Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Intermetallics Formation and Their Effect on Mechanical Properties of Al-Si-X Alloys

Written By

Williams S. Ebhota and Tien-Chien Jen

Submitted: 22 May 2017 Reviewed: 18 December 2017 Published: 30 May 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.73188

From the Edited Volume

Intermetallic Compounds - Formation and Applications

Edited by Mahmood Aliofkhazraei

Chapter metrics overview

2,867 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


This study focuses on primary impurities, called intermetallics, in the microstructure of Al-Si-X alloys, their formation, effects and treatments to eliminate or ameliorate their deleterious effects. Intermetallic compounds are usually formed when alloying elements, such as Fe, Cu, Mn, Mg and Sr. are added to Al-Si based alloys. These elements are depicted by X in the alloys formation expression. The chapter noted that the most common intermetallics are iron (Fe) based, and several of these Fe-phases, including the most harmful Fe-phase, β-Al5SiFe, are listed and discussed. Fe-phase intermetallics are deleterious to the mechanical properties of Al-alloys; however, addition of <0.7% Fe helps prevent soldering in die casting mould. The effects of Fe-phase and other intermetallics formed by Cu, Mg and Mn were examined. Further, some techniques of eliminating or mitigating the negative influences of intermetallics were discussed.


  • Al-Si alloys
  • Fe intermetallics
  • aluminium alloys intermetallics
  • impurities in aluminium alloys
  • alloying elements

1. Introduction

Eutectic and near-eutectic alloys of Al-Si-X (ternary systems) have many areas of applications, particularly in the automotive, airspace and marine industries, due to their exceptional properties. X in Al-Si-X formation represents one or more alloying elements, such as copper (Cu), magnesium (Mg), nickel (Ni), iron (Fe), etc. Large quantities of aluminium (Al) alloys (Al-Si-X) are required in engineering applications, especially in automotive and airspace industries [1, 2, 3, 4]. The mean aluminium consumption in automobiles in Europe is shown in Figure 1. The increasing demand and studies on these alloys seem to be proportionate, as several studies have been reported on Al-Si-X alloys’ microstructure, mechanical properties and their modifications [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. The high demand is due to the excellent high strength-to-weight ratio, abrasion and corrosion resistance and low coefficient of thermal expansion possess by aluminium alloys. Besides these properties, aluminium alloys application is limited by certain mechanical property drawbacks, such as partially inherited as-cast microstructure, existence of unavoidable metastable intermetallics and intra-dendritic zones of microstructure [12, 13]. Eutectic and near-eutectic Al–Si-X alloys depend on chemical composition, morphology of dendritic α-Al, and intermetallics that are present in the microstructure for mechanical properties. Coupled with the size and morphology of eutectic Si and the precipitation hardening phases during heat treatment, describing the myriad variables responsible for mechanical properties is quite complex.

Figure 1.

The mean aluminium consumption in automobiles in Europe [15].

These alloys are usually produced from secondary alloys and recycling processes. Many of their based alloys contain impurities, while the levels of impurities in the recycled ones are multiplied during recycling process. Alloying elements, such as Mg, Cu and silicon (Si) are deliberately added to Al alloys to enhance their mechanical properties. Apart from the intentionally added elements, impurities such as Fe, Cu, Cr, Manganese (Mn), and transition metals are usually present [14]. Although these impurities are at trace levels in the alloys, they form new phase components called intermetallics that significantly influence the properties of the microstructures. Quite often, these impurities are strong sites for crack initiation that serve as weak points for decohesion failure. However, intermetallics of Al or Si show resistance to corrosion and oxidation due to their adherent surface oxides; intermetallics of light elements are applied in light weight areas due to their attractive low density, which gives rise to highly specific properties.

The total amount of intermetallics in as-cast alloys is below 5% volume. Despite a few intermetallics in the cast microstructure, the detrimental effects on the ductility and service performance of alloys are huge. Controlling and manipulating the development of the metastable intermetallics during non-equilibrium solidification are of technological interests. This chapter, therefore, centres on the understanding of intermetallics in Al-Si-X alloys, their formation, nature, their effects on mechanical properties and methods of mitigating their adverse influences. There are several published studies on the type of intermetallics in Al-Si-X alloys and their effects as presented in Table 1.

RefAl-AlloyIntermetallicsEffects on mechanical properties
[16, 17]Al-Fe-Fe is highly soluble in molten Al but low in solid Al (max 0.05 wt.%, 0.025 atm.%)Al3FeIt cracks and reduces formability and fatigue resistance but Improves wear resistance
Al6FeThe effect of Al6Fe fibres on fatigue properties of Al-Fe alloys is not very clear yet, though is said to be finely dispersed.
[18, 19, 20, 21, 22]Fe combines with other elements to form intermetallic phase particles of various types
Al-Si-Feβ-Al5FeSi;Deleterious; stress raiser
α-Al8Fe2SiLess harmful
Al-Si-Mg-Feπ-Al8Mg3FeSi6It has negative impact on ductile properties; lower strength and ductility
Al9FeMg3Si5improved significantly after the T6 heat treatment
Mg2SiDetrimental to the alloys’ ductility
[23]Al-Mn-FeAl6(Fe,Mn)Significantly deteriorate the mechanical properties of alloy
(Excess Mn + Al5FeSi)
(China script)
Not very harmful but reduces the machinability
[24, 25]Al-Cu
(Cu 1–4%)
θ-Al2CuImprove mechanical properties-they decrease the grain size and increase the fatigue life
(Cu 1–4%)
(Q) AI5Cu2Mg8Si6

Table 1.

Studies on the types of intermetallics in al-Si-X alloys and their effects on mechanical properties.


2. Formation processes of intermetallic compounds and their identification

The equilibrium and non-equilibrium reactions that occur during the casting of Al alloy account for intermetallic phases. Coarse intermetallic particles are formed in the interdendritic regions during solidification or at a relatively high temperature in the solid state during solution treatment, homogenisation, or recrystallization [14]. Most metals, except for Mg and Cu, exhibit a low solid solubility in Al. When the amount of solute element exceeds the limit of solid solubility, an intermediate phase, also called second phase, is developed. The composition of the intermediate phase is in between two pure metals (primary components) and has a varied crystal structure from the primary components. The intermediate phase, with unchanging composition, is called an intermetallic compound. Therefore, intermetallics are products of incomplete solid solubility by alloy systems. Intermetallic compounds identification in Al alloys is critical to complex structure examination. Microstructural examination is one of the primary ways of evaluating the evolution of phases in materials. This evaluation promotes the understanding of the effects of composition, production technique, heat treatments and deformation process on alloys’ mechanical behaviours. Also, it is used to investigate the influences of new fabrication processes and to analyse failure mechanisms and causes.

2.1. Identification of intermetallics

2.1.1. Fe-Intermetallics

The known intermetallic compounds in aluminium and its alloys are categorised into two systems: binary (Al-Fe and Fe-Si) and ternary systems. The following phases have been reported to exist in Al-Fe binary systems: Al5Fe2, Al3Fe, Al2Fe Al13Fe4 and Al8Fe5 [26, 27, 28]. In the case of a Fe-Si system, the following stable compounds were found: FeSi, Fe2Si, FeSi2, and Fe5Si3 [2930]. Phase equilibria of the binary systems are generally well known. The ternary system is characterised by a large number phases, both metastable and stable. Several review papers on Al-Fe-Si ternary phases have been published [23, 24, 25]. Gosh appraised over 150 research papers on ternary phases that covered unto 1986 [30, 31]. More updates have been provided by other authors [30] and in 2008, Du et al. presented about 24 Al-Si-Fe ternary compounds [32]. A summary of all the significant phases of both binary and ternary systems are presented in Table 2.

Binary systemsDenary systems (Al-Si-Fe)
AlFe (α2)HT-FeSi2 (Fe2Si5)FeSiAl3FeSiAl3Fe2Si3
Al8Fe5 (e)Al53-56Fe23.5–24.5Si20.5–22.5aAl57-59Fe24-25Si17-18a

Table 2.

A summary of both binary and ternary systems.

In a study, the effects of Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, and Sr. additions on the type of intermetallic compounds formed in Al-Si eutectic alloys were investigated and reported [33]. Many eutectic alloys (SP0, SP1 SP2, SP3, SP4, and SP5) were developed by adding elements Cu, Fe, Mn, Mg and Sr. to A413.1. The chemical compositions of the various alloys produced for the experiment are presented in Table 3.

Phase typeAlloy codeAlSiCuFeCrMnMgSr/ppm*Suggested composition
Mg2S Pi phaseSp30.3337.362.400Mg1.9Si
Q phasesSp316.5631.619.

Table 3.

Analysis of chemical composition of intermetallic phases [33].

Microstructural examination shows the presence of α-Fe Chinese script phases in alloys SP0, SP4 and SP5, with a reasonable amount of Mn, as shown in Figure 2. The morphology of Chinese script of the α-Fe phase arises during solidification of eutectic alongside α-Al. The appearance of α-Fe phase could be polyhedrons if it solidifies before the eutectic reaction occurs [34].

Figure 2.

Refs. [33, 34] shows (a) non-modified PS0 alloy; (b) shows compact SEM image of phase; (c) structure of over modified PS4 alloy –note the presences of Al4SrSi2 particles on top of a-Fe morphology.

2.1.2. α- and β-Fe phases

The platelet β-AlFeSi particles are found in the Sp1, Sp2 and Sp4 alloys. The β phase is known to be a primary phase, with a three-dimensional form of a platelet that looks like needles in a two-dimensional optical micrograph, as shown in Figure 3. The β-Fe phase chemical composition observed vary within Al9Fe2Si2, Al9FeSi, Al13.6Fe3 Si3.05, Al13.3Fe3Si3.3 and Al13.6Fe3Si3.4 [35]. The phases are generally represented by the chemical formula Al5FeSi, despite the non-inclusion of alloying elements such as Cu, Mn, etc. The α-phase is the second type of the script-like; it has a lower amount of Fe which is between 23.88 and 26.79 wt.%, with Si in the range of 6.87 and 8.38 wt.%. The chemical formula of the phase is Al10.42–11.67Fe2Si1.08–1.25. The second type of the script-like a phase has a lower iron content, between 23.88 and 26.79 wt.%, a silicon content lying between 6.87 and 8.38 wt.%, and a chemical formula of Al10.42–11.67Fe2Si1.08–1.25.

Figure 3.

Optical micrograph of (a) β-Fe phase (needles) in alloy Sp1 and (b) SEM image showing 3-D platelet morphology of β-Fe phase [33].

2.1.3. δ- and pi-phase α- and β-Fe phases

Apart from α- and β-AlFeSi phases commonly found in Fe intermetallic compounds, there are other phases that are occasionally found [33]. These phases include δ-Al4FeSi2 and pi-Al8Mg3FeSi6 compounds, shown in the micrographs in Figure 4. The formation of the δ-Al4FeSi2 phase is favoured by high amount of Si in Al-Si eutectic alloys. This phase is considered to be the richest in Si of the Al-Fe-Si phases, and looks like platelet morphology and shows grey level under optical microscope like β-phase [21, 36]. The disparity in the Fe/Si atomic ratio in the examined β-phase particles is most likely the outcome of the partial conversion of the δ-phase to the β-phase via the peritectic decomposition as in the expression [37]:

Figure 4.

(a) β-Al5FeSi transforming into pi-phase in Sp4 alloy; (b) presence of pi-phase and phases of Mg2Si Chinese script in SP3 alloy [33].

Liq. + δ-Al4FeSi2 → β-Al5FeSi + Si.

The pi-Al8Mg3FeSi6 phase is usually present in the precipitates of an alloy containing relatively high Mg, such as Sp3 and Sp4 in Table 3.

2.2. Mg2Si phase

The precipitate, Mg2Si, is usually observed to in all Al–Si–Mg alloys, at the edge of pi phase particles. It appears in the form of black Chinese script particles, as shown in Figure 4. The precipitate can also be found at the edge of primary Si and the average chemical analysis of the Mg2Si provided in Table 3.

2.3. Al2Cu and Q-phases

Copper concentration increases with the solid fraction and segregates to the liquid during solidification. Al–Al2Cu is formed to the end of solidification. A study has suggested that addition of alloying elements, such as Mg and Sr phase, does not alter the stability of the Al2Cu [33]. During final solidification, the Q-phase, Q-Al5Mg8Si6Cu2, grows out from Al2Cu particles. The EDX spectrum in Figure 5, shown that Q-phase has a reflection of elements, such as Al, Cu, Si and Mg, in the alloy.

Figure 5.

(a) Q-phase growing out of Al2Cu phase; (b) energy dispersive spectroscopy corresponding to Q phase in (a) [33].

Secondary alloys were prepared from recycling of cast Al alloys scrap of AlSi9Cu3, AlSi12Cu1Fe and AlSi8Zn10Mg were investigated for intermetallic compounds [38]. The chemical compositions of the recycled alloys are presented in Table 4.

Materials elementsAlSi9Cu3AlSi12Cu1FeAlSi8Zn10Mg

Table 4.

Chemical composition of the recycled of cast al alloys scrap (wt.%).

The intermetallics found in recycled cast alloys, AlSi12Cu1Fe, AlSi8Zn10Mg and AlSi9Cu3, are presented Figures 6 and 7.

Figure 6.

Intermetallic phases in the microstructures of recycled al-Si-X cast alloys [38] (a–c) intermetallics in AlSi8Zn10Mg cast alloy; (e–h) intermetallics in AlSi12Cu1Fe cast alloy; (d & i) microstructures of secondary AlSi8Zn10Mg and AlSi12Cu1Fe alloys respectively.

Figure 7.

Intermetallic compounds in recycled AlSi9Cu3 cast alloy.


3. Effect of intermetallic on mechanical and physical properties of al-Si alloys

The presence of intermetallic compounds in Al alloys is of a great concern to materials engineers due to their harmful effects on mechanical properties. Mechanical properties of Al-Si-X alloys are greatly affected by the structures of the intermetallic. Intermetallics compounds appear more in recycled Al-Si based alloys, however, cycling which is a secondary production process of Al and its alloys is cheaper than primary production process. Therefore, producing Al alloys devoid of deleterious intermetallic phases will positively affect Al and its alloys recycle market and decrease the use of primary method that requires high fabrication power consumption.

The β-phase platelets are usually potential sites for crack initiation, where eventual breakup failure occurs. Iron-based intermetallics dominate Al-Si-X alloys’ intermetallics studies. Commercially available alloys contain Fe impurities in the form of Al and Si and other elements phases. In conductive liquids, the presence of certain Fe-phases, Al3Fe and α-AlFeSi, on the surface stimulates pitting attacks on the surface because α-AlFeSi is cathodic in the Al matrix. The greatest disadvantage of intermetallics is their low ductility, especially at low and transitional temperatures. This has been attributed to several factors, such as [39]:

  1. A restricted number of simple deformation modes to suit the von Mises criterion,

  2. Dislocations operation with large slip vectors

  3. Restricted cross-slip

  4. Transmitting slip across grain boundaries complexity

  5. Inherent grain boundary weakness

  6. Isolation of harmful solutes to grain boundaries

  7. High Peierls-Nabarro stress and covalent bonding

  8. Environmental vulnerability.

3.1. Fe intermetallics

The presence of the dispersed brittle intermetallic ß-Al5FeSi phase in the structure is one of the primary barriers that impede the bendability of Al-Si based alloy sheet and consequently, poor mechanical formability. During sheet bending and forming processes, these particles create damage and premature failure. Intermetallic, ß-Al5FeSi, forms thin brittle platelets that cause weak bond strengths within the matrix of α-Al, thus initiating crack sites around the structure. This deleterious behaviour is especially severe in sheets produced by strip casting, a cost-effective fabrication method, which should be economically suitable for automotive Al alloys production [40]. In Al-Si based casting, Fe is the most common deleterious impurity element and forms the intermetallic compound ß-Al5FeSi when levels of Fe in an alloy exceed critical percentage. Solid solubility of Fe in Al is very low and consequently combines with other impurities or alloying elements to form intermetallic compounds. The type of compound formed depends on the other available impurities. An optical micrograph of the Al-Si-1.8Fe-0.8Mn microstructure is shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Optical micrograph of al-Si-1.8Fe-0.8Mn microstructure [41].

However, Fe is required in pressure die casting to prevent liquid metal from soldering to the die [42, 43]. For optimal thermal performance, Fe is desirable for Al-Si alloys to maintain stable mechanical properties at high temperatures. The Al alloys formed by Cu and Mg addition, are known for high strength due to precipitation hardening. These alloys, however, lose their strength at elevated temperatures because of unstable precipitates formed by Cu and Mg. Addition of Fe to alloys makes them stable at high temperatures compared to alloys with Cu and Mg addition. Transition elements such as Fe, upon addition to Al alloys, yield thermally stable intermetallics. The composition of eutectic Al-Si-Fe alloy is about 0.8 wt.% Fe. The liquid metal does not show affinity of dissolution with the steel mould, once the iron content is at approximately this level. The desirable Fe content in alloys in most Al pressure die casters is in the range of 0.8–1.1 wt.% Fe.

The class of wrought Al alloys, 6xxx series, is known for good corrosion resistance and high strength to density ratio. These alloys are good substitutes for steel in the manufacturing of automobile body panels. Apart from their principal compositional elements, Al, Mg, and Si, 6xxx alloys also possess Fe, Cu, Mn, and Cr, which sometimes are not deliberately added. The presence of these elements, especially Fe, promotes the development of different brittle iron-containing intermetallic compounds [44]. These Fe intermetallics cause poor formability and consequently, stimulate premature failure and damage during bending and forming operations. This drawback limits the application of 6xxx alloys in both automotive and aerospace industries [40, 45, 46].

3.2. Other Fe-phases

Other phases that have a detrimental influence on the alloy properties are Al3Fe and α-AlFeSi, which is cathodic to the α-Al matrix. Their presence on the surface accelerates pitting attacks in conductive liquids. Subsequently, these affect the mechanical property of the alloy by decreasing its ductility and resulting in de-cohesion failure. Equally, the platelets and needles of β-phase intermetallic, may adversely affect the alloy’s castability, fluidity, and dendrites channel feeding, which results in cast defects. The different intermetallic phases in Al-Si eutectic alloys depend on the composition of the alloys. However, the phases in the microstructure with Cu and Mg, β-Al–Fe–Si–X and Sr, which are usually called Chinese script phases, are most studied. Virtually in all the alloys microstructures, α-AlFeSiCuMg phases with the Chinese script morphology are the dominant Fe intermetallic phases [47]. The composition of the alloy affects the morphology and location of intermetallic phases in α-Al or in the interdendritic regions.

3.3. Manganese, Mn

Often, Mn is found in secondary metal made from recycled wrought product and is usually not deliberately added to virgin cast alloys. Manganese can transform iron-rich (Al5FeSi) phases morphology of Al-Si-X alloy from platelets to a more cubic or globules (Al15(MnFe)3Si2) and this improves the alloy’s ductility and tensile strength. Figure 9 shows micrographs of Al-Si-X structure with (a) iron-rich Al5FeSi phase; and (b) Cubic Al15(MnFe)3Si2 form.

Figure 9.

(a) Formation of a thick polyhedral α-Al15(Fe,Mn)3Si2 phase in the microstructure of the Al9Si0.8Fe alloy containing 0.7 wt.% of Mn; (b) micrograph of the Al9Si0.8Fe alloy containing 0.7 wt.% of Mn showing the presence of the β-Al5FeSi particles [2].

It is recommended that Mn should be over 50% of Fe when the amount of Fe exceeds 0.45 wt.%. Manganese (Mn) is more influential in causing gravity segregation than Fe. Application of Mn concentration that exceeds 0.6 wt.% causes segregation whether the Fe content is 0.8 or 2.3 wt.% [48]. Further, Mondolfo [21] reported that Mn marginally improves strength at the expense of ductility, while Kashyap et al. [49] indicate that presence of Mn weakens the strength of Al-7Si-Mg alloy.

Several literatures have indicated that Mn enhances yield strength and ultimate tensile strength of wrought Al-Si alloys [50, 51]. Formation of fine dispersoids of about 0.03–0.3 μm by the addition of Zr, Cr and Mn to commercial aluminium alloys was reported in these studies. Dispersoids significantly affect alloy’s fracture toughness, strength, grain structures and recrystallization characteristics. Investigation has revealed that commercial 6000, 7000 and 8000 series aluminium alloys are improved by the addition of manganese with it ductility retailed [52].


4. Processes to eliminate or ameliorate intermetallic deleterious effects

Many studies have reported various approaches and techniques in improving the mechanical properties of Fe-bearing intermetallics by the application of modification principle. Rapid solidification process increases the solubility fields and alters the morphology and size of microstructural elements but does not eliminate intermetallics. Das et al. demonstrated the effect of rapid cooling on alloy by processing Rheocast A380 alloy, using cooling slope (CS) technique to generate semisolid slurry from the superheated alloy melt [53]. The study observed finer, near spherical grains within the cooling slope fabricated slurry and in the solidified castings. This structure is different from the dendritic grains bounded by large eutectic phase within the conventionally cast A380 alloy. However, the most harmful intermetallic phase, β-Al5FeSi (monoclinic), was found to be present, accounting for the alloy’s low ductility and consequent poor mechanical formability [54].

The Al–Si–Cu ternary system alloy, A380, has minute fractions of Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni and Zn. These impurity elements interact to form intermetallic compounds near the grain boundary and occasionally in the parent matrix. The expected intermetallics phases in A380 alloy are α-phase, β-phase (Al5FeSi), and (Al15(Fe,Mn)3Si2). β-phase morphology is platelet-like (needle-like) appearance and serves as a stress-raiser in the matrix, while α-Phase morphology is like polyhedral crystals and sometimes like Chinese script. The detrimental effects of intermetallic need to be removed or reduced; some of the techniques that are exploited include thermal treatment, chemical solutions and microstructural control by co-injecting inoculated intermetallic particles [54, 55, 56].

Thermal treatment—Heat treatment is a normal alternative to be considered. However, the dissolved phase possibly precipitated by thermal homogenisation process during artificial or natural ageing. This is not very effective because thermodynamically, stable phases are not influenced by heat treatment.

Chemical solutions—Conventional metallurgical chemical processes are used to eliminate the deleterious effects of Fe in Al alloys by limiting the amount of Fe to prevent the formation of Al-Fe-Si compounds.

Microstructural control—Co-injecting inoculated intermetallic particles is used to manipulate the microstructure. The particles, which vaporised during spray-forming, act as a substrate for heterogeneous nucleation, promoting nucleation and grow into the cubic. This principle involves the alteration of the type, size, morphology and the dispersion of the intermetallics in these alloys. Hosseinifar and Malakhov reported that the addition of 0.2% wt lanthanum (La) decreased the fraction of deleterious plate-like β-AlFeSi phase and increased the amount of a lesser harmful, α-AlFeSi phase [57]. It was explained that La covers the surface of the Chinese script particles (α-AlFeSi), a behaviour inferred to be like that of Strontium (Sr) addition. SEM images of Chinese script-shaped intermetallic compounds and the morphology of the β-AlFeSi phase are shown in Figure 10.

Figure 10.

SEM images showing the (a) presence of the Chinese script-shaped intermetallic compounds [58]; (b) morphology of the b-AlFeSi phase [57].

The addition of a sufficient amount of Mn to Fe-rich intermetallics can defuse its brittleness and alter the platelet morphology to a less deleterious intermetallic compound [43, 59]. However, the addition of Mn to a melt containing Fe leads to another problem, as this increases the volume fraction of intermetallics and the mean diameter size of Fe solute. This development deteriorates the alloy’s mechanical properties [60]. Table 5 shows examples of intermetallics and their corresponding ductility improving alloying elements.

Alloying element for ductilityLanthanum (La)Boron (B)Manganese (Mn)Niobium (Nb)

Table 5.

Intermetallics with ductility improving alloying elements [39].

The thixoforming process has been described as an effective technique to modify the morphology of the primary phases. Gencalp and Saklakoglu used this method to improve the formability property of A390 alloy with excess levels of Fe and Mn [58]. The intermetallic compounds observed in A380 fabricated by thixoforming are α-Al15Si2(Fe,Mn)3 with polyhedral morphology, different from the Chinese script morphology observed in the traditional gravity casting. Also, in A380 alloy by thixoforming, the very harmful β-Al5FeSi particle morphology was small-plate and θ-Al2Cu phase in the form of particle. These phases, Al5FeSi and θ-Al2Cu phase morphology are needle-like and thin plate respectively in gravity casting. SEM images of the varied intermetallics between thixoforming and gravity casting are shown in Figure 11. The A380 by thixoforming alloys had better mechanical properties compared to A380 by traditional gravity casting method.

Figure 11.

SEM images of (a) β-Al5FeSi needle-like intermetallics present in the gravity casting (b) particle small plate intermetallics, β-Al5FeSi found in thixoforming (c) α-Al15Si2(Fe,Mn)3 with polyhedral morphology found in thixoforming [58].

The solidification paths of 6xxx series Al alloys with and without La were established using careful calorimetric and microstructural investigations. Studies have shown that the addition of Sr. to Al-Si-Fe alloys prevents the formation β-phase intermetallic but promotes the production of a less harmful phase, α-AlFeSi, in as-cast alloys [48, 61]. Adding Sr to Al alloys under a fast cooling is an effective way of altering the amount, size and morphology of needle-like of Al5FeSi intermetallic compound. Chinese script or sludge are not formed in Al alloy without Mn. Addition of the combination of Fe and Mn at a high cooling rate was reported to be the most efficient technique of modifying intermetallic compounds [61]. SEM images in Figure 12 show the Sr. unmodified and modified microstructure of Al-6.5Si-3.5Cu-1.0Fe (in mass %) alloy.

Figure 12.

SEM images show the effect of adding Sr. on the microstructure of Al-6.5Si-3.5Cu-1.0Fe cast alloys (a) Sr. without; (b) with about 0.015% mass Sr [61].

Apart from Sr., the less expensive rare-earth metal, lanthanum (La), was found to decrease the fraction of plate-like β-AlFeSi particles and increase the fraction of α-AlFeSi particles with Chinese script morphology.


5. Conclusion

The influences of ternary alloying elements (Fe, Cu, Mn, and Mg) additions to Al-Si alloys (binary alloys) were discussed in this paper. The chapter observed that:

  1. The equilibrium and non-equilibrium reactions that occur during the casting of Al alloy account for intermetallic phases.

  2. Primary alloying elements are not completely soluble in the α-Al matrix and sometimes combine with impurities and matrix to form intermediate (intermetallics) phases.

  3. Intermetallics are products of incomplete solid solubility by alloy systems.

  4. Fe-based intermetallics are the most common. Fe-phases can be grouped into α- phase, β-phases, Pi-phase, and δ- phase, with α- and β-phases the most common. The most harmful intermetallics in Al-Si-Fe alloys is β-phase (β-Al5SiFe).

  5. Iron is deliberately added to the alloy to prevent soldering in die casting mould.

  6. Addition of Mn and Sr reduces the negative effect of β-phase of Fe intermetallics by improving the ductility. However, the addition of Mn weakens the strength of Al-7Si-Mg alloy.

  7. Microstructural examination is one of the primary ways of evaluating the evolution of phases in materials.


  1. 1. Ceschini L, Boromei I, Morri A, Seifeddine S, Svensson IL. Microstructure, tensile and fatigue properties of the al–10%Si–2%cu alloy with different Fe and Mn content cast under controlled conditions. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209, pp. 5669-5679, 2009/08/01/ 2009
  2. 2. Baldan R, Malavazi J, Couto AA. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Al9si0.8fe alloy with different Mn contents. Materials Science and Technology;33:1192-1199 2017/07/03 2017
  3. 3. Aker A, Kaya H. Measurements of electrical and thermal properties with growth rate, alloying elements and temperature in the al–Si–X alloys. International Journal of Cast Metals Research;30:293-300 2017/09/03 2017
  4. 4. Kuchariková L, Tillová E, Matvija M, Belan J, Chalupová M. Study of the precipitation hardening process in recycled Al-Si-cu cast alloys. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials. 2017;62:397
  5. 5. Das S, Yegneswaran AH, Rohatgi PK. Characterization of rapidly solidified Aluminium-silicon alloy. Journal of Materials Science. 1987;22:3173-3177
  6. 6. Uzun O, Karaaslan T, Keskin M. Production and structure of rapidly solidied Al-Si alloys. Turkish Journal Physics. 2001;25:455-466
  7. 7. Zeren M, Karakulak E. Influence of Ti addition on the microstructure and hardness properties of near-eutectic Al–Si alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 450, pp. 255-259, 2008/02/14/ 2008
  8. 8. Panagos P, Wang Y, McCartney DG, Li M, Ghaffari B, Zindel JW, et al. Characterising precipitate evolution in multi-component cast Aluminium alloys using small-angle X-ray scattering. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 703, pp. 344-353, 2017/05/05/ 2017
  9. 9. Barter S, Burchill M, Jones M. Fatigue crack growth calculations versus measurements of short increments of crack growth in 7XXX Aluminium alloys. International Journal of Fatigue. 2017/07/20/ 2017
  10. 10. Yasakau KA, Zheludkevich ML, Ferreira MGS. Role of Intermetallics in corrosion of aluminum alloys. Smart corrosion protection. In: Intermetallic Matrix Composites. Sawston, Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing; 2018. pp. 425-462
  11. 11. Gupta R, Sharma A, Pandel U, Ratke L. Effect of heat treatment on microstructures and mechanical properties of A356 alloy cast through rapid slurry formation (RSF) process. International Journal of Cast Metals Research, Vol. 30, pp. 283-292, 2017/09/03 2017
  12. 12. Liao H, Sun Y, Sun G. Correlation between mechanical properties and amount of dendritic α-Al phase in as-cast near-eutectic Al–11.6% Si alloys modified with strontium. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 335, pp. 62-66, 2002/09/25/ 2002
  13. 13. Lasa L, Rodriguez-Ibabe JM. Wear behaviour of eutectic and hypereutectic Al–Si–cu–mg casting alloys tested against a composite brake pad. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 363, pp. 193-202, 2003/12/20/ 2003
  14. 14. Roy RK. Recrystallization behavior of commercial purity Aluminium alloys. In: Monteiro WA, editor. Light Metal Alloys Applications. Rijeka: InTech; 2014 p. Ch. 04
  15. 15. Smolej A, Slacek E, Turk R. State and development of some wrought aluminum alloys for special and general applications. Meta. 2002;41:149-155
  16. 16. Mitra R. Intermetallic Matrix Composites: Properties and applications. Elsevier Science. 2017
  17. 17. Phillips HWL, Annotated Equilibrium Diagrams of some Aluminium Alloy Systems. London Institute of Metals.; 1959
  18. 18. Cáceres CH, Svensson IL, Taylor JA. Strength-ductility behaviour of al-Si-cu-mg casting alloys in T6 temper. International Journal of Cast Metals Research, Vol. 15, pp. 531-543, 2003/05/01 2003
  19. 19. Smith R, Caceres CH, St-John D. The microstructure of Al-Si-Cu-Mg alloys. In: Materials Research 96, Brisbane, Australia. 1996. pp. 140-143
  20. 20. Kral MV. A crystallographic identification of intermetallic phases in al–Si alloys. Materials Letters, Vol. 59, pp. 2271-2276, 2005/08/01/ 2005
  21. 21. Mondolfo LF. Aluminium Alloys: Structure and Properties. England: Butterworths; 1976
  22. 22. Salleh MS, Omar MZ, Syarif J. The effects of mg addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Thixoformed al–5%Si–cu alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 621, pp. 121-130, 2015/02/05/ 2015
  23. 23. Liu Y, Huang G, Sun Y, Zhang L, Huang Z, Wang J, et al. Effect of Mn and Fe on the formation of Fe- and Mn-rich Intermetallics in al–5Mg–Mn alloys solidified under near-rapid cooling. Materials. 2016;9:88
  24. 24. Taylor JA. The effect of iron in al-Si casting alloys. In: 35th Australian Foundry Institute National Conference, Adelaide, South Australia. 2004. p. 148
  25. 25. Tillová E, Chalupová M, Hurtalová L. Evolution of phases in a recycled Al-Si cast alloy during solution treatment. In: Kazmiruk V, editor. Scanning Electron Microscopy. Rijeka: InTech; 2012 p. Ch. 21
  26. 26. Chumak I, Richter KW, Ehrenberg H. Redetermination of iron Dialuminide, FeAl2. Acta Crystallographica Section C. 2010;66:i87-i88
  27. 27. Maximov B, Bolotina N, Simonov V, Petricek V, Schulz H. Structure of a modulated monoclinic phase of Na4TiP2O9. Acta Crystallographica Section B. 1994;50:261-268
  28. 28. Stein F, Vogel SC, Eumann M, Palm M. Determination of the crystal structure of the ɛ phase in the Fe–al system by high-temperature neutron diffraction. Intermetallics, Vol. 18, pp. 150-156, 2010/01/01/ 2010
  29. 29. Watanabe H, Yamamoto H, Ito K-i. Neutron diffraction study of the intermetallic compound FeSi. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Vol. 18, pp. 995-999, 1963/07/15 1963
  30. 30. Marker MCJ, Skolyszewska-Kühberger B, Effenberger HS, Schmetterer C, Richter KW. Phase Equilibria and structural investigations in the system al–Fe–Si. Intermetallics,Vol. 19, 1919-1929, 2011/12/01/ 2011
  31. 31. Ghosh G. Phase diagrams, crystallographic and thermodynamic data. In: Aluminium-Iron-Silicon, Light Metal Systems. Vol. 11A2. LandolteBörnstein, Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2005. pp. 359-409
  32. 32. Du Y, Schuster JC, Liu Z-K, Hu R, Nash P, Sun W, et al. A thermodynamic description of the al–Fe–Si system over the whole composition and temperature ranges via a hybrid approach of CALPHAD and key experiments. Intermetallics, Vol. 18, pp. 150-156, 2008/04/01/ 2008
  33. 33. Samuel E, Samuel AM, Doty HW, Valtierra S, Samuel FH. Intermetallic phases in Al–Si based cast alloys: New perspective. International Journal of Cast Metals Research, Vol. 27, pp. 107-114, 2014/01/01 2014
  34. 34. Crepeau PN. Effect of iron in Al-Si casting alloys: A critical review. AFS Transactions. 1995;103:361-366
  35. 35. Pearson WB. Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structure of Metals and Alloys. London: Pergamon Press; 1967
  36. 36. Khalifa W, Samuel FH, Gruzleski JE. Iron intermetallic phases in the Al corner of the Al-Si-Fe system. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. March 01 2003;34:807-825
  37. 37. Backerud L, Krol E, Tamminen J. Solidification Characteristics of Aluminum Alloys: Wrought Alloys. Vol. 1. SkanAluminum: Sweden; 1986
  38. 38. Hurtalová L, Tillová E, Chalupová M, Ďuriníková E. Effect of Chemical Composition of Secondary Al-Si Cast Alloy on Intermetallic Phases. 25/08/2017. Available:
  39. 39. Smallman RE, Bishop RJ. Modern Physical Metallurgy and Materials Engineering. 6th ed. Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999
  40. 40. Lievers WB, Pilkey AK, Lloyd DJ. The influence of iron content on the bendability of AA6111 sheet. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 361, pp. 312-320, 2003/11/25/ 2003
  41. 41. Darvishi A, Maleki A, Atabaki MM, Zargami M. The mutual effect of iron and manganese on microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium-silicon alloy. Association of Metallurgical Engineers of Serbia. 2010;16:pp. 11-24
  42. 42. Shankar S, Apelian D. Die soldering: Mechanism of the Interface reaction between molten aluminum alloy and tool steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B-Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science. 2002;33:465-476
  43. 43. Shabestari SG, Shahri F. Influence of modification, solidification conditions and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloy. Journal of Materials Science. March 01 2004;39:2023-2032
  44. 44. Hosseinifar M, Malakhov DV. The sequence of intermetallics formation during the solidification of an Al-Mg-Si alloy containing La. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2011;42A:825-833
  45. 45. Spencer K, Corbin SF, Lloyd DJ. The influence of iron content on the plane strain fracture behaviour of AA 5754 Al–Mg sheet alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A;325:pp. 394-404. 2002/02/28/ 2002
  46. 46. Sarkar J, Kutty TRG, Wilkinson DS, Embury JD, Lloyd DJ. Tensile properties and bendability of T4 treated AA6111 aluminum alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 369, pp. 258-266, 2004/03/25/ 2004
  47. 47. Podprocká R, Bolibruchová D, Chalupová M. Reducing the negative of the iron in the alloy based on al-Si-mg by manganese. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 2017;17:212
  48. 48. Shabestari S, Mahmudi M, Emamy M, Campbell J. Effect of Mn and Sr on Intermetallics in Fe-rich eutectic al-Si alloy. International Journal of Cast Metals Research. 2002;15:17-24
  49. 49. Kashyap KT, Murali S, Raman KS, Murthy KSS. Casting and heat treatment variables of Al-7%Si-mg alloy. Materials Science and Technology. 1993;9:189-203
  50. 50. Garrett GG, Knott JF. The influence of compositional and microstructural variations on the mechanism of static fracture in aluminum alloys. Metallurgical Transactions A. 1978;9:1187-1201
  51. 51. Santner JS. A study of fracture in high purity 7075 aluminum alloys. Metallurgical Transactions A. 1978;9:769-779
  52. 52. Park DS, Nam SW. Effects of manganese Dispersoid on the mechanical properties in al-Zn-mg alloys. Journal of Materials Science. 1995;30:1313-1320
  53. 53. Das P, Kumar M, Samanta SK, Dutta P, Ghosh D. Semisolid processing of A380 Al alloy using cooling slope. Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 2014;29:422-428. 2014/04/03 2014
  54. 54. Borba EC, Andrade MS. Thermodynamic calculations in the AIMnSi system. Presented at the 17° CBECIMat - Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia e Ciência dos Materiais, Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brasil, 2006
  55. 55. Warmuzek M, Mrówka G, Sieniawski J. Influence of the heat treatment on the precipitation of the intermetallic phases in commercial AlMn1FeSi Alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology;157:pp. 624-632. 2004/12/20/ 2004
  56. 56. Dang B, Jian Z-y, Xu J-f, Chang F-e, Zhu M. Effect of phosphorus and heat treatment on microstructure of al-25%Si alloy. China Foundry. January 01 2017;14:10-15
  57. 57. Hosseinifar M, Malakhov DV. Effect of Ce and la on microstructure and properties of a 6xxx series type aluminum alloy. Journal of Materials Science. October 23 2008;43:7157
  58. 58. Gencalp Irizalp S, Saklakoglu N. Effect of Fe-rich intermetallics on the microstructure and mechanical properties of thixoformed A380 aluminum alloy. Engineering Science and Technology, An International Journal;17:pp. 58-62. 2014/06/01/ 2014
  59. 59. Apelian D, Shivkumar S, Sigworth G. Fundamental aspects of heat treatment of cast Al-Si-mg alloys. AFS Transactions. 1989;97:727-742
  60. 60. Emamy GM. Casting Properties of Metal Matrix Composites. Ph.D Thesis. The University of Birmingham; 1995
  61. 61. Ashtari P, Tezuka H, Sato T. Influence of Sr and Mn additions on intermetallic compound morphologies in Al-Si-Cu-Fe cast alloys. Materials Transactions. 2003;44:2611-2616

Written By

Williams S. Ebhota and Tien-Chien Jen

Submitted: 22 May 2017 Reviewed: 18 December 2017 Published: 30 May 2018