Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Thin Wall Ductile Iron Castings

Written By

Rianti Dewi Sulamet-Ariobimo, Johny Wahyuadi Soedarsono and Tresna Priyana Soemardi

Submitted: 24 July 2017 Reviewed: 31 October 2017 Published: 20 December 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72117

From the Edited Volume

Advanced Casting Technologies

Edited by T.R. Vijayaram

Chapter metrics overview

1,288 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The use of austempered ductile iron (ADI) as an alternative material has increased, and it is predicted that it will reach 300,000 tons by the year of 2020 due to its characteristics especially design flexibility. When the reduction in weight is considered as a parameter for energy saving, ADI is presented as thin wall austempered ductile iron (TWADI). To produce a good quality TWADI, a good quality thin wall ductile iron (TWDI) must be used as a raw material. Good quality TWDI is produced by casting design. This chapter discusses the production of thin wall ductile iron, including its characterisation and defect. The discussion includes the background of thin wall casting (TWC) and TWDI, applying TWC in general casting, the problems in producing TWDI, characterisation of the TWDI and specific defects.

Keywords

  • thin wall casting
  • ductile iron
  • austempered ductile iron
  • vertical casting
  • ingate position
  • premature solidification
  • single matrix for microstructure

1. Introduction

Thin wall casting (TWC) is developed to produce lighter casting products. The weight reduction in TWC is gained by thinning out the wall thickness of products in whole like plates or partially. Thinning of the cast product will disturb the pouring time and speed up the solidification rate. The pouring time will shorten since the volume of the cast product is decreased due to depletion process. To overcome this, foundrymen tends to increase the pouring temperature. The increase in pouring temperature will expand the temperature differences, which will result in higher solidification rate.

Increasing pouring temperature could not be applied while producing ductile iron (FCD) since the process includes liquid treatment processes, known as inoculation and nodulation. Both processes are limited by temperature and time. The effect of liquid treatment will reduce if the limit of temperature and time is exceeded. This condition will disturb the formation of spheroidal graphite and cause failure in production.

Thin wall ductile iron (TWDI) is ductile iron casted in TWC. The thicknesses of some products of FCD were reduced in certain parts. Caldera defined TWDI as ductile iron casting with wall thickness below 5 mm [1], while Stefanescu limited its thickness below 3 mm [2]. But the properties of TWDI should fulfil the properties of FCD. TWDI has made it possible for ductile iron to compete with aluminium in terms of weight [3]. The size of the thinnest TWDI plate is 1 mm [4, 5, 6, 7].

Advertisement

2. Problems in producing thin wall ductile iron

Problems in producing thin wall ductile iron occur due to its thickness. In general casting, to avoid premature solidification, pouring temperature is raised when the casting product is thin. Premature solidification will lead to defects as presented in Figure 1. However, this method cannot be applied in producing TWDI since there is temperature limitation for liquid treatment process. Liquid treatments, i.e. inoculation and nodulation (Mg treatment), are applied to liquid metal to produce nodule graphite. Liquid treatment will fail if the temperature limit is exceeded.

Figure 1.

Shrinkage defect formation due to premature solidification [8].

Another issue that should also be considered is the formation of carbides as shown in Figure 2. Carbides form as a result of high solidification rate, and solidification rate increases when the thickness of the casting product decreases. Carbides formation in TWDI is to be strongly avoided. To deal with it, solidification rate should be maintained.

Figure 2.

Carbides formation in TWDI [8].

Advertisement

3. Designing TWDI products

As mentioned previously, the classification of TWDI is made based on the thickness of casting products which can be applied either in the whole part of product such as plate as shown in Figure 1 or in just some parts such as in the connecting rod invented by Martinez [9] as shown in Figure 2. The thickness of the casting products should not exceed 5 mm.

Soedarsono, Soemardi and Sulamet-Ariobimo have designed two series of plates. In the first series, they designed five plates with the same length and width but different thicknesses. The length is 150 mm while the width is 75 mm. The thicknesses are varied from 5 mm to 1 mm with 1 mm interval. As in the second series, they designed also five plates with the same length, width and thickness. The length and width are still the same as the first series, and the thickness is 1 mm. Since it is just plates, designing the product is not challenging but designing the gating system will be challenging since the design of gating system determines the plates formation. The gating system design made by Soedarsono, Soemardi and Sulamet-Ariobimo is discussed in the following section (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

TWDI plates [8].

Contrary to the plates’ design, applying thin wall casting in components are challenging since the part or parts of component being modified should be carefully selected to ensure that the thinning process will not disturb the function and properties of the component. Martinez invented TWDI connecting rod by modifying the I-beam part. I-beam is not a critical part in connecting rod. Martinez modified the solid I-beam to hollow I-beam as presented in Figure 4. The wall thickness of the hollow I-beam is 4 mm. The hollow I-beam reduces 100 g of weight of the connecting rod.

Figure 4.

TWDI connecting rod invented by Martinez [9].

Advertisement

4. Casting design for TWDI

There are several ways to maintain cooling rate, but among all of them, casting design is the easiest one. Casting design covers the cast products, gating system and risers. Casting design is important since it determines the quality of the products and their production cost. Regarding TWDI, the casting design should consider fluidity, pouring temperature, pouring time and solidification rate of the molten metal. The casting design should ensure that premature solidification does not occur [10]. The main cause of premature solidification is pouring disruption. To deal with this, pouring stability should always be maintained.

Many researchers used steps design to produce TWDI plates. Javaid [11] designs are presented in Figure 5. Javaid used this design to study the effects of chemical composition and process parameters on tensile and impact properties, while Showman [12, 13, 14] used groove steps design as shown in Figure 6 for studying the effects of cooling rate on skin effect formation. Pedersen used both horizontal and vertical steps design, as shown in Figure 7, to gain cooling rate from various plate thicknesses. Javaid also modified steps design as presented in Figure 8 to analyse the effects of position on plates.

Figure 5.

Javaid designs [11].

Figure 6.

Showman designs [12, 13, 14].

Figure 7.

Pedersen designs [15, 16, 17]. (a) Horizontal design; (b) vertical design.

Figure 8.

Javaid designs [11].

Besides the steps design, Stefanescu used horizontal and vertical design as shown in Figure 9a and b. The vertical design was made after unsatisfactory data gained from its horizontal design [18, 19]. Stefanescu defined his vertical design as gating system, casting products and risers. The casting products were plates of 250 mm in height and 1000 mm in length. The thicknesses of the plates were 6.0, 2.5 and 3.5 mm, which were arranged vertically with cylindrical risers in between. The diameter of the riser is 25 mm, and the number of risers is four [19]. Stefanescu used counter gravity system to maintain the filling rate.

Figure 9.

Stefanescu designs [2, 18, 19, 20]. (a) Horizontal design; (b) vertical design.

Schrems developed a horizontal design as shown in Figure 10, and INTEMA team developed several designs as shown in Figure 11. From his design, Schrems found that the condition of the plates together with their thickness affects mechanical properties and reducing cooling rate will make TWDI characteristic equal to general casting. INTEMA used the design shown in Figure 11a and b to evaluate the graphite characterizations. The results obtained from the first two designs were used to develop the other designs as shown in Figure 11c and d. The new designs were used for further research.

Figure 10.

Schrems design [21, 22].

Figure 11.

INTEMA designs [23, 24, 25, 26, 27].

Labreque used the design shown in Figure 12 to study the effects of cooling rate on microstructure and mechanical properties of TWDI. The design developed by Labreque resembles industrial condition. Filling process was maintained by using pouring basin, while the adjustment of undercooling temperature and cooling rate was controlled by using material known as low-density alumina silicate. This combination leads to the similarity of TWDI with the specification of ductile iron.

Figure 12.

Labreque design [28, 29, 30].

This section shows that all researchers are producing their TWDI plates using varied casting designs in horizontal and vertical casting position. This demonstrates how important is an appropriate gating system design to produce TWDI products, whether plates or components.

Advertisement

5. Purposed casting design for TWDI plates

As mention previously, Soedarsono, Soemardi and Sulamet-Ariobimo in their works developed vertical casting designs to produce their plate series. They developed two models of vertical casting design. The first model was based on Stefanescu vertical casting design which used gating system and risers as presented in Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Soedarsono designs [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 31, 32, 33]. Vertical casting. 1—Down sprue; 1a—supporting gate; 2—runner; 3—ingate; 4—riser; 5—plate; 6—gas tunnel.

Soedarsono, Soemardi and Sulamet-Ariobimo modified the Stefanescu design in the number, dimension and thickness of the plates produced. Stefanescu design produced three plates with the dimension of 100 mm × 25 mm and thicknesses of 2.5, 3.5 and 6.0 mm. The design purposed by Soedarsono, Soemardi and Sulamet-Ariobimo produced five plates with the dimension of 150 mm × 75 mm and thicknesses of 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 mm. The casting design consists of down sprue, runner, ingate, risers and plates. Every plate is clamped by risers.

Soedarsono, Soemardi and Sulamet-Ariobimo also modified the arrangement of the plates. Since it is a vertical casting design, they placed the thinnest plate near the ingate. This is contrary to the general rule of casting. In the general rule of casting, ingate should not be placed in the thinnest part since it could block the filling process due to first place to solidify. But Soedarsono, Soemardi and Sulamet-Ariobimo assumed that the heat in the running liquid metal will prevent the thinnest part of the casting to solidify or known as premature solidification. Therefore, as long as the liquid metal runs along the system, the thinnest part will not solidify and premature solidification will not happen so the liquid metal can fulfil the mould. This assumption was verified during the casting process. A minor disturbance during the pouring process resulted in defective products.

Soedarsono, Soemardi and Sulamet-Ariobimo proposed three types and all of them produced TWDI plates with ferrite matrix. After evaluating the microstructures and tensile properties of every plates resulting from every types [3, 4, 31, 32, 33], they chose the first type which is presented in Figure 13a for further developments.

Soedarsono, Soemardi and Sulamet-Ariobimo also developed vertical casting design to produce TWDI without using gating system as the second model shown in Figure 14. The dimension and thickness of the plates produced are same as the previous designs. In this model, they proposed two types of design. These designs produced TWDI plates with perlite matrix.

Figure 14.

Soedarsono designs [6]. Vertical casting without gating system.

Both models were able to produce TWDI plates. This showed that the casting design proposed were able to produce TWDI plates. Comparing the design of both models revealed that the advantage of the second model is high casting yield, while the first design tends to reduce the casting failure. Both models have their own solidification rate as shown by the microstructures. The first model has ferrite as a matrix, and the second one has perlite. Microstructures represent solidification rate. The conclusion made based on the microstructure formation is that the second model has higher solidification rate than the first one.

Later Soedarsono, Soemardi and Sulamet-Ariobimo modified the chosen design presented in Figure 13a for further development. They changed the thickness of the plate from 1 to 5 mm to only 1 mm in all position to discover the ability of the casting design. Experimental studies showed that all plates were formed during the casting process and presented with ferrite matrix.

Based on the latest design, Sulamet-Ariobimo and Gumilang modified the design of vertical casting. They reduced the number of the plates and minimised the dimension of the gating system to gain higher casting yield. The improved design is presented in Figure 15. This design produced TWDI in perlite matrix.

Figure 15.

Improved design [34]. 1—Down sprue; 1a—supporting gate; 2—runner; 3—ingate; 4—riser; 5—plate; 6—gas tunnel.

Advertisement

6. Characterisation

Characterisation, especially tensile test, become an important issue in TWDI production since TWDI properties should be same as FCD and thinning process should not change the material properties. ASTM has determined the tensile specimen for TWDI or TWADI, but JIS has not determined which kind of specimen should be used for TWDI or TWADI.

Referring to ASTM Standard, researchers tended to use ASTM E8 [35] as shown in Figure 16, for the tensile specimen. While in JIS, several types of tensile specimens can be applied in plate. However, each type of this specimen gave different results. Sulamet-Ariobimo et al. investigated this [36] and decided to use JIS Z2201 No. 5 [37], shown in Figure 17. This decision was made based on the findings that fracture propagation in TWDI and nonferrous metals needs wider width.

Figure 16.

Tensile specimen of ASTM E8 [35].

Figure 17.

Tensile specimen of JIS Z2201 No. 5 [37].

Advertisement

7. Skin effects

Skin effect [13] or flake graphite rim anomaly [18] is a layer of flake or vermicular graphite formed in outer layer of ductile iron microstructure. This layer tends to appear in sand casting products. The formation of skin effect occurred due to magnesium malfunction. The malfunction of magnesium is caused by several things such as the presence of sulphur or oxygen. Magnesium tends to bind with sulphur which produce MgS or with oxygen which produce MgO. Ruxanda [18] assumed that skin effect was formed due to different level of magnesium content. Aufderheiden [13] found that besides magnesium content, the type of sand also contributed to the formation of skin effect. Sulamet-Ariobimo [38] found that besides magnesium content, cooling rate also influences the formation of skin effect.

Goodrich in Dix [19] stated that skin effect tends to disturb the tensile properties. Ruxanda [18] found difference of magnesium content between bulk and rim area. He concluded that skin effect was formed due to the lack of magnesium. Boonmee [39] supported the Ruxanda’s conclusion and concluded that skin effect is formed due to depletion of magnesium. The magnesium depletion is caused by the reaction of magnesium with sulphur and oxygen. Labreque [31] found that although skin effect is detrimental to mechanical properties but up to certain limit, it supports the homogenization of microstructure. Skin effect is an acceptable defect in general casting since it will vanish during the finishing process, but it is vice versa for TWDI. The thickness of TWDI makes it impossible to apply machining process to dispose skin effect. This is the reason why the formation of skin effect in TWDI should be avoided.

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

Light weight components are produced to answer the needs of lower energy consumption. TWDI is produced by applying TWC to ductile iron casting. This will enrich the material preference for lighter weight. TWDI has higher design flexibility than aluminium, which is one of the reasons to choose TWDI rather than aluminium.

During TWDI production, problems occur due to its thickness and liquid treatment process. A vertical design has been made and is able to produce TWDI plates with 1 mm thickness. This design puts the ingate in the thinnest part, which is controverted to the general rule of casting. The casting will be succeeded if the pouring process runs smoothly, while slight interruption will cause failure.

Apart from the regular casting defects, the presence of skin effect is also detrimental to TWDI. In general casting, skin effect can be removed by machining process. This removal process cannot be applied in TWDI.

References

  1. 1. Caldera M, Chapetti M, Massone JM, Sikora JA. Influence of nodule count on fatique properties of ferritic thin wall ductile iron. Materials Science and Engineering. 2007;23(8):1000-1004
  2. 2. Stefanescu DM, Dix LP, Ruxanda RE, Corbitt-Corburn C, Piwonka TS. Tensile properties of thin wall ductile iron. AFS Transactions. 2002;02-178:1149-1162
  3. 3. Soedarsono JW, Suharno B, Sulamet-Ariobimo RD. Effect of casting design to microstructure and mechanical properties of 3 mm TWDI plate. Advance Materials Researchs. 2012;415-417:831-837
  4. 4. Soedarsono JW, Sulamet-Ariobimo RD. Effect of casting design to microstructure and mechanical properties of 1 mm TWDI plate. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2012;110-116:3301-3307
  5. 5. Suharno B, Soedarsono JW, Sulamet-Ariobimo RD. The effect of plates position in vertical casting producing thin wall ductile iron. Advance Materials Researchs. 2011;277:66-75
  6. 6. Sulamet-Ariobimo RD, Soedarsono JW, Nanda IP. The effect of vertical step block casting to microstructure and mechanical properties in producing thin wall ductile iron. Advance Materials Researchs. 2013;789:387-393
  7. 7. Sulamet-Ariobimo RD, Soedarsono JW, Suharno B. Cooling rate analysis of thin wall ductile iron using microstructure examination and simulation. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2015;752-753:845-850
  8. 8. Sulamet-Ariobimo RD. Thin wall ductile iron casting for thin wall austempered ductile iron. [Dissertation]. Indonesia: Universitas Indonesia; 2010
  9. 9. Martinez RA, Boeri RE, Sikora JA. Application of ADI in high strength thin wall automotive part. In: Proceedings of 2002 World Conference on ADI. AFS; 2002
  10. 10. Tomovic M. Designing thin section. Modern Casting. 2003;93(5):55-56
  11. 11. Javaid A, Thomson J, Sahoo M, Davis KG. Factors affecting the formation of carbides in thin wall DI castings. AFS Transactions. 1999;74:441-451
  12. 12. Showman RE, Aufderheide RC. Getting to the core of thin-walled casting. Modern Casting. 2004;94(4):32-34
  13. 13. Aufderheiden RC, Showman RE, Hysell MA. Controlling the skin effect on thin wall ductile iron casting. AFS Transactions. 2005;5-043:567-579
  14. 14. Showman RE, Aufderheide RC, Yeomans N. Ironing out thin-wall casting defects, Modern Casting. 2006;96-7:29-32
  15. 15. Pedersen KM, Tiedje NS. Temperature measurement during solidification of thin wall ductile cast iron. Part 1: Theory and experiment. Measurement. 2007;05-200:1-10
  16. 16. Pedersen KM, Tiedje NS. Graphite nodule count and size distribution in thin-walled ductile cast iron. Materials Characterization. 2007;09-001:1-11 (09)
  17. 17. Pedersen KM, Tiedje NS. Temperature measurement during solidification of thin wall ductile cast iron. Part 2: Numerical stimulation. Measurement. 2007;05-003:1-8
  18. 18. Ruxanda RE, Stefanescu DM, Piwonka TS. Microstructure characterization of ductile thin wall iron casting. AFS Transaction. 2002;02-177:1131-1147
  19. 19. Dix LP, Ruxanda RE, Torrance J, Fukumoto M, Stefanescu DM. Static mechanical properties of ferritic and perlitic light weight ductile iron casting. AFS Transactions. 2003;03-109:895-910 (03)
  20. 20. Stefanescu DM, Ruxanda R, Dix LP. The metallurgy and tensile mechanical properties of thin wall spheroidal graphite iron. International Journal of Cast Metal Research. 2003;16:319-324
  21. 21. Schrems KK, Dogan ON, Hawk JA. Verification of thin wall ductile iron test methodology. Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 2002;30(1)
  22. 22. Schrems KK, Hawk JA, Dogan ON, Druschitz AP. Statistical analysis of the mechanical properties of thin-walled ductile iron casting. 2003. SAE Technical Paper Doc. No. 2003-01-0828
  23. 23. Borrajo JM, Martinez RA, Boeri RE, Sikora JA. Shape and count of free graphite particles in thin wall ductile iron castings. ISIJ International. 2002;42-3:257-263
  24. 24. David P, Massone J, Boeri R, Sikora J. Mechanical properties of thin wall ductile iron – Influence of carbon equivalent and graphite distribution. ISIJ International. 2004;44-7:1180-1187
  25. 25. Caldera M, Massone JM, Boeri RE, Sikora JA. Impact properties of thin wall ductile iron. ISIJ International. 2004;44(4):731-736
  26. 26. David P, Massone JM, Boeri R, Sikora JA. Gating system design to cast thin wall ductile iron plates. International Journal of Cast Metal Research. 2005;18-5:1-12
  27. 27. Caldera M, Chapetti M, Massone JM, Sikora JA. Influence of nodule count on fatigue properties of ferritic thin wall ductile iron. Materials Science and Engineering. 2007;23-8:1000-1004
  28. 28. Labreque C, Gagne M. Development of carbide free thin wall ductile iron casting. AFS Transactions. 2000;108:31-38
  29. 29. Labreque C, Gagne M, Javaid A, Sahoo M. Production and properties of thin wall ductile iron castings. International Journal of Cast Metals Research. 2003;16:313-317
  30. 30. Labreque C, Gagne M. Optimizing the mechanical properties of thin-wall ductile iron casting. AFS Transactions. 2005;05-116:1-10
  31. 31. Soedarsono JW, Suharno B, Sulamet-Ariobimo RD. Effect of casting design to microstructure and mechanical properties of 5 mm TWDI plate. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2012;152-154:1607-1611
  32. 32. Sulamet-Ariobimo RD, Soedarsono JW, Suharno B. Effect of casting design to microstructure and mechanical properties of 2 mm TWDI plate. Advance Materials Researchs. 2013;652-654:2404-2408
  33. 33. Sulamet-Ariobimo RD, Soedarsono JW, Suharno B. Effect of casting design to microstructure and mechanical properties of 4 mm TWDI plate. Advance Materials Researchs. 2013;702:269-274
  34. 34. Sulamet-Ariobimo RD, Gemilang Y, Dhaneswara D, Soedarsono JW, Suharno B. Casting design modification to improved casting yield in producing thin wall ductile iron plate. 2017 (in press)
  35. 35. ASTM. E8 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. Pennsylvania, USA: American Society for Testing and Material; 2000
  36. 36. Sulamet-Ariobimo RD, Soedarsono JW, Sukarnoto T, Rustandi A, Mujalis Y, Prayitno D. Tensile properties analysis of AA1100 aluminium and SS400 steel using different JIS tensile standard specimen. Journal of Applied Research and Technology. 2016;14:148-153
  37. 37. JIS. JIS Z2201-2000, Tension Test Pieces for Metallic Materials. Tokyo, Japan: Japanese Standard Association; 2000
  38. 38. Sulamet-Ariobimo RD, Soedarsono JW. Effect of plate thickness and casting position on skin effect formation in thin wall ductile iron. International Journal of Technology. 2016;3:375-382
  39. 39. Boonmee S. Ductile and compacted graphite iron casting skin – Evaluation effect on fatique strenght and elimination. [Dissertation]. United State of America: Ohio State University; 2013

Written By

Rianti Dewi Sulamet-Ariobimo, Johny Wahyuadi Soedarsono and Tresna Priyana Soemardi

Submitted: 24 July 2017 Reviewed: 31 October 2017 Published: 20 December 2017