List of immunomodulators tested on goats.
Information on goat genome has led to a better understanding of the genetics of goats, its response to infection and the underlying immune response mechanism. Natural product-based therapeutic can therefore be utilized to target genes important for goat immunity. In this chapter, we have summarized the effect of diet and dietary supplements as immune modulators in goats. These modulators affect the expression of genes and secreted proteins associated with innate and adaptive immune response and homeostasis. Probiotics, mushroom extracts, plant polyphenol extracts, Sericea lespedeza (SL) and cowpea diet affect key molecular pathways including Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway, Wnt signaling pathway and cytokine-mediated signaling pathway. Results from various studies reviewed in this chapter suggest that utilization of dietary immunomodulators has beneficial effects on goat health and production.
- gene expression
- innate immunity
The domestic goat (
In the United States, production of small ruminants is a growing industry as a result of high demand for grass-fed or organically produced livestock . Compared to all other livestock enterprise, goat production requires minimal capital input and low cost of breeding stock . Globally, healthy goats are crucial for the long-term success of the goat industry. Production is negatively challenged by factors such as feed toxins, respiratory diseases (pneumonia) and other infectious diseases. Goats are also susceptible to viral diseases (foot and mouth diseases) and bacterial diseases (mastitis). Gastrointestinal (GI) nematode infection is considered the most important limiting factor in goat production systems around the world and results in huge economic losses to producers.
However, resistance to current drugs and lack of interest in developing new drugs by companies pose a challenge for sustainable ruminant production. The widely used approach for the treatment of infection by parasite is drug treatment. Measures used to reduce parasite infection include the reduction of stock density and the maximization of pasture to reduce parasite numbers. Plant-based anthelmintic is also being explored for use in the elimination of gastrointestinal parasites including extracts such as: garlic, neem, wormwood, tobacco, cowpea [4, 5, 6] and Sericea lespedeza . Several other alternatives that have been proposed include the use of nonchemical additives such as probiotics  and prebiotics, the improved production practices and the use of genetics-based breeding schemes. Improvement in animal nutrition can also impact the immune response including gene response, protein synthesis, modification and degradation, metabolism, signal transduction and cellular proliferation . The understanding of protective mechanisms regarding the initial steps of the host’s response to pest or parasite-derived molecules that can correlate with resistance or susceptibility to pathogens needs to be explored. This understanding will aid the design of immunomodulatory strategies to induce a change in the magnitude of immune or nonimmune responses.
2. The goat genome
In the last decade, molecular genetics has led to the discovery of individual genes or candidate genes with substantial effects on our understanding of homeostasis and immunity. The goat genome has been sequenced, and raw sequences have been deposited in NCBI (GenBank, CapAeg_1.0 (GCA_000978405.1) under the accession no. SRA184825. Utilizing information on the goat genome enables a better understanding of the genetics of the goat and how it responses to infection and disease and fights it naturally. The sequencing of the goat genome has led to increased understanding of the genetics underlying immune response mechanism . Genes significant for goat immunity can be targeted by using natural products and plant-based therapeutics for improving goat health. This eliminates the need for chemical treatment, buildup of antibiotic resistance and food insecurity concerns among goat consumers.
2.1. Innate immune system
The main function of the immune system is to distinguish between own cells and tissues from external cells and tissues in order to protect against infestation. The immune system has various mechanisms to eliminate or withstand the impact of external agents. The animal’s immune system is composed of two related functional elements: the innate immune system and the adaptive immune system . Both function in coordination to protect against invading microorganisms . Innate immunity is the first line of defense against organisms; it acts in a nonspecific way through anatomical barriers (skin, mucus membrane), secretions, cells and other elements. The adaptive immune system is the second line of defense which responds slower than the innate immunity system. Innate immune defense plays a key role in affording protection . Unlike the innate immune system, the adaptive immune system has the ability to ‘memorize’ infectious agents allowing the adaptive immune system to serve as a rapid response system if pathological agents are encountered again . The innate immune system consists of natural killer cells, T-cell and B-cell, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, macrophages and polymorphonuclear neutrophils. These cells are called white blood cells or leukocytes and are also divided into two groups based on their morphology: granulocytes and agranulocytes. Granulocytes include eosinophils, neutrophils and basophils, and agranulocytes are lymphocytes (T and B cells) and macrophages . A differential white blood cell count is an important tool used to provide clinical diagnosis and for monitoring of disease and blood disorders . This system quantifies and differentiates white blood cells at one particular time giving an insight into infection and checking whether treatments are working .
2.2. Toll-like receptors
Animals live in a wide variety of microbe-rich environments, and hence, it is crucial to have a sensitive innate defense mechanism which relies in part by recognizing conserved molecules that are unique to some classes of potential pathogens . It is very important to understand the innate immunity against microbial components and its critical role in host defense against infection. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have been shown to participate in the recognition of pathogens by the innate immune system.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a highly conserved group of proteins that have been identified in mammals . The TLR family consists of 10 receptors: TLR-1-10, which are very important in the identification of microbes . The coding regions within the goats, TLR-1-10 genes, have been sequenced and found to be conserved and highly similar in nucleotide composition . With the discovery of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), studies have shown that pathogen recognition by the innate immune system is broadly specific, which relies on germline-encoded pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) to detect relatively conserved components of pathogens referred to as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) . The PAMPs recognized by TLRs include lipids, lipoproteins, proteins and nucleic acids derived from a wide range of microbes such as bacteria, viruses, parasites and fungi  which initiates a complex signaling cascade to activate a wide variety of transcription factors and inflammatory cytokines .
Cytokines are small proteins that transmit information from one cell to another. The analysis of cytokines secreted by immune cells in response to infectious agents is crucial to understand pathogenesis and immunity. Most cells in the body produce cytokines during inflammatory processes which represent a large series of regulatory proteins of the immunologic system. Many cytokines are referred to as interleukins, a name indicating that they are secreted by some leukocytes and act upon other leukocytes. Two general patterns of cytokine secretion by such cells have been described. In the Th1 response, cytokines initiate cell-mediated reactions defined as the activation of macrophages to combat infectious pathogens by releasing IL-1, IL-2, IL-8, and IL-12 to activate inflammation . In the Th2 response, T-helper cells activate B-cells; interleukins IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-13 are released to counter infectious agents caused by extracellular organisms . Studies have shown that the release of cytokines is essential for host survival from infection and is also required for tissue repair.
2.4. Wingless pathway
The Wingless (Wnt) signaling pathway is a conserved pathway in mammals. It involves Wnts, which are secreted glycoproteins that are associated with the Wnt-1 and Wingless gene products of Drosophila . Activation of Wnt signaling happens when Wnt ligands binds to Frizzled receptors together with other receptors lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) 5 and 6 [23, 24, 25]. About 19 Wnt ligands and 10 Frizzle receptors have been identified in metazoan mammals. The receptor-ligand interaction leads to downstream signal regulation which is categorized into two: canonical (Wnt/β-catenin) and noncanonical pathways. The former is dependent on β-catenin, but the latter is not. The noncanonical pathway is further subdivided into the planar cell polarity and the Wnt/Ca2+ pathways. The Wnt signaling pathway function in cellular processes includes cell proliferation, cell differentiation, cell migration, cell polarity and cell fate determination and has recently been implicated in stem cell renewal . Wnt signaling has also been associated with various biological processes including adipogenesis, myogenesis, embryogenesis and meat quality. In addition, Wnt signaling has been associated with innate immune and inflammation responses via a cross talk with the TLR and NF-κB pathways [27, 28]. Therefore, a defective or deregulated Wnt signaling has detrimental effect on developing embryo (birth defects) and also affects a number of pathological disease conditions.
3. Methodologies for goat studies
3.1. Evaluation of phenotypic parameters
Various phenotypic characteristics are measured in goats following treatment with supplements or feeds in a study. Usually, body weight, body condition score and FAMACHA score are recorded periodically as a measure of effect on growth and health. Body weights are taken before morning feeding using a portable scale . Body condition is scored on a scale of 1–5 by physical examination of the goat’s body as described by Villaquiran et al. . Blood samples collected aseptically are evaluated for packed cell volume (PCV) and white blood differential cell counts. PCV is widely used as an indicator trait for anemia. White blood differential counts are measured using the procedure described by Schalm et al. . Fecal samples are collected directly from the rectum and evaluated for the number of parasite egg counts. More specifically, the number of strongyle eggs and coccidia oocytes is measured using the modified McMaster method . The fecal eggs counted are multiplied by 50, and resulting total is expressed as eggs per gram (epg) of fecal sample per animal .
3.2. Molecular techniques
The molecular effects of immunomodulators have been evaluated in goats at the gene transcription and protein levels using different techniques including real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
3.3. Real-time PCR
Quantitative real-time PCR is used to measure messenger RNA (MRNA) levels . For real-time PCR analysis, total RNA is isolated from whole blood cell pellets using Trizol method or QuickRNA MiniPrep Kit (Zymo Research) as per manufacturer’s procedure. The concentration and purity of the RNA are checked on NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (ND-1000; Thermo Fisher). Mostly, a pure RNA typically yields a 260/280 ratio of ˜2.0 and this is considered ideal. A 260/280 ratio below 2.0 suggests protein contamination . In addition, the integrity of the RNA (RNA integrity number (RIN)) can be measured with a bioanalyzer, and a RIN <7.0 indicates a good RNA. Since RNA is not stable, it is converted into more stable complimentary DNA (cDNA) using cDNA conversion kits containing oligo (DT) and random primers, reverse transcriptase, and other needed reagents as specified in the manufacturer’s manual. Real-time PCR is performed with reaction mixture comprising of cDNA template, primers and SYBR Green . Housing-keeping genes such as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH),
3.3.1. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a molecular assay used for analytical detection and quantification of specific antigens or antibodies in a given sample. It uses the concept of an antigen binding to its specific antibody which enables detection of antigens such as proteins, peptides and antibodies . With ELISA, goat serum or plasma is evaluated for the levels of immune response and inflammation biomarkers such as cytokines, prostaglandin and immunoglobulins. Cytokines measured in goat serum following dietary supplementation include TNFα, IL-1β, IL-8, GCSF, GMCSF, Rantes and IFNγ [7, 8, 34]. The levels of secreted prostaglandin E, an eicosanoid and also an inflammation mediator have also been measured in goat serum and plasma with ELISA [34, 35, 36].
3.4. Effect of pathogen-associated molecular patterns
Goats rely on pasture as their main source of feed. Studies have been done to elucidate the effects of different PAMPs, microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP) and plant polyphenol metabolite in animal feed on goat health. Pathogen-associated molecular pattern evaluated in goats includes the following: probiotics, mushroom, plant polyphenols, cowpea, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), peptidoglycan, nystatin and Sericea lespedeza (Table 1).
Probiotics has been studied and considered as health beneficial microorganism which plays a role in maintaining homeostasis. Previous studies have shown the use of probiotics to modulate gastrointestinal health. Liong  reported the resistance to infectious diseases in the gastrointestinal tract as a result of probiotics. Probiotics as a supplement in animal feed has shown to have a beneficial effect on milk yield, fat and protein content . Ekwemalor et al.  reported the release of proinflammatory cytokines in goats orally drenched with probiotics (
|Modulator (s)||Sample type (s)||Cytokines||Innate immune response||Reference|
|Probiotics||Whole blood, serum||IL2, IL5, IL10, IL8, IL18||TLR4, TLR6, TLR7, TLR9||[80, 81]|
|Plant extract||Whole blood||—||TLR2|||
|Cowpea||Whole blood, serum, plasma||TNFα, IL1α, ILβ, IL8 ||TLR2||[34, 69]|
|Sericea lespedeza||Whole blood, serum||TNF-α, IFNr, GCSF, GMCSF, IL-1α, IP-10||TLR2 and TLR4|||
|Mushroom||Neutrophils, whole blood, serum||IFNr, Rantes and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF). granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)||TLR1, TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9, TLR10|||
|Lipopolysaccharide||Mammary epithelial cells, whole blood, blood leukocytes||IL1B, CCL3 and IL8, ||[54, 83]|
|Lipoteichoic acid||Mammary epithelial cells|||
|Pattern recognition receptors (PPRs)||DDX58, NLRP3, NOD1, NOD2, TLR1, TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9|||
|Cytokines||CCL2, CCL5, CSF2, CXCL10, IFNA1, IFNB1, IL18, 1L1A, IL1B, IL2, CXCL8, TNF|||
|Innate immunity genes||APCS, C3, CASP1, CD14, CD4, CD40, CD40LG, CD8A, CRP, HLA-A, HLA-E, IL1R1, IRAK1, IRF3, IRF7, ITGAM, LY96, LTZ, MAPK1, MAPK8, MBL2, MPO, MX1, MYD88, NFKB1, NFKB1A, STAT1, TICAM1, TRAF6|||
|Th1 markers & immune response||CCR5, CD80, CXCR3, IFNG, IL18, IL23A, SLC11A1, STAT4, TBX21, TLR4, TLR6|||
|Th17 markers||CCR6, IL17A, RORC, STAT3|||
|T-cell activation||CD80, CD86, ICAM1, IFNG, IL23A, 1 L6, SLC11A1|||
|Treg markers||CCR4, CCR8, FOXP3, IL10|||
|Adaptive immunity genes||CD40, CD40LG, CD8A, CRP, FASLG, HLA-A, IFNARI, IL1B, IL1R1, IRF3, IRF7, ITGAM, JAK2, MAPK8, MBL2, MX1, NFKB1, RAG1, STAT1|||
|Inflammatory response||APCS, C3, CCL5, CRP, FOXP3, IL1A, IL1B, IL4, IL6, MBL2, STAT3, TNF|||
|Defense response to bacteria||IFNB1, IFNG, IL23A, IL6, LYZ, MBL2, MYD88, NOD1, NOD2, SLC11A1, TLR1, TLR3, TLR4, TLR6, TLR9, TNF|||
|Defense response to viruses||CD4, CD40, CD86, CD8A, CXCL10, DDX58, HLA-A, IFNARI, IFNBI, IL23A, IL6, NLRP3, TICAM1, TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, TYK2|||
Researchers have reported effects of probiotics in goats of which most effects have been attributed to an increase in the innate immune system and others in the acquired immune response. Leeber et al.  reported that probiotics have the properties to modulate host immune system through different signaling pathways of innate immune cells. The innate immune system functions by initiating a response to microorganisms or their components via pattern recognition receptors such as nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors or TLR . Previous studies conducted by Worku and Morris  and Worku et al.  have shown the expression of TLRs in whole blood.
When ligands bind to TLRs, they trigger at least two most important cell signaling pathways. One of the pathways involves MyD88, an adaptor protein which is shared by most TLRs. When this pathway is triggered, it leads to the activation of the transcription factor NF-κB which then results in the release of proinflammatory cytokines [10, 43, 44]. Ekwemalor et al.  reported that probiotics modulated the expression of genes in myeloid differentiation antigen 88 (MYD88)-dependent or MYD88-independent system, TLR-mediated signaling induction pathway, nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), cytokine-mediated signaling pathways and Wnt signaling pathway. Table 3 shows the different genes that were expressed in the Wnt signaling pathway involved in canonical Wnt signaling, planar cell polarity, negative regulation, calcium signaling, cell growth and proliferation as a result of probiotics.
|Canonical WNT signaling||Probiotics||APC, AXIN2, CSNK1A1, DVL2, FZDI, FZD7, FZD8, GSK3A, GSK3B, LEF1, LRP5, NKD1, PORCN, RUVBL1, SFRP4, TCF7, TCF7L1, WIF1, WNT1, WNT2, WNT3A, WNT7B, WNT8A|||
|Wnt signaling target genes||Probiotics||CCND2, WISP1|||
|Planar cell polarity||Probiotics||DAAM1, MAPK8, VANGL2,|||
|WNT signaling negative regulation||Probiotics||FBXW4, FBXW11, FRZB|||
|Cell growth and proliferation||Probiotics||FOXN1, JUN, MMPZ, PPARD||,|
|WNT calcium signaling||Probiotics Nystatin||NFATC1, WNT5B, WNT5A||[35, 80]|
3.4.2. Mushrooms (Coriolus versicolor)
Mushrooms have been studied and are known for their nutritional and medicinal properties. They contain bioactive compounds which are of medicinal importance. There are several types of mushroom of which
3.4.3. Lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan and nystatin
Bacteria produce molecules such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), lipoproteins, peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acids (LTAs), and this serves as specific molecular signatures for different classes of bacteria . Lipopolysaccharides (LPSs), also known as lipoglycans, are the main surface membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. LPSs comprise poly- or oligosaccharide region and lipid A, which is the main immunostimulatory part of LPS . Lipopolysaccharide is recognized by TLR4 assisted by CD14 proteins .
Peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acids are the major stimulatory components of Gram-negative bacteria and are recognized by TLR2 . Pathogen recognition receptors, such as TLRs, have evolved to recognize these PAMPs and detect invading disease microbes .
The linkage between PAMPs, TLR, activation of the prostaglandin pathway and the promotion of Wnt signaling in inflammatory response has been studied [52, 53]. Previous work by Asiamah et al.  also indicates that TLR2 and Frizzled receptors are increased in response to bacterial cell wall components (lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan). Nystatin is a lipid raft inhibitor derived from the bacterium
3.4.4. Plant polyphenols
Apart from plants being important feed resource for animal nutrition, they are also a rich source of polyphenol bioactive compounds that have beneficial health effects. Polyphenols (also known as phenolic compounds) are naturally occurring plant metabolites and are an integral part of both human and animal diet . These compounds include flavonoids, tannins, phenolic acid and others . Feed resources containing tannins have been reported to have both beneficial and detrimental effects on grazing animals. Tannin-rich plants have direct antiparasitic activity but might also act indirectly by increasing host resistance. These effects vary depending on the species of plant, parasite and host . The antiparasitic potential of forage legumes (Fabaceae family), including sulla (
The roles of polyphenol extracts from plants in the immune function have been reported on different cell types both
3.4.5. Sericea lespedeza
Sericea lespedeza (
A study by Adjei-Fremah et al.  demonstrated the impact of cowpea forage grazing, particularly Mississippi Silver variety on growth, internal parasite burden, and markers of immunity in goats. Their study results showed a modulation in cytokines levels, TNF-α, IL-8, and IP10 decreased, whereas an increase in G-CSF, Rantes and IFNγ was observed. The total antioxidants in plasma also increased in the cowpea-grazed goats [34, 73]. Cowpea diet may therefore stimulate innate immune response in goats, and this will help the animals fight against infectious pathogens and diseases. The immunomodulatory potential of cowpea feed may be due to at least in part their polyphenols [68, 74, 75]. Phenolic compounds in animal feeds have antioxidant properties that prevent the damaging effect of free radicals and their metabolic by-products  and stimulate an immune response in animals .
These studies provide an insight into the utility of cross-reactive regents to understand the molecular genetics and genome biology of the goat and importance of dietary modulators as avenues for immune modulation and maintenance of homeostasis in the goat. Treatment with probiotics, mushroom extracts, PAMPS and plant-derived PAMPS resulted in differential expression of genes related to TLR signaling and WNT signaling pathway. Greater insight is provided into goat molecular genetics and genome biology, conserved and novel genes and signaling pathways. Gene expression and modulation has implications for the design and development of innovative therapeutics. Novel goat-specific and conserved gene expression patterns have been identified and provide insight into the utility of genome analysis for the better definition of the mechanism of action of modulators of gene expression in the goat for improved production and welfare.
McGuire, S. FAO, IFAD, and WFP. The state of food insecurity in the world 2015: Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: Taking stock of uneven progress. Rome: FAO, 2015. Advances in Nutrition: An International Review Journal. 2015: 6(5):623-624
Joshi BR, Kommuru DS, Terrill TH, Mosjidis JA, Burke JM, Shakya KP, Miller JE. Effect of feeding Sericea lespedeza leaf meal in goats experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. Veterinary Parasitology. 2011; 178(1):192-197
Schiere JB, Ibrahim MNM, Van Keulen H. The role of livestock for sustainability in mixed farming: Criteria and scenario studies under varying resource allocation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2002; 90(2):139-153
Worku M, Franco R, Baldwin K. Efficacy of garlic as an anthelmintic in adult Boer goats. Archives of Biological Sciences. 2009; 61(1):135-140
Worku M, Franco R, Miller JH. Evaluation of the activity of plant extracts in Boer goats. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2009; 4(4):72-79
Adjei-Fremah S, Asiamah EK, Ekwemalor K, Jackai L, Schimmel K, Worku M. Modulation of bovine Wnt signaling pathway genes by cowpea phenolic extract. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2016; 8(3):21
Worku M, Abdalla A, Adjei-Fremah S, Ismail H. The impact of diet on expression of genes involved in innate immunity in goat blood. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2016; 8(3):1
Ekwemalor K, Asiamah E, Worku M. Effect of a mushroom ( Coriolus versicolor) based probiotic on the expression of toll-like receptors and signal transduction in goat neutrophils. Journal of Molecular Biology Research. 2016; 6(1):71
Afacan NJ, Fjell CD, Hancock RE. A systems biology approach to nutritional immunology—Focus on innate immunity. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2012; 33(1):14-25
Raja A, Vignesh AR, Mary BA, Tirumurugaan KG, Raj GD, Kataria R, Kumanan K. Sequence analysis of toll-like receptor genes 1-10 of goat ( Capra hircus). Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2011; 140(3):252-258
Hoffmann JA, Kafatos FC, Janeway CA, Ezekowitz RAB. Phylogenetic perspectives in innate immunity. Science. 1999; 284(5418):1313-1318
Medzhitov R, Janeway CA. Decoding the patterns of self and nonself by the innate immune system. Science. 2002; 296(5566):298-300
Siwicki AK, Anderson DP, Rumsey GL. Dietary intake of immunostimulants by rainbow trout affects non-specific immunity and protection against furunculosis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 1994; 41(1-2):125-139
Kaplan RM, Burke JM, Terrill TH, Miller JE, Getz WR, Mobini S, Vatta AF. Validation of the FAMACHA© eye color chart for detecting clinical anemia in sheep and goats on farms in the southern United States. Veterinary Parasitology. 2004;(1):105-120
Houwen B. The differential cell count. Laboratory Hematology. 2001; 7:89-100
Tirumurugaan KG, Dhanasekaran S, Raj GD, Raja A, Kumanan K, Ramaswamy V. Differential expression of toll-like receptor mRNA in selected tissues of goat ( Capra hircus). Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2010; 133(2):296-301
Medzhitov R, Preston-Hurlburt P, Janeway CA Jr. A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature. 1997; 388(6640):394
Takeda K, Akira S. Toll-like receptors in innate immunity. International Immunology. 2005; 17(1):1-14
Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annual Review of Immunology. 2002; 20(1):197-216
Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell. 2006; 124(4):783-801
Raghupathy R. Pregnancy: Success and failure within the Th1/Th2/Th3 paradigm. Seminars in Immunology. 2001, August; 13(4):219-227
Logan CY, Nusse R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2004; 20:781-810
Miller JR. The wnts. Genome Biology. 2002; 3(1):1-15
He X, Semenov M, Tamai K, Zeng X. LDL receptor-related proteins 5 and 6 in Wnt/β-catenin signaling: Arrows point the way. Development. 2004; 131(8):1663-1677
Wodarz A, Nusse R. Mechanisms of Wnt signaling in development. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 1998; 14(1):59-88
Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/β-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012; 149(6):1192-1205
Umar S, Sarkar S, Wang Y, Singh P. Functional cross-talk between β-catenin and NFκB signaling pathways in colonic crypts of mice in response to progastrin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009; 284(33):22274-22284
Duan Y, Sun J, Liao AP, Kupireddi S, Ye Z, Ciancio MJ. Beta-catenin activity negatively regulates bacteria-induced inflammation. The FASEB Journal. 2007; 21(5):A589-A589
Villaquiran M, Gipson TA, Merkel RC, Goetsch AL, Sahlu T. Body Condition Scores in Goats. Langston, OK, USA: Langston University, Agriculture Research & Cooperative Extension, Box 730; 2004
Schalm OW, Jain NC, Carroll EJ. Veterinary Hematology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, USA: Lea & Febiger; 1975
Whitlock HV. Some modifications of the McMaster helminth egg-counting technique and apparatus. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Australia. 1948; 21(3):177-180
Kozera B, Rapacz M. Reference genes in real-time PCR. Journal of Applied Genetics. 2013; 54(4):391-406
Albuquerque CF, da Silva SM, Camargo ZP. Improvement of the specificity of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005; 43(4):1944-1946
Adjei-Fremah S. Molecular effects of cowpea polyphenols on mammalian transcriptome, proteome, and microbiome [Doctoral dissertation]. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. Ann Arbor, Missouri, USA: ProQuest LLC; 2017
Asiamah EK. Ex vivo effects of water extracts of Sericea lespedeza on cow, sheep and goat blood [Doctoral dissertation]. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. Ann Arbor, Missouri, USA: ProQuest LLC; 2015
Ekwemalor K. The effect of a mushroom ( Coriolus versicolor) based probiotic on innate immunity in goats naturally infected with gastrointestinal parasites [Doctoral dissertation]. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. Ann Arbor, Missouri, USA: ProQuest LLC; 2015
Liong MT. Probiotics: A critical review of their potential role as antihypertensives, immune modulators, hypocholesterolemics, and perimenopausal treatments. Nutrition Reviews. 2007; 65(7):316-328
Kritas SK, Govaris A, Christodoulopoulos G, Burriel AR. Effect of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis supplementation of ewe's feed on sheep milk production and young lamb mortality. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2006; 53(4):170-173
Ekwemalor K, Asiamah E, Adjei-Fremah S, Worku M. Effect of a mushroom ( Coriolus versicolor) based probiotic on goat health. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2016; 11(3):108-118
Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. Genes and molecules of Lactobacilli supporting probiotic action. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2008; 72(4):728-764
Kingma SD, Li N, Sun F, Valladares RB, Neu J, Lorca GL. Lactobacillus johnsoniiN6. 2 stimulates the innate immune response through toll-like receptor 9 in Caco-2 cells and increases intestinal crypt Paneth cell number in biobreeding diabetes-prone rats. The Journal of Nutrition. 2011; 141(6):1023-1028
Worku M, Morris A. Binding of different forms of lipopolysaccharide and gene expression in bovine blood neutrophils. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009; 92(7):3185-3193
Adjei-Fremah S, Everett A, Franco R, Moultone K, Asiamah E, Ekwemalor K, Worku M. Health and production benefits of feeding cowpeas to goats. Journal of Animal Science. 2016; 94(Suppl. 5):80-81
Liu M, Wu Q, Wang M, Fu Y, Wang J. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 limits Escherichia coli. Inflammation. 2016; 39(4):1483-1494
Chan SL, Yeung JH. Effects of polysaccharide peptide (PSP) from Coriolus versicoloron the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide in the rat and cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2006; 44(5):689-694
Eliza WL, Fai CK, Chung LP. Efficacy of Yun Zhi ( Coriolus versicolor) on survival in cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Recent Patents on Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery. 2012; 6(1):78-87
Zhou L, Ivanov II, Spolski R, Roy M, Shenderov K, Egawa T, et al. IL-6 programs TH-17 cell differentiation by promoting sequential engagement of the IL-21 and IL-23 pathways. Nature Immunology. 2007; 8(9):967
Lull C, Wichers HJ, Savelkoul HF. Antiinflammatory and immunomodulating properties of fungal metabolites. Mediators of Inflammation. 2005; 2005(2):63-80
Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2001; 1(2):135
Alexander C, Rietschel ET. Invited review: Bacterial lipopolysaccharides and innate immunity. Journal of Endotoxin Research. 2001; 7(3):167-202
Schwandner R, Dziarski R, Wesche H, Rothe M, Kirschning CJ. Peptidoglycan-and lipoteichoic acid-induced cell activation is mediated by toll-like receptor 2. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999; 274(25):17406-17409
Blumenthal A, Ehlers S, Lauber J, Buer J, Lange C, Goldmann T, et al. The wingless homolog WNT5A and its receptor Frizzled-5 regulate inflammatory responses of human mononuclear cells induced by microbial stimulation. Blood. 2006; 108(3):965-973
Oshima H, Oguma K, Du YC, Oshima M. Prostaglandin E2, Wnt, and BMP in gastric tumor mouse models. Cancer Science. 2009; 100(10):1779-1785
Asiamah EK, Adjei-Fremah S, Osei B, Ekwemalor K, Worku M. An extract of Sericea lespedeza modulates production of inflammatory markers in pathogen associated molecular pattern (PAMP) activated ruminant blood. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2016; 8(9):1
Bravo L. Polyphenols: Chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance. Nutrition Reviews. 1998; 56(11):317-333
Scalbert A, Manach C, Morand C, Rémésy C, Jiménez L. Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2005; 45(4):287-306
Hoste H, Jackson F, Athanasiadou S, Thamsborg SM, Hoskin SO. The effects of tannin-rich plants on parasitic nematodes in ruminants. Trends in Parasitology. 2006; 22(6):253-261
Di Trana A, Bonanno A, Cecchini S, Giorgio D, Di Grigoli A, Claps S. Effects of Sulla forage ( Sulla coronariumL.) on the oxidative status and milk polyphenol content in goats. Journal of Dairy Science. 2015; 98(1):37-46
Barrau E, Fabre N, Fouraste I, Hoste H. Effect of bioactive compounds from Sainfoin ( Onobrychis viciifoliaScop.) on the in vitro larval migration of Haemonchus contortus: Role of tannins and flavonol glycosides. Parasitology. 2005; 131(4):531-538
Min BR, Pinchak WE, Merkel R, Walker S, Tomita G, Anderson RC. Comparative antimicrobial activity of tannin extracts from perennial plants on mastitis pathogens. Scientific Research and Essay. 2008; 3(2):066-073
Heckendorn F, Häring DA, Maurer V, Senn M, Hertzberg H. Individual administration of three tanniferous forage plants to lambs artificially infected with Haemonchus contortusand Cooperia curticei. Veterinary Parasitology. 2007; 146(1):123-134
Shaik SA, Terrill TH, Miller JE, Kouakou B, Kannan G, Kaplan RM, et al. Sericea lespedeza hay as a natural deworming agent against gastrointestinal nematode infection in goats. Veterinary Parasitology. 2006; 139(1):150-157
Terrill TH, Mosjidis JA, Moore DA, Shaik SA, Miller JE, Burke JM, et al. Effect of pelleting on efficacy of Sericea lespedeza hay as a natural dewormer in goats. Veterinary Parasitology. 2007; 146(1):117-122
Kommuru DS, Barker T, Desai S, Burke JM, Ramsay A, Mueller-Harvey I, et al. Use of pelleted Sericea lespedeza ( Lespedeza cuneata) for natural control of coccidia and gastrointestinal nematodes in weaned goats. Veterinary Parasitology. 2014; 204(3):191-198
John CM, Sandrasaigaran P, Tong CK, Adam A, Ramasamy R. Immunomodulatory activity of polyphenols derived from Cassia auriculataflowers in aged rats. Cellular Immunology. 2011; 271(2):474-479
Magrone T, Jirillo E. Polyphenols from red wine are potent modulators of innate and adaptive immune responsiveness. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2010; 69(3):279-285
Youn HS, Lee JY, Saitoh SI, Miyake K, Kang KW, Choi YJ, Hwang DH. Suppression of MyD88-and TRIF-dependent signaling pathways of toll-like receptor by (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate, a polyphenol component of green tea. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2006; 72(7):850-859
Adjei-Fremah S, Jackai LE, Worku M. Analysis of phenolic content and antioxidant properties of selected cowpea varieties tested in bovine peripheral blood. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2015; 10(4):235-245
Adjei-Fremah S, Jackai LE, Schimmel K, Worku M. Immunomodulatory activities of polyphenol extract from cowpea on bovine polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Journal of Animal Science. 2016; 94(Suppl 5):86-87
Etana A, Tadesse E, Mengistu A, Hassen A. Advanced evaluation of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata) accessions for fodder production in the central rift valley of Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development. 2013; 5(3):55-61
Baloyi JJ, Ngongoni NT, Hamudikuwanda H. Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of cowpea and silverleaf desmodium forage legumes harvested at different stages of maturity. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 2008; 8(1):1-11
Cai R, Hettiarachchy NS, Jalaluddin M. High-performance liquid chromatography determination of phenolic constituents in 17 varieties of cowpeas. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2003; 51:1623-1627
Adjei-Fremah S, Asiamah E, Ekwemalor K, Osei B, Ismail H, Jackai LE, Worku M. The anti-inflammatory effect of cowpea polyphenol in bovine blood. Journal of Animal Science. 2017; 95(Suppl. 4):27-27
Ojwang LO, Banerjee N, Noratto GD, Angel-Morales G, Hachibamba T, Awika JM, Mertens-Talcott SU. Polyphenolic extracts from cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata) protect colonic myofibroblasts (CCD18Co cells) from lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation—Modulation of microRNA 126. Food & Function. 2015; 6(1):145-153
Karasawa K, Uzuhashi Y, Hirota M, Otani H. A matured fruit extract of date palm tree ( Phoenix dactyliferaL.) stimulates the cellular immune system in mice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2011; 59:11287-11293
Surai PF. Polyphenol compounds in the chicken/animal diet: From the past to the future. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2014; 98:19-31
VanGuilder HD, Vrana KE, Freeman WM. Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. BioTechniques. 2008; 44(5):619
Yin JL, Shackel NA, Zekry A, McGuinness PH, Richards C, Van Der Putten K, et al. Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for measurement of cytokine and growth factor mRNA expression with fluorogenic probes or SYBR green I. Immunology and Cell Biology. 2001; 79(3):213
Adjei-Fremah S, Jackai LE, Schimmel K, Worku M. Microarray analysis of the effect of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata) phenolic extract in bovine peripheral blood. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 2016; 46(1):100-106
Ekwemalor K, Asiamah E, Osei B, Ismail H, Worku M. Evaluation of the effect of probiotic administration on gene expression in goat blood. Journal of Molecular Biology Research. 2017; 7(1):88
Gyenai K, Worku M, Tajkarimi M, Ibrahim S. Influence of probiotics on coccidia, H. contortus and markers of infection in goats. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2016; 11(3):91-99
Desjardins P, Conklin D. NanoDrop microvolume quantitation of nucleic acids. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. 2010; 45:1-4
Salvesen Ø, Reiten MR, Heegaard PM, Tranulis MA, Espenes A, Skovgaard K, Ersdal C. Activation of innate immune genes in caprine blood leukocytes after systemic endotoxin challenge. BMC Veterinary Research. 2016; 12(1):241
Bulgari O, Dong X, Roca AL, Caroli AM, Loor JJ. Innate immune responses induced by lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid in primary goat mammary epithelial cells. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 2017; 8(1):29