Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Sediments Pollution with Mobile Heavy Metals in an Abandoned Mining Area from Romania

Written By

Lidia Kim, Geanina-Gabriela Vasile, Luoana Florentina Pascu, Bogdan Stanescu, Alina-Maria Muresan, Adriana Cuciureanu, Gheorghe Batrinescu and Nicolae Ionut Cristea

Submitted: 25 July 2017 Reviewed: 30 August 2017 Published: 20 December 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70749

From the Edited Volume

Sedimentation Engineering

Edited by Ata Amini

Chapter metrics overview

968 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The present chapter focuses on spatio-temporal evolution of sediments pollution with mobile heavy metals in five sampling campaigns, in an abandoned gold-bearing mining area from Certeju de Jos, Hunedoara County. The investigated zone is situated in a region where for a long period intense activities of mining exploitation was conducted. For determination of total metals content, sediment samples were dissolved with ultrapure nitric acid to microwave digestion. For the determination of mobile metals concentrations, it used the first step of BCR 701 sequential extraction scheme in a modified form, by reducing the extraction time from 16 hours to 20 minutes by sonication. The total and mobile concentrations of metals were determined by using ICP-MS. The concentrations of the mobile fractions of Cd, As and Cu are between 60 and 98% for Cd, 10 and 38% for As and up to 44% for Cu, indicating their presence in a bioavailable form. Due to the high mobility, these metals can pass from sediment to surface water and, implicitly, to the aquatic ecosystems. The pollution indices, calculated for the total content of As, Cd, Cu, Ni and Pb, indicate the presence of a strong environmental risk of sediment degradation in most investigated site.

Keywords

  • sediments
  • heavy metals
  • mining area
  • index pollution
  • spatio-temporal evolution

1. Introduction

Nowadays, aquatic sediments contamination with heavy metals is a major environmental problem at both national and global level [1, 2, 3]. One of the main sources leading to heavy-metal pollution of the aquatic environment is represented by a series of industrial activities associated with mining exploitations processes [4, 5, 6, 7].

Due to certain conditions imposed by the legislation in force, mining companies are trying to reduce the emission of effluents resulting from operating activities, but despite all the efforts and safety procedures, accidental pollution is still common within this industry.

Also, near abandoned metal mines, high levels of heavy metals can be found as a result of the discharge and dispersion of waste tailings both the aquatic environment and the soils surrounding the mining areas [8, 9, 10, 11, 12].

Depending on the geochemical characteristics and the mineral waste tailing loading, the degree of heavy metals contamination recorded in mining areas varies within a large range [13]. Heavy metals concentrations exceeding the permitted limits regulated by the legislation in force are the main source of aquatic toxicity [14, 15]. The sediments coming from metallic mining areas as main feature of the acid pH value that strongly influences the transport of contaminants from sediment to surface water [16, 17, 18, 19]. Drainage of both acid mines and also discharged sediments from abandoned metal mines represents a serious threat to the biota and human health [20].

Heavy metals accumulation in sediments occurs through five major processes: precipitation of certain compounds; binding of fine solid particles having active surface points (encountered in discharges or resuspended during turbulence); coprecipitation together with Fe or Mn oxides or in form of carbonates; association with organic molecules and incorporation into mineral crystals [20]. Therefore, these processes are represented by precipitation and adsorption processes. The balance between these two process categories depends on the metal concentrations, the size of the available surfaces and also the concentrations of the complexing agents found in the water [21]. Inorganic precipitates are formed by oxides, hydroxides, carbonates, sulfates and sulfides [22]. Within aquatic systems having high mineral loading, carbonates and hydroxides are reactive species [20]. The heavy metals as Zn, Ag, Hg, Cu, Cd, or Pb have a strong affinity for sulfide ions thus forming precipitates with very low solubility, so association as sulfide is predominant in reducing conditions as well as when sulfide is released as a result of organic matter decomposition [23].

It is important to underline that heavy metals are not biologically degradable and thus can be accumulated by plants or animals by entering in biochemical where they are transformed into various organometallic compounds [14, 24]. In recent years, more and more attention has been paid for the determination of species in which metals are found, taking in account that toxicity, bioavailability, mobility and other properties depend on the chemical forms of the metals within sample [25, 26, 27]. Due to this fact, in addition to determining the total metal concentrations, it was proposed to determine the chemical species associated with the metal using sequential extraction schemes in order to ensure the characterization of the metals’ chemical forms found in sediments, soils and muds [28, 29, 30, 31].

In Romania, there are several areas affected by heavy metals contamination such as Baia Mare, Rosia Montana, Certej and Tara Oasului, where gold-mining activities have been carried out for a long time [32, 33, 34, 35].

The present chapter focuses on spatio-temporal evolution of sediments pollution with mobile heavy metals as Cd, As, Cu, Ni and Pb in five sampling campaigns, in an abandoned gold-bearing mining area from Certeju de Jos, Hunedoara County. For estimation level pollution of sediments with heavy metals, pollution indexes were calculated. The investigated zone is situated in an region where for a long period intense activities of mining exploitation was conducted.

Advertisement

2. The study area

The analyzed sector (Bajaga River) is located on the territory of Certeju de Jos village, Hunedoara County, about 20 km north of Deva City (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Sampling points location – Certej, Hunedoara County.

In the central area of the studied perimeter, the main collector is represented by the Certej Valley. Its main tributaries are Faerag and Mures streams on the right side, and Bocsa Mica (Ciongani) and Nojag Valley streams on the left side.

After crossing the mountain area, it has a large reception basin powered by a well-developed torrential network, known as the Baiaga Valley and completed downstream by the Hondol Valley, the Certej Valley forms a narrow meadow that gradually spreads until it flows into the Mures River.

From a topographic point of view, the studied area is part of the small mountains group, which has rounded or flat ridges with heights which do not exceed 1300 m. These kinds of mountains groups surround andesite lava beds or quaternary depressions.

Within these types of areas, the water courses are usually short, with steep slopes and insignificant average annual flows. During torrential rains, drift on the slopes occurs rapidly and facilitates the occurrence of impetuous floods, often with catastrophic effects. In these areas, the water courses are short having quick slopes and average annual flows are insignificant as values (Figure 2). The river flows undergo major changes during torrential rains when the slopes leakage occurs with high speeds thus facilitating the occurrence of impetuous floods, often with catastrophic effects.

Figure 2.

Acid mine water – Baiaga stream.

In order to study the spatio-temporal evolution of heavy metal sediment pollution, five sampling campaigns were carried out over 3 years in different periods of the year. In each sampling campaign 10 samples of sediment and surface water associated with sediment within the Certej catchment were taken. In order to compare the results obtained from the polluted sediments, a blank sample was also collected. The location of the sampling points is shown in Figure 1, and the GPS coordinates and sample indices are shown in the Table 1.

No.GPS coordinatesSample type/indicativeObservations
145°59′84.3″ N
23°00′25.9″ E
S1Sampling point situated on Coranda Stream – upstream
245°59′81.9″ N
23°00′13.1″ E
S2Sampling point situated on Baiaga Stream, downstream of the confluence with Coranda stream
345°59′80.1″ N
23°00′06.3″ E
S3Sampling point situated at the exit Nicodim gallery
445°59′67.7″ N
22°59′96.6″ E
S4Sampling point situated on Baiaga Stream, downstream of the confluence with career water from Nicodim gallery
545°59′41.8″ N
22°59′74.0″ E
S5Sampling point situated on Baiaga Stream, upstream of the confluence with career water
645°59′41.7″ N
22°59′73.9″ E
S6Sampling point from career water, before of the confluence with Baiaga Stream
745°59′39.8″ N
22°59′74.1″ E
S7Sampling point situated on Baiaga Stream, downstream of the confluence with career water and upstream of the confluence with Baiaga Stream
845°59′41.0″ N
22°59′72.2″ E
S8Sampling point situated on Ciongani Stream before of the confluence with Baiaga Stream
945°59′39.8″ N
22°59′68.3″ E
S9Sampling point situated on Baiaga Stream, downstream of the confluence with Ciongani Stream
1045°59′20.7″ N
22°59′06.5″ E
S10Sampling point situated on Baiaga Stream, in the Hondol Village
1146°00′29.6″ N
23°00′51.3″ E
sediment blank sample (Bs)Sampling point situated on Baiaga Stream – 2 kilometers away from the quarry area.

Table 1.

GPS coordinates and description of sampling points.

Advertisement

3. Materials and methods

3.1. Sampling

The sampling techniques were used in accordance with SR ISO 5667-12/2000 – Guidance on the Sampling of Bottom Sediments the standard in force. The sediment harvested samples were taken from 0 to 5 cm depths using a Van Veen (Wagtech) scrubber. The samples were placed into polypropylene containers which were pre-washed with dilute hydrochloric acid solution.

Samples were transported to the test laboratory in refrigerated boxes and stored at 4°C until the analysis was done.

3.2. Sediment pretreatment

Total content – A part of each sediment sample collected from these sampling points was first prepared before the actual analysis by air-drying and homogenization. For evaluation of the total content of heavy metals from each soil probe, after this pre-treatment was subjected to the final analysis, only the fraction having smaller dimensions than 63 μm. Through sieving process and using a Fritsch Analysette 3 Spartan Vibratory Sieve Shaker, the sediment samples were separated and finally 2 g of probe were digested in a microwave oven (Berghof, Germany) at 175°C in a 1:3 (v/v) ratio mixture formed by nitric acid (65%):hydrochloric acid (37%) mixture.

Mobile fraction – In order to perform mobile fraction determinations, the remaining part of each sediment sample was first sieved in wet condition using surface water from same sampling point in order to maintain the same structure existing in its natural condition. In this case, similar to total content analysis, the fraction having smaller dimensions than 63 μm was also collected.

3.3. Dry matter content

A separate portion of 1 g was taken from each sample at the same time with the experiments and was dried in an oven at 105 ± 2°C for 3–4 h until constant mass in order to measure dry matter. The results of metals were corrected according to dry matter (d.m.) content.

3.4. Mobile fraction determining methods

3.4.1. The BCR method

In order to correlate the existing analysis methods connected to metals deposition within sediments, an European researcher group conducted a collaboration with the Community Reference Materials Office (CRM). As a result of their common work and a viable alternative to the Tessier method [36], a sequential extraction scheme in three stages (BCR scheme) was proposed [37, 38]. Acetic acid (0.11 M, pH = 2.8), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (0.5 M, pH = 2) and ammonium acetate (1 M, pH = 2) were used as extraction agents. Thus three fractions were separated:

  1. The changeable (mobile) fraction for metals having low adsorption rate that are released by ion exchange processes and carbonate-linked metals.

  2. The fraction linked to Fe and Mn oxide, also called the “reducible fraction” due to the fact that these kinds of metals are released when this fraction is reduced.

  3. The organic matter fraction, also called the “oxidizable fraction” due to the fact that these kinds of metals are released by oxidation.

Currently, this extraction procedure is being used on a large scale performing sediment, soil, muddy soil and also waste analysis [39, 40, 41].

The exchangeable (mobile) fraction for cadmium, copper, nickel and lead was determined through a modified BCR method that allowed the extraction time reduction from 16 hours to 20 minutes by using ultrasonic shaking [42] for 20 minutes at 50 KHz and 25°C (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Scheme BCR modified.

The metals concentrations obtained by applying BCR sequential extraction scheme were verified using a certified reference material (BCR-701 – lake sediment produced by the Standards, Measurements and Testing Program – European Commission) with a recovery rate between 99.65 and 99.90%.

3.4.2. Cold extraction procedure

The mobile fraction of arsenic was determined using a cold extraction treatment (Figure 4). In order to verify the single chemical extraction of these two metals, this procedure was also applied on a certified reference material WQB-1: lake sediment (with a recovery rate between 99.70 and 99.88%) [43].

Figure 4.

Cold extraction procedure scheme for arsenic mobile content.

The BCR method and cold extraction procedures were performed three times per each sediment sample. The final results were reported as an average. To ensure the quality control of the extraction (decreasing contamination during procedure), a blank extraction (without sediment) was also used for each set of analysis.

The total and mobile content of arsenic in sediment samples were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Bruker: Aurora M90). All the chemicals and extraction agents were analytical reagents grade provided by Merck. Calibration curve was performed using a Certified Reference Material ICP multi-element standard solution XXI for MS (Merck quality).

3.4.3. Results and discussion

For all five sampling campaigns, the entire study area indicates an acid pH, both in sediment and in surface water ranging between 3 and 4 pH units.

The results obtained in our study were correlated to the existing limits imposed by the Romanian Order no. 161/2006 on surface water quality and sediments. In Table 2, the results for the total and mobile concentrations of cadmium in sediments are shown. Maximum admissible value for total cadmium in sediment according to Romanian Legislation [44] is set to 0.8 mg/kg.

SamplingS1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10
March 2013Cd total1.962.854.093.053.314.384.886.456.226.33
Cd mobile1.932.113.642.792.543.094.205.575.374.22
January 2014Cd total1.822.764.821.353.883.064.981.353.215.46
Cd mobile1.081.253.761.261.081.434.351.093.005.15
July 2014Cd total3.153.828.193.092.855.082.853.233.712.16
Cd mobile2.323.357.722.761.992.892.323.013.501.99
October 2014Cd total0.983.981.761.15.231.511.391.522.241.82
Cd mobile0.382.821.070.583.100.80.840.721.491.09
March 2015Cd total2.011.033.982.931.123.431.742.521.622.21
Cd mobile1.730.542.652.580.742.611.292.021.351.43

Table 2.

Total and mobile content of CADMIUM in sediments samples (mg/kg d.m.).

After analyzing the collected data, it was found that in all sampling campaigns total cadmium content exceeded the maximum admissible concentration.

The lowest points of both total and mobile cadmium concentrations were recorded in S1 sampling point located upstream of the quarry and tailings dumps. In the same line, the highest total and mobile cadmium concentrations were recorded in S3 sampling point corresponding to the Nicodim gallery.

The spatio-temporal evolution of the cadmium mobile content in all five sampling campaigns is given in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Spatio-temporal evolution of cadmium mobile content.

In all five sampling campaigns, mobile cadmium concentrations represent at least 35% of the total cadmium content recorded in the analyzed sediments. In most samples, it was observed that the mobile cadmium content ranges between 60 and 98% of total content. Also, due to the high mobility percentage, cadmium could induce strong pollution upon aquatic environment by passing from sediment within surface water.

The results obtained for total and mobile arsenic concentrations in sediments are presented in Table 3.

SamplingS1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10
March 2013As total282176658485386184312356331215
As mobil65.442.116889.574.957.856.198.588.255.8
January 2014As total202144588405289218222316209217
As mobil60.955.112910536.132.642.852.441.635.6
July 2014As total378285710512406173296411399381
As mobil71.951.614514093.859.643.391.594.592.7
October 2014As total198129775386276197189345277289
As mobil35.625.818681.152.449.329.875.949.946.2
March 2015As total274159614449298175294326246191
As mobil29.735.415211081.160.349.288.610456.9

Table 3.

Total and mobile content of ARSENIC in sediments samples (mg/kg d.m.).

Maximum admissible value for As in sediment samples is set to 29 mg/kg, limit imposed by the Romanian legislation in force. In all sampling campaigns, total and mobile arsenic content exceeded the maximum admissible concentration. Sampling points S3 and S4 were the ones in which in all sampling campaigns, the total arsenic concentration was 10 times higher than the maximum admissible concentration.

The elevated arsenic concentrations in these points are due to the water intake from the Nicodim gallery and the water coming from the Coranda River that transports contaminants from the North Dump. It was also noted that in the spring campaigns (March 2013 and March 2015) the values obtained are comparative. This behavior confirms that metals are not biodegradable and were accumulated in aquatic systems over extended periods of time.

The spatio-temporal evolution of the mobile arsenic content in all five sampling campaigns is given in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Spatio-temporal evolution of arsenic mobile content.

The mobile arsenic concentrations reported to the total arsenic content varied between 10 and 38%. March 2015 sampling campaign corresponded to the highest mobile arsenic concentrations.

The average arsenic concentration obtained from all five sampling campaigns was 23%, value which represents almost a quarter of the total arsenic content. The high content of mobile arsenic induces significant sediment and aquatic ecosystem pollution.

In Table 4 the results obtained for total and mobile copper concentrations in sediments for all five sampling campaigns are presented.

SamplingS1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10
March 2013Cu total75.238.948.257.635.418.847.152.637.542.1
Cu mobil16.912.88.2715.68.913.5610.4412.3511.910.8
January 2014Cu total28.432.243.570.229.148.335.836.826.125.1
Cu mobil6.8514.29.4318.74.8819.56.615.887.225.47
July 2014Cu total54.21055736.454.913929.754.535.532.7
Cu mobil11.525.713.18.8812.530.15.8612.98.398.64
October 2014Cu total40.429.651.442.810264.144.610962.240.3
Cu mobil9.610.87.811.414.77.3710.519.28.69.6
March 2015Cu total66.315.540.425.148.320.637.233.220.850.5
Cu mobil6.524.927.082.44.087.321.391.761.121.2

Table 4.

Total and mobile content of COPPER in sediments samples (mg/kg d.m.).

Regarding copper concentrations, 56% from the sediment samples has the total content above the maximum admissible concentration limit with is set to 40 mg/kg d.m. No mobile content over the limit has been recorded.

The highest concentrations exceeding twice the maximum admissible concentration are recorded at S5 and S8 (October 2014) and S2 (July 2014).

The spatio-temporal evolution of the mobile copper content in all sampling campaigns is given in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Spatio-temporal evolution of copper mobile content.

Analyzing the data presented in Figure 7, a decrease regarding copper content throughout the investigated route was noticed as follows: January 2014 > March 2013 > Oct 2014 > March 2015. The bioavailable content was ranged between 2 and 44%. In the same time, it was also recorded a peak in mobile copper concentration, the highest values were found in S2 (44%) and S6 (41%), corresponding to samples collected in January 2014.

All these concentrations exceeded the maximum admissible concentration according to Order 61/2006. In all the other campaigns, the mobile copper concentrations found in the investigated samples were below the maximum admissible value.

In Table 5, the results obtained for total and mobile nickel concentrations in sediments collected in all five sampling campaigns are presented. The data were compared with maximum admissible value, which is 35 mg/kg.

SamplingS1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10
March 2013Ni total32.316.762.318.233.916.58.4443.930.530.9
Ni mobil8.056.5514.88.0419.28.632.608.409.3210.6
January 2014Ni total24.320.538.623.130.814.226.225.217.618.6
Ni mobil7.356.2810.79.8416.56.825.864.795.8811.7
July 2014Ni total34.725.875.929.140.624.219.738.532.827.4
Ni mobil7.258.6417.95.3311.99.263.814.567.626.25
October 2014Ni total19.115.245.123.426.98.0343.96.5830.122.9
Ni mobil2.832.607.946.8311.92.174.561.798.289.71
March 2015Ni total27.622.865.425.230.912.715.425.822.731.9
Ni mobil5.416.3320.87.826.494.218.5210.413.116.9

Table 5.

Total and mobile content of NICKEL in sediments samples (mg/kg d.m.).

The highest total nickel concentration was recorded in S3 sampling point associated with Nicodim gallery (two times higher than limit). Also nickel exceedings in S5 and S8 (July 2014), S8 (March 2013) and S7 (October 2014) were found.

At all the other sampling points, both total and mobile nickel concentrations were below the maximum admissible value.

The spatio-temporal evolution of nickel mobile content in the all sampling campaigns is given in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Spatio-temporal evolution of nickel mobile content.

After the results were collected, we could conclude that in all sampling campaigns the mobile nickel concentrations varied between 10 and 63%.The highest mobile Ni concentrations were determined in the samples coming from S5, S6, S7, S9 and S10 points. In these cases, the values determined exceeded the maximum admitted concentration and represent more than 50% of the total nickel content.

The intake of contaminants accumulating in the upstream from Nicodim gallery, mine water and career water could be the main sources of these overtakings. In March 2015, the sampling campaign recorded a decrease of the Ni mobile concentrations for the majority of the investigated sediments. Sediments can change their composition, so they could be more diluted or loaded, depending on the volume of precipitation and weather conditions [43].

In Table 6, the results obtained for the total and mobile lead concentrations within sediments are presented for the five sampling campaigns:

SamplingS1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10
March 2013Pb total12911123510925412026628.864.9103
Pb mobil10.310.18.503.729.983.3611.84.773.724.51
January 2014Pb total15214435412710366.518511348.436.6
Pb mobil10.86.4215.99.536.875.4510.48.704.026.21
July 2014Pb total20515742613579.287.822315188.475.9
Pb mobil6.824.1624.58.683.216.1712.918.715.910.8
October 2014Pb total213127539115174284165244364131
Pb mobil14.52.3516.35.152.189.895.488.526.923.56
March 2015Pb total14574.338215118321914876.9297154
Pb mobil12.83.8523.98.826.1412.48.225.4416.98.24

Table 6.

Total and mobile content of LEAD in sediments samples (mg/kg d.m.).

Regarding Pb content, the results obtained from the most sampling points indicate that the maximum admissible concentration, which is 85 mg/kg, was exceeded.

The highest lead concentrations were recorded at sampling point S3 where the total lead concentration ranges between 235 mg/kg d.m. (March 2013) and 539 mg/kg d.m. (October 2014).

The spatio-temporal evolution of mobile lead content in all five sampling campaigns is shown in Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Spatio-temporal evolution of lead mobile content.

Although within the majority of the analyzed sediments the total lead content exceeds the maximum admissible concentration, the mobile content of Pb is below the maximum admissible value and thus in almost all investigated samples does not exceed 15 mg/kg d.m.

This behavior confirms that lead is link in a lower share within oxides, carbonates and organic matter and a greater share within residual fraction.

3.5. Estimation the pollution degree by pollution indexes

In order to assess the pollution degree of the aquatic environment with these toxic metals, we proposed the determination of two pollution indices: the contamination factor (CF) and the geoaccumulation index (Igeo).

The contamination factor (CF) (Table 7)—is given by the ratio between the metal concentration within the sediment and the metal concentration in the natural background. CF is calculated according to Hakanson’s formula (Eq. (1)) [45]:

CF=CsBsE1

where Cs is the metal concentration within the sample and Bs is the metal concentration within the natural background (Figure 1).

Contamination factor (CF)Contamination level
CF < 1Low contamination
1 ≤ CF < 3Medium contamination
3 ≤ CF < 6Significant contamination
CF > 6Very high contamination

Table 7.

Contamination factor (CF) and contamination level.

The geoaccumulation index (Igeo) (Table 8) was introduced by Müller [46] and is widely used [15, 47, 48] to determine the pollution degree with heavy metal in surface sediments:

Igeo=log2CsK×BsE2

where Cs is the metal concentration within the sample, Bs is the metal concentration within the natural background and K is the correction factor that takes into account the variation of metal traces in the natural background as a result of the lithogenic effects (K = 1.5).

Igeo valueClass of pollution in relation to IgeoSediment quality
≤00Unpolluted level
0–11Unpolluted level to moderate pollution
1–22Moderate pollution level
2–33Moderate pollution level to high pollution
3–44High pollution level
4–55High pollution level to very high pollution level
>56Very high pollution level

Table 8.

The relationship between Igeo and the pollution level.

The geoaccumulation index provides a classification system for the pollution degree in relation to the sediment quality [46].

In Table 9, the concentrations of metals within the natural background are given.

No.MetalUMConcentration within the natural background
1Cadmiummg/kg dm0.43
2Arsenicmg/kg dm9.34
3Coppermg/kg dm23.4
4Nickelmg/kg dm38.3
5Leadmg/kg dm16.7

Table 9.

Metal concentration within the natural background (Bs).

The determination of contamination factor (CF) and geoaccumulation index (Igeo) involved assuming that each metal concentration introduced in the formulas was the average value obtained after the five sampling campaigns.

Contamination factor (CF) and geoaccumulation index (Igeo) values are shown in Tables 10 and 11.

Concentration factor CF
No.MetalS1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10
1Cd4.616.7210.65.367.628.127.377.017.918.36
2As28.619.171.647.935.420.328.137.631.327.7
3Cu2.261.892.061.982.312.491.662.451.561.63
4Ni0.720.531.500.620.850.390.590.730.700.69
5Pb10.17.3423.27.639.509.3111.87.3510.36.00
Geoaccumulation index (Igeo)
No.MetalS1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10
1Cd1.622.162.821.842.352.442.302.222.402.48
2As4.253.675.585.004.563.764.234.654.384.21
3Cu0.590.330.450.400.620.730.150.710.050.12
4Ni−1.10−1.500.00−1.30−0.80−1.90−1.30−1.00−1.10−1.10
5Pb2.752.293.952.352.662.632.982.292.782.00
Concentration factor CF
No.MetalS1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10
1Cd4.616.7210.65.367.628.127.377.017.918.36
2As28.619.171.647.935.420.328.137.631.327.7
3Cu2.261.892.061.982.312.491.662.451.561.63
4Ni0.720.531.500.620.850.390.590.730.700.69
5Pb10.17.3423.27.639.509.3111.87.3510.36.00
Geoaccumulation index (Igeo)
No.MetalS1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10
1Cd1.622.162.821.842.352.442.302.222.402.48
2As4.253.675.585.004.563.764.234.654.384.21
3Cu0.590.330.450.400.620.730.150.710.050.12
4Ni−1.10−1.500.00−1.30−0.80−1.90−1.30−1.00−1.10−1.10
5Pb2.752.293.952.352.662.632.982.292.782.00

Table 10.

Contamination factor (CF) and geoaccumulation index (Igeo) values within sediments.

SedimentIgeoSedimentIgeo
S14S64
S24S74
S36S85
S45S95
S55S105

Table 11.

The quality class for each sediment according to geoaccumulation indexes.

Both arsenic and lead induce a very high contamination (CF > 6). The same behavior was also observed for cadmium, which induces very high contamination with the exception of samples S1 and S4 where the sediments exhibit only considerable contamination. In case of nickel, we could conclude that it induces low contamination in sediments, except for the S3 sediment that also enters into moderate contamination category. In all sediments that were analyzed, copper induced moderate contamination.

Taking in consideration that each of the analyzed sediments had very high concentrations of As, Cd and Pb and without taking into account the contribution that other metals could imply on the samples, the samples were introduce in very high contamination category.

According to the classification given in Table 8, the geoaccumulation indexes calculated for Cd in sediments classified sediments S1 and S4 into class 2 (moderate pollution level) and all the other sediments into class 3 (moderately to high polluted).

In the same time, geoaccumulation indexes calculated for As, classified sediments S2 and S6 into class 4 (highly polluted), sediments S1, S2 and S7 into class 4 (highly polluted), sediments S1, S5, S7, S8, S9, S10 into class 5 (from highly polluted to very highly polluted) and sediment S3 and S4 into class 6 (very highly polluted).

In Cu case, the geoaccumulation index values obtained classified all sediments into class 1 (from unpolluted to moderately polluted). Regarding Ni, the geoaccumulation index values obtained classified all sediments into class 0 (unpolluted level). Geoaccumulation index values obtained for Pb, classified sediment S3 into class 4 (heavily polluted) and all other sediments into class 3 (moderately to highly polluted).

Based on the results given in Table 11, we could conclude that the most contaminated area is at sampling point S3, the point near Nicodim gallery exit.

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

In all sampling campaigns, the area investigated indicates an acid pH, both in sediment and in surface water. Concerning the total of heavy metal content, from all five metals investigated, Cd, Pb and As induce high sediment contamination with concentrations exceeding the limits imposed by the legislation in force.

From the point of view of metal mobile fraction, Cd and As are predominantly present in a bioavailable form within the analyzed sediments, thus inducing a high degree of pollution upon the aquatic environment by passing from sediments within surface water.

The pollution degree of the water depends on the amount of precipitation in the area, a heavy rain implies a less dilution and also the opposite case. Therefore, all the values recorded at most sampling points may be momentary, associated with the place and time of sampling.

The pollution indexes, calculated for the total content of As, Cd, Cu, Ni and Pb, indicate the presence of a strong environmental risk of sediment degradation.

References

  1. 1. Lee P-K, Kang M-J, Yu S, Ko K-S, Ha K, Shin S-C, Park JH. Enrichment and geochemical mobility of heavy metals in bottom sediment of the Hoedong reservoir, Korea and their source apportionment. Chemosphere. 2017;184:74-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.124
  2. 2. El Azhari A, Rhoujjati A, Hachimi MLE. Assessment of heavy metals and arsenic contamination in the sediments of the Moulouya River and the Hassan II Dam downstream of the abandoned mine Zeïda (High Moulouya, Morocco). Journal of African Earth Sciences. 2016;119:279-288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.04.011
  3. 3. Kim L, Vasile GG, Stanescu B, Calinescu S, Batrinescu G. Distribution and bioavailability of mobile arsenic in sediments from a mining catchment area. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology. 2015;16:1227-1236
  4. 4. Rieuwerts J, Mighanetara K, Braungardt C, Rollinson G, Pirrie D, Azizi F. Geochemistry and mineralogy of arsenic in mine wastes and stream sediments in a historic metal mining area in the UK. Science of the Total Environment. 2014;472:226-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.029
  5. 5. Gao Z. Evaluation of heavy metal pollution and its ecological risk in one river reach of a gold mine in Inner Mongolia, Northern China. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2017;xxx:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.001
  6. 6. Chernova EN, Potikha EV, Nesterenko OE. The content of heavy metals in bottom sediments of the streams of the Sikhote-Alin biosphere reserve and the streams draining mines of the transit zone of the reserve. Achievements in the Life Sciences. 2015;9:9-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.als.2015.05.002
  7. 7. Redwan M, Rammlmair D. Flood hazard assessment and heavy metal distributions around um Gheig mine area, Eastern Desert, Egypt. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2017;173:64-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.11.012
  8. 8. Navarro M, Pérez-Sirvent C, Martínez-Sánchez M, Vidal J, Tovar P, Bech J. Abandoned mine sites as a source of contamination by heavy metals: A case study in a semi-arid zone. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2008;96:183-193. DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2007.04.011
  9. 9. Beane SJ, Comber SD, Rieuwerts J, Long P. Abandoned metal mines and their impact on receiving waters: A case study from Southwest England. Chemosphere. 2016;153:294-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.022
  10. 10. Antunes I, Gomes M, Neiva A, Carvalho P, Santos A. Potential risk assessment in stream sediments, soils and waters after remediation in an abandoned W>Sn mine (NE Portugal). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2016;133:135-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.06.045
  11. 11. Neiva A, Carvalho P, Antunes I, Silva M, Santos A, Pinto MC, Cunha P. Contaminated water, stream sediments and soils close to the abandoned Pinhal do Souto uranium mine, central Portugal. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2014;136:102-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.10.014
  12. 12. da Silva EF, Almeida SF, Nunes ML, Luís AT, Borg F, Hedlund M, de Sá CM, Patinha C, Teixeira P. Heavy metal pollution downstream the abandoned Coval da Mó mine (Portugal) and associated effects on epilithic diatom communities. Science of the Total Environment. 2009;407:5620-5636. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.047
  13. 13. Johnson R, Blowes D, Robertson W, Jambor J. The hydrogeochemistry of the Nickel Rim mine tailings impoundment, Sudbury, Ontario. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 2000;41:49-80. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7722(99)00068-6
  14. 14. Delgado J, Barba-Brioso C, Nieto JM, Boski T. Speciation and ecological risk of toxic elements in estuarine sediments affected by multiple anthropogenic contributions (Guadiana saltmarshes, SW Iberian Peninsula): I. Surficial sediments. Science of the Total Environment. 2011;409:3666-3679. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.013
  15. 15. Sarmiento AM, DelValls A, Nieto JM, Salamanca MJ, Caraballo MA. Toxicity and potential risk assessment of a river polluted by acid mine drainage in the Iberian Pyrite Belt (SW Spain). Science of the Total Environment. 2011;409:4763-4771. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.07.043
  16. 16. Zhao H, Xia B, Qin J, Zhang J. Hydrogeochemical and mineralogical characteristics related to heavy metal attenuation in a stream polluted by acid mine drainage: A case study in Dabaoshan Mine, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2012;24:979-989. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60868-1
  17. 17. Equeenuddin SM, Tripathy S, Sahoo P, Panigrahi M. Metal behavior in sediment associated with acid mine drainage stream: Role of pH. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2013;124:230-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.10.010
  18. 18. Magyar MI, Ladson AR, Diaper C. Sediment transport in rainwater tanks and implications for water quality. In: Manning A, Editor. Sediment Transport in Aquatic Environments, InTech; Croatia. 2011. p. 65-88
  19. 19. Zaharia L, Grecu F, Ioana-Toroimac G, Neculau G. Sediment transport and river channel dynamics in Romania–variability and control factors. In: Manning A, Editor. Sediment Transport in Aquatic Environments, InTech; Croatia. 2011. p. 293-316
  20. 20. Peplow D, Edmonds R. The effects of mine waste contamination at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecological Engineering. 2005;24:101-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.12.011
  21. 21. Pagenkopf GK, Cameron D. Deposition of trace metals in stream sediments. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 1979;11:429-435. DOI: 10.1007/BF00283434
  22. 22. Ogbonna PC, Odukaesieme C, Teixeira da Silva JA. Distribution of heavy metals in soil and accumulation in plants at an agricultural area of Umudike, Nigeria. Chemistry and Ecology. 2013;29:595-603. DOI: 10.1080/02757540.2013.810721
  23. 23. Al T, Blowes D, Martin C, Cabri L, Jambor J. Aqueous geochemistry and analysis of pyrite surfaces in sulfide-rich mine tailings. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1997;61:2353-2366. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00113-0
  24. 24. Morillo J, Usero J, Gracia I. Potential mobility of metals in polluted coastal sediments in two bays of southern Spain. Journal of Coastal Research. 2007;23:352-361. DOI: 10.2112/04-0246.1
  25. 25. Castillo MA, Trujillo IS, Alonso EV, de Torres AG, Pavón JC. Bioavailability of heavy metals in water and sediments from a typical Mediterranean Bay (Málaga Bay, Region of Andalucía, Southern Spain). Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2013;76:427-434. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.08.031
  26. 26. Noronha-D’Mello CA, Nayak G. Assessment of metal enrichment and their bioavailability in sediment and bioaccumulation by mangrove plant pneumatophores in a tropical (Zuari) estuary, west coast of India. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2016;110:221-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.059
  27. 27. Marin NM, Vasile GG, Simion M, Pascu LF, Lehr CB. Rapid method for evaluation of metallic mobile fraction from sewage sludge samples. Scientific Study & Research. Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology, Food Industry. 2017;18:43
  28. 28. Anju M, Banerjee D. Comparison of two sequential extraction procedures for heavy metal partitioning in mine tailings. Chemosphere. 2010;78:1393-1402. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.064
  29. 29. Vasile G, Tanase IG. In-house’validation for mobile nickel in solid environment samples. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology. 2011;12:1262-1274
  30. 30. Vasile GG, Kim L, Gheorghe S, Stanescu B. Ecological assessment of mobile cadmium in sediments from Certej mining site, Hunedoara County, Romania. In: International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM: Surveying Geology & mining Ecology Management 16-22 June 2013; Albena. Bulgaria. p. 299
  31. 31. Vasile GG, Tanase IG. Comparative study of different extraction methods for evaluation of bioavailability of terrestrial sediment – Bound metallic elements. Revue Roumaine de Chimie. 2008;53:1041-1049. DOI: 10.1007/BF02484715
  32. 32. Vasile GD, Vlădescu L. Cadmium partition in river sediments from an area affected by mining activities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2010;167:349-357. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-1054-y
  33. 33. Vasile GG, Tanase IG, Dinu C. The influence of the air-drying pretreatment of sediment samples for metallic element mobilities. Analytical Letters. 2010;43:1199-1206. DOI: 10.1080/00032710903518625
  34. 34. Vasile GD, Nicolau M, Vlădescu L. Zinc speciation in sediments from a polluted river, as an estimate of its bioaccesibility. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2010;160:71-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0658-y
  35. 35. Kim L, Vasile GG, Stanescu B, Dinu C, Ene C. Distribution of trace metals in surface water and streambed sediments in the vicinity of an abandoned gold mine from Hunedoara County, Romania. Revista de Chimie (Bucharest). 2016;67:1441-1446
  36. 36. Tessier A, Campbell PG, Bisson M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Analytical Chemistry. 1979;51:844-851. DOI: 10.1021/ac50043a017
  37. 37. Quevauviller P, Rauret G, López-Sánchez J-F, Rubio R, Ure A, Muntau H. Certification of trace metal extractable contents in a sediment reference material (CRM 601) following a three-step sequential extraction procedure. Science of the Total Environment. 1997;205:223-234. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00205-2
  38. 38. Ure A, Quevauviller P, Muntau H, Griepink B. Speciation of heavy metals in soils and sediments. An account of the improvement and harmonization of extraction techniques undertaken under the auspices of the BCR of the Commission of the European Communities. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 1993;51:135-151. DOI: 10.1080/03067319308027619
  39. 39. Pueyo M, Mateu J, Rigol A, Vidal M, López-Sánchez J, Rauret G. Use of the modified BCR three-step sequential extraction procedure for the study of trace element dynamics in contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution. 2008;152:330-341
  40. 40. Sutherland RA, Tack FM. Fractionation of cu, Pb and Zn in certified reference soils SRM 2710 and SRM 2711 using the optimized BCR sequential extraction procedure. Advances in Environmental Research. 2003;8:37-50
  41. 41. Rauret G, López-Sánchez J-F, Sahuquillo A, Barahona E, Lachica M, Ure A, Davidson C, Gomez A, Lück D, Bacon J. Application of a modified BCR sequential extraction (three-step) procedure for the determination of extractable trace metal contents in a sewage sludge amended soil reference material (CRM 483), complemented by a three-year stability study of acetic acid and EDTA extractable metal content. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2000;2:228-233. DOI: 10.1039/B001496F
  42. 42. Arain MB, Kazi TG, Jamali MK, Jalbani N, Afridi HI, Baig JA. Speciation of heavy metals in sediment by conventional, ultrasound and microwave assisted single extraction methods: A comparison with modified sequential extraction procedure. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2008;154:998-1006
  43. 43. National Laboratory for Environmental Testing – National Water Research Institute, Ontario, Canada
  44. 44. Order no 161/2006 for the approval of the Norm concerning the reference objectives for the surface water quality classification, The Ministry of Environment and Water. Official Monitor of Romania. Part.1, no. 511 bis
  45. 45. Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach. Water Research. 1980;14:975-1001
  46. 46. Förstner U, Müller G. Concentrations of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in river sediments: Geochemical background, man’s influence and environmental impact. GeoJournal. 1981;5:417-432
  47. 47. El Azhari A, Rhoujjati A, El Hachimi ML, J-p A. Pollution and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the soil-plant system and the sediment-water column around a former Pb/Zn-mining area in NE Morocco. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2017;144:464-474. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.051
  48. 48. Iordache M, Popescu LR, Pascu LF, Iordache I. Assessment of the potential ecological risk with heavy metals in surface s sediments from accumulation lakes on the sector inferior of the Olt River. In: International Symposium “The Environment and the Industry”, SIMI 2015; 29-30 October 2015; Bucharest, Romania. p. 175-184

Written By

Lidia Kim, Geanina-Gabriela Vasile, Luoana Florentina Pascu, Bogdan Stanescu, Alina-Maria Muresan, Adriana Cuciureanu, Gheorghe Batrinescu and Nicolae Ionut Cristea

Submitted: 25 July 2017 Reviewed: 30 August 2017 Published: 20 December 2017