Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Nanotechnologies in Cultural Heritage - Materials and Instruments for Diagnosis and Treatment

Written By

Rodica-Mariana Ion, Sanda-Maria Doncea and Daniela Ţurcanu- Caruțiu

Submitted: 09 July 2017 Reviewed: 25 October 2017 Published: 20 December 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71950

From the Edited Volume

Novel Nanomaterials - Synthesis and Applications

Edited by George Z. Kyzas and Athanasios C. Mitropoulos

Chapter metrics overview

1,528 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


This chapter aims to evaluate the nanomaterials that can be used to diagnostic, conservation and restoration of different artifacts and monuments and that can contribute to solving the problems which could appear during weathering processes of them. The nanotechnology, as a new and revolutionary area in science, can improve the traditional methods currently used for restoration and preservation in cultural heritage and can contribute to the creation of new highly specialized methods for diagnostic and treatment of different artifacts or even monuments. With a smaller size, a higher penetrability, viscosity, thermal and magnetic properties, in comparison with the traditional materials, the nanomaterials can contribute to solve the problems deriving from specific phenomena that could appear during the intervention and to identify the potential newly formed products in the treated materials. In this chapter, some aspects about the nanomaterials used for conservation and restoration of stone and paper artifacts are evidenced and discussed.


  • nanomaterial
  • nanotechnology
  • cultural heritage
  • hydroxyapatite

1. Introduction

The term “preservation” may have different meanings depending on the field in which it is applied [1]. The knowledge of the preservation of artworks on different artifacts is not limited to historical and semiotic analyses. Preservation nowadays requires an interdisciplinary team with a solid knowledge of materials science, chemistry, physics, microbiology, art history and nanotechnology in order to contribute and offer solutions to prevent the natural aging of some artifacts (paper documents, stone, paints, etc.) and to provide useful and basic predictions about the degradation of the cultural patrimony and can come up with viable solutions [2, 3].

Generally speaking, the term “nano” defines an extremely small entity in the order of 10−9 m [4].

The applications of nanotechnologies in the field of preservation of cultural heritage could include:

  • Diagnosis of the damaged surfaces to obtain physicochemical and structural information on the materials that form the historic heritage and for identifying the surface damaging type: alveolarization, fractures and so on [5].

  • New instruments and diagnostic methods, in order to make an informed decision on the materials to use during the further phases of restoration [6].

  • Innovative methods for cleaning surfaces affected by polluting substances and black crusts [7].

  • Treatment of surfaces (protection, waterproofing, self-cleaning) [8].

  • New products for consolidation and protection of natural and artificial stones (compatible products) [9].

  • Materials and innovative processes against raising of humidity and against sulfation for the conservation and/or restoration interventions on art manufactures of different nature [10].

The present chapter means to complete a survey on the use of nanotechnology for the preservation and restoration of the stone monuments and different damaged paper and stone artifacts. The scientific principles behind numerous nanomaterials on different types of common movable and fixed artistic substrates are discussed. Compared to traditional methods, these new tools have the benefit of considerably less impact on both the operators and the environment. Different types of nanoparticles currently used to produce conservation treatments with enhanced material properties are discussed.

1.1. Nanomaterials for restoration and conservation of cultural heritage

Nanostructures represent a stage of matter between agglomerated molecules and structures and are typically characterized by a large surface area that affects their physicochemical properties. Innovative applications are of nanostructures and are based on two types of unique properties associated with nanostructures [11]:

  1. New optical properties due to the generation of quantum effects.

  2. Changes in reactivity and mechanical properties due to small physical dimensions and a large area of the specific surface. The advantages of small granule sizes in comparison with the agglomerated materials include: a low sintering temperature, super-elasticity, improved diffusion, improved dielectric and tribological properties.

One of the directions for the use of nanoparticles, nowadays, is the preservation of cultural heritage. The application of nanotechnologies to different artifacts has recently proved the huge potential of this science to apply in the field of preservation of universal cultural heritage [12, 13]. Solid nanodispersions, micelles, gels or microemulsions offer new viable solutions for the restoration and preservation of works of art. Some recently concerns are related to the synthesis and the application of nanoparticles of Ca and Mg or hydroxyapatite to paper and stone preservation [14]. In this chapter, the most used methods of nanoparticle synthesis and some of their recent applications for the preservation of artifacts are presented. The novelty of this area resides in a type of cultural heritage material (stone, paper) and starts with the main degradation paths and discussing protocols for the application of innovative nanomaterial-based tools for cleaning, consolidation or deacidification, which represent the majority of the case studies encountered in restoration and conservation procedures.


2. Artifacts conservation and restoration

2.1. Stone

2.1.1. Influence of pollutants

The main types of atmospheric pollutants which could affect the stony monuments are shown in Table 1.

Nr.crt.PollutantSourceEffect on stone
1Carbon dioxide and carbon monoxideInternal combustion enginesAcid rain, soil pollution
2Nitrogen and sulfur oxidesCombustion of fossil fuels by motor vehicles or thermoelectric power plantsAcid rain, soil pollution
3Volatile organic compounds (hydrocarbons and hydrocarbon derivatives)Combustion of fossil fuels, the evaporation of fuels, solvents used in various industrial processesAcid rain, soil pollution
4Suspended particulates—very small particles similar with gas may contain iron oxides,heavy metals (lead, cadmium, manganese,chromium), asbestos fibers or other pollutantsCombustion of fossil fuels, human activityAcid rain, soil pollution

Table 1.

Pollutant source and effects on stone.

Usually, calcium carbonate can take three forms of polymorphs: calcite, aragonite and vaterite [15]. It is known that in the calcite variety (calcium carbonate variety detected by X-ray diffraction (XRD)) dissolution is affected by the presence of foreign substances Mg2+ (from MgSO4·7H2O, called epsomite), which is considered one of the major cations in seawater and groundwater. Also, SO42− (from atmospheric pollution responsible for calcite conversion in gypsum) and NO3 (responsible for solubilizing the stone in the wall) are the most damaging pollutants or different artifacts [16]. Processes such as crystallization and salt dissolution contribute to new pores, which are responsible for an accelerated damaging process through the microcracks generated in the stone. The dissolution rate significantly increases in the presence of NaCl solutions, due to electrostatic reasons. Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) can be found in soils, rocks and sediments. Among the minerals, calcium carbonate is one of the most sensitive ones to weathering [17]. Due to rapid weather destruction, small amounts of CaCO3 can dominate the geochemical behavior of aquatic systems. Given the sensitivity of this rock, it is necessary to study the influence of climatic and environmental factors on this rock [18].

The pollutant effects on buildings and monuments degradation require a multidisciplinary approach using conventional and unconventional methods to achieve a good understanding of the mechanisms and consequences of such pollution [6]. It has been established that the hydraulic properties of stones and their traction resistance are the most important parameters that control the stone resistance to decomposition, and these parameters are widely used to estimate their durability.

The effects of the environment on some monuments (Basarabi-Murfatlar Churches) have been assessed through various analytical investigations: thermal analysis, XRD, EDXRF and ion chromatography. When the temperature is less than 120°C, a weight loss due to the absorbed water is recorded, especially in the absence of hydrated salts. In the temperature range 200–600°C, a loss of chemically bonded water is registered, but no other compounds subjected to weight loss. After 600°C, CO2 loss is observed, due to the decomposition of carbonates, higher for the most degraded stones [19].

Stone surface alteration (determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis coupled with diffused X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX)) could be classified in several types:

  1. Surface damage caused by sulfur and calcium and by the calcite reaction with the sulfur oxides present in the medium.

  2. Alteration of the surface caused by deposits, when no chemical reactions occurred. These deposits are composed of dust from the anthropogenic particles. These degraded layers are mainly caused by the epigenetic formation of gypsum. In areas with high traffic, the sulfur oxide content is considerably higher [20]. There are two different mechanisms of destruction in the process of damaging the stones under the action of environmental conditions:

    • Chemical alteration of calcite and precipitation on gypsum that catches atmospheric particles on the surface.

    • Physical phenomenon of deposition of atmospheric particles on the surface.

Kruhl and Nega [21] investigated the fragmented form of quartz particles and found that the size of the fragments decreases as temperature increases during suture formation, while Bernal et al. [22] concluded that the processes of degradation cause the fragmentation of the surface size. Daniele and Taglieri [13] studied the morphology of quartz aggregates in granite and showed that the fragmented dimensions of the quartz aggregates are different depending on the type of granite. The sedimentary rocks are those originating:

  1. Sedimentation and cementation under natural pressure of particles of natural rocks eroded by wind, rain, sunbathing, conglomerate and sandstone.

  2. Precipitation from natural solutions—gypsum, limestone, dolomite and travertine; sedimentation and consolidation of residues of dead organisms (shells, shells)—diatomite, limestone and chalk. The limestone is derived from marine sediments and fossilized organic lakes (such as crinoids or brachiopods), consisting of calcium carbonate or calcite. Sandstones are the result of sedimentation of sand together with silica or calcium carbonate; the silica in the tiles may have the same adverse effect encountered at the granite. Both sedimentary rocks—limestone and sandstone—are easier to cut than granite, which has made them quite often used in the masonry of historical buildings [23, 24]. On the Romanian territory, there are many masonry made of siliceous sandstone or calcareous sandstone, the first being those with higher compressive strength. The mineralogical composition and crystal structure of the stone monuments before and after the conservation treatment can be determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) [25, 26]. A sample of CaCO3 (Figure 1) has a series of diffraction peaks at 2ϑ: 29.5, 39.5, 47.6, 48.58, etc., corresponding to the calcite phase, which shows that in the water the precipitated calcium carbonate crystals were formed mainly of calcite.

Figure 1.

X-ray diffraction of calcite.

In Figure 2, there are Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) peaks corresponding to the vaterite phase generated inside and outside of the damaged limestone surfaces.

Figure 2.

FTIR spectra of inside and outside treated limestone surface.

Very clear bands could be observed in FTIR spectra, which show significant differences between not-treated and treated limestones, especially at the bands assigned to carbonate groups and to sulfate bands (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

FTIR spectra of not-treated and treated limestones.

2.2. Causes of natural stone degradation

The natural stone is subjected to a slow and continuous process of deterioration (known as alteration— or degradation, or even “decay”), which is a phenomenon caused by physicochemical causes other than mechanical actions: moisture; crystallization of salts in the mass of the material; deposition of pollutants on the surface of the rock, acting through chemical and/or biological processes; high temperature variations during day and night (strong heat cycles - temperature drop) or accidental fire action; and erosion due to strong winds (process without significant mechanical stress) [25, 26, 27].

Moisture is one of the main factors that attack stones through the capillary phenomenon, and limestone, dolomite and marble are most affected by this external factor [28]. During 10 years of exposure to a 100 cm column of atmospheric precipitation, calcareous rocks can reduce their thickness by 0.2 mm. Moisture can also affect the rocks that contain the tiny black, feldspar and tremolite. In the case of granite, the moisture from the pores can lead to the splitting of the stone into layers of 1–3 mm thick, through the expansion-contraction cycles (important to the reversible frost-thaw phenomena, because the freezing volume increases with 9%).

Salt crystallization is one of the main phenomena of the destruction of porous materials, which occurs by penetrating the material pores by the aqueous solution containing dissolved pollutants, such as mineral salts, combustion gases, powdered plant residues and microorganisms, Table 2. The tensions in the surfaces that delineate the pores due to the salts crystallized here, known as “stone efflorescence,” represents a great danger for the durability of a historical structure. The most common salts in the efflorescence phenomenon of masonry are sulfates, carbonates and nitrates (sodium, magnesium, calcium, potassium), generated from the atmospheric pollutants (SO2, NO2 and CO2), which are transformed in (HNO3, H2SO4 and H2CO3) in contact with the mortars [24, 29].

Nr.crt.FactorSourceEffect on stone
1MoistureRain, freeze-thaw cycles, groundwater,Construction, surface water mitigating through the shoulder, ditches or imbibing through in the paved surface of the pavement
2Salt crystallizationMirabilite (Na2SO4• 10H2O) and thenardite (Na2SO4)Severe alveolar weathering,
granular disintegration, efflorescences and subflorescences in buildings, monuments and quarry
3Freeze-thaw cyclesWeather seasonsSevere alveolar weathering,
granular disintegration, efflorescences and subflorescences in buildings, monuments and quarry
4Black crusts - soiling on buildings. This aids the production of gypsum, which crystallizes on the surfaceExposition to moisture in the form of fog, mist or dew. Diesel engines are one of the most damaging particle sourcesOngoing decay mechanisms, such as salt weathering

Table 2.

Causes of natural stone degradation.

Freeze-thaw cycles. If the mortar pores are filled with water, a pressure will be exerted on the pore walls of the mortar due to the increase in the volume (by 9%) of the frozen water. Thus, prolonged freeze-thaw cycles will progressively degrade mortars with moisture. The most sensitive to this phenomenon is lime mortars [30].

2.3. Type of inorganic nano-consolidants

The nanomaterials are adequate materials for the architectural heritage, due to their consolidation and protection capacity of damaged building materials. The nanoparticles are able of self-cleaning coatings for a preventive protection system for historical surfaces, preserving the original aspect of treated elements, decreasing the deposition of pollutants and soiling and reducing the onset of external degradation processes due to soiling phenomena. The nanoparticles must have the following attributes: termal stability, biologically and chemically inertness, nontoxic, low cost, stable toward visible or near UV light, good adaptability to various environment and good adsorption in solar spectrum. In addition, these treatments can also have water repellent properties, which favor this self-cleaning action. On the other hand, the presence of soluble salts is recognized as an important decay agent of stone heritage. Thus, in the last few years, the study of the application of nanoparticles as a desulfating agent for stone, mortars and wall paintings is being carried out [31].

The principle of the inorganic materials is to create an insoluble “paste” that fills the pores of the stone. There is a large area of such consolidants, as it is shown in Table 3.

1Alcalo-silicatesDeposition of silica in the limestone mass
2Silico-fluorideSilicone tiles can form a cemented crust on the outside, a layer of higher hardness. In general, these solutions are no longer recommended
3Alkaline hydroxidesThe consolidation effect is still low, requiring repeat treatment to make it more effective. The process remains relatively uneconomical
4Strontium and barium hydroxidesThese solutions seem to be more effective than calcium-based, but experts believe the problem of the durability of the treated stone, the application to historical structures
5Inorganic builders (zinc stearate and aluminum stearate, aluminum sulfate, phosphoric acid, phosphate and hydrofluoric acid )Superficial penetration into the pores of the stone. Danger of microorganism population
6Alcosilanes (or alkoxylans). Increased mechanical strength has also been reported with approx. 20% of the silicon tiles treated, which is already performingThe best materials with a reinforcing function
A deep penetration into the pores of silky tiles. The penetration of the alkoxylans in the stone occurs at a depth of 20–25 mm, which means much more than the inorganic builders
7Acrylic polymers (methyl-methacrylate, methyl-acrylate, ethyl-methacrylate and butyl-methacrylate).All of these builders have increased the resistance of the treated stone layer, but unfortunately they are unstable in color under the action of the already mentioned agents
8Vinyl polymers (polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylchloride-chlorinate, polyvinyl acetate)Polyvinyl acetate may cause a glossy-glassy appearance on the surface of the stone. On the other hand, if the polymers were insufficiently diluted in the solvent, layers were formed which could represent a screen for retaining the moisture and salts in the stone, that is, exactly the opposite of what was intended by applying the waterproofing treatment
9The polyurethanesTreatment is very effective, but warmth and light produce opposite effects

Table 3.

Consolidants used for stone and their effects.

Some inorganic materials, such as calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2, magnesium hydroxide Mg(OH)2, barium hydroxide Ba(OH)2, strontium hydroxide Sr(OH)2 and hydroxyapatite (HAp), have already been used as consolidants for different damaged carbonate stones [32]. Calcium hydroxide has been used as nanoparticles (130–300 nm), dispersed in alcohols, as nanosols (50–250 nm), as “pastelike” in ethanol and as calcium hydroxide microparticles (1–3 mm) [33]. But, due to their low porosity, high moisture content of the substrate, oversaturation of the material and quick evaporation of the solvent, calcium hydroxide is not an optimal option for this monument [34]. This is the reason for finding other optimal materials. Also, a reduced penetration depth and a limited solubility of lime in water are causing chromatic alteration of stone surface [35, 36]. Except the metallic hydroxides above mentioned, for stone consolidation could be used hydroxyapatite (HAp) [37, 38]. It is a natural mineral form of calcium apatite having the formula Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 and has the ability to readily accept in its structure numerous substitution ions for both Ca2+ and PO43 ions, with the chemical composition altering and the morphological structure [39]. The OH ion may be replaced by fluoride, chloride or carbonate ions, producing fluorouracil or chlorapatite [40].


3. Paper

3.1. Considerations on the methods of conserving the historical paper

Hydrolysis of acid-catalyzed cellulose is the main source of paper degradation. It is well known that the degradation process resides in the manufacture of low quality paper. At the beginning of the eighteenth century, papermaking technology changed and the paper began to be made of increasingly reactive materials (wood pulp) and acidic substances (rosin, used for sizing, chlorine for bleaching and so on). After a long period of exposure to environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity, light), these substances accelerate chemical degradation of the paper. The global effect is the rapid decrease in the resistance to degradation of paper documents, especially on paper made since the eighteenth century [41, 42, 43]. There is a general consensus on the inevitable treatment of deacidification in paper preservation. Deacidification involves a complete neutralization of the paper and, in most cases, the introduction of an alkaline reservoir that opposes the acidity assault in the environment (e.g., pollution) [44]. In this context, many studies have been developed addressing acidity elimination processes [45]. The best methods of deacidification are based on nonaqueous solvents. Less polar fluids minimize the risk of ink solubility. Among these most important deacidification methods are the Wei T'o method and the Bookkeeper method [46].

Recently, a new method has been proposed based on alcohols dispersed in calcium hydroxide nanoparticles that give good results in deacidification of the paper. The above-mentioned studies have also been extended to the treatment of paper with magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles (brucellosis) because it has been shown that magnesium reduces the rate of oxidative degradation of the cellulose substrate due to exposure to light.

Magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles, Mg(OH)2 (brucite), can be obtained by hydrating Mg (MgO), precipitating magnesium salts with an alkaline solution and electrolyzing an aqueous solution of a bounce magnesium.

Mg(OH)2 is usually accomplished by the first two methods [47]. When magnesium hydroxide powder is used as a precursor for the synthesis of magnesium oxide, the size of the hydroxide particles, the shape and degree of agglomeration of these are key parameters for many applications. An example is the sintering stage in the ceramic manufacturing process. Magnesium-based alkaline compounds are of great importance in the preservation of cultural heritage. Such an area of interest is also the treatments for deacidification of acidic paper in order to preserve it. Both the Wei T'o and Bookkeeper methods are based on the use of magnesium compounds that generate Mg(OH)2 “in situ” after hydrolysis. Unfortunately, some studies have demonstrated a limited homogeneous distribution of alkaline reservoirs [48]. The purpose of the new studies was to synthesize magnesium nanoparticles following the procedure similar to that of calcium hydroxide, which yielded very good results. Unlike the Wei T'o and Bookkeeper methods, these nanoparticles once deposited on the paper immediately acquire the role of deacidifier or buffer. Synthetic pathways for Mg(OH)2 nanoparticles have an important role both theoretically and practically. Several papers have shown that the precipitation of metallic hydroxides in their salts is strongly affected by variation in synthesis parameters. These include high-temperature reactions, reagent concentration and aging time. In particular, it was demonstrated that temperatures above 100°C promote the formation of nanoparticles in nonaqueous media. Some studies also reported significant effects of organic solvents related to the shape and size of precipitated particles. The obtained particles were characterized for determination of their chemical nature by: FT-TR spectroscopy, specific surface area (SA) measurement of dry powder, X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization and shape and size characterization by SEM and TEM electronic microscopy with scanning or electron transmission. Applying deacidification of nanoparticle paper is compared to Wei T'o [49].

In some cases, during the degradation process, it is possible to identify some odorous compounds such as vanillin or vanilic acid, well identified by gas chromatography, Figure 4.

Figure 4.

GC-MS chromatogram of the damaged paper.

3.1.1. Synthesis of nanoparticles of alkaline hydroxides

This process can be considerably stopped or slowed down by deacidification treatment. The excellent deacidification agents are Mg(OH)2 and Ca(OH)2 because they provide very good physicochemical compatibility with the support, and after conversion into carbonates, they work as alkaline reservoirs without producing any undesirable side effect [50].

Nanoparticles dispersed in alcohols can be applied to the paper by spraying, impregnating or dipping [51]. This method produces in situ hydroxides and requires dispersants to stabilize the system. The solvents used are volatile, environmentally friendly and with low surface tension so that they act as carrier solids for solid particles and ensure the homogeneity and penetration of nanoparticles into the depth of cellulose fibers [52].

The synthesis of Ca(OH)2 and Mg(OH)2 nanoparticles was made in heterogeneous medium, and CaO and MgO reagents were used. The oxides in turn were obtained from the corresponding carbonates, which were initially milled and then milled to a size of 100 μm. Then, the carbonates were calcined at 1000°C. Both carbonates were of analytical purity.

The process consists of suspending in a mixture of isopropyl alcohol and water in each of the two stoichiometric proportions of the respective oxides according to the equations given above. The hydrolysis reaction was carried out at 80°C for about 30 min (using deionized water).

3.1.2. Treatment of paper document with suspension of alkaline hydroxide nanoparticles

The resulting particles were used to treat paper with HAp in isopropanol, and the historical paper was manually sprayed. The pulverized sheets were from a book printed in Romania, in Bucharest, from a private collection from the end of the nineteenth century. Untreated paper was taken as a reference. The paper was then treated with the nanoparticles of Ca(OH)2 or Mg(OH)2 and examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [37, 38]. Initially untreated, unwritten, unprinted and uncolored paper was investigated by SEM and AFM, too, as a reference (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

SEM images for not-damaged and damaged cellulose substrates.

The cellular microarchitecture of cellulose was investigated by SEM. The micrographs obtained for this sample revealed a densely packed cellulose fiber network which, on a microscopic scale, inside the sheet of paper appears randomly oriented without having a majority direction of microfiber orientation. The fibers are homogeneous and seem to come from plant fibers, perhaps cotton or linen. The size of the fibers is different, some of them are whole, others are broken. Some fibers have inlay that might be salt crystals. The presence of mineral crystals in paper can be considered as a consequence of how it is made (Figure 6). The presence of luminous areas on the image is a consequence of either the presence of a thicker part of the glue material or a rupture of the paper [53].

Figure 6.

AFM images of not-damaged and damaged cellulose substrates.

On a macroscopic examination of the sprayed sample of nanoparticles of Mg(OH)2, no negative influence on the optical parameters of the paper is observed. Some white deposits of Mg (OH)2 were formed on the paper surface more pronounced in this case than in the case of Ca (OH)2, although both consolidants have the same concentration and volume applied to the same type of paper. Not all Mg (OH)2 nanoparticles neutralize the acidity of the paper and the unreacted quantity will be carbonated over time in the presence of atmospheric CO2.

3.1.3. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: synthesis and characterization

Hydroxyapatite (HAp) was obtained by the modified precipitation chemical method, and the synthesized substance was analyzed by spectral techniques: atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Figure 7) X-ray diffraction (XRD) and spectroscopy in Fourier transform infrared (FTIR).

Figure 7.

SEM images of not-treated and treated papers with Hap.

As synthesis reagents were used, calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, and dibasic ammonium phosphate, (NH4)2HPO4, were previously dissolved each in deionized water. Then, the solution of Ca(NO3)2·4H2O was added dropwise over the (NH4)2HPO4 solution, which was stirred vigorously at room temperature for about 1 h until a milky and somewhat gelatinous precipitate was obtained and further stirred for further 1 h to increase the reaction rate and homogenize the mixture [20]. The mixture was synthesized at 100°C for 24 h. Then, the precipitate was washed and filtered on a glass filter. After filtration, the compact and sticky cake was dried at 80°C in a furnace. The dried powder was then ground into a mortar and then calcined in an alumina crucible for 4 h [27].

As a method of synthesis, a modified wet precipitation method has been chosen because this is more advantageous due to the ease with which it is achieved, the low working temperature, the relatively important percentage of the pure product and the synthesis equipment that is not expensive. It has been found that well-crystallized products with a low degree of sintering have been obtained, but relatively high calcination temperatures were required and the application of this long-term treatment, 4 h, was to obtain a finished product with the desired parameters [3]. Both X-ray diffraction and infrared spectroscopy showed the high degree of purity of the reaction products [54]. The study of SEM and AFM images was very consistent with the results obtained by other analysis techniques: thermal analysis [46]. It has been determined that the crystal size for HAp synthesized is 70–nm. It has also been concluded that a sintering temperature of the synthesis product above 850°C leads to the occurrence of a by-product reaction, namely tricalcium phosphate, and for its conversion into Hap, it is necessary to calcinate at 1200°C for 4 h.


4. Conclusions

Nanomaterials bring huge enhancements of improvement endeavors for various applications, due to the extensive scale nanomaterials for auxiliary applications. The structure-handling property acquires an imperative segment in the cultural heritage. The present paper plans to do a review of the condition of workmanship on the use of some nanomaterials to the preservation and rebuilding of the stony and paper cultural artifacts. With a smaller size, a higher penetrability, viscosity, thermal and magnetic properties, in comparison with the traditional materials, the nanomaterials can contribute to solve the problems deriving from specific phenomena that could appear during the intervention and to identify the potential newly formed products in the treated materials. In this chapter, some aspects about the nanomaterials used for conservation and restoration of stone and paper artifacts are evidenced and discussed. Distinctive sorts of nanoparticles right now used to create preservation with upgraded material properties and novel functionalities have been discussed and exemplified in this chapter (Ca(OH)2, Mg(OH)2, Ba(OH)2, Sr(OH)2, hydroxyapatite), both for their synthesis, characterization and specific applications for paper and stone surfaces.



This chapter received financial support from MCI-UEFISCDI by the projects: PNII 261/2014, PN, 11 BM/2016 and 31CI/2017.


  1. 1. Preservation Technologies PTLP. Preservation Technologies PTLP [Internet]. 15 January 2000 [Updated: 15 January 2000]. Available from: [Accessed: 07 October 2017]
  2. 2. Colangiuli, D; Calia, A; Bianco, N. Novel multifunctional coatings with photocatalytic and hydrophobic properties for the preservation of the stone building heritage. Construction and Building Materials. 2015;93189-196. DOI:
  3. 3. Dei, L., Salvadori, B. Nanotechnology in cultural heritage conservation: nanometric slaked lime saves architectonic and artistic surfaces from decay. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2006;7(2):110-115. DOI:
  4. 4. Hensen E, Doehne E, Fidler J, Larson J, Martin B, Matteini M, Rodríguez-Navarro C, Sebastian Pardo E, Price C, de Tagle A, Teutonico J-M, Weiss NR. A review of selected inorganic consolidants and protective treatments for porous calcareous materials. Reviews in Conservation. 2003;4(13-25). DOI:
  5. 5. Álvarez de Buergo M, Fort R. A basic methodology for evaluating and selecting water-proofing treatments applied to carbonatic materials. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2001;43:258-266
  6. 6. López-Arce P, Gomez-Villalba LS, Fernández-Valle ME, Álvarez de Buergo M, Fort R.Influence of porosity and relative humidity on consolidation of dolostone with calcium hydroxide nanoparticles: Effectiveness assessment with non-destructive techniques. Materials Characterization. 2010;61(2):168-184
  7. 7. Vázquez-Calvo C, Ávarez de Buergo M, Fort R, Varas-Muriel MJ. Characterization of patinas by means of microscopic techniques. Materials Characterization. 2007;58(11-12):1119-1132. DOI:
  8. 8. Daniele V, Taglieri G, Quaresima R. The nanolimes in cultural heritage conservation: Characterisation and analysis of the carbonatation process. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2008;9(3):294-301. DOI:
  9. 9. Ferreira Pinto AP, Delgado-Rodrigues J. Stone consolidation: The role of treatment procedures. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2008;9(1):38-53.
  10. 10. Naidu S, Sassoni E, Scherer GW. New treatment for corrosion-resistant coatings for marble and consolidation of limestone. In: Stefanaggi M, Vergès-Belmin V. Eds, Jardins de Pierres – Conservation of Stone in Parks, Gardens and Cemeteries, Paris, 22-24 June 2011. pp. 289-294; 2011. ISBN: 2-905430-17-6
  11. 11. Ion RM. Nano Crystalline Materials. Bucharest: FMR Ed; 2003. 189 p
  12. 12. Baglioni P, Chelazzi D, Giorgi R. Nanotechnologies in the conservation of cultural heritage. A compendium of materials and techniques. Edit. Springer; 2015. ISBN: 978-94-017-9303-2
  13. 13. Daniele V, Taglieri G. Nanolime suspensions applied on natural lithotypes: The influence of concentration and residual water content on carbonatation process and on treatment effectiveness. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2010;11(1):102-106
  14. 14. Ion RM, Teodorescu S, Ştirbescu RM, Dulamă ID, Şuică-Bunghez IR, Bucurică IA, Fierăscu RC, Fierascu I, Ion ML. Effects of the restoration mortar on chalk stone buildings. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; 2016; Jessy. 2016:012038
  15. 15. Lopez-Arce P, Zornoza-Indart A. Carbonation acceleration of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles: induced by yeast fermentation. Applied Physics A. 2015;120(4):1475-1495
  16. 16. Ion RM, Fierascu RC, Leahu M, Ion ML, Turcanu D. Nanomaterials for conservation and preservation of historical monuments. In: Proc EWCHP; Bolzano. 2013. pp. 97-104
  17. 17. Ion RM, Bunghez RI, Pop SF, Fierascu RC, Ion ML, Leahu M. Chemical weathering of chalk stone materials from Basarabi churches. Metalurgia International. 2013;18(1):89-93
  18. 18. López-Arce P, Gomez-Villalba LS, Martínez-Ramírez S, Álvarez de Buergo M, Fort R. Influence of relative humidity on the carbonation of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles and the formation of calcium carbonate polymorphs. Powder Technology. 2011;205(1):263-269. DOI:
  19. 19. Ion RM, Ion ML, Radu A, Şuică-Bunghez RI, Fierăscu RC, Fierăscu I, Teodorescu S. Mortar pe bază de nanomateriale pentru conservarea faţadelor construcţiilor. Romanian Journal of Materials. 2016;46(4):412-416
  20. 20. Ion RM, Bunghez IR, Teodorescu S, Ion ML. Degradation of chalk stones induced by freeze–thaw action. In: Proc. XIX-th international conference “INVENTICA 2015”; June 2015; Jessy. Jessy: Performantica. 2015. pp. 141-147
  21. 21. Kruhl JH, Nega M. The fractal shape of sutured quartz grain boundaries: application as a geothermometer. Geologische Rundschau. 1996;85(1):38-43
  22. 22. Bernal SA, Mejía de Gutiérrez R, Provis JL. Engineering and durability properties of concretes based on alkali-activated granulated blast furnace slag/metakaolin blends. Construction and Building Materials. 2012;33:99-108
  23. 23. Campbell A, Hamilton A, Stratford T, Modestou S, Ioannou I. Calcium hydroxide nanoparticles for limestone conservation: Imbibition and adhesion. Proceedings of Symposium, Adhesives and Consolidants for Conservation, Ottawa. 2011:1-16
  24. 24. Drdácký M, Slížková Z, Ziegenbalg G. A nano approach to consolidation of degraded historic lime mortars. Journal of Nano Research. 2009;8:13-22. DOI:
  25. 25. Ruffolo S, LaRussa MF, Aloise P, Belfiore CM, Macchia A, Pezzino A, Crisci GM. Efficacy of nanolime in restoration procedures of salt weathered limestone rock. Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing. 2014;114:753-758
  26. 26. Slíížková Z, Drdácký M, Viani A. Consolidation of weak lime mortars by means of saturated solution of calcium hydroxide or barium hydroxide. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2015;16:452-460.
  27. 27. Ambrosi M, Ambrosi M, Dei L, Giorgi R, Neto C, Baglioni P. Colloidal particles of Ca(OH)2: Properties and applications to restoration of frescoes. Langmuir. 2001;17(14):4251-4255
  28. 28. Kryza R, Prell M, Czechowski F, Domaradzka M. Acidic weathering of carbonate building stones: experimental assessment (preliminary results). Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai. Geologia. 2009;54(1):33-36
  29. 29. Sassoni E, Franzoni E. Sugaring marble in the Monumental Cemetery in Bologna (Italy): characterization of naturally and artificially weathered samples and first results of consolidation by hydroxyapatite. Applied Physics A. 2014;117:1893-1906.
  30. 30. Winkler EM. Stone: Properties, Durability in Men’s Environment. Wien: Springer Verlag; 1973. p. 223
  31. 31. Hansen E, Doehne E, Fidler J, Larson J, Martin B, Matteini M, et al. A review of selected inorganic consolidants and protective treatments for porous calcareous materials. Reviews in Conservation. 2003;4:13-25.
  32. 32. Pianski J, Brümmer K, Ziegenbalg G.. Nano-particles for stone conservation-state of the art, characteristics and recent developments. In: Stonecore—“Recent Progress in the Consolidation of Calcareous Materials”, Litomysl, Czech Republic, 21-22 April 2010; 2010
  33. 33. Daniele V, Taglieri G. Ca(OH)2 nanoparticle characterization: microscopic investigation of their application on natural stones. Materials Characterisation. 2011;72:55-66
  34. 34. Giorgi R, Ambrosi M, Toccafondi N, Baglioni P. Nanoparticles for cultural heritage conservation: Calcium and barium hydroxide nanoparticles for wall painting consolidation. Chemistry - A European Journal. 2010;16(31):9374-9382
  35. 35. Delgado Rodrigues J, Ferreira Pinto AP. Laboratory and onsite study of barium hydroxide as a consolidant for high porosity limestones. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2016;19:467-476.
  36. 36. Ciliberto E, Condorelli GG, La Delfa S, Viscuso E. Nanoparticles of Sr(OH)2: synthesis in homogeneous phase at low temperature and application for cultural heritage artefacts. Applied Physics A-Materials Science Process. 2008;91(1):137-141.
  37. 37. Sassoni E, Naidu S, Scherer GW. The use of hydroxyapatite as a new inorganic consolidant for damaged carbonate stones. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2011;12:346-355.
  38. 38. Ion R-M, Turcanu-Carutiu D, Fierascu R-C, Fierascu I. Chalk Stone restoration with hydroxyapatite-based nanoparticles. SBMM. 2014;12:9:24
  39. 39. Ion R-M, Turcanu-Carutiu D, Fierascu R-C, Fierascu I, Bunghez I-R, Ion M-L, Teodorescu S,Vasilievici G, Raditoiu V. Caoxite-hydroxyapatite composition as consolidating material for the chalk stone from Basarabi-Murfatlar churches ensemble. Applied Surface Science. 2015;358:612-618.
  40. 40. Ion RM, Fierascu RC, Fierascu I, Senin RM, Ion ML, Leahu M. Influence of Fântâniṭa Lake (Chalk Lake) Water on the Degradation of Basarabi–Murfatlar Churches. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory. 2015;8:543-546
  41. 41. Sequeira S, Casanova C, Cabrita EJ. Deacidification of paper using dispersions of Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles in isopropanol. Journal Cultural Heritage. 2006;7:264-272
  42. 42. Ion R-M, Doncea SM, Ion M-L, Rǎdiţoiu V, Amǎriuţei V. Surface investigations of old book paper treated with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Applied Surface Science. 2013;285(A):27-32
  43. 43. Taglieri G, Daniele V, Del Re G, Volpe R. A new and original method to produce Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles by using an anion exchange resin. Advances in Nanoparticles. 2015;4:17-24. DOI: 10.4236/anp.2015.42003
  44. 44. Roy A, Bhattacharya J. Synthesis of Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles by wet chemical method. Micro & Nano letters. 2010;3:131-134
  45. 45. Samanta A. Synthesis of nano calcium hydroxide in aqueous medium. Journal American Ceramic Society. 2016;795:787-795
  46. 46. Doncea SM, Ion RM, Fierascu RC, Bacalum E, Bunaciu AA, Aboul-Enein HY. Spectral methods for historical paper analysis: Composition and age approximation. Instrumentation Science and Technology. 2010;38(1):96-106
  47. 47. Gomez-Villalba LS, López-Arce P, de Buergo MA, Zornoza-Indart A, Fort R. Mineralogical and textural considerations in the assessment of aesthetic changes in dolostones by effect of treatments with Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles. Science and Technology for the Conservation of Cultural Heritage. 2013;235-329
  48. 48. Doncea SM, Ion RM, Fierascu RC, Dumitriu I. Extended spectral analysis (FTIR, EDXRF, ICP-EAS) of cellulose-based artifacts. Studia Universitatis Babes Bolyai, Geologia, Special. 2009;83-86
  49. 49. Ion RM, Ion ML, Niculescu VIR, Dumitriu I, Fierascu RC, Florea G, Bercu C, Serban S. Spectral analysis of original and restaurated ancient paper from a Romanian Gospel. Rom. Journal of Physics. 2008;53(5-6):781-791
  50. 50. Mosini V, Calvini P, Mattogno G, Righini G. Derivative infrared spectroscopy and electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis of ancient paper documents. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology. 1990;24:263-272
  51. 51. Doncea SM, Ion RM, Nuta A, Somoghi R, Ghiurea M. Optical methods of investigation for book papers conservation with nanoparticles. In: SPIE US, editor. Proceeding of SPIE; 2010. p. 78211 F
  52. 52. Sierra-Fernández A, Gómez-Villalba LS, Milosevic O, Fort R, Rabanal ME. Synthesis and morpho-structural characterization of nanostructured magnesium hydroxide obtained by a hydrothermal method. Ceramics International. 2014;40:12285-12292. DOI:
  53. 53. Gómez-Villalba LS, López-Arce P, Álvarez de Buergo M, Fort R. Structural stability of a colloidal solution of Ca(OH)2 nanocrystals exposed to high relative humidity conditions. Applied Physics A.2011;104(4):1249-1254. DOI:
  54. 54. Taglieri G, Mondelli C, Daniele V, Pusceddu E, Trapananti A. Synthesis and X-ray diffraction analyses of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles in aqueous suspension. Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry. 2013;3:108-112.

Written By

Rodica-Mariana Ion, Sanda-Maria Doncea and Daniela Ţurcanu- Caruțiu

Submitted: 09 July 2017 Reviewed: 25 October 2017 Published: 20 December 2017