Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Copper Metal for Semiconductor Interconnects

Written By

Yi-Lung Cheng, Chih-Yen Lee and Yao-Liang Huang

Submitted: June 28th, 2017 Reviewed: November 13th, 2017 Published: January 26th, 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72396

Chapter metrics overview

2,591 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Resistance-capacitance (RC) delay produced by the interconnects limits the speed of the integrated circuits from 0.25 mm technology node. Copper (Cu) had been used to replace aluminum (Al) as an interconnecting conductor in order to reduce the resistance. In this chapter, the deposition method of Cu films and the interconnect fabrication with Cu metallization are introduced. The resulting integration and reliability challenges are addressed as well.

Keywords

  • Cu interconnects
  • BEOL
  • damascene
  • resistivity
  • reliability

1. Introduction

During the last about 50 years, Si-based integrated circuits (ICs) have been developed with numerous applications in the computer, communication, and consumer electronics industries. There has also been tremendous progress in the manufacturing of ICs over the past 60 years. The minimum feature size has advanced from 10 μm down to 10 nm, the cost per transistor has decreased by seven orders of magnitude, and the maximum number of transistors per chip has increased by at least 10 orders of magnitude [1]. Generally, technology node advances every 2 years with the shrinkage of the feature size by 0.7 times. Hence, the area of IC chip can be approximately reduced by 50%, resulting in doubling of the IC chips produced in a fixed area.

The main purpose of continuous scaling of the device dimensions is to improve the performance of the semiconductor microprocessors and to pack more devices in the same area. However, as the technology node is advanced to 0.25 μm, the back-end-of-line (BEOL) interconnect of ICs becomes the bottleneck in the improvement of IC performance [2]. In other words, as the feature size of ICs is continuously scaling down, the speed of the device increases due to a shorter channel length, although, resistance-capacitance (RC) delay produced by the interconnects limits the chip speed. This RCdelay is the product of the dielectric capacitance (C) and the conductor resistance (R), which can be calculated according to Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively.

C=kLTSE1
R=ρLWTE2

where kis dielectric constant and ρis metal resistivity. L, W, and Tare the length, width, and thickness of metal line, respectively. Sis the spacing between metal lines.

Table 1 provides the estimated critical dimensions of the BEOL interconnect from 90 to 7 nm technology nodes. As shown, with the advance of the technology node, the smaller line width and pitch result in the increased resistance of the metal lines and the increased capacitance between the neighboring metal lines. This leads to a larger RCdelay in the advanced technology nodes, which surpasses the gate delay and becomes a limiting factor in ICs performance [3, 4, 5, 6].

Table 1.

Interconnect dimensions with technology nodes.

In order to slow down the increase of RCdelay, the possible solution is to change the materials used in the BEOL interconnects. A dielectric film with the relative dielectric constant (k) lower than 4.0 (called low-k) had replaced a conventional chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-SiO2 film with a kvalue of 4.0 as an interconnect insulator because it can provide lower capacitance between the neighboring metal lines. The low-kmaterials currently used in the BEOL interconnects are SiOF (k = 3.5–3.8), SiCOH (k = 2.2–3.2), or air gap (k~1.0) [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. On the other hand, to reduce the resistance of BEOL interconnects, a metal material with a lower resistivity (ρ) than that of aluminum (Al), which is the traditional conductor used in 3.0–0.25 μm technology nodes, is considered to be a candidate to replace Al conductor. Table 2 lists the electrical resistivity for different metals. Among all metals in the world, three kinds of metal have lower resistivity than Al with a resistivity of 2.65 Ωμ-cm: Gold (Au; 2.214 Ωμ cm), copper (Cu; 1.678 Ωμ cm), and silver (Ag: 1.587 Ωμ cm). Compared with these three metals, Cu has been recognized to be a candidate as a conductor in the BEOL interconnects for integration consideration. Additionally, higher electromigration reliability than Al by at least 10 times is another advantage for Cu as a conductor because Cu has a lower diffusivity than Al. Based on these reasons, semiconductor industries are fully transitioning toward using Cu instead of Al in future IC applications [12, 13, 14, 15].

Table 2.

Melting point and resistivity of different metals.

In this connection, this chapter is an attempt to provide an overview of Cu conductor used in the BEOL interconnects of ICs in the past, present, and future. This chapter is organized as follows: in Section 2, we describe the process flow of Cu damascene metallization. Then, in Section 3, the deposition methods of Cu metal are introduced and compared. Next, the integration and reliability issues of Cu metallization are discussed in Sections 4 and 5, respectively. Finally, short conclusion and future trend for conductors used in the BEOL interconnects are provided in Section 6.

Advertisement

2. Copper damascene metallization

Unlike Al metallization, Cu cannot be easily patterned by reactive ion etching (RIE) due to the low volatility of Cu etching by-products, such as Cu chlorides and Cu fluorides [16, 17]. Hence, to fabricate Cu interconnects, a different process flow which is called “damascene” process has been developed, including “single damascene” and “dual damascene” processes [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23]. In the “single damascene” process, only trench or via is fabricated after completing the process. While in the dual damascene process, both via and trench can be fabricated simultaneously, in which both via and trench can be performed with the same metallization step. Thus, Cu interconnects are usually fabricated by cost-effective dual damascene technology.

In order to fabricate Cu dual damascene interconnects, various process flows were developed. “Via first” and “Trench first” dual damascene processes are commonly used, as plotted in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Via first (B1–D1) and Trench first (B2–D2) approaches for dual damascene patterning. (A) Dielectrics (SiN/SiCN, SiCOH, SiO2) deposition; (B1) Via-1 lithography and RIE; (B2) M-2 trench lithography and RIE; (C1) ARC plug; (C2) Via-1 lithography; (D1) M-2 trench lithography and RIE and etching stop layer opening; (D2) Via-1 RIE; (E) metal barrier and Cu seed deposition; (F) electroplating Cu deposition; and (G) Cu CMP and dielectric barrier deposition.

The process flow of Cu dual damascene metallization is described as below: After processing of Metal-1 (M-1), the etching stop layer (Cu barrier dielectric layer) and the Via-1 (V-1)/Metal-2 (M-2) dielectric layer (e.g., SiCOH low-k) are subsequently deposited. For the etching stop layer, also called Cu barrier dielectric layer, SiN or SiCN can be used, providing functions to protect Cu from oxidation and protect Cu from diffusion into the low-kdielectric during processing or device operation. These materials have much higher dielectric constants than that of the low-kdielectric. The dielectric constant of SiN film ranges from 6.8 to 7.3 and that of SiCN layer from 4.0 to 5.0, depending on the process conditions [24, 25, 26]. Sometimes, a sandwich dielectric stack film (SiCOH/Si(C)N/SiCOH) is used in order to control the depths of the via and metal precisely. These steps will increase the effective dielectric constant, raising the capacitance. The dense SiO2 layer can be capped onto the SiCOH low-kdielectric to mitigate damage on the low-kdielectric caused by the subsequent process steps, such as photoresist, and Cu chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). This layer will not appear in the final structure of the fabricated Cu interconnects because it can be removed by Cu CMP process.

For “Via first” process, Via-1 is patterned first, stopping on the SiN (or SiCN) layer that protects Cu from oxidation. Then, the Metal-2 trench is patterned and the final step is the removal of the SiN (or SiCN) etch stop from the bottom of the via. For the “Trench first” process, the “via patterning” and “trench pattering” steps are reversed.

The metal deposition in the dual damascene structure consists of three steps: Cu barrier layer, Cu seed layer, and bulk Cu layer. Currently, the first two steps are performed by sputtering and the last step uses Cu electroplating (ECP) method. The used material for Cu barrier layer is a TaN/Ta barrier layer, which prevents Cu from diffusing into the dielectric, A Cu seed layer helps to the growth of electroplated Cu film. Cu electroplating provides to fill in the via and trench. After completing the metal deposition, Cu chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process is used to remove the excess metal over the field regions. Thus, a layer of Cu dual damascene structure (via and trench) is finished. To construct multiple metal levels, these steps are repeated for each metal level. After the last metal layer is fabricated, thick dielectric passivation layer (e.g., SiO2/SiN bi-layer) is deposited and via is opened to the bond pads.

Further reduction of the capacitance between the meal conductors is required as the device dimensions are continuously scaled down. The porous low-kmaterial with a dielectric constant as low as 2.2 is adopted as an interconnect insulator [9]. The porous low-kmaterial can be produced by adding pores (<2 nm diameter) to the SiCOH film. The obtained dielectric constant depends on the porosity. A higher porosity results in a lower dielectric constant; however, open pore are formed (high pore connectivity). The open pore in the porous low-kfilm allows water and other contaminations to diffuse into the dielectric. Moreover, during the interconnect fabrication, the porous low-kmaterial is exposed to oxygen plasma environments in the conventional resist strip step. Ions and radicals produced from oxygen plasmas can severely damage the porous low-kmaterial. These issues result in an increased dielectric constant and degraded dielectric breakdown reliability for the porous low-kmaterial. To minimize the damage on the porous low-kmaterial, low-kmaterial optimization and resist strip condition are chosen, and the process integration modification has been provided. The integration approach for dual damascene patterning is transformed to “metal hardmask” method from 32 nm technology node as shown in Figure 2 [27]. In the metal hardmask method, the resist strip damage on the porous low-kmaterial can be minimized because the resist is stripped prior to the trench and via etching. However, this method requires the extra steps and good process control to avoid the integration issues.

Figure 2.

Metal hardmask approach for dual damascene patterning. (A) TiN, ARC, and resist deposition; (B) M-2 metal hardmask RIE; (C) M-2 trench lithography; (D) Via-1 lithography; (E) Via-1 RIE; (F) M-2 oxide hardmask RIE; (G) M-2/Via-1 RIE and M-1 capping layer RIE; and (H) M-2/Via-1 Cu metallization.

Advertisement

3. Copper deposition method

In addition to the need of lower resistivity, the other requirement for Cu film is to fill the high aspect ratio vias and trenches without voids in the dual damascene structure. After continuous research and development for many years, Cu film can now be deposited by various technologies, such as physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), laser reflow, atomic layer deposition (ALD), and plating (electrolytic and electroless) [28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33]. Table 3 lists the properties of Cu films obtained by different deposition technologies. Evaporation and sputtering methods belong to PVD technology, which can provide a lower resistivity as compared to other technologies. The latter method is widely used in the semiconductor industry.

Table 3.

Comparison of various Cu deposition technologies.

In current Cu metallization, electroplating method is used to fill the high aspect ratio via and trench in the dual damascene structure. However, in order to successfully deposit Cu film during ECP process, a Cu seed layer is needed. Sputtering deposition is the preferred method to deposit the Cu seed layer because it can produce high-purity films. In the sputtering process to deposit Cu film, Ar plasma is used to sputter Cu target and then the sputtering Cu material is deposition on the wafer. The biggest challenge for Cu sputtering process is to achieve good step coverage in the high aspect ratio via and trench. With the reduction of interconnect dimensions in the advanced technology nodes, this problem is becoming thrilling. To achieve adequate conformity in high aspect ratio via and trench in the dual damascene structure for advanced technology nodes, ionized PVD [34] or atomic layer deposition (ALD) [35] technologies have been developed for Cu seed layer deposition with demonstrated good step-coverage.

After depositing a Cu seed layer, ECP process is used to fill-in via and trench dual damascene structure. ECP process is performed by immersing the wafers in a solution containing cupric ions, sulfuric acid, and trace organic additives [36]. By applying an electric current, Cu ion (Cu+2) is reduced to Cu, which deposit onto the seed layer. To achieve void-free filling in the high aspect ratio feature for ECP process, the “bottom-up” or “super-filling” strategy is adopted. By means of the bottom-up (or super-filling) method, the deposition of Cu film is growing from the bottom to the top, so no void is formed in the via and trench. To meet this goal, the additives in the ECP solution play an important role. The additives must consist of both suppressors and accelerators. The former is polymers, such as polyethylene glycol, which reduce the plating rate at the top of features by blocking of growth sites on the Cu surface. While the latter is dimercaptopropane sulfonic acid (SPS) with sulfide and thiol-like functional groups, which enhance the plating rate at the bottom of features because the functional groups strongly absorb on Cu surfaces [36, 37]. Consequently, ECP process can provide a void-free filling process for via and trench dual damascene structure under an adequate combination of suppressor and accelerator additives.

Advertisement

4. Integration issues of copper metal

In the advance technology nodes, the critical dimensions of BEOL interconnects are continuously scaled down. Additionally, new materials (Cu and low-k) and a dual damascene process have been introduced. Furthermore, new technologies, such as electroplating and Cu CMP, have been used in the semiconductor fabrication line. Thus, more integration challenges are raised, as described below:

4.1. Width effect on resistivity of Cu

As the dimensions of Cu interconnects are reduced, the resistivity increases dramatically due to grain boundary scattering, surface scattering, and an increasing fraction of refractory metal liner in the trench (Figure 3) [38, 39].

Figure 3.

Resistivity of metal line and thickness of Cu barrier layer with technology nodes [40].

The first factor that increases the resistivity of the metal line is grain boundary scattering. The smaller gain size in Cu lines results in more grain boundaries, leading to an increased resistivity. Unfortunately, Cu gain size scales as the critical dimensions of the Cu line in dual damascene interconnect. It is difficult to achieve large grain size in narrow lines because grain growth of Cu in trenches is inhibited at small dimensions. Therefore, subtractive Cu method is the possible solution to increase the Cu grain size [41]. That is, Cu film is patterned by etching process. In such a case, Cu grain size would be much larger because Cu deposition is not restricted in the narrow lines. However, there remain many challenges to solve for etching of Cu including etching chemistry, hardmask, and hardware. Moreover, encapsulation of Cu line with barrier/liner materials is another issue to solve.

Surface scattering increases as the critical dimensions of the Cu line becomes smaller than the bulk mean free path of the electrons. To solve this issue, new material such as tungsten (W), silicides, carbon nanotube, or collective excitations could be an alternative to Cu as interconnects [42, 43]. Even though the bulk resistivity of W and silicide films is much larger than that of Cu film, the shorter mean free path of the electrons will lower the surface scattering effect. Another advantage of W interconnects is no-barrier process because the diffusivity of W metal is very low. The latter two materials (carbon nanotube and collective excitations) can provide a different conductance mechanism, but they are still in the research and development phase. Therefore, for these new conductor materials to successfully integrate into the semiconductor industry is a long way off.

As the dimensions of Cu interconnects are continuously scaled down for the advanced technology nodes, a larger fraction of the metal line cross-section is occupied by the refractory metal barrier film. The resistivity of the refractory metal barrier film is far larger than that of Cu metal. Therefore, the overall resistivity of the metal line is significantly increased. The direct strategy to reduce the resistance rise is to decrease the thickness of the metal barrier film. However, the accompanied problems are poor step coverage and Cu diffusion into the dielectric. The improved sputtering method or atomic layer deposition method can be used to deposit a thinner liner layer [44, 45, 46]. The most promising method is to adopt a self-forming barrier process by depositing Mn-based film. The deposited Mn film can react with silicon-based dielectrics to form a self-forming dielectric barrier by annealing. A smooth MnOxlayer can be formed at Cu/dielectric film interface. This layer also provides a good adhesion for Cu film deposition. Furthermore, if this self-forming barrier process is controlled precisely, there is no barrier at the via bottom connecting the underlying metal line because of high diffusivity of Mn in Cu [47, 48]. This results in a lower via resistance and a better reliability for Cu interconnects.

4.2. Cu diffusion into the dielectric

Cu is easily diffused into the dielectric under a thermal and/or electric stress, causing a dielectric failure. For this reason, Cu film must be surrounded by a good diffusion barrier layer. Generally, the barrier layer in the sides and bottom of the Cu line is metal barrier film and is typically a TaN/Ta bilayer [49], while that on the top is dielectric barrier film, such as silicon nitride (SiN), silicon carbide (SiC), silicon carbonitride (SiCN), and silicon oxynitride (SiON) [24, 25, 26, 50, 51].

Both Ta and TaN are good Cu diffusion barrier layers. Besides, TaN can provide good adhesion to the dielectric, and Ta can provide a surface with good wettability of the Cu seed layer. Based on these characteristics, a TaN/Ta bilayer instead of a Ta/TaN bilayer is the best choice for a Cu diffusion barrier layer. Moreover, Ti-based and Ru-based barrier layers are alternatives to act as a Cu barrier layer for cost and resistivity consideration [52, 53]. However, the Cu barrier efficiency of Ti and Ru is not as good as that of Ta-based films. Therefore, a multilayer film of Ti/TiN/Ti is used as a Cu diffusion barrier layer; TiN can prevent excessive reaction between Ti and Cu, which can increase the resistivity of the wire. The top Ti layer can provide good wetting of Cu film because Cu wetting on TiN is very poor. Ru-based layer can provide a lower resistivity and a better Cu wettability than Ta layer; however, its Cu diffusion barrier is very poor. So, a TaN/Ru or Ti/Ru bilayer is used for Cu diffusion barrier [54, 55, 56].

The diffusion barrier layer on the top of Cu wires is typically a dielectric barrier film. However, its Cu barrier efficiency and adhesion ability with Cu film are poorer than those of a metal barrier layer. To address these issues, an extra metal layer (Ta/TaN or CoWP) is capped on the top surface of Cu wires before a dielectric barrier film deposition [57]. This extra process to deposit a metal layer is very challenging because of selectivity deposition on the Cu lines. However, control of this process can make a significant improvement on reliability for Cu interconnects if it is controlled precisely.

4.3. Cu oxidation

The other disadvantage for Cu interconnects is that Cu film can be oxidized during the water rinse and exposure to air. In addition to increasing the resistance of Cu wires, the formed Cu oxides cause reliability degradation due to the weakened adhesion at the Cu interfaces. During the fabrication of Cu dual damascene structure, there are two stages in which Cu film could be exposed to air. One stage is via-opening before Cu metallization deposition. The other stage is the completion of Cu CMP before a dielectric barrier layer deposition. Hence, to remove Cu oxides and avoid Cu re-oxidation, an in situclean is required. The mechanism to remove Cu oxides in clean process can be achieved by either physical removal or chemical reaction [58].

Ar sputtering clean to physically remove Cu oxides is a typical physical method. However, during Ar sputtering process, the corners of vias and trenches are chamfered and re-sputtering Cu atoms are trapped onto the sidewalls of the via [58]. The former phenomenon leads to an increased leakage current between the neighboring wires. The latter phenomenon results in strong degradation in dielectric reliability. Hence, the energy and time in the Ar sputtering clean process must be carefully controlled in order to alleviate these two phenomena. Moreover, a “barrier-first” process was provided to minimize the detrimental effects caused by Ar sputtering clean [59]. In this barrier-first process, a TaN layer is deposited first and Ar sputtering clean is then performed to etch through the TaN layer and the contamination at the bottom of the via. Finally, a Ta layer is deposited. Due to the presence of the TaN layer, the chamfering at the top corner of vias and trenches and the re-sputtered Cu atoms and contaminations into the dielectric can be effectively reduced during Ar sputtering clean process.

The chemical clean to remove Cu oxides can also minimize the detrimental effects caused by the Ar sputtering clean. The mechanism of chemical clean is based on the oxidation-reduction reaction. Hydrogen (H) atom is typically the reducing agent. Hence, H2 or NH3 is widely used reduction gas [60, 61, 62]. The chemical clean is processed under a plasma process, which increases the activity of the reaction. During chemical plasma clean process, Cu oxides can be reduced; however, the dielectric (e.g. low-k) is also exposure to a plasma environment. The dielectric is damaged by plasma irradiation. This leads to an increased dielectric constant and a reduced dielectric breakdown filed. Therefore, the drawback of using chemical plasma cleaning to remove Cu oxides is the plasma-induced damage on the dielectric (e.g. low-kdamage). To minimize the damage on the dielectric and keep Cu oxide removal efficiency, a remote plasma technology has been proposed [63].

4.4. Cu chemical mechanical polishing

The chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process has been used to polish oxide dielectric film and W plug in Al metallization since 0.35 μm technology node. As the BEOL interconnect was transferred to Cu metallization, due to the adoption of damascene structure, dielectrics do not needed to be polished by the CMP process. Instead, the excess Cu films in the damascene structure are necessary to be removed by CMP process. Cu CMP process can be regarded as a new technology and has a different consideration from oxide CMP process, hence, it is very challenging. During CMP process, the wafers are placed face-down on a rotating pad on which the slurry is dispensed, resulting in the removal of the film by chemical reaction and mechanical force. In Cu CMP process, the excess Cu film and metal barrier layer must be removed to fabricate Cu metallization. Typically, there are three main steps in Cu CMP process [64]. The first step is Cu film removal, stopping on the barrier layer. In this step, removal selectivity is not considered because only Cu film is polished. The second step is the barrier layer removal, stopping on the dielectric. During this step, both barrier layer and Cu film are polished. The last step is over-polishing to ensure that all metals are removed from the field regions in all parts of the wafer. Cu film, barrier layer, and the dielectric are polished simultaneously. In the last two steps, the selectivity should be considered because it is of importance to reach high-degreed planarization.

Cu dishing and oxide erosion as shown in Figure 4 are the main problems associated with Cu CMP process [65, 66, 67]. As porous low-kdielectric films are used as the BEOL insulators to further reduce the capacitance between the metal lines, these two issues also become more severe. Therefore, the Cu CMP process is needed to be optimized. Since the formation mechanism of these two problems is due to the faster polish rate and lower selectivity in the slurry, reducing the down-force during Cu CMP process and/or optimizing the used slurry are feasible methods to minimize these effects.

Figure 4.

Side view schematic of Cu dishing and oxide erosion induced by the Cu CMP process.

Additionally, the pattern density of the Cu line also influences the performance of Cu CMP process. Generally, in the region of high Cu pattern density, the polishing rate is high and the thinning of the Cu line is observed due to a high polishing rate, resulting in a large variation in the resistance of the metal line. Thus, design rules to restrict the local Cu pattern density are provided for IC designers based on Cu CMP process [68]. Therefore, to reach high IC performance, inserting the dummy Cu lines to increase Cu pattern density is a general method to minimize the pattern effect of the Cu CMP process. Moreover, low downforce during the over-polish step in Cu CMP process is required to minimize this effect from the perspective of the process [69].

Moreover, cracks, delamination, scratching and contamination are the problems accompanied with Cu CMP process because the Cu CMP process is basically a frictional process. These problems can be solved through: (i) reducing the down-force during Cu CMP process; (ii) improving the adhesion between layers in the interconnect; (iii) optimizing the used slurry; (iv) depositing a relatively dense material, such as SiO2 or nonporous SiCOH films on the top of the porous low-kdielectric film; and (v) performing an optimized wetting clean after the CMP process [70, 71, 72].

Advertisement

5. Reliability of copper metal

In the Cu interconnects, there are three main reliability items: electromigration (EM), stress-induced voiding (SIV), and time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) [18]. The first two items are used to assess metal reliability, while the last item is to evaluate dielectric reliability. However, all reliability items are related to each component of Cu interconnects.

5.1. Electromigration (EM)

The failure of interconnects through electromigration (EM) has been a long-standing concern for the development of highly reliable ICs. The first EM-related failure of Al-interconnect based circuit was observed in 1966 [73]. For the past 60 years, intense efforts have been made on either Al interconnects or the newly introduced Cu interconnects to enhance the resistance against EM.

The phenomenon of EM involves metal atoms migration in a metal conductor due to a stress with a high electrical current density (~105 A/cm) [74]. As an electric current is applied on a metal lead, the momentum transfer is occurred from the electrons to the metallic atoms, resulting in the migration of the metallic atoms. Therefore, the depletion and accumulation of the metallic atoms in a metal lead would be observed, which occur in the cathode and anode sides of a metal lead, respectively. As a lead is depleted at the cathode side, voids will form and the resistance will increase. If the voids grow large enough to spans the whole line, open line will be observed. At the anode end of the wire, metal atoms will accumulate, resulting in a hydrostatic stress. If the stress is high enough and the dielectrics are weak, metal extrusions may form, causing leakage between the neighboring metal lines [18, 75]. In Cu interconnects, the Ta/TaN barrier layers at the bottom of the via can act as blocking boundaries, which provide a higher EM resistance than Cu. Hence, during an EM stress, the depletion and accumulation phenomenon occur in the Cu line.

This stress produces a back flux of atoms that is opposite in the direction to the flux from electromigration, which is called the “Blech effect” or Short-length effect” [76, 77, 78, 79]. This buildup stress causes a reverse migration process, which reduces or compensates for the effective metal material flow toward the anode side during EM. Thus, the EM failure time can be effectively improved. Moreover, this back-stress force becomes obvious as the length of the wire decreases. Therefore, the short wires that have a length below a critical threshold length (typically on the order of 5–50 μm), the back flux of atoms prevents killer voids from forming, and the wires are immortal.

To accelerate the fails and save the test time, the EM test is performed under a high-current density and a high-temperature condition. The failure time (t) of Cu line is widely described by using Black’s equation [80, 81]:

t=AjnexpEakTE3

where jis the current density, Eais the activation energy for diffusion, kis the Boltzmann constant, Tis the temperature, Ais a constant, and nis the current exponent, which value is typically between 1 and 2. If nvalue is close to 1, the EM kinetics is dominated by void growth, whereas n = 2 corresponds to kinetics limited by void nucleation [82].

The activation energy for diffusion is varied by the different diffusional mechanisms as listed in Table 4 [83]. Diffusion process caused by EM can be divided into bulk diffusion, grain boundary diffusion, surface diffusion, and interface diffusion. In Al and Cu interconnects, the activation energies for diffusion in different diffusion paths are different. In Cu interconnects, interface diffusion has the lowest activation energy, presenting the major path for EM. Whereas in Al interconnects, grain boundary diffusion is a fast EM path due to a lower activation energy [83, 84, 85, 86].

Table 4.

Activation energy for different diffusion paths for Al, Al/Cu, and Cu metal.

In Cu metallization, the “line-via” structure is widely used for EM characterization. Two typical EM test structures: “downstream stressing” and “upstreaming stressing,” as shown in Figure 5. In order to minimize the Blech effect on EM results, the length of the tested Cu line must be sufficiently long. Generally, the length is about 200–250 μm. During an EM test, the resistance is monitored with the stressing time. As the monitored resistance is increased by a certain value or a certain percentage, this time is defined as the EM failure time. Generally, 20–30 samples are tested for an EM test. The measured failure times are usually plotted using a log-normal distribution and analyzed [23].

Figure 5.

Side view schematic of electromigration test structures and void formation locations. (A) Downstream stressing structure and (B) upstream stressing structure.

In a “downstream stressing” test structure, electron flow is from metal-2 to metal-1 through Via-1. The EM-induced void will form under the via (early failure) and in the wire far from the via (late failure). In an “upstream stressing” test structure, electron flow is from metal-1 to metal-2 through Via-1. The EM-induced void will form inside the via (early failure) and in the wire (late failure). The early failure occurred in both test structures is related to via process or metal barrier deposition. The late failure is directly linked to Cu/dielectric interface or Cu line property. Therefore, to mitigate Cu EM phenomenon, these related processes are needed to be optimized.

Many factors, such as design related, process related, and environmental related factors, can significantly affect Cu EM reliability, as summarized below:

5.1.1. Scaling effect

As device and wire dimensions are reduced in the advanced technology nodes, it is desirable to increase the maximum required current density in Cu lines, thus a longer EM lifetime of Cu lines should be achieved [40]. Figure 6 plots the maximum required current density at 105°C for Cu lines. The reason for this increase is that the drive current in the devices increases and the switching speed increases as the dimension of the device is scaling. Simultaneously, the dimension of the metal line is minimized. Hence, the metal line should sustain a higher current density.

Figure 6.

Maximum required current density at 105°C for M-1 Cu lines with technology nodes [40].

The EM performance, however, could not be improved as the dimensions of Cu lines decrease. Actually, the EM lifetime decreases as shown in Figure 7. Two reasons can explain this result. First, as the dimensions of via and trench decreases, the void size required to cause a EM fail decreases accordingly [86]. This leads to a short time to form a “killer” void. The other reason is due to the grain size in Cu lines. Experimental results indicated that the grain size decreases with line width as the width of Cu lines is less than 0.2 μm. In Cu lines with the smaller grain size, grain boundary diffusion can be significant during an EM stress, resulting in a lower EM lifetime [87].

Figure 7.

Experiment and model results of electromigration lifetime scaling with the reduction of interconnect dimension. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [86].

For the advanced technology nodes, EM reliability is becoming a critical challenge due to a high EM requirement and a low EM performance. Therefore, a number of Cu interconnect fabrication technologies or ways to improve the EM performance for narrow Cu lines are necessary. Moreover, from the perspective of stressing method, alternative current (AC) stressing can enlarge EM lifetime of Cu lines as compared to the conventional direct current stressing [88, 89]. The improvement in EM lifetime is attributed to the effect of damage healing. Under AC conditions, the partial Cu atoms migrating in one direction at one polarity stress would migrate back to its original location at the reversing polarity stress. Consequently, the Cu line suffers less damage from EM for a given time, resulting in a long EM lifetime. Additionally, the effect of damage healing from AC stress depends on the operation frequency. As the operation frequency is above 10 Hz, the effect of self-healing becomes significant and increases with the operation frequency. When the operation frequency is up to about 10 kHz, this effect is saturated. Thus, no further EM lifetime improvement is observed at the operation frequencies above this point [88].

5.1.2. Cu interface effect

The interface between Cu line and the capping layer is the dominating EM transport path for Cu damascene interconnects due to the lowest activation energy for diffusion [83]. Therefore, to obtain a long EM lifetime, the improvement of Cu interface is the most effective method by increasing the adhesion between these layers [90]. A typical dielectric capping process consists of two main steps: plasma clean to remove Cu oxides and a Cu barrier dielectric deposition (either SiN or SiCN) [91, 92].

A plasma clean has a pronounced effect on the EM improvement as compared to a barrier dielectric deposition. This is attributed to the enhanced adhesion between Cu line and barrier dielectric layer. H2 or NH3 plasma clean is typically used, which can remove the Cu oxide from the top surface of Cu metallization through chemical reaction. The obtained results were contradictory [93, 94, 95] since some authors reported H2-based plasma clean is better. These apparent contradictions may result from the wide variety of plasma chambers and the plasma conditions. Nevertheless, it is clear that both the H2 and NH3 plasma clean can enhance EM lifetime. Additionally, in order to strengthen adhesion, a SiH4 exposure process is inserted between a plasma clean and a dielectric deposition processes to form a thin Cu silicide layer. This way, the EM lifetime was enhanced due to the improved adhesion [96, 97].

The effect of Cu dielectric capping layer on EM is not as obvious as compared to that of a plasma clean although it is concluded that the improvement in the adhesion between Cu line and dielectric capping layer can enhance EM. SiN and SiCN capping layers have similar EM lifetime, but have longer EM lifetime as compared to SiC capping layer [98]. The formation of Cu compound (Cu3N) at the interface for providing a better interface is a possible mechanism.

Based on these results, an alternative to improve Cu interface is through the use of a metal capping layer in replace of a dielectric capping layer. Due to the reduction in interface diffusion, EM lifetime was found to have a huge improvement. The used metal capping layer can be Ta/TaN or CoWP [57], the latter capping layer reported to provide a larger EM improvement than the former. Moreover, in Cu damascene lines with bamboo-like grain structure (i.e., no grain boundary diffusion), the activation energies for diffusion were 1.0 eV for an SiN or SiCN capping layer, 1.4 eV for an Ta/TaN capping layer, and 2.4 eV for a CoWP capping layer [99]. This suggests that the diffusion mechanism is changed from interface diffusion to bulk diffusion for CoWP capping layer. In the cast of Ta/TaN capping layer, although the interface diffusion mechanism is still dominating, the interface bonding between the Cu and the capping layer is enhanced.

Figure 8 compares various technologies for EM improvement in terms of EM improvement efficiency (EM lifetime improvement ratio and the resistance increase ratio). CoWP capping layer is shown to be the best approach with a higher EM life-time improvement and a lower resistance increase.

Figure 8.

Comparison of electromigration lifetime improvement versus the resistance increase for various electromigration improvement technologies [40].

5.1.3. Microstructure effect

The microstructure of Cu interconnects also plays an important role in EM performance. The important microstructure parameters include grain size (with respect to line width), grain distribution, and grain orientation. Each of these parameters influences EM performance and is impacted by Cu metallization steps. Generally, large grain size or bamboo grain structure, tight grain distribution, and (111) grain orientation are helpful for EM improvement. Experimental results indicated that electroplated Cu line has relatively large grain size and tight grain distribution as compared to CVD Cu line, resulting in longer EM lifetime [100]. Furthermore, an annealing (<400°C) step after electroplating and before Cu CMP step can increase the grain size of Cu lines due to gain growth and recrystallization, resulting in increased EM lifetime [101].

5.1.4. Dielectric effect

A lower EM lifetime was found when a low-kdielectric is used as an insulator in Cu interconnects [102, 103]. This reduction is amplified with decreasing the dielectric constant of low-kdielectrics. There are several reasons to explain the lower EM life-time for low-kdielectrics. First, the modulus of the low-kdielectrics is lower than that of SiO2 film and decreases with the reduction of the dielectric constant. Because of the lower modulus, the Blech effect and the critical length for line immortality will be reduced [103]. Second, the barrier layers often have weak adhesion to low-kmaterials; the weak adhesion can result in extrusion fails during an EM stress [104]. Finally, low-kmaterials have lower thermal conductivity than does SiO2. Hence, more joule heating is generated for a given current density [105], resulting in a higher temperature in the Cu wire, and therefore a faster diffusion rate of EM.

5.1.5. Cu seed layer doping effect

Doping impurities such as Al [106, 107], Ag [108], Mn [109, 110, 111], Magnesium (Mg) [112, 113], Zirconium (Zr) [114], and Tin (Sn) [115] into the Cu layer is an effective method to improve the EM lifetime. The main disadvantage of this approach is that the impurities increase the resistivity of Cu line. To avoid a huge increase in the resistivity, the dopant concentration is kept relatively low and the dopant is usually introduced in the Cu seed layer deposition process. Additionally, an extra annealing process is needed after completing Cu metallization. The purpose is that the dopant impurities segregate at grain boundaries and interfaces between the Cu line and the capping layer by an annealing. Thus, Cu migration rate of EM is retarded due to the reduction in the grain boundary and interface diffusions [106, 110]. The measured EM lifetime was found to be enhanced by at least one order of magnitude and is positively proportional to the doping concentration.

Among the dopants used, Al and Mn have received more attention because they have shown to increase EM lifetime significantly. Furthermore, Mn is the promising candidate for providing some advantages. Its low solubility in Cu lines allows minimum increase in resistivity by optimizing the post-metal annealing [109]. Moreover, Mn has high affinity for oxygen, resulting in the formation of MnOxlayer with the dielectric film by annealing. The formed MnOxlayer can act as a Cu barrier layer, thus avoiding depositing a metal barrier layer [47, 48].

5.2. Stress-induced voiding (SIV)

Like EM, voids will form in the metal line for stress-induced voiding. But these two reliability terms have different mechanisms. Whereas EM is induced by electron wind force under an electric field, stress-induced voiding (SIV) is due to stress migration. As a passivated Cu interconnect is annealed at moderate temperatures (200–250°C), tensile stress in the metal is established. If this built-up tensile stress is above the critical stress, voids will form in the Cu line, leading to a resistance increase or an open line. The built-up stress in the metal line is caused by two mechanisms: One is thermal stress due to thermal expansion mismatch between the metal line and the dielectric insulator; and the other is growth stress due to grain growth in the metal line [116, 117, 118].

The unique characteristic of stress-induced void is that the maximum rate of void growth in Cu line does not occur at a high temperature, as shown in Figure 9. To achieve large enough voids to fail the circuit, the stress built-up (void nucleation) and Cu atom migration (void accumulation) must occur in sequence. However, the temperature-dependence effect of these two mechanisms is totally different. If stress-induced void is originated from thermal expansion mismatch during the dielectric capping layer deposition, a “stress-free” temperature can be obtained. This stress-free temperature is related to the deposition temperature of the dielectric capping layer and subsequent processes. The stress-free temperature is close to the inter-level dielectric deposition temperature, generally being 300–450°C. As the stress temperatures is close to the stress-free temperature, the tensile stress (σ) in the metal line is low, so that the void growth rate is low. On the other hand, the Cu diffusivity is increased with increasing the temperature, leading to a high void growth rate at high temperatures. These two different mechanisms result in a significant void growth at intermediate temperatures (150–250°C) [116, 119, 120]. Therefore, for a newly developed process for Cu interconnects, the stress temperature for the maximum rate of void growth in Cu line should be characterized in advance.

Figure 9.

Void growth rate of stress-induced void as a function of temperature [116].

The test structure of stress-induced void is simple via-chain structures. The resistance is monitored as a function of time at the stress temperature [121]. As the resistance is increased by a certain value (5–10%), this time is defined as the lifetime for stress-induced void.

The main affecting factors for stress-induced voids in Cu lines can be categorized as follows.

5.2.1. Scaling effect

The main failure mode of stress-induced void is void formation under vias due to the stress gradient in the underlying Cu line and the presence of the via-metal interface [116]. As the formation void is spanned the whole via, which is called “killer void,” the electric current is stopped, leading to a failure of circuits. Therefore, the failure rate for stress-induced void in Cu line increases with decreasing via size (Figure 10).

Figure 10.

Failure rate of stress-induced void versus M2 line width and V2 via size after annealing stress at 225°C for 1000 h. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [122].

On the other hand, the failure rate for stress-induced void in Cu line increases with increasing line width (Figure 10) opposite to what is observed with Al line [116, 117, 122]. Two mechanisms can explain this unique behavior. One is that the hydrostatic stress increases with increasing the width of Cu lines based on the result of stress simulation [123]. Hence, a stronger driving force for void formation is produced in wide Cu lines than in narrow Cu lines. The other mechanism can be explained by the theory of “active diffusion volume” [124]. In this theory, the formation void is related to the number of vacancies, which are available within a diffusion length of the via. The wider Cu lines can provide a greater number of vacancies to form void under the bottom of the via. Thus, the wider Cu lines take less time to form a “killer void” and have a weak resistance against stress-induced void. To solve stress-induced void reliability issue on the narrow via and wide line, a design solution is provided by inserting redundant vias in the wide Cu line [125, 126]. By this approach, the stress gradient is reduced and the volume of the killer void is increased, thus enhancing stress-induced void.

5.2.2. Cu surface effect

Stress-induced void in Cu lines are mostly observed under vias [116]. A high tensile stress in the metal at the edge of the via and a weak adhesion between the barrier metal and the underlying Cu at the bottom of the via are responsible for this failure mode. A high tensile stress in the metal at the edge of the via was detected through stress simulation modeling [127, 128]. At this point, if the tensile stress exceeds the critical stress, a void will nucleate and then grow along the interface between the barrier metal and the underlying Cu at the bottom of the via. Once a void forms, the critical stress will be reduced, making the stress field surrounding the void becomes less tensile. The resulting stress gradient favors vacancy diffusion toward the void resulting in further growth.

To solve this failure mode of stress-induced void, providing a better Cu interface is the main strategy. Therefore, the approaches to optimize Cu interfaces applied for EM improvement also provide great help for stress-induced void [129, 130, 131].

5.2.3. Cu grain boundary effect

Stress-induced void can also be observed at grain boundaries in Cu lines [132]. Thus, grain boundary is another diffusion path. Decreasing the grain boundaries in Cu lines (i.e. maximizing Cu grain size) can minimize the fail rate of stress-induced void, similar to the improvement in EM reliability. The most effective method to maximize Cu grain size is by the use of an annealing process. The operation timing is after Cu plating and before Cu CMP step. It is noted that the maximum annealing temperature must be limited after dielectric capping layer deposition because high-temperature annealing after dielectric capping layer deposition can lead to high rates of stress-induced void formation due to either confined grain growth or due to increased stress in the Cu line [122, 132]. Additionally, the use of metal capping layers [133] and/or Cu alloying lines [106, 107], which are used to improve EM has also shown to reduce the failure rate of stress-induced void.

5.2.4. Via barrier effect

The early failure of stress-induced void occurs inside the via due to a defect in the via with a lower tensile stress [124]. Since Cu atoms will migrate to the regions of higher tensile stress, the vacancies will diffuse to the regions of lower tensile stress. If there is a defect in the via, then void nucleation will be further enhanced in the via. Poor coverage of seed layer and undesirable gap filling of electroplating are the precursors for void formation. As the dimensions of Cu interconnects shrink, these two processes are becoming more challenging. To ensure low resistance of the metal line in the advanced technology nodes, the thickness of Cu barrier layer is required to thin down as much as possible. However, the issues of Cu diffusion into the dielectric, metal barrier layer coverage on the bottom and sidewalls of trenches and vias and Cu plating gap filling are important.

This failure mode of stress-induced voids can be eliminated with good metal barrier layer coverage on the bottom and sidewalls of trenches and vias and void-free Cu-filling process. To achieve these goals, pore sealing on porous low-kdielectrics [134], good control of the via and trench profiles [135], use of ALD barrier technology [136], and optimization of the additives in the Cu plating process [37] have been demonstrated.

5.3. Time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB)

During a prolonged stress at high electric fields, electric damage can occur in dielectric materials. This induces the loss of the insulating properties for a dielectric material for which the resistance state is converted from high to low. Finally, an electrical breakdown occurs as a conducting path is formed. This loss of reliability is called “time-dependent-dielectric breakdown” (TDDB) [137, 138, 139, 140, 141].

The time-dependent dielectric breakdown can occur in gate dielectrics and BEOL dielectrics [142, 143]. The former has been an important reliability issue because the thickness of gate dielectrics is continuously decreased with the advance of technology node although the latter is not a key issue in Al interconnects because the applied electric field across the BEOL dielectric is low due to the relatively large spacing between the metal lines. However, as the technology node of ICs is continuously advancing, the lateral electric field across the BEOL dielectric significantly increases due to the reduction of interconnect dimension. Simultaneously, the used BEOL dielectric is transforming to low-kdielectrics with a lower dielectric constant than 4.0. The breakdown strength of low-kdielectrics is lower than that of SiO2 film and typically decreases with the reduction of the dielectric constant. These combined effects result in a critical challenge in time-dependent dielectric breakdown for BEOL dielectrics in the advanced technology nodes [144, 145].

The test structure for the TDDB reliability evaluation has two typical configurations: comb-comb or comb-serpentine layout [146, 147, 148, 149], as shown in Figure 11. Typically, metal-1 is the most commonly used metal level because it has the smallest pitch. During a test, one electrode (e.g., serpentine) is grounded and a constant positive voltage is applied to the other electrode (e.g., comb). The leakage current is measured with the stress time. The typical leakage current versus the stress time is the initial decrease in leakage current due to trapping of charge, followed by stress-induced leakage current, and finally breakdown [150]. The stress time with a sharp increase in the monitored leakage current, is corresponding to the breakdown time.

Figure 11.

Top view schematic of time-dependent dielectric breakdown test structures. (A) Comb-comb structure. (B) Comb-serpentine structure.

Since the time-dependent dielectric breakdown is used to assess the dielectric reliability, its performance is strongly dependent on the property of a dielectric. Additional investigations have indicated that a high density of defect sites in the as-deposited dielectric (especially for low-kmaterials) [151], damage or contamination of the dielectric from processes such as plasma and CMP processes [152, 153, 154], and patterning problems such as line edge roughness or via misalignment [155, 156] resulted in the low breakdown strength of BEOL dielectrics. Consequently, the optimization of the BEOL interconnect process can effectively improve time-dependent dielectric breakdown reliability.

Additionally, Cu metallization also influences the TDDB performance. Cu diffusion into the dielectric leads to serious degradation in BEOL dielectrics reliability [157, 158, 159]. Cu diffusion into the dielectric can be through the dielectric and metal barrier layers, which are interfacial diffusion and bulk diffusion, respectively. The interfacial diffusion is considered to be the dominant Cu diffusion path. This can be demonstrated by the fact that dielectric breakdown between neighboring Cu wires generally occurs at the interface between the capping layer and the dielectric [150, 160]. The interface is expected to have a higher trap density than the bulk dielectrics due to the bond mismatch between the different materials or due to contaminants from the Cu CMP process [153, 161]. Hence, the interface between the capping layer and the dielectric is the preferred diffusion and leakage path for Cu atoms. Moreover, the fabricated Cu lines are generally tapered shape (wider at the top than at the bottom), so the space is smallest at the top of the Cu line, leading to the highest electric field at this location. Due to the combination of high electric field and high-defect density, the interface is the dominant path for Cu diffusion.

Moreover, “Cu-diffusion-catalyzed breakdown” theory has been proposed to explain lower dielectric breakdown strength for Cu diffusion into the dielectric [162]. In this theory, Cu could act as a precursor for an ultimate dielectric breakdown. As the concentration of Cu in the dielectric reaches a critical value, the dielectric breakdown event occurs. Two possible mechanisms can account for Cu-induced dielectric breakdown. First, the diffused Cu atoms can catalyze the bond breakage reaction by inducing permanent bond displacement in the dielectric. The other mechanism is that the accumulated Cu atoms in the dielectric form clusters of nanoparticles. As these clusters are connected, a metallic shorting bridge or a local dielectric thinning is established, triggering a dielectric breakdown.

In addition to the reduced dielectric breakdown strength and failure time, Cu diffusion into the dielectric alters the TDDB electric field acceleration model, which is used to determine the fail rate or lifetime at the use conditions (the high-field stress data must be extrapolated to the lower fields at the use conditions). The “E-model” [163, 164, 165], which is a field-driven model and chemical bond breakage mechanism, fails to describe the low-kTDDB behavior with Cu diffusion. Instead, “E1/2-model” [146, 166] is the most appropriate model. It is postulated that the accelerated electrons, injected from the cathode, transport inside low-kdielectric by means of Schottky-Emission or Poole-Frenkel conduction. Some electrons undergo thermalization under high field and high temperature and impact the Cu atoms at the anode. This produces the positive Cu ions, which in turn inject into the dielectric under the field along a fast diffusion path. Since the current in the Schottky-Emission or Poole-Frenkel conduction is proportional to E1/2, the “E1/2-model” is the possible model to describe low-ktime-dependent dielectric breakdown with Cu diffusion. However, the TDBD model is not yet fully accepted and so it remains an open issue.

To minimize Cu diffusion into the dielectric to avoid reliability degradation in TDDB, several process strategies have been proposed including using adequate metal barrier layers [167, 168], minimizing residues after post-CMP cleaning [169], and minimizing air exposure prior to capping of the Cu [150, 153]. Additionally, alternating polarity operation method instead of direct current stress could increase dielectric breakdown lifetime, resulting from recovery effect due to the backward migration of Cu ions during the reverse-bias stress [170, 171].

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

To improve the performance of ICs by reducing RCdelay, the conductor with a lower resistivity in interconnects should be rechosen. In the past two decades, better performance of ICs was achieved by using Cu conductor in place of Al conductor. Currently, although Cu metallization has been successfully integrated into ICs, a different and complex process to fabricate Cu interconnects has many remaining issues, resulting in integration and reliability challenges.

In future, the interconnect process returning to subtractive metal process from dual damascene process is one possible solution. Furthermore, looking for an alternative to replace Cu is an on-going important topic for research and development. Silver, carbon nanotube, graphene, or photonic interconnects are possible candidates.

References

  1. 1. Thompson SE, Parthasarathy S. Moore’s law: The future of Si microelectronics. Materials Today. 2006;9:20-25
  2. 2. Grill A, Gates SM, Ryan TE, Nguyen SV, Priyadarshini D. Progress in the development and understanding of advanced lowkand ultralowkdielectrics for very large-scale integrated interconnects – State of the art. Applied Physics Reviews. 2014;1:011306-011312
  3. 3. Bohr M. MOS transistors: Scaling and performance trends. Semiconductor International. 1995;18(6):75-80
  4. 4. Grill A. Porous pSiCOH ultralow-kdielectrics for chip interconnects prepared by PECVD. Annual Review of Materials Research. 2009;39:49-69
  5. 5. Kim CY, Navamathavan R, Lee HS, Woo JK, Hyun MT, Lee KM, Jeung WY, Choi CK. Ultraviolet irradiation effect on the properties of leakage current current and dielectric breakdown of low-dielectric-constant SiOC(H) films using comb capacitor structure. Thin Solid Films. 2011;519:6732-6736
  6. 6. Broussous L, Berthout G, Rebiscoul D, Rouessac V, Ayral A. Mechanical properties of a plasma-modified porous low-kmaterial. Microelectronic Engineering. 2010;87:466-469
  7. 7. Cheng YL, Wang YL, Liu CW, Wu YL, Lo KY, Liu CP, Lan JK. Characterization and reliability of low dielectric constant fluorosilicate glass and silicon rich oxide process for deep sub-micro device application. Thin Solid Films. 2001;398–399:544-548
  8. 8. Cheng YL, Wang YL, Lan JK, Chen HC, Lin JH, Wu YL, Liu PT, Wu YC, Feng MS. Effect of carrier gas on the structure and electrical properties of low dielectric constant SiCOH film using trimethylsilane prepared by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Films. 2004;469:178-183
  9. 9. Grill A. Plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposited SiCOH dielectrics: From low-kto extreme low-kinterconnect materials. Journal of Applied Physics. 2003;93:1785-1790
  10. 10. Chang YM, Chang WY, Leu J, Cheng YL. Effect of thermal treatment on physical, electrical properties and reliability of porogen-containing and porogen-free ultralow-kdielectrics. Thin Solid Films. 2013;528:67-71
  11. 11. Noguchi J, Sato K, Konishi N, Uno S, Oshima T, Ishikawa K, et al. Process and reliability of air-gap Cu interconnect using 90-nm node technology. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 2005;52:352-359
  12. 12. Dixit GA, Havemann RH. Overview of interconnect – Copper and low-kintegration. In: Handbook of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology. 2nd ed. NY: CRC Press; 2008 (Chapter 2)
  13. 13. Isaac RD. The future of CMOS technology. IBM Journal of Research and Development. 2000;44:369-378
  14. 14. Huang HY, Hsieh CH, Jeng SM, Tao HJ, Cao M, Mii YJ. A new enhancement layer to improve copper performance. In: IEEE Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2010. paper 4.2
  15. 15. Havemann RH, Hutchby JA. High-performance interconnects: An integration overview. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2001;89(5):586-601
  16. 16. Plummer JD, Deal MD, Griffin PB. Silicon VLSI Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2000
  17. 17. Havemann RH, Antonelli GA, Arendt GK, Danek M, McKerrow AJ, Weinberg RS. Copper BEOL solutions for advanced memory. Solid State Technology. 2009;31:10-13
  18. 18. Jeffery G. Process technology for copper interconnects. In: Handbook of Thin Film Deposition. 2012. pp. 221-269
  19. 19. Quirk M, Serda J. Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2001
  20. 20. Gambino J, Chen F, He J. Copper interconnect technology for the 32 Nm node and beyond. In: IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference Proceedings. PA: Warrebdale; 2009. pp. 141-148
  21. 21. Shapiro MJ, Nguyen SV, Matsuda T, Dobuzinsky D. CVD of fluorosilicate glass for ULSI applications. Thin Solid Films. 1995;270:503-507
  22. 22. Kriz J, Angelkort C, Czekalla M, Huth S, Meinhold D, Pohl A, et al. Overview of dual damascene integration schemes in Cu BEOL integration. Microelectronic Engineering. 2008;85:2128-2132
  23. 23. Takei S. Resist poisoning studies of gap fill materials for patterning metal trenches in via-first dual damascene process. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2008;47:8766-8770
  24. 24. Matz LM, Tsui T, Engbrecht ER, Taylor K, Haase G, Ajmera S, et al. Structural characterization of silicon carbide dielectric barrier materials. In: Brongersma SH, Taylor TC, Tsujimura M, Masu K, editors. Advanced Metallization Conference Proceedings 2005. Warrendale, PA: MRS; 2006. pp. 437-443
  25. 25. Cheng YL, Chen SA, Chiu TJ, Wei BJ, Wu J, Chang HJ. Electrical and reliability performance of nitrogen-doped silicon carbide dielectric by chemical vapor deposition. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B. 2010;28(3):573-576
  26. 26. Cheng YL, Chiu TJ, Wei BJ, Wang HJ, Wu J, Wang YL. Effect of copper barrier dielectric deposition process on characterization of copper interconnects. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B. 2010;28(3):567-572
  27. 27. Travaly V, Van Aelst J, Truffert V, Verdonck P, Dupont T, Camerotto E, et al. Key factors to sustain the extension of a MHM-based integration scheme to medium and high porosity PECVD low-kmaterials. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2008. pp. 52-54
  28. 28. Hinsinger O, Fox R, Sabouret E, Goldberg C, Verove C, Besling W, et al. Demonstration of an extendable and industrial 300 mm BEOL integration for the 65-nm technology node. In: IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Proceedings. 2004. pp. 317-320
  29. 29. Cooney EC, Strippe DC, Korejwa JW, Simon AH, Uzoh C. Effects of collimator aspect ratio and deposition temperature on copper sputtered seed layers. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A. 1999;17:1898-1903
  30. 30. Reid J, Mayer S, Broadbent E, Klawuhn E, Ashtiani K. Factors influencing damascene feature fill using copper PVD and electroplating. Solid State Technology. 2000;43:86-94
  31. 31. Kodas TT, Shin H-K, Chi K-M, Hampden-Smith MJ, Farr JD, Paffett M. Selective low-temperature chemical vapor deposition of copper from (hexafluoroacetylacetonato)copper(I)trimethylphosphine, (hfa)CuP(me)3+. Advanced Materials. 1991;3(5):246-248
  32. 32. Chen ST, Chung YC, Fang JS, Cheng YL, Chen GS. Enhancement of seeding for electroless Cu plating of metallic barrier layers by using alkyl self-assembled monolayers. Applied Surface Science. 2017;405:350-358
  33. 33. Fang JS, Chen GS, Cheng YL, Chin TS. Direct, sequential growth of copper film on TaN/ta barrier substrates by alternation of Pb-UPD and Cu-SLRR. Electrochimica Acta. 2016;206:45-51
  34. 34. Hopwood JA. The role of ionized physical vapor deposition in integrated circuit fabrication. Thin Solid Films. 2000;27:1-7
  35. 35. Li Z, Rahtu A, Gordon RG. Atomic layer deposition of ultrathin copper metal films from a liquid copper(I) amidinate precursor. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2006;153(11):C787-C794
  36. 36. Reid J, McKerrow A, Varadarajan S, Kozlowski G. Copper electroplating approaches for 16 nm technology. Solid State Technology. 2010;53:14-17
  37. 37. Huang Y-C, Lin X, Zheng B, Ngai CS, Paneccasio V, Behnke J, et al. High performance copper plating process for 65 nm and 45 nm technology nodes. In: Brongersma SH, Taylor TC, Tsujimura M, Masu K, editors. Advanced Metallization Conference Proceeding, 2006. Warrendale, PA: MRS. 2005. pp. 507-511
  38. 38. Lee HB, Hong JW, Seong GJ, Lee JM, Park H, Baek JM, et al. A highly reliable Cu interconnect technology for memory devices. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2007. pp. 64-66
  39. 39. Steinhogl W, Schindler G, Steinlesberger G, Traving M, Engelhardt M. Comprehensive study of the resistivity of copper wires with lateral dimensions of 100 nm and smaller. Journal of Applied Physics. 2005;97:0237061-0237067
  40. 40. The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor, ITRS 2015.https://www.semiconductors.org/main/2015_international_technology_roadmap_for_semiconductors_itrs/
  41. 41. Schuegraf K, Abraham MC, Brand A, Naik M, Thakur R. Semiconductor logic technology innovation to achieve sub-10 nm manufacturing. IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society. 2013;1(3):66-75
  42. 42. Ward JW, Nichols J, Stachowiak TB, Ngo Q, Egerton EJ. Reduction of CNT interconnect resistance for the replacement of Cu for future technology nodes. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology. 2012;11(1):56-62
  43. 43. Li B, Luo Z, Shi L, Zhou JP, Rabenberg L, Ho PS, Allen RA, Cresswell MW. Controlled formation and resistivity scalling of nickel silicide nanolines. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:085304
  44. 44. Forster J, Gopalraja P, Gung TJ, Sundarrajan A, Fu X, Hammond N, et al. A PVD based barrier technology for the 45 nm node. Microelectronic Engineering. 2005;82:594-599
  45. 45. Simon AH, Bolom T, Tang TJ, Baker B, Peters C, Rhoads B, et al. Extendability study of a PVD Cu seed process with Ar Rf-plasma enhanced coverage for 45 nm interconnects. Materials Research Society Proceedings. 2008;1079:N03-N04
  46. 46. Rossnagel SM. Physical vapor deposition. In: Doering R, Nishi Y, editors. Handbook of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology. 2nd ed. NY: CRC Press; 2008 (Chapter 15)
  47. 47. Au Y, Lin Y, Kim H, Beh E, Liu Y, Gordon RG. Selectivity CVD of manganese self-aligned capping layer for Cu interconnects in microelectronics. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2010;157(6):D341-D345
  48. 48. Usui T, Tsumura K, Nasu H, Hayashi Y, Minamihaba G, Toyoda H, et al. High performance ultra low-k(k= 2.0/keff = 2.4)/Cu dual-damascene interconnect technology with self-formed MnSixOy barrier layer for 32 nm-node. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2006. pp. 216-218
  49. 49. Edelstein D, Uzoh C, Cabral C Jr, DeHaven P, Buchwalter P, Simon A, et al. An optimal liner for copper damascene interconnects. In: McKerrow AJ, Shacham-Diamond Y, Zaima S, Ohba T, editors. Proceedings of the Advanced Metallization Conference 2001. 2002. pp. 541-547
  50. 50. Cheng YL, Wu J, Chiu TJ, Chen SA, Wang YL. Comprehensive comparison of electrical and reliability characteristics of various copper barrier films. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B. 2011;29(3):031207-1-031207-7
  51. 51. Kim SW. Dielectric barrier, etch stop, and metal capping materials for state of the art and beyond metal interconnects. Journal of Solid State Science and Technology. 2015;4(1):N3029-N3047
  52. 52. Kumar N, Moraes K, Narasimhan M, Gopalraja P. Advanced metallization needs copper. Semiconductor International. 2008;31(5):26-33
  53. 53. Wu W, Wu HJ, Dixit G, Shaviv R, Gao M, Mountsier T, et al. Ti-based barrier for Cu interconnect applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference. 2008. pp. 202-204
  54. 54. Yang C-C, Cohen S, Shaw T, Wang P-C, Nogami T, Edelstein D. Characterization of ultrathin-Cu/Ru(Ta)/TaN liner stack for copper interconnects. IEEE Electron Device Letters. 2010;31:722-724
  55. 55. Rullan J, Ishizaka T, Cerio F, Mizuno S, Mizusawa Y, Ponnuswamy T, et al. Low resistance wiring and 2Xnm void free fill with CVD ruthenium liner and direct seed copper. In: IEEE Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2010. paper 8.5
  56. 56. Tagami M, Furutake N, Saito S, Hayashi Y. Highly-reliable low-resistance Cu interconnects with PVD-Ru/Ti barrier metal toward automotive LSIs. In: IEEE Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2008. pp. 205-207
  57. 57. Hu CK, Gignac L, Rosenberg R, Liniger E, Rubino J, Sambucetti C, et al. Reduced Cu interface diffusion by CoWP surface coating. Microelectronics and Reliability. 2003;70:406-411
  58. 58. Tokei Z, Lanckmans F, Van den bosch G, Van Hove M, Maex K, Bender H, et al. Reliability of copper dual damascene influenced by pre-clean. In: IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. 2002. pp. 118-123
  59. 59. Alers GB, Rozbicki RT, Harm GJ, Kailasam SK, Ray GW, Danek M. Barrier-first integration for improved reliability in copper dual damascene interconnects. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technical Conference Proceedings. 2003. pp. 27-29
  60. 60. Fu X, Forster J, Yu J, Gopalraja P, Bhatnagar A, Ahn S, et al. Advanced preclean for integration of PECVD SiCOH (k< 2.5) dielectrics with copper metallization beyond 45 nm technology. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2006. pp. 51-53
  61. 61. Chang YM, Leu J, Lin BH, Wang YL, Cheng YL. Comparison of H2 and NH3 treatments for copper interconnects. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2013;2013:7. Article ID: 825195
  62. 62. Baklanov MR, Shamiryan DG, Tokei Z, Beyer GP, Conard T, Vanhaelemeersch S, et al. Characterization of Cu surface cleaning by hydrogen plasma, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B. 2001;19:1201-1211
  63. 63. Cheng YL, Huang JF, Chang YM, Leu J. Impact of plasma treatment on structure and electrical properties of porous low dielectric constant SiCOH material. Thin Solid Films. 2013;544:537-540
  64. 64. Kamigata Y, Kurata Y, Masuda K, Amanokura J, Yoshida M, Hanazono M. Why abrasive free Cu slurry is promising? Materials Research Society Proceedings. 2001;671:M1.3
  65. 65. Kondo S, Yoon BU, Tokitoh S, Misawa K, Sone S, Shin HJ, et al. Low-pressure CMP for 300-mm ultra low-k(k= 1.6–1.8)/Cu integration. In: IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Proceedings. 2004. pp. 151-154
  66. 66. Chapelon LL, Chaabouni H, Imbert G, Brun P, Mellier M, Hamioud K, et al. Dense SiOC cap for damage-less ultra lowkintegration with direct CMP in C45 architecture and beyond. Microelectronic Engineering. 2008;85:2098-2101
  67. 67. Heylen N, Camerotto E, Volders H, Travaly Y, Vereecke G, Beyer GP, et al. CMP process optimization for improved compatibility with advanced metal liners. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2010. pp. 17-19
  68. 68. Landis HS, Sucharitaves J-T. Changing density requirements for semiconductor manufacturing. In: McKerrow AJ, Sacham-Diamand Y, Shingubara S, Shimogaki Y, editors. Advanced Metallization Conference Proceedings. Warrendale, PA: MRS; 2007. pp. 535-542
  69. 69. Oshida D, Takewaki T, Iguchi M, Taiji T, Morita T, Tsuchiya Y, et al., Quantitative analysis of correlation between insulator surface copper contamination and TDDB lifetime based on actual measurement. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2008. pp. 222-224
  70. 70. Ueki M, Onodera T, Ishikawa A, Hoshino S, Hayashi Y. Defectless monolithic low-k/Cu interconnects produced by chemically controlled chemical mechanical polishing process with in situ end-point-detection technique. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2010;49:04C029-1-04C029-6
  71. 71. Kanki T, Shirasu T, Takesako S, Sakamoto M, Asneil AA, Idani N, et al. On the elements of high throughput Cu-CMP slurries compatible with low step heights. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference. 2008. pp. 79-81
  72. 72. Chen SW, Kung TM, Liu CP, Chang SC, Cheng YL, Wang YL. Effect of electric potential and mechanical force on copper electro-chemical mechanical planarization. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2012;51:036504-1-036504-7
  73. 73. Black JR. Electromigration – A brief survey and some recent results. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 1969;16:338-347
  74. 74. Blech IA, Herring C. Stress generation by electromigration. Applied Physics Letters. 1976;29:131-133
  75. 75. Lin MH, Lin YL, Chen JM, Yeh M-S, Chang KP, Su KC, Wang T. Electromigration lifetime improvement of copper interconnect by cap/dielectric interface treatment and geometrical design. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 2005;52(12):2602-2608
  76. 76. Christiansen C, Li B, Gill J. Blech effect and lifetime projection for Cu/low-kinterconnects. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2008. pp. 114-116
  77. 77. Cheng YL, Lee SY, Chiu CC, Wu K. Back stress model on electromigration lifetime prediction in short length copper interconnects. In: 46th IEEE Annual International Reliability Physical Symposium Proceedings Conference (IRPS). 2008. pp. 685-686
  78. 78. Thompson CV. Using line-length effects to optimize circuit-level reliability. In: 15th IEEE Annual Int. Symp. on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA). 2008. pp. 63-66
  79. 79. Cheng YL, Chang WY, Wang YL. Line width dependence on electromigration performance for short and long Cu interconnects. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B. 2010;28(3):973-977
  80. 80. Black JR. Electromigration failure modes in aluminum metallization for semiconductor devices. Proceedings of the IEEE. 1969;57:1587-1594
  81. 81. Lloyd JR. Black’s law revisited—Nucleation and growth in electromigration failure. Microelectronics and Reliability. 2007;47:1468-1472
  82. 82. Blair JC, Ghate PB, Haywood CT. Concerning electromigration in thin films. Proceedings of the IEEE. 1971;59:1023-1024
  83. 83. Tan CM, Roy A. Electromigration in ULSI interconnects. Materials Science and Engineering. 2007;58:1-75
  84. 84. Scorzoni A, Neri B, Caprile C, Fantini F. Electromigration in Thin-film Inter-connection Lines: Models, Methods and Results, Material Science Reports. Vol. 7. New York: Elservier; 1991. pp. 143-219
  85. 85. Hau-Riege CS. An introduction to Cu electromigration. Microelectronics and Reliability. 2004;44:195-205
  86. 86. Hu C-K, Gignac L, Rosenberg R. Electromigration of Cu/low dielectric constant interconnects. Microelectronics and Reliability. 2006;46:213-231
  87. 87. Rru C, Kwon K-W, Loke ALS, Lee H, Nogami T, Dubin VM, Kavan RA, Ray GW, Wang SS. Microstructure and reliability of Cu interconnects. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 1999;46:1113-1120
  88. 88. Tao J, Cheung NW, Hu C. Metal electromigration damage healing under bidirectional current stress. IEEE Electron Device Letters. 1993;14:554-556
  89. 89. Tao J, Chen JF, Cheung NW, Hu C. Modeling and characterization of electromigration failures under bidirectional current stress. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 1996;43(5):800
  90. 90. Lane MW, Liniger EG, Lloyd JR. Relationship between interfacial adhesion and electromigration in Cu metallization. Journal of Applied Physics. 2003;93:1417-1421
  91. 91. Gosset LG, Chhun S, Guillan J, Gras R, Flake J, Daamen R, et al. Self aligned barrier approach: overview on process, module integration, and interconnect performance improvement challenges. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2006. pp. 84-86
  92. 92. Stamper AK, Baks H, Cooney E, Gignac L, Gill J, Hu C-K, et al. Damascene copper integration impact on electomigration and stress migration. In: Brongersma SH, Taylor TC, Tsujimura M, Masu K, editors. Proceedings of the Advanced Metallization Conference 2005. Pittsburgh, PA: MRS; 2006. pp. 727-733
  93. 93. Mandal RP, Cheung D, Yau W-F, Cohen B, Rengarajan S, Chou E. Comparison of κ = 3 silicon oxide-based dielectric pre-copper metallization preclean processes using black diamond. In: IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference Proceedings. 1999, pp. 299-303
  94. 94. Chhun S, Gosset LG, Casanova N, Guillaumond JF, Dumont-Girard P, Federspiel X, Pantel R, Arnal V, Arnaud L, Torres J. Microelectronic Engineering. 2004;76:106-112
  95. 95. Vairagar AV, Mhaisalkar SG, Krishnamoothy A. Effect of surface treatment on electromigration in sub-micro Cu damascene interconnects. Thin Solid Films. 2004;462-463:325-330
  96. 96. Li B, Christiansen C, Gill J, Sullivan T, Yashchin E, Filippi R. Threshold electromigration failure time and its statistics for Cu interconnects. Journal of Applied Physics. 2006;100:114516
  97. 97. Wei FL, Gan CL, Tan TL, Hau-Riege CS, Marathe AP, Vlassak JJ, et al. Electromigration-induced extrusion failures in Cu/low-kinterconnects. Journal of Applied Physics. 2008;104:023529-1-023529-10
  98. 98. Ogawa ET, Lee K-D, Blaschke VA, Ho PS. Electromigration reliability issues in dual-damascene Cu interconnections. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 2002;51:403-419
  99. 99. Vairagar AV, Mhaisalkar SG, Tu KN, Gusak AM, Meyer MA, Zschech E. In situ observation of electromigration-induced void migration in dual-damascene Cu interconnect structures. Applied Physics Letters. 2004;85:2502-2504
  100. 100. Hu C-K, Gignac L, Baker B, Liniger E, Yu R. Impact of Cu microstructure on electromigration reliability. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2007. pp. 93-95
  101. 101. Choi Z-S, Monig R, Thompson CV. Effects of microstructure on the formation, shape, and motion of voids during electromigration in passivated copper interconnects. Journal of Materials Research. 2008;23:383-391
  102. 102. Cheng YL, Wang YL, Chen HC, Lin JH. Effect of inter-level dielectrics on electromigration in damascene copper interconnect. Thin Solid Films. 2006;494:315-319
  103. 103. Hau-Riege SP, Thompson C. The effects of the mechanical properties of the confinement material on electromigration in metallic interconnects. Journal of Materials Research. 2000;15:1797-1802
  104. 104. Lee K-D, Lu X, Ogawa ET, Matsuhashi H, Ho PS. Electromigration study of Cu/low-kdual-damascene interconnects. In: IRPS Proceedings. 2002. pp. 322-326
  105. 105. Mosig K, Blaschke V. Electromigration reliability of Cu/spin-on porous ultra low-kinterconnects. In: McKerrow AJ, Shacham-Diamond Y, Zaima S, Ohba T, editors. AMC Proceedings, 2002. Pittsburgh, PA: MRS; 2001. pp. 427-432
  106. 106. Maekawa K, Mori K, Kobayashi K, Kumar N, Chu S, Chen S, et al. Improvement in reliability of Cu dual-damascene interconnects using Cu-Al alloy seed. In: Erb D, Ramm P, Masu K, Osaki A, editors. AMC Proceedings. Warrendale, PA: MRS; 2004. pp. 221-226
  107. 107. Yokogawa S, Tsuchiya H. Effects of Al doping on the electromigration performance of damascene Cu interconnects. Journal of Applied Physics. 2007;101:013513
  108. 108. Isobayashi A, Enomoto Y, Yamada H, Takahashi S, Kadomura S. Thermally robust Cu interconnects with Cu-Ag alloy for sub 45 nm node. In: IEEE International Electron Device Meeting Proceedings. 2004. pp. 953-956
  109. 109. Koike J, Haneda M, Iijima J, Wada M, Cu alloy metallization for self-forming barrier process. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2006. pp. 161-163
  110. 110. Ohoka Y, Ohba Y, Isobayashi A, Hayashi T, Komai N, Arakawa S, et al. Integration of high performance and low cost Cu/ultra low-kSiOC (k= 2.0) interconnects with self-formed barrier technology for 32 nm-node and beyond. In: IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2007. pp. 67-69
  111. 111. Takewaki T, Kaihara R, Ohmi T, Nitta T. Excellent electro/stress-migration-resistance surface-silicide passivated giant-grain Cu-Mg alloy interconnect technology for gig scale integration (GSI). IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting. 1995:253-256
  112. 112. Braeckelmann G, Venkatraman R, Capasso C, Herrick M. Integration and reliability of copper magnesium alloys for multilevel interconnects, In: Interconnect Technology, IEEE International Conference. 2000. pp. 236-238
  113. 113. Igarashi Y, Ito T. Electromigration properties of copper-zirconium alloy interconnect. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B. 1998;16:2745-2750
  114. 114. Tonegawa T, Hiroi M, Motoyama K, Fujii K, Miyamoto H. Suppression of bimodal stress-induced voiding using high-diffusive dopant Cu-alloy seed layer. In: Interconnect Technology, IEEE International Conference. 2003. pp. 216-218
  115. 115. Lee KL, Hu CK, Tu KN. In situ scanning electron microscope comparison studies on electromigration of Cu and Cu(Sn) alloys for advanced chip interconnects. Journal of Applied Physics. 1995;78:4428-4437
  116. 116. Ogawa ET, McPherson JW, Rosal JA, Dickerson KJ, Chiu T-C, Tsung LY, et al. Stress-induced voiding under vias connected to wide Cu metal leads. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2002. pp. 312-321
  117. 117. Paik J-M, Park I-M, Joo Y-C, Park K-C. Linewidth dependence of grain structure and stress in damascene Cu lines. Journal of Applied Physics. 2006;99:024509
  118. 118. Sullivan TD. Stress-induced voiding in microelectronic metallization: Void growth models and refinements. Annual Review of Materials Science. 1996;26:333-364
  119. 119. Gan D, Li B, Ho PS. Stress-induced void formation in passivated Cu films, materials, technology and reliability of advanced interconnects. MRS Proceedings. 2005;863:259-264
  120. 120. Oshima T, Hinode K, Yamaguchi H, Aoki H, Torii K, Saito T, et al. Suppression of stress-induced voiding in copper interconnects. In: IEEE International Electron Device Meeting Proceedings. 2002. pp. 757-760
  121. 121. Ohring M. Reliability and Failure Analysis of Electronic Materials and Devices. NY: Academic Press; 1998
  122. 122. Gambino JP, Lee TC, Chen F, Sullivan TD. Reliability of copper interconnects: Stress-induced voids. Electrochemical Society Transactions. 2009;18:205-211
  123. 123. Li Y-L, Tokei Z, Roussel P, Groeseneken G, Maex K. Layout dependency induced deviation from poisson area scaling in BEOL dielectric reliability. Microelectronics and Reliability. 2005;45:1299-1304
  124. 124. Doong KYY, Wang RCJ, Lin SC, Hung LJ, Lee SY, Chiu CC, et al. Stress-induced voiding and its geometry dependency characterization. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2003. pp. 156-160
  125. 125. McCullen K. Redundant via insertion in restricted topology layouts, proceedings of the eighth international symposium on quality. Electronic Design. 2007:821-828
  126. 126. Yoshida K, Fujimaki T, Miyamoto K, Honma T, Kaneko H, Nakazawa H, et al. Stress-induced voiding phenomena for an actual CMOS LSI interconnects. In: IEEE International Electron Device Meeting Proceedings. 2002. pp. 753-756
  127. 127. Zhai CJ, Yao HW, Besser PR, Marathe A, Blish II RC, Erb D, et al. Stress modelling of Cu/low-k BEOL-applications to stress migration. International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2004. pp. 234-239
  128. 128. Hau-Riege CS, Hau-Riege SP, Marathe AP. The effect of interlevel dielectric on the critical tensile stress to void nucleation for the reliability of Cu interconnects. Journal of Applied Physics. 2004;96:5792-5796
  129. 129. Vairagar AV, Gan Z, Shao W, Mhaisalkar SG, Li H, Tu KN, Chen Z, Zschech E, Engelmann HJ, Zhang S. Improvement of electromigration lifetime of submicrometer dual-damascene Cu interconnects through surface engineering. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2006;153(9):G840-G845
  130. 130. Fischer AH, Glasow AV, Penka S, Ungar F. Process optimization-the key to obtain highly reliable Cu interconnects. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference. 2003. pp. 253-255
  131. 131. Yi S-M, Shim C, Lee H-C, Han J-W, Kim K-H, Joo Y-C. Effect of capping layer and post-CMP surface treatments on adhesion between damascene Cu and capping layer for ULSI interconnects. Microelectronic Engineering. 2008;85(3):621-624
  132. 132. Shaw TM, Gignac L, Liu X-H, Rosenberg RR, Levine E, McLaughlin P, et al. Stress voiding in wide copper lines. In: Baker SP, Korhonen MA, Arzt E, Ho PS, editors. Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization. New York: AIP; 2002. pp. 177-183
  133. 133. Ishigami T, Kurokawa T, Kakuhara Y, Withers B, Jacobs J, Kolics A, et al. High reliability Cu interconnection utilizing a low contamination CoWP capping layer. IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2004. pp. 75-77
  134. 134. Armini S, Prado JL, Krishtab M,. Swerts J, Verdonck P, Meersschaut J, Conard T, Blauw M, Struyf H, Baklanov MR. Pore sealing of k 2.0 dielectricsassisted by self-assembled monolayers deposited from vapor phase. Microelectronic Engineering. 2014;120:240-245
  135. 135. Chen F, Li B, Lee T, Christiansen C, Gill J, Angyal M, et al. Technology reliability qualification of a 65 nm CMOS Cu/low-kBEOL interconnect. IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. 2006. pp. 97-105
  136. 136. Lee HJ, Hong TE, Kim SH. Atomic layer deposited self-forming Ru-Mn diffusion barrier for seedless Cu interconnects. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2016;686:1025-1031
  137. 137. Kimura M. Oxide breakdown mechanism and quantum physical chemistry for time-dependent dielectric breakdown. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 1997. pp. 190-200
  138. 138. Ogawa ET, Kim J, Haase GS, Mogul HC, McPherson IW. Leakage, breakdown, and TDDB characteristics of porous low-ksilica-based interconnect dielectrics. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2003. pp. 166-172
  139. 139. Chen F, McLaughlin P, Gambino J, Wu E, Demarest J, Meatyard D, et al. The effect of metal area and line spacing on TDDB characteristics of 45 nm low-kSiCOH dielectrics. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2007. pp. 382-389
  140. 140. Kim J, Ogawa ET, McPherson JW. Time dependent dielectric breakdown characteristics of low-kdielectric (SiOC) over a wide range of test areas and electric fields. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2007. pp. 399-404
  141. 141. Gambino J, Lee TC, Chen F, Sullivan TD. Reliability challenges for advanced copper interconnects: electromigration and time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB). In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits. 2009. pp. 677-684
  142. 142. Hunter WR. The analysis of oxide reliability data. International Reliability Workshop Final Report. 1998. pp. 114-134
  143. 143. Alers GB, Jow K, Shaviv R, Kooi G, Ray GW. Interlevel dielectric failures in copper/low-kstructures. IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability. 2004;4(2):148-152
  144. 144. Noguchi J. Dominant factors in TDDB degradation of Cu interconnects. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 2005;52(8):1743-1750
  145. 145. Chen F, Shinosky M. Addressing Cu/low-kdielectric TDDB-reliability challenges for advanced CMOS technologies. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 2009;56(1):2-12
  146. 146. Chen F, Bravo O, Harmon D, Shinosky M, Aitken J. Cu/low-kdielectric TDDB reliability issues for advanced CMOS technologies. Microelectronics and Reliability. 2008;48:1375-1383
  147. 147. Ueno K, Kameyama A, Matsumoto A, Iguchi M, Takewaki T, Oshida D, et al. Time-dependent dielectric breakdown characterization of 90-and 65-nm-node Cu/SiOC interconnects with via plugs. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2007;46:1444-1451
  148. 148. Haase GS, Ogawa ET, McPherson JW. Reliability analysis method for low-kinterconnect dielectrics breakdown in integrated circuits. Journal of Applied Physics. 2005;98:034503
  149. 149. Chen F, Bravo O, Chanda K, McLaughlin P, Sullivan T, Gill J, et al. A comprehensive study of low-kSiCOH TDDB phenomena and its reliability lifetime model development. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2006. pp. 46-53
  150. 150. Chen F, Chanda K, Gill J, Angyal M, Demarest J, Sullivan T, et al. Investigation of CVD SiCOH low-ktime-dependent dielectric breakdown at 65 nm node technology. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2005. pp. 501-507
  151. 151. Baklanov MR, Zhao L, Besien EV, Pntouvaki M. Effect of porogen residue onelectrical characteristics of ultra low-kmaterials. Microelectronic Engineering. 2011;88:990-993
  152. 152. Noguchi J, Ohashi N, Jimbo T, Yamaguchi H, Takeda K, Hinode K. Effect of NH3-plasma treatment and CMP modification on TDDB improvement in Cu metallization. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 2001;48:1340-1345
  153. 153. Cheng YL, Lin BH, Huang SW. Effect of O2 plasma treatment on physical, electrical, and reliability characteristics of low dielectric constant materials. Thin Solid Films. 2014;572:44-50
  154. 154. Liv J, Gan D, Hu C, Kiene M, Hu PS, Volksen W, Miller RD. Porosity effect on the dielectric constant and thermomechanical properties of organosilicate films. Applied Physics Letters. 2002;81:4180-4182
  155. 155. Tőkei Z, Croes K, Beyer GP. Reliability of copper low-kinterconnects. Microelectronic Engineering. 2010;87(3):348-354
  156. 156. Chen F, Lloyd JR, Chanda K, Achanta R, Bravo O, Strong A, et al. Line edge roughness and spacing effect on low-kTDDB characteristics. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2008. pp. 132-137
  157. 157. Noguchi J, Miura N, Kubo M, Tamaru T, Yamaguchi H, Hamada N, et al. Cu-ion-migration phenomena and its influence on TDDB lifetime in Cu metallization. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2003. pp. 287-292
  158. 158. Raghavan G, Chiang C, Anders PB, Tzeng S, Villasol R, Bai G, Bohr M, Fraser DB. Diffusion of copper through dielectric films under bias temperature stress. Thin Solid Films. 1995;262:168-176
  159. 159. Lloyd JR, Murray CE, Ponoth S, Cohen S, Liniger E. The effect of Cu diffusion on the TDDB behavior in a low-kinterlevel dielectrics. Microelectronics and Reliability. 2006;46:1643-1647
  160. 160. Suzumura N, Yamamoto S, Kodama D, Makabe K, Komori J, Murakami E, et al. A new TDDB degradation model based on Cu ion drift in Cu interconnect dielectrics. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2006. pp. 484-489
  161. 161. Oshida D, Takewaki T, Iguchi M, Taiji T, Morita T, Tsuchiya Y, et al. Quantitative analysis of correlation between insulator surface copper contamination and TDDB lifetime based on actual measurement. In: IEEE Interconnect Technology Conference Proceedings. 2008. pp. 222-224
  162. 162. Chen F, Shinosky MA. Electron fluence driven, Cu catalyzed, interface breakdown mechanism for BEOL low-ktime dependent dielectric breakdown. Microelectronics and Reliability. 2014;54(3):529-540
  163. 163. McPherson JW, Mogul HC. Underlying physics of the thermochemical E model in describing low-field time-dependent dielectric breakdown in SiO2 thin films. Journal of Applied Physics. 1998;84:1513-1523
  164. 164. Haase GS, McPherson JW. Modeling of interconnect dielectric lifetime under stress conditions and new extrapolation methodologies for time-dependent dielectric breakdown. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2007. pp. 390-398
  165. 165. Lloyd JR, Liniger E, Shaw TM. Simple model for time-dependent dielectric breakdown in inter- and intralevel low-kdielectrics. Journal of Applied Physics. 2005;98:084109
  166. 166. McPherson JW. Time dependent dielectric breakdown physics–models revisited. Microelectronics and Reliability. 2012;52:1753-1760
  167. 167. Tokei Z, Sutcliffe V, Demuynck S, Iacopi F, Roussel P, Beyer GP, et al. Impact of the barrier/dielectric interface quality on reliability of Cu porous-low-kinterconnects. In: IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 2004. pp. 326-332
  168. 168. Li Y, Tokei Z, Mandrekar T, Mebarki B, Groeseneken G, Maex K. Barrier integrity effect on leakage mechanism and dielectric reliability of copper/OSG interconnects, materials, technology and reliability of advanced interconnects. MRS Proceedings. 2005;863:265-270
  169. 169. Yamada Y, Konishi N, Noguchi J, Jimbo T. Influence of CMP slurries and post-CMP cleaning solutions on Cu interconnects and TDDB reliability. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2008;155(7):H485-H490
  170. 170. Jung S-Y, Kim B-J, Lee NY, Kim B-M, Yeom SJ, Kwak NJ, Joo Y-C. Bias polarity and frequency effects of Cu-induced dielectric breakdown in damascene Cu interconnects. Microelectronic Engineering. 2011;89:58-61
  171. 171. Cheng YL, Lee CY, Huang YL, Sun CR, Lee WH, Chen GS, Fang JS, Phan BT. Cu-induced dielectric breakdown of porous low dielectric constant film. Journal of Electronic Materials. 2017;46(6):3627-3633

Written By

Yi-Lung Cheng, Chih-Yen Lee and Yao-Liang Huang

Submitted: June 28th, 2017 Reviewed: November 13th, 2017 Published: January 26th, 2018