Open access peer-reviewed chapter

High-Power Laser Systems of UV and Visible Spectral Ranges

Written By

Nikolay Ivanov, Valery Losev, Yury Panchenko and Viktor Tarasenko

Submitted: October 18th, 2016 Reviewed: October 4th, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71455

Chapter metrics overview

950 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Three high-power excimer laser systems with apertures of 25 and 40 cm of the output laser beam are described. The first and second laser systems consist of four and five excimer lasers, respectively. Third system consists of Ti:Sa front end and XeF(C-A) amplifier. The experimental results of the generation of the high-quality and high-power laser pulses are presented. Laser beams with pulse energy of up to 330 J (308 nm, 250 ns) and peak power 14 TW (450 nm, 50 fs) were obtained.


  • excimer laser systems
  • discharge
  • e-beam
  • hybrid laser system
  • laser pulse

1. Introduction

Laser systems on the noble-gas halides are the most powerful and effective sources of the coherent radiation in the UV spectral range. Nowadays, these systems serve as a unique means for solving fundamental and applied problems (e.g., inertial nuclear fusion, the physics of the interaction of the superintense radiation with matter, the generation of the x-ray radiation, the acceleration of particles in the presence of superstrong electromagnetic field, etc.).

Nike (United States) is the most powerful excimer laser system, generating radiation pulses with energy of up to 5 kJ at a pulse duration of 240 ns on full width half maximum (FWHM) and a wavelength of 248 nm [1]. The aperture of the output amplifier of this system is 60 × 60 cm. The system was created and applied to solve the problem of laser thermonuclear fusion. It is used in the experiments on the generation of high-power nanosecond pulses and their interaction with a target. The second largest excimer laser system (Super-Ashura) was created in Japan [2]. The aperture size of the output amplifier is 61 cm. This system generates radiation pulses with an energy of up to 3.7 kJ (KrF molecule) at a pulse duration of about 240 ns. The Super-Ashura system is used for experiments on the generation of high-power nanosecond and picosecond pulses and the interaction of these pulses with matter. The Titania laser system, created in England, employs KrF molecules and generates pulses with an energy of about 1 kJ and a pulse duration of about 150 ns [3]. The aperture size of the output amplifier is 42 cm. This system is used for experiments on the generation of high-power picosecond and femtosecond pulses and their interaction with matter.

Russian institutions also develop and create the powerful excimer lasers and laser systems [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. In particular, a KrF laser system with a Garpun output unit (Institute of Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences) has an output aperture with a size of 16 × 18 cm and one generates radiation pulses with energy of 80 J and pulse duration of 100 ns [12].

The excimer lasers developed at the High-Current Electronics Institute (HCEI), Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, generate pulses with an energy of greater than 100 J [4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11]. The two most powerful XeCl lasers (308 nm) with apertures of 40 [8] and 60 cm [9, 10, 11] generate pulses with energies of 660 J and 1.9 kJ and pulse durations of about 350 and 250 ns, respectively.

At the end of the nineteenth century, the hybrid approach to femtosecond pulse amplification was developed. To amplify femtosecond pulses, the rare-gas-halide excimer media excited by a high-voltage discharge or an electron beam were used. In these media, the laser transitions between the excited B–state and ground weakly bound or weakly repulsive X-state of ArF, XeCl, XeF, or KrF excimer molecules were used [13]. However, B-X transitions have rather narrow gain bandwidths (broadest bandwidth of Δλ ≈ 2 nm) and rather small saturation fluence (εsat≈ 1 mJ/cm2). To realize high-output peak powers, (more than 1 TW) large apertures are required. Furthermore, a high gain of the amplifiers limits the temporal contrast of output radiation at the level of 102–103 [14]. The highest peak power of output radiation reached in traditional rare-gas-halide excimer amplifiers does not exceed ~ 4 TW [15].

А photodissociative-driven XeF(С-А) medium has a wide amplification band (~ 60 nm) in 475 nm range and a high saturation fluence of ~ 0.05 J/cm2 unlike the traditional excimer molecules on the B-X transition [16]. At present, the development of ultra–high-power laser systems with a pulse duration of 10–100 fs is based mainly on near-infrared solid-state Ti:sapphire or parametric amplifiers. In these systems, positively chirped pulses, i.e., stretched in time (up to 0.5–1 ns) by linear frequency modulation [17], are amplified, and following its temporal recompression, the initial duration is realized. A pulse stretching allows avoiding nonlinear effects related to self-focusing. The pulses are normally stretched ~104 times, and for pulse recompression, a vacuum compressor based on diffraction gold-coated gratings is used.

An alternative approach to the design of multiterawatt and petawatt femtosecond laser systems has been developed at the Lebedev Physical Institute (Moscow, Russia) [18, 19], LP3 Laboratory of the Marseille University (Marseille, France) [20, 21, 22], and Institute of High Current Electronics (Tomsk, Russia) [23, 24, 25]. This approach is based on a solid-state femtosecond front-end and a photochemical XeF(C-A) boosting amplifier with a gaseous active medium [26, 27]. The advantage of this hybrid (solid/gas) design is that due to the much lower optical nonlinearity of gas compared to solids, the admissible factor of stretching femtosecond pulse is three orders of magnitude smaller than for solid-state systems. This allows the amplification of picosecond chirped pulses and their subsequent compression by simpler and more efficient methods. The compression of negatively chirped pulses can be realized in bulk glass with positive group velocity dispersion. In addition, the hybrid laser system operates in the visible spectral range, which may be advantageous in some applications to strong-field laser-matter interaction [28]. The gaseous nature of the active medium also allows easy scaling of hybrid laser systems. At the Institute of High Current Electronics (HCEI) SB RAS, the multiterawatt hybrid laser system THL-100 based on a photochemical-driven XeF(C-A) boosting amplifier with a 24 cm aperture was developed.

In this work, we describe three high-power excimer laser systems developed at HCEI and based on wide-aperture lasers with the output laser beam sizes 25 × 25 cm [6], 40 cm (diameter) [8], and 25 cm [29, 30], respectively. The experimental results obtained on these systems are presented.


2. MELS-4 k laser system

2.1. Experimental method and equipment

The MELS-4 k laser system consists of the master complex, preamplifier, and a UFL-100 M amplifier [7]. The master complex contains two electric-discharge XeCl lasers. One of them serves as the master oscillator. The combination of the two lasers makes it possible to vary the parameters of the output radiation. In particular, for single-pass lasing, the radiation energy is E = 15 mJ, the spectral line half width is Δν = 0.01 cm−1, and the pulse FWHM is 50 ns. In the case of injection locking, the parameters of the output beam are E = 100 mJ, Δν = 0.01 cm−1, and τ = 100 ns, while more than 50% of the radiation energy is concentrated inside the diffraction angle [31]. In the case of double-pass lasing with the phase conjugation, the parameters are E = 50 mJ, Δν = 0.01–0.4 cm−1, and τ = 30 ns, and the divergence is close to the diffraction-limited Qd [32]. When the pulse is compressed to a pulse duration of 1–2 ns upon stimulated Brillouin scattering, the parameters are E = 10 mJ, Δν = 0.01 cm−1, and Qd [33].

The preamplifier represents an electric-discharge lase with an active volume of 6x11x80 cm3 (Figure 1). This laser consists of a metal housing that contains the dielectric laser chamber, capacitors with a total capacitance of 368 nF that are directly connected to the electrodes, and the x-ray source. A discharge gap and a storage capacitor (0.4 μF) are placed outside. The laser mixture Ne/Xe/HCl = 1000/10/1 is photo-ionized at a pressure of 2–4 atm. The storage capacitor is connected to the discharge gap, and 300 ns prior to the moment when the voltage across the electrodes reaches the maximum value, the x-ray source is switched on. The radiation of this source initiates the discharge. The x-ray radiation is injected through a stainless steel grid with a geometrical transparency of 50%. The doze inside the laser chamber is about 25 mR. The laser energy amounts to 6–10 J at a pulse duration of τ = 80–160 ns.

Figure 1.

Photograph of the electric-discharge preamplifier.

The active volume of the main amplifier is 25 × 25 × 100 cm3. The gas is excited by two electron beams [6]. The electron accelerators are placed at the top and bottom of the laser chamber, which has an internal volume of 360 l. In each accelerator, the vacuum diode and the high-voltage generator are placed in a single metal housing. The cathode of the vacuum diode is directly fixed on the last stage of the high-voltage generator. The maximum energy of the laser with a plane-parallel cavity is 210 J, and the pulse duration is τ = 250 ns. In the amplification mode, the windows of the laser chamber are tilted at an angle of 100 relatively to the optical axis.

To start the master complex and to lock it to the amplifiers, we employ a high-voltage pulsed oscillator. The switch on time of the master oscillator and the amplifier is controlled using the cable and artificial delay lines. When the radiation is amplified in the laser system, the following condition is satisfied: the maximum intensity of the input pulse coincides with the pump power maximum in each of the amplifiers.

To determine the wave-front distortions of the amplified beam on the optical elements, we calculate the optical path taking into account the positions of the elements and the surface finish. For the optical elements with a diameter of up to 100 mm, the wave-front distortion of the laser beam is no greater than λ/4. For a diameter D of greater than 100 mm, the distortion is no greater than λ (wave length).

To find the energy parameters of the radiation, we numerically simulate the amplification modes. For this purpose, we employ the one-dimensional model developed at HCEI based on the system of nonstationary equations for the concentrations of the excimer molecules and the photon fluxes [7].

2.2. Calculated parameters of the amplified radiation

The short spontaneous lifetime (10–14 ns) of the upper laser level of excimer molecules and a high small signal gain g0 (0.05–0.1 cm−1) lead to a relatively high level of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE). The purpose of the calculations is to predict the output parameters of the laser system with allowance for the ASE in the optical schemes.

The output characteristics of the radiation are calculated for the preamplifier and the main amplifier where the ASE effect is maximal. All of the intensity distributions are presented for a time-constant pump power. Figure 2 demonstrates the radiation intensity distribution with respect to the length of the preamplifier active medium for various intensities of the input signal. The calculations are performed for the following initial parameters of the active medium: g0 = 0.08 cm−1, α = 0.015 cm−1, τef = 2.5 ns, and σ = 4 × 10−16 cm2, where α is absorption coefficient, τef is the efficient life time of XeCl* molecule, and σ is the stimulated emission cross section The spontaneous lifetime of the XeCl* molecules is τs = 14 ns. Based on the results of the calculations and the input pulse duration, we may conclude that an input energy of about 10 mJ is sufficient for the saturation of the amplifier at two passes. In this case, the intensity of the amplified signal as about 2Is (Is is the saturation intensity). For input signals with an intensity of no less than 100 kW/cm2, it is expedient to employ single-pass amplification. In general, the ASE effect is weak provided that the input intensity is more than 2 kW/cm2 at the given parameters and sizes of the active medium.

Figure 2.

Intensity distributions of (1)–(4) the amplified signals and (5) the total ASE for (1)–(3) and (5) the double-pass and (4) single-pass amplification in the active medium of the preamplifier. The signal traveling from the right-hand side to the left-hand side is reflected by the mirror on the left-hand side. Curve5corresponding to the ASE is presented for the conditions of curve1.

For the main amplifier with a lower pump power, the parameters of the active medium are as follows: g0 = 0.065 cm−1, α = 0.0145 cm−1, τef = 3 ns, σ = 4 × 10−16 cm2, and τs = 14 ns [7]. Figure 3 demonstrates the intensity distributions of the amplified radiation and ASE for the single-pass (a) and double-pass (b) configurations. It is seen that the ASE effect is significantly stronger than the effect in the preamplifier in spite of the comparable values of the product gL, where L is active medium length and g is the gain coefficient. For example, at a kilowatt level of the input signal, the ASE intensity at the output of the main preamplifier is close to the intensity of the amplified radiation, so that the latter cannot effectively make use of the population inversion. Note that the one-dimensional model slightly overestimates the signal-to-noise ratio (especially in the case of double-pass amplification). Therefore, the real ASE effect should be even stronger. Thus, the minimum intensity of the input signal of the main amplifier should be about 10 kW/cm2. At a pulse duration of 80 ns, the corresponding energy density is about 1 mJ/cm2. In this case, preference should be given to the double-pass configuration with regard to the energy of the amplified radiation.

Figure 3.

Intensity distributions of (solid lines1–4) the amplified signals and (dashed lines1–4) the total ASE for (a) one and (b) two passes in the active medium of the main amplifier.

In the calculations, we employ the nonstationary model and, therefore, observe the shape of the desired signal and the ASE pulse shape [7]. The pulses at the input and output of the active medium may substantially differ from each other. This difference depends on the difference between the radiation and pump pulse shapes, on the steepness of the pulse edges and the length of the active medium.

2.3. Experimental results

The experiments on the amplification of radiation in the laser systems are performed at a pulse duration of τ0.5 = 80 ns. The purpose of the experiments is to measure the energy characteristics of the amplifiers and to determine the wave-front distortions in the optical path. Figure 4 shows the experimental optical scheme. In the case under consideration, the amplified beam diverges owing to the presence of the negative lens 5. This makes it possible, on the one hand, to increase the output energy of the first stage and, on the other hand, to relatively easily match the apertures of the electric-discharge amplifiers. To match the beam size with the aperture of the output amplifier, we additionally employ telescope 6, which also provides for the spatial filtering of the radiation.

Figure 4.

Optical scheme of the experiment:1and4totally reflecting mirrors,2pinhole with a diameter of 1.5 mm,3semitransparent mirror, 5negative lens withF = − 80 cm,6telescope consisting of lenses with focal lengths of 50 and 100 cm (L is the optical path length in between the stages).

Table 1 demonstrates the measured output radiation energies and divergences for each of the amplification stages. Here, Ais the beam size at the amplifier output; Ein and Eout are the input and output energies, respectively; and Ed is the energy inside the angle Qd. The larger beam size in the preamplifier and amplifier corresponds to the presence of the telescope. The difference between the output and input energies of the stages is related to the loss at the turning mirrors and the loss resulting from the aperture matching.

ParametersFirst stageSecond stageThird stageFourth stage
A, cmØ = 0.61.2 × 1.85 × 621 × 25
Ein, J0.0030.031.2
Eout, J0.0050.081.525

Table 1.

Parameters of the radiation amplified with an MELS-4 k laser system.

It is seen from Table 1 that the radiation divergence at the output of the first stage is close to the diffraction-limited divergence. Nevertheless, a worsening of the discharge homogeneity or an increase in the diameter of the beam amplified in it leads to a decrease in the energy concentrated inside the angle Qd to a level of no greater than 50%. Using single-pass amplification in the passive part of the active medium of the first stage, we additionally increase the output energy of the master oscillator by a factor of about 20.

For the second stage, an input energy of 3 mJ is sufficient for the saturation of the amplifier active medium at two passes. A minor increase in the divergence after the second amplification stage in comparison to the divergence after the first stage is related to the presence of the ASE. The active medium of the preamplifier does not contribute to the observed increase in the divergence that is related to the distortions in the remaining part of the optical path (air and optical elements).

The atmospheric turbulent flows impede the measurements of the divergence at the output of the main amplifier. In particular, the position and structure of the focal spot are unstable when the radiation of the master oscillator passes through the optical system in the absence of amplification. The instability strongly depends on the presence of heat sources in the vicinity of the optical path and on the time interval after the operation of the amplifiers. This is the reason for the approximate value of the ratio Ed/Eout for a beam size of 10 × 12 cm. We may state that, in this case, nearly 50% of the energy is concentrated in an angle of 5 × 10−5 rad. This result is in agreement with the results of the alternative measurements in which the output radiation is focused by a lens with F = 1.5 m on the titanium foil with a thickness of 50 μm: a hole diameter of 100 μm corresponds to a divergence of about 6.5 × 10−5 rad.

To more thoroughly study the effect of the heterogeneities in the active medium of the main amplifier and the optical path, we amplify the radiation of the master oscillator at three beam diameters: 35, 75, and 150 mm, respectively. Figure 5 demonstrates the intensity distributions of the original radiation (the amplifier is switched off) and the amplified radiation measured in the far-field region. The first three panels correspond to the single-pass amplification in the active medium. It is seen that, for beam diameters of 35 and 75 mm, the divergence of the original and amplified radiation is close to the diffraction-limited divergence Qd. At a beam diameter of 150 mm, the focal spot is broken into a few spots, so that the divergence is significantly higher than Qd.

Figure 5.

Densitograms of the focal spots for beam diameters of (a) 35, (b) and (c) 75, and (d) and (e) 150 mm:1original radiation,2amplified radiation, and3original radiation having passed through the amplifier a few seconds after its work.

The most probable reason for this lies in the fluctuations of the air density in the optical path, since, in the case under consideration, the distance between lens 5and the focal spot is about 25 m. We change the optical scheme to decrease the possible effect of air. In the new scheme, the amplified radiation is expanded with a telescope in front of the amplifier, amplified, reflected by the mirror, amplified on the return pass, compressed by the same telescope, and detected. For detection, the reflection mirror was slightly misaligned relative to the optical axis of the system. Figure 5d and e shows the densitograms of the focal spots for the new scheme. It is seen that the focal spot remains unbroken even at a beam diameter of 150 mm. The calculations show that a certain broadening in comparison to the diffraction size is related to the spherical aberration in the telescope.

In the measurements of the densitograms, the time interval between the amplifier activations is no less than 30 min. At shorter pauses, the divergence of the original radiation increases even for a beam diameter of 35 mm (Figure 5a). Nevertheless, the distortions are not observed when the radiation of the master laser enters the working medium of the amplifier immediately after the termination of the pump pulse.


3. Laser system with an output aperture of 40 cm

The laser system consists of five excimer lasers (Photon-1–Photon-5), the synchronization and starting system, and the matching optical elements. In three lasers, the working mixture is excited by an electric discharge. In two lasers, electron-beam excitation is used. In the experiments, the parameters of the laser radiation are measured using conventional methods and devices. To measure the time and energy characteristics of the laser pulses, we employ an FEK-22 vacuum photodiode, TPI and IKT-2 N calorimeters, and an OPHIR calorimeter with an L30A-EX head. The signals are detected with Tektronix oscilloscopes.

3.1. Discharge lasers

Figure 6 shows the exterior view of the first laser (Photon-1) [34]. The electrodes of the discharge gap are mounted inside the steel discharge chamber of the laser, which has a diameter of 35 cm. The electrode length is 107 cm, its active length is 102 cm, and the width of the interelectrode gap is 4 cm. A rectangular hole on one of the sides of the laser chamber is covered with an insulator. The elements of the system for the laser excitation are placed on the insulator surface and are covered with a metal housing.

Figure 6.

Photograph of the Photon-1 laser setup.

For the excitation, we employ an electric circuit with inductive energy storage and a semiconductor current breaker [35]. In this circuit, the high-voltage pulse with a short leading edge that is needed for discharge ignition is formed with a peaking capacitor C = 3.2 nF that is charged by the inductive energy storage with 12 SOS diodes [36]. The discharge preionization is realized upon the charging of the peaking capacitors owing to the radiation of 90 spark gaps that are uniformly distributed on the two sides of the anode. The main energy is deposited to the active medium at a low optimal voltage supplied by the storage capacitor (550 nF) that consists of K15–10 ceramic capacitors. The laser cavity consists of dielectric mirrors with reflectances of 98% and 7%. For the mixture Ne:Xe:HCl = 1520:10:1 with a pressure of 2 atm, the maximum laser energy is higher than 1.5 J at a pulse duration of 300 ns (FWHM) and a total efficiency of 1.35%. The low efficiency was due to the low content of HCl in the mixture, which was necessary to ignite the bulk discharge with large duration (~ 500 ns).

The two remaining electric-discharge lasers (Photon-2 and Photon-3) [37, 38] are virtually identical with respect to the design and the pumping scheme. Figure 7 demonstrates the exterior view of Photon-3. Each of these lasers consists of three units that contain the gas-discharge chamber with the pump generator and electric and pneumatic control panels. The chamber contains the vacuum diode of the soft x-ray source, the electrodes of the laser discharge gap, and the insulator of the high-voltage input. The electrodes are made of stainless steel. For the Photon-2 (Photon-3) laser, the interelectrode distance is 5.4 (9) cm and the electrode length is 80 (100) cm. The x-ray radiation is transmitted to the discharge gap through the electrode window, which is covered with 80-μm-thick titanium foil. The anode of the discharge gap is connected to the pump generator located outside the chamber via an insulator with metal studs. The design of the elements that connect the generator to the anode and the backward wire-ways provides for the minimum inductance of the discharge circuit.

Figure 7.

Photograph of the Photon-3 laser setup.

The vacuum diode of the x-ray source has a cylindrical housing that accommodates the anode and the cold cathode working upon explosive electron emission. The emission surface of the cathode consists of strips of foil-clad fiberglass plastic. The strips are attached to a separating grid that is covered with a 40-μm-thick titanium foil for the sealing of the vacuum diode and is used for the out coupling of the x-ray radiation. A tantalum foil serves as the anode of the vacuum diode. The vacuum diode is evacuated with an oil-diffusion pump to a residual pressure of about 10−4 torr.

A three-stage Arkad’ev-Marx generator with a fast capacitance of 15 nF serves as the power supply for the vacuum diode. The generator is connected to the vacuum diode with a KVI-120 high-voltage cable. A positive voltage pulse with an amplitude of 50–55 kV and a duration of 700 ns is fed to the anode. The x-ray doze in the cathode region of the discharge gap is 20–30 mR.

The storage capacitor, the switching unit, and the peaking capacitor are the main elements of the laser pump generator. The storage capacitor CLconsists of two (Photon-2) or three (Photon-3) FL-300 lines connected in parallel. The electric length of the line is 300 ns, its capacitance is 150 nF, and the impedance is 1 Ω. The pulsed charging of the line employs an IK-100 capacitor that is connected to the line with a KVI-120 cable. This capacitor can be charged to a voltage of 40–65 kV. The peaking capacitors C2 = 4.9 (Photon-2) and 6.9 nF (Photon-3) that form the space discharge in the gap represent the batteries of KVI-3 ceramic capacitors (20 kV and 680 pF).

A rail-gap switch exhibits a low inductance. Its electrodes are made of stainless steel. For the Photon-2 (Photon-3) laser, the electrode length is 80 (100) cm and the interelectrode distance is 4 (6) mm. A starting electrode made up of foil leaves is located in the vicinity of the cathode along its entire length. The gaps are activated when a high-voltage pulse is fed to the starting electrode. The gap case represents a dielectric tube with an outer diameter of 65 mm. In the working mode, the gaps are filled with dry air at a pressure of 4–6.6 atm.

The high-voltage pulse needed for the activation of the spark gaps is produced by a high-voltage impulse generator based on a TGI-1-1000/25 thyratron. The artificial delay lines of the synchronization system provide for a sequential switching on of the pump generator and the x-ray source.

Plane-parallel plates made of fused quartz serve as the windows of the laser chamber. In the lasing mode, the laser cavity is formed by the external dielectric mirror with a reflectance of 98% at a wavelength of 308 nm and the window of the laser chamber. The laser mixture has a pressure of 3.5–4 atm and consists of the gases Ne, Xe, and HCl.

The free-running Photon-2 and Photon-3 lasers generate pulses with a duration of 250–300 ns (FWHM) and an energy of 3.5 and 10 J, respectively.

3.2. Electron beam–pumped lasers

Figure 8 shows a photograph of the forth laser (Photon-4). The laser consists of the Arkad’ev-Marx generator (high-voltage generator), vacuum diode, laser chamber, gas-filling and evacuation system, and electric control panel. The vacuum diode and the generator that serves as its power supply are placed in a single case. Thus, vacuum insulation of the high-voltage components is realized in the high-voltage generator. This design makes it possible to minimize the inductance of the power-supply circuit of the vacuum diode, as well as the accelerator size and weight. The high-voltage generator has three parallel branches that make it possible to minimize the inductance and the erosion of the gap electrodes. In each branch, the spark-gap space is filled with dry air mixed with SF6. The capacitance of each stage in one branch is 0.18 nF. The accelerator is started with a controlled gap switched to a high-voltage cable connected to the high-voltage generator. The gap is activated by a high-voltage pulse of the thyratron generator. The vacuum-diode cathodes with a total length of 110 cm are mounted on a holder fixed on the upper stage of the high-voltage generator. The laser chamber that serves as the anode is located in between the cathodes in the center of the vacuum diode. The inner diameter of the laser chamber is 25 cm. At the entire length, the chamber is attached to the diode housing with a metal plate. The plate facilitates the current flow and decreases the electron beam loss owing to the effect of the self-magnetic field. In the absence of the plate, when the current is closed only on the ends of the gas chamber, the loss may amount to 50%. Velvet serves as the electron emitter on the cathodes of the vacuum diode. The width of the anode-cathode gap is 7 cm. Thus, four radially converging beams formed in the diode are injected into the laser chamber through eight windows (two windows in a row with a total length of 120 cm). Each vacuum-sealed window is closed with a 40-μm-thick titanium foil attached to a metal grid. The residual gas pressure in the case that accommodates the high-voltage generator and the vacuum diode is 5 × 10−5 torr.

Figure 8.

Photograph of the Photon-4 laser setup.

At a charging voltage of 85 kV, the voltage pulse formed by the generator across the diode has a duration of 1000 ns, an amplitude of 480 kV, and a total current of 74 kA. The electron beam generated in the diode provides for a relatively homogeneous excitation of the laser mixture.

The plane-parallel plates, which have a diameter of 300 mm and are made of fused quartz, serve as the windows of the laser chamber. In the lasing mode, the laser cavity is formed by the Al-coated external mirror and the window of the laser chamber.

The laser mixture consists of argon, xenon, and HCl. For the mixture Ar:Xe:HCl = 760:20:1 with a pressure of 2 atm, the radiation pulse energy amounts to 120 J at a charging voltage of 85 kV. The FWHM of the laser pulse is about 250 ns. Figure 9 shows the exterior view of the Photon-5 laser. The laser gas mixture is excited by a radially converging electron beam from six directions [8]. The beam is generated in a vacuum diode that contains 18 cathodes. The cathode profile is chosen in accordance with the results of the numerical calculations of the beam parameters using the original 2D code. The emitting cathode surface is made of carbotextim (graphite-fiber material with a resistivity of about [5–50] × 10−2 Ωm), and it is covered with velvet. The width of the emitting surface is 120 mm and the total area of the cathode-emitting surface is 0.95 m2. The interelectrode gap between the emitting surface and the supporting structure of the outcoupling window is 6 cm. The supporting structure contains 18 windows (three windows in a row with a total length of 150 cm). The geometrical transparency of the beam outcoupling system is about 75%. The beam is outcoupled to the laser chamber through the Ti foil with a thickness of 40 μm. The laser cell diameter is 41 cm and the cell volume is 200 l.

Figure 9.

Photograph of the Photon-5 laser setup.

The voltage pulse across the diode is generated using two paralleled linear transformers with the vacuum insulation of the secondary coil. Each of the transformers consists of ten stages, and each of the stages consists of eight IK-100-0.17 capacitors (100 kV, 17 μF, and 50 nH). The output power of the stage is about 12 GW. The voltage is fed to the diode (the cathode collector) with vacuum lines that serve as the secondary coils of the transformer. The diameter of the diode vacuum chamber is 131 cm and its length is 210 cm. The collector is suspended coaxially to the vacuum chamber on two springs in the upper part of the chamber. The vacuum chamber is evacuated using two AVDM-250 vacuum devices with liquid-nitrogen traps to a residual pressure in the diode of (3–4) × 10−5 torr.

At a charging voltage of 85 kV, the amplitude of the voltage pulse across the vacuum diode amounts to 550 kV. In this case, the total current (the sum of two currents) is 320 kA, and the energy transferred from the transformer to the diode is 87 kJ. At a charging voltage of 80 kV, the voltage across the vacuum diode is 440 kV, the total current is 290 kA, and the energy transferred to the diode is 78 kJ. The energy input to the gas increases when the pressure increases to 2.5 atm. Then, the energy input remains virtually unchanged when the pressure increases to 3.5 atm. The maximum energy input to the gas from the electron beam is about 19 kJ. The efficiency of the energy transfer from the primary storage to the gas is about 19%. This result is close to the value realized in conventional accelerators with water lines [1, 2, 3].

Plane-parallel plates with a diameter of 400 mm made of fused quartz serve as the windows of the laser chamber. This laser is tested in lasing mode with the cavity formed by the Al-coated plane mirror and the laser chamber window. For the mixture Ar:Xe:HCl = 760:20:1 with a pressure of 2 atm, the radiation pulse energy amounts to 660 J at a charging voltage of 85 kV [8]. The radiation pulse FWHM is about 350 ns. The heterogeneity of the radiation energy density distribution over the cross section of the laser beam is less than 10%.

3.3. Laser system

Figure 10 demonstrates the block diagram of the synchronization and starting system that is used to synchronize the setups. The laser system is controlled with a PC that is interfaced with a synchronization pulse generator producing voltage pulses with an amplitude of 600 V and a variable interpulse delay. These pulses are used to start four thyratron generators and the magnetic-bias generator of the Photon-5 laser. The last generator produces two bias pulses that are fed to the linear transformers to premagnetize the transformer cores in the appropriate direction. The thyratron generators produce negative voltage pulses with an amplitude of about 20 kV. These pulses are fed to the spark gaps of the Photon-1, Photon-2, and Photon-3 lasers and to the inputs of the generators of the Photon-4 and Photon-5 lasers. Both generators produce negative pulses with an amplitude of about 85 kV, which are used to trigger the rail gaps of the Photon-2 and Photon-3 lasers and to start the Photon-4 laser. These pulses are also fed to the inputs of the trigger generators G-1 and G-2. The trigger generators produce 40 negative pulses with an amplitude of 85 kV that activate the gaps of the transformer stages of the Photon-5 laser. In addition, the PC controls the on-off switching of the capacitive storage charging in all of the lasers with allowance for the particular charging times, so that the storages are charged simultaneously.

Figure 10.

Block diagram of the starting and synchronization system.

Thus, at the first stage of the laser system’s operation, the storage capacitors of all of the lasers are charged. Then, the starting pulse is fed to the magnetic-bias generator of the Photon-5 laser and a certain sequence of the starting pulses is fed to the thyratron generators of the Photon-1, Photon-2, Photon-3, and Photon-4 lasers. Thus, we activate the system as a whole.

In the laser system, the Photon-2, Photon-3, Photon-4, and Photon-5 lasers start working as slave amplifiers. In this case, the windows of all of the laser chambers are tilted at angles providing for the absence of feedback. The Photon-1 laser serves as the master oscillator [34]. Its optical scheme makes it possible to generate a high-quality beam in a certain part of the active volume and to amplify this beam in the remaining part. To improve the spatial structure of the radiation, we employ two pinholes with a diameter of 2 mm. In this case, the Fresnel number is N~ 2 for a cavity with a length of 1.5 m. The spectral selection is realized with an auto-collimation diffraction grating (1800 mm−1). The feedback in the cavity is maintained via the first diffraction order. To decrease the contribution of the noise component to the output radiation, we outcouple the laser beam through a semitransparent mirror with a reflectance of R = 30%. Then, the low-power high-quality radiation of the master laser is additionally amplified at two passes in the same active medium, so that the output beam diameter increases to 7 mm. The output pulse of the Photon-1 laser has an energy of 50 mJ, a duration of 250 ns, and a spectral line width of 0.9 cm−1. The divergence of the laser beam, which contains 80% of the energy (0.13 mrad), is greater than the diffraction-limited divergence by a factor of 1.2.

This beam is expanded using a lens telescope with a magnification of M = 1.5 to match the beam diameter with the sizes of the active media of the Photon-2 and Photon-3 lasers. The beam is amplified at three passes in the Photon-2 laser and one pass in the Photon-3 laser. The output beam diameters of these lasers are 3 and 6 cm, respectively. For further matching of the beam diameter with the sizes of the active media of the Photon-4 and Photon-5 lasers, we employ a lens telescope with a fivefold magnification. After the beam expansion, the radiation is amplified at one pass in the active medium of the Photon-4 laser and at one or two passes in the active medium of the Photon-5 laser.

Table 2 summarizes the experimental results for the laser system. The maximum energy (330 J) is obtained in the case of the single-pass amplification in the Photon-5 laser when the ASE flux and the absorption in the active medium are minimized. In the case of double pass amplification, both the absorption and the ASE contribution increase (the ASE intensity increases owing to the reflection from the rear mirror with R = 99%). This leads to a decrease in the energy of the amplified radiation to a level of 250 J.

LasersOperating modeEnergy, JPulse duration, nsLine width, cm−1Divergence, μrad







250, 330

Table 2.

Parameters of the radiation of the photon lasers.

The spectral and spatial parameters of the radiation are measured only for the first three setups (Photon-1, Photon-2, and Photon-3). The divergence is measured using the spot size in the focal plane of a lens with a focal length of F = 13.5 m. The line width is measured with the Fabry-Perot interferometer. In both cases, the radiation intensity distribution is detected by a CCD array. The spectral measurements show that the line width remains unchanged (0.9 cm−1) after the amplification. In general, the divergence of the amplified radiation decreases with an increase in the beam diameter. However, the divergence is slightly greater than the diffraction-limited divergence due to the distortions in the active medium and the optical path.

Figure 11 shows the dependence of the output energy of the main amplifier on the input energy upon the double-pass amplification. The input energy is measured when one of the amplifiers (Photon-3 or Photon-4) is switched off. It is seen that the Photon-5 amplifier is saturated only when all of the amplifiers are switched on. In this case, the gain is about 10. The laser beam spot on photosensitive paper exhibits a relatively homogeneous distribution and a minor contribution of the diffraction rings related to the heterogeneities in the optical path. This indicates a high spatial coherence of the output radiation.

Figure 11.

Plot of the output radiation energy vs. the input signal energy for the double-pass amplification in the active medium of the Photon-5 laser.


4. Laser system THL-100

4.1. Femtosecond pulse generator

The femtosecond pulse generator (front-end) of laser system consists of a femtosecond Ti:sapphire master oscillator, regenerative and multipass amplifiers, a pulse stretcher and a pulse compressor, and generator of second harmonic. It operates at a pulse repetition rate of 10 Hz and in a single pulse mode. Output energy of front-end is up to 5 mJ at 475 nm. Transform-limited pulse duration is 50 fs.

4.2. Photodissociation excimer XeF(C-A) amplifier

XeF(C-A) amplifier and its schematic cross section are shown in Figures 12 and 13, respectively. It consists of two high-voltage pulse generators, a vacuum chamber with six electron cathodes, a xenon gas chamber, and a laser cell. For multipass laser beam amplification, the laser cell has a mirror unit (32 mirrors).

Figure 12.

Photo of the XeF(C-A) amplifier.

Figure 13.

Schematic of the pump circuit of the XeF(C-A) amplifier active medium.

Two high-voltage pulse generators are line transformers, which have twelve transformer stages. Each stage has 320 nF capacitors and multigap spark switch. A secondary turn of the transformer is a vacuum coaxial line, which is connected with an e-beam diode. The diode has six explosive emission cathodes (flock-coated metal). The anode of vacuum diode is 45 cm-dia gas chamber closed by 40-μm-thick titanium foil (Figure 14). The vacuum diode forms six radially converging electron beams, each of 15 × 100 cm2 area, that are injected into gas chamber filled by xenon at a 3 atm pressure. The capacitors of each stage can be charged up to 90–100 kV.

Figure 14.

Gas chamber of the XeF(C-A) amplifier with windows for electron beam injection.

At charge voltage of 95 kV, the energy stored in the capacitor of a line transformer is 34.6 kJ, the energy of electron beam in the vacuum diode is 21 kJ, and the energy delivered to the gas chamber is 7 kJ. E-beam in the vacuum diode has following parameters: peak voltage of 550 kV, peak current of 200 kA, and current pulse duration of 150 ns (FWHM). The electron beam is injected into the gas chamber and one almost completely is absorbed by xenon at its thickness of 8 cm. An efficiency of the electron beam energy converting to VUV radiation of Xe2* excimers is 30–40% [27].

The laser cell (Figure 15) is housed into the gas chamber along its axis and contains a gas mixture of XeF2 and high-purity nitrogen at partial pressures of 0.2–0.4 and 190–380 torr, respectively. The active medium of amplifier on XeF(C-A) molecules is excited by the VUV radiation (172 nm) due to photodissociation of XeF2 molecules with the XeF(B) molecules formation. The XeF(C) state of the laser (C-A) transition is formed due to relaxation of the XeF(B) molecules in collisions with buffer gas of N2. The active medium of 110 cm long is pumped through arrays of 54 CaF2 windows (square of 12 × 12 cm2) located on the side walls of the hexahedral laser cell against the foils through which the electron beams are injected into the gas chamber. This ensures the highest geometric coupling of the pumping source with the active medium. The windows are vacuum sealed by Viton gaskets. The hexagon laser cell has a clear aperture of 25 cm. The laser cells are sealed by the end flanges with 30 cm-dia fused silica windows.

Figure 15.

Laser cell of the XeF(C-A) amplifier.

A high-purity xenon (99.9997%) was supplied to the gas chamber to provide maximum efficiency of the e-beam to VUV radiation conversion. The chamber preliminary evacuated to a pressure of 10−4 torr. During operation of the amplifier, the intensity of xenon VUV radiation gradually decreased due to outgassing from the stainless steel walls of the gas chamber, exposed to the electron beam. Xenon was circulated through a Sircal MP-2000 purifier to support the gas purity recovery.

In our experiments, the mixture in the laser cell was replaced after each shot, because repeated pumping of the mixture decreased the output energy by 20–30%.

4.3. Measurement procedures

The laser beam of front-end was amplified in the XeF(C-A) amplifier in a multipass optical scheme (33 passes) formed by 32 round mirrors increasing in diameter. The mirrors with a reflectivity of 99.7% were fixed along the perimeter of the intracell flanges of the laser cell. A divergent laser beam is injected into the laser cell, so that it expands in diameter from 2 cm at the inlet to 6 cm after 32 passes. When traveling between the mirrors, the beam makes two circular rounds in the laser cell. The penultimate convex mirror directs the beam to a flat 10 cm-diameter mirror located on the optical axis of the laser cell. A reflected beam propagates along the optical axis and is ejected from the laser cell with a diameter of 12 cm.

Input in the XeF(C-A) amplifier laser pulse was preliminary stretched up to 1 ps in a prism stretcher with negative group-velocity dispersion. The amplified negatively chirped laser pulse was expanded up to 20 cm and then one was collimated and compressed in three fused silica plates of 4 cm thickness at a Brewster angle on two passages. The energy loss in the compressor was about 2%. For measurement of the amplified pulse duration, the 90 mm-dia central part of the beam was attenuated by two wedges and focused by a 12-m focal length spherical mirror into a 0.25 mm-dia aperture placed in front of an ASF-20-480 single-shot autocorrelator. The sech2 function was used in autocorrelator to fit the temporal intensity profile.

The energies of the e-beams in the converter and VUV radiation in the laser chamber were measured by TPI-2-7 calorimeter. The output energy ща XeF(C-A) amplifier was measured with an OPHIR energy meter placed in the output beam, which was attenuated with a fused silica wedge and focused to a spot of 2.5 cm. The part of the beam passed through the wedge plate was used to record an image of laser beam on a photographic paper. The small signal gain of active medium was measured using a Sapphire-488 CW semiconductor laser after four passes of its probe beam through the active medium. This laser emits at 488 nm wavelength coinciding with the amplification band maximum of the XeF(C-A) transition.

4.4. Experimental results

First of all, the VUV radiation energy transmitted through the CaF2 windows into the laser cell was measured. Its value was 240–260 J. In view of the quantum efficiency of laser transition and 100% quantum yield of XeF(C) state production, the integral value of the energy stored in the active medium is ~ 90 J. In actuality, the actual lifetime of the XeF(C) state, which is determined by radiative decay and quenching, is much shorter than the pump pulse width. This makes the maximum current value of the energy stored on the XeF(C-A) transition 10 times less than the integral value.

The time profile of the small-signal gain near the CaF2 windows is shown in Figure 16. These results correlate well with those found in the experiments on femtosecond pulse amplification. As can be seen in the Figure 16, the maximum gain is 0.004 cm−1 and the FWHM of the amplified signal is ~ 200 ns. The amplification of picosecond pulses was performed within the time interval of 146 ns (33 passes) close to the gain profile maximum.

Figure 16.

Time profile of the e-beam current in the diode and gain measured near the CaF2 windows with the continuous laser at 488 nm for a XeF2 vapor pressure of 0.25 torr.

The small-signal gain distribution over the active medium cross section, measured at different XeF2 vapor pressures, is shown in Figure 17. These measurements show that decreasing the vapor pressure enhances the gain distribution uniformity, but at the same time, it greatly decreases the gain near the pump windows. Final optimization of the gas mixture composition was made by achieving the maximum output energy of the amplified picosecond pulse in the real multipass amplification scheme. The maximum output energy was obtained for a XeF2 vapor pressure of 0.2–0.25 torr.

Figure 17.

Small signal gain distribution from the window toward the center of the laser cell for different XeF2 vapor pressures. The nitrogen pressure is 190 tоrr.

In our experiments, the seed pulse energy varied from 0.04 to 2 mJ. At an input energy of 0.04 mJ, the gain of active medium is far from saturation. The total gain factor was 2.5 × 103 by 100 mJ output energy. The total gain factor was reduced down to 5 × 102 under near-saturation conditions at a seed pulse energy of 2 mJ. In this case, the output energy was 1 J. The shot-to-shot fluctuations in the output pulse energy were within 10%. An imprint of the output laser beam on a photographic paper is shown in Figure 18.

Figure 18.

Autograph of the output laser beam.

The ASE power of the XeF(C-A) amplifier with seed pulse blocked was measured for an estimation of the contrast ratio. It was 1 W within an angle of 0.2 mrad, which is close to the output beam divergence angle. Thus, the temporal contrast ratio between the output laser peak and background ASE was ~ 1013. It means that the real contrast of output beam is determined by the seed pulse temporal contrast, which is usually ~ 1010 at the second harmonic frequency [39].

After compression, the pulse duration was measured both with and without amplification in active medium. In both cases, the pulse duration was 50–60 fs inferred assuming sech2 pulse-shape. The output beam energy was 0.5–0.7 J in these experiments. The autocorrelation function for the compressed pulse at 0.7 J output energy, which corresponds to 50 fs pulse duration, is shown in Figure 19. This result gives the peak power ~ 14 TW. According to literature data, the highest power of femtosecond pulses in the visible spectrum was attained earlier upon nonlinear conversion to the second harmonic in a Ti:sapphire laser [39] and upon direct amplification of 250-fs pulses in an electron beam–excited XeF(C-A) amplifier [40]. These values (4 TW and 1 TW, correspondingly) are far below the power attained in the present work.

Figure 19.

Pulse duration of the laser beam with energy of 0.7 J.


5. Conclusions

Three wide-aperture excimer laser systems created at HCEI were presented. The schemes of small powerful lasers pumped by electric discharge and electron beam were analyzed. It was shown that electron beam–pumped lasers are more efficient for long laser pulse duration (300 ns and more). The formation results of a high-quality and high-power radiation in UV and visible range were reported.

Based on the experimental data, we demonstrated that diffraction-limited laser beams with a large cross section can be amplified in the gas laser system. It was shown that the divergence of amplified UV beam was close to the diffraction-limited beam when its diameter was no greater than 5 cm. But the divergence increased with a further increase of diameter. The wave-front distortions on the turbulent flows in the laser mixture and air were the main reason for it. The minimum divergence of the laser beam 10 μrad was obtained. The pulse energy of the amplified UV radiation at a wavelength of 308 nm with 250 ns pulse duration was 330 J.

The output energy of 1 J was reached in the first pilot experiments of amplification of down-chirped 1 ps pulses in femtosecond hybrid laser system THL-100. At the output energy of 0.7 J, the recompression of the amplified pulses in bulk fused silica to the initial duration of 50 fs was realized. This means that a record-breaking peak power ~ 14 TW in the visible spectrum has been attained.


  1. 1. Obenschain SP, Bodner SE, Colombant D, Gerber K, Lehmberg RH, McLean EA, Mostivych AN, Pronko MS, Pawley CJ, Schmitt AJ, Sethian JD, Serlin V, Stamper JA, Sullivan CA. The Nike KrF laser facility: Performance and initial target experiments. Physics of Plasmas. 1996;3:2098-2107. Available from: DOI:
  2. 2. Owadano Y, Okudo I, Matsumoto Y, Tanimoto M, Tomie T, Koyama K, Yano M. Development of a high-power laser system, ASURA. Laser and Particle Beams. 1989;7:383-392. DOI: S0263034600007345
  3. 3. Dival EJ, Edwards CB, Hirst GJ, Hooker CJ, Kidd AK, Lister JMD, Mathumo R, Ross IN, Shaw MJ, Toner WT, Visser AP, Wyborn BE. Titania – A 1020 Wcm−2 ultraviolet laser. Journal Modern Optics. 1996;43:1025-1033
  4. 4. Bychkov YI, Ivanov NG, Losev VF, Mesyats GA. XeCl-laser with 150 J laser energy. Soviet Technical Physics Letters. 1988;14:253-256
  5. 5. Abdullin EN, Gorbachev SI, Efremov AM, Koval’chuk BM, Loginov SV, Skakun VS, Tarasenko VF, Tolkachev VS, Fedenev AV, Fomin EA, Shchanin PM. High-power compact laser with λ = 308 and 249 nm pumped by a radially converging electron beam. Quantum Electronics. 1993;23:564-567. Available from: 07ABEH 003124
  6. 6. Ivanov NG, Losev VF, Naats EI, Ryzhov VV, Turchanovskii IY, Yastremskii AG. XeCl laser with an output energy 200 J. Quantum Electronics. 1997;27:670-672. Available from: H001029
  7. 7. Ivanov NG, Losev VF, Panchenko YN, Yastremskii AG. XeCl laser system with a 25 cm × 25 cm output aperture. Quantum Electronics. 1999;29:852-856. DOI: 10.1070/QE1999v029n10ABEH0015 89
  8. 8. Abdullin EN, Grishin DM, Gubanov VP, Zorin VB, Kim AA, Koval’chuk BM, Kumpyak EV, Liu J, Morozov AV, Skakun VS, Stepchenko AS, Tarasenko VF, Tolkachev VS, Tsoi NV, Shchanin PM. A 650-J XeCl laser. Quantum Electronics. 2004;34:199-202. Available from: 2610
  9. 9. Mesyats GA, Osipov VV, Tarasenko VF. Pulse Gas Lasers (Nauka, Moscow, 1991). Washington: Opt. Eng. Press; 1995. 272 p
  10. 10. Kovalchuk BM, Losev VF, Mesyats GA, Tarasenko VF. Electron-beam-pumped high-power wide-aperture exciplex lasers and laser systems. Russian Physics Journal. 2000;43:352-357. DOI: 10.1007/BF025 08516
  11. 11. Bugaev SP, Abdullin EN, Zorin VB, Koval’chuk BM, Loginov SV, Mesyats GA, Skakun VS,Tarasenko VF, Tolkachev VS, Shchanin PM. A 2-kJ wide-aperture XeCl laser. Quantum Electronics. 2004;34:801-804. DOI: 034n09 ABEH002687
  12. 12. Zvorykin VD, Arlantsev SV, Bakaev VG, Rantsev OV, Sergeev PB, Sychugov GV, Tserkovnikov AY. Transport of electron beams and stability of optical windows in high-power e-beam-pumped krypton fluoride lasers. Laser Particle Beams. 2001;19:609-622. DOI: 10.1017/S0263034601194085
  13. 13. Rhodes CK. Excimer Lasers. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1984. 245 p
  14. 14. McIntyre IA, Rhodes CK. High power ultrafast excimer lasers. Journal of Applied Physics. 1991;69:121-139. DOI: 10.1063/1.347665
  15. 15. Watanabe M, Endoh A, Sarukura N, Watanabe S. Subpicosecond UV pulse generation for a multiterawatt KrF laser. Applied Physics B. 1989;48:417-420. DOI: 10.1007/BF00694542
  16. 16. Bischel WK, Eckstrom DJ, Walker HC, Tilton RA. Photolytically pumped XeF(C-A) laser studies. Journal of Applied Physics. 1981;81:4429-4434. DOI: 10.1063/1.329357
  17. 17. Strickland D, Mourou GA. Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses. Optics Communications. 1985;56:219-221. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4018(85)90151-8
  18. 18. Mikheev LD. On the possibility of amplification of a femtosecond pulse up to the energy 1 kJ. Laser and Particle Beams. 1992;10:473-478. DOI: 10.1017/S02630346000067
  19. 19. Аristov AI, Grudtsin YV, Zubarev IG, Ivanov NG, Konyashenko AV, Krokhin ON, Losev VF, Mavritsky AO, Mamaev SB, Mesyats GA, Mikheev LD, Panchenko YN, Rastvortseva AA, Ratakhin NA, Sentis M, Starodub AN, Tenyakov SY, Uteza O, Tcheremiskin VI, Jalovoi VI. Hybrid femtosecond laser system based on photochemical XeF(C-A) amplifier with an aperture of 12 cm. Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics. 2009;22:1029-1034
  20. 20. Malinovskii GY, Mamaev SB, Mikheev LD, Moskalev TJ, Sentis ML, Tcheremiskine VI, Yalovoi VI. Numerical simulation of the active medium and investigation of the pump source for the development of a photochemical XeF(C-A) amplifier of femtosecond optical pulses. Quantum Electronics. 2001;31:617-622. DOI: 10.1070/QE2001v031n07ABEH002014
  21. 21. Clady R, Coustillier G, Gastaud M, Sentis M, Spiga P, Tcheremiskine V, Uteza O, Mikheev LD,Mislavskii V, Chambaret JP, Chẻriaux G. Architecture of a blue high contrast multiterawatt ultrashort laser. Applied Physics B-Lasers and Optics. 2006;82:347-358. DOI: 10.1007/s00340-005-2081-1
  22. 22. Tcheremiskine V, Uteza O, Aristov A, Sentis M, Mikheev L. Optical sources based on a multichannel surface discharge and their application to pump photolytically driven femtosecond XeF(C-A) amplifier. Proceedings of SPIE. 2008;7005:70051K. DOI: 10.1117/12.782779
  23. 23. Alexeev SV, Ivanov NG, Kovalchuk BM, Losev VF, Mesyats GA, Mikheev LD, Panchenko YN, Ratakhin NA, Yastremsky АG. Hybrid femtosecond laser system THL-100 on the base of XeF(С-А) amplifier. Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics. 2012;25:221-225
  24. 24. Losev V, Alekseev S, Ivanov N, Kovalchuk B, Mikheev L, Mesyats G, Panchenko Y, Puchikin A, Ratakhin N, Yastremsky A. Development of a 100-terawatt hybrid femtosecond laser system. Proceedings of SPIE. 2011;7393:739317. DOI: 10.1117/12.879123
  25. 25. Losev V, Alekseev S, Ivanov N, Kovalchuk B, Mikheev L, Mesyats G, Panchenko Y, Ratakhin N, Yastremsky A. Development of a 100-terawatt hybrid femtosecond laser system on base of photochemically driven XeF(C-A) amplifier. Proceedigs of . SPIE. 2012;1461:116-119. DOI: 10.1063/1.4736773
  26. 26. Mikheev LD, Stavrovskii DB, Zuev VS. Photodissociation XeF laser operating in the visible and UV regions. Journal of Russian Laser Research. 1995;16:427-475. DOI: 10.1007/BF02581226
  27. 27. Eckstrom DJ, Walker HC. Multijoul performance of the photolytically pumped XeF(C-A) laser. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 1982;QE18:176-181. DOI: 10.1109/JQE.1982.1071517
  28. 28. Mikheev LD, Tcheremiskine VI, Uteza OP, Sentis ML. Photochemical gas lasers and hybrid (solid/gas) blue-green femtosecond systems. Progress in Quantum Electronics. 2012;36:98-142. DOI: 10.1016/j. pquantelec.2012.03.004
  29. 29. Alekseev SV, Aristov AI, Ivanov NG, Kovalchuk BM, Losev VF, Mesyats GA, Mikheev LD, Panchenko YN, Ratakhin NA. Multiterawatt femtosecond laser system in the visible with photochemically driven XeF(C-A) boosting amplifier. Laser and Particle Beams. 2013;31:17-21. DOI: 10.1017/S0263034612000 870
  30. 30. Alekseev SV, Aristov AI, Grudtsyn YV, Ivanov NG, Koval’chuk BM, Losev VF, Mamaev SB, Mesyats GA, Mikheev LD, Panchenko YN, Polivin AV, Stepanov SG, Ratakhin NA, Yalovoi VI, Yastremskii AG. Visible-range hybrid femtosecond systems based on a XeF(C-A) amplifier: State of the art and prospects. Quantum Electronics. 2013;43:190-200. DOI: 10.1070/QE2013v043n03ABEH015096
  31. 31. Ivanov NG, Kovalenko SE, Losev VF, Panchenko YN. The laser system on XeCl molecules with high spectral brightness. Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics. 1995;8:1590-1594
  32. 32. Byskov YI, Losev VF, Panchenko YN. Experimental investigation of the efficiency of phase conjugation of a XeCl laser-beam by stimulated brillouin-scattering. Kvantovaya Elektronika (Moscow). 1992;19:688-690
  33. 33. Losev VF, Panchenko YN. Compression of a XeCl laser-pulse using stimulated brillouin-scattering. Kvantovaya Elektronika (Moscow). 1994;21:55-56
  34. 34. Baksht EH, Losev VF, Panchenko AN, Panchenko YN, Tarasenko VF. XeCl master oscillator with 300 ns pulse duration. Proceedings of SPIE. 2002;4747:88-92. DOI: 10.1117/12.460106
  35. 35. Baksht EH, Panchenko AN, Tarasenko VF. Discharge lasers pumped by generators with inductive energy storage. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 1999;35:261-266. DOI: 10.1109/3.748826
  36. 36. Rukin SN. High-power nanosecond pulse generators based on semiconductor opening switches (review). Instruments and Experimental Techniques. 1999;42:439-467
  37. 37. Konovalov IN, Losev VF, Liu J, Panchenko YN. Wide-aperture electric-discharge XeCl lasers. Proceeding of SPIE. 2004;5483:55-59. DOI: 10.1117/12.562962
  38. 38. Konovalov IN, Losev VF, Panchenko YN, Ivanov NG, Sykhov MY. Electric-discharge XeCl laser emitting 10-J, 300-ns pulses. Quantum Electronics. 2005;35:237-240. DOI: 10.1070/QE2005v035n03ABEH 0034 28
  39. 39. Ozaki T, Kieffer JC, Toth R, Fourmaux S, Bandule H. Experimental prospects at the Canadian advanced laser light source facility. Laser Particle Beams. 2006;24:101-106. DOI: 10.1017/S0263034606060150
  40. 40. Hofmann T, Sharp TE, Dane CB, Wisoff PJ, Wilson WL, Tittel FK, Szabo G. Characterization of an ultrahigh peak power XeF(C-A) excimer laser system. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 1992;28:1366-1375. DOI: 10.1109/3.135279

Written By

Nikolay Ivanov, Valery Losev, Yury Panchenko and Viktor Tarasenko

Submitted: October 18th, 2016 Reviewed: October 4th, 2017 Published: December 20th, 2017