, high machinability and environmental friendly makes the GDs-PEDOT:PSS-coated paper electrode playing a crucial role in lightweight electronic devices. Most importantly, this GDs-PEDOT:PSS composite ink can be used in the printable processes for mass production of flexible electrodes.


2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of graphene dots

The GDs solution was prepared by using deionized water and glucose as the solvent and source, respectively. First, the as-prepared glucose solution (2.5 mL) was transferred to a glass bottle with 4 mL volume and a tightened cover. The synthesis reaction was carried out in a microwave oven (595 W) for 9 min; the glucose molecules are pyrolyzed and then converted to GDs as shown in Figure 2. Subsequently, the reaction bottle was cooled to ambient temperature, and the water-soluble GDs solution was thus prepared. Figure 3 is the photographs of GDs solution taken under the illumination of visible light and UV light, showing the excitation wavelength-dependent fluorescence property of GDs.

Figure 2.

Preparation of graphene dots via the microwave-assisted hydrothermal technique.

Figure 3.

The GDs solutions under ambient light (left) and UV light (right) [41].

2.2. Preparation of paper-based counter electrodes

The mixing solutions composed of 50 V% PEDOT:PSS aqueous solution and 50 V% binary solution consisting of GDs (X) and ethanol (Y) (X/Y = 3/2) were used for preparing the GDs-PEDOT:PSS composite inks.

For the preparation of paper-based CEs, the commercial printing papers were used as the substrate of counter electrodes. The paper with a fixed coating area was immersed in the GDs-PEDOT:PSS solution (i.e., 30 V% GDs solution content) for 10 min, and it was took out and then dried under 60°C. The thus prepared GDs-PEDOT:PSS/paper electrode (left-hand side of Figure 4) was used as the CE for the studies on flexible DSSCs. For comparison purposes, the paper-based CE with sputtered Pt (right-hand side of Figure 4) was also prepared as the standard CE.

Figure 4.

Pictures of CEs with 30 V% GDs-PEDOT:PSS composite (left) and with sputtered Pt (right) on paper substrates.

2.3. Fabrication of flexible dye-sensitized solar cells

For the preparation of the flexible photoanode of DSSCs, the dye-sensitized TiO2 film was prepared on the conducting plastic substrate (13 Ω sq.−1, ITO-PEN) according to the previous reports [42, 43]. First, the binder-free TiO2 paste was synthesized by mixing 1 g TiO2 powder (P25) with 6 mL binary solution consisting of tert-butanol and deionized water (volume ratio of 2:1) uniformly. Then, the surface of the ITO-PEN substrate was coated with a TiOx compact layer by spraying an ethanol solution (10 mL) containing titanium tetraisopropoxide (0.028 g) on it. Using the binder-free TiO2 paste, a 10-μm-thick film was coated on the treated ITO-PEN substrate through doctor blade technique [44]. Thereafter, an active area of 0.4 × 0.4 cm2was selected from the TiO2 films by scrapping. The as-prepared TiO2/ITO-PEN electrodes were gradually heated to 120°C under ambient conditions, and subsequently annealed at the respective temperatures for 60 min. After annealing and cooling to 80°C, the TiO2/ITO-PEN electrode was immediately immersed in a 5 × 10−4 M N719 dye solution for 60 min under 55°C. The thus prepared dye-sensitized TiO2/ITO-PEN photoanode (Figure 5) was coupled with paper-based CE (i.e., GDs-PEDOT:PSS or sputtered Pt) as the flexible DSSC.

Figure 5.

A flexible photoanode with dye-sensitized TiO2 film on ITO-PEN substrate.


3. Results and discussion

GDs are edge-bound nanosized graphene pieces and exhibit unique electronic and optical properties due to the quantum confinement and edge effects [38, 39]. Figure 6(a) shows the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the monodispersed GDs, which exhibit uniform diameters of ~3.50 nm. As shown in the inset of Figure 6(a), the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image indicates high crystallinity of GDs with a lattice spacing of 0.246 nm corresponding to the interplanar separation of graphene (1120). Figure 6(b) presents the atomic force microscope (AFM) image of the monodispersed GDs; the inset of Figure 6(b) reveals that the average height of GDs is around 2.90 nm. As shown in Figure 6(c), two absorption peaks centered at 228 and 282 nm are observed in the ultraviolet-visible (UV-visible) spectrum of the diluted GD solution, which consists with the result in the previous literature [36]. Figure 6(d) shows the photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of the GD solution. The broad emission peaks centered at around 450, 460 and 537 nm are observed when the sample is excited by 300, 400 and 500 nm, respectively, and they show the decrease of PL intensity. The excitation wavelength-dependent intensity and emission wavelength observed here is a common phenomenon for carbonaceous quantum dots [36, 45]. The elemental distribution of the GDs is analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and the elemental mappings of C and O are shown in Figure 7. Obviously, the C content is much higher than O content; the atomic ratio of C/O is 95.32/4.68, which demonstrated C is the dominant element in the GDs.

Figure 6.

(a) TEM image with the corresponding HRTEM image (inset) of GDs; (b) AFM image of the GDs and its corresponding height profile; (c) absorbance spectrum of the GDs; (d) PL spectra of GDs [41].

Figure 7.

SEM image (a) and EDS spectrum (b) of a GD film. (c) Elemental C mapping of the image shown in (a). The elemental mappings of C (c) and O (d) of the GD film [46].

A mixing solution composed of 50 V% PEDOT:PSS solution, 30 V% GDs solution and 20 V% ethanol were used as the GDs-PEDOT:PSS composite ink. To explore the advantage of the GDs-PEDOT:PSS composite ink for the application in DSSCs, 30 V% GDs-PEDOT:PSS and Pt were separately coated onto the printed papers as the CEs of flexible DSSCs. Figure 8(a) and (b) shows the top-view SEM images of paper electrodes with sputtered Pt and with 30 V% GDs-PEDOT:PSS, respectively. The SEM images obviously show that the porosity of paper substrate can be perfectly filled by GDs/PEDOT:PSS; however, that cannot be achieved by sputtering Pt, which means that the sputtered Pt layer could not provide a continuous electron transport route in a porous paper substrate. Above two paper, CEs (i.e., 30 V% GDs-PEDOT:PSS and sputtered Pt) are assembled with flexible dye/TiO2/ITO-PEN photoanodes for studying the pertinent photovoltaic performance.

Figure 8.

The top-view SEM images of paper substrates with (a) sputtered Pt and with (b) 30 V% GDs-PEDOT:PSS composite [46].

Figure 9 shows the photovoltaic parameters of the flexible DSSCs using various paper-based CEs with different bending times. As shown in Figure 9(a), the flexible DSSC with GDs/PEDOT:PSS-coated paper CE (η = 4.91%) exhibits three times higher cell efficiency than that of cell using Pt-coated paper CE (η = 1.70%), since the GDs/PEDOT:PSS composite can well fill the porosity of paper substrate. It is worth to mention that the development of an all-metal-free CE is an effective approach for reducing the cost of the DSSCs. Moreover, the bending test is carried out to study the durability of the paper CEs. Both GDs/PEDOT:PSS-coated paper electrode and Pt-coated paper electrode are bended for several times (0, 50, 100 and 150 times) and then assembled with the flexible photoanodes to measure and record their corresponding photovoltaic performances. Figure 9(a) shows the bending time dependence of cell efficiency for the flexible DSSCs with various paper CEs; their corresponding photovoltaic parameters are shown in Figure 9(b)(d). It obviously shows that the GDs/PEDOT:PSS-coated paper CE shows unfailing performance even though it was bended for 150 times; on the contrary, the Pt-coated paper CE lost its original performance drastically.

Figure 9.

The photovoltaic parameters of the flexible DSSCs using various paper-based CEs with different bending times. (a) Cell efficiency (η); (b) fill factor (FF); (c) open-circuit voltage (VOC); (d) short-circuit current density (JSC) [46].


4. Conclusion

In summary, a GDs-PEDOT:PSS composite ink was synthesized for preparing the all-metal-free paper-based CEs for flexible DSSCs. The GDs-PEDOT:PSS/paper CE was fabricated through a low-cost and simple coating method (i.e., soak and dry), which could be easily scaled up to mass production. An all-flexible DSSC with GDs/PEDOT:PSS-coated paper CE exhibits much higher cell efficiency (4.91%) than that of cell using paper CE with sputtered Pt (1.70%), since the porosity of paper substrate can be well filled by GDs-PEDOT:PSS, which cannot be achieved by sputtered Pt. After bending for 150 cycles, the performance of GDs/PEDOT:PSS-coated paper CE is still perfectly preserved; on the contrary, the paper CE with sputtered Pt lost its initial performance drastically. In conclusion, this GDs/PEDOT:PSS-coated paper CE is lightweight, low-cost, space-saving (high flexibility), high machinability (easy-cutting) and environmental friendly, which shows the potential for the future applications on portable/wearable electronics.



This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.


  1. 1. Bandodkar AJ, You J-M, Kim N-H, Gu Y, Kumar R, Mohan AMV, Kurniawan J, Imani S, Nakagawa T, Parish B, Parthasarathy M, Mercier PP, Xu S, Wang J. Soft, stretchable, high power density electronic skin-based biofuel cells for scavenging energy from human sweat. Energy & Environmental Science. 2017;10:1581-1589
  2. 2. Zhu H, Fang Z, Preston C, Li Y, Hu L. Transparent paper: Fabrications, properties, and device applications. Energy & Environmental Science. 2014;7:269-287
  3. 3. Yoon J, Lee J, Choi B, Lee D, Kim DH, Kim DM, Moon D-I, Lim M, Kim S, Choi S-J. Flammable carbon nanotube transistors on a nitrocellulose paper substrate for transient electronics. Nano Research. 2017;10:87-96
  4. 4. Andersson P, Nilsson D, Svensson PO, Chen M, Malmström A, Remonen T, Kugler T, Berggren M. Active matrix displays based on all-organic electrochemical smart pixels printed on paper. Advanced Materials. 2002;14:1460-1464
  5. 5. Khiabani PS, Soeriyadi AH, Reece PJ, Gooding JJ. Paper-based sensor for monitoring sun exposure. ACS Sensors. 2016;1:775-780
  6. 6. Lien D-H, Kao Z-K, Huang T-H, Liao Y-C, Lee S-C, He J-H. All-printed paper memory. ACS Nano. 2014;8:7613-7619
  7. 7. Aliahmad N, Shrestha S, Varahramyan K, Agarwal M. Poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene) polymer electrolyte for paper-based and flexible battery applications. AIP Advances. 2016;6:065206
  8. 8. Down MP, Foster CW, Ji X, Banks CE. Pencil drawn paper based supercapacitors. RSC Advances. 2016;6:81130-81141
  9. 9. Yang P-K, Lin Z-H, Pradel KC, Lin L, Li X, Wen X, He J-H, Wang ZL. Paper-based origami triboelectric nanogenerators and self-powered pressure sensors. ACS Nano. 2015;9:901-907
  10. 10. Zhu H, Xiao Z, Liu D, Li Y, Weadock NJ, Fang Z, Huang J, Hu L. Biodegradable transparent substrates for flexible organic-light-emitting diodes. Energy & Environmental Science. 2013;6:2105-2111
  11. 11. Fang Z, Zhu H, Yuan Y, Ha D, Zhu S, Preston C, Chen Q, Li Y, Han X, Lee S, Chen G, Li T, Munday J, Huang J, Hu L. Novel nanostructured paper with ultrahigh transparency and ultrahigh haze for solar cells. Nano Letters. 2014;14:765-773
  12. 12. Fang Z, Zhu H, Preston C, Han X, Li Y, Lee S, Chai X, Chen G, Hu L. Highly transparent and writable wood all-cellulose hybrid nanostructured paper. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2013;1:6191-6197
  13. 13. Fang Z, Zhu H, Bao W, Preston C, Liu Z, Dai J, Li Y, Hu L. Highly transparent paper with tunable haze for green electronics. Energy & Environmental Science. 2014;7:3313-3319
  14. 14. Leijonmarck S, Cornell A, Lindbergh G, Wagberg L. Single-paper flexible Li-ion battery cells through a paper-making process based on nano-fibrillated cellulose. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2013;1:4671-4677
  15. 15. Lee C-P, Li C-T, Ho K-C. Use of organic materials in dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials Today. 2017;20:267-283
  16. 16. Yugis AR, Mansa RF, Sipaut CS. Review on metallic and plastic flexible dye-sensitized solar cell. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2015;78:012003
  17. 17. Li Y-C, Jia S-R, Liu Z-Y, Liu X-Q, Wang Y, Cao Y, Hu X-Q, Peng C-L, Li Z. Fabrication of PEDOT films via a facile method and their application in Pt-free dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2017;5:7862-7868
  18. 18. Yeh MH, Lee CP, Lin LY, Nien PC, Chen PY, Vittal R, Ho KC. A composite poly(3,3-diethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-thieno-[3,4-b][1,4]-dioxepine) and Pt film as a counter electrode catalyst in dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochimica Acta. 2011;56:6157-6164
  19. 19. Sangiorgi N, Sanson A. Influence of electropolymerized polypyrrole optical properties on bifacial dye-sensitized solar cells. Polymer. 2017;125:208-216
  20. 20. He Z, Liu J, Khoo SY, Tan TTY. Electropolymerization of uniform polyaniline nanorod arrays on conducting oxides as counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells. ChemSusChem. 2016;9:172-176
  21. 21. Wu C-S, Chang T-W, Teng H, Lee Y-L. High performance carbon black counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy. 2016;115:513-518
  22. 22. Li Y-Y, Li C-T, Yeh M-H, Huang K-C, Chen P-W, Vittal R, Ho K-C. Graphite with different structures as catalysts for counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochimica Acta. 2015;179:211-219
  23. 23. Chang LY, Lee CP, Huang KC, Wang YC, Yeh MH, Lin JJ, Ho KC. Facile fabrication of PtNP/MWCNT nanohybrid films for flexible counter electrode in dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2012;22:3185-3191
  24. 24. Casaluci S, Gemmi M, Pellegrini V, Di Carlo A, Bonaccorso F. Graphene-based large area dye-sensitized solar cell modules. Nanoscale. 2016;8:5368-5378
  25. 25. Moolsarn K, Tangtrakarn A, Pimsawat A, Duangsa K, Mongkolkachit C, Maiaugree W, Amornkitbamrung V. A dye-sensitized solar cell using a composite of PEDOT:PSS and carbon derived from human hair for a counter electrode. International Journal of Photoenergy. 2017;2017:11
  26. 26. Chiang C-H, Wu C-G. High-efficient dye-sensitized solar cell based on highly conducting and thermally stable PEDOT:PSS/glass counter electrode. Organic Electronics. 2013;14:1769-1776
  27. 27. Ouyang J, Chu CW, Chen FC, Xu Q, Yang Y. High-conductivity poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) film and its application in polymer optoelectronic devices. Advanced Functional Materials. 2005;15:203-208
  28. 28. Yue G, Wu J, Xiao Y, Lin J, Huang M. Low cost poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate/carbon black counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochimica Acta. 2012;67:113-118
  29. 29. Fan B, Mei X, Sun K, Ouyang J. Conducting polymer/carbon nanotube composite as counter electrode of dye-sensitized solar cells. Applied Physics Letters. 2008;93:143103
  30. 30. Hong W, Xu Y, Lu G, Li C, Shi G. Transparent graphene/PEDOT–PSS composite films as counter electrodes of dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochemistry Communications. 2008;10:1555-1558
  31. 31. Xue Y, Liu J, Chen H, Wang R, Li D, Qu J, Dai L. Nitrogen-doped graphene foams as metal-free counter electrodes in high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2012;51:12124-12127
  32. 32. Wang Z, Chen Y, Li P, He J, Zhang W, Guo Z, Li Y, Dong M. Synthesis of silicon-doped reduced graphene oxide and its applications in dye-sensitive solar cells and supercapacitors. RSC Advances. 2016;6:15080-15086
  33. 33. Gao Z, Wang L, Chang J, Liu X, Wu D, Xu F, Guo Y, Jiang K. Nitrogen doped porous graphene as counter electrode for efficient dye-sensitized solar cell. Electrochimica Acta. 2016;188:441-449
  34. 34. Chang Q, Ma Z, Wang J, Li P, Yan Y, Shi W, Chen Q, Huang Y, Huang L. Hybrid graphene quantum dots@graphene foam nanosheets for dye-sensitized solar cell electrodes. Energy Technology. 2016;4:256-262
  35. 35. Sun H, Wu L, Gao N, Ren J, Qu X. Improvement of photoluminescence of graphene quantum dots with a biocompatible photochemical reduction pathway and its bioimaging application. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2013;5:1174-1179
  36. 36. Tang L, Ji R, Cao X, Lin J, Jiang H, Li X, Teng KS, Luk CM, Zeng S, Hao J, Lau SP. Deep ultraviolet photoluminescence of water-soluble self-passivated graphene quantum dots. ACS Nano. 2012;6:5102-5110
  37. 37. Kim JK, Park MJ, Kim SJ, Wang DH, Cho SP, Bae S, Park JH, Hong BH. Balancing light absorptivity and carrier conductivity of graphene quantum dots for high-efficiency bulk heterojunction solar cells. ACS Nano. 2013;7:7207-7212
  38. 38. Gupta V, Chaudhary N, Srivastava R, Sharma GD, Bhardwaj R, Chand S. Luminescent graphene quantum dots for organic photovoltaic devices. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133:9960-9963
  39. 39. Ponomarenko LA, Schedin F, Katsnelson MI, Yang R, Hill EW, Novoselov KS, Geim AK. Chaotic Dirac billiard in graphene quantum dots. Science. 2008;320:356-358
  40. 40. Li M, Ni W, Kan B, Wan X, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Long G, Zuo Y, Chen Y. Graphene quantum dots as the hole transport layer material for high-performance organic solar cells. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2013;15:18973-18978
  41. 41. Lee C-P, Lin C-A, Wei T-C, Tsai M-L, Meng Y, Li C-T, Ho K-C, Wu C-I, Lau S-P, He J-H. Economical low-light photovoltaics by using the Pt-free dye-sensitized solar cell with graphene dot/PEDOT:PSS counter electrodes. Nano Energy. 2015;18:109-117
  42. 42. Lin L-Y, Lee C-P, Tsai K-W, Yeh M-H, Chen C-Y, Vittal R, Wu C-G, Ho K-C. Low-temperature flexible Ti/TiO2 photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cells with binder-free TiO2 paste. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. 2012;20:181-190
  43. 43. Lee CP, Lin LY, Tsai KW, Vittal R, Ho KC. Enhanced performance of dye-sensitized solar cell with thermally-treated TiN in its TiO2 film prepared at low temperature. Journal of Power Sources. 2011;196:1632-1638
  44. 44. Ahmadi S, Asim N, Alghoul MA, Hammadi FY, Saeedfar K, Ludin NA, Zaidi SH, Sopian K. The role of physical techniques on the preparation of photoanodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. International Journal of Photoenergy. 2014;2014:19
  45. 45. Zhu S, Zhang J, Qiao C, Tang S, Li Y, Yuan W, Li B, Tian L, Liu F, Hu R, Gao H, Wei H, Zhang H, Sun H, Yang B. Strongly green-photoluminescent graphene quantum dots for bioimaging applications. Chemical Communications. 2011;47:6858-6860
  46. 46. Lee C-P, Lai K-Y, Lin C-A, Li C-T, Ho K-C, Wu C-I, Lau S-P, He J-H. A paper-based electrode using a graphene dot/PEDOT:PSS composite for flexible solar cells. Nano Energy. 2017;36:260-267

Written By

Chuan-Pei Lee

Submitted: 07 November 2016 Reviewed: 16 January 2018 Published: 09 February 2018