Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Role of Nutraceuticals in Modulation of Gut-Brain Axis in Elderly Persons

Written By

Ana-Maria Enciu, Elena Codrici, Simona Mihai, Emilia Manole, Sevinci Pop, Eleonora Codorean, Cristina Mariana Niculite, Laura Necula, Isabela Tarcomnicu, Elvira Gille and Cristiana Pistol Tanase

Submitted: 30 September 2017 Reviewed: 07 December 2017 Published: 04 July 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.73005

From the Edited Volume


Edited by Grazia D’Onofrio, Antonio Greco and Daniele Sancarlo

Chapter metrics overview

1,616 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


A rather new and somewhat unusual concept connects brain functions to gut microbiota. It is called “gut-brain axis” (or “microbiota-gut-brain axis”) and states that probiotics consumption and a healthy gut microbiota positively influence brain functions related to behavior and cognition. Synergistic with a low chronic grade peripheral inflammation, this faulty barrier exposes the aged brain to negative extra-cerebral signals. Given the quasi-constant failure of pharmacological treatments in neurodegenerative diseases, increased interest is directed toward allopathic medicine, including dietary supplements. Interplay between gut microbiota and central nervous system by immune, neural and metabolic pathways is being explored as a possible modulator of cognitive impairment and behavior disorders. In elderly persons, this axis has been reported to be altered, contributing to systemic inflammation and was also indicated as a possible marker for early frailty in younger population. Currently, there are several clinical trials addressing the relationship between gut microbiota and central nervous system psychiatric disorders and at least one directly investigating whether there is a correlation between composition of gut microbiome, permeability of intestinal barrier and systemic inflammation in patients with dementia. This chapter discusses evidence-based data on positive modulation of gut-brain axis to alleviate behavior and cognition alterations in the elderly.


  • nutraceuticals
  • gut-brain axis
  • microbiota
  • inflammaging
  • aging
  • neurodegeneration
  • anxiolytic

1. Introduction

In recent years, great progress has been made in characterizing bidirectional interactions between central nervous system (CNS), enteric nervous system and gastrointestinal tract. Dr Michael Gershon has defined the gut as “the second brain” [1] for several reasons: the enteric nervous system may function autonomously (it is capable of reflexes in the absence of CNS input), it can communicate with CNS through the parasympathetic (via vagal nerve) and sympathetic (via paravertebral ganglia) nervous system and is susceptible to neurotrophic and neuromodulators signaling.

The term gut-brain axis is often extended to include the role of intestinal flora in the system, in which case the axis is called microbiota-gut-brain axis. The microbiota is not limited to bacteria but also includes protozoa, fungi, nematodes and viruses, so that in the intestinal tract there are over 1000 species of bacteria out of a total of approximately 100 trillion organisms [2]. To maintain the homeostasis of such complex system, permanent correlation between the gut and the brain is essential.

The gastrointestinal microbiota has a symbiotic relationship with enteric cells and contributes to basic physiological processes such as digestion, growth and immune defense. The composition of an individual’s microbiota depends on the mode of delivery at birth, genetic predisposition, age, nutrition, physical activity, environmental factors, stress, infections, other diseases and the use of antibiotics [3].

Gut microbiota can influence the functioning of the CNS by the ability to synthesize or mimic some molecules such as host-signaling neuroactive molecules, for example, acetylcholine, catecholamine, g-aminobutyric acid (GABA), histamine, melatonin and serotonin [4]. Conversely, the composition of the microbiota is influenced by emotional and psychological stress [5], resulting, for example, in the decrease in Lactobacilli species or the increase of Clostridium species [6, 7]. Although communication between the components of the microbiota-gut-brain axis has been well established by preclinical and clinical studies (excellently reviewed in [8, 9, 10, 11]), the exact mechanisms by which this communication is made remains largely unknown. The interest in this research area began to consistently grow since the early 2000s, when one of the first papers to be published showed that germ-free (GF) mice exhibit an exaggerated hypothalamus-pituitary axis (HPA) response to stress compared to a normal mouse [12]. These results were later on confirmed by other studies on rodents grown in a germ-free (GF) environment that showed how gut microbiota influences the development of emotional behavior, stress and pain systems modulation, and the functioning of neurotransmitter systems in the brain [13, 14]. This communication between gut and brain was proven to be dependent on at least two elements such as vagus nerve signaling and specific bacterial species [15, 16, 17, 18]. Further on, the influence of gut microbiota composition on high cognitive processes and brain chemistry [19] was demonstrated by its modulation with probiotics and antibiotics [10, 20].

Studies on GF mice also highlighted another surprising relationship between gut microbiota and aging and in the occurrence of aging-related-diseases. It has been shown that GF mice live significantly longer than normal animals, probably due to the reduction of pathological infections, with a first report back in the mid 1960s [21], followed by others in mice [22, 23] Drosophila melanogaster [24], Caernohabditis elegans [25].

We shall further detail some topics related to the gut-brain axis in the elderly, like gut-brain alterations observed in preclinical and clinical studies, some data about neuro-nutraceuticals with a focus on mechanisms and gut-brain axis modulation with a final reference to clinical trials.


2. Evidence-based data of gut-brain axis alteration in aged laboratory animals

Aging is (so far) an irreversible process which impacts on all cell populations, with several common denominators such as genomic instability, epigenetic alterations and oxidative stress [26]. It equally affects gut lining and brain cells, but it also changes the gut microbiota composition [27, 28] which in turn is associated with behavioral and physiological modifications. An anxious behavioral phenotype was observed while transferring fecal microbiota between two strains of mice [10]. Also, fecal microbiota transplantation from depressed patients to microbiota-depleted rats may have the potential to provoke behavioral and physiological features specific to depression, including anhedonia, anxiety-like behaviors, as well as modifications in tryptophan metabolism, suggesting that gut microbiota could be an important player in neurobehavioral changes in the rat [29]. Reduced anxiety and depression-related comportment in mice were connected to dysregulated GABA signaling by metabolizing dietary glutamate through certain strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria [30]. Another study focused on the analysis of microbiota of aged mice. It is reported that, although composition differed significantly, there was only an insignificant overall increase in bacterial taxa, from that of young mice. At phylum level, the most common microbial taxa were Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. A few statistically significant differences in bacterial groups were noticed in aged mice. At the phylum level, TM7 was significantly higher, while at family level abundance less than 1%, significant increases in Porphyromondaceae, TM7 uncultured, Clostridiaceae, Thermoanaerobacteraceae, Desulfovibrionaceae and Oxalobacteraceae were seen in aged mice compared to young. Genera Odoribacter was much higher in the aged group whereas, other bacterial genera, including Butyricimonas, TM7 uncultured, Gelria, Anaerosporobacter, Clostridium and Oxalobacter had significant increases in aged mice. The Chao 1 index (which estimates species richness), the number of observed species and the phylogenetic diversity, the Shannon Index (alpha diversity) and beta diversity were higher in the aged compared with young groups. Also, gut permeability in young and aged mice prior to and after 1 h of restraint stress was assessed, proved that aged mice had significantly greater basal intestinal permeability than young mice [31].


3. Evidence of gut-brain axis alteration in old patients

Each human organism hosts a widely diverse population of microbes that form a “metaorganism” (comprising 10 bacterial cells for every one of our own) [32]. This metaorganism, which is now studied thoroughly in major scientific endeavors such as Human Microbiome Project [33], impacts on its host as much as the human host changes it back throughout different life stages. Microbial diversity and intestinal microflora stability decrease with age [27, 28] and are accompanied by a reduction in brain function and a decrease in cognitive abilities [34, 35]. Furthermore, alteration of gut microbiota homeostasis, through dietary or environmental factors, can lead to an imbalance between symbionts and pathobionts, resulting in reduced intestinal barrier function such as a dysbiosis state can be related to subsequent metabolic and inflammatory disorders, visceral pain and even alterations in brain functioning [36]. Other studies have shown that while the microbial composition of the gut changes with age, it is not a linear process. The two dominant phyla in younger persons, Bacteroides and Firmicutes, remain prominent at older ages, but there are supposed to be changes in the percentage of these phyla, a fact still under discussion. Other studies support the prevalence of potentially pathogenic bacteria (e.g. proteobacteria) that are detrimental for symbiotic beneficial bacteria (e.g. species of Bifidobacteria) [37]. In this regard, there is an increased interest in the putative role of microbial gut in the fragility and vulnerability associated with the aging process.

Gut microbiota and extreme longevity are the main topics of several interesting studies. There are evidence that extreme aging might be supported by subdominant gut microbiota species, along with pro-inflammatory species and health-associated taxa [38]. Another study was focused on long-lived Chinese people and gut microbiota, with a special reference to the above-mentioned study. Significant differences in community membership and structures between the Italian and Chinese long-living groups were observed, attributed to many factors such as geography, genetics, diets and DNA-extraction methods [39].

These findings emphasize the importance of sampling a healthy population, both in terms of age, geographic and cultural traditions in order to identify features of gut microbiomes signatures related to age [40].

Age-associated alterations in gut microbiota are associated with subsequent decline with age in the functionality of the immune system (immunosenescence) and a chronic low-grade inflammatory status, partially due to increased intestinal permeability and increased colonic cytokine expression (inflammaging) [41]. The inflammaging process can undermine the homeostatic equilibrium and accelerate the changes in gut microbiota structure and composition that could be related to the progression of diseases and frailty in the elderly population [42].

Mabbott et al. in 2015 [43] provided an important advance in our understanding on the effects of aging on intestinal permeability and innate mucosal immune responsiveness in elderly patients. Using human terminal ileal biopsy tissues, they demonstrated that intestinal permeability to solutes, but not macromolecules, was significantly increased in the intestines of elderly humans. Tran and Greenwood-Van Meerveld in 2013 [44] showed for the first time a pivotal contributing factor to geriatric vulnerability to gastrointestinal dysfunction may increase colonic permeability via age-associated remodeling of intestinal epithelial tight junction proteins. On the opposite side is a recent report by Valentini et al. that found no correlation between aging and increased intestinal permeability (or altered intestinal barrier), but mentioned low-grade inflammation as a possible favoring factor [45].

Age-related physiological modifications in the gastrointestinal tract undoubtedly affect the gut microbiota and high susceptibility to infections becomes an inevitable consequence. The gut microbiota homeostasis seem to play a crucial role for the gut well-being during the aging process and, in this perspective, dietary control of the gut microbiota of the elderly could be an important target for preserving a healthy gut microbiota community [42].


4. Neuro-nutraceuticals: definition, examples and mechanisms of action

Nutraceuticals are defined as “food or food product that provides medical or health benefits including the prevention and treatment of diseases” [46]. This concept is partially overlapping with the term “bioactive compounds” – “secondary plant metabolites eliciting pharmacological or toxicological effects in man and animals” [47]. Neuro-nutraceuticals are, by extrapolation, active compounds, obtained from food products or plants that exert effects on the CNS. They can be represented by vitamins, amino acids, minerals, trace elements, etc., with presumed health-promoting or disease-preventing effects. Oxidative stress, dysregulation of redox metals homeostasis and inflammation represent the main leading causes of brain aging and therefore the administration of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory molecules can be an important strategy for preventing brain aging and several brain age-related diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia and depression [48, 49].

However, the evaluation of nutraceutical efficacy and safety represents a big challenge due to the complex chemical compositions and multiple mode of actions [50]. Starting from chemical classification of bioactive compounds [47], several classes have been repeatedly associated with beneficial neurological effects. Flavonoids consist of a central three-ring structure and may occur as oligomers -proanthocyanidins. All compounds contain phenol groups with antioxidant effect. Many different polyphenols have been reported to retard age-related declines in CNS function, cognition and behavior. A polyphenol with the ability to modulate a multitude of signaling molecules and with antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties is curcumin, the active ingredient in the spice turmeric. Curcumin acting as an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and lipophilic agent can improve the cognitive functions in animal models and patients with Alzheimer’s disease by several mechanisms. Short-term supplementation of curcumin to aged rats enhanced the frequency of polysialylated cells in the dentate infragranular zone and significantly improved both spatial learning and memory in adult and aged rats [51]. The long-term curcumin-supplemented diet had a important effects on hippocampal cellular proliferation, cognitive function and transcriptional responses in aged rats and this response is dependent of the length of curcumin treatment [52]. Curcumin administration supported the immune system to reduce beta-amyloid plaques, ensures the delayed degradation of neurons and decreased microglia activation resulting in the improvement of overall memory [53]. Curcumin treatment could also improve the outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury by reducing acute activation of microglia/macrophages and neuronal apoptosis, demonstrated by in vivo experiments [54]. Eugenol (4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol), an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory molecule, found in various plants such as basil, cinnamon and other herbs is another nutraceutical with demonstrated roles in brain physiology. In the Drosophila model, eugenol manifests neuroprotective effects in acrylamide-induced neuropathy models. In vitro studies showed that eugenol enhanced the viability of neuroblastoma cell lines by reducing oxidative stress in experimental hyperglycemia. Moreover in diabetic rats, eugenol administration results in reduction of oxidative markers in brain with restoration of activities of mitochondrial complexes I, II and III [55, 56]. Other polyphenols (anthocyanin extract, pomegranate or resveratrol), exerted their anti-inflammatory effects by reducing TNF-a brain level and microgliosis or sirtuin activation in correlation with improving brain plasticity in non-transgenic AD animal models [57, 58]. Resveratrol positive effects were also related to the activation of AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) and the antioxidant transcription factorNrf2 (nuclear factor (erythroid derived 2)-like 2) [59]. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of resveratrol for patients with Alzheimer’s disease, resveratrol was detected in cerebrospinal fluid with beneficial effects such as the alteration of Alzheimer’s disease biomarker trajectories, the preservation of blood-brain barrier integrity and the modulation of the central nervous system immune response [60].

Methylxanthine alkaloids (found in coffee and cocoa) elicit stimulating neurological effects. Some tropane alkaloids are analgesics [61]. Aromatic compounds, terpenes/terpenoids and aliphatic molecules, particularly with low molecular weights, found in plant essential oils, were mentioned as free radicals scavengers and acetylcholine esterase inhibitors [62]. Some volatile oils were associated with anxiolytic and antidepressant effects, along with strong antioxidant effects [63].

Creatine is a nitrogenous organic acid found in animal tissues being involved in several critical processes in the brain such as the sustaining of energy supply, antioxidant processes and neuroprotection. Increased dietary intake of creatine can elevate brain creatine levels which can sustain cognitive function under oxidative and nitrosative stress. Several in vitro or even preclinical studies showed that creatine directly preserves mitochondrial function in adult neurodegenerative conditions [64, 65]. Clearly, mitochondrial impairment contributes directly and/or indirectly to the pathogenesis of numerous neurodegenerative disorders [66]. Exogenous creatine supplementation reduced neuronal cell loss in acute and chronic neurological diseases and promoted differentiation of neuronal precursor cells [67]. In vivo studies showed that maternal creatine supplementation during pregnancy protects the brain against the effects of severe birth asphyxia [68, 69].

A special class of food derivatives or food ingredients includes prebiotics and probiotics.

Prebiotics are defined as “nondigestible food ingredients that beneficially affect the host by selectively stimulating the growth or the activity of one or a limited number of bacteria (Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli) in the colon” [70]. From chemical perspective, they are fructooligosaccharides, enzymatically processed in the colon with positive impact on commensal flora. Fermentation of prebiotics generates short-chain fatty acids [71], which exert positive effects on integrity of epithelial barrier, but also on brain metabolism, as discussed later.

Probiotics are “viable microorganisms, sufficient amounts of which reach the intestine in an active state and thus exert positive health effects” [72]. The most commonly used probiotics are bacterial species (frequently, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, but also some E. coli and Bacillus species), but the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and can also be employed [73].

Both types of nutraceuticals exert positive effects beyond local, intestinal environment. Prebiotics were demonstrated to exhibit triglycerides and cholesterol-lowering effects [70], with beneficial effect on blood-brain barrier integrity and brain lipid metabolism. Among many local effects, it is worth mentioning that, related to gut-brain axis, probiotics modify the gut microbiota, which is the main determinant of tryptophan levels, the serotonin precursor, hence the documented effect of these food supplements as anxiety alleviators.

Throughout the next sections, some evidence of modulation of gut-brain axis with nutraceuticals in the elderly will be discussed, in relationship with experimental results from preclinical and clinical studies.


5. Modulation of gut-brain axis with nutraceuticals in the elderly: evidence-based benefits in animal models

Diet and altered gut physiology, together with age-related changes in intestinal microbiome and a weakened immune system [74, 75] result in low-grade inflammation in the gut, that is associated with systemic release of pro-inflammatory metabolites. Finally, the inflammatory process is related to glial cells activation, neuroinflammation and to cognitive decline in the elderly [37, 41].

A useful model for the study of gut-brain axis is the germ-free (GF) mouse. GF mice have socially impaired behavior [12] and present an exaggerated stress response [76] that can be directly correlated with changes occurring in different regions of the brain [13], depressed neurogenesis [77] and prefrontal cortical hypermyelination [78]. However, preclinical studies reveal that oral administration of probiotics and/or nutraceuticals is sufficient to reduce anxiety-like and depressive-like behaviors and to induce changes in brain chemistry [10, 79]. For example, the impaired microglial function in GF animals was rescued by the oral treatment with short-chain fatty acids [80]. Also, Distrutti et al. [81], showed that a probiotic mixture (VSL#3) induced a significant change in the composition of gut microbiota of aged rats and increased brain tissue expression of genes associated with inflammation and neural plasticity such as BDNF and synapsin.

The gut microbiome is also essential to the bioavailability of polyphenols, unsaturated fats and antioxidants, all of which may help protect against neuronal and cell aging under normal circumstances [82]. For example, the diet supplemented with blueberries (rich in anthocyanin and flavanols) improved spatial working memory in aged animals [83]. This process is accompanied by increases in neural stem cells proliferation, extracellular receptor kinase activation and increase of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level, the key modulator of hippocampal neurogenesis [84]. Also, aged rats consuming berry diets exhibited enhanced motor performance and improved cognition, correlated with increased hippocampal neurogenesis and expression of IGF-1 [85].

Since short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) seem to play an important role in shaping the gut microbiota metabolism, it was necessary to study the effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated acids (n-3 PUFA) on cognitive decline in aging. Animal studies have shed light on their neuroprotective roles through pathways of synaptic plasticity, neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, evidencing also positive correlations between peripheral n-3 PUFA levels and regional gray matter [86]. Supplementation of n-3 PUFA increased hippocampal neurogenesis and the fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA—an intermediate molecule in the metabolism of eicosapentaenoic acid) was able to down regulate microglial activation [87]. Furthermore, age-related decline in c-Fos expression, that reflects neuronal response to extracellular signals such as growth factors and is triggered during action potentials, is attenuated by n-3 PUFA diet [88]. The protective role of n-3 PUFA supplementation in counteracting cognitive decline, emotional dysfunctions and brain atrophy is governed by antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms [86, 89]. Some evidence in animal models suggested that long-term consumption of fish oil (rich in n-3 PUFA) may predispose the brain to lipid oxidation. The enrichment of fish oil with quercetin significantly attenuated behavioral impairments, restored the ROT-induced oxidative markers, depleted dopamine levels in striatum and reduced mitochondrial dysfunction, offering a higher neuroprotection in animal model [90].

Phytosterols, a class of nutraceuticals derivated from plant foods, have been demonstrated to possess cholesterol-lowering, antioxidant effects and recently neuroprotective role on cognitive deficit induced by a cholesterol-enriched diet in aged rats. The phytosterol ester (PSE) treatment maintained the body weight balance, reduced serum lipid levels and improved the cognitive performance of aged rats in the Morris water maze test. Importantly, histological and immunohistochemical results in the brain showed that PSE supplementation alleviates neuroinflammation by significantly increasing the number of pyramidal cells and decreasing the number of astrocytes. Furthermore, PSE improved cholinergic activities by restoring the acetylcholine (ACh) content and decreasing acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity in the cerebral cortex, as well as by elevating choline acetyl transferase (ChAT) activity in the hippocampus and the cerebral cortex [91].

In conclusion, preclinical studies support the rationale of further clinical testing of nutritional strategies to improve aged brain function, including the use of bioactive compounds with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory or neuroprotective properties in the diet of the elderly.


6. Neuro-nutraceuticals/gut-brain axis targeting in clinical trials

The direct modulation of gut microbiome by targeted dietary and probiotic uptake seem to have a positive impact in treating particular age-related disorders and represent a promising therapeutic option for the aging process itself [28]. Well supported evidence came from findings from ELDERMET, a research consortium ( which studied and characterized the gut microbiota in an Irish elderly population anti its relationship to mental health in aging [92]. As a consequence of a growing body of evidence regarding a positive correlation between the health of gut microbiota and brain health, funding for clinical research is also spent for study of modulation of gut-brain axis with impact on healthy aging and mental health.

Clinical trials targeting not only the cross-talk between the gut microbiota and the central nervous system focus on its association with various neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders (anxiety, depression, dementia, etc.), but also on its involvement in the regulation of hunger/satiety and in pathologies affecting the digestive tract (Table 1). The therapeutic solutions investigated these clinical trials involve the use of prebiotics and probiotics, dietary changes and fecal microbiota transplant.

No.Clinical trialMain objectiveStatusReference
1Microbiome and the gut-brain axisTo examine the relationship between digestive tract microbes and mental healthCompleted
2Microbiome and dementiaTo study the role of gut microbiome composition and gut permeability in the progression of dementiaRecruiting
3Full4Health: understanding food-gut-brain axis across the life courseTo examine how dietary manipulation influences the relationship between hunger/satiety/food preference and gut hormones, neural activation and energy metabolismCompleted
4Oral fecal transplant in cirrhosisTo evaluate the safety and tolerability of oral fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathyRecruiting
5Reduced appetite in Crohn’s disease: the role of the brain in the control of food intakeTo investigate the changes in activity in areas of the brain that control food intakeRecruiting
6FMT treating constipation patients with depression and/or anxiety symptoms - clinical efficacy and potential mechanismsTo observe the clinical efficiency of fecal microbiota transplant and the role of the gut microbiome in treating patients with constipation, depression and/or anxietyRecruiting
7Prebiotic intake reduces the waking cortisol response
and alters emotional bias in healthy volunteers
To investigate the effects of two prebiotics on the secretion of cortisol and emotional response in healthy individualsCompleted[93]
8A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of a probiotic in emotional symptoms of chronic fatigue syndromeTo study how the administration of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota affects the mood of patients with chronic fatigue syndromeCompleted[94]
9Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjectsTo study the effects of probiotic formulations on stress, anxiety, depression and coping strategies in healthy volunteersCompleted[95]
10A randomized controlled trial to test the effect of multispecies probiotics on cognitive reactivity to sad moodTo evaluate whether a multispecies probiotic formulation can reduce cognitive reactivity in non-depressed individualsCompleted[96]
11Metabolic effect of new foods through gut-brain axisTo measure the effectiveness of coffee melanoidins, bread melanoidins, beta-glucans and a Gentiana lutea L. extract in decreasing energy intake and modifying the physiological markers of satiety in the short termRecruiting
12FMT for patients with IBS with fecal and mucosal microbiota assessmentTo assess the efficiency of fecal microbiota transplant in treating irritable bowel syndromeRecruiting
13Effects of green-MED diet via the gut-fat-brain axisTo investigate the effect of a Mediterranean diet low in processed meat on the gut microbiota and age-related declines (changes in adiposity, cognitive function and cardiometabolic risk)Recruiting
14The clinical research on the relationship between circadian rhythm and gut microbiota in TBI patientsTo examine whether the gut microbiota is involved in the modulation of sleep disorders in patients with brain traumatic injuryRecruiting

Table 1.

Clinical trials related to investigation of gut-brain axis in relationship with mental health.

Reports of already completed trials support the findings of preclinical trials, demonstrating that modulation of gut microbiota results in anxiolytic effect without a direct intervention on neurotransmitter circuitries. For example, the reported results of Schmidt et al. [93], after completion of trial, supported previous evidence that fructooligosaccharides, or Bimuno®-galactooligosaccharides supplementation lowered neuroendocrine stress response, measured by cortisol awakening response. Rao et al. [94] reported that supplementation with specific lactic acid probiotic bacteria for 8 weeks improved the anxiety scores of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. A complex report by Messaoudi et al. [95], involving both laboratory rats as well as healthy human volunteers showed that supplementation with a combination of Lactobacillus helveticus and Bifidobacterium longum displayed beneficial psychological effect. Finally, a recent publication regarding the effect of “4-week multispecies probiotics intervention showed a significantly reduced overall cognitive reactivity to sad mood”, [96]. These results open a promising avenue not only for age-related mental disorders, but also for selected cases of psychiatric pathologies.


7. Conclusions

Gut-brain axis is a bidirectional chemical network sending information between the intestine and the brain via soluble, chemical messages as well as nervous sympathetic and parasympathetic inputs. A third player with a determinant role in the health of both systems is the gut microbiota. Aging affects all players of the microbiota-gut-brain axis, leading to modified composition of bacterial taxa, chronic low-grade inflammation, modified intestinal metabolism, resulting in diminished availability of neurotransmitters or neurotransmitter precursors and short-chain fatty acids. Along with synaptic impairment, oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, aging leads to behavior alterations, anxiety and cognitive impairment. Interventions on gut-brain axis with nutraceuticals (food or food-derived products that have putative beneficial effects) alleviate some age-associated behavioral and cognitive alterations, as repeatedly demonstrated in animal models. Recently, clinical trials have begun to explore the beneficial effect of gut-brain axis modulation, in mood or cognition-associated disorders. Upon reports of positive results, gut-brain axis emerges as an important, easy to access target for promoting a healthy brain aging.



This work has been supported by National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation (ANCSI), Program POC Axis 1 Action 1.2.3. Grant ID P_40_197, Contract No. 52/05.09.2016.


  1. 1. Gershon MD, editor. The Second Brain: The Scientific Basis of Gut Instinct and a Groundbreaking New Understanding of Nervous Disorders of the Stomach and Intestines. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publ; 1998
  2. 2. Frank DN, Pace NR. Gastrointestinal microbiology enters the metagenomics era. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. 2008;24(1):4-10. DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282f2b0e8
  3. 3. Petra AI, Panagiotidou S, Hatziagelaki E, Stewart JM, Conti P, et al. Gut-microbiota-brain Axis and its effect on neuropsychiatric disorders with suspected immune dysregulation. Clinical Therapeutics. 2015;37(5):984-995. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.04.002
  4. 4. Barrett E, Ross RP, O'Toole PW, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C. Gamma-aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine. Journal of applied microbiology. 2012;113(2):411-417. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05344.x
  5. 5. Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Regulation of the stress response by the gut microbiota: Implications for psychoneuroendocrinology. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37(9):1369-1378. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.03.007
  6. 6. Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Melancholic microbes: A link between gut microbiota and depression? Neurogastroenterology and Motility: The Official Journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society. 2013;25(9):713-719. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12198
  7. 7. Bailey MT, Lubach GR, Coe CL. Prenatal stress alters bacterial colonization of the gut in infant monkeys. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2004;38(4):414-421
  8. 8. Mayer EA. The neurobiology of stress and gastrointestinal disease. Gut. 2000;47(6):861-869
  9. 9. Rhee SH, Pothoulakis C, Mayer EA. Principles and clinical implications of the brain-gut-enteric microbiota axis. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2009;6(5):306-314. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.35
  10. 10. Bercik P, Denou E, Collins J, Jackson W, Lu J, et al. The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(2):599-609; e591-593. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.052
  11. 11. Cryan JF, O'Mahony SM. The microbiome-gut-brain axis: From bowel to behavior. Neurogastroenterology and Motility: The Official Journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society. 2011;23(3):187-192. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01664.x
  12. 12. Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. The Journal of Physiology. 2004;558(Pt 1):263-275. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063388
  13. 13. Diaz Heijtz R, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Bjorkholm B, et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(7):3047-3052. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1010529108
  14. 14. Neufeld KM, Kang N, Bienenstock J, Foster JA. Reduced anxiety-like behavior and central neurochemical change in germ-free mice. Neurogastroenterology and Motility: The Official Journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society. 2011;23(3):255-264, e119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01620.x
  15. 15. Bercik P, Park AJ, Sinclair D, Khoshdel A, Lu J, et al. The anxiolytic effect of Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 involves vagal pathways for gut-brain communication. Neurogastroenterology and Motility: The Official Journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society. 2011;23(12):1132-1139. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01796.x
  16. 16. Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savignac HM, et al. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(38):16050-16055. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1102999108
  17. 17. Lyte M, Li W, Opitz N, Gaykema RP, Goehler LE. Induction of anxiety-like behavior in mice during the initial stages of infection with the agent of murine colonic hyperplasia Citrobacter rodentium. Physiology & Behavior. 2006;89(3):350-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.06.019
  18. 18. Bercik P, Verdu EF, Foster JA, Macri J, Potter M, et al. Chronic gastrointestinal inflammation induces anxiety-like behavior and alters central nervous system biochemistry in mice. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(6):2102-2112. e2101. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.063
  19. 19. Kawase T, Nagasawa M, Ikeda H, Yasuo S, Koga Y, et al. Gut microbiota of mice putatively modifies amino acid metabolism in the host brain. The British Journal of Nutrition. 2017;117(6):775-783. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114517000678
  20. 20. Li W, Dowd SE, Scurlock B, Acosta-Martinez V, Lyte M. Memory and learning behavior in mice is temporally associated with diet-induced alterations in gut bacteria. Physiology & Behavior. 2009;96(4-5):557-567. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.12.004
  21. 21. Gordon HA, Bruckner-Kardoss E, Wostmann BS. Aging in germ-free mice: Life tables and lesions observed at natural death. Journal of Gerontology. 1966;21(3):380-387
  22. 22. Tazume S, Umehara K, Matsuzawa H, Aikawa H, Hashimoto K, et al. Effects of germfree status and food restriction on longevity and growth of mice. Jikken Dobutsu Experimental Animals. 1991;40(4):517-522
  23. 23. Cardona P-J, Matsumoto M, Kurihara S, Kibe R, Ashida H, et al. Longevity in mice is promoted by probiotic-induced suppression of colonic senescence dependent on upregulation of gut bacterial polyamine production. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23652. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023652
  24. 24. Blum JE, Fischer CN, Miles J, Handelsman J. Frequent replenishment sustains the beneficial microbiome of Drosophila melanogaster. mBio Journal. 2013;4(6):e00860-e00813. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00860-13
  25. 25. Kwon G, Lee J, Lim Y-H. Dairy Propionibacterium extends the mean lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans via activation of the innate immune system. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1038/srep31713
  26. 26. Lopez-Otin C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194-1217. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039
  27. 27. Saraswati S, Sitaraman R. Aging and the human gut microbiota from correlation to causality. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;5:1-4. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00764
  28. 28. Vaiserman AM, Koliada AK, Marotta F. Gut microbiota: A player in aging and a target for anti-aging intervention. Ageing Research Reviews. 2017;35:36-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.001
  29. 29. Kelly JR, Borre Y, OB C, Patterson E, El Aidy S, et al. Transferring the blues: Depression-associated gut microbiota induces neurobehavioural changes in the rat. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2016;82:109-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.019
  30. 30. Kelly JR, Clarke G, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Brain-gut-microbiota axis: Challenges for translation in psychiatry. Annals of Epidemiology. 2016;26(5):366-372. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.02.008
  31. 31. Scott KA, Ida M, Peterson VL, Prenderville JA, Moloney GM, et al. Revisiting Metchnikoff: Age-related alterations in microbiota-gut-brain axis in the mouse. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2017;65:20-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.02.004
  32. 32. Heintz C, Mair W. You are what you host: Microbiome modulation of the aging process. Cell. 2014;156(3):408-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.025
  33. 33. Cho I, Yamanishi S, Cox L, Methe BA, Zavadil J, et al. Antibiotics in early life alter the murine colonic microbiome and adiposity. Nature. 2012;488(7413):621-626. DOI: 10.1038/nature11400
  34. 34. Borre YE, O'Keeffe GW, Clarke G, Stanton C, Dinan TG, et al. Microbiota and neurodevelopmental windows: Implications for brain disorders. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2014;20(9):509-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.05.002
  35. 35. Flint HJ, O'Toole PW, Walker AW. Special issue: The human intestinal microbiota. Microbiology. 2010;156(Pt 11):3203-3204. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.045443-0
  36. 36. Oriach CS, Robertson RC, Stanton C, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Food for thought: The role of nutrition in the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Clinical Nutrition Experimental. 2016;6:25-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.yclnex.2016.01.003
  37. 37. Caracciolo B, Xu W, Collins S, Fratiglioni L. Cognitive decline, dietary factors and gut-brain interactions. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2014;136-137:59-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2013.11.011
  38. 38. Biagi E, Franceschi C, Rampelli S, Severgnini M, Ostan R, et al. Gut microbiota and extreme longevity. Current Biology: CB. 2016;26(11):1480-1485. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.016
  39. 39. Kong F, Hua Y, Zeng B, Ning R, Li Y, et al. Gut microbiota signatures of longevity. Current Biology: CB. 2016;26(18):R832-R833. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.015
  40. 40. Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012;486(7402):222-227. DOI: 10.1038/nature11053
  41. 41. Franceschi C, Bonafe M, Valensin S, Olivieri F, De Luca M, et al. Inflamm-aging. An evolutionary perspective on immunosenescence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2000;908:244-254
  42. 42. Biagi E, Nylund L, Candela M, Ostan R, Bucci L, et al. Through ageing, and beyond: Gut microbiota and inflammatory status in seniors and centenarians. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10667. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010667
  43. 43. Mabbott NA, Kobayashi A, Sehgal A, Bradford BM, Pattison M, et al. Aging and the mucosal immune system in the intestine. Biogerontology. 2015;16(2):133-145. DOI: 10.1007/s10522-014-9498-z
  44. 44. Tran L, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B. Age-associated remodeling of the intestinal epithelial barrier. The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2013;68(9):1045-1056. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glt106
  45. 45. Valentini L, Ramminger S, Haas V, Postrach E, Werich M, et al. Small intestinal permeability in older adults. Physiological Reports. 2014;2(4):e00281-e00281. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.281
  46. 46. Abd El-Salam MH, El-Shibiny S. Preparation, properties, and uses of enzymatic milk protein hydrolysates. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2017;57(6):1119-1132. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2014.899200
  47. 47. Bernhoft A. Bioactive compounds in plants: Benefits and risks for man and animals. In: Proceedings from a Symposium Held in Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Nov 13-14, 2008. Oslo: Novus Forlag; 2010
  48. 48. Sarubbo F, Moranta D, Asensio VJ, Miralles A, Esteban S. Effects of resveratrol and other polyphenols on the most common brain age-related diseases. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2017;24(38):4245 - 4266. DOI: 10.2174/0929867324666170724102743
  49. 49. Mandel SA, Weinreb O, Amit T, Youdim MB. Molecular mechanisms of the neuroprotective/neurorescue action of multi-target green tea polyphenols. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2012;4:581-598
  50. 50. Sut S, Baldan V, Faggian M, Peron G, Dall Acqua S. Nutraceuticals, a new challenge for medicinal chemistry. Current medicinal chemistry. 2016;23(28):3198-3223
  51. 51. Conboy L, Foley AG, O'Boyle NM, Lawlor M, Gallagher HC, et al. Curcumin-induced degradation of PKC delta is associated with enhanced dentate NCAM PSA expression and spatial learning in adult and aged Wistar rats. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2009;77(7):1254-1265. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.12.011
  52. 52. Dong S, Zeng Q, Mitchell ES, Xiu J, Duan Y, et al. Curcumin enhances neurogenesis and cognition in aged rats: Implications for transcriptional interactions related to growth and synaptic plasticity. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31211. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031211
  53. 53. Mishra S, Palanivelu K. The effect of curcumin (turmeric) on Alzheimer's disease: An overview. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2008;11(1):13-19. DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.40220
  54. 54. Zhu HT, Bian C, Yuan JC, Chu WH, Xiang X, et al. Curcumin attenuates acute inflammatory injury by inhibiting the TLR4/MyD88/NF-kappaB signaling pathway in experimental traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:59. DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-59
  55. 55. Prasad SN, Bharath MM, Muralidhara. Neurorestorative effects of eugenol, a spice bioactive: Evidence in cell model and its efficacy as an intervention molecule to abrogate brain oxidative dysfunctions in the streptozotocin diabetic rat. Neurochemistry International. 2016;95:24-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2015.10.012
  56. 56. Prasad SN, Muralidhara. Evidence of acrylamide induced oxidative stress and neurotoxicity in Drosophila melanogaster – Its amelioration with spice active enrichment: Relevance to neuropathy. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33(5):1254-1264. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2012.07.006
  57. 57. Porquet D, Casadesus G, Bayod S, Vicente A, Canudas AM, et al. Dietary resveratrol prevents Alzheimer's markers and increases life span in SAMP8. Age. 2013;35(5):1851-1865. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-012-9489-4
  58. 58. Pena-Altamira E, Petralla S, Massenzio F, Virgili M, Bolognesi ML, et al. Nutritional and pharmacological strategies to regulate microglial polarization in cognitive aging and Alzheimer's disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2017;9(175):1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00175
  59. 59. Lopez MS, Dempsey RJ, Vemuganti R. Resveratrol neuroprotection in stroke and traumatic CNS injury. Neurochemistry International. 2015;89:75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2015.08.009
  60. 60. Sawda C, Moussa C, Turner RS. Resveratrol for Alzheimer's disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2017;1403(1):142-149. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13431
  61. 61. Kukula-Koch WA, Widelski J. Chapter 9 – Alkaloids A2 – Badal, Simone. In: Delgoda R, editor. Pharmacognosy. Boston: Academic Press; 2017. pp. 163-198
  62. 62. Ayaz M, Sadiq A, Junaid M, Ullah F, Subhan F, et al. Neuroprotective and anti-aging potentials of essential oils from aromatic and medicinal plants. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2017;9:1-16. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00168
  63. 63. Cioanca O, Hritcu L, Mihasan M, Trifan A, Hancianu M. Inhalation of coriander volatile oil increased anxiolytic–antidepressant-like behaviors and decreased oxidative status in beta-amyloid (1-42) rat model of Alzheimer's disease. Physiology & Behavior. 2014;131:68-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.04.021
  64. 64. Rae CD, Broer S. Creatine as a booster for human brain function. How might it work? Neurochemistry International. 2015;89:249-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2015.08.010
  65. 65. Williams RJ, Mohanakumar KP, Beart PM. Neuro-nutraceuticals: Further insights into their promise for brain health. Neurochemistry International. 2016;95:1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2016.03.016
  66. 66. Adhihetty PJ, Beal MF. Creatine and its potential therapeutic value for targeting cellular energy impairment in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuromolecular Medicine. 2008;10(4):275-290. DOI: 10.1007/s12017-008-8053-y
  67. 67. Andres RH, Ducray AD, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Widmer HR. Functions and effects of creatine in the central nervous system. Brain Research Bulletin. 2008;76(4):329-343. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.02.035
  68. 68. Ellery SJ, Ireland Z, Kett MM, Snow R, Walker DW, et al. Creatine pretreatment prevents birth asphyxia-induced injury of the newborn spiny mouse kidney. Pediatric Research. 2013;73(2):201-208. DOI: 10.1038/pr.2012.174
  69. 69. LaRosa DA, Ellery SJ, Snow RJ, Walker DW, Dickinson H. Maternal creatine supplementation during pregnancy prevents acute and long-term deficits in skeletal muscle after birth asphyxia: A study of structure and function of hind limb muscle in the spiny mouse. Pediatric Research. 2016;80(6):852-860. DOI: 10.1038/pr.2016.153
  70. 70. Delzenne NM, Williams CM. Prebiotics and lipid metabolism. Current Opinion in Lipidology. 2002;13(1):61-67
  71. 71. Shen Q, Zhao L, Tuohy KM. High-level dietary fibre up-regulates colonic fermentation and relative abundance of saccharolytic bacteria within the human faecal microbiota in vitro. European Journal of Nutrition. 2012;51(6):693-705. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-011-0248-6
  72. 72. de Vrese M, Schrezenmeir J. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology. 2008;111:1-66.10.1007/10_2008_097
  73. 73. WGO Practice Guideline – Probiotics and Prebiotics. Available from:
  74. 74. Salazar N, Arboleya S, Valdes L, Stanton C, Ross P, et al. The human intestinal microbiome at extreme ages of life. Dietary intervention as a way to counteract alterations. Frontiers in Genetics. 2014;5(406):1-9. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00406
  75. 75. Rondanelli M, Giacosa A, Faliva MA, Perna S, Allieri F, et al. Review on microbiota and effectiveness of probiotics use in older. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2015;3(2):156-162. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i2.156
  76. 76. Desbonnet L, Clarke G, Traplin A, O'Sullivan O, Crispie F, et al. Gut microbiota depletion from early adolescence in mice: Implications for brain and behaviour. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2015;48:165-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.04.004
  77. 77. Collins SM, Kassam Z, Bercik P. The adoptive transfer of behavioral phenotype via the intestinal microbiota: Experimental evidence and clinical implications. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2013;16(3):240-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.06.004
  78. 78. Stilling RM, Ryan FJ, Hoban AE, Shanahan F, Clarke G, et al. Microbes & neurodevelopment – Absence of microbiota during early life increases activity-related transcriptional pathways in the amygdala. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2015;50:209-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.07.009
  79. 79. Messaoudi M, Violle N, Bisson JF, Desor D, Javelot H, et al. Beneficial psychological effects of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in healthy human volunteers. Gut Microbes. 2011;2(4):256-261. DOI: 10.4161/gmic.2.4.16108
  80. 80. Erny D, Hrabe de Angelis AL, Jaitin D, Wieghofer P, Staszewski O, et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nature Neuroscience. 2015;18(7):965-977. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4030
  81. 81. Distrutti E, Cipriani S, Mencarelli A, Renga B, Fiorucci S. Probiotics VSL#3 protect against development of visceral pain in murine model of irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63893. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063893
  82. 82. Rogers GB, Keating DJ, Young RL, Wong ML, Licinio J, et al. From gut dysbiosis to altered brain function and mental illness: Mechanisms and pathways. Molecular Psychiatry. 2016;21(6):738-748. DOI: 10.1038/mp.2016.50
  83. 83. Spencer JP. The impact of fruit flavonoids on memory and cognition. The British Journal of Nutrition. 2010;104(Suppl 3):S40-S47. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114510003934
  84. 84. Casadesus G, Shukitt-Hale B, Stellwagen HM, Zhu X, Lee HG, et al. Modulation of hippocampal plasticity and cognitive behavior by short-term blueberry supplementation in aged rats. Nutritional Neuroscience. 2004;7(5-6):309-316. DOI: 10.1080/10284150400020482
  85. 85. Shukitt-Hale B, Bielinski DF, Lau FC, Willis LM, Carey AN, et al. The beneficial effects of berries on cognition, motor behaviour and neuronal function in ageing. The British Journal of Nutrition. 2015;114(10):1542-1549. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515003451
  86. 86. Cutuli D, Pagani M, Caporali P, Galbusera A, Laricchiuta D, et al. Effects of Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on cognitive functions and neural substrates: A voxel-based Morphometry study in aged mice. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2016;8(38):1-14. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00038
  87. 87. Kelly L, Grehan B, Chiesa AD, O'Mara SM, Downer E, et al. The polyunsaturated fatty acids, EPA and DPA exert a protective effect in the hippocampus of the aged rat. Neurobiology of Aging. 2011;32(12):2318. e2311-e2315. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.04.001
  88. 88. Hussain G, Schmitt F, Loeffler JP, Gonzalez de Aguilar JL. Fatting the brain: A brief of recent research. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2013;7(144):1-14. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00144
  89. 89. Cutuli D, De Bartolo P, Caporali P, Laricchiuta D, Foti F, et al. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids supplementation enhances hippocampal functionality in aged mice. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2014;6(220):1-17. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00220
  90. 90. Denny Joseph KM, Muralidhara. Combined oral supplementation of fish oil and quercetin enhances neuroprotection in a chronic rotenone rat model: Relevance to Parkinson's disease. Neurochemical Research. 2015;40(5):894-905. DOI: 10.1007/s11064-015-1542-0
  91. 91. Rui X, Wenfang L, Jing C, Meng C, Chengcheng D, et al. Neuroprotective effects of phytosterol esters against high cholesterol-induced cognitive deficits in aged rat. Food & Function. 2017;8(3):1323-1332. DOI: 10.1039/c6fo01656a
  92. 92. Claesson MJ, Jeffery IB, Conde S, Power SE, O'Connor EM, et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature. 2012;488(7410):178-184. DOI: 10.1038/nature11319
  93. 93. Schmidt K, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ, Tzortzis G, Errington S, et al. Prebiotic intake reduces the waking cortisol response and alters emotional bias in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232(10):1793-1801. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-014-3810-0
  94. 94. Rao AV, Bested AC, Beaulne TM, Katzman MA, Iorio C, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of a probiotic in emotional symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome. Gut Pathogens. 2009;1(1):6. DOI: 10.1186/1757-4749-1-6
  95. 95. Messaoudi M, Lalonde R, Violle N, Javelot H, Desor D, et al. Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects. The British Journal of Nutrition. 2011;105(5):755-764. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114510004319
  96. 96. Steenbergen L, Sellaro R, van Hemert S, Bosch JA, Colzato LS. A randomized controlled trial to test the effect of multispecies probiotics on cognitive reactivity to sad mood. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2015;48:258-264. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.04.003

Written By

Ana-Maria Enciu, Elena Codrici, Simona Mihai, Emilia Manole, Sevinci Pop, Eleonora Codorean, Cristina Mariana Niculite, Laura Necula, Isabela Tarcomnicu, Elvira Gille and Cristiana Pistol Tanase

Submitted: 30 September 2017 Reviewed: 07 December 2017 Published: 04 July 2018